►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting March 25, 2014
10c. Authorize M.O.U. with SMC Transportation Authority
B
Have
the
extreme
pleasure
to
entertain
you
a
little
bit
longer
tonight
and
the
intent
of
this
item
to
give
you
a
on
update
on
three
projects
are
on
on
State
Route
around
the
city
and
the
city
is
surrounded
by
state
routes,
and
certainly
the
operation
on
those
state
routes
had
a
major
impact
on
the
overall
traffic
circulation
in
the
city.
Reason
why,
whenever
opportunity
arise
based
on
your
direction,
staff
very
aggressively
seek
out
any
funding
opportunity
to
improve
the
operation
on
those
state
routes,
and
that
was
the
case.
B
In
the
case
of
these
three
projects
measure
a
funding
became
available
in
2012.
You
supported
staff
to
sponsor
and
co-sponsor
the
application
for
to
project
for
the
widening
of
35
proposed,
and
also
on
safety
and
congestion
improvement
on
to
380
dividing
dr.
if
I'm
was
sponsored
by
the
city
and
co-sponsor,
but
by
South
San
Francisco
and
the
safety
improvement
on
380
was
sponsored
by
south
city
and
co-sponsored
by
the
city
of
San
Bruno
in
last
year.
B
The
city,
like
most
of
the
time
was
successful
and
funding
was
approved
for
all
of
those
three
projects
and
the
action
requested
of
you
tonight
to
authorize
the
city
manager
to
enter
in
a
memorandum
of
understanding
with
with
the
TA
for
moving
ahead
on
those
projects.
No
funding
will
come
to
the
city
or
in
our
quality
or
sponsored
or
co-sponsored
for
those
project.
The
city
responsibility
will
be
to
collaborate
to
help
the
TA
for
public
outreach,
public
input
and
to
act
or
say
advocate
for
those
projects.
B
I
will
just
summarize
what
those
three
projects
entail
and
the
funding
for
those
widening
335
would
be
widening
between
snead
up
to
280.
The
available
funding
will
be
850.
This
project
or
ad
was
included
in
our
CIP.
Is
the
estimated
Steph
time
is
about
30,000
a
year
staff
time
the
total
estimator
caused
them
will
be
90,000
for
the
duration
of
this
alternative
analysis
phase.
For
this
project,
this
would
would
the
funding
use
for
preliminary
analysis
and
also
for
the
environmental
phase
of
the
project.
B
Then
additional
funding
will
need
to
be
seeked
for
the
next
design
phase
and
the
construction
phase
for
the
project
for
the
safety
improvement
on
on
380.
The
approved
funding
is
for
preliminary
project
project
planning,
innocence,
establishing
the
problem
and
trying
to
come
up
with
a
possible
solution,
and
the
estimated
step
time
to
participate
in
this
project
would
be
about
twenty
five
hundred
dollar
and
the
third
project
for
the
Scott
great
separation
project,
the
approved
funding
for
this
project
for
Scott,
great
separation
and
also
south
linden,
those
two
or
one
project
application.
B
You
can
add
great,
separate
or
consider
either
of
those
intersection
with
how
to
have
an
impact
on
the
other
intersection
solution.
Reason.
Why
is
one
one
and
the
same
project
and
overestimate
of
step
time
for
that
project
is
five
thousand
dollars?
My
recommendation
is
for
you
to
authorize
the
city
manager
to
enter
in
memorandum
of
understanding
with
the
transportation
agency
to
start
the
design
phone
on
those
project
and
also
to
establish
those
two
projects
in
our
CIP
which
were
not
established
before
the
implement
on
380
and
also
the
Scott
great
separation
project.