►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting May 13, 2014
10a. Joint Use Agreement with San Bruno Park School District
B
Good
evening,
honorable
mayor
and
members
of
the
City
Council,
as
the
council
knows,
the
city
of
San
Bruno
and
the
San
Bruno
Park
District
School
District
have
shared
a
long-standing
special
relationship
and
partnership
in
serving
the
educational
and
recreational
interests
of
the
community.
A
feature
of
this
relationship
is
the
joint
use
agreement
between
the
two
parties,
which
memorializes
the
city
and
school
districts,
collective
understanding
of
the
city
and
school
districts,
use
of
one
another's
facilities
to
deliver
recreation
programs,
as
well
as
the
maintenance
of
the
district's
fields
at
belair,
elementary
school
and
Parkside
middle
school.
B
The
first
joint
use
agreement
dates
back
more
than
a
decade
2002
since
that
time,
both
the
city
and
the
school
district
have
requested
updates
to
this
agreement.
The
agreement
currently
in
place
expires
august,
31st
2021,
as
a
result
of
the
school
district
shift
in
policy
to
begin
charging
nonprofits
in
the
city
for
use
of
school
district
facilities
for
non-school
related
activities,
which
the
school
district
implemented
last
spring.
B
In
august
2013,
the
school
district
requested
the
opportunity
to
renegotiate
a
successor,
joint
use
agreement
with
the
city,
as
might
be
as
a
means
by
which
to
implement
these
new
fees.
Shortly
thereafter,
at
a
meeting
of
the
City
Council
and
school
district
governing
board
subcommittee,
the
subcommittee
confirmed
its
collective
desire
to
negotiate
a
successor
agreement.
B
Following
this
meeting,
the
city
and
school
district
staff
held
several
meetings
to
develop
this
new
joint
use
agreement.
While
these
discussions
were
productive
and
moving
forward
successfully,
additional
time
was
required
to
complete
these
negotiations.
Priority
expiration
of
the
agreement
in
February
of
2014
at
a
joint
meeting
in
January
of
the
City
Council
and
school
board,
the
parties
mutually
agreed
to
extend
the
joint
use
agreement
by
90
days
until
May
tenth
2014
staff
is
presenting
for
City
Council
consideration
this
evening.
This
this
successor
joint
use
agreement.
B
This
agreement
will
also
be
presented
tomorrow
evening
at
the
school
district's
board
meeting
for
their
consideration
as
well.
The
City
Council
and
School
Board
district
governing
board
joint
sub
committee
is
recommending
approval.
A
primary
feature
of
this
proposed
agreement
is
certainty
over
the
facilities
and
their
costs
associated
with
the
use,
as
well
as
a
mechanism
for
adjusting
these
costs.
If
increases
are
experienced
over
time
in
a
dress,
in
addition
to
addressing
minor
language
cleanup
in
the
prior
agreement
or
the
existing
agreement.
B
Elementary
and
Parkside
middle
schools,
also
incorporated
into
the
agreement,
is
an
annual
increase
for
both
of
these
fees,
based
on
the
Consumer
Price
Index
at
the
end
of
the
evergreen
term.
At
the
end
of
this
three
year
period,
both
the
city
and
the
school
district
would
come
together
to
work
collaboratively
on
updating
the
actual
costs.
If
and
if
they
were
to
increase,
these
new
increased
costs
would
be
incorporated
in
the
first
year
of
the
new
evergreen
contract.
B
The
city
continues
to
assist
the
school
district
free
of
charge
with
various
activities
which
result
in
two
in
a
direct
cost
to
the
city,
including
support
for
the
day
of
the
child,
cable,
television
production
and
delivery
and
the
school
districts
tree
management
program
in
June.
In
next
month,
staff
will
be
presenting
the
Master
fee
schedule
update
for
consideration
by
the
City
Council.
B
In
the
event,
the
City
Council
wishes
to
recover
some
or
all
of
the
costs
associated
with
the
new
school
districts
facility
use
fees,
existing
programs
for
the
city's
after-school
adventures,
program
and
middle
school
sports
programs
will
need
to
be
adjusted.
Staff
is
recommending
to
the
city
council
authorized
the
city
manager
to
execute
the
proposed
joint
successor
joint
use
agreement.
This
concludes
my
staff
report
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Hmmm.
C
The
person
that
owns
the
facilities
doesn't
do
anything.
They
just
have
the
facility.
So
now,
they're
asking
us
to
now
pay
a
certain
amount
based
on
some
calculation
of
a
cost
and
the
way
the
city
comes
out
of
it
is
that
we
have
the
program,
but
now
we
have
to
pay
more
and
now
you've
and
then,
at
the
end
of
your
staff
report,
you
said
that
the
adjustment,
which
is
obviously
going
to
be
an
increase,
is
going
to
be
face
facing
us
or
facing
the
users,
which
is
the
children,
the
families
and
that's.
D
So
I'd
like
to
just
clarify
one
comment
and
and
perhaps
correct
a
in
understanding,
and
that
is
that
the
school
districts
fee
schedule
being
implemented
through
this
joint
use
agreement.
The
costs
are
primarily
related
that
the
city
would
experience
are
primarily
related
to
the
use
cities,
use
of
indoor
classroom
space
at
various
school
sites
for
the
delivery
of
afterschool
recreational
programs
and
those
programs
are
an
important
community
asset.
D
We
believe,
however,
it
is
impact
the
case
that
the
school
district
does
maintain
its
building
spaces
and
it
does
have
costs
associated
with
that
janitorial
of
facility,
maintenance,
administrative
and
other
costs.
It
is
accurate
that
the
city
maintains
two
of
the
school
districts
fields
at
parkside
in
it
Bel
Air
school.
D
C
This
did
the
school
district
through
the
negotiations.
Did
the
school
district
group
provide
information
to
the
bring
bring
information
in
table
that
they
were
losing
money
by
providing
these
programs?
Were
they
losing
money
because
of
their
of
allowing
the
city
to
use
the
city
to
provide
these
programs
in
their
facilities?
So.
D
Is
experiencing
revenue
shortfalls
for
their
educational
programs
and
has
identified
a
facility
use
fee
as
they
are
allowed
to
do
under
state
law
as
a
means
of
generating
revenue
to
assist
in
supporting
the
district's
overall
services
in
its
costs
of
doing
business?
We
have
that's.
That
is
the
manner
in
which
we
understand
this
program
and
again,
there
are
costs
to
the
district
associated
with
the
operation,
maintenance
and
provision
of
school
buildings.
E
E
I
would
say
a
bad
agreement
would
have
been
if
we
went
back
to
when
we
had
the
San
Mateo
union
high
school
district
and
where
the
fire
prevention,
poster
contest
used
to
be
free,
became
a
thousand
dollars
to
walk
in
the
door
and
that's
why
it
isn't
there
anymore.
So
it
doesn't
go,
didn't
go
down
that
path,
but
I
know.
Even
when
I
was
on
staff,
the
city
began
to
charge
even
nonprofit
groups,
Boy
Scouts
sports
groups
for
using
its
facilities
after
hours
because
of
the
fact
it
had
to
recoup
costs.
E
Even
it
was
a
nominal
fee.
The
school
district
has
looked
as
far
as
the
athletic
group,
so
I
sat
in
one
of
those
meetings
where
they
were
concerned
about
hey,
look
at
all
the
work
that
we
do
at
parkside
or
Bel
Air,
so
the
district
did
sit
down
and
formulated
an
idea
with
your
labor
materials
that
can
offset
the
charges
that
would
accompany
that
so
that
they
can
still
produce
their
programs
and
activities
with
not
having
any
increase,
hopefully
to
their
youth
than
their
program.
E
Ours,
primarily,
is
are
on
the
indoor
activities
which
do
take
staff,
time
and
resources
and
what
they
are
saying
to
us
when
they
SAT
with
Michael
and
I
was
we
just
can't
subsidize
any
longer,
but
I
think
what
we
tried
to
do
and
I
think
staff
went
around
around
with
the
district
a
couple
times
and
some
versions
of
it
was
to
trying
to
make
it
fair,
but
as
a
little
at
least
harmful
to
the
current
activities
and
programs.
One
of
our
concerns
was
about
what
about
the
youth
are
their
scholarships
available?
The
answer
is
yes.
E
C
Come
back
on
that
as
I.
Thank
you
for
that
and
I
respect
that
the
staff
and
the
subcommittee
for
what
they
dealt
with
and
how
to
put
this
together
and
I.
You
know
and
I'll
admit
it's.
It's
probably
a
better
agreement.
It's
not
the
agreement.
I
like
I'm
I'm,
going
to
I'm
going
to
vote
for
it
and
I'm
going
to
three
years.
I
am
I'm
going
to
remember
and
in
three
years
when
we
look
at
this
and
when
we
look
at
how
the
trending
of
our
master
fee
schedule
is
going.
C
D
Mirror
if
I
could
interrupt
for
just
one
moment
we
have.
The
city
attorney
has
informed
me
that
there
is
actually
no
resolution
in
your
agenda
materials,
so
we
would
be
looking
tonight.
As
is
stated
on
the
agenda.
We
were
looking
tonight
for
your
action
to
authorize
me
by
minute
action
to
sign
or
not
sign
the
agreement,
and
we
would
return
to
your
next
meeting
with
a
resolution
that
confirms
whatever
action
you
take
tonight.