►
From YouTube: JUN 21, 2022 | City Council Afternoon Session
Description
City of San José, California
City Council Afternoon Session of June 21, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=51&event_id=4682
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
A
A
A
C
A
A
A
E
Okay,
just
as
I
was
admiring
my
extraordinary
leadership
for
supersonic
speed
and
moving
through
this
agenda,
we
look.
It
appears
that
we
need
to
go
backward
to
items
3.5
to
address
a
technical
issue
due
to
conflict,
so
we're
going
to
vote
on
this
we're
going
to
take
two
separate
boats
on
item
3.5,
which
is
the
approval
of
terms
agreements,
the
various
bargaining
units
and
so
I'll.
First
I'll
entertain
a
motion.
I
guess
we
do
have
to
reconsider
first,
or
can
we
just
vote
separate.
G
E
H
B
E
A
G
A
G
A
I
E
E
A
J
K
E
E
A
A
Friend,
director
of
housing
will
be
here
momentarily,
but
now
you
have
me,
you
also
have
andrea,
flores
shelton,
our
deputy
and
olympia
williams,
our
division
manager.
So
if
you
want
to
get
into
the
encampment
management
side
of
things
to
begin
with,
jackie
will
be
here
in
a
few
minutes.
I
do
want
to
just
give
the
council
one
quick
update
that
we
didn't
know
by
the
time
the
memo
published
but
I'll.
E
K
All
right,
hi,
blair,
beekman
here
I
was
a
little
late
for
the
meeting
today.
You
know
for
the
other
items
on
today's
agenda.
I
hope
you
can
remember.
I
don't
know
I've
been
going
to
these
meetings
for
a
number
of
years
now,
and
I
think
you
can
get
a
sense
of
how
I
can
my
voice
and
my
feelings
about
some
of
the
previous
agenda
items
for
this
item.
K
K
K
You
know
the
superstitions
we
all
can
have
at
this
sort
of
process.
It's
important
that
people
can
get
their
cars
towed
and
you
do
a
good
service
if
you
can
tow
those
cars
for
them.
So
good
luck:
how
to
address
that
sort
of
issue
with
ourselves
and
it
should
be
open
and
free
and
yeah.
Just
good
luck
how
we
can
make
that
an
open
conversation.
Thank
you.
I
I
I
So
the
good
news
is
that
we've
seen
a
significant
decrease
in
illegal
dumping
around
the
perimeter.
We
think
the
cameras
are
acting
as
a
deterrent.
We
are
also
seeing
stolen
vehicles
that
were
a
spike
in
april.
That's
also
reduced.
We
also
have
note
there
is
a
camera
on
taylor
and
irene.
That
actually
has
pd
has
a
camera
on
it.
So
anything
that
we're
doing
with
vsj
is
in
coordination
with
code
mpd.
I
So
we
will
continue
to
work
with
the
vendor
to
make
sure
that
we
can
have
cameras
that
we've
deployed
also
be
implemented
fully.
So
what
I
got
from
that
andreas?
We
we
have
some
cameras,
but
we
maybe
don't
have
the
footage,
we're
basically
using
them
in
a
deterrent
mode
right
now,
we're
not
ticketing.
I
D
And
it's
also
because
that
first
question
that
you
asked
me
about,
which
is
people
getting
ready
and
finding
their
paperwork
so
we're
anticipating
more
people
will
be
ready
and
it
also
takes
more
time
for
people
just
to
find
the
actual
housing.
So
if
they
have
a,
for
example,
a
rapid
rehousing
or
rental
assistance
program,
it
there
we're
not
going
to
see
anyone
moving
most
likely
or
very
few
who
move
in
the
first
month.
But
we
begin
to
see
movement
much
greater
movement
in
the
second
month,
because
again
the
paperwork
and
actually
finding
a
place.
D
I
I
I
think,
you're
just
talking
about
the
people
whose
names
we
didn't
originally
have
when
we
did
the
initial
outreach
and
count,
and
at
that
time
it
was
very
specific
to
this
count.
I
don't
have
any
updated
numbers
regarding
how
many
of
the
people
we
have
actually
identified
since
then,
but
I
am
happy
to
forward
that
information
to
you
later
this
week.
E
E
I
E
E
E
E
A
A
E
E
C
C
C
It
is
a
89
unit,
hotel
in
december
of
2021,
the
city
applied
to
the
california
department
of
housing
and
community
development
development's
home
key
program
for
funding
to
acquire,
rehabilitate
and
operate
the
site.
In
may
2022,
hdc
announced
the
city
had
been
awarded
a
home
key
award
in
the
amount
of
approximately
25
million
dollars.
C
The
city
is
working
with
the
developer
urban
housing
communities
and
the
service
provider
home
first
on
the
site.
In
the
short
term,
the
property
will
provide
immediate
interim
housing
to
individuals
and
families
experiencing
homelessness.
Such
individuals
in
the
surrounding
areas
will
be
invited
to
the
property
and
it
is
anticipated.
The
residents
at
the
guadalupe
gardens
encampment
will
be
invited
as
well
to
the
property.
C
E
Thank
you,
kenneth
and
thank
you
jackie,
both
for
the
work
and
for
the
great
news
and
securing
these
dollars.
Obviously,
it's
a
very
competitive
program,
statewide
and
it
says
a
lot
weren't
able
to
get
that
large,
a
commitment,
obviously
testament
to
a
really
strong
proposal
that
the
team
put
together.
Okay,
let's
go
to
the
public.
K
Hi,
what
beakman
here
my
mouse
is
having
difficulty.
You
know,
unmuting.
Sorry
yeah
for
this
item.
First,
a
thank
you.
You
know
in
the
on
the
previous
on
my
previous
public
comment.
I
know
the
city
government
really
tries
hard
to
come
through
for
the
community,
but
there's
that
super
it's
in
a
superstition
that
I
hope
by
talking
about
it
can
be
of
help
to
all
of
us,
and
the
same
goes
for
this
item
myself.
F
E
Okay
motion.
Second:
I
want
to
also
thank
councilmember
davis
for
support
this
project
in
her
district,
as
well
as
councillor
prowlis,
because
we
started
this
whole
business
of
motel
conversions
back
before
gavin
newsom
made
it
cool,
I
guess,
went
back
in
2015
and
then
we
made
the
first
two
purchases
in
2016.
I
think-
and
I
think
it's
been
a
very
successful
model
and
it's
great
to
see
us
continue
to
expand
this.
Obviously
the
need
is
far
greater,
but
we'll
continue
to
make
really
rapid
progress
this
way.
So
thank
you
one
last
question.
E
D
Sure
the
reason
why
we
picked
15
was
because,
when
we
transitioned
people
out
of
the
what
was
known
as
the
jungle
many
many
years
ago,
we
actually
placed
everyone
in
or
the
overwhelming
majority
of
people
into
one
hotel,
and
we
found
that
that
put
a
lot
of
stress
on
the
hotel.
And
so
it
was
recommended
by
almost
everyone
that
worked
on
that
project.
For
me
to
limit
the
number
of
people
in
each
facility
in
order
to
limit
the
impact
to
the
overall
facility
and
people
actual
units
themselves.
So.
D
E
C
Again
good
afternoon,
mayor
and
city
council
kevin
mawakana
division
manager
in
the
housing
department,
along
with
jackie
morales
fran
director
of
housing.
I'm
happy
to
bring
forward
the
first
funding
commitments
resulting
from
our
recent
notice
of
funding
available
availability
process,
which
was
issued
in
december
of
2021.
C
Starting
with
tamiya
station
cayman
station
will
consist
of
a
five-story
building
with
135
total
residential
apartments
and
a
3
000
square
foot
commercial
space
to
be
used
as
a
child
care
center
core.
The
developer
has
partnered,
with
the
low-income
investment
fund
in
santa
clara
county
santa
clara
county
office
of
education,
to
solicit
proposals
from
title
v;
child
care
providers
to
offer
subsidized
child
care
services.
C
C
C
C
C
Third
project
is
1860,
1860,
alum
rock,
again
charities
housing.
The
developer
is
proposing
to
develop
own
and
manage
a
new
mixed
use.
60
60-unit,
5-story,
100,
affordable
housing
development
located
at
1860,
alum
rock
the
ground
floor
will
contain
approximately
3
100
square
feet
of
commercial
space,
residential
common
area,
utility
spaces,
bicycle
storage
and
enclosed
parking.
C
The
upper
floors
will
include
59,
affordable
units
and
one
unrestricted
managers.
Unit
charities
has
partnered
with
amigos
de
guadalupe
to
develop
a
new
amigos
de
guadalupe
center
for
justice
and
empowerment
in
the
commercial
portion
of
the
development
from
the
current
location
across
the
street
from
the
proposed
1860
alum
rock
housing
development.
C
They
serve
east
san
jose
residents
with
services
ranging
from
education,
housing,
immigration
and
advocacy
amigos
de
guadalupe
in
charities.
Housing
entered
into
a
memorandum
of
understanding
in
january
of
2021
for
charities
to
provide
support
in
the
entitlement,
design
and
financing
of
the
development
and
amigos
de
guadalupe
will
provide
advocacy,
support
and
fundraising
for
the
development
of
the
commercial
portion
as
necessary.
C
They
are
seeking
funding
of
7.5
million
from
the
city
and
the
county
is
contributing
over
8.5
million
again.
The
necessary
authorizations
are
approval
of
ltv
in
excess
of
100
approval
of
float-up
language
to
allow
for
rent
increases
in
the
event
of
foreclosure
and
authorization
to
the
director
of
housing
to
negotiate
and
execute
relevant
documents.
C
And
the
fourth
of
the
four
projects
coming
forward
for
funding
commitments
is
777.
West
san,
carlos
777,
west
san
carlos,
affordable
housing
development
is
proposing
a
funding
commitment
of
19
million
to
danko
communities
to
design,
develop,
construct
and
manage
a
new
154
unit,
affordable
housing
development
on
1.22
acres.
The
building
is
a
six
story.
Five
over
one
podium
style
structure.
The
building
will
be
served
by
two
elevators
and
be
fully
accessible
for
california
accessibility
standards.
C
Community
amenities
include
a
multi-purpose
room
community
room
with
a
full
kitchen,
manager's
office
and
therapy
rooms
for
individual
sessions.
There
will
also
be
a
fitness
room,
yoga
room
bike,
parking
bike,
repair
area,
package,
storage,
storage
area,
pet
grooming,
room
trash
room
and
multiple
elevators
child
care.
There
will
also
be
a
child
care
center.
C
C
C
D
Thank
you.
Thank
you
kemet.
So,
yes,
I
think
what
I
was
struck
by
listening
to
some
of
those
descriptions
is
how
closely
affordable
is
now
coming
to
having
a
look
and
feel
of
what
market
rate
developments
have
so
with
child
care
on
site
bike
facilities,
where
they
can,
people
can
repair
fitness
rooms,
places
where
people
can
have
community
space
or
things
that
really
help
to
make
a
place
seem
like
home.
D
Additional
benefits
include,
while
the
city
is
investing
in
these
four
developments
over
53
million
dollars,
we
are
leveraging
329
million
dollars
of
investment,
so
for
every
one
dollar
that
the
city
spends
over
six
dollars
is
invested
as
a
result
of
it.
This
commitment,
the
other
thing,
is
that
these
are
loans.
They
are
not
grants
and
that
the
funding
gets
repaid
over
time
for
the
housing
department.
This
has
been
significant.
D
The
only
reason
we
survived,
and
there
were
very
few
housing
departments
that
survived
the
elimination
of
redevelopment
was
because
we
had
such
a
large
loan
portfolio.
The
majority
of
the
housing
department
at
the
time
that
I
took
over
was
funded
by
those
loan
repayments.
We've
managed
over
time,
thanks
to
your
funding
commitments
through
the
housing
impact
fee,
the
commercial
linkage
fee,
we've
created
other
funding
streams
for
the
housing
department,
but
loan
repayments
provides
one
of
those
funding
streams.
D
The
other
thing
that
we
see
in
these
out
of
these
four
developments
is
that
two
of
them
are
going
to
be
providing
child
care
centers
and
we're
offering
non-profit
space.
This
is
a
dramatic
change
than
from
what
we
have
seen
in
the
past
and
again,
these
investments
have
come
because
of
our
partnerships
on
the
child
care
side
with
the
library.
D
So
I
wanted
to
thank
jill,
borden
and
her
staff
for
helping
us
and
then
our
commitment
to
really
help
non-profits
and
to
try
to
create
more
partnerships
with
our
affordable
housing
and
the
nonprofit
community,
because
we
understand
the
importance
of
having
really
some
community
and
commercial
space
on
the
ground
floor
and
then,
lastly,
these
investments
also
provide
fees
to
the
city,
so
they
will
be
paying
a
little
over
five
million
dollars
in
impact
fees
and
taxes
that
benefit
us.
And
then
I
just
want
to
close
that.
D
Most
importantly,
what
these
investments
bring
to
us
is
that
they
create
a
home
for
individuals
and
families
who
have
been
priced
out
of
our
communities,
including
our
most
vulnerable
residents,
who
are
unhoused
and
living
on
our
streets
and
are
strongly
struggling.
Families
who
live
in
overcrowded
in
unsafe
conditions
or
for
people
who
are
spending
a
significant
amount
of
their
incomes
on
their
rents.
D
We
can
see
that
rents
are
increasing
every
year
again.
After
the
recovery
from
covid-
and
it
will
continue
to
be
a
challenge
for
people
who
make
low
income
and
some
modern
income
wages
for
people
to
afford
rental
housing,
and
so
these
investments
are
very
important,
and
so
with
that
we
are
available
for
questions.
Thank
you.
E
F
F
F
There
are
a
lot
of
single
single
fan
or
one
bedroom
studios,
one
or
two
two
bedrooms,
but
this
has
a
lot
of
focus
on
families
which
I
think
is
really
really
critical
and
to
that
goes
the
child
care
centers,
which
is
really
important
to
allow
those
moms
and
dads
to
put
their
kids
in
child
care
and
then
go
out
and
work
or
seek
employment.
That's
really
critical!
I'm
really
excited
to
see
that
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
for
you,
though,
specifically
regarding
777
west
san
carlos.
F
D
F
D
F
F
F
D
F
H
I
thought
there
was
going
to
be
a
delay
in
this,
but
it's
it's
really
wonderful
to
see.
All
of
this.
All
of
these
projects
come
into
the
pipeline
and
I
was
wondering:
is
there
any
additional
projects
that
are
in
the
pipeline
that
are
eligible
for
child
care,
tenant
improvements
and
for
the
fund
that
we
have.
D
We're
continuing
to
work
to
identify
potential
other
developments
that
will
be
able
to
include
child
care.
So
it's
something
that
we
are
now
in
discussions
with
with
each
developer
that
we
meet
with
and
we
try
to
get
the
word
out
early,
because
the
child
care
facilities
often
can
require
outdoor
space
or
particular
planning
requirements.
H
Awesome
awesome
awesome,
awesome
and
I
would
encourage
for
there
to
be
child
care
beyond
five
years
of
age.
I
know
that
a
lot
of
the
times
we
think
about
up
to
five
because
they
potentially
are
not
in
school,
but
there's
a
lot
of
school-aged
children
that
need
care
at
justice
just
as
much
and
so
hopefully
that's
something
that
can
be
incorporated.
D
So,
in
terms
of
the
capacity
to
to
serve
children
and
the
age
range,
that
is
something
that
the
developer
my
guest
is
going
to
be
working
on
depending
upon
the
space
needs,
because
the
space
needs
are
all
going
to
be
very
different
depending
on
the
kids.
So,
ideally-
and
I
don't
know,
if
jill
has
anything
more,
she
would
add
on
how
we
decide
or
partner
with
people
in
terms
of
the
different
facilities
that
are
going
in.
H
H
I
City
librarian
yeah:
I
we
initially
scoped
the
projects
around
early
child
care
zero
to
five,
but
that's
you
know
doesn't
mean
that
we
can't
reach
out
to
our
partners
and
explore
what
additional
child
care
could
look
like
for
the
five
to
twelve
set
after
school
summer,
that
sort
of
thing
and
what
the
flexibility
would
be.
And
then
we
could
bring
that
back
to
council.
H
Yeah,
that
would
be
wonderful
jill,
since
we
know
that
in
the
pipeline
there's
also
preschool
for
all,
and
so
those
children
will
be
served
by
our
school
districts
soon
enough
and
I'm
gonna
knock
on
wood
and-
and
I
think
the
older
children
are
the
ones
that
are
going
to
end
up
needing
our
support.
So
I'm
excited
congratulations!
H
D
I
didn't
just
want
to
jump
in
on
how
you
found
the
ant
response
on
the
556
parking
spaces,
so
it
was,
it
included
the
authority
for
transit
spaces
as
well,
so
there's
147
that
are
the
transit
parking
that
was
part
of
that
there's
some
private
parking
as
well
for
residential
and
communities
and
some
short-term
parking
for
the
transit
as
well.
So
that's
why
there's
so
much
parking.
E
E
E
E
E
D
D
We
used
to
do
this
10
years
ago,
where
we
would
kind
of
try
to
control
the
pipeline
so
that
we
wouldn't
have
our
own
developments
competing
against
each
other,
and
so
we're
trying
to
look
at
a
model
that
will
help
us
to
better
align
our
funding
and
our
submittal.
So
at
least
on
this
county
side
we
don't
we're
not
trying
to
over
subscribe
or
compete
amongst
ourselves.
D
The
other
piece
is,
we
want
to
use
the
nine
percents
more,
that
used
to
be
the
primary
mechanism,
even
though
there
wasn't
a
lot
and
we're
finding
our
developers
crazy,
leasing
going
going
through.
The
four
percent
seems
to
be
easier
and
they're
more
competitive,
but
we
would
like
to
also
start
figuring
out
how
we
have
access
to
the
nine
percent
side
as
well,
so
we're
hoping
with
the
changes
that
were
made
in
silac,
that
we'll
have
better
opportunities
to
be
competitive,
but
that's
the
best
we
can
do
right
now.
E
E
L
D
E
E
Getting
families
lined
up
to
be
able
to
take
the
available
units
and
I'm
just
wondering
to
what
extent
there
is
some
flexibility
for
the
managers.
The
operators
of
these
facilities
be
able
to
move
the
li
eli
designations
around
from
one
unit
to
another,
based
on
where
the
need
is
to
be
able
to
best
address
the
needs
so
that
we're
not
leaving
some
people
out
on
the
street
while
a
unit's
vacant.
E
D
Yeah,
no,
and
mostly
because
it's
all
the
amount
of
their
loans
are
set
based
on
the
amount
of
rents
that
they
generate,
and
so
a
three
bedroom
at
30
would
generate
way
less
than
a
a
one
bedroom,
and
so
just
right
it
would
change
all
the
financing.
I
think
you
know
to
the
extent
we
have
the
most
the
more
affordable
threes
and
twos.
D
K
D
D
No
because
many
of
these
particular
apartments
are
just
regular
affordable,
so
these
are
a
good
mix
of
both
permanent
supportive
housing
and
affordable,
and
so
and
even
with
the
permanent
support
of
housing,
the
county
has
done
an
excellent
job
in
really
improving
their
ability
to
move
people
into
apartments
and,
to
the
extent
we're
able
to
eventually
work
on
a
program.
You
know
right
now
they
have
an
actual
site
where
they
put
people
in
as
they're
waiting
for
their
apartments.
D
E
Okay,
well,
thank
you,
jackie
and
thank
you
kenneth.
This
is
great
to
see
this,
this
kind
of
448
units-
that's
that's,
going
to
help
an
awful
lot
of
families,
so
that
and
and
people
that's
great.
I
just
want
to
also
thank
our
residents
for
approving
measure
e.
I
think
you
know
we
never
would
have
foreseen
here.
E
E
G
G
I
mentioned
earlier
a
couple
months
ago
when
we
recognized
cerebral
palsy
awareness
month
about
my
aunt
and
my
aunt
is
currently
in
a
rehab
facility.
Hopefully,
we'll
be
getting
back
out
and
she's
lived
in
a
traditional
apartment,
one
that
she
will
not
be
able
to
move
back
into
and
she
is
going
to
be
in
desperate
need
of
a
type
of
development
like
this,
for
people
of
all
abilities
and-
and
so
we
desperately
need
more
of
these-
and
and
I'm
excited
about
this
opportunity.
G
G
But
we
were
able
to
come
to
a
a
great
final
product
here
and-
and
I'm
tremendously
excited
about
this-
and
I
do
want
to
invite
my
colleagues
because
we
will
be
celebrating
the
the
groundbreaking
of
the
project
on
july
30th
at
3
30
over
at
447,
north
first
street
and
I'll,
ask
my
team
and
make
sure
that
that
you
are
each
invited.
If
you
wanted
to
come
out
and
then
celebrate
that
at
san
pedro
market
square
immediately
following
the
the
groundbreaking
at
5
pm
again
on
july
30th.
F
E
E
And
thank
you
council,
member
for
your
leadership
in
the
community.
This
was
involved
a
lot
of
tough
conversations
because
we
do
have
a
single
family
neighborhood
right
behind
it.
There
was
a
lot
of
concern
about
the
density
and
size
and
so
forth,
and
the
developer
the
affordable
builder
here
is
really,
I
think,
very
collaborative,
and
I'm
glad
what
has
resulted
in
something
fantastic
like
this
all
right.
Let's
go
to
the
public.
A
G
A
E
E
D
M
M
Joining
me
on
this
item
are
james
stagey,
housing,
development
administrator
in
the
public
works
department,
matt
cano,
the
director
of
public
works,
jackie
morales,
frand,
our
director
of
housing
and
in
the
back
row,
rosen
huey
and
omar
passins
of
the
city
manager's
office,
they're.
Also
on
our
eih
team.
We
have
about
a
15
slide
presentation,
we'll
try
and
move
briefly
through
this.
M
In
september,
2021
mayor
le
cardo
and
councilmembers
foley,
perales
mahan
and
jimenez
issued
a
rules
memo
that
focused
on
increasing
the
supply
of
emergency
interim
housing
and
home
key
units,
as
well
as
identifying
additional
funding
and
operational
strategies.
Specifically,
it
called
for
1
000
pandemic
era.
Eih
units
and
300
home
key
units
sites
should
be
spread
across
six
council
districts
where
no
projects
have
been
built
to
date.
M
In
this
category
of
shelter
housing,
it
should
focus
on
more
effective
and
efficient
operations
of
existing
and
future
emergency
room,
housing
facilities
and
coordination
with
the
county
related
to
providing
services
at
these
facilities.
So
with
that
direction,
we
started
moving
forward
with
our
work
plan
and
efforts.
Before
I
get
into
the
details
of
our
recommendations,
there
are
three
council
member
memos
actually
one
issued
by
mayor
licardo
and
councilmembers
perales
and
foley
and
won
by
councilman
cohen,
and
then
this
morning
there
was
another
memorandum
issued
by
councilmember
mayhem.
M
So
significant
progress
has
been
made
to
date
during
previous
phases
of
emergency
interim
housing,
development
and
pro
and
the
project
home
key
program
that
pro
that
progress
you
can
see
on
the
screen.
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
detail
it's
outlined
in
the
staff
report
as
well.
I
think
it's
safe
to
say:
we've
made
a
tremendous
amount
of
progress,
but
the
need
is
still
substantial
and
that's.
Why
we're
here
today
to
make
additional
recommendations
on
the
next
phase
of
development.
M
M
So
the
rules
committee
in
september
of
last
year,
the
discussion
and
direction,
was
to
focus
on
existing
lists
of
potential
sites,
so
those
existing
lists
had
over
140
sites
on
them,
but
many
on
the
list
were
not
feasible
or
were
minimally
feasible
at
best.
In
fact,
the
best
six
sites
have
already
been
used
for
our
existing
bridge
housing
and
emergency
housing
sites.
M
Additional
direction
was
provided
to
seek
out
more
caltrans
sites
and
to
evaluate
whether
expansion
of
existing
sites
made
practical
sense
as
well,
and
so
we
included
that
in
our
search
effort
about
45
sites
focused
mainly
in
the
six
districts
that
don't
have.
An
interim
housing
facility
today
warranted
and
received
an
initial
site
visit
to
rule
out
obvious
fatal
flaws
like
steep
slopes
or
unusable
site
configurations.
M
However,
even
though
a
project
could
be
technically
viable
and
we
could
build
some
level
of
project,
it
doesn't
mean
it's
practical
or
be
a
good
use
of
city
funding.
It
just
may
not
yield
enough
units
to
meet
the
significant
demand
that
we
have
so
with
high
demand
for
more
shelter
and
limited
funding
and
staff
capacity
to
build
and
operate
sites.
Determining
which
are
the
most
practical
is
the
most
critical
step
in
the
process.
M
A
practicality
phase
focuses
on
conditions
and
characteristics
that
make
up
the
best
sites,
including
location
size,
shape.
Do
we
own
it
and
if
not,
can
it
be
assembled
or
controlled?
If
so,
how
quickly
can
we
do
that
and
how
much
would
it
cost
to
do
that
sites?
The
city
owns
typically
have
the
best
path
to
project
development,
because
it
eliminates
site
control
issues,
external
agency
review
and
overly
conservative
standards
that
we've
experienced
working
with
other
agencies
at
times
cost
and
time
to
deliver
will
be
greater
if
the
city
is
not
the
owner.
M
Practicality
of
a
site
is
also
assessed
through
the
initial
layout
work
or
access
to
the
site.
Utility
connections
flow
around
a
site,
potential
building
locations
and
capacity
and
unit
count
are
estimated
that
information
has
led
to
what
we
believe
is
the
most
practical
slate
of
sites
of
six
sites
to
meet
council
direction
in
districts
that
don't
have
projects
to
do
so
in
a
cost-effective
manner
and
deploy
the
projects
as
quickly
as
possible,
with
most
of
them
in
project
development
by
december
2022.
M
M
Four
of
them
are
in
districts
that
do
not
have
facilities
which,
when
completed
with
the
existing
sites,
would
bring
the
number
to
eight
in
terms
of
the
number
of
city
council
districts
with
an
eih
facility.
So
we're
we'd
be
approaching
eighty
percent
of
the
goal
that
was
laid
out
a
number
of
years
back
of
all
the
sites,
two
are
city
owned
and
four
are
caltrans
owned
on
this
list.
M
Moving
on
to
the
individual
sites,
this
slide
identifies
the
two
sites
recommended
for
a
new
development.
Excuse
me
for
for
existing
development
expansion.
I
mean
and
the
city-owned
guadalupe
site
currently
under
construction
and
the
roof
ferrari
site,
currently
an
existing
site
lease
from
caltrans
that
has
capacity
to
expand
both
within
the
existing
perimeter
and
on
the
undeveloped
land
on
the
site.
Both
are
efficient
sites
for
expansion
from
a
development
and
operations
standpoint.
I
think
we've
proven
out
the
roof
ferrari
site
and
we
anticipate
a
similar
experience
with
the
guadalupe
site
as
well.
M
M
All
of
them
have
challenges,
we've
always
experienced
that,
and
I
I'm
confident
we
would
have
challenges
here
too,
but
I
think,
as
far
as
new
sites
go,
these
two
have
many
practical
advantages.
The
noble
site
is
city
owned.
It's
nice
size
about
two
acres.
It's
flat,
it's
accessible,
it
has
utilities.
Nearby
project
can
yield
about
a
hundred
units,
making
a
major
contribution
to
the
400
unit
gap.
We're
trying
to
close.
M
We
do
acknowledge,
though
there
are
potential
proximity
concerns
with
the
residential
neighborhood.
Both
the
mayor,
councilman,
corrales
and
foley
memo
and
the
councilmember
cohen.
Memo
have
recommendations
related
to
this
noble
avenue
site.
The
mayor,
pearl's
foley
memo
directs
the
housing
department
to
explore
the
need
for
shelter
for
women
and
seniors
and
whether
dedicating
units
towards
those
populations
at
the
noble
avenue
site
would
be
warranted.
So
that
would
be
part
of
the
design
and
project
development
evaluation
and
would
be
coordinated
with
the
mayor's
office,
the
council
office
and
the
community.
M
We
think
that
it
should
be
with
the
understanding,
though,
that
a
project
is
planned
for
this
location
and
the
notification
outreach
would
aim
to
inform
the
community
the
sighting
the
ideas
for
design
operations
and
how
to
approach
community
compatibility,
be
a
critical
focus
of
the
outreach
and
it
not
be
given
the
opportunity
to
reject
the
site.
We've
experienced
that
before
what
we
could
approach
is
something
similar
to
what
we
did
in
district
2
and
6
in
2020.
M
When
we
developed
a
couple
of
projects
very
rapidly,
both
of
those
districts
held
initial
community
meetings.
We
did
experience
opposition
in
district
2
from
surrounding
neighborhoods,
but
ultimately
through
the
design
and
development
process
and
the
good
work
of
the
council
office
and
the
community
advisory
committee.
A
collaborative
effort
emerged
to
create
a
good
coexistence
between
the
surrounding
community
and
the
emergency
interim
housing
site,
and
so
some
of
that
approach
could
be
applied
at
the
noble
site.
M
You
know
we
would
recommend
that
we
work
with
the
council
office
the
mayor's
office
to
figure
out
what's
the
best
way
to
proceed
from
a
community
outreach
standpoint
and
then
moving
on
to
the
85
great
oak
side.
At
first
glance,
the
large
site
at
85
and
great
oaks
could
deliver
up
to
100
units
as
well.
M
It
has
many
good
characteristics,
however,
as
we
noted
in
the
staff
report,
when
coordinating
with
calc
fans
on
that
site,
they
informed
staff
that
the
30-foot
setbacks
that
we've
previously
had
projects
approved
with
were
likely
changing
to
about
50
feet
and
on
narrow
sites.
That's
that's
substantial
that
that
can
have
an
impact
and,
in
addition,
they're
planning
to
sell
about
25
feet,
25
feet,
swath
of
the
property
on
the
southern
portion
of
the
site
for
an
underground
utility
project
that
could
have
impacts
as
well.
M
But
this
morning,
myself
and
and
james
met
with
the
developer
of
the
project.
They
very
much
are
willing
to
work
with
us.
They
still
have
a
go
no-go
decision
to
make
on
the
project,
but
we
believe
this
is
still
very
much
a
viable
site
and
thinks
and
think
it
should
be.
We
should
proceed
forward
in
that
evaluation.
M
Moving
on
to
the
last
two
sites
that
we're
recommending
that
were
recommended
as
future
priorities,
they're
both
caltrans
owned
at
680
in
jackson,
85
and
prospect
the
reality
in
both
districts,
five
and
one
is
they're
densely
developed.
They
have
limited
available
sites,
particularly
publicly
owned
sites.
M
M
We
have
two
slides
here
on
alternatives
in
district
10
and
district
4.,
looking
at
the
district
10
alternatives.
First,
if
the
85
grade
oak
site
did
not
work
out,
we
have
a
site
at
85
in
santa
teresa,
near
oak
ridge,
mall,
it's
an
alternative,
caltrans
location,
it's
smaller
than
the
great
oak
site.
M
It
does
have
challenges
related
to
setbacks
and
slopes,
but
nonetheless
a
project
could
be
viable
there,
but
the
question
how
many
units
it
could
yield
probably
is
more
in
the
50
unit
range,
so
it
is
smaller
and
it
would
yield
less
likely.
The
more
technically
viable
site
is
the
large
vta
site
at
the
end
of
the
light
rail
line
in
south
san
jose
at
the
santa
teresa
station.
It's
a
large
35-acre
site
and
it
has
areas
that
are
undeveloped
on
the
site
about
a
four
point.
M
Acre
portion
of
the
site
on
the
southeast
corner,
furthest
away
from
residential,
could
make
a
very
practical
emergency
housing
site
sort
of.
There
are
memorandums
that
speak
to
to
this
location
as
well.
The
member
from
councilman
mahan
recommends
that
staff
work
with
his
office
in
the
mayor's
office
to
evaluate
a
slate
of
alternative
sites,
and
then
the
mayor,
perales
foley
memo
suggests
looking
at
alternatives
only
if
the
85
great
oak
site
proves
not
viable
moving
on
to
the
alternatives
in
district
four.
M
This
slide
identifies
two
sites
in
district
four
that
were
initially
considered
alternatives.
If
the
noble
avenue
site
was
not
the
preferred
site
of
the
city
council,
the
two
sites
are
primarily
san
jose
water
company,
owned
sites,
they're
privately
owned.
So,
given
the
interest
in
alternative
sites
in
this
district
staff
presented
these
alternatives
and
initiated
further
work
determine
their
viability.
M
So
we've
focused
our
attention
back
on
the
1.1
acre
and
0.5
acre
site
on
the
upper
left
corner
of
the
picture
on
the
right
as
a
potential
site,
a
small
site,
maybe
up
to
30
units,
so
that
could
be
an
alternative
in
district
4
as
well.
The
water
company
did
offer
a
couple
other
sites.
One
was
too
small
and
the
other
one
we
had
previously
looked
at.
D
Thanks
jim
first
of
all,
thank
you
for
showing
such
leadership
and
helping
us
to
identify
sites
the
housing
department's
very
grateful
for
the
work
that
you've
been
doing.
We
have
worked.
The
housing
department
has
worked
with
the
budget
office
to
develop
a
funding
proposal
that
really
ensures
that
we'll
be
able
to
operate
the
sites
as
we
go
forward.
As
you
know,
that's
always
been.
My
primary
concern
is
that
we
want
to
ensure
that
we
can
build
them.
D
We
can
continue
to
create
services
for
people
who
are
living
there,
and
so
the
budget
office
prepared-
and
you
all
approved
the
mba
number
three,
which
provided
a
detailed
overview
for
that
funding
plan
that
allows
us
to
expand
our
emergency
interim
housing
sites
in
san
jose.
Part
of
that
plan
includes
a
commitment
of
60
million
dollars
of
general
fund
and
arp
money
in
order
to
create
a
development
and
operations
budget
and
plan.
D
D
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
that
the
way
the
sites
currently
work,
we
welcome
residents
who
are
unhoused,
who
are
living
in
the
surrounding
areas
of
these
facilities.
So
that's
the
has
been
the
first
priority
in
filling
up
the
sites.
Secondly,
we
are
committed
to
filling
the
sites
up
with
people
who
live
at
the
guadalupe
gardens
right
now
in
order
to
make
and
reach
our
commitment
of
ensuring
that
we
have
moved
everyone
by
the
fall
of
this
year.
A
Public
works
staff
will
continue
to
work
with
the
city,
manager's
office
and
housing
as
directed
same
with
the
future
sites.
So
the
two
sites
that
we
have
as
future
priorities,
even
though
we
may
not
be
starting
construction
on
those
right
away,
we'll
continue
to
keep
evaluating
those
sites.
Looking
at
the
things
that
we
need
to
do
to
be
prepared
to
start
construction.
A
Check
looking
at
site
grades
tree
counts,
I'm
really
evaluating
the
sites
to
prepare
for
construction.
We've
conducted
initial
analysis
for
environmental
conditions,
but
there
are
things
that
we're
going
to
have
to
continue
to
look
at
for
further
analysis
and
then
concurrently,
we'll
be
working
with
the
partner
agencies
such
as
caltrans
vta,
on
agreements.
A
M
This
third
phase,
directed
by
the
council,
aims
to
complete
the
goal
of
an
eih
in
all
10
council
districts
by
adding
six
more
sites
across
the
city.
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
community
acceptance
probably
has
not
changed
a
lot
except
in
areas
where
we
have
a
bhc
or
an
eih
project,
and
we
have
a
community
advisory
committee,
but
future
community
notification.
M
Outreach
needs
to
be
considered
thoughtfully
and
with
this
history
in
mind,
staff
recommends
that
we
do
it
as
a
collaborative
approach
and
a
tailored
approach
with
the
mayor's
office
and
the
affected
council
office
and
the
city
administration.
It
should
be
focused
on
notification
and
outreach.
It
should
be
focused
on
ensuring
community
compatibility
with
the
project.
It
should
be
focused
on
good
design
and
good
support
services,
but
not
on
the
ability
to
veto
the
project
or
the
likely
outcome
is
that
new
projects
won't
move
forward.
M
K
I
don't
know
how
much
it
relates
to
this
item,
but
all
my
talk
these
past
few
months
about
how
we
need
to
practice
the
ideas
of
subsidy
with
low
income
housing.
You
know
when
these
first,
these
subsidy
plans
in
the
age
of
cobit
first
started
coming
down.
I
first
learned
about
this
in
berkeley
and
they
were
talking
about.
You
know
the
home
key
program
and
all
this
new
money
coming
in,
but
they
had
a
major
focus
on
how
you
know
that
the
issue
is
up
for
decades.
K
Now
you
know
in
trying
to
house
people
the
reason
why
they
fall
out
of
housing
is
not
because
they
they're
not
they're,
not
pulling
themselves
up
by
their
bootstraps
and
and
ready
to
go
to
work
and
everything.
It's
that
they
just
simply
don't
have
the
money
to
continue
paying
for
their
rent
each
month
and
and
they
really
they
have
a
trouble
in
falling
behind,
and
we
can't.
K
That's
the
kind
of
things
we're
not
talking
about
here
that
really
need
to
be
addressed,
and
I
don't
think
it
should
be
a
fearful
subject.
It
can
be
a
bit
dicey
and
difficult.
It's
always
difficult
to
talk
about
subsidy
and
to
be
relying
on
it,
but
I
think
it's
something
we
have
to
address
we're
addressing
a
decades
old
issue
that
once
people
we
find
housing
for
people,
they
can't
stay
in
it
because
they
simply
can't
afford
it
and
that
that
does
mean
job
training.
K
That
means
a
whole
bunch
of
different
experiences
that
they
need
the
subsidy
help
and
support
for
that,
and
we
have
that
now
and
yet
we
don't
make
that
more
clear
to
ourselves
how
we
can
work
on
those
good
goals.
I
think
that's
the
way
to
build
a
positiveness
and
hope
for
our
future.
I
hope
you
can
talk
about
these
things
more
often
and
good
luck
on
how
you
talk
about
these
issues.
Thank
you.
G
I
Hi,
thank
you.
I'd
like
two
sites
removed
number
six
at
prospect
and
85
of
30
units
on
the
caltrains
property,
because
the
infrastructure
in
the
area
doesn't
meet
does
not
meet
the
current
population's
needs.
It's
way
behind,
and
there
are
so
many
thousands
of
units
proposed
to
be
added
to
the
area.
It
is
just
overwhelming
and
not
viable
on
top
of
that,
I'd,
like
noble
percolation
ponds
removed
in
order
to
protect
the
water
from
any
pollution
that
results
from
development
as
well
as
enable
us
to
expand
the
pawns
in
the
future.
E
Thank
you
all
right.
I
really
want
to
thank
jim
james
matt,
jackie
rosalind,
the
whole
team.
That's
worked
so
hard
on
all
this,
and
particularly
to
thank
jim
for
coming
back
out
of
retirement
to
take
this
on.
You
didn't
take
the
easy
job
and
really
grateful
for
how
you've
led
both
before
you
retired,
and
getting
those
three
developments
up
and
running
quickly
through
the
pandemic
and
and
now
on
this
effort.
So
thank
you
for
all
your
work.
I
appreciate
the
the
thoughtful
memoranda
from
my
colleagues.
F
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
jim.
Thank
you
for
your
work
on
this.
I'm
disappointed
and
we've
had
this
conversation.
I
appreciate
you
coming
to
my
office
and
talking
to
me
about
district
9
and,
and
a
note
is
that
district
9
does
not
have
any
sites
available.
We
went
through
the
list.
There's
district
9
is
pretty
built
out
and
it's
not.
What
is
there
isn't
suitable
doesn't
work.
F
F
M
The
councilor
foley,
thank
you
for
your
comments.
The
the
actual
size
of
the
total
parcel
is
about
10
acres.
James
and
the
public
works
team
have
taken
kind
of
the
the
prime
swath
in
the
middle
and
we've
identified
about
two
and
a
half
acres
of
developable
land.
It
would
be
a
long,
narrow
site,
it
would
be
a
unique
design.
It
wouldn't
be
a
traditional
one
where
the
residential
units
are
clustered
around
community
buildings.
M
It
would
be
a
linear
type
site
where
we
would
spread
out
some
of
the
community
facilities
between
the
different
modular
residential
buildings,
so
it
would
be
unique.
We
still
have
work
to
do
to
confirm
that
you
know
what
type
of
specific
project
we
can
develop.
We
have
work
to
do
with
caltrans
and
the
utility
company
that
is
contemplating
a
project
out
in
that
area,
so
it
wouldn't
be
what
we've
traditionally
seen,
but
I
think
we're
running
out
of
sites
to
have
an
easy
all
the
easy
ones
are
gone.
I
understand.
F
M
Left
are
sites
that
require
some
creativity
by
our
public
works
teams,
our
consultant,
architects
and
the
construction
firms.
But
I
think
we
need
to
do
that
and
we're
ready
to
to
dig
in
on
that
one,
and
if
that
one
ends
up
not
being
practical,
we
did
recommend
alternatives
and
we're
ready
to
work
with
mayor's
office
and
the
council
office
on
those.
If
we
can't
make
it
work.
F
M
Work,
I
I'm,
I
would
say
that,
probably
within
60
days,
we
can
kind
of
make
that
determination.
Okay,
it
will.
It
will
be
contingent
upon
what
that
private
company
is
going
to
do
this
morning
we
talked
to
them.
They
thought
about
two
to
four
weeks.
They
would
be
making
a
go
no-go
decision
and
we
will
continue
working
with
caltrans
in
the
meantime,
because
it's
not
just
this
site
for
caltrans,
it's
others.
F
J
Okay,
thank
you
and
I
know
you're
expecting
an
interesting,
vigorous
conversation
now.
So
I
appreciate
all
the
effort
that's
gone
into
this.
I
know
that
last
year
you
started
this
with
a
specific
set
of
instructions
and
and
you've
done
a
great
job,
with
the
work
you've
done
under
the
constraints
that
are
there.
You
just
said
a
couple
of
things
in
answer
to
council
member
fully,
actually
that
that
kind
of
triggered
some
thoughts.
J
So
when
we
when,
when
we
and
I
you
know,
I
didn't
write
the
memo
that
started
this
last
year,
but
I
I
voted
in
favor
of
it,
but
when
I
did,
my
anticipation
was
that
we
had
kind
of
we
all
understand
going
into
this.
The
easy
options
don't
exist
right
and
what
we're
gonna
need
to
do.
Next
is
what
you
just
said:
we're
gonna
need
to
find
sites
that
require
creativity,
we're
gonna
need
to
find
sites
where
we
go
out
and
say
to
to
private
property
owners.
Hey.
J
When
we
started
this
last
year,
I
thought
wow
there's
got
to
be
dozens
of
places
in
district
4,
where
we
can
figure
out
a
way
to
make
this
happen,
and
my
hope
was
that
between
that
time
and
now
we
would
have
started
that
process
of
trying
to
make
that
happen,
and-
and
from
my
perspective,
I
don't
think
in
district
4-
we've
done
that
and
I
it's
not
to
say
not
to
dismiss
all
of
the
effort.
That's
gone
into
the
sites
that
we
have
talked
about
throughout
this
process.
J
You
know,
I
know
that
our
staff,
when
we
talk
to
a
developer
about
a
site
that
they've
bought,
often
says
hey,
you're,
not
going
to
build
on
this
site
for
three
years.
Do
you
think
we
could
park
rvs
there
for
three
years
or
hey?
This
is
going
to
take
a
while
to
entitle,
but
do
you
think
we
could
use
this
for
something
else?
We've
talked
to
svlg
about
what
what
businesses
in
the
district
might
be
willing
to
help
us
out
with
offering
us
properties,
and
we
know
these
are
all
difficult
questions.
J
But
to
me
this
is
the
creative
thinking
that
has
to
occur.
So
I
just
want
to
go
back
a
little
bit
on
the
history
of
the
site,
that's
being
proposed
as
sort
of
a
panacea
site
in
district
four-
and
I
know
it's
not
a,
I
know
you
didn't
put
it
that
way.
I'm
just
expressing
a
little
bit
of
my
frustration
in
2015.
This
was
on
the
list
of
sites
that
were
clearly
the
best
sites
in
the
city
to
build
interim
housing.
J
I
wasn't
on
council
time
there
were
a
few
people
here
who
were
on
council
at
the
time,
and
you
know
that
I'm
very
excited
about
the
idea
of
building
many
sites
throughout
my
district
about
going
out
and
talking
to
community
and
about
pushing
the
community
to
a
point
in
which
they're
not
even
happy
and
you.
You
know,
we
know
what
what
happened
at
vista
montana
and
I'm
very
proud
of
the
results
we
had
there
being.
J
I
wasn't
on
council,
but
I
was
at
some
community
meetings
in
2015
and
16
and
I
will
tell
you
that
the
vista
montana
behavior
felt
like
child's
play
compared
to
what
happened
in
2015-16
at
the
noble
site
and
I'm
gonna
just
make
sure
my
colleagues
understand
the
details
of
that
site
a
little
bit
before
we
take
this
vote.
You
go
to
the
map
on
the
page.
J
You
don't
have
to
do
that
now,
but
if
you
look
at
the
map
across
the
street
on
the
north
side
is
an
elementary
school,
a
city
park
and
the
city
library,
we're
talking
about
adjacent
to
the
site
and
I'm
I'm
willing,
I'm
not,
I'm
not
one
that
buys
into
the
stereotype
of
the
site
is
bringing
danger
into
a
neighborhood.
I'm
willing
to
have
conversations
with
people
about
whether
it's
better
to
have
a
site.
J
But
right
adjacent
to
that
site
is
an
elementary
school,
a
city
library
in
a
city
park
right
behind
it
are
the
ponds
which
are
a
very,
very
heavily
used.
Recreational
area
in
our
community,
with
people
walking
on
trails
and
one
block
to
the
to
the
west
to
the
south
yet
to
the
west,
is
the
middle
school.
So
we
have
two
schools,
a
park,
recreational
trails
and
a
library.
Now
this.
J
The
other
sites
that
we've
talked
about
in
district
4
are
within
walking
distance
to
a
bart
station
within
walking
distance
to
a
vta
hub
within
walking
distance
to
a
large
supermarket.
This
site
doesn't
offer
any
of
that.
Yes,
there
is
a
bus
line
down
piedmont,
road,
but
that's
pretty
much
it
so
it
doesn't
even
offer
us
the
benefits
that
some
of
the
other
sites
have
and
while
I'm
very
frustrated,
I
was
again.
I
wasn't
on
council
when
the
this
fell
apart.
J
The
city
said:
hey,
let's
put
a
dog
park
in
that
same
city,
owned
property.
Instead,
this
district
has
been
dying
to
have
a
dog
park.
They
came
out
with
the
same
thing
and
said
we
don't
want
a
dog
park.
It'll
ruin
our
neighborhood,
and
I
am
very
frustrated
by
one
of
my
predecessors
who
gave
in
to
that
pressure
and
didn't
allow
the
dog
park
to
be
built
there,
but
given
that
they
wouldn't
they
fought
to
the
death
over
a
dog
park
at
this
site.
J
I'm
not
sure
what
we've
done
since
then
to
help
smooth
over
this
kind
of
use
of
this
site
and,
as
I
think
I
said
to
you,
and
I
think
it
says
in
our
memo,
this
outreach
and
community
discussion
has
to
happen
before
I
can
vote
to
approve
it.
As
a
council
member,
I
can't
send
you
off
to
start
designing
and
building
a
site
at
a
site
that
completely
failed
in
the
past
and
again
not
having
been
on
the
inside.
J
I
can't
explain
exactly
what
the
thought
process
was
in
giving
up
on
that
site,
but
it
was
given
up
on
and
I
will
say
the
result
was
the
site
being
built
at
the
mayberry
yard,
which
I
get
is
considered
a
district
3
site
because
it's
on
the
boundary,
just
maybe
road,
is
the
boundary
between
district
3
in
district
4.,
and
so
our
community
came
out
and
said:
hey
this
other
site
over
by
mayberry
makes
more
sense.
They
helped
push
for
that
site.
J
They
got
it
built
and
as
far
as
many
district
4
residents
think
the
mayberry
site
is
a
district
4
eih
site.
So
it's
really
hard
for
me
now
to
say:
well,
we
don't
have
a
site
in
our
district
and
therefore
this
recite
that
you
fought
so
hard
to
defeat
is
now
the
only
site
you
can
have
in
district
4..
So
I'm
I'm
trying
to
find
alternatives,
and
you
have
two
in
the
in
the
presentation
which
I
think
are
viable.
I
get
some
of
the
problems
with
the
triangular
shaped
properties
over
on
king
road.
J
J
People
who
are,
I
think,
foster
kids,
it's
in
an
area
that
has
this
kind
of
development.
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
and
I
know
that
there's
some
that
might
not
be
as
large
as
we'd,
like
the
pecton
court
site,
of
course,
is
also
near
other
things.
I
was
hoping
we
could
find
some
sites
in
north
san
jose
and
I
get
that
all
the
city
owned
and
public
owned
sites
because
of
the
nature
of
alviso
and
north
san
jose
are
in
flood
plains,
and
we
had
some
difficulty
with
some
of
those
sites.
J
J
So
that's
why
my
memo
suggests
doing
a
community
outreach
process
to
find
out
if
we
can
bring
them
along
through
some
of
the
compromises
and
other
ideas
that
we've
put
for
that.
I
know
the
mayor
had
the
memo
with
the
mayor
at
all
had
about
types
of
housing
we
might
offer
at
that
site,
and
I've
talked
to
you
about
potentially
smoothing
it
over.
I've
had
some
conversations
with
people.
J
One
of
my
concerns,
of
course,
about
that.
Is
that
one
of
the
things
we
offer
the
community
when
we
build
the
site
is
that
the
people
we
will
serve.
First,
are
the
people
who
are
homeless
in
your
neighborhood
and,
if
we're
going
to
say
this
site
is
targeted
to
people
who
are
very
specific
demographic,
it
wouldn't
necessarily
target
people
in
their
neighborhood.
They
would
target
people
from
across
the
city
which
is
great,
but
then
they
wouldn't
necessarily
get
the
benefits
of
the
ones
who
are
homeless
in
their
neighborhood,
getting
taken
off
the
street.
J
You
know,
I
know
that
the
site
the
water
district
water
companies
sold
that
property
on
pectin.
We
had
heard
that
there
was
a
developer
interested.
I
didn't
know
until
this
week
that
they've
moved
forward
with
selling
the
site
doesn't
mean
that
the
developer
is
going
to
be
building
anything
in
the
next
three
to
five
years.
We
have
the
option
to
potentially
build
temporary
housing
there.
In
the
meantime,
we
should
be
looking
into
all
these
kinds
of
options.
We
can
do
30
houses
quickly
at
king
road
and
get
that
community
engaged.
J
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
make
sure
that
we're
honest
with
the
community
before
we
we
bring
something
forward
and
say
we're
just
doing
this
here
pains
me
to
have
this
conversation,
because
I
want
so
badly
for
there
to
be
sites.
In
my
district
that
work,
I
want
so
badly
to
be
able
to
go
out
and
say
to
the
community.
I
get
your
concerns,
but
I'm
going
to
work
with
you,
but
this
site
was
just
one
of
such
difficulty.
J
J
J
Homelessness
has
only
gotten
worse
if
nothing
else
since
then,
look
at
the
people
living
a
block
away,
we'd
like
a
place
for
them
sure
we
can
start
having
that
conversation,
but
we
haven't
done
that
yet
and
then
the
the
third
thing
is
this
idea,
potentially
of
saying
we're
going
to
target
for
very
certain
kinds
of
people
that
maybe
fit
better
into
this
neighborhood
in
this
community.
But
again
we
haven't
had
that
conversation
yet
with
them.
J
J
If,
since
we
do
think
hey,
we
could
build
30
units
there
and
get
it
done
pretty
quickly,
it's
a
city-owned
property,
that's
over
an
acre,
and
then
I
did
want
to
mention
what
I
think
is
a
huge
need
in
our
district
and
across
the
city,
but
particularly
in
district
4,
which
is
rv
parking.
We've
been
having
this
conversation
for
a
long
time.
J
The
census
seems
to
imply
that
district
4
actually
has
the
highest
number
of
rv
of
rvs
parked
on
streets
across
the
city.
But
I'm
not
going
to
don't
quote
me
on
that.
I
I'm
sure
everybody
will
will
claim
that
their
district
has
a
big
issue,
but
we
do
have
sites
that
I
think
can
work,
and
we
recommend
one
of
those
in
my
memo
as
well,
that
we
should
pursue
that
in
parallel
with
this.
So
those
are
the
things
I'd
like
included.
M
Councilman,
I
I
totally
appreciate
you
know
your
perspective
and
the
concerns
you've
raised.
I
think
we
find
ourselves
in
the
dilemma
that
going
out
without
a
specific
plan
or
an
approach
usually
ends
up
with
us
coming
back
here
with
no
sight
to
move
forward
on
no
interim
housing
to
develop.
We've
we've
been
through
that
a
number
of
times
you
know,
probably
through
community
outreach
we
may
be
able
to
maybe
soften
the
perspective
some,
but
I'm
not
expecting
that
we're
going
to
have
people
saying
we
support
this.
We
not
had
that
anywhere
throughout
the
city.
M
District
six
was
probably
the
the
most
unique
location
where
there
was.
You
know,
maybe
just
a
little
bit
of
a
different
approach,
but
for
the
most
part
it's
been
opposition
and
it
feels
like
much
of
it
is
because
we
don't
fully
understand
exactly
what's
going
there
and
how
it's
going
to
be
operating
those
types
of
things,
but
I
appreciate
your
concern.
M
We
certainly
know
outreach
needs
to
happen.
The
question
is:
what's
the
question
and
what
are
we
trying
to
solve
we're
out
there?
Is
it
a
yes
or
no
on
the
site,
or
is
it?
We
have
this
reality
across
our
city.
We
know
we
have
a
crisis
that
we
must
deal
with.
This
is
the
location
we're
going
to
be
partially
addressing
it,
and
we
want
to
work
with
you
to
do
it
in
the
most
compatible
way,
smartest
way
we
can
and
we'll
be
very
open
to
the
feedback
to
do
it
in
the
best
possible.
J
Okay,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
and
I
think
that,
obviously,
that
is
the
best
approach
again.
My
frustration
is
that
I
think
that
that
approach
had
to
happen
before
we
came
to
this
vote
today,
particularly
in
a
site
that
already
has
been
attempted-
and
you
know
as
far
as
the
community
is
concerned-
I'm
sure
their
feeling
is
well.
We
already
the
city
already
agreed
with
us
that
this
campsite
isn't
possible
right
and
now
to
go
back
and
say
to
them.
J
J
I
decided
it
was
better
for
us
to
have
this
conversation
first
before
we
alarm
an
entire
neighborhood,
but
this
is
the
the
to
me.
I
think
that
there's
a
there
was
a
timeline
issue
here
in
terms
of
how
this
site
got
recommended.
I
guess
I
also
was
surprised
that
we
got
to
the
point
at
which
hey,
there's
only
really
three
options
in
the
whole
city,
and
this
is
one
of
them
again,
which
we
had
already
basically
told
them
years
ago,
so
anyway,
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
Thank
you.
D
The
from
the
staff
perspective,
because
the
housing
department
at
the
time
was
leading
those
discussions.
I
just
want
to
turn
over
to
jim.
I
mean
james
just
to
clarify
what
the
process
was
before
and
what
we
communicated
to
the
neighborhoods,
because
I
don't
believe
it
was
exactly
just
the
way
you
summarized
it,
which
was
we're.
Never
coming
back.
You're
we've
reviewed
your
site
and
we
will
not
build
on
say.
I
don't
believe
that
was
what
we
said,
and
so
I'm
I'd
like
james
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
that
process
was
like.
A
At
that
time
we
were
doing
general
meetings
across
the
city,
so
I
think
we
did
one
in
every
district
at
that
time,
and
so
we
were
just
sharing
the
entire
list
with
the
community,
and
that
was
that
was
definitely
a
particular
site
that
your
community
was
not
too
thrilled
about
being
on
the
list,
but
we
never.
We
never
actually
considered
that
as
a
site
for
eih.
It
never
reached
that
top
three
or
four
levels,
so
it
was
never
really
recommended
as
a
site
or
rejected
as
a
site.
D
I
think
what
jim
was
trying
to
say,
which
is
if
you're
asked
is,
can
we
go
back
out
and
have
community
meetings
and
that
the
neighborhood
will
actually
accept
and
and
get
to
a
point
where
they
will
say?
Yes,
that
is
not
something
that
will
fall
under
your
title
of
quick
build.
That
will
be
very,
very
slow,
build
housing
because
it
will
take
an
extensive
amount
of
time
for
us
to
get
any
kind
of
momentum
where
people
would
be.
I
mean
I
can't
even
imagine
the
truth.
J
Yeah
I
appreciate
that
I'll
just
end
by
saying
I
you
know
not
having
like
I
mentioned
many
times.
I
wasn't
here.
I
wasn't
on
council,
I
didn't
know
from
the
city's
perspective.
I
saw
it
from
the
community's
perspective
as
an
attendee
at
actually
one
of
those
meetings
where
people
came
with
everything,
but
their
pitchforks
large
signs.
They
were
very
ugly
communication
from
the
community
and
I
saw
that
and
didn't
like
it
either
I
mean
I'm
not.
J
You
know,
I'm
not
here
to
say
that
the
community
was
was
saying
or
doing
the
right
thing.
I
was
a
school
board
member
at
the
time
and
I
got
the
calls
from
the
residents
of
that
neighborhood.
That
said,
your
kids
go
to
this
school.
I
hope
you
are
going
to
stand
up
to
the
city
and
say
this
list.
Can
this
site
cannot
be
built
on,
and
I
I
did
not
do
that,
because
I
I
understood
that
there
was
a
point
of
a
place
of
fear
that
was
exaggerated,
that
we
can
make
sure
people
understand.
J
J
I
think
to
have
that
and
then,
when
I
saw
what
happened
later
with
even
a
dog
park
proposal
in
that
neighborhood,
I
just
it
just
worries
me
about
now.
What
we're
at
a
stage
of
saying
this
is
a
quick
build,
and
the
idea
is
because
we
can
identify
this
and
get
it
done
by
the
end
of
the
year.
We
have
to
get
started
right
away.
That's
that
concerns
me
greatly,
and
it's
again
I
think
it's.
My
memo
says
that
I
would
like
the
conversation
to
occur.
J
I'd
like
to
explain
to
people
what's
changed
what
our
experiences
are,
how
we
think
it
can
be
compatible.
Here's
a
drawing
of
what
it
would
look
like:
here's
how
it
would
affect
you,
but
that
has
to
happen
before
I
could
vote
to
to
move
forward
with
a
quick
build
at
that
site,
so
that
at
this
time
I
really
will
leave
it
there.
E
Are
you
just
telling
me
councilman
cohen,
you
know,
look,
I
think,
just
about
everything
you've
said
nobody
could
possibly
quibble
with.
I
I
I
do
want
to
just
quibble
with
one
small
detail,
and
this
is
not
a
big
one.
There's
a
small
one.
The
suggestion
that
residence
district
4
pointed
to
the
berryessa
site
and
said
hey.
That
will
be
a
better
one.
We'll
accept
that
I
I
was
at
that
meeting
with
two
or
300
people,
I
think
with
james.
I
think
it
was
the
first
person
to
speak.
E
I
don't
think
any
of
those
residents
showed
up
at
that
meeting.
It
was
uniformly
folks
showed
up
in
opposition,
and
so
I
I'm
not
saying
that
that
wasn't
the
case
that
there
weren't
residents,
who
felt
that
way,
I'm
just
saying
in
terms
of
what
we
hear
from
the
community,
it's
overwhelmingly
no
okay,.
J
Yeah,
that
was
a
that
was
a
misstatement
a
little
bit
because
I
remember
as
well
and
I,
and
even
even
after
it
was
built
when
I
walk
those
neighborhoods
people
are
still
skeptical
of
the
site,
that's
down
the
street
from
them
over
on
mayberry.
So
there's
no
doubt
there's
opposition,
no
matter
where
and
by
the
way
the
site
that's
on
king
is
surrounded
by
housing.
J
I've
actually
already
stood
on
that
corner
and
said
to
the
residents
who
were
worried
about
homelessness
in
that
area
and
said:
well,
hey
what
about
this
big
property
here
they
weren't
happy,
but
at
least
they're
willing
to
have
the
conversation.
If
we
go
and
have
the
conversation
nobody's
going
to
be
happy.
I
admit
that
part.
I
just.
J
G
Okay,
so,
and-
and
maybe
I'll
try
to
formulate
one
but
first
off.
Thank
you
to
the
staff
for
for
the
work
on
this
and
jim
for,
for
you
know,
coming
back
to
us
and
helping
to
navigate
this.
I
think
you
know
we
certainly
find
ourselves
in
similar
situations
that
we've
been
in
before,
where
again
we're
not
gonna.
We're
not
gonna,
find
perfection
here,
but
I
do
think
if
we
want
to
do
what
we've
set
out
to
do,
which
is
move
quickly
to
create
these
housing
opportunities.
G
We're
gonna
have
to
make
some
some
tough
decisions
and
what
I,
what
I
don't
wanna
do
is,
is
slow
any
anything
down,
and
I
get
it.
That's
tough
if
you're
looking
at
sites
within
your
district,
where
you
know
that
neighbors
are
going
to
be
frustrated,
but
I'd
like
to
try
and
accommodate
some
of
what
my
colleagues
are
asking
for,
but
again
without
slowing
things
down
and
so
in
in
you
know
regards
to
councilmember
cohen's
memo
here.
G
Definitely
not
quick,
build
right,
extremely
slow,
build
and-
and
I
don't
want
to
do
that.
What
I'd
like
to
do
is
try
to
give
an
opportunity
to
allow
for
these
discussions
and
give
some
direction
for
these
discussions
to
happen.
While
we're
also
giving
approval
today
right.
So
we're
sort
of
like
here's
your
approval
today,
but
then
there
is
going
to
be
an
expectation
that
you're
going
out
and
you're
having
these
discussions
with
the
community.
G
It
is
going
to
change.
Obviously
the
conversation
right.
The
community
is
going
to
say:
well,
hey
you've
already
approved
this
yes,
and
that
is
true,
but
it
then
requires
us
to
have
these
deeper
conversations
and
then,
at
the
same
time,
potentially
look
at,
for
instance,
like
liking,
councilmember
mayhem's
memo.
Similarly,
right
giving
you
the
authority
for
going
out
to
to
to
develop
the
great
oaks
in
85
site,
not
as
is
suggested
by
in
by
councilman
his
memo,
that
would
say,
let's
evaluate
these
other
properties.
First
doing
so
together.
G
Let's
give
we
give
you
approval
and
at
the
same
time
you
know
there's
it's
not
like
we're.
Gonna
start
building
it
tomorrow
right,
so
it
gives
a
little
bit
of
opportunity
and
some
wiggle
room
is
there
a
site
that
you
know
that
we've
missed?
I
know
that
we
spoke
about
it
in
our
meetings
right
and
and
hey
what
about
this
site?
Is
that
an
opportunity,
but
at
least
not
not
slowing
down
the
process,
not
creating
another
step?
G
Simply
just
saying
you
have
the
approval
as
you've
asked
for
in
your
recommendations
today,
but
then
we
do
allow
you
and
direct
you
to
go
out
and
look
at.
Is
there
another
feasibility
of
a
site?
Much
like
we've
put
in
our
joint
memo
that,
for
instance,
you
could
have
other
problems
at
the
85
right,
great
oak
side
and
and
we're
saying,
hey
we
want
to
get
in
our
memo.
We've
said
we
want
to
give
you
this
sorry.
This
is
myself
the
mayor
and
councilmember
foley.
G
D
Yes,
anything
that
is
city
funded
where
we're
the
lead
agency,
like
all
of
the
eihs
and
all
the
bhcs,
are
100
funded
by
the
city
of
san
jose.
We
control
who
goes
into
those
sites
and,
as
the
council
has
directed
the
housing
department,
we
prioritize
and
welcome
people
who
live
in
the
surrounding
neighborhoods.
G
Okay,
yeah-
and
I
know
that's
an
important
one.
That's
obviously
always
been
important
with
my
neighbors
as
well,
and
the
frustrating
part
was.
You
know
that
we
couldn't
do
that
necessarily
the
way
we
wanted
to
with
measure
a
funded
projects
right,
and
so,
when
it's
fully
city
funded.
I
know
that
that's
what
we've
been
doing
recommendation
2d,
I
think
as
well,
is
something
we
we
do
right.
G
The
the
community
advisory
committee
is
right
and
being
able
to
ensure
that
people
have
that
opportunity
to
participate,
and
so
I
think
those
two
are
fine
that
but
but
to
be
and
see
in
my
mind,
although
we
have
talked
about
these,
I
have
as
well
kind
of
chimed
in
on
hey.
Could
we
could
we
ensure
that
there
is
you
know?
Is
there
a
an
additional
benefit
to
the
community?
Here?
G
I
don't
believe
those
are
as
easily
done
as
as
kind
of
written
or
understood
right
that
we
can,
for
instance,
have
more
code
enforcement
or
police
patrols
right
where
we're
not
necessarily
able
to
direct
that
level
of
resource
in
these
site-specific
areas,
whether
it's
with
these
quickbilt
projects
or
permanent
support
right,
it's
it's.
I
don't
believe
that
that,
for
instance,
2b
in
2c
are
simply
something
we
can
accept
today,
right.
D
L
I
also
offer
a
point
of
information
council
member
sure,
because
I
don't
think
you're
interpreting
what
I'm
suggesting
correctly.
I
I'm
not
in
any
way
suggesting
that
we
should
dictate
today
that
these
things
must
happen,
which
is
why
I
wrote
the
word
potentially
what
I
have
observed,
participating
in
a
number
of
community
input.
Meetings
on
these
sites.
Is
that
people
ask
many
of
the
same
questions.
Will
you
focus
on
people
in
the
surrounding
area?
Will
you
ensure
that
new
encampments
don't
get
created
right
next
to
a
new
site?
Sjpd
whoever's
present
there?
L
I
would
like
us
to
try
to
articulate
clearly
and
consistently
in
a
way
that
we
can
package
up
in
all
of
our
community
engagement
meetings,
the
menu
of
things
that
we
either
will
do
or
will
try
to
do,
or
some
articulation
in
a
clearer,
more
consistent
way
for
these
eih
sites,
specifically,
and
maybe
also
for
safe
parkings.
I'm
going
through
this
exact
process
today
with
a
new,
safe
parking
site
in
district
10.
L
What
it
is
that
we're
going
to
do
to
protect
or
enhance
or
improve
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
and
I
don't
that's
why
I
wrote
the
word.
Potentially
I'm
not
trying
to
dict,
I'm
just
offering
some
suggestions,
because
these
are
the
ones
that
I
hear
come
up
in
every
single
meeting,
but
I
don't
think
we
should
lock
in
today.
What
I'm
hoping
for
is
that
staff
could
come
back
and
say
here's
the
slide.
L
We
could
present
at
community
engagement
meetings
to
anticipate
these
questions
that
we're
invariably
going
to
get
every
single
time,
and
I
find
that
we
always
reactively
get
to
them
over
the
course
of
a
90-minute
community
meeting.
When
people
ask
all
the
same
questions,
that's
all
I'm
getting
out
there.
I
hope
that
helps
clarify.
Maybe
we
can
get
to
the
same
place.
There.
M
So
maybe
I'll
just
make
a
quick
point,
and
I
think
staff
is
fine,
taking
this
as
input
and
then
formulating
what
we
think
is
the
most
effective
and
efficient
way
to
make
sure
the
neighborhood
is
at
least
staying
like
they
are
today.
Ideally,
we'd
improve
it.
We
think
these
sites
actually
help
in
some
respects,
because
the
sites
aren't
great,
sometimes
as
they
are,
so
we
as
a
staff
will
look
at
it
and
then
be
prepared
to
do
that
in
a
community
meeting
and
to
maybe
inform
the
council
through
an
info
memo.
G
Okay,
yeah,
no,
I
and
and
having
been
through
a
number
of
these
conversations.
I'm
you
know
aware
of
the
the
questions
that
those
in
our
community
right
are
very
concerned
about.
I.
What
I
don't
want
to
do
is
give
them
a
false
sense
of
belief
that
that
sort
of
what
may
be
written
here
is
what
is
going
to
happen
right,
that
they're
going
to
get
added
investments
say
in
these
neighborhood-wide
beautification
efforts
right,
because
we
can't
guarantee
that
right,
that's
not
going
that
doesn't
come
along
with
an
eih
site.
G
Regardless
of.
If
the
answer
is
hey
look,
yes,
we
will.
We
will
try
our
best
right
to
address
these
concerns
a
a
an
encampment
popping
up
in
the
area.
We
will
be
much
more
keen
to
that,
but
again
I
I
don't
think,
there's
a
promise
that
we
can
give
to
people
in
the
community
that
those
two
things
are
gonna
happen
right:
the
2b
and
2c
that,
whether
it's
additional
code
enforcement
or
sdpd
patrols
or
beautification,
or
just
investments
into
the
area.
G
If,
if
there
is
right,
then
that's
then
that's
a
that's
a
different
model
than
we've
than
we've
done
before.
As
jackie
pointed
out,
we
we
piloted
right
something
like
that,
but
we
never
really
got
to
a
full-fledged
model
like
that.
So
I
I'm,
I
think,
as
you're
saying
councilmember
mayhem,
this
is
you're
saying
potentially
including
so
it's
really
a
list
of
hey.
This
is
this
is
something
that
could
be
included,
but
not
necessarily
that
it's
required
to
be
where
my
concern
is.
G
Is
that
the
beginning
of
your
two
recommendation
two
says
before
opening
any
of
the
proposed
new
eih
sites?
So
I
wouldn't
want
to
make
it
contingent
right
on
hey
we're
going
to
have
to
complete
this,
because
I
think
we're
we're
there.
We've
opened
up
eight
sites
before
right.
We've
had
these
community
meetings.
Could
we
continue
to
improve
on
our
you
know
on
our
messaging
or
our
outreach?
Absolutely,
but
I
don't
want
what
I
didn't
want
to
do
just
like
with
councilmember
cohen's
memo.
G
We
can
take
their
suggestions
and
see
if
there
is
an
alternative,
but
ultimately
right
if
there's
not
as
we
move
forward
this
year
at
the
end
of
the
year,
you're
not
having
any
time
this
year,
you're
not
having
to
come
back
to
this
council
to
get
another
additional
approval
right
or
to
hear
from
us
again
before
being
able
to
proceed
so
that
that's
that's
the
the
motion
and
and
I'll
include
the
the
direct
the
memo
from
myself.
The
mayor
and
councilmember
foley
as
well.
I
E
All
right
motion
from
council
member
peralta,
second
from
council
member
davis,
counselor
mayhem-
I
know
you're
about
to
speak.
Let
me
just
let
me
offer
one
suggested
friendly
amendment
and
I'm
sorry.
This
is
obviously
coming
off
the
diocese
without
all
the
checking
in
that
we
typically
would
do
in
suggestions.
E
But
you
know
we
have
seen
other
cities
experiment
with
no
encampment
zones
in
these
areas,
and
I
know
that
there
are
legal
issues
there,
but
we've
seen
it
done
successfully
here
in
california,
and
I
wonder
if
we
could
at
least
explore
no
encampment
zones
within
some
limited
area
around
these
eihcs
and
come
back
to
council.
Perhaps
in
august
or
september.
E
We
know
it's
going
to
take
a
while
to
get
the
development
construction
going
to
discuss
to
what
extent
we
could
create
no
encampment
zones
around
these
areas
so
that
we
can
assure
neighborhoods
that
that
they
are
stepping
up
to
their
responsibility
and
we're
going
to
step
up
with
them.
Would
you
consider
that
customer's
problem.
G
I
would
I'm
happy
to
again
as
long
as
it's
right.
It's
we're
given
the
ability
for
staff
to
move
forward.
This
is
yet
another
suggestion
right
where,
if
we
can
add
this
to
the
to
the
pot,
I'm
I'm
happy
with
that.
I
I
don't
know.
If
that's
something,
that's
just
you
know,
we
can
dictate
today
to
staff.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
staff
hey.
G
Is
that
easy
enough
right
to
hey
you're,
going
to
come
back
with
a
known
camera
zone
by
the
end
of
summer,
or
is
that
something
that
would
require
you
to
do
a
bit
of
policy?
Work
and
you'd
have
to
come
back
with
an
early
consideration?
You
know
so
I
I
it
is
coming
off
the
data.
So
that's
that's
my
only
concern
with
it.
Otherwise,
I'm
happy
to
include
it
very
concerned.
M
I
guess
my
my
thought
process
would
be.
Let
us
take
that
as
a
friendly
amendment,
a
suggestion
like
the
other
items
that
are
identified
in
the
memos
and
we'll
evaluate
that
with
the
other
things,
and
I
think
some
type
of
information
memorandum
back
to
the
council
on
that
would
be
a
a
less
intensive
way
to
go
about
it.
M
If
we
do
need
to
come
back
to
council,
councilman
pearl
is
the
way
you've
suggested
we're
still
moving
on
these
things.
It
would
be,
though,
to
give
you
the
particulars
of
a
no
encampment
zone.
Beautify
san
jose
certainly
has
to
be
a
part
of
this
you,
you
know
the
setback
process
they're
going
through
and
they're
trying
to
get
to
more
places.
D
And
the
other
piece
of
the
evaluation
would
certainly
be
the
you
know
in
terms
of
the
people
and
who
they
are
and
what
their
situations
are.
We
certainly
know,
especially
with
rv
dwellers,
that
there
are
certain
reasons,
sometimes
that
they
want
to
be
in
a
particular
neighborhood,
and
if
we
don't
have
an
alternative
site
that
really
meets
whatever
their
needs
are.
It
is
very
hard
to
have
them
move,
and
then
we
begin
to
move
towards
criminalizing
homeless
behavior,
which
we
have
really
tried
hard
in
san
jose.
Not
to
do.
D
G
E
I
L
Thank
you
now
I
want
to
just
go
back
and
thank
staff
for
all
the
all
the
great
work
here
I
know
jim
and
the
team
have
spent
countless
hours
evaluating
potential
sites,
communicating
with
council
offices-
and
I
appreciate
all
the
hard
work
you've
done.
I
am
very
committed
to
expanding
eih
sites
in
our
city
and
was
an
author
of
the
original
memo
that
set
this
in
motion.
L
So
I
am
continue
to
be
very
committed
to
that
outcome,
and-
and
I
do
want
to
make
clear
that
I
did
not
in
any
way
intend
for
my
memo
today,
which
did
come
a
little
late
to
be
an
obstacle
to
moving
forward
to
sight
in
district
10..
I
think
it's
really
important
that
district
10
take
on
a
site.
Ironically,
I've
been
through
this
process
now
a
couple
times
and
don't
have
a
site
in
my
district,
yet
thanks
to
redistricting,
but
you
know
to
some
of
the
points
councilman
pearls
made.
L
You
know
for
the
I'll.
Just
take
the
second
point.
First,
in
my
memo,
since
we
were
just
talking
about
that,
what
I'm
really
talking
about
here
is
improving
our
communication.
I've
sat
in
on
enough
of
these
meetings
for
both
eih
and
safe
parking
sites
to,
I
think
we
all
know
the
questions
that
come
up
and
the
answers
that
we
give
and
frankly
I
have
heard
city
staff
multiple
times
now
say:
oh
no,
we
will
absolutely
not
allow
a
new
encampment
to
be
set
up
right
next
to
this
site.
L
And
how
are
we
going
to
do
that
because,
when
pressed
by
a
room
full
of
a
couple
hundred
frustrated
community
members,
I've
heard
us
make
a
lot
of
commitments
about
what
we're
going
to
do
to
ensure
that
the
surrounding
neighborhood
is
not
worse
off
because
of
the
presence
of
a
new
site,
and
I
think
that's
what
the
community
is
fundamentally
asking
for
and
deserves,
and
so
we
need
to
better
clarify
and
codify
what
things
we
are
willing
to
do.
To
ensure
that
that's
true
and
I
don't
think
that
needs
to
include
criminalizing
homelessness.
L
But
I
think
it
does
need
to
say
include
we're
going
to
do
a
bunch
of
outreach
to
those
who
are
unhoused
in
the
vicinity
within
a
half
mile
or
whatever.
It
might
be
we're
going
to
coordinate
with
the
local
police
captain
to
make
sure
they're
aware
of
when
the
site's
opening
and
who's
at
the
site
and
that's
on
their
radar,
whatever
steps
they
are,
and
I
I
did
not
mean
for
my
memo
to
dictate
what
those
have
to
be.
What
I
am
a
little
frustrated
with
and
want
to
move
us
past.
L
Is
us
answering
these
questions
inconsistently
and
reactively
over
the
course
of
90-minute
meetings
with
community
members
who
are
frustrated
and
ought
to
see
it
up
front
anticipated
in
the
slide
deck
that
we
present
to
them
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting?
So
that's
really
what
I'm
referring
to
in
item
two
is
just
improving
our
communication,
but
but
not
as
I
did
not
mean
that
as
a
barrier.
L
The
reason
I
put
before
opening
these
sites
is
that
I
assume
we're
gonna
have,
in
fact
I
know
we're
gonna
have
one
or
more
community
meetings,
and
I
would-
and
I've
already
been
speaking
with
the
housing
department,
about
this
I'd
like
to
see
our
slide
deck
up
front,
be
more
robust
and
anticipate
more
of
these
questions.
That's
really
all
I'm
pointing
to
there
on
the
first
one
again,
I'm
very
committed
to
approving
a
site
in
district
10
this
year
we
need
to.
We
need
to
move
forward.
We
need
to
do
this
quickly.
L
The
reason
I'm
so
excited
about
these
quick
build
sites
is
that
we
can
move
quickly
and
do
this
cost
effectively.
There
are
a
lot
of
concerns
with
great
oaks,
one
of
which
is
that
the
site
may
be
infeasible,
as
has
been
referenced.
The
other
which
I
included
in
the
map
here,
is
that
you
know
I
represent
a
district,
that's
quite
large,
geographically
and
yet
just
due
to
kind
of
quirks
of
geography
and
where
district
lines
are
we're.
L
Looking
at
four
potentially
five
sites
within
a
half
mile
radius
that
are
relatively
new
sites,
eih
safe
parking,
a
potential
motel
conversion,
the
motel
conversion's
on
hold
so
or
hotel
conversion.
So
it
may
just
be
four
sites,
but
within
a
half
mile,
it's
it's
reasonable
that
in
a
district
of
100
000
people
in
a
geographically
large
district
that
the
neighbors
here
would
be
saying.
Well,
what's
the
rest
of
district
10
doing
and
they
don't
care
that
the
line
just
happens
to
be
it's
district
2.
L
L
I
think,
personally,
that
the
site
at
santa
teresa
and
highway
85
is
an
equally
good
site
that
probably
would
have
more
community
support,
would
show
some
distribution
of
sites
in
our
district
and
would
be
something
that
I
would
certainly
be
more
comfortable
supporting.
So
I
would
like
to
spend
a
little
more
time
before
we
commit
to
this
site
evaluating
that
site
and
a
few
others
I've
listed
here
and
I'd
be
okay
with
us
setting
the
deadline
for
approving
one
of
them.
L
I
think
that's
reasonable,
but
I'm
I'm
not
real
comfortable
with
saying
this
is
the
only
site
in
district
10.
That
makes
sense.
I'd
rather
say
here
are
a
few
that
we
want
to
spend
a
little
more
time
on
and
we'll
make
a
decision
by
x
date,
which
I
think
is
probably
a
little
more
in
line
with
what
councilman
cohen
is
describing
as
well
I'll
leave
my
comments
for
now.
L
F
A
A
In
my
prior
job,
we
actually
laid
out
try
to
lay
out
a
deck
before
going
out
to
the
community
and
doing
some
of
these
things,
and
I
just
as
I
get
up
to
speed
and
learn
from
my
colleagues
about
what's
going
on
here.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
whatever
that
motion
is
about
what
the
scope
of
the
property
examination
is,
even
if
it's
in
parallel
that
I
just
that
we're
clear
so
that
we
can
can
shape
yeah.
D
G
G
G
But
if,
if
you're
not
successful
right,
where
you
get
to
a
point
where
you're
going,
we
are
so
deep
in
moving
forward
with
you
know
the
noble
site.
We
are
not
turning
back
now,
we
may
just
add
another
site
in
district
four
right.
We
may
not.
We
may
not
substitute
one,
but
if
we
find
another
viable
site
in
district
four
great
we
go
forward.
G
I
I
couldn't
tell
you
when
that
timeline
is
because
it's
gonna
come
to
a
point
where
you're
gonna
say
we
are
far
enough
ahead
with
these
sites
that
there's
no
turning
back,
and
so
that's
what
I
I.
What
I
don't
want
to
do
is
as
councilman
just
suggested.
Hey,
let's
put
a
a
you
know
a
time
certain,
let's
give
it
a
month
or
something
I
don't
want
to
do
that.
I
I
don't
want
to
come
back
here
right
to
have
this
same
conversation
again
we're
going
to
what
I
can
guarantee
if
we
find
another
site.
G
There's
also
going
to
be
something
wrong
with
that
one
right.
So
so
I
haven't
found
one
site:
whether
where
we've
done
permanent
supportive
housing,
safe
parking,
emergency
interhousing
in
my
district
that
we've
approved,
which
is
the
most
that
any
of
the
council
member,
has
I've
not
found
one
where
the
community
has
said.
Oh,
that's
a
lovely
site
right,
we'd
love
to
do
it.
There.
G
I've
had
the
protesters
right
and
the
the
people
yelling
and
right
again,
coming
with
everything
besides
pitchforks
right
to
these
meetings,
and
so
and-
and
I
think
that
that's
going
to
be
the
case
regardless.
So
if
we
are
going
to
accept
this,
as
we've
asked
for
it
to
be
quick,
build
moving
forward,
I
think
you've
done
that
work.
We
need
to
grant
you
the
authority
to
move
forward
today
and,
at
the
same
time
asking
you
to
to
provide
some
due
diligence.
G
I'm
imagining
councilmember,
cohen
and
counselor
mayhem
want
to
help
you
and
meet
with
you
quickly
and
say:
let's
really
really
right
do
our
due
diligence
and
look
at
some
of
these
other
sites
and
if
something
pops
up
quickly,
where
you
think
you
have
time
to
shift
away
from
what
we've
approved
today
great
right,
then
I
I'm
almost
like
what
we've
put
in
our
mayor,
our
memo
mayor
and
councilman
foley,
where
we're
sort
of
giving
some
authority
right
where
we're
hey.
If
that
particular
site
doesn't
work
out
right,
you
find
another
alternative
in
d10.
G
M
E
M
Yeah,
that's
a
that's
a
great
question
james
and
I
were
just
kind
of
going
over
it
in
in
mayor
your
memo
and
counselor
parallels
fully
memo.
It
says
120
days
right.
I
think
that
should
be
sufficient
time.
We
we
are
already
in
communication
with
councilman
mayhem's
office
and
councilman
cohen's
office.
We
certainly
will
continue
that
that
will
be
kind
of
the
first
place
we
go.
You
know
we
will.
M
We
will
size
up
the
sites
that
we've
recommended
and
what
the
path
is
to
get
them
into
the
pipeline,
and
we
will
on
a
parallel
track,
work
with
them
as
well
and
and
we'll
try
and
again
utilize
our
resources
as
best
we
can
to
move
the
right
pieces
of
the
program
together.
You
know
there
are
a
couple
sites
that
we
think
we
can
get
into
design
and
development
quickly.
These
other
ones
there's
a
little
bit
more
evaluation
to
do
the
120
days
seems
seems
reasonable.
A
A
No
two
things
going
on,
I
think
one
is,
I
think,
each
of
the
council
members
may
have
a
paralysis
and
cohen
had
mentioned
hey.
We
want
to
be
creative,
we
want
to
potentially
invoke
other
sites,
and
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
is
that
limited
to
city
owned
property,
publicly
owned
property?
I
just
wanted
to
get
clear.
I.
M
And
we'd
factor
in
yeah:
how
do
you
control
them?
What
does
it
cost
yeah?
I
mean
that
that's
that's
an
important
factor,
so
I
think
omar.
What
we
do
is
within
that
time
frame
what
could
come
under
our
control
quickly
and
at
a
price
that
we
can
afford
within
the
funding
that's
been
allocated
to
try
and
deliver
we're
pursuing
a
goal
of
400
units,
so
we
have
to
pick
sites
that
can
yield
a
certain
amount
to
get
to
that
goal.
You
know
the
community
plan
and
homelessness
identified
a
goal.
This
ties
into
that.
A
J
Yeah,
let
me
start
with
that
last
question.
I
have
a
different
answer
than
they
have,
but
I
expected
that
to
me.
The
answer
is
anything:
that's
feasible,
not
anything!
That's
in
our
control,
not
anything
that
we
own,
but
we
have
to
I
mean
some.
There
must
be
some
discretion.
What
feasible
means
but
feasible
might
mean
different
things
to
different
people,
and
we
already
have
said
pectin
courts
on
your
list
you're
looking
at
it,
we
don't
own
it,
we
don't
control
it,
but
hey.
Maybe
it's
going
to
turn
out
to
be
feasible.
J
J
I
get
it
that
we've
been
talking
about
this
for
years
and
therefore
this
doesn't
seem
like
it's
fast
anymore,
but
it,
but
you
know
just
this
doing
it
fast
for
the
sake
of
doing
it
fast
is
going
to
lead
us
to
the
wrong
outcome.
In
my
opinion,
but
I
also
do
agree
that
the
minute
this
action
occurs,
whatever
the
outcome
may
be,
I'm
not
sure
I'm
going
to
support
it.
Just
based
on
what
I
wanted.
J
And
I
think
any
presentation
that
occurs
has
to
include
case
studies.
Here's
where
we
have
a
site
now,
here's
how
they've
worked.
Here's
a
picture,
here's
what
we've
experienced
here
are
the
climb
reports,
or
hopefully,
lack
of
crime
reports.
Here
is
what
we've
seen
so
that
you
now
have
something
that
you
didn't
have.
Last
time
we
spoke
to
you,
which
is
a
real
example
in
san
jose.
If
it's
working,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
yeah.
D
I
just
pulled
up
a
city
of
san
francisco
did
a
study
on
their
navigation
centers,
which
is
very
similar
to
what
these
are,
which
are.
You
know,
low
barrier
shelters
that
people
are
coming
into
and
it
was
very
helpful
in
terms
of
thinking
through
what
an
evaluation
would
look
like,
and
they
did
not
find
any
significant
findings
in
terms
of
the
fears
that
people
commonly
express
it
didn't
hurt
people's
properties
right
and.
J
D
Will
tell
you
we
increased
crimes
that
didn't
do
all
kinds
of
things.
They
did
a
study
where
they
looked
at
both
data
and
they
interviewed
residents
as
well.
There
were
still
definitely
some
perceptual
issues
that
people
had
that
lived
around
the
sites,
but
they
couldn't
find
any
kind
of
factual
data
to
support
that
they
were
negative
impacts,
but.
F
D
J
Right
and
I've
said
this
to
you
before
jackie,
we
don't
do
enough
in
the
city
to
tutor
our
own
horn
about
what's
working
and
what
we're
successful
at
people.
I
think
who
pay
detailed
attention
understand.
We've
been
successful,
we've
done
good
things,
as
I
said
to
you
before.
It's
being
noticed
that
yeah,
maybe
there's
just
as
many
homeless
people
as
there
were
before,
but
there
would
be
twice
as
many.
If
we
didn't
do
all
the
things
we
had
done.
We
don't
tell
that
story.
J
We
need
to
tell
that
story
as
part
of
this
when
I'm
again
in
the
southwest
corner
of
my
district,
they
think
of
the
mayberry
bridge
housing
development
as
d4
as
in
their
neighborhood.
We
talk
to
them
all
the
time.
That's
why
I've
reached
out
to
your
office
and
said:
can
you
tell
me
the
success
rate?
J
What's
going
on
people
ask
me:
has
it
been
successful
because
no
one's
telling
them
no
one's
we're,
not
communicating
that
when
I
was
able
to
give
them
statistics
70
of
the
people
who
have
come
into
the
site
have
been
placed
or
have
become
stable?
Oh
my
gosh!
That's
great!
It's
good
to
know
right
people
actually
seem
to
be
more
accepting
when
they
learn
the
success.
So
that's
why
I'm
suggesting
the
case
study
will
be
very
helpful
in
that
communication.
I
I
think
that's
important.
J
Just
one
last
thing
for
a
friendly
amendment
in
in
the
staff
memo
under
alternative
number
two,
it
does
mention
the
king
mayberry
site.
That
is
not
anywhere
in
my
memo
or
in
the
motion.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
gets
included
and
let
staff
decide
whether
that
becomes
moved
up
on
the
list
because
you've
determined
hey.
We
can
build
30
here
with
very
little
eat
problem,
let's
move
ahead
or
how
you
incorporate
that.
But
I
would
like
to
have
that
site
included
in
the
list
that
we
approved
today.
G
G
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
but
both
of
those,
I
think
you
know
I
think
you're.
The
word
that
you
would
use
was
just
feasible
right
like
it
and
again
is
it,
you
know.
Is
it
as
long
as
it's
not
going
to?
You
know
to
truly
delay
our
progress
on
moving
forward
here
then
then,
great!
That's,
why
we're
doing
it
in
parallel
and
and
what
I
would
say
again
is
we
may
find
something
that
works
and
we
may
ultimately
do
you
know,
get
additional
sites
right.
It
may
not
even
be
an
alternative.
G
J
M
A
quick,
oh
sorry,
so
we're
happy
to
do
that
work.
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
just
be
very
smart
and
efficient
about
how
we
do
it.
We
aren't
going
to
design
four
sites
in
those
two
districts.
Take
it
to
you
know
a
very
far
distance.
I
think
what
we
want
to
do
is
evaluate
it
and
lay
it
out
to
a
level
that
we
know
whether
it
would
be
a
practical.
M
What
are
the
best
projects
and
that's
where
we
need
to
stop,
because
there
is
limited
capacity
within
public
works
to
do
all
these,
so
we're
not
designing
four
sites
in
this
district
four
sites
and
that
we're
taking
it
to
that
efficient
level
of
understanding
and
then
making
decisions
perfect.
If
that
makes
sense,
yes,.
J
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
site
was
included
by
by
name
somewhere
in
the
motion.
The
only
thing
I
would
say
is
exactly
what
councilmember
allah
said.
I
was
that
I
was
going
to
say.
I
don't
expect
this
to
end.
Let's
say
we
found.
We
said
all
these
three
sites
work
and
we
build
them
at
the
end
of
the
year.
I
would
expect
that
our
plan
is
we're
going
to
need
even
more
and
we're
going
to
keep
going
and
that's
why,
back
to
your
question
about
what's
feasible?
What's
not?
J
G
I
just
wanted
to
add.
I
definitely
think
it's
valuable
to
give
community,
especially
those
that
may
be
in
opposition,
an
opportunity
to
see
these
sites
that
are
already
built
and-
and
we
took
that
approach
with
both
permanent
supportive
housing
developments
and
eih
sites.
When
we
had
the
you
know
very
first
neighbors
that
spoke
up
in
opposition,
my
office
was
offering
to
them
to
go
and
tour
the
other
sites,
so
they
could
actually
see
it
right.
G
G
What
we'd
like
to
see
a
snap,
but
overwhelmingly
they
felt
much
more
comfortable
once
they
saw
it,
especially
for
those
of
them
that
in
their
mind,
it's
what's
at
the
guadalupe
river
right
or
they're
they're,
imagining
an
encampment
site
right
and
and
when
they
see
these
emerging
internet
housing
sites
or
or
supportive
housing
developments.
I
think
they
they
get
a
much
better
feeling
for
what
is
actually
there.
So
to
you
what
you
were
saying:
councilmember,
mayhem
on
hey,
I'm
sorry,
councilman
cohen,
on
hey
there.
G
You
know
it
is
there's
an
unknown
right
for
a
lot
of
these
neighbors
until
they
actually
see
it,
and
I
think
there
is
a
ton
of
success
that
we
don't.
You
know,
I
wouldn't
say
we're
doing
a
bad
job.
It's
just
it's
not
necessarily
right
well
known
to
the
community
how
successful
some
of
these
sites
may
be,
and
so
I
would
encourage
anybody
that
ends
up
with
you
know.
G
One
of
these
sites
or
other
sites
to
you
know,
take
a
tour
with
your
residents
of
some
of
the
other
sites
that
are
open
or
the
one
by
the
police
parking
lot
right.
That's
under
construction
or
just
different
phases
right
for
them
to
be
able
to
see
what
what
is
going
on
out
there,
and
and
thank
you
for
sharing
that
on
the
the
success
rate.
G
I
don't
know
if
you
have
that
in
a
summary,
jackie,
on
the
success
like
at
the
mayberry
site,
like
hey
70
of
residents,
right,
I
think,
having
that
success.
You
know
the
success
stories
and
just
the
data
is
also
very
helpful
if
there's
a
one
pager
on
that
on
on
certain
example
sites.
So
that's
I
think.
B
B
F
B
B
M
M
B
So
so
what
what's
not
on
the
presentation
there
on
that
slide,
but
is
in
page
35
of
the
memo?
Is
you
know
right
over?
I
think
that's
the
creek
is
minnie's.
So
I
just
want
to
take
you
through
this.
This
little
parcel
here
right
over
that
little
creek,
which
is
that
little
black
strip
right
there
is
minnie's
preschool
child
care.
B
They
end
up
in
what's
called
the
storybook
neighborhood,
which
is
cinderella
peter
pan,
bambi
lane
galahad
all
those
all
those
streets
and
if
they
cross
over
towards
the
east,
they
get
into
capital
park
and
we
have
an
elementary
school
there
if
they
go
north,
which
is
towards
that
little
black
section.
There
you're
going
to
hit
minnie's
preschool
child
care
if
they
keep
walking
down
a
little
further
you're
going
to
hit
another
elementary
school,
including
two
rocket
ship
schools
and
then
mayfair
community
center
and
the
cesar
chavez
elementary
school.
B
So
yet
another
another
elementary
school.
Although
that
one's
going
to
be
closing
down
and
it's
going
to
be
turned
into
a
full
service
preschool,
which
almost
has
decided
to
turn
it
into.
But
if
you
continue
to
go
down
that
street
and
hang
another
left
on
to
san
antonio
there's
yet
another
elementary
school
san
antonio
elementary
school.
B
B
It's
very
difficult.
District
5
is,
is
just
a
very
difficult,
very
challenging
district
to
find
a
site,
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
you
know
an
ideal
site.
I
don't
think
it's
an
ideal
site.
I
don't
even
know
if
it's
a
good
site,
but
but
that
is
the
only
thing
that
we
could,
that
you
can
find,
but
making
sure
this
community,
especially
this
community,
is
engaged
from
the
get-go
is,
is
critical.
E
B
M
Councilman
carrasco:
this
is
jim
ortball,
just
a
couple
of
thoughts,
one
yes,
we've
talked
on
this
location
and
and
about
your
district
on
a
number
of
occasions.
There
just
aren't
many
opportunities.
You
know
the
reality
is
at
this
point
in
time.
This
is
this
is
the
best
site
that
we
could
identify,
we're
not
identifying
it
as
an
immediate
priority
for
development.
M
We
have
four
other
locations
identified
ahead
of
it
and
given
our
capacity
and
funding,
our
approach
would
be
to
initiate
those
four
in
this
next
upcoming
fiscal
year
and
once
we're
we
have
those
in
the
pipeline
we're
confident
on
the
delivery
of
those
other
locations
and
they're
they're
on
the
path
to
delivery.
We
would
then
refocus
to
looking
at
this
site
we
would
see
is,
does
the
need
still
exist?
M
Is
the
funding
there
and
then
contemplate
the
community
outreach
at
that
point
in
time
we
can't
see
developing
this
site
physically
developing
at
any
time
within
the
next
couple
of
years.
I
would
anticipate,
maybe
in
2023
that
we
would
be
more
specific
about
when
we
would
start
outreach,
and
it
would
be
based
upon
the
progress
we've
made
on
the
other
four
sites
and
the
funding,
availability
and
capacity
that
we
still
have.
M
So
it
is
being
recommended
as
a
future
priority
and
we're
not
in
a
position
today
to
move
on
this
project,
and
we
would
do
some
level
of
assessment
when
we've
made
enough
progress
on
the
other
sites
to
say
yes,
do
we
want
to
still
move
forward
on
this?
Does
it
still
does
it
still
make
practical
sense
and
do
we
have
the
capacity
and
need
to
still
go
forward
with
it?
M
So
I
I
can't
see
anything
happening
on
this
site
in
the
remainder
of
this
calendar
year
and
then
we
would
reassess
in
2023
and
when
we
brought
back
progress
reports
of
the
council,
we
would
let
them
know
where
this
is
moving
in
terms
of
up
up
the
prioritization
list
and
the
timing
of
it.
So
that's,
I
think
what
we
know
today
and
we're
certainly
will
keep
you
in
the
loop
in
terms
of
timing
and
anything
that
changes
in
that
regard.
M
B
I
I
know
that
staff
understands
the
importance
of
engaging,
and
I
know
that
you
know
community
members
understand
the
importance
of
engaging,
especially
in
these
kind
of
these,
these
kinds
of
developments
that
that
take
place
in
the
community.
Again,
you
know
I
I
I
I
look
at
at
the
configuration
and
I
look
at
the
just
the
geographic
location
it
just
you
know
it.
It's
just
it's.
It
just
seems
odd
to
me
to
see
it
right
there.
B
B
We
want
to
find
a
space
in
every
district
to
accommodate
the
kind
of
crises
that
we're
experiencing.
I'm
the
opinion.
You
know
that
there's
some
districts
that
we're
not
going
to
necessarily
find
the
proper
accommodations,
and
I
think
I
think
that's
okay.
You
know
there
are
going
to
be
some
other
districts.
It's
not
because
we're
we're
we're
we're
pushing
off
a
situation
into
another
district
and
we're
saying
you
know
not
in
my
backyard
or
we're
trying
to
you
know
you
know
clean
our
hands
off
of
this
of
a
of
a
difficult
situation.
B
I
think
that
that
truly
there
are
some
districts
that
are
just
you
know.
Just
make
it
extremely
extremely
difficult,
not
politically
difficult.
I
think,
just
geographically
difficult
to
find
those
spaces,
and
some
other
areas
in
the
city
of
san
jose
are
are
more
apt
to
have
have
these
kind
of
build
outs,
and
so
I
think
that
we
need
to
be
open
to
those
other
opportunities.
I
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
make
one
one
comment
and
I
think
councilmember
perella's
alluded
to
it.
I
honestly
think
it
is
incumbent
on
each
council
member
to
do
the
outreach
for
their
district.
You
know
your
neighborhood's
best
and
frankly,
I
don't
think
step
staff.
You
guys
do
tons
of
stuff
well
and
unless
you
live
in
the
neighborhood,
I
I
just
don't
think
outreach
is
taking
the
lead
on
outreaches
is
the
appropriate
thing
for
staff.
I
What
this
you
know,
safety,
sanitation
and
services
plans
might
look
like
without
without
having
you
can
you
can
pull
up
the
site
plans
for
the
the
sites
that
exist
right
now,
because
we
have
a
number
of
them
and
say:
here's
what's
going
on
there,
what
you
know,
what
might
you
like?
Councilmember
perales
took
people
out
from
his
district
to
other
sites,
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
point.
I
I
heard
a
lot
of
you
know.
E
A
E
J
L
E
M
E
E
A
Really,
I
know
everyone
wants
to
go
eat
dinner,
but
just
10
seconds
to
thank
the
staff.
This
is
a
a
prerequisite
action
to
facilitate
a
housing
development
on
this
site
that
will
generate
166
housing
units
and
the
developer
intends
to
provide
the
inclusionary
affordable
units
on
site.
So
it's
a
good
mixed
income
development.
So
we
thank
the
real
estate
staff
and
the
public
works
staff
for
working
with
us
and
bringing
this
forward.
Thank
you.
G
Yeah
since
eric
was
here,
I
just
wanted
to
say
this
is
a
good
development.
I
think
that
the
property
owner
here
for
being
willing
to
incorporate
a
good
mix,
we've
seen
a
lot
and
we
actually
just
approved
a
project
that
I
know
my
community
wasn't
super
excited
about,
even
though
they
didn't
show
up
today
on
the
four
affordable
projects
that
we
approved
in
the
spartan
key
one
of
them
in
the
spartan
keys.
G
E
M
G
E
A
M
F
A
Just
to
be
clear,
the
project
is
going
to
provide
the
mandatory
15,
affordable
units
within
the
project,
yeah
and
and
the
developer
believes
that
they
can
accommodate
that
in
their
model
of
development.
Okay,
yeah.
I
think
I
think
it's
a
good
thing
eric.
I
just
I'm
just
curious
because
I
think
there's
an
item
coming
before
us
a
little
later
in
which
the
items
are
separate.
You
know
the
the
the
how
type
of
housing
is
separated.
A
M
J
A
Fact
the
fact
that
that
80,
that
that
this
project
would
include
about
25,
affordable
units
out
of
166,
is
a
number
that
can
be
absorbed
into
the
overall
development,
the
other
project.
It's
a
very
large,
it's
a
very
large
number
of
units
and
you
can
build
it
in
a
single
building.
Right
you
couldn't
in
this
project,
you
couldn't
carve
out
the
25
units
to
put
in
a
single
building
correct,
because.