►
From YouTube: JUN 20, 2023 | City Council Afternoon Session
Description
City of San José, California
City Council Afternoon Session, June 20, 2023
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1088260&GUID=3827E476-C7D7-4E34-BA20-46D31866B184
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
D
A
E
C
F
It's
from
the
Church
of
the
East
Mar
Joseph
parish
in
1965,
there
were
only
10
Assyrian
families
here
in
San
Jose
and
the
closest
Assyrian
churches
were
in
San,
Francisco
and
Turlock
to
make
this
is
more
available
and
closer
to
home.
Seven
Assyrian
families
began
hosting
fundraisers
in
1976
and
after
12
years
of
raising
money,
they
were
able
to
purchase
and
remodel
the
property
on
Minnesota
Avenue
Avenue
that
we
know
today,
as
the
Church
of
mariosa
Parish
district
6
is
proud
to
have
you
call
one
of
our
streets
home
and
for
everyone
else.
F
This
is
a
reminder
to
please
come
out
and
enjoy
the
annual
Assyrian
food
festival
that
the
church
will
be
hosting
this
summer
on
Saturday
and
Sunday,
August
19th
and
20th
from
11
A.M
to
11
p.m.
You
can
experience
authentic
Assyrian
food
live
music
and
dancing,
and
you
can
learn
more
by
visiting
a
syrianfoodfestival.org.
It
is
a
really
fun
and
very
tasty
event.
Father
namano
namato,
thank
you
for
conducting
our
invocation
today.
G
In
the
name
of
the
father
and
of
the
son,
and
of
the
holy
spirit,
amen
of
O,
Father
of
mercies
and
God,
all
of
all
consolation,
we
come
to
you
at
this
hour
asking
you
to
bless
our
civil
servants
as
they
labor
for
our
city
and
its
citizens,
grant
them
your
wisdom
and
Enlighten
them
with
your
truth
that
they
might
serve
a
greater
good
of
the
city
in
which
we
live
and
work
strengthen
them
to
be
instruments
of
peace
and
justice
in
our
society.
Today.
G
C
Thank
you
Father
great,
to
have
you
here
thanks
councilmember
Davis,
we
are
on
to
ceremonial
items,
councilmember
Davis.
If
you
join
me
at
the
podium,
we
will
recognize
and
Proclaim
July
as
Parks
and
Rec
month.
Also
as
we
head
down
there
as
I
understand
it
it's
somebody's
birthday
today,
Olympia
is
this
your
birthday
happy
birthday.
F
Good
afternoon
our
city
has
nine
Regional
Parks
207
neighborhood
parks,
290
playgrounds,
48,
community
centers,
almost
61
miles
of
Trail
and
many
many
Community
programs
at
the
parks,
recreation
and
Neighborhood
Services
Department
manages
today
we
are
proclaiming
this
July
as
Parks
and
Recreation
month
to
celebrate
and
recognize
all
the
spaces
and
programs.
Our
hard-working
Parks
and
Rec
departments,
staff
manage
and
everybody
knows,
I
think
that
Parks
and
Rec
manages
Happy
Hollow
park
and
zoo
right.
F
Please
visit
the
San,
Jose
City,
Parks,
Recreation
and
neighborhood
services
website.
Now
I
would
like
to
introduce
the
prns
director
John
ciccarelli
John
leads
the
department
with
dedication,
Innovation
and
resiliency
John
and
all
the
city
park
staff.
Thank
you
for
all.
You
do
to
maintain
and
activate
our
Parks
and
Recreation
spaces
and,
more
more
importantly,
thank
you
for
creating
fun
for
our
residents.
John.
I
Thank
you
everybody.
As
the
council
member
mentioned,
we
have
lots
of
fun
events
going
on
this
summer.
You
know
our
vision
is
Healthy
Communities,
that
Inspire
belonging
and
the
theme
of
this
year's
park
and
rec
month
is
where
community
grows.
So
it
works
perfectly
with
the
kind
of
things
we
do.
We're
going
to
show
you
a
quick
video
to
show
you
where
that
community
grows
in
our
city.
If
you
can
queue
that
up
and
while
you're
doing
that,
I
just
want
you
to
know
the
all.
I
I
I
I
I'd
like
to
thank
the
mayor
and,
of
course,
councilmember
Davis
for
helping
us
with
this
Proclamation,
but
also
the
entire
city
council,
they're,
all
very
supportive
of
all
the
parks
and
the
programs
that
we
provide
for
the
community.
We've
got
thousands
of
kids
out
there
with
us
right
now,
as
we
speak
in
summer
camps,
but,
most
importantly,
I
want
to
thank
the
staff,
the
people
who
do
this
for
the
community
day
in
and
day
out
in
their
dedication,
thanks.
A
A
So
good
afternoon.
Everyone
I'm
happy
to
recognize
an
extraordinary
extraordinary
or
individual
who
has
dedicated
an
incredible
22
years
of
her
life,
improving
the
conditions
of
abused
children,
teenagers
and
Veterans
suffering
from
PTSD
Miss
Juanita
Morales
uresti
Juanita's
Journey
began
in
her
native
state
of
Texas,
where
she
embarked
on
her
early
career
as
a
clinical
social
worker
at
the
Amarillo
VA
Medical
Center
there.
She
compassionately
worked
with
combat
veterans
in
the
mental
health
clinic,
providing
them
with
the
care
and
support
they
so
desperately
needed.
Juanita's
commitment
extended
Beyond
language
barriers.
A
She
conducted
she
conducted
therapy
sessions
in
both
English
and
Spanish,
ensuring
that
no
veteran
was
left
unheard
or
unsupported.
But
Juanita
is
a
passion
for
helping
those
in
need
to
not
stop
at
veterans.
She
worked
tirelessly
with
the
Texas
court
system
as
a
fresnik
interviewer
assisting
sexually
emotionally
and
physically
abused
children.
Her
dedication
and
empathy
also
extended
to
inmates
suffering
from
PTSD
and
drug
and
alcohol
problems.
A
A
Today,
we
not
only
celebrate
Juanita's
outstanding
service
to
our
country,
but
also
acknowledge
her
inspiring
Journey,
becoming
a
role
model
for
young
women
in
San
Jose,
her
dedication,
compassion
and
unwavering
commitment
to
improving
the
lives
of
others.
The
lives
of
others
are
are
qualities
that
we
deserve
that
we
deserve
that
deserve
our
utmost
admiration
and
respect
Juanita.
On
behalf
of
our
grateful
community
congratula.
A
J
J
J
Every
one
of
my
staff
was
the
backbone
to
the
San
Jose
Vet
Center
I
couldn't
have
done
it
alone.
There
is
no
way
that
one
person
it
takes.
It
takes
a
team.
In
addition,
the
Santa
Clara
County
veterans
service
staff,
including
Lisa
Moreno
and
Richard
Vega,
are
instrumental
in
referring
veterans
to
the
San
Jose
Center.
J
J
J
War
is
held,
stated
General
Sherman,
but
the
hell
of
war
did
not
continue
in
our
veterans
lives.
Today,
the
San
Jose
Vet
Center
continues
serving
the
veterans,
keeping
the
promise
to
all
Vietnam
veterans
that
seek
our
services,
for
our
Unity
of
purpose
continues
in
serving
the
men
and
women
that
have
served
our
nation
God
Bless
America.
Thank
you.
C
L
This
is
great
what
a
great
day
to
honor
the
San
Jose
pickleball
Club,
on
the
same
day
that
we
acknowledge
our
parks
and
rec
department
and
all
of
our
Parks,
although
I
have
to
say
John
ciccarelli
next
time
you
need
pickleballers
in
that
video.
Don't
you
agree?
You
noticed
there
were
no
pickleballers
I
did
because
I
have
pickleballers
in
the
audience.
You
know
so
I'm.
L
Good
morning,
good
morning,
good
afternoon,
everyone
Welcome
to
our
city
council,
meeting
I'm
I
represent
District
nine,
which
includes
the
neighborhoods
of
Cambrian
Park
Robertsville
and
South
Willow
Glen
I'm
excited
to
round
out
today's
ceremonials
with
a
bit
of
fun
as
we
recognize
the
San
Jose
pickleball.
Club
of
this
is
just
a
small
number
of
them.
L
They
have
over
2
400
members
that
can
be
found
at
public
courts
all
around
the
area,
but
I'm
going
to
tell
you
who
has
the
most
pickleball
courts
in
a
minute
for
those
of
you
who
are
not
familiar
with
the
sport.
Pickleball
is
a
cross
between
ping
pong,
badminton
and
tennis,
and
has
been
ranked
as
the
fastest
growing
sport
in
America
for
the
third
year
running,
District
9
has
become
somewhat
of
a
hub
for
many
of
our
community
members
who
enjoy
pickleball
and
I.
Think
D9
has
I,
don't
think
I
know.
L
D9
has
the
most
courts
of
all
the
city
council
districts.
I
am
all
in
for
pickleball
to
brag
about
a
bit.
District
9
has
a
total
of
23
courts
and
one
light
it
that
they're
really
excited
about
and
we'll
soon
see
the
addition
of
three
more
dedicated
Courts
at
De
Anza
Park.
So
that
brings
us
up
to
26
Parks
I
challenged
my
Council
colleagues
to
build
pickleball
courts
in
your
District.
L
L
My
own
experience
with
their
members
has
been
nothing
short
of
positive,
welcoming
environment.
They
provide
in
the
community
when
I
joined
the
grand
opening
of
the
pickleball
courts
at
Lone,
Hill
Park,
my
own
doubles
partner.
Bill
took
the
time
to
give
me
the
lowdown
on
all
of
the
rules
and
terms
of
pickleball,
so
I
wouldn't
look
as
much
like
a
rookie.
I
may
not
have
I
may
have
known
the
rules,
but
I'm
sure
I
looked
like
a
rookie.
L
It
was
here
that
I
learned
new
terms,
new
meanings
for
terms
like
kitchen
and
Dink
through
pickleball
clinics,
fundraisers
and
events.
They
demonstrate
the
power
of
sports
to
bring
people
together,
uplift
Community
communities
and
promote
Goodwill
throughout
the
greater
San
Jose
area
mayor.
Please
present
this
recognition
to
Kenji
miwa
president
of
the
San
Jose
pickleball
Club,
who
will
accept
this
Commendation
and
say
a
few
words.
M
Hi
everyone
I'm
Kenji
miwa
I'm,
a
founding
member
of
the
San
Jose
pickleball
Club
I'd,
like
to
thank
council
member
Pam
Foley
for
officially
recognizing
the
club
for
its
contributions
and
for
her
continued
support
of
pickleball
in
her
District
from
Parks
and
Rec
I'd
like
to
thank
Steve
Ryan,
Jeff,
Gomez,
Manny
Cota
and
many
others
who
do
the
work
behind
the
scenes
to
add
more
courts
to
San
Jose
I'd,
also
like
to
thank
all
the
current
and
past
board
members
who
have
volunteered
their
time
to
Foster
the
community
Ron
Bueno
Thomas,
Nguyen,
Lisa,
trumpler,
vietvu,
Rachel,
campignalo,
Robert,
Rothrock,
Manar,
Ahmad,
SRI,
Vada,
kapat,
confo,
Chris,
Roth,
Sharon,
Miller,
Doherty
and,
of
course,
my
wife,
my
wife
Kate
law,
who
has
done
a
lot
of
Hands-On
work
behind
the
scenes
to
make
things
happen.
M
M
The
San
Jose
pickleball
Club
is
a
501c7
non-profit
founded
in
early
2021.
We
now
have
about
600
dues,
pain
members,
2400
face
group
members
and
many
many
location-based
WhatsApp
groups.
We
provided
the
community
with
free
nuts
at
Palmore
park,
canoas
park
and
Edenvale
Park
we've
distributed
thousands
of
balls,
hosted
tournaments
clinics
and
fundraisers.
Recently,
we
added
four
overlays
at
Edenvale,
Park
and
I
have
to
thank
council
member
Sergio,
Jimenez
Helen
Chapman
from
his
staff
and
Manny
Cota
from
Parks
and
Rec,
who
I
worked
with
closely
to
make
this
happen.
M
One
thing
is
clear:
is
that
people
love
pickleball,
it's
here
to
stay
and
it's
showing
no
signs
of
stopping.
So
my
one
message
for
you
all
here
today
is
that
San
Jose
needs
more
dedicated,
pickleball
courts,
the
more
in
one
location,
the
better
I
know
there
are
many
top
priorities
competing
for
Budget
dollars,
but
the
relatively
small
investment
in
pickleball
will
yield
better
Park
usage,
bring
communities
together
and
produce
better
health
health
outcomes
for
our
citizens.
M
Pickleball
gets
people
outside
moving
socializing
face
to
face
and
simply
just
having
fun
so
I
invite
all
of
you
to
come.
Try
out
pickleball
for
yourself
and
see
why
it's
such
a
fast-growing
sport.
You
can
find
a
list
of
core
locations
on
our
website
at
San,
Jose,
pickleballclub.org
and
so
on.
On
behalf
of
all
the
San
Jose
pickleball
club,
we
thank
you
all
for
this
Commendation
and
hope
to
see
you
out
on
the
courts.
Thank
you.
C
All
right,
thank
you
all
for
some
great
ceremonial
items.
We
are
on
to
orders
of
the
day
and
I
believe
we
have
a
new
consent
item
item
2.38,
which
is
the
Viba
advisory
committee
appointment,
and
that's
to
ensure
that
the
committee
has
its
four-person
required
Quorum
in
person
to
renew
their
insurance
policy,
which
expires
at
the
end
of
the
month.
C
H
Q
Q
That
building
has
been
neglected
for
like
far
far
too
long,
and
it's
a
beautiful,
beautiful
representation
of
the
architecture.
Of
that
time.
Q
I
know,
package
J
is
working
diligently
on
doing
what
they
can
and
I
was
encouraged.
When
I
saw
the
200
000
Grant
allocation,
it's
important
to
it's
important
to
invest
monies
in
these
architectural
pieces
because
they
tell
a
story,
and
that
story
is
the
identity
of
this
city.
Q
I
would
hope
that
in
the
future
that
we
could
also
Finance
and
expand
on
the
definition
of
historical
preservation
work
that
historical
preservation
work
is
not
necessarily
preserving
a
particular
architecture.
It's
also
preserving
the
history
and
the
people.
The
stories
of
the
people
in
the
places
and
spaces
where
that
history
was
made
example
say,
for
example,
the
CSO
office
of
Fred
Ross.
Q
That
is
a
perfect
example
of
that.
These
places
and
spaces
need
to
be
preserved.
They're,
very
humble
they're,
very
humble
you
know
we
didn't
have
the
means
to
to
invest
in
the
architecture,
as
obviously
the
First
Church
of
Christ
Science
is
but
I
hope
that
you
reconsider
that
two
hundred
thousand
dollar
allocation.
Thank
you.
D
R
Hi
thanks
a
lot
Blair
Beekman
here
thanks
a
lot
for
the
words
of
Paul
Soto
for
this
item.
I
wanted
to
quickly
comment.
Thank
you
for
our
offering
public
comment
on
orders
of
the
day
items
and
how
to
talk
about
agenda
items.
If
we
so
wish,
I
hope
you
can
offer
the
same
public
comment
time
for
the
future
of
the
city
managers
report
in
closed
session
items
in
the
future.
Good
luck
in
working
towards
open
public
comment
efforts
thanks.
S
Thank
you,
mayor
I,
do
have
one
thing
to
report
out
of
closed
session.
Today
we
received
authority
to
file
a
lawsuit
when
that
lawsuit
is
filed,
it'll
be
made
available
publicly.
Thank
you.
C
C
We
have
a
couple
items
that
were
noticed
right
before
consent
and
then
we're
coming
to
consent
yeah.
So
we
are
on
item
three
three
and
that
is
for
actions
related
to
fiscal
year.
22-23.
R
Gonna
offer
a
player
Beekman
here,
I
was
going
to
offer
public
comment.
I
was
waiting
for
a
consent
calendar,
but
this
is
if
this
is
talk
about
FY,
22,
23
budget
issues.
R
I,
don't
know
just
good
luck
on
working
on
this
issues
and
to
note
that
our
items
from
our
third
quarter
of
FY,
23
can
or
20
or
of
this
year
for
the
third
quarter
of
fy23
can
play
an
important
role
in
the
future
of
FY
23
budgeting.
Just
thought
I'd
mention
that
thanks.
D
Q
Q
Q
Q
Number
two
is
that
you
gave
30
percent
of
measure
e
funds
that
was
designated
for
extremely
low
income,
30
percent,
and
then
you
gave
that
to
West
San
Carlos,
West,
San
Carlos
doesn't
qualify
for
that,
and
then
you
try
to
legitimize
it
by
oh
well,
it's
a
daycare
center,
well
who's
going
to
say
anything
about
that.
I
am
I'm
going
to
say
something
about
it,
because
I
was
wrong
and
that
was
foul.
You
don't
take
from
extremely
low
income
to
give
to
an
affordable
income
rip.
C
I
just
want
to
be
very
clear
on
the
record
that,
on
the
ARP
funding
that
was
a
the
city
did
make
an
accounting
move
to
allocate
ARP
dollars
to
the
police
budget
and
then
debited
the
exact
same
amount
to
go
to
funding
those
programs.
So
there
was
no
net
change
in
the
funding
to
the
police
department,
councilor
Davis
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to
add
any
context.
C
But
okay,
great
just
want
to
be
really
clear
about
that,
because
that's
come
up
a
few
times
in
the
last
few
weeks
now
is
to
make
sure
that
those
dollars
were
protected
and
could
in
fact
be
kept
for
the
use
in
the
in
the
programs
we
all
intended,
because
there
were
concerns
about
the
federal
government
potentially
climb
back
some
of
those
dollars.
C
Thank
you,
okay,
great
and
then
item
three
four
is
also
to
be
heard
immediately
before
consent.
This
is
the
adoption
of
the
annual
appropriation
ordinance
and
annual
funding
sources
resolution
for
the
fiscal
year.
2324
and
there's
no
presentation
do
we
have
a
motion
move
approval.
Thank
you.
Is
there
any
public
comment.
T
Hi,
this
is
Roxanne,
say
her
name,
Natalia
Lopez,
once
again,
I'm
asking
this
Council
to
stop
here
blatant
transphobia
towards
my
community.
When
you
refuse
to
hire
us,
appoint
us
or
allow
us
the
students
at
the
table,
then
your
department
follow
your
leads
and
discriminate
against
us,
like
the
library,
the
police
department
and
park
and
rec
senior
meal
programs.
T
T
None
of
you,
not
one
of
you,
stood
up
for
the
trans
Community
or
offered
a
moment
of
remembrance,
say
her
name:
Natalia
Lopez
black
Trans
woman
from
San
Jose
murdered
when
you
discriminate
against
us
at
the
highest
level.
My
community
pays
the
literal
price
for
that.
It's
time
to
stop
and
it's
despicable.
D
R
All
right,
Blair
Beekman
here
are
a
few
clarifications
boy.
Thank
you
very
much
for
mayor
Mahan
and
his
explanation
about
how
funding
for
arpa
was
used.
That
is
very
much
different
than
how
I
was
talking
about
it.
How
we
could
be
talking
about
it
and
just
of
a
storage
of
funds
you
money
was
put
in
and
then
taken
out
and
that's
a
different
set
of
questions
that
I
have
not
better
addressed
and
boy
good
luck
in
such
a
question.
R
Obviously
I
still
have
reservations
about
Police
Department
use,
but
it
is
a
different
question
now
and
sorry
for
any
confusion
on
my
part
and
to
speak
up
really
really
quickly.
On
one
more
item
of
confusion
when
I
just
mentioned
quarter,
reports
for
the
third
quarter
can
relate
to
FY
24
budgets
as
well
as
FY
23,
but
third
quarter
reports.
There
always
can
be
an
important
part
of
fy24
budgets.
An
item
I
was
talking
about
at
pispus
last
week.
Just
saw
I'd
mention
it
this
time.
Q
Yeah
Paul
something
from
the
Horseshoe.
There
is
a
reason
why
racial
Equity
was
to
be
instituted
as
a
policy,
and
that
is
that
this
city
owes
and
I
mean
that
in
a
very
literal
sense
it
owes
for
the
generational
impacts
of
racist
policies.
Q
They
were
economic,
they
were
political,
they
were
social,
they
were
generational,
they
were
it
had
to
do
with
Public
Health,
you
know,
so
there
wasn't
any
facet
of
the
existence
of
the
Chicano
community.
That
was
not
impacted
by
racist
policies.
Q
Now,
what
racial
Equity
would
do
and
be
helpful
in
is
that
budgets
are
kind
of
like
values.
They
they,
where
you're,
putting
your
money.
That
is
what
we
value
as
a
city,
and
so
when
you're
putting
monies
in
different
areas
and
you're
neglecting
that
guiding
principle
that
you
guys
espoused
and
that
I
pushed
on
and
that
I
changed.
I
I
didn't
accept
that
definition.
That
definition
had
to
get
sent
back
three
times
and
and
the
one
that
you're
working
with
now
is
still
an
aspiration.
It's
not
a
definition.
Q
You
have
to
either
either
we're
going
to
Institute
racial
Equity
as
a
policy
position,
and
it's
going
to
be
used
as
a
metric
when
you're
measuring
budget
allocations
or
it's
not,
then
just
leave
it
alone.
Just
just
say
you
know
what
we
we're
going
to
stay
here,
as
racist
system
can
be
in
in
in
the
budgets
are
going
to
reflect
that.
C
Great
okay,
thank
you.
We
are
on
to
the
consent.
Calendar
I
need
to
recuse
myself
from
voting
on
item
2.25,
which
is
an
agreement
with
the
Cristo
Rey
San
Jose
work
study
program,
so
I
just
asked
that
we
Council
deliberate
and
vote
on
that
item.
First,
so
I
can
rejoin
for
the
remainder
of
the
consent.
Calendar
are
there
other
items
that
Council
would
like
to
pull
from
consent
today,
councilor
batra.
C
C
K
C
R
We're
a
big
man
here.
Can
you
talk
to
Paul
first
and
come
back
to
me?
No,
no,
oh
well!
Okay.
I
will
then
pass
on
this
item.
Thank
you.
Paul.
Q
Yes,
Tony
is
this
for
2.25,
specifically,
yes,
okay,
thank
you.
Paul
soda
from
the
Horseshoe,
the
the
mayor
respectfully
leads
to
State
on
the
record.
The
point
of
what
the
conflict
of
interest
is
just
so
that
so
that
it's
on
the
record
that
we
know
what
that
is,
so
that
we
know
what
it
looks
like
we
we
need
to
know
those
relationships,
and
so
I
would
like
I
would
ask
if,
if
vice
mayor,
could
please
request
of
the
mayor
that
he
stayed
on
the
record.
Q
The
point
of
conflict,
this
program
I,
would
hope
that
like.
Why
is
it
so
exclusive?
You
know
the
exclusivity
of
programs
like
this.
They
actually
need
to
be
expanded,
which
we
reference
back
to
my
earlier.
Coming
with
respect
to
racial
Equity.
You
see,
we
need
to
start
institutionalizing
these
types
of
work-study
programs
I
mean
this.
Is
this
is
Crystal
Ray?
This
is,
you
know,
you
know
a
Catholic
school.
You
know
a
grounded
rooted,
Catholic
School.
Q
These
kids
are
going
to
get
a
quality,
education
and
they're
going
to
have
an
advantage
over
other
kids
and
there's.
There's
there's
something
just
not
quite
there's
something.
Quite
not
quite
just
about
them,
you
know.
Why
are
we
having
these
disparities
in
education,
we're
resourcing
certain
areas
of
our
city
in
certain
areas?
We're
not
and
I
would
hate
to
think
that
the
determining
factor
is
Catholicism
or
the
Jesuits.
Q
You
know,
I
would
hate
to
think
that
it's
just
that.
You
know,
I
think
these.
These
watch
study
programs
are
excellent.
We
need
more
of
them,
but
those
are
the
questions
that
I
have
in
the
concerns
and
and
back.
V
Thank
you,
I,
didn't
see.
N
Yeah,
thank
you
glad
it
was
pulled.
I
didn't
need
to
pull
it,
but
you
know
when
I,
when
I
saw
the
side
of
it
actually
took
him
back
to
conversation
and
to
the
the
previous
item
that
was
before
us
when
mayor
licardo
was
here
and
I.
Remember,
when
I
saw
that
item
related
to
Cristo
Rey
I
I
reached
out
to
because
I
thought
it
was
a
good
idea,
I
think
work.
Study
programs
obviously
are
a
good
idea.
Cristo
Ray
is
a
great
school
kids.
There
I
know
they
come
from
disadvantaged
backgrounds.
N
They
get
a
lot
of
opportunities
there,
which
I
think
is
wonderful,
but
I
did
reach
out
to
the
at
that
time.
This
few
years
ago,
the
the
East
Side
Union
High
School
District
superintendent,
asking
him
if
he
was
aware
of
these
opportunities
and
he
expressed
that
he
wasn't
aware
of
these
opportunities,
and
so
when
I
saw
this
come
through
and
I
think
there
was
an
RFP
that
was
released.
I
think
several
people
downloaded
the
application,
but
in
the
end
there
was
only
one
applicant
and
I
was
I.
N
N
That's
really
what
it
comes
down
to
in
my
mind
and
I'm,
trying
to
understand
sort
of
the
efforts,
because
I
think
it
was
said
as
an
example
of
the
staff
conducted
Outreach
via
email
to
72
schools
and
school
districts.
I
guess
I'd
be
curious.
If
that
was
just
you
know,
because
we
send
emails
out
to
thousands
of
residents
by
one
fail
soup
with.
T
N
W
I
can
start
and
then
Kelly
can
jump
in
Lee,
Wilcox
assistant
city
manager.
A
lot
of
Outreach
was
done
by
Kelly
is
also
actually
the
city
manager's
office.
So
we
followed
up
with
Chris
Funk
and
a
number
of
Super
superintendents
personally
I
think
it
is
hard
for
a
lot
of
public
school
districts
to
apply
for
something
like
this,
because
they
don't
have
existing
programs
or
work
study
programs
and
in
some
ways,
are
actually
quite
prohibited
from
what
their
Charter
is
in
doing
something
like
this.
W
So
they
would
be
asking
the
city
to
stand
up
quite
a
bit
of
resources
to
manage
a
program
like
this
one
that
which
we
don't
really
have
capacity
for,
whereas
Cristo
Ray
and
a
few
charter
schools
are
starting
to
to
get
into
this
space
and
really
kind
of
serve
this
Niche.
But
I'll.
Let
Kelly
jump
in
on
more
specifically.
X
Because
we
were
well
aware
of
the
conversation
from
the
last
time
this
was
done,
and
so
this
is
the
first
time
by
the
way,
I'm
Kelly
Parmley
assistant
director
for
HR
Council.
Thank
you
and
it
was.
It
came
to
HR
this
year
as
part
of
our
portfolio
of
work
and
pipeline
activity
right,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
reaching
the
high
school
space
for
all
the
reasons
that
liebo
Cox
mentions
here.
It's
a
very
specific
area.
X
Work
study
is
actually
something
that
they
have
a
very
special
privilege
through
the
federal
government
to
be
able
to
offer
these
programs
where
students
can
come
on
site
during
the
school
day
as
part
of
their
academic
credit.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
can
continue
that
work,
while
we
also
are
building
other
opportunities,
mostly
in
the
summer
space,
to
be
able
to
spend
time
with
high
school
students.
X
It's
really
hard
for
a
district
to
let
students
go
during
the
school
day
to
be
able
to
be
on
site
and
still
maintain
that
academic
credit
that
they
need,
whether
they're
in
Career
and
Technical
education
programs,
or
whether
they're
in
regular
academic
programs
in
the
school.
So
it's
our
way
to
create
a
menu
of
opportunities
with
our
high
school
Partners.
So
in
this
case
our
staff
actually
reached
out
individually
by
phone
to
each
school
high
school
72
high
schools
to
make
sure
we
have
the
right
contact
person.
X
That
was
one
of
the
concerns
from
the
last
time.
If
you
recall
all,
and
then
not
only
did
we
send
the
email
through
the
typical
RFP
platform,
which
sometimes
can
be
unrecognizable
to
folks.
We
actually
sent
follow-up
emails,
actually
three
separate
ones
and
made
sure
that
we
had
correct
email
addresses
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
we're
limited
by
what
the
RFP
process
to
keep
it
fair
and
open
can
actually
do
by
way
of
you
know
solicitation,
but
we
did
do
several
emails.
X
N
Question
it
does
it
does,
but
it
raises
other
questions
sure
it
doesn't
answer
the
question:
I
I,
guess
you
know,
I
read
the
memo,
but
I,
maybe
I
missed
it,
but
I
think
the
touching
on
whether
that
you
know
there
was
personal
Outreach
to
folks
made
that
I
didn't
see
it
in
here.
Yeah,
maybe
I
missed
it,
but
anyway
that
would
have
answered
sort
of
that
question.
Quite
frankly,
that
may
have
prevented
me
for
even
pulling
it
or.
B
N
Interest
in
bullet,
but
but
the
other
sort
of
touching
on
what
Lee
said
about
there's,
not
because
I
was
actually
talking
councilman
fully
about
I'm,
not
quite
sure
how
this
would
be
structured,
say
with
Santa
Teresa,
high
school
or
Branham
High
School,
because
I
don't
know
how
that
would
work.
N
But
to
that
and
what
I'm
curious
about
is
are
we?
If
did
we
I'm
gonna
say
this?
Did
we
my
feeling
is
knowing
that
a
lot
of
high
schools
couldn't
stand
this
up?
You
know
it's
a
lot
of
resources.
A
lot
of
time
couldn't
stand
it
up.
Work,
work,
study
program
by
the
Fall
Right
is
what
we
think
what
the
requirement
was.
So
did
we
by
knowing
that
and
then
developing
this
RFP
essentially
developing
in
a
way
that
it
only
a
certain
amount
of
folks
were
going
to
be
applying.
X
For
I
hear
your
question
is
that
yeah,
yeah
and
I
think
we
were
very
well
aware
of
wanting
to
make
sure
that
this
was
as
open
as
possible
and
could
be
responded
to.
We
actually
added
specific
language
in
this
RFP.
That
said,
if
you're
in
the
stage
of
creating
a
program
like
this
or
you
need
some
lead
time,
we'll
take
it.
If
you
got
it
in
progress
through
fall
of
2023,
so
you
could
submit.
X
If
you
didn't,
have
a
fully
approved
academic
work
study
program,
we
were
trying
to
send
a
signal
to
folks
that
were
here,
we're
open.
We
understand
that
it
takes
time
to
do
this,
so
we
did
add
specific
language
to
that
effect
in
the
RFP
to
communicate
that
we
are
looking
for
folks
who
have
it
also
could
have
been
a
non-academic
not
for
a
profit,
for
example.
I
think
is
what
the
language
was
in
there
if
you've
got
this
kind
of
program.
X
N
Okay,
all
right
and
then
and
then
just
two
other
questions.
One
is
I
know
that
the
the
work
study,
students
from
Cristo
riggett
placed
you
know
and
I've
seen
them
going
down
the
elevator
and
stuff
and
say
hello,
I
know
they're
in
various
departments,
including
the
mayor's
office.
How
do
council
members
you
know
play
you.
Y
X
B
X
From
their
non-personal
savings
or
sorry,
their
additional
salary
savings
that
they
might
have,
so
that
would
apply
to
you
all
as
well,
but
happy
to
have
you
take
them
or
have
a
conversation
with
you
about
how
you
might
sponsor
a
student
to.
N
Z
N
X
And
or
to
be
able
to
make
this
program
work
for
high
school
students
with
a
department
or
any
employer
for
that
matter,
we're
not
the
only
employer.
That's
in
that
mix
it's
administratively.
They
have
to
administratively
support
these
students.
So
they
have
somebody
who's
our
point
of
contact
in
terms
of
a
coordinator.
We
have
to
make
sure
they
have
transportation,
so
they're,
making
sure
that
happens.
There's
lots
of
follow-up
to
make
sure
they're
on
track
academically.
There
aren't
any
issues
in
the
workplace
that
they're
supported
appropriately
in
the
workplace,
so
all
that
administrative
cost.
H
X
Going
to
support
them
like
we
have
fellows
programs
right
where
we
administratively
support
an
organization
to
do
their
part,
to
make
sure
that
that
person
is
successful
and
we
want
to
make
sure
these
students
are
successful.
It's
for
them
to
support
the
students
in
the
way
that's
needed
for
them
to
be
on
campus
here
with
us.
As.
N
K
Thank
you
so
much
vice
mayor
I,
remember
these
discussions
when
we
were
on
the
County
Board
of
Education,
because
I
think
I
represented
Eastside
I
was
still
represent,
east
side,
but
I
represented
the
Eastside
Union
High,
School,
District
and
I.
K
Remember
the
superintendent
and
everyone,
and
both
Eastside
Union
and
for
San
Jose
Unified
had
not
heard
about
this
grant
that
was
available
and
then,
if
I,
if
I
heard
correctly
with
your
line
of
questioning,
Council
council
member
Jimenez,
essentially
the
way
the
language
of
this
grant
or
these
dollars
are
written,
the
only
school
that
could
qualify
right,
no
other
Public
public
high
school
could
qualify
for
this
is
the
only
school
that
could
qualify
is
essentially
Crystal
Ray.
So
the
way
I
see
it.
This
is
the
city
of
San
Jose.
K
Writing
grants
that
own.
They
know
who
the
person
is
going
to
be
applied,
because
it's
only
one
school
that
can
apply
here
in
the
area.
Essentially,
building
up
this
funnel
I
think
any
sort
of
transparency
or
competitiveness.
For
for
this
grant
is
it's
just
non-existent.
This
is
the
only
school
that
could
get
the
dollars,
we're
writing
for
these
dollars
to
go
directly
to
them,
and
it's
really
not
a
process
that
can
be
altered.
K
I
think
we
have
plenty
of
high
schools
like
overfilled
High
School,
on
the
corner
on
the
on
the
border
of
District
Five
and
District
8.
That
would
do
a
lot
of
work
with
it.
So,
if
anything,
we
shouldn't
be
essentially
saying.
Oh,
this
is
the
organ.
This
is
the
only
organization
that
can
qualify
for
the
grant,
so
we'll
give
the
grant
to
them.
K
We
should
be
saying
how
do
we
change
the
language
in
this
grant
so
that
Public
Schools
public
charters,
schools,
whatever
school,
could
qualify
for
for
these
and
and
I
personally
feel
like
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
comfortable
with
writing
grants
or
the
city
writing
grants
that
could
only
be
accepted
by
one
organization
that
that
to
me
seems
like
we're
just
funneling
dollars
into
the
private
school
system.
That's
all.
V
Thank
you,
I,
don't
see
any
other
hands.
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
I
am
familiar
with
the
program
and
they
have
it
down
so
that
they're
able
to
do
it
during
the
Academic
Year
I
guess.
My
question
was
really
trying
to
look
at
you
know
many
of
the
students,
especially
in
the
public
schools,
have
pretty
much
the
summer
generally.
As
Lee
said
it's
it's
very
difficult
for
during
the
school
year,
I'm
wondering
had
we
considered
having
work
study
just
for
the
summer
or
some
kind
of
the
I
know.
V
In
the
past,
we've
talked
about
internships.
It's
a
little
bit
difficult,
because
Crystal
Ray
does
provide
all
of
the
administrative
support
necessary
and
the
money
goes
to
help
offset.
The
cost
of
their
tuition
is
what
it
is.
So
I
was
just
curious
in
terms
of
looking
at
alternative
ways
to
what
council
member
Ortiz
is
talking
about
out
in
terms
of
being
able
to
make
it
more
sort
of
broadly
available.
X
Sure,
again,
Kelly
primary
assistant
director
for
HR.
Thank
you
for
the
question
as
you're,
probably
aware,
or
maybe
through
the
budget
process,
that
additional
staffing
has
been
put
to.
What's
our
Learning
and
Development
team
to
broaden
that
to
a
Workforce,
Learning
and
Development
team
to
expand
our
pipeline
efforts,
we
have
just
on
Friday,
did
a
planning
Retreat
to
be
able
to
understand
what
we
can
do
by
way
of
Summer
engagement
in
the
high
school
space
for
next
summer?
It's
been
our
long-term
plan
to
be
able
to
do
that.
X
Just
coming
back
from
covet,
it's
taken
a
while
to
be
able
to
establish
relationships
first
with
those
High
School
folks,
in
order
for
us
to
understand
what
makes
the
most
sense
in
terms
of
Engagement
with
our
departments
in
a
high
school
space
in
the
summer,
work
to
Future,
as
you're
probably
aware,
also
runs
a
summer
program
of
which
we've
been
supportive
and
helping
to
advertise
with
departments
about.
Even
now,
could
you
take
students
for
the
six
to
eight
weeks
over
the
summer
and
give
them
experience
and
exposure
to
government
as
well
as
direct
work
experience?
X
V
You
for
that
and
I'm
glad
you're
sort
of
going
into
that
Arena
because
it
sounds
like
there
might
be
some
interest
in
in
really
taking
a
look
at
a
broader
way
of
engaging
high
school
students,
especially
during
the
summer
they're
looking
for
jobs
and
it'd
be
great
to
be
able
to
get
give
them
that
exposure
in
the
summer
in
terms
of
what
we
do
here
at
the
city.
Okay,
thank
you.
So
much
council
member
batra.
U
Application
I
think
a
comment
was
made
that
if
the
council
members
want
to
have
same
opportunity
to
hire
students,
they
have
to
come
up
with
the
Department
budget.
Could
you
clarify
the
difference
between
this
Grant
and
the
department
budget?
Are.
X
Sure,
in
the
case,
specifically
of
the
Crystal
Ray
students,
we
don't
have
a
centralized
set
of
resources
to
support
those
students.
What
we
do
is
put
out
a
call
to
departments
and
ask
them
if
they
would
have
a
place
for
a
student
where
they
could
be
successful
and
the
resources
to
do
that
through
their
personal
service
budget.
Typically,
salary
savings
is
the
opportunity
to
use
to
fund
students.
We
could
do
the
same
thing
and
have
done
the
same
thing
in
elected
offices
as
well.
That's
what
I
was
offering
does
that
help
clarify
yeah.
U
And
yeah-
and
you
know
like
now-
this
is
not.
This
program
is
not
really
accepted
by
any
of
the
schools,
but
we
have
been
hiring
a
student
interns
during
the
Academic
Year
from
high
schools
and
they're,
not
part
of
your
work
program,
but
the
high
school
students
do
seem
to
work
and
we
have
in
at
my
group
there
are
three
students,
students,
working
intern
and.
Y
X
Have
a
question
about
how
that's
different
from
what
I'm
talking
about
with
Crystal
Ray
yeah,
so
certainly
students
during
the
Academic
Year
work
right.
This
particular
academic
work
study
program
allows
them
to
receive
credit
as
the
time
that
they
spend
on
the
Employers
in
the
employer's
workspace.
So
they
have
Project
work,
that's
deemed
to
be
an
oversight
driven
able
to
be
given
academic
credit
for
back
at
the
institution.
So
that's
the
thing
that
makes
it
substantially
different
for
other
students
who
might
want
to
work
with
us.
X
We
don't
actually
have
a
policy
that
allows
us
to
have
a
student
here
on
site
and
pay
them
to
work,
and
we
just
don't
have
a
high
school
policy
that
does
that
so
organizations
like
work
to
Future
Has,
a
mechanism
by
which
we
can
do
that
during
the
summer
and
they
can
get
paid
and
they
can
also
get
the
experience.
But
that's
not
for
credit.
Does
that
help
to
clarify.
K
Thank
you
and
this
I
guess
this
could
be
a
question
for
our
Council.
Do
we
have
any
legal
obligation
to
make
sure
that
funding
that's
provided
through
grants
have
to
be
competitive
because
I
could
see
somebody
I,
don't
know
putting
a
lawsuit
saying?
Oh,
you
know
this.
You
guys
are
saying
this
is
a
competitive
process,
but
only
one
organization
in
the
city
could
essentially
get
it.
So
does
this
leave
us
up
to
any
legal
ramifications.
B
S
You
council,
member
potentially,
although
I
I
I'm,
not
certain
that
the
RFP
that
was
put
out
was
so
narrow
that
only
one
could
one
school
could
respond,
but
I
would
leave,
but
staff
would
have
to
provide
more
information
on
that,
but
it
did
go
through
a
normal
RFP
type
process.
I.
S
S
V
Thank
you,
I,
don't
see
any
other
hands.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
this
move
approval?
Second,
there's
a
motion:
a
second
Tony.
V
R
All
right,
Beekman
here
a
reminder
to
practice:
good
openness
and
accountability
with
atnt
and
other
Broadband
technology
companies.
Good
luck!
In
those
efforts
there
was
a
lot
possible
that
we
can
be
doing
good
luck
on
those
efforts.
Thank
you.
D
Q
What
is
not
attached
to
this
and
what
kobit
highlighted
very
clearly
in
distinction
is
the
digital
divide
that
exists
on
the
east
side
of
San
Jose,
and
we
need
to
bridge
that
that
is
government's
job.
That
is
government's
responsibility
to
do
that,
because
the
deficiency
is
created
out
of
the
aforementioned
racist
policies
that
I
was
referencing
earlier.
You
see
there
wasn't
any
any
element
of
Our
Lives.
That
was
not
impacted
and
one
of
them
was
the
digital
divide
and
so
you're
you're
actually
hampering
and
impeding
students
ability
to
access
the
internet.
Q
You
know
it
Foams
us
up
a
lot,
there's
a
lot
of
like
dead
zones
over
there
on
the
east
side,
because
there
was
no
infrastructure
set
in
place
in
order
to
accommodate
them,
because
somebody
decided
that
Mexicans
were
only
Suited
for
field
work,
they
were
suited
for
car
mechanics
and
they
were
suited
for
working
in
warehouses
and
driving
forklifts,
but
that's
all
we
were
suited
for
so
there
was
no
investment
in
infrastructures
that
would
support
the
people
that
literally
fed
the
world
and
I
make
no
exaggeration
in
them.
Q
K
Okay,
so
the
2.23
was
essentially
the
Santa
Clara
County
Housing
Authority
purchase
of
the
hirasol
apartments
and
in
District
Five,
first
off
I
just
want
to
thank
Jackie
and
the
housing
team
for
their
work
on
this
item
and
I'm
going
to
try
to
be
brief.
I
want
to
share
my
appreciation
for
the
team
at
the
Santa
Clara
County
Housing
Authority,
who
Moved
quickly
with
stakeholders
to
make
sure
that
they
could
take
ownership
of
the
hitasol
apartments.
I
want
to
just
be
clear
if
the
county
didn't
come
in.
K
This
could
have
been
disastrous.
A
disastrous
outcome
for
some
of
our
senior
families
who
live
in
this
apartment,
because
if
a
for-profit
developer
or
a
for-profit
property
owner
had
purchased
it,
we
could
have
seen
a
displacement
of
around
59,
high-risk,
seniors.
So
I
think
this
item
truly
demonstrates
the
importance
of
strategies
for
preservation
to
make
sure
that
we're
ensuring
the
livelihood
of
our
most
vulnerable.
Thank
you
and
I
I
would
like
to
move
the
memo.
C
Right
is
there
a
second
great
councilor
Davis?
Thank
you,
I,
don't
see
any
other
hands.
We've
not
taken
public
comment
on
the
full,
correct.
Okay,
let's
go
ahead
and
do
that
clarify.
D
R
All
right,
Larry
Beekman,
here,
good
luck
on
this
consent,
calendar
item
you're
talking
about
I,
wanted
to
speak
on
items
2.21,
2.31
and
2.32,
which
is
around
Tech
accountability
as
usual.
I
guess,
the
first
to
comment
on
on
previous
comments
from
Paul
on
this
item
about
racial
equity
on
the
east
side.
There's
a
lot
of
stuff
going
in
right
now
and
there's
a
lot
especially
on
these
side.
R
West
Side
issues
actually
have
their
own
Dead
Zone
problems
and
that
we
really
have
to
consider
the
ideas
of
responsibility
and
openness
and
accountability.
If
you
want
to
add
those
things
and
how
you
talk
about
the
future
of
tech
and
Broadband
issues,
then
we
have
a
full
community
process.
Then
we
have
ideas
of
sustainability,
which
goes
directly
into
the
conversation
about
again
these
Tech
items.
You
are
finally
Hallelujah
talking
about
aopr
use
again.
R
You
were
not
talking
about
this
subject
the
past
few
years,
police
were
saying
they
had
zero
aoprs
in
their
mobile
units
in
their
police
cars.
Basically,
you've
been
building
aoprs
for
years,
not
just
in
police
departments
and
Public
Works
in
many
departments.
Aoprs
are
like
stocking
stuffers
going
around
these
days
and
for
you
guys
to
say
there
was
Zero
coming
in.
It
was
really
disingenuous
and
hurtful
thankfully
you're
talking
about
it
again
and
what
you
need
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
R
There's
a
new
flock
system
going
around.
That's
it's
a
blanket
system,
that's
covering
areas,
entire
cities
with
aopa
our
use,
and
that
way
you
can
do
quick
spots
and
it's
been
a
help
and
I
think
that
you
guys
have
been
really
impressed
and
I
can
feel
that
energy
that
you're
impressed.
It's
from
that
I
really
ask
that
you
can
ask
to
limit
this
sort
of
tech.
That's
off
to
a
really
promising
start.
I
think
you
guys
are
going
to
probably
want
to
build
and
build
and
build
on
it.
Please
keep
it
minimum.
Q
Yes,
also
from
the
Horseshoe,
where
do
I
start
first
of
all
go
with
the
grants
that
were
allocated
to
all
of
these
non-profits.
There
was
literally
there's
there's
tens
of
millions
of
dollars
there.
It
would
have
been
nice
if
they
were
held
responsible
to
come
in
and
tell
us.
This
is
our.
This
is
my
money,
so
I
want
to
know
what
are
they
doing?
Q
You
know
just
as
a
courtesy
that
since
you're
getting
all
this
millions
and
millions
of
dollars,
wouldn't
don't
you
think
it
would
be
prudent
for
them
to
have.
You
know,
come
in,
and
you
know
kind
of
just
give
a
little
spill
about
how
that
money
is
being
spent,
considering
that
the
homeless
rate
continues
to
increase,
there's
that
the
library
Foundation,
the
library
Foundation
a
two
million
dollar
contract,
the
San
Jose
Public
Library-
is
now
dealing
with
something
called
Library
Foundation.
Q
Well,
what
I'd
like
to
know
is
who's
censoring,
the
videos,
Eastside
dreams,
Eastside
dreams,
the
one
where
Dr
Professor,
Jose
Negrete
Jose
Negrete,
was
giving
her
grito
her
platica
my
forever
home,
and
that
video
was
censored.
Q
Half
of
it
is
gone
and
that
half
that's
gone
was
all
of
the
Chicano
organizations
that
that
made
a
difference
for
us.
This
is
our
identity
sounds
like
now,
I'm
not
going
to
assume
any.
You
know
malfeasance
on
the
part
of
the
public
library,
but
they
need
to
answer
to
us.
C
AC
I
don't
like
to
keep
you
all
waiting.
Sorry
thanks.
Hey
just
wanted
to
say
that
had
a
good
conversation
with
Dolan
Bechtel
about
the
new
director
of
Housing,
and
we
talked
about
some
good
stuff.
We
talked
about
someone
with
a
background
in
community
engagement,
which
I
see
some
of
the
questions
included
in
the
interviews
include.
AC
We
had
a
conversation
about
metrics
and
how
analyzing
what
the
department
does
and
how
the
contracts
that
it
gives
out
achieve
outcomes
that
the
city
wants
to
see,
and
we
also
talked
about
the
department
thinking
about
how
to
plan
and
how's
the
best
city
policy
or
policy
is
possible
and
how
to
allow
you,
the
elected
officials,
to
worry
most
about
the
politics.
So
there
is
no
replacing
I
think
she's
here
today,
there's
no
replacing
Jackie
she
just
left,
but
I
I
think
they're
the
city's
on
oh
there.
AC
Q
Q
So
you
see
we're
not
going
to
get
anywhere
as
a
city
we're
going
to
keep
putting
Band-Aids
on
everything,
because
we're
not
dealing
with
the
source
of
the
infection
and
the
source
of
the
infection.
Is
that
redlining
map?
That's
what
created
the
policies
of
segregation
which
created
the
policies
of
generational
poverty
and
in
those
varios?
What
you
did
is
you
criminalized
the
symptoms
of
the
segregation
that
you
created?
Q
Thusly,
you
didn't
have
to
accept
any
accountability
for
it.
You
could
blame
the
victim.
You
can
blame
the
people
that
grew
up
there.
Oh
they're,
just
they're,
just
maladjusted,
no
we're
not
you
created
these
bodies.
We
didn't
pick
where
we
lived.
You
picked
where
we
lived
so
now
that
housing
director
they
better
be
schooled
because
I'm
gonna
be
on
them
and
I'm
gonna
make
absolutely
certain
that
that
has
to
be
a
it
has
to
be
a
metric
that
they
use
in
order
to
so
I
want
Section
8
housing
on
Lincoln
Avenue.
Q
D
R
Hi
Blair
Beekman,
here
yeah.
We
we
had
two
really
really
good
ipas
back
to
back
in
the
2000
2010s
ladoris,
Cordell
and
Kevin
I
can't
remember
his
last
name.
He
moved
to
Chicago.
He
went
to
work
in
Chicago
as
an
IPA
of
all
places,
so
I
mean
really.
They
did
amazing
good
work,
and
then
we
had
a
third
one
come
in
boy.
R
R
It
does
embracing,
so
what
I'm
saying
is
is
from
those
three
really
good
choices:
I,
let
Siobhan
was
good.
She
was
good
bureaucratically,
but
not
Dynamic.
So
much
and
not
Progressive
is
in
a
ways
the
three
others
were
Jackie's
been
amazingly
Progressive
and
it's
it's
really
I
think
we
all
count
on
her
for
that
and
I
hope.
R
You'll
want
to
continue
that
tradition
and
I
I
think
we
we're
obviously
really
hurting
from
the
IP
IPA
things
and
that
I
I
just
think
a
dynamism
to
have
a
really
good
Progressive
housing
directors,
important
for
our
future.
In
the
mold
of
Jackie
and
Rachel
Vander
Bean
has
been
a
really
good
student
of
Jackie
I.
Think
and
if
you,
when
you
listen
to
Rachel,
speak
of
things,
I
think
she's
just
really
interesting
in
how
how
to
talk
about
issues.
R
So
you
know
a
directness,
I
suppose
maybe
needed
more,
and
with
that
a
good
Progressive,
really
good,
oppress,
Progressive
approach.
Those
two
things
are
I,
I,
just
hope.
We
can
continue
that
tradition
of
what
Jackie
started
here
in
Forest,
album
San
Jose,
and
that
I
mean
for
your
current
issues.
I'll
talk
more
later.
Thank
you.
C
K
Thank
you,
Meryl
I'll,
try
to
make
this
quick.
Thank
you.
Jennifer
Dolan,
Sarah
Lee
and
our
entire
housing
department
for
today's
item.
I
had
haven't
had
much
time
to
get
to
know
Jackie,
but
what
I
do
know
is
she'll
be
missed
by
many
as
an
incoming.
Well
as
a
recently
addition
added
council
member
I've
experienced
about
three
different
director,
searches
and
I've
been
pleasantly
surprised
with
the
process
and
how
it's
been
led
by
staff.
E
K
H
K
Oh,
don't
answer,
oh,
could
you
could
you
speak
to
that
or
essentially
are
we
comfortable
with
the
response
rate
of
only
18
of
the
staff
and
then
do
we
feel
that
the
panel
was
a
strong
representation
of
the
positions
within
the
department.
AD
So
good
afternoon,
Dolan
Beckel
chief
of
staff
for
the
city
manager,
I,
am
not
part
of
the
housing
department,
but
but
I
will
I
will
I
will
endeavor
to
answer
those
questions,
so
the
specific
that
you're
mentioning
was
the
the
surveys
and
the
number
of
employees
in
the
housing
department
that
actually
took
the
survey
being
about
20,
which
is
about
18
of
the
department.
I.
Think
I
would
say
that
What
What
In
addition
to
that.
AD
AD
That's
actually
much
higher
than
the
normal
engagement
that
we've
had
so
so
I,
obviously
can't
answer
answer
for
Jackie,
but
I
think
that
when
we
look
at
all
the
feedback
we
had
from
all
the
community
surveys
and
the
focus
group
groups
and
the
76
one-on-one
conversations
I
had
I
think
that
the
feedback
was
fairly
consistent
and
I.
Actually
thank
the
housing
department
for
having
50
of
their
their
their
employees
actually
engage
on
this
I.
K
C
D
R
Hi
Blair
Beekman
here
encroachment,
so
this
is
items
to
people
for
people
to
stay
off
the
the
land
that
you're
going
to
be
developing
and
building
on.
R
If
I'm
understanding
this
correctly
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
I
can
understand
you're
setting
a
an
agenda
item
to
create
such
a
statement.
So
that's
a
lot
and
so
good
luck
in
addressing
this
issue.
I
think
we
have
to
be
very
mindful
of
these
sort
of
things
and
respect
the
fact
that
people
you
know
we
do
have
to
build
housing
and
find
ways
to
build
shelter
and
good
luck.
R
How
we
do
that
and
you
can
respect
when
people
do
move
into
places
and
that
it
doesn't
have
to
be
an
immediate
removal.
There
can
be
a
certain
time
period
to
ask
people
to
move
and
I'm
learning
that
here
actually
down
in
San
Diego.
Now
it
doesn't
have
to
be
in
a
24-hour
period.
It
can
be
48,
it
can
be
72,
it
can
be
reasonable
amounts
of
time.
Thank
you.
B
Q
Q
Not
sure
yeah,
sorry
about
that.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
admonishment
okay,
so
the
the
Martin
versus
Boise
was
instituted
to
allow
for
people
to
camp
on
public
sidewalks
or
in
public
parks.
Q
If
there
is
no
other
accommodation
provided
for
by
the
city,
okay,
so
it's
the
city
dragging
its
feet
and
using
or
outgoing
director
which
I'm
glad
to
buy
that
created
these
deficits,
to
create
the
encroachment.
So
you
see
I,
don't
want
to
be
looking
at
symptoms
and
just
be
dealing
with
symptoms
as
independent
of
other
issues.
We,
if
we're
going
to
assess
something
and
we're
going
to
look
at
something.
V
Thank
you
I
know
that
we
generally
do
minor
encroachments
kind
of
frequently
whenever
there's
major
encroachments
I
wonder
in
terms
of
whether
or
not
that
we
would
do
this
for
anybody.
I
know
that
when
the
city
encroached
on
private
property,
we
have
to
pay
for
it
and
we
just
did
it
on
First
Street.
When
you
know
we
have
a
construction
encroachment,
so
I
was
just
wondering.
Is
this
done
for
just
anybody,
because
it's
not
minor,
it's
rather
large?
It's
a
major
would.
AE
Good
afternoon
public
works
again,
the
the
term
major
and
minor
sometimes
makes
it
seem
like
it's
one
thing
or
another
in
terms
of
the
descriptor
again,
it
is
a
kind
of
a
class
of
encroachment
that
is
also
revocable
in
terms
of
anything
else,
and
so
it
is
a
period
of
time,
and
it
is
a
of
a
kind
of
a
permanence
and
an
agreement
of
what
how
long
that
will
be
there,
as
opposed
to
a
minor
which
has
much
lesser
permanency
in
that
location
plus,
we
also
have
other
agreements
with
those
entities
like
PG
e,
like
Verizon,
like
those
other
ones
that
typically
have
a
lot
of
minor
encroachment
permits
to
do
work
in
the
right-of-way.
AE
The
major
increase
encroachment
has
to
do
with
we're
it's
a
decent
sized
piece
of
infrastructure
that
can
be
revoked
based
on
the
terms
of
an
agreement,
and
so
in
terms
of,
and
we
put
it
in
a
way
so
that
it
doesn't
obstruct
other
utilization
of
that
space.
Should
there
be
a
need
for
that
space,
we
would
invoke
the
part
of
the
agreement
that
would
then
revoke
their
ability
to
use
that
space.
Does
that
make
sense?
Is.
V
V
Property
we
had
to
pay
for
the
use
of
that.
You
know
if
the.
AF
V
On
the
other
foot
we
have
to
pay,
but
when
it's
a
private.
AE
I
understand
I,
understand
the
question
now
better
I
apologize,
so
we
have
a
set
of
criteria
that
it
needs
to
meet
for
us
to
allow
them
to
use
it
okay,
and
so
we
meet
and
it's
in
the
municipal
code
that
requires
a
certain
there
has
to
be
a
public
benefit
for
that.
It's
one
of
the
things
that
so
we
get
a
benefit
for
this
being
done,
and
so
that's
one
of
their
Criterion
that
usually
kind
of
offsets
the
idea
of
of
a
fee.
C
Well,
it's
Innovative
and
experimental
and
we'll
see
I
I'm
excited
about
the
potential
public
benefit
of
being
able
to
install
a
private
utility
system
that
allows
for
water
and
energy
used
to
be
shared
across
multiple
properties
and
have
water
from
one
be
reused
elsewhere
and
heat
be
exchanged
in
more
efficient
ways,
so
certainly
a
learning
opportunity,
but
definitely
appreciate
the
question,
I'm
glad
we
have
the
ability
to
revoke
the
this
offered
this
privilege
if
it's
getting
in
the
way
of
any
public
interest.
C
C
Q
Yes,
password
from
the
Horseshoe
I
would
like
to
reference,
because
I
thought
it
was
an
excellent
idea
and
I
hope
that
you
will
chime
in
on
this
and
and
articulate
and
kind
of
expand
on
that
position.
And
what
you
had
stated
mayor,
Mayhem
was
using
metrics
to.
Q
Q
Why
should
you
just
like
sit
down
and
just
like
continue
to
benefit
from
our
tax
dollars
when
you
are
not
producing
anything
of
public
interest
for
those
tax
dollars?
You
know
I
mean
I,
don't
like
getting
burned
man,
you
know
I,
don't
I
I
I,
don't
like
that.
So
I
think
that
this
was.
This
is
an
opportune
moment
to
really
institutionalize
that
idea
and
I
hope
that
it
becomes
a
part
of
the
discussion.
Thank
you.
D
R
Hi
Blair
Beekman
I
just
wanted
to
thank
yourselves
for
the
explanations
of
encouragement
on
the
previous
item
and
it's
helped
myself
a
lot.
Thank
you.
C
Great
thank
you
and
I.
I
do
just
want
to
clarify
that
this
is
a
general
wage
increase
that
is
essentially
in
line
with
all
the
other
bargaining
units
that
we've
come
to
terms
with
this
year.
Not
I,
don't
want
it
to
be
confused
with
the
management
performance
program
that
the
city
has
okay,
I
am
not
seeing
any
hands.
Any
colleagues
have
questions,
comments
or
emotion,
motion.
D
C
Unanimous
zero
great!
Thank
you,
Tony!
Okay,
we
are
on
item
3.8,
an
agreement
between
the
city
of
San,
Jose
and
The.
Association
of
Legal
professionals
also
lovingly
known
as
Alp
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
to
our
city
manager
to
share
a
few
words
before
we
continue.
AB
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
We
are
very
pleased
that
the
city
and
The
Association
of
Legal
professionals,
again
known
as
Alp,
reached
an
overall
tentative
agreement
on
June
13th
2023,
which
extends
the
term
of
their
contract
for
an
additional
two
years.
I
would
like
to
thank
Tara
Shafi,
who
is
the
president
of
alp
and
Jennifer
shambry.
The
city's
lead
labor
negotiator.
We
very
much
appreciate.
Tara's
collaboration
allowed
us
to
reach
an
agreement
very
very
quickly,
so
thank
you
very
much.
Q
The
supernatives
do,
do
you
know,
need
any
good
I,
don't
know
what
that
I.
Don't
know
what
great
fantastic
work
means,
those
those
are
meaningless
to
me.
You
know
excellent
job,
you
know
a
go-getter,
you
know
those
mean
nothing.
I
need
something
a
little
bit
more
concrete
if
we're
going
to
be
extending
their
contract
for
two
years,
I
mean
you
know,
and
it's
up
on
an
agenda
item
and
it's
up
for
public
discussion,
I
mean
what
are
we
getting
for
that
money?
Q
You
know
what
what
what's
been
done,
because
all
I
have
seen
is
you
know,
issue
after
it's
almost
like
the
city
is
like
imploding
upon
itself.
Not
not
you
know.
Have
it
not
expanding
in
ways
that
would
address
the
entire
community,
we're
addressing
a
very
exclusive
part
of
our
community,
and
so
lawyers
protect
them.
Q
Q
Him
so
I
want
to
hear
what
their
position
is
on
the
city's
policies
and
the
legal
arguing
for
the
legal
Amendment
in
language,
formulating
the
legal
language
to
legally
amend
what
has
happened
in
the
past
that
continues
to
infect
the
president,
which
is
going
to
impact
our
future
I
think
those
are
legitimate
questions
to
ask
attorneys
and
lawyers
that
we're
going
to
hire
again
for
two
more
years.
What
is
their
policy
positions
on
that
specific
issue
itself?
Thank
you.
R
All
right
player
here,
where
we've
been
to
add
to
Paul's
words,
good
luck
in
how
we're
addressing
issues
of
outside
sources
of
city
government
how
they
work.
It
would
be
good
to
know
how
they
work
and.
R
And
think,
just
in
a
brief
looking
over
this
agenda
item,
it's
interesting.
It's
possible
I
mean
they
look
like
kind
of
almost
as
a.
R
It
would
be
nice
if
they
could
be
kind
of
a
study
session
group
where
our
own
City
attorneys
can
learn
best
practices
and
better
ways
to
work
overall
in
working
with
this
group,
and
if
that's
the
case,
hopefully
they
can
have
a
neutral
philosophy
and
and
a
teaching
learning
Philosophy
for
ourselves
and
just
a
good
luck
and
in
in
finding
the
future
of
city
government
programs
that
work
in
those
good
ways.
Thank
you.
C
Great,
thank
you
and
I
also
just
want
to
add
my
thanks
to
Jennifer
shambry
and
the
city's
negotiating
team
and
to
those
who
represented
Alp
great,
to
have
another
agreement
in
place.
I
believe
that's
our
fourth
agreement
with
the
bargaining
unit
this
year,
which
is
great
momentum
and
they've
all
been
I,
think
great
negotiations
and
gotten
us
to
a
very
fair
and
reasonable
place
so
excited
to
see
this
agreement
wrapped
up
I,
don't
see
any
hands
I.
Believe
we
had
a
motion.
Did
we
not
approval.
U
C
C
We
have
two
items:
I'm,
sorry.
We
have
three
items
item.
One
is
an
amendment
to
certain
agreements
related
to
the
interim
financing
program
to
finance
Capital
Improvements
for
the
Wastewater
system,
and
we
have
a
roughly
five-minute
staff
presentation
on
item
one.
We
will
be
hearing
items
2
and
1.6
concurrently,
but
vote
on
them
separately
after
we
take
up
this
item.
So,
let's,
let's
proceed
with
the
staff
presentation
on
item
one.
AG
Thank
you
and
good
afternoon
mayor
Mayhem,
City
Council
Members
members
of
the
public.
My
name
is
Rick
Bruno
I'm,
the
Director
of
Finance
I'm,
here
with
chinyu
sun.
The
deputy
director
of
Finance
today
we're
here
to
present
to
you
a
Wastewater
system,
interim
financing
program,
credit
agreement
amendments.
In
short,
this
is
a
line
of
credit
that
the
city
has
with
Wells
Fargo
we've
had
in
place
since
2017,
and
this
is
the
fourth
amendment
to
it.
AG
It
allows
us
to
borrow
short
term
and
then
in
once,
we've
borrowed
against
that
we're
able
to
take
out
long-term
bonds.
So
this
is
just
a
mechanism
for
us
to
borrow
interim
as
we're
developing
projects
and
spending
on
our
Capital
Improvements
for
the
Wastewater
system,
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
and
thank
a
few
folks
that
have
helped
us
on
this
effort.
The
city
attorney's
office
has
helped
us
Environmental,
Services
Department.
We
have
Municipal
advisors
and
bond
Council
that
have
helped
us
in
negotiating
this
agreement
with
Wells
Fargo.
AG
AG
The
city
has
the
ability,
through
the
San
Jose
financing
authority,
to
issue
debt
for
capital
projects,
and
the
source
of
those
funds
is
primarily
through
the
city's
sewer
service
and
use
charges
of
which
95
percent
is
collected.
On
the
annual
property
tax
bill,
the
Wastewater
system
has
a
planned
10-year,
Capital,
Improvement
of
1.5
billion
to
modernize
its
system.
AG
The
interim
financing
program,
as
I
mentioned,
is
with
Wells
Fargo
Bank
it's
for
300
million
dollars
and
was
established
in
2017.
this
Bridges,
the
short-term
financing
needs.
Well,
we
then
issue
long-term
notes.
Subordinate
Wastewater,
Revenue
notes,
interests
only
accrues
when
funds
are
borrowed.
So,
as
we
are
working
on
our
projects,
we
do
not
need
to
pay
interest
on
the
full
amount
borrowed
and,
as
I
mentioned,
there
have
been
three
amendments
so
far.
This
is
the
fourth
one.
AG
The
current
agreement
expires
on
October
18th
of
this
year,
and
the
repayment
of
this
of
these
notes
will
be
the
net
system
revenues
consideration
for
this
extension.
Why
now
we
have
revolving
notes
that
were
completely
paid
off
in
March
of
of
this
year.
Those
were
the
2022b
proceeds
from
our
bond
issuance
last
December.
AG
Interest
rates
have
been
rising
over
the
past
year
and
the
the
and
stableness
of
the
banking
sector
has
also
raised
concerns
if
we
go
out
back
out
to
Market
to
issue
a
new
agreement.
So
we
approached
Wells
Fargo
to
inquire
about
extending
our
current
agreement,
making
an
amendment
to
it
and
negotiated
the
fees
and
interest
rates.
I
would
now
pass
over
to
tenu
to
go
over
some
of
the
deals.
AH
So
what
means
we
don't
have
to
wait
until
the
expiration
date
of
the
current
agreement,
as
of
October
18
2023
for
the
capacity
reduction.
This
item
alone
will
save
the
city
about
65
000,
and
the
proposed
Force
Amendment
will
last
for
additional
three
years
to
October
16
2026.
AH
The
bank,
through
the
negotiation,
had
agreed
to
waive
the
amendment
fee
of
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
also
cover
its
legal
fee
fee
up
to
ten
thousand
dollars,
which
generated
quite
a
bit
of
saving
for
the
city
on
the
bottom
of
the
slides.
There's
some
comparison
between
the
current
agreements
and
then
the
Amendments
I
want
to
draw
your
attention
to
the
fourth
to
the
third
line.
The
commitment
fee
is
to
be
paid
on
the
entire
capacity,
whether
we
draw
of
the
funds
from
the
facility
or
not.
AH
In
this
amendment,
the
bank
agreed
to
reduce
the
commitment
fee
from
21
basis
points
to
the
19
basis,
points
which
will
create
additional
saving
for
the
city
on
the
last
line
is
talking
about
the
tax
expect
a
tax
exempt
drawer
rate.
The
spread
will
increase
from
37
basis
point
to
42
basis
point.
This
is
with
the
tax
exam
wait.
We
mostly
use
the
facility
to
draw
tax
exam
funding
for
the
CIP
development
of
the
Wastewater
Revenue
system,
which,
as
you
all
know,
is
generally
charged
at
a
lower
rate.
AH
The
pricing
of
the
Wastewater
subordinary
Revenue
notes
is
packed
to
the
rating
of
the
2020
to
be
bonds,
which
we
all
know
has
been
rated
very
high
as
a
topics
top
and
highest
rating
possible
AAA
by
three
major
rating
agencies:
SMP
Fitch
and
Uncle
bound
reading
agency,
which
plays
The
Proposal
fee
in
the
lowest
category
level.
One
is
indicated
by
the
screen
Arrow.
AH
So
with
this
item,
we're
asking
the
city,
council
and
then
city
of
San,
Jose
financing,
Authority
board
to
adopt
a
resolution
to
approve
and
authorize
the
execution
and
delivery
of
a
Fourth
Amendment
to
the
credit
agreement
and,
of
course,
amended
and
a
restated
fee
ladder.
Q
Q
Now
Wells,
Fargo
I,
you
know,
there's
short-term
memory
here
they
were
forging
people's
I
mean
ruining
People's
Credit,
they
were
forging
documents,
and
these
were
these
were
Wells
Fargo
employees
in
order
to
open
up
accounts
and
and
the
customers
didn't
know
anything
about
it,
and
it
was
on
a
large
large
scale
and
so
I'm
concerned
and
questioned
the
Judgment
of
who's,
making
the
decision
to
do
300
million
dollars
worth
of
business
with
the
company
like
that
and
and
the
another
issue,
was
that
a
large
source
of
those
peoples
more,
of
course,
May
comes,
and
you
know,
because
they're
vulnerable
they're
vulnerable
to
these
systems,
and
so
there's
that
now,
as
as
far
as
the
who's,
the
fiduciary
now
with
respect
to
the
bonds,
I
think
we
need
to
talk
about
how
we're
going
to
start
financing
Bonds
in
the
future,
and
one
of
the
ideas
that
I
have
and
that
I'd
like
to
suggest
here
is
that
we
create
a
bond
that
taxes
at
one
percent
over
every
one.
Q
Hundred
thousand
dollars
in
equity
and
every
single
one
of
the
redlined
areas
of
the
city,
it's
going
to
generate
it's
going
to
generate
Millions
upon
millions
of
dollars
every
single
year.
That's
number
one
number
two:
it's
also
going
to
amend
historical
justices
because
it's
going
to
be
directly
tied
to
it
and
number
three.
We
also
need
to
renegotiate
prop
13.,
oh
yeah,.
D
R
Hi,
if
this
item
is
going
to
be
about
water
treatment,
plant
issues,
you
know,
I
I
think
it's
important
to
really
note
that
we
spent
a
lot
of
money
in
the
past
several
years
on
on
on
updating
and
upgrading
the
water
treatment
plant
and
an
Institute,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
climate
change
issues.
R
I
think
I
think
we're
trying
to
prepare
my
guests
for
the
upcoming
seed
level
rise
issues
in
the
Around
The
Bay,
and
we
I
I
can't
say
it
enough
we're
in
a
new
Administration.
Now
we
have
to
learn
how
to
be
more
open
about
that
conversation
and
I
know.
R
Real
estate
is
important
to
yourselves,
but
with
all
the
new
federal
funding
dollars
coming
in
with
sewer
and
wastewater
treatment
and
water
runoff
issues
we're
at
a
time
and
an
opportunity
to
learn
how
to
make
that
conversation
more
open
and
accessible
and
understandable
and
I
know
you
guys
have
a
lot
of
fears,
but
I
just
think
you're
smart
enough
to
learn
how
to
balance
these
important
matters
and
conversations
and
not
keep
it
so
hidden
from
the
public.
R
You
refuse
to
talk
about
the
sea
level
rise
issues
around
the
bay
and
around
District
Four
and
the
other
districts
around
the
bay,
and
we
have
to.
We
simply
have
to
and
I'm
a
bit
upset.
You
guys
don't
make
a
better
attempt
to
do
that
and
good
luck
how
you
can
and
I
really
hope
this
is
applicable
to
this
item.
I'm!
Sorry,
if
it's
not,
and
if
it
isn't,
hopefully
it's
something
we
can
be
considering
as
well.
I'm.
Sorry
thank
you
for
your
time
and
patience
and
turning
out.
C
C
D
D
And
Joanna's
absent,
okay,
so
the
vote
is
10-0
with
botcher
voting.
Yes
verbally
because
his
his
screen's,
not
working
and
Juwan
is,
is
voting.
Yes,
it's
unanimous
yay.
C
Okay,
thank
you.
Yeah
just
everybody's,
following
along
we're
going
to
take
up
item
two
which
isn't
it
the
issuance
of
city
of
San,
Jose,
financing,
Authority
commercial
paper
notes.
We
will
hear
that
item
concurrently
with
item
6.1,
which
involves
the
Municipal
Water
new
offices
project.
There's
a
staff
presentation.
We
will
only
vote
on
item
two
within
the
joint
meeting.
When
we
adjourn
this
meeting,
we
will
then
vote
on
6-1
as
part
of
the
regular
order
of
our
city
council
meeting
as
I
understand
it.
Okay,
I'm
seeing
thumbs
up
great.
AI
AI
This
presentation
in
this
project
is
regarding
the
replacement
of
the
muni
water,
administrative
and
operations
facility
and
Council
authorization
to
award
the
project,
along
with
the
associated
financing
quick
background
here
on
on
our
munawati
mini
water
facilities.
We
we
serve
primarily
District
8
and
a
portion
of
District
4..
We
have
about
22
locations,
spread
out
over
about
33
square
miles.
This
is
our
main
site.
AI
This
is
our
main
Hub,
where
we
control
and
operate
the
water
utility
as
long
as
well
as
we
prepare
for
emergency
emergency
response,
water
quality
issues
and
response
and
all
our
Regulatory
Compliance,
the
existing
facility
primarily
has
three
staff
locations.
One
is
a
converted
equipment
garage.
That's
where
about
a
third
of
the
staff
sit
as
well
as
our
our
computer
control
room
that
we
use
to
respond
to
the
water
utility
and
operate,
especially
during
emergencies.
We
have
a
temporary
office
trailer
about
another
third
of
the
staff
and
a
and
an
aging
Administration
facility.
AI
We
also
have
several
features
that
are
very
unique
to
a
water
utility
versus
most
other
places
where
staff
might
sit.
We
have
a
computer
control,
room,
water,
quality,
room,
water,
sample
room.
We
have
a
Communications
Tower,
which
may
not
seem
like
a
big
deal,
but
that
is
our
way
of
of
connecting
all
of
the
sites
together
and
making
sure
the
water
system
is
operating
as
efficiently
as
possible
to
keep
a
key
feature
for
us.
Also
at
the
same
location,
we
have
on-site,
Wells,
backup
power
generation.
AI
We
are
an
EOC
for
us,
it's
a
department
operations
center,
but
to
the
state
we're
considered
an
EOC,
so
we
are
designated
as
that
in
order
to
run
the
water
utility
efficiently
in
any
emergency
situation,
and
then
we
have
again
some
other
items.
AI
Going
back
several
years
now,
almost
a
decade,
we
began
to
log
in
several
site
improvements
that
were
needed.
We
have
deteriorating
infrastructure
on
site,
a
lot
of
seismic
and
structural
upgrades
that
are
needed.
Mechanical
improvements,
Investments
to
address
some
health
and
safety
concerns
and
issues
for
staff,
primarily
a
mold,
in
addition
to
some
seismic
issues
and
then
implementation
and
looking
forward
potential
implementation
of
some
Net
Zero
carbon
objectives
to
address
all
that
go
up
until
about
2018.
AI
We
are
looking
at
the
list
of
of
project
individual
projects
and
they
were
getting
more
and
more
expensive
and
we
were
concerned
about
both
implementation,
the
timeline,
but
also
cost
our
primary
way
of
funding.
Our
projects
is
through
water
rates
and
we
are
very
concerned
leading
into
about
2019
on
what
is.
How
are
we
going
to
do
this,
and
with
that
we
partnered
with
Public
Works
in
2019
and
procured
the
services
of
IBA
group.
AE
AH
So
the
city
has
established
a
commercial
paper
Pro
program
as
a
short-term
financing
program
in
2014..
In
this
program,
the
city
pledges
a
number
of
assets,
including
Tech
Museum
fire
stations,
one
number
one
and
a
three,
please
Communication,
Center
Animal
Care
Center
and
South
San
Jose
police
substation
to
the
direct
pay
letter
for
credit
of
a
U.S
Bank
up
to
toward
issuance
of
commercial
paper
up
to
175
million
dollars.
Our
agreement
with
U.S
Bank
expires
on
March
in
March
2025..
AH
So,
with
underneath
the
program
we
can
issue
a
number
of
CP.
You
know
the
commercial
paper
notes,
meaning
and
each
CP
node
can
stay.
You
know
can
be
outstanding
up
to
270
days
when
the
CP
node
matures
we
can
either
fully
pay
it
off
or
partially
paid
off
or
roll
it
to
another
maturity
date
and
when
the
project
gets
Pro
is
completed
if
there
are
still
commercial
paper
notes
that
are
standing
for
that
project.
AH
Finance
staff
usually
work
with
the
Department
to
amortize
the
outstanding
balance
up
to
seven
years
in
accordance
with
the
debt
management
policy
of
the
city.
The
least
the
commercial
paper
program
is
under
the
city's
least
Revenue
financing
program
So
based
on
our
debt
management
policy.
It
requires
a
super
majority
approval
by
the
city
council,
meaning
we
need
a
two-service
approval
from
you.
A
minimum
of
eight
notes,
eight
votes,
so
there
are
a
number
of
benefits
and
the
risk
associated
with
the
commercial
paper
group
program.
AH
The
benefits,
including
it's
a
short-term
financing,
with
very
flexible
automatic
amortization
schedule.
It
is
a
alternative
to
other
medium-term
financing
like,
for
instance,
seven
to
ten
year
bonds
on
a
normal
condition,
Market
condition,
meaning
on
an
absolute
yell
curve
condition.
Short-Term
financing,
like
commercial
paper,
does
generate
a
lower
cost
of
a
funding,
but
right
now
it's
not
necessarily
the
case,
because
we
know
the
yield
curve
is
kind
of
inverted,
but
hopefully
the
situation
will
reverse
itself
sometime
in
a
relative's
near
future,
but
nobody
has
crystal
ball
at
this
point.
AH
There
is
no
additional
links
or
improvements
being
financed
under
the
commercial
paper
with
those
benefits
they
also
come
with
risks.
The
commercial
paper
requires
a
lot
of
credit
from
A
banks.
The
banks
can
be
downgraded
and
when
we
have
the
letter
credit
reaching
to
the
end
of
the
term,
we
need
a
renewal
sometime
when
the
banking
sector
becomes
volatile
renewal
of
the
letter,
credit
can
be
challenging
and
I
would
say
at
the
current
market
condition,
which
is
so
much
so
much
volatility
happen
in
the
banking
sector.
AH
In
my
this,
this
period
is
going
to
be
challenging
to
extend
any
kind
of
a
lot
of
credit,
Maybe
and
then
also
commercial
paper
is
a
short-term
note,
so
meaning
the
rate
change
is
quite
quite
a
bit.
So
every
time
we
we
wrote
the
paperwork
forward.
The
interest
rate
will
change
based
on
the
market
conditions,
so
there's
been
quite
an
uncertainty
in
the
interest
rate
and
the
commercial
paper.
AH
When
we
say
we
roll
the
beginning,
we
are
marketing
the
commercial
paper
when
every
time
when
we
Market
the
commercial
paper,
there's
always
a
risk
associated
with
the
market
when
the
market
interests
in
a
certain
credit,
no,
the
city's
commercial
paper
is
a
credit.
When
the
appetite
for
the
credit
wins,
we
may
run
into
challenges,
enrolling
the
and
the
remarketing
of
a
commercial
paper.
AH
So
the
city
is
a
commercial
paper,
has
a
maximum
capacity
right
now
of
175
million
dollars.
Only
three
programs
right
now
has
outstanding
commercial
paper
notes
and
authorization,
and
those
three
are
the
parts
of
food
flood
recovery
program.
They
have
about
6.4
million
dollars.
AH
The
clean
energy
department
for
the
purchase
of
a
energy
and
operation
cost
operating
costs,
they're
about
95
million,
outstanding
authorize,
CP,
awesome
capacity
and
then
Esco
conservation
project
project
also
has
a
6.4
million
on
Commercial
paper
outstanding.
All
in
all,
current
utilization
of
the
commercial
paper
is
about
a
1.8
million
dollars.
AH
So
in
this
item
we
are
requesting
the
authorized
authorization
from
the
council
and
the
financing
board
up
to
40
million
dollars
for
the
community
water
building
project.
The
description
the
project
was
provided
by
the
public
works
and
then
Environmental
Services
Department.
Additionally,
with
this
request,
we'll
also
ask
you
to
consider
reducing
the
authorization
for
energy
purchase
for
the
clean
energy
Department
from
95
million
to
75
million
just
to
reduce
about
20
million.
I
would
like
to
take
a
few
moments
to
discuss
why
we
are
requesting
this.
AH
Since
then,
the
department
clean
energy
department
has
issued
about
60
million
out
of
the
95
million
authorization
in
commercial
paper
notes.
So
far
they
have
paid
down
40
million,
so
there's
only
20
million
outstanding,
so
there's
quite
a
bit
gap
between
the
outstanding
CP
notes
and
then
your
Authority,
so
staff
from
Finance
approached
to
staff
in
C
in
clean
energy,
Department
discussed
whether
they
need
this
much
of
a
capacity,
and
we
mutually
agreed
that
it
is
a
option
at
this
time
to
reduce
the
capacity
authorization
to
clean
energy
Department
by
20
million.
AH
There
are
two
obviously
benefits
for
this
reduction
one
and
it
will
reduce
the
fee
burden
by
the
department,
so
clean
energy
won't
pay,
lower
fee
regard
related
to
the
CP
program.
Second,
as
I
had
mentioned,
we
only
have
175
capacity
right
now,
so
by
reducing
the
authorization
for
the
clean
energy
Department,
it
will
free
up
additional
20
million
capacity
for
other
City
uses.
AH
So
with
those
proposal,
the
CP
program
utilization,
if
Council
and
financing
board
approves,
we
will
will
just
be
utilize.
The
program
under
128
million
dollars,
so
our
recommendation
are
as
the
following.
AH
C
Great
thank
you.
I
now
need
to
read
a
script
before
we
take
comments
as
part
of
this
public
hearing
and
move
on
to
action
of
the
joint
Authority
here
good
afternoon,
the
city
of
San
Jose
is
proposing
to
issue
lease
Revenue
commercial
paper
notes
by
the
city
of
San,
Jose's,
financing,
Authority
and
the
city
for
the
one
construction
of
a
new
Municipal
Water
Administration
and
operations
building
and
two
the
acquisition
construction
installation
of
related
Capital
Improvements
for
the
city
of
San,
Jose,
Environmental,
Services,
Department,
section
section.
C
6586.5
of
the
California
government
code
requires
that
the
city
hold
a
public
hearing
regarding
the
approval
by
the
city
of
a
lease
financing
by
the
authority
and
after
such
hearing
make
a
finding
that
significant
public
benefits
will
accrue
from
such
financing
in
accordance
with
section
6586
of
the
California
government
code.
This
hearing
is
the
opportunity
for
all
interested
persons
to
speak
or
submit
written
comments
about
the
proposal
to
issue
lease
Revenue
commercial
paper
notes
and
the
improvements
to
be
financed.
Would
anyone
like
to
submit
written
comments
Tony?
Do
we
have
any
written
comments.
D
AJ
C
C
C
V
This
is
just
a
quick
thank
you.
I
I
had
a
bunch
of
questions
and
Catherine,
and
our
director
alosh
answered
them.
So
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you.
C
U
C
O
Thank
you,
mayor
Chris,
Burton,
director
of
planning,
building
code
enforcement,
joined
by
Rachel,
Roberts,
director,
deputy
director
of
code
enforcement,
and
yes,
we're
pleased
to
come
before
you
to
give
a
report
on
the
the
code
enforcement
focused
area
service
team
pilot
program
that
we're
about
to
bring
to
fruition.
O
O
You
know
we've
put
in
a
strategic
plan
to
address
our
agency,
that
is
ongoing,
but
one
of
our
top
key
target
areas
has
been
code
enforcement.
So
beginning
back
in
October
of
2021,
we
had
a
vacancy
rate
of
28
in
our
code
enforcement
inspector
positions.
We've
run
essentially
one
ongoing
recruitment
since
then
over
the
last
20
months
and
have
brought
that
vacancy
rate
down
to
four
percent
and
within
that
our
general
code
team
of
15
code
inspectors
is
now
fully
staffed,
which
is
the
first
time
in
in
a
number
of
years.
O
We
developed
a
pilot
program
that
really
took
the
emphasis
away
from
complaint-based
code
enforcement
and
is
dedicating
resources
into
areas
that
are
most
impacted
by
blight
throughout
the
city
to
actually
shift
to
a
proactive
model
where
we
will
be
going
out
and
identifying
issues
within
the
community
and
working
with
those
Property
Owners
to
bring
them
into
compliance
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
hand
it
to
Rachel.
Just
to
give
you
some
brief
details
on
the
program
itself,.
AK
AK
Focus
areas
will
provide
information
around
the
types
of
light
that
we'll
be
looking
for
how
some
best
management
practices
on
how
they
can
maintain
their
properties,
ensure
that
they
are
in
compliance
with
the
municipal
code,
and
then
we
will
also
offer
contact
information
should
they
have
questions
and
additional
resources
and,
most
importantly,
we'll
providing
them.
The
time
frame
that
we
plan
to
service
their
focus
area
once
that's
been
sent
out
and
underway,
then
will
be
conducting
those
proactive
inspections
in
two
week.
O
The
last
thing
I'd
just
like
to
say
mayor.
Obviously
our
code
enforcement
team
has
been
under
a
considerable
amount
of
pressure
through
that
period,
so
they've
continued
to
deliver
phenomenal
service
to
the
community
and
work
really
hard
to
bring
down
the
number
of
cases
that
we're
working
on.
Obviously,
that
workload
does
not
go
away
and
so
we're
using
this
as
an
opportunity
to
think
differently,
but
obviously
we'll
continue
all
the
good
work
that
we
continue
to
do
throughout
the
city
and
again
just
want
to
recognize
Rachel
for
her
leadership
on
this
topic.
AB
Yes,
I
just
really
want
to
do
a
shout
out
to
you
Chris
and
you
Rachel,
I
I
gave
you
this
Challenge
and
within
a
couple
of
weeks
they
gave
me
a
proposal
on
on
this
proactive
team
and
with
metrics,
and
they
have
done
a
yeoman's
job
on
filling
their
vacancies
and
so
super
excited
for
what
can
come
from
this
pilot.
AB
C
Thanks
and
and
I
want
to
add
my
thanks
to
Chris
Rachel,
our
HR
department,
which
has
helped
with
hiring
and
Jennifer
McGuire
the
same
manager
in
her
office.
So
we've
been
talking
a
lot
about
code
enforcement
and
blight
this
year
and
I.
Think
it's
really
exciting
that
the
team
focused
in
was
able
to
make
those
hires
get
that
vacancy
rate
down
and
give
us
the
capacity
to
be
in
a
more
proactive
posture
and
really
help
some
of
our
most
underserved
commercial
corridors.
C
We
know
from
research
that
it's
really
important,
that
we
maintain
clean
storefronts
if
we're
going
support
our
small
businesses,
so
super
excited
that
we're
doing
this
and
we
were
I-
was
out
with
councilor
Torres
earlier
this
morning,
along
East
Santa
Clara,
where
we
heard
from
some
very
excited
small
business
owners
who
are
really
ready
for
the
city
to
lean
in
and
have
more
of
an
impact
here.
So
why
don't
we
go
to
public
comment
and
we'll
come
back
to
the
council.
Q
The
U.S
Paul
from
the
horseshoe
up
to
reference
that
dirt
bag
that
was
working
for
code
enforcement
and
going
around
to
the
massage
parlors
and
and
abusing
I,
mean
it.
There
was
just.
Q
Q
Pilot
programs
now
now
I
have
to
get
to
that
so
a
private
program
to
ensure
that
you
don't
have
dirt
bags
doing
that
kind
of
work
there
needs
to
be.
This
gives
us
an
opportunity,
as
a
city,
to
start
really
instituting.
What
is
it
that
we
value
as
a
city
and
not
just
like?
Oh
you
know,
we
want
things
clean.
We
I
already
get
the
euthenics
program,
I
already
get
that
Kellogg.
Q
Q
So
then
that
means
you
created
subsequence.
It
necessarily
means
the
same
thing.
That's
why
code
enforcement
is
is
important.
You
see
have
no
code
enforcement
over
their
subsequence.
We
didn't
have
any
of
that.
No
that
was
suitable
for
the
Chicanos,
and
so
we
have
an
opportunity
to
do
now
is
to
institutionalize
a
very
critical
component
of
overall
city
government.
Thank
you.
D
R
All
right,
Beekman
thanks
a
lot
for
yourselves
and
your
patience
for
listening
to
your
our
public
comment
that
at
least
certainly
my
public
comment
that
I
think
Paul
made
some
really
good
points
in
how
we
have
to
consider
who
we
hire
and
how
we
hire
and
and
gave
good
examples
from
the
past
that
we
may
be
a
little
abstract.
But
we
have
good
intentions
in
talking
about
these
items.
Just
to
thank
you
for
your
patience
and
hearing
us
out.
R
R
It
seems
an
appropriate
time
to
mention
that
it's
my
understanding
that
these
sort
of
new
code
enforcement
ideas
are
coming
down,
possibly
from
the
federal
level
and
I
know,
and
we
can
all
understand,
what's
going
on
in
San,
Francisco
right
now,
people
within
government
and
there's
just
a
new
wave
of
how
to
address
their
homeless
issues
and
such
overall
people
living
on
the
streets
and
Fentanyl
issues.
R
They
kicked
out
their
former
D.A
to
bring
in
this
whole
new
process
of
to
talk
about
law
enforcement
and
and
jail
time
and
and
and
going
through
that
route
in
order
to
create
a
inventory
and
had
an
inventory,
their
community
and
I.
R
This
is
obviously
a
softer
version
of
that
a
lighter
version,
but
I
I
I'm
sure
you
try
to
take
the
make
that
a
lot
softer
here
in
San
Jose,
but
I
think
it
should
be
noted
of
what's
going
on
in
San
Francisco
and
that
we
don't
have
to
follow
that
sort
of
model
and
I
I'm
I.
Guess
you've
tried
to
do
that
here
and
it
just
seemed
important
Brian.
AJ
Thank
you,
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
idea.
I
appreciate
the
mayor,
pushing
for
it.
AJ
There
still
will
be
a
complaint
based
issues
too
by
people
who
have
problems
can
still
make
complaints,
that'll
still
being
that'll
still
be
being
addressed,
but
it
won't
be
the
primary
way
that
they
deal
with
code
enforcement
issues
am
I
understanding
that
correct.
Thank
you.
C
Great
thank
you
and
since
the
question
was
asked,
yes,
the
department
is
still
doing
all
of
the
reactive
work,
but
now
that,
thanks
to.
R
C
Work
of
our
city
manager
and
Chris
and
Rachel
and
others
our
HR
department.
We
are
effectively
fully
staffed
in
Code
Enforcement.
We
have
the
capacity
to
do
more,
proactive
review
and
and
code
enforcement
work,
so
both
still
exist.
Okay,
great,
let's
come
back
to
council,
we
will
go
to
councilmer
Torres.
A
Good
afternoon,
thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
to
our
pbce
group
of
folks.
So
code
enforcement
is,
as
you
know,
code
enforcement
is
super
important
and
it
is
very
important
that
we
make
sure
that
our
business
districts
in
mostly
underserved
under
resource
business
corridors,
have
the
tools
they
need
to
create
incredibly
diverse
and
vibrant
business
district.
A
So
this
program
is
going
to
do
just
that,
I'm
very
happy
to
know
that
we're
going
to
be
proactive
right
and
that
we're
all
going
to
work
together
as
one
city,
one
Department,
to
make
sure
that
that
these
business
districts
have
the
services
they
need
to
to
create
vibrant
business
districts.
So
with
that
I
motion
to
support
item
7.1,
along
with
the
memo
that
myself
and
council
member
Ortiz
wrote
second.
V
Thank
you
I
too,
want
to
say.
Thank
you.
I
know,
it's
been
really
tough
in
terms
of
not
having
enough
Staffing
and
resources,
so
I'm
delighted
that
you're
all
staffed
up
I
am
very
excited
that
this
pilot
is
going
to
move
forward.
I'm
a
little
bit
curious
in
terms
of
focus
areas,
and
you
know
I
keep
looking
at
the
Cadillac
Winchester
area
and
it's
a
constant
thing,
constant
thing,
constant
thing
and
and
even
though
it
doesn't
show
up
in
the
census
track.
V
O
Thank
you
vice
mayor
yeah.
Obviously,
it's
an
important
step
in
understanding
how
best
to
provide
service
in
a
number
of
different
ways.
So
the
hope
is
is
that
there
is.
You
know,
significant
impact
that
we
can
see
and
that
we
can
balance
that
workload
with
the
existing
caseload
that
we
see
through
the
complaint-based
system
and
that'll
sort
of
lead
us
to
you
know
through
this
year
and
to
look
at
potential
proposals
going
into
next
year
on
how
we
would
adjust
our
model
and
and
whether
or
not
to
expand
from
there.
Yeah.
V
The
thing
that
I
would
say
is
that
in
some
areas
where
you
have
individuals
who
no
matter
what
will
continue,
I
mean
we're
encouraging
people
to
complain
and
to
identify
blight.
But
in
some
areas
you
know
people
are
working,
they're
doing
other
things
and
they
don't
have
the
capacity
to
be
able
to
be.
You
know
putting
in
the
the
complaints
all
the
time
so
I
just
I.
V
Just
look
at
you
know
a
couple
of
the
areas
that
I
have
and
I
know
know
that
there's
a
tremendous
need,
but
it
isn't
as
evident
because
the
complaints
are
not
as
high
so
I
will
continue
to
encourage
people
to
complain,
but
I
think
that
there's
got
to
be
room
for
those
areas
that
perhaps
you
know
need
it
but
are
not
are
not
sort
of
like
visible.
AK
If
I
could
add,
council
member,
so
one
one,
another
aspect
of
the
good
news
of
being
us
being
staffed
up
is
that
our
other
programs
are
also
seeing
that
benefit
so
with
cdbg
the
Cadillac
Winchester.
The
project
hope
work
that
we're
doing
in
partnership
with
other
departments.
We
can
definitely
take
a
look
and
see
if
there's
more,
we
can
do
in
that
area.
C
I
appreciate
that
question
point,
and
it's
certainly
my
hope
that,
as
we
pilot
some
proactive
code
enforcement
and
learn
how
to
measure
the
impact
of
that
that
we
that
the
council
considers
in
future
budget
Cycles,
potentially
expanding,
that
model
make
sure
we're
getting
to
other
underserved
communities.
There's
no
way
that,
in
six
months,
with
a
very
limited
team
of
two
that
we're
going
to
get
to
every
District
or
every
Corridor
that
needs
it,
but
I'm
hoping
we
can
get
some
proof
points
for
conversation
next
year.
K
Foreign
thank
you,
staff
for
presenting
this
very
important
topic,
especially
to
our
some
of
our
harder
hit
areas
by
blight.
I'm,
incredibly
excited
for
this
pilot,
as
it
will
begin
to
address
decades-long
of
issues
around
neglect
for
our
working
class
communities.
K
The
approach
brought
before
us
I
believe,
is
a
great
step
towards
improving
how
we
deliver
our
core
services
and
finding
ways
to
respond
more
efficiently
is
both
resourceful
and
Innovative
and
likewise
and
very
important
for
our
families.
It
takes
a
burden
off
reporting,
as
vice
mayor
kamay
had
had
mentioned
for
many,
the
last
thing
that
people
want
to
do
when
they're
getting
off
work,
or
you
know
in
in
reality
here
in
San
Jose.
Their
second
job
is
to
want
to
report
the
washing
machine,
that's
down
the
street,
or
something
like
that.
K
So
for
the
areas
that
this
program
is
active
on,
it
definitely
relieves
them
from
that.
I
believe
I'm
really
pumped
up
and
happy
to
see
that
we're
having
a
proactive
approach
towards
blight
and
addressing
areas
that
this
this,
where
the
city
has
you
know,
dealt
with
blight
and
other
issues
to
essentially
expedite
our
services.
K
But
to
my
last
point,
I
I
do
want
to,
as
I
mentioned
in
the
memo
I
did,
recommend
and
along
with
council
member
Torres,
that
we
make
sure
that
we're
going
further
by
also
referring
municipal
code
violations
in
the
public
right-of-way,
such
as
illegal
dumping,
abandoned
vehicles
and
graffiti
to
the
appropriate
City
Department
for
follow-up,
and
currently
the
pilot
has
the
code
enforcement
inspectors
role
to
what
I
believe
is
a
little
bit
too
limited
to
addressing
these
issues.
So
I'm
I'm
glad
that
we
were
able
to
put
that
memo
together.
K
Nevertheless,
some
of
these
locations
attract
blight
in
the
public
right
away
and
then
and
at
the
front
of
even
some
of
the
buildings,
so
I
believe
the
memo
that
myself
and
council
member
Torres
have
produced
in
collaboration
with
code
enforcement
is
to
further
these
efforts
in
combating
blight
through
a
comprehensive
approach
both
on
private
property,
but
also
on
the
public
right-of-way.
This
will
help
blight
from
worsamine
our
neighborhoods
and
reducing
the
need
for
our
residents
to
report
the
complaints.
K
That
being
said,
I
do
have
just
two
questions
for
staff
and
in
East
San
Jose.
We
have
many
residents
who
are
I
guess
entrepreneurs
in
May
operate
home
kitchens,
along
with
like
the
Miko's
program
that
was
recently
approved
at
the
county,
that
they
may
also
be
subject
to
code
enforcement
violations
if
the
proper
permitting
is
not
submitted.
AK
K
AK
AK
That
was
a
result
of
that
operation,
but
our
our
process
will
be
that
we're
going
to
be
sending
out
a
very
detailed
communication
letter
to
every
property
identified
within
the
focus
areas,
and
then
we'll
also
do
Outreach
to
the
neighborhood
groups
and
Community
groups
and
within
those
areas
as
well,
and
they
will
have
all
the
information
around
the
the
codes
will
be
or
excuse
me.
The
violations
we'll
be
looking
for
whether
it's
overcome
vegetation
graffiti.
So
on.
AK
What
they
can
do
to
comply
and
who
they
can
contact
with
questions,
it'll
be
done
in
multiple
languages
and
we'll
have
our
language
access
line
it's
available
as
well,
and
so
that
will
also
give
them
the
date
that
we
plan
on
being
in
their
area.
So
they
have
a
sense
of
you
know
when
we'll
be
out
there,
so
they
have
ample
opportunity
to
to
take
corrective
actions
voluntarily.
AK
Should
they
need
to
do
that
and
then
once
we're
out
in
their
area,
we'll
assess
the
properties
and
those
that
we
find
in
violation
would
receive
a
citation
in
the
citation.
We
again
restate
the
violation:
what's
corrected
the
corrective
actions
that
are
needed
and
how
long
they
have
to
comply,
it
will
will
be
a
shorter
time
frame
than
we
do
currently.
So,
instead
of
15
days,
it'll
be
reduced
to
10
days
and
then
we'll
do
a
follow-up
re-inspection
and
then
the
process
goes
on
from
there
at
any
point
in
time.
They
can
always
call
us.
AK
We
have
a
code
enforcement
information
email,
they
can
send
an
inquiry
to.
They
can
talk
with
the
inspector
directly.
We
have
a
support
staff
team
that
can
also
communicate
with
if
they
have
questions,
or
they
can
also
come
in
person
to
our
office.
So
there's
a
number
of
ways
for
them
to
reach
us.
If
they
do
have
questions
and
then
you
know
any
any,
you
also
have
the
opportunity
to
appeal
a
citation
should
they
receive
one.
So
there's
lots
of
checks
and
balances
in
our
process,
so.
AK
K
And
then,
as
well
as
I
mentioned,
I'm
really
excited
about
this
program,
but
also
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
need
across
the
city.
If
there
is
positive
results
from
this
pilot,
is
there
opportunities
for
there
to
you
know,
spread
to
Cadillac
or
other
other
area?
This
specific
strategy.
AK
Yes,
as
Kristen
mentioned
previously,
The
Hope
is
that
we,
you
know,
assess
this
program
at
the
end
of
the
six
month,
duration,
so
in
January,
and
we'll
take
a
look
at
and
evaluate
it
for
its
Effectiveness,
where
we
could
improve.
You
know
see
if
there's
other
areas
if
it's
worth
continuing
what
those
next
areas
might
look
like
and
so
forth,
and
we
plan
to
report
out
to
the
NSC
in
Spring
of
next
year.
C
AL
Mayor
I
I
want
to
just
express
my
appreciation
for
staff.
You
know
Chris
and
Rachel,
and
code
enforcement.
You
guys
have
been
fantastic,
especially
anytime,
I
reach
out
with
with
concerns
on
on
on
private
property
and
I'm,
excited
to
see
this.
This
pilot
program
deploy
in
the
downtown
area
and
the
other
areas
and
to
vice
mayor
kame's
point
in
my
Council
colleague
Ortiz.
AL
You
know,
I
think
there
are
other
areas
in
our
city
that
that
could
potentially
benefit
from
this
kind
of
innovative
process.
Improvement
and
especially
along
the
the
tele
Eastridge
Corridor
and
and
the
waltz
Park
area
blight,
is
something
that
I
hear
constantly
from
the
small
business
owners,
mom
and
pop
shops
and
the
the
broken
windows
effect.
AL
If
you
will
that
that
it
has
in
our
neighborhoods-
and
this
is
a
way
to
to
mitigate
that
and
and
I
look
forward
to
just
hearing
the
report
in
NSC
next
year
and
and
fingers
crossed
that
you
know
we,
we
we
we
make,
we
make
a
dent
and-
and
you
know,
clean
our
clean
our
streets
because
I
know
are
are
not
not
just
our
residents,
but
you
know
the
small
business
owners
are
are
begging
us
to
do
something.
So
thank
you.
U
I
think
it
is
great
to
see
that
going
from
a
complaint,
driven
system
to
a
proactive
inspection
system
and
trying
to
get
the
compliance,
so
the
people
have
a
chance
to
get
the
thing
done
before
it
really
becomes.
A
problem
question,
for
you
is,
if
you
don't
get
a
compliance,
is
your
only
thing
is
to
penalize
them
or
do
you
have
the
ability
to
get
action
taken
at
their
expense.
AK
Thank
you
for
the
question
so
most
in
most
instances
we
do
go
through
our
normal
process
for
enforcement,
which
could
either
be
escalating.
Citations
usually
get
up
to
three
citations.
Before
we
move
to
the
administrative
remedy
process,
I
won't
bore
you
with
the
details
of
that
process
as
a
lengthy
process,
but
and
through
that
process,
there's
a
point
at
which
we
would,
if
found
by
the
pills
hearing
board,
to
still
be
in
violation.
AK
We
could
charge
fines
per
day
if
it
should
be
a
situation
where
it's
creating
an
imminent
Hazard
to
the
public
or
the
property,
there's
a
very
high
threshold
for
that.
But
we
can
move
to
do
a
an
abatement
where
the
city
cleans
up
the
property,
and
then
we
charge
the
the
cost
of
that
abatement
to
the
owner.
O
O
It
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
address
issues
earlier
in
the
process
right
now
on
a
complaints-based
system,
we're
waiting
for
people
to
be
so
bothered
by
the
situation
that
they
call
the
city
we'll
have
trained
Professionals
in
the
field
that
can
identify
these
issues
and
hopefully
get
out
there
in
advance
how
that
plays
out
from
a
staffing
resource
and
efficiency
standpoint
that
that's
the
piece
we
really
need
to
understand
and
then,
as
we
move
into
sort
of
planning
for
next
year
and
looking
at
our
available
resources
where
the
caseload
is
how
this
impacts
our
caseload,
we
can
bring
that
information
back
and
have
that
conversation
with
Council
about
what
the
future
of
the
program
looks
like.
U
A
I
I
forgot
to
ask
a
question
mayor,
thank
you
and
thanks
again
to
our
PPC
team.
So
I
actually
have
a
I.
Have
a
question
and
I
know
we're
trying
to
tackle
blight
and
graffiti
and
illegal
dumping.
However,
I
know
that
there's
there's
plenty
of
small
businesses
in
my
Council
District
who
are
coming
up
to
code
for
their
outdoor
dining
or
their
outdoor
dining
patio
area.
AK
So,
with
our
complaint
case
management
system,
we
can
see
all
the
open,
Active
cases
if
it's
so
something
we're
already
aware
of,
and
we
will
be
able
to
see
that
there's
a
case
there,
and
we
can
take
that
into
consideration.
As
far
as
how
we
handle
any
blight
that
we
may
observe,
we
could
always
contact
that
owner,
since
we
already
have
something
ongoing
with
them,
as
opposed
to
creating
this
new
process
that
they
now
have
to
deal
with.
O
Great,
thank
you
councilmember
I.
Just
add
to
that.
Obviously,
you
know
you
raise
a
really
good
point,
because
code
enforcement
doesn't
stand
alone
and
that's
part
of
the
part
of
the
reason
it's
within
the
department
is
quite
often
some
of
the
resolution
to
individual
code
cases
requires
either
a
building
permit
or
a
planning
process,
and
just
given,
where
we're
at
with
timelines
across
the
department.
That's
something
that
we
take
into
consideration
as
we're
working
with
those
Property
Owners.
O
You
know
we
certainly
don't
penalize
people
when
they're
stuck
in
whether
it's
building
or
planning
and
we're
trying
to
move
them
through
that
process
as
well.
So
it's
definitely
something
we
take
into
consideration
great.
A
No,
that's
thank
you
for
for
those
answers.
I
know
that,
as
unfortunately
as
retail
is
struggling
in
our
economy
or
struggling
here
in
in
our
area
right,
we
have
some
of
these
incredible
restaurants
that
have
to
that
bring
out
folks
and
have
them
outside,
but
they're,
going
through
the
process
of
of
having
their
outdoor
dining
patio
up
to
code,
and
so
we
don't,
we
definitely
don't
want
to.
You
know,
get
rid
of
that,
because
they're.
The
only
reason
why
that
business
district
is
is
active
and
thriving.
C
U
C
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
In
August,
both
American
leadership
forum
and
catalyze
SSV
asked
for
a
special
exemption
for
for
the
small
and
local
business
preference
points
because
they
supplied
that
information
after
the
RFP
deadline.
In
addition,
catalyze
wanted
special
consideration
because
they
deemed
or
felt
that
their
scoring
should
have
been
higher.
Their
point
allocation
should
be
higher.
AM
The
result
was
that
Council
moved
forward
with
the
private
Consultants,
the
nine
recommended
and
those
are
available
to
you
and
to
City
staff
right
now
and
at
that
point,
Council
directed
staff
to
do
a
separate
RFP
for
just
cbos
to
make
sure
that
cbo's
were
included
as
important
resources
to
all
of
us
in
August.
Council,
basically
had
two
options
on
what
we
think.
AM
Our
recommendations
again
are
to
authorize
staff
to
negotiate
and
execute
Master
agreements
with
22
organizations
for
three
years
with
the
option
to
extend
one
term
for
an
additional
two
years.
Each
agreement
would
have
a
limit
of
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
for
a
combined
limit
of
six
million
for
the
whole
program.
AM
This
includes
five
hundred
thousand
in
contingency
that
could
be
used.
Should
any
agreement
be
in
need
to
be
increased
prior
to
the
end
of
the
terms
identified
staff,
City,
Department
or
Council
staff
will
identify
funding
from
their
departments
when
they
execute
service
orders
for
the
specific
projects
with
the
cbo's
identified
and
the
total
of
all
service
orders
cannot
exceed
the
master
agreements
limits.
AN
Thank
you
Nancy,
so,
for
this
RFP
oedca
staff
followed
the
city's
Standard
Process
using
the
badingo
platform
we
offered
a
longer
than
average
submission
period
of
six
weeks,
beginning
on
January
27th.
We
also
set
up
a
special
page
on
the
city's
website
to
make
the
information
even
more
accessible.
This
helped
us
advertise
two
events
for
answering
questions.
During
the
submission
period
we
ended
up
receiving
34
submissions,
of
which
30
were
deemed
complete.
AN
So
this
is
a
quick
summary
of
how
it'll
work
so
following
Council
approval
staff
will
begin
to
execute
the
master
agreements.
Oedca
will
be
responsible
for
managing
all
of
them.
Staff
in
other
departments,
including
Council
offices,
will
reach
out
when
they
want
to
contract
with
one
or
more
of
the
cbo's
on
the
list.
Those
project
managers
will
be
responsible
for
putting
a
service
order
through
the
system.
AN
AN
So
here
are
the
22
cbo's.
That
staff
is
recommending
for
the
master
agreement
list.
You'll
see
a
variety
of
organizational
sizes.
Focus
areas
and
population
served
just
to
name
a
few
Latino
business
Foundation,
the
African-American
Community
Services
Agency,
somos,
Mayfair,
Vietnamese,
American,
Roundtable
and
Chopsticks
alley
so
per
City
policy.
There
was
a
10-day
protest
period
that
began
when
we
posted
the
notice
of
intent
to
award.
AN
During
that
time,
we
received
protests
from
the
Vietnamese
American
organization
and
mothers
out
front
following
the
municipal
code
procedures,
oedca
provided
a
response
to
each
of
them,
which
then
triggered
a
10-day
appeal
period.
We
then
received
appeals
from
both
of
these
organizations,
we'll
Briefly
summarize
the
nature
of
those
appeals.
Then,
following
this
presentation,
each
organization
will
have
five
minutes
to
speak.
AN
AN
AN
AM
AM
That
recommendation
is
to
encourage
us
all
to
have
great
resources
to
move
forward
with
community
outreach
and
engagement
and
to
remind
and
reiterate
that
there
is
an
opportunity
for
Council
to
either
move
ahead
and
or
to
send
us
back
out
to
do
this
again
and
just
to
remind
that.
The
these
types
of
protests
are
not
unusual
and
in
fact
the
last
RFP
had
virtually
the
same
concerns
when
Council
determined.
We
would
move
forward
with
staff's
recommendations.
C
C
H
C
Z
Okay:
okay,
hi,
my
name
is
Andrea
Slater
and
I.
Am
the
community
organizer
with
mothers
out
front
one
of
the
staff
members
here
in
California,
and
we
are
here
to
support
the
Silicon
Valley
members
and
their
appeal
in
this
process
just
to
give
a
little
bit
of
information,
we're
an
environmental
justice
group
that
focuses
on
diversity
and
civic
education
and
building
Healthy
Communities
for
families
focusing
on
the
families
and
our
children
and
future
Generations.
Thanks.
AA
So
you
may
know
of
us
as
a
policy
organization
we
advocate
for
you
with
policy,
so
we're
also
very
engaged
in
the
community
and
in
the
past,
we've
had
two
grants
from
through
ESD
to
educate
the
community
about
our
climate,
smart
program.
We
focus
these
on
low-income
communities
by
doing
presentations
in
Spanish
and
Vietnamese
on
how
to
save
money
in
your
home,
and
these
are
just
we
provided
this
in
our
application,
and
our
protest
was
much
more
detailed
than
the
point
about
the
small
and
local
businesses.
AA
One
of
the
comments
was
made
on
criteria
two,
which
was
a
collaborative
inclusive
process,
that
we
didn't
talk
about
our
work
with
cbos.
Well,
that
was
never
asked.
The
question
is
nowhere
in
the
application,
if
it
had
been
I
would
have
included
this
photo.
We
we
facilitated
a
series
of
CBO
networking
mixers
during
the
pandemic,
for
groups
focusing
on
the
environment,
equity
and
health,
and
they
were
very
successful
and
very
well
attended,
but
since
we
know
that
you
are
not
probably
going
to
be
thinking
of
just
adding
one
group
know,
however
well
deserving.
AA
We
want
to
focus
on
how
the
goals
of
the
on-call
list
maybe
didn't
match
the
process.
The
goals
again
were
to
have
more
robust
Community
engagement,
streamline
the
work
of
City
staff
and,
very
importantly,
provide
an
opportunity
for
capacity
building
and
shared
learning
among
cbo's
and
their
staff
at
one
of
those
information
sessions
that
the
staff
provided,
they
stated.
We
hope
we
will
get
as
many
of
you
as
possible
on
our
on-call
list.
AA
Therefore,
we
feel,
like
the
process,
was
a
little
bit
more
stringent
that
it
could
have
been.
If
that
was
truly
the
goal,
the
oedca
decided
that
the
cutoff
score
should
be
75
points,
I,
don't
believe
and
I,
don't
know
where
that
number
came
from
I
guess
they
needed
to
figure
some
number,
but
that
wasn't
mandated
by
the
council
that
wasn't
mandated
by
the
City
attorney.
That
was
just
where
they
determined
if
you're
above
75
you'll
be
on
if
you're
below
you'll
be
off.
AA
If
you
look
at
the
list,
there's
some
excellent
groups
that
are
below
the
75
and
again
we
feel
that
in
many
categories
we
legitimately
proved
our
case
that
we
deserve
more
points.
But
our
protest
was
denied
so
today
we're
moving
on
to
share
with
you
a
win-win
solution
here:
okay-
and
that
is
since
the
goal
was
to
get
as
many
groups
as
possible
on
the
list-
it
wasn't
meant
to
be
like
grading
on
the
curve
and
only
the
very
most
strong
cbo's
will
win.
AA
It
was
meant
to
include
as
many
as
possible
without
mothers
out
front
and
other
groups
being
on
the
list.
We
are,
we
don't
have
the
opportunity
for
that
desired
capacity.
Building
groups
like
Catholic
Charities
and
spur
somos,
Mayfair
they're,
wonderful.
They
already
have
a
lot
of
capacity.
The
newer,
smaller,
currently
less
staffed
groups
would
actually
benefit
the
most
so
that
we
can
also
hire
again
community
engagers
that
speak
Spanish
and
Vietnamese,
and
we
feel,
like
those
definitions,
were
very
overly
narrow
that,
in
order
to
be
considered
small,
you
had
to
also
be
local.
AA
Well,
we're
very
small.
We
have
one
staff
person
that
supports
our
team.
Our
entire
organization
nationally
has
under
35..
We
clearly
are
small,
but
the
definition
for
small
was.
You
also
have
to
be
local,
so
we
lost
five
points
there
and
we
lost
five
points
for
not
being
currently
at
that
time.
Having
the
business
license,
we
were
still
small,
we
didn't
need
it.
So
here's
a
dilemma.
Some
of
the
organ
some
of
the
Departments
have
told
us
they
wish.
AA
We
were
on
the
list,
they
were
very
disappointed
and
they
might
consider
doing
new
rfps,
but
they'd
probably
be
like
10,
000
or
less,
but
that
will
make
more
work
for
them
and
the
state
doesn't
tend
to
do
a
new
process
for
three
to
five
years.
So
groups
like
ours
that
now
qualify.
If
we
gotten
those
10
points,
we'd
be
on
the
list.
We
have
to
wait
quite
a
long
time
and
the
city's
climate
program
needs
to
move
forward
more
quickly.
AA
So
here's
an
elegant
solution
that
came
from
conversations
with
some
of
you
on
Council
the
mayor's
office
was
what
about.
If
you
establish
a
new
threshold,
don't
redo
the
whole
process.
Don't
add
us
more
points,
although
we
feel
we
deserve
them,
just
lower
the
threshold
and
say
we'd
like
a
more
robust
list
for
the
city
departments
to
choose
from
if
you
lower
the
threshold
to
69,
that
would
add
four
more
cbos,
including
mothers
out
front,
and
if
you
lowered
it
to
50,
it
would
add
eight
more
cpos,
all
of
them
that
had
complete
applications.
AA
Again,
we
were
told
by
this
oedca
that
nothing
was
disqualifying.
It's
just.
We
didn't
meet
the
bar
and
we
were
up
against
some
very
strong
organizations,
but
we
also
believe
we
would
bring
unique
skill
set
to
this.
We
do
work
in
low
with
low-income
communities,
communities
of
color
and
youth,
and
we
would
like
that
chance
again,
please
in
the
future,
consider
decoupling
the
small
and
the
local
and
I
will
finish
off
with
letting
Andrea
make
her
final
Point.
Z
All
right,
so
we
just
wanted
to
make
the
point
that
if
we
do
lower
the
threshold
and
make
the
process
more
inclusive,
that
this
is
basically
a
win-win-win,
it's
a
win
for
the
city
departments,
it's
wimford,
the
community-based
organizations
and
City
residents.
The
city
departments
would
not
have
to
start
the
process
all
over
and
it
would
save
time.
The
cbos
would
be
offered
more
diversity
and
opportunities
to
grow
their
capacity,
as
well
as
expand
the
Civic
engagement
piece
and
then
City
residents
are
going
to
benefit
from
the
expanded
community
outreach.
C
AO
Vao
complete
the
submission
process
without
incurring
any
error
notification
from
bit
dingo
on
May
1st
Vel
was
notified
that
it,
along
with
three
other
notable
non-profits,
were
disqualified
for
moving
forward
for
review
by
the
evaluation
panel.
City
staff
informed
vao
that
this
application
was
missing.
A
cover
letter
resume
and
Outreach
samples
all
are
simple
and
can
even
can
be
easily
complied
a
given
the
opportunity
to
rectify
on
May
4th.
AO
We
are
here
to
the
guideline
and
submit
a
letter
to
City
staff,
highlight
several
flaws
in
the
bid
process
on
bid
Dingle
and
express
concern
about
the
city
staff
fellow
to
express
the
proper
bid
submission
process
in
line
with
the
requirement,
as
outlined
by
the
city.
Rfp
documents.
Vao
emphasized
that
these
shortcomings
resulting
confusions
and
their
mission
of
necessary
document
during
the
submission
process,
the
city
of
San
Jose
aim
to
promote
inclusivity
for
strong
Partnerships
and
enhance
Community
relationships.
AO
Three
to
promote
to
promote
support
for
non-profit
organizations,
Foster
Partnerships
and
to
ensure
an
equity.
We
recommend
that
City
adopt
a
clear
pause
for
setting
the
building
process
to
be
consistent
with
RFP
procurement
by
ensuring
that
the
application
has
to
be
completed
before
the
submission
can
be
considered
as
completed
with
all
due
respect
to
the
city
staff
comment
earlier.
Those
Mission
those
missing
items
would
not
require
medical
submission
page.
If
City
staff
had
marked
those
items
required
on
the
building
or
platform,
vao
could
not
have
submit
them.
AO
Screenshot
was
made
to
City
staff
as
part
of
the
protest
ladder.
By
implementing
such
a
policy,
the
city
can
demonstrate
the
commitment
to
fairness,
transparency
and
inclusivity
in
its
engagement
with
non-profit
organizations.
This
will
encourage
a
greater
participation
force,
a
stronger
partnership
and
contribute
the
city
overall
goal
of
promote
equity
and
supporting
the
valuable
work
of
non-profit
organization
in
the
community.
For
this
reason,
we
respectfully
ask
for
your
support
of
our
requests
on
this
item.
Together
we
can
build
an
equitable,
vibrant
and
harmonious
Community.
Thank
you.
C
D
Have
Rocio
Molina,
followed
by
Paul.
AP
AP
Sorry
about
that,
that's
my
dog
in
the
background
I
want
to
commence
staff
in
particularly
Lori
and
Zach
for
their
work
on
this
RFP
and
the
master
agreement.
We
are
very
excited
about
the
inclusion
of
22
organizations
that
are
so
focused
and
successful
today
and
work
so
much
to
create
Community
engagement,
programs
and
processes
that
support
people
of
color.
Oh
sorry,
all
right,
so
it's
included.
AP
We
participated
in
the
discussions
in
2022
on
how
to
create
a
more
inclusive,
Master
agreement
process
for
community-based
organization
and
are
very
encouraged
about
what
we
see
here
today.
We
did
submit
a
couple
of
questions
to
clarify
the
process
to
ensure
that
the
goals
of
the
RC
are
met
in
creating
a
more
streamlined,
contrasting
opportunity
for
partners.
AP
We
would
like
to
explore
Solutions
with
the
staff
and
continue
conversations
on
how
to
create
Pathways
for
partnership
between
cbo's
locally
and
the
city
of
San
Jose.
Again,
we
commend
the
staff,
and
we
are
ecstatic
about
this
opportunity-
your
vote
today
in
order
to
pass
these
Master
agreements,
will
be
a
huge
step
forward
for
the
city
of
San
Jose
in
creating
a
more
streamlined
process
to
create
Partnerships
and
collaboration
between
cbo's
and
your
departments.
Thank
you
so
much
for
this
opportunity
and
we
look
forward
to
working
hand
in
hand
with
your
staff.
Thank
you.
Q
Q
There's
a
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
a
lot
of
these
cbos
that
they
have
to
answer
to
in
novario,
but
they
don't
they.
They
don't
feel
like
they
have
to
like,
like
they're
condescending,
if
they
do
they're
not
going
to
lower
themselves
to
doing
that
because
they
answer
to
you
because
you're
the
one
that
pays
their
check.
Q
AQ
I'm
here
I'm
just
trying
to
get
my
my
my
sound
to
work.
AQ
AQ
If
we
were
to
be
included
in
the
on-call
CBO
list,
as
we
hope
and
if
we
were
chosen
by
a
city
department
for
a
grant,
what
we
would
want
to
do
is
to
again
hire
Outreach
coordinators,
Vietnamese
speaking
and
Spanish
speaking,
to
help
us
support
residents
to
reduce
their
energy
bills,
improve
indoor
air
quality
and
reduce
climate
impacts
in
our
small
group
of
active
leaders
of
mothers
out
front
Silicon
Valley.
Some
of
us
are
low
income,
including
me,
and
several
of
us
are
Spanish.
Speakers.
AQ
I
also
live
in
a
mobile
home
as
part
of
our
electrification
campaign.
We
are
working
with
climate,
smart
team
to
align
policies
to
support
electrification
for
low-income
residents
and
mobile
home
residents.
Like
me,
I
appreciate
that
both
climate,
smart
and
mothers
out
front
want
to
include
all
housing
situations,
apartment
residents,
homeowners,
mobile
homes
in
all
of
our
climate
work.
We
so
value
the
collaboration
and
teamwork
of
climate
Smart
in
this
work,
and
we
know
that
our
collaboration
is
also
valued
by
our
partners
at
the
city.
AQ
We
seek
to
offer
options
that
are
good
for
the
climate,
for
cost
saving
and
for
health,
and
we
seek
to
make
climate
accents
accessible
to
all
residents
of
Santa
Clara
County.
We
are
so
glad
that
you
share
this
value
and
this
goal
with
us.
Please
approve
the
proposal
to
include
more
organizations
on
the
on-call
CBO
list,
including
weathers
out
front.
Thank
you.
D
AF
Good
evening,
mayor
Mahan
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Kalisha
Webster
and
I'm.
The
senior
housing,
Advocate
housing
choices,
I'm
calling
this
evening
express
my
support
and
today
to
award
a
master
agreement
for
Community
engagement,
despite
the
cbo's
identified,
including
catalyze
SV
City,
for
providing
this
opportunity
for
cbos,
with
first-hand
experience
working
with
the
most
vulnerable
members
of
the
community
to
work
with
City,
develop
more
effective
programs
and
policies
to
serve
those
most
in
need.
AF
Secondly,
I'd
like
to
thank
Ms
SV
for
inventing
housing
places
to
apply
as
partners
for
this
opportunity
as
leaders
in
the
community
with
creating
a
more
sustainable,
Equitable
and
inclusive
community.
We
know
that
catalyze
SV
will
be
a
great
addition
to
the
city's
public
engagement
initiatives.
Lastly,
we
are
particularly
grateful
to
be
able
to
bring
the
voices
of
people
development
other
disabilities
to
today's
public
engagement
process.
AF
For
over
25
years,
housing
places
has
been
supporting
self-advocates
parents
and
service
providers
for
people
with
developmental
other
disabilities
advocate
for
their
housing
needs.
The
city
of
San
Jose
is
home
to
nearly
7
000
individuals
from
the
development
of
disability.
Many
of
the
adults
are
on
fixed
income,
work,
part-time
and
low-wage
jobs
and
struggled
to
qualify
for
even
the
most
affordable
housing
units
in
the
community.
AF
Often,
these
members
of
our
community,
with
some
of
the
highest
support
needs,
are
left
out
of
the
conversations
on
Housing
and
Community
Development,
as
it
is
assume
that
house
is
provided
for
them
by
the
state
or
federal
government.
This,
however,
is
not
true.
Instead,
more
than
half
of
San
Jose's
adult
population
with
developmental
disabilities
depends
on
the
verge
of
becoming
unhoused
every
day
because
they
are
dependent
parent
or
family
member
to
provide
them
with
housing.
AF
D
R
Hi
Blair
Beekman
here
just
to
quickly
comment
very
much
of
a
thank
you
for
this
sort
of
item
on
this
week's
agenda
with
the
difficult
work
with
measure
e
issues
that
I
think
I
hope
we're
going
through
a
a
learning
process.
It's
a
whole
Community
process
to
understand
and
to
come
to
agreements
about
how
we
move
forward
with
measure
e.
But
you
was
mentioned
very
nicely
by
yourselves
that
we
do
have
to
take
a
comprehensive
approach
and
that
it's
it's
a
quick,
build.
It's
it's
building
a
good.
R
R
Overall,
good
luck
to
ourselves
to
really
develop
that
and
that
this
sort
of
item
lends
itself
to
to
our
to
our
better
practices
of
of
short-term
Solutions,
of
to
talk
with
Delta
people
in
shelters
and
and
this
sort
of
work,
good
luck
in
these
sort
of
efforts
and
and
to
and
our
conversations
can
be
good
about
the
funding
for
the
future
of
these
items.
Thank
you.
AR
Yes,
thank
you.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
Nancy,
your
departments
Lori
for
the
work
in
putting
this
yet
list
together.
Pre-Qualifying
these
organizations
I
think
it's
important
and
really
good
to
for
the
city
to
have
this
process
in
place
to
pre-qualify
groups
so
that
it
can
streamline
the
ability
to
do
this
work
going
forward.
AR
I
have
a
few
questions
for
you
on
the
on
the
objectives
and
the
process
a
little
bit,
so
the
the
number
of
organizations
that
were
selected
was
somewhat
arbitrary
right.
You
were
looking
for
organizations
that
met
criteria
and
the
number
could
have
been
10
or
50.
Is
that
correct.
AM
AR
AR
AM
Different
direction,
everyone
is
stretched
right
and
it
would
have
been
very
easy
for
staff
to
come
back
to
you
and
say:
let's
take
the
top.
10.
OED
is
facilitating
these
contracts.
AM
We
that's
a
later
question
that
catalyze
asked
oed's
role
in
helping
the
Departments
is
to
facilitate
facilitating
22
organizations
with
all
across
the
council
and
City
we
know,
is
a
lift,
but
we're
going
headlong
because
we
know
we
think
we
will
make
it
easier
than
having
departments
and
Council
offices
unto
themselves
without
the
ability
to
guide
those
those
service
orders
through
and
because
we're
already
really
squeezed
in
time.
It
would
have
been
very
easy
for
us
to
say
top
10..
We
pushed
ourselves.
AM
We
challenged
ourselves
to
squeak
this
out
to
include
plus
double
more
than
double
of
the
list,
so
it
would
have
been
very,
very
difficult
to
say
it
wasn't
competitive
because
it
was-
and
it
would
have
been
very
difficult
in
time
because
we're
already
stretched
to
take
on
even
more.
AR
Okay,
yeah
and
I,
certainly
I
I,
don't
think
I
certainly
am
not
critical
of
the
process.
I
think
the
process
you
followed
was
the
same
vigorous
process.
We
use
rigorous
process.
We
use
for
all
of
our
rfps.
We've
had
plenty
of
conversations
here
in
the
past
about
why
groups
get
excluded
about
whether
exceptions
can
be
made
about
how
you
help
groups
clean
up
what
might
have
been
an
oversight
on
their
part
and
we
I
don't
want
to
re
rehash
that
I,
don't
think
it's
worth
reacting.
AR
That
I
think
we
we've
I,
think
I
did
request
in
fact
a
a
at
a
past
meeting
to
come
back
at
the
future
with
a
review
of
the
process
so
that
we
can
unders.
You
know
see
whether
there's
what
changes
we
have
to
make
in
the
process,
but
the
process
that
we
have
is
a
process.
You
followed
and
I
support
that
I
guess.
AR
What
is
the
downside?
I
mean?
Obviously
there's
a
number
limit
in
terms
of
groups
you
want
to
work
with
I
mean.
Maybe
that's
the
answer
to
the
question,
but
if
groups
complete
their
application
and
in
some
sense
would
be
deemed
as
qualified
to
do
the
work.
Is
there
a
reason
why
we
would
want
to
limit
that
list
of
pre-qualified
organizations.
AM
The
damages
is
a
bigger
one
than
I.
Think
we're
talking
about
in
potential
damage
is
bigger
than
this
specific
RF.
It's
a
question
of.
Do
we
change
precedent,
which
has
been
a
long-standing
precedent
for
DOT
housing,
OED
parks
that
when
you
open
a
bid
you
you
provide
the
list
of
qualified
from
those
who
met
the
goals
of
the
panel,
the
the
initial
outline
of
information
requested
and
the
scoring
from
the
panel.
AR
Yeah
and
I
look
I'm,
not
I,
don't
think
I'm
going
to
make
a
suggestion
that
we
alter
any
criteria
or
any
way
the
points
are
rewarded
were
awarded.
I.
Think
it's
fair
to
say
that
the
process
was
followed
and
honestly
if
an
organization
doesn't
meet
the
criteria,
whether
it's
because
they
didn't
submit
everything
or
because
they
didn't
have
everything,
then
it
you
know,
then
it
to
me
it's
fair
to
say
yes
or
no.
This
organization
is
qualified.
The
reason
I'm
asking
these
questions
is,
you
know,
I
know
and
I'm.
AR
Just
I'm
gonna
only
use
mother
dotron
as
an
example
for
not
only
because
I'm
interested
in
some
of
the
work
that
they
do,
but
I
think
I've
heard
that
the
the
answer
is
you
know,
an
organization
in
the
city
can
still
hire
them
for
the
work
if
they
deem
that
that
organization
is
best
suited
for
the
particular
task
that
they
need
to
get
done.
If
that's
the
case,
we
are
not
saying
this
group
isn't
qualified
to
do
City,
contract
and
so
I'm.
Just
wondering
is
the
best
process.
AR
AM
Okay,
let
me
give
as
a
St
as
a
department
head.
Let
me
share
our
procurement
process
is
necessary
and
challenging
if
another
department
wants
to
hire
mothers
out
front,
for
example,
as
other
departments
have,
if
you're
my
understanding
in
Jennifer
or
others
will
correct
me,
if
you,
if
you
have
a
task,
that's
ten
thousand
dollars
or
below
you
can
go
direct.
If
you
have
a
task,
that's
50
000
might
even
be
up
to
a
hundred
thousand.
You
can
get
three
verbal
bids,
so
there
is.
AM
There
are
other
opportunities,
but
the
process
requires
time
and
just
out
of
awareness
of
the
process
and
also
out
of
doing
a
lot
of
projects
which
it
isn't
always
thought
of.
I'll,
be
quite
honest
boy.
We
could
use
this
extra
Outreach,
but
you
don't
have
once
you're
in
it
and
there
with
the
project.
You
do
not
have
time
to
go
back
and
run
through
a
procurement
process
to
get
this
whatever
project
you're
working
on.
AM
So
this
was
all
about
speed
and
convenience
and
doing
great
work
with
our
community
groups
so
and
because
the
process
must
be
consistent
to
be
fair
and
have
integrity,
we
can
recommend
no
other
than
what
our
recommendation
is
to
you
today.
AR
Okay
and
the
reason
I
I
have
pause
on.
This
is
obviously,
as
you
know,
our
our
climate
work
that
we're
doing
is
particularly
important
to
me
and
I.
Think
we
have
it
as
a
priority
on
our
Council
I.
Look
at
the
list
of
organizations.
I
don't
see
an
organization
that
necessarily
is
focused
on
that
particular
area
and
I
mean
I
I,
don't
know
whether
I
mean
I,
don't
know
whether
there's
a
process
that
could
be
set
up
to
say,
hey.
AR
We
have
to
have
at
least
an
organization
that
can
be
handle
each
of
the
areas
that
our
city
is
likely
to
be
doing.
Public
Outreach
on
in
the
next
three
years,
I'd
be
slightly
I'd,
be
I,
know
that
we're
going
to
be
doing
public
Outreach
on
climate
work,
especially
since
we're
trying
to
be
carbon
neutral
by
2030.
We
have
ambitious
goals.
We
electrification
is
an
ambitious
goal.
AM
Thank
you
again,
council
member
two
thoughts.
One
is,
it
is
completely
possible
and
in
fact
encouraged
that
any
of
the
22
can
partner
or
subcontract
with
other
cbos.
So
there's
an
if
there
is
a
need
on
a
particular
topic,
as
you
mentioned,
of
of
climate,
that
the
one
of
our
22
may
not
hit
spot
on,
but
they
can
partner
in
order
to
reach
the
goals,
so
that
is
completely
allowable
and
the
other
is
there
are
so
many
needs
across
the
city.
AR
Fair
enough,
thank
you
for
the
answers.
I'll
only
say
Obviously
in
in
the.
If
the
interest
here
is
speed
and
and
Agility,
which
you've
said
it
is
then
I'm
just
concerned
that
making
it
more
complicated
by
having
to
say
you
have
to
partner
with
another
group
where
you
have
to
go,
find
to
go,
find
the
right
organization
that
might
not
be
in
the
wheel
or
the
right
facilitator
that
might
not
be
part
of
the
Wheelhouse
of
one
of
these
groups
seems
to
me
that
we're
not
necessarily
achieving
that
objective.
Completely.
AR
I
know
there's
topics
in
which
we
are
and
there's
a
lot
of
groups
that
are
great
that
are
on
this
list,
but
I
just
just
want
us
to
think
a
little
bit
about
that.
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
I
I,
don't
want
to
say
that
we
shouldn't
approve
this
at
this
point
because
and
I
understand
the
process
and
I
know
why
we
follow
that
process.
AR
V
V
Great
and
then
each
organization
is
up
to
250
000.
AM
AM
V
B
V
Great
okay
and
then
the
last
thing
is
that
I
do
understand
that
this
is
having
a
pre-qualified
list
that
would
streamline
the
process
so
that,
if
you
need
someone
immediately
boom
there,
you
go
and
I
think
that's
a
great
thing
to
do.
I
know
it
takes
a
lot
of
time.
So
thank
you.
V
Thank
you
for
putting
this
together,
but
that
doesn't
preclude
any
Department
who
knows
specifically
that
they
have
worked
with
this
organization
before
they
have
had
successes
and
they
go
through
the
other,
much
more
longer
process,
knowing
that
it's
going
to
take
longer,
and
it
just
would
take
a
lot
of
pre-planning
from
some
of
the
environmental
organ
you
know,
Environmental
Services,
on
climate,
smart
or
whatever
it
is
that
is
needed
for
outreach.
It
would
just
be
a
longer
process.
Is
that
right,
correct,
so
it
doesn't
preclude
any
agency
from
going
through
the
more
traditional
way
perfect.
E
AM
Thank
you
for
the
question
council
member.
So
just
want
to
remind
what
what
Lori
had
said.
Oed
in
the
process
went
above
and
beyond
what
is
required.
We
created
a
website
which
is
trans
can
be
viewed
in
Vietnamese
or
Spanish,
or
English,
or
other
languages
too.
Actually,
and
there
were
at
least
two
meetings,
one
in
person
and
one
online
plus
we
had
staff
numbers
provided
so
that
the
the
opportunity
was
for
people
who
were
not
or
there
could
be
very
familiar,
but
particularly
those
who
are
not
familiar
to
work
with
staff.
AM
E
Thank
you
and
then
on
the
bid
Dingle.
Is
there
a
parameter
where,
if
a
applicant
did
not
fulfill
some
of
these
requirement,
it
would
stop
the
application
from
moving
forward.
AM
No
and
the
the
problem
or
the
the
processes,
it
is
not
staff's
role
to
step
in
and
say,
you're
missing
this
or
that
there
is
a
process
and
once
it
closes
the
panels
review
what
was
complete.
So
we
would
not
recommend
and
I,
don't
believe
the
attorneys
would
recommend,
and
certainly
they
can
speak
to
that-
that
we
do
any
changes
or
check
for
compliance
before
proceeding.
E
Thank
you
and
some
of
these
form
that
that
needs
to
be
filled
out.
Does
it
State
clearly,
is
it
a
requirement
mandatory,
necessary
or
possibly.
AM
Yes,
Lori
is
sharing
with
me
that
there
was
a
submittal
checklist
in
RFP
documents.
We
didn't
include
this,
but
it
lists
seven
documents
that
are
specifically
required,
which
include
those
that
Vietnamese
organ
American
organization,
as
well
as
the
other
22
achieved.
AM
It
it
would
be
very
challenging
both
in
terms
of
we've,
got
I,
believe
Rosalind
compiled
a
list
of
12
to
15
very
important
Outreach
efforts
that
the
city
is
moving
forward
in
over
the
summer
departments.
Lori
has
coordinated
with
departments
that
are
very
eagerly
awaiting
the
opportunity
to
to
call
cbo's
from
the
approved
Council
list
if
we
get
there,
and
so
that
would
be
very
difficult
for
the
Departments
who
would
not
have
access
to
resource
in
the
time
frame
and
OED
Staffing
is
very
challenged
so
to
go
through
this
again.
AM
Member
to
to
lower
the
score-
yes,
thank
you
again,
We
Believe
on
this
isn't
anything
against
mothers
out
front
at
all.
It
is
that
it
would
be
dangerous
to
the
overall
RFP
and
bidding
process.
Should
the
city
after
the
fact
change
the
rules,
which
then
could
easily
be
be
pointed
to
in
any
other
RF
or
bid
process
to
say
you
change
the
rules
here.
Why
didn't
you
change
the
rules
and
allow
this?
In
the
other
instance,.
A
Yeah
good
afternoon,
thank
you
Nancy
and
thank
you
mayor,
I
know
this
robust
conversation
we
have
here
regarding
community
outreach
from
our
cbo's,
so
we
know
that
this
work
is
important.
Our
city
can't
do
it
alone
and
most
of
the
organizations
I
see
here
right.
They
know
they
know
our
community
they've
worked
within
our
community,
so
it's
so
so
very
important
to
to
have
these
Community
Based
organizations
out
in
the
communities
they
know
right.
A
So
we
can't
do
it
alone,
as
I
just
mentioned,
and
so
I
am
too
particularly
concerned
with
that
Mother's
mothers
out
front,
but
Nancy
you've
explicitly
said
that
they
can.
A
They
can
receive
some
work
in
other
from
other
departments,
not
necessarily
right,
not
necessarily
within
this
list,
but
they
can
work
in
other
departments
to
do
community
outreach
so
that
that
relieves
some
of
the
the
cons,
the
concerns
that
I
have
because
I
really
do
think
that
mothers
out
front
does
good
work
and,
just
like
my
colleague
mentioned
climate,
climate
change
is
extremely
important,
especially
in
our
most
under-resourced
neighborhoods,
and
there
is
no
as
I.
You
know
I
know
pretty
much
all
the
folks
on
the
list
and
there
are
none
there
are.
A
There
is
no
organization
that
deals
with
climate
change
in
our
city,
San
Jose
on
this
list,
so
I
know
they.
They
didn't
score
too
high
on
the
list.
But
with
your
comments,
I
I
hope
that
we
can
make
sure
that
mothers
out
fronts
does
get
some
type
of
funding
for
whatever
project
that
we
may
need.
So
thank
you.
C
AR
AR
Mo,
obviously,
most
cases
we
do
an
RFP
we're
looking
for
the
number,
the
top
the
single
choice
right,
we
do
an
RFP.
We
go
out
to
try
to
for
a
contract,
and
then
you
know
in
in
a
lot
of
cases
and
obviously,
when
you're
looking
for
the
top
scoring
Choice,
it's
not
about
some
location
of
where
a
line
is
on
points
right.
It's
about
who
scores
highest.
Obviously,
I
know
there's
some
where
you
have
multiple
right.
You
end
up
with
multiple.
AR
AM
Thank
you
for
the
question.
The
part
I
can
answer,
because
I'm
not
privy
to
all
the
RF,
so
I
wouldn't
know.
The
specifics.
I
would
mention
that
in
August
there
were
of
the
private
entities
there
were
Lori
might
remember
better.
There
were
several
that
did
not
make
that
cut,
so
that
was
consistent.
What
we're
doing
now
is
consistent
with
what
we
recommend
we
do
recommended
and
Council
approved
on
the
prior,
and
there
certainly
were
our
other
RFS
that
have
gone
out,
which
creates
a
bench
so
I
I
can't
give
you
unfortunately,.
AR
Some
great
there's
some
that
are
there
to
create
a
bench,
but
many
of
them
are
obviously
a
competitive
process
to
hire
one
or
two
or
three
for
very
specific
tasks
where
whether
there's
50
bidders
or
six
bidders
you're
there's
a
specific
number.
You
have
to
end
up
with,
whereas
this
case
didn't
have
a
specific
number.
We
had
to
end
up
with.
AR
Right
I
understand
that,
but
but
again
some
of
those
other
groups
would
still
be
getting
contracts
with
the
city
and
that
would
essentially
create
workload
for
others.
So
I
mean
it's
because
they
wouldn't
necessarily
have
pre-qualified
and
it
wouldn't
streamline
it
for
them.
I
understand
what
your
saying
right:
I.
AR
And
thank
you
for
your
comparison
to
last
August.
I!
Guess.
I
now
regret
I
didn't
ask
all
these
questions
then,
because
perhaps
this
this
conversation
should
have
been
held
at
that
time
about
why
it
is
that
this
pre-qualification
was
limiting
the
number
but
I'll
I'll.
Leave
it
at
that
I
I'll
leave
it
up
to
a
colleague
to
make
a
motion.
E
AN
E
Well,
with
the
two
representation
here,
the
mother
in
front
and
also
vao,
so
my
thought
is:
if
they
actually
Reach
Out
and
attended
to
zoom
meeting
and
one
in
person,
then
what
was
the
hiccup
and
if
it
isn't
then
I
guess
if
they
didn't
reach
out,
then
it's
is
on
them.
I
guess
in
a
sense.
AA
So
we
watched
the
video
that
was
provided
of
one
of
the
zoom
meetings
and
took
detailed
notes
and
felt
that
it
was
a
very
encouraging
meeting,
that's
where
they
said.
We
hope,
as
many
of
you
as
possible,
can
get
on
this
list.
We
we
followed
it
with
I
think
we
they
made
it
clear
all
the
required
elements.
So
we
we
checked
it
off.
We
were
very
meticulous.
Everything
was
asked
for.
We
turned
it
in.
AA
We
just
didn't
know
how
important
it
would
be
to
have
a
San
Jose
business
license
and
I
want
to
point
out
that
it
was
meant
to
give
points
to
add
on
to
groups
not
to
like
disqualify
them.
So
if
we
had
gotten
those
five
points
for
being
local
which
we
are
haven't,
we
gotten
the
five
points
for
being
small
which
we
are.
We
would
have
made
the
cut
off
it
wasn't
like
we
weren't
qualified.
We
were
very
close
to
the
cutoff
point.
AA
I
also
just
want
to
address
the
fact
that
Miss
Klein
said
that
it
wouldn't
be
fair
to
the
other
cbos
to
have
the
score
threshold.
Lower
I.
Don't
think
that's
the
case
when
I
was
a
teacher,
we
were
we
had
this
analogy.
That
was,
if
one
kid
in
the
audience
audience
or
your
classroom
is
having
a
heart
attack.
You
don't
say:
oh,
it's
not
fair.
AA
Finally,
the
fact
that
there
may
have
been
mistakes
in
the
past
or
was
differently
handled
in
the
past.
Does
it
mean
it's
not
time
right
now
we
could
rectify
that.
I
think
this
goal
and
I
think
they
was
very
well
intentioned.
I.
Think
there
was
this
fair
and
it
was
unbiased,
but
we
did
document
their
protest
letter.
The
ways
we
did
deserve
more
points
not
for
the
small
and
local.
We
can
see
that,
but
for
the
reaching
populations
of
interest
and
for
the
inclusive
and
collaborative
process
and
when
they
responded
they
protest.
AA
E
E
AM
Done
not
when
you're
inside
the
RFP
process
and
I
I
have
reached
out
to
ESD
and
CED
and
they
don't
have
any
intent
to.
As
was
shared
with
me.
They
don't
have
any
intent
at
this
time
to
contract.
That
was
the
information
given
to
me
earlier
today.
E
C
C
Are
we
able
to
customize
the
form
so
that
we
can
make
clear
what
is
required
could
be
all
Fields,
but
such
that
people
get
some
kind
of
notice
when
applying
if
they're
missing
something
I
heard
that,
in
part
of
the
commentary
earlier
that
there
was
an
incomplete
application,
the
organization
may
not
have
realized
that
something
was
required,
or
that
was
missing.
Is
that
something
we
can
build
into
the
process
in
the
future?
I.
AJ
AM
They
would
not
move
forward
in
the
public
work
say
process
and
for
us
to
take
on
the
responsibility
of
perhaps
missing
that
we
didn't
catch.
Someone
who
didn't
fill
in
that
that
can't
be
from
just
a
workload
point
of
view
and
In
fairness,
the
city's
responsibility.
The
attorneys
may
feel
differently,
but
I
think
that
would
be
very
difficult
for
the
city
to
try
to
step
in
in
Chief.
C
Yeah,
as
you
describe
it,
I
agree,
I
think,
there's
a
difference,
though,
between
having
a
required
field
and
having
it
triple
flag
in
a
forum
that
says
you're
missing
this
attachment,
or
you
did
not
include
an
answer
in
this
box-
I
mean
it
hopefully,
I
have
not
seen
the
form
I
hope
it
was
very
clear,
especially
to
organizations
that
are
maybe
for
which
English
is
a
second
language,
for
example,
I
just
hope
that
the
form
and
the
process
is
extremely
explicit
about
what's
required
and
whether
or
not
the
appropriate
things
have
been
inputted
into
the
form.
C
I
could
see
that
tripping
organizations
up.
That's
that's
my
only
point.
I
know
when
we
do
Google
forms
for
Community
things.
We
often
make
very
clear
this
is
required.
This
is
optional
and
there's
a
nice,
simple
interface
and
setting
for
that.
That's
just
why
I
raised
the
question.
Something
I
just
ask
you
look
at
in
the
tool
is
something
to
make
sure
it's
really
clear
to
everybody:
okay,
we're
back
around
and
I'm
hoping
we're
going
to
get
to
a
motion
here.
Council,
member
Cohen.
AR
Yes,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion,
but
I'm
going
to
start
it
with
an
apology
Nancy,
but
but
the
reason
why
we're
here
in
the
first
place
is
because
we
didn't
think
the
last
process
you
went
through
caught
all
the
things
we
needed
to
catch,
and
so
we
had
a
new
process
to
catch
the
see
the
the
non-profits
and
get
them
involved.
The
motion
I
want
to
make
is
to
approve
the
list
to
pre-qualified
organizations.
AR
F
Thank
you
Nancy.
Can
you
comment
on
the
the
ability
for
your
office
to
do
yet?
Another
RFP
I
know
we're
losing
some
help
in
your
office.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
from
you
about
the
possibility
of
doing
that.
Yet
again,
I
I
don't
take
the
RFP
process
lightly,
because
I
know
it
is
a
ton
of
work
for
staff,
so
I'm
very
concerned
about
having
you
go
out
for
a
third
time.
AM
Council,
member
and
mayor,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
question.
It
is
a
tremendous
amount
of
work.
I,
don't
I
can't
commit
at
this
point
that
it
would
be
the
OED
that
would
do
this
work.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
access
anywhere
else
and
again,
I
I
would
remind
you,
there's
the
opportunity
for
mother's
out
front
in
particular
to
partner
with
other
cbo's
to
to
to
share
in
that
would
increase
their
capacity
when
there
are
those
service
orders
and
looking
at
three.
AM
That
would
increase
the
points
because
you're
ticking
the
box
of
having
very
specialized
work
and,
of
course,
depending
on
the
Contracting
amount,
the
Departments
themselves
again,
ten
thousand
or
under,
can
go
to
direct
50,
000,
I,
think
or
possibly
more
can
go
with
three
verbal
and
go
through
that
process.
So
from
an
OED
workload
that
that
would
be
very
difficult.
AM
F
Thank
you,
I'm
I'm,
not
going
to
support
the
the
motion.
If
you'd
be
willing
to
amend
it
to
just
make
it
staff
recommendation,
I
I
would
be
happy
to
support
it,
but
I
just
think.
There's
another
opportunity
for
for
mothers
out
front
that
won't
cost
us
any
more
staff
time
that
we
don't
have
and-
and
we
can
still
mothers
out
front
can
still
be
or
any
other
environmental
organization
or
CBO
that
would
be
able
to
do.
Outreach
can
still
do
that
with
a
much
lower
workload.
F
C
S
Not
legal
legal
but
Johnny
you're.
J
B
C
AR
Anything
I
mean
I,
you
know
I
I'll
go
ahead.
I
understand
I,
mean
I'm,
wondering
if
there's
you
know
a
compromise
language
that
can
be
put
in
there
and
sort
of
say
next
time.
You
know
if,
in
fact,
for
example,
the
environmental
service
department
is
going
out
for
to
do
this
Outreach
and
wants
to
trying
to
go
out
for
an
RFP
to
do
the
Outreach,
because
they
don't
have
a
group
on
the
list
that
they
think
is
appropriate
for
their
work,
that
potentially,
that
scope
can
be
expanded
to
to
turn
that
into
a
pre-qualification.
AR
So
they
don't
have
to
redo
it
at
each
time.
So
that
it'll
be
a
one-time
thing
for
their
department
to
get
that
out.
Somebody
in
Outreach
so
that
we
can
actually
have
an
organization
I
mean
they
may
or
may
not
be
doing
that
in
the
next
few
months,
but
when
they
next
do
turn
it
into
this
pre-qualification
process
so
that
they
then
have
the
qualified
Organization
for
any
future.
AS
AR
AS
AS
Organization
to
do
climate
and
and
yeah
I
mean
I
I.
Don't
have
any
other
additional
comments
other
than
at
what's
been.
AR
AR
F
That's
fine
I'll
make
a
substitute
motion
a
moving.
The
staff
recommendation.
V
Good,
you
know
one
of
the
concerns
I
think
some
of
the
organizations
like
part
of
the
22,
the
weight
three
to
five
years
to
be
able
to
even
pre-qualify
again
Nancy
I
was
just
wondering
that
six
million
well
that
6
million
take
you
to
five
years
because
you
have
it
as
an
option,
so
I'm
just
wondering
if
it
gets
spent
all
up
front.
You
know
you're
only
going
to
have
500
000
left
if
everyone
were
to
max
out
right.
V
So
I'm
just
wondering
you
know
like
the
timing
of
all
this
and
whether
or
not
making
it
shorter
so
that
you
know
okay,
this
would
be
for
the
three
year
period,
see
where
we
are
and
I
I
know.
It's
an
option
that
you
put
in
here,
but
I
was
just
wondering:
does
a
6
million
take
you
to
five
years.
AM
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
question
the
The
Six
Million
has
a
buffer.
We,
we
hope
it
for
sure
takes
us
to
the
three
years,
but
we
really
won't
know
until
hopefully
your
office
is
all
and
all
the
other
departments
use
it.
If
we're
coming
close
and
it's
been
really
beneficial.
We've
come
back
to
council
to
do
one
of
two
things:
either
go
out
again
or
again
in
in
order
to
to
continue
a
good
thing,
extend
the
time
frame,
but
that
that
either
one
of
those
decisions
would
be
a
council
decision.
Yeah.
V
Okay,
well,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
that,
because
I
think
that
you
know
maybe
seeing
how
it
goes
and
then
you
know
coming
back
sooner
might
be
helpful.
I
do
understand!
You
know
the
need
for
climate,
smart
and,
and
the
work
that's
done
there.
I
do
know
that
breathe.
California
does
some
environmental
work
so
there's
one
partner
potential
partner
there
we'd
love
to
have
more
and
I
I
know
that
there
is
a
process
in
which
climate
smart
can
also
use
mothers
out
front
to
be
able
to
to
do
this.
V
So
with
that
I
support
the
motion.
AL
You
mayor
on
that
same
spirit,
I,
guess,
I
I,
a
question
I
would
have
for
Nancy.
Is
you
know
the
three-year
period?
Is
there?
Maybe
you
know
what
are
your
thoughts
on?
AL
You
know
organizations
Sprout
up
nonprofit
organizations
that
are
that
are
deeply
rooted
in
our
community
Sprout
up
and
and
that's
a
good
thing
and
I,
don't
necessarily
want
to
lock
Us
in
on
a
three-year
where
we're,
where
we
have
this
list
for
three
years,
possibly
five
without
you
know
coming
back
to
us
to
check
in
and
say,
Hey
you
know
Council.
This
is
there's
an
opportunity
to
you
know.
Do
this
thing
next
year
or
the
year
after
it's
it's
an
arbitrary
number.
But
what
are
your
thoughts
on
that.
AT
Rosalyn
Huey
Deputy
city
manager,
so
I
just
wanted
to
remind
the
the
city
council
that
the
city
manager's
office
is
doing
a
lot
of
work
around
Community
engagement,
the
community
engagement
working
group
has
actually
drafted
a
framework
and
we're
getting
ready
to
bring
that
to
council.
This
fall
early
fall.
Probably
the
October
time
frame.
I
would
suggest
that
what
we
can
do
is
actually
report
on
all
of
our
community
engagement
efforts.
AL
AL
The
commission,
so
if
the
maker
of
the
motion
could
I
add
that
as
a
friendly
Amendment,
absolutely
awesome.
Thank
you.
D
Motion
passes
unanimously,
botra
voted
yes,
and
for
people
who
are
just
tuning
in
council,
member
Rogers
computer
is
broken,
so
he
is
voting
verbally.
C
Okay,
thank
you,
Tony,
we're
on
the
item.
Thank
you
to
staff,
we're
on
to
item
8.2,
purchase
and
sale
agreement
for
property
located
at
517,
West
Saint,
John,
Street
I
am
thinking
by
the
way
I'll
look
to
my
colleagues
for
feedback
thinking
we'll
go
until
six
and
then
take
a
short
dinner
recess
that
sound
okay
colleagues,
they're
gonna
go
until
six
and
then
a
short
recess
for
dinner.
Okay,
so
we'll
take
up
8.2,
we
have
a
short
staff
presentation.
AM
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
and
Council.
We
have
a
Nancy
Klein
office
of
Economic
Development
and
cultural
Affairs
and
I'm
with
Kevin
ice,
who
manages
real
estate
on
a
day-to-day
I'm,
going
to
ask
Kevin
just
to
turn
to
the
air
first
aerial
just
to
to
give
you
a
little
orientation
and
then
Kevin
will
move
swiftly
through
the
presentation,
the
site
that
is.
AM
AM
This
is
an
opportunity
that
or
a
requirement
that
has
been
in
place
for
many
years,
and
it's
difficult,
as
you
know,
to
go
through
both
to
gather
the
funds
together,
thank
you
dot
and
to
move
forward
and
reach
a
an
agreement,
so
this
did
not
ultimately
require
going
through
the
eminent
domain
process.
We've
reached
an
agreement
with
the
property
owner,
it's
a
large
component
of
the
overall
site
that
we
need
for
parking,
and
so
we're
excited
about
moving
forward
on
this
particular
item
with
that
Kevin.
Please
walk
us
through.
AM
AU
Sorry
can
we
go
back
to
the
beginning
of
the
presentation,
please
the
clicker
isn't
working.
So
thank
you.
Nancy.
My
name
is
Kevin
Ice
senior,
real
estate
manager
in
the
office
of
Economic,
Development
and
cultural
affairs,
so
in
October,
2022
Council
authorized
staff
to
use
the
power
of
eminent
domain
to
acquire
two
properties
necessary
to
construct
lot
e
behind
the
sap
Center
517
West
St
John
Street
and
150
North
Montgomery
Street.
However,
staff
were
directed
to
continue
efforts
to
negotiate
for
a
consensual
deal
and
avoid
the
court
process.
AU
AU
So,
to
summarize
the
deal
the
city
would
purchase
the
property
for
five
million
one
hundred
thousand
dollars
or
268
dollars
a
foot.
The
property
is
0.44
acres
and
improved
with
a
10
000
square
foot,
industrial
building
constructed
in
1939
that
houses,
the
Thorson
tile
and
stone
business,
as
well
as
the
sharks
on-site.
Due
diligence
will
commence
upon
execution
of
a
contingent,
purchase
and
sale
agreement,
additional
costs
to
acquire
the
property
or
estimated
ten
thousand
dollars
in
closing
costs
and
up
to
275
thousand
dollars
for
relocation.
AU
AP
Q
Parking,
it's
hypocritical
to
tell
us,
on
the
one
hand,
that
you
need
to
reduce
cars,
you
need
to
reduce
parking
spaces.
Certain
parts
of
the
city,
which
is
primarily
the
east
side.
I
mean
it's.
It's
it's
beyond
hypocritical
for
you
to
tell
us
that
and
then
you're
here,
building
parking,
lots,
parking,
lots,
facilitate
vehicle
ownership,
that's
what
they're
for,
and
so
it's
it's.
Q
We
have
to
get
to
a
point:
either
quit
lying
and
quit
continuing
with
people
or
or
just
you
know,
try
something
else,
man,
but
people
are
listening.
It's
embarrassing
for
me
to
have
to
confront
you
with
this,
because
I
don't
want
to
do
this.
I
want
to
work
cooperatively.
I
want
to
work
effectively
in
order
to
really
make
some
concrete
changes
that
are
going
to
be
beneficial
to
all
members
of
our
community,
but
it
when
we
have
this
kind
of
of
just
flat
out
blatant
hypocrisy.
It
it
has
to
be
questioned.
Q
That's
number
one
number
two
is
that
they
got
a
pretty
sweet
deal
when
the
freeway
went
through
and
from
this
to
the
Horseshoe
and
everybody
got
displaced.
There
were
no
relocation
concerts,
it
was
it.
It
was
awful,
it
was
awful,
so
the
the
owners
I'm
sure
they're
they're
glad
they're
grateful
they
got.
They
got
a
pretty
good,
buyout
and
yeah.
The
city
was
pretty
generous
on
on
their
end,
thanks.
F
F
And
I
just
want
to
clarify
I,
don't
remember
if
we've
talked
about
this
in
closed
session,
since
everybody
knew
has
come
on
we're
doing
this
parking
replacement
because
of
the
BART
project
taking
away
parking
and
so
that
we
can
continue
to
comply
with
the
shark's
parking
requirements.
Agreement
right,
absolutely
correct.
Thank
you.
Okay,
thank
you.
All
move
staff
recommendation.
AJ
C
Okay,
thank
you
Tony
great
Rhonda
item
and
thank
you
to
staff.
We
are
on
item
8.3,
which
is
the
proposed
one-year
extension
of
the
measure
e
real
property
transfer
tax
refund
for
qualifying
non-profit
Real
Property
Transfers,
and
this
is
a
pilot
program.
There's
no
staff
recommendation.
We
will
I'm
sorry
presentation.
We
will
go
to
public
comment.
D
Y
Hi,
thank
you.
Do
not
extend
this
program.
The
non-profits
pay
tax,
the
non-profits
should
pay
taxes
on
all
Property
Transfers.
Y
If
you
only
had
one
application
and
it's
costly
to
maintain
this
program
and
I
think
I
think
we
should
stop
throwing
good
money
after
bad.
It's
counterproductive
to
reduce
funding
for
development
by
excusing
well-funded
corporate,
backed
ngos
from
paying
the
same
transfer
tax
as
any
property
owner.
Thank
you
for
this
time.
D
Q
Yeah
I'm
here
also
from
the
horseshoe
you
this.
This
was
an
excellent
idea.
Whoever
came
up
with
this
idea.
Thank
you.
This
was
an
excellent
job
of
government
working
with
non-profits
to
make
sure
that
when
they
relocate
or
or
they
get,
they
acquire
a
property.
If
they're,
given
that
kind
of
benefit,
you
know
I'm
tired
of
giving
I'm
tired
of
giving
rich
people
money.
Q
They
they
they're
fine.
They
are
fine,
they're
they're,
not
you
know,
they're,
not
destitute
or
they're,
not
like
you
know,
I
mean
like
poor
and
and
so
when
we're
giving
tax
breaks
to
to
these
developers.
Q
We're
it's
a
it's
it's,
but
this
one,
you
you
it's
a
right
combination
of
city
government
working
with
the
non-profits
in
order
to
facilitate
the
non-profits
viability
in
the
community,
now
you're
going
to
need
that
viability
in
the
community,
because
this
gentrification
process
that
you
guys
have
designed
it's
going
to
accelerate,
and
that
means
there's
going
to
be
a
greater
Demand
on
those
non-profits,
and
so
those
nonprofits
need
to
be
as
solvent
as
possible,
and
this
is
one
mechanism
that
makes
that
possible.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
whoever's
idea.
AF
R
Hi
here
thanks
good
luck,
I
was
really
impressed
by
the
overall
mediation
process
of
measure
e
I
hope
that
those
practices
and
can
really
develop
a
a
real
good
overall
Community
dialogue
in
how
to
address
issues
and
to
address
issues
progressively
smartly
is,
is
a
good
first
step
and
then
I
think
we're
learning.
R
The
added
parts
of
the
series
of
good
Progressive
practices
can
help
add
to
these
sort
of
ideas
and
programs,
so
I
hope
are
of
interest
to
ourselves
and
that
we
really
want
to
take
an
enthusiastic,
enjoyable
understanding,
an
effort
to
work
towards
those
kind
of
ideas.
So
thanks
a
lot,
and
hopefully
I,
don't
know
the
depth
fully
of
this
item,
but
it
is
that
Cooperative
process
that
I
hope
we're
going
through
right
now.
That
can
lend
itself
to
a
really
good
answers
for
this
sort
of
item.
Thanks.
E
C
Just
to
stay
just
clarifying
okay,
thank
you.
Council
repatra,.
C
U
AV
Okay,
thank
you,
council
member.
This
is
Rachel
vanderveen
assistant,
director
of
the
housing
department,
the
the
real
estate
transfer
tax
is
actually
traditionally
negotiated
between
the
buyer
and
the
seller,
and
so
it
can
actually
be
a
point
of
negotiation
and
go
different
ways
just
based
on
the
parties
and
what
they
determine.
Okay,.
U
But
the
bottom
line
is
it's
really
coming
out
of
the
sales
price
right
and
that's
the
only
money
that
is
right?
Okay,
so
so,
okay,
so
that's
I
got
your
point.
The
second
question
is
that
why
do
we
need
this
program?
Because
non-profit
is
being
helped
to
buy
the
property
anyways?
You
got
multiple
programs,
helping
them
get
the
money.
U
Why
administratively
spend
one
more
ounce
of
energy
on
it,
and
your
analysis
shows
that
you
had
during
the
time
only
one
person
applied
after
your
extensive
effort,
and
you
indicate
that
the
amount
of
administrative
time
being
spent
has
not
been
all
that
productive
you're
going
to
be
making
extensive
Outreach
to
find
that
the
non-profit,
if
they're
buying
it
they're
getting
help.
They
don't
need
this
additional
program
and
you
are
busier
than
anybody
else
in
the
world.
U
You
don't
have
any
extra
time
to
go
and
search
for
these
people
when
they're
buying-
and
this
is
a
big
purchase.
They
did.
These
are
not
uninformed
a
non-profit,
buying,
151
unit
apartments
and
all
that
so
I
think
this
program
might
have
been
very
well
intentioned,
but
considering
our
resources
of
the
city
staff,
and
especially
yours,
so
you've
got
many
other
things
which
are
much
more
productive.
I
would
say
this
pilot
program
for
one
year
you
had
it.
Should
it
not
end
now,
rather
than
extend
it
for
another
year,.
AV
I
would
just
say
first
of
all,
there's
there's
really
kind
of
like
two
portions
to
the
program,
so
I
want
to
kind
of
talk
about
them
separately.
So
one
is
a
is
around
the
non-profits,
okay,
and
so
so
really.
The
reason
that
we
put
together
the
non-profit
piece
was
in
response
to
very
clear
direction
that
we
received
from
the
mayor.
So
we
were
given
specific
direction
to
make
that
happen.
AV
The
the
thought
behind
it
was
actually
for
nonprofits
who
were
selling
property.
They
were.
It
was
really
important
that
they
they
received
the
benefit
of
not
of
being
refunded
for
the
measure
e
like
cost
or
transfer
tax.
So
I
just
want
to
make
that
clear.
First
of
all,
too,
like
it
was
intended,
the
non-profit
portion
was
intended
for
nonprofits
who
are
actually
selling
property.
AV
We
did
not
during
this.
This
pilot
program
have
any
any
nonprofits
take
advantage
of
this
refund
now.
Secondly,
there's
a
second
part
to
the
program
which
is
specific
to
organizations
providing
affordable
housing,
and
so
that
is
a
piece
that
we
definitely
contemplated
and
and
really
that's,
where
you're
going
to
have
developers
nonprofits,
whoever
it
is,
who
are
doing
affordable
housing,
securing
sites
for
the
development
of
affordable
housing.
AV
So
we
also
wanted
to
create
a
way
for
them
to
it's
kind
of
like
it's
sort
of
recycling
money,
because
they
would
may
end
up
getting
some
measure
e
in
order
to
do
what
they're
doing
anyway.
But
so
there
we
wanted
to
just
call
that
out
and
again
they
would
just
receive
a
refund.
We
did
receive
one
request:
the
one
refund
is
related
to
the
affordable
housing
development
piece,
and
so
so
that
piece
we
did
have
one
request
and
they
have.
U
AV
I
guess
I
want
I,
do
want
to
answer
your
very
direct
question.
I
I
believe
that
this
is
a
policy
decision
and
it
is
really
up
to
the
mayor
and
city
council.
If
you
would
want
to
extend
this
or
not
we
I
guess.
What
we
would
like
to
just
say
is
that
we
did
not
have
a
chance
to
do
an
extensive
Outreach
to
the
nonprofits.
Who
may
be
thinking
that
this
is
still
going
to
continue,
so
so
I
don't
have
like
really
good
feedback
for
you
from
those
potentially
impacted
groups.
AV
U
C
C
AV
AV
C
AV
AV
And
I
think
just
to
kind
of
add
to
the
conversation
regarding
the
affordable
housing
portion,
because
we
are
most
likely
having
some
sort
of
funding
relationship
with
the
with
the
future,
affordable
housing
development
or
acquisition
whatever
it
is,
we
do
believe
we
could
have
other
mechanisms
to
just
make
sure
that
they're
that
everyone
is
whole
I.
Don't
think
that
this
is
the
only
way
to
do
that.
Okay,.
C
Good
to
know
councilor
Davis.
F
F
I
mean
it
we're
forecasting
measuring
revenues
to
be
down,
and
it
sounds
like
it
doesn't
take
much
staff
time
to
just
extend
this
for
one
more
year
and
kind
of
see
what
happens
we
haven't
had
any
anyone
take
us
up
on
the
the
first
part
of
it
and
I
know
the
thought
if
I
remember
correctly,
from
the
conversations
that
we
had
was
that
non-profits
are,
you
know
generally
tax
exempt
in
in
general,
and
that
they're
doing
things
like
I
mean
Goodwill
comes
to
mind
where
they're
not
building
housing
but
they're,
employing
unhoused
individuals,
they're
doing
other
things
that
are
beneficial
to
the
community,
just
for
example,
and
they
might
sell,
they
might
sell
property,
and
there
are
other
non-profits,
obviously
that
that
may
be
selling
property,
maybe
because
they
need
to
downsize
for
whatever
reason
so
in
terms
of
extending
it
for
one
year
in
case
there
is
a
a
case
where
that
happens.
F
F
Yeah
yeah
so
I'm
not
inclined
to
support
the
motion
on
the
floor
because
we
we
haven't
done
any
Outreach
to
let
the
nonprofits
know
that
they're
that
we're
not
going
to
be
extending
this
I
think
there
was
probably
an
assumption
that
they
would
be
extending
and
if
we're
gonna,
if
we're
gonna,
do
away
even
with
a
pilot
program,
we
I
think
the
best
thing
to
do
is
to
let
people
know
and
not
do
it
at
the
last
meeting,
just
on
the
without
any
kind
of
input.
H
U
Yeah
I
think
the
very
fact
that
you
said
we
do
the
Outreach,
that's
exactly
the
thing
I'm
trying
to
prevent
spending
time
on,
because
there's
nobody
out
there
who's
looking
around
for
this
thing,
you
have
too
many
other
things
to
help
make
the
affordable
homes
happen.
Why
take
on
another
Outreach
for
another
program,
to
explain
to
the
people,
and
maybe
one
or
two
may
take
advantage
of
it?
U
A
general
statement
say
comment
any
question
yeah
because
she
said
that
she's
not
going
to
be
able
to
support
it
because
it
doesn't
take
staff
time.
I
read
here
in
the
analysis
published
here,
it
says
administrative
workload
required
to
manage.
The
program
is
disproportionate
to
the
demand
of
the
service
as
currently
structured.
So
the
very
fact
we
are
trying
to
protect
is
the
one
you're
saying
it
doesn't
take
anything.
F
You're
you're,
obviously
you're
entitled
to
your
opinion,
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
there
needs
to
be
Outreach
about
the
program.
I
know,
nonprofits
are
well
aware
of
the
program
existing.
What
I'm
saying
is,
if
we
were
going
to
do
away
with
it,
I
would
want
to
let
some
some
folks
know
that
we
were
going
to
do
away
with
it
and,
in
fact,
I
think
it
will
cost
more
work
to
to
do
away
with
it
now,
because
Not
only
would
all
of
us
need
to
be
talking
to
non-profits.
F
U
Well
known
Samir,
it
was
a
one-year
pilot
program.
Nobody
said
it
will
be
continued
and
hence
the
anybody
who
is
under
the
impression
that
is
continuing
is
really
under
the
impression,
a
misnomer,
because
a
pilot
program
is
meant
to
be
evaluated
and
to
be
continued
only
when
it
makes
sense.
So
if
somebody
has
some
wrong
expectation,
maybe
it
is
time
to
go
and
correct
them,
but
the
purpose
of
having
pilot
programs
is
exactly
to
evaluate
them
at
the
end
of
it
and
figure
out
if
they
should
be
continued.
U
C
Okay,
thanks
council
member
I,
you
know,
look
I
I,
think
it's
a
value
judgment.
Each
of
us
has
to
make
as
to
whether
or
not
we
want
more
data.
As
councilman
Davis
pointed
out.
This
is
a
year
where
we're
seeing
far
fewer
real
estate
transactions.
You
have
to
decide
whether
or
not
one
year
of
data
is
enough
to
evaluate
the
effectiveness
of
the
program.
C
The
logic
for
the
program
to
me
felt
fairly
sound,
at
least
when
it
came
I
mean
on
both
halves,
really
the
idea
that
one
you've
got
nonprofits
providing
critical,
Human
Services
generally
they're
tax
exempt.
Is
this
an
area
where
we
really
want
to
increase
the
cost
to
them
or
allow
them
to
retain
those
funds
to
provide
services
in
our
community?
Certainly,
you
can
make
arguments
on
either
side.
That
was
the
logic,
though,
in
the
second
in
particular,
you
have
somebody
coming
in
to
build.
C
Affordable
housing,
which
is
one
of
the
primary
goals
of
measure
e,
seems
a
little
silly
to
take
money
out
of
that
transaction.
Only
to
then
put
it
back
into
the
market,
potentially
with
a
two-year
lag.
Given
that
construction
costs
are
escalating
every
single
year,
it
is
less
efficient
to
pull
it
out
and
RFP
at
two
to
three
years
down
the
road
when
your
cost
of
construction
is
going
up
eight
percent
a
year,
so
the
logic
there
was
a
logic
there.
C
AL
And
you
know:
I
I
appreciate
the
Zeal
and
and
the
passion
of
my
accounts
colleagues
speaking
to
to
to
this,
but
you
know
I,
think
I,
think
it's
I
think
we
should
always
be
encouraging
the
public
and
we
should
always
be
encouraging
Outreach,
not
less
of
it
more
more
people
informed
of
policy
and
of
decisions
that
their
council
members
and
the
representatives
appointed
or
elected
a
make
is
a
good
thing
for
for
public
transparency
in
the
public
trust.
AL
Ultimately-
and
you
know,
I
too
want
to
want
to
want
to
take
a
line
from
the
report,
because
I
did
do
my
reading
and
and
it's
it's
important
to
consider
the
potential
impacts
on
discontin
the
discontinuation
of
the
refund
program.
It's
important
to
consider
the
potential
impacts
on
racial
equity.
Furthermore,
it
we,
we
should
be
reassessing
the
program,
but
the
outcomes
will
prioritize
extremely
low-income
communities
of
color
through
city
council
directed
through
the
program.
AL
So
I
fear
that
if
we
discontinue
the
program
too
early,
which
is
which,
which
is
what
what
the
current
motion
on
the
floor
is,
we're
missing
out
on
the
opportunity
to
truly
see
the
the
efficacy
into
the
mayor's
point.
Whether
whether
this
program
is
working
as
originally
intended.
So
I
am
inclined
to
make
a
substitute
motion
to
accept
staff's
recommendations.
AL
And
and
and
there
you
go
so
but
but
again,
I
I,
think
I,
think
my
Council
colleague,
Zeal
and
and
I
appreciate.
You
know
the
the
fact
that
he
wants
to
you
know:
move
move
our
city
forward,
but
I
I
think
I.
Think
we
we
making
that
decision
now
with
the
lack
of
of
Outreach
and
the
lack
of
information
on
the
people
who
were
potentially
affected
is
is,
is,
is
poor
public
policy
and
that's
why
I
had
to
make
the
substitution.
Thank
you.
C
C
Okay,
honorary
second
for
Davis
we're
going
back
to
counselor
Dewan
well,.
E
I
like
to
motion
for
friendly
amendment
that
if
a
project
is
approved
under
measure
e,
then
they
should
qualify
for
this
funding.
But
if
they're
not,
then
they
should
pay
taxes
like
everyone
else,.
AV
I,
just
I
would
just
say
that
a
staff
response
to
that
would
be
in
general,
I
think
what
that
would
mean
is
that
there's
two
parts
to
the
exemption:
there's
the
non-profit
selling
property
for
Human
Services
and
then
there's
the
affordable
housing
purposes
so
most
likely.
What
would
happen
in
that
case
is
that
the
nonprofits
providing
Human
Services
would
not
qualify
for
the
refund,
whereas
the
affordable
housing
portion
would
General.
C
U
AL
Well,
while
I
appreciate
the
the
the
wanting
to
to
solve
I
think
we're
over
complicating
our
program
and
and
I
I
I
I
I,
don't
don't
think
that's
necessary
at
this
point
again
again,
we
haven't
had
the
time
to
assess
this
program
with
the
way
we
have
it
and
so
adding
another
another
hurdle
for
for
the
community
to
understand
and
what's
a
loophole.
What's
not
it's
it's
too
complicated
and
I.
AL
E
The
recommendation-
thank
you,
I
appreciate
that,
but
I
don't
think
it's
complicated
things
when,
if
a
non-profit
or
you
know,
qualify
under
affordable
housing,
then
they
get
exempt
under
housing,
but
if
they're
not
and
they
don't,
they
have
to
pay
the
taxes.
It's
very
simple
analogy
and
I
think
any
constituent
out
there
that
are
you,
know
fiscally
responsible
and
and
follow.
The
rules
would
understand
that.
Thank
you.
AL
C
Okay,
counselor
Taurus.
A
No
great,
thank
you
so
much
for
the
robust
dialogue
from
my
colleagues
but
I.
As
you
know,
first
year,
council
member
wasn't
here
when
this
pilot
program
got
launched.
I
definitely
want
to
see
it
continue,
as
there
haven't
been
enough
transactions
to
actually
measure
the
the
pilot
program.
So
I'm
going
to
be
supporting
the
the
some
motion
that
my
colleague
Candelas
motion
for
so
thank
you.
C
Okay,
thank
you.
We
we're
gonna
counselor
fully.
B
L
L
I
do
also
appreciate
council,
member
Candelas
and
his
motion,
so
I'm
conflicted,
but
I
think
we
need
a
I
feel
this
that
we
do
need
to
notify
the
non-profits
that
this
project
this
program
is
going
to
Sunset.
If
we
don't
you,
if
it's
not
utilized
and
to
do
that
today,
without
notifying
them
ahead
of
time
is
a
disservice
to
the
Outreach
that
we
normally
like
to
do
and
that
we
like
to
credit
with
our
ourselves
with
doing
well.
L
Sometimes
we're
successful
with
that
Outreach
and
sometimes
we're
not,
but
but
sitting
here
and
saying
we're
going
to
deny
something
that
came
through
that
is,
should
be
extended.
Everyone's
assuming
we're
going
to
extend
it
today,
they're,
not
on
the
alert
that
this
is
something
we
might
be
doing,
which
is
to
unwind
it
completely.
L
Even
though
one
only
one
organization
has
used
it,
which
in
me
to
me,
isn't
as
successful
a
success,
but
that
also
May
mean
there's
not
an
that,
we
need
more
time
to
get
the
word
out
to
do
some
Outreach
to
at
least
see
if
there's
any
need
for
this
program
and
then
reassess
it
for
in
a
year.
So,
if
you'll
accept
a
friendly
Amendment,
have
the
program
sunset
in
a
year
would
after
analysis.
AL
No,
no
I
I
appreciate
I
appreciate
the
the
recommendation.
Councilmember
Foley
I,
just
I
fear
that
if
we,
if
we
go,
if
we
default
it,
it's
gonna.
Well,
you
know
it
actually
wouldn't
be.
It
wouldn't
be
a
bad
idea,
because
if
if,
if
the
the
program
is
intended
and
and
our
and
our
Outreach
is
adequate,
then
we
will
hear
from
from
from
the
community
and-
and
we
will
know
whether
it's
needed
or
not
and
I
think
that's
a
decision.
AL
We
should
weigh
and
so
I'm
inclined
to
support
your
your
Amendment
I'm
I'm,
curious
to
to
hear
what
my
seconder
has
to
say.
Yeah.
F
F
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
thinking
about
it.
Yeah
I
would
suggest
amending
the
amendment
to
say
that
we
haven't
come
back
to
to
council
member
Foley's
committee
for
a
report
before
before
it
sunsets
to
actually
see
what
the
results
are
and
to
have
a
discussion
with
that
committee
and
that
committee
can
make
a
recommendation
for
whether
or
not
to
Sunset.
That
way.
It
comes
back
to
the
council
for
a
vote
on
the
sunset,
but
it
comes
to
your
committee
to
for
a
more
fulsome
discussion.
L
F
AL
You
I'll
accept
that
a
minute
I'll
accept
that
Amendment
to
give
council
member
Foley's
CED
committee
more
more
work.
Thank
you.