►
From YouTube: San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting May 6, 2014
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting
May 6, 2014
TRT 1:15:37
D
B
Sure
peterson
I'd
like
to
introduce
tonight
Brian
the
land
brian,
is
our
planning
technician
or
counter
technician
in
the
community.
Development
department
and
Brian
will
be
joining
us
at
our
Planning
Commission
meetings
that
he'll
be
taking
minutes
for
us
and
providing
those
back
to
the
Commission
like
to
welcome
bright,
great.
A
Welcome
Brian
any
other
communications.
Okay.
Moving
on
to
agenda
item
number
three
public
comment
on
items
not
on
the
agenda.
If
there's
any
member
of
the
public,
who
has
a
comment?
That's
about
a
subject
that
is
not
on
the
agenda
and
seeing
none
we'll
close
that
item
and
move
on
to
number
four
announcement
of
conflict
of
interest.
Do
any
commissioners
have
a
conflict?
A
The
second
item
is
add:
chapter
12
point:
250
density,
bonus
to
title
12,
land
use
of
the
San
Bruno,
yet
municipal
code
to
provide
provisions
for
density
bonuses
for
residential
developments
with
affordable
housing
units
item
3
is
a
men's
section.
1296
110
regulating
emergency
shelters
in
the
sea,
general
commercial
district
and
add
section
12,
84
to
20
emergency
shelters
to
title
12
land
use
of
the
san
bruno
municipal
code
to
allow
emergency
homeless
shelters
as
a
permitted
use,
subject
to
location
requirements
and
performance
standards
and
for
a
men's
section.
F
Good
evening,
commissioners,
I'm
Mark
Sullivan
I'm,
the
long-range
planning
manager
for
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
just
to
provide
you
with
a
bit
of
background
on
these
four
ordnance
items.
The
the
housing
element
is
a
required
element
of
the
general
plan
that
provides
a
plan
to
meet
the
city's
housing
needs
over
a
period
of
approximately
seven
years.
The
housing
element
is
a
requirement
of
state
law.
The
city's
current
housing
element
was
was
adopted
in
2010
and
it
was
certified
by
the
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development.
F
The
housing
element
includes
housing
programs
and
implementation
actions
to
support
the
overarching
aim
to
provide
decent
housing
and
a
suitable
living
environment.
The
housing
element
includes
for
implementation
actions
that
are
mandated
by
the
state
and
must
be
completed
during
the
current
housing
element
period
being
compliant
with
state
law.
The
cart,
housing
element
planning
period
is
runs
from
2007
to
2014.
So
it's
really
the
end
of
2014.
F
Those
amendments,
as
you
mentioned
I'll
just
say
them
briefly
again-
are
to
establish
a
reasonable
accommodation
process
for
persons
with
disabilities
to
establish
density,
bonus
provisions
for
residential
developments
with
affordable
housing
units
to
allow
emergency
shelters
in
the
Cedar
district
as
a
permitted
use,
and
to
amend
the
definition
of
special
residential
care
facility
to
include
transitional
and
supportive
housing.
The
for
implementation
act
actions
were
introduced
to
the
Planning
Commission
on
march
forth,
and
also
to
the
city
council
on
april
eighth
of
this
year.
Why?
Why
are
these
important?
F
The
city
is
in
the
process
of
updating
its
its
housing
element
for
the
next
planning
period
from
2014
until
2020
to
the
update
must
be
completed
by
January,
31st
2015,
so
essentially
by
the
beginning
of
next
year.
If
the
current
act,
housing
element
is
in
compliance
with
state
law,
the
city
will
qualify
for
a
streamlined
review
process
by
the
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development,
which
will
help
to
adopt
the
housing
element
on
time.
F
For
these
four
amendments,
legal
notice
was
published
in
the
paper
and
for
the
the
emergency,
shelter
ordinance
in
particular
notice,
was
mailed
to
property
owners
within
the
area
of
where
the
emergency
shelters
are
proposed
to
be
allowed
and
three
and
a
three
hundred
buffer
area
surrounding
that.
And
this
is
because
it's
a
it's
a
distinct
area.
It's
not
a
citywide
ordinance
if
it
discipline
tarea.
F
So
in
that
process
we
staff
has
received
a
number
of
emails
and
phone
calls
from
concerned.
Property
owners
in
general.
People
were
concerned
about
the
concentration
of
homeless
people
in
the
area
in
that
area
they
feel
like,
or
it
was
expressed
that
neighborhood
has
experienced
a
lot
of
impacts
over
the
years
which
benefit
the
entire
city,
but
impact
that
area
the
most,
including
construction,
that
at
the
bart
station
and
caltrain
and
so
forth,
concerns
about
quality
of
life
and
safety
and
also
need
for
Economic
Development
just
to
approve
things
in
general
in
the
area.
F
Given
the
nature
of
the
comment,
staff
recommends
that
the
emergency
shelter
ordinance
be
separated
out
from
the
other
three
zoning
amendments
for
further
consideration
beyond
tonight's
meeting
and
that
the
Planning
Commission
defer
action
on
the
emergency
shelter
importance.
Until
a
later
meeting
staff
has
prepared
a
result,
revised
resolution,
which
was
provided
to
you
that
addresses
just
the
three
other
amendments
for
Plan
Commission
consideration.
F
What
staff
recommends
that,
after
this
presentation,
the
Planning
Commission
received
public
comment
and
and
discuss
the
item?
And
it's
important
to
remember
that
the
emergency
shelter
ordinance
must
comply
with
very
strict
guidelines
of
the
state
law.
So,
there's
there's
not
a
whole
lot
of
latitude
in
terms
of
how
we
can
adopt
it,
or
you
know
what
the
local
provisions
can
be,
but
there
is
some
flexibility
and
staff
will
work
on
the
the
emergency,
shelter
ordinance
further
and
bring
back
a
revised
draft
at
a
future
meeting.
F
A
2014
dash
1
recommending
that
the
City
Council
adopt
for
ordinances,
we
amending
title
12
land
use
of
the
San
Fernando
Municipal
Code,
so
I
I
thought
I
had
mentioned
that
just
to
make
sure
that
the
audience
on
the
television
in
the
course
the
general
public
here
has
this
in
the
correct
context.
Thank
you.
Please
glad.
F
So,
as
I
mentioned
I'll
start
with
the
emergency
shelter
ordinance,
the
the
requirement
for
that
ordinance
came
from
state
laws
called
senate
bill
to
which
was
adopted
by
the
state
legislature
in
2008,
and
it
requires
every
jurisdiction
in
state
california
to
identify
potential
sites
or
zoning
district.
Where
emergency
shelters
can
be
permitted
without
discretionary
view
by
the
local
government.
F
The
law
required
that
cities
evaluate
the
local
need
and
in
san
bruno
that
was
determined
to
be
32
beds
and
the
way
that
was
identified
was
there
is
a
biannual
homeless
census
and
you
know
counting
of
all
the
people
that
are
sheltered
and
unsheltered
in
the
homeless
population,
and
this
was
in
2009
when
the
housing
element
was
being
prepared,
and
at
that
time
there
were
32
unsheltered,
homeless
people
identified
in
san
bruno
and
that
was
that
became
our
our
emergency.
Shelter
need.
F
The
zoning
district
would
allow
anivision
individual
homeless
facility
of
up
to
20
beds.
So
therefore,
it
would
require
to
in
order
to
reach
the
32
need,
which
provides
a
realistic
opportunity
for
shelters
to
meet
Sam
Bruno's
need
the
ordinance
describes,
minimum
standards
for
emergency
shelters,
including
parking
outdoor
waiting
areas
out
on-site
management,
concentration,
exterior
exterior
lighting
and
security,
which
are
all
outlined
in
state
law.
A
shelter
cannot
be
located
within
300
feet
of
another
shelter
and
the
shelter
must
provide
on-site
management
and
security
during
the
hours
at
the
the
shelters
offer
in
operation.
F
F
The
next
item
is
reasonable
accommodation,
and
this
is
one
we
think
that
that
should
go
forward.
This
comes
from
the
Federal
Fair
Housing
Act,
and
also
the
California
Fair
Employment
and
Housing
Act,
which
requires
local
governments
to
make
reasonable
accommodations
in
their
zoning
was
when
such
accommodations
make
are
necessary
to
afford
a
disabled
person
an
equal
opportunity
to
use
or
enjoy
what
a
dwelling.
F
The
the
procedure
would
be
a
ministerial
process,
sub,
subject
to
approval
by
the
community
development
director
and
the
next
item
I'll
discusses
the
is
the
density
bonus
item
that
is
also
a
state
law
requirement
and
state
density.
Bonus
law
was
under
legislation
passed
in
2004
called
SB
1818,
and
it
requires
local
jurisdictions
to
adopt
state
density
bonus
law
into
their
municipal
codes.
So
the
fact
is,
we're
already
subject
to
density
bonus
law
by
the
state,
but
we
can
adapt
it
to
some
degree
to
fit
local
needs,
and
so
under.
F
One
of
the
main
things
is
that
the
the
density
bonus
law
provides,
depending
on
the
amount
of
affordable
housing.
That's
provided
in
a
development
provides
a
concession
to
a
developer
and
that
concession
is
to
a
zoning
standard
and
what
we
have
done
is
specified
what
those
zoning
standards
are
and
left
out
ones
that
you
know
we
think
are
not
appropriate
and
so
that
that's
how
it
is
adapted
to
to
local
needs.
F
For
example,
the
concession
could
be
a
relaxation
of
setbacks,
it
could
be
a
reduction
landscaping,
but
it
could
also
be,
for
example,
an
increase
in
height,
and
we
remove
that
so
that,
in
order
in
order
to
request
an
increase
in
height,
it
would
have
to
go
through
a
public
review
process.
For
that
to
happen
would
be
allowed
by
right
and
the
last
one
has
to
do
with
transitional
and
supportive
housing,
and
this
is
a
this
is
another
piece
of
SB
2
which
deals
with
the
with
the
emergency
shelters.
F
Residential
care
facilities
are
allowed
in
residential
areas,
but
there
are
some
controls
and
so
forth
on
residential
care
facilities
that
it
would
seem
appropriate
for
transitional
and
supportive
housing
as
well,
including
limitation
on
size
and
I,
also
like
to
point
out
that
that
ordinance
was
revised
today,
based
on
an
email
that
we
received,
that
there's
just
been
a
change
in
the
state
law,
adding
because
in
supportive
housing
it
mentions
target
population
and
gives
a
sort
of
a
brief
description,
and
what
state
law
has
done
is
it's
further
defined?
What
target
population
means?
F
So
that's
a
summary
of
the
of
the
four
ordinances,
and
so
in
conclusion,
I'd
like
to
remind
you
that
that
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
revised
resolution
addressing
the
three
ordinances
related
to
reasonable
accommodation
density,
bonus
and
transitional
and
supportive
housing
and
for
forwarding
those
ordinances
to
the
City
Council
for
adoption,
and
that
staff
will
bring
back
the
fourth
ordinance
related
to
emergency
shelters
at
a
future
meeting.
After
reviewing
public
comment
and
plan
commissioned
direction
and
without
I'd
be
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Thank.
A
You
I
just
a
brief
comment
on
the
present
staff
presentation.
While
the
agenda
lists
these
items
in
order,
1,
2,
3
4,
the
presentation
covered
up
covered
item
3
first,
which
is
emergency
shelters
and
then
it
covered
the
others.
Thank
you
and
now
our
do.
Any
members
of
commission
have
a
question
of
staff
before
the
public
hearing
through.
E
How
come
it
took
us
so
long?
You
know
to
get
the
to
bring
the
four
amendments
to
us
support
to
the
City
Council
when
we're
in
2014
right
now
in
2007
to
2014.
You
know
we
kind
of
like
up
against
the
wall
time
time
wise
right,
I
mean
reserved
and
should
be
I
mean
I
don't
know.
I
don't
know
why,
but
it
just
seems
like
you
perhaps
maybe
it
could
have
been
a
little
sooner
in
the
ball
game,
maybe
I.
B
While
the
staff
staff
resources
were
were
used
to
really
address
that
community
issue
and
the
intent
really
was
that
these
four
ordinances
that
we
have
before
you
this
evening
would
be
addressed
as
part
of
the
zoning
code
update.
The
zoning
code,
update
is
still
underway
and,
in
fact,
probably
won't
be
completed
until
later
on
this
year
and
as
mr.
Solomon
indicated,
it's
necessary
that
these
ordinances
be
addressed,
and
hopefully
it
adopted
by
the
city
this
year
and
well
before
the
end
of
the
year,
so
that
we
can
be
eligible
for
that
shorter
review
period.
B
So
we
decided
to
actually
move
these
ordinances
out
of
the
zoning
code
update
and
to
bring
them
to
you
independently,
so
that
we
could
hopefully
get
these
reviewed
approved
and
then
be
in
line
with
the
current
update
housing
element
update
so
that
the
city
of
San
Bruno
could
be
eligible
for
the
streamline
review
and
the
extended
overall
review
period
of
eight
years
versus
four
years.
So
that's
a
little
bit
of
the
rationale
and
mr.
Sullivan
could
add
to
that.
If
he
needs
to
I,
think.
F
E
E
So
basically,
it's
like
2014
is
over
halfway
through
it
through
it
already
so
soon,
as
we
thought.
If
these
things
get
adopted
its
site,
I
mean
it
doesn't
really
need
a
whole
lot
for
them
for
the
2007
to
2014
time
frame.
They
were
talking
about
it's
basically
from
this
point
forward,
so
that
we
can
get
the
streamlined
and
may
be
able
to
catch
the
break
with
the
state
down.
In
that.
F
E
More
question,
as
we
discussed
at
the
previous
meeting
you
about
the
timelines
and
how
critical
all
that
is,
are
we
going
to
be
up
against
that
again?
Let's
just
hypothetically
say
all
the
amendments
get
approved
and
everybody's
good
with
whatever,
so
that
moving
forward,
would
we
perhaps
maybe
be
able
to
be
a
little
bit
more
timely
or
things.
E
A
E
F
G
G
G
Uses
like
these,
I
feel
that
I
want
to
explore
the
latitude
that's
given
to
us.
I
want
to
understand
the
demographics
we're
serving
I
would
like.
You
know,
you're,
saying
that
the
Tod
is
where
we
want
to
put
this,
but
the
accommodation
is
that
you're
providing
parking,
you're,
providing
other
things
to
the
demographics
that
is
counterintuitive
to
a
Tod
development
and
I
would
like
to
know
more
and
I'm
sure
the
public
won't
like
to
know
more,
which
demographic
is
going
to
be
using
this
from
our
community
and
if
they're
all
say.
G
If
the
statistics
come
back,
that
one
hundred
percent
of
what
we're
going
to
be
serving
are
going
to
be
driving,
then
this
could
be
in
any
corner
of
the
city.
And,
if
that's
the
case,
then
we
should
open
up
this
development
to
anywhere
in
the
city,
because
that's
the
demographic
will
be
serving
and
not
restrict
ourselves.
G
G
A
Other
Commission
questions
or
discussion:
okay,
I'd
like
to
open
the
public
hearing
and
there's
an
introduction.
You
may
comment
on
any
one
of
these
parts
1
through
4
and
please
step
to
the
podium
and
make
any
comments
or
ask
any
questions.
You
would
like
to
through
the
check
real,
quick
commission,
a
1.
E
A
Can
be
on
the
table
at
the
preference
of
the
Commission,
the
staff
is
observing
that,
since
there
are
a
lot
of
comments,
they
would
recommend
that
we
continue
that
item
to
the
to
another
meeting
right
take
take
testimony
tonight.
Okay,
but
also
continue
it
to
another
meeting
I,
for
example,
is
more
information
should
be
gathered?
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
sir.
Please
give
you
a
name
in
your
sweet
name,
rich.
H
H
H
A
H
A
F
That
the
city
identified
as
a
site
of
potential
site
or
a
zoning
district,
where
emergency
cell
shelters
can
be
permitted.
It
does
not
require
any
particular
area
at
all.
It
just
requires
that
the
city
identify
a
location
that
could
accommodate
the
number
that
that
is
the
city's.
That
is
the
identified
city,
need
great.
H
A
A
H
A
I
I
Other
one
is
that
my
dealings
with
the
homeless
shelters
I
know
that
most
of
them
are
the
people
that
live
in
them.
Are
you
either
vagrants,
drunks
or
or
drugs
druggies
and
within
48
hours
are
back
out
into
the
streets.
So,
if
you're
looking
at
this
area
here,
the
best
place
for
one
of
these
persons
whose
left
the
homeless
to
hang
out
will
be
your
new
train
station
and
I.
I
F
The
maximum
amount
of
time
is
is
six
months,
it's
up
to
six
months
and
generally,
what
happens
is
that
transition,
so
transitional
housing
is
six
months
or
more.
So
it's
six
months
and
I
believe
that
we
need
90
to
end.
So
within
our
ordinance,
we've
set.
The
maximum
is
90
days.
So,
let's
considerably
less
than
six
months
through.
E
E
F
F
F
F
I
I
I
I
J
Moisture
I
just
want
to
make
a
couple
comment:
I
didn't
really
another
question
that
was
only
I
did
have.
Why
did
you
not
look
into
putting
the
homeless
shelters
into
the
industrial
areas?
Why
did
you
only
look
into
putting
them
in
this
san
bruno
avenue,
el
camino
corridor?
Why
did
you
not
look
anywhere
else?
Okay,.
A
A
F
I
that
was
was
brought
up
there
were.
There
were
a
couple
of
meetings
back
in
2009.
There
was
a
city
council,
study
session
and
I
believe
there
were
a
couple
of
other
meetings
and
that's
what
came
forward
was
the
and
the
the
the
industrial
area
was
was
considered
and
the
Tod
area
was
was
what
was
chosen.
Okay,.
B
You
know
to
to
add
to
what
mr.
Sullivan
said
in
terms
of
the
location
the
the
industrial
area
was
looked
at
and
I
think
from
consultation
with
staff
and
others
on
this.
It
seems
like
the
Tod
area
was
looked
at
because
it
was
closer
in
closer
proximity
to
services
and
transportation,
so
the
industrial
area
was
looked
at,
but
that
was
the
rationale
at
the
time.
As
far
as
the
transitional
housing,
the
transitional
housing,
as
was
indicated
in
the
presentation,
would
be
allowed
where
housing
for
special
needs
would
be
allowed
for
up
to
six
units.
J
Only
other
comment-
I
had
was
the
dysgenesis
of
me
about
our
nice
new
train
upgrade
for
that.
It's
really
nice
or
they'd
have
a
beautiful,
fountain
now
and
I
just
know
exactly
who's
going
to
be
using
the
fountain,
because
it's
going
to
be
it
would
have
homeless
in
the
area,
and
you
need
to
take
a
shower
or
whatever
it's
gonna.
It's
not
going
to
help
and
I.
Don't
even
see
homeless
people
that
much
at
san
bruno
either.
So
I
don't
know
how
we
devised
that
there
was
30
to
20
most
people
in
san
bruno.
A
J
A
F
It's
a
the
census
is
done
every
two
years
at
the
same
time,
every
year
at
the
the
last
week,
end
of
January,
so
on
on
odd
years,
so
2009
there
was
one
in
2011.
There
was
one
in
2013
and
in
this
surprised
me
as
well
in
2013
the
count
was
99,
so
you
know
I
mean
people
do
tend
to
hide,
and
you
know
they
are
not
going.
D
I
E
Mr.
Commissioner
say
your
5
I'd
be
allowed
just
to
make
a
common.
You
know
19.
I
know
most
people
at
the
city
of
san
bruno.
While
that
may
seem
to
be
a
lot.
You
know
it's
like
the
invisible
population.
You
know
they're
they're
out
there
and
you
just
dont
rek.
You
don't
see
him,
you
know
it's
nothing
for
all
druggies
and
I,
like
they're
all
addicts,
oh
yeah,
you
get
outs
and
brutal
park
right
down
here
you
go
back,
buettner
shelter.
E
Whatever
you
look
to
to
preserve
park,
I
mean
whatever
you
know,
they're,
not
necessarily
in
our
in
our
backyards,
but
what
it's
unfortunate,
but
there's
a
lot
of
them
out
there
they're
everywhere.
It's
you
know
most
cases.
It's
sad
anyway
is
my
comment
on.
You
know
why
we
don't
see
32
people
or-
and
we
have
a
comment
up.
You
know
that's
what
ever
think
of
99.
It's
very
reasonable
number
I
would
think.
Thank.
K
I
hope
that
my
views
will
not
only
be
heard
but
considered
with
regard
to
the
zoning
code,
amendment
related
to
homeless
shelters.
My
residence
is
not
within
the
boundaries
of
the
proposed
emergency
shelter
zone.
However,
we
are
within
300
feet
of
the
zone.
We
are
also
within
two
blocks
of
st.
Bruno's
church,
where
a
10-bed
shelter
has
been
in
operation
for
several
years.
K
It's
very
distressing
to
learn
of
the
potential
for
a
30
to
bed,
shelter
to
be
imposed
upon
our
neighborhood
and
I
hope
to
provide
you
with
some
insight
into
my
opposition
to
yet
another
shelter
in
the
neighborhood
that
the
city
planners
have
designated
as
the
most
desirable
area
number
one
we
have
owned
and
resided
in
our
house
for
28
years
and
during
those
28
years
the
neighborhood
has
been
frequently
inhabited
by
the
homeless
population.
Due
to
st.
K
Bruno's
church
and
the
Catholic
Worker
hospitality
house
on
Second
Avenue
in
1996,
the
neighborhood
was
overrun
with
homeless
individuals.
The
forest
lane
park,
which,
if
you're
not
familiar
with
it,
is
at
the
end
of
the
very
top
of
the
screen,
is
just
below
interstate
380.
It
was
literally
a
homeless
encampment,
where
people
congregated
after
having
a
meal
at
st.
Bruno's
church
in
the
soup
kitchen,
then
purchasing
alcohol,
atla,
Dora's
liquor,
store
and
then
taken
a
two-block
walk
to
forest
lane
park
for
late
evening.
Activities
of
alcohol
and
drugs
before
slipping
into
the
bushes.
K
For
the
night
of
note,
the
park
has
no
water
or
restroom
facilities,
though
so
the
bushes
became
the
parks
latrine
the
park
was
filthy
and
the
neighborhood
was
littered.
My
children
weren't
allowed
to
play
in
front
of
our
house
because
the
unsavory
neighborhood
inhabitants,
the
children,
were
also
seldom
able
to
use
their
own
neighborhood
park.
The
police
department
was
unequipped
to
deal
with
the
problem
and
I
know
this,
because
I
had
police
officers
in
my
house,
I
had
to
tell
them
rules
about
about
curfew
in
the
parks.
K
Finally,
after
my
fifth
grade
daughter
and
her
friend
made
a
plea
at
the
city
council
meeting
to
get
the
park
cleaned
up,
the
city
took
action,
trees
and
shrubs
were
removed.
New
signage
with
park
rules
and
curfew
were
imposed
and
constant
monitoring
by
police
officers
and
local
residents
proved
moderately
successful.
K
The
problem
eventually
subsided,
but
has
never
gone
away
with
recurring
problems,
especially
during
the
summer
months
last
fall
city
workers
had
to
remove
the
barbecue
picnic
tables
and
park
benches
because
the
homeless
population
had
moved
and
again
and
was
starting
fires
in
the
barbecue,
with
the
shrubbery,
with
the
branches
from
the
shrubs.
My
children
are
grown
now,
but
I
want
today's
and
tomorrow's
children
of
the
neighborhood
to
be
able
to
enjoy
the
park
facilities
as
children
should
number
2.
I'm
not
sure
how
deeply
the
city
planners
have
looked
throughout.
K
Saint-Bruno
San,
Bruno's
five
square
miles
for
an
alternate
location
for
the
emergency
shelter
zoning
other
than
the
transit
oriented
development
area.
The
neighborhoods
on
the
east
side
of
san
bruno
along
san
bruno
avenue
corridor
have
been
negatively
impacted
for
years.
The
airport,
freeways
and
trains
are
constant
source
of
noise
and
air
pollution.
In
addition,
the
neighborhoods
have
suffered
through
significant
constructed
construction,
noise,
traffic
and
neighborhood
interruptions
due
to
bart
construction,
tanforan
renovation,
construction
and
now
the
grade
separation
construction.
K
Point
number
three.
In
addition,
the
plans
for
the
transit
oriented
development
area
include,
among
others,
a
potential
development
of
a
seven-story
multi-use
residential
building.
What
developer
will
risk
financial
loss
by
situating
their
building
next
door
to
a
homeless,
shelter
or
within
an
area
zoned
for
such?
Have
you
determined
the
financial
impact
on
the
current
property
owners
of
this
neighborhood,
such
as
myself.
K
The
city's
intention
now
is
to
force
the
residents
of
our
neighborhood
to
be
subjected
to
another
significant
negative
impact.
If
the
current
zoning
code,
amendment
related
to
homeless
shelters
is
approved,
please
consider
this
as
my
objection
to
the
city's
current
plan
and
just
as
an
aside
I
applaud
your
decision
today
or
hopefully
it
will
be
a
decision
this
evening
to
put
this
decision
off
and
to
restart
the
plan
of
it
before
you
do
make
maker
a
recommendation
to
the
City
Council.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
L
I'd
like
to
say
that
was
very
well
stated:
it's
a
hard
act
to
follow,
but
I
live
on.
Hensley
Avenue
and
we've
lived
there
for
about
12
years
and
I
wanted
to
mirror
my
neighbor's
opinion
about
the
homeless
that
already
exist
in
our
neighborhood.
It
has
a
negative
impact
on
our
community
life
and
our
socialization
with
our
neighbors
as
well.
It's
an
area
now,
where
you
don't
really
want
to
have
your
kids
out,
you're,
almost
afraid
to
go
outside,
and
you
certainly
don't
want
to
confront
any
of
the
homeless
that
exists.
L
M
My
name
is
shirley
allen.
I
live
at
836
mills
avenue
all
I'm
going
to
say
is:
please
reconsider
people
in
this
area
have
suffered
enough.
We
went
through
Bart,
we
went
through
what's
going
on
now
and
to
have
this
in
our
neighborhood.
How
much
more
can
we
take?
I
mean
people
in
this
area
are
looking
elsewhere
it
to
move.
Because
of
all
of
this,
that's
that's
going
on
I
have
grandchildren.
Do
you
think
I
won't
grant
my
grandchildren
to
to
be
able
to
you
know
to
play
outside?
M
Yes,
if
this
is
300
feet
from
from
my
house?
No,
so
this
is
for
CB
to
reconsider,
moving
out
of
san
bruno
and
what
type
of
effect
is
this
going
to
have
on
the
city?
If
people
are
starting
to
move
out
of
the
area,
you
did
the
nice
grade
separation.
It's
gorgeous.
Okay,
san
bruno
avenue
is
a
main
intersection,
int
main
gateway
into
san
bruno.
Do
you
want
to
have
homeless
people
on
the
streets?
Do
you
want
people
from
other
cities
coming
in
and
experiencing
this?
Other
cities
have
researched
all
the
homeless.
M
D
D
A
Any
other
members
of
the
public
like
to
Connor,
you
see
no
other
commenters.
So
close,
the
public
hearing
bring
the
item
back
in
the
condition
I
like
to
start
by
saying
I.
As
chair
I
appreciate
your
coming
to
the
meeting
and
making
your
comments
they're
very
clear
and
covered
a
lot
of
brown
sure.
Are
there
any
Commission
Commission
your
comments
on
this
yeah
future?
A
D
D
We
do
wind
up
passing
on
the
ordinance
on
the
emergency
shelters
mark.
Could
you
ask
that,
as
part
of
the
package,
we
get
any
police
reports
or
police
numbers
on
toxicated
people
homeless,
people,
whatever
any
issues
that
they've
had
with
with
the
Catholic
Worker
house,
just
in
general
to
downtown
area?
Yes,.
F
G
Personally,
I
would,
I
would
actually
have
stained
tonight
if
we
do
vote
on
the
emergency
shelters,
I
believe
it
should
say,
stay
separate.
That's
my
personal
I
I
appreciate
the
comments.
It's
pretty
evident
that
we
in
master
planning
there's
two
concepts.
What
is
the
ask
and
we
haven't
defined?
What
is,
but
what
is
it
that
we're
trying
to
solve?
The
second
is:
there's
this.
It
keeps
coming
up
that,
let's
put
it
in
a
corner
that
is
part
of
an
industrial
zone
and
personally
I,
don't
agree
with
it.
G
Just
right
now,
I
want
to
see
how
it
plays
out,
but
there's
this
concept
of
of
visual
surveillance
at
all
hours
of
the
day,
and
one
of
the
things
that
the
El
Camino
corridor
offers
is
that
constant
monitoring
which
I'd
like
to
explore
more
I'm,
not
saying
it's
the
right
thing
to
do.
It's
the
wrong
finger,
I'm,
just
saying:
there's
a
visual
there.
G
There
are
people
watching
the
streets
at
every
hour
of
the
day
and
so
to
tuck
it
in
a
corner
of
a
city
could
be,
it
could
be
another
problem
and
I,
don't
know
that
it
is
a
bigger
problem
or
not.
Also
going
back
to
my
demographics
question
out,
if
we
put
in
an
industrial
area
which
is
really
close
to
Caltrans,
are
we
inviting
is
that
opening
the
doors
to
other
homeless
from
other
cities,
because
they're
ignoring
the
issue
they're
coming
to
our
city?
G
So
have
you
created
a
larger
problem
in
our
industrial
zone
and
I'd
like
to
know
that
I'd
like
to
study
that
I'd
like
answers
on
that
before
we
choose
to
do
anything
with
it?
I
understand
that
this
legislation
is,
you
know,
compassionate
legislation,
but
it's
up
to
us
to
study
better,
to
understand
it
and
serve
our
community,
the
best
way
possible
and
99
people
that
are
homeless
in
the
city,
whether
it
be
10
99.
G
It's
still
a
problem
and
we
need
to
find
a
solution
for
the
problem
and
putting
in
a
corner
allowing
people
to
use
the
parks
for
latrine
services
is
not
an
answer,
no
matter
what
part
of
the
city
it
is,
I,
don't
agree
with
it,
so
we
need
to
better
start.
Your
problem
and
I
would
personally
say
that
I'm
not
voting
on
any
issue
today,
I
for
this
to
come
back
as.
A
G
C
It
is,
it
is
a
difficult
it's
a
difficult,
complex
situation
and
looking
at
both
ends.
I
own
a
business
and
I
certainly
would
have
to
think
about
safety
of
mod
of
those
that
are
going
to
be
near
my
business,
so,
whether
it's
industrial
or
whether
it's
homes
there
was
there
is
an
issue
here.
We
have
to
take
a
look
at
and
I
completely
support
the
study
and
taking
a
look
at
this
and
what
can
be
done.
C
I
also
know
that
there
are
homeless
people
who
work
who
go
to
school,
who
do
things
and
they
just
don't,
have
a
place
to
go
these
sleeping
cars.
Did
you
other
things
and
they're
credible,
good
people,
but
they
don't
have
a
place
to
live,
and
then
there
was
the
other
range
who
have
mental
illness
who
have
had
difficulties.
C
Who've
been
veterans,
there's
a
huge
range
and
the
important
part
is
to
recognize
not
to
judge,
but
to
look
at
what
can
we
do
to
move
forward
to
do
our
best
thinking
in
this
process,
and
I
can
certainly
stand
behind
any
of
the
thinking
you
know
sort
of
not
my
back
door.
However,
it
needs
to
be
in
somebody's
back
door
in
somebody's
place
and
we
all
have
to
think
well.
They
have
to
be
shoulder
to
shoulder
in
this
process.
People
will
think
about
it.
Well,
because
humans
are
humans.
C
C
Vast
I
sit
here
with
you
know
with
like
with
the
heartache
with
it
through
the
whole
thing,
because
I
teach
it
a
homeless,
shelter
and
I
teach
parenting
skills
at
almost
shelter
and
I've
been
doing
it
for
probably
15
20
years
and
I
hear
the
story,
and
so
it
is
definitely
something
that
I'm
very
familiar
with
noun
men
and
women,
and
so
it
can't
be
ignored,
but
we
can't
we
can't
not
do
something
about
it
and
I.
Don't
know
what
that
answer
is
an
absolutely
there.
C
I
think
additional
information
I
need
to
have
as
much
information,
because
you
know
it's
not
about
not
being
in
my
back
door.
It's
about
what
can
we
do
and
we
are
required
to
do.
Sometimes
it's
not
like.
We
have
an
option.
We
are
required
by
law
to
do
something
about
it.
It's
not
an
option,
it's
how
we
do
it.
That
makes
it
makes
a
difference.
Oh
thank
you.
D
D
As
a
planning,
Commissioner
I
look
at
this,
and
my
only
thought
is-
is
this
consistent
with
the
general
plan
of
the
transit
order
for
transient
development-oriented
plan
that
we've
looked
at
and
talked
about
and
I,
don't
believe
that
it's
consistent
with
those
two
plants
period
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
some
other
areas,
some
other
options.
But
I
absolutely
believe
this
is
inconsistent
with
the
general
plan
period.
A
E
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
agree
with
Commissioner
Johnson.
As
far
as
the
comment
that
it's
a
very
tough
situation,
if
somebody
had
the
answer,
I'm
sure
that
we
would
already
have
heard
about
it,
you
know
I,
don't
feel
that
we're
inviting
them
in
their
here.
You
know
I
mean
they're.
People
are
you
almost
already
here.
E
My
understanding
is
that,
excuse
me,
there's
an
emergency.
Shelter
is
just
that
for
an
emergency,
you
know,
so
it
should
be
monitored,
as
such.
I
would
assume
you
know,
whoever's
running
the
shelter
and
I
would
assume
that
they
would
keep
tabs
on
who's
there
and
how
often
they're
there
or
whatever
or
what
their
you
know.
Mental
capabilities
are
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
E
And
then
my
final
comment
would
it's
in
regards
to
the
transitional
housing?
Isn't
it
much
the
same
as
our
residential
care
board
and
care
situation
where
it
should
be
in
any
in
any
neighborhood
I
mean
the
law
allows
it
I
mean
it
can
have
them
across
the
street.
It
can
be
across
the
street.
You
know,
am
I
right,
there's
no
pre
dedicated
zoned
area,
for
you
know
the
transitional
housing,
no.
F
E
Can't
finally,
one
last
comment
is
I,
just
really
like
that
Commissioner
Johnson
made
the
point
of
you
know
we're
not
really
here
to
judge.
We
need
to
fix
the
problem,
not
about
judging
individuals
who
you
know
or
in
that
particular
situation
where
those
other
own
making
or
not.
You
know
we
need
to
deal
with
it
and
you
know
I
just
commend
her
for
making
that
comment.
I
think
that
was
spot
on
myself.
E
C
I
just
want
to
comment
on
these:
the
Commissioner
Jace
residential
care
boarding
care
homes.
There
was
a
huge
concern
when
those
started
to
grow
in
san
bruno,
and
one
of
the
things
it
has
been
observed
is
that
they
don't
cause
the
traffic
problems
that
they
were
going
to,
but
they
expected
they
have
visitors
that
come
often
times
are
not
longevity
people
there
there
it's
transitional
and
sometimes
it's
health,
its
medical
health,
to
transition
back
into
good
health,
and
there
are
typically
six
to
eight
beds
and
they're.
C
Now,
looking
at
raising
that
to
thirteen
batters
through
the
problem
of
social
services,
community
care,
licensing,
transitional
homes,
there's
a
different
clientele
and
the
clientele
is
different
and
my
mother
lives
next
door
to
one,
and
so
it
is
very
different
clientele
and
it
does
and
I
think
it's
important
that
we
recognize
that,
so
that
we
could
prepare
to
address
the
issue
and
not
think
that
they're
the
same
people
in
residual
wasn't
bored
care.
Homes
typically
are
not
mobile.
There
are
not
ambulatory
and
oftentimes
in
transitional
care.
B
B
You
know
at
this
point,
I
think
we'll
take
in
the
information
review
it
with
our
city
manager
and
determine
what
the
best
process
might
be,
that
that's
an
option
that
will
look
at
you
know.
We've
we've
heard
a
number
of
different
things
tonight.
Certainly
there
have
been
concerns
about
location,
as
mr.
Sullivan
indicated
in
his
report
and
comments.
B
E
A
C
For
Santa,
can
you
provide
us
in
future
some
research
as
to
what
are
some
successful
areas
of
shelters
where
it
is
working
and
and
why
it's
working
I
do
know
that
if
we
had
you
known
arid
or
he
would
convey
a
location
because
they
want
confused
the
fact
of
an
example.
But
if
it's
a
place
where
there
was
a
lot
of
treason,
but
there
wasn't,
any
transportation
will
will
that
be
an
area
that
that
the
homeless
would
actually
go
to?
Is
it
freezing
cold
another
or
not,
for
you
cold?
C
C
D
D
Two
more
questions
am
I.
Reading
here
tonight,
I
see
the
change,
in
definition
in
page
1
of
the
ordinance
section
2,
it's
a
special
residential
care
facility
means
and
there's
a
change
why
the
change,
in
definition,
I
know-
you
mentioned
it
earlier
in
the
presentation,
but
it
escapes
me
why
we're
changing
that.
B
Be
happy
to
I
think.
As
again
mr.
Sullivan
indicated
in
his
report,
we
got
an
email
from
hcd
housing
and
community
development
and
they
indicated
that
the
the
definition
should
be
replaced,
as
previously
stated
to
provide
the
more
specific
information
that
we
provided.
Farming,
the
strikeout
version.
F
F
E
D
E
A
Right
not
to
lash
alignment
right
well,
actually
we
are
voting
a
number
32
to
defer
it,
but
we
are
taking
some
kind
of
action
on
the
chain
right
and
what
it
looks
like
since
there's
little
relatively
little
discussion
on
items,
1,
2,
&,
4
that
there
should
be
some
discussion
on
them.
If
there
are
concerns
and
if
not
a
motion
to
recommend
a
resolution
to
the
council,
do.
A
E
D
B
B
A
F
A
E
Real
quickly,
Commissioner
chase
I'd
like
to
just
agree
with
you
know,
chair
Peterson's
comments
about
having
the
public
here,
it's
nice
to
see
the
public
here
you
know
and
then
putting
they're,
giving
us
your
input
on
what's
important
to
you.
So
we
really
do
appreciate
it.
When
we
do
try
and
listen,
you
know
so.
Thank
you.