►
From YouTube: DEC 8, 2020 | City Council, Evening Session
Description
City of San José, California
City Council Meeting of December 8, 2020, Evening Session
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=790228&GUID=98C0DF50-A98E-47DB-9129-65FD4DD3CCEB
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
A
president,
thank
you
I
am
3.7
is
the
amendment
to
the
declaration,
suspending
enforcement,
certain
provisions
and
land
use
permits
and
approvals
and
san
jose
municipal
code
issued
june
4th
2020
relating
to
alfresco.
I
don't
believe,
there's
a
presentation:
is
there
a
blog?
No,
there
is
here
for
questions.
Thank
you
for
being
here.
I
will
go
first
to
the
public
and
see
if
there
are
any
questions
or
comments
on
this
item,
which
is
item
3.7,
the
declaration
of
suspending
enforcement
of
the
use,
permit
restrictions
and
outdoor
activity.
B
Okay,
so
we'll
return
now
to
the
council.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
or
motion
move
approval?
Thank
you
right
motion
and
second,
let's
vote.
D
B
Thank
you
onto
3.8,
the
privacy
policy
update
I
see
andrew,
is
here,
and
I
suspect,
you're
here,
to
give
us
a
presentation.
Welcome
andrew.
E
Thank
you
yes,
good
evening,
honorable
mayor
city,
council,
members
of
the
public,
I'm
andrew
erick
assistant
to
the
city,
manager
and
city
data
analytics
lead.
We
are
here
today
at
the
recommendation
of
the
smart
cities
and
service
improvements
committee,
to
recommend
that
the
city
council
approve
the
city's
first
ever
digital
privacy
policy.
We
will
provide
a
very
brief
overview
and
then
look
forward
to
receiving
your
direction
and
guidance.
E
So
when
we
talk
about
privacy
at
the
city,
we're
talking
about
protecting
types
of
information
that
are
classified
as
pii
or
personally
identifiable
information,
pii
is
information
that
can
be
used
indirectly
or
directly
to
identify
an
individual
and,
as
a
city,
we
consider
pii
to
include
the
five
categories
of
data
you
see
on
this
slide:
personal,
sensitive
image,
recording
and
geolocation
data.
The
policy
before
you
today
would
cover
all
of
these
types
of
data
when
they
are
collected
or
used
by
the
city.
E
E
After
researching
the
landscape
of
privacy
policies
around
the
world,
we
feel
that
the
best
course
of
action
would
be
to
model
the
san
jose
privacy
policy.
After
the
european
union's
privacy
policy,
which
is
called
the
general
data,
privacy
regulations
or
gdpr
gdpr
is
a
human
rights-based
privacy
framework.
It
starts
from
a
point
like
san
jose's
principles
that
privacy
is
a
human
right.
It
was
adopted
by
the
european
union
in
2016
and
it
has
been
effective
since
2018.
E
since
that
time.
In
addition
to
being
effective
in
the
european
union,
it
has
been
formally
and
informally
adopted
by
other
governments
and
by
companies
around
the
world.
So
several
other
cities
have
also
modeled
their
policies.
After
gdpr
and
money
companies
are
taking
steps
to
ensure
they
are
in
compliance
with
gdpr
and
so
by
modeling,
our
policy.
After
gdpr.
We
can
take
advantage
of
best
practices
already
in
use
around
the
world,
and
we
can
use
a
framework
that
many
of
our
government
and
business
partners
are
already
working
towards
and
using
in
their
operations.
E
First
was
case
studies
of
other
cities,
most
notably
seattle
and
dublin,
who
have
privacy
programs
of
their
own
and
we're
grateful
to
the
guidance
they've
provided
us.
Second,
we've
engaged
with
san
jose's
privacy
advisory
task
force,
which
is
comprised
of
local
and
community
leaders
from
the
nonprofit
sector,
technology
sector,
our
our
government
partners,
the
business
sector
and
the
law
enforcement
sectors
and,
finally,
to
better
understand
the
needs
of
city
departments
and
offices.
We
have
an
internal
privacy
working
group
comprised
of
representatives
from
departments
around
the
city.
E
Based
on
those
three
inputs,
the
policy
before
you
today
creates
seven
standards
for
protecting
privacy.
These
standards
would
be
used
for
evaluating
projects
and
technologies,
project
technologies
and
services
in
our
city.
So
if
the
city
were
to
embark
on
installing
led
lights
or
smart
city
sensors
around
the
city,
these
standards
would
be
used
to
evaluate
and
made
sure
that
make
sure
that
project
protected
the
pii
involved.
If
the
city
were
to
adopt
a
new
transportation
planning
tool
same
thing,
these
standards
would
be
used
to
evaluate
the
privacy
implications
of
that.
E
If
council
decides
to
adopt
this
policy,
the
next
step
would
of
course,
be
implementation.
Putting
in
place
the
processes
to
do
this
evaluation
for
projects
and
technologies
across
our
city
and
our
community.
E
E
Each
of
those
two
cities,
after
implementing
their
privacy
policy,
have
committed
four
full-time
staff,
in
addition
to
departmental
staff
over
a
period
of
years
to
policy
implementation,
and
we
anticipate
that
full
implementation
in
our
city
would
require
similar
amounts
of
resources,
and
so
we
expect
council
should
expect
conversations
in
future
budget
processes
around
the
needs
for
implementation
of
this
policy.
E
To
conclude
I'll
note
that
passage
of
a
digital
privacy
policy
would
be
an
exciting
step
for
san
jose.
It
would
allow
us,
for
the
first
time
to
put
in
place
a
framework
to
consistently
and
clearly
evaluate
projects
to
safeguard
and
protect
the
enormous
trust
that
the
public
places
in
us
to
deliver
services
for
the
community
and
before
I
close,
I
just
want
to
thank
some
folks
who
have
been
instrumental
in
this
first.
E
I'd
also
like
to
thank
clay
gardner
from
the
mer
from
the
mayor's
office,
who
has
brought
his
creativity
and
insight
to
this
effort
and
has
been
fantastic.
Sarah
zarate
jay,
gavara
and
dolan
beckel
from
the
city
manager's
office,
who
helped
the
city
to
take
the
first
steps
on
this
journey
and
deserve
enormous
credit.
E
B
Thank
you
very
much,
andrew
thanks
for
all
your
hard
work
on
this,
and
this
is
an
effort
we
undertook
several
years
ago.
I
think
before
you
got
into
the
role,
so
I
appreciate
you
bringing
it
home.
I
really
also
want
to
thank
marcelo
paredo
and
rob
lloyd,
all
the
work
that
you
guys
have
invested
into
parkness.
Of
course,
I
appreciate
you
acknowledging
clay
and
his
work,
and,
and
certainly
jordan
and
and
folks
on
our
team.
B
I
know
shreem
has
pushed
on
this
long
ago
and
all
those
folks
who
have
been
serving
on
the
privacy
task
force
advisory
board
and
forgive
me
for
not
knowing
everyone's
name,
but
I
know
a
wide
variety
of
organizations
were
represented
with
a
lot
of
insight
and
good
advice
and
guidance
for
us,
ranging
from
cisco
to
naacp
to
san
jose
state
university
to
stanford
the
county
of
santa
clara
and
the
aclu
so
great
to
have
so
many
folks
deeply
committed
to
this
work,
and
I'm
glad
we've
gotten
to
this
point.
B
This
is
important
for
us
as
a
really
necessary
foundational
step
for
us,
a
building
block
for
all
the
other
work
we
want
to
do
because
we
know
it
gets
a
lot
harder
if,
if
you're,
not,
if
you
have
a
clear
policy
in
place,
so
let's
go
to
the
public
now
see.
If
anyone
has
any
comment
on
3.8,
the
privacy
policy
update.
F
Yes,
hello,
my
name
is
samina
usman,
I'm
the
government
relations
coordinator
for
the
council
on
american
islamic
relations,
as
I
have
spoken
before
on
the
other
times
that
this
issue
has
come
before
the
city
council.
While
I
am
excited
about
the
new
technology
and
new,
you
know
innovative
solutions
brought
to
the
city.
I
am
concerned,
though,
that
this
privacy
policy
doesn't
really
have
a
like
a
surveillance
ordinance
as
as
we
define
it
in
the
civil
rights
community.
F
You
know
we.
We
would
like
to
see
that
there
is
a
surveillance
ordinance
which
would
be
in
place
to
allow
for
the
city
council
to
be
to
be
voting
on
whatever
surveillance
technologies
are
brought
before
the
city,
and
also
that
the
community
would
have
the
ability
to
weigh
in
on
this.
The
other
thing
that
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
as
I
was
looking
through
the
documents,
and
I
saw
that
it
had
information
about
predictive
policing
tools
and
also
biometric
surveillance.
F
You
know,
I
I'm
concerned
that
I
I
don't
want
our
city
to
turn
into.
You
know
like
the
real
life
version
of
the
minority
report
or
you're,
going
to
be
predicting
crimes
before
they
happen,
and
I
feel
that
there's
a
lot
of
rooms
for
roon
for
error
for
this
and
I'm
very
concerned
about
that
and
the
the
privacy
of
our
community.
F
F
Local
city
police
officers
and
we've
seen
a
you
know,
the
the
worst
that
I
know
of
so
far
is
of
you
know
with
the
new
york
p
new
york
police
department,
spying
on
the
muslim
community,
and
it
ended
up
resulting
in
no
no
positive
hits.
So
again,
you
know
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
that
this
will
work
towards
having
a
surveillance
ordinance
in
place,
that
we
do
not
have
predictive
policing
and
we
also
do
not
have
facial
recognition.
G
Thank
you.
Life
is
a
lot
different
than
just
several
years
ago.
The
goal
at
this
time
is
to
leave
the
opaqueness
and
secrecy
of
war
and
for
more
open
discussion
and
debate
in
a
community
to
be
allowed
towards
a
shared
middle
ground
supervisor.
Joseph
sebedian
and
staff
and
santa
clara
county
government
have
done
an
incredible
job
to
label
and
itemize
how
technology
and
its
data
will
be
used,
stored
and
shared
for
santa
clara
county
equipment
with
the
aclu
surveillance
technology
safety
ordinance.
G
This
is
how
to
build
the
ideas
of
peace
and
a
more
positive,
sustainable,
community
and
future,
and
from
this,
how
both
the
everyday
public
and
local
government
can
know
how
to
better
ask
questions
of
policy
together,
simple,
open
cyber
security
policy.
Ideas
need
to
be
reconsidered
as
part
of
this
decent
and
fair
process
in
designing
good
technology
policy
practices.
For
the
future.
To
note,
the
ideas
of
better
public
accessibility
with
cyber
security
policy
is
being
fully
worked
on
by
eastern
european
countries
and
the
un.
G
At
this
time,
the
aclu
has
been
developing
many
ideas:
guidelines
in
state
california,
legal
precedence.
These
aclu
ideas
are
good
rules
of
the
road
that
can
work
towards
a
one
person,
one
voice,
ideal
of
local
community
democracy.
At
this
time,
open
public
policy
ideas,
human
rights
and
civil
protections
with
the
internet
and
iot
can
be
of
important
help
in
the
future
of
everyday
community
work
of
equity
and
reimagine.
G
You
have
developed
a
new
staff
that
seems
to
understand
these
concepts
and
knows
how
to
better
talk
about
openness
and
community
more
than
the
staff
of
previous
years.
Thank
you
to
conclude,
these
are
the
efforts
along
with
other
u.s
communities
that
can
eventually
make
important
demands
of
peace,
caring
and
better
practices
at
the
national
and
international
level.
G
A
final
reminder,
all
parts
of
the
technology
process
and
the
future
of
a
community
can
work
towards
the
country's
good
democratic
ideals.
Thank
you.
H
This
policy
does
not
appear
to
be
adequately
responsive
to
the
public's
concern
with
that
type
of
data
which
directly
implicates
their
privacy
rights.
The
policy
says
that
this
is
a
framework
for
city
departments
to
observe
when
information
systems
or
other
applications
and
forms
collect
the
public's
personally
identifiable
information.
H
So
do
information
systems
include
surveillance
technologies
like
drones,
facial
recognition,
etc.
The
policy
also
exempts
police
departments
from
the
notice
requirements.
We
could
not
locate
any
general
surveillance
use
policies
that
apply
to
police
departments
and
are
concerned
that
in
accepting
it,
the
city
is
failing
to
address
the
very
police
surveillance
that
capitalized
digital
privacy
efforts.
H
I
Yes,
hello,
thank
you,
mayor
and
and
council
for
the
time
I
share
very
similar
concerns.
I'm
I'm
the
founder
of
an
organization
called
the
citizens,
privacy
coalition
of
santa
clara
county.
We
believe
that
this
policy
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
the
city
has
a
long
way
to
go.
I
There
are
a
lot
of
racial
biases
in
technologies
that
that
the
city
is
going
to
be
deploying
with
the
smart
city
efforts
and,
as
victor
pointed
out,
there
is
an
exemption
for
the
police
department
in
this
privacy
policy
that
they
can
collect
these
this
data
and
we're
and
we're
extremely
concerned
that
this
is
going
to
enable
mass
surveillance.
I
think
it's
extremely
telling
that
victor
sin
who
is
on
this
privacy
task
force,
is
concerned
about
this
privacy
policy.
I
So,
like
I
said
it's
a
very
small
step
in
the
wrong
direction
in
the
right
direction.
Excuse
me,
but
the
city
has
a
long
way
to
go.
I
actually
wanted
to
specifically
address
facial
recognition,
surveillance
really
quick.
I
did
this
in
the
last
council
meeting
that
I
attended.
San
jose
is
actually
behind
the
times
compared
to
other
major
cities
in
the
bay
area.
San
francisco,
alameda
berkeley,
oakland
have
all
banned
the
use
of
facial
recognition,
also
portland
oregon.
I
I
actually
emailed
every
single
one
of
you
this
morning
about
making
a
proposal
to
ban
the
technology
in
san
jose.
I
would
love
to
hear
back
from
any
of
you
and
talk
with
to
any
of
you
about
about
moving
forward
with
that.
We're
just
concerned
that
yeah
we're
the
san
jose
police
department
has
shown
interest
in
using
facial
recognition
surveillance
in
the
past.
I
I
have
the
records
to
prove
it
and
we're
just
concerned
that,
along
with
this
privacy
policy
and
and
no
ban
on
the
technology
that
we're
that
we're
going
to
be
enabling
racist
mass
surveillance.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
all
right.
Returning
to
the
council,
I
want
to
thank
again
everyone
for
their
hard
work
on
this.
B
I
have
one
question
and
then
one
observation
I
know
we've
got
to
find
a
way
to
actually
fund
this
work
going
forward,
particularly
the
position
of
privacy
house,
which
I
think
andrew's
handling
with
a
lot
of
other
duties,
and
my
recollection
of
the
knight
foundation
has
a
particular
interest
in
this.
Are.
Are
we
talking
tonight
now
about
supporting
this.
E
Work
I'll
take
a
shot
at
that
and
then
others
can
weigh
in.
I
think
the
short.
E
Yes,
I
think
the
the
knight
foundation
is
interested
in
this
work
and
I
don't
think
we've
yet
made
specific
proposal
proposals
to
them
about
funding
particular
parts
of
it.
But
if
we
did,
I
think
they
may
be
receptive.
B
Okay,
thanks
andrew
I
in
a
tough
underspot,
because
I
obviously
this
conversation
stuff
to
happen.
I
just
know
that.
Obviously
the
community
wants
us
to
go
much
further
or
many
many
members
of
the
community
would
like
to
see
us
push
them
further.
I
appreciate
their
interest
in
having
us
do
that.
We
have
very
limited
bandwidth
because,
unlike
those
other
cities,
I
have
four
staff
members
that
do
nothing
but
privacy,
which
must
be
a
nice
world
to
live
in.
B
We
continue
to
be
the
most
friendly
staff
city
hall
of
any
major
city
in
the
country,
so
we've
got
to
focus
so
yeah,
I'm
happy
to
offer
our
offices
in
support
of
your
efforts
to
seek
outside
grant
funding.
I
did
want
to
make
a
very
small
modification
of
the
policy.
I
know
a
lot
of
folks
are
interested
in.
You
know
everything
from
banning
facial
recognition
to
a
policy
regarding
surveillance
technology.
B
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
simply
to
have
a
very
blanket
explicit
statement,
within
that
exception,
around
emergency
responders.
Where,
currently,
you
know,
has
some
language
and
then
says
something
along
the
lines
of
whenever
possible
or
emergency
responders
will
attempt
to
honor
the
city's
privacy
principles.
I
think
we
should
also
include
a
sentence
that
would
read
as
an
example:
emergency
responders
must
abide
by
constitutional
privacy
standards
articulating
the
4th
5th
6th
and
14th
amendments
of
the
u.s
constitution,
so
that
it's
clear
to
everybody.
B
We've
got
a
very
clear
floor
and
we
expect
we're
going
to
be
abiding
by
constitutional
privacy
standards.
You
know
that
that
doesn't
take
a
lot
of
research
for
us
to
do,
because,
because
you
know,
every
police
officer
is
trained
to
search
and
seizure
and
other
relevant
issues.
B
So
I
would
ask
the
maker
of
the
motion
to
consider
adding
a
sentence
similar
to
the
one
I
just
described,
and
hopefully
at
least
that
will
give
us
a
a
bit
of
a
small
step
toward
the
direction
that
folks
would
like
to
see
us
moving
in
to
establish
some
some
basic
standards
in
that
space
council
member.
K
Davis,
thank
you
mayor
and
happy
to
explicitly
state
that
we
need
to
follow
the
constitution
in
in
the
motion
that
I'm
about
to
make.
But
I,
before
that
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
and
I
and
I
completely
first
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
andrew
and
the
team
for
working
on
this.
It's
been
we've
been
talking
about
a
privacy
policy
for
many
years.
I'm
sure
council,
member
camas,
will
tell
us
exactly
how
many
years
since
he
predates
me
on
the
council
and
I'm
glad
that
we're
we're.
K
Finally,
at
this
point
I
and
I
fully
understand
the
the
need
to
want
to
go
farther
in
terms
of
privacy
for
the
individual.
I
also
take
a
researcher's
view
of
it
and,
as
a
council
member,
a
practical
view
of
it,
and
so
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
in
those
areas
wanting
to
balance
the
individual's
need
for
privacy,
with
with
a
couple
of
other
things,
first
of
all
services.
K
It's
not
included
in
the
exceptions
but
andrew
is
there
still
an
ability
for
staff,
like
council
offices,
to
coordinate
and
and
discuss
specific
cases
with
someone
like
someone
from
parks,
for
example,
or
for
co
from
code
enforcement,
and
to
give
that
personally
identified
information
among
across
offices,
I
guess
and
for
them
to
share
with
us
when
we're
talking
about
a
case
that
was
referred.
E
That
work
yeah.
So
I
think
that's
a
good
question.
Thank
you,
council
member.
So
the
the
policy,
of
course
does
not
prohibit
collection
or
or
sharing
of
information.
It
just
puts
in
place
standards
for
ensuring
that
that
information
is
not
misused
or
misshared.
So
we
would
apply
those
standards
and
I
think
it
probably
would
not
prohibit
sharing
information
securely
amongst
city
staff
or
or
elected
officials.
Certainly,
but
we
you
know,
the
point
of
the
policy
is
to
make
sure
that
we
have
standards
in
place
to
look
at
that.
K
Great
thank
you,
and
I
would
just
like
to
to
ask
tony
when
you're,
when
you're
working
on
your
trainings
for
the
18th
floor
and
council
member
staff
to
incorporate
the
the
privacy
policy
for
items
that
that
that
may
be
impacted
by
for,
for,
I
guess,
workflows
that
might
be
impacted
by
this
by
this
privacy
policy
on
a
go
forward
basis,
so
that
we
can
all
understand
and
our
staffs
can
understand
what
exactly
is
meant
by
this
and
and
what
we
can
and
cannot
share
across
departments
and
maybe
outside
the
city
with
others.
K
Just
to
make
sure
everybody
is
clear
going
forward
because
we
are
now
setting
a
standard.
So
thank
you
for
that,
andrew
and
then.
Secondly,
I
I
see
the
I
read
this
section:
confidentiality,
anonymity
and
government
open
government
standards,
and
I
think
this
speaks
to
it.
But
it's
not
it's
not
precisely
clear.
K
It
talks
about
anonymizing,
de-identifying
or
student
pseudonymizing,
I
think,
is
the
way
you
say
that
personally
identifying
information
so
that
it
can't
be
related
back
to
a
given
individual,
and
I
just
want
to
ensure-
because
I
think
this
is
in
our
principles.
K
But
I
just
want
to
ensure
that
that
we're
clear
because
it
will
go
these
kinds
of
things-
will
go
to
the
city
attorney's
office
when
a
researcher
requests
data
and
I've
been
on
the
the
research
request
side
of
that,
and
that
that
that
statement
can
be
taken
very,
very
granularly
to
and
used
basically
not
to
share
information
when
we
have
made
it
clear
in
our
principles
that
we
do
want
to
continue
to
work
with
researchers
not
only
to
enlist
research
help,
but
also
to
be
responsive
to
researchers
in
a
way
that
will
advance
policy
improvement
right
over
time
through
quantitative
and
qualitative
analysis.
K
So
when
we're
talking
about
anonymizing
or
pseudo-anonymizing,
I'm
just
going
to
say
it
that
way
or
de-identifying
data
that
we
don't
do
it
in
a
way
that
precludes
putting
multiple
data
sets
together
across
different
departments.
For
example-
and
I
know
we
used
to
talk
about
a
data
lake-
we
haven't
talked
about
that
in
a
very
long
time
where
you
would
have
a
very
large
data
set
sorry
for
getting
super
wonky
to
everybody.
Who's-
not
interested
in
this
in
this
topic.
But
I
just
want
to
andrew's
giggling
at
me
thanks
andrew,
but
I.
K
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
we
can
be
responsive
to
researchers,
because
we
can't
right
now
today
say
exactly
what
a
researcher
might
want
to
look
at
and
put
together
to
create
a
data
set
that
that
crosses
boundaries.
K
For,
for
example,
I
just
to
use
my
own
example
where
we
we
might
want
to
look
at
what
happened
on
at
my
residence,
with
public
works
and
with
street
improvements
and
with
small
cell
permits,
for
example,
and
we
might
want
to
to
have
all
of
that
information
and
that's.
K
There
are
three
discrete
boxes
of
information,
and
if
we
anonymized
each
one
using
a
different
algorithm,
then
you
couldn't
tie
them
all
together
to
say
this
is
what
happened
on
at
this
address
over
the
last
five
years,
for
just,
for
example,
and
that's
just
a
off
the
top
of
my
head.
So
this
is
a
long-winded
way
of
saying.
E
Yep,
so
thank
you,
council
member.
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
well-taken
question
and
a
good
point.
The
policy
is
not
meant
to
prohibit
data
sharing
with
researchers
or
with
external
folks,
because
that's
extremely
valuable
it.
E
It
is
meant
to
obviously
put
in
place
a
standard
and
an
expectation
that
information
be
anonymized
where
possible
and
where
that
anonymization
would
not
get
in
the
way
of
that
particular
research,
and
there
are
great
tools
out
there
from
institutions
like
mit
and
google
and
folks
who
have
really
put
a
lot
of
work
into
thinking
about
privacy
to
basically
propose
and
give
us
ways
to
do
that
in
a
way
that
is
safe
and
anonymizes
the
data
without
taking
away
its
its
power.
E
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
would
want
to
do
an
implementation,
and
one
of
the
reasons
that
you
know,
satellite
dublin
have
put
in
place.
These
resources
is
to
put
in
place
those
technologies
that
help
with
data
sharing
in
a
safe
way.
H
Yes
and
this
policy
would
clarify
that
we
would
be
expecting
researchers
not
to
be
releasing
data
in
any
way
that
would
violate
the
privacy
principles
that
we
have.
So
the
terms
of
our
sharing
with
them
would
be
consistent
with
these,
so
that,
while
in
their
research,
there
might
be
some
things
that
they
are
doing,
that
they
would
not
be
releasing
any
pii
or
anything
that
could
be
linked
back
together
to
to
feel
a
violation
of
the
privacy
along
the
principles
that
we're
we're,
suggesting.
K
Yes,
exactly
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
also
just
put
out
there,
so
I've
encountered
a
lot
of
different
in
my
in
my
past
life
as
an
education
researcher,
a
lot
of
different
legal
departments
at
different
state
education
departments
and
the
idea
of
this
phrase
in
such
a
way
that
it
can
no
longer
be
related
back
to
a
given
individual
can
be
taken
very,
very
literally
when
you're
getting
sometimes
millions
of
data
records,
and
there
would
be
you
can
find
a
and
a
completely
unduplicated
record.
But
you
would
never.
K
You
would
have
to
be
searching
for
that
particular
record
in
order
to
actually
identify
it
and
go
looking
for
that.
One
individual,
I
used
to
say
you
know
getting
looking
at
the
california
test
score
data.
I
couldn't
even
find
my
own
children
without
knowing
their
all
of
their.
I
know
all
of
their
variables,
but
I
would
have
to
know
their
test
score
in
order
to
find
them.
That
was
how
it
was.
K
It
was
de-anonymized
to
that
level,
but
at
the
same
time
we
still
we
still
had
issues
with
with
the
california
department
of
education
as
just
an
example,
and
so
I
don't
I'm
concerned
about
when
I
read
that
that
the
phrase
in
such
a
way
that
it
can
no
longer
be
related
back
to
an
given
individual
that
that
the
city
attorney's
office
or
a
lawyer
who
looks
at
this,
who
hasn't
ever
gotten
a
huge
data
file,
would
understand
what
what
that
means
for
the
researcher.
K
I
know
our
attorney's
office
is
very
conservative
and
I
understand
that
they
don't
want
us
to
get
in
trouble
and
but
I've
encountered
that
again
from
the
other
side,
and
it
precludes
very
good
and
very
important
research
on,
for
example,
in
my
case,
educational
equity
and
and
not
releasing
that
data
prevented
that
research
from
happening
for
many
years.
And
so
I
don't
want
us
to
get
into
that.
That
issue,
especially
as
we're
talking
about
equity,
that
we
could
get
into
that
problem.
H
If
I
could,
council
member,
I
think
this
is
exactly
the
reason
that
we
wanted
to
bring
this
to
the
full
council
for
policy
direction.
So
if
there
are
pieces
to
the
policy
that
you
as
a
whole
think
should
be
called
out
or
emphasized,
we
can
take
that
direction
back
and
incorporate
that
into
the
next
iteration
of
the
policy.
K
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that,
so
I'm
I'm
happy
to
make
the
motion
to
to
accept
staff
recommendation
and
then
also
to
include
a
statement
within
the
emergency
responder
exception
per
the
mayor's
direction.
To
say
that
emergency
responders
must,
of
course,
abide
by
protections
provided
in
the
at
minimum.
Fourth,
fifth,
sixth,
and
fourteenth
amendments
of
the
u.s
constitution.
J
Thank
you
and
and
thank
you,
councilmember
davis.
I
know
that
our
future
researchers
will
appreciate
your
your
expertise
in
in
the
data
analysis.
J
I
have
to
tell
you
that
I
do
have
a
depth
of
knowledge
on
this
issue,
and
I
recall
that
I
remember
maybe
six
years
ago
trying
to
get
it
on
priority.
Setting
it
didn't
make
it,
but
staff
did
bring
it
forward.
J
When
I
was
on
pispas
when
when
any
com
was
being
proposed,
any
comment
I
ended
up
voting.
No
because
we
didn't
have
a
data
policy,
but
but
it
actually
highlighted
the
need
for
a
data
policy,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
staff
took
up
the
ball
and
and
and
ran
with
it.
J
I
mean
there's
a
whole
group
of
people
from
kipp
to
rob
to
you
know
I
I
lost
track
of
how
many
people
were
involved
in
this
process,
but
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
your
dedication
to
making
sure
that
this
went
over
the
finish
line,
and
I
know
that
this
job
isn't
finished,
because
I
I
still
have
questions
remaining
as
well,
and
I
I'm
going
to
be
supporting
motion
you
know
like
today.
We
realize
that
people
can
analyze
our
poop
and
find
out
if
we
have
cobin.
J
That's
true,
it's
anonymized,
but
I
appreciate
that
so
so
I
hope
you
continue
this
effort.
I
know
that
we're
you're,
obviously
collecting
data
and
some
people's
you
know
information
is,
is
very
valuable
and-
and
I
appreciate
the
work
that's
being
done-
and
I
know
this-
this
isn't
the
last
time
this
policy
is
going
to
be
up
for
review
and
thank
you
for
the
effort.
J
You
know
one
question
I
do
have:
if
we,
if
we
do,
you
know,
I
think
some
of
the
people
who
spoke
up
about
facial
recognition
and
all
that
if
we
are
going
forward
with
a
technology
like
this,
wouldn't
it
have
to
go
through
city
council,
at
least
in
closed
session
or
something
before
we
approve
it.
Don't
we
have
to
pay
for
it
somehow?
Well,
we've.
J
Yeah
at
the
airport
yeah
we
approved
it,
but
that
was
publicly
discussed,
yeah
yeah,
so
I'm.
What
I'm
saying
is
that
there
is
some
transparency
in
the
decisions
that
we
make.
We
do
take
it
to
the
public
before
we
make
those
decisions,
and
I
want
to
be
clear
that
we
don't
necess,
we
don't
make
decisions
in
a
vacuum
just
for
those
who
are
listening.
Many
of
the
things
that
that
we
implement
go
through
everything
that
cost
money
goes
through
city
council
and
it
gets
voted
on
and-
and
that's
that's
a
great
way
to
keep.
B
A
B
Okay,
we'll
move
forward
then
to
item.
I
believe
we're
on
3.9.
B
C
C
As
you
know,
measure
t
was
passed
by
by
the
residents
of
san
jose
in
2018
to
provide
up
to
650
million
650
million
dollars
for
public
safety
and
infrastructure
improvements
in
our
city,
and
we
all
have
a
very
strong
obligation
to
deliver
on
the
promises
we
made
to
the
residents
in
2015
to
2018
and
we're
making
great
progress
so
far
in
this
current
cip.
We
have
about
500
million
of
that
650
million
dollars
program
and
about
146
million
of
that.
C
In
this
current
fiscal
year,
we've
had
two
very
productive
meetings
with
our
community
oversight
committee,
12
seats
of
which
are
filled
and
three
vacant
positions,
and
we
had
a
meeting
on
december
3rd
to
review
the
latest
audit
results
and
we'll
be
reporting
back
to
the
mayor
and
city
council
on
the
co
community
oversight
committee's
findings
in
january
february
time
frame
of
next
year.
C
One
area
of
measure
t
the
biggest
actually
single
area
is
street
repairs
under
the
leadership
of
our
department
of
transportation.
We've
been
making
great
progress
on
this
so
far,
37
million
37.5
million
approximately
per
year
for
the
next
eight
years
in
the
current
current
calendar
year
about
72
miles
will
have
been
resurfaced
with
measure
t
funding
and
a
lot
more
miles
overall
with
other
funding
sources,
as
is
detailed
in
our
report.
C
C
However,
we
are
working
to
leverage
about
61
million
dollars
of
additional
funding
for
this
category
through
our
highway
through
the
highway
federal
highway
bridge
program
grant
fund
we've
so
far,
as
shown
in
the
table
here
completed
27
smaller
bridge
treatment
projects
in
this
year,
and
we
have
18
more
of
those
projects
to
go
by
spring
2021
and
in
the
next
measure,
t
report
we'll
be
starting
to
talk
about
those
projects
that
we're
going
to
be
programming
up
programming,
not
for
future
years
under
the
bridge
program,
public
safety,
another
large
category
in
measure
t
includes
five
new
or
relocated
fire
stations
fire
station
37
is
under
con
and
fire
station
20,
the
one
which
is
the
one
at
the
airport.
C
Those
are
both
under
construction.
We
have
site
identified
by
the
mayor
and
city
council
for
fire
station
number,
eight
in
the
downtown
area,
and
we
have
fire
station
32
and
36,
which
are
both
in
the
council
district
7
area.
We
have
sites
that
we
have
identified
and
are
under
negotiations
and
we're
hoping
to
report
back
to
the
mayor
and
city
or
under
discussions
and
or
negotiations,
and
we're
hoping
to
report
back
to
the
mayor
and
city
council
on
those
sites
in
early
2021.
C
So
over
the
next
few
months
we
are
still
looking
at
some
candidate
sites
for
the
fire
station
23
relocation,
which
is
in
council
district
4.,
and
so
we,
I
we're
working
really
hard
next
calendar
year
to
pinpoint
that
site
as
well
the
pd
training
and
academy
for
the
police
department.
C
We
are
continuing
to
search
for
viable
sites
to
place
that
facility
and
the
police
air
support
unit
hangar
is
currently
on
hold.
It
was
planned
to
be
rebuilt
as
part
of
the
facilities
reconstructions
for
at
the
airport
and
since
the
facilities
project
is
on
a
temporary
hold.
The
air
hangar
is
on
temporary
hold
as
well
and
we'll
revisit
that
next
year,
pending
economic
forecasts,
emergency
operations
center,
which
is
being
constructed
in
conjunction
with
our
new
fire
training
center,
has
an
overall
budget
of
roughly
87
million
dollars,
25.7
of
which
is
from
measure
t.
C
We
received
bids
a
few
weeks
ago
for
this
project
and
we
are
analyzing
those
bids
right
now
and
planning
to
recommend
or
an
award
of
that
project
to
the
mayor
and
city
council
likely.
The
second
council
meeting
in
january
2021
and
complete
construction
of
the
entire
facility
by
december
2022,
led
lighting
is
another
huge
area
in
important
area
in
measure.
C
T
overall,
there's
36
000
streetlights
remaining
to
be
converted
and
we're
planning
on
converting
9000
of
those
with
city,
transportation,
department,
staff
and
27
000
of
those
through
a
turnkey
agreement
with
pg
e,
and
that
work
is
starting
in
the
next
few
weeks.
Actually-
and
we
are
planning
on
reinitiating
a
procurement
for
smart
controllers
for
the
led
lights
in
the
next,
as
as
we
move
forward
city
facilities
and
parks,
we
are
working
on
converting
all
the
led
lights
in
the
city
facilities
and
parks
and
trails
by
2024.
C
I
do
want
to
be
clear,
though,
that,
as
as
noted
in
the
memo
most
of
the
measure
t
money
has
been,
we
were
directed
a
few
reports
ago
on
measure
t
to
really
focus
on
parks
and
and
trails
as
a
priority,
and
we
plan
on
finishing
those
in
the
next
year
to
year
and
a
half
and
that
likely
will
use
a
lot
of
the
measure,
t
lighting
money
and
so
for
some
of
our
other
city
buildings
and
maintenance
yards
and
such
we
will
continue
to
look
at
other
funding
sources
or
on
bill
financing
avenues
in
the
future.
C
We
are
working
on
the
controller
for
the
or
the
procurement
for
the
controllers,
for
the
led
lighting
led
the
controller
procurement
for
the
facilities
led
lights
as
well
with
the
finance
department.
So
that's
moving
forward
right
now
and
another
category
is
the
clean
water
and
green
infrastructure
categories.
We
are
working,
we
have
25
million
dollars
for
clean
water
and
green
infrastructure.
C
We
are
working
right
now
on
the
river
oaks
pump
station
project
and
we
are
starting
a
process
to
identify
the
other
projects
that
we'll
be
able
to
do
with
that.
C
25
million
dollars
in
green
infrastructure
and
we'll
have
some
community
outreach
on
that
in
the
likely
february
time
frame
and
reporting
back
to
the
transportation
environment
committee
around
april
and
then
in
may
or
june,
coming
to
city
council
with
the
specific
project
recommendations
on
that
for
additional
green
infrastructure
projects
and
then
the
charcot
storm
drain
improvement
project
is
another
we
have
35
million
dollars
allocated
for
that
and,
as
opposed
to
building
a
pump
station,
we
have
identified
a
better
solution
that
we've
been
coordinating
with
the
set
with
valley
water,
where
we
would
essentially
have
a
piping
system
to
shift
that
water
over
into
cuddy
creek
as
opposed
to
building
a
large
pump
station,
and
that
is
expected
to
generate
some
project
savings.
C
As
we've
identified
in
our
report,
we
expect
the
project
overall
to
cost
under
30
million
dollars
and
with
that
we'd
be
happy
to
address
any
questions.
You
have
we
don't
have
any
specific
recommendations
in
this
report.
Other
than
just
ask
you
to
accept
the
report
that
we're
presenting
to
you
today.
B
G
Breakman
hi
boy
beekman
here
in
some
early
gestures
towards
public
oversight
with
the
future
of
community
technology.
It
seems
public
oversight,
ideas
with
measure
t
will
take
at
least
a
few
more
years
to
settle
into
its
initial
intentions
as
public
oversight
to
monitor
the
accounting
issues
of
measure
t
leaving
another
several
years
before
settling
into
what
seems
the
only
half-hearted
goal
of
technology.
G
Public
oversight
with
measure
t
as
there
are
currently
three
city
government
review
boards
to
address
technology
projects
and
practices,
can
work
begin
to
consider
a
public
oversight
board
that
can
address
openness
and
accountability,
issues
and
the
future
of
community
technology,
surveillance
and
data
collection
policy
practices
and
projects,
and
it
can
possibly
work
to
also
address
some
community
law
enforcement
issues
as
well.
G
Thank
you
for
this
issue.
You
know
from
the
last
item.
It
was
nice
to
hear
council
person
camas.
You
know
talk
about
years
of
wanting
to
develop
good
practices.
He
mentioned
the
term
data
privacy.
G
He
seemed
to
say
something
of
which
is
a
much
more
interesting
concept
than
just
saying
privacy
policy,
because
you
know
myself,
I
really
like
the
ideas
of
open
public
policy
that
talks
about.
You
know:
surveillance
technology,
that's
out
on
the
street
that
the
police
will
be
using
and
that
you're
trying
to
better
address
now.
G
You
know:
there's
open
public
policy,
there's
there's
data
privacy
policy.
I
think
we
may
have
to
learn
to
to
expand
the
word
privacy
policy
and-
and
you
want
to
review
things
at
this
time-
review
the
sunshine
ordnance,
ideas
of
2007
and
8..
Those
are
really
good
things
and
also
review
the
beginning
stages
of
drone
policy
and
drone
work
in
2014..
G
That
should
very
much
address
these
civil
rights
and
civil
protection
questions.
You're,
asking
that
you
know
I
hope,
you're
going
to
turn
the
tide
and
work
towards
civil
protection
ideas
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
B
I
thank
you
all
right
back
to
the
councilman
councilmember
canvas.
J
Yes,
I
just
had
like
two
quick
questions.
I
appreciate
matt
kano's
efforts
on
this
and
number
one.
I
I
was
you
know
considering
that
we
had
so
much
emergency
things
happen
in
the
last
couple
years.
Do
we
have
enough
allocated
to
the
emergency
operations
center?
C
Yes,
councilman
chemist.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
question
and
we
we
actually
have
a
table
in
the
memo
with
our
funding
plan
for
the
for
the
eoc
and
and
we
feel
very
comfortable
that
we
have
enough
money
to
award
the
project.
We
received
bids
a
few
weeks
ago
again
that
we're
still
evaluating,
but
they
appear
to
be
within
our
budget
and
so
we're
reporting
back
officially
to
make
that
recommendation
in
january.
J
Okay,
great
and
I-
and
I
know
that
you
like
to
make
sure
that
people
don't
fall
asleep
reading
the
reports
with
too
many
drill
downs.
I
appreciate
that,
but
is
there?
Is
there
a
a
more
detailed
report
of
where
the
you
know
like
dollars
are
going
to
be
allocated
that
kind
of
thing
that
either
council
or
the
public
could
be
privy.
C
To
yes,
there
is
thank
you
for
that
question.
We
we
haven't.
The
audit
of
of
that
was
prepared
for
the
community
oversight
committee
is
available.
We
reviewed
it
last
week
the
week
before
with
the
actual
community
oversight
committee
and
will
be
in
front
of
you.
I
think
it's
in
february
with
that
detailed
audit
report.
C
B
All
right,
I
don't
think
there
are
any
other
questions,
so
I
think
we
will
entertain
a
motion
to
accept
the
report.
H
D
B
B
You
thank
you
item.
312
is
a
police
retiree
member
term
extension
to
the
board
administration,
that
is
on
the
retirement
board.
A
K
B
Thank
you.
Let's
see
if
any
members
of
the
public
would
like
to
speak,
I
don't
see
any
hands
on
this
item.
3
11
and
thank
you
to
nick
muyo
for
your
willingness
to
continue
to
serve.
Let's
vote.
H
B
L
I
think
it
all
gonna
prompt
you
for
the
for
the
slide,
thanks
right
well,
first
off,
thank
you,
and
certainly
I
was
gonna
say
I
know
we're
on
a
tight
schedule
today,
but
we've
kind
of
blown
right
through
being
on
a
tight
schedule,
so
I'll
try
to
to
zoom
through
this
there's,
there's
just
six
slides,
and
so
in
the
last
three
months
you
know
it's.
L
It's
certainly
been
a
roller
coaster
ride
for
all
of
us
and-
and
we
know
undoubtedly
for
our
business
community
as
well
and
and
so
in-
regards
to
our
our
local
businesses
and
organizations
that
have
been
been
struggling.
We
we've
been
putting
in
a
lot
of
work
to
try
and
support
them
through
this
task
force.
You
can
go
to
slide
two.
L
L
So
during
the
second
phase
of
our
task
force,
we
expanded
from
four
to
eight
committees
and
we
conducted
38
meetings.
We
worked
to
include
businesses
not
only
in
the
downtown
core,
but
in
the
surrounding
neighborhood
business
districts
such
as
japan,
town,
east,
santa
clara,
alum
rock
and
the
alameda,
and
I
would
be
remiss
not
to
mention
that
this
task
force
was
entirely
supported
and
staffed
by
my
team,
and
I
do
want
to
personally
take
the
opportunity
now
to
thank
them
for
their
collective
efforts.
L
I
also
want
to
thank
all
of
our
partners
who
participated
as
at
large,
non-voting
members,
and
that
includes
state
senator
jim
bell's
office,
state
assembly,
mirage
caller's
office,
county
supervisor,
susan
ellenberg's
office,
blagey,
zelalich
of
our
our
downtown
manager,
laura
schumalewski
from
team
san
jose
and
a
special
thanks
to
bennett
chang,
our
intergovernmental
relations
director
for
having
participated
in
the
process.
L
You
can
advance
to
slide
five
so
for
the
city
recommendations
there
quite
a
bit
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
detail
on
each
one.
I
do
want
to
highlight
just
a
few
things,
though.
A
number
of
the
recreation
recommendations
revolved
around
next
year's
budget
discussion
and
hopefully
with
federal
funding
on
the
way
by
then
we
can
explore
some
creative
ideas,
such
as
the
consumer
cash
card
pilot
like
they
implemented
in
hawaii
or
creating
additional
fee
waivers
like
how
san
francisco
mayor
london
breed
did
for
the
food
and
entertainment
businesses
there.
L
The
task
force
asked
to
explore
some
form
of
tax
relief
for
businesses
that
have
already
incurred
expenses
in
covert
related
business
operations
as
well,
and
I
also
want
to
commend
staff,
especially
blage,
our
downtown
manager
and
ed
solis,
the
prns
placemaking
team,
or
from
the
prs
placemaking
team
for
their
work
on
the
alfresco
program.
L
Parking
relief
is
an
ongoing
theme
in
our
discussions,
and
my
office
has
been
working
with
dot
to
explore
what
makes
sense
without
draining
our
entire
parking
fund,
which
a
lot
of
other
things
depend
on.
And
finally,
I
heard
loud
and
clear
from
our
task
force
members
the
need
to
place
a
cap
on
third
party
delivery.
Fee
services
at
15.
L
Many
are
paying
25
to
30.
Right
now,
and
as
we
go
into
this
this
next
shelter
in
place,
we
know
it
is
even
more
important
because
we
are
no
longer
allowing
the
indoor
our
outdoor
dining.
I
was
happy
to
reconnect
with
councilmember
deep
over
the
summer
and
although
disappointed
that
that
effort
didn't
make
its
way
out
of
rules,
I'm
I'm
I'm
happy
now
to
be
working
with
the
mayor
and
councilman
rodrigo.
L
As
the
plea
from
the
task
force
has
reignited
this
conversation,
and
it
was
also
promising
to
see
supervisor
chavez
and
simian
submitting
a
similar
proposal
at
the
county.
You
can
advance
to
the
last
slide
slide.
Six,
so
thank
you
for
your
patience
and
if
anybody
would
like
to
learn
more
about
our
task
force,
including
including
all
the
documents
meeting,
minutes
and
recordings
of
our
meetings,
you
can
visit
sjd3.com
backslash
dtsj
recovery,
and
I
do
ask
my
colleagues
that
you
approve
the
memo
moving
forward.
L
The
task
force
recommendations
and
I
would
like
to
thank
everybody
who
participated
in
the
task
force
for
speaking
up
on
their
needs
during
these
uncertain
times,
and
I'm
available
for
questions
thanks.
L
Thank
you,
member
and
I'll.
Make
I'll
make
the
motion
as
well
to
approve
the
set
of
recommendations
thanks.
B
B
H
Just
got
there
thanks
sam
sorry
about
that
council
members
long
day
today
spoke
at
the
county
twice
already
today.
So
just
a
little
bit
of
zoom
fatigue
just
want
to
ask
that
the
council,
please
accept
the
recommendations.
I'm
nate
leblanc
business
development
manager
with
the
downtown
association.
H
Many
downtown
association
members
were
key
members
of
the
task
force.
We
ask
that
you
respect
the
opinions
of
the
small
business
people.
This
is
a
great
avenue
for
their
to
get
directly
to
you
and
to
help
shape
the
city's
work
in
helping
businesses
survive.
The
coven
pandemic
like
to
call
special
attention
to
the
15
fee
cap
on
third
party
delivery.
Apps.
It's
not
something
the
downtown
association
would
normally
wait
into,
but
we
want
to
respect
the
call
from
our
small
business
members.
H
Our
restaurant
members
who've
just
been
hit
with
another
crushing
kind
of
shutdown
or
move
only
to
delivery
or
take
out
as
options
that
this
is
something
that
can
help
them
try
to
survive.
What
is
sure
to
be
a
long
and
dark
winter.
I
want
to
thank
everyone
for
their
time
in
putting
these
recommendations
together
and
ask
that
the
council
move
the
entire
package
forward
so
that
the
work
can
continue
and
the
task
force
can
feel
like
their
voice
has
been
heard
at
the
at
this
level.
Thank
you.
B
Thanks
nate
we'll
take
that
recommendation
up
tomorrow
at
rules
committee,
dalia
rossen,
welcome,
dalia.
A
Hi,
yes,
I'm
dahlia
rosson,
I'm
the
director
of
new
ballet,
and
I
was
also
one
of
the
co-chairs
of
the
task
force
and
thank
you,
mayor
and
council
members
for
considering
today's
recommendations
from
council
member
perales
and
the
task
force.
Local
businesses
and
organizations
in
the
greater
downtown
area
continue
to
struggle
throughout
this
pandemic.
More
now
than
ever
with
the
regional
stay-at-home
order
in
full
effect
and
the
task
force
recommendations
are
crafted
from
an
inclusive
process
and
would
provide
short-term
relief
and
long-term
strategies
to
sustain
our
economic
and
cultural
hub,
especially
for
performance
venues.
A
We
really
need
help
in
looking
at
what
the
future
is
going
to
look
like.
So
I
really
ask
that
you,
you
approve
these
recommendations.
Thanks.
M
Carrasco,
thank
you
mayor.
Well,
first
of
all,
I
I
wanna.
I
just
wanna
applaud
council
member
paralysis
efforts
here
this
started
months
ago
when,
when
he
took
the
initiative
to
start
the
task
force-
and
I
know
it
was
out
of
a
lot
of
frustration-
excuse
me
out
of
a
lot
of
frustration.
M
I
I
shared
the
same
frustration
and
and
as
a
result,
I
I
headed
up
the
equity
health
task
force
and
he
was
instrumental
in
in
getting
some
of
those
recommendations
to
the
city
and
and
to
the
county.
M
But
but
this
is
this,
is
I
I
think,
we're
in
such
a
unique
moment
in
time
where
we're
we're
trying
to
be
creative
and
innovative,
where
we're
trying
to
be
inclusive
and
really
get
to
the
table,
with
with
different
ideas
on
how
we
help
how
we
wrap
our
arms
around
each
other
to
try
and
survive
one
of
the
most
stark
moments
in
modern
history.
M
We
we,
we
just
don't
have
the
answers,
and
so
I
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
leadership
council
member
perales
and
I
and
also
very
grateful
for
all
of
the
input
of
all
your
businesses
in
the
downtown
in
the
core
of
san
jose.
We
know
how
vital
they
are
to
the
economy
of
the
city,
but
also
in
terms
of
bringing
in
folks
from
outside
of
the
city
who
are
interested
in
what
we're
doing,
and
you
know,
they're
they're,
just
such
a
critical
part
of
the
future
and
how
we're
going
to
recover.
M
So
we
have
to
do
everything
and
anything
that
we
can
to
help
them
survive.
I've
said
the
same
thing
about
the
businesses
in
my
district
and
council
member
esparza's,
really
in
every
corner
of
the
city
of
san
jose.
This
is
going
to
be,
as
I've
said,
all
hands
on
deck,
to
try
and
really
figure
this
out.
I
don't
have
the
answers
and
I'm
hoping
that
you
know
we're
going
to
be
able
to
put
all
our
heads
together
to
see
how
we
help
keep
these
doors
open
and,
of
course,
we're
shutting
down
again.
M
There's
no
indoor,
dining
there's.
No
outdoor
dining,
it's
just
pickup
and
and
and
it's
going
to
be
a
long,
very
cold
winter.
We
need
to
promote
our
businesses
and
have
to
do
everything
we
can
to
to
keep
them
alive
so
that
when
we
come
out
of
this
stay
at
home
order
or
or
if
it
becomes
a
shelter
in
place,
not
real
sure
what
the
difference
is
in
the
nuances
of
those
two.
M
But
when
we
do
come
out
of
it,
our
businesses
are
are
still
there
and
they
continue
to
provide
the
vitality
and
the
economic
engine
that
they
are
for
the
city
of
san
jose.
So
thank
you,
councilmember
perales,
for
for
sticking
with
it
and
making
sure
that
that
our
businesses
have
a
voice
at
the
table
and
and
very
happy
to
support
your
recommendations.
B
Oh
sorry
about
that,
I
was
on
mute
myself,
councilmember
foley.
N
Thank
you.
I
really
appreciate
the
recommendations
and
your
task
force
council,
member
perales,
the
and
all
the
work
that
you've
done
and
committed
to
working
to
preserve
our
businesses
downtown.
N
Our
neighboring
cities
aren't
necessarily
so
I
understand
that
uber
ubereats,
in
particular,
has
an
algorithm
that
they
use
that
when
you
search
for
example,
mexican
restaurant
you'll
get
the
mexican
restaurant
that
isn't
necessarily
closest
to
you.
You'll
get
the
one
with
the
highest
fees
and
then
they'll
be
delivered
that
that
it's
more.
N
It's
more
defined
by
whether
you
have
franchises
than
individual
businesses,
which
is
what
you
have
downtown
a
lot
of,
but
I'm
concerned
about
imposing
a
fee
restriction
on
a
city
when
it
should
be
a
regional
approach
or
even
a
state
approach.
I
heard
you
mentioned
that
the
county
is
looking
at
the
the
15
percent
cap
too.
Can
you
tell
me
where
that
stands?
How
how
far
is
the
city?
The
county
is
along
with
this,
because
actually,
I
think
this
is
where
that
point
rests.
L
Yeah,
thank
you.
I'd
love
to
phone
a
friend
as
well,
so
I'm
only
aware
of
the
fact
that
it's
been
presented,
so
I
don't
know
exactly
where
it's
at.
I
don't
yeah.
So
maybe
if
somebody
from
staff
has
a
better
answer.
B
Okay,
I'm
not
sure
I
know
it
was
introduced.
I
I
suspect
they're
gonna
be
real
challenges
about
the
position
of
that
beyond
unincorporated
areas.
So
the
rules
committee
will
be
considering
our
own
proposal.
Actually
something
counselor
diep
argued.
We
should
do
many
months
ago
and
we've
now
revived.
N
B
C
B
Yes,
councilwoman
yep
had
proposed
something
similar
several
months
ago
since
that
time,
and
obviously
with
the
second
shutdown
order,
gave
new
reason
for
us
to
do
something
to
try
to
support
struggling
restaurants,
and
we've
now
had
additional
outreach
in
the
industry
and
joel
on.
Our
team
has
been
working
very
closely
with
them
to
make
sure
we
can
impose
a
mandate
in
a
way
that
doesn't
shut
down
delivery
to
some
of
the
far-reaching
parts
of
the
city.
B
That's
what
we're
concerned
about
is
a
fee
that
would
ultimately
cut
off
delivery
to
places
like
evergreen
or
alviso
that
might
be
far
away
from
the
city
center.
N
I
use
doordash
way
too
much,
I'm
sorry,
sorry
to
say,
but
it
helps
me
keep
knowing
that
I'm
ordering
from
small
businesses
when
I'm
not
going
out
and
driving
to
them
and
doing
the
pickup.
It's
that's
my
little
way
of
supporting
our
local
economy,
but
I'm
happy
to
support
this.
I
think
it's
really
a
good
step
forward
and
it
and
I
look
forward
to
the
work
as
it
comes
down
further.
N
Some
of
these
things
aren't
our
state
approach
or
may
require
a
state
legislation
in
order
to
implement,
but
I
really
appreciate
what
you
have
done:
councilman
perales
and
working
together
to
help
improve
the
economy
downtown
and
hopefully
throughout
the
rest
of
the
city
and
our
restaurants
throughout
throughout
the
city.
But
thank
you
and
I
am
happy
to
support
it.
L
Yeah,
I
think
I
do.
I
did
get
a
brief
update
that
the
county
did
vote
today
to
to
try
and
expedite
their
approval
on
the
the
15th
of
of
their
policy.
But,
as
you
point
out,
mayor
ricardo
beyond
the
united
corporate
areas,
I'm
not
certain.
Where
else
that
will
have
you
know
some
jurisdiction,
but
indeed
as
the
memo
that
that
you
have
with
councilmember
dia
coming
tomorrow.
We'll
have
our
own
further
discussion
on
this.
L
This
item
so-
and
I
obviously
look
forward
to
that-
and
I
think
we'll
there'll
be
a
lot
more
policy
discussion
as
what
you're
talking
about
right
now,
councilmember
foley.
I
just
wanted
to
to
end
in
regards
to
to
thanking
one
of
our
our
co-chairs
that
waited
through
the
the
evening,
dalia
rossen.
L
I
know
we
had
a
lot
more
participants
of
the
task
force
that
had
hoped
to
speak,
but
obviously
we're
running
a
little
bit
late
today
and
I'll
put
a
plug
in
because
fortunately,
as
we
heard
earlier
today,
christmas
in
the
park,
the
drive-through
version
is
still
gonna,
be
open
during
this
holiday
season
and
you'll.
Actually,
as
as
dalia's
new
ballet
has
been
severely
impacted.
They're
not
able
to
do
their
performances.
One
of
the
exciting
features
for
the
christmas
in
the
park.
Drive-Through
is
actually
live.
L
Ballet
performers
from
new
ballet
and
and
so
I'll
put
a
plug-in
to
go
out
there
and
and
go
and
support,
not
only
a
great
local
non-profit
like
christmas
in
the
park,
but
they've
actually
partnered
this
year
with
a
lot
of
other
local
organizations,
and
so
with
that,
and
thank
you
to
my
colleagues
as
well.
B
E
K
B
4.1
our
actions
related
to
the
2020
internet
crimes
against
children,
task
force,
invited
awards
grant
agreement.
I
just
want
to
say
thanks
to
say,
san
jose
pd
and
the
folks
who
work
on
getting
this
icac
grant
and
even
more
importantly,
the
folks
who
actually
do
the
work
with
the
icap
grant.
I
had
an
opportunity
as
a
much
younger
prosecutor.
Actually,
I
think
it
was
with
the
very
first
icat
grant
that
the
department
got.
I
worked
in
the
sexual
assault
unit
at
the
time,
and
I
can
tell
you
these.
B
What
these
officers
do
is
incredible
online
in
terms
of
being
able
to
identify
a
perps
would
ultimately
be
a
great
threat
to
our
children
and
they're
able
to
get
them
off
the
street.
Well,
before
anything,
anything
awful
happens.
So
I
think
it's
a
it's
money
well
used.
I'm
glad
we're
able
to
get
grant
money
to
do
it.
I
don't
believe,
there's
any
presentation
here
we'll
ask
to
see
if
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
who'd
like
to
speak
on
this
item
4.1,
this
is
icac.
Grant
I
see
no
hands.
D
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Item
5.1
doesn't
increase
the
authority
of
the
department
director
of
public
works
for
minnesota
international
airport
aircraft,
rescue
and
fire
fighting
facility
station
20
project.
There
is
no
report
on
this,
we'll
ask
to
see.
If
there
any
members
of
the
public
would
like
to
discuss
item
5.1,
the
increase
in
authority
of
the
public
works
director
on
this
project.
I
see
no
hands
coming
back
to
the
council.
Did
I
hear
a
motion?
Yes,
second,.
B
All
right,
we're
rolling,
now
item
5.2,
it's
a
potential
amendment
to
the
parking
agreement
with
almaden
corner
hotel,
llc.
B
There's
no
presentation:
I
see
no
hands
from
the
public
to
speak
on
item
5.2.
The
potential
amendment
to
the
parking
agreement
with
amaden
corner
hotel
coming
back
to
the
council,
councilmember
perales
was
that
you
about
to
make
a
motion.
A
B
A
A
O
All
right,
thank
you,
rosalind
mayor
and
city
council,
so
today
kicks
off
the
2020
general
plan.
Annual
review
is
part
of
the
process.
Staff
prepares
an
annual
performance
review
report
which
staff
is
going
to
summarize
this
evening.
O
The
general
plan
includes
policies
to
annually
evaluate
progress
on
the
of
the
plan's
strategies
and
actions
as
part
of
the
annual
review,
which
is
also
when
the
city
council
can
consider
privately
proposed
amendments
to
the
general
plan
staff
organizes
the
performance
evaluation
around
the
12
major
strategies
of
the
general
plan
based
on
the
most
recent
fiscal
year.
O
So
since
adoption
in
the
general
plan
in
2011,
the
city
has
grown
by
about
eight
percent
or
that's
about
approximately
80
000
new
residents,
that
said
the
city's
population.
Growth
has
slowed
over
the
last
couple
years:
san
jose's
total
population
we're
currently
around
1.05
million
residents,
but
between
2018
and
2020.
O
The
graph
on
the
slide
here
shows
the
city's
projected
population
out
to
2040
in
the
current
trajectory
of
our
population
growth,
the
flattening
population
growth
in
san
jose
in
san
jose
and
the
entire
bay
area,
because
this
is
not
just
a
phenomenon
to
san
jose.
This
is
this
is
a
regional
kind
of
trend.
This
can
be,
you
know,
part
attributed
to
declining
birth
rates,
as
well
as
a
net
migration,
whereas
many
residents
are
leaving
the
region
as
they
are
moving
into
it.
O
One
of
the
contributors,
obviously
with
that
is
the
region's
high
housing
and
living
costs
next
slide.
So
the
general
plans
focus
growth.
Major
strategy
focuses
new
residential
and
commercial
growth
capacity
and
specifically
identified
growth
areas
to
reduce
environmental
impacts,
improve
the
city's
fiscal
health
and
support
new
residential
and
employment
development.
O
O
O
So
the
next
graph
here
shows
square
footage
of
new
commercial
and
industrial
and
office
building
permits
issued
over
the
same
time
period.
I
want
to
note
that
that
the
graph
here
has
been
updated
from
figure
seven
in
our
in
the
annual
performance
review
report
after
re-looking
at
how
some
of
our
development
data
was
classified.
O
Commercial
activity
dropped
this
last
fiscal
year,
but
office
development
was
up
in
particular
due
to
building
permit
issuance
for
office
towers
in
the
downtown
of
that
new
space.
75
percent
of
new
commercial
development
cons
was
constructed
in
the
general
plans,
designated
growth
areas
and
71
percent
of
industrial
and
office.
Space
was
also
located
in
growth
areas.
O
The
general
plan
plans
for
382
thousand
new
jobs
and
aims
to
reverse
the
imbalance
of
jobs,
to
housing
by
establishing
a
jobs
employed,
resident
ratio,
goal
of
1.0
by
2025
and
1.1
by
2040..
The
graph
on
the
on
the
slide
shows
the
city's
projected
job
growth
out
to
2040
and
the
current
trajectory
of
our
job
growth.
O
Based
on
the
most
current
data,
the
the
city's
jobs
employment
resident
ratio
has
been
relatively
stagnant
since
2011,
and
it's
currently
at
a
0.81
or
zero
point.
Yeah
0.81,
which
you
know
really
enforces
the
importance
of
preserving
our
existing
job
base
and
continuing
to
attract
new
jobs
to
our
downtown
and
other
employment.
Centers
such
as
north
san
jose.
O
So
moving
on
to
our
urban
village
urban
villages,
major
strategy,
so
so
this
strat
strategy
promotes
economic
development,
environmental
sustainability
and
the
creation
of
complete
communities
through
the
development
of
villages
across
the
city
that
are,
you,
know,
attractive,
walkable,
really
mixed
use,
settings
for
new
housing
and
job
growth
and
where
people
can
meet
kind
of
all
their
daily
needs.
O
Thus
far,
12
urban
village
plans
have
been
adopted
by
council
and
and
two
are
currently
in
the
planning
process.
All
urban
village
plans
involve
extensive
community
engagement
and
input
when
developing
those
plans
in
2021
three
additional
plans.
We'll
start
the
public
planning
process
and
an
update
to
the
urban
village
plans
around
the
28th
street
little
portugal
bart
station
will
also
be
initiated.
O
O
O
Also,
the
commercial
offices,
vacancy
rate
has
significantly
declined
from
where
we
started,
and
it's
currently
at
a
9.7
percent
compared
to
over
23
percent
in
2011.,
so
to
accommodate,
proposed
in
in
future
growth
in
the
downtown
additional
growth
capacity
is,
is
recommended
to
be
reallocated
to
downtown
through
the
general
plan
for
your
review
process.
O
So
this
the
the
slide
here
gives
a
breakdown
of
the
types
of
general
plan
amendment
requests
the
city
has
received
since
adoption
of
the
general
plan.
Generally,
the
requests
have
involved
allowing
for
residential
use,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
stack
graph
here.
It's
in
the
red,
gray
and
orange
shades.
O
It's
also
noteworthy
that
you
know
following
2015,
there's
been
only
three
applications
for
industrial
land,
conversions
which
are
prohibited
by
the
general
plan
and
all
proposed
industrial
to
non-industrial
use.
Conversions
have
been
either
withdrawn
by
the
applicants
or
denied
by
city.
O
Council,
so
the
table
here
this
list,
six,
the
six
private
general
plan-
amendment
requests
that
the
council
will
be
considering
during
this
general
plan
annual
review
cycle.
Five
of
them
are
for
land
use
changes
and
one
is
a
proposed
text,
amendment
to
the
five
wounds
urban
village
plan.
O
And
then
the
next
table
here
shows
the
there's.
There's
two
city-initiated
general
plan
amendments
that
the
council
will
also
be
considering
during
the
general
plan
in
a
review
cycle.
Both
of
those
are
fairly
minor
text.
O
Amendments
staff
also
wants
wants
to
note
subsequent
general
plan
hearing
cycles
that
will
give
opportunities
for
privately
initiated
general
plan.
Amendment
requests
to
be
considered
by
the
city
council
outside
of
the
typical
general
plan
annual
review
hearing
the
the
first
is
an
additional
general
plan
hearing
cycle
to
be
held
annually
for
non-city
initiated
amendments
for
100,
affordable
housing
projects.
O
So
this
is
a
change
that
was
approved
by
city
council
last
year
and
there
will
also
be
an
additional
general
plan
hearing
cycle
in
spring
of
2021
for
non-city,
initiated
general
plan
amendments
that
were
impacted
by
cobit
19
and
need
additional
time
to
get
to
hearing.
So
with
that.
That
concludes
staff's
presentation
and
we
are
available
for
questions.
B
Jared,
thank
you
very
much.
Let's
go
to
the
community
c30
public
comments
on
this
item
or
final
item
regarding
the
general
plan
and
our
progress.
B
Hey.
Can
I
take
you
back
to
that
slide.
You
just
showed
around
the
jobs
ratio
in
the
city
in
our
progress
over
10
years,
appreciate
all
the
work
that
goes
into
this,
and
I
know
it's
non-exact
science
and
hard
to
always
figure
out,
but
I
just
wanted
to
point
this
out
because
I
know
we
hear
endlessly
about
how
the
jobs
that
we're
letting
into
the
city
is
are
pushing
people
out.
B
Rosen's
working
on
it,
okay,
thank
you!
So
it's
coming
so
I
mean
this
is
really
awfully
important,
because
the
reality
is.
If
you
look
at
the
last
half
decade,
if
anything,
we've
actually
been
adding
residents
more
than
we've
been
adding
jobs
and
that's
really
important
because,
as
we
look
at
this
chart,
which
is
really
important,
particularly
the
part
on
the
right
talks
about
jobs
per
employee
resident
since
2010,
which
by
the
way
was
the
depth
of
the
great
recession,
and
since
that
time,
can
we
get
that
back
up?
Please.
B
B
B
And
by
that
I
mean,
if
you
look
at
the
top
30
cities
in
the
united
states
by
population
or
number
10,
you're,
not
going
to
find
a
single
one
of
them
as
anywhere
near
our
jobs
for
employed
resident
ratio.
And
it's
not
a
coincidence
that
we
also
have
the
lowest
ratio
of
in
city
employees
to
population
of
any
major
city
in
the
country.
B
There's
no
question:
there's
been
a
huge
jobs
boom
in
cities
and,
frankly,
it's
much
smaller
suburbs
right
like
santa
clara
and
sunnyvale
and
palo
alto,
but
it
really
hasn't
happened
here,
and
so
I
think
when
we
go
into-
and
we
talk
about,
for
example,
the
google
project
and
folks
are
talking
about
20
000
jobs.
What's
that's
gonna
do
to
our
city?
Well,
it's
gonna
increase
the
number
of
payroll
jobs
we
have
in
this
city.
B
But
what
looks
like
to
be
just
going
to
do
the
back
of
the
envelope
math
here
about
120
yeah
somewhere
around
looks
like
four
percent
at
most,
which
would
be
nice
because
it
might
actually
make
that
green
line
be
parallel
to
what
population
growth
has
been
in
this
city
over
the
last
few
decades.
We
might
actually
have
enough
jobs
for
residents
who
are
here,
which
we
currently
don't,
if
you
consider
1.0
being
a
balance
of
jobs
for
employed
residents.
B
So
you
know
that
might
help
us
crawl
a
little
closer
toward
the
1.0,
but
not
very
close.
So
I
I
just
think
we
we
need
to
be
really
clear
with
the
community
about.
You
know
when
we've
got
opportunities
to
add
a
lot
of
jobs
in
our
downtown
that
this
is
not
about
chasing
people
out.
B
The
people
are
being
chased
out
because
of
growth
in
a
spaceship
campus
in
cupertino
or
what
may
be
happening
in
sunnyvale
or
wherever
else
mountain
view
that
that's
been
going
on
for
many
years,
and
it
hasn't
been
happening
here
in
san
jose.
In
the
meantime,
we're
starving
services
to
the
extent
that
we're
not
aggressively
in
embracing
job
growth
as
well.
So
I
I
support
housing
growth.
I
support
job
growth.
I
think
we
need
both
to
support
our
city
and
our
community,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
take
a
sober
approach
going
forward.
K
Thank
you
mayor.
One
of
the
things
that
I
noticed
in
this
report
is
that
some
items
like
this
one
tend
to
show
what
is
planned
and
some
items
don't
show
what
is
planned
and
just
give
kind
of
what
happened
and
what's
going
forward.
So,
for
example,
the
urban
village
plans
and
horizons,
don't
say
what
the
goal
would
be,
either
on
an
annual
basis
or
what
how
many
urban
villages
need
to
be
passed
and
completely
planned.
K
You
know,
we've
got
20
years
left
and
we
have
47
that
we
haven't
started.
So
I
would
like
to
make
the
request
to
to
include
those
benchmarks
every
year,
so
not
just
to
give
a
report
on
the
progress,
but
also
to
say
what
the
goal
is.
So
you
say
it
in
the
arena
in
this
section
for
housing.
K
It
does
say
what
the
arena
goal
is
the
overall
goal,
but
it
doesn't
say
what
the
affordable
housing
goal
is
and
the
what
the
market
rate
housing
goal
is
in
that
in
that
section,
so
there's
just
seems
to
be
a
little
bit
of
unevenness
in
the
report
in
terms
of
giving
us
that
grounding
of
what
we
expect
and
even
in
the
jobs
to
employed
resident,
the
graphic
has
a
one-to-one
ratio.
K
If
you,
if
you
know
your
slope,
but
it
doesn't,
actually
I
don't
think
it
says
it
in
the
report
unless
I
missed
it,
that
what
we
were
going
for
is,
I
think
it's
1.1
actually
and
not
not
1.0
in
in
the
urban
village
plan
itself.
So
I'd
really
like
the
goals
and
the
metrics
to
be
included
and
to
tell
us
our
progress
towards
those
goals
in
the
annual
performance
report,
as
opposed
to
just
telling
us
what
happened.
H
I
think
so
I
think
so.
I
think
we
need
a
little
more
clarification,
so
we
don't
yeah,
I
mean
urban,
so
I
wasn't
sure
I
understood
the
arena
comment.
This
is
michael
bria.
By
the
way
we
don't
have
an
urban
village
goal
in
terms
of
how
many
plans
we
would
do.
K
But
we
have
identified
areas-
and
it
didn't
say
in
here
that
there
are
61
urban
village
plans
and
if
we
wanted
to
get
them
all
passed
by
2040
we're
not
on
track
to
do
that,
because
it
takes
x
number
of
months
to
pass
an
urban
village
plan.
And
we
we
didn't.
We
haven't
passed
three
a
year
since,
since
2011.
H
K
K
B
B
The
the
point
was
that
many
of
those
urban
villages
would
remain
undeveloped
well
into
the
future,
because
there
was
a
desire
to
focus
on
the
development
of
those
that
were
closest
to
transit
in
the
core,
and
so
there
was
no
schedule
and
there
was
no
desire
necessarily
to
go,
get
61
urban
village
plans
done,
because
the
explicit
understanding
was
we're
planning
for
urban
villages
well
in
the
future,
and
development
shouldn't
be
happening
in
a
lot
of
villages
where
we
haven't
taken
advantage
of
opportunities
to
build
their
transit
yeah.
That's
correct.
H
Urban
villages
and
those
are
done
so
we're
now
moving
on
to
horizon
two
urban
villages,
and
we
could
do
we
could
we
could
maybe
do
a
better
job
explaining
how
we're
doing
and
knocking
those
out.
But
the
original
approach
was
to
focus
on
villages
that
radiate
out
from
downtown
on
transit
and
we've.
We've.
G
H
Those
out
those
are
complicated
so
but
yeah
we
can.
We
can
sort
of
elaborate
on
that,
but
sound
right
intention
to
do
the
plan
for
all
of
them
in
the
time
frame
of
the
general
plan
and
council
member.
A
Davis,
I
I
think
also
to
get
to
your
question.
What
we
can
provide
is
the
development
program
for
each
urban
village,
because
there
is
an
absolute
assigned
number
of
housing
units
and
commercial
office
score
footage.
So
that's
something
definitely
that
we
can
share
with
you
in
the
annual
report
in
terms
of
how
many
of
those
units
are
being
entitled,
or
you
know
what
our
progress
is
toward
building
out,
that
commercial
square
footage,
because
I
I
think
that
gets
to
your
point.
A
Are
we
meeting
the
goals
of
the
intended
development
that
we
wanted
to
see
in
each
of
the
urban
villages?.
O
And
one
thing
we
can
try
to
do
what
we
we
include
a
kind
of
executive
summary
in
the
urban
village.
I'm
sorry
in
the
the
annual
review
report,
where
we
try
to
kind
of
highlight
those
key
metrics
like
we've
got
the
you
know
the
1.1
jobs
employed
resident
ratio
goal
than
where
we're
at
and
trying
to
really
highlight
those
key
metrics.
O
So
we'll
look
for
ways
to
improve
that
as
well
to
where
we
can
really
bring
out
to
make
sure
that
it's
clear
with
that
we've
got
our
goals
listed
as
as
well
as
the
the
metrics,
not
just
the
performance.
H
D
Go
it's
kind
of
small
from
what
let
me
pull
up
my
screen
yeah.
So
I
I
just
you
know
this
is
my
last
chance
to
talk
about
the
general
plan,
but
one
of
the
things
that
that
I've
learned
from
my
discussions
with
with
the
pcbe-
and
it's
really
impressive
on
me
is-
is
this
fact
that
we
have
a
general
plan,
our
idealized
vision
of
san
jose,
and
then
we
have
the
zoning
that
is
incongruent,
and
I
know
I
keep
hammering
on
this,
and
the
state
has
a
mandate
that
we
do
it.
D
But
I
just
stated
again
that
you
know
I've
had
applicants
come
into
my
office
and
where
we
want
to
do
something
that
the
general
plan
allows,
but
we've
had
the
land
and
the
parcel
doesn't
allow
it
so
we're
we're
paying
the
city
tens
of
thousands
of
dollars.
D
I
think
ten
thousand
dollars
for
the
application
to
convert
it
into
the
thing
that
you
know
the
city
wants
us
to
do
anyway,
and,
and
that
is
a
real
hurdle
for,
for
you
know,
developers
and
business
folks
coming
in
and
it's
when
they
come
in
that
that
we
get
the
jobs.
The
racial
balance
that
will
help
you
know
increase
revenue
in
the
city.
Either
we
raise
taxes
or
we
we
get
more
consumption,
more
commerce
happening
within
the
boundaries
of
san
jose.
D
So
I've
always
been
a
big
proponent
of
reminding
my
residents
to
eat
it
eat
at
the
mcdonald's
inside
san
jose
like
two
exits
after
the
one
in
milpitas
or
whatever,
because
I,
I
really
think
it
matters,
and
you
know
I
hope
my
colleagues
will
continue
to
advocate
for
that
sort
of
thing.
I
I
mentioned
this
now
because
earlier
when
we
were
increasing
the
or
implementing
the
credit
card
fee,
I
raised
my
hand
by
I
hit
the
button
too
late.
D
I
hope
one
day,
10
20
30
40
50
years
out
from
now
a
future
council
will
be
able
to
be
fiscally
strong
enough
to
be
able
to
say
we're
going
to
absorb
the
cost
of
credit
card
fees
for
for
people
who
come
to
san
jose,
because
the
theory
of
the
credit
card
is
you'll
be
able
to
use
it.
D
You
spend
more,
at
least
in
grocery
stores
and
target
and
other
places
like
that,
and
I
hope
it's
the
same
for
san
jose,
because
I
did
not
realize
until
recently
when
I
was
getting
to
the
discussion
with
about
fees.
Is
that
we're
on
a
cost
recovery
basis.
So
when
a
planner
looks
at
an
application,
you
know
the
applicant
is
paying
for
the
planner's
time
and
and
the
salary
and
the
pension
and
all
that
stuff,
whereas
in
other
bigger
cities
that
that
are
inviting
and
welcome
and
of
business.
D
You
know
those
are
kind
of
the
cost
of
doing
business,
the
the
application
review
and
such-
and
I
understand
that
we're
behind
the
eight
ball
in
that.
So
we
have
to
do
that,
but
somehow
some
way
I
I
really
wish
for
san
jose
that
we're
able
to
attract
the
commerce
and
the
jobs
to
right
the
ship
and
get
to
a
place
where
we're
not
operating
on
a
cost
recovery
model,
but
that
it
is
just
the
cost
of
doing
business
in
san
jose
and
people.
D
We
encourage
people
to
apply
to
do
stuff
and
we
will
review
their
applications
for
a
very
minimal
fee
if
no
fee
at
all,
so
I'll
end
there
and
I'll
yield.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
councilman
yep,
all
right,
I
think
that's
it
for
comments.
Was
there
a
motion
to
accept
the
report.
B
Second,
all
right:
counseling
tips
motion.
Let's
vote.
A
B
Okay,
we're
on
to
open
forum.
B
H
Yeah,
okay,
great,
I
live
in
the
100
block
of
east
reed
street
and
I
wanted
to
make
this
council
aware
that
last
friday,
night
at
10
30
p.m.
There
was
a
side
show
at
the
intersection
of
4th
and
reed.
It
was
incredibly
noisy.
It
was
incredibly
smell
of
burning
rubber
and
hundreds
of
young
people
appeared
from
out
of
nowhere.
It
all
happened
very
quickly
in
10
minutes.
It
was
all
done
and
everybody
dispersed.
H
I
did
not
call
the
police
at
the
time.
I
was
pretty
much
scared
to
go
beyond
my
door.
I
am
concerned
about
this
and
I
also
know
in
this
time
of
pandemic.
The
last
thing
we
want
is
people
getting
together
in
this
fashion.
Maybe
they
were
just
whooping
it
up
before
the
big
lockdown,
but
it
was
scary-
and
I
wanted
to
make
this
council
aware
of
it.
B
All
right,
those
are
all
the
members
of
public
want
to
speak,
and
we
wish
everybody
very
healthy
week.
We
will
be
back
next
week
means.