►
From YouTube: OCT 25, 2022 | City Council Afternoon session
Description
City of San José, California
City Council Afternoon Session, October 25, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=999873&GUID=59D50B29-E35E-4F24-AB2C-25B2B37E936B
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
B
B
A
You
first
mistake
of
the
day
today
the
invocation
will
be
provided
by
Beth
kill.
Is
that
pregnant
kill?
Kyle
author
of
haunted,
San
Jose
council
members?
Foley
will
tell
us
more.
C
Thank
you
vice
mayor
I'm
really
excited
to
have
this
presentation
for
you
today
and
it's
a
little
departure
from
an
invocation
you're
not
going
to
hear
someone
evoke
words
of
philosophy,
but
there
may
be
some
Spirits
involved
in
what
she
has
to
tell
us.
So
for
today's
invocation,
I've
invited
Elizabeth,
Kyle
Beth
known
by
her
neighbors,
which
is
me
as
Beth,
a
Seventh
Generation
resident
of
California
and
District.
Nine
Beth
is
an
English
teacher
at
Branham,
High
School
in
San
Jose
and
lives
in
Willow
Glen
with
her
family.
C
I've
asked
her
here
today,
as
she
recently
released.
A
book
titled
haunted
San
Jose,
which
details
the
long
history
of
ghostly
Tales
associated
with
our
city
as
a
lifelong
resident
of
San
Jose
she's,
deeply
familiar
with
the
places
she's
written
about
from
driving
Hicks
Road
as
a
teenager
to
attending
graduate
school
at
San,
Jose
State.
C
Since
this
is
the
last
council
meeting
before
Halloween
I
thought
it
would
be
fun
to
have
Beth
read
a
passage
from
her
book
and
I
have
provided
a
copy
of
the
book
to
all
of
my
colleagues
and
the
city
manager
and
City
attorney,
who
are
up
here.
So
everyone
can
read
it
and
share
it.
With
that,
I'd
like
to
introduce
Beth
Kyle
to
read
a
portion
of
her
new
book,
happy
Halloween.
D
Thank
you,
council,
member
Foley,
so
in
my
book,
I
have
tried
to
blend
history
and
storytelling,
and
the
story
I'll
be
sharing
with.
You
is
from
the
new
Almaden
area
of
San
Jose
Hacienda
cemetery
is
the
Eternal
home
of
some
new
Almaden
residents,
both
Miners
and
prominent
community
members.
The
cemetery
dating
to
the
early
1850s
is
thought
to
be
the
final
resting
place
of
about
50
people.
Today,
due
to
age
and
vandalism,
a
number
of
the
graves
are
unmarked.
D
In
1928,
a
musician
named
Ben
black
bought
some
of
the
land
owned
by
the
mining
company
near
the
Hacienda
and
attempted
to
subdivide
it
when
he
couldn't
get
the
necessary
permits
to
extend
Bertram
Road
through
the
cemetery.
He
took
matters
into
his
own
hands,
piloting
a
bulldozer
in
the
middle
of
the
night
and
cutting
a
swath
directly
through
the
cemetery
and
over
a
number
of
occupied
Graves.
Today,
the
cemetery
is
divided
in
two
on
either
side
of
the
road,
and
it's
said
that
when
you
drive
down
that
road,
the
bumps
you
pass
over
are
Graves.
D
In
1974,
the
cemetery
was
deeded
to
the
California
pioneers
of
Santa
Clara
County,
under
whose
care
it
remains
today,
vandalism
embodies
under
the
roadway.
Aren't
the
only
unfortunate
elements
associated
with
this
tiny
plot
of
land,
Bertram
Road,
The,
Narrow
Lane
that
runs
on
the
south
side
of
Alamitos
Creek
is
named
after
Richard
Bertram
Barrett
also
called
Bert
at
the
age
of
13.
Bert
lost
his
left
arm
in
a
hunting
accident
in
accordance
with
laws
and
custom
of
the
time.
D
His
arm
was
required
to
be
given
a
proper
burial
and
thus
was
interred
in
Hacienda
Cemetery
at
the
grave.
A
wooden
marker
surrounded
by
a
white
picket
fence,
reads:
Richard
Bertram,
Bert
Barrett.
His
arm
lies
here,
1893
may
it
rest.
In
peace,
bird
himself
lived
for
another
66
years,
working
as
Chief
sanitation,
engineer
for
Santa,
Clara,
County
and
passing
away
in
1957..
The
rest
of
his
body,
Sand's
left
arm
is
interred
in
Oak
Hill
Memorial
Park
11
miles
away
from
New
Almaden,
where
he
rests
peacefully.
But
what
of
that
arm?
D
The
disembodied
limb
tries
to
steer
a
course
down
the
hilly
Lanes
of
new
Almaden,
perhaps
hoping
to
reanimate
the
rest
of
its
body
when
it
finds
it.
The
Barrett's
rented
home
is
across
Alamitos
Creek
from
the
cemetery
and
is
known
as
cottage
number
five,
while
the
home
doesn't
seem
to
have
any
Legends
associated
with
it.
It's
not
difficult
to
imagine
Bert
Barrett's,
disembodied
arms
stopping
by
its
old
home
on
its
jaunt
down
the
road
to
Oak
Hill
in
San
Jose.
C
A
You
now
again,
for
the
second
time,
I'd
like
to
ask
councilmember
Carrasco
to
join
me
at
the
podium
and
we
will
recognize
and
Proclaim
Arts
and
Humanities
month.
A
E
I
have
the
pleasure
of
representing
our
beautiful
and
talented
east
side
of
San
Jose
and,
besides
being
a
council
member
I'm,
also
the
proud
to
serve
as
the
city
council
liaison
to
the
Arts
Commission.
What
a
joy
it
is
to
Proclaim
October
as
National
Arts
and
Humanities
month.
We
recognize
National,
Arts
and
Humanities
month
as
a
time
to
uplift,
our
art
community,
as
well
as
honor
those
creatives
that
have
made
a
long-standing
Visionary
impact
on
our
city
of
San
Jose.
E
E
We
find
incredible
historic
and
cultural
richness
all
on
one
historic
block.
The
Curious
Wonder
of
walking
downtown
music
live
music
greeting
us
at
the
plaza
de
Cesar
Chavez,
beautiful
dancers,
at
Circle
of
the
Palms
connected
through
City
dams,
unbelievable
artwork
and
programs,
birth
from
makla
fill
the
sofa
district
with
life.
E
By
providing
space
to
heal,
I'm
proud
to
share
that
this
Friday
October
28th,
we
will
be
unveiling
a
mural
for
Kayla
Salazar,
a
victim
of
the
Gilroy
Garlic,
shooting
grateful
for
all
the
Departments
and
the
amazing
artistic
Jessica
sabogal
who
came
together
to
present
this
mural
and
Aid
in
the
healing
process
for
our
families
in
the
Arts.
We
recognize
our
strength
and
find
the
soul
of
San
Jose
I
want
to
thank
our
entire
art
community
for
sharing
their
talent.
E
You
bring
us
together,
you
lift
us
up
and
encapsulate
The
Human
Experience
through
an
artistic
language
that
resonates
with
each
and
every
one
of
us.
It's
my
great
honor
to
present
today's
proclamation
to
our
very
own
office
of
Economic
Development,
a
plaza
plus
and
cultural
Affairs,
led
by
director
Nancy
Klein
and
deputy
director
Carrie
Adams
Hefner,
the
OCA
Fosters
community
Through
process,
building
that
defines
creative
Place,
making
expanding
the
community's
access
to
public
space
and
impacting
economic
and
visual
aspects
of
the
city
of
San
Jose.
E
The
OCA
is
a
champion
of
the
Arts
in
San
Jose,
ensuring
that
our
Arts
Community
is
taken
care
of
through
Grant,
making
special
events,
public
art
and
programs
aimed
at
celebrating
the
Arts
and
creative
expression.
I
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
all
the
work
that
you
do.
Truly
you
bring
San
Jose
to
life
and
I'm
happy
to
be
able
to
tour
the
city
with
my
my
children,
who
are
inspired
by
you.
E
B
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
and
a
special
thank
you
to
the
mayor
and
Council,
but
particularly
you
councilmember
Carrasco,
who
has
been
a
passionate
and
committed
supporter
and
hero
for
our
efforts.
That
really
means
a
lot
to
us
and
then
also
just
to
remind
that.
The
Arts
in
San
Jose
are
our
heart,
our
culture,
our
identity
and
and
very
much
our
conscious
when
we
need
to
be
reminded
of
what
matters.
B
So
it's
with
great
appreciation
that
we
look
to
the
Arts
to
bring
more
sense
of
place,
activation
to
be
coming,
the
city
and
the
county.
The
people
who
we
already
are
and
want
to
show
more
of
so
with
that
also
want
to
make
sure
to
thank
the
Arts
commission,
which
is
stewarding
our
efforts
and,
last
but
not
least,
the
staff
from
OCA
they're
already
back
to
hundreds
of
events,
and
they
pour
their
heart
and
soul
and
a
lot
of
their
personal
time.
Thank
you.
B
C
Good
afternoon,
thank
you
vice
mayor
I'm
honored
to
recognize
October
as
Hindu
Heritage
Month
I'm,
proud
to
acknowledge
the
significant
contributions
made
by
Hindu
Americans
living
in
San
Jose
and
seek
to
increase
awareness
and
understanding
of
the
Hindu
American
community
October
is
significant
because
it's
the
birth
month
of
Mahatma
Gandhi
and
is
often
when
major
Hindu
holidays,
such
as
Diwali,
are
celebrated.
In
fact,
diwali's
five-day
celebration
began
yesterday,
Diwali
known
as
the
Festival
of
Lights
includes
the
illumination
of
Lights
candles
and
sparklers
to
symbolize
the
victory
of
good
over
evil
light
over
darkness
and
knowledge.
C
Over
ignorance,
the
city
of
San
Jose
has
been
influenced
by
the
extraordinary
cultural,
ethnic,
linguistic
and
religious
diversity
of
its
residents,
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
assembly,
member
ashkara,
who
originally
brought
forth
the
celebration
of
this
month
in
the
city
of
San
Jose.
When
he
served
on
the
council
a
few
years
back.
C
We
use
this
opportunity
to
acknowledge
the
ways
we
have
benefited
from
Hindu
Americans
through
classical
Indian
art,
dance,
music,
meditation,
yoga
literature,
community
service
and
so
much
more.
In
fact,
it's
hard
pressed
to
see
where
they
haven't
influenced
Our
Lives
Hindu
Americans,
promote
the
ideals
of
Tolerance
pluralism
and
religious
freedom,
all
of
which
are
in
inherent
to
their
beliefs
and
respect.
The
diversity
of
all
faiths
is
popularly
recited.
Hindu
invocation
that
is
translated
in
English
demonstrates
this
concern
for
Universal
kinship
kinship
and
well-being
and
I
quote:
may
all
beings
be
happy?
C
May
all
beings
be
healthy?
May
all
beings
experience
Prosperity
May.
None
in
the
world
suffer
against
the
backdrop
of
this
understanding
of
equality
and
unity.
The
Hindu
world
has
been
able
to
embrace
the
reality
of
diversity
through
its
philosophy
of
pluralism,
every
being
with
their
varying
likes
and
dislikes
their
unique
personalities
and
their
different
cultures
not
only
connect
with
one
another
in
their
unique
ways,
but
connect
with
others
in
their
own
unique
and
individual
ways.
C
Today,
I
have
Milan,
maquana
and
Samir
Kara
here
to
accept
this
Proclamation
on
behalf
of
the
hindu-american
residents
of
San
Jose
Samir
is
managing
director
of
the
Hindu
American
foundation
and
Malin
is
a
com
Community
volunteer
for
Hindu,
Education
Foundation
and
a
resident
of
city
council
District
9.
vice
mayor
Jones?
Would
you
please
present
the
recognition
to
Milan
maquana
and
Samira
Kara,
who
is
joining
us
virtually
and
Milan
will
start
by
accepting
the
proclamation
and
then
turn
it
over
to
Samir
there
vice
mayor
just
promoted,
you.
A
On
behalf
of
Hindu
Education
Foundation
and
several
other
Hindu
American
organization
and
dharmic
organizations,
I
would
like
to
thank
council
member
Foley
and
the
entire
San
Jose
City
Council,
for
this
Proclamation
on
occasion
of
Hindu
Heritage
Month,
as
rightly
pointed
out
by
Foley.
This
is
like
you
know.
This
cannot
come
at
a
more
better
time
across
the
world.
1.2
billion
Hindus
are
celebrating
the
Hindu
festival
of
deepavali,
so
Hindus
follow
diverse,
set
of
beliefs
and
practices.
A
Hindus
across
the
world
are
living
together,
thriving
together
and
co-existing
with
others
in
harmony
due
to
the
principles
of
Dharma.
So
Dharma
is
a
Sanskrit
non-translatable,
but
the
closest
meaning
is
a
way
of
righteousness
and
Duty
and
kind
of
following
one's
own
path.
So
in
short,
Dharma
is
an
art
and
science
of
living
together
at
America.
We
feel
at
home
because
America
is
equally
diverse
and
respects
diversity
to
and
San
Jose
City.
A
Being
the
prime
example
to
quote
from
my
own
experience
when
I
moved
to
San
Jose
in
our
when
we
moved
to
San
Jose
in
our
new
house
few
years
back,
we
were
welcomed
by
our
American
neighbors
Mr
and
Mrs
nicoleta
with
open
arms.
Mr
Nicoletta
is
a
veteran
and
his
lovely
wife
Diana.
They
are
one
of
the
most
nicest
human
beings.
I.
Would
you
know
I
have
ever
known
on
this
Earth
I
would
like
to
end
my
short
talk
with
a
prayer
which
council
member
also
rightly
quoted.
A
A
So
as
meaning
the
short
meaning
is,
let
everyone
be
happy
healthy
and
let
us
see
good
and
auspiciousness
in
others,
and
let
there
be
peace,
peace
and
peace.
So
this,
why
do
Hindus
chant
peace
three
times
right
so
peace
or
Shanti,
is
a
natural
state
of
any
being?
Disturbances
are
either
caused
by
others
or
us
directly
or
indirectly.
For
example,
peace
already
existed
in
this
place
until
we
came
and
took
over
right
and
Hindus
Shanti
three
times
in
order
to
emphasize
their
intense
desire
for
peace.
A
All
obstacles,
Sorrows
or
problems
are
caused
due
to
three
sources.
First
is
Adi
devika,
which
is
the
Unseen
Divine
forces
which
causes
things
like
flood
volcanic
eruptions
and
earthquake
I'm.
Sure
most
of
us
would
have
felted
or
read
about
the
earthquake,
which
just
happened.
So
that's
the
first
unseen
Divine
forces.
A
Second,
these
are
the
known
factors
around
us
which
causes
accidents
disease
due
to
human
to
human
contact,
think
of
it
pollution
war
crimes
last,
but
not
the
least
for
ourselves
to
remove
any
illness
from
us
and
also
to
pacify
any
emotions
in
our
mind,
like
anger,
anxiety,
frustration,
hence
Hindustan,
Shanti
Shanti
three
times
the
first
Shanti.
If
you
all
noticed,
I
I
chanted
it
louder
because
it
was
for
the
Unseen
Divine
forces.
Second,
chant
is
softer
for
the
people
around
us
and
third
Shanti
for
myself.
Thank
you
and
God
bless.
America.
F
Thank
you
all
so
much
I
wish
I
could
have
been
there
with
you
all
in
person
today,
but,
as
you
can
probably
see,
I
have
a
sick
daughter
with
me
at
home
today
taking
care
of
her
so
I'm
joining
you
all
virtually,
but
I
really
want
to
thank
council
member
Foley
of
the
vice
mayor
mayor
and
the
entire
city
council
for
bestowing
this
Honor
on
the
Hindu
American
Community.
It's
been
a
great
privilege
to
see
how
the
Bay
Area
has
grown
in
particularly
San
Jose.
F
You
mentioned
that
in
2000
and
sorry,
the
prior
San
Jose
City
Council
under
the
leadership
of
now
State
Assembly
member
ashkara,
had
first
introduced
this
resolution
of
proclamation
through
the
city
and
even
before
that
in
2013,
former
State
Senate
Majority
Leader
Ellen
Corbett
had
first
recognized
Hindu,
American
awareness
and
appreciation
month
at
the
state
level
at
the
state
capitol
in
Sacramento.
So
from
there
we've
come
a
long
way
in
the
American.
Community
has
contributed
a
lot
at
the
same
time.
We
all.
F
We
are
also
facing
a
number
of
challenges
right
here
in
Santa,
Clara
County
we're
facing
hate
crimes.
There
was
a
recent
string
of
robberies,
targeted,
robberies
and
assaults
against
Hindu
American
women
here
in
Santa,
Clara
County.
F
Thanks
to
the
efforts
of
the
Santa
Clara
County
DA's
office,
they
have
been
charged
as
hate
crimes,
we've
seen
similar
incidents
in
neighboring,
Alameda,
County
and
Fremont
and
other
parts
of
the
world.
Sorry
other
parts
of
the
country,
as
well
as
the
increase
in
online
Hindu
phobia,
which
is
perpetuating
negative
stereotypes
against
Hindu
Americans.
So
it's
great
to
see
a
proclamation
like
this
helping
to
dispel
stereotypes,
helping
to
increase
awareness,
education
and,
in
light
in
in
consistent
with
Diwali,
in
bringing
light
over
darkness
and
knowledge
over
ignorance.
F
H
Good
afternoon,
everyone
as
the
well
first,
let
me
say-
I'm
joined
by
calatophic,
the
our
CIO
Chief
Information
officer,
Marcelo
Pareto,
our
chief
information
security
officer
and
other
members
of
RIT
Department.
Thank
you
all
for
the
work
you
do
and
for
being
up
here.
H
As
chair
of
the
smart
cities
and
services
improvements
committee
I'm
pleased
to
join
the
vice
mayor
and
my
colleagues
on
the
city
council
to
proclaim
the
month
of
October
as
cyber
security
awareness
month
to
encourage
residents
to
build
positive
habits
that
will
ensure
the
security
of
their
information
at
home,
work
and
school
since
2004.
Cyber
security
awareness
month
is
a
joint
effort
between
Homeland,
Security,
States
and
local
governments
to
build
awareness
around
the
critical
impacts.
Cyber
threats
have
on
individuals
and
organizations.
H
Technology
is
so
ingrained
in
our
daily
life
today
that,
if
we
are
not
careful,
it
can
create
risk
and
cause
harm.
This
year's
theme
is
see
yourself
in
cyber
cities
and
districts
across
the
country
have
been
compromised.
While
others
are
under
attack.
Criminals
around
the
world
have
different
motivations
to
inflict
harm.
Local
governments
are
working
hard
to
defend
against
Myriad
threats.
Some
facts
for
reference:
most
cyber
security
disasters
start
with
a
person
clicking
on
a
suspicious
link.
Keep
that
in
mind
when
checking
your
email.
H
The
impacts
and
costs
of
cyber
security
breaches
on
average
in
large
organizations
is
approximately
10
million
dollars
per
incident
and
increasing
the
cost
of
protecting
our
systems
and
the
number
of
threat
actors
continues
to
grow,
and
human
vigilance
remains
our
number
one
tool
to
protect
ourselves
and
the
organizations.
We
are
a
part
of
learn
to
recognize
phishing
scams
and
be
very
suspicious
of
unsolicited
emails.
Phone
calls
and
flyers.
H
San
Jose
works
all
year
to
build
awareness
in
good
cyber
hygiene
habits.
These
habits
are
what
matter
most
and
October
is
when
we
pause
to
recognize
the
importance
of
these
practices.
Remember
the
large
percentage
of
compromises
come
from
people
being
tricked
into
clicking
on
saying
or
typing
something
they
shouldn't
have.
We
are
in
this
together
in
our
personal
and
work
lives.
Safe
practices
are
vital.
So,
let's
work
hard
to
create
the
new
habits
needed
to
secure
our
technology.
Intensive
world
and
I'll
present
the
proclamation
of
cyber
security
awareness
month
to
call
it
in
the
team.
H
I
J
Proclamation
and
vice
mayor
Jones,
it
is
really
a
pleasure
to
be
here.
B
And
to
be
a
part
of
bringing
awareness
for
cyber
security
to
community
and
to
the
public.
B
B
J
I
J
I
This
an
effort
to
to
to
educate,
inform
and
bring
awareness.
B
And
thank
you
for
proclaiming
October
as
cyber
security
awareness
month.
Thank
you.
A
Seeing
none
closed
session
report
thank.
A
A
And
seeing
No
Hands
raised,
we
are
going
to
take
public
comments
for
the
whole
consent
agenda,
including
item
2.14.
B
K
.,
yes,
Paul
something
from
the
Horseshoe
is
a
point
of
order
of
vice
mayor.
The
public
comment
on
the
separate
item
that's
being
pulled.
That
is
a
separate
item
which
we
separately
give
a
public
comment
on,
because
that's
an
item
that
is
being
pulled
by
the
council
member
themselves
for
discussion,
meaning
that
it's
a
regular
agendized
item.
That's
what
that's
what
it
falls
under
so
am
I
understanding
you
correctly
and
you're
saying
that
the
comment
that
I
give
now
is
going
to
be
relative
to
2.14.
K
B
Okay
Paul:
this
is
Tony
Tabor,
City
Clerk.
The
item
2.14
consideration.
It's
only
being
pulled
for
council
member
question
and
comment.
It
will
not
be
voted
on
separately,
it'll
be
included
in
the
whole
motion.
Therefore,
this
is
a
two-minute
period
to
speak
on
the
entire
consent
calendar,
including
2.1.
K
Got
it
that's
clear,
that's
clear!
Now,
that's
good!
That's
a
clear
explanation!
Thank
you
for
that.
Okay,
I
won't
need
very
much
time.
The
only
thing
that
I'd
like
to
really
talk
about
is
2.13
and
your
your
you're,
increasing
it
by
a
million
dollars.
That's
120
percent
I
mean
you
guys
are
handing
out
money,
millions
and
millions
of
dollars
on
this
consent.
Calendar
like
it's
candy.
It's
not
your
money,
it's
our
money
and
you
know,
and
you
saying
that
we
have
no
absolutely
no
means
or
or
recourse
by
which
to
comment
on
it.
K
L
All
right,
Glenn
Beekman
here
thanks
for
the
words
of
Paul
on
the
last
item
that
was
a
nice
nice
to
learn
just
speak
on
item
2.14,
division,
zero,
Traffic,
Safety
issues
for
the
future
of
King
Road.
This
sounds
like
a
real
major
project.
It's
going
to
really
be
defining
the
future
of
the
King
Road
area
between
Berryessa
and
capital,
and
it's
going
to
be
Transit
issues,
pedestrian
bicycle.
L
You
know,
good
luck!
How
we
talk
about
the
concepts
of
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
surveillance
and
data
collection
technology
involved
with
this.
So
a
real
good
luck
that
this
can
be
a
real
important
project
to
develop
the
concepts
of
how
to
make
it
a
full
community
process
of
what
can
be
open,
accountable
practices
with
the
technology
involved,
and
it's
not
just
You're
Building.
You
know
Vision
zero,
neighborhood
safety.
L
You
know,
there's
a
whole
series
of
things
involved
with
neighborhood
safety,
and
that
means
you
know
open
accountable
practices
with
the
tech.
I
mean
that's
how
you
talk
about
Community
Harmony
I
mean
those
are
the
good
practices
of
Our
Lives
I.
I
really
hope
that
you
know
I
thought
well
we're
here
at
the
end
of
a
mayoral
Administration,
that
our
new
Administration
will
want
to
practice
those
sort
of
values
and
bring
out.
L
You
know
important
new
Concepts
towards
that
goal,
to
comment
on
the
words
of
a
council
person
Mayhem-
and
you
know
previous
at
the
beginning
of
the
month,
of
the
the
goal
of
openness
and
accountability,
isn't
to
regulate,
but
it's
to
enhance
it's
to
bring
out
what
is
truly,
our
positive
selves
and
I
I.
Just
really
hope
we
want
to
make
those
efforts
into
the
next
mayoral
Administration,
whoever
will
be
mayor
and
and
and
and
and
the
full
city
government
staff
thanks
a
lot.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
Carrasco,.
E
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
actually
I,
just
I
I
wanted
to
just
comment
on
the
complete
streets
of
King,
which
spans
all
the
way
from
Berryessa
all
the
way
down
to
Capital,
Expressway
I
think
that's
the
total
of
four
council
districts,
and
this
is
a
street
that
is
really
at
the
heart
of
the
east
side
of
San,
Jose
and
I'm.
Glad
to
see
investment.
E
That's
about
to
happen
and
I
understand
that
the
process
now
is
going
to
be
to
go
out
to
the
community
and
and
have
these
conversations,
I
think
that
you
know
as
I'm
leaving
counsel.
The
idea
that
this
is
going
to
happen
is
is
really
fulfilling.
E
I'll
say
that,
because
I
know
how
busy
this
street
is
all
the
way
up
and
down
regardless
of
the
District,
so
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
doing
that,
and
I
look
forward
actually
to
seeing
what
the
community
has
to
has
to
say
in
in
the
input
that
will
be
incorporated
into
this
plan.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
I
I.
This
is
a
hugely
important
project
and,
as
councilmember
Carrasco
mentioned,
it
cuts
across
several
council
districts
and
I
know
that
the
the
complete
streets
plan
and
the
movimiento
plan,
which
has
been
talking
to
some
of
the
groups
some
of
the
community
groups,
but
if
D.O.T
could
continue
to
work
with
the
council
offices
to
ensure
that
we're
not
leaving
anyone
out.
This
is
an
extremely
dense,
very
busy
stretch.
B
Sorry
I'm
not
feeling.
Well
sorry,
it's
a
stretch
of
road,
which
is
why
it's
so
important
to
do
it,
but
it
also
means
that
we
really
need
to
coordinate
with
the
community
but
I'm
thrilled
to
see
this
project
move
forward.
B
Thank
you.
That's
it.
A
B
M
L
L
N
Okay,
thank
you.
Everybody
we're
done
with
the
consent.
Calendar
we're
going
to
go
on
to
land
use,
consent
item
10.1
is
the
uncodified
uncodified
whatever
it
is,
it's
not
codified.
Ordinance,
extending
land
use
and
historic
preservation
permits
we'll
go
first
to
the
public.
N
B
O
N
Right
3.3
is
the
award
of
a
contract
for
our
Airport
New
taxiway
Victor
phase
one
project,
there's
no
presentation.
B
N
You
all
right
now
we're
going
to
talk
trash
3.4
is
the
order
of
the
contract
for
the
large
trash
capture
device,
installation
Project
based
seven.
We
do
have
a
presentation.
Welcome.
I
Thank
you
may
and
good
good
afternoon
everybody.
My
name
is
Matthew
Nguyen
I'm,
a
deputy
director
for
public
works
and
today
I'm
going
to
present
to
you
the
we,
the
law,
stress,
capture,
device,
installation,
phase,
seven.
I
We
complete
the
design
of
the
project
in
August
and
we
advertise
in
September,
we
received
4
bits,
the
lowest
responsive
beta
was
KJ,
Wood
Construction,
and
so
this
project
will
be
fully
funded
by
Caltrans
and
in
return
we
will
receive
and
and
treat
and
remove
trust
from
a
total
of
125
Acres
from
caltransland.
I
Here's
a
map
showing
the
locations
of
this
device.
I
In
some
case,
these
are
also
located
near
the
freeway
so
that
we
can
also
capture
the
trash
coming
from
Caltrans
right
away
and
in
order
to
ensure
efficiency
for
this
device,
dot
usually
go
out
there
prior
or
during
the
storm
season,
and
depends
on
the
to
inspect
these
device
and
depends
on
the
location
they
might
have
to
do
that
on
a
monthly
basis
or
sometimes
quarterly
or
semi-annual
basis,
and
cleaning,
as
well
as
maintenance
activities,
will
then
be
scheduled.
Following
these
inspection.
I
Foreign,
this
project
right
now
is
needed
in
order
for
the
city
to
meet
the
requirement
for
the
new
MRP
3.0
that
was
issued
by
the
regional
water
board,
effective
July
1st
of
this
year.
So
at
this
time,
there's
a
few
Milestones
that
we
need
to
pay
attention
to
per
the
new
permit.
The
CD
will
need
to
be
at
90
percent
trust,
load
reduction
by
June
2023
and
a
hundred
percent
by
two
by
June
2025.
I
So,
at
the
completion
of
this
project,
we
will
be
at
100,
dress,
load
reduction,
so
we
exceed
that
requirement.
However,
there's
a
few
things
that
the
new
MRP
3.0
have
changed.
The
first
is
for
the
new
permit.
Source
control
action
such
as
the
band
of
single-use
plastic
bag
and
styrofoam
will
no
longer
be
counted
toward
the
credit
and
also
starting
July
2025
Creek
cleaning,
as
well
as
direct
discharge.
Trust
control
program
will
be
facing
out.
I
So
for
that
reason
we
will
need
to
focus
on
building
more
food
grass
captured
device
such
as
LTC
or
connector
pipe
screens,
and
also
the
city
will
have
to
continue
to
implement
the
online
trust
control.
Action
such
as
street
sweeping
and
adopt
a
park
things
like
that,
and
then
coupling
with
visual
trash
assessment
in
order
to
meet
the
term
and
requirements
of
the
permit.
I
I
Another
type
of
LTC,
as
you
can
see
here,
is
the
continuous
reflective
separation.
This
is
part
of
phase
three,
where
we
build
a
CDs
on
Coyote,
Creek
and
Fullerton
during
construction
and
and
after
it's
being
used.
This
project
is
complete
in
January
2017.
I
I
K
Yes,
thank
you
for
that
presentation
trash
because
we
have
blight
and
blight
is
still
associating
bright
and
trash
is
so
associated
with
the
with
the
unhoused
population.
My
question
to
the
council
is:
what
kinds
of
contingencies
are
you
making
to
accommodate
the
increase
in
homelessness
because
that
11
number
that
came
up?
That's
a
lot
I,
don't
know
who
came
up
with
that
lie:
I,
don't
know
who
who
approved
that
lie,
but
it's
a
lie.
It's
not
true.
We
didn't
increase
11
over
covert.
K
We
increased,
probably
probably
exponentially
by
five
to
that
number,
and
so
what
my
question
is
is
what
kinds
of
accommodations
are
being
made
for
the
future
unhoused
population,
because
there's
going
to
be
a
necessary
trash
increase
in
particular
areas,
and
so
what
in
these
bids
are
being
in
terms
of
the
logistics?
What
is
being
bid
into
these
contracts
to
accommodate?
For
that?
Because
what
happens?
Is
you
if
you
don't
do
that?
K
What
you
do
is
you
use
the
bright
in
order
to
leverage
that
politically
in
order
to
get
the
people's
buy-in
in
order
to
to
basically
bum
rush?
These
encampments?
That's
what's
happening
and
that's
what's
been
happening,
so
what
I'm
saying
is
why
don't
we
take
preventative
measures
in
order
to
prevent
something
like
that
from
happening?
Thank
you.
N
Thank
you.
Are
there
questions
from
my
colleagues.
N
I
had
a
couple
questions
if
nobody
else
does
Matthew
or
anybody
else
would
like
to
jump
in
on
this
I
understand
the
permit,
sets
certain
requirements
and
gives
us
credit
for
some
things
and
not
for
others,
I
guess
as
I
as
I
look
at
this,
it
seems
as
though
we
have
a
permit
requirement
that
primarily
Rewards
us
for
reducing
trash
that
may
be
coming
from
the
street
or
from
surface
activities
in
the
city
and
not
really
doing
a
darn
thing
about
the
enormous
amount
of
trash
that's
created
when
we
have
human
beings
living
along
Creek
and
I'm,
not
blaming
those
human
beings
by
the
way
I
know
they're
there,
if
anything,
but
by
choice
and
not
by
choice
rather
and
and
obviously
all
of
us
generate
trash.
N
But
I'm
really
concerned
that
this
has
us
really
spending
money
somewhere
other
than
where
the
primary
source
of
the
problem
is
and
I.
Guess?
If
you
ask
me
where
to
spend
seven
and
a
half
million
dollars,
it
would
probably
not
be
on
a
single
device
in
this
single
stationary
location
in
the
city.
I'd
probably
go
say:
let's
go
hire
a
hundred
unhoused
residents
to
give
them
a
full-time
job,
cleaning
up
our
creeks,
and
we
could
do
a
whole
lot
more
good
in
terms
of
improving
the
Waterway
and
so
forth.
N
So
try
to
understand
first,
is
my
perception
off
I
mean:
are
there
things
that
this
permit
is
the
permit
requirements
are
going
to
do?
That
will
actually
do
help
us
focus
on
where
an
awful
lot
of
the
the
generation
of
of
trash
is.
Q
I
can
help
you
out
I
think
if
you
and
let's
see
what,
if
you
want
to
take
it,
this
is
Kip
behind
you,
Kip
Harkness,
deputy
director.
Excuse
me
Deputy
city
manager
of
city
of
San,
Jose
mayor
we've
actually
been
starting
to
wrestle
with
exactly
these
questions
at
the
staff
level.
Q
It
also
includes
the
necessity
of
an
awful
lot
of
work
along
the
Creeks
where
folks
are
housed
or
not,
as
the
case
may
be,
and
we've
gotta
actually
just
defer
to
tne
report
that
we
want
to
bring
to
tne
in
December,
because
we
realize
we
need
more
staff
time
to
start
to
wrestle
with
these
questions
on
what
are
the
implications
of
the
permit
across
Public
Works
across
pvce,
Environmental,
Services,
Parks
and
Rec,
because
we're
going
to
be
getting
a
lot
of
pressure
actually
from
both
sides.
Q
So
it's
probably
going
to
have
to
be
in
all
of
the
above
kind
of
answer,
but
I
think
we
owe
you
and
Council
a
much
more
detailed
understanding
of
what
the
new
permit
requires
and
what
we
think
the
approaches
are
or
could
be
for
you
to
begin
to
weigh
in
on
this.
So
I
know
that's
a
little
bit
of
an
indirect
piece,
and
maybe
maybe
somebody
else
wants
to
add.
But
you're
right.
You
put
your
finger
on
there's
an
awful
lot
going
on
here,
including
a
lot
more
requirements
on
both
ends.
N
So
thanks
for
that
Captain
and
look
I'm
I'm
only
looking
at
this
anecdotally,
so
I
don't
have
the
depth
of
understanding
that
you
guys
have
as
you're
dealing
with
this
every
day,
but
help
me
better
understand
the
pcbs
I
thought
that
was
primarily
a
factor
of
legacy
methods
of
manufacturing
piping
and
that
that's
where
a
lot
of
ppcs
is
there
another
source.
That's.
Q
They're
about
770
different
sources,
sites
with
have
pcbs
which
are
associated
with
Industrial,
Development
and
I'm,
not
sure,
okay,
all
of
the
sources,
many
of
them
located
in
North
San
Jose,
which
are
the
catchment
areas
that
we
have
to
worry
about
most
and
that's
going
to
have
the
solutions
to
that
are
going
to
have
to
include
both
on-site
work
right
at
those
sites
and
or
potentially
large
trash
capture.
Devices
like
this
that
are
strategically
cited.
If
you
will
in
the
in
the
watersheds
of
those
areas.
Q
So
part
of
the
reason
we
actually
asked
for
this
to
be
a
presentation
and
not
and
not
just
come
to
you
without
a
presentation,
is
to
begin
to
surface
these
questions
and
to
begin
to
have
to
think
strategically
about
these
large
trash
capture
devices
and
also
the
burdens
that
would
have
to
be
perhaps
on
some
of
those
individual
sites.
If
we
don't
do
these
larger
pieces
right.
N
N
Okay,
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
that
conversation
understand
better,
but
if
we
believe
that
this
is
really
incentivizing
less
than
optimal
responses,
if
our
goal
is
to
try
to
reduce
pollution
and
trash
in
the
creeks,
because
we're
not
investing
in
things
like
click,
create
cleanups
and
getting
the
trash,
you
know
in
The
Creeks
itself
or
along
the
the
creek
beds.
That
then,
are
there
opportunities
for
us
to
think
about.
How
do
we
push
back
on
the
agencies?
The
Regulatory
Agencies?
Maybe
we
get
exemptions?
N
Maybe
we
try
to
get
them
to
consider
alternative
approaches
to
credits,
because
it
seems
as
though
maybe
these
are
regulations
that
are
perhaps
optimal
for
other
parts
of
the
country
or
other
parts
of
the
state,
but
not
urbanized
areas
like
ours
with
large
unhoused
populations,
where
we
know
the
environmental
threat
is
really
much
more
in
the
creek
and,
frankly
I.
N
You
know
I'd
like
to
see
lower
Tech,
Solutions
and
lower
Capital,
less
Capital
intensive
solutions
that
would
actually
help
us
enable
some
of
these
folks
to
get
back
on
their
feet
rather
than
simply
investing
in
large.
You
know
seven
and
a
half
million
capital
projects.
You
know
where
we
got
a
lot
of
those
going
on,
but
anyway,
you
understand
my
point.
I.
Q
Certainly
do,
and
those
are
exactly
some
of
the
questions
we
want
to
raise
and
discuss
is
what
what
are
the
regulations
might
be?
We
might
be
able
to
push
back
on
or
modify.
How
would
we,
in
the
absence
of
the
regulations,
think
strategically
about
this
yeah
and
and
do
the
right
thing
before
we
just
simply
try
to
comply
with
complicated
set
of
laws
which
clearly
weren't
written
with
us
in
mind.
Yeah.
M
N
Think
is
really
important.
It's
important
for
for
us,
as
the
city
come
up
with
a
game
plan
about
what
we
think
is
going
to
reduce
the
pollution.
The
most
and
I
know
we
have
a
lot
of
Partners
like
save
the
bay
and
others
that
are
very
invested
in
this
and
I
think
a
lot
of
folks
who
can
help
us
councilman
Cohen.
R
Yeah,
thank
you
Kip
to
kind
of
continue
on
some
questioning
the
there
are
three
different
ways
that
water
gets
into
our
Bay
right.
One
is
effluent
from
our
Water
Treatment
Plant,
which
obviously
is
a
separate
issue.
One
are
The
Creeks
water's,
going
straight
into
the
bay
from
The
Creeks
this.
This
is
about
what's
coming
through
our
storm
drain
system,
storm
sewer
system
right,
so
those
are
kind
of
two
separate
and
unconnected
when
we
talk
about
cleaning
the
creeks
and
rivers
and
rivers
and
the
storm
sewer
they're
somewhat
unconnected
right.
A
Q
And
no
and
I
don't
mean
to
be
disingenuous
in
that
they
are
considered
separate
systems
but
part
of
what
the
interesting
discussions
that
we've
been
having.
Is
that
really
the
way
that
we
they're
they're,
actually
subsystems
of
the
same
system,
I
think
is
the
way
to
think
about
it?
So
all
of
it
all
of
it,
impacts
the
bay
ultimately
and
either
it's
to
your
point.
Q
Either
it's
running
through
pipes
completely
and
it's
treated
at
our
regional
Wastewater
facility,
extremely
well,
it's
running
over
surfaces
and
getting
to
the
Creeks
directly
or
it's
running
through
our
storm
water
system,
but
all
of
those
are
interrelated
and
part
of
part
of
including
and
how
we
fund
them
and
how
we
operate
and
maintain
them
and
under
the
permit.
We
really
have
to
think
of
all
of
those
in
order
to
comply
with
the
permit.
R
Right
and
I
guess
that's.
My
point
is
that
a
lot
of
what
we're
dealing
with
in
this
particular
contract
is
not
water,
that's
going
through
the
Creeks,
but
is
water
that
would
coming
through
the
sewers
from
roads
and
places
that
are
away
from
The
Creeks.
Typically,
a
lot
of
it
comes
a
lot
of
that
stuff
is
getting
a
lot
of
garbage,
is
getting
in
through
the
storms,
the
sewers
along
the
roads
and
in
neighborhoods
and
other
places.
So
we
do
need
a
method
to
to
get
garbage
out
of
that
system
as
well
right,
yeah.
Q
That's
why
I
think
it's
it's
ultimately
not
necessarily
all
of
the
above,
but
there's
going
to
be
an
array
of
different
things
that
make
sense
for
each
component
of
the
system.
One
there'd
probably
be
a
handful
of
interventions
of
the
right
ones
for
The
Creeks.
A
handful
of
their
interventions
are
the
right
ones
for
the
storm
water
system,
the
storm
and
a
handful
that
we
need
to
think
about
in
terms
of
the
regional
Wastewater
facility.
So.
I
I
R
I
Yeah
so
well,
there's
a
few
heavy
stuff,
we'll
be
able
to
settle
down,
and
so
we
can
remove
those
separately
but
you're
right
if
it's
smaller
than
five
millimeter.
That's
still.
R
I
Through
a
chance
to
pass
through,
okay,
thank
you
thank
you
and,
if
I
may
add
real
quick
for
this
project,
because
Caltrans
is
paying
info
for
the
project,
so
they
definitely
want
us
to
to
collect
some
of
the
storm
water
from
there
right
of
way.
So
you
know
reusing
of
this
funding
in
other
areas.
I
At
my
you
know,
yeah
it
it
may
not
be
in
compliance
with
Caltrans
requirement.
Okay,.
N
Thank
you,
Matthew
all
right,
other
questions
and
help
me
understand
better,
because
my
understanding
the
permit
was
that
it
governed
water
both
in
the
bay
and
in
our
Creeks,
am
I,
am
I
mistaken.
That's
the
same
permits.
Yes,
that's
the
same.
Permit!
Okay!
This
is
not
a
separate
yeah
all
right.
Thank
you
all
right,
any
other
questions.
There
are
not.
We
do
have
a
motion
on
this
nope.
B
N
All
right
next
up!
Thank
you.
Gentlemen.
Next
up
proposed
edition,
Air
Service
Support
Program,
should
we
do
this
together
with
the
public
hearing
on
the
new
Air
Service
Support
Program,
for
zip
air?
Since
we
have
a
presentation,
no,
we
don't
have
a
presentation
on
either
one.
Do
we
John?
No,
no
presentation,
all
right,
let's
take
it
separately.
5.1
is
a
proposed
edition.
Air,
Service,
Support
Program
or
let's
go
to
the
public.
N
N
You
know,
I
understand
the
value
of
these
long-haul
domestic
flights
and
the
international
flights
not
just
for
the
airport,
but
for
hotels
and
restaurants
and
lots
of
things
in
our
city
considerably
less
on
the
short
haul,
and
you
know,
I
know
that
you
you've
still
got
some
some
capacity
there
in
the
airport
but
I'm
guessing
this
economy.
N
Well,
who
knows
what
happens
with
the
economy,
but
I
do
know
as
times
you
know,
his
activity
starts
to
really
heat
up.
We
would
love
to
have
some
of
the
short
haul
slots
open
so
that
we
could
use
them
for
domestic
and
international
fights,
and
you
know
I
remember
just
a
couple
years
ago
feeling
really
as
though
we
were
jammed
up
with
a
lot
of
shorter
Hall
flights
that
we
probably
would
be
happy
to
trade
out.
N
If
we
could,
if
we
get
more
flights
to
DC,
Atlanta
and
New
York,
and
so
help
me
understand
why
we'd
want
to
incentivize
the
shortholes.
Q
Mr
mayor
council
members,
John
Aiken,
director
of
Aviation
the
program
additions
that
we're
doing
right
now
are
basically
taking
us
back
to
2018..
So
in
for
many
years
we
had
the
incentive
program.
We
took
them
out
in
2018
because,
as
you
said,
we
were
one
of
the
fastest
growing
airports
in
the
country
we
didn't
have
to
give
as
much
incentives
to
get
new
service
in
the
current
condition.
I
think
it's
more
required
on
us
again
to
start
that
program
up
to
enter
to
entice
people
to
come
serve
us.
Q
The
short
Haul
is
to
destinations
that
aren't
currently
served.
So
until
you
get
to
1200
miles
you,
you
have
to
go
to
a
new
place,
so
Tucson
or
Winnemucca
or
whatever
you
know
it's,
it's
it's
a
city
that
we
don't
serve.
So
it's
not
one
more
to
La.
It's
not
one
more
to
Santa
Ana
right.
It's
not
that
kind
of
stuff.
So
I
think
it's
still
shaped
right.
Q
We
set
the
mileage
so
that
an
additional
flight
to
Minneapolis
would
qualify
because
that's
good
for
us
and
it
builds
connections.
An
extra
flight
to
Atlanta
or
New
York
would
be
good,
but
the
the
short
calls
are
restricted
to
the
first
person
to
go
into
that
airport.
N
N
Q
In
somehow
so,
Tucson
is
an
is
an
airport
that
would
be
interested
in
it's
it's
a
important
city
in
Arizona
we've
had
service,
we
don't
have
it
now.
We
haven't
had
it
since
before
covid
right,
so
I
think
that
would
be
something
where
waiving
these
fees
would
be
a
good
thing,
as
as
a
partnership
with
our
Airline
they're
spending,
a
lot
of
money,
yeah
right
to
start
that
service
to
Tucson,
This,
Is,
Us,
saying
we
support
it.
Q
N
N
N
Year,
yeah
understood
okay,
I
appreciate
the
points
I
I
know
at
some
point.
You
know
a
few
years
down
the
road.
We
make
it
to
the
point
where
we
really
want
those
slots,
but
I.
Q
N
M
N
N
Okay,
congratulations,
John,
Mark
and
the
whole
team.
This
is
a
great
victory
for
us.
I
understand
this
is
a
subsidiary
of
Japan
Airlines,
so
they'll
have
good
Network
to
be
flying
from.
Are
there
any
questions?
A
N
N
Hi,
thank
you.
Okay,
Lori
is,
and
team
are
coming
down
to
join
us
for
item
6.1,
which
is
the
clean
energy
resilience,
power,
procurement
agreements,
foreign.
Q
Well,
folks
are
settling
in
I'll,
just
I'll
get
us
kicked
off
and
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
dean,
Kip
Harkness
Deputy
city
manager.
Over
the
last
several
months,
we've
brought
to
city
council
a
number
of
complicated
and
high
dollar
Community
energy
items
and
over
the
next
several
months
we
will
bring
many
more.
The
item
today
on
the
integrated
resource
plan
is
the
framework
that
pulls
all
of
these
together.
M
Q
Spending
some
time
with
it
to
understand
where
we're
going
it
makes
great
bedtime
reading
and
the
plan
you'll
see
today
is
based
on
months
of
sophisticated
iterative.
Stochastic
modeling
also
called
Monte
Carlo
modeling
that
generates
hundreds
or
thousands
of
possible
scenarios
and
then
allows
the
team
to
evaluate
the
most
probable
or
problematic
and
test
various
sensitivity
assumptions.
Q
In
addition
to
the
mathematical
modeling,
this
plan
has
been
Guided
by
the
Deep
expertise
of
Staff
consultants
and
our
community
Advisory
Group,
and
puts
forward
a
realistic
path
to
achieving
your
ambitious
goal
of
becoming
carbon
neutral
by
2030..
So
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
team.
Who's
done.
The
good
work
on
this
and
our
director
Lori
Mitchell.
S
Great
thank
you
for
that.
Kip
I'm,
Lori,
Mitchell
I'm,
the
director
of
community
energy
and
very
pleased
today
to
be
joined
by
Jean
Saleh
she's,
our
deputy
director
of
power
resources
Cara,
not
our
senior
power
resource,
specialist
and
Phil
Cornish.
Also
our
senior
power
resource
specialist.
S
So,
first
of
all,
we
just
wanted
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
detail
on
what
an
integrated
resource
plan
is.
So
this
is
a
very
standard
plan
in
the
utility
industry.
It's
a
long-term
planning
tool
used
to
meet
our
regulatory
requirements,
our
local
policy
goals,
and
it
evaluates
our
electricity
Supply
and
our
demand
over
that
long-term
time
frame
to
identify
resource
options
to
deliver
low-carbon,
reliable
and
cost-effective
energy
to
our
customers.
S
So,
just
as
a
reminder
to
date,
we
have
contracted
for
over
500
megawatts
of
new
renewable
and
energy
storage
resources,
and
we
are
bringing
forward
additional
recommendations
after
this
item
So
the
plan
considered
all
of
those
previous
Investments
and
then
looked
at.
What
do
we
need
to
add
to
it
over
the
years
to
meet
those
state
and
local,
clean
energy
goals.
S
So
in
terms
of
the
timeline,
as
Kip
said,
you
know,
we
started
this
work
over
a
year
ago
and
then
in
the
spring
we
briefed
our
advisory
Commission
on
it.
Then
we
completed
the
modeling
over
the
summer,
once
the
cpuc
published
their
findings
and
their
requirements,
and
then
in
September
we
presented
the
findings
to
our
advisory
commission
and
also
our
risk
oversight
committee,
and
today
we
are
seeking
city
council
approval
so
that
we
can
file
the
plan
on
November
1st
and
so
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Jean
Soleil.
P
Good
afternoon,
council
members,
so
the
2022
cpuc
requirements
included
preparing
two
plans
or
preparing
one
plan.
If
you
opted
for
the
more
aggressive
of
the
two
plans,
that's
the
choice
that
we
took.
P
P
and
how
the
cpuc
came
up
with
these
targets
is
in
conversations
with
the
air
resources
board
about
the
maximum
emissions
that
could
come
from
the
electricity
sector
in
order
for
the
state
to
meet
its
carbon
reduction
goals.
In
addition,
we
have
to
forecast
our
customer
re,
our
customer
demand
through
2035,
including
rooftop,
solar
and
electric
vehicles.
We
have
to
develop
a
portfolio
to
meet
renewable
energy
and
carbon
emission
targets,
considering
the
cost,
availability
time
frame
and
needs,
and
we
have
to
meet
state
requirements
for
capacity.
P
P
We
developed
two
portfolios.
The
first
portfolio
was
the
more
aggressive
of
the
cpuc
portfolios,
which
would
get
us
to
emitting
our
proportional
share
of
an
aggressive
portfolio
that
gets
to
30
million
metric
tons
of
carbon
emissions
by
2030
and
25
million
metric
tons
of
carbon
emissions
by
2035,
and
the
second
portfolio
was
the
city
compliant
portfolio
which
achieves
the
city's
goal
to
be
carbon
neutral
by
2030..
P
We
did
some
sensitivity,
analysis
in
particular
backing
down
solar,
Plus,
Storage,
adding
wind
and
doing
the
reverse
just
to
understand
how
using
different
proportions
of
those
would
affect
our
portfolio
and
what
we
found
is
using
wind
reduces
our
exposure
to
price
risks,
particularly
in
the
evening
next
slide.
P
The
modeling
findings
show
a
need
to
aggressively
add
to
our
portfolio.
This
chart
shows
in
the
blue
what
we've
already
procured
the
yellow
shows
what
the
cpuc
has
already
directed
us
to
procure.
We've
been
here
before
you
asking
you
for
authority
to
to
contract
to
meet
some
of
those
requirements,
and
then
the
gray
is
what
we
have
to
do.
In
addition
to
that,
just
to
meet
the
more
aggressive
cpuc
case
and
the
teal.
Finally,
is
what
we
need
to
do
to
be
carbon
neutral
by
2030.
P
next
slide,
please,
this
slide
gives
you
an
idea
of
the
proportion
of
different
types
of
resources.
The
green
is
wind,
the
yellow
is
solar,
the
pink
is
storage,
and
then,
on
top
of
that,
you
see
some
natural
gas,
which
is
consistent
with
the
authorization
we
got
from
you
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
for
the
more
aggressive
City
case,
same
types
of
resources,
same
proportion
of
resources,
but
more
of
all
of
them,
except
natural
gases.
The
same
in
both
portfolios
next
slide
so
important
observations.
P
Both
portfolios
require
us
to
significantly
increase
our
pace
of
renewable
resource
procurement,
so
busy,
as
we
may
have
been
in
the
past
four
years,
we're
going
to
have
to
be
a
lot
busier.
We're
excited
about
that.
The
other
important
observation
is
that,
as
we
move
into
this
more
aggressive
phase,
we're
actually
going
to
have
more
renewable
capacity
than
we
have
load,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
the
Renewables
don't
generate
24.
7.
solar
is
available
during
the
day,
even
with
batteries.
P
We
can
shift
that
into
the
evening,
but
it
doesn't
generate
overnight,
whereas
wind
tends
to
generate
mostly
overnight
and
is
strongest
in
the
winter.
But
the
result
of
having
that
mixed
portfolio
and
having
to
have
more
capacity
than
we
have
load
is
that
in
certain
hours
we
will
have
more
generation
than
we
have
load,
and
so
we
will
sell
our
excess
back
to
the
system
and
even
with
that
really
aggressive
amount
of
Renewables,
there
will
be
hours
of
the
during
the
year
when
we'll
be
buying
system
power.
P
We
paired
that
with
storage
in
order
to
reduce
the
amount
of
emissions
from
that
natural
gas,
that
gas
is
needed
to
balance
the
large
amount
of
intermittent
Renewables
and
also
to
meet
our
reliability
needs.
We
understand
that.
That's
something
that's
challenging
for
a
city
with
the
aggressive
carbon
reduction
goals
that
San
Jose
has
and
that's
why
we're
looking
for
ways
to
reduce
the
emissions
from
those
plants
to
the
extent
possible,
such
as
pairing
them
with
batteries?
P
So
they
don't
have
to
operate
as
much
or
retrofitting
them
to
burn
a
blend
of
green
hydrogen
and
natural
gas
and,
of
course,
will
be
required
to
buy
carbon
offsets
anytime,
that
we
use
the
natural
gas
plants
we'll
also
be
monitoring
emerging
Technologies,
so
that
we
can
find
alternative
approaches
to
basically
be
able
to
get
ourselves
away
from
using
natural
gas
next
slide.
P
So
our
recommendation
is
that
we
be
allowed
to
submit
to
the
cpuc
the
cpuc
compliant
plan
that
we
be
directed
to
use
the
city
carbon
neutral
plan
as
a
guide
to
meet
the
city's
goals.
To
be
carbon
neutral
by
2030,
and
that
we
continue
to
work
with
other
departments
to
achieve
climate,
smart
goals
and
a
pathway
to
carbon
neutrality
by
2030..
S
Take
yours
on
and
without
happy
to
take
any
questions.
N
Great
thank
you
very
much
for
the
presentation
and
for
the
for
the
work
putting
this
together.
It's
very
complex
and
very
important.
All
right.
Let's
go
to
the
public.
K
Yes,
Paul
Soto
from
the
Horseshoe.
Yes,
thank
you
for
that
presentation.
I
have
a
few
questions
number
one.
What
is
the?
What
is
the
total
megawatt
power
usage
of
San
Jose?
Just
as
it
is
right
now,
you
know
how
much
power
is
being
used
by
the
city
as
it
stands
now
number
two
with
the
projection
of
400
000
residents
coming
into
the
city
of
San
Jose,
that's
already
been
planned
by
2040..
What
is
the
projected
amount
of
power
that
is
going
to
be
necessary
at
that
particular
time?
K
I
know
those
assessments
have
been
made,
but
none
of
that
was
was
was
apparent
in
your
presentation,
so
I'm
just
looking
for
what
those
what
those
numbers
look
like,
and
what
and
also
the
the
the
the
the
moral
and
ethical
responsibility
of
the
city
to
accept
that
when
you
have
power
usage,
when
you
have
power
storage,
you
need
lithium,
Cobalt
and
nickel.
Okay
in
those
three
elements,
we're
going
to
be
starting
Wars
in
other
countries
in
order
to
control
those
those
particular
resources
because
they're
absolutely
necessary
for
battery
storage.
Okay.
K
So
when
we're
talking
about
this
clean
energy
project,
we
also
have
to
talk
about
that,
because
we're
not
going
to
sit
here
and
and
act
like
we're
being
morally
and
ethically
responsible
for
the
environment,
while
at
the
same
time
we're
disrupting
and
corrupting
other
governments
and
other
people's
environments
in
order
to
to
sell
our
conscience
that
we
are
being
climate
responsible
and
we're
being
climate
conscious
when
really
what
we're
actually
doing
is
we're
corrupting
other
governments
and
we're
corrupting
other
people's
livelihoods
and
spaces
and
places
so
I'd.
L
All
right
thanks
a
lot
for
the
words
of
Paul
yeah
I
feel
the
same
way.
I
mean
I've,
been
you
know:
I
use
the
word
hand
in
hand
for
the
previous
item
about
Vision
zero
and
an
open,
accountable
practices.
L
That's
a
process
that
has
to
work
hand
in
hand
in
the
future,
with
accountability
and
and
neighborhood
safety.
For
this
item,
you
know
the
concepts
of
building
our
sustainable
future,
along
with
the
concepts
of
worker
rights.
That
has
to
be
a
process
that
works
hand
in
hand
in
our
future.
We
always
have
to
be
considering
those
things
in
our
future.
As
Paul
said,
I
think
we
consider
worker
rights
issues.
L
We
actually
work
to
end
the
concepts
of
possible
Wars
that
we'll
be
forming
in
in
the
next
coming
decades
over
these
issues
and
it's
working
rights
issues
that
can
help
create
a
peaceful
process
to
avoid
those
things
with
that
all
said
boy:
the
I,
this
I
IRP
item.
This
is
a
item.
L
You
know
in
2020
that
I
got
my
ideas
from
you
know:
I
read
into
its
charts
that
to
me
seemed
to
suggest
we
may
be
headed
for
a
possible
earthquake
and
how
they
were
planning
for
energy
issues,
but
of
course,
I.
Think
since
then,
I
I
just
have
been
proven
wrong
and
I
I've,
possibly
read
the
statistics
wrong.
So
my
fault
I'm,
really
sorry
about
that.
I've
been
trying
to
apologize
since
then,
but
to
note
the
importance
of
what
this
work
can
offer
us
to
our
future.
L
You
you
note
natural
gas
use
will
be
heavily
on
the
rise
and
will
have
a
relationship
with
renewable
energy.
What's
up
in
2024,
aren't
we
supposed
to
shift
our
our
work
in
how
we
think
of
natural
gas
issues
and
I
I
think
that
2024
is
the
year
we
start
to
make
adjustments
and
those
numbers
that
are
continuously
Rising
shouldn't
they
be
leveling
off
and
and
and
finding
new
sources
of
renewable
energy
to
work
with
that's
an
important
concept.
I
hope
you
can
talk
about
foreign.
R
Yeah
no
question
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
thank
you
for
the
report
and
for
the
work
and
all
the
modeling
and
all
the
modeling
that
you've
done
to
help
us
project.
What
we're
going
to
do
and
I'm
excited
that
to
have
us
I'm,
supportive
of
having
us,
submit
the
cpuc
compliant
portfolio.
While
we
keep
our
eye
on
the
prize
in
San,
Jose
and
aim
for
that
carbon
neutral
portfolio
and
I'm
glad
that
we're
doing
that
so
I'll
move
approval.
N
N
What
this
team
has
done
in
a
short
period
of
time
is
really
tremendous,
and
I
was
just
on
stage
at
The
Verge
conference,
where
we've
got
a
lot
of
folks,
pretty
passionate
about
climate
change
and
a
lot
of
Applause
we
got
is
when
we
talked
about
what
we've
already
accomplished
in
terms
of
being
able
to
provide
electricity,
it's
95
ghg
free
and
now
we're
gonna
greater
carbon
free
grid
15
years
ahead
of
the
state
goal,
I
think
that's
pretty
tremendous
I
had
a
question
or
two
though
about
whether
or
not
let
me
just
ask
the
question
whether
we
have
a
sense
about
whether
it
will
cost
less
money
to
reduce
demand
in
front
of
the
meter
by
incentivizing,
solar
and
storage,
for
example.
N
For
let's
say
we
did
it
for
modest
income
homeowners
or
for
affordable
housing
multi-family
projects.
So
could
we
actually
would
it
actually
cost
less
money
to
incentivize
that
private
investment?
Then
it
costs
us
to
go
procure
that
energy,
or
are
those
subsidies
less
efficient
than
just
buying
the
energy
ourselves.
S
So
we
looked
out
in
this
plan
and
you
know
I
think
it
would
depend
highly
on
what
that
subsidy
is
so
generally
utility
scale.
Solar
right
now
is
pretty
cost
effective
and
much
more
cost
effective
than
behind
the
meter,
but
we
do
know
the
behind
the
meter.
Solar
is
very
beneficial
because
it's
generated
here
locally,
so
it
improves
our
reliability
and
also
reduces
the
transmission
and
distribution
costs
associated
with
that.
So
you
know
I
think
we
we
need
both,
but
that's
certainly
something
we
could
study
and
and
take
a
look
at
in
the
future.
N
Okay,
yeah
I
was
talking
to
some
folks
at
the
clean
energy
commission.
They
were
just
showing
our
clean
energy.
Well,
anyway,
the
organization
and
and
they're
just
showing
me
just
how
Stark
the
the
cost
of
distribution
and
transmission
is
relative
to
generation.
It's
what
10x
and
it's
just
becoming
so
apparent
that
we've
got
to
move
to
this
kind
of
distributed
generation
and
storage
approach
and
I'm
wondering
to
what
extent.
N
Maybe
we
could
Aid
that
and
I
appreciate
that
it
is
much
cheaper
to
get
industrial
scale
solar,
but
if
we're
not
paying
for
it,
if
private
homeowners
paying
for
it
and
they
ultimately
get
a
better
deal
for
themselves,
I,
just
wonder
you
know:
is
there
a
source
out
there
I
mean
we
know.
Utilities
have
been
subsidizing
these
things
for
a
long
time.
S
Sure
it's
something
that
we've
looked
at
in
the
context
of
our
programs
roadmap,
you
know,
and
so
it's
something
that
we
can
continue
to
study
there
and
then
bring
recommendations
to
council.
It's
probably
also
worth
noting
in
the
the
new
inflation
reduction
act.
There's
a
number
of
new
subsidies.
A
S
N
Thanks
Lori
and
then
just
in
terms
of
I
understand
it's
really
complex.
N
Described
Monte
Carlo
analysis,
which
you
know
I,
remember,
reading
about
in
school
and
every
time
my
eyes
would
glaze
over.
How
do
we
have
a
sense
of
the
order
of
scale
of
cost
difference?
N
N
Theoretically,
at
some
cost
we
could
do
that
and
still
have
reliable
Supply.
Couldn't
we.
S
So
we
didn't
model
that
exact
case,
because
we
are
concerned
about
the
the
reliability
of
that
in
the
short
term.
You
know,
obviously
it's
something
that
that
is
very
important
to
us,
and
you
know
we
want
to
phase
out
that
those
types
of
resources
in
the
portfolio,
but
that
is
modeling.
We
could
take
a
look
at
you
know
right
now.
I
think
one
of
the
main
concerns
is
just
the
duration
of
the
batteries.
S
So
right
now
the
the
common
batteries
are
for
our
duration,
there's
the
eight
hour,
but
even
that
doesn't
get
us
to
overnight
and
and
really
the
case
that
we
look
at
from
a
reliability
perspective.
Is
that
winter
day,
where
it's
very
cloudy,
not
a
lot
of
solar
generation,
and
so
the
batteries
aren't
charging.
And
if
that
happens,
for
multiple
days
you
know,
then
we
get
concerned
about
reliability
there,
but
as
John
noted,
hopefully
in
the
future
there
are
Technologies.
We
can
take
advantage
of
to
phase
out
that
generation.
S
That's
certainly
our
objective
right,
but
in
terms
of
meeting
the
reliability
requirements
of
the
plan,
and
that's
why
it
did
identify
that
gas.
It
wasn't
so
much
a
cost
issue
as
a
technology
issue
at
this
point,
so.
N
S
Yes,
I
think
we
would
still
need
to
look
at
how
much
solar
we
would
have
to
pair
that
with
to
make
sure
the
batteries
can
charge
on
those
days
in
the
winter
when
the
days
are
very
short
and
and
perhaps
overcast,
so
that
you
know
they,
they
may
not
provide
enough
energy
to
charge
those
batteries
in
particular,
if
that
happens
multiple
days
on
end,
and
so
that's
something
that
we'd
have
to
take
a
look
at
okay.
H
Yeah
thanks
mayor
just
a
couple
quick
questions.
Thank
you
for
all
the
all
the
great
work
and
and
excited
that
we're
on
a
good
trajectory
right
now,
based
on
past
presentations.
Just
two
questions
on
the
IRP
one
was
I
assume
in
the
IRP.
We
don't
actually
project
costs,
but
I
feel,
like
that's
kind
of
relevant
to
some
of
the
questions
the
mayor
was
just
asking.
Do
we
have
a
sense
of
what
this
plan
might
mean
for
ratepayers
over
time?
Is
that
part
of
the
model.
H
S
A
very
important
part
of
the
model
of
you
know
looking
at
resources,
what
are
the
cost
of
those
resources
and
that's
why
it
did
select
a
lot
of
solar
and
wind
and
battery
storage,
because
those
Technologies
are
the
most
cost
effective,
and
you
know
very
happy
to
report
very
good
news
here
is
that
in
in
both
plans,
both
the
carbon
neutral
plan
and
the
cpuc
compliant
plan
very
little
difference
in
terms
of
costs
between
those
two
plans
just
about
eight
to
three
percent
difference
between
those
two
plans.
S
S
H
Okay,
thanks
that's
good
to
know
and
then
I
noticed
in
the
slides.
It
seems
like
we're
assuming
of
quite
a
bit
of
wind,
but
then
I
think
I
read
in
the
memo
that
there
were
some
challenges
related
to
procuring
wind
and
I
just
wanted
to
square
those
to
what
is
what
does
that
mean
for
us
in
the
years
ahead?.
S
S
Ccas
I've
done
over
recent
years
and
Contracting
for
that,
so
our
main
opportunities
are
out
of
state
wind
and
that
is
reliant
on
transmission
lines
coming
into
the
state,
and
so
that
could
be
a
potential
issue
that
we'll
have
to
monitor,
hopefully
with
some
of
the
incentives
in
the
inflation
and
reduction
act
that
that's
not
an
issue.
The
other
type
of
win
that
the
modeling
looked
at
is
offshore
wind,
and
that
isn't
something
that's
been
installed
here
in
California.
S
Yet,
but
there
are
some
opportunities
in
the
state,
but
there
are
definitely
some
sequa
issues
there,
as
well
as
some
transmission
issues,
depending
on
where
that's
cited,
and
so
those
are
some
of
the
issues
and
then
another
issue
we
identified
with
wind
is
there's
a
limited
number
of
developers
and
we
already
have
quite
a
bit
of
wind
in
our
portfolio
because
of
our
prior
Investments
and
our
risk
oversight
committee
and
our
risk
management
policy
requires
that
we
don't
have
too
much
contracted
with
any
one
counterparty.
S
R
S
R
Okay,
so
so
it's
we're
gonna
in
two
years,
we'll
know
a
lot
more
about
the
wind
opportunity,
particularly
I
know
the
state
just
passed
a
bill
to
have
30
of
its
energy
generated
by
Wind
by
20.
Was
it
20
35?
Maybe
I
forget
the
year,
but
that's
a
significant
amount
of
wind
development
that
we
don't
know
of
today
and
I
know
that
the
federal
government
just
actually
just
put
out
for
bids
on
leases
of
offshore
wind
off
California,
so
I
expect
things
to
change
in
the
next
two
years.
So
right.
S
Right
you're
absolutely
correct
on
that,
and
so,
as
we
update
the
plan,
that's
a
great
opportunity
to
update
you
know
the
opportunities
that
we
see
there
great.
N
B
T
H
N
Thank
you,
okay,
so
we're
now
getting
to
the
nitty-gritty
agreements
for
solar
power
and
battery
storage
are
up
next.
B
Voting,
yes,
I
have
I'll,
recall
Perales,
yes,.
L
N
S
So
these
Agreements
are
for
additional
and
solar
power
and
battery
storage.
So
we're
very
excited
about
these.
Just
as
a
background.
This
is
something
we've
been
talking
about.
A
lot
over
the
last
few
months
is
the
cpuc's
midterm
reliability
requirements,
so
there's
a
number
of
requirements
that
they
have
mandated
for
us
in
terms
of
bringing
new
resources
online.
S
So
just
as
background
this
is
something
you've
seen
many
times
over
the
last
few
months,
but
it
notes
our
progress
to
date
in
meeting
those
cpuc
midterm
reliability
requirements.
So
our
requirement
for
2023
has
been
met
and
we
are
very
close
with
today's
recommendation
in
meeting
our
requirements
for
2024
and
2025,
but
you
can
see
we're
still
a
little
bit
short
there,
and
so
we
will
come
back
to
you
with
additional
recommendations
and
then
for
2026
through
previous
Council
actions.
We
have
meta
requirements
for
that.
S
So
the
first
project
very
exciting
is
a
battery
storage
project
that
will
provide
resource
adequacy.
This
Project's
located
in
San
Joaquin
County.
It
will
be
online
next
summer
by
June
1st
and
it
has
a
term
of
10
years
with
a
total
cost
of
3.6
million.
S
The
other
project
is
located
in
the
same
county
in
San
Joaquin
County.
It
also
provides
resource
adequacy
and
it
will
be
online
by
the
summer
of
2024..
It
will
operate
for
10
years,
with
a
total
cost
of
26
million
a
little
bit
of
background
about
broad
reach
power,
so
they're
a
utility
scale,
independent
power
producer.
They
have
250
megawatts
of
battery
storage
and
operation
and
10
gigawatts
in
their
pipeline.
S
At
the
end
of
21,
broadreach
power
received
a
400
million
Equity
commitment
to
accelerate
their
growth,
important
to
note
that
they're,
not
a
publicly
traded
company.
S
Our
next
recommendation
is
a
Calpine
contract.
This
is
also
a
battery
storage
contract,
so
it
will
provide
resource
adequacy
and
importantly,
it
will
also
provide
energy
generation,
so
it
allows
us
to
direct
the
battery
operation,
so
we
can
charge
it
during
those
solar
hours
and
then
collect
the
revenues
and
discharge
during
those
evening
hours
which
lowers
our
power
procurement
costs.
So
this
project
will
be
online
in
the
summer
of
2025..
It's
a
15-year
agreement
for
a
total
cost
of
148.5
million.
S
Just
a
little
bit
about
Calpine
Corporation
they're,
a
full
service,
Energy
company,
they
develop
power
generation
they
own
and
operate
a
fleet
of
gas,
geothermal
and
now
battery
storage
projects
across
the
U.S
and
Canada
76
power
plants
in
total,
with
a
total
generation
capacity
of
26
gigawatts
and
important.
To
note
that
Calpine
is
a
private
company
and
they
have
public
debt
and
then,
finally,
we
are
recommending
a
replacement
project
for
a
solar
project
that
we
signed
back
in
2019.
S
They
did
inform
Us
in
the
spring
that
they
would
not
be
able
to
build
this
project
due
to
sequa
construction
issues,
and
so
we
have
been
working
with
them
on
replacement
agreements
which
we're
pretty
excited
about
because
they
expand
the
amount
of
renewable
energy
that
we
will
be
able
to
purchase
from
teradyn,
and
we
modeled
this
after
a
very
successful
project
that
we
have
with
them.
Edwards
IV,
which
delivers
renewable
energy
during
a
fixed
time
period.
So
it
delivers
between
10
a.m
and
10
p.m.
S
The
same
amount
of
energy
during
that
whole
time
period,
which
is
very
attractive
to
us
because
it
helps
us
meet
our
afternoon
and
our
evening
hours.
So
this
replacement
contracts
significantly
expands
upon
the
original
contract
and
provides
additional
value
to
us
in
meeting
our
our
load
during
those
evening
hours.
It
also
provides
resource
adequacy
from
those
batteries,
so
it
achieves
additional
value
there
as
well.
S
So
just
a
little
bit
about
teragen
they're,
a
leading
developer
owner
of
utility
scale,
renewable
energy
projects,
important
to
note
that
we
do
have
another
successful
project
with
them.
Edwards
4
that
has
been
operating
all
year
successfully
they've
been
operating
these
projects
since
2008
and
have
over
1700
megawatts
in
operation
they're,
not
a
publicly
traded
company
and
important
to
note
that
they
are
one
of
the
only
firms
that
provides
this
firm,
Renewable
Power
that
we're
looking
for
and
that
it
can
generate
from
morning
into
the
evening
hours
versus
a
typical
solar
project
that
delivers.
S
So,
in
summary,
this
replacement
package
four
different
contracts.
It
provides
both
Resource
adequacy
as
well
as
firm,
renewable
energy.
This
project
is
located
in
Kern
County
next
to
the
other
operating
project
and
the
contract.
Operation
dates
vary
between
2023
and
2026,
with
a
term
of
15
years
and
a
total
cost
of
352
million
dollars,
and
with
that
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
K
Again,
battery
storage,
we
can't
without
any
Storage
Wars
in
South
America,
mainly
Cuba
Chile
Argentina,
and
there
is
a
lot
of
reservation
sites
in
the
Midwest
and
here
in
California
that
are
sitting
on
native
disputable
land.
That
has
the
deposits
of
the
minerals
that
are
necessary
for
the
battery
storage
and
I.
Think
there's
some
council
members
on
the
on
the
council
that
are
aware
of
this,
especially
considering
that
they
work
in
Tech.
K
You
know
considering
the
next
candidate
for
mayor
I'm,
actually
surprised
that
there
is
no
comment
on
that,
because
you
know
that
you
know
about
these
Technologies
and
you
know
about
the
storage,
and
so
we
have
to
assume
the
moral
and
ethical
responsibility.
I
know
you
guys
don't
care
about
that!
All
you
care
about
is
the
law
as
long
as
it
doesn't
break
the
law,
then
I'm,
morally
and
ethically
in
the
clear
nope
you're
not,
and
that's
what
that's
a
job
that
I
hold.
K
That's
responsibility
that
I
hold
it's
the
whole
ourselves
accountable
for
the
wars
that
are
going
to
be
started
in
these
other
countries,
so
that
you
can
have
clean
energy
so
that
you
can
drive
a
Tesla
so
that
Google
can
have
a
grid
all
their
own,
so
that
nobody
is
regulating
or
checking
their
their
consumption
of
power
because
of
the
AI
Technologies
and
the
super
computers
that
they're
going
to
be
using
in
their
basements
I
mean
that's
really
why
they
want
their
own
grid.
K
It's
so
that
nobody
can
tell
how
much
power
and
juice
that
they're
using,
and
so
this
storage
capacity
Wars
in
countries
and
the
United
States
military
being
used
in
order
to
ferment
those
Wars,
okay
and
then
we're
going
to
be
told
a
bunch
of
Stories
on
CNN
and
Fox
News,
a
bunch
of
Lies,
no
you're,
not
hearing
lies
you're
hearing
the
truth
right
here.
This
is
what
the
truth
sounds
like,
so
get
used
to
it,
because
you're
going
to
hear
it
more
often.
Thank
you.
L
All
right,
thank
you
thanks
again
for
the
words
of
Paul,
just
to
my
own
few
words,
the
worker
writes
issues
and
human
rights
issues
we
set
up
and
around
the
world
now
with
the
future
of
mining
mirrors.
Minerals,
I
think
not
only
you
know,
develops
good
human
rights
practices
now,
but
as
a
way
to
work
for
the
Hedge
against
the
future
of
what
will
be
upcoming,
Wars
and
we'll
have
a
good
set
of
ideals
in
place.
That
I
think
could
hedge
off
cut
off,
basically
the
future
of
War.
L
That's
the
goals
and
good
luck.
How
we
work
around
good
human
rights
ideals.
What's
the
future
of
clean
energy
practices,
I
wanted
to
quickly
ask
I'm
a
little
behind
in
how
to
under
better
understand
these
sort
of
practices,
so
for
as
as
much
as
I
believe
in
the
future
of
Renewables
energy
that
can
really
be
of
help
to
ourselves.
L
I
know
there
is
a
Reliance
on
natural
gas
with
Renewables
at
this
time,
but
I
I,
don't
quite
know
the
depth
of
it
and
I.
Don't
quite
know
that
I
know
that
we
are
headed
for
what
could
be
some
good
changes
in
2024
about
how
to
talk
about
the
feature
of
natural
gas.
But
what
I'm
not
clear
about
is
that?
Can
renewable
energy
then
stand
on
its
own
two
feet
and
and
will
not
need
to
have
to
rely
on
natural
gas
as
much
to
me?
That's
an
important
goal.
L
I
hope
you
can
learn
to
explain
that
more
openly
and
clearly
to
the
public
in
our
in
the
next
few
months
and
years
and
just
make
it
a
a
real
important
subject
matter
to
understand
the
issue
and
I
thank
yourselves
very
much
in
the
North
in
the
Bay
Area
in
the
previous
work.
You've
done
to
really
limit
how
you
know:
fossil
fuel
companies
and
natural
gas
companies
how
they
can
make
a
profit
at
this
time.
Try
to
limit
that
Northern
California.
Thank
you
for
those
efforts
and
good
luck
to
2024..
Thanks.
N
Okay
back
to
the
council,
lots
of
sound
effects
on
that
one
councilmember.
M
Frost
yeah,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
is
it
gene
or
Genie.
M
Jean,
thank
you.
Well,
neither
one
of
the
ones
that
I
said
I
want
to
say
thank
you
Jean
for
the
briefing
that
you
provided
me
and
it
was
helpful
to
dive
in
a
little
further
and
have
a
better
understanding
and,
as
you
know,
I
I
took
some
concern
with
the
terriglin
Edwards
solar
5,
the
replacement
package
and
I'm
I'm,
going
to
express
some
of
those
concerns
here.
M
I,
don't
know
if
I'll
vote
against
it,
but
I
definitely
want
to
want
to
voice
concerns
I'm
comfortable
with
recommendation
B1,
which
is
that
first
15-year
term
that
will
start
next
year,
but
the
remainder
of
it
be
two
three
and
four.
M
What
I'm
mainly
concerned
about-
and
maybe
you
can
talk
about
it
here-
Lori,
if
you
wanted
to
add
to
it
is,
is
quite
simply
the
fact
that
we
had
an
agreement
with
him
for
whatever
reason
I
understand
they
have
their
their
reasonings,
but
for
whatever
reason
they
weren't
able
to
make
good
on
that,
and
we've
been
now
trying
to
to
find
doubt
what
a
you
know,
what
what
a
step
forward
is-
and
this
is
what
you've
come
up
with
so
I
appreciate
the
hard
work
that
you've
done,
but
we
are
now
contingenting
in
on
them,
making
good
on
another
build
out
right
of
of
new
solar
energy,
and
so
they've
failed
us
once
and
I'm
concerned
right
that
we're
entering
a
contract
again
and
right.
M
Shame
me
or
fool
me.
One!
Shame
on
on!
You
fool
me
twice
now.
Shame
on
me
right,
so
we
are
entering
into
this
willing
willingly,
knowing
that
right,
they
didn't
make
good
on
this
first
contract
and
where
I
had
a
concern.
Was
that
I
recognize
this
may
be
a
good
deal
today,
but
it
doesn't
look
like
such
a
great
deal.
M
You
know
three
years
from
now
when
they
haven't
made
good
on
it
again
and
now
we're
back
to
square
one,
but
three
years
past
the
fact,
and-
and
at
that
point
I
imagine
right-
we
don't
know
what
the
the
cost
will
be
for
a
program
like
this
and
so
in
my
mind,
I
I
felt
it
might
be
more
worthwhile
to
Simply,
say
well,
let's,
let's
go
with
this
first
package.
We
know
that
something
we
have
some
more
confidence
in
and
then
and
then
really
look
elsewhere.
M
I
and
I
appreciate
I
understand
that
we
are
doing
that
already
we're
always
kind
of
looking
right
for
other.
You
know
programs
and
packages,
and
so
it
looks
like
we
don't
have
to
go
out
there
and
do
any
extra
work.
It's
just
a
matter
now
of
do
we
do
we
accept
this
replacement
contract
or
not
and
then
continue
to
do
the
hard
work
to
go
out
there
and
try
to
find
other
sources
of
solar
energy.
So
that's
my
concern.
M
If
hoping
you
can,
you
know
convince
me
again:
I
I
trust
your
knowledge
more
than
mine
on
this
subject,
but
it
does.
It
does
raise
on
a
you
know
on
a
basic
level.
You
know
Layman's
concerns.
This
is
a
concern.
S
Yeah,
thank
you,
council
member.
You
know
very
good
concerns
that
you
raised,
and
you
know
we
certainly
have
shared
some
of
that
in
terms
of
answering
your
question
of
you
know
why
we
are
recommending
moving
forward
with
these
agreements.
S
So,
although
this
project
faced
some
issues
and
they
didn't
get
it
into
construction,
you
know
they
did
successfully
complete
the
other
contract
that
we
have
with
them.
That
contract
has
performed
very
well
all
year
and
they
have
many
megawatts
under
operation
throughout
their
portfolio
over
the
last
you
know,
decade
and
more
that
they've
been
in
operation,
so
we
do
know
that
they
have
a
track
record
of
success.
S
S
You
know
the
other
reason
we're
recommending
going
forward
with
this
is
that
you
know,
as
I
stated
in
many
ways
this
these
projects
are
much
more
valuable
than
the
original
contract
and
that
they
provide
firm
energy.
The
original
contract
was
as
available
solar
and
so
that's
going
to
generate.
Who
knows
how
much
between
the
hours
of
ten
and
three
but
nothing
in
those
evening
hours
when
Energy
prices
are
the
highest
and
our
load
is
the
highest,
and
so
you
know
successfully
through
Jean's
great
work
and
the
team's
work
here.
S
You
know
negotiated
a
very
attractive
replacement
package
that
you
know
increases
the
value,
preserves
everything
that
we
had
in
that
original
agreement
and
is
a
much
more
attractive
agreement
than
the
original
one.
Because
of
that
firm
delivery,
we
know
we
can
count
on
it
and
I'll.
Just
give
you
an
example
back
in
September,
when
we
had
that
heat
wave,
the
other
project
that
they
operate
for
us,
Edwards
IV
performed
very,
very
well.
S
You
know
it
was
very
nice
to
know
that
that
renewable
energy
was
going
to
show
up
at
a
fixed
amount
during
those
evening
hours
and
be
part
of
our
portfolio,
and
we
want
more.
You
know
projects
like
that
in
our
portfolio
and
right
now,
terrigen
is
one
of
the
only
developers.
That's
offering
that,
and
so
that's
why
we
are
recommending
it
and
I'll
say.
The
other
thing
that
gives
us
Comfort
is
that
in
the
agreement,
just
like
the
original
one,
there
are
performance
damages.
S
So
if
they
do
not
construct
these,
they
have
to
pay
us
those
damages,
and
so
that's
certainly
an
option
that
we
could
take
today.
We
could
just
take
that
performance,
security
and
move
on
to
another
developer,
but
we
don't
think
we
would
get
the
same
type
of
value
in
the
market
that
we're
getting
with
these
contracts.
So
I
hope
that
answers
some
of
your
concerns.
M
M
It's
positive
to
hear
that
we
have
a
a
history
of
success
with
them
as
well,
and
they
have
a
demonstrated
history
of
success
and
look
forward
to
this
being
successful
as
well
and
hopefully
paying
out
for
us
in
the
long
run.
Thanks
and
I'll
move
approval.
N
B
B
N
B
N
B
N
G
Good
afternoon,
mayor
and
City
Council
Members
I'm
Jill,
Bourne
City
librarian
for
the
San
Jose
Public,
Library
and
I'm
here
with
our
facilities,
program
manager
and
Tran.
We're
going
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background
about
the
grant
agreement
with
the
California
State
library
for
the
building
forward.
Library
infrastructure
grants.
G
So
the
budget
Act
of
2021
allocated
one-time
funds
to
the
California
State
Library
Building,
forward,
Library
infrastructure
program
to
address
life
safety
and
critical
maintenance
needs
of
Public
Library
facilities.
The
Grant
application
was
then
made
available
to
allocate
254
million
dollars
in
the
first
round
to
direct
matching
grants
to
libraries
throughout
California
next
slide.
G
Oh
sorry,
first
where's
the
thingy
I'm
like
directing
myself,
so
this
provides
you
with
the
structure
of
the
grants.
There
were
439
million
dollars
provided
to
the
State
library
and
the
first
round,
as
you
see
here,
is
for
254
million
dollars.
There
will
be
an
additional
round.
We
understand
for
the
remaining
185
million
dollars
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Ann
to
talk
through
the
specifics.
T
Application
for
the
25
libraries
and
we
actually
have
to
do
a
prioritization
exercise
and
the
state
requires
that
we
look
at
the
California
poverty
measure
index,
which
we
validated
with
our
an
equity
tool,
and
then
we
looked
at
the
building
condition
assessments
as
well
as
the
lifespan
of
our
individual
buildings,
the
equipments
and
then
factored
in
any
emergency
or
accessibility
improvements
that
could
be
made
especially
to
the
libraries
in
our
underserved
neighborhoods
and
then
consider
the
operational
impacts
for
any
major
repairs.
Obviously,
because
we
want
to
maintain
accessibility
throughout
our
renovation
projects
next
slide.
Please.
T
There
you
go
so
this
is
a
snapshot
of
the
breakdown
in
in
Grant
allocation
in
in
California,
especially
for
the
northern
part
of
California.
You'll,
see
that
San
Jose
received
some.
The
majority
of
the
branches
were
at
least
the
most
of
the
libraries
compared
to
other
Bay
Area
cities.
T
So
the
breakdown
for
the
total
grant
funding
that
we
received
from
the
state
equals
about
8.6
million
dollars.
You'll
see
that
biblioteca
Latino,
Americano,
Branch
library
and
Seven
Trees
received
the
majority
of
the
funds
are
mass
commitments?
Is
a
dollar
for
dollar
match
to
the
states
Awards
which
makes
us
or
which
would
commit
us
to
about
another
8.6
million
dollars
in
local
match?.
G
So
we
are
very
appreciative
of
the
Partnerships
with
public
works
and
prns
and
the
capital
budget
team
to
make
this
happen
and
we're
excited
by
the
opportunity
to
basically
double
the
city's
funding
power
to
ensure
that
our
public
libraries
remain
open,
accessible
and
welcoming
for
our
communities.
This
concludes
our
presentation
and
we're
welcome
any
questions.
K
Yes,
yes,
pull
something
from
the
Horseshoe,
specifically
with
respect
to
the
biblical
Latino
America
and
because
I'm
looking
at
it
right
now
and
Seven
Trees
they're,
taking
up
the
lion
shared,
not
that
I'm
complaining.
K
But
what
I'd
like
to
know
is:
why
is
it
that
Hillview
and
and
East
San
Jose,
Carnegie,
Branch,
okay,
no
I,
know
where
that
is
because
of
the
size,
but
the
Hillview
branch
and
albiso
they're,
the
the
metric
that's
used
is,
is
like
kind
of
lost
on
I'm
just
looking
for
what
is
the
reason
why
these
particular
libraries
are
receiving
the
Lion's
Share
okay,
number
one
I
get
Equity
I
get
all
that.
K
Okay,
that's
not
the
question
that
I'm
asking
you
I'm
asking
is
what
metric
was
used
and
the
other
thing
is:
what
does
it
mean
for
infrastructure?
I
mean?
How
are
you
defining
that?
How
are
you
defining
where
exactly
this
money
is
going
to
go
I
mean?
Are
you
going
through
retrofit,
a
particular
poll
or
or
put
cement
in
in
some
wall?
You
know
or
you
or
is
the
money
really
going
to
go
towards
the
educational
piece
and
maybe
expanding
the
the
access
that
these
particular
people
have
in
these
particular
areas?
K
It's
not
it's
not
enough
to
just
say:
Equity
we're
using
Equity,
I
I
need
to
know
what
you
mean
by
that
because
I
don't
know
what
you
mean
when
you
use
that
word
and
I
need
to
know,
because
this
is
my
money.
This
is
the
Public's
money,
and
so
so
so
I
need
to
know
exactly
what
metrics
are
being
used.
How
are
you
defining
Equity?
What
does
equity
mean
within
this
context?
K
B
L
All
right
perfectly
here
with
your
Council
items
this
week,
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
remind
good
luck
with
the
digital
Equity
issues
that
may
be
involved
with
this,
and
that
you
know,
openness
and
accountability
with
tech
can
really
be
an
important
factor
to
help
kids
understand
the
digital
Equity
process
in
our
future
community
life
in
San
Jose
thanks
a
lot
back.
R
Yeah,
thank
you.
I'll
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
continuing
to
improve
our
libraries
and
go
out
and
find
resources
for
it.
I
understand
all
of
the
the
needs
at
the
various
branches
vary
from
Branch
to
Branch.
R
There
were
two
branches
that
were
not
upgraded
or
modernized
during
the
well
three
I
guess,
but
there
was
the
there
was
the
West
Valley
branch
is
that
what's
called
West
Valley
branch,
which
was
relatively
new
right
before
the
bond
passed,
so
it
didn't
get
work,
but
those
two
branches
that
older
branches
that
didn't
get
work
during
the
from
the
bond
and
I
know
there
was
a
conscious
decision
not
to
upgrade
out
viso
as
part
of
that,
partly
because
there
was
a
consideration
question
about
whether
or
not
Alviso
would
eventually
get
replaced
with
something
new
and
better.
R
R
The
memo
that
I'm
I've
submitted
asks
for
additional
funding
to
be
found
out
of
the
CNC
or
other
Library
Bond
Library
Capital
funds
in
mid-year
review
to
do
some
cosmetic
customer
facing
work
in
addition
to
this
important
infrastructure
work
for
this
grant
to
help
that
Community,
this
alvisa
Remains,
the
only
library
for
residents
of
San,
Jose
west
of
880
and
north
of
Brokaw.
There
is
no
library
for
the
8
000
homes
in
North,
San
Jose.
There
is
no
Library.
The
only
library
in
North
San
Jose
is
the
Alviso
Branch.
It's
very
important
for
that
Community.
R
For
multiple
reasons,
and
by
the
way,
as
a
anecdote,
the
demand
to
show
is
shown
by
the
fact
that
it
was
a
branch
that
actually
has
more
people
coming
in
on
Sunday
now
that
it's
open
on
Sundays
than
it
does
during
its
average
weekday.
So
there
was
a
lot
of
pent-up
demand
in
Alviso
for
usage,
so
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
accept
the
grant
agreement.
Along
with
my
memo.
P
N
Thank
you,
council,
member,
and
just
to
clarify
that
would
come
back
through
the
budget
process.
It.
R
Was
intended
to
come
back
through
the
mid-year
budget
review,
it's
not,
and
it's
coming
from
library
reserves
that
is,
that
an
acceptable
process.
B
R
G
G
We,
the
library,
has
been
working
for
a
few
years
and
a
council
member
paralysis
well
aware
of
the
the
efforts
to
really
put
heavy
improvements
into
the
bibliotech,
a
Latino
Americana
branch,
and
that's
why,
when
we
were
able
to
apply
for
the
grant,
we
had
a
very
fleshed
out
plan
that
then,
you
know
resulted
in
a
in
a
higher
dollar
value
with
Alviso,
because
that
question
has
always
remained
of
whether
the
building
should
be
replaced.
Or
you
know
what
are
the
options
with
it?
G
R
Whatever
makes
sense
and
I
did
mean
to
mention
that,
obviously
biblioteca
being
the
other
branch
that
didn't
get
the
work,
it's
important
that
that
one
is
getting
a
large
amount
of
remaining
Bond
money
to
do
the
work
now
and
so
I
do
appreciate
doing
this.
Right
is
important
too,
but
there
potentially
are
short-term
and
long-term
improvements
that
can
be
made.
N
R
N
N
Well,
it's
great
to
see:
let's
do
so
well,
I
had
a
question
about
one
which
was
Educational,
Park,
Library
I
know
it
serves
a
community
absolutely
would
qualify
under
the
grant,
but
it's
a
really
new
library
I
could
be
wrong,
but
I
think
it's
either
our
newest
or
second
newest.
Was
there.
My
understanding
is.
This
is
supposed
to
be
about
sort
of
capital
placement
of
of
of
those
parts
of
the
library
that
are
under
maintained.
Could
you
just
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
this
yeah.
G
In
general,
I
think
and
then
M
can
add
any
specifics,
that
I
don't
and
that
I
don't
know
but
I
think
in
general,
and
it's
it's
important
to
note
that
the
that
the
primary
factor
of
the
application
requirements
was
that
we
have
building
assessment
reports
that
tell
you
what
the
critical
infrastructure
and
system
needs
are
for
every
branch,
and
so
we
have
worked
with
Public
Works
to
develop
that
out.
G
J
N
That
part
we
can
take
it
offline,
then
did
anything
happen.
No.
T
It
was
just
the
roof,
had
an
estimated
end
of
life
for
about
or
estimated
for
2024.
So
we
factored
that
in
and
then,
as
we
looked
at
emergency
or
an
accessibility
repairs,
we
also
factored
those
components
into
Educational
Park.
N
B
Thank
you,
I
just
had
a
question
on
the
timeline.
Is
this
isn't
going
to
impact
the
timeline
for
the
other
funded
Grant
projects?
Is
that
correct.
G
B
G
G
M
H
H
N
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you
item
8.1
is
the
public
hearing
and
approval
of
a
downtown
high-rise,
residential
tax
and
fee
waiver
for
escape
at
10,
East,
Reed
Street.
N
J
Foreign
thanks
Nancy
good
afternoon,
Jared
Ferguson
housing
Catalyst
with
the
office
of
Economic,
Development
and
cultural
affairs.
So
the
the
current
high-rise
program
was
approved
by
the
city
council
on
November
5th
2019..
The
program
provides
for
a
50
reduction
of
the
building
and
structure
construction
tax
and
the
commercial
residential
mobile
home
park
building
tax.
It
also
includes
a
reduction
to
zero
dollars.
The
inclusionary
housing
ordinance
in
Luffy
projects
must
obtain
their
certificate
of
occupancy
before
June
30th
2025,
in
order
to
qualify
for
the
tax
and
fee
reductions.
J
J
The
next
two
slides
include
direct
Revenue
estimates
to
the
city,
school
district
and
County.
This
first
slide
is
the
one-time
Revenue
that
will
be
received
from
the
project.
The
city
will
receive
construction
taxes
in
Parkland
and
Luffy's.
The
school
district
will
also
receive
one-time
development
fees.
The
total
one-time
Revenue
estimate
is
six
million
two
hundred
and
nineteen
thousand
two
hundred
and
forty
seven
dollars.
J
This
slide
shows
the
annual
recurring
Revenue
to
the
city
school
district
and
County.
The
totals
City
recurring
revenue
is
365
thousand
dollars
a
little
over
365
thousand
dollars
and
then
the
total
recurring
Revenue
to
the
the
county
and
school
district
and
the
city
is
just
below
1.4
million
dollars.
J
And
to
escape
has
started
their
initial
work
and
is
anticipated
and
is
anticipating
receiving
their
building
permit
in
November.
This
would
be
the
first
high-rise
to
start
construction
since
Miro
across
the
street
from
City
Hall.
That
concludes
staff.
Staff's
presentation,
representatives
from
scape
are
also
available
via
Zoom.
For
for
any
questions,
thanks.
B
L
Hi
we're
Beekman
here
just
to
offer
my
two
cents.
I
always
worry
when
you
talk
about
high
rises
in
San,
Jose,
downtown
area-
and
this
is
another
example-
I
mean
I-
know
you
guys
you'd
like
to
work.
L
Precipitously
close
to
the
White
Pass
can
I
offer
that
a
10
story,
12-story
building
in
that
area
would
not
only
be
possibly
safer
for
the
aircrafts
in
the
area,
but
just
aesthetically
I
think
would
be
more
interesting
and
offer
a
kind
of
a
more
of
a
slower
introduction
to
what
you're
introducing
you're,
basically
introducing
a
high-rise
feature,
but
maybe
not
just
the
Reed
area,
but
the
area
on
the
other
side
of
the
freeway
and
so
I
I
just
think
I
think
those
buildings
are
not
going
to
be
20
stories.
L
High
I
think
they
would
be
more
like
10
or
12,
maybe
so
to
have
to
build
in
those
terms,
I
think
maybe
a
bit
more
practical,
but
that's
just
my
two
cents
really
consider
safety
issues
as
always
and
good
luck
on
making
it
a
relaxed
process
and
I
just
moved
to
San
Diego,
where
they
have
really
tall
high
rises.
I,
don't
think
we
have
to
necessarily
do
that
in
San
Jose
and
you
can
build.
L
You
know
eight
eight
story,
ten-story
buildings
that
can
be
pretty
interesting,
looking
I,
think
and
and
unique
to
what
San
Jose's
character
is
about.
Thank
you.
K
K
Okay
and
13
million
dollars
would
buy
a
lot
of
land
here
in
San,
Jose,
okay,
so
what
you're
actually
doing
is
you're
creating
deficiency
in
voids
within
the
general
budget
that
is
not
being
able
to
be
accessed
by
people
who
really
actually
need
that
kind
of
money.
Let
me
give
you
some
examples.
You
want
to
pay
a
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars
for
these
units.
K
Okay,
but
these
are
market
rate
units,
which
means
that
for
a
person
to
live
there,
they
have
to
make
a
hundred
above
120
percent
of
the
median
income
120
above
the
median
income
is
a
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
dollars
a
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
dollars
that's
how
much
they
have
to
earn
okay.
So
these
are
people
that
can
afford
it.
Okay
and
you
want
to
allow
them,
and
these
units
would
normally
go
for
it
anywhere
between
8.8
point
850
000
to
1.5
million.
K
That's
how
much
those
units
would
normally
go
for,
but
you're
allowing
the
developer
to
buy
it
back
for
a
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars,
and
then
you
keep
a
straight
face
and
one
you
want
to
talk
about
Equity
you
want
to
talk
about.
We
got
a
housing
crisis
and
then
you
want
to
get
up
and
say
that
this
council
is
the
one
that
is
responsible
for
the
housing
crisis.
To
begin
with,
that,
the
people
rely
on
decreased
they're,
not
responsible
for
being
there.
K
B
F
Honorable
mayor
licardo
and
city
council
members,
this
is
Victor
Gomez
government,
Affairs
consultant
with
the
San
Jose
downtown
Association
I'm,
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
Downtown
Association
in
favor
of
the
staff
recommendation,
as
outlined
in
your
presentation,
as
outlined
in
the
staff
report
from
the
housing
department,
the
number
of
residents
living
downtown
continues
to
be
critical
for
the
future
of
downtown
San
Jose.
F
Waiving
taxes
fees
on
downtown
residential
development,
including
the
proposed
skate
project,
is
important
for
the
health
and
the
success
of
downtown
the
downtown
community
that
needs
the
foot
traffic
and
the
economic
activity
for
more
residents
to
bring
construction
costs
for
high-rise.
Residential
development
continues
to
climb.
In
2019,
the
city
council
accepted
a
downtown
hybrid
high-rise
feasibility
assessment
that
showed
a
typical
high-rise
residential
development
in
Downtown
San
Jose
is
not
financially
feasible.
Today,
these
costs
burdens
are
even
higher.
F
Approving
the
residential
tax
and
fee
waiver
will
help
these
projects
lightscape
get
underway
and
once
constructed
we'll
house,
more
San
Jose
residents
and
other
typical
projects
in
the
downtown
core.
With
that
said,
we
fully
support
on
behalf
of
the
Downtown
Association
again.
We
fully
support
these
actions
and
look
forward
to
your
support.
Thank
you.
B
O
Yeah
this
excuse
me
this
is
Mike
sodergren
president
vice
president
of
the
preservation,
Action
Council,
do
exclusively
to
exclusively
pretty
much
to
our
trust
in
Nancy.
Klein
act
does
not
oppose
this
project,
but
we
would
like
to
say
the
following:
this
is
a
tremendous
amount
of
taxes
and
fees
to
forego
unless
the
city
truly
believes
that
the
alternative
is
no
development
at
all.
O
It
is
in
this
context
that
Pac
would
like
to
remind
the
council
that
scape,
the
Escape
project
is
where
the
historic
Palace
and
apartment
building
was
originally
located
before
it
was
moved
in
a
rush
and
at
a
cost
of
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
it
was
raised
by
a
non-profit
Pac
to
a
city
provided
receiver
site
at
4th
and
Reed,
though,
through
the
joint
work
of
Pac,
the
city's
office
of
Economic
Development
housing
at
District,
3,
Council
ownership
of
the
palace
and
was
transferred
to
Habitat
for
Humanity,
which
is
actively
working
to
provide.
O
What
now
looks
like
the
only
truly
affordable
housing
that
will
result
from
the
skate
project.
The
good
news
is
the
alternative
when
this
project
started
was
the
Demolition
and
loss
of
the
historic
building,
so
thank
you,
San
Jose,
for
all
you
did
to
preserve
it,
and
I'd
also
like
to
thank
councilman
or
Perales
for
working
out
a
an
agreement
with
scape
to
make
sure
that
the
thirty
thousand
dollars
promised
for
the
equivalent
cost.
B
B
N
Okay,
thanks
Blair,
hey,
thank
you
Nancy
and
Jared
for
the
presentation
and
thanks
to
councilmember
Pros
for
all
he's
done
to
try
to
promote
housing
in
downtown,
and
we
know
it's
really
hard
right
now
for
anybody
to
get
financing
to
build
anything
I'm
guessing.
This
is
going
to
be
the
last
one
of
these.
N
We
see
for
a
long
time,
I
appreciate
Jared
that
you
did
the
analysis
that
I
asked
around
last
time
around
that
tax
revenue
I
think
that's
really
helpful
for
people
to
really
understand
what's
going
on,
but
could
we
go
to
that
last
slide?
Where
you
talk
about
the
recurring
Revenue
about
the
city
and
to
all
the
jurisdictions,
because
I
know
it's
hard,
I
think
for
the
public
to
follow
the
bouncing
ball.
If
we're
talking
about
apples
and
oranges,
we've
got
one
time:
revenue
and
costs
right
or
foregone
Revenue
I
should
say
so.
N
N
So
I'll
describe
the
problem
generally,
which
is:
we've
got
foregone
Revenue,
which
is
one
time
we've
got
one-time,
Revenue
and
and
those
are
apples.
And
then
we
got
this
oranges,
which
is
the
recurring
Revenue,
and
so
it
becomes
difficult.
N
N
What
does
this
all
mean
if
we've
got
one-time
Revenue
six
million
foregone
Revenue
10
million,
and
then
we
got
this
recurring
menu
Revenue,
which
is
a
different
Beast
and
and
I'm
just
wondering
I
I
just
did
a
backup
envelope
because
I
got
a
spreadsheet
here
of
of
the
net
present
value
and
then
at
present
value
just
to
the
city
of
365
000..
It
depends
on
what
discount
rate
you
pick.
N
I
picked
four
percent,
so
I
don't
know
what
so
you
would
pick
somewhere
around
a
risk-free
rate
and,
and
that
comes
to
a
little
more
than
seven
million
dollars,
I
just
assumed
that
building
was
going
to
last
40
years.
It's
going
to
last
a
lot
longer
than
that.
Obviously,
but
we
can
conservatively
say
it
would
be
about
7.2
million
to
the
city
and
then
to
all
these
other
agencies,
the
county,
school
district
and
so
forth,
that's
27
and
a
half
million.
N
N
B
Agreed
and,
and
if
you
think
about
it,
when
we
get
our
money
back,
the
other
calculation
is
just
somewhere
around
10
years,
yeah
lower
than
that
we've
returned
all
the
money,
plus
some
yeah.
N
Yeah
and
I
think
that's
important.
You
know
that
what
staff
is
created
as
a
mechanism
that
puts
us
ahead
and
that's
that's
what
we
want.
Councilman
Falls.
M
Yeah
thanks
mayor
and
I
appreciate
your
comment.
You
added
on
in
regards
to
that
we're
not
approving
development
of
high-rise
housing
to
collect
fees.
Right
I
mean
that's,
that's
not
that's
not
why
we're
doing
it,
and
thus
we
can
utilize
it
as
an
incentive
to
get
something
else
that
we
are
trying
to
achieve,
which
is
dense,
high-rise
housing
in
the
the
downtown
core.
The
place
where
we
today
can
can
build
as
high
as
possible.
M
That's
that's
permitted
and
unfortunately
it's
it's
very
difficult
and
it
took
me
a
couple
years
to
understand
the
challenge
to
be
able
to
finance
and
permit
and
break
ground
on
a
high-rise
in
downtown,
and
you
know
we
eliminated
some
other
factors:
west
of
of
87,
with
our
one
engine
inoperable
our
height
limits
because
of
our
airport,
but
we
are
still
capped
and-
and
we
have
a
a
challenge
in
being
able
to
to
just
build
and
break
ground
on
a
high-rise
in
downtown
and
and
so,
although
subsidies
are
not
our
our
first
I
think
look
at
how
we
might
be
able
to
help
a
project
through
in
essence,
I.
M
Don't
think
we
would
have
gotten
any
of
these
high-rises
approved
through
my
last
two
terms,
unless
it
was
for
what
what
in
actuality
is,
is
not
a
significant
amount
in
the
overall
financing
of
a
project.
But
it
is
you
know
it's
a
big
number,
as
we
look
at
it.
M
Six
million
but
I
would
say
fairly
insignificant
over
the
long
run
in
regards
to
not
only
the
tax
revenue
that
we
will
generate,
and
thank
you
mayor
for
putting
that
out,
because
it
could
be
a
bit
confusing
looking
at
the
the
slides,
but
also
just
in
being
able
to
build
the
type
of
housing
that
we
know
that
we
we
desperately
need
in
the
city
all
across
the
board,
from
this
type
of
housing
to
the
affordable
housing
that
we've
been
approving
in
downtown.
So
I
appreciate
the
work
on
it
and
I
know.
M
H
B
Thank
you,
I,
just
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
getting
this
right,
so
we
are
foregoing
almost
nine
million
dollars
in
inclusionary
housing
and
Luffy's,
and
in
exchange
we
have
one-time
City
revenue
and
then
a
total
City
recurring
revenue
of
365
000..
What
is
our
plan?
Are
we
counting
on
Google
to
add
density
for,
affordable
housing.
B
Council,
member
Nancy
Klein
of
Economic
Development.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
question.
The
housing
department
and
the
rest
of
the
city
are
moving
forward
as
you
and
Council
have
directed
on
a
multi-prong
strategy,
getting
more
housing
in
the
downtown
or
throughout
the
city.
The
market
rate
is
important
and
we've
worked
closely
with
the
housing
department
and
Kemet
is
here.
B
Thank
you
again,
council
member,
a
couple
different
things,
one.
It
is
foregoing
the
revenue
not
in
any
way
trying
to
sidestep
that.
We
don't
believe
the
market
rate
housing
would
get
built,
so
it
would
be
zero
dollars
and
zero
units
to
the
city
and
by
the
math
that
we
showed
that
in
the
combination
of
one-time
dollars
to
the
city
and
other
jurisdictions,
as
well
as
the
ongoing
dollars.
We
both
recoup
what
we
gave
up
and
we
gain
in
the
long
term
for
revenues
in
units.
N
All
right
council,
member
Cohen.
R
Yeah,
thank
you.
I've
always
been
uncomfortable
with
on
this
topic.
I
think,
for
similar
reasons,
a
council
member
Esparza
I
know
that
this
analysis
was
done
before
I
was
on
Council,
so
I'm
I'm
not
suggesting
that
we
revisit
the
whole
conversation
now
just
want
to
ask
a
couple.
Questions
I
see
on
the
on
the
first
slot
Slide
the
statement.
Basically,
that
says
analysis
demonstrated
a
typical
high-rise
was
not
financially
feasible
and
I
guess.
We
still
believe
that
certain
types
of
projects
are
not
feasible
and
I.
R
Guess
I'm
just
going
to
ask
the
question
combined
with
sort
of
other
parts
of
the
city
we're
building,
maybe
not
quite
the
same
magnitude
of
high-rise,
but
we're
building
some
high-rise
projects
in
other
parts
of
the
city
that
have
inclusionary
housing.
What
makes
what
do
we?
What
do
we
look
at
to
determine
what's
feasible
in
in
some
areas
but
isn't
feasible
downtown
and
what
are
the
differences.
J
So
the
the
current
program
was
approved
with
the
analysis
from
2019
that
showed
in
feasibility
we
next
week
at
the
city
council.
We
have
a
study
session
on
the
cost
development,
where
we've
updated
that
same
analysis.
So
we
looked
at
high-rise
feasibility
as
well
as
mid
rise
and
low
rise
in
the
city,
and
the
results
are
consistent
with
the
29
actually
a
little
bit
worse
in
terms
of
feasibility
for
for
housing,
market
rate,
housing
projects
in
the
city,
you've
been
mid-rise
or
not
not
feasible,
under
the
current
condition.
J
So
you
know,
and
the
current
analysis
looks
at
high
rise
again
and
the
situation
if
there
was
no
no
waiver,
that
no
waiver
of
the
inclusionary
housing
ordinances,
the
projects
would
not
be
feasible
even
with
the
reduction
they're
very
challenged
to
move
forward.
So
if
the
situation
is
very
similar
and
in
fact,
a
little
bit
worse
because
of
the
pandemic
and
other
factors,
yeah.
R
I
mean
I'm
asking
this
question
because
we're
we've
talked
a
lot
about
North,
San,
Jose
and
projects
in
North,
San
Jose,
where
we
have
put
our
foot
down
a
little
bit
as
a
council
recently
and
said
we're
going
to
hold
developers
to
20,
inclusionary
housing
and
clearly
you
know
we
could.
We
might
hear
some
of
the
same
arguments
about
well,
it's
not
feasible.
R
J
I
think
there's
definitely
I
mean
what
we've
seen
and
what
you're
talking
about
with
the
entitlements
in
North
San
Jose
is
that
there's
definitely
help
when
you
can
separate
the
buildings
in
terms
of
helping
with
the
financing
and
and
those
are,
the
projects
that
have
been
approved
recently
that
are
complying
with
inclusion
or
housing.
Ordinance
are
doing
so
with
the
clustered
option
and
you
have
a
high
rise.
You
don't
really
have
that
opportunity
to
be
able
to
have
a
separate
building
to
deliver
these
units,
so.
R
R
B
R
R
R
The
get
the
other
question
the
other
comment
I
was
going
to
make
is,
it
seems
to
me
we
look
at
this
as
an
either
or
I
just
want
to
do
the
financial
analysis.
There's
really
three
options:
three
outcome
options
or
three
possible
outcomes:
one
is,
it
doesn't
get
built
clearly,
there's
no
Revenue
if
it
doesn't
get
built,
one
is
it
gets
built
within
with
and
with
the
fees
still
intact,
and
we
end
up
with
the
Six
Million
and
all
the
ongoing
fees
plus
an
additional
9
million.
R
And
the
third
is
the
outcome
that
we're
getting
here,
which
is:
we've
waived,
the
fees
we're
getting
the
six
million
plus
the
ongoing
fees.
It's
not
just
it's
so
really.
The
question
is
what
feasibility
and
not
we're
sacrificing
something
to
gain,
something
that
we
otherwise
wouldn't
get,
except
for
the
fact
that
the
project
may
or
may
not
get
built,
I
I.
R
Guess
it
I'm,
not
maybe
I'm,
not
explaining
my
thought
process
very
well,
but
it
we
need
to
be
thinking
about
this
in
terms
of
the
subsidian
sacrifice
for
and
what
we
potential
revenue
is
for
a
project
where
we
didn't
make
that
sacrifice.
In
addition,
as
another
option,
we
seem
to
leave
that
out
in
this
discussion.
R
I
just
want
to
make
that
that
clear,
although
I,
understand
I'd,
be
loath
at
this
point
to
change
the
process,
because
these
developers
have
been
financing
and
planning
their
project
under
a
set
of
policies
that
allows
them
to
make
these
to
us
to
expect
to
these
kinds
of
subsidies,
so
I'm,
okay,
with
allowing
them
to
proceed
under
the
policies
that
are
in
place.
I
just
want
to
be
thoughtful
as
we
move
forward
about.
R
You
know.
What's
the
right
magnitude
of
the
sacrifices
that
are
needed
by
the
city
and
for
our
collusionary
Housing
Programs,
you
know
is:
is
it
an
All
or
Nothing
Zero
versus
the
fees,
or
is
there
some
in
between
we
just
just
using
this
opportunity
to
bring
up
those
questions
that
are
still
in
my
head?
Every
time
we
have
a
waiver
like
this
I
guess,
that's
all
I'm
saying
that
but
I'm
supportive
of
allowing
this
developer
to
take
advantage
of
the
project
of
the
program.
That's
already
in
place.
N
Thank
you,
I
and
councilman
I
apologize
for
jumping
in
what
the
reason
why
I
did
was
I
think
you
would
articulate
that
we're
building
high
rises
in
other
parts
of
the
city
and
I
just
want
to
emphasize
the
type
one.
Construction
is
really
not
happening
anywhere
outside
of
the
downtown
and
by
type
1
I
mean
steel
construction
with
a
very
specific
life
safety
requirements
that
make
this
a
very
high
cost
per
unit.
That's
different
than
the
six
seven
stories
that
we
may
be
building
in
other
parts
of
the.
R
City
right
point
taken,
I
was
actually
kind
of
thinking
about
Paseo,
San,
Antonio,
I
think
that
building,
but
but
you're
right.
That's,
probably
not
quite
that.
That's
so
I
was
just
thinking
of
an
example.
That
was
one
example.
Maybe
I
can
come
up
with,
but
it
is
an
example
where
we
did
get
inclusionary
housing
in
the
project
yeah.
R
N
H
H
H
J
J
H
O
Thank
you
thanks
for
the
time
today,.
F
Not
receiving
these
subsidies
would
certainly
change
our
entire
financial
plan
and
financing
package,
and
you
know,
as
part
of
you
know,
similar
to
what
Jared
and
Nancy
have
been
saying.
This
has
been
in
the
works
for
three
years
now,
and
you
know
we
assume
that
these
subsidies
is
as
part
of
the
city
of
San
Jose
would
be
received.
N
H
And
if
the
project
didn't
move
forward,
we
would
therefore
have
zero
dollars
for
inclusionary,
okay
and
then
finally,
is.
Is
it
fair
to
say
that,
even
when
we
build
market
rate
like
this,
that
we
are
in
fact
providing
housing
for
residents
who
are
therefore
otherwise
not
out
there
in
the
rest
of
the
marketplace,
bidding
up
the
price
of
other
existing
housing
stock.
H
M
M
You
know
it
took
some
time
to
truly
understand
the
nuanced
difference
of
the
different
types
of
developments,
the
different
locations
of
development
and
and,
quite
frankly,
right.
That's
why
we
came
to
to
this
agreement.
M
We
put
in
there
some
parameters
timelines,
because
we
knew
that
you
know
the
environment
is
going
to
change
and,
quite
frankly,
would
give
the
new
Council-
or
even
this
Council,
an
opportunity
right
to
read
that
out
should
a
fee
waiver
reduction
program
like
this
exist
and
for
what
types
of
development
and
the
council
will
have
that
opportunity
to
do
that
quite
frankly,
next
year,
and
so
even
maybe
you
know
ahead
of
time,
we
may
have
a
chance
to
to
discuss
that
as
some
of
these
projects
are,
as
you
point
out
mayor
this,
this
would
likely
be
the
last
one.
M
June
30th
of
next
year
is
the
certificate
of
occupancy
date,
and
so
and,
as
councilman
pointed
out,
this
is
the
this.
Well,
if
it
broke
down
the
last
one
was
five
years
ago,
and
so
even
with
this
subsidy
program,
it
has
been
extremely
difficult
in
the
environment
of
downtown
to
build
high-rise.
M
I'll
I
will
be
the
first
to
to
say
and
answer
more
bluntly
councilmember.
As
far
as
this
question.
This
doesn't
really
do
anything
directly,
at
least
for
our
affordable
housing
needs
indirectly,
as
councilor
Mayhem
described
yes
right,
there's
there's
some
some
indirect
correlation,
I
think
you
could.
You
could
find
out
of
that,
but
directly
it
really
doesn't.
It
is
building
market
rate.
M
Housing
taking
conclusionary
housing
dollars
doesn't
help
to
add
money
to
our
ability
to
build
affordable
housing,
but
neither
does
you
know
100
of
zero
and
and
neither
does
right,
the
the
opportunity
of
getting
more
housing
overall
and
I,
quite
frankly,
think
we
would
have
had
none
of
the
high-rises
under
my
turn
break
ground
if
it
wasn't
for
this
piece
of
the
pie
and
so
I
do
think,
it's
important
I
do
think
the
discussion
of
what
should
it
be
is
important
and
and
we'll
have
an
opportunity,
as
a
council
to
you
know
through
the
years
continually
vet
that
out,
but
for
now
absolutely
this
is
a
program
that
the
council
has
approved,
the
one
that's
been
standing
for
a
number
of
years
and
that,
as
we've
heard
from
scape
they've
put
in
to
their
financing,
and
so
that
that's
you
know
it's
incumbent
upon
them
to
to
get
this
approved.
M
If
not
I
would
say
not
just
unlikely
I
would
say
you
know
we
wouldn't
see
this.
This
project
move
forward
so
just
wanted
to
add
some
color
to
it.
N
J
S
J
N
So
we've
look:
we've
we've
seen
a
lot
of
great
Mercury
News
articles
with
beautiful
pictures
of
high
rises
that
have
been
planned
as
councilmember
Perales
mentioned
during
his
term
and
I
think
we've
gotten,
maybe
three
or
four
actually
under
construction,
it's
it's!
This
is
a
very
difficult
thing
to
do,
and
this
is
why
cities
throughout
the
country
tend
to
offer
a
lot
more
in
terms
of
subsidy
than
we
do
we're
just
cutting
fees,
they're,
actually
giving
developers
money
in
other
cities
and
in
this
case
I
do
want
to
clarify.
N
You
know
if
you
look
at
again
Apples
to
Apples
Net
Present
Value
costs
to
the
city,
whatever
you
believe
about
the
foregone
10
million
dollars,
most
of
that
in
affordable
housing,
funding,
I
think
Nancy
put
it
well,
it's
money
we're
not
likely
to
get
anyway,
because
this
thing
ain't
going
to
get
built.
What
we
get
for
the
city
in
that
present
value
is
more
than
13
million
and
what
all
the
other
public
agencies
get
on
top
of
that
is
about
27
million
in
north.
N
In
that
present
value,
and
in
addition
to
most
importantly,
we
get
housing
and
customer
problems
put
it
well.
Well,
although
I
probably
would
differ
on
an
issue
of
semantics,
which
is
how
we
Define
affordability,
I,
think
affordability
matters
to
a
lot
of
people,
even
if
they
don't
qualify
for
quote-unquote,
affordable
housing
and
a
lot
of
workers
who
are
struggling
to
pay
market
rate
rents
and
struggle
greatly
to
do
that.
It
matters
for
us
to
get
housing
Supply
out
there
for
market
rate
as
well.
N
The
higher
that
market
rate
gets
the
harder
it
gets
for
us
to
even
get
the
affordable
product
to
move
forward.
Everything
matters
so
I
think
we
just.
We
want
more
Supply
period,
because
affordability
matters
to
lots
of
families
all
throughout
the
income
structures,
income
scale
and,
of
course
we
want
to
focus
every
dollar
of
actual
City
money
on
those
families,
they're
struggling
the
most
and
the
lowest
incomes,
but
getting
housing
build
is
a
good
thing.
Jared.
J
I
I
got
the
number
for
you.
It's
a
little
over
7
800
in
in
review
or
or
approved
for
high
rise.
Okay,
thank.
N
You,
okay,
I,
think
that's
units
yeah,
not
actual
buildings,
yeah,
correct
units.
J
R
B
N
N
B
B
F
Hi
this
is
Alex
Shore
with
catalyze
SV
I.
Think
I
missed
an
opportunity
for
public
comment
earlier
on
the
development
issue.
So
if
I
can't
submit
this
comment
now,
that's
okay,
I,
I,
guess
part
of
the
question
in
this
discussion
that
you
all
have
with
the
developers.
I
would
wonder
if
we
could
pose
the
question
to
them.
Perhaps
in
the
future
on
you
know-
or
at
least
maybe
the
council
or
the
office
of
Economic
Development
could
understand
what
those
profit
margins
would
be.
F
So
I
wonder
if
that's
information,
even
if
it's
not
available
to
the
public,
that
the
council
could
be
in
conversation
with
the
developer
and
say
hey
how
much
of
this
fee
could
you
handle
or
not
handle
toward
affordable
housing?
So
just
food
for
thought,
as
you
all
are
going
forward
on
these
discussions
on
these
fees.
Thanks
so
much.
B
L
Hi
Brad
Beekman
here
thanks
for
thanks
for
having
public
comment
afternoon.
Public
comment:
that's
that's
very
nice
of
you
guys
respecting
that.
Thank
you
good
luck
to
yourselves
that
you
really
have
to
address
affordable
housing
and
gentrification
issues.
The
previous
item.
Good
luck
on
those
efforts,
an
open
subject
matter,
make
it
open
as
possible
for
myself
a
public
comment
time.
You
know:
I
I
offered
some
pretty
heavy
words
yesterday
about
the
future
of
the
Ukraine
area
that
you
know,
I
I
need
to
give
Ukraine
it's
due.
L
They
deserve
their
part
of
the
country
as
well
and
and
they
deserve
a
future
of
a
large
Port
area
themselves
and
I
hope
that
can
be
respected
as
part
of
the
negotiation
process.
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
if
I
relish
the
fact
of
Russia
having
so
much
of
a
large
Port
area.
L
But
you
know
I
I,
respect
that
I
think
there
can
be
a
ways
that
both
sides
can
negotiate
a
future
that
they
can
both
have
Port
areas
in
the
future
and
that
yeah
I
I
I'm
really
upset
that
Russia
had
to
go
to
war
in
the
first
place,
because
I
felt
they
could
have
done
a
peaceful
dialogue
negotiation
process
without
having
to
go
to
war
I'm.
L
So
I'm
pretty
upset
with
myself
to
me
to
describe
their
use
of
fossil
fuels
that
clouded
their
judgment,
I
feel
and
so
I'm
I
do
have
my
upsetness
that
Russia
to
be
clear
with
that
said,
just
a
a
reminder
of
the
work
of
the
city
of
Berkeley
and
San
Diego
towards
the
ideas
of
you
know,
they're
really.
L
In
the
past
year,
their
communities
have
been
really
upset
with
them
over
street
light
technology
and
aoprs
and
and
and
downtown
kiosk
data
collection
things
they're
really
trying
to
make
up
to
them
with
good
civil
protection
practices
within
that
data
collection
and
aopr
use.
Good
luck!
How
San
Jose
can
do
the
same
Paul.
K
I
am
literally
astounded.
I
was
looking
from
the
Horseshoe
that
we
are
following
the
agenda
as
written.
Thank
you
I
appreciate
that
it's
taken
five
years
to
get
to
this
point,
and
so
this
is
definitely
a
day
to
to
mark
down
and
note
a
statistical
fact
that
can
never
be
challenged
by
this
city,
because
it's
the
truth
from
2016.
K
Until
this
quarter,
95
to
115
percent
of
market
rate
housing
goals
have
been
met
year
over
year
quarter
over
quarter
at
the
same
time,
in
the
same
time
period
the
threshold
of
25
of
Eli
vla,
affordable
housing.
However,
you
want
to
Define
it
put
it
this
way.
The
rest
of
us
has
never
breaking
25.
That
threshold
is
never
broken
at
the
State
of
the
Union
Address.
K
Are
the
mayor
of
San
Jose
stood
up
and
said
specifically
that
the
people
that
are
in
the
creeps,
the
people
that
are
living
homeless?
Now
it
is
not
their
fault,
nor
is
it
their
responsibility.
It
is
the
failures
of
myself
and
the
council.
End
quote:
okay
and
the
cut
the
way
that
this
Council
talks
about.
N
Okay
meetings
adjourned
until
six
o'clock
thanks
everyone.