►
From YouTube: MAY 3, 2022 | City Council
Description
City of San José, California
City Council of May 3, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=957964&GUID=7EE0EFC0-4DDB-4A8B-9CAC-D316252C5697
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
D
D
F
F
H
A
F
So
we
were
just
informed
before
this
meeting
about
of
the
passing
of
nor
mineta
yes,
so
I
would
like
to
take
a
moment
of
silence
and
in
honor
and
memory
of
normanetta.
F
Thank
you.
Today's
invocation
will
be
provided
by
professor
rosanna
alvarez.
Councilmember
carrasco
will
tell
us
more.
I
Thank
you
vice
mayor
and
my
my
condolence
condolences
to
the
entire
mineta
family
and
entire
community.
We've
lost
a
a
wonderful
human
being
well,
it's
it's
may,
and
I
want
to
say
that
I've
been
waiting
all
year
for
this
because
may
is
my
month
so
as
they
say
in
in
the
latino
community
watch
out,
because
this
is
going
to
be
a
good
month,
I'm
incredibly
honored
to
present
part
of
my
final
set
of
invocations
and
I'm
very
excited
today
to
have
a
professor
alvarez.
I
I
One
of
her
proudest
works
of
art
involves
her
role
as
the
co-founder
and
editor
of
eastside
magazine,
through
which
she
remains
forever
in
awe
of
the
power
of
telling
stories
by
us
for
us
and
about
us,
with
heart
in
hand
inked
to
the
page
and
allows
hollering
truths
to
convene
the
experiences,
talent,
spirit
and
voice
of
our
east.
San
jose
community
is
truly
something
special
and
I'm
grateful
to
rosanna
to
omar
and
all
those
creatives
who
have
devoted
themselves
to
this
endeavor.
J
While
it
remains
a
chronically
misunderstood
and
slightly
misinterpreted
quasi-non-holiday.
It's
worth
noting
the
significance
of
the
many
many
layers
of
community
and
belonging.
It
historically
has
solidified
within
a
place
that
values,
diversity
and
celebrates
cultural
difference,
as
we
think
about
that
historical
connection
that
both
roots
and
grounds
us
across
space
and
time.
J
Let
us
take
a
moment
to
think
about
all
of
those
people
to
that
shape,
our
commitment
that
constellation
of
beautiful,
complicated
people
that
shape
our
city,
our
neighborhoods,
our
neighbors,
our
families
as
a
poet
and
adan
sante.
Folks,
sometimes
mistaken
me
from
time
to
time.
For
being
a
performer,
and
often
I
circle
back
to
remind
folks
that
poetry
is
not
a
performance,
it
is
the
truth
of
our
hearts.
J
J
People
like
me
and
I'll
leave
that
open
to
interpretation
and
a
poet
is
as
much
a
listener
and
observer
as
she
is
a
scribe.
A
shape-shifter
often
forged
through
a
seemingly
chaotic
non-linear
journey
that
some
would
mistaken
for
fire,
where
others
sense
a
mirror
of
how
we
collectively
are
living
poetry.
J
So,
in
the
spirit
of
floricanto,
let
our
decisions
be
guided
by
poetry,
a
commitment
to
holding
up
a
mirror
to
where
we
are
as
people
and
how
we
can
reimagine,
where
we
could
be
as
we
take
action
to
do.
What
is
right
for
all
of
us
as
opposed
to
simply
reinforcing
the
select
privileges
of
a
few,
so
we
everyone
that
I
represent
in
my
communities.
J
Let
us
take
a
moment
to
think
about
how
our
ancestors
showed
up
not
just
in
resilience
but
in
their
joy.
Let
us
take
a
moment
to
think
about
how
we
are
showing
up
for
our
elders,
keeping
their
dignity
intact
daily.
Let
us
take
a
moment
to
think
about
how
we
can
do
right
by
our
youth.
Let
us
take
a
moment
to
think
about
how
we
can
keep
that
hopeful
vibrant
spirit
of
every
one
of
our
children
alive.
J
Let
us
take
a
moment
to
think
about
our
history
as
the
heart
of
silicon
valley,
the
center
of
the
valley
of
hearts
delight:
we've
always
fancied
ourselves,
a
region
of
abundance
and,
lastly,
let
us
take
a
moment
to
ground
ourselves
in
the
courage
and
humility
to
both
listen
and
act
for
that
beautiful,
complicated
constellation
of
people.
We
represent
bridging
past
and
present,
serving
with
humility,
integrity
and
heart
to
push
for
parity,
equality,
equity
and
justice
in
our
everyday
governance.
F
So
let's
keep
council
member
carrasco's
month
going
the
month
of
may
and
will.
Will
you
join
me
at
the
podium
to
recognize
and
proclaim
mayday.
I
I
Their
struggles
in
the
name
of
workers
rights
may
day
was
first
recognized
in
1889
by
an
international
federation
of
socialist
groups
and
trade
unions,
both
in
support
of
workers
and
in
commemoration
of
the
1886
hay
market
riot
in
chicago.
The
haymarket
riot,
also
known
as
the
haymarket
massacre,
was
part
of
a
national
campaign
working
to
secure
an
eight-hour
workday
back
when
a
16-hour
workday
was
normal.
I
The
riot
resulted
in
casualties
as
police
intervened,
to
protect,
strike
breakers
and
intimidate
strikers
during
a
union
manifestation
at
the
mccormick
harvesting
machine
company.
Later
eight
men
were
tried
for
conspiracy
of
murder,
and
four
of
them
were
hanged,
thus
becoming
international
martyrs
for
the
rights
of
workers.
Everywhere.
I
I
I
We
owe
so
much
to
the
leaders
and
the
martyrs
of
the
labor
movement,
a
guaranteed
minimum
wage,
an
eight
hour
work
day,
a
for
40
hour
work
week
and
time
and
a
half
overtime.
All
thanks
for
the
fight
for
justice
and
as
kovan
19
swept
through
the
world.
We
again
found
ourselves
challenged
to
ensure
the
rights
of
workers
everywhere,
especially
for
those
essential
workers.
Our
field
laborers
store,
clerks
doctors,
nurses
fight,
first
responses,
responders
teachers,
all
those
who
weren't
afforded
the
benefits
of
working
from
home.
I
I
Nicaragua
and
luis
lisa's
here
awesome
with
nuna
local
270.
through
their
collective
work.
They
represent
thousands,
thousands
of
hard-working
men
and
women
who
add
to
the
value
of
our
great
city,
they're
front
and
center
at
the
battle
for
wage
theft
in
modern
day
slavery
and
it's
through
their
work
that
we
are
reminded
that
without
labor
capital
is
non-existent
in
san
jose.
We
honor
the
work
of
these
men
and
women.
They
literally
have
built
this
city,
our
homes,
our
roads,
our
bridges,
they
educate
our
children
and
make
our
city
run
in
battles
of
values.
I
K
Thank
you
so
much
to
the
city,
council
and
council
member
carrasco
in
particular.
The
labor
council
represents
100
000
working
men
and
women
and
101
unions,
but
the
work
we
do
every
day
is
to
advance
causes,
policies
and
environments
that
protect
all
working
people
in
san
jose
and
santa
clara
county.
K
I'd
like
to
just
thank
the
city
council,
and
especially
the
staff
of
the
city
who,
over
covid,
have
really
provided
essential
services
not
only
to
working
people
who
have
had
jobs
and
making
sure
that
they
are
getting
paid
a
fair
wage
and
that
their
work
sites
are
safe,
but
also
for
so
many
people
who
struggled
over
the
last
24
months
and
weren't
able
to
pay
their
rent
weren't
able
to
feed
their
kids
needed
internet
to
make
sure
that
their
children
were
learning.
So
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
everybody
who
creates
the
labor
movement.
K
M
All
right,
council
member
david
cohen,
is
here
we
will
be
remembering
america
armenian
genocide,
remembrance
day.
Thank
you.
C
Well,
thank
you.
Thank
you
mayor
today,
we're
here
to
recognize
armenian
genocide.
Remembrance
day
on
april
24th
armenians
around
the
world
and
here
in
san
jose
commemorated
the
107th
anniversary
of
the
beginning
of
the
armenian
genocide,
starting
on
that
day,
in
1915,
a
million
and
a
half
armenians
living
on
ancestral
armenian
lands
and
the
ottoman
empire
were
driven
from
their
homes
and
systematically
murdered
in
an
unprecedented
campaign
of
extermination.
C
For
those
who
survived
life
would
never
be
the
same.
They
lost
their
homes,
their
families,
everything
they
owned
and
were
forced
to
seek
refuge
on
foreign
shores
where
they
often
continue
to
face
discrimination
and
prejudice,
but
armenian
genocide.
Remembrance
day
is
not
only
a
day
to
mourn
all
that
was
lost
during
the
genocide.
It's
a
day
to
honor
the
strength
and
resilience
of
those
who
survived
who,
in
the
face
of
unimaginable
loss
and
suffering,
built
new
homes
and
communities
around
the
world.
C
C
C
The
most
important
thing
we
can
do
to
honor
this
day
is
to
uplift
the
voices
of
those
in
the
armenian
american
community
to
hear
their
story
and
their
words,
so
I've
invited
today
ani
yenni
kopsian
kamshan,
who
is
the
chair
of
the
silicon
valley,
chapter
of
the
armenian
national
committee
of
america,
which
is
a
grassroots
organization,
giving
a
voice
to
the
needs
and
concerns
of
armenian
americans.
So
first
we'll
present
the
proclamation
and
then
let
her
say
a
few
words.
J
Consequently,
it
is
fair
to
say
that
current
day,
turkey
was
built
on
the
removal
of
the
armenian
people
and
taking
over
all
their
assets
and
properties
and
for
which
armenians
never
saw
justice
and
how
did
the
u.s
help
at
the
time
u.s
ambassador
to
the
ottoman
empire
ambassador
henry
morgenthau
reported
atrocities,
as
they
were
happening,
missionaries
from
the
u.s
traveled
to
help
humanitarian
aid
was
provided
by
the
near
east
relief,
us's
oldest
congressionally,
sanctioned
ngo
raising.
At
that
time.
Imagine
over
110
million
dollars
for
refugees
and
orphans.
J
There
were
by
1922.
There
were
over
a
hundred
thousand
children
that
were
living
in
orphanages.
There
was
one
major
orphanage:
twenty
five
thousand
kids
in
just
one
orphanage
alone.
We're
eternally
grateful
to
all
those
that
helped.
At
that
time.
Armenians
arrived
to
the
us
as
a
direct
result
of
the
army
and
genocide.
J
They
were
hard
working
and
quick
to
adapt
to
their
new
home
since
their
arrival
they
have
contributed
immensely
to
the
fabric
of
santa
clara
county,
the
state
of
california
and
the
united
states
of
america,
and
very
proud
citizens
of
the
united
states
of
america.
What
it
means
for
armenians
living
here
in
san
jose.
It
means
opportunity
opportunity
for
education
work
to
live
safely
comfortably
to
provide
for
our
families.
American
armenians
are
grateful
to
have
the
opportunity
to
live
here
and
they
give
back
to
the
communities
they
live
in.
J
Why
can't
we
move
on?
I
was
discussing
with
allah
yesterday
this
this
question
comes
up
to
us.
Why
not
move
on
a
few
reasons?
Not
only
have
we
been
dealing
with
genocide,
denial
for
over
100
years,
but
more
recently
in
2020,
we
witnessed
hate
crimes
here
in
the
san
francisco
bay
area,
followed
by
the
unprovoked
attack
against
the
armenian
people
living
in
by
azerbaijan.
J
With
the
direct
assistance
of
turkey,
our
generation
never
imagined,
we
would
witness
the
continuity
continuation
of
the
genocide
with
ethnic
cleansing
war
crimes,
land
confiscation
and
erasure
all
while
hearing
comments
from
the
aggressors
finishing
what
their
ancestors
started.
So
daily
threats
and
harassments
do
continue
again
today,
against
armenians
with
the
intent
to
force
more
concessions.
It
makes
it
difficult
to
move
on
the
armenian
people,
hope
and
pray
for
change
of
heart
of
the
leaders
of
these
two
countries
acknowledging
of
the
wrongdoings
and
only
then
there
can
be
long-lasting
peace.
That's
something
that
we
all
want.
J
What
this
affirmation
does
it
combats
denial
and
with
armenian
genocide?
Recognition
comes
responsibility,
so
the
u.s
policy
must
reflect
this
at
every
level
from
a
local
level
to
its
foreign
policy.
So,
on
armenian
genocide
remembrance
day,
we
stand
together
against
genocide,
all
forms
of
hate
and
intolerance,
crimes
against
humanity.
Both
locally
and
abroad,
and
on
behalf
of
the
armenian
american
community,
we
thank
the
city
of
san
jose
for
this
proclamation.
M
F
Thank
you.
Today
we
recognize
national
small
business
week,
which
is
celebrated
the
first
week
of
may.
Each
year
we
honor
the
entrepreneurs
of
our
country
who
have
played
their
part
in
bringing
new
ideas
to
life
and
for
growing
our
economy
through
the
31
million
small
businesses
of
the
united
states.
F
F
We
could
not
have
achieved
this
without
the
collective
efforts
of
the
banks,
our
business
advice
organizations
as
well
as
the
city,
the
total
value
of
those
loans
exceeded
2.7
billion
dollars.
I'm
going
to
repeat
that
2.7
billion
dollars
for
san
jose
businesses
soon
we
are
expecting
to
add
another
500
million
dollars
to
take
us
closer
to
3.3
billion
dollars.
F
Citywide
recovery
is
well
underway.
Sales
tax
figures
are
improving
and
unemployment
has
fallen
sharply,
but
not
every
business
has
bounced
back
in
honor
of
small
business
week.
The
city
is
launching
today,
a
new
small
business
grant
program
to
minimize
the
risk
of
commercial
evictions
and
support
the
commercial
property
market.
F
F
B
B
He
wanted
to
say
what
bridges
can
we
build
between
the
city
of
san
jose
and
the
student
population
of
san
jose
state
and
beyond
that
led
to
my
inviting
him
to
bring
the
whole
city
council
to
the
student
union
at
san
jose
state,
where
we
had
a
meeting,
and
I
believe,
that's
the
first
formal
city
council
meeting
at
san
jose
state
and
nora
mineta.
He
kept
asking
me
to
call
him
norman.
I
had
a
hard
time
doing
that,
but
norm
asked
me
to
pick
a
priority.
B
B
He
was
a
small
business
owner
as
an
insurance
agent,
his
own
agency
in
japan,
town
and
that's
where
my
father
knew
him,
and
I
was
totally
amazed
that
he
had
this
phenomenal
memory
to
remember
people
that
he
just
met
once
and
we
would
remember
them
for
years
he
was
a
phenomenal
human
being
and
certainly
has
made
san
jose,
proud
to
name
its
international
airport
after
him
and
in
so
many
ways
keep
him
close
to
his
heart.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
city
council.
B
That's
probably
the
second
most
important
thing
that
small
businesses
need
what
we
know
from
sbdc.
What
they
need
most
of
all
is
access
to
customers
and
that's
what
we
try
to
do
in
a
wide
variety
of
ways
joining
me
today.
Connie
madrigal
ali
lopez
are
my
anchors
for
helping
our
small
business
development
literally
help
hundreds,
if
not
thousands,
of
businesses
every
year
in
san
jose
throughout
the
county,
we're
honored
to
work
with
the
city
of
san
jose
on
this
particular
grant
program.
This
is
our
seventh
grant
program
that
we've
helped
since
the
advent
of
covent.
B
By
the
end
of
this
summer,
we
will
have
written
under
my
signature
checks
to
over
10
and
a
half
million
dollars
to
small
businesses,
mostly
here
in
san
jose
and
that's
quiet.
My
only
disappointment
in
these
programs
is,
I
keep
hearing
political,
gadflies
and
criticism
to
san
jose
about
helping
small
businesses,
not
realizing
the
millions
of
dollars
that
you
have
dedicated
to
helping
small
businesses
that
are
struggling
today,
and
so
I
acknowledge
that
we
acknowledge
that
we
thank
you
for
your
leadership.
B
B
M
All
right,
thank
you,
we're
now
on
to
orders
of
the
day
and
one
on
the
council
when
he
changes
the
print
agenda.
I
understand,
I
believe,
council
member
probably
indicated
desire
to
adjoin
the
meeting
is
that
right.
M
Do
it
in
a
future
week,
yeah
yeah,
that
was
it!
Thank
you
for
giving
me.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
we'll
we
will
do
so.
I
certainly
need
to
honor
mayor
and
secretary
norman
neta,
all
right,
any
other
changes
not
seeing
any
indications
so
we'll
move
forward
to
the
closed
session
report.
Nora.
M
A
Hi
we're
beakman
here,
thanks
for
your
ceremony
items
today,
happy
may
to
everyone.
A
I
guess
you
know,
there's
a
couple
items
about
t-mobile
things
feature
cell
things,
macro
cells
called
just
a
reminder
that
there's
going
to
be
quite
the
possibility,
a
lot
more
surveillance
and
data
collection
technology
within
the
micro
macro
cell
system
and
just
a
reminder
that
the
importance
of
bridging
the
digital
divide,
it's
the
open
public
policies
and
accountability
practices
that
we
share
as
a
whole
community
process.
A
A
So
thanks
for
this
item
and
to
quickly
comment,
you've
moved
around
the
on
the
agenda
is
that
close
sester
reports
are
now
at
the
top
of
the
agenda
and
not
a
part
of
the
regular
agenda
items.
I
it's
a
smooth
way
to
work.
I
don't
think
I
think
I
me
I
question
that
a
bit
I
I
question
that
you
have
to
have
closed
session
items
and
the
city
manager's
report
that
has
to
learn
to
become
a
part
of
a
public
meeting
process
where
the
public
can
offer
public
comment.
M
Thank
you
all
right.
Is
there
any
reconsideration
of
my
colleagues?
Are
there
any
other
items
to
pull,
if
not
we'll,
entertain
a
motion.
F
M
Okay,
let's
vote
on
consent,
jimenez.
A
N
M
L
G
M
M
Tony.
Would
you
like
to.
G
Tom
is
on
tom,
have
hovel,
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
pronouncing
that
right,
he
is.
G
M
Hello,
mr
pablo,
are
you
with
us?
Yes,
can
you
hear
me
yeah,
should
I
pronounce
your
name
correctly?
Forgive
me.
A
It's
fine,
my
my
name
is:
is
tom,
pavel
pavel?
Thank
you,
sir.
M
Well,
thanks
for
your
willingness
to
to
serve,
why
don't
we
give
you
a
couple
minutes
just
to
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
why
you'd
like
to
serve
and
why
you
believe
you'd
be
able
to
do
a
good
job
on
this
on
this
commission
and
then
we'll
go
to
the
council
for
questions.
A
Great
great,
so
I
am
a
retiree
from
20
years
in
the
tech
industry
and
before
that
my
training
was
actually
as
a
particle
physicist
at
slack
at
stanford
last
year
I
had
the
privilege
to
serve
on
the
civil
grand
jury
and
I
found
that
to
be
a
very
rewarding
experience.
A
A
So
I
guess,
after
looking
around
at
the
san
jose
commissions,
it
seemed
like
the
fcpp
could
be
a
good
fit.
There
appear
to
be
several
vacancies
at
present.
I
have
a
basic
familiarity
with
campaign
finance
issues
and
have
a
firm
conviction
in
favor
of
transparency
in
campaign
finance
and
in
lobbying.
A
M
Thank
you,
sir.
The
good
news
is,
I
don't
think,
we've
ever
appointed
a
perfect
candidate,
so
you're
you're
in
the
perfect
spot.
Okay,
do
we
have
questions
from
the
council
vice
mayor.
F
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you,
mr
pavel.
My
question
is
you
potentially,
if
you're
on
on
this
board
could
receive
complaints
and
allegations
against
candidates
and
elected
officials,
and
in
the
past
there
was
a
concern
that
people
were
using
that
board
to
for
political
reasons
and
not
necessarily
to
report
or
adjudicate
any
misdeeds.
So
I
just
wanted
to
get
your
your
take
or
understanding
on
how
you
would
evaluate
complaints
that
come
before
you
and
and
how
you
would
address.
A
Yeah
so,
as
I
understand
the
the
investigation
or
the
collection
of
the
facts
around
the
complaints
is
done
by
dedicated
investigators,
and
so
the
the
role
of
the
of
the
commission
of
the
board,
I
guess,
is
to
you
know,
look
at
those
facts
objectively
and,
and
you
know
decide
on
whether
that
violates
the
rules
or
not.
A
M
Thank
you,
mr
prevell.
I
appreciate
your
your
prior
service
on
the
civil
grand
jury.
Thank
you
for
that,
and
I
also
appreciate
your
response
to
that
question
about
list
of
three
issues
facing
the
city.
I
appreciate
you
being
forthright
about
the
fact
that
you
know
this
is
really
a
commission
that
addresses
complaints
that
come
to
it.
M
M
M
In
terms
of
what
your
duty
is
here
on
this
commission.
A
A
It
seems
to
me
that
would
be
the
appropriate
way
to
try
to
you
know
if
you
found
that
the
rule
was
not
appropriate
in
this
case,
it
would
seem
like
you
know.
You
should
rule
on
on
the
case
with
the
as
the
ruling
as
the
rules
currently
stand,
and
then
you
should
recommend
a
change
to
the
rules
for
future
cases.
I
seems
to
me
the
right
approach.
M
Okay,
I
think
we
can
then
draw
to
a
close
with
a
simple
motion
that
be
appropriate.
M
A
G
D
O
D
Q
Thank
you:
marion
council,
jeff,
provenzano,
deputy
director
environmental
services,
department,
water
resources,
division,
you're,
correct,
and
today's
topic
is
proposed
amendments
to
our
water,
efficient,
landscape,
ordinance.
Q
So
this
is
not
our
first
time
we've
been
here
with
a
water,
efficient,
landscape,
ordinance
or
or
wello
as
it's,
it's
called
in
in
more
informal
terms.
We
first
came
back
to
council
with
this
willow
in
1994..
It
was
amended
again
in
2013
and
2016.
Q
There
were
several
motivations
and
considerations
that
we
went
through
and
I'll
kind
of
walk
through
each
of
those
kind
of
briefly
just
to
kind
of
keep
it
high
level.
For
you,
all,
one
of
the
motivations
is
where
we
are
in
our
current
drought,
we're
still
in
a
very
severe
drought,
statewide
and,
unfortunately,
we're
expecting
that
to
be
our
future
here.
Q
Periods
of
extended
drought
in
california-
and
that
was
really
a
motivation
for
us
to
in
looking
at
how
we
can
adapt
going
forward
to
two
periods
of
drought
and
one
of
those
is
looking
at
outdoor
irrigation,
especially
here
in
urban
areas
like
san
jose
outdoor
irrigation,
is
at
a
minimum
50
percent
of
the
water
that
we
use
upwards
of
65
percent.
So
not
only
this
action
but
other
actions
in
the
future,
really
to
kind
of
focus
on
bringing
down
our
outdoor
water
usage.
Q
Q
Some
other
considerations
were
benefits
to
residents
and
the
community.
Specifically,
we
looked
at
supporting
drought,
resiliency
supporting
carbon
sequestration,
doing
what
we
can
to
reduce
urban
heat
island
effects
and,
lastly,
if
there's
any
ways
to
generate
cost
savings
or
in
the
form
of
water
savings
for
residents
and
customers,.
Q
Plant
selection
is
one
area
that
we
kind
of
dived
into
understanding
that
there's
a
broad
range
of
water
uses
and
plant
types.
This
slide,
we
thought
was
pretty
informative
for
ourselves
and
hopefully
for
council.
I
want
to
call
your
attention
to
the
bottom
row
of
ground
cover
and
shrubs
ground
cover
and
shrubs,
especially
native
plants
or
drought.
Q
Tolerant
plants
have
a
very
low
water
usage
factor,
and
if
we
compare
that
to
the
top
row,
which
is
turf
grass
turf
grass,
what
we
know
that,
as
here
in
california
is
most
commonly
called
kentucky,
bluegrass
is
a
type
of
grass
that
we
have
almost
everywhere.
That
has
a
very
high
water
factor.
In
fact,
it's
about
10
times
the
amount
of
water
to
water
in
kentucky
bluegrass
than
it
is
ground
cover
and
shrubs.
Q
We
put
this
table
together
and
kind
of
looking
at
what
what
could
the
possible
savings
be
for
for
a
resident
in
the
future,
just
to
kind
of
get
a
gauge
of
how
much
water
is
used
and
what?
What
changes
that
we
could
recommend
and
what
the
benefit
would
be
for
a
typical
single
family
resident
that
has
high
water
use,
needs
they're,
using
about
38,
000
gallons
of
water
annually
to
water
their
front
yard.
Q
If
that
front
yard
were
to
be
converted
over
time
to
low
water
use
plants
that
would
decrease
the
amount
of
water
used
in
the
front
yard
by
about
80
percent
and
to
go
to
a
very
low
water
plant
base
would
decrease
front
yard
water
usage
by
about
90,
and
you
may
recall,
mentioned
just
a
bit
ago.
Outside
water
use
is
about
50
to
65
percent
of
all
the
water
that
we
use
here
in
san
jose.
Q
We
also
spent
a
lot
of
time
focusing
on
native
plants.
The
the
resolution.
Sorry
excuse
me
the
ordinance
recommendations
before
you
do
not
specifically
mandate
native
plants,
but
we
did
spend
a
lot
of
time
working
on
it
on
the
benefits
of
those,
and
I
want
to
spend
just
a
few
minutes
going
over
three
benefits.
One
native
plants,
like
all
drought,
tolerant
plants,
have
a
very
low
water
usage
factor,
so
they
use
less
water.
Q
Q
They
live
and
grow
within
the
root
structure
and
surrounding
area
of
these
native
plants,
and
that's
important
because
that
biome
is
called
a
healthy
soil
in
other
terms,
and
what
that
healthy
soil
does
is.
It
helps
to
retain
moisture
so
that
that
water
evaporates
slower
over
time
and
that
could
help
with
reducing
urban
heat
island
effect.
Q
In
addition,
because
those
plants
use
less
water,
more
water
is
retained
in
the
soil
longer
and,
secondly
or
sorry,
and
lastly,
that
biome
is
really
healthy.
The
echo
system
is
really
healthy
in
that
it
not
only
entraps
carbon
but
also
helps
in
pulling
carbon
out
of
the
atmosphere,
so
it's
called
carbon
sequestration.
Q
Q
I
mentioned
this
just
a
minute
ago.
We
also
looked
at
urban
heat
island
effect
and
any
possible
amendments
that
could
help
support
a
reduction
in
those,
and
we
found
two
really
in
and
finding
ways
of
reducing
hardscape
in
in
a
reasonable
manner,
and
also
to
look
at
different
types
of
plant
selection.
Q
And
lastly,
we
looked
at
different
types
of
irrigation,
typically
or
historically
spray.
Irrigation
has
been
the
way
to
go
for
most
plants,
but
as
we
move
into
moderate
to
low
use
plants,
spray
irrigation
isn't
necessarily
the
most
efficient
for
watering
or
the
most
efficient
in
in
reducing
water
usage.
And
so
we
looked
at
recommendations
that
we
could
provide
to
council
on
going
towards
low-flow
irrigation,
such
as
drip
irrigation,
bubblers
misters.
Q
Q
This
table,
in
summary,
is
the
main
changes
to
that
we're
recommending
to
our
ordinance
applicability
and
again
we
have
a
wella
we've
had
a
willow
in
place
since
1994
in
different
versions.
So
one
of
the
main
recommendations
is
to
remove
that
lower
threshold
for
new
construction,
to
remove
the
threshold
of
500
or
more
square
feet,
and
just
say
all
new
construction
have
to
apply
to
this.
We
also
specifically
called
out
backyards.
Q
Also,
the
existing
ordinance
has
three
different
compliance
pathways,
so
we
the
current
way
we
have
at
warden.
Now
we
do
allow
high
water
use
plants
which
didn't
seem
to
fit
with
where
we
are
and
where
we're
going
to
be
going
in
the
future.
So
we
kind
of
revised
the
compliance
pathways
and
really
narrowed
it
down.
Ideally,
two
to
really
streamline
the
application
process
make
sure
its
expectations
are
known
for
anyone
that
wants
to
work
here
in
san
jose
or
has
to
has
to
do
a
landscape
project.
Q
I
mean
it
applies
to
these
applications,
so
I
really
got
rid
of
the
three
pathway
compliances
and
just
required
moderate
to
low
of
low
water
usage
plants
for
all
new
construction.
Q
And
with
that,
we
did
pretty
extensive,
we
believe
pretty
extensive
stakeholder
engagement,
a
wide
group
of
individuals.
We've
got
several
good
comments.
Back
most
comments
were
around
applicability,
individual
circumstances.
We
did
make
some
minor
changes,
particularly
as
one
example
charities
housing
reached
out
to
us
on.
Q
If
the
way
our
the
wording
was
anyway
going
to
impede
their
ability
to
get
tax
credits
for
affordable
housing
and
we
wait,
we
went
back
and
made
sure
that
the
language
in
the
proposed
the
recommended
changes-
the
proposed
ordinance,
I'm
in
no
way
impedes,
for
example,
charities,
housing
and
their
work
and
in
getting
tax
credits,
so
we
tried
to
go
back
and
most
of
the
other
comments
were
generally
supportive
and
again,
mostly
around
applicability,
and
with
that
I
would
like
to
answer
any
questions.
A
My
big
name
here
just
a
quick
reminder
that
you
know
it's
a
few
years
old
now,
but
you
know
a
few
years
ago
there
was
some
serious
issues
about
the
future
of
you
know:
creating
good
irrigation
plans
and
and
and
islands
and
and
you
know,
flow
of
how
landscapes.
G
B
A
My
thanks,
I
appreciate
the
direction
we're
going
in
here.
I
think
this
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
It's
a
it's!
A
very
targeted,
smart
adaptive
measure.
We're
gonna
have
to
take
more
of
these
as
we
move
forward.
I
think-
and
I
appreciate
that-
it's
that
it's
incremental,
that
it's
that
it's
focused
in
scope
and
still
offers
flexibility
right.
It's
it's
a
framework
within
which
there's
still
a
fair
bit
of
latitude
to
make
decisions
and,
given
that
over
what
is
it
over
50
of
our
water
use
in
san
jose
is
still
outdoors
this.
A
So
I
see
you
nodding
for
those
who
are
watching
on
tv.
This
seems
especially
important.
I
also
think
it's
worth
noting
that
the
best
time
to
get
these
things
right
is
when
we,
when
we
build
something
new,
because
once
we've
built
it,
it
may
be
there
for
years,
if
not
decades.
So
I
think
this
is
a
great
place
to
start.
A
I
did
have
one
question
which
is
for
developers,
homeowners
residents
who
are
interested
in
the
research
behind
this
the
plant
list,
the
products
we
recommend
do
we
have
a
hub
that
helps
people
jump
off
to
information.
They
might
need,
is
there
an
easy
place
for
them
to
go,
to
learn
more.
A
R
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
give
my
thanks
to
you
both
for
to
jeff
and
kerry,
for
you
both
for
listening
to
our
comments
and
our
suggestions
and
doing
additional
outreach
and
making
some
amendments
after
the
transportation
and
environment
committee
meeting.
R
It's
very,
I
think,
they're
they're
good
amendments
and
I
think
exempting
backyards
is
helpful
and
as
well
as
play
areas,
we
still
need
that
nice,
natural
grass
for
our
kids
to
be
able
to
kind
of
run
and
play
so
I
I
appreciate
where
we've
come
out
on
this
and
I'm
happy
to
support
it
today.
Thank
you.
F
Thank
you
mira.
I
just
want
carrie
and
jeff
if
you
can
just
do
me
a
solid
and
just
state
again
that
this
is
only
for
new
construction,
because
I'm
afraid
that
my,
if,
if
it's
not
clear
that
my
inbox
is
going
to
get
blown
up
with
people,
terrified
that
we're
going
to
come
and
pull
up
their
grass.
Q
That's
correct
and
just
to
clarify
too
there
we
do
have
an
ordinance
in
place
and
that's
modeled
off
the
state
ordinance
by
requirement.
What
the
proposed
recommendations
here
affect
that
lower
threshold
for
new
development,
which
is
reducing
that
the
previous
threshold
was
500
square
feet
or
more
and
we're
just
saying
for
new
development.
F
M
Thank
you
vice
mayor
for
saving
me
that
trouble
cool
all
right,
any
other.
Oh
councilman,
foley.
L
Thank
you
thank
you
for
the
report
and
for
the
clarification
that
it
is
new
construction,
but
jeff,
something
you
just
said,
triggered
some
new
construction.
In
my
mind,
adus
adus,
if
they
they're
done
with
permits
well,
theoretically,
they're
done
with
permits
that
would
trigger
these
restrictions
to
be
kicked
in
for
any
landscaping
in
the
front
of
the
property,
but
not
necessarily
the
back
of
the
backyard.
Is
that
right.
Q
L
Okay
and
does
do,
does
our
ordinance
or
does
this
change
have
any
effects
on
school
districts
or.
Q
M
Thank
you.
So
I
guess
jeff.
I
was
going
to
ask
you
for
some
little
advice
here
for
those
of
us
who
have
yards
and
from
one
of
those
guys
who
was
industrious
enough
to
tear
out
the
lawn
during
the
last
route,
but
not
industrious
enough
actually
to
plan
anything
else
and
just
you
know,
have
a
bunch
of
dirt
for
the
last
six
years.
Neighbors
occasionally
ask
me
what
I'm
gonna
do
and
oh
it's
coming,
but
yeah
I
got
a
next
door.
Q
Q
Cool
yeah,
no,
you
know
we
recommend
actually
the
way
the
way
we
worded
it.
There
is
a
water
use
plant
standard,
there's
like
3
500
plants
on
there,
we're
recommending
lower
water
and
moderate
to
lower
water.
Huge
plant
use
plant
plants,
but
we
don't
specifically
say
native.
So
if
you
are
looking
at,
if
you
are
looking
at
redoing,
your
front
yard,
we'd
recommend
go
native.
M
Yeah
understood
I
was
just
trying
to
I
understand
that
cactus
is
good
native
is
better
there
you
go,
and
I
just
wanted
to
understand
with
a
cake
that
cactus
can
never
get
you
any
of
those
benefits
of
natives
and
it
sounds
like
you're
saying
no.
E
M
Okay,
item
7.1:
this
is
the
city
roadmap,
encampment
management
and
safe
relocation
policy,
and
we
have
lots
of
folks
here
to
help
welcome
everyone.
S
Good
afternoon,
mayor
and
council,
my
name
is
john
cicerelli.
I'm
the
director
of
parks,
recreation,
neighborhood
services
with
me
today,
andrea
flores,
shelton,
our
deputy
director,
next
to
her
olympia
williams,
division
manager
for
encampment
management
program,
beautify
next
to
her
reagan,
henniger,
the
deputy
director
in
housing.
S
Behind
me,
we
have
jackie,
ronald's
friend,
the
director
of
housing
and
nicole
burnham,
deputy
director
parks
and
rec,
and
angel
rios
deputy
city
manager,
we're
here
today
to
talk
about
encampment
management
and
safe
relocation.
S
We
have
a
fairly
quick
15-minute
slide
presentation,
we're
going
to
walk
you
through
sort
of
about
where
we've
been
and
where
we're
going.
We
are
also
aware
of
the
I
think,
by
my
count,
21
recommendations.
We
have
to
review
after
that,
so
we're
here
all
afternoon.
Thankfully,
it's
a
light
agenda
so
with
no
further
ado
I'll
hand
it
over
to
andrea.
Thank
you.
D
Good
afternoon,
okay,
there
we
go
so
all
hands
on
deck
here
per
the
city's
roadmap,
priority
prns
and
housing
own.
These
four
encampment
objectives
you
see
in
coordination
with
the
environmental
services
department,
code
enforcement,
public
works
transportation
and
our
county
partners
together,
prns
and
housing
drive
aggressively
to
achieve
numerous
key
results
on
a
quarterly
basis.
D
So
why
encampment
management,
the
principles
of
an
equitable,
effective
and
efficient
strategy
presented
to
you
in
2020
still
apply
today.
As
you
know,
the
city
shifted
from
an
abatement
approach
to
a
housing
first
model
which
minimizes
re-traumatizing
those
who
are
living
outside
and
who
are
disproportionately
people
of
color.
Encampment
management
acknowledges
that
there
is
not
enough
housing.
Therefore,
encampment
locations
do
exist
and
will
exist.
Yet
an
effective
strategy
means
that
they
should
be
clean
and
offer
some
force
form
of
sanitation,
hygiene
and
social
services.
D
Oh
also,
with
the
proposed
budgets
edition
of
physical
deterrent
funding,
we
are
striving
to
install
gates,
boulders
and
other
types
of
tools
to
prevent
and
limit
re-encampments
in
key
areas.
We
will
assess
its
effectiveness
in
allowing
our
teams
to
be
more
efficient
with
time
and
resources.
A
D
You
fixed
that
I'll
keep
talking
at
the
core
of
our
work,
we're
operationalizing
a
new,
complex,
multi-dimensional
model
of
protocol
services
and
systems,
while
attempting
to
put
compassion
into
action
with
those
most
impacted
at
the
center.
We
work
amongst
this
tension
that
is
present
for
all
of
us
how
to
maintain
the
quality
of
life
that
housed
residents
have
come
to
expect,
while
also
creating
a
standard
of
living
for
unhoused
residents.
D
We
are
looking
forward
to
developing
a
more
responsive
customer
service
experience
where
we're
able
to
communicate
what
we
do
when
we
will
do
it
and
what
our
decisions
are
well,
not
every
neighborhood,
business
or
waterway
in
san
jose
experiences,
the
impacts
of
encampments
the
same.
We
do
have
every
intention
of
treating
our
customers
the
same
with
timely
information.
T
We
would
like
to
walk
you
through
an
example
of
an
interagency
cleanup
in
march
2022,
the
beautify
beautify
sj
in
valley
water
held
an
escalated
cleanup
along
the
coyote
creek
at
watson
park.
An
escalated
cleanup
includes
the
removal
of
excessive
amounts
of
trash
and
debris
and
right
sizes
encampments
to
a
12
by
12
footprint.
T
An
escalated
cleanup
also
includes
the
towing
of
inoperable
and
stripped
vehicles.
More
specifically,
once
the
cleanup
is
completed,
encampments
will
remain
at
the
site.
With
the
smaller
footprint
over
the
last
year,
the
city
conducted
179
escalated
cleanups,
in
this
case,
over
a
three-day
period,
the
city
removed
14,
inoperable
vehicles
and
coordinated
with
valley
water
to
remove
over
44
tons
of
trash
from
the
area.
Additionally,
our
volunteers
through
keep
coyote
creek
beautiful,
removed,
an
additional
3.89
tons
of
trash
for
a
total
of
over
96
000
pounds
of
trash
removed.
T
T
We
have
proposed
funding
to
support
a
new
data
system
that
can
be
used
by
multiple
departments
to
better
track
and
report
on
activities
and
services
at
encampment
locations.
Moving
forward,
beautify
sj
will
utilize
an
encampment
assessment
process
when
receiving
complaints
to
determine
the
possible
actions.
T
The
encampment
setback
guidelines
chart
outlines
the
locations
and
conditions
that
can
lead
to
an
abatement.
These
setbacks
are
enforced
areas
or
locations
where
living
structures
and
personal
belongings
are
not
allowed.
There
are
four
categories
of
setbacks:
first,
encampments
within
150
feet
of
a
school.
We
really
mean
built
structures
or
stored
items.
Currently,
this
setback
does
not
apply
to
rvs
or
other
lived-in
vehicles.
T
Second,
encampments
that
block
the
public
right-of-way
third,
an
encampment
that
may
be
posing
a
health
or
safety
concern.
This
can
include
an
encampment
that
poses
a
fire
danger.
We
coordinate
with
san
jose
fire
department
to
address
these
types
of
issues
and
last
encampments
that
obstruct
critical
infrastructure
such
as
access
to
a
hospital
or
trauma
center
or
impact
public
operations
or
maintenance.
The
encampment
management
team
is
also
in
development
of
an
encampment
risk
factor
checklist
that
will
help
guide
encampment
abatement
decisions.
T
Beautify
sj
works
closely
with
interagency
partners
to
address
the
impact
of
trash
and
debris
near
our
waterways
as
well.
Currently,
we
focus
services
along
the
waterways
by
addressing
trash
and
debris
in
the
existing
direct
discharge
areas
which
are
located
from
corey
court
to
capitol
expressway
along
the
coyote
creek
to
focus
on
areas
most
impacted.
We
are
recommending
that
a
new
bi-weekly
trash
service
for
encampments
located
in
these
direct
discharge
areas
begin
in
july.
T
D
Moving
on
from
the
encampment
management
section
to
the
guadalupe
gardens
update,
which
were
all
familiar
is
the
airport
property
located
at
spring
heading
in
asbury
and
before
I
turn
it
over
I'd
like
to
provide
a
few
beautify
updates
related
to
guadalupe
gardens
in
the
last
six
weeks,
44
vehicles
have
been
towed
from
stage
3.
each
week
between
15
and
20.
Tons
of
trash
has
been
removed
and
three
video
cameras
and
three
license
plate.
Readers
were
installed
this
past
saturday
to
monitor
for
stolen
vehicles
and
illegal
dumping.
D
Today
we
are
recommending
that
councils
support
a
request
to
the
faa
to
extend
the
deadline
for
the
complete
removal
of
residential
uses
from
june
30th
to
the
end
of
september.
The
faa
has
witnessed
our
progress
and
is
looking
for
humane
approaches
to
a
nationwide
issue.
With
your
support,
we
can
pursue
the
housing
plan
that
reagan
will
lay
out,
but
first
an
update
from
nicole
on
prototype
park.
Sure.
K
Thank
you
thanks.
So
when
we
were
here
in
february,
we
showed
you
graphics
of
a
prototype
park
for
that
40
acres,
and
we
mentioned
we
needed
to
do
additional
community
feedback.
That
feedback
was
completed
through
both
a
community
meeting
that
was
held
via
zoom
on
april
4th,
as
well
as
an
online
survey
as
a
result
of
that
feedback
from
the
second
round,
we
have
advanced
the
plan
of
the
prototype
park
and
the
key
changes
are
listed
here,
but
I'll
use
sorry
guys
I'll
use
this
graphic
to
just
highlight
a
few
of
them.
K
K
So
we
clarified
what's
happening
there
on
the
on
the
left
side
of
that
graphic,
and
we
also
included.
We
still
continue
to
hear
from
roller
skating
community
wanting
to
see
more
activity
and
more
opportunity
for
them
to
have
space.
So
we
took
the
pathway
that
had
been
in
the
initial
plan
and
made
it
more
sinuous
to
wrap
around
the
space
at
first
it
will
be
gravel,
but
our
hope
is
that
in
the
longer
term,
with
the
appropriate
sql
clearances
that
we
can
perhaps
have
that
be
a
paved
space.
K
So
all
of
that
is
progressing.
Our
partners
at
public
works
are
working
on
the
construction
documents
needed
to
support
the
dog
park.
We
are
actively
coordinating
with
silicon
valley,
disc
golf.
We
are
also
actively
coordinating
with
with
guadalupe
park
conservancy
about
the
future
urban
agriculture
use
and
what
that
might
look
like
and
how
they
may
be
able
to
help
us
move
that
forward.
K
There
are
some
critical
path
items
associated
with
this
design
that
we
are
still
in
the
process
of
of
addressing
one
is
related
to
soil
sampling.
We've
done
phase
one
site
assessment.
We
are
in
the
process
of
doing
phase
2
that
soil
sampling
should
be
done
later
this
month,
but
we
need
to
ensure
that
this
area
is
appropriate
for
public
use.
K
We
continue
to
need
to
work
on
our
environmental
clearances.
While
there
was
environmental
clearance
for
the
master
plan
from
20,
I'm
sorry
from
2002,
we
need
to
make
sure
we
have
appropriate
clearing
clearances
for
these
current
uses
and
last
but
not
least,
and
perhaps
most
importantly,
we
still
need
to
work
with
our
partners
at
san
jose
airport
and
the
faa
to
get
clearance
to
have
these
activities
here
without
the
need
to
pay
for
fair
market
value
of
those
uses,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
reagan.
G
Good
afternoon
reagan
henninger
with
the
housing
department.
Over
the
last
seven
months,
we've
housed
71
people
who
are
living
in
the
area
of
guadalupe
gardens
to
us.
That
is
great
progress,
particularly
given
the
fact
that
there
is
very
little
housing
options
available
for
people,
but
to
others.
It's
not
so
fast
right,
especially
to
the
people
who
are
living
outside
and
suffering
every
day.
We're
not
moving
fast
enough.
G
G
G
D
We
have
several
projects
to
finish
service
lines,
to
stand
up
and
people
to
serve
and,
of
course,
outcomes
to
measure,
and
we
are
know
that
there's
a
state
of
urgency
to
complete
them
all,
and
so,
with
that
we
are
done,
and
we
are
open
to
your
questions.
Thank
you.
M
Great,
thank
you,
andrea
olympia,
reagan.
John,
thank
you
for
all
the
hard
work.
All
right,
tony,
should
let's
go
to
the
public.
I
think
we
have
people
in
person
here.
A
Hello,
this
is
sandy
perry
from
affordable
housing
network,
I'm
speaking
because
the
network
opposes
the
road
map
and
relocation
policy.
The
way
it's
written,
the
very
idea
that
relocation
is
an
acceptable
response
to
homelessness
is
wrong.
We
do
support
the
extension
of
the
guadalupe.
S
Gardens
the
extension.
A
Of
the
time
before,
they're
swept
from
june
to
september,
but
it
should
be
longer,
we
need
more
resources
to
speed
up
alternatives
like
various
housing
programs
and
especially
safe
parks.
For
the
week
for
for
rvs,
the
housing
department
makes
it
clear
that
the
problem
is
the
lack
of
housing
resources,
not
the
lie,
which
is
being
spread
apparently
by
some
council
members.
Some
political
candidates
that
people
on
the
streets
are
so-called
service
resistant.
A
You
can't
be
service
resistant
to
services
that
don't
even
exist.
We're
also
extremely
concerned
about
the
proposal
for
a
buffer
zone
ordinance
which
we
feel
again
without
alternatives
for
people
to
go
to.
You
cannot
restrict
people
and
criminalize
people's
attempts
to
survive
wherever
they
can.
Thank
you.
G
Wrote
going
back
to
the
people
in
public
rose,
barajas,
lisa,
reeve
and
mike
eckerd
just
come
on
down.
Whoever
gets
the
microphone
first
state,
your
name
and
everybody
else
just
line
up
behind
the
first
speaker.
A
Good
afternoon,
everyone,
my
name,
is
mike
eckhart.
I
am
a
lead
member
and
I'm
here
in
to
support
the
extension
of
the
guadalupe
gardens.
There
is
interim
housing
that
is
being
built
at
this
time.
That
is
due
to
be
online
by
the
end
of
the
deadline
for
the
extension,
so
we're
hoping
to
be
able
to
move
people
from
there
into
the
interim
housing
and
at
this
time,
we're
also
asking
that
the
council
take
into
consideration
asking
lieb
to
be
a
part
of
these
conversations
to
help
brainstorm
some
solutions
to
these
problems
that
were
happening.
G
E
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
rose
barajas
and
I
am
with
him
my
team
lead,
and
we
are
here
to
support
or
request
on
your
mercy
of
the
extension
for
the
spring
area,
they're
trying
to
clean
it
up
there
and
there's
just
a
lot
of
you
know
things
that
need
to
people
need
help
with
and
they're.
You
know
just
can't
get
to
everybody
at
once,
and
I
just
I
hope
that
they
get
the
extension.
E
E
E
But
sometimes
it
takes
time
to
build
the
relationship
with
people
to
be
able
to
encourage
them
to
accept
what
we
have
to
offer
and
I'm
hoping
that
you
know
we
can
vote
to
extend
the
the
time
limit
for
guadalupe
gardens
and
also
to
maybe
have
some
more
discussion
on
the
memorandums
and
different
statements.
Staff
statements
that
the
lived
experience
board
would
be
glad
to
to
be
part
of,
and
and
we're
here
to
to
help
people
that
are
in
need
to
get
off
the
streets.
E
And
sometimes
that's
it's
never
a
it's
a
sticky
issue
and
you
know
it
has
a
lot
of
facets
and
I
think
we're
doing
good
at
building
the
trust
and
I'd
like
to
see
lieb.
You
know
we're
offering
to
be
of
any
assistance
that
we
can
to
help
people.
Sometimes
it's
it's
better
to
hear
it
from
people
who
have
been
there
who
have
been
in
the
situation.
You
know
we
have
members
who,
if
you
don't
know
who
lib
is
we're
bored
of
previously
or
currently
even
homeless.
E
P
O
Hi
good
afternoon,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
dr
jackie
newton
and
I've
been
a
doctor
in
san
jose
for
seven
years.
I'm
the
primary
care
doctor
for
many
people
who
are
homeless,
living
at
columbus
park
and
I've
gotten
to
know
people
living
there
really
well
reagan
and
her
team
home
first
and
the
office
of
supportive
housing
are
doing
their
best.
But
whether
we
like
it
or
not,
there's
not
enough
housing
or
safe
parking
sites
for
all
of
the
people
who
are
living
there.
O
But
people
have
managed
to
make
columbus
park
their
home
with
the
few
resources
that
they
do
have.
People
have
even
built
little
homes
for
themselves
and
they've
created
their
own
communities
to
protect
each
other
and
keep
each
other
safe
cleaning.
The
city's
public
space
at
columbus
park
means
cleaning
out
the
people
who
live
there.
We
are
breaking
up
people's
homes,
their
community
and
their
families,
and
I
want
you
to
know
that
many
people
have
chronic
medical
conditions.
O
It
makes
my
job
harder
to
find
them,
and
often
I
don't
find
them
we're
only
you
know
we're
not
only
breaking
up
people's
homes,
but
we
are
also
disrupting
their
medical
care
and
their
health
people
will
get
sicker
and
end
up
back
in
our
hospitals
and
costing
our
system
even
more.
So
you
know,
please
definitely
extend
the
time
you
know
if
we
are
going
to
sweep
them,
but
but
honestly,
I
plead
to
you
to
keep
columbus
park
as
their
home
by
making
it
a
sanctioned.
O
O
Good
afternoon
mayor
vice
mayor
and
city
council
members,
my
name
is
erica
pinto.
Speaking
on
behalf
of
spur,
we
appreciate
city
staff's
cross,
departmental
and
cross-agency
coordination
to
thoughtfully,
develop
and
implement
encampment
management
strategies
that
address
the
looming,
faa
deadline
for
the
flight
path
across
federal
river
gardens
and
then
center
priorities
to
do
this
equitably
safely
and
with
a
housing
first
model.
We
would
also
like
to
thank
the
public
engagement
work
done
by
prns
and
the
guadalupe
river
park
conservancy
to
update
plans
for
the
prototype
park
after
receiving
additional
community
input
further.
O
We
recognize
that
ongoing
and
consistent
funds
for
cleaning
oversight,
upkeep
and
public
space
activation
are
just
as
important
in
our
parks.
Operations
and
maintenance
include
repairs,
landscaping,
cleaning
and
waste
management
that
are
critical
to
the
success
of
a
public
space
spur
will
continue
to
engage
with
the
city
and
county
to
address
these
needs
for
the
long-term,
long-term
success
and
well-being
of
residents.
O
Furthermore,
the
underlying
forces
that
cause
homelessness
are
deeply
rooted
in
housing.
Economic
and
racial
inequity,
while
homelessness
is
a
current
condition
that
park
managers
and
stewards
must
must
work
with
the
city.
County
and
state
must
continue
addressing
the
housing
shortage,
income,
inequality
and
other
structural
causes
of
homelessness.
O
O
We
at
the
law
foundation
are
urging
against
the
adoption
of
the
city's
encampment
management
plan
as
written.
The
city's
plan
fails
to
provide
solutions
that
actually
meet
the
basic
needs
of
unhoused
people
and
instead
creates
alarming
new
opportunities
for
the
city
to
sweep
displace
and
hurt
vulnerable
and
housed
communities.
O
O
A
Hi,
thank
you
claire
beekman.
Here
is
this.
The
item
that's
been
kind
of
deferred
over
the
past
few
months,
because
I
mean
when
I
first
saw
this
deferment.
I
thought
it
was
about
the
idea
of
how
to
we
can
better
consider
the
future
of
the
government
encampment
process,
whether
it's
government,
encampments
or
encampments,
sponsored
by
ngos.
A
You
know
it
was
just
my
feeling
that
we're
headed
to
some
important
important
work
and
I
can
see
parts
of
that
important
work
within
this
item
and
yet
from
what
the
previous
speakers
have
said.
This
is
an
item.
That's
that's
kind
of
meant
as
a
bit
restrictive
and
it's
kind
of
the
worst
parts
of
ourselves
coming
out
again,
I
I'm
a
bit
surprised
that
you
have
to
have
aopr
technology
at
columbus
park.
A
You
know
you
treat
kind
of
aopr
technology
like
candy,
like
anybody
can
have
it
your
best
friend's
neighbor
can
walk
around
the
streets
with
it.
It's
a
fun
toy.
It
shouldn't
be
treated
that
way.
I
I
don't
think
it's
necessary.
There's
a
there's,
a
good
feeling
enough
of
a
good
feeling
at
columbus
park
that
shouldn't
shouldn't
have
to
be
doing
those
sort
of
things
you
really
have
to
consider
our
technology
practices
and
what
could
be
responsibility
and
minimal
practices
with
the
toe
issues
around
the
park
area
that
was
mentioned
today.
A
I
I
really
hope
that
you
know
we're
headed
towards
a
future
that
that
people
can
get
help
with
toe
issues
from
from
city
government.
They
they
can
be
of
service
to
to
help
people
get
out
of
that
area
to
where
they
need
to
go.
There
was
a
debate
last
night
between
the
da's
running
for
santa
clara
county
d.a.
An
interesting
item
was
brought
up
about
how
to
bring
what
I
felt.
A
What
I
got
out
of
it
was
the
idea
of
how
to
bring
an
enthusiasm
to
invite
people
to
their
own
future
of
do
they
seek
drug
help
or
not
that's
the
sort
of
direction.
We
should
be
considering
our
issues
and
that's
amazing.
O
Hi,
mayor
and
council,
thank
you
for
for
this
conversation,
this
very
complex
conversation.
O
I
am
with
the
guadalupe
river
park,
conservancy
I'm
on
their
board,
and
I
just
want
to
make
a
couple
of
comments
that
the
conservancy
supports
staff's
recommendation
and
memos
regarding
an
ongoing
work
plan
added
housing
resources,
including
columbus
park
as
part
of
the
gardens
plan
and
aligning
construction
of
prototype
park
with
clean
up
deadlines.
O
A
couple
of
questions,
since
the
land
between
coleman
and
taylor
were
also
purchased
with
federal
funds
will
do
you
think
the
airport
will
be
in
compliance
if
encampments
are
also
present
there
and,
secondly,
how
will
housing
efforts
and
services
reach
the
entire
area
of
the
gardens
procured
through
this
federal
funding?
There's
just
a
couple
of
things
on
my
mind.
O
E
Yeah
definitely
a
tough
issue.
This
is
alex
here
speaking
personally
today.
I
just
want
to
build
on
some
comments.
I
made
the
last
time
we
talked
about
this.
I
do
in
fact
think
sanctioned
encampments,
as
councilmember
perales
has
talked
about,
is
a
good
way
forward
for
san
jose
and
would
like
to
see
the
council
and
staff
continue
to
work
on
sites
for
sanctioning
commits.
E
I
also
want
to
balance
that
with
the
concern
about
the
safety
along
the
trails
and
the
challenges
I
talked
about
last
month
with
cars
along
those
trails
and
potentially
impacting
pedestrians
and
bikers
and
commuters
along
the
trail.
That
is
a
big
concern
for
me.
I
also,
I
think
we
need
to
figure
out
how
to
make
our
homeless
encampments
if
they
are
sanctioned
as
safe
as
possible
for
everyone,
the
folks
who
are
unhoused,
as
well
as
the
folks
living
nearby.
O
O
I
was
part
of
an
expansion
of
our
street
medicine
team,
providing
health
care
to
the
unhoused
in
their
very
own
encampments
columbus
park
being
one
of
the
major
ones
quickly.
I
became
aware
of
the
detrimental
suites
that
are
not
only
for
our
unhoused,
but
how
detrimental
torad
was
for
our
house
neighbors.
O
These
abatements
create
a
never-ending
revolving
door
of
disease
such
as
syphilis
and
hep
c,
and
exhaustion
of
our
health
care
resources
when
we
can
no
longer
reach
our
patients
needing
treatment.
Due
to
these
sweeps,
we
cannot
provide
mental
health
treatment,
sti
and
hep
c
treatment
and
longitudinal
care
of
our
chronic
illnesses,
such
as
uncontrolled
diabetes
and
heart
disease.
This
only
makes
it
worse
for
your
own
house
residents
and
for
us
health
care
employees
having
an
escalated
abatement,
simply
spreads
homelessness
to
other
parts
of
the
city
and
depletes
healthcare
resources.
O
When
I
take
my
kids
to
rotary
park,
we
pass
by
columbus
park
and
I
take
the
opportunity
to
teach
my
kids
to
be
selfless
and
fearless
leaders
to
understand
that
homeless
are
people
just
like
you
and
me,
but
have
had
it
really
rough
from
people
who
they
are
supposed
to
trust
ethically
in
your
heart
of
hearts.
Do
you
think
this
escalated
abatement
is
right,
I'll
leave
you
with
this
question
to
ponder.
I
hope
you
think
about
your
kids,
my
kids
and
the
growing
youth.
Looking
at
you
as
an
example.
A
O
Okay,
great,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
scott
largent.
I
am
a
resident
of
columbus
park
out
there.
I
live
in
a
chieftain,
winnebago
motorhome,
I'm
parked
directly
across
from
the
storage
center.
That's
there
on
heading
when
the
pandemic
hit
a
lot
of
things,
got
cut
off
resources
stuff
I
was
used
to
using
in
my
sobriety
anywhere
from,
like
you
know
the
light
rail
to
the
libraries
you
know
I
didn't.
I
didn't
plan
on
ending
up
homeless.
Again
I
I
didn't
plan
on
ending
up
there.
I
searched
around
on
craigslist.
O
I
found
this
rv.
I
just
figured.
I
had
to
write
things
out.
I
didn't
know
much
about
kobit.
I
couldn't
go
to
my
meetings
that
I
went
to.
They
were
all
cut
off.
The
library
was
a
was
a
huge
resource
for
me
in
my
sobriety
that
was
cut
off
it.
Just
all
was
cut
off
and
I've
met
a
lot
of
people.
I
I
the
good
bad
and
the
ugly
out
there
that
had
a
lot
of
these
things
in
their
life,
happened
to
them
and
they've
been
without
services.
O
They've
been
without
therapy,
counseling
even
judge
manley's
courtroom.
They
went
remote
and
most
people
were
not
even
able
to
check
up
with
their
mental
health
programs,
and
these
people
have
now
been
shoved
into
one
area,
and
it's
just
some
big
big
mock
bucket
you'll
have
people
like
myself
that
are
six
years.
Sober
and
you'll
have
people
that
are
half
naked
running
around
in
circles.
Don't
even
know
what
planet
they're
on.
O
You
know
we're
on
the
world
stage
right
now
watching
this
play
out
and-
and
I
I
just
wish
it
would-
the
humane
route.
I
I
cannot
believe
this
is
happening
in
silicon
valley.
I'm
I'm
very
worried
about
people
out
there.
I've
started
to
care
about
a
lot
of
people
out
there
and
they
have
really
no
options
and
76
people
being
housed.
A
I
You
becky.
E
Moskowitz,
I'm
with
the
law
foundation
of
silicon
valley.
In
addition
to
reiterating
my
colleague,
joanna's
excellent
comments
and
those
contained
in
our
letter.
I
wanted
to
share
some
of
what
I've
learned
from
doing
outreach
to
folks
living
in
the
encampments
and
want
to
stress
my
extreme
concern
about
on
holding
ongoing
sweeps.
E
So
when
I
talked
with
individuals
living
in
encampments
about
sanctioned
encampments,
the
last
time
that
that
proposal
was
on
the
table.
What
I
learned
is
that
many
of
the
people
living
in
encampments
are
victims
of
pretty
significant
trauma
and
that
in
the
camps
that
they've
formed
they've
formed
neighborhoods
communities
and,
in
some
cases,
informal
families.
E
And
these
are
the
folks
that
they
trust
and
feel
comfortable
with,
and
should
they
be
asked
to
relocate
to
a
new
local
area.
They
are
very
fearful
of
unknown
and
unvetted
people
and
therefore
we
ask
that
if
any
consideration
of
sanctioned
encampments
be
made,
it
be
made
of
the
existing
camps
and
folks
not
be
swept.
Thank
you.
M
Thank
you.
I
want
to
thank
all
the
members
of
the
community
who
came
to
speak
and
particularly
the
members
that
lived
experience
advisory
board.
I
appreciate
your
offer
of
engagement
and
further
engagement
and
advice.
I
know
that
found
it
beneficial
in
the
past.
When
we
work
with
members
of
leave,
I
believe
you
guys
are
affiliated
with
destination
home.
Is
that
right?
Okay,
same
yeah,
same
group,
wonderful,.
M
Understood
yeah
you're
speaking
for
yourselves
yeah.
We
found
it
certainly
helpful,
as
we
were
engaging
with
members
of
the
lived
experience
advisory
board
around
the
design
of
a
cook
belt
community
over
near
lot
e,
and
so
appreciate
your
willingness
to
roll
up
your
sleeves
with
us.
M
I
think,
as
john
pointed
out,
we've
got
a
lot
of
recommendations
and
staff
has
more
recommendations
than
they
do
have
money
or
people.
So
what
I
want
to
suggest
is
each
of
us
talk
that,
if
you're
about
to
make
a
motion
that
will
include
or
refer
to
any
of
your
proposed
recommendations
that
we
stop
the
action
allow
staff
to
be
able
to
respond,
because
I
haven't
even
read
all
these
recommendations.
Yet
several
came
in
today,
I
think
or
yesterday,
and
I
think
all
of
us
would
benefit
from
being
able
to
take
a
breath.
M
Look
at
what
these
specifics
are
and
allowing
staff
to
have
a
chance
to
tell
us
give
us
their
feedback
on
whatever
that
recommendation
might
be.
So
if
you
would
do
the
public
and
each
other
the
service
that
would
be
great
just
to
identify
what
it
is.
You
want
to
specifically
refer
to
and
then
allow
staff
a
chance
to
respond
and
then
we'll
move
forward.
M
Okay,
let's
go
to
the
council,
councilmember
davis.
R
R
I
did
want
to
ask
something
I
didn't
hear
and
forgive
me
if
I
missed
it,
how
many
people
in
the
in
the
131
are
you,
including
people
who
are
currently
living
in
their
vehicles
or
their
rvs,
and
what
is
the
plan
for
those
people
if
they're
not
included
in
the
131.
G
G
If,
for
some
reason,
housing
is
not
immediately
available
or
there
just
could
be
a
situation
where
perhaps
safe
parking
is
an
option
for
some
period
of
time
for
a
household,
we
are
working
with
amigos
and
with
the
county
for
their
safe
parking
options,
and
then
we
do
hope
to
have
a
city-funded
state
parking
option
online
later
this
fall.
R
R
Okay,
the
131
individuals
who
are
because
they
live
in
an
rv
or
because
they
live
in
their
car
may
be
resistant
to
be
to
entering
housing
or
otherwise.
Service
resistant.
For
other
reasons-
and
I
think
our
lived
experience,
advisory
board
talked
about
that
there
is.
There
are
trust
issues
and
there
are
people
who
are
service
resistant.
Do
we
have
a
sense
of
what
what
the
core
group
of
people
are?
Who
are
going
to
be
our
toughest
challenges?
G
Yeah
in
our
experience
in
heading
and
spring,
people
are
receptive
to
a
meaningful
offer
of
housing,
so
not
shelter,
not
necessarily
safe
parking,
but
people
want
a
home.
I
don't
think
that's
surprising,
that's
what
we
found
in
our
work
holistically
as
a
system.
People
want
a
home.
G
If
there
is
a
number
of
who
is
service
resistant,
I'll,
begrudgingly
use
that
term,
it
would
be
encompassed
in
that
number
of
27
who
we
don't
have
a
current,
be
I
sped
up
for.
P
G
P
Let
me
just
jump
in
this:
is
jackie
morales-friend,
I'm
the
director
of
the
housing
department
and,
as
reagan
has
said,
when
people
are
offered
a
housing
choice,
they're
much
more
likely
to
to
take
it
and
just
based
on
statistics
alone.
We
could
predict
that
at
least
80
percent
of
the
27
would
accept
a
housing
solution.
So
there
could
be
a
limited
number
of
people
that
might
have
additional
concerns
or
challenges
on
wanting
to
move.
R
G
I
don't
know
the
number
of
what's
being
worked
on
today,
but
I
do
know
that
the
challenge
that
we
have
found
is
that
we
people
often
have
to
demonstrate
that
they
own
their
vehicle
for
the
repairs
and
a
lot
of
times
if
you're
living
outside
you
may
not
have
all
of
that
documentation
and
paperwork
to
demonstrate
that
you
own
that
vehicle.
The
other
challenge
to
the
repairs.
G
We've
just
found
it's
hard
to
do
the
work
out
in
the
field
in
those
challenging
conditions,
it's
much
easier
for
the
mechanic
to
do
their
work
in
the
shop
right
where
they
have
their
tools
and
they
can
lift
the
car
up,
and
so
the
on-site
work
has
been
challenging
and
it's
possible
to
do
simpler.
Work
like
sure
you
can
replace
a
battery
out
in
the
field,
but
more
comprehensive
work
really
is
preferable
by
the
mechanic
to
do
it
in
its
shop.
R
G
We
can
work
with
that
individual
just
say,
for
example,
we're
working
with
an
individual
and
they're
gonna
they're
enrolled
in
rapid
rehousing
and
they
find
their
unit
and
their,
but
their
car
is
inoperable.
We
can
work
with
that
individual
to
either
tow
the
vehicle
to
where
they're
living
or
get
it
towed
to
the
mechanic.
J
D
R
D
So
in
working
with
itd,
we
have
not
yet
developed
and
completed
the
design,
and
so,
in
speaking
with
many
of
the
council
members
last
week,
we
heard
about
this.
We
understand
this
is
as
much
about
intake
our
customer
service
that
we
can
respond
to
complainants,
but
if
it
also
is
a
tracking
mechanism,
we
can
look
into
that.
So
again,
the
design
is
not
yet
complete.
Okay,.
R
And
of
the
131
people-
and
I
see
I'm
almost
out
of
time-
and
I
have
so
many
more
questions,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
one
more
and
then
I'll
come
back
around
of
the
131
people
who
are
still
out
there
are
the
are.
How
are
you
prioritizing
people
for
housing?
Are
we
prioritizing
people
who
need
medications
and
have
disabilities,
as
we
heard
from
a
medical
professional
who
serves
residents
out
there?
P
So
the
plan
does
contemplate
that
the
county
is
going
to
take
the
lead
on
a
certain
number
of
the
people.
So
there
they've
already
started
deploying
their
outreach
working
with
our
staff
and
our
outreach
to
identify
the
people
that
are
in
their
queue
so
they're
beginning
that
work
and
then
we're
taking
on
the
people
who
need
the
rapid
rehousing
through
our
contracts
and
we've
begun
having
those
discussions
and
connecting
those
people.
And
then
I
think
there
were
four
or
three
who
had
you
know
or
higher
functioning
people
who
didn't.
P
R
Thank
you
I
will,
since
my
time
is
up,
I
will
yield
to
my
colleagues
and
hope
to
come
back
around
on
the
rotation.
Thank
you.
We.
M
Will
come
back
to
you
councilmember
ross.
N
Yeah,
thank
you
and
yeah.
There's
a
lot
to
to,
I
think
chew
on
here,
and
certainly,
as
you
mentioned,
a
lot
of
memos,
but
first
off.
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
staff
and
thank
you
for
the
the
briefing
discussion
on
this.
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
work
and
I
do
agree
with
the
direction
the
overall
shift
in
our
direction
on
how
we
intend
to
manage
encampments
and
hopefully
put
people
on
the
best
path
to
be
able
to
get
the
services,
resources
and
ultimately
housing.
N
The
first
component-
and
I
do
there's
two
memos,
actually
one
that
I
co-signed
on
to
and
then
one
that
I
that
I
issued
independently
and
so
I'll
initially
speak
to
the
one
that
that
issued
independently
and
just
in
the
the
first
request
and
happy
to
hear
back
from
staff,
but
in
regards
to
the
mental
health
component
and
in
in
just
ensuring
better
coordination
there
in
incorporating
that
in
all
the
outreach
that
we're
doing.
N
I
think
we
have
some
more
opportunities
today
than
we
have
over
the
years
because
of
some
of
the
the
advancements
with
the
county
and
new
investments
from
both
us
as
well
at
the
city,
and
then
I
think
some
of
the
shift
as
well
that
we're
hearing
from
the
state
level
not
necessarily
a
tool
yet.
But
I
think
that
there's
some
more
opportunities
there
to
have
a
focus
and
ensure
coordination
on
mental
health
in
that
component
as
we're
going
out
and
doing
our
outreach.
N
And
so
the
ask
is
in
my
mind
not
necessarily
significant
being
able
to
get
an
update
on
those
efforts
and
so
but
wanted
to
hear
back
from
from
staff
on
that
recommendation.
One
from
my
solo
memo.
G
N
Was
paragraph
yeah
yeah
yeah,
the
first
recommendation
yeah?
In
regards
to
the
second
recommendation,
I
I've
had
conversations
with
mary
lee
jennings,
the
executive
director
of
the
children's
discovery
museum
and
as
really
excitingly,
that
they've
been
able
to
get
back
open
and
people
coming
in
to
the
discovery
museum.
N
They
have
now
been
dealing
with
some
significant
safety
challenges
there
on
site
and
a
lot
of
feedback
from
parents
and
families,
namely
that
actually
the
access
to
the
to
the
building
itself,
where
the
parking
lot
is
that
is
immediately
adjacent
to
one
of
the
largest
source
sites
and
then
the
children's
discovery
museum
itself,
as
well
kind
of
surrounded
by
by
three
different
source
sites,
one
being
the
most
immediate
one
there
across
from
the
parking
lot
and
and
in
the
conversations
with
her
in
trying
to
consider
the
the
focus
that
we
have
had
on
some
of
these,
the
both
the
setback
guidelines
and
the
prioritization
of
where
we
will
actually
focus
on
some
of
our
abatement
efforts.
N
Specifically,
as
we
rolled
that
out
initially
last
year
for
a
focus
around
schools.
I
have
an
interest
to
see
if
we
can
include
that
as
a
as
a
location,
a
priority
location
as
well
and
wanted
to
be
able
to
to
hear
back
from
staff.
On
on
that.
I
understand
the
the
you
know
that
the
challenges
there
and
and
sort
of
how
we're
beginning
to
look
at
some
of
these
sites.
I
think
the
biggest
challenge
for
this
particular
site
is,
is
honestly
just
the
sheer
size
of
the
source
site.
N
That's
nearby
and
and
then
the
significant
number
of
individuals
that
are
homeless,
living
in
the
area
and
and
just
in
general,
the
I
think,
being
surrounded
by
a
couple
source
sites
so
but
wanted
to
hear
from
staff.
On
that.
D
Thank
you,
council,
member,
so
in
looking
at
the
surrounding
area
around
the
children's
discovery,
museum
and
staff,
we
did
meet
with
the
executive
director
of
children's
discovery
museum
as
well.
First
off
we
did
do
an
assessment,
and
currently
the
soar
site
is
outside
of
the
150
foot
school
buffer
zone
that
could
that
you're
seeking
to
apply
to
the
children's
discovery,
museum
and
the
active
encampments
that
were
along
the
east
side
of
the
children's
discovery.
D
Museum
in
the
river
staff
were
just
out
there
yesterday
they're
no
longer
active,
they're,
abandoned
or
just
not
housed
at
this
time,
but
we
understand
that
this
facility
has
had
impacts
frankly
for
years
and
decades,
given
its
its
location
and
in
speaking
with
marilee
and
hearing
from
you
as
well.
We
really
do
think
an
overall
security
strategy
would
be
better
for
the
building,
in
addition
to
us
being
fine
with
adding
it
to
the
setback
guidelines.
I
just
will
say
the
caveat
would
be
once
we
add
one
facility
right.
D
The
anticipation
that
more
would
come
could
be
a
challenge
to
us,
but
we
understand
the
serving
aspect
of
it
and
again
the
our
team's
assessment
and
john,
and
I
were
out
there
with
captain
acosta
recently.
It
has
frankly
gotten
smaller
on
the
encampment,
especially
towards
the
end
of
the
parking
lot,
has
gotten
smaller,
as
people
moved
on,
and
so
we
continue
to
manage
it
understand
the
situation
around.
It.
N
Okay,
thank
you
and
yeah,
and
I
recognize
that
challenge.
I
know
we
had
that
conversation
and
and
likely
we'll
you
know
we'll
be
able
to
converse
about
that
here.
Right.
I
don't
think,
there's
a
perfect
solution,
albeit
I
do
think
there's
another
solution.
So
I'll
end
on
those
comments,
I
don't
know
where
my
timer
clock
is
oh
there.
N
It
is
so,
but
no
surprise,
obviously,
and
as
I
put
in
the
memo,
I
do
think
that
this
is
just
more
reason
why
and
almost
in
the
disclaimer
that
I
had
last
year
and
as
we're
looking
at
abating
this
major
area
under
the
airport
right
away
there,
that
without
having
an
alternative
location,
sanctioned
location
for
redirecting
people
to,
we
continue
to
sort
of
just
go
into
this
vicious
cycle
and
really
where
I
think
the
the
biggest
challenge
for
me
is
that
I
agree
with
again
the
direction
we're
going.
N
I
agree
with
what
we're
doing
at
source
sides.
What
the
one
piece
that
I
don't
agree
with
is
that
we
have
removed
ourselves
from
the
selection
process
of
a
location
which
was
very
very
challenging
when
we
did
the
you
know:
emergency
interim
housing
or
tiny
homes
right,
but,
albeit
challenging.
I
think
it's
a
step
that
we
need
to
do,
because
what
we've
done
is
we've
eliminated.
N
That
and
we've
said
well
we're
going
to
just
bring
the
source
site
the
services
to
our
unhoused
population,
wherever
they
have
decided
to
congregate
and
those
locations
of
of
where
they've
congregated
may
not
be
the
best
locations
for
us
to
number
one
offer
service.
A
lot
of
them
are
not
very
easy
accessible
number
two:
they
could
have
a
ton
of
detriment
to
the
surrounding
community.
In
this
case
right
children's
square
museum
waterway,
you
name
it.
N
I
would
like
to
to
do
the
difficult
first
step
of
identifying
the
locations,
and
I
think
that
the
best
route
to
go
down
that
as
I've
proposed
a
couple
times
now-
is
the
sanction
encampment
route.
And
so
we
have
that
opportunity
to
discuss
that
in
the
budget
through
the
mba
process.
But
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
again.
This
is
why
I
think
that
is
so
necessary
so
that
we
can
actually
identify
those
locations
and
not
end
up
in
sort
of
the
the
circumstances
that
we
find
ourselves
today
through
source
sites.
N
I
I
think
that
it
was
a
good
strategy
to
manage
and
navigate
through
the
pandemic,
but
as
we
begin
to
exit
that
and
what
you
are
proposing
here
is
sort
of
what
is
that?
What
does
the
go
forward?
Management
look
like.
I
think
that
we
still
have
disadvantaged
ourselves
and
our
community
by
not
identifying
what
are
the
the
best
locations
and
instead
just
saying
we
will
react
to
the
locations
that
have.
You
know,
presented
themselves
and
then
do
our
best
to
manage
around
those.
I
don't,
I
don't
think
that's
the
best
approach.
N
N
Welcome
that
when
being
abated
or
redirected
and-
and
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
go
down
that
path-
we
had
the
path
of
what
it
was
going
to
cost
what
it
would
take
as
far
as
staff
wise
to
simply
pilot
that
opportunity,
and
so
I'm
hoping
my
colleagues
take
the
efforts
we're
doing
today
the
challenges
we're
facing
and
are
able
to
support
that
as
that
comes
forward
through
the
mba
process.
N
I
I
was
going
to
try
to
maybe
make
a
motion,
but
there
is
quite
a
bit
here
and
then
considering
the
mayor's
request.
What
I'll?
What
I'll
do
I'll
I'll
wait
then,
to
my
colleagues
speak
up,
and
hopefully
we
can
clear
up
some
of
the
different
requests
from
from
my
colleagues
memos
and
we'll
make
a
motion
after
thanks
sounds.
C
Thank
you,
yeah,
there's,
so
many
questions
here.
I
think
I'm
gonna
leave
some
of
them
to
colleagues,
and
I
know
others
have
already
started
asking
some
of
these
questions,
although
I'm
just
to
first
follow
up
on
a
few
things
like,
for
example,
at
the
this
question
of
children,
discover
museum,
I
mean
it
makes
sense,
except
that
we
obviously
all
have
sites
that
we
could
make
the
same
argument
about,
and
so
what
concerns
me
is
how
do
we?
You
know?
C
Where
does
that?
Where
do
we
draw
that
line
right
I
mean
we
have
people
in
right
across
the
neighborhood,
where
there's
kids
living
on
the
street
and
their
families
are
saying
my
kids
can't
go
out
for
out
in
our
front
yard.
There
are
obviously
you
know.
Obviously,
we've
dealt
with
schools,
but
we
have
people
in
parking,
lots
of
community
centers
or
the
right
next
door
to
parks,
and
so
you
know
clearly,
I
think
almost
every
site
where
we
have
people
now
is
close
to
something
that
you
can
make
the
case
that
you
know.
C
In
order
for,
for
safety
and
and
the
comfort
of
people
using
facilities,
we
would
have
to
do
something
about
it.
So
I
just
I
just
get
concerned
as
we
begin
to
single
out
specific
sites,
rather
than
think
about
the
circumstances
as
we,
you
know,
the
specific
circumstances
of
who's
there
and
how
disruptive
they're
being
versus
some
blanket
statement
that
so
I
I
don't
know
if
I
have
the
right
answer
to
that
again
to
me
until
we
have
a
place
until
we
have
a
place
to
locate
people.
C
It's
it's
not
necessarily
productive,
to
say,
let's
add
more
sites
to
our
to
our
abatements,
because
that
all
that
does
is
cause
other
sites
to
grow,
because
people
need
to
go
somewhere
when
they
move
from
those
sites.
And
so
and
and
while
I
I
agree
with
council
member
proles
about
the
need
for
some
sanctioned
locations.
C
You
know,
sanctions
locations
that
hold
a
couple
hundred
people
are
still
not
going
to
you
know,
get
thousands
of
people
placed
to
go
so
so
this
is
a
really
difficult
problem.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
make
a
comment
about
that.
D
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
be
clear
that,
in
the
case
of
the
children's
discovery
museum,
what
we're
seeing
is
there
wouldn't
be
a
large
service
impact
where
there
wouldn't
be
an
impact
on
encampments.
Frankly,
if
it
did
apply
to
the
150
school
buffer
zone.
But
to
your
point,
the
school
buffer
zone's
intent
was
around
creating
spaces
where
young
children-
or
you
know
older
young
teens
right
if
they
walk
to
school
by
themselves
without
parent
supervision
that
there
wouldn't
be
encampments
hindering
that
right.
D
C
D
And
I
I
do
want
to
point
out
again:
we
want
to
differentiate
between
encampments
and
specific
behaviors
of
people
right
right
and
so
many
times
there
can
be
behaviors.
We
don't
want
that
are
unrelated
to
encampments
right.
C
P
Only
thing
else
I
would
add,
on
the
housing
perspective
to
this
whole
piece-
is
that
the
more
you
say
where
you
don't
want
people,
the
more
you're
going
to
be
pushing
people
into
areas
with
unintended
consequences?
I
think
or
us
not
really
realizing
where
people
will
go
and
this
challenge
of
you
know
whether
we
open
more
facilities,
whether
it's
a
sanctioned
encampment.
We
opened
more
shelter
space
during
covet
19
than
in
any
time
in
the
15
years.
P
So
I'm
not
I'm
I'm
somewhat
confused
on
how
there's
a
belief
that
if
we
opened
two
sanctioned
encampments
that
we
would
have
a
very
challenging
time
citing
because
even
our
you
know,
I
think
the
modular
housing
has
been
very
successful.
It
looks
good,
it's
extremely
quiet,
it's
functioning
really!
Well.
We
still
have
challenges
citing
that.
P
C
Yeah-
and
I
fully
understand-
I
mean
the
problem-
is
that
not
a
single
one
of
the
solutions
gets
to
scale
right?
I
mean
so
to
me
it's
a
it's
got
to
be
a
combination
of
all
of
the
above,
but
I
agree
with
you
on
the
idea
that
creating
more
places
where
people
can't
be
actually
make
the
problem
worse.
In
my
mind,
and
that's
why
I
mean
I
tell
people
yeah,
I
could
move,
we
could
try
to
work
to
move
people
out
of
this
area,
but
they're
going
to
move
down
the
street.
C
They
could
end
up
even
closer
to
you
or
they
could
end
up
they're
going
to
end
up
being
somebody
else's
issue.
So
it's
not
necessarily
the
right
thing
to
do
until
we
have
a
solution
for
everybody,
but
you
know
I'm
not
sure,
everybody's
patient
enough
to
wait
for
a
solution
for
everybody
and
that's
where
we
run
into
the
challenge.
I
understand
question
I
have
about
encampments
as
well
is
structures
that
we
see
at
encampments
we're
starting
to
see
people.
C
You
know:
building
multi
multi-story,
very
elaborate
homes
along
the
creeks
near
other
people's
houses,
and
I
fully
you
know
understand
why
people
want
that
kind
of
space
for
themselves.
But
what?
What
is?
What
is
our
policy
about
that
kind
of
structure.
D
So,
especially
after
the
two
years,
I'm
sorry,
I
can't
I'm
going.
D
We
are,
we
are
seeing
those
significant
structures
being
built,
especially
near
our
watersheds,
and
so
that
is
a
part
of
the
work
we've
been
doing
with
escalated,
cleanups,
which
is
usually
those
footprints
go
beyond
the
12
by
12
that,
ideally
we
we
would
like
to
keep
people
to
so
right
now.
What
we're
doing
is
that's
through
our
escalated
cleanup
process.
When
we
go
through
an
assessment
we
look
to
see.
Is
it
conforming
to
the
12
by
12?
D
If
again,
it
meets
the
setback
guidelines
it's
in
a
deemed
an
allowable
place,
and
then
we
see
cooperation
from
them
through
trash
programs
and
or
continue
to
stay
in
the
right
size.
You
know
challenging,
but
this
is
a
part
of
our
ongoing
engagement,
work.
Yep.
C
And
I
appreciate
the
work
that
you're
doing
in
a
lot
of
these
locations
and
one
of
the
things
you
mentioned
earlier
was
putting
up
barricades,
so
people
can't
drive
into
places,
for
example,
a
quick
question
about
how
well
that's
working.
I
mean,
I
know
that
there's
been
issues
with
people
cutting
locks
and
being
able
to
still
get
through.
Do
we
have
solutions
now
that
we
think
are
better?
Are
they
still
not
working.
D
We're
open
to
all
ideas
and
a
new
one
that
we're
talking
to
valley
water
about
is
a
lock
shroud
that
they
have
shared
with
us,
and
I
know
prness
is
going
to
be
looking
into
that.
But
a
part
of
our
deterrent
work
for
next
year
will
be
understanding
effectiveness.
You
know
we're
again
trying
to
try
anything
like
even
at
watson
park
we
came
in
with,
we
didn't,
have
a
deterrent
in
mind.
D
It
was
just
such
a
long
space
that
the
team
was
clever
enough
to
put
in
a
natural
deterrent
to
see
if
it
could
just
stop
cars
from
just
rolling
straight
through.
So
we
definitely
need
to
know
what
is
effective
and
it
has
been
challenging,
as
you
know,
and
along
mercado
and
yeah.
C
Along
the
creek
there,
okay
for
the
rest
of
my
time,
I
just
wanted
to
address
my
memo,
which
is
about
the
building,
an
application
that
the
city
would
use.
I
I
just
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
ques.
You
know.
I
appreciate
the
conversation
we
had
last
week,
andrea
and
reagan
about
this,
and
I
know
that
we've
talked
to
you
about
whether
there's
budget
for
this-
and
yes,
you
have
some
budget
to
do
this.
C
My
my
feeling
is:
we
have
an
opportunity
now
that
we
have
that
budget,
and
this
will
to
do
it
to
do
it
right
to
come
up
with
something.
That's
really
going
to
be
useful,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
that
we
take
advantage
of
that
and
don't
hurry
into
a
solution
that
may
not
be
sustainable,
may
not
be
supportable
and
may
become
outdated
quickly,
for
example.
So
that's
why
I
have
some
specific
things
in
my
memo
that
I
think
are
important
to
think
about.
C
I
think,
as
council
member
davis
asked,
I
think
the
ability
for
council
offices
to
be
able
to
have
that
feedback.
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
say
when
somebody
calls
me
and
says
we
have
an
encampment
here,
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
look
up
and
say
well
how
many
visits
have
been
there
in
the
last
year.
What
were
the
outcomes?
C
What
were
you
know?
How
many
times
have
they
been
contacted
and
how
many
people
provide
were
provided
with
service?
What
kinds
of
services
were
they
provided
with,
so
that
I
know
that
information
our
office
knows
that
information
before
we
are
speaking
to
the
residents,
and
I
think
it
would
be
useful
to
have
in
addition,
a
tool
that
your
offices,
you
know
from
from
housing
and
from
uf
isj,
can
all
share
that,
along
with
our
council
offices.
C
I
know
you
already
have
the
database
in
salesforce,
but
it
might
be
that
you
know
we
can
export
that
data
and
use
something
else.
That's
already
supported
and
provided
by
third
parties
and
I've
spoken
with
companies
that
offer
services
like
that.
We
ought
to
look
into
that
and
figure
out
what
is
the
best
use
for
our
for
our
city.
Clearly,
ideally,
we
would
be
able
to
share
that
data
with
the
county
system.
C
D
What
are
you
going
to
say?
We
did
just
want
and
thank
you,
councilmember
cohen.
This
is
thoughtful
and
we
just
did
want
to
let
you
know
that
we
are
discussing
this
with
the
different
cities
that
have
the
platforms,
whether
we
go
off
the
shelf
or
custom
design,
but
in
terms
of
outcomes
of
each
interaction
we,
you
know,
I
think
again,
we
are
in
the
design
phase,
but
major
interactions.
Major
milestones
is
something
that
we
think
may
be
more
easier
to
design
and
easier
for
tracking
purposes.
D
Otherwise
it
becomes
really
a
data
glut
and
I'll
be
honest
with
you.
Some
of
we're
inundated
in
survey123
right
now
with
data
so
trying
to
be
smart
about
meaningful
collection
of
data
is
something
that
we'd
really
like
to
focus
on
and
just
understanding
sort
of
the
differences
between
encampment
trash
service
outreach.
D
C
Database
yeah,
I
just
want
to
be
clear,
and
I
don't
think-
and
I
know
there's
issues
that
it's
not
necessary-
that
I
as
a
that.
We
as
a
council
office
necessarily
say
well
individual
a
needs.
This
individual
b
is
getting
this,
but
there
were
there
were
15
people
when
we
were
there
and
we
talked
to
10
of
them,
and
three
of
them
were
provided
with
a
service
that
would
be
useful
information
for
us.
C
M
M
Have
we
had
the
conversation
with
the
county
about
whether
hmis
could
be
segregated
in
a
way
so
that
I
understand
we
can't
get
access
to
anything.
That's
health
related,
hipaa
and
confidentiality
reasons,
but
the
reason
why
they
couldn't
enable
that
database
to
be
accessible
by
the
city
for
identifying
unhoused
individuals
and
being
able
to
add
to
that
as
we
have
engaged
as
we
engage
with
them
to
identify
kind
of
services
they
might
need
or.
G
We
do
have
access
today,
the
homeless
response
team
has
access,
we
do
plan
on
going
to
the
county
and
asking
for
more
access,
more
accounts
and
more
accounts
that
just
have
like
lookup
capability
for
lack
of
a
better
word
like.
I
can't
go
in
and
change
the
data,
but
I
can
run
reports
and
look
up
data.
M
M
P
But
certainly
you
know.
Our
focus
when
we
met
was
on
the
annual
report
to
really
provide
meaningful
data,
around
outcomes
and
costs
so
that
we
could
make
better
decisions
if
this
is
the
best
use
of
resources
or
again
communicate
better
an
understanding
of
what
we're
able
to
achieve
with
this
particular
strategy
of
outcome
of
outreach.
M
Thank
you,
jackie
last
question.
My
hmi
asked
a
promise,
but
does
it
identify
as
a
field
to
identify
geographically
where
that
person
was
last?
I
located
it
does
okay,
so
I
can
imagine
that
is
particularly
valuable
for
us
if
we're
trying
to
reach
out
to
them
to
identify
housing
opportunities
that
might
come
up,
and
you
know
when
path
went
out
on
on
table
three
on
page
eight,
I
think
they
were
looking
at
the
coyote
creek
stretch
there
and
path
actually
identified.
M
D
What
I
have
come
to
believe
is
that
somebody
living
in
a
12
by
12
usually
also
has
stuff,
and
we
all
we
kind
of-
have
a
bedroom
and
we
have
a
living
room
in
our
homes
or
a
kitchen,
and
so
I
think
what
we're
finding
is
is,
and
we,
our
team,
see
it
on
a
regular
basis.
Is
your
living
area?
Is
one
place
and
potentially
you
have
another
structure
for
your
belongings.
M
G
M
Okay,
that's
full
enough,
and
then
I
know
that
a
huge
constraint
for
us
has
been,
particularly
as
we
look
at
the
guadalupe,
the
challenge
of
finding
land
for
the
rvs
for
the
for
the
cars.
M
M
I
was
hoping
just
get
to
sort
of
a
30
000
foot
level.
Do
we
think
it's
likely
that
we
would
get
any
more
private
parcels?
That
is
large
parking
lots
to
be
able
to
go
park,
a
lot
of
rvs
if
we
made
this
any
more
lucrative
for
the
property
owner?
In
other
words,
if
we
said
hey,
we
want
a
two-year
lease
and
we'll
pay
you
20
percent.
More.
M
Is
that
getting
is
that
the
constraint
or
is
there
a
different
set
of
constraints
in
terms
of
us
if
we
were
to
look
for
private
parcels,
because
I
understand
public
have
been,
I
think
we've
exhausted,
I'm
guessing
that
that
inventory,
if
we
were
looking
for
privately
owned
parcels
is,
is
that
the
pathway.
M
Yeah-
and
I
I
and
I
know
that
I'm
coming
at
this
with
having
absolutely
no
understanding
of
the
the
day-to-day,
but
I'm
wondering
if
we
looked
at
this
in
the
same
way
and
we
literally
got
a
commercial
broker
who
went
out
there
and
go,
went
and
talked
to
a
whole
bunch
of
you
know.
M
Lord
knows:
we've
got
a
lot
of
companies
with
lots
of
empty
parking
lots
right
now,
because
pandemic
I
mean
I
would
certainly
be
willing
to
pay
more,
knowing
that
it
could
dramatically
reduce
the
cost
and
the
burden
on
all
of
us.
If
we
actually
had
a
place
for
an
awful
lot
of
these
rvs
and
obviously
make
life
a
lot
easier
for
the
residents
themselves,
have
we
already
done
that
if
we
consider
just
getting
a
broker
and
having
those
conversations
or
are
we
still.
D
More
questions,
okay,
as
you
know,
jamarpal
has
been
supporting
us
in
many
of.
C
D
Endeavors
and
his
one
little
note
to
me,
is
it's
really
about
funding
right?
It.
D
I
mean
in
many
cases
it's
about.
Funding
obviously
would
be
about
availability
too
right,
but
it
all
comes
down
in
many
cases
and
I've
heard
reagan
say
this
many
times
about
lots
of
sites.
It's
really
a
funding
issue.
In
many
cases.
M
M
M
M
M
R
M
H
H
I
have
some
thoughts,
but
also
some
questions,
so
I'm
gonna
go
through
the
questions
first,
but
but
to
your
point
mayor,
I
think
as
an
example,
you
know,
if
you
think
back
to
when
we
approved
the
google
project,
that
there
was
a
a
building
that
they
took
ownership
of
it's
an
old
orchard
supply
hardware
store
that
essentially
today
is
serving
as
a
parking
lot
for
a
local
restaurant
and
so
that
parking
lot
for
the
most
part
is
empty,
and
those
are
things
that
I
think
we
should
really
think
about
as
we're
going
down
the
line
and
thinking
about
opportunities
in
which
folks
that
may
be
willing
to
help
the
city.
H
You
know
sort
of
field
some
some
of
these
locations,
if
you
will
but
just
wanted
to
throw
that
out
there
one.
The
first
question
I
have
is
related
to
vice
mayor
chappie
jones
and
councilmember
matt
mahan's
memo,
because
I
wanted
to
make
clear,
I
understood
their
direction,
because
I
know
that
staff
to
the
extent
everything's
approved
they
take.
You
know
they
sometimes
take
the
well.
Actually
they
should
take
the
direction
via
these
memos.
H
Quite
literally
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
I
understood
both
the
vice
mayor
and
and
matt's
direction
in
the
body
of
the
memo,
and
any
of
them
could
answer
this
question,
but
it
says
I
think
it's
the
beginning
of
the
second
paragraph.
It
says
we
recommend
that
staff
explore
various
alternatives
for
rv
parking.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
is
not
moving
us
away
from
the
the
well
the
working
with
vta,
for
example.
H
H
Okay,
cool
cool
cool,
that's
what
I
was
hoping
so
thank
you
so
much
the
other
questions
I
had
were:
let's
see
you
know
the.
I
know
that
I
think
on
page
six,
I
forget
exactly
who
touched
on
this
man.
It
might
have
been
andrea.
That
touched
on.
We
talked
about
the
good
neighbor
policy
in
the
12x12
area.
H
T
Thank
you
for
the
question
council
member.
It
includes
the
area
it's
the
the
12
by
12
should
include
the
person's
living
structure
and
belongings.
So
we
ask
people
to
try
to
confine
their
living
structure,
outdoor
chair,
bicycle,
etc,
to
a
12
by
12
area.
H
Would
you
say
that
that
well,
let
me
back
up
a
little
bit.
The
reason
I'm
asking
is
that
you
know
you
drive
around
our
city
and
you
know
some
folks
maintain
their
area
relatively
clean,
which
I
think
is
appreciated
by
many
of
the
folks
that
call
our
office
right
as
it
relates
to
cleanliness
of
some
of
these
sites,
but
in
other
areas
I
think
it's
to
know,
and
you
know
I
see
it
on
a
daily
basis.
H
I
can
drive
down
the
street
from
my
home
to
see
this,
but
there
in
some
cases
it
seems
like
there's
just
an
explosion
of
trash.
If
you
will
right
and
so
what
I'm,
what
I'm
curious
about
is
anecdotally,
can
you
tell
me
how
often
that's
used
to
to
sweep
or
remove
people
that
just
are
uncooperative
and
unwilling
to
you
know
scale
back
their
operation?
If
you
will.
T
So
yes,
if
a
person
has
an
encampment
size,
that's
larger
than
12
by
12,
we
usually
don't
start
with
an
abatement.
We
start
with
an
escalated
cleanup
where
we
go
in
work
with
the
person.
Ask
them
what
items
they
want
to
get
rid
of,
so
they
can
reduce
and
downsize
their
living
space,
and
that
has
typically
been
our
approach.
We
find
that
most
people
are
very
cooperative
in
an
escalated
cleanup,
but
the
challenge
is
that
people
oftentimes
have
new
items
coming
in
which
continues
to
expand
their
encampment
location.
T
H
Think
that's
one
of
the
that's
one
of
the
complaints
I
get
most
of
it
is
just
you
know,
house,
folks
or
people
who
live
in
whatever
neighborhood.
It
is
saying,
look
we
don't
you
know.
We
don't
want
to
complain
that
that
some
of
the
unhoused
folks
are
living
in
this
particular
location,
but
just
the
the
the
the
trash
and
things
of
that
nature
are
unsightly
right.
How
do
we?
How
do
we
address
that?
And
so
I
was
glad
to
see
this
in
place,
because
I
was
curious
if
it
existed,
I
just
you
know.
I.
H
I
suspect
that
you
go
through
this
process.
They
may
clean
up
and
then
it
just
happens
again
and
again
and
so
anyway,
so
so,
okay,
thank
you
for
helping
me
understand
that
the
other
question
I
had
was
on
page
11,
where
it
cites
the
total
amount
of
trash
collected.
I
think
it
was
about
4
500
tons
and
it
cites
dumpster
days
as
one
of
the
methods
for
collection
of
that
trash,
essentially
contribution
to
that
4500
are
those
different
dumpster
days
than
the
ones
we
hold
in
our
respective
districts
right.
T
Yes,
so
we
have
dumpster
days
that
are
held
in
districts
that
are
out
of
the
eighteen
thousand
dollars
that
each
council
office
get
receives.
We
also
do
additional
dumpster
days
at
homeless,
encampments,
along
with
our
unhoused
residents,
to
help
clean
up
as
well.
H
Okay,
all
right,
okay,
cool.
The
other
question
I
had
is
there
was
you
know
I
forget
what
page
it's
on,
but
it
has
the
list
of
all
the
different
source
sites.
I
think
one
of
those
are
now
in
district
two,
which
was
formerly
district
10,
which
is
and
narvaez,
but
what
I
was
curious
about
is
I
all
I
remember
reading
in
the
document
that
I
think,
when
a
site
is
owned
by
the
city,
it
helps
facilitate,
I
guess,
the
cleaning
or
creates
less
barriers
to
maintaining
that
site.
T
A
H
Okay,
okay,
thank
you
and
then
another
question
is,
I
think,
in
the
memo
it
decided
that
we're
going
to
be
opening
up
or
or
activating
10
additional
new
soar
locations.
Is
that
correct?
I
think
it's
on
page
16.
H
G
We
don't
have
the
sites
for
you
today,
council
member,
but
we
do.
G
We
have
the
site
selection
criteria
for
you
in
this
memo
and
we
really
did
want
to
be
more
thoughtful
about
the
source
site
criteria
than
when
we
established
the
soar
program
a
year
year
and
a
half
ago,
when
we
were
simply
in
emergency
response
mode
and
trying
to
quickly
reach
as
many
people
who
are
unsheltered
as
possible,
and
so
now,
with
this,
it's
a
one-time
expansion
of
soar
that
was
council
directed,
and
so
we
are
trying
to
be
thoughtful
with
where
those
locations
are.
G
A
H
Okay,
okay
and
that's,
hence
the
importance
of
it
being
a
site
that
the
city
owns
right
because
it
allows
this
prevents
it
from
happening
right.
Okay,
I
understand
the
other
question
I
had
was:
I
think
it
was
maybe
a
weekend
or
so
ago
we
had
a
fire
at
an
encampment
here
on
the
corner
of
branham
and
monterey
road,
and
what
I
realized
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
maybe
I
misunderstood,
there
are
no
outreach
services
on
the
weekend.
Is
that
the
case.
A
G
So
typically,.
G
C
G
Your
question
so
I'm
going
to
respond
yeah
so
for
after
hours
services
we
do
realize
that
that
is
a
gap
that
we
currently
don't
have
so,
for
example,
in
the
case
of
a
fire
and
someone's
belongings
who
is
unsheltered,
they
have
lost
all
of
their
belongings.
There
is
no
red
cross
response,
as
there
would
be
for
a
person
who
is
housed,
which
is
very
unfortunate
right.
So
we.
K
G
H
Okay,
and
can
you
hear
me
just
find
out
reagan,
yes,
okay,
cool,
so
thank
you
for
that.
I
appreciate
it
and
so
you
know
red
cross
when
there's
a
fire.
I
think
they
offer
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
think
they
may
offer
housing
to
folks
impacted
by
by
fires
and
such
it
may
be
temporary,
maybe
a
hotel.
They
don't
do
the
same
for
unhoused
folks
is
that
is
that
the
case.
G
That's
right,
council,
member,
that,
according
to
them,
is
not
their
line
of
business.
A
H
All
right,
the
other
question
I
had
is
related
it's
something
on
page
14
and
15,
where
you
or
someone
all
of
you
take
us
through
the
numbers,
that's
associated
with
path
and
home
first,
but
I
think
those
numbers
are
from
january
to
june
2021..
H
G
No,
those
are
from
june.
I
don't
have
more
current
numbers
today.
M
H
All
right,
okay
and
the
very
last
question
I
have.
H
F
Yeah,
I
gave
you
a
few
extra
a
little
extra
time,
but
can
I
just
ask.
H
H
E
Thank
you.
I
will
try
and
be
as
succinct
as
possible
and
see
if
I
can
do
everything
in
one
round.
So
thanks
to
everyone,
I
this
was
a
really
informative
presentation
and
I
appreciate
the
briefings
as
well.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
captured
one
piece
of
information.
E
Are
we
we're
hauling
15
to
20
tons
a
week
from
encampments?
Is
that
correct.
E
That
was
just
guadalupe,
correct,
okay,
thank
you,
and
so
I'll
put
some
comments
together
very
quickly.
First,
is
I
wanted
to
thank
councilmember
davis
for
her
memo,
including
caltrans
and
working
with
caltrans?
E
It's
a
huge
issue
for
story
in
101.
In
fact
that
was,
I
know
she
has
meridian
in
280,
but
for
story
in
101.
E
In
fact,
it
was
so
dangerous
that
it
was
one
of
the
caltrans
property,
one
of
the
very
few
that
was
actually
abated
during
the
height
of
covet,
because
people
were
running
out
onto
the
freeway,
and
so
it's
some
of
these
caltrans
properties,
they're
a
matter
of
life
and
death
and
and
some
of
them
we
just
need
to
say
they
cannot
have
encampments,
and
so
so
that
I
wanted
to
mention
that
and
appreciate
that,
and
in
a
similar
vein
I
wanted
to
ask
about
the
county
roads.
E
Do
we
have
an
update
on
that?
I
have
some
county
property
that
we
have
been
going
back
and
forth
with
the
county
for
three
years,
and
I
I
just.
D
We
are
getting
very
close
and
I
think
we
should
have
it
executed
by
the
end
of
this
month.
The
month
of
may
thank.
E
You
I
appreciate
that
and
in
terms
of
the
guadalupe,
are
we
connecting
our
efforts
between
coyote,
creek
and
guadalupe,
so
that
we're
not
so
that
we
are
aligning
our
efforts
on
both
creeks
because
they
are
connected.
E
Efforts
in
terms
of
vehicle
prevention
outreach-
if
we
do
one
thing
in
guadalupe
and
we
don't
do
it
in
coyote
creek
we're
just
moving
folks
back
and
forth,
and
we
have
some
really
large
encampments
in
both
creeks
that
need
a
significant
need,
significant
outreach.
They
need
significant
source
support,
significant
vehicle
prevention.
S
So
yeah,
I
would
say
the
answer
to
the
question
is:
first,
no,
but
then
also
yes.
So
currently
it's
not
well
aligned.
The
services
we
have
going
on
in
guadalupe
are
quite
different
because
of
the
major
encampment
that
was
up
there.
So
there
was
a
ton
of
investment,
as
you
know,
over
the
last
well
several
months
to
a
year,
but
in
the
in
the
proposed
budget
there
are
resources
to
start
doing
those
exact
sorts
of
things
along
the
guadalupe.
E
Okay
and
how
is
the
guadalupe
gardens,
how
is
our
outreach,
how
how
are
our
efforts,
particularly
when
we,
we
meaning
the
council,
speed
up
deadlines
and
move
that?
How
does
that
impact
services
in
the
rest
of
the
city?
What's
the
bandwidth
of
all
the
folks
that
we're
taking
and
putting
in
guadalupe
gardens?
How
does
that
impact
services
in
other
city,
council
districts,
for
example,.
D
Well,
from
a
hiring
standpoint,
as
you
know,
a
significant
amount
of
funding
was
put
in
in
june
of
last
year
in
november,
and
we
are
very
glad
that
we
are
80
percent
filled
with
our
positions,
but
in
terms
of
our
boots
on
the
ground
for
encampment
management,
we
are
at
a
hundred
percent,
so
that
was
additional
additional
work
for
both
the
illegal
dumping
strike
team,
which
we
we
have
used
rapid
in
some
of
our
efforts
at
guadalupe.
D
So
there
shouldn't
be
an
impact
city-wide
and
as
well
as
bringing
on
more
community
coordinators,
community
activity
workers
to
do
the
work
of
the
zones.
City-Wide
and
again
I
mentioned
in
the
presentation,
but
we
are
happy
to
report
that
we
will
move
from
bi-weekly
trash
service
to
weekly
trash
service
by
the
end
of
the
month.
P
Last
week
anytime,
we
have
a
slot
opened
up
in
our
interim
facility
that
will
go
to
a
person
living
in
guadalupe
gardens.
They
will
be
the
priority.
P
We
also
have
sure
stay,
so
we
do
need
to
move
people
from
that
facility,
so
those
two
sites
will
take
up
all
of
our
slots
until
this
site
is
completely
emptied
out
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
reagan,
so
she
can
address
the
any
other
impacts.
E
P
And
as
more
room
becomes
available
because
people
do
move
out
those
sites,
those
empty
beds
will
go
to
people
at
the
guadalupe
gardens
will
be
offered
there.
First.
D
Thank
you,
hey.
Oh,
go
ahead!
Yeah,
I'm
sorry!
This
is
andrea.
I
I
miss
part
of
the
the
question
the
answer
to
the
question,
but
as
you've
seen
as
we
increase
our
frequency
as
we're
doing
more
work,
whether
it
be
dumpster
days
or
again,
the
frequency.
What
we're
having
an
impact
on
is
our
our
yards,
the
amount
of
hauling
that
is
being
done.
The
impact
on
mayberry,
specifically
because
mayberry
is
the
only
yard
that
has
the
scale
so
that
we
can
actually
measure
the
amount
of
trash
that
we
are
collecting.
E
Helps
thank
you
and
just
a
quick
comment
on
the
app
database.
E
I
just
wanted
to
add
my
voice
to
giving
thought
what
the
purpose
of
data,
because,
for
example,
we
know
that
it
takes
several
touches
to
folks
in
terms
of
outreach
to
to
get
to
know
each
other,
build
rapport
and
and
get
folks
into
that
next
step.
So
I'm
not
sure
what
the
purpose
of
that
would
be.
So
anyway,
I
appreciate
giving
more
thought
to
that.
E
I
wanted
to
also,
I
think,
the
memo
that
vice
mayor
and
councilmember
mann
put
forward
on
rvs.
I
think
it's
important
as
part
of
the
conversation
around
how
we
manage
and
deal
with,
rvs
that
we
acknowledge
that
there
are
some
places
that
we
should
not
allow
rvs.
E
For
example,
I
have
residences
in
my
district,
as
I'm
sure
others
do,
that
have
an
rv
if
someone,
they
don't
know
parked
in
front
of
their
home,
throwing
biowaste
threatening
some
of
the
folks
that
live
in
their
home
and-
and
so
that's
that's
based
on
behavior
right.
But
you
know
so
that's
created
some
issues
in
an
industrial
area.
We
have
areas
where
there
are
rvs.
E
There
are
some
accidents
that
were
caused
by
rvs
parking
along
lines
of
sight
and
in
industrial
areas
where
trucks
of
distribution
services,
services
coming
in
and
out
that
created
some
issues,
and
so
I
think
that
we
also
need
to
look
at
rvs
and
I
will
go
ahead
and
stop
there
I'll
go
ahead
and
stop
there
and
I
look
forward
to
hearing
more
questions
from
my
colleagues.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you
vice
mayor
and
thank
you
to
my
colleagues
for
their
very
thoughtful
memos
and
to
the
presentation
from
our
staffs
and
olympia.
Welcome
to
district
nine
look
forward
to
coming
over
and
visiting
you
there.
L
This
obviously
is
an
issue
that
impacts
all
of
our
residents,
both
unhoused
and
housed.
It's
an
issue
that
we
hear
about-
oh
probably
50
of
our
council
day,
is
related
to
issues
around
the
unhoused
and
mostly
it's
the
trash,
the
bio
waste,
the
noise,
the
hazard
fire
hazard
and
the
very
serious
concerns
about
the
residents,
the
housed
residents
that
are
nearby.
L
T
Thank
you
for
the
question
council
members.
So
when
we
come
out
and
find
these
large
encampments,
if
there's
a
significant
amount
of
plywood,
if
there's
a
significant
amount
of
propane
tanks,
if
there's
two
stories,
those
are
the
first
sites
that
we
typically
address,
because
they
can
be
dangerous,
as
you
can
imagine
for
the
staff
that
are
actually
out
there
as
well.
They
don't
want
something
to
fall
on
them
or
they're,
helping
someone
clean
up
or
other
issues
that
happen.
T
So
typically,
we
work
with
the
person
and
say
we
need
you
to
downsize
and
it's
usually
taking
off
the
first
level.
Most
people
understand
it
and
after
a
couple
weeks
of
having
engagement
with
them,
they'll
allow
us
to
break
those
down.
Our
challenge
has
been
not
working
with
people
to
break
them
down,
but
they
tend
to
come
back
much
quicker.
Then
we
can
get
back
out
to
then
kind
of
go
through
the
work
once
again.
S
L
Okay,
so
so
olympia,
when
you
have
that
situation,
that
they
take
down
the
first
story
and
they
have
now
they've
converted
it
to
a
12
by
12
and
then
a
neighbor
reports
it
to
us,
and
then
we
report
it
to
you.
How
long
does
that
assessment
take?
How
what
can
you
walk
us
through
the
process
of
when
you're
involved
and
how
long
before
resolution?
L
Because
that's
what
the
house
residents
are
looking
for
and
we're
the
intermediaries,
so
we
always
need
to
know
what's
happening
and
what
the
timeline
is
and-
and
I,
your
re,
your
staff
is
really
good
at
working
with
us.
But
can
you
kind
of
tell
me
about
the
assessment
process
and
how
long
that
takes
to
remediate
a
situation
like
that.
T
Yes,
when
we
receive
an
initial
complaint,
it
is
then
assigned
to
our
team
that
does
the
assessment,
an
assessment,
depending
on
how
many
we
have
can
take
up
to
three
weeks.
Once
the
team
assesses
the
site,
they'll
usually
determine
it
needs
an
escalated.
Cleanup
it'll
just
continue
in
weekly
trash
service
or
cash
for
trash,
or
it
needs
an
abatement.
T
Then
it
takes
about
a
week
to
schedule
that,
because
they
need
to
post,
let
outreach
come
out
and
have
contact
with
the
person
and
then
kind
of
we
do
that
action,
so
it
can
be
from
the
time
of
person
report
a
short
turnaround
time,
maybe
two
to
three
weeks
a
little
bit
longer.
It
could
be
three
to
half
possibly
four
weeks
depending
on
the
time
of
year
and
the
types
of
abatements
that
we
have
scheduled.
D
Can
I
just
add
it's
a
really
good
point,
because
I've
learned
as
we
get
into
the
hotter
days,
that
is
that
actually
will
slow
our
work
and
we
need
to
understand
that
we
can't
have
people
working
outside
I'm
in
those
conditions.
So
again,
what
we're
hoping
to
to
move
to
is
communicating
having
some
expectations
around
that
three-week
time
frame,
because
we
want
to
honor
the
housing
outreach
process
as
well,
because
every
opportunity,
even
an
escalated
cleanup,
is
an
opportunity.
D
You
know
to
re-contact
that
person
or
confirm
that
they,
whether
they've,
had
a
vice
verdad
or
not.
So
again.
Communication,
though,
is
our
goal.
If
we're
not
gonna
meet
the
three
weeks,
we
would
communicate
that
as
well.
L
L
How
are
you
enforcing
that?
Do
you?
Are
you
notified
by
us
or,
and
you
have
a
a
resident?
Who
complains?
Is
everything
complaint
driven?
Are
you
driving
by
do
you
have
a
team
driving
by
regularly
to
determine
what's
happening
at
your
your
normal
encampments
and
your
the
source
lights
in
particular,
but
not
just
because
we
have
non-source
sites
on
our
creeks
that
are
problematic
and
I'll
get
get
to
that
in
a
minute.
But
so
do
you?
L
T
Our
teams
visit
our
encampments
they're
transitioning
from
bi-weekly
to
weekly
service,
so
typically
escalated.
Cleanups
and
abatements
are
usually
noticed
first
by
the
team,
because
they're
at
the
site
on
a
regular
basis
and
they're,
usually
communicating
with
someone
to
get
them
to
cooperate
and
then,
if
they
don't
leads
to
escalated
actions,
we
also
get
complaints.
I
will
tell
you
probably
ninety
percent
of
the
complaints
we
receive.
The
team
is
already
aware
of
it
and
has
usually
started
to
work
on
it
by
the
time
we
receive
it
from
the
public
or
from
a
council
office.
L
Okay
and
and
what
kind
of
strategies
do
you
have
for
cleaning
in
many
of
our
creek
beds,
are
under
the
control
of
valley
water.
So
how
is
the
partnership
working
with
our
inner
agencies,
particularly
valley,
water
and
then
county,
of
course,
caltrans.
D
Thank
you,
the
valley,
water
relationship
is
is
healthy
and
good.
D
We
have
multi
layers
of
communication
right
now
and
I
would
say
at
our
kind
of
the
program
level
I
receive
in
olympia,
we
receive
sort
of
a
joint,
quarterly
development
of
projects
that
would
be
mutually
beneficial
to
both
valley,
water
and
san
jose,
where
we're
sharing
equipment,
labor
and
other
resources.
D
So
we've
gone
from
about,
I
think.
After
the
winter
we
went
from
six
joint
escalated
actions,
a
quarter,
and
this
last
quarter,
we've
done
about
11
11
to
13..
So
so
that's
going
very
well
on
the
ground
and
then
at
a
city
level
and
at
a
valley,
water,
sort
of
executive
level,
we're
now
having
regular
coordination
and
conversation
about
not
just
encampment
management
but
a
whole
host
of
necessary
and
important
conversations.
That's.
L
L
When
is
because
what
we're
seeing
is
there's
encampments
along
our
creek
beds.
They're
the
occupants
are
cutting
down
trees
so
that
they
can
cross
over
the
creeks.
No,
even
though
there's
no
water
in
the
creeks,
but
they're
still
cutting
down
the
trees,
which
is
counterintuitive
to
what
we
want
to
do
to
protect
our
environment
and
our
trees
and
our
our
waterways,
not
to
mention
the
biowaste
and
other
huge
environmental
impacts
on
our
creeks.
D
I'll
start
by
saying
that,
as
we
put
forward
in
the
memo
that
we
do
want
to
use
our
resources
that
we've
been
given
this
year
to
create
a
new
brand
new
service
along
coyote,
so
we
are
dedicated
as
a
city
to
the
three
focus
zones
in
the
direct
discharge.
Trash
can
trash
reduction
plan,
and
so
we
we
are
upping
our
resources
and
to
again
remove
trash
from
encampments
in
those
three
areas.
D
What
we're
doing
with
environmental
service
services
department
is
understanding
we're
under
the
current
permit
and
as
we
understand
the
requirements
for
the
new
permit,
we
will
have
next
year
to
plan
for
that
and
understand
sort
of
how
that
would
really
help
us
to
to
design
a
creek
strategy.
But
we
also
have
to
understand
kind
of
like
guadalupe
right
when
we
do
clear
folks.
If
we
must
do
that,
you
know
there
will
there
will
be
impact
so
planning
for
that
is
going
to
take
some
time.
L
Okay,
thank
you
so
so
I
know
when
you're
in
your
memo
and
it
was
specific
about
coyote
but
is
guadalupe
included
in
there
or
I
I
didn't
see
a
specific
detail
about
what
is
the
intention
with
guadalupe.
S
S
The
three
areas
along
coyote
are
areas
that
were
identified
in
that
permit
the
last
time
so
we're
committed
to
those
as
a
city.
So
that's
where
we're
starting
and
making
sure
we
can
gain
better
ground
than
we
have
been
and
demonstrate
to
the
board
that
we're
taking
it
seriously.
The
very
concerns
you
brought
up
environmental
bio
all
that,
however,
in
the
new
permit,
it's
going
to
apply
to
all
of
our
direct
discharge
areas,
so
that'll
be
the
guadalupe
that'll,
be
los
gatos
creek,
that's
all
of
them
all.
S
Are
we
have
what
over
100
tributaries
and
little
creeks
all
over
the
place?
It
includes
all
of
that,
because
all
of
that's
the
watershed
going
into
the
bay,
so
the
permit
is
all
inclusive.
The
question
will
be:
how
far-reaching
will
the
permit
be
this
next
time
and
we
we're
not
just
not
there
yet
we're
still
in
that
planning
phase
working
with
the
board
in
there.
I
think
their
direction
is
going
to
come
out
in
the
middle
of
this
year
july,
or
something
like
that.
So
we'll
have
a
better
sense
of
here's.
S
L
L
These
are
steep
embankments
and
they're
very
difficult
for
our
firefighters
to
get
down
into
so
anything
we
can
do
to
make
the
setbacks
even
greater
along
the
creeks
and
in
areas
that
are
not
accessible
or
easily
accessible
fire
for
our
firefighters
and
then
any
any
other
thing
we
can
do
to
prevent
fires
and
along
our
in
our
at
our
encampments,
and
with
that,
I
think
I've
exceeded
my
ten
minutes
by
at
least
two
or
three.
So
thank
you.
M
Thank
you.
Let's
go
to
councilman
davis
and
councilmember
cohen.
R
Okay,
thank
you.
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
columbus
park
and
I
would
refer
my
colleagues
to
page
three
of
my
memo
to
ensure,
and
you
even
heard
some
public
commenters
talking
about
columbus
park.
R
What
was
news
to
me,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
everybody
is
aware-
columbus
park
itself,
the
boundaries
of
it
that
are
on
page
three
of
my
memo
is
not
currently
included
in
our
direction
to
staff.
As
you
see,
it
is
immediately
adjacent
to
the
area
that
is
being
cleared
and
the
public
often
refers
to
the
area
as
columbus
park
and
assumes
that
the
entire
part
that
we're
talking
about
columbus
park
and
guadalupe
gardens
will
be
abated
and
part
of
phase
three.
R
So
the
the
issue
for
me
is
that
the
proximity
to
columbus
park
of
columbus
park
to
guadalupe
gardens
is
all
it's
already
being
used
by
our
unhoused
residents
to
relieve
the
saturation
from
phase
three
and
I've
been
out
there
multiple
times
and
staff
has
confirmed
that,
so
there
is
a
very
real
possibility
that
columbus
park
will
become
an
encampment
proportional
to
what
we've
seen
or
what
we
have
in
phase
three
in
guadalupe
gardens
and
potentially
spill
back
into
the
the
40
acres
that
we
are
now
clearing
because
of
the
faa
regulations.
R
Of
course,
I
would
like
columbus
park
to
have
foot
traffic
to
prevent
further
encampments
from
moving
in.
We
currently
don't
have
activation
in
that
park
and
the
park
quality.
If
you
saw,
if
you
were
happen
to
be
looking,
it
actually
has
the
lowest.
I
can't
remember
it's
not
the
park's
assessment
condition
assessment
anymore.
Whatever
the
new
assessment
is,
it
has
the
lowest
score
of
any
park
in
the
entire
city.
Is
that
correct,
john.
R
O
R
R
In
addition
to
that,
I
have
added
that
I
want
to
keep
the
community
gardens
activated
and
that
the
there
are
a
number
of
people
who
want
to
go
there
and
be
there
on
a
regular
basis.
There
are
some
volunteers
as
prns
knows
who
come
every
day,
but
they
have
been
having
trouble
finding
parking
because
the
walnut
street
one
hour
parking
is
not
enforced.
Right
now,
so
I'm
asking
for
a
pla
either
to
actually
enforce
that
parking
or
for
prns
to
make
parking
available
to
the
community
gardens
folks.
So
that's
I
I'm.
S
Thank
you,
councilmember
and,
first
of
all,
I
just
want
to
be
clear:
I'm
not
disagreeing,
but
I'm
asking
for
some
friendly
consideration
here
so
with
respect
to
columbus
park.
It
has,
it
has
not
ever
been
included
because
it
was
already
a
city
park.
However,
our
preference
would
be
not
to
have
the
direction
to
absolutely
abate,
but
let
us
let
phase
three
play
out,
because
some
of
the
big
things
that
are
gonna
happen
in
phase
three
is
the
street
on
the
north.
S
S
So
all
of
those
things
are
going
to
be
moved
out
of
the
park
and
they'll
be
required
to
leave
and
then
parking
enforcement
will.
We
will
begin
again.
We
have
put
a
pause
on
parking
enforcement
ever
since
we
started
this
project
because
people
had
to
have
a
place
to
park,
we're
trying
to
get
them
to
park
on
the
street
and
not
in
the
dirt
and
not
down
by
the
creek.
S
So
by
the
end
of
phase
three,
I
think
we'll
have
a
better
sense
of
what's
going
on
in
columbus
park
and
who's
remaining
or
wanting
to
remain.
It
may
mean
that
that's
a
managed
space
right,
just
like
many
of
the
other
encampments
we've
talked
about,
but
we'd
like
to
have
that
flexibility
to
let
that
play
out
a
little
more
versus
an
absolute
saying.
You
must
abate
and
then,
with
respect
to
the
parking
by
the
garden-
and
there
are,
I
think,
114
gardeners
that
go
out
of
that
garden.
S
It
is
a
popular
garden
and
I'm
very
familiar.
You
know
about
simple.
As
you
know,
he
contacts
me
very
regularly
about
it.
We
can
look
at
how
we
can
fix
that,
but
again
we're
not
planning
on
doing
parking
enforcement
until
we
clear
phase
three,
so
we
could
try
to
create
some
space,
but
there's
a
lot
of
times.
The
the
people
who
park
aren't
really
that
interested
in
what
signs
we
put
up
or
what
color
we
paint
the
curb.
S
So
we
wouldn't
anticipate
doing
enforcement
of
that
until
the
end
of
phase
three,
when
we're
making
everybody
leave
kind
of
not
necessarily
the
same
time.
Hopefully
we
got
a
lot
of
rvs
in
in
safe
parking
right
and
we've
found
other
solutions.
So
it's
not
just
everybody
goes
at
once,
but
there's
there's
a
lot
of
dynamic
to
this.
So
just
a
little
bit
softer
of
an
edge
would
help
us
and
then
I'm
I'm
guessing
housing
wants
to
talk
about
your
item
2a,
which
is
including
them
in
the
housing
solution.
S
I
don't
know
if
reagan
or
jackie
wants
to
address
that
aspect.
Okay,.
G
I'll
address
that
aspect
I
I
think
including
it
does
create
some
challenges
for
us,
because
the
county
has
communicated
that
they
are
providing
the
additional
housing
and
resources
in
the
40
acres,
because
we
have
a
notice
from
the
faa
that
says
we're
out
of
compliance,
but
they
would
not
be
willing
to
provide
any
additional
housing
or
resources
to
other
sites
in
the
city,
whether
it's
columbus
park
or
the
guadalupe
river
park
trail,
because
they
do
believe
it's
an
equity
issue.
G
And
then
I
think,
even
if
we
were
to
just
find
the
budgetary
resources
for
housing,
I
think
that
still
presents
a
problem.
If
the
housing.
J
G
R
On
the
flip
side,
and-
and
I
understand
everything
you
both
have
said
and
sympathize
with
it
on
the
flip
side,
we
have
again
a
growing
outcry
from
our
residents
to
see
something
being
done
and
if
we
are
telling
them,
we
are
going
to
clear
this
site
and
we
actually
pull
the
rug
out
from
under
them
and
don't
clear
the
entire
site.
As
expected,
it
looks
bad
for
all
of
us.
R
It
looks
like
we're
ineffective,
and
so
I
I
again-
and
I
know
that
you
you
know
this
since
I've
been
out
there
with
you
many
times.
I
am
sympathetic
to
what
you're
saying
and
I
understand
the
difficulty
we
have
to.
I
think
we
have
to
forge
ahead
and
I
would
respectfully
ask
my
colleagues
to
support
me
on
this,
because
we
are
getting.
R
P
Yeah-
and
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that
there's
absolutely
no
way
that
we
can
get
within
the
time
frame
that
we
have
outlined
in
this
memo
in
september,
the
additional
people
in
columbus
park.
So
if
you
would
like
us
to
do
that,
our
strategy
would
be
putting
them
into
our
moving
them
into
our
interim
facilities
and
we'd
have
a
better
idea.
P
After
doing
this,
work,
like
the
the
number
of
people,
were
able
to
moving
to
move
in
per
month,
given
the
slots
that
open
up,
because
the
only
alternative
then
is
that
that
site
would
be
abated
and
people
would
then
move
into
the
whatever
the
surrounding
areas
to
columbus
park,
and
they
would
come
back
unless
we're
fully
able
to
secure
these
sites,
because
what
we've
created
essentially
is
just
push
them
out,
but
they
just
come
back.
R
R
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
move
council,
member
cohen's
memo
and
my
memo,
which
incorporates
all
my
other
colleagues
memos
and
I'll
add
just
the
amend
my
memo
slightly
for
item
2a.
That
said,
come
back
to
me
in
may
to
actually
align
with
the
the
mayor
at
all
memo
timeline
of
coming
back
to
us
with
the
work
plan
in
june.
Thank
you.
S
Councilmember,
if
I
can
ask
a
clarifying
question
or
not
a
clarifying
question,
but
ask
nicole
to
just
comment
on
the
expedited
timeline
for
the
park
to
october
the
22nd.
K
Sure,
thank
you,
yeah
with
regard
to
columbus
park
and
accelerating
construction
of
that,
the
public
works
team
is
hard
at
work
on
that
we
are
not
in
a
position
right
now.
K
The
current
status
of
that
is
our
last
community
meeting
is
in
may.
The
eir
still
needs
to
be
completed
and
it's
a
20
million
dollar
project
to
rebuild
columbus
park.
So
there's
a
significant
design
effort
associated
with
that.
Our
current
schedule
has
us
completing
design
in
late
2023
and
accelerating
faster
than
that
will
probably
be
extremely
challenging
for
us.
K
So
we
wanted
to
just
make
that
clear
and
I
think,
in
terms
of
accelerating
other
improvements
in
the
park,
I
think
we're
in
the
same
boat.
We
have
to
address
a
number
of
issues
related
to
sequa,
as
well
as
faa
compliance,
so
we're
doing
everything
we
can
to
move
those
projects
as
quickly
as
we
can,
but
there's
a
number
of
factors
that
are
that
are
that
are
conspiring
to
dictate
some
schedule.
A
And
appreciate
the
points
councilmember
davis
that
you're
bringing
up
but
having
gone
through
this
quite
a
bit
with
the
team
and
looking
at
the
resources
over
the
last
few
days.
I
would
suggest,
instead
of
including
everything
in
phase
three,
because
we
need
to
be
super
efficient
with
the
resources
that.
S
A
R
Yeah,
I
I
will
say
I'm
loath
to
make
that
to
make
that
amendment,
but
in
the
interests
of
being
collaborative
I
will
agree
to
include
columbus
park
as
a
phase
four.
But
I
will
ask
that
that
ad.
That
is
added
to
the
work
plan
that
we've
requested
come
back
to
us
in
june.
M
Okay,
that's
all
right
with
councilmember
foley,
councilman
cohen.
C
Yeah,
let
me
first,
I
want
to
start
by
something
that
the
mayor
mentioned
earlier
about
private
sites
for
rv
parking
and
I've
been
very
frustrated.
It's
not
anybody's
fault
in
this
room,
but
by
the
fact
that
we've
been
talking
about
rv
parking
for
a
long
time,
and
we
still
don't
have
really
many
sites
for
rv
parking
and
there's
a
lot
big
issue
throughout
our
city,
and
I
will
say
that
in
our
office,
when
we
have
a
developer,
who
has
a
piece
of
property
that
says
it's
a
few
years
away,
we're
asking
them
directly?
C
Can
we
use
your
site
temporarily
for
rv
parking
and
we've
actually
had
one
at
least
one
who
said
yeah?
I
think
that
may
work
and
we
haven't
gotten
to
the
point
where
we
can
begin
to
talk
about
it,
but
we're
hoping
that
that
can
happen.
So
I
encourage
people
to
have
those
conversations,
but
I
do
like
the
idea
of
a
systematic
approach
also
of
being
able
to
go
out
and
talk
to
private
property
owners.
Now
I
did
have
a
conversation
with
svlg
about
some
of
the
north
san
jose
sites.
C
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
use
some
of
them.
There's
concern,
of
course,
about
you,
know:
they're
marketing,
their
sites,
they're
trying
to
sell
them.
They
don't
it's
hard
to
to
to
use
them
for
something
else,
while
they're
also
in
the
process
of
trying
to
do
that
for,
but
with
the
right
financial
incentives,
it's
possible.
We
could
do
that
and
I,
like
I,
like
the
idea.
I
don't
know
if
it
necessarily
should
be
part
of
this
motion
today,
but
I
think
we
ought
to
consider
that
going
forward.
C
On
these
sit
on
the
situation
we've
been,
you
know,
we've
been
focused
on
what
we
have
to
do
for
the
faa,
obviously,
and
that
should
be
primary
job
number
one,
but
we're
here
now,
because
we
couldn't
get
it
done
by
the
june
30th
and
we're
asking
to
move
it
to
september
and
now
we're
adding
additional
scope,
and
I
understand
we've
just
added
it
as
a
phase
four,
instead
of
as
part
of
the
same
one,
but
it
still
concerns
me
a
little
bit
and
that
that
goes
from
not
just
the
suggestion
in
council.
C
Member
davis's
area,
but
also
the
children's
discovery
museum,
is
being
part
of
that
as
well.
That's
another
piece
of
scope
that
that
you
know
kind
of
focuses:
resources
in
on
a
specific
site,
and
yet
yes,
we
we
as
councilmember
david
says,
need
the
win.
C
The
city
is
focused
right
now
in
guadalupe
gardens
we're
not
going
to
have
as
many
resources
in
some
of
these
other
areas,
but
we
can't
indefinitely
say
that
all
beds
go
to
one
part
of
the
city
and
not
to
other
parts
of
the
city.
Again,
I'm
not
asking
for
us
to
abate,
but
I'm
asking
for
us
to
be
able
to
say
at
some
point:
there
are
places
other
places
in
the
city
where
people
need
beds.
C
I'm
also
concerned
there
will
be
people
who
are
going
to
relocate
into
the
other
parts
of
the
city
when,
when
this
happens
in
guadalupe
gardens
and
columbus
park
and
other
places
which
will
exacerbate
the
problem
in
some
of
our
districts,
where
we're
telling
people,
we
can't
do
something
right
now,
so
I
so
I'm
concerned
about
going
beyond
the
scope
of
what
was
already
in
the
work
plan.
At
this
point,
I
think
it
makes
more
sense
to
say:
let's
come
back
with
a
further
discussion
about
other
places
in
the
city
and
how
we
address
them.
C
C
C
M
Councilman
davis,
I
I
think
I
heard
a
request
for
a
friendly
amendment.
Let
me
let
me
try
to
see
if
I
could
fashion
that
amendment
in
some
way
that,
upon
the
conclusion
of
phase
three,
that
there
would
be
a
return
to
the
council
to
determine
whether
to
go
forward
with
phase
four
or
some
variation
is,
that
is
that
right,
yeah.
C
So
I
think
you
know
we
really
want
to
focus
on
making
sure
we
hit
this
next
date
and
and
not
necessarily
detract
our
resources
away
from
from
meeting
that
goal.
But
knowing
obviously,
as
you
all
know,
you're
going
to
still
be
getting.
C
You
know
calls
from
those
of
us
in
other
districts
where
we
have
some
issues
that
need
addressing
and-
and
you
know
we
can't
necessarily
say
no
we're
not
going
to
clean
up
a
you
know
a
site,
that's
become
a
problem
elsewhere
right.
So,
that's
why
that's
what
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
resources
to
do
as
we
move
this
process
forward.
R
Councilmember
cohen,
with
all
due
respect,
I
have
other
sites
in
my
district
as
well.
The
reason
that
I
think
it's
important
for
us
is
that
this
has
garnered
probably
national
attention,
but
certainly
local
attention,
and
if
it's
not
cleaned
up
completely,
including
columbus
park,
whether
we
as
we
I've,
said
it's,
okay,
let's
add
it
to
a
phase
four.
If
it's
not
cleaned
up,
we
will
hear
about
it
everywhere.
I
hear
about
the
faa
site
in
evergreen
I
hear
about
the
faa
site
in
almaden
everywhere
I
go
in
this
city.
R
C
I
mean,
I
guess
the
next
question
would
be
if
we
can
bifurcate
that
discussion
so
that
we
can
kind
of
I
you
know
I
can
support
the
rest
of
the
work
plan
in
motion
without
necessarily
supporting
that
detailed
that
addition
to
the
scope.
So
I
guess
the
question
would
be
if
you'd
be
willing
to
bifurcate
that
motion.
N
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
had
a
suggestion
and
this
is
kind
of
how
we
managed
it
in
the
memo
mayor
that
that
I
signed
on
with
with
you
and
our
our
colleagues
here,
councilman
davis
and
cohen,
included
and
vice
mayor
jones.
N
So
on
recommendation
two
we
made
the
suggestion-
and
this
also
was
sort
of
a
bit
of
scope
creep,
but
we
made
the
the
recommendation
on
those
40-plus
individuals
for
the
city
manager
to
produce
an
mba
on
that,
and
then
we
specified
that
that
should
not
interfere
with
the
proposed
schedule
that
we
we
had
that
we
were
working
under
under
faa.
N
So
it
sounds
like
we're
kind
of
going
down
that
path,
but
that
was
what
my
suggestion
was
going
to
be.
Was
that
that
would
allow
us
to
have
this
discussion.
It
sounds
like
the
city
manager
is
calling
it
a
phase
four,
but
I
think
the
direction
of
an
mba
would
give
us
an
opportunity
to
then
talk
about
the
resources
needed
and
then
similarly,
I
think
I
really
you
know
liked
the
sentence
about
it.
Shouldn't
interfere
with
it,
so
that
way
makes
it
very
clear
that
look.
These
are
two
different
efforts
right.
N
We
recognize
the
scope
that
we
were
trying
to
work
under
and
we
can
allow
staff
to
still
finish
that
work
and
then,
knowing
that
we
have
additional
challenges,
both
north
and
south
of
you
know,
the
faa
required
area.
So
is
that
I
don't
know
if
that's
along
the
lines
of
where
you
were
going
with
it
lee.
Were
you
expected
on
coming
back
with
an
mba
or
under
the
current
motion
or
or
no
were
you
when
you
discussed
a
phase
four?
How
would
you
bring
that
forward.
A
Yeah,
so
I
think
we
could
now
start
planning
for
a
phase
four,
and
I
think
part
of
that
that
planning
work
that
I
would
expect
from
the
team
is
if
resources
are
needed
and
we're
in
that
period
of
time,
so
I'll
defer
to
staff
if
they
expected
to
come
forward
in
an
mba.
But
that
was
my
expectation
but
really
bifurcating
that
work
and
the
expectations
that
staff
has
laid
out
today
with
the
resources
available
in
the
timeline
from
that
conversation,
because.
P
Yeah,
so
just
to
clarify
from
the
housing
department's
perspective,
we
would
have
to
have
additional
resources
so
whether
that
would
mean
the
reallocating
of
measure
e
funds
towards
more
rapid
rehousing
resources
or
if
and
we
would
have
to
ensure
the
current
contracts
had
capacity
to
take
on
more
people,
and
then
it
just
occurred
to
me.
You
know
we
do
have
lot
e
is
opening
up,
and
so
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
we
brought
forward
in
this
plan
was
we
said
this
plan
was
not
connected
to
the
lot
e
anymore.
P
We
had
disconnected
that,
but
that
would
have
to
be
a
resource
that
we
would
have
to
have
available
to
us
in
order
to
continue
to
provide
opportunities
for
people
to
move
quickly.
If
that
is
what
you
you
all
desire.
N
Thank
you.
It
does
sound
inappropriate
that
maybe
we
use
similar
language
if
you're
comfortable
with
that
councilmember
davis,
as
we
used
in
the
joint
memo
on
recommendation
two
that
it
actually
asked
for
this
phase
four,
which
includes
columbus
park
to
come
back.
Maybe
as
part
of
that
work
as
well.
N
M
In
the
pool
everybody
all
right,
okay,
any
other
comments
from
my
colleagues
on
I
have.
E
Thank
you,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
so
that
I
can
support
it's.
The
compromise
is
to
move
forward
with
the
mba.
So
could
you
please
restate
the
motion,
councilmember
davis,
sure
so.
R
It
is
moving
all
the
mem.
My
my
motion
moves
all
the
memos
with
the
clarification
that
columbus
park
will
come
back
as
part
of
the
nba
process,
as
well
as
the
guadalupe
river
trail
individuals
living
there
as
well.
E
Okay,
great,
thank
you.
I
I
appreciate
that
and
thanks
for
the
compromise,
I
thank
my
colleagues
for
that.
I
I
think,
adding
that
additional
information
and
flexibility
on
what
resources
it
takes.
When
is
helpful,
because
I'm
I'm
pretty
concerned
about
not
having
beds
for
the
rest
of
the
city.
So
that's
a
big
concern,
so
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
see
what
resources
would
be
needed
to
move
forward
and
what
that
phase
four
would
look
like.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
everybody
and
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion.
Thanks.
E
Thank
you
mayor,
so
I'm
gonna
take
us
back
because
I've
been
waiting
to
make
these
questions.
I
know
we,
it
sounds
like
we
we've
got
a
motion
on
the
floor,
but
I
have
a
couple
of
questions,
so
I
I
know
that
there
was
a
couple
of
children
at
the
guadalupe
gardens
site
earlier
this
year
and
I
think
ours,
our
team
did
a
wonderful
job
in
making
sure
that
those
families
got
connected
to
some
interim
housing,
hopefully
which
led
to
permanent
housing.
E
E
They
prioritize
those
individuals
that
have
children?
What
what
is
the
typical
protocol
there.
G
The
first
I'm
I'm
gonna
summarize
a
protocol,
but
the
first
step
is
that
the
outreach
team,
whether
it's
life,
moves,
outreach
team
or
abode
or
a
county
outreach
team
that
outreach
team
calls
our
centralized
hotline
for
screening
and
placement.
So
we
need
to
understand
the
household
size
and
the
number
of
children.
G
G
G
If
a
family
refuses
assistance,
the
outreach
team
will
continue
to
engage
that
family.
We
don't
take
no
foreign
answer.
We
keep
going
back
if
the
family
is
in
a
vehicle.
The
protocol
is
to
also
to
contact
amigos
de
guadalupe,
their
safe
parking
outreach
team
who
will
offer
and
encourage
the
family
to
participate.
G
We
we
tend
to
use
them,
they
have
a
car
reagan,
that's
if
they
have
a
car,
then
we
have
an
avenue
for
people
in
vehicles.
If
they
are
unsheltered,
then
it's
we
try
and
go
with
a.
We
call
it
temporary
housing,
because
sometimes
folks
are
when
you
say
the
word
shelter
I
think,
there's
misnomers
about
you,
know
big
warehouses
or
places
that
are
unsafe.
G
We
do
often
encounter
parents
who
are
fearful
of
accepting
services
because
not
that
they
don't
want
services,
but
they
are
very
fearful
of
having
their
children
taken
away
from
them.
E
E
I
E
I
E
To
hear
that,
what
what
happens,
if
the
says,
no,
thanks
to
any
and
all
of
the
options
that
are
laid
out,
what
is
our
response
is
our
response
to
then
include
escalate
the
response,
or
do
we
switch
provider
and
have
maybe
somebody
else
try
to
connect
with
the
family?
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out.
G
As
I
said,
we
don't
we
don't
take
no
for
an
answer.
We
keep
going
back
and
keep
trying
to
engage,
and
sometimes
that
does
mean
council
member
doing
a
warm
handoff
to
a
different
provider.
If.
O
G
Makes
sense
it
is
driven
by
by
the
family
and
kind
of
their
circumstances
and
needs.
E
Okay,
and
at
what
point
would
you
would
you
say,
and
have
we
ever
done
a
a
child
abuse
report?
Is
this
something
that
when
ultimately,
you
know,
I'm
sure
that
every
parent
wants
to
accept
the
service
that
they're
being
offered,
but
I'm
just
thinking
about
the
worst
case
scenario
so
that
we're
prepared
for
it?
Do
we
have
a
worst
case
scenario
in
terms
of
protocol.
G
Do
intervene
if
there
are
unsafe
conditions
for
minors
or
unsafe
behavior
that
they've
observed.
E
Okay,
I
I
appreciate
that.
E
I'm
trying
to
we
don't
talk
about
it
enough
I
mean
we
know.
I
know
that
we
are
targeting
families
and
there
is
a
very
coordinated
and
comprehensive
approach
from
the
county
as
well
as
from
from
our
our
city.
We
just
haven't
talked
enough
about
some
of
those
kiddos
that
are
out
there,
and
we
know
that
there's
quite
a
bit,
because
we
we
know
that
those
numbers
from
us
from
the
schools
and
from
the
the
counts
that
we
do.
E
I
just
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
are
all
on
the
same
page
about
that.
E
The
other
question
that
I
had,
or
the
other
consideration
I'd
like
to
ask
for
is
this-
is
something
that
council,
member
cohen,
was
getting
to
with
his
comments
about
making
sure
that
there's
enough
resources
for
folks
outside
of
a
targeted
area
and
I'd
like
for
us
to
think
about
how
we
factor
equity
into
the
decisions
of
abatement,
is
it?
Is
it
because
we
have
a
lot
of
attention?
Is
it
because
you
know
we
have
a
requirement?
E
E
Is
it
because,
there's
you
know
a
certain
number
of
people
there
or
what
is
that
criteria
that
we
use.
D
Thank
you,
councilmember
arenas.
What
we're
looking
at
are
sort
of
a
multitude
of
risk
factors,
so
I'll
just
say
no,
it's
not.
The
number
of
calls
is
not
a
determination
of
abatement,
it
would
be
based
on
location
conditions,
and
we
do
want
to
create
some
level
of
objectivity
to
it.
So
again,
that's
why
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
the
a
risk
factor
checklist
and
I
do
believe
I
think
we
all
we
will
bring
an
equity
lens
to
it,
because
I
think
a
lot
of
the
work
that
we
do.
D
E
Thank
you.
I
I'd
also
like
to
make
sure
that,
when
we
have
overnight
warming
locations
that
we
have
a
certain
priority
for
some
of
those
folk
of
some
of
those
areas
after
because
there
is,
there
is.
E
I
think
people
set
up
camp
around
the
the
owl
locations
and
I
that's
what
I've
noticed
in
in
our
owl
and
you
know,
even
in
the
middle
of
the
street,
and
we've
had
to
have
bta,
take
replace
a
bench
just
this
week,
and
so
I
I
don't
know
that
everybody's
getting
the
good
neighbor
information
and
if
they
are
not
abiding
by
it,
if
they're
not
abiding
by
it.
I
don't
know
if
that
is
a
determinant
to
have
it.
What
what?
What
kind
of
approach
that
creates.
E
When
folks
are
not
complying
with
with
that
good
neighbor
policy.
P
So
I
can
jump
in
so
when
we
first
started
working
with
the
city
manager's
office.
We
had
come
up
with
a
good
neighborhood
policy
and
a
program
that
was
designed
to
provide
additional
support
to
any
communities
that
were
accepting
these
facility
types
of
facilities,
whether
it
was
owls
or
we
only
had
tiny
homes
at
the
time,
and
so
we
literally
drew
a
map
and
we
did
and
we
did
additional
cleanup
in
those
areas.
P
We
had
additional
outreach
in
those
areas.
We
invited
people
that
were
living
in
those
areas
to
come
into
the
facilities
that
we
were
in
and
then
covet
19
hit,
and
then
all
of
our
resources
have
been
going
to
the
cove
19
response,
and
so
we
have
not
been
able
to
operate
that
program
anymore.
That
program
went
away
as
a
result
of
covet
19,
and
so
that
is
something
that
we
are
not
offering
at
this
point
in
time.
E
Okay,
well,
I
think
that
some
of
the
owl
locations
might
when
we
think
about
the
criteria
of
of
attend
the
criteria
that
we
take
into
account
to
either
provide
service
or
to
provide
abatements
or
just
to
have
a
more
comprehensive
response.
E
We
need
to
make
sure
that
the
the
owl's
locations
are
in
consideration
or
have
some
level
of
priority
over
others,
so
that
the
neighborhood
can
continue
to
welcome
owl
centers
and
that
they,
you
know,
aren't
asking
to
they're,
not
part
of
creating
a
greater
issue
for
that
community.
Instead,
this
is
an
actual
solution,
so
anyways
that
that
is
my
my
feedback
and
my
response
and
my
questions.
Thank
you.
M
A
M
S
M
Do
you
want
to
offer
this
for
council's
benefit?
What
you
believe
is
something
staff
can
do
I'll
defer
to
nicole
woody.
K
Sure
I
think
right
now
our
current
schedule
has
us
designing
and
getting
the
dog
park
under
construction
in
q1
of
2023
and-
and
I
think,
that's
achievable
and
striking
distance.
I
think
committing
at
this
very
moment
to
the
rest
of
the
prototype
park.
Assets
is
a
little
bit
more
tenuous,
so
I
I
think
the
an
alternate
that
proposes
dog
park
in
20
early
2023
is
fine.
M
Okay
would
make
you
the
motion.
R
I
I
just
want
to
be
clear
when
we
had
a
briefing
about
this
I'm.
What
I'm
talking
about
here
is
that
construction
begins,
not
that
construction
ends
by
october.
H
H
A
H
Starting
this
week,
and
so
we
are
moving
and
we're
going
to
push
really
hard
on
this
project.
But,
as
nicole
said,
construction
in
early.
M
Question
is
modified
counselor
calling.
C
Just
a
quick
question
for
for
nicole
or
matt-
maybe
both
you
know-
we've
been.
We
have
conversations,
obviously
about
timelines
for
for
particularly
a
few
key
park
elements
in
other
parts
of
the
city
and
in
my
district,
particularly.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
this
isn't
necessarily
just
like
before,
isn't
necessarily
changing
timelines
for
other
projects
in
the
pipeline
and
we've
we've
had
a
conversation
recently
about
how
disappointing
we
are
disappointed.
H
A
Put
other
things
aside
right
now,
based
on
the
direction
we're
receiving
and
we're
going
to
work
on
it
as
expeditiously
as
possible,
but
we're
not
going
to
put
aside.
We
don't
plan
on
putting
aside
any
other
formal
commitments
that
we've
made
on
other
projects
and
other
council
districts
based
on
what
the
direction
we're
hearing
today.
C
All
right,
I
guess
thank
you
and
nicole,
that
that
you
know
what
I'm
referring
to.
I
don't
want
to
necessarily
specifically
and.
A
I
would
say
the
challenge,
like
I
mentioned
with
with
faa
and
a
lot
of
the
other
coordination
we
did.
We
need
to
do
for
projects
at
guadalupe
gardens,
even
if
we
were
to
get
the
direction
to
absolutely
start
construction
by
october.
It
it
would
be,
may
not
be
possible,
given
the
challenge,
given
the
coordination
we
need
to
do,
but
we'll
still
push
it
as
soon
as
we
can.
A
Okay,
as.
E
A
question
there,
my
hands
are
messed
up,
thank
you
and
so
matt,
while
you're
still
there
didn't
want
you
guys.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
again
because
I'm
trying
to
I
so
the
most
so
other
projects
will
not
be
slowed
down
by
the
motion
in
front
of
us.
Is
that
correct.
A
Correct
I'm
going
to
ask
nicole
to
please
weigh
in
if
there's
anything
she
wants
to
add
here,
but
right
now
we're
focused
on
the
dog
park
and
expediting
that
as
quick
as
possible
and
trying
to
get
under
construction
earlier.
However,
first
quarter
of
2023
definitely
getting
under
construction
right
now,
based
on
our
project,
manager's
workload
and
other
commitments
we've
made.
We
do
have
that
planned
out
in
the
schedule
so
that
shouldn't
impact
any
other
project
commitments
and
that's
not
the
plan
right
now.
So.
E
And
so
the
the
languages
or
devise
an
alternate
strategy
correct
to
secure
this.
So
I
I
seconded
councilmember
davis's
motion
on
this
earlier.
You
know
if
we
need
to
do
a
fence
or
if
we
need
to
do,
is
that
the
type
of
alternate
strategy,
you're
thinking
of
councilmember
davis
and
and
for
clarification,
I'm
thinking
of
several
months
ago.
So
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
this
and
the
impact
to
other
projects
in
the
city.
R
Thank
you,
councilmember
esparza,
whether
it's
a
fence
or
whether
it's
the
airport,
continuing
to
monitor
that
site
or
whether
it's
something
I
haven't
thought
of.
Yet
I
I'm
agnostic
as
to
the
solution.
As
long
as
there
is
an
assurance
that
we
don't
see
a
re-encampment
of
this
site,
while
we
are
waiting
for
all
of
these
ducks
to
fall
into
a
row
that.
S
Might
be
able
to
be
of
assistance
here.
So
if
you
look
at
the
mayor
jones,
paul's,
cohen,
davis,
memo
item
e
says
after
residents
have
been
re-housed
securing
the
site
using
k-rail
or
other
temporary
physical
barriers
until
construction
of
the
prototype
commences
and
activating
the
site
with
maintenance
workers,
resilience
corps
bridge
participants
in
regular
police
bike
patrols.
So
that
would
be
part
of
your
approval
proved
recommendation.
R
E
I'll
I'll
share
my
perspective,
which
is
I'm
trying
to
find
a
way
I
I
am
supportive
and,
like
I
said
a
few
months
ago,
I
seconded
seconded
council
member
davis's
motion
to
put
a
fence,
because
I
thought
we
needed
a
fence
and
I
agreed
with
her
and
we
ended
up
in
a
place
that
had
some
flexibility
in
there.
I
I
don't
think
I
I
do
think
we
have
to
add
an
equity
lens.
I
you
know
we
all
have
projects
in
our
districts.
E
E
We
owe
that
neighborhood
service
as
well
and
and
so
so,
I'm
trying
to
find
a
way
to
support
work
in
this
area,
while
acknowledging
that
guadalupe
gardens
is
pulling
resources
from
every
council
district
in
the
city,
and
so
that
that's
my
point,
if
it's
an
issue
with
just
being
agnostic
and
being
flexible
about
different
ways
about
securing
that
site,
that's
something
I
can
support,
but
I
just
want
to
explain
where
my
questions
are
coming
from,
because
I
do
think
I
do
believe
in
equity,
and
I
do
think
we
have
to
have
an
equity
lens
and
some
of
the
work
that
we
do
and
and
I'm
I'm.
M
Councilmember
cohen,
your
hand
is
up.
Is
that
from
before?
Okay,
it's
not
happening
anymore,
all
right
matt!
I
don't
have
any
questions
for
you,
so
if
you
want
to
run
away
before
someone
else
does
this
is
your
chance.
M
I
was
going
to
actually
ask
a
few
more
questions
started
to
do
this
to
folks,
but
it's
not
related
to
this.
I
thought
it
was
important
to
get
that
the
motion
out.
First,
just
a
quick
question
about
the
mayberry
yard
closure.
D
Choke
point
it's
back
online.
It
was
only
closed
for
three
to
four
weeks.
J
S
I
think
the
the
point
we're
trying
to
make,
though,
is,
is
going
to
weekly
service
and
continuing.
You
know
each
time
we're
here,
we
add
more
add
more
we're
just
producing
a
whole
lot
greater
volume
and
it
is
exceeding
the
capacity
of
our
existing
infrastructure
to
do
something
about
it.
That's
that's
kind
of
the
flag,
we're
raising
in
this
issue,
yeah.
M
Happy
to
see
trash
for
cash
seems
to
be
building
really
appreciate,
all
staff's
hard
work
and
making
that
happen.
I
think
we're
up
to
more
than
400
participants.
Now
is
that
right-
and
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
work,
obviously
in
in
that
whole
program,
but
is
it
doing
anything
to
reduce,
say
the
calls
for
service
or
the
the
responsive,
the
reactive
cleanup
that
we'd
otherwise
have
to
do.
T
I
can
tell
you
that
our
cash
for
trash
sites
tend
to
be
the
cleaner
sites.
They
tend
to
be
the
sites
that
get
the
fewest
number
of
complaints,
and
all
of
our
all
of
the
people
in
the
program
are
happy
to
be
in
the
program
and
really
participate.
They
clean
up
kind
of
their
area
and
they
make
sure
the
entire
encampment
area
and
right
in
front
of
it,
is
clean.
So
they
do
a
really
good
job.
M
Okay,
well
that
warms
my
heart
to
hear
that.
So
thank
you
olympia
for
all
your
work
on
it
and
I
yeah.
I
hope
we
can
have
more
conversations
through
the
budget
processes.
We've
got
a
lot
of
things
to
have
to
spend
resources
on.
We
know
to
address
this,
this
huge
challenge
and
if
that's
working,
I'd
love
to
to
water,
whatever's
growing
reagan.
Thank
you
for
all
that
your
team's
work
in
housing,
71
residents,
the
grp
mentioned
there
were
also
nine
vehicles
that
were
paired.
M
G
G
M
And
then,
finally,
the
ptcos
are
responding
in
vehicle
abatement,
and
I
know
there
are
some
challenges
there,
because
they
don't
have
the
authority
to
do
a
lot
of
stuff,
and
I
I
don't
know
if
maybe
this
is
a
better
question
to
ask
department
of
transportation.
So
this
is
probably
not
for
a
question
for
me
now.
I
realized
I
really
should
be
asking
this
question
from
dot,
so
I
won't
bug
you
guys
that
question.
M
Unless
somebody
wants
to
respond
about
ptcos,
I'm
guessing
not
okay,
I'll
move
on
then
flag
that
on
page
13
come
back
to
it
all
right.
So
then,
finally,
we
do
have
a
two
million
dollar
grant
that
you
guys
are
successful
in
securing
for
the
source
side
of
cdm.
M
G
Yes,
we
did
receive
notice
that
we
were
awarded
a
two
million
dollar
grant
from
the
state
of
california
or
what
the
state
calls
encampment
resolution.
G
It's
a
new
program
for
the
state,
but
it
is
focused
on
demobilizing
encampments,
but
with
a
human-centered
approach,
where
we
are
working
on
housing
solutions
for
the
individuals
in
those
encampments.
So
we
did
get
an
award
to
demobilize
the
encampment
along
guadalupe
river
trail
from
basically
to
280
87
right
behind
children's
discovery,
museum
going
north
to
arena
green
and
there's
about
100
folks
that
we
counted
in
that
area.
G
M
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
So
thank
you
again.
Thanks
to
everyone.
This
is
the
hardest
work
in
the
city
and
I
appreciate
everyone's
really
diligent
efforts
in
very,
very
difficult
circumstances.
M
Okay,
we
now
have
a
motion.
Let's
vote.
E
G
N
D
A
D
G
A
G
M
G
G
G
G
G
And
just
a
reminder:
this
is
a
public
hearing
to
take
input
on
the
proposed
amendment
to
the
plan,
and
I
will
just
underscore
that
we
are
moving
around
funds
in
order
to
meet
our
federal
spending
deadline.
We
don't
want
to
ever
send
money
back
to
hud.
We
want
to
keep
it
in
our
community.
M
Thank
you
reagan
and
certainly
welcome
to
see
more
dollars,
go
to
the
vouchers.
It's
great
okay,
we're
opening
the
hearing.
So
it
comes
to
stampede.
I
don't
see
anybody
here
in
person
tony,
you
want
to
go
online.
A
Hi
beekman
here
stampede
of
one-
maybe
for
this
item
and
in
my
stampede
very
much
of
a
thank
you
that
you
are
once
again
bringing
federal
hud
funding
questions
to
the
public
space.
A
I
would
guess
that
I'm
not
positive,
but
I
this
I
don't
know
if
it's
part
of
this
funding
series,
but
as
a
part
of
this
hud
funding
process,
you
would
previously
offer
that
surveillance
and
technology
ideas,
basically
bridging
digital
divide
issues,
we're
going
to
be
a
part
of
this
fed
funding
and,
as
always,
my
role
in
life
here
is
to
remind
the
importance
of
how
open
and
accountable
practices
and
public
policies
can
be
of
much
help
in
determining
the
success
of
the
future
of
bridging
the
digital
divide.
M
All
right,
thank
you.
The
hearing
is
now
closed.
I
believe
you
need
a
motion.
Is
that
right
reagan
move.
M
H
G
A
M
Ricardo
hi,
thank
you,
okay,
so
jen
just
concluded.
I
wanted
to
note,
in
addition
to,
I
appreciate
the
moment
of
silence
that
was
taken
by
vice
mayor
and
the
council.
I
believe
the
flags
will
be
flown
at
half-mast
for
the
rest
of
the
week
in
honor
of
norm.
Mineta's
passing
we'll
go
now
to
open
session
open.
A
All
right
wait:
we've
been
here
thanks
for
taking
like
three
hours,
basically
on
on
the
housing
item
and
the
future
of
how
to
address
displacement
issues,
a
real
good
luck
to
government-sponsored
housing.
Now
it's
helping
define.
I
think,
some
of
your
questions
this
time.
Good
luck
in
that
efforts
from
all
of
us,
and
it's
from
that,
but
yesterday.
M
A
Had
a
really
interesting
item
about
the
future
of
housing
issues
and
what
exactly
can
be
a
secret,
a
sql
process
for
that
a
good
sql
process,
you
had
a
really
good
memo
for
it.
Yesterday,
it's
a
really
caring
memo
and
you're
in
a
caring
space.
A
Right
now
and
you're
asking
you
know
difficult
questions
of
ourselves
and
how
can
we
move
past?
How
can
how
can
the
future
of
housing
not
just
be
a
matter
of
money
itself,
but
real
idealism
from
ourselves
that
we
can
all
feel
and
it's
from
that
place?
We
can
ask
the
questions
of
money
and
and
you're
asking
in
the
right
ways.
So
thank
you
for
that
and
good
luck
in
the
efforts
of
working
on
that
I
had
a
few
short
words
I'm
trying
to
practice.
A
I
hope
you
can
have
patience
once
again,
as
there's
already
been
years
of
open
dialogue
and
negotiation
for
all
sides
about
the
future
of
the
ukraine
area,
including
recent
additional
negotiation
ideas.
A
As
the
uk,
ukraine
can
join
the
eu
and
that
russia
can
possibly
return
parts
of
the
georgia
republic.
I
hope
we
do
not
have
to
continue
to
rely
on
war.
Its
harm
and
its
placement
displacement
as
the
ways
for
people
in
countries
in
the
ukraine
region
to
try
to
prove
their
metal
and
points
of
view
before
fully
returning
to
the
negotiation
table.
A
It's
just
my
hope
that
you
know
we
can
really
work.
It's
a
peaceful
solution
for
all
sides.
At
this
time.
All
sides
should
be
able
to
want
to
work
on
that
and
again
a
helpful
reminder
that
I
hope
we
can
think
of
life
at
home
with
issues
like
paul
soto
and
we
don't.
He
doesn't
fall
through
kirk
vartan
good
afternoon,
mayor
and
council.
My
name
is
kirk
vartan.
I
want
to
continue
to
shine
a
light
on
the
problematic
and
opaque
process
that
is
happening
happening
around
the
city's
gun
ordinances.
A
Next
week,
the
ghost
gun
ordinance
will
come
before
this
body
for
repute
approval
if
there
has
been
no
outreach,
no
community
meetings
and
no
discussion.
The
silicon
valley,
public
accountability
foundation,
has
specific
concerns
on
this
upcoming
ordinance
and
we'll
send
them
to
you
this
week.
I
hope
you
will
please
review
the
comments
with
an
open
mind.
A
The
main
concerns
I
have
today
are
around
the
mayor's
lack
of
outreach
and
community
engagement.
He
brought
the
request
for
a
dozen
related
gun
ordinances
to
this
council
in
june
2021,
and
it
was
unanimously
supported.
It
gave
direction
to
the
city
attorney
to
research
and
bring
back
ideas
and
ordinances.
A
I
think
it
was
clear
that
this
would
not
be
done
in
a
vacuum.
Unfortunately,
that
is
what
is
happening.
The
city
staff
is
not
tasked
with
community
outreach,
vetting
or
engagement,
and
no
one
is
doing
it
and
there
is
no
notice
typically,
not
even
going
to
the
rules.
Committee
mayor
licardo,
you
talk
about
community
engagement,
transparency
and
outreach.
A
A
A
Hold
regular
town
hall
meetings
on
gun
ordinances,
you're
proposing
and
talk
to
your
constituents
share
your
views
on
why
they
are
needed.
If
you
are
so
convinced
these
ordinances
are
appropriate.
Why
are
you
so
unwilling
to
discuss
them
in
public
with
the
community
mayor
licardo
my
offer
to
partner
and
collaborate
is
unchanged.
You
know
how
to
reach
me.