►
From YouTube: San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting 10/20/15
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting
October 20, 2015
trt 57:45
A
A
B
A
B
Cheer
cheer
Johnson
I'm
very,
very
pleased
to
introduce
our
new
planning.
Commissioner
Murray
kiya
Marie
was
appointed
to
the
Planning
Commission
by
the
City
Council
at
their
last
meeting
on
octobre,
13
and
Marie
has
served
the
city
on
the
crime
prevention
committee
until
just
recently
with
this
appointment
since
her
appointment
by
the
city
council
city
clerk,
Carol
Bonner
has
sworn
Marie
n,
so
she's
formerly
a
commissioner.
B
We
did
an
orientation,
so
she
has
a
stack
materials
to
review
and
she
joins
you
tonight
and
I
believe
she's
prepared
to
formally
participate
in
her
first
meeting
and
participate
participate
with
you
by
taking
action.
So
we
welcome,
read
tonight,
she's
the
five
and
a
happier
resident
of
the
city
of
san
bruno
and
welcome.
Thank.
A
A
Next
item
is
the
time
for
any
one
of
the
audience
can
step
forward
and
speak
to
anything
that
is
not
on
the
agenda
there.
Anyone
from
the
audience
who
wishes
to
address
the
Commission
and
any
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda,
all
right,
we'll
go
on
to
the
next
item,
which
is
conflict
of
interest.
Is
there
anything
within
the
agenda
that
is
a
conflict
of
interest
for
any
other
commissioners?
A
A
F
Bradley
the
project
planner
and
this
project
is
at
twelve-thirty
El
Camino
Real
in
the
town
center
shopping
center.
It's
a
request
for
a
use
permit
to
allow
wine
and
beer
sales
in
an
existing
restaurant
and
the
applicant
is
not
proposing
any
changes
to
the
restaurant.
No
interior
changes.
It
will
remain
exactly
as
it
is.
Currently,
the
only
change
would
be
that
it
would
have
the
license
to
sell
wine
and
beer
with
food.
F
F
F
F
The
police
department
has
reviewed
the
application
and
conditions
from
the
previous
permit
and
conditions
of
approval
for
the
permit
have
been
added.
So
if
there's
this
permit
is
subject
to
review,
if
there's
any
issues
with
any
kind
of
nuisance
resulting
from
the
alcohol
sales
that
mining
director
can
call
the
the
permit
back
to
planning
commission
for
review.
G
A
F
G
A
H
A
C
A
A
J
You
and
good
evening,
as
indicated
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
expand
the
existing
residents
by
greater
than
fifty
percent.
The
site
itself
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
First
Avenue
between
pine
street
and
Angus
Avenue
East.
It
is
currently
developed
with
a
one-story
single-family
dwelling
and
the
existing
single-family
dwelling
has
785
square
feet
of
living
area
with
two
bedrooms:
one
bathroom,
a
living
room,
dining
room
kitchen
and
an
attached
two
hundred
square
foot
garage.
J
The
proposal
before
us
tonight
is
for
a
527
square
foot
addition
to
the
rear
of
the
existing
single-family
dwelling.
That
addition
would
include
two
bedrooms,
one
bathroom
and
a
family
room
if
approved
and
constructed.
This
would
be
a
4-bedroom
2-bathroom
home
with
a
total
floor
area
of
1512
square
feet.
The
project
was
reviewed
by
the
Architectural
Review
Committee
at
their
August
13
2015
meeting
at
that
meeting,
the
Architectural
Review
Committee
for
did
the
project
on
to
the
Planning
Commission,
with
several
minor
staff
recommendations.
J
Really
they
included,
updates
to
the
plans
such
as
relocating
the
front
property
line
in
relation
to
back
edges
sidewalk.
In
this
particular
instance,
the
front
property
line
begins
two
feet
from
back
edge
of
sidewalk,
including
the
detached
accessory
structure
of
the
site
plan
for
cooperating
a
basic
landscaping
plan,
as
well
as
indicating
the
existing
and
proposed
window
trim
and,
lastly,
incorporating
the
front
elevation
of
the
existing
single-family
home.
J
As
indicated
a
use
permit
is
required
because
the
existing
residence
would
be
expanded
by
fifty
percent
more
than
fifty
percent.
The
proposal
does
meet
all
other
development
standards,
including
floor
area
lot,
coverage
setback
and
height
requirements.
Staff
finds
that
the
basic
that
the
addition
conforms
to
the
basic
requirements
of
the
residential
design
guidelines.
We
find
that
it's
really
continuing
the
simple
building
form.
It
is
a
527
square
foot
once
too,
in
addition
to
the
rear
of
an
existing
one
story
home.
J
Additionally,
we
do
find
it
it's
consistent
with
the
design
and
scale
of
the
overall
neighborhood,
which
primarily
consists
of
one
story:
single-family
homes
with
some
to
family
or
two
story.
Homes
in
the
immediate
neighborhood
Steph
did
send
the
required
legal
notice
on
august
or
excuse
me
october,
9
2015,
and
we
have
not
received
any
comments
regarding
the
proposal
staff.
Would
recommend
that
we
approved
that
the
Planning
Commission
approve
the
use
permit
subject
to
findings
1
through
6
and
conditions
of
approval?
One
through
28
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
have.
Thank
you.
I
J
I
Not
that
it's
going
to
affect
this
particular
homeowner,
but
is
there
any
any
way
that
in
the
in
the
future,
something
like
this
wouldn't
have
to
trigger
a
use
permit
if
every
other
guideline
is
met,
I
mean
this
is
well
below
any
other
thresholds
that
we
have
for
lot
coverage
pretty
much
everything
I
think
it's
from
my
standpoint.
It's
just
I
think
it's
a
little
tough
on
the
homeowner
to
have
to
be
here,
because
it's
a
fifty-four
percent
increase
and
that
triggered
used.
B
The
through
the
chair,
if
I,
could
comment
and
respond
to
Commissioner
salutes
comments
about
this
application.
The
current
code
requires
that
this
comes
forward
to
you
for
consideration.
By
way
of
a
use.
Permit,
we
don't
disagree.
In
fact,
there
are
a
number
of
items
that
currently
trigger
use
permits
that
we're
going
to
bring
forward
to
the
City
Council
at
a
study
session,
as
we
work
on
our
new
zoning
code-
and
this
is
actually
one
of
them
were.
B
B
C
K
Commissioners,
man
is
having
a
solos
and
I'm
the
applicant
for
this
project
to
answer
mission.
Some
boats
question.
In
this
particular
case.
It
was
something
so
minor
and
the
only
reason
was
in
order
for
us
to
retain
one
of
the
existing
bedrooms.
We
had
to
do
kind
of
a
cut
out
to
the
addition,
those
us
having
to
add
a
little
bit
more
to
the
side
of
the
addition
and
adding
you
know
that
increases
by
four
percent
as
I
understand
the
next
project
on
today's
agenda.
K
It's
a
similar
cases,
hours
they're,
just
increasing
like
by
four
per
cents
on
my
new,
and
they
meet
everything
else.
So
I
think
that
commercial.
So
much
has
a
very
good
point.
Having
said
that,
like
I
said
of
project
is
a
really
small
addition
to
the
rear.
One
story:
I
think
it's
very
much
in
compliance
with
the
development
in
that
whole
area
and
again,
the
only
reason
why
we
went
beyond
the
threshold
of
fifty
percent
was
in
order
to
allow
that
bedroom
to
continue
in
existence
at
the
existing
bedroom.
E
A
K
That's
an
existing
door,
that's
there!
If
that
would
be
one
of
the
issues
that
Mike
that
the
Commission
after
we
consider
this,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
the
owners
question
here,
we
could
close
it
up.
There's
another
door
in
the
front
of
garage
to
enter
into
the
kitchen
directly
yeah
I!
Think
that's
more
of
a
utility
door.
Just
in
case
you
have
a
lot
more,
whatever
you
bring
it
into
the
backyard
rather
than
having
to
walk
all
the
way
around
to
the
front
of
the
garage.
E
A
A
K
A
K
K
D
The
the
recommendation
by
the
Architectural
Review
Committee
says
include
a
basic
landscaping
plan
that
identifies
existing
and
proposed
landscaping,
and
this
identifies
existing
and
proposed
the
plan
that
that
shows
a
denim
existing
and
proposed
landscaping,
except
other
than
saying
it's
grass
and
small
plants.
It
doesn't
say
where,
or
what
kind
and
a
basic
landscaping
plan.
K
A
J
J
J
B
Through
the
chair,
if
I
could
add,
it
looks
like
in
terms
of
the
dimensional
call-outs
that
it's
indicated
to
be
11
feet,
I,
think
from
from
curb,
including
the
planting
strip
and
the
sidewalk
Commissioner
Peterson.
What
we
can
do
and
be
happy
to
do
this.
We
can
take
a
look
at
this
site
plan
diagram,
I'm
sure
that
our
associate
planner.
We
can
work
with
the
designer
and
review
this
and
make
sure
for
the
records
that
the
call-outs
are
accurate,
including
the
North
arrow.
So
we'll
be
happy
to
do
that.
I
appreciate.
D
That
the
other
concern
that
I
had
is
that
the
lines
are
all
drawn
with
an
interesting
fuzzy
kind
of
line
which
I
hadn't,
seen
in
computerized
architecture
or
by
hand
and
then
I
started
so
I
started,
checking
some
of
the
dimensions
and
things
like
the
North,
arrow
and
I
wasn't
getting
confirmation
that
they
appeared
reasonable.
So
you
might
take
a
look
at
the
drawings.
That
was
that's
my
basic
thought
behind
these
questions,
but
I
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you
and.
B
Through
the
chair,
if
I
could
add
another
comment,
Commissioner
Peterson
had
a
concern
about
the
level
of
landscape
plans,
I
think
that
were
submitted
this
evening
and
in
terms
of
condition
number
nine.
It
basically
refers
to
plans
submitted
to
the
Planning
Commission
this
evening
and
that
those
would
be
the
plans
that
would
be
considered
for
approval.
B
I
would
suggest
that
you
may
have
noticed
at
our
last
City
Council
meeting
councilmember
Irene
O'connell
presented
some
xeriscaping
plans
that
were
quite
excellent
about
what
people
here
in
this
community
have
done
in
terms
of
landscape
treatments,
and
we
have
a
copy
of
her
powerpoint.
We
would
be
happy
to
work
with
the
applicant
and
work
with
the
applicant
to
modify
and
maybe
improve
on
these
plans,
to
a
point
that
they
could
be
prepared
say
to
the
community
development
directors.
Satisfaction
that
would
give
us
an
opportunity
to
work
directly
with
the
Apple.
B
C
A
A
All
right,
I
remember
c5c-
is
14
bayshore
circle,
so
request
for
use
for
me
to
allow
the
construction
of
a
600
square
foot
addition
which
increases
tickle
the
gross
floor
area
of
the
existing
home
by
greater
than
fifty
percent
and
to
enlarge
the
covered
parking
area
to
over
600
square
feet,
902,
which
is
currently
to
cut
I'm.
Sorry
too,
over
600
square
feet,
four
sections,
12
point:
200.0,
30,
p,
1
and
12
point
200.0
80
be
at
3b
staff
report.
Please
thank.
J
You,
as
indicated
the
applicant,
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
expand
the
existing
residence
by
greater
than
fifty
percent
and
to
enlarge
the
covered
parking
area
to
be
over
600
square
feet.
Site
is
located
on
the
north
side
of
bayshore
circle
and
is
currently
developed
with
a
one-story
single-family
dwelling.
The
existing
home
contains
two
bedrooms:
one
bathroom
a
living
room,
family
room
kitchen
and
an
attached
320
square
foot
garage.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
construct
a
detached
garage
in
the
rear
yard.
J
J
New
curb
cut
is
proposed
along
the
Eastern
property
line,
which
would
provide
access
to
the
proposed
garage
project
was
reviewed
by
the
Architectural
Review
Committee
in
August
and
the
architecture
review
committee
for
those
plans
on
to
the
Planning
Commission
with
a
favorable
recommendation,
and
there
were
a
number
of
staff
recommendations
and
there's
two
architectural
recommendations
and
one
was
to
incorporate
windows
along
the
upper
portion
of
the
garage
doors
and
the
second
was
to
incorporate
two
additional
windows
along
the
rear
elevation.
The
applicant
has
updated
the
plans
according
to
these
recommendations.
J
As
stated,
the
project
requires
a
use
permit
as
the
addition
results
in
a
50-percent
expansion
and
the
amount
of
proposed
covered
parking
exceeds
600
square
feet.
The
proposal
meets
all
other
development
standards
of
the
zoning
district,
including
FA
our
slot
coverage,
setbacks
and
height
requirements.
Staff
does
find
that
the
proposal
is
consistent
with
a
residential
design
guidelines
and,
if
you
look
throughout
the
guidelines,
there's
there's
a
lot
of
language.
Discussing
we're
emphasizing
to
reduce
the
visual
impacts
of
garages
really
be
emphasized.
J
The
garage
and
in
this
particular
instance,
staff
finds
that
the
applicant
has
incorporated
a
number
of
design
measures
to
really
de-emphasize
the
garage.
Most
importantly,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
locate
this
garage
72
feet
back
from
the
front
property
line.
Additionally,
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
the
garage
is
broken
into
two
different
segments.
One
segment
would
contain
a
one-car
garage
with
a
garage
door
measuring
8
feet
wide.
The
second
segment
would
contain
the
two-car
garage
door
measuring
16
feet
wide.
J
D
D
J
Should
not
have
been
included
in
the
staff
report?
That
item
was
addressed
at
the
Architectural
Review
Committee,
and
the
applicant
indicated
that
the
area
direct
above
the
garage
is
going
to
be
used
for
storage,
so
staff
essentially
indicated
that
a
floor
plan
was
not
necessary
for
that
specific
area.
Thank
you.
Welcome.
I
J
J
J
Rather
the
guidelines,
the
residential
design
guidelines
talk
about
de-emphasizing,
the
garage
as
staff
finds
that,
with
the
location
of
the
proposed
garage
being
located,
72
feet
from
packages
from
front
property
line
and
with
some
of
the
architectural
elements
that
have
been
incorporated,
that
they
really
are
de-emphasizing.
The
garage
in
this
particular
case,
but.
I
It's
still
part
of
the
use
and
permit,
even
though
it's
not
part
of
the
front
facade
of
the
house.
It's
all
the
way
in
the
back
and
it's
you're
really
taking
a
lot
of
cars
off
the
street
between
the
size
of
that
garage
and
a
length
of
that
driveway
and
and
the
existing
garage
that
still
triggers
it.
They
use
permit
correct,
correct,
okay
in.
D
I
D
Throw
a
little
light
on
this
600-foot
garage
issue
a
number
of
years
ago
say
at
least
exceeding
ten
years.
There
was
a
garage
space
created
in
the
you
know
home
plan
to
put
a
garage
space
in
a
home
in
the
north
west
of
san
bruno,
and
it
receives
such
concern
among
the
community
that
the
council
asked
this
part
of
the
ordinance
that
restricts
the
size
and
garages
and
general.
The
general
concern
was.
D
C
E
J
So
we
did
remove
some
of
our
standard
public
services
conditions,
but
the
ones
that
are
included
within
the
staff
report
are
required
per
the
Municipal
Code,
so
a
tree
tree
planting
is
required
for
this
specific
project.
Additionally,
these
are
our
standard
conditions
of
approval
from
the
fire
department,
so
they
would
be
requesting
if
the
smoke
detectors
are
not
hardwired,
that
they
would
be
as
a
result
of
this
project.
So.
G
J
That's
the
applicants
intense.
In
fact,
the
applicant
recently
obtained
a
building
permit
to
do
a
number
of
interior
modifications,
as
well
as
exterior
modifications
where
they
replace
the
existing
finish
on
the
home
with
horizontal
board
and
the
intent
is
to
match
that
existing
finish
in
color.
Thank
you.
A
Question
I
just
what
a
state
for
the
record
at
the
opportunity
to
visit
the
property
I
did
see
a
new
roof,
new
gutters
new
styling
new
materials,
and
it
was
completely
modern
and
up-to-date.
So
I
would
expect
that
they
were
going
to
be
indicated
to
me
that
they
would
match.
The
existing,
however,
will
certainly
bring
the
applicant
up
and
they'll
speak
to
that.
But
I
wanted
to
my
peers
to
know
that
I
actually
did
see
the
newness
of
that
project.
A
L
L
We
definitely
put
a
lot
of
money
into
the
renovation,
as
Commissioner
Johnson
just
said,
for
the
garage
we
plan
to
match
the
siding
to
the
house.
The
roof
will
be
matching.
This
it'll
be
the
same.
The
same
tiles
it'll
be
a
major
improvement.
It's
you
know
we're
definitely
a
focal
point
for
the
transit
corridor
plan.
I
mean
we
are
literally
across
the
street
from
bart.
So
when
you
look
across
the
street,
it's
our
property
that
you
see
and
it's
completely
transformed
so
with
the
garage
being
so
far,
setback
I
understand.
L
You
know
the
concern
of
having
such
a
big
garage
along
with
the
house.
It's
just
it's
gonna
work.
The
property
is
huge,
it's
8,400
square
feet,
so
we
have
where
passion
is
gardening.
We
have
drought,
tolerant
plants
and
everything.
We
are
our
lawn
that
we
had
before.
We
started
the
project
of
the
renovation
was
weeds,
but
we
kept
it
mowed
and
trimmed
and
we'll
be
pulling
all
of
that
out
and
doing
a
complete
drought,
tolerant,
landscape
and
continuing
to
plant
drought,
tolerant
in
the
back.
L
A
D
B
So
chair
Johnson
and
planning
commissioners,
first
I'd
like
to
just
invite
three
volunteers
for
our
architects
review
committee
meeting
in
November
and
at
that
meeting,
we're
tentatively
looking
at
bringing
the
hotel
project
the
crossing
hotel
project
forward
at
that
meeting.
So
I
think
what
you're
going
to
notice
is
that
over
the
next
few
months
and
ongoing
some
larger,
more
substantial
projects
are
going
to
start
coming
before
the
Planning
Commission,
for
example,
at
your
next
planning
commission
meeting
on
November.
B
Third-
and
please
remember
the
next
meeting-
is
the
first
Tuesday
November
third,
we're
planning
to
bring
forward
to
you
a
medical
office
building
that
841
san
bruno
avenue
west.
So
I
think
that
over
the
next
few
months
that
medical
office
building
the
hotel
project,
the
zoning
code
project
climate
action
plan
and
Paul
Bradley
has
been
working
on
the
walk
and
bike
plan.
So
a
number
of
a
larger
may
be
more
interesting.
Projects
are
going
to
be
coming
your
way
and
I
think
you
know.
B
Commissioner
salutes
comments
tonight
about
a
couple
of
items
on
the
agenda
are
acknowledged
and
in
fact,
in
terms
of
the
listing
of
items
that
require
use
permits.
Currently,
for
the
Planning
Commission
to
consider
the
two
we
had
tonight
are
among
several
that
actually
will
be
bringing
forward
to
the
City
Council
to
get
their
feedback
in
terms
of
as
we
work
on
the
new
zoning
code.
Update
are
those
items,
the
600
square,
foot,
garage
or
larger.
The
fifty
percent
expansion
expansion
of
FA
are
below
should
say
above
a
certain
level.
B
A
number
of
other
items
are
those
items
that
either
we
should
be
looking
at
the
thresholds
or
perhaps
delegate
to
staff
or
an
administrative
review,
so
that'll
be
part
of
our
discussion
with
council
and
then
part
of
work
on
the
zoning
code
update
over
the
next
few
months.
But
right
now,
if
we
can
get
three
volunteers
for
the
upcoming
architecture
review
committee
meeting
on
on
the
12,
so
we've
got
chair
Johnson.
We
have
Commissioner,
bsod
and
Commissioner
some
mood.
Thank
you
and
I
think
that's
it
for
staff.
A
D
With
a
this
evening
of
staff
reports,
I
looked
at
them
and,
as
I
read
the
first
one
I
looked
for
the
information
I
usually
expect
to
find,
and
it
wasn't
where
I
was
looking.
I
found
that,
on
closer
examination,
the
report
staff
report
format
in
tonight's
packet
has
changed
in
literally
dozens
of
ways
from
the
previous
20
or
30
years,
which
has
had
the
same
report.
Format
and
I
have
some
questions
about
that.
B
You
know
if
I
could-
maybe
maybe
I
could
just
you
know,
talk
to
you
a
little
bit
about
that.
As
a
commission,
I
think
is.
Is
we
looked
at
that
format
that
we've
been
using?
There
are
a
number
of
redundancies.
In
fact
we
found
you
know.
Whole
sections
were
repeated,
sometimes
two
or
three
times
so
that
the
general
direction
and
objective
was
to
try
to
make
sure
that
the
Commission
and
public
would
have
the
information
that
you
would
need,
but
not
repeated,
two
or
three
times
as
we
found
the
prior
format
to
have.
B
D
Sure
the
the
issues
that
I
see
with
this
change
in
format,
if
repetition
were
concerned,
I
think
it
would
be
simply
addressed
by
indicating
on
the
staff
template
where
to
put
the
data
that
you
would
like
best,
but
the
issues
I
have
or
that
multiple
changes
in
the
format
makes
comparison
with
past
reports
very
difficult.
That's
if
you
were
looking
at
a
one
report
and
you
want
to
compare
it
to
a
similar
case
from
the
past.
These
changes
can
be
confusing
to
commissioners,
familiar
with
the
format.
D
C
D
The
changes
actually
detract
from
the
redeveloped
readability
of
the
report
when
looking
for
specific
data
and
there's
no
clear
reason
for
any
of
the
changes.
Thus
value
is
lost
with
the
changes.
Now
you
point
out,
something
I
didn't
realize
that
you
feel
there's
repetition,
but
I'd
like
to
pass
out
an
analysis
that
shows
in
one
column
where
the
data
is
found
in
the
in
the
traditional
report,
format
and
another.
That
shows
where
the
is
in
a
new
format
and
that,
because
of
those
changes,
the
data
is
drastically
rearranged
throughout
the
report.
B
That
would
be
great
we'd
be
happy
to
receive
that
might
make
a
recommendation.
I
think
that,
in
terms
of
trying
to
develop
a
improve
format,
we
would
be
more
than
happy
to
work
with,
say
account.
Come
Commission
subcommittee,
for
example,
perhaps
chair
Johnson.
If
you
would
like
to
consider,
maybe
appointing
a
couple
of
commissioners
to
work
with
staff
on
this
I.
Think
again,
as
we
looked
at
the
prior
format,
there
were
quite
a
few
redundancies,
and
the
objective
really
is
to
really
improve
I.
Don't
know
that
we
need
to
stay
with
something.
That's
you
know.
B
D
D
D
A
Before
we
go
in
that
direction,
I
wanted
to
state
that
the
planning
of
their
City
Council
had
requested
that
we
align
ourselves
with
their
report.
At
one
point,
we
had
a
column
I,
absolutely
really
liked
that
you
can
write
notes
about
what
might
have
happened,
but
they
wanted
the
format
to
be
the
same
as
their
meeting.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we
take
that
in
consideration
that
we
don't
make
such
change
that
we're
not
in
meeting
their
request.
So
is
there
anyone
here
that
would
like
to
be
on
that
committee?
It's
just
urging
I'll.
A
C
B
I
So
I
had
three
items:
I'd
just
like
to
bring
it
up,
but
and
the
first
of
course
being
that
I,
like
the
new
format.
Oh,
will
scratch
that
that's
the
second
that
First
Avenue
adjacent
to
the
BART
tracks,
where
the
new
sidewalk
vegetation
has
been
planted.
I
don't
know
who's
responsible
now
for
the
vegetation
there,
but
it
is
it's
mostly
wheat
right
now
and
I
I'm,
not
sure
if
that's
a
san
bruno
item
or
a
part
item,
but
it
just
looks
bad.
I
B
Did
and
why
don't
we
do
this,
we'll
look
into
it
and
determine
what
we
can
do
to
try
to
improve
that
situation.
I
know
that
there's
been
discussions
back
and
forth
between
the
caltrain
samtrans
group
and
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
but
let
me
check
in
with
public
services
and
others
that
maybe
are
working
more
closely
with
that
matter
and
see
if
we
can
improve
that
condition
out
there
and
we'll
report
back
to
you
well.
I
You
don't
have
to
report
back
to
me
just
as
pitino
sauce,
it's
gonna
get
taken
care
of.
I
don't.
I
don't
need
to
I'll
see
it.
I
mean
okay,
I
want
to
have
to
hear
about
it
and
the
third
thing
is-
and
you
know
David
and
you
and
I
had
spoken
once
about
dead
pine
trees
along
the
tracks.
Yes,
on
the
southern
side
of
Huntington
mm-hmm,
there
are
and
thank
you've
taken
care
of
that
those
got
taken
care
of
quickly
get
down
and
removed.
I
There
are
probably
eight
to
ten
more
that
are
just
probably
at
the
beginning
of
San
Antonio
Avenue,
just
at
at
the
end
Huntington
there
there's
maybe
eight
to
ten
more
and
some
of
them
now
are
dropping
limbs
and
it
just
hate
to
have
one
of
those
things
fall
over
into
the
street
or
on
a
car
on
somebody.
So
if
you
could
work
your
magic
on
that
and
have
somebody
take
a
look,
absolutely.
A
D
Like
to
second
Commissioner
moose
comments
on
First
Avenue,
but
focus
also
on
the
condition
of
the
pavement,
the
heavy
construction
equipment
that
moves
through
there
was
continuously
moving
and
heavy
equipment.
The
kind
of
equipment
that
I
don't
see
how
a
city
street
can
take
that
kind
of
loading
and
remain
in
good
repair.
Surprise,
it's
not
in
good
repair,
and
it
would
think,
seemed
to
me
that
the
city
would
ask
caltrain
to
address
that.
B
A
G
E
About
a
year
ago,
we
had
a
list
of
about
six
or
eight
items
that
the
fine
department
was
falling
off
for
us
and
I'd
like
to
revive
that
list
and
find
out
what
happened
to
those
eight
items,
one
of
them
being
the
the
white
way.
One
way
streets
behind
the
liver
that
was
forwarded
to
the
TSP,
see
I'd
like
to
know
what
happened
to
that.
There
are
six
other
items
that
I
can
probably
dig
up,
but
I'm
sure
you
have
that
list
I'd
like
to
see
that
list
every
three
months
to
make
sure
moving
forward.
E
A
Well,
on
a
positive
note,
I
want
to
indicate
that
my
business
is
located
right
on
that
street
right
where
becomes
Huntington
in
San
Antonio,
practically
so
I
travel
that
every
single
day.
So
on
the
positive
side,
I
want
to
indicate
that
the
construction
team
and
many
times
it's
the
city
of
san
bruno
trucks,
clean
up
or
thorough,
make
note
of
all
construction
dates
and
times
and
follow
up
to
be
sure.
That's
all
clean
up
afterwards.
I
really
want
to
at
least
acknowledge
that
that
part
of
it.
A
G
A
And
lastly,
I
want
to
report
on
and
I
have
the
opportunity
on
your
behalf
as
commissioners
reporting
to
the
City
Council.
The
activity
of
this
past
year
it
was
set.
I
was
excellent
report
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
or
the
good
job
that
they
did
side
up
with
the
thanks
for
a
cipher
just
a
second,
but
it
was
really
a
pleasure
to
make
that
report
to
the
City
Council
and
to
the
audience
that
was
there
to
see
the
work.
That's
been
done
on
the
behalf.
A
All
of
us
is
past
year,
knowing
that
there
are
amazing
projects
coming
up
taking
place,
just
incredible
to
see
our
city,
it's
worth
a
very
pivotal
point
and
right
now
sembrano
is
about
location,
location,
location
and
people.
We
were
a
bedroom
community
for
many
years
of
certain
escape
on
this
committee.
I
was
commissioned
rather
for
25
years,
and
the
action
over
the
past
few
years
is
incredible.
A
I'm,
looking
forward
to
the
changes
we
have
excellent
thinkers
and
within
our
city
and
within
our
Commission,
things
get
done
and
without
creating
a
lot
of
high,
because
I've
been
Twitter
Commission
meetings
and
we're
moving
forward
for
the
best
of
the
city
and
I
want
to
thank
the
Commission
for
the
good
work
they
do,
and
they
also
want
to
thank
the
staff.
I
really
want
to
acknowledge
each
one
of
you
for
the
work
that
you
do,
keep
it
under
pressure.
A
You've
been
short-staffed,
you've
been
stretched
and
I
know
that
you've
been
given
feedback
on
reports
and
now
that
it
wasn't
warranted.
But
you
you,
you
know
it.
You
did
it
and
the
best
that
you
could
under
the
conditions
that
were
out
of
your
control.
So
looking
back
at
that
year,
each
one
of
you
have
done
an
amazing
job
and
I
wanted
to
publicly
recognize
you
for
that
good
work
and,
and
also
Michael
your
brush
coming
on.
A
Community
developer
wall
routines
a
mouthful
for
me
sometimes
I
example.
On
that
whole,
look
at
all
those
words
you
really
want
to.
Thank
you
for
your
leadership
and
I
had
I
know.
I,
probably
embarrassed
him
a
little
bit
of
that
meeting,
but
I
wanted
people
to
know
that
he
does
the
little
things
behind
the
scenes
that
a
lot
of
people
would
not
do,
and
he
acknowledges
those
that
there
was
events
going
on.