►
From YouTube: JAN 11, 2021 | Charter Review Commission
Description
City of San José, California
Charter Review Commission of January 11, 2021
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=830903&GUID=206B1258-047A-47AD-B506-E802E918A956
A
A
A
I'm
checking
attendees
just
to
make
sure
he
didn't
pop
over
the
case..
I
only
have
one
absent
so
go
and
raise
your
right
hand.
and
I'm.
If
I
can't
hear
you
as
long
as
I
see
your
mouth
moving,,
that's
ok..
So
if
you
want
to,
you
can
stay
mute
because
it's
going
to
be
kind
of
crazy.,
but
I
will
be
looking
at
all
of
your
pictures.
So
I
state
your
name,
my
home.
I
already.
I
only
do
solemnly
swear.
to
support
and
defend.
G
G
we're
going
to
be
starting
with
introductions
of
each
other
just
so
that
we
can
continue
to
see
faces
and
names
and
understand
kind
of
who's
in
who's,
in
the
room
to
be
able
to
work
together
over
the
next
few
months
and
we're
then
going
to
have
an
overview
of
the
brownout..
So
all
of
us
to
then
work
for
public,
elected
or
public
offices
understand
that
we
have
transparency..
So
our.
G
What
do
we
as
commissioners
expect
to
do
in
this
set
of
work,
and
we
want
to
hear
from
everyone
around
what
your
expectation
are
as
we
come
to
understand,
how
do
we
want
to
work
together
to
be
the
most
effective
as
we
prepare
recommendations
for
city
council?,
we
will
then
hear
if
there
is
anyone
to
make
comments
from
the
public.
and
then
finally
we're
going
to
talk
about
logistics
around
meeting
schedules,
timing,
the.
G
G
Was
appointed
by
the
mayor,
so
I
represent
the
full
city
and
was
asked
by
the
mayor
to
chair
this
commission,
which
I
just
consider
such
a
high
honor
and
a
real
pleasure
to
work
with
all
of
you..
I
really
I'm
very
excited
to
be
able
to
do
that
tonight..
What
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
do
is
introduce
yourself
with
your
name.
If
you
have
any
like
my
last
name
is
forever
and
everyone
always
mispronounce
it..
So
did
you
have
a
name
that
folks
mispronounce??
G
Please
feel
free
to
make
sure
that
we're
clear
and
please
correct
us
if
we
don't
say
your
name
correctly,
so
that
we
can
learn
the
proper
pronunciation
of
everyone's
name..
The
district
that
you're
representing
and
one
hope
at
the
end
of
this
process
finish
the
step,
the
statement
that
says,
I
hope
that
fill
in
the.
G
Statement.,
if
everyone
could
spend
less
than
a
minute
in
your
introduction,,
what
are
the
things
that
I'm
going
to
be
doing
and
I'm
gonna
ask
our
consultants
to
do
is
help
us
with
the
timing
so
that
we
work
expeditiously..
We
move
through
things
quickly..
We
want
everyone
to
be
heard..
We
want
everyone
to
have
kind
of
an
equal
say
in
any
conversation
they
want.,
but
we
also
don't
want
to
spend
all
night
doing
things
that
we
just
don't
need
to
spend
a
ton
of
time
on..
G
So
tonight
we're
going
to
practice
everyone
introduce
themselves
by
their
name,
their
district
and
fill
in
the
statement
at
the
end
of
this
process..
I
hope
that
and
do
that
in
less
than
a
minute
and
we'll
walk
through
toni..
I
think
I'm
gonna
ask
you
to
call
roll
again,
because
I
think
it
will
just
be
faster
for
us
to
do
that,
if
you
will
.
again,,
we'll
start
arbor.
A
I
I
Many
things
I
think
that
are
clear
in
this
moment
in
our
country,
and
one
of
them,
is
that
the
rules
of
how
we
make
decisions
as
a
democracy
have
tremendous
implications
for
for
winners
and
losers
and
access
and
transparency
and
faith
in
government.,
and
we
get
to
do
something
about
that
here
in
san
jose..
So
I
hope
we
we
live.
F
Evening
everyone.
chandra
go
by,
rick.
for
those
of
you
that
know
me,.
You
can
call
me
and
rico
rick.
I'll
respond
to
both..
I
live
in
district
7
appointed
by
esparza,
and
I
hope
that
whatever
changes
that
we
ultimately
make
to
recommend
counsel
make
for
a
better
inclusive
and
transparent
city
of
san
jose.,
thanks,
rick.
K
F
F
L
L
C
C
We'll
be
engaged
in
the
interest
enough
to
share
our
thoughts
with
one
or
two
of
our
friends
or
family
members
and
we'll
start
a
domino
effect
where
they
add
there
and
tell
other
people
about
the
work
we're
doing,
and
we
kind
of
let
light
a
fire
in
terms
of
the
renewed
civic.
And
then
it
was
a
like
you.
linda,
was
that.
M
G
D
It
is
just
too
just
like
barbara
was
saying.
I
really
hope
we
feel
good
about
the
recommendations
at
the
end
of
this
that
we've
really
put
in
the
time..
I
we're
all
volunteers
that
we've
really
put
in
the
time
and
the
research
both
to
educate
ourselves
and
each
other
and
that
we're
very
open
minded
to
each
others.
Research
and
points.
E
E
N
F
H
E
G
G
G
At
this
time,
I'm
going
to
ask
toni
tabor,
the
city
clerk
to
go
over
and
review
with
us
the
brown
act,
which
is
the
sunshine
laws
in
the
state
of
california,
that
we
will
be
operating
under.
and
if
you
have
questions-
or
you
have
specific
things
that
you
have
questions
on,,
you
certainly
can
ask
toni
afterwards.,
but
I'm
going
to
ask
her
to
do
her
overview.,
let's
take
about
15
minutes
for
her
to
do
the
overview
view
on
the
brown
act,
.
toni
ok..
So
I
will
probably.
A
Talk
a
little
fast
partially
because
I've
done
this
a
lot
and
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
glide
through
some
of
these
things
like
frequently
use
terms
or
a
commission
secretary.,
that's
the
person
that
we'll
be
attending
to
take
notes.
Currently,
that's
I
have
hired
somebody
for
your
commission
that
will
be
starting
at
the
end
of
this
month,
so
you
will
be
getting
your
own
dedicated
staff
person..
Just
a
couple
things
to
make
sure
you
guys
know
a
quorum
is
half
plus
1.
We
cannot
meet
unless
we
have
at
least
11
people..
A
A
You
vote
on
is
requires
an
affirmative
vote
of
the
majority
present
so
well
when
you're
actually
voting
on
things
we'll
go
over
that
more.
If
we
get
close.
brown
act.,
this
is
the
most
important
part..
All
meetings
must
be
open
to
the
public..
I
will
be
having
the
q
and
a
and
chat
disabled
for
your
next
meeting,
because
that
brown
act
does
not
allow
you
to
talk
amongst
each
other
amongst
yourselves
during
the
meeting
that
includes
chatting.,
so
the
brown
act
was
created
in
1953..
A
A
Is
a
meeting
or
meeting
is
when
a
majority
of
the
commissioners
are
present
at
the
same
time
and
place
to
hear,
discuss,
deliberate
or
take
action
on
something
that
is
when
the
commission,
within
the
commission's
subject
matter
jurisdiction..
I
want
to
emphasize
this
that
no
action
has
to
be
taken
in
order
for
this
to
be
considered
a
meeting,
a
hearing,
discussion
or
deliberation
triggers
brown
act,
open
meeting
requirements,
for
example.
Tonight
we're
not
taking
any
decisions,
but
it
still
needs
to
be
a
public.
We
noticed
open
meeting..
This
makes
it
also
sound.
A
A
Words
not
only
answered
questions
should
be
viewable,
but
I
am
deleting
them
as
they
pop
up..
Thank
you
person
who
was
spamming
us
I'd,
remove
them
from
the
meeting..
What
is
not
a
meeting?,
a
majority
of
commissioners
can
attend
social
ceremonial,
occasions,
conferences
and
community
forums
and
other
government
bodies,
as
long
as
they
do
not
discuss
business..
That
would
come
before
the
commission.-
so,
yes,
you
can
all
attend
council
meetings
and
county
board
meetings..
Just
don't
hang
out
and
talk
about
commission
business.
A
Under
the
act
there
are
prohibited
meetings.
A
majority
of
us
cannot
use
a
cell
phone.,
telephone.,
fax.,
email.
text,
message.
human
areas
or
other
means
to
discuss
deliberate
or
develop
a
consensus.
A
or
a
decision
on
any
item
of
business
is
within
the
commission's
subject
matter:
jurisdiction..
This
discussion
should
occur
in
jeopardized
public
meeting..
An
email
is
another
tricky
area
and
we'll
talk
about
that
next.,
so
secret.
A
Meetings
prohibited
meetings
include
serial
meetings..
These
are
a
series
of
meetings
to
discuss,
deliberate
or
take
action.,
each
of
which
involves
less
than
a
majority
but
which
taken
together
involve
a
majority
of
commissioners,
for
example,
in
a
daisy
chain
and
a
five
member
board.
three
is
a
majority.
A
april
talks
to
bill
bill
text,
chris
his
own
position
and
alan's
position.
Bronek
violation
occurred
because,
even
though
each
communication
involves
less
than
a
majority
of
the
members
overall,
it
involves
contact
among
a
majority
of
the
members.
In
this
case,
even
though
she
was
violating
the
brown
act.,
so
you
can
actually
violate
it
and
it's
no
fault
of
your
own..
A
A
A
A
A
Discuss
items
that
are
not
in
the
posted
agenda.,
the
commission
should
also
not
take
action
if
the
item
has
not
energized
for
action
or
possible.
Action.
commissioners
can
comment
on
certain
un
agendas
as
long
as
there
is
no
disruption
or
action.
briefly
responding
to
public
asking
a
question
for
clarification,
referring
item
to
staff
or
future
meeting
report
by
commissioner
or
his
or
her
activities
and
brief
announcements.
When
you
have
members
of
the
public
you
let
them
speak
for
their
two
minutes
and
then
move
on..
There
is
no
dialog.
public
comment
is.
A
When
you
let
the
public
comment
on
something
that
is
within
your
subject
matter,
jurisdiction.,
there's
two
different
kinds
of
public
comment..
First
agenda
items
like
approval
of
work
plan
after
hearing
the
staff's
presentation,
but
before
a
vote
there
is
an
opportunity
for
public
comment..
Second,
is
public
comment
section
of
the
agenda?
That's
listed
on
the
agenda
as
open
forum..
So
what.
A
Can
you
do
with
them??
You
can
refer
the
speaker
to
staff..
You
can
refer
the
speaker
to
appropriate
reference
materials..
You
can
request
the
staff
to
report
back
at
a
future
meeting
or
direct
the
staff
to
place
matter
on
a
future
agenda..
This
is
not
a
time
to
debate
the
public
speaker
or
engage
in
a
question
and
answer
period..
This
part.
A
A
A
The
revolving
door,
restrictions
and
parliamentary
procedures.
all
of
these
are
available
on
the
brown
act
or
the
boards
commissions
training
online..
This
whole
presentation
has
been
recorded
so
after
this
meeting
the
link
to
that
that
boards
and
commissions
training
for
you
all
to
watch
on
your
own
time..
It's
not
very
long.
A
I
A
Act
does
apply
to
everything
we
do
in
the
state.,
so
any
e-mail
that
you
sent
me
our
public
records
and
people
can
request
them..
So
that
is
something
like
I'm
used
to
it
because
I've
been
a
public
servant
for
many
years.,
so
I'm
used
to..
I
know
if
I
type
it
in
an
email,
it's
gonna
be
a
public
record..
So
just
be
mindful
that
your
communication.,
I
should
cover
the
camera..
Sorry,
I'm
used
to
you
stepping
off
camera..
You
should
be
just
be
mindful
when
you
communicate
with
each
other
and
with
me
you.
A
A
A
A
A
Don't
tend
to
do
the
same
thing
or
as
counsel.
we'll
get
together
and
submit
a
memo..
You
don't
see
the
boards
of
commissions
very
often,
however..
That's
if
that's
how
you
guys
want
to
do
things
here.
what
we
can
do
another
little
lesson
to
make
sure
you
don't
cross
the
line,
because
again
it's
that
the
daisy
chain,
where
you
say
you
talk
to
me.
A
And
then
jeremy
talks
to
tea
and
then
he
talks
to
you
guys
eventually
can
get
to
a
point
where
so
christina's
garrick
who's
going
to
talk
to
young.
So
it
can
get
rough
matty,
I'm
actually
with
twenty
three
of
you,
because
you
think
oh
I'm
well
under
the
eleven,
because
there's
so
many
people
and
the
next
thing
you
know
you
you've
got
this
huge
spider..
So
it's
just
something
have
to
be
really
careful..
We
want
everything
to
be
open
and
transparent..
There
are
cures.
A
A
A
Opinions.,
I
would
say,
like
I
think,
it's
better
to
just
keep
like
yes,
here's,
the
material.,
here's
the
link
to
the
website..
This
is
what
we
talked
about
last
week.,
but
just
be
really
careful
that
it
doesn't
look
like
you're
deliberate
with
other
people.
mo,
it.
It
can
be
tricky.
But
you
guys
we're
gonna,
have
a
lot
of
public
hearings
for
people
to
come
in
and
give
their
opinion
on
all
of
the
different
topics
that
you're
going
to
cover.
any
other.
A
A
G
G
I
think
he's
on
here.
good
sga..
It's
going
to
be
the
facilitator
of
a
lot
of
our
conversations.,
so
my
hope
I
didn't
get
to
take
my
turn,
but
my
hope
is
that
at
the
end
of
this
process,,
even
if
you
disagree
with
the
recommendation,
one
recommendation
or
another
that
you
don't
disagree
with
the
process
that
you
think
the
process
was
a
fair
and
equitable
process
and
the
recommendations.
G
lawrence
will
facilitate
conversations
and
some
of
the
discussions
we're
going
to
have
so
I
can
ask
him
to
introduce
himself
in
a
little
bit
about
civic
makers,
his
organization
and
then
we're
going
to
talk
about
our
expectations
that
we
have
for
how
we
want
to
work
together.
As
a
commission.-
so
lawrence,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
you
and
we're
gonna
have
about
just
a
quick.
P
Right.
thanks,
fred.
that
thrill
honor
to
be
here..
This
is
a
once
in
a
lifetime
opportunity
to
sit
with
a
bunch
of
residents
who
are
tasked
with
understanding
and
thinking
through
how
a
city
should
govern
itself..
So
really
proud
of
you
all
for
being
part
of
this
and
excited
support.
You
get.,
my
name
is
lawrence
francesca.,
I'm
one
of
the
founders
and
a
partner
in
a
firm
called
civic,
because
we
do
strategic
planning
management,
consulting
and
community
engagement,
work
for
cities,
muse
palaces
and
public
sector
agencies
around
the
bay
area..
P
P
Of
you
to
have
a
fair,
conversation,,
transparent,
conversation,,
an
equitable
conversation
where
you
want
to
echo
fred's
commitment
to
making
sure
everyone
feels
heard
and
feels
good
about
the
process
we
follow..
We
may
not
agree
on
everything,
but
we
all
should
agree
that
this
commission
followed
a
process
that
is
transparent
and
defensible
and
that
the
final
report
or
reports
that
we
deliver
to
the
city
council
that
you
deliver
to
the
city
council
are
a
product
of
process
over
the
next
months
that
we
all
feel
good
about
and
get
behind.
P
Even
if
we
don't
necessarily
agree
on
the
content
of
the
final
reports.,
so
I
will
be
stepping
in
in
moments
like
this
to
help
have
a
conversation.
So
it's
not
fred's.
freddie
will
have
his
own
opinions..
I
don't
have
an
opinion.,
I'm
just
here
to
support
yours.
so
that
being
said,,
I
also
want
introduce
my
colleague,
mary
l.
valentine,
who
is
here
somewhere.
she's,
going
to
be
taking
notes.
tony's
team
is
going
to
be
taking
action
minutes
which
are
the
more
kind
of
technical
legal
notes
that
the
city
has
to
post
for
the
public.
P
P
P
P
P
Respect
each
other
for
each
other
and
basically
align
around
a
process
and
a
focus
so
that
if
we
stray
down
the
road,,
if
other
things
come
up,,
if
things
get
a
little
untoward,
we're
able
to
pull
back
and
say
we
all
agreed
to
this
right
when
we
started
out
in
this
journey
together.,
so
we'd
like
to
jump
right
in
and
give
everyone
90
seconds
this
time
instead
60
seconds.,
we
all
did
such
a
great
job..
I
like
linda
and
I'm
very
proud
of
you
all
and
thankful
for
you
all
for
moving
along
this
front.
Again.
P
P
P
So
you
can
toggle
the
video
on
and
off.,
but
I
do
hope
that
while
you're
here
you're
able
to
be
present,
stay
off
your
phone,
stay
off
web
browsing
and
be
engaged
in
the
conversation,
because
these
conversations
will
be
fairly
detailed
and
kind
of
heady
and
philosophical
potentially..
So
that's
my
outsider
request
but
modeling
the
prompt..
So
I'm
just
gonna
go
down
the
list
here
of
participants,
toni,
australia
and.
P
E
F
F
F
P
P
P
B
H
H
So
that's
what
I
would
hope
would
happen.
Here.
and
you
know,
not
for
someone
to
just
dominate
the
conversation..
I've
had
a
lot
of
meetings
where
one
person
dominates
the
conversation.,
others
get
intimidated
to
share.
so..
So
that's
what
I'm
hoping.
everyone's
very
mindful
and
you
when
they,
when
they
do
share
that
others
might
want
to
share..
They
can
appreciate.
B
B
P
I
Terms
of
the
impact
of
the
future
sentence:
ave
maria
reference
that
in
her
introduction.
and
so
to
me,
that
means
we
look
far
and
wide
with
very
open
minds,
learn
about
practices
in
cities
across
the
country,
potentially
across
the
globe,
to
really
examine
what
it
is
going
to
take
to
achieve
more
accountability,
representation,
inclusion
in
santa
fe.,
those
actually
aren't
easy
things
to
do.
there.
You
see
things
to
say
and
not
do.
I
I
Commissioners,
as
well
as
you
know,,
the
questioning
of
the
staff
to
make
meetings
not
just
accessible
but
but
actively
reaching
out
to
members
of
the
public
to
engage
and
see,
and
especially
in
these
challenging
times,
we've
covid.
What
we
can
do
to
center
the
voices
of
the
folks
who,
who
perhaps
haven't
had
representation
and
that's
what
we're
seeking
to
remedy.
G
What
I
would
say
is
clarity,
like
I
expect
that
we
have
a
clear
agenda..
We
have
a
clear
task
in
front
of
us..
We
have
a
clear
picture
where
we're
going
and
if,
like
with
the
ended
mind
I
like
that.,
it's
like
real
clarity
about
the
process..
So
if
we've
got
a
good
map
to
get
us
from
here
to
recommendations.
G
That
includes
the
community
that
includes
public
input,.
Then
I
think
that
when
we
take
each
part,
we
then
have
a
good
sense
of
where
we're
going
as
opposed
to.
Why
are
we
talking
about
this,
like
that,
always
bugs
me
in
meetings.,
so
having
a
good
sense
of
clarity
of
what
the
map
looks
like.,
so
I
know
where
I
am
and
why
I
need
to
do
this
part
in
order
to
get
to
the
rest..
So
that's
my
hope
is
that
we
have
really
a
lot
of
good
clarity
in
all
our
work.
fantastic..
I'm
glad.
P
J
J
Really
interested
to
learn
other
people's
experiences
and
perspectives,
because
I
think
one
of
the
things
of
great
about
a
commissioner
of
the
sizes
we
all
come
with
different
set
of
experiences
and
level
expertise
and
and-
and
so
I
really
hope
to
to
learn
from
everybody.
Else.
I
mean
I
that's
one
of
the.
I
think
things
that
I
come
to
this
is.
I
owe
a
lot
to
learn,
and-
and
so
I
look
forward
to
that,
aside
from.
J
K
F
C
Somebody
gets
a
stick
to
speak
for
five
minutes.
We
pass
it
around
whatever
that
is.
it
doesn't
have
to
robert's
rules,
but
we're
all
just.
We
know
the
ground
game,
ground
rules,
rather.,
and
also
it's
not
clear
to
me
how
long
this
this
commission
is
is
assembled
for
whether
it's
six
meetings
or
twelve
meetings
or
twice
a
month
or
what
that
is.,
but
having
a
set
of
schedules,.
We
can
then
plan
our
lives
around
that..
There
was
somebody.
C
C
C
You
know,
we're
really
crane
report
to
spark
a
discussion.
If
we
have
the
time.,
I
wouldn't
even
limit
ourselves
to,,
you
know,
the
things
council
wanted
to
talk
about.
If
we
have
to.,
if
we
had
the
time
that
is
you
know,
look
at
the
full
charter,
read
the
whole
thing
and
if
there
are
things
that
we
feel
that
hey,
you
know,,
maybe
it
is
time
update
this
from
the
1960s..
We
can
insert
that
too,
because
it's
really
just
a
recommendation
and
a
point
of
stuff..
So
I'll
stop
there.
M
First
answered
the
questions
or
look
at
the
areas
that
the
council
wants
us
to..
Some
of
you
may
know
that
I
was
on
the
city
council
for
eight
years
and
the
the
charter
was
the
document
that
guided
in
what
we
did.,
but
I
know
that
it's
an
organic
document
that
needs
to
be
changed
as
times
change.
and
so
first
we
should
get
through.
M
M
I
think
that's
the
preliminary
issue.
and
then
secondarily,
I
think
we
need
to
get
to
consensus..
I
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
you
know,,
100
percent.
Everybody
agrees
we
can
have
a
majority
and
minority
report.,
but
I
think
after
whenever
we're
going
to
vote
on
something,
I
think
we
should
strive
towards
a
consensus,
because
that
looks
that
looks
good.
with
regard
to
how
flexible
we
all
are
and
are
going
to
be,
and
I
think
that's
important.
also,
I
mean
if.
L
Understand
the
task
right.,
I
think
there
were
a
couple
of
bullet
points
at
the
beginning
in
terms
district
cycles,,
a
couple
of
charter
amendments,
but
it
will
really
be
good
to
kind
of
put
that
in
a
very
succinct,
way.
right
for.
for
us
and
the
public..
I
would
also
say,
since
I
was
twenty
three
of
us,
and
probably
at
times
we're
all
going
to
click.
Ray's
hand.
L
First,
like
they
may
branch
out
into
different
type
of
charters
or
different
type
of
thinking,
that
just
clarity
in
terms
of
how
we're
going
to
organize
them
with
our
time
together
and
how
we're
going
to
weave
in
and
out.
right..
We
don't
want
to
agree
to
something.
well,,
I
don't
know.,
maybe
we
do.
right.,
but
we
just
need
clarity
on
how
we're
going
to
move
forward
and
how
we're
going
to
take
steps
back
if
we
need
to..
So
that's
that's
what
I
offer.
great.
D
Really
like
it,
if
between
the
commissioners,
we
could
break
up
the
research
and
present
our
piece
to
the
group
as
well
as
a
list
of
where
we
got
our
research
from
so
that
each
commissioner
can
visit
the
research
we
did.
in
addition
to
conducting
their
own
research,
which
is,
in
addition
to
the
recommended
readings
that
we
are
getting
from
the
city..
I
think
it's
pretty
overwhelming
for
each
person
to
have
to
to
actually
do
everything.,
it's
just
enormous..
D
So
if
we
could
kind
of
have
a
game
plan
on
breaking
that
up,
but
of
course
we're
not
just
going
to
accept
someone
else's
research.,
we
would
do
our
own,
but
it
would
be
nice
to
sort
of
each
be
responsible
for
presenting
a
piece
of
it,
and
I
think
that
would
help
keep
us
engaged
as
well
with
the
research..
I
would
also
really
love
to
see
a
comment
board,
or
a
blog
for
information
that
members
of
the
public
want
to
share
with
us.
santa
zay
has
over
a
million
people..
F
Looking
for
when
I
agree
with
everything
I've
heard
in
front
of
me,
I
don't
want
to
be
repetitive,
but
I
think,
being
able
to
clearly
identify
some
outcomes,
topic
areas
that
we're
going
to
be
focused
on,
so
we
know
exactly
what
we're
working
towards
and
what
we're
working
on..
I
think
that
would
be
very
helpful..
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
meetings
accessible
and
very
accessible
for
the
most
part
of
my
zone,
but
my
husband
pointed
out,
is
not
accessible
to
everyone.,
make
sure
we're
open
and
accepting
folks
comments..
F
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
I
heard
is
and
I'm
glad
that
what
I'd
like
to
see
is
basically
a
project
plan..
So
we
know
exactly
what
we're
working
on
the
timeline
that
we're
working
on
it
and
how
much
time
we're
going
to
spend.
Otherwise
we
could
be
spiraling
into
something..
I
have
no
idea
where
it
is.,
so
that
project
plan
would
help
us
identify
when
the
meetings
are
going
to
occur
and
know
what
we're
working
towards
and
the
outcomes
for
for
each
meeting..
N
Thank
you,
sir..
I
just
want
to
really
echo
richter
said
it's
having
a
clear
outline
of
what
we're
going
to
be
discussing.,
but
I
also
want
to
go
back
to
what
I
think,
christina
lund
said,
which
is
making
sure
that
conversation
doesn't
really
get
monopolized
and
just
having
an
active
board
decision
making
process
and
just
being
really
respectful
committee
members
that
also
the
public
as
well
and
engage
parts
of
the
community
that
wouldn't
necessarily
be
a
part
of
public
meetings,
especially
through
ssm..
N
O
F
I'm
preaching
to
the
choir.,
I
think,
there's
really
two
things
from
my
end..
The
first
one
is
my
my
hope
is.
We
can
be
methodical
within
these
deliberations,
but
secondly,
also
be
patient,
that
at
the
same
time,
I
think
this
is
an
enormous
task
that
we're
all
been
asked
to
do,
and
I
think
the
last
thing
each
one
of
us
would.
The
last
thing
we
would
all
intend
on
doing
is
to
rush
something
through
and
say
here
you
go
counsel..
This
is
what
we
came
up
with
in
a
short
timespan.
F
H
P
P
G
Thanks
to
the
to
our
fellow
commissioners.,
great
feedback.,
really
helpful.,
and
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
those
things
already
kind
of
in
plan.
and
so
at
our
next
meeting,
we'll
walk
you
through
the
schedule
of
the
plan
or
the
kind
of
the
other
pieces
to
it
to
just
tonight,
just
getting
things
started.,
but
definitely
we'll
be
able
to
keep
your
thoughts
in
mind.,
so
that
was
kind
of
demonstrate.
G
Q
Everybody.,
my
name
is
eileen
ian
and
I'm
a
resident
of
district
6..
I
was
born
and
raised
in
district
4
and
I'm
really
pleased
to
hear
that
the
majority
you
care
so
much
about
transparency
and
community
engagement
to
prioritize
it
as
a
whole.
on
that
note,,
I
would
like
to
bring
up
the
importance
of
broadly
advertising
when
these
meetings
are
actually
taking
place..
Now,
I'm
not
here
to
point
fingers
at
anyone,
because
I
know
that
this
is
just
it's
always
been
the
way
it's
been
done,
but
I
think
everyone
can
agree
here
needs
change,
now..
Q
Q
Always
post
actually
engaged
with
this
process,
then,
and
with
this
commission
and
with
the
commissioners
diep,
I
really
do
thank
you
for
bringing
up
the
entire
city
charter..
I
agree
with
you
wholeheartedly
that
we
should
be
looking
at
what
is
outdated
and
holding
us
back
from
a
truly
better
form
of
government
and
as
a
member
of
the
public
and
a
lifelong
sound
as
a
resident..
I
really
believe
that
this
commission
can
become
a
new
example
of
doing
things
better..
Thank
you.
So
much
for.
M
G
And
to
respond
to
some
of
the
the
thoughts
that
have
come
from
the
public.
this
next
section.
I'd
like
to
talk
through
is
the
meeting
schedule
and
agenda
items
really
want
to
be
able
to
set
the
next
meeting
date
and
schedule
future
meetings
and
turn
it
over
to
lawrence
to
be
able
to
facilitate
this..
We
we're
going
to
do
polling,
but
by
brown
act
requirements
we
can't.,
so
we're
going
to
try
some
hand
raising
the
old
fashioned
way..
P
P
P
P
A
P
P
P
P
P
So
for
30
meeting
we
will
be
done
at
seven
thirty
at
the
latest..
If
we
start
at
6:00,
we
will
then
be
done
at
9:00
at
the
latest.
so
like
for
you
all
to
think
about
those
four
times
again
and
then
raise
your
hand
when
I,
when
I
say
each
time.,
so
you're,
going
to
repeat
the
list,
one
more
time
for
thirty
five,
five,
thirty
six.
so.
G
The
only
thing
I
will
do
is
if
we
start
getting
a
lot
of
public
comment,
one
channel:
what
are
the
ideas
that
I
had
was
if
we
do
public
comment
at
the
beginning
like
and
that's
why
we
started
5
30
as
opposed
to
starting
at
six,
and
we
don't
start
deliberation
or
listening
to
our
part
of
the
meeting
for
a
good
half
hour.,
it's
just
a
chat..
It's
just
to
get
a
lot
of
good
public
input..
G
So
six
o'clock
works
for
me
and
we'll
start
there.,
but
that's
the
only
thing.
If
that
does
become
an
issue,
we
may
want
to
look
at
this
again
and
say,.
You
know,
we're
spending
a
good
half
hour,
forty
five
minutes
listening
to
the
public
just
on
our
agenda,
not
the
public
hearings.,
and
so
that
may
be
a
way
that
we
want
to
look
at
trying
to
start
earlier
in
order
to
accommodate
public
input.,
we'll
wait
until
we
actually
get
some
experience
and
then
we'll
see
how
things
go..
So
six
o'clock
mondays
works
and
that's
great.
G
P
P
P
D
P
I
A
P
P
P
O
Every
other
monday
isn't
an
issue,
except
that
I
have
a
class
at
usc
on
this
exact
night
that
ends
at
6:00..
I
didn't
want
to
cause
disrupt,
so
I
could
like
leave
half
an
hour,
but
if
it's
consistently
minds
every
other
week
on
this
week.,
so
like
the
next
time
we
mean
I'll
have
to
leave
early
and
the
next
time
we
meet
we'll
have
to
leave
early..
So
it's
the
bi
weekly
being
on
the
same,
but
it's
half
an
hour.
So
I
could
you
know,
I
don't
know
what
the
rules
for.
O
P
P
G
That's
really
helpful..
I
think
the
other
piece
is
that
there
are
commissions
that
don't
have
an
end
time,
and
I
would
recommend
that
we
have
an
end
time
and
that
we
can
then
hit
it
and
I'll
do
my
best
to
get
us
there..
Otherwise.
I
think
that
just
gives
permission
for
like
way
too
long.
and
so
we'll.
G
C
Of
that
I
mean
the
bi
weekly
works
for
me
right.,
but
it
kind
held
with
what
the
chair
was
speaking
about
like
ok.
What
do
we
have
an
end
date
that
coulson
needs
to
vote
on
something,
so
are
we
timely
and
if
we
know
the
three
topics,
the
five
or
how
many
topics
were
supposed
to
be
delivered
debating
or
exploring
that.
G
G
We
can
do
that
break
and
propose
to
you
that
can
then
alter
change
or
adopt
so
that
we
all
have
a
good
working
plan
of
what's
the
end
date..
If
we
are
meeting
weekly
for
one
hour,
we're
meeting
monthly
for
one
hour,
it
changes
how
fast
you
can
get
things
done..
So
now
that
we
know
your
parameter,
we
can
come
back
with
a
proposal
for
you
around
what
the
schedule
overall
looks
like
and
how
we
would
lay
out
kind
of
the
the
methodology
for
our
deliberations..
So
that's
really
helpful
to
us..
Thank
you
for
that.
G
That
we
had
was
just
a
time
limit
for
commissioners.
council
members
have
a
15
minute
maximum
time
to
talk
on
any
topic..
There
is
twenty
three
of
us.
there's,
not
eleven.,
so
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
facilitate
most
of
our
conversations
in
somewhat
some
kind
of
a
timeframe.,
and
I
would
hope
that
we
don't
have
these
super
long
slow.
Your.
G
Agenda.
having
timing
on
all
of
our
conversations
and
extending
those
for
bigger
conversations,
substantive
issues.,
so
we
may
not
be
able
to
get
your
points
across
in
90
seconds,
but
let's
keep
looking
at
what
is
a
parameter
for
what
that
what
everyone
can
do
and
also
what
are
the
expectations
that
didn't
come
up,
which
is
to
not
repeat
things..
So
if
you
concur,
you
don't
have
to
restate
it..
G
G
G
G
Does
taking
a
leak
get
their
data?,
any
data
can
go
to
toni
taber..
All
data
should
go
any
any
communication
to
the
commission
should
go
to
toni
and
toni
will
distribute
it
to
the
full
commission.-
it's
better,
if
you
just
send
the
public
directly
to
toni
rather
than
you
get
it,
and
then
you
send
it
just
from
a
brown
out
perspective..
I
think
it's
cleaner
and
easier.
So
any
member
of
the
public
that
wishes
to
address
the
commission.
G
They
should
send
it
officially
to
toni
taber
as
our
city
clerk
and
then
eventually
to
our
own
staff
person.,
so
that
then
she
can
distributed
to
all
of
us
and
we
can
put
it
into
your
agenda
packet
of
information.
That's
that
comes
to
us.,
I'm
hoping
that
lots
of
folks
are
going
to
be
engaging
with
us..
So
just
in
terms
organizationally
I'll
be
more
efficient.
If
we
have
it
as
attachments
to
our
agenda
so
that
everybody
has
it,
everyone
has
access
to
read
it.
G
D
G
Around
the
inclusive
nature
of
our
meetings
and
the
input
to
us.,
so
if
you
have
other
suggestions,
ideas
or
thoughts
around
how
to
do
different
communities
communicate
with
us.,
we
certainly
want
to
talk
about
that
and
be
able
to
to
incorporate
those
practices
into
our
model..
That
is
not
something
that
we
will
take
lightly
at
all..
We've
got
to
really
figure
out
how
best
to
do
that
to
model
those
behaviors
for
what
we
want:
an
inclusive
process
to
look
like
.
G
I
Thanks.,
it
looks
like
we
have,
I
assume,
a
couple,
other
staff
members
joining
us
as
well.
and
so
first
and
foremost,.
Thank
you
for
your
work
on
this
and
your
support.
and
second,.
If
there's
an
opportunity
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
who
you
are
in
your
role,,
that
would
be
wonderful.,
but
please
shut
it.