►
From YouTube: JUN 28, 2022 | City Council Afternoon Session
Description
City of San José, California
City Council Afternoon Session of June 28, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=51&event_id=4686
B
A
All
right,
today's
invitation
will
be
provided
by
the
member
members
of
the
san
jose
fire
departments,
engine
eight
c-shift
crew
members,
part
of
the
bureau
of
ems
in
training
and
bureau
of
field
operations.
I
hope
I
got
all
that
right.
Councilmember
davis
will
tell
us
more.
F
Good
thank
you
mayor
and
good
afternoon.
I
have
done
something
a
little
bit
different
for
today's
invocation
and
invited
members
of
san
jose
fire
department
today
to
the
meeting
and
asked
them
to
demonstrate
life-saving
equipment
that
is
now
available
on
all
front-line
fire
engines,
trucks
and
rescue
medics
across
the
city
of
san
jose.
F
F
F
Please
join
me
in
welcoming
the
san
jose
fire
department's
bureau
of
ems
and
training
battalion
chief
patrick
chung
fire
captain
kevin
stidham
fire
captain
dennis
bell
and
from
the
bureau
of
field
of
operations,
engine
8,
c-shift
crew
members,
fire
captain
ryan,
west
fire
engineer,
christopher
berger
firefighter
and
paramedic
pablo
polidoro
firefighter
brandon
van
valor.
Thank
you
for
coming
today,
gentlemen.
H
Good
afternoon
everybody
currently
in
santa
clara
county,
we
do
high
performance
cpr.
This
is
a
very
effective
method
of
doing
cpr,
where
every
crew
member
has
a
position
that
they're
responsible
for
and
the
other
crew
members
also
know
what
their
positions
are
when
they
need
to
rotate.
H
Recently,
we
went
to
a
seminar
in
seattle
where
we
learn
pit
crew
cpr,
just
like
when
you
think
of
nascar
or
formula
one
raising
it
takes
effective
cpr
and
makes
it
efficient
cpr.
This
has
a
better
chance
of
survivability
for
the
patient,
that's
in
a
shockable
rhythm.
So
what
we've
started
doing
recently
is
we've
started
with
with
few
interruptions
while
doing
cpr
science
shows
that
early
cpr
can
increase
your
chance
of
survival
in
a
shockable
rhythm,
any
time
that
you
are
not
doing
cpr
for
a
maximum
of
three
seconds.
H
H
The
emts
are
also
starting
to
own.
The
call
this
allows
the
paramedics
to
stand
back
and
assess
maybe
a
little
bit
greater
detail,
what
they're
going
to
do
as
far
as
medications.
Maybe
what's
caused
the
patient
to
go
into
cardiac
arrest
and
then
that
lets
them
start
to
think.
As
you
can
see,
there's
a
very
quiet
scene.
Everybody
knows
what
they're
supposed
to
be
doing.
It's
a
very
controlled
atmosphere
and
the
captain's
now
speaking
to
him
telling
we're
almost
done
with
the
with
this
cycle
of
cpr.
H
H
H
This
allows
us
to
do
quality
compressions,
while
we're
moving
the
patient.
The
other
big
advantage
to
having
the
lucas
device
is
that
we're
able
to
transport
in
the
back
of
the
ambulance
and
we're
able
to
be
seat.
Belted
in
the
past,
we've
been
driving
down
the
road
code,
three
with
lights
and
sirens,
and
we
were
not
secured
just
so.
We
could
do
quality
compressions.
H
H
Also
one
other
thing
I
wanted
to
add
is
that
this
is
the
engine
8
crew
there
at
17th
and
santa
clara.
They
are
our
fourth
busiest
engine
company
in
the
city.
We
also
have
the
opportunity
firefighter
pablo
is
an
accreditor
and
firefighter
van
dalen
is
actually
a
new
hire
and
he's
actually
doing
his
accreditation
rides
right
now.
Engine
8
does
serve
city
hall
and
serves
the
campus
behind
us
as
well.
So
thank
you
guys.
A
A
All
right,
let's
we'll
go
to
a
few
ceremonial
items
before
we
move
on
with
our
agenda
first
council
member
carrasco,
we
will
be
recognizing
and
proclaiming
adopt
cat
month.
E
E
I'm
so
glad,
I'm
so
glad
to
have
you
here
today
and
thank
you
for
joining
me.
As
we
proclaim
june
as
national
adopt
a
cat
month,
we
recognize
adopt
a
catman
to
promote
adoptions
over
shopping
for
cats
and
kittens
as
well
as
shine
a
light
on
the
pressures
currently
felt
by
our
awesome
veterinary
staff
and
volunteers.
E
As
we
heard
during
the
budget
setting
process,
our
city
is
facing
a
feral
cat
crisis
and
our
shelters
are
currently
overflowing
with
sweet,
little
kittens
as
well
as
dogs
and
birds
and
bears
and
lions.
Oh,
my
who
are
in
desperate
need
of
loving
homes.
We
heard
that
our
veterinarian
staff
is
overworked,
that
our
volunteers,
like
resources
and
because
of
it
our
city,
is
feeling
the
effects
of
this
crisis.
E
That's
where
you
can
make
a
difference
and
help
our
dedicated
shelter,
staff
and
volunteers
by
adopting
a
cat
donating
your
time,
treasures
or
your
talent.
Now
I
know
that
there
may
be
some
hesitancy
to
adopt
a
cat,
especially
if
you
believe
that
you
are
strictly
a
dog
lover.
But
let
me
tell
you
that
cats
have
a
ton
of
personality
and
for
those
of
you
who
think
you're
a
dog
lover,
give
it
a
try.
I
thought
I
was
a
dog
lover.
E
E
E
I
think
that's
a
poem
it's
important
to
adopt
and
not
shop,
because
it
saves
already
existing
animals
in
desperate
need
of
new
and
loving
families,
and
when
you
adopt
a
cat,
you
are
actually
saving
two
lives,
that
of
the
kitty
cat
that
you
adopt
and
the
one
that
you
just
made
room
for
to
receive
essential
services
at
the
shelter.
I
also
want
to.
Let
all
of
you
know
that
you
can
currently
adopt
a
cat
from
our
city,
shelter
for
free
mayor.
I,
like
that
price
tag.
E
It
doesn't
cost
you
a
penny
if
you
go
shopping
at
the
shelter
and
get
a
kitty
to
date.
So
it's
with
great
joy
with
great
respect
that
I
present
this
proclamation
to
both
dinah
haysee
and
kate,
amber
my
apologies.
If
I
mispronounce
and
the
community
cats
working
group,
it
was
organized
in
may
of
2021.
E
I've
done
that
a
couple
of
times
in
my
own
home
as
an
overnighting
volunteer,
kate
became
aware
of
the
high
volume
of
kittens
that
come
into
the
shelter
during
kitten
season.
By
the
way
we
are
in
it
now
and
began
to
look
for
solutions
such
as
community
outreach
and
education,
kate,
expanded
her
skill
set
from
bottle
feeding
baby
kittens
to
alert
to
learning
how
to
trap
community
cats
for
spay
and
neuter
working
in
the
community
to
address
the
problem
as
the
source
and
this
past
weekend.
Kate
helped
this
shelter
get
25
kittens,
possibly
even
more.
E
She
to
fix
them,
so
they
can
now
go
up
for
adoptions
through
the
shelter.
Both
kate
and
dinah
have
been
incredibly
helpful
in
helping
solve
our
kitty
cat
problem
at
capitol
park
in
my
district
district,
five
best
district
in
the
city,
where
you
can
currently
find
litters
of
kittens
running
through
our
community
room,
you'll
find
beautiful,
kittens
there
that
deserve
the
chance
of
finding
a
forever
home.
If
you
like
to
be
part
of
the
solution,
there
are
easy
steps
that
you
can
take
adopt.
E
Do
not
shop
donate
your
time,
your
treasure
or
your
talent,
to
your
local
shelter,
help,
trap,
neuter
and
release
local
cats
and,
most
importantly,
spay
and
neuter
your
own
cats,
especially
if
they
like
to
roam
outdoors
to
say
that
we
are
grateful
for
kate
indiana's
work
of
the
community
cats
working
group
is
an
understatement.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
all
of
the
work
that
you
do,
our
residents,
our
public
works
department,
our
veterinary
staff.
We
all
thank
you
dearly
for
your
dedication
to
this
work.
I
myself
am
very
grateful.
E
K
K
For
recognizing
the
importance
of
adoption
in
animal
welfare
and
for
their
continuing
support
of
our
local
animal
shelter
during
this
challenging
time-
and
I
appreciate
the
progress
that's
being
made
purely
truly-
I
see
it-
I
was
at
the
shelter
today,
I'm
seeing
it
at
this
time.
Our
shelter
is
200
animals
over
max
capacity
of
400,
with
75
percent
of
those
being
kittens
and
cats
as
a
result
of
lack
of
access
to
spay
and
neuter
services
and
rescues
in
addition
to
the
shelter
are
already
stretched
beyond
capacity.
K
Now
is
the
time
for
the
community
to
make
a
difference
in
the
lives
of
these
animals
by
adopting
from
our
local
rescue
groups
and
shelters.
If
you
can't
adopt
consider
fostering
a
kitten
or
two
temporarily,
you
will
literally
be
saving
lives
and
to
those
in
this
chamber,
we
would
ask
that
you
please
help
remove
barriers
to
adoption
by
supporting
pet-friendly
housing
policies
that
expand
the
number
of
homes
available
to
those
who
want
to
adopt.
K
In
closing,
I'd
also
like
to
recognize
dinah
hayes
standing
here
with
me
for
her
persistence
and
resourcefulness
in
advocating
for
our
cause,
as
well
as
the
other
members
of
the
community
cats
working
group,
bay
area,
cats,
the
dancing
cat,
gatos
de
la
noche
and
saint
francis
animal
protection
society.
Again,
thank
you
for
the
support
and
recognition
of
adopt
a
cat
month,
the
animals,
the
rescues,
the
shelter
staff
and
volunteers.
K
A
All
right,
I
understand
council
member
mayhem's
under
the
weather,
but
have
no
fear
he's
with
us
remotely
and
I
think
he's
proclaiming
park
and
recreation
month.
Yes,.
J
A
M
Prns
staff,
of
course,
also
do
many
other
critical
things
here
in
our
city
for
our
community.
They
maintain
one
of
the
nation's
largest
urban
trail
networks
from
the
los
alamitos
creek
trail
down
here
in
district
10
at
one
end
of
the
city
to
those
in
the
foothills
of
district
4
at
the
other
san
jose's.
More
than
60
miles
of
trails
offer
wonderful
opportunities
to
exercise
socialize
and
appreciate
the
natural
beauty
around
us.
Pr
staff
also
manage
over
200
city
parks,
many
of
which
are
connected
by
those
same
trails.
M
Last
but
not
least,
prns
delivers
over
30
programs
and
services
that
bring
families
together,
strengthen
communities
and
increase
cultural
awareness
and
respect,
including
educational
programming,
that
offers
our
young
people
a
safe
and
productive
learning
environment
after
school
and
during
summers.
Instructional
programs
for
seniors,
including
a
computer
skills
class
that
my
father
could
have
so
benefited
from.
M
N
Assistant
director
for
park
and
rec,
and
I'm
really
honored,
to
represent
the
department
and
those
wonderful
staff
who
are
standing
here
behind
me,
as
well
as
the
thousands
of
other
staff
that
we
have
out
in
the
field
today,
super
proud
to
be
a
part
of
a
department
that
really
strives
to
look
sound
and
feel
like
the
residents
of
san
jose.
And
so
thank
you.
Mayor
councilman.
N
A
All
right,
thank
you
to
our
pr
s
team.
Finally,
we
have
some
volunteers.
We
want
to
recognize
and
commend
from
the
berryessa
arts
festival
committee,
councilmember
cohen,.
P
Give
the
volunteers
a
second
minute
to
come
up
here.
Thank
you,
mayor.
The
barrier
arts
festival
has
been
a
highlight
of
the
year
in
the
berries
community
since
its
inception,
nearly
five
decades
ago,
usually
takes
place
on
the
saturday
of
mother's
day
weekend
and
brings
community
vendors,
entertainment
for
service
provider,
booths
food
and
drink
all
berry
essences
know
to
expect
the
event
and
look
forward
to
attending
it
every
year
and
either
mother's
day,
gifts
there.
It's
now
the
largest
art
and
wine
festival
in
the
city
of
san
jose.
P
Few
people
really
can
understand
the
amount
of
work
that
goes
into
putting
together
this
outstanding
event.
So
today
I
want
to
recognize
the
committee,
the
various
arts
committee,
some
of
their
members
are
here
today.
They
worked
tirelessly
for
months
leading
up
to
the
event
to
make
sure
everything
goes
smoothly.
On
the
day
of
the
event,
they
work
to
secure
all
the
permits
needed
from
the
city,
the
state
and
the
county.
P
They
plan
the
entertainment
schedule
make
sure
there
are
enough
performers
to
fill
the
day
and
make
sure
there
are
plenty
of
vendors
and
service
providers,
and
they
collaborate
with
city
staff
to
make
pen
make
sure
penitentiary
creek
park
will
be
ready
to
receive
thousands
of
visitors
on
the
day
of
the
festival
they
mark.
The
spaces
fill
in
the
ground
squirrel
holes
put
up
signs
and
build
the
performance
stage.
P
This
year
the
berryessa
arts
festival
committee
included
community
members,
various
school
district
employees
and
city
staff,
besides
being
a
great
event
that
entices
the
community
to
come
to
the
park
and
enjoy
a
day
of
food,
entertainment
and
vendors.
The
arts
festival
is
also
the
biggest
fundraiser
for
the
berryessa
school
district.
P
P
F
I'd
like
to
take
this
opportunity,
first
of
all
not
to
thank
just
the
volunteers,
but
also
to
thank
our
mayor
and
the
whole
city
staff
that
really
supported
us
this
year.
Our
councilmember
dave,
gohan
really
still
be
beside
us,
and
his
staff
was
really
excellent
to
in
supporting
us.
But,
along
with
that,
the
volunteers
that
come
along
will
be
the
school
district
that
you
know.
We
support
with
the
fundraising.
N
F
F
A
All
right,
on
orders
of
the
day,
staff's
request
into
full
volume,
10.2
planned
development
permit
on
barack
obama
boulevard
to
the
august
9th
agenda.
Councilman
jimenez
would
like
to
adjourn
this
meeting
in
memory.
Fernando
perez
lopez.
A
Okay,
councilmember
jimenez.
C
Yeah,
I'm
already
mayor,
if
you're
ready
to,
let
me
go
sure
all
right.
Thank
you
well!
C
Well,
first,
let
me
just
apologize
for
not
being
there
in
person
as
I've
been
a
little
sick,
so
apologies
to
the
families,
everyone
else,
but
really
it
is
my
honor
to
present
today's
adjournment
in
memory
of
a
committed
public
servant,
inspiring
community
advocate
and
a
loving
husband
and
father
who
is
fernando
perez
lopez
joining
us
today
and
if
you
all
can
stand,
as
I
say
your
name,
I
think
many
of
you
are
in
the
audience
joining
us
today
and
remembering
fernando's
legacy
is
his
wife,
marta
naranjo
bernabe,
daughter,
paloma
lopez,
son,
fernando
lopez,
brother
miguel,
lopez,
father
manuel
lopez
and
mother,
alicia
lopez,
and
I
believe
that
there's
also
likely
some
members
of
the
code
enforcement
team
out
in
the
audience
as
well
and
can't
see
everyone,
but
I'm
sure
that
they're
there
now
fednanda
worked
at
the
city
of
san
jose
for
24
years
spending
most
of
his
career
as
part
of
the
mayor's
gang
prevention
task
force.
C
C
Fernando
resolved
an
826
code
enforcement
cases
during
his
tenure
with
code
enforcement,
including
a
notoriously
complicated
hoarding
case
in
district
2,
where
he
worked
with
my
team
on,
and
he
did
that
for
tirelessly
for
many
years.
Dealing
with
that
situation,
fernando
was
a
kind-hearted
person
who
brought
his
heart
and
soul
to
his
work,
colleagues,
friendships,
family
and
obviously
the
community.
He
served.
C
He
had
a
wonderful
spirit
that
brought
positivity
fun
camaraderie
to
the
code
enforcement
team,
and
I'm
also
told
by
his
colleagues
that
he
was
always
the
first
to
volunteer
to
cook
for
the
many
code,
division
barbecues
and
the
pbce
department
picnics.
He
was
known
for
his
chile,
verde
and
homemade
beans.
C
C
He
loved
his
wife,
marta
and
children
paloma
and
fernando
dearly
he
enjoyed
taking
them
on
family
trips
to
san
diego
tahoe,
las
vegas
and
mexico,
as
they
traveled
together.
He
would
always
say
that
he
had
precious
cargo
with
him,
which
I'm
sure
is
the
truth.
Fernando
and
his
brother
miguel
were
very
close.
He
spent
many
years
attending
raider
games
bonding
over
food,
football
and,
of
course,
life
fernando
adored,
his
parents,
manuel
and
alicia.
C
C
Heart
of
gold
will
be
sincerely
missed.
He
will
forever
be
remembered
as
a
loving
father
and
husband,
loyal
raider
fan,
joyful
friend
and
a
strong
community
advocate,
and
I'm
sure
that
the
folks
at
the
city
join
his
family
in
saying
that
we
will
miss
him
dearly
and
that's
all,
but
thank
you
all
for
being
there
and
again
apologies.
I
couldn't
be
there.
A
Thank
you,
councilman
jimenez
appreciate
very
much
your
words
and
family
fernando.
Thank
you
for
joining
us.
I
had
an
opportunity
to
get
to
know
fernando
lopez
many
years
ago
when
he
was
part
of
pr
s
on
doing
gang
prevention
work,
and
he
was
just
so
passionate
about
supporting
our
youth
and
reaching
out
to
kids,
who
are
at
risk
and
and
and
about
community
building,
and
remember,
that's
so
distinctive.
I
love
that
photo
of
him
smiling
there.
His
smile
was
so
distinctive
and
it
was.
A
P
A
All
right,
we'll
now
take
a
a
vote
on
orders
of
the
day.
B
R
A
A
A
E
Yes,
thank
you.
I'm
glad
to
see
some
of
the
folks
that
I've
I've
appointed
and
I
just
wanted
to
congratulate
jonathan
and
luis
barrosio
jonathan
borka
will
be
appointed
to
the
arts
commission,
luis
barrosio,
to
the
planning
commission.
I
want
to
just
give
them
a
shout
out
and
congratulate
them.
They
will
represent
district
five
beautifully.
Thank
you.
A
B
Okay,
both
hands
went
down.
A
Okay
feel
free
to
raise
them
again
when
we're
ready
item.
2.11
is
the
extension
of
hiring
incentive
referral
program
for
city
employees.
This
is
councilman
jimenez.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
and
I
didn't
tell
stop.
I
was
gonna
pull
this
of
my
apologies,
but
yeah.
You
know
it
just
this
item
goes
into
details
as
far
as
continuing
the
extension
of
the
500
to
1500
incentive
referral
program
payment.
What
I'm
curious
about
is
it
doesn't
talk
much
about
how
effective
it's
been
and
I'm
curious
if
there's
anyone,
whether
it
be
jennifer
either
jennifer
can
touch
on
just
how
effective
the
program
has
been
and
whether
we've
seen
an
increase
in
referrals
from
staff,
given
the
increase
that
we've
done.
F
F
What
we
have
heard
anecdotally
is
that
a
lot
of
the
city
employees
are
not
aware
of
this
program,
despite
us
doing
a
good
advertising
campaign
when
we
increased
it
to
1500.
So
I
did
speak
to
the
city
manager's
office
of
communications
yesterday
about
trying
to
do
something
a
little
bit
more
creative
to
get
the
word
out
this
time.
C
A
Exactly
let
me
ask
you
to
if
you
might
councilman
jimenez,
we
might
come
back
to
you
and
ask
you
to
include
in
that
motion
some
other
motions
as
well.
Yeah.
A
D
Yeah
hi,
thank
you,
claire
beekman,
here
sitting
at
the
bart
station.
Sorry
about
that
just
to
quickly
ask
a
helpful
reminder
after
this
item.
I
hope
you
can
make
sure
to
ask
for
a
public
comment
for
remainder
of
consent.
Calendar
items
just
a
friendly
reminder
of
that.
Thank
you.
A
E
N
Yeah
councilmember
john
rizzo,
director
of
transportation,
so
that
portion
of
the
memo
that
describes
those
streets
being
selected
for
20
miles
an
hour
are
a
result
of
new
legislation
that
was
passed
last
year.
Ab43
that
allows
cities
to
actually
select
these
lower
volume,
specific
streets
that
are
in
business
areas.
So
in
the
memo
we
do
go
into
the
meeting
the
criteria
that
ab43.
E
Yeah,
thank
you
and
the
reason
why
I'm
bringing
this
up
is,
as
you
know,
in
in
district
five
we've
had,
especially
just
recently
some
devastating
accidents.
In
fact,
I
just
I
just
went
by
a
horrible
accident
on
story
road.
E
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
measures
that
we're
putting
in
place,
and
you
know
I
think,
your
department
for
helping
on
some
of
those
efforts.
I
don't
I'm
just
baffled
by
why
what
I'm
still
seeing?
I
don't
know
how
to
stop
them.
Unless
we
just
go
out
there
and
actually,
you
know,
put
up,
stop
signs
manually.
E
I
I
don't
know
what
what
people
are
doing
nowadays
and
then,
of
course,
with
the
we
had
the
the
hit
and
run
where
we
lost
two
of
our
women
in
in
the
district
who
were
just
walking
in
the.
D
E
And
and
so
slowing
people
down,
even
though
some
people
are
not
going
to
be
happy
with
it,
and
I
get
it,
but
this
is
now
costing
people's
lives,
and
but
one
of
the
the
complaints
that
we've
had
along
the
olem
rock
corridor,
which
is
the
business
district,
is
that
people
are
just
zooming
through
and
it's
making
it
very
difficult
for
businesses
to
for
customers
to
come
out
of
the
driveways
as
they're
as
they're
exiting
the
businesses.
E
Some
of
them
are
feeling
really
rushed
as
they're
going
into
the
driveways
and
they
feel
like
like
folks
are,
you
know,
piling
up
behind
them.
I
think
that
the
speed
limit
there
is
35
to
40,
and
then
we
do
have
a
concentration
of
senior
homes
right
up
on
olum
rock
as
well
as
well
as
a
senior
citizen.
E
So
I
don't
know
if
that
would
check
off.
N
Yeah,
unfortunately,
those
segments
of
roadway
or
roadways
you're
describing
do
not
qualify
under
ab43,
but
I
can
assure
you
what
we
do
on
a
regular
basis
is.
We
are
continuing,
looking
at
all
segments
of
roadways,
you
know
the
arterial
and
the
more
business
districts
to
see
if
we
can
modify
speed
limits
to
bring
them
down.
We,
you
know
we
have
to
go
through
a
process
for
that
as
well.
It's
more
extensive.
N
We
have
to
do
quite
a
bit
of
surveys,
analysis
of
speed
and
volume
of
those
roadways,
but
then,
when
we
can,
we
do
try
to
reduce
that
speed
limit
yeah
bring
in
bring
in
also
physical
changes
to
the
roadway,
because
if
we,
if
we
aren't
going
to
make
those
physical
changes,
the
speed
limits
are
going
to
stay
the
same.
As
you
know,
85th
percentile
of
most
of
the
drivers
are
just
going
to
drive
according
to
what
they
feel
comfortable
with.
N
It
doesn't
qualify
under
ab43,
it's
just
it
doesn't
meet
the
what
they
were
looking
for
under
that
which
was
really
a
more
really
localized
road,
with
a
business
district
that
meets
that
criteria.
That's
in
that
bill
and
if
you
look
at
the
chart
that
we
had
in
there
that
looks
at
the
criteria
that
the
8043
allows
roadways
like
alum
rock,
wouldn't
qualify.
N
It's
higher
volume,
higher
speed
right
now
so
and
and
the
surrounding
area
it
doesn't
qualify
for
that.
So,
okay.
E
In
the
future-
and
I
I
guess
it's
a
conversation
we'll
have
offline
but
but
I
wanted
to
have-
I
wanted
to
be
able
to
point
that
out
and
of
course,
there's
some
other
air
areas
in
the
district
where
I'm
very
concerned
just
because
they're
speeding
through
and
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
activity-
that's
really
starting
to
ramp
up
but
okay.
Thank
you.
So
much
all
right.
Thank.
E
A
All
right,
I'm
not
seeing
any
counsel,
let's
go
to
the
public
again
2.22
has
to
do
with
the
resolution
establishing
speed
limits.
Are
there
any
comments
from
members
of
the
public
tony.
D
Good
luck
on
this
issue,
all
right
boy,
beekman
here,
I
guess,
there's
you
know,
there's
a
number
of
issues
that
we're
trying
to
reconsider
idea
of
good
civic
practices.
Just
good
luck.
How,
as
a
community
effort,
we
can
talk
to
ourselves
in
working
towards
our
better
community
selves,
takes
a
lot
of
effort,
we're
kind
of
entering
a
new
era.
How
to
talk
about
these
issues,
I
think
kobe
did
not
help
things.
I
think
we
were
on
an
interesting
good
track.
D
You
know
pre-2020
good
luck,
how
we
can
be
returning
to
that
way
of
thinking.
That
was
how
we
were
thinking
at
that
time,
2018
and
2019,
and
what
we're
trying
to
develop
and
moving
towards
a
future
positive
sustainability,
basically
and
and
better
community
dialogue.
Open
democracy!
Good
luck!
If
we
work
on
those
things,
I
I
think
we
can
all
address
the
limit
issues
and
crime
issues
together
in
our
future.
Thank
you.
B
Not
yet
we're
going
to
go
to
full
consent.
Calendar
comment
right
in
a
second.
Q
K
Follow
the
right
process,
obviously
some
very
qualified
planning
commissioners
will
presumably
be
approved
today
by
the
council,
including
some
incumbents,
with
some
great
experience.
D
Hi
weather
beekman
here
I
wanted
to
comment
on
the.
D
For
this
part
station,
I
wanted
to
quick
quickly
try
to
offer
that
as.
D
Okay,
the
bard
thing's
ended.
I
wanted
to
quickly
comment
that
you
have
you're
doing
your
ordinance
stuff
today,
ordinance
that
would
be
passed
that
include
military
use
issues,
and
I
just
wanted
to
remind
ourselves
that
you
know
eight
years
ago
we
were
still
kind
of
in
an
era
of
military
and
warfare
and
and
we
were
basing
our
decisions
based
on
military
and
warfare
and
and
the
public
couldn't
talk
to
the
government
based
on
military
and
warfare.
D
I
just
wanted
to
thank
yourselves
for
that
for
those
efforts
and
to
notice
that
we
are
doing
that
sort
of
work
at
this
time
in
our
lives
and
that
we
can
continue
that
work
and
really
look
at
what
that
work
is
about
and
what
it's
doing
and
that's
you
know
the
open
public
policies
with
data
collection
and
technology
for
our
future.
That's
the
ideas
of
reimagine,
it's
the
ideas
of
a
racial
equity.
Basically,
it's
really
important
stuff.
D
We
really
have
a
way
to
work
towards
peace
in
our
future,
that
through
open
democracy,
that
I
think
we
really
have
to
explore
and
really
work
towards
and
continue
to
work
towards.
That's
how
we
get
out
of
this
era
of
covid
basically
and
work
towards
a
positive
sustainability
and
continue
that
path,
I
think,
can
address
a
number
of
issues,
including
the
war
in
ukraine.
Right
now,
with
that
all
said,
the
that
you're
approving
the
continuation
of
zoom
meetings
until
the
end
of
july.
I
hope
you
can
keep
zoom
meetings
up.
D
I
think
they
do
an
important
service,
and
hopefully
we
can
talk
about
that
some
more.
Thank
you,
vicky.
B
S
B
K
I'd
like
to
echo
what
mr
beekman
and
the
other
person
that
was
speaking
about
the
high
bread
meetings-
I
I
wouldn't
be
so
necessarily
ardent
about
it.
If
I
knew
that
emails
phone
calls,
faxes
and
stuff
made
any
difference,
because
I
really,
I
really
don't
think
they
do.
The
hybrid
meeting
offers
at
least
to
have
our
voice
heard
and
and
there's
usually
some
kind
of
response.
K
When
you
write
call
and
write
and
call
and
there's
no
response,
I
have
found
the
hybrid
meeting
because
trying
to
drive
down
in
san
jose
to
participate
it.
It's
it's
a
drive
for
a
lot
of
us.
You
know
if
I
took
the
bus
down
there,
it
would
take
me
an
hour
and
a
half
just
to
get
down
there,
so
I
would
appreciate
keeping
that
up
and
also
about
the
equity
issues
that
mr
baker
brought
up.
Thank
you.
B
K
I
wanted
to
chime
in
on
4.1.
Is
that
open
for
discussion
now
or
do
I
need
to
just
wait
a
little
longer.
A
Thank
you
all
right,
councilman
jimenez.
Would
you
consider
expanding
your
motion
include
all
the
consent
items.
Q
Q
K
F
A
B
A
Okay,
thank
you.
There's
a
commission
member
who
has
asked
that
we
accelerate
an
item
due
to
a
challenge
timing,
and
so
I'm
going
to
accommodate
that
request.
A
That
is,
item
3.4,
which
are
actions
related
to
measure
t
actually
the
item
right
after
3.3,
so
3.4
reactions
related
to
the
measure
t
stats
report
on
the
work
plan,
implementation
updates.
I
know,
there's
a
presentation,
hello,
matt
and
welcome
team.
I
Thank
you
mayor
and
city
council
matt
cano,
director
of
public
works
with
me
today,
is
arjun
batra,
the
chair
of
our
citizens,
oversight
committee,
catherine
brown,
deputy
director
and
aziza
emiry,
the
program
manager
for
measure
t
program
today
we're
presenting
to
you
both
the
annual
measure,
t
citizens,
oversight
committee
report,
as
well
as
the
staff
report
on
the
status
of
projects.
So
we
have
two
presentations
embedded
into
one
arjun.
Our
chair,
arjun
vatra,
is
going
to
start
followed
by
katherine
brown
and
then
myself
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
arjun.
J
Oh
all
right:
okay,
technical
correction,
good
afternoon,
honorable
mayor
council,
members,
members
of
the
staff
and
public
I'm
arjun
batra,
and
I'm
a
san
jose
resident
for
39
years.
Okay,
our
family
has
grown
here,
and
I'm
here
have
the
privilege
of
presenting
to
you
today.
The
annual
report
for
measure
t
community
oversight
committee's
behalf.
J
J
J
We're
part
of
measure
t
we
track
everything
about
those
projects,
the
expenditures,
their
progress,
their
achievements,
any
setbacks,
and
primarily
the
estimate
for
remaining
work.
What
will
it
take
to
complete
it,
and,
as
a
result
of
that,
we
are
able
to
give
you
the
report
which
you
have
asked
us.
It
tells
us
whether
we
are
consistent
in
our
spending
and
are
we
able
to
complete
all
the
work
which
you
wanted
us
to
complete
with
the
measure
t
what
you
promised
to
the
voters
taking
to
the
next
page
so
for
2021.
J
We
have
listed
on
our
report,
which
we
have
sent
to
you,
which
was
completed
in
february
on
february
9th.
We
highlighted
that
we
found
that
at
that
time,
the
all
these
expenditures
were
consistent
with
the
measure
t
approved
purpose
at
that
time.
Also,
the
dpw
expected
that
all
of
the
work
which
was
originally
foreseen
will
be
possible
to
complete
with
the
funds
available
and
what
funds
are
remaining
so
so
that
piece
of
the
progress
was
also
mentioned.
J
Then
we
mentioned
to
you
that
on
item
number,
five,
that
the
bond
issuance
and
expenditures
are
being
timed
to
ensure
compliance
with
our
irs
tax-exempt
guidelines
and
hence
the
bonds
will
be
properly
utilized
without
having
to
pay
any
taxes,
because
we
would
have
met
the
objectives
with
the
irs
has
laid
out
for
us.
So
the
2021
was
a
very
successful
year.
Dpw
did
an
astonishingly
good
job
and
we
were,
as
the
coc
were,
able
to
commend
them
on
their
work.
J
J
Now
this
debate
about
whether
the
project,
which
is
the
lake
cunningham
project,
how
worthy
it
is
how
many
people
are
willing
to
support.
It
is
really
not
the
issue.
The
issue
which
we
are
seeing
being
debated
is
that
that
whether
this
project
belongs
to
measure
t
listed
projects
or
not,
we
have
seen
mayor
ricardo's
and
dev
dave's.
This
council
member's
memo,
which
has
listed
in
detail,
given
all
the
explanation
necessary
to
say
that
this
project
does
not
belong
in
the
measure,
t
approved
purposes.
J
Now
we
have
to
respect
and
give
a
lot
of
weight
to
that
memo,
because
the
mayor
was
personally
involved
in
the
development
of
the
measure,
t
bond
measure
and
promote
it
personally
and
got
it
approved.
So
we
would
imagine
that
he
is
pretty
intimately
aware
of
what
this
project
is,
whether
it
meets
the
purpose
a
lot.
J
J
J
So
as
a
result,
we
believe
that
the
coc
would
request
that
if
you
want
to
fund
this
project-
and
you
do
fund
this
project,
we
will
be
setting
up
a
precedent
of
taking
the
money
from
the
measure,
t
and
funding
non-measure
t
projects
and
tomorrow,
a
request.
Today,
the
request
is
only
for
3.2
million
tomorrow,
the
request
may
be
for
30
million
and
a
precedent
would
have
been
set
and
we
would
not
be
able
to
refuse
the
second
request
any
better
than
we
would
be
able
to
request.
J
The
first
one,
so
we
have
recommended
that
if
you
want
to
fund
this
project
of
any
amount,
whether
one
dollar
or
even
10
dollars,
we
should
get
some
independent,
competent
authority
to
really
sign
off
and
say
that
this
project
truly
belongs
in
the
purpose
of
the
measure
t
for
which
the
the
voters
approve
this
project
at
the
bond.
So
we
would
have
that
somebody
who
is
really
accountable
and
signs
off
on
this
thing.
J
J
The
last
part
of
the
couple
of
items
I
want
to
take
one
minute
on
is
the
coc
is
a
15
member
state
committee.
You
had
authorized.
We
have
six
vacancies
on
it.
We
would
like
the
help
of
the
council
members,
because
they're
one
from
each
district
and
their
five
members
are
supposed
to
be
nominated
by
the
mayor.
We'd,
like
some
help
in
getting
those
vacancies
filled
so
that
citizen
citizen
can
do
the
job
which
you
want
us
to
do.
J
So
so
that
would
be
a
conclusion
of
my
report
and
recommendation
on
behalf
of
the
clc
and
thank
you
for
giving
me
the
chance
to
present
in
person
and
and
putting
it
on
the
agenda
earlier
then
now
it
was
likely
to
happen.
G
Thank
you,
chair
batra
good
afternoon,
mayor
and
council
members,
deputy
director,
kathryn
brown
of
public
works
and
we're
going
to
go
over
the
measure.
T
program
specifically
this
first
slide
just
gives
an
overview
and
a
reminder
of
what
measure
t
was.
So
this
was
a
measure
that
was
passed
in
november
of
2018
for
650
million
dollars
in
general
obligation,
bonds
for
a
wide
variety
of
infrastructure
needs.
G
G
On
to
the
measure
tree
street
repairs,
this
is
the
largest
funded
project
category
in
measure
t
with
300
million
dollars
allocated
to
road
rehabilitation
of
our
local
streets,
with
a
planned
spending
of
37.5
million
dollars
over
the
next
per
year.
Over
the
next
eight
years,
there
were
166
miles,
total
miles
completed
to
date
with
measure
t
funding,
87
completed
in
last
year's
construction
season
and
126
miles
planned
for
this
year.
G
20
million
dollars
of
measure
t
funds
are
allocated
to
the
repair
and
rehabilitation
of
our
san
jose
bridges.
45
bridge
maintenance
projects
have
been
completed
in
three
separate
packages
so
far
with
one
more
starting
in
construction.
As
of
last
month,
the
projects
are
continuing
to
accrue
the
bridge
investment
credits
for
grant
funded
bridge
projects
that
will
pending
available
the
availability
of
the
grants,
and
we
anticipate
roughly
three
million
in
credits
to
be
accumulated
after
the
completion
of
this
fourth
project.
G
Our
measure
t
street
lighting,
the
city
has
over
65
000
street
lights
in
total
inventory
and
have
successfully
completed
the
conversion
of
over
60
000,
most
recently
using
a
pg
e
turnkey
agreement,
as
well
as
our
own
city
forces
of
the
remaining
5
500
lights
to
be
converted.
5
000
of
these
are
ornamental
and
are
planning
to
be
done
with
city
forces
and
then
the
remaining
500
unique
fixtures
are
scheduled
to
be
completed
by
pg
e
later
this
year.
G
Our
measure
t
street
facility
or
sorry
city
facility
lighting,
roughly
70
of
the
lights,
have
been
converted
as
of
this
month
and
the
teams
should
be
finalizing
the
parks
and
trails
within
the
next
couple
of
months.
The
controller
procurement
was
completed
back
in
december
of
last
year
and
we
anticipate
the
installation
of
these
controllers
beginning
this
fall.
G
Next,
we
have
the
clean
water
and
green
stormwater
infrastructure
improvement
projects.
The
gsi
program
has
25
million
dollars
dedicated
to
this
category
of
projects.
First,
we
have
the
river
oaks
pump
station
or
storm
water
capture
project.
The
design
is
currently
underway
with
construction
completion,
completion
anticipated
in
december
of
2023.
G
This
project
was
originally
estimated
at
9.2
million,
6
million
coming
from
measure
t
and
3.2
from
grants.
With
recent
estimates,
we
anticipate
the
new
estimate
to
be
roughly
around
11
million
and
as
identified
in
our
supplemental
memo,
we
are
looking
for
ways
to
value
engineer
this
project
and
reduce
the
scope.
But
if
that
proves
to
be
unsuccessful,
we
will
utilize
funds
within
the
gsi
program
to
cover
the
overage.
G
The
second,
if
approved
by
council,
will
be
the
cityland
south
of
phelan.
This
project
is
currently
in
the
feasibility
phase
and,
lastly,
we
have
the
charcot
storm
drain
improvement
project.
This
is
also
in
the
design
phase
and
currently
planned
to
be
completed
in
two
phases
due
to
the
size
and
complexity
of
the
project.
Both
of
these
phases
are
anticipated
to
be
completed
in
early
2025.
G
The
teams
are
in
the
process
of
designing
for
priority
groups,
one
two
and
three
with
anticipated:
completion
dates;
construction,
completion
dates
in
2024,
as
identified
on
the
screen
for
the
priority
for
grouping
southside
and
cyprus.
These
have
been
identified
to
be
part
of
a
public
private
partnership,
so
those
have
not
started
design.
G
On
to
our
public
safety
projects,
we
have
starting
with
our
fire
stations.
We
have
completed
two
fire
stations
to
date,
fire
station
37
off
of
lincoln
avenue
and
will
glenn
and
then
fire
station
20,
which
is
the
attached
to
the
r
for
the
aircraft.
Rescue
and
firefighting
facility
at
the
airport
properties
have
been
identified
for
stations,
8,
32
and
36.
G
Both
fire
station
8
and
32
are
currently
in
design
and
fire
station
36
has
not
started
design
yet,
but
we
are
anticipating.
We
haven't
finalized
the
sale
of
the
property,
so
we're
anticipating
starting
design,
possibly
later
this
year
for
fire
station
23
staff
are
still
looking
for
a
property
to
fit
the
needs.
This
is
intended
to
be
a
co-development
with
housing
and
public
works
to
construct
a
fire
station
and
an
affordable
housing.
G
G
G
G
G
I
This
slide
shows
the
available
funding
and
measure
t
that
has
not
yet
been
allocated
to
specific
projects
between
our
public
safety
reserves,
interest
earnings
to
date,
critical
infrastructure
repairs
and
environmental
protection.
We
have
a
little
over
25
million
dollars
available.
It
should
be
noted
that
the
critical
infrastructure
repair
line
item
was
never
intended
for
public
safety.
It
was
a
carve
out
of
5
million
out
of
the
650
million
dollars
that
I
was
really
hopeful
would
be
available
at
the
end
of
this
to
meet.
I
Other
city
facility
needs
such
as
service
yards
or
just
other
buildings
that
need
work,
but
it
does
look
like
and
has
never
been,
allocated
or
discussed
to
be
allocated
or
committed
or
promised
to
any
specific
projects,
and
so,
as
you'll
see
here
later,
we
are
recommending
to
shift
it
into
help
solve
our
public
safety
challenges.
I
I
also
want
to
mention
that
of
this
25
million
dollars
a
little
over
three
million
dollars
of
this
in
june
2021
was.
It
was
directed
by
the
mayor
and
city
council
to
vote
to
keep
this
in
the
environmental
protection
category
as
savings.
I
It
was
not
allocated
to
a
specific
project
in
june
2021,
although
lake
cunningham
was
mentioned
as
a
possibility-
and
I
wanted
to
you,
know
arjuna
and
I
have
had
some
discussions
on
this
coc
chair
and
I
wanted
to
indicate
well,
there
may
be
a
difference
of
opinion
on
where
on
whether
to
keep
the
three
million
dollars
in
savings
in
environmental
protection
or
shifted
over
to
public
safety
or
another
category.
I
I
think
we
were
clear
in
our
staff
memo
and
I
want
to
double
down
and
be
extremely
clear,
that
wake
cunningham
is
a
great
possible
project
like
cunningham
is
absolutely
eligible
for
a
measure
measure,
t
funding
and
we've
we've.
I
was
kathryn
and
I
were
both
clear
with
the
citizens
oversight
committee
on
that
topic
last
week
in
the
public
meeting
as
well.
I
I
This
slide
shows
the
public
safety
needs.
As
of
our
current
estimates
and
by
current,
we
just
actually
got
a
new
estimate
yesterday
and
that
that
is-
and
this
is
why
this
is
a
little
different
from
the
presentation
we
had
as
of
yesterday.
This
does
include
the
second,
the
need
and
the
desire
for
the
second
company,
lockers
and
and
dorms
for
fire
station
32..
I
This
is
updated,
as
I
mentioned,
even
from
the
supplemental
memo
based
on
information
we
just
received
yesterday
on
our
police
air
support,
hangar
costs
coming
in,
unfortunately
higher
than
we
had
hoped,
as
can
be
seen
from
here.
We
have.
I
currently
have
a
6.3
million
dollar
need
for
these
projects,
that's
the
bottom
right
hand,
side
and
we
have
8.3
million
available,
and
so
that
does
show
a
2
million
surplus.
I
However,
that
assumes
that
we
would
be
using
the
savings
from
environmental
protection
towards
public
safety,
so
if
we
weren't
using
the
savings
from
environmental
protection
towards
public
safety,
we'd
be
currently
tracking
a
1
million
deficit
which,
in
the
scheme
of
city
budgets,
is
not
necessarily
huge
over
a
several
year
period.
But
I
want
to
address
that
more
as
we
go
here.
However,
I
do
want
to
stress
these
are
current
estimates.
They
seem
to
be,
unfortunately,
with
the
economy
changing
by
the
day
and
by
the
minute.
I
As
noted
in
our
supplemental
memo,
construction
prices
are
skyrocketing
and
extremely
difficult
to
predict.
We
are
getting
fewer
bidders
on
projects
and
higher
prices
in
previous
years,
the
construction
index
as
an
example
in
our
memo
for
our
area
increases
by
about
four
percent
annually.
This
year
it
increased
by
14
percent.
I
On
this
slide
is
it's
an
attachment
to
our
supplemental
memo.
It
shows
the
schedules
for
our
remaining
public
safety
projects,
and
I
know
it's
harder
to
read
on
the
screen
here,
but
there
are
markers
in
here
about
when
we're
going
to
be
getting
estimates
in
and
if
you
can
see
it,
there's
a
number
three
marker
for
each
little
diamond
for
on
each
of
these,
and
that
number
three
indicates
when
we're
going
to
get
the
95
percent
estimate
for
our
project.
I
The
95
estimate
is
usually
very,
very
solid,
really
typically
pretty
accurately
predicts
what
we're
going
to
get
it
accounts
for
any
inflation
that
is
anticipated
between
the
time
of
the
estimate
and
the
bid,
and
your
project
is
pretty
much
fully
designed.
By
that
time
we
will
have
95
estimates
on
all
of
our
public
safety
projects,
except
fire
stations,
23
and
36
by
the
end
of
this
calendar
year
so
by
december.
I
Given
the
timing
of
our
estimates
coming
in
and
the
volatility
of
the
market
right
now,
we
feel
that
waiting
until
february
2023
to
make
a
recommendation
on
allocating
any
unallocated
funding
would
be
prudent
to
ensure
that
the
mayor
and
city
council
are
working
with
the
best
available
information
and
if
all
the
estimates
are
coming
in
in
december,
it
takes
us
a
little
little
time
to
absorb
that
news.
Draft,
a
staff
report
and
that's
why
we're
recommending
february.
I
And
finally,
I
want
to
close
with
some
thoughts
on
the
path
forward.
A
year
ago,
I
felt
comfortable
based
on
our
professional
estimates,
that
we
had
a
good
shot
at
delivering
on
all
the
public
safety
commitments
within
or
close
to
the
available
measure
t
budget.
However,
the
volatility
right
now
is
extreme
and
extremely
hard
to
predict,
and
I
anticipate
more
not
great
or
bad
news
on
estimates
to
come
over
the
next
few
months.
I
Unless
there's
a
recession,
we'll
likely
be
faced
with
a
significant
challenge
on
delivering
every
one
of
these
public
safety
projects,
I'm
committed
to
figuring
out
how
to
do
it,
but
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
challenging
than
I
had
hoped.
Whether
the
final
number
that
we
need
to
supplement
measure
t
is
5
10,
15
million
dollars.
I
I
don't
know
right
now
and
it's
really
hard
to
predict,
but
we
are
likely
unless
there's
a
recession
going
to
have
to
supplement
measure,
t
to
make
sure
we
can
build
all
the
projects
and-
and
unfortunately,
is
typically
the
last
project
that
that
would
that
suffers
like
fire
station
37
did
in
the
last
public
safety
bond
measure
and
we're
tracking
fire
station
23
as
the
last
project
here
and
I'm
committed
to
figuring
out
how
to
build
it.
But
I
am
just
being
realistic
right
now
that
it
is
going
to
be
challenging.
I
We
will
continue
to
work
diligently,
moving
forward
with
the
city,
manager's
office,
the
budget
office
and
others
on
a
plan
to
resent
council
in
february
and
with
let
me
just
close
and
with
that-
I'm
not
going
to
read
through.
But
we
did
slightly
change
our
recommendation
to
on
the
supplemental
memo
to
to
shift
that
policy
decision
on
the
use
of
that
remaining
eight
million
dollars
until
february,
and
then
obviously
it's
the
council
of
the
union
council's
decision.
But
that
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
Q
Thank
you
mayor,
our
folks
at
the
county
disappear
for
hours
during
their
zoo
meetings.
I'm
glad
we're
all
here
just
happened
to
walk
with
the
group
that
was
inspecting
the
park
on
fixing
this
lake
and
pointed
out
a
lot
of
things.
They
didn't
know
a
lot
of
folks
in
evergreen
field.
This
park
is
ghetto
and
we
take
a
lot
of
money
out
millions,
but
we
don't
put
money
back
in
I'd
like
to
know
who
the
yahoo
was
at
designed
this
lake.
We
want
our
money
back.
Q
All
these
things
to
keep
our
kids
off
the
streets,
also
the
beauty
of
it,
but
he
decided
not
to
have
any
water
coming
in
and
no
water
coming
out.
The
water
just
sits
there
and
rots,
and
so
after
what
30
years,
or
so,
it's
no
longer
usable
things
that
make
money
there,
we
got
raging
waters
millions.
Q
You
guys
hit
us
for
10
bucks
to
go
into
the
park,
there's
underused
skatepark,
but
you
guys
take
all
this
money
out.
Let's
put
it
back
into
our
park,
let's
bring
some
water
in
from
the
hills.
Q
Q
B
Thank
you,
jeremy
burus.
F
Last
june,
this
council
took
steps
to
advocate
for
3.2
million
dollars
to
fund
the
environmental
justice
and
water
quality
improvements
at
lake
cunningham.
F
Due
to
years
and
years
of
the
deteriorating
water
quality
at
lake
cunningham,
recreational
activities
like
swimming,
kayaking
and
more
were
taken
away
from
east
san
jose
families.
This
really
is
an
environmental
justice
issue
and
saving
lake
cunningham
would
provide
environmental
and
community
benefits
to
counter
the
effects
of
climate
change
in
east
san
jose.
F
This
council
took
some
great
steps
last
june
in
saving
some
of
the
leftover
funds
and
measure
t's
environmental
and
flood
protection
projects
for
lake
cunningham,
and
we
need
to
see
it
through
and
remember.
We
may
not
see
this
opportunity
ever
again,
so
I
urge
the
council
to
please
approve
the
memo
authored
by
council
members,
arenas,
cohen
and
carrasco.
Thank
you.
D
All
right,
claire
b,
queen
here
thanks
for
this
item-
I'm
sorry
I
missed
the
measure
t
public
meeting
last
week
I
wanted
to
attend.
I
was
busy,
it
was
nice
to
hear
them
speak
today
on
the
item.
I
know
during
the
mayor's
budget
time
in
may.
He
was
a
bit
saddened
that
they
did
not.
The
city
did
not
take
a
few
more
proactive
steps
towards.
F
D
Calling
attention
to
measure
t
programs
in
some
way-
and
I
know
at
the
same
time
in
the
past
year,
measure
t
has
been
asking
as
a
board.
How
can
their
public
oversight
process
be
a
bit
more
open
in
public?
Basically,
I
feel,
and
how
can
they
garner
a
bit
more
attention
and
make
it
a
more
community
process?
I
don't
know
if
that's
fully
it,
but
I
think
that's
something
of
what's
being
asked
for
good
luck
in
those
sort
of
efforts.
D
I
know
the
work
I
do
I've
mentioned
before
with
technology
and
accountability
can
be
of
a
lot
of
help.
It's
guidelines
and
it's
organizational
ideas
can
be
a
lot
of
help
for
your
group
at
this
time.
I
know,
for
instance,
what
you
described
today
that
you
are
going
to
be
there's
many
future
projects
that
measure
t
is
going
to
be
working
on.
D
Besides,
it's
retrofitting
projects,
it's
fire
station
projects,
they're
gonna,
possibly
involve
the
use
of
both
road
servicing
and
the
use
of
technology,
and
it's
it's
important
that
we
have
good
understandings
of
the
technology
oversight,
that's
possible
at
this
time
and
the
good
guidelines
and
towards
open
public
policies
and
understand
the
depth
of
data
collection
and
then
surveillance
and
and
and
it's
all
of
that
that
can
help
organize.
I
think
some
really
good
practices
for
yourselves
and
the
future
of
the
measure
t
program
and
what
you
need
to
be
working
on
at
this
time.
D
Good
luck
on
those
efforts
and-
and
this
sort
of
good
work
from
all
of
us.
Thank
you.
B
B
K
Garcia,
hello,
hello,
my
name
is
eddie
garcia
and
I'm
a
district
8
resident,
and
I
I
just
want
to
say
that
lake
cunningham
is
an
amazing
asset
to
the
east
valley,
actually
to
the
whole
valley.
R
K
B
F
Hi
there,
my
name
is
shreya
and
I'm
calling
as
a
san
jose
resident
and,
on
behalf
of
mothers
and
allies
out
front
for
climate
change,
to
urge
the
city
council
to
approve
this
memo
to
invest
and
revitalize
lake
cunningham.
As
it's
been
mentioned,
the
years
of
deteriorating
water
quality
has
taken
away.
Recreational
activities
like
swimming
and
kayaking
away
from.
O
F
J
K
Dear
city
council,
my
name
is
juan
estrada
and
I
represent
green
foothills,
which
has
protected
open
space,
farmlands
and
natural
resources
in
santa
clara
and
san
mateo
counties
for
60
years.
In
what
may
be
new
information
for
the
presenter
from
the
citizens
oversight
committee,
there
were
countless
organizations
and
individuals
responsible
for
the
success
of
measure.
T
thank
you
to
city
staff
for
educating
the
speaker
on
the
fed
that
a
late
cunningham
water
quality
improvement
project
is
eligible
for
the
remaining
3.2
million
in
natural
flood
and
water
quality
protection
funds.
K
We
ask
that
you
spend
the
remaining
3.2
million
to
address
water
quality
contamination
at
lake
cunningham,
rather
than
redirecting
it
to
construction
projects.
The
question
at
hand
isn't
whether
a
proposed
construction
project
is
worthy
of
funding
or
not
that's
a
separate
topic.
The
question
is
whether
funds
should
be
shifted
from
water
quality
to
pay
for
it.
For
health
and
equity
reasons
you
all
intuitively
know.
The
answer
is
no.
K
Regarding
the
new
proposal
to
defer
a
decision,
you
have
an
opportunity
today
to
take
a
step
towards
rehabilitation
of
a
critical
city
lake
that
serves
all
residents
of
san
jose.
We
don't
need
a
way
to
determine
whether
funding
is
needed.
We
already
know
it's
needed.
Delaying
a
decision
would
simply
delay
action
which
would
delay
justice.
San
jose
residents
also
understand
that
rome
wasn't
built
in
a
day.
K
The
community
understands
that
3.2
million
will
take
a
step
towards
improved
water
quality
and
that
much
more
will
be
needed
to
fully
restore
and
fix
lake
cunningham,
there's
no
need
to
hesitate
and
delay
justice
simply
because
3.2
million
won't
fix
everything.
Lastly,
I
also
ask
you
to
consider
that
there's
also
potential
opportunity
to
leverage
the
3.2
million
in
environmental
funding.
As
you're
aware
most
state
grant
funds
expect
that
there
will
be
a
locally
sourced
match.
A
city
that
applies
for
grant
funding
without
committing
any
of
its
own
funding
is
not
likely
to
succeed.
K
Name
is
eddie
garcia
and
I'm
a
district
8
resident,
and
I
just
want
the
council
to
know
that
my
family
and
I
all
of
whom
live
in
district
8,
fully
support
an
investment
in
lake
huntingham.
It
is
an
amazing
asset
to
the
east
valley
and
to
a
whole
valley
as
a
whole.
So
please
support
this
memo
and
please.
K
K
K
E
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you
so
much
for
for
the
work
that
you're
doing
matt
I
and,
of
course
right
now,
what's
on
my
mind,
is
lee
cunningham.
I.
E
You
know
I
often
go
there
with
the
kids
and
pre-covet
we
were.
E
We
were
going
to
the
skate
park
there
and
we
were
really
looking
forward
to
the
what
do
they
call
it
the
bmx
park
and-
and
I
often
run
there
and
I'm
I'm
really
amazed
at
how
the
diversity
of
folks
that
come
and
use
it,
whether
it's
very
early
in
the
morning
or
throughout
the
day
or
and
late
in
the
evening
and
the
age,
the
difference
in
ages
and
and
folks
really
from
all
over
the
area.
E
It's
it's
a
park,
that's
really
put
to
great
use
and
and
in
spite
of
the
the
the
deferred
maintenance
and
the
fact
that
it's
actually
really
really
stinky.
You
know-
and
I
actually
say
that
very
lovingly.
E
But
it's
really
very
you
know
it's
not
a
pleasant
smell,
but
people
love
love
their
park
and
and
it's
you
know,
and
I
find
the
charm
in
it.
I
actually
find
it
very
beautiful
and
when
I'm
jogging
and
gasping
for
air
I
I
still
see
the
beauty
and
the
the
nature,
and
it
really
is.
You
know
someone
was
talking
about
all
the
wildlife
it
it's
it
for
those
who
haven't
been
there.
E
I
invite
you
to
go
there
and
if
you
can
see
past
the
the
you
know
the
lack
of
upkeep
it's
a
beautiful
park,
and
so
I
guess
the
question
is
I
you
know
you
know,
I'm
I'm
very
concerned
about
what
we
can
do
there
and
actually-
and
I
don't
know
if,
if
raging
waters
is
still
up
and
running,
I
I've
not
been
there.
Since
I
was
in
high
school,
which
is
a
really
long
time
ago,.
E
I
E
Okay,
so
we
don't
run
the
the
amusement
park
piece.
Q
E
It
correct,
but
but
we're
no
longer
fishing
in
there
and
and
doing
classes,
sailing
and
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
because
we
used
to
we
actually
used
to
have
classes
on
the
lake.
E
Now
we
have,
you
know
the
little
boats
there
that
are
just
they're,
not
operable
or
they're,
not
we're
not
putting
them
out
on
the
lake
anymore.
For.
I
The
same
reason:
correct
yeah,
we're
not
doing
the
fishing
and
I
participated
on
those
ones,
we're
not
doing
the
fishing
or
the
water
activities
anymore.
E
Right
now
such
a
shame,
yeah,
and
so
so,
if
we
could
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
are
the
plans
in
the
next
several
years,
five
years,
ten
years,
love
to
have
that
asset
brought
back
to
the
community.
I
Sure,
thank
you
for
your
question.
Councilmember
and,
as
I
said
previously
like
cam
cunningham
is
a
tremendous
asset
to
the
city
and
it
needs
investment
and
and
it
if
we
were
able
to
invest
money
in
it,
it
would
be
for
a
great
purpose
and
a
very
necessary
purpose.
We
did
a
preliminary
study
focused
on
what
it
may
take,
or
did
a
study.
I
I
would
say
to
focus
on
what
it
may
take
to
hit
the
water
so
that
we
can
start
up
water
contact
activities
again,
whether
they
be
boating
and
or
fishing,
and
it's
a
very
conceptual
process
and
there's
a
lot
of
assumptions.
I
Our
preliminary
estimate
to
get
it
to
the
point
where
we
can
probably
have
water
activities
again
is
about
26
million
dollars.
However,
I
don't
want
that
price
tag
to
scare
anybody,
because
there's
a
lot
of
great
things
that
can
be
done
with
smaller
dollar
amounts
to
enhance
the
experience
at
lake
huntingham
such
as
there's
pathways
right
now
that
are
deteriorating
into
the
lake.
The
asphalt
you
can
see
big
cracks,
that's
something
after
walkers
and
joggers
around
the
lake
is
very
important.
I
I
So
you
get
kind
of
the
churn
of
water
and
fresh
water
comes
in
and
then
the
other
water
leaves
out
and
it
kind
of
flows
through
lake
cunningham
is
just
like
a
a
bucket
that
just
takes
in
water,
mostly
from
rainwater
that
you
know,
rains
on
the
surface
picks
up
the
geese,
droppings
on
the
way
into
the
lake
or
that
seeps
in
as
well,
and
there's
no
outflow
of
that.
And
so
it's
a
it's
a
big
challenge
a
minute
to,
and
it
will
be
a
big
challenge
to
get
it
consistently
clean.
I
But,
as
I
said
before,
there's
definitely
a
great
number
of
projects
we
can
do,
even
if
that
would
be
steps
towards
getting
it
to
where
it
needs
to
be,
and
we
do
have.
There
was
prior
direction
for
us
and
I
think
there
may
be
direction
today
for
public
works
and
parks
and
rec
to
come
back
to
the
mayor
and
city
council.
At
a
future
date
with
a
detailed
presentation
on
the
study,
and
so
we're
definitely
prepared
to
do
that,
the
study
is
being
wrapped
up
right
now.
I
Actually,
it'll
be
kind
of
finalized
within
about
two
weeks
and
so
it'll
be
ready
for
you
know
to
provide
to
the
public
in
in
the
next
few
weeks,
and
then
we
can
come
back
to
the
city
council
when,
when
appropriate
and
when
needed,
yeah.
E
E
I
I
I
you
know,
I'm
I'm
I'm
having
this
emotional
rollercoaster.
You
know,
but
but
but
as
as
my
kids
are,
are
becoming
young
adults
and
they're.
Looking
in
terms
of
where
they're
going
to
study
and
and
even
this
conversation
about
where
they're
going
to
live,
they
continue
to
talk
about
the
amenities
of
cities.
E
We
all
do
don't
we
we
all
do
and
and
even
when
they
talk
about
where
they
live
in
this
city,
they
they
talk
about
this
side
of
the
district
or
that
side
of
the
district
or
downtown
or
what
you
know
and-
and
you
know
the
east
side
of
san
jose-
has
some
really
awesome
amenities
and
I've
said
this.
I've
been
saying
this,
you
know
for
years.
The
issue
is
whether
or
not
we
preserve
them.
We
invest
in
them.
E
E
But
again,
east
of
101
is
a
very
densely
populated
side
of
the
city
and
and
we've
been
deferring
maintenance
and
we
haven't
been
prioritizing
the
fact
that
it
needs
so
much.
Tlc
is
also
a
testament
to
what
we've
been
saying
over
and
over
and
over
and
over,
especially
since
especially
since
covet
hit,
especially
since
george
floyd
was
killed.
E
That
redlining
had
an
impact
that
the
policies
of
yesterday
had
an
impact
on
what
we're
seeing
today
and
among
those
policies
were
a
lot
of
under
investment
and
different
maintenance,
and
so
you
have
pal.
You
have
emma
push
park
and
we
saw
the
price
tag
on
that.
E
E
If
you
have
the
assets
they
come
out
and
they
do
it
organically,
because
that's
the
way
community
is
bonded,
but
we
have
to
invest
in
those
in
those
assets
and
I
envision
cunningham
park
as
one
of
those
assets
right
in
the
middle
of
a
of
a
district,
it
it
bonds,
district,
8
to
district
5
and
district
4
and
the
hills
and
unincorporated
areas.
E
You
know
when
you
play
in
a
park
and
you
commune
in
a
park.
It
doesn't
matter
what
your
economic
status
is
and
it
doesn't
matter
what
kind
of
house
you
live
in.
E
You
commune
together
and
you
experience
life
together,
but
but
I
I
I
just
hope
that
we
can
truly
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
continue
to
invest
in
these
assets
that
are
just
decaying
right.
Before
our
very
eyes.
I
mean
the
I'm
telling
you.
The
stench
is
not
it's
not
pleasant,
especially
on
a
very
hot
day,
and
especially
when
you're
gasping
for
air
and
you're,
not
in
great
shape.
You
know,
but
and
cunningham
is
just
it's
one
of
them
to
envision.
E
You
know,
council,
member
arenas
does
a
a
beautiful,
very
large
community
event
there
and
it
gets
filled.
People
love
it
there,
but
I
can
envision
yoga
days.
People
go
out
there
and
they
do
tai
chi,
but
be
able
to
support
families
who
want
to
do
those
kind
of
things.
E
We
need
to
be
able
to
provide
the
the
venues
first
to
be
able
to
to
bring
people
out
and
be
able
to
have
healthy
lifestyles
and
and
be
environmentally
minded
anyway.
So
I'm
interested
in
hearing
my
council
colleagues
comments
on
a
lot
of
this.
A
A
What
was
mentioned
this
specific
project
for
vegetated
bioswale,
and
I
I
guess
I
want
to
go
back
in
time
and
I'm
not
sure
if
you
were
in
the
room,
but
I
can
remember
having
this
conversation
with
angel
rios
and
dave,
and
I
think
you
were
in
the
room
too.
So
we
were
talking
about
bond
measures
and
how
we'd
like
to
see
if
we
could
restore
lake
cunningham
and
link
almaden
to
recreational
lakes
again
and
make
them
great
public
amenities-
and
I
recall,
being
told
exactly
what
you
described,
which
was
hey.
A
You
got
somehow
another
crate
flow
for
that
water,
or
else
you've
got
still
water
and
you've
got
what
we
have
today,
and
so
I'm
trying
to
understand
that
the
26
million
dollar
tab
does
that
does
that
get
us
outflow
or
what
does
it
take
to
get
flowing
water?
So
we
have
some
hope
of
actually
having
safe
water.
I
Sure
thank
you
mayor
for
your
question
and
katherine
to
help
me.
If
I
miss
anything
here,
you
know
it
does
not
get
us
outflow.
It
doesn't
get
us
a
creek
that
outflows
continuously,
which
would
be
ideal.
What
it
does
get
us
is
a
an
ecosystem
that
can,
in
a
way
keep
have
the
best
shot
at
keeping
itself
clean.
I
In
addition
to
the
vegetated
soils
which
would
capture
the
water
coming
in
and
clean
it
before
it
gets
in
the
lake.
There
are
things
such
as
the
wetlands,
basically
taking
a
big
portion
of
the
grass
area
and
creating
wetlands
that
would
basic
would
that
would
help
keep
the
lake
water
thriving
and
then
also
the
mechanical
devices
that
would
churn
the
water
and
those
specific.
There
are
some
items
that
would
not
be
measure
t
eligible
like
the
mechanical
devices,
probably
wouldn't,
but
most
of
the
26
million
dollars.
I
I
mean
not
that
we're
not
recommending
that
much
for
measure
t,
but
it
would
be,
and
so
it
is
really
creating
through
wetlands
and
bioswales
and
mechanical
devices
that
keep
the
water
churning
from
the
bottom
to
the
top
and
an
ecosystem
that
has
the
best
shot
at
keeping
itself
clean.
It
is
not
as
as
ideal
necessarily
as
lake
almaden,
for
example,
has
a
river
that
runs
through
it.
So
there's
you
know
better
opportunities
there.
I
I
I
I
don't
think
we
could
use
this
money
for
that
and
and
by
the
biosoils,
is
an
example
of
what
we
could
use
the
money
for.
If,
if
money
was
provided
to
lake
cunningham
from
measure
t,
we
would
have
a
process
with
parks
and
rec,
of
course,
taking
the
lead
with
the
council
office
and
the
community
to
decide
what
the
kind
of
best
project
is
for
that
three
million.
A
A
And
as
I
was,
and
as
I'm
thinking
about
today,
I'm
just
wondering
the
3.2
million
invested
today.
Is
that
going
to
fundamentally
change
the
problem
of
water
not
being
safe
for
people
to
be
able
to
engage
in
recreational
activity
or
water?
That's
creating
an
odor
in
a
park,
or
are
we
going
to
get
some
bios
whales
and
sort
of
hope
that
we
can
get
capital
money
someday
to
do
the
heavy
lifting.
I
So
the
fundamentally
change:
if,
if
we
did
the
bioswale
project,
it
likely
would
not
fundamentally
change
the
situation.
I
Probably
not,
however,
and
the
sooner
we
start
filtering
the
geese
poop
from
entering
the
lake,
the
the
kind
of
quicker
we
can
eventually
get
the
lake
clean,
and
so
if
we
do
a
project
now
and
start
and
again
and
start
filtering
the
water
coming
into
the
lake
now
better,
you
know
we
probably
wouldn't
be
able
to
make
a
major
advancement
until
we
may
build
the
wetlands
in
the
future,
but
it
would
make
it
that
much
quicker
in
the
future,
because
the
the
bioswales
would
have
already
started
to
work
yeah.
I
A
Okay,
so
I
appreciate
this
cumulative
work
here
and
some
of
that
work
like
the
walkways,
I'm
guessing,
doesn't
have
a
lot
to
do
necessarily
with
the
specific
environmental
issue
we're
trying
to
deal
with,
which
is
the
polluted
water,
but
would
be
a
nice
amenity
to
improve
the
park.
Is
that
is
that
fair
to
say.
G
A
The
city
made
a
promise
to
us
to
build
station.
37
hasn't
done
a
darn
thing
for
20
years,
and
you
know
I
had
the
pleasure
of
celebrating
with
council
member
davis,
the
opening
of
that
station
and
she
stopped
in
and
others
just
a
couple
weeks
ago.
A
I
think
there
was
a
certain
sense
of
relief
from
a
lot
of
members
of
that
community
because
in
particular,
as
I
understand
when
we
were
looking
at
emergency
medical
response
times,
that
was
a
real
pain
point
for
us
because
of
the
lack
of
a
facility
that
could
provide
immediate
response
for
a
very
large
sloth
of
the
resonance
and
that
building
that
station
obviously
helped
release
pressure
on
other
stations.
A
So
I
I'm
really
concerned
about
repeating
the
mistakes
of
the
past
and
I'm
particularly
concerned
about
repeating
those
mistakes
without
having
all
the
information
and
I'm
not
going
to
be
on
this
council
in
february,
and
several
of
us
won't
be
on
it.
But
enough
of
us
will
be
I'm
confident
enough
to
trust
that
that
council
will
make
a
better
decision,
because
they'll
have
more
information
than
we
will
than
I
will
about
how
best
to
spend
these
scarce
dollars.
A
But
I
suspect
that
if,
at
the
end
of
the
day
we're
spending
money
on
other
things
and
station
23
goes
unfunded,
there's
going
to
be
a
future
mayor
and
a
future
council,
that's
going
to
have
a
real
hard
time.
A
Persuading
voters
in
that
part
of
the
city
never
support
a
citywide
initiative,
because
they
feel
somehow
know
that
they
have
been
shortchanged
and
I
think
we
need
to
talk
to
our
future
selves,
just
as
we
communicate
to
our
pastels
and
that's
a
very
important
conversation
I
think,
to
have
in
this
business
a
city
building,
because
these
investments
are
very
important.
I've
heard
certainly
from
the
community
supporting
investments
in
cunningham,
and
I
think
that
is
an
incredibly
important
city
asset
and
that's
why
we
spent
a
lot
of
time.
A
I
think
in
2018,
looking
at
whether
or
not
we
make
a
commitment
there
or
not-
and
I
know
we
talked
about
in
the
context
of
a
parks
bond
as
well,
but
it
seems
to
me
these
are
trade-offs
best
made
with
all
the
information
and
what
I'm
concerned
about
is
those
residents
who
may
well
live
around
that
fire
station?
Who
aren't
part
of
this
conversation
because
they're
not
aware
that
this
conversation
is
happening
because
they
may
not
be
aware
of
what's
at
stake.
A
So
I
think
it
is
good
for
us
simply
to
follow
staff
recommendation
and
let's
appreciate
that,
we
don't
know
what
we
don't
know.
This
is
a
fast-changing
environment
with
regard
to
construction
costs.
We've
seen
that,
certainly
as
a
dramatic
change
in
cost
over
the
last
two
years-
and
you
know
we
all
hope-
there's
no
recession
on
the
horizon,
but
I
guess
the
one.
A
The
one
silver
lining
in
a
very
dark
cloud
of
a
recession
is,
we
might
end
up
getting
a
whole
lot
better
bids,
and
maybe
that
will
change
the
choices
we
make
and
we'll
be
able
to
make
even
better
choices
and
serve
more
of
our
residents
as
a
result.
So,
like
I
say,
I
support
the
staff
recommendation.
Let's
make
the
decision
when
we
have
more
and
better
information,
all
right,
councilman
awareness.
T
Thank
you.
I
I
appreciate
that.
We
we
don't
know
what
we
don't
know,
but
what
we
do
know
is
that
history,
when
we
don't
make
different
decisions,
will
repeat
itself
and
back
when
council
member
about
senator
cortezzi,
who
was
a
council
member
back,
then
there
was
a
study
that
had
been
completed
and
that
the
city
knew
was
there
that
could
begin
to
to
address
some
of
the
issues
that
we're
starting
to
talk
about
right
now
about
lake
huntingham.
T
Yet
there
wasn't
any
action,
there
isn't
any
priority,
and
I
fear
that
it's
also
has
to
do
with
what
councilmember
carrasco
was
laying
out
in
her
points
earlier,
and
that
is
that
there
is
a
lot
of
redlining
and
a
lot
of
policies
that
still
created
this
cycle
of
institutional
racism
and
and
some
of
our
policies
supported.
T
That,
for
example-
and
I've
said
this
before
the
way
that
we
chose
what
community
centers
stayed
open
after
the
recession
and
those
that
stayed
open
were
the
ones
that,
in
the
places
where
those
communities
could
afford
it,
not
where
our
communities
needed
those
community,
centers
and
those
classes,
but
where
our
community
could
pay
for
them.
And
that
is
not
an
equity-based
decision.
T
It
is
a
financial
decision
that
doesn't
take
into
account
who
we're
leaving
out
of
the
conversation
and
I'm
afraid
that
once
again,
we're
going
to
begin
to
do
the
same
thing
with
lake
cunningham.
T
K
T
Me
you've
heard
how
important
our
community
and-
and
I
also
want
to
thank
our
community
for
calling
everyone
who's
called
in
and
just
expressed,
either
through
email
or
through
phone
call
or
being
in
person.
Thank
you,
mr
bennett,
for
being
here
and
expressing
your
fondness
and
your
love
of
this
park
and
also
calling
us
out
on
our
lack
of
commitment
to
lake
cunningham,
because
that's
what
it
is.
There's
another
lake
that
we
have
in
our
city
and
that
lake
offers
on
the
water,
sports
and
activities.
T
And
yet
we
can't
get
the
the
lake
on
the
east
side
clean
enough
for
us
to
touch
the
water.
Much
less
have
any
kind
of
activity
on
top
of
the
water,
and
I've
also
been
campaigning
in
this
primary
and
I've
knocked
on
doors,
especially
around
lake
cunningham,
and
the
first
priority
that
they
expressed
was
well
first.
T
They
expressed
the
love
for
this
lake
and
the
park
and
how
often
they
visited
and
how
this
was
part
of
their
daily
ritual
of
of
walking
over
to
the
park
about
making
the
rounds
around
the
park,
or
just
many
reasons
that
are
just
absolutely
re-energizing.
T
For
lots
of
folks
who
sometimes
get
stuck
in
a
daily
grind
or
for
folks
who
are
now
retired
and
don't
have
to
deal
with
some
of
that
stuff,
so
they
have
lake
cunningham
to
enjoy,
but
unfortunately,
like
councilmember
carrasco
mentioned,
you
know,
there's
a
stench
there's
a
stench,
and
this
is
not
the
first
salt
for
this
lake.
T
I
have
already
approached
the
valley
of
water
because
it
was
valley
waters
doing
to
stop
that
outflow
for
lake
cunningham.
They
did
not
want
to
be
part
of
the
solution
to
see.
If
we
can
begin
to
address
this,
and
so
we've
we've
been
trying
to
figure
out
how
what
kind
of
funding?
What
can
we
get
an
updated
study?
We
don't
even
have
the
updated
study,
and
so
I
agree
with
you
mayor
that
we
don't
know
what
we
don't
know.
T
We
don't
know
what,
if
there's
any
easy
solves
for
the
moment,
that
could
benefit
the
and
improve
the
quality
of
the
water
at
lake
huntingham
and
based
on
that
list,
that
we
saw
in
the
report
there's
at
least
four
items,
one
of
which
is
making
sure
that
the
that
the
the
edge
of
the
lake
has
maybe
some
tree
plants
or
that
there
isn't
a
a
a
kind
of
beach
area
there.
Because
that's
what
attracts
all
of
the
the
geese
and
the
ducks
to
come
into
the
water.
T
So
there
isn't
a
landing
for
them.
If
you
will
they're
less
likely
to
come
into
the
lake.
But
this
is
how
they
usually
get
into
the
into
the
lake
and,
like
you
said
that
there's
there's
some
things
that
we
can
do
like
the
tree.
T
Planting
like
the
the
flow
through
wetland
at
the
big
moto
is
something
that
is
not
doesn't
take
the
whole
26
million,
but
there's
at
least
four
items
on
that
table
within
that
study
that
we,
that
matt
you've
been
kind
enough
to
share
with
us,
and
and
and
thank
you
for
your
support
and
diligency
and
in
making
sure
that
we
complete
this
study,
and
then
it's
not
official.
Yet
though,
so
I
think
this
is.
This
is
very
premature.
T
I
I'd
love
to
see
what
other
sources
of
of
revenue
that
we
can
use.
T
Lake
cunningham
is
already
one
of
the
best
examples
of
a
private
public
partnership.
We
have
raging
waters
on
site
and
I
don't
know
that
there's
any
other
park
like
this,
and
so
we
already
have
that.
What
we
need
is
some
additional
revenues
and
grants
that
that
we
can
apply
to
almost
always
ask
for
a
matching
fund.
So
what
do
we?
You
know?
Where
is
that
money
gonna
come
from
how
are
go?
T
How
are
we
one
going
to
do
some
of
the
smaller
scale
items
that
are
that
are
on
the
table
that
can
improve
the
quality
of
the
water
and
then,
if
we
are
going
to
apply
for
grants?
Where
are
we
gonna
get
this
the
matching
funds
from
and
so
th?
This
is.
This
is
not
about
whether
the
fire
stations
yeah
get
completed
or
are
a
priority
because
they
absolutely
are.
T
I
just
want
to
make
very
clear
that
all
of
the
fire
stations
are
very
important
not
only
to
to
those
folks
who
have
already
expressed
their
support,
but
to
me
as
well
in
all
of
my
all
of
my
residents
personally,
I
know
that
my
my
mom
benefited
from
from
their
service
when
she
was
at
home
and
needed
to
go
through
a
on
an
ambulance
and
have
some
emergency
service,
and
so
I
understand
the
value
of
that
very
at
a
very
personal
level.
T
I
want
to
make
sure
that
there
is
enough
funding
for
our
fire
stations.
It
is
not.
It
is
not
beneficial
to
pit
anything
against
one
another,
because
it's
not
solving
the
solution.
Finding
a
solution
to
the
problem
that
we
can
that
we
will
continue
to
have,
and
so
one
of
the
questions
that
I
have
for
you
mayor
is,
if
you
could
think
of
a
source
of
revenue
you've
been
here
longer
than
I
have,
and
you
know
our
city's
infrastructure
much
better
than
I.
A
Yeah,
I
obviously
I'm
only
speaking
off
the
top
my
head,
but
there
is
a
record
amount
of
state
funding
right
now
for
projects
that
have
environmental
benefit,
a
record
amount
and
I
certainly
be
happy
to
talk
I'll,
be
talking
to
secretary
crowfoot.
I
know
later
tonight
I'd
be
happy
to
explore
how
we
could
secure
state
funding
just
over
the
last
two
years.
I
think
it's
more
than
we've
seen
probably
in
a
decade
in
terms
of
what's
going
on,
and
so
I
just
think
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
out
there.
A
If
we're
hustling
hard
for
grants,
and
certainly
we
always
have
cnc
funding.
I
know
that
we
have
long
been
talking
about
how
and
whether
we
would
get
out
for
a
a
parks,
bond
or
measure.
That's
something
I
know
we
have
pull
tested
several
times.
It's
not
going
to
happen
this
year.
We
know,
but
ultimately
that
would
be
a
primary
project.
It
seems
to
me
for
such
a
measure.
D
T
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
so
there's
there'll
be
four
budget
cycles
before
this
money
could
potentially
get
used.
T
Couldn't
we
use
utilize
some
of
this
funding
to
have
some
of
the
lower,
maybe
some
of
the
more
affordable
strategies
completed,
and
this
is
maybe
a
question
that
we
need
to
have
once
we
get
this
study
and
everybody
has
it
in
front
of
them,
but
those
bio
swells
that
you
talked
about
or
or
the
improvement
of
the
shoreline
that
I
talked
about.
T
Excuse
me
or
just
the
tree
planting
along
the
paths
of
the
edges
of
the
lake
that'll
tree
planting
is
480
000.,
so
there's
some
things
that
we
could
do
with
some
algae
treatment
for
30
000
lake
bed,
sediment
treatment
for
150
000
there
you
know
there's
some
things
that
we
could
do
and
not
wait
until
we
see
that
there's
overages
with
our
fire
station.
Of
course,
that
is
definitely
a
priority.
T
I
don't
want
it
to
not
be,
but
I
think
that
we
could
move
both
of
these
items
at
the
same
time
it
doesn't
have
to
have
to
be
one
or
the
other.
T
S
P
Yeah,
thank
you
and
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
few
comments
and
also
ask
maybe
maybe
one
question.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know.
Obviously
I
think
it's
important
for
us
as
a
council
to
express
our
support
for
the
vision
of
of
doing
work
at
lake
cunningham.
Obviously,
I
know
that
the
money
is
a
lot
more
than
the
three.
P
Even
if
we
were
to
say
the
three
million
is
available
now
and-
and
we
have
to
be
sure
we
you
know
about
that,
based
on
the
safety
projects.
We
need
a
lot
more
and
we
have
to
make
sure
we
do
things
smartly.
What
I'm
concerned
about
is
that
we
pick
projects
off
that
that
might
be
short-term
fixes,
but
that
without
some
of
the
longer-term
fixes
we
fall
back
into
the
same
situation.
We're
in
now,
maybe
there's
a
question
underlining
underlying
this.
P
But
if
you
just
replace
it
with
clean
water
and
don't
fix
the
filtration
system,
it
doesn't
really
solve
the
problem.
You
end
up
with
the
green
fish
tank
again
in
a
couple
weeks,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
guess
the
question
would
be
are:
are
there
things
we
can
do
in
the
short
term
that
are
the
right
first
steps
so
that
when
we
have
the
resources
to
do
the
bigger
fixes,
we
will
be
upset
up
for
success.
I
Councilmember,
just
real
quick
before
we
go
too
far,
I'd
like
to
just
make
sure
we
clarify
the
motion,
because
the
rec,
the
staff
recommendation
in
the
supplemental
memo
is
a
bit
different
than
in
the
original
memo.
So
if
we
could
come
back
to
that,
when
appropriate,
that'd
be
great.
So
to
answer
your
question
councilmember,
yes,
there
are
things
we
can
do
there
is
there
is
one
of
the
challenges
is
so
of
the
20.
It's
actually
26.6
million
dollar
conceptual
estimate
we
have
about
350.
I
000
of
that
is,
we
think,
is
non-measure
t
eligible
so
from
300
to
a
million
of
that,
we
think
is
non-measure
t
eligible.
That
means
there's
still
25
and
a
half
million.
That
could
be
measure
t
eligible.
But
what
I
wanted
to
just
add
is
that
some
of
the
simpler
stuff,
like
the
algaecide
treatment,
the
lake
bed,
sediment
treatment,
treatment,
those
or
when
you're
adding
chemicals
into
the
lake
would
not
see
when
you
when
for
measure,
t
bond
funding.
I
You
have
to
just
build
a
physical
thing
that
is
permanent
and
that's
probably
not
the
best
legal
way
of
saying
it,
but
it's
essentially
what
what?
What
I've
been
it's
yeah,
essential
summary,
and
so
when
you're,
just
adding
chemicals,
which
is
definitely
something
we
can
look
into
and
possibly
should
look
into
and
we'd
probably
have
to
find
another
source
for
that.
But
we
could.
I
There
are
some
smaller
projects.
The
tree
planting
is
probably
half
a
million
dollars
that
is
very
borderline
measure.
T
we'd
probably
have
I
think
it
could
be,
but
we'd
have
to
explore
that
further
we'd
have
to
just
get
an
actual
scope
of
that
project
and
review.
It
review
it
internally
a
little
bit.
So
there
are
smaller
things
we
can
do,
but
some
of
the
smaller
things
may
not
be
measure
t
eligible.
I
P
Right
and
that's
a
good
analogy
made
yes,
okay,
yeah!
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
that
we're
thinking
about
that
and
that
we
are
clear
that
well,
there's
might
be
things
that
might
make
it
look
good
for
a
year
or
two
that
that
wouldn't
be.
Do
us
any
good.
If
we
don't
and
then
we
just
are
wasting
the
money
in
the
year
in
that
year
or
two.
P
Yeah
and
I
mean-
and
I
think
obviously
the
fact
that
this
lake
doesn't
have
the
inlet
outlet.
I
think
that
filtration
system
has
got
to
be
incredibly
important
when
you
we
know
we,
everyone
tells
us,
don't
don't
leave
your
don't
leave
standing
water
in
your
yard.
You
get
mosquitoes
right,
you
get
a
you,
get
the
problem
and
that's
kind
of
what
we
have
there
at
lake
cunningham.
Without
that's
why
pools
have
filtration
systems
right?
P
They
don't
just
sit
so
but,
but
I
do
think
it's
important
for
us
to
reaffirm
our
vision
and
support
for
figuring
out
what
the
resources
are,
and
I
appreciate
the
mayor's
suggestion
of
that.
This
is
an
area
where
there
is
a
lot
of
money
out
there
and
we
ought
to
be
looking
for
it.
I
also
I'm
just
going
to
go
to
bat
for
fire
station
23,
it's
last
on
the
list.
P
It's
in
my
district,
it's
one
of
the
20
busiest
fire
stations
in
the
city
and
it
is
operating
out
of
a
single
out
of
a
tiny
home
with
a
single
bay,
very
a
very
old
building
and
a
very
un,
not
not
adequate
facility
for
the
volume
of
work
that
they
do
out
of
that
station.
So
it's
very
important
to
our
city
to
me
to
the
just
to
the
district
that
we
make
sure
that
we
have
the
resources
for
that
work.
And
that's
why
I
do
I
do
I.
P
I
do
like
the
idea
of
waiting
till
next
spring
we're.
We
now
know
more
about
the
escalation
and
the
cost
of
these
fire
stations,
and
I
think
it's
important
that
we
know
as
much
as
we
can
before.
We
start
to
allocate
specific
dollar
dollars
away
from
the
fire
stations,
so
I'll
just
say
make
those
comments
and
support
the
motion.
But
now
I
guess
we
can
have
council
member
arenas
clarify
exactly
what
yeah.
A
I
think
we
need
a
lot
of
clarity,
because
I
don't
see
how
the
memorandum
from
council,
member
uranus
and
others
is
consistent
with
staff
recommendation.
A
We
either
spend
the
money
or
we
don't
so
either
matt
or
councilman
reynolds.
Do
you
want
to
try
to
reconcile
the
two.
I
I
I
I
I
wouldn't
mind
taking
this
the
first
shot
at
just
making
sure
I
understand
so
in
the
supplemental
memo
we
actually
split.
So
then,
council,
member,
erenis,
cohen
and
carrasco's
memo
from
may
17th.
They
essentially
accepted
that
what
they
sent
except
staff
reported
items,
a
b,
c
d
and
f
and
and
then
took
recommendation
e,
which
was
asking
the
policy
decision
and
broke
it
down
into
a
detailed
recommendation.
I
What
we've
done
in
this
and
if
I
could
have
that
presentation
pulled
up
please
again
what
we've
done
in
the
supplemental
memo
is:
we've
broken
recommendation
e
into
two
items,
and
so
I
want
to
clarify
whether
both
those
are
being
deferred
or
yeah.
We
broke
so
the
first
portion
of
reclamation
e,
which,
if
the
motion
passes,
I
would
hope
that
this
first
portion
passes
with
it
is
to
accept
the
funding
recommendation
shown
in
table.
I
A
A
Man,
I
I
really
want
to
urge
you
to
actually
talk
about
concrete
numbers
and
concrete
projects,
because
sure
I
think
we're
all
gonna
have
a
hard
time
following
you
sure
absolutely.
I
As
soon
as
it
comes
back
up,
we've
got
this
table
in
the
in
the
presentation,
so.
I
Thank
you,
okay,
so
table
two
in
the
memo
and
if
you
just
look
at
the
recommended
use
column
on
this
table,
what
table
two
in
our
original
memorandum
states
is
that
those
are
the
dollar
amounts
that
no
matter
what
decision
is
made
today,
whether
to
place
regarding
the
three
million
dollars
for
lake
cunningham
and
the
other
funding
is
that
those
monies
be
committed
to
these
projects
and
so
the
five
million
dollars
again.
This
is
the
third
column
on
here.
I
Five
million
dollars
is
currently
allocated
in
the
reserves
for
infrastructure
for
fire
stations
that
need
rehab.
Just
acknowledging
that
it
is,
you
know
still.
Hopefully,
we
can
use
some
of
that
for
that,
but
also
for
fire
station
overages,
780
000,
at
least
for
the
police
air
support
hangar.
Unfortunately,
it
looks
like
those
costs
are
going
to
rise,
but
we're
just
acknowledging
that
today
we're
again
not
asking
that
that
be
allocated
today:
nine
million
dollars
for
the
police,
training
and
academy
facility.
I
This
would
get
us
the
full
training
build
out
and
enough
of
the
academy
in
order
that
we
can
open
the
south
police
substation
in
order
to
fully
build
out
the
academy,
we
would
need
more
and
then
for
the
police
headquarters,
infrastructure
upgrades
at
least
2.2
million
and
so
we're
we
are
recommending.
You
know
I'm.
I
My
hope
is
that
as
part
of
the
motion
that
was
made
by
councilman
arenas
that
that
recommended
use
column,
which
is
table
two
in
our
staff
report,
get
allocated
and
as
can
seen
on,
as
can
be
seen
on
here
at
the
very
bottom
of
that
road,
there's
still
eight
point
three
million
dollars
that
a
decision
needs
to
be
made
on
that.
My
understanding
of
councilman
raynes's
recommendation
is
that
8.3
would
be
you
know,
3
million
of
that
would
be
officially
allocated
towards
lake
cunningham,
and
so
the
remaining
of
that
8.3.
I
F
I
A
E
A
Then
we'll
go
to
the
motion.
If
you're
saying
the
money's
already
allocated,
then
theoretically,
it
could
already
be
spent
that
the
3.2
million
on
on
cunningham
is.
Are
you
saying
that
you
would
recommend
that
be
spent.
I
No
so
sorry
I
was,
I
was
confusing
the
question
between
my
staff
recommendation
and
my
clarification
of
the
motion
so
so
to
to
clarify
that
3.2
million
dollars
is
not
currently
allocated
towards
lake
cunningham.
The
direction
in
june
of
2021
was
to
keep
it
in
the
clean
water
category,
but
not
to
allocate
it
to
a
specific
project
at
that
time.
I
Okay,
so
my
current
staff
recommendation
in
the
supplemental
memo
is
to
go
ahead
and
allocate
the
monies
in
the
third
column
here
that
I
just
listed
and
that
eight
point
three
million
dollars
fund
remaining
to
push
that
till
february
2023
and
so
okay,
and
that
includes
waiting
on
the
lake,
whether
we
fund
lake
cunningham
or
not,
wait
in
until
february
2023.
That's
our
staff
recommendation.
A
A
T
Right
right,
it
is
to
hold
off
on
any
policy
decision
until
they
have
a
final
and
better
estimate
of
what
is
needed.
So
I'm
I'm
fine
with
that.
I
think
that,
okay,
what
I
was
expressing
earlier
is
that
we
needed
to
this
also
shows
the
need
for
us
to
have
a
a
a
discussion
about
the
study
and
I
believe
it's
going
to
be
ready
in
two
weeks.
Matt.
T
I
Hi,
council
member,
you
can
come
back
whenever
we're
directed
to
I
ideally
from
a
staff.
Standpoint.
We'd
come
back
at
the
same
time
in
february,
but
we
can.
We
can.
J
F
T
I
know
that
we
had
a
discussion
about
having
maybe
a
tiered
approach
and
and
doing
some
things
that
are,
that
could
add
to
potentially
the
filtration
and
I'd
love
to
hear
from
my
colleagues
about
that,
because
I
think
the
the
tree
planting
is
the
natural
filtration
system
that,
whether
we
you
know
whether
there's
additional
funding
that
happens
or
not
trees
are
going
to
support
our
our
canopy
goals
as
well.
T
As
I
mean
just
for
those
for
those
joggers
that
are
out
of
breath
to
be
able
to
go
under
a
tree.
That
is
also
very
helpful,
so
so
anyways
I'd
love
to
hear
from
my
from
my
colleagues
to
see
if
that's
something
that
they
would
be
supportive
of
now,
I
think
it's
the
least
expensive
of
the
items,
but
because
we
haven't
had
the
discussion
on
the
study.
I
think
we
can't
I'm
just
thinking
this
out
loud,
because
we
haven't
had
the
the
conversation
with
the
study.
T
We
really
can't
make
this
decision,
so
I'm
just
gonna
never
never
mind
that
scratch
that
we're
just
gonna
stick
to
delaying
the
any
policy
decisions
until
february.
When
we
can
hear
about
the
study-
and
we
can
hear
about
the
final
construction
needs
cost
okay,.
T
No,
so
I'm
I'm,
I'm
I'm
supporting
the
supplemental
and
and
my
memo
as
well
as
your
memo,
but
not
making
a
decision
on
on
table
two
and
four,
which
is
your
item
number
two.
So
your
item
number
two
is
is
not
going
to
be
included.
A
A
That's
from
before,
okay
other
members
of
the
council
having
a
hard
time
pulling
up
my
zoom,
I.
S
S
Thank
you.
I
I
obviously
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion.
One
of
the
questions
just
to
kind
of
continue
on
this
line
before
I
get
to
my
questions,
is
what
are
the
usual
deadlines
for
us
to
apply
for
these
grants,
because
I'm
wondering
if
having
that
end-of-year
discussion
is
better
for
those
timelines
than
maybe
february.
If
we're
looking
to
capitalize
on
state
grants
for
lake
cunningham,.
I
J
S
Okay,
thank
you
and
yeah.
You
know
I
was
reflecting
earlier
today.
I
remember
in
I
want
to
say
summer
of
1998
dead,
fish
being
pulled
out
of
lake
cunningham,
so
this
issue
goes
back
quite
a
while.
I
actually
wanted
to
move
forward
on
fire
stations
and
really
appreciate
that
we
are
affirming
our
commitment
to
fund
the
fires.
All
of
the
fire
stations
you
know,
station
23
is
not
in
district
7,
but
we
all
benefit
as
a
city
by
having
that
part
of
the
city
adequately
covered
by
fire.
S
So
I'm
really
really
happy
to
see
that
today.
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
the
memo
about
the
full
build
out
on
fire
station
32,
which
is
the
next
measure
t
fire
station.
That's
coming.
Online
staff
has
identified
a
3.8
million
gap
to
get
the
dual
company
build
out
that
our
fire
station
has
indicated
that
they
need
to
adequately
serve
this
site,
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
with
the
motion
council
member
at
ns.
S
The
old
memo
from
last
month
includes
old
numbers,
which
had
a
two
million
dollar
gap,
and
now
the
staff
recommendation
has
a
2.5
million
of
the
3.8
million
gap
to
be
allotted
now
with
a
1.3
million
dollar
gap
that
would
come
back
to
us.
Is
that
what
your
motion
includes?
The
current
numbers.
T
What
what
it
includes
council
number
is
a
final
discussion
about
those
numbers
in
february,
because
we
know
that
those
are
not
final
numbers
right.
These
numbers
might
look
bigger
in
february.
Hopefully
not
you
know
we'll
cross
our
fingers
over
our
shoulder,
but
that's
the
reason
why
we
delay
both
of
these
discussions
and
so
that
we
can
get
a
more
accurate
picture
of
what
this
looks
like
and
and
so
then
delay
the
the
policy
decision.
T
The
fire
was
never
compromised
with
with
with
lake
cunningham,
and
so
that's
it.
I
think
it's
independent
of
that
and
I
think
that's
because
this
conversation's
been
laid
out
to
pit
one
against
the
other,
but
like
our
mem,
you
know
my
memo
says
we
are
reaffirming
our
commitment
to
make
sure
that
measure
t
funds
our
fire
stations
in
in
a
way
that
makes
them
feasible
and
a
reality.
T
And
so
that
is
my
priority.
I
don't
know
what
those
numbers
are
going
to
look
like.
I
don't
think
that
that
matt
has
the
the
total
numbers
finalized
and
I
think
that's
why
they
are
delaying
until
february,
so
they
can
get
a
better
idea.
S
T
Is
and
that's
not
in
the
supplemental,
that
is
the
original
consumption.
I
Sorry
sure
it's
so
the
from
what
I've
heard
is
the
staff
recommendation
and
the
supplemental
memo
would
be
moving
forward
as
part
of
the
motion
with
some
additions
from
with
some
additions
and
the
staff
recommendation
on
the
supplemental
memo
regarding
fire
station
32,
which
I
I
understand
is
part
of.
The
current
motion
is
that
to
recognize
that
at
least
two
and
a
half
million
dollars
of
the
five
million
dollar
public
safety
reserve
for
the
fire
depart
for
the
fire
stations
would
be
going
to
fire
station
32.
I
That
does
not
acknowledge
the
additional
1.3
for
the
extra
dorms
and
lockers
for
the
second
company,
and
so,
however,
as
I
think
you're,
where
we
are
designing
the
dorms
and
lockers
for
the
second
company
and
we
are
putting
that
out
to
bid,
and
so
we
will,
even
if,
even
if
the
final
funding
isn't
completely
identified
until
later,
that
will
be
part
of
our
bid
package
and
we
will
be
getting
firm
prices
and
bids
on
that
that
we
can
share
with
the
city
council
early
next
year.
S
I
appreciate
that,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
for
folks
that
aren't
aware
fire
station
32
it's
going
to
be
on
the
border
of
district
7
in
district
3
near
the
intersection
of
280
and
101,
so
this
station
is
going
to
serve
a
large
part
of
downtown,
as
well
as
pretty
much
the
east
side,
and
so
it's
this
station's
in
the
middle
of
four
of
the
busiest
fire
stations
in
the
city
station
26
station
8
station
3
and
station
16
that
represent
four
out
of
the
top
five
busiest
stations
and
so
given
the
location
station
32
is
expected
to
be
one
of
the
busiest,
if
not
the
busiest
fire
station
in
the
city
as
soon
as
it
opens,
and
so,
given
that
we're
expecting
and
planning
for
a
lot
of
growth
in
these
areas
over
the
next
decade,
it's
really
important
that
we
build
this
fire
station
right,
given
that
it's
at
a
central
location
in
our
city
at
the
nexus
of
a
lot
of
growth
and
development,
and
so
that's
why
making
sure
that
we
can
accommodate
the
dual
company
is
really
important
and
is
chi
sapien
on
here.
I
He's
on
the
way
in
arjun
batra
from
the
cscs
quick
comment,
yeah.
J
Okay,
go
for
it,
sorry
for
the
interruption
and
thank
you
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
present.
I
need
to
excuse
myself
and
I
think
you
have
our
input
on
the
we're
not
opposed
to
lake
cunningham,
but
but
we
are
concerned
about
using
the
measure,
t
funds
for
it
and
thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity.
S
So,
chief,
can
you
share
with
us
about
the
need
to
have
a
dual
company
at
the
station.
Q
Thank
you,
council
member
robert
sapien
fire
chief
san
jose
fire
department,
so
you
articulated
the
service
demand
issues
very
clearly.
I
don't
think
I
could.
I
could
improve
on
how
you
described
how
busy
we
think
station
32
will
be
and
how
much
support
it
will
provide
to
our
fire
station
26.
That
is
really
at
a
point
of
being
unable
to
keep
pace
with
service
demand.
Q
Q
The
dual
company
house
at
station
32
will
give
us
an
opportunity
to
move
a
truck
company
in
closer
proximity
to
serving
the
heart
of
east
san
jose
and
give
us
a
chance
to
move
a
truck
company
south
right
now
we're
contemplating
station
24
as
that
location,
that'll
really
give
us
better
balance
of
truck
service
to
the
east
and
will
also
at
some
point,
give
us
an
opportunity,
I
think,
to
even
improve
service
back
to
a
pre-recession
period
where
we
had
an
additional
truck
on
the
in
west
san
jose.
Q
So
really,
I
think,
there's
there's
two
points
to
this
station.
One
is
the
the
very
high
call
demand
projected
development
with
high
density
housing
throughout
that
area
and
then
the
truck
service
citywide.
S
Thank
you
chief
and
chief
and
matt,
so
I'm
assuming
that
fired
and
public
works
are
coordinating
on
staff's
proposal
to
defer
the
final
decision
on
the
1.3
million.
Is
that
true
and
chief,
can
you
give
us
your
thoughts
on
that.
Q
I'll
say:
we've
been
essentially
partners
in
in
these
projects
and
and
in
lockstep
understanding,
certainly
highly
sensitive
to
public
works
challenges
of
meeting
the
funding
and
the
increasing
cost
of
the
projects.
But
I
think
we've
been
very
well
heard
in
terms
of
the
needs
of
the
department.
A
Thank
you.
I
certainly
appreciate
the
need
to
ensure
that
we
have
that
additional
the
additional
company
at
32.
So
thank
you,
council,
member,
all
right
other
comments
or
questions.
A
Okay,
as
the
as
the
motion
has
been
either
revised
or
refined
or
clarified,
I
can
I'm
happy
to
support
the
motion.
I
believe
it
ensures
that
we
reserve
this
decision
for
a
day
when
I
think
this
council
is
going
to
be
better
informed.
So
thank
you,
everyone
for
the
dialogue,
let's
vote.
E
A
B
B
All
right
good
afternoon,
we
are
here
as
a
referral
from
the
neighborhood
services
and
education
committee,
who
referred
our
quarterly
report
on
residential
anti-displacement
to
the
full
council.
B
As
of
june,
they
have
processed
almost
10
000
applications
for
emergency
rental
assistance,
totaling,
just
over
118
million.
As
of
yesterday.
They
have
231
applications
yet
to
process,
and
that
is
well
within
their
weekly
processing
rate.
So
we
have
no
worries
that
they
will
be
unable
to
finish
processing
applications
by
the
end
of
the
week.
B
B
B
B
And
then
the
second
program
that
we
set
up
is
a
weekly
unlawful,
detainer
clinic,
and
that
is
in
partnership
with
the
superior
court.
We
launched
it
on
june
1st
our
partners
are
the
superior
court
self-help
center
sacred
heart
project
sentinel.
It
is
open
to
tenants
and
landlords
alike
who
are
somehow
involved
in
a
unlawful
detainer
or
eviction
action,
and
we
offer
assistance
with
court
filings.
Legal
referrals,
access
to
mediation,
services,
help
with
rental
assistance
and
again
the
goal
is
to
prevent
an
eviction
both
of
those
programs
are
launched
and
rocking
and
rolling.
B
And
just
just
to
conclude,
we
are
not
recommending
any
kind
of
council
urgent
legislation
regarding
an
eviction
moratorium,
but
we
are
before
you
today
just
to
make
sure
you
all
are
aware
that
that
legislation
is
sun.
Setting
june
30th
and
we're
available
for
questions.
A
I
see
no
hands
up
here
and
online.
T
A
Okay
reagan:
I
guess
you
were
that
good.
You
just
convinced
us.
Thank
you
for
all
the
enormous
amount
of
work.
That's
gone
into
the
rental
assistance
program
from
our
housing
department.
A
B
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
emily
and
reagan
for
the
work
that
they've
been
able
to
achieve
and
actually
getting
a
program
in
the
courts.
That
has
been
something
you
know.
We've
been
working
on
for
years
to
try
to
make
some
entryway
there,
and
it
has
been
extremely
difficult
to
really
move
that
initiative
forward
and
they
have
been
able
to
be
very
successful
and
to
really
demonstrate
to
the
court
that
we
could
actually
add
some
value,
and
so
I
think
that
really
speaks
to
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
in
that
collaboration.
A
Thank
you
jackie,
it's
well
well
put.
Can
I
ask,
is
that
going
to
continue.
B
Yes,
so
our
weekly
clinic
will
continue
in
perpetuity
we're
actually
looking
at
how
we
can
keep
iterating
and
improving
that
weekly
clinic,
for
example,
we're
talking
to
santa
clara
law
school
about
adding
some
of
their
students
and.
B
A
That
would
seem
to
be
a
great
clinical
program
for
for
any
law
school.
B
And
as
I'm
expressing
my
appreciation,
I
also
want
to
express
appreciation
to
teresa
ramos
who's,
a
long-time
city,
employee
who's,
worked
in
various
city
departments
and
has
been
with
the
housing
department
a
long
time.
She's
played
a
significant
role
in
our
community
outreach,
and
you
know
it's
because
of
her
knowledge
and
her
connection
and
her
commitment
to
community
that
you
know
we
have
been
able
to
make
great
strides
in
creating
some
connections,
and
so
I
did
want
to
acknowledge
her
work
as
well.
A
Thank
you,
jackie.
The
one
question
I
did
have
when
I
read
the
report
was
the
was
the
the
utilization
of
that.
B
Yes,
we
are,
I
think,
because
we
have
a
lot
of.
We
have
a
lot
of
referrals
coming
from
different
sources,
either
the
existing
like
court
mediators
and
self-help
centers.
B
We
also
get
referrals
from
landlord
attorneys
tenant
attorneys
we're
getting
referrals
from
our
partners
like
sacred
heart,
so
we're
trying
to
have
like
a
no
wrong
door
approach
where,
as
many
partners
in
the
community
are
aware
of
the
program
and
utilize
it,
I
think
we're
gonna
just
continue
to
to
build
off
the
three
weeks
of
success
that
we've
had
operating
the
program
and
it's
going
to
keep
getting
better
and
better.
A
T
Thank
you
on
on
that
note.
I'd
also
like
to
to
thank
our
our
housing
department
and
its
leadership,
and
thank
you
so
much
for
for
the
work
that
you're
doing.
T
I
know
that
you've
made
sure
that
a
lot
of
our
families
are
not
out
in
the
streets
or
in
their
cars
or
in
motels,
but
that
they're
staying
put
and
and
not
leaving
san
jose
and
so
that
that
really
is
fundamental
to
who
we
are
as
a
city,
and
so
I
want
to
really
thank
you
for
for
the
work
that
you've
done
and
jackie
when
you
mentioned
teresa
ramos.
I
took
me
back
because
I
worked
with
patricia
her
sister
at
the
neighborhood
development
center
at
the
old
city
hall.
T
Back
when
I
was
in
my
twenties
and
and
you
know
we
were,
we
were
working
to
make
sure
that
we
also
organized
our
communities
and
supported
our
communities
and
it
just
you
know.
People
like
theresa,
like
patricia
like
a
lot
of
the
folks
who've
been
long-term
city.
Employees
just
add
so
much
value
that
when
we
hopefully
you
know,
there's
no
like
we
don't
lose
them.
T
But
when
we
have
these
kinds
of
programs
they
I
think
it
just
adds
to
what
the
all
of
the
experience
has
led
them
to
the
where
they
are
in
the
position
that
they
are
in,
and
I
think
that's
part
of
also
the
success
and
so
really
grateful
that
you
mentioned
teresa.
T
But
of
course
I
know
that
there
there's
a
lot
of
folks
within
the
housing
department.
That's
been
doing
the
great
work,
so
thank
you
I
we
had
talked
about
previously.
This
is
now
to
a
question,
including
some
questions
in
the
packet.
T
The
intake
forms
that
that
you
all
use
to
help
us,
maybe
bridge
some
of
the
city
resources
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I'm
thinking
about
the
arp
funds
for
happy
hollow
and
you
know
other
tickets
that
are
going
to
get
funded.
T
These
are
the
families
that
are
struggling
that
are
probably
not
going
to
use
some
of
their
additional
or
some
of
the
funds
that
they
may
have
to
take
out.
The
kids
to
you
know
go
do
a
little
bit
of
an
r
r.
Have
you
have
you
all
included
in
any
additional
questions
on
the
intake
forms
to
help
us
bridge
with
those
city
resources.
B
Hi
councilmember,
we
do
have
questions
the
the
are
our
questions
for
rental
assistance
are
primarily
income
based,
but
if
you,
basically,
if
you
qualify
for
rental
assistance
for
the
state
program
or
for
our
local
homelessness
prevention
program,
as
you
know,
councilmember
you,
you
qualify
for
a
lot
of
other
city
programs,
parks
and.
B
And
so
we
are
making
those
connections
either
right
then,
and
there
or
we
give.
We
have
information
and
packets
available
if
a
family
doesn't
have
time.
In
that
moment,
I
will
say
what
what
could
be
a
gap
and
what
is
to
be
a
good
technology
project
is
a
like
a
city-wide
technology.
So
when
we're
working
with
families
we're
working
in
either
the
state
rental
assistance,
application
system
or
our
own,
we
have
something
set
up
in
our
hmis
system,
our
database
for
prevention
anyways.
But
we
don't.
B
T
Yeah
and-
and
I
don't
know
if
I
think
lee
is
yeah-
I
see
you
lee-
I'm
wondering
if
this
is
something
that
that
week.
I
know
that
when
was
it
2019
when
we
had
an
mba
about
how
we
integrate
equity-
or
maybe
it's
2020..
I
you
know
what
these
years
are
just
all
blending
in
together
because
of
the
pandemic,
but
you
all
put
a
a
city
manager's
addendum
together
and
identified,
as
you
know,
the
lack
of
maybe
this
kind
of
format.
T
I
don't
know
if
it
would
be
a
online
program
app.
You
know
database,
I
don't
know
what
it
would
be,
but
but
that
there
wasn't
a
uniform
way
of
collecting
information
that
every
department
collected
something
slightly
different
and
that
we
didn't
include
race
as
part
of
those
questions.
And
so
how
are
they?
Is
there
anything
in
the
pipeline
that
we
could
maybe
connect
with
to
leverage
an
opportunity
to
to
build
something,
not
just
for
the
housing
department?
T
M
Yeah
council
member
arenas-
I
would
ask
specifically
on
this,
if
I
know
jackie
and
housing,
as
well
as
rosalind
huey
in
our
office,
just
related
to
civic
engagement
in
general
and
how
we
touch
our
residents
through
various
different
methods
have
looked
at
this.
So
we're
happy
to
follow
up
with
greater
detail
with
an
info
memo
or
offline.
Q
B
B
Eligible
for,
and
so
we
are
having
those
ongoing
discussions,
oh
great,
with
the
recovery
team
and
are
working
to
see
if
we
can
get
something
proposed
as
a
an
opportunity
for
the
city
to
actually
place
this
as
a
priority
for
us
to
be
working
on.
So
you
know
we
we
continue
to
advocate
for
it.
We
think
it's
a
great
idea.
It's
just
trying
to
get
the
tools
and
figure
out
how
to
make
it
work.
T
Yeah
yeah
definitely
I
was
just
thinking
if
there
was
anything
already
happening
in
the
pipeline
that
would
address
some
of
the
database
needs
or
some
of
the
way,
the
the
the
need
to
collect
information
in
a
uniform
manner
that
was
identified
through
the
budget
process
a
couple
of
years
ago
that
we
could-
and
I
don't
know
if
anything's
happened
since
or
if
that
was
just
you
know,
an
opportunity
to
identify
the
need,
but
we
haven't
addressed
it,
and
so
I
guess
you
know
this
kind
of
answers.
T
My
question,
because
we
haven't
really
addressed,
and
I
think
it's
probably
something
that
could
go
on
priority
setting
as
we
are
going
to
be
working
on
this
childhood
youth
master
plan
and
we
for
this
very
same
reason.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
all
of
these
programs
are
scale
folded
and
that
our
youth
and
our
children
are
maximizing
the
sequence
of
programs
and
and
to
identify
any
any
any
gaps.
So
anyways
well
we'll
touch
basis,
offline
lee.
T
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
response,
and
and
thank
you
for
jackie,
for
not
forgetting
and
continuing
to
work
on
this.
I
know
this
is
an
approach
that
is
going
to
be
not
only
useful
for
your
program,
but
potentially
to
prevent
some
of
those
families
from
continually
seeing
you
or
asking
for
that
rental
assistance
if
we
can
find
them
other
sources
of
funds,
for
you
know,
after-school
care
or
child
care,
and
they
can
get
definitely
back
on
their
feet
and
find
something
more
permanent
as
a
solution.
S
Thank
you
mayor.
I
I
actually,
I
forgot
what
I
was
gonna
say
other
than
to
really
thank
everyone
and
thank
the
city
staff
that
have
been
doing
a
lot
of
outreach
at
community
events
partnering
out
with
our
local
agencies
to
get
in
front
of
families,
and
that
has
been
hugely
effective
in
the
community.
So
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
thanks.
A
Tony,
I
look
like
you
were
about
to
speak.
Do
you
want
to
go
to.
F
A
Okay,
great
thanks
owen
3.5
report
and
request
for
a
quotation
on
e-discovery
software.
Apparently
there's
a
presentation.
F
L
L
L
L
Protests
must
be
submitted
to
the
city's
chief
purchasing
officer
within
two
days
after
the
recommendation
of
award
is
published,
but
it's
longer
for
requests
for
bids
and
requests
for
proposals
which
is
10
calendar
days
per
san,
jose
unicode
and
lastly,
how
was
a
protest
evaluated
and
by
whom?
So
upon
receipt
of
a
protest?
The
city's
chief
purchasing
officer
me
carefully
reviews
all
submitted
protest,
materials,
procurement,
documentation
and
information
to
assess
and
determine
whether
the
procurement
process
was
followed,
as
described
in
the
procurement
documents
and
conducted
in
a
fair
and
impartial
manner.
L
The
chief
purchasing
officer
will
issue
a
written
response
back
to
the
protesting
party
with
information
findings
and
a
determination
whether
to
uphold
the
protest
or
staff's
award
recommendation
for
contracts
and
purchase
orders
under
the
city's
formal
procurement
threshold,
which
is
currently
130
thousand
dollars.
The
city's
chief
procurement
officer's
decision
is
final,
but
for
items
that
exceed
that
threshold,
the
protesting
party
has
the
right
to
appeal
the
city
council
by
filing
a
written
appeal
to
the
city
clerk
within
10
days
of
receiving
the
chief
purchasing
officer's
response
letter
next
slide,
please.
L
So
the
procurement
where
that's
in
question
today
is
the
request
for
quotation
that
the
finance
department
recently
completed
for
e-discovery
software
on
behalf
of
the
city
attorney's
office,
e-discovery
software
provides
document,
repository
and
document
management
and
see
used
in
litigation
and
public
record
tax
requests.
It
contains
all
the
features
and
functionalities
listed
on
the
slide
here.
The
city
attorney's
office
has
been
using
an
e-discovery
solution
from
logic
systems,
incorporated
doing
business
as
logical
for
the
past
five
years
and
that
agreement
expired
yesterday
on
june.
27
2022
next
slide,
please.
L
So
in
anticipation
of
the
expiring
agreement
in
march
2022,
the
finance
department
released
an
evaluative
request
for
quotation
or
an
rfq
for
e-discovery
software.
Five
responsive
written
proposals
were
received
prior
to
the
bid
deadline
and
they
were
evaluated
and
scored
independently
by
a
three-member
evaluation
panel
made
up
of
members
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
L
I
like
to
make
several
points
on
the
method:
evaluation
methodology
for
evaluated
procurements,
so
number
one
evaluation
must
be
submitted
based
on
information
submitted
by
companies
during
the
procurement
process.
We
can't
consider
any
information
received
outside
or
after
the
process
to
preserve
the
integrity
of
the
procurement.
L
The
evaluation
methodology
is
based
on
a
best
value
assessment,
which
is
based
on
a
variety
of
factors
such
as
quality
design
features
and
performance,
and
it's
within
the
evaluation
panel's
discretion
to
award
points
based
on
the
above
factors
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
best
value
assessment
was
reached.
Next
slide,
please
for
this
particular
procurement.
These
are
the
final
evaluation
scores.
L
You
can
see
the
evaluation
criteria
there
on
the
left
and
the
final
score
is
running
on
the
bottom,
so
modus
e
discovery
was
determined
to
be
the
highest
ranked
scoring
proposer
by
the
evaluation
team,
with
74
total
points,
carros
off.
Second,
at
68,
complete
discovery
source.
Third
at
66
and
logic
systems,
dba
logical,
a
fourth
at
62
points.
L
So,
on
june
5th,
the
city
received
one
protest
during
a
protest
period
from
the
city's
incumbent,
logical,
and
we
also
would
receive
additional
information
from
logical
on
june
7.
As
part
of
this
protest
and
its
protest,
logical
makes
three
main
points
they
contended
that
they
should
have
been
awarded
more
points
in
the
categories
of
general
requirements,
project
approach
and
technical
capabilities.
L
L
So,
as
the
city
chief
purchasing
officer,
I
carefully
reviewed
logical's
protest
and
I
responded
to
logical
on
june
14th,
upholding
staff's
recommendation
of
award
to
motorspeed
discovery,
and
I
included
the
following
information
in
the
letter
one.
I
included
an
explanation
of
the
city
scoring
methodology.
L
Specifically,
I
explained
that
because
the
evaluation
is
based
on
best
value,
simply
meeting
a
particular
requirement
does
not
automatically
mean
the
company
gets
full
points.
Secondly,
I
included
examples
from
logical's
written
response
to
the
procurement
that
contributed
to
the
final
scores
that
they
receive.
L
For
example,
logical's
written
proposal
included
numerous
formatting
errors
that
made
evaluation
difficult
for
the
evaluation
team,
resulting
in
two
lower
points
awarded
as
another
example.
The
evaluators
determined
that
logical
did
not
provide
a
response
on
project
approach
resulting
into
lower
points
awarded.
L
L
This
is
what
we're
doing
now,
and
I
understand
that
logical
is
on
zoom
and
they
have
five
minutes
to
speak
on
this
appeal
on
this
appeal
after
my
presentation,
if
they
wish
to
next
slide,
please
I
like
to
end
my
presentation
on
the
final
slide
here,
the
staff's
recommendation.
B
Okay,
I'm
gonna
unmute
both.
Actually
I'm
gonna
promote
the
two
people
from
logical.
B
Okay,
so
both
sheba
and
ryan
are
in
the
panelist
link.
I'll
also
share
a
five
minute
timer,
but
go
ahead.
You
guys
can
start.
A
My
name
is
ryan
ballard.
I'm
representing
logical,
just
have
a
wanted
to
make
a
statement.
After
reviewing.
A
Be
fully
represented
as
an
example,
there
were,
you
know
the
the
project
schedule.
F
Which
is
one
of
the
core
criteria
for
evaluation
is
something
that's
almost
non-existent
with
logical,
where
the
simple
click
of
a
button
and
dragging
files
to
the
platform
launches
your
projects.
We
scored
the
worst
here
in
the
rfu
process,
because
we
didn't
have
a
full
schedule
to
describe
of
steps,
but
we
don't
have
one,
because
it's
that
simple.
F
A
Our
simple
request
was
that
you
know
at
this
time
prior
to
the
partnership
being
awarded.
O
Thanks
ryan,
I
also
wanted
to
jump
in
with
a
few
more
comments
as
well.
First
of
all,
thank
you
so
much
for
letting
us
speak
today
about
the
rfq
process
and
just
giving
this
opportunity
to
into
the
final
protest
about
the
rfq
for
the
e-discovery
software
and
again
just
started
building
up
what
what
ryan
had
said
previously
and
the
finance
department
states
that
we
don't.
O
We
didn't
respond
to
their
requests
in
the
rfq
about
project
approach
and
implementation
schedule,
as
we
did
originally
state
in
the
original
rfq
logical
is
a
self-service
platform
which
can
be
implemented
from
any
modern
web
browser
at
any
time
from
anywhere
a
project
schedule.
It's
not
really
existent
with
logical
just
because
you
can't
start
an
account
and
start
any
sort
of
project
with
just
a
simple
click
of
a
button
and
by
dragging
files
to
the
platform
from
your
computer.
O
That's
all
it
is
like
you,
don't
need
an
implementation
schedule
or
a
project
plan.
It
really
is
clicking
a
couple
of
buttons
to
start
a
project
and
start
an
overall
account
with
logical,
the
city's
attorney's
office.
You
guys
they've
already
been
implemented
and
onboarded
with
logical
over
the
last
five
years.
We
provided
this
information
as
well.
During
the
oral
interview
during
the
oral
interview,
we
went
into
even
more
detail
about
our
general
new
user
and
general
new
account
onboarding
training
process.
O
We
did
offer
to
do
the
exact
same
kind
of
onboarding
and
training
that
we
normally
do
for
new
users
for
the
city
of
san
jose,
even
though
they
are
a
current
customer.
We
also
provided
supplemental
information
about
this
during
the
protests
with
which
jennifer
did
talk
about.
While
she
was
speaking
in
reference
to
the
cost
proposal
that
we
were
just
talking
about
the
price
that
we
submitted
for
the
baffle.
That's
the
exact
same
price
that
san
jose
has
been
paying
for
the
last
few
years.
O
The
price
has
never
been
in
question
about
logical.
We've
never
had
received
any
sort
of
complaint.
That
price
was
negotiated
with
the
city
a
few
years
ago,
without
really
any
sort
of
pushback
from
the
city,
so
the
offer
that
we
submitted
was
already
something
that
we've
talked
about
over
the
years.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
to
bring
that
to
your
attention
today.
O
Finally,
in
reference
to
our
technical
capabilities,
again,
logical's
technic
technical
capabilities
have
been
successful
with
the
city
attorney's
office
for
the
last
few
years,
so
we're
not
really
sure
why
we
score
the
lowest
in
this
category.
Out
of
all
the
vendors
we've
been
meeting
with
the
city
attorney's
office
every
quarter
for
years.
At
this
point,
where
part
of
the
meeting
is
to
talk
about
what
other
product
features?
O
Do
you
want
to
see
from
us,
and
we
have
gotten
feedback
that
there
are
a
couple
of
product
features
that
people
would
like
to
see
and
that
our
engineering
team
is
currently
working
on
building
to
be
released
by
the
end
of
this
year.
So
it's
really
hard
for
us
to
believe
that
these
minimal
features
are
enough
to
rank
us,
the
lowest
in
this
category
and
again
you
know
we
weren't.
We
didn't
have
a
lot
of
clarity
about
what
you
guys
meant
by
onboarding
and
project
implementation
schedule
until
the
very
end
of
the
rfq
process.
O
So
that's
why
we
submitted
the
supplement,
supplemental
information
just
to
provide
better
clarity,
clarity
on
our
capabilities
and,
again,
like
ryan,
said,
we
would
like
to
speak
with
you
guys
again
about
this.
If
that's
available.
D
That
you
know
the
idea
of
civil
rights
and
school
pre-protections
is
an
important
concept
that
I
think
can
really
facilitate
good
lessons
for
all
of
us
in
the
future.
Will
move
forward
into
good
luck
on
how
all.
A
All
right
back
to
council,
nice
vice
mayor,
thank.
B
You
mayor
can
staff
speak
to
the
whole.
F
Issue
that
they
raised
around
the
schedule
or
not
having
a
schedule,
I
just
I
didn't
totally
understand
what
the
the
issue
or
distinction
was.
L
Yes,
I
I
can
provide
some
clarity
on
that
vice
mayor,
so
it
seems
like
logical
is
claiming
that
it
is
well
based
on
their
earlier
statements
that
it's
so
they
don't
do
project
schedules
at
all,
and
so
that's
why
they
feel
like
they
scored
lower
on
the
on
that
particular
evaluation
criteria.
F
L
F
Was
that
the
determining
criteria
that
caused
caused
them
to
lose
the
bid
or
were
there
other
factors
involved?.
L
No
actually,
if
we're
able
to
pull
up
the
the
powerpoint
or
julia,
should
I
share
my
screen.
I
can
jump
back
to
the
slide
where
it
shows
the
final
rfq
evaluation
scores.
L
I
assume
it's
on
the
slide,
so
if
we
look
at
this
final
evaluation
scores,
what's
really
driving
the
lower
scores
from
four
logical
is
the
cost
proposal
they
they
actually
after
the
end
of
the
best
and
final
offer,
they
weren't
actually
the
highest
cost
vendors,
so
they
received
the
least
amount
of
points
out
of
all
the
finalists.
F
F
Shiva
actually
I'll,
let
you
you
also
wanted
to
address
the
issue
around
the
schedule.
F
O
Awesome,
thank
you
all
right.
So
the
first
thing
about
how
we
didn't
say
anything
at
all
about
not
having
a
project
schedule
or
implementation
plan.
We
don't
consider
that
true
to
be
based
on
our
rfq
response.
If
you
look
at
page
three
of
our
rfq
response,
we
tell
you
that
logical
is
a
platform.
That's
enabled
it's
cloud-based.
It's
enabled
anywhere
at
any
time
literally
have
access
to
it
24
hours
a
day
from
any
sort
of
modern
web
browser.
O
So,
starting
on
page
three
and
going
into
about
page
six,
we
go
into
really
big
detail
about
a
lot
of
that
into
a
lot
of
those
issues
about
the
project,
implementation
and
onboarding
for
what
it
means
to
us.
So
to
me,
it
kind
of
sounds
like
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
misunderstanding
in
terminology
about
what
you're,
considering
project
implementation
versus
what
we
at
logical
consider
project
implementation.
O
So
that's
the
first
point.
I
wanted
to
make
second
point
to
this
one
about
how
we
were
the
highest
bid
in
terms
of
the
baffle
and
again,
I
sort
of
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
earlier
about
how
the
price
that
we
submitted
for
the
baffle
is
exactly
the
same
price.
San
jose
has
been
paying
for
the
last
few
years
and
again,
when
we've
negotiated
the
price
with
san
jose
over
the
last
few
years,
never
really
been
any
pushback
from
anyone
on
the
team.
Everyone
was
happy
with
the
product
and
didn't
you
know.
O
We
gave
the
best
value
that
we
possibly
could
based
on
our
pricing
schedule,
and
it
was
never
really
really
an
issue.
We
haven't
had
an
issue
with
anybody
at
the
city
attorney's
office,
about
our
pricing
ever
so.
That's
why
it
was
surprising
that
price,
especially
such
a
small
price
difference
about
like
nine
thousand
dollars,
was
enough
to
you
know
boot
us
out
of
this
competition
also
as
well.
In
the
baffle
we
submitted
pricing
for
400
gigabytes
when
the
original
the
original
pricing
called
for
100
gigabytes.
O
So
you
guys
were
increasing
the
request
by
300,
going
from
100
gigabytes
to
400
gigabytes
and
also
in
the
baffle
when
we
submitted
it,
we
gave
you
guys
400
gigabytes
of
active
storage
plus
just
because
you
guys
have
been
customers
of
ours
like
really
good
customers
for
the
last
five
years.
We
also
gave
you
guys,
400
gigabytes
of
archive
storage
as
well,
bringing
the
total
storage
that
we're
giving
to
you
800
gigabytes,
total.
D
F
Jennifer,
can
you
unpack
that,
for
me.
L
Yes,
there's
a
there's
a
lot
to
impact
there.
I
guess.
L
Okay,
I
you
might
have
to
remind
me
some
of
the
points
that
you
would
like
clarification
on
vice
mayor,
but
to
the
first
point
made
by
logical
in
terms
of
the
cost
points.
What
what
might
have
been
previously
agreed
to
in
previous
agreements
is
not
relevant
for
this
particular
bid.
The
fact
is
is
that
the
contract
was
ending
logical,
new.
L
L
Essentially,
the
lowest
cost
bidder
gets
all
of
the
available
cost
points
and
every
bitter,
every
other
bidder
gets
a
percentage
thereof,
and
so
that
was
how
logical
was
awarded
the
cost
points
that
they
had
in
the
final
scoring
criteria
and
in
terms
of
project
approach.
L
L
Yeah,
because
you
might,
if
I
just
complete
my
thought
here
and
we
can-
we
can
do
that
yeah
for
sure.
Okay,
all
right,
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
this,
it
is
in
slide
mode,
but
essentially
this
is
the
it's
a
little
bit
small,
but
this
is
the
evaluation
criteria
clearly
stated
in
rfq
document
project
approach.
Schedule
is
one
of
them,
and
this
is
the
particular
form
that
the
respondents
were
asked
to
complete
to
provide
information
on
project
approach.
You
can
see
here,
please
describe
project
approach
and
provide
an
estimated
implementation
schedule.
L
Now.
This
slide
here
show
is
actually
a
snapshot
of
logical
certain
response,
for
that
particular
form.
You
can
I
circled
it
here.
You
can
see
that
it
just
has
the
question
from
the
original
form
posted
by
the
city.
It
doesn't
actually
appear
to
have
a
response,
and
this
is
what
the
evaluators
were
looking
at
when
seeking
a
response
for
project
approach
and
implementation
schedule
now
logical
states
that
you
know
this
information
was
provided
elsewhere
in
the
proposal.
L
That's
also
an
area
where
the
evaluators
found
that
they
gave
little
scores
to
logical,
for
because
it
was,
it
was
difficult
for
them
to
follow
their
proposal.
They
had
a
number
of
formatting
errors
and
you
can
kind
of
see
that
here
where
the
numbers
are
mislabeled
project
approach.
Implementation
is
such
as
item
two,
but
then
technical
capabilities
that
should
be
item
three
on
the
form
as
label
as
item
two
and
everything
else
was
mislabeled
as
a
result.
So
it
was
difficult
for
the
evaluation
team
to
follow
the
proposed.
O
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
wanted
to
respond
to
both
issues
so
again,
just
going
back
to
the
issue
where
we
got
dinged
for
not
having
proper
formatting,
I
wish
that
entire
page
had
been
cut
and
pasted
into
the
slide,
because,
if,
if
you
guys
had
just
scrolled
down
to
a
little
bit
further
down
on
page
three,
that's
where
we
start
getting
into
it's
a
cloud-based
e-discovery
platform
that
you
can
access
anytime
from
anywhere.
Everything
starts
in
a
matter
of
seconds
just
by
a
couple
of
clicks.
O
So
it's
really
unfortunate
in
my
opinion
that
we
got
dinged
because
of
a
couple
of
formatting
issues.
It
doesn't
really
go
to
the
substance
of
the
software
and
what
everyone
on
the
team
is
able
to
do.
O
Oh
and
jennifer
the
question
I
had
about
the
cost
proposal,
when
we
were
requested
to
submit
the
best
and
final
offer,
we
were
asked
to
increase
our
storage
capacity
by
from
100
gigabytes
to
400
gigabytes,
so
that
was
reflected
in
the
increase
in
pricing,
because
there
was
like
that
huge
percentage
increase
in
terms
of
active
data
stored.
Are
you
able
to
tell
us
if
the
other
vendors
also
increased
their
storage
capacity
to
be
reflected
in
their
pricing.
F
On
what
the
other
proposers
did
just
just
want
to
hear
you
state
your
case
and
then
we'll
make
a
decision
so
based
on
what
I'm
hearing
jennifer
that,
if
you
are
going
to
summarize
this,
there
were
elements
of
the
of
their
response.
That
was
non-responsive
and
that's
what
cost
them
points
in
the
evaluation
process.
Would
that
be
an
accurate
summary.
L
Yes,
vice
mayor,
I
would
probably
tweak
that
a
little
bit
if
the
entire
proposal
was
non-responsive,
we
wouldn't
have
recommended
to
evaluate
the
proposal
at
all.
It's
just
that
there
are
certain
parts
of
their
proposal
where
perhaps
the
evaluation,
the
evaluators
found
them
a
bit
weak
and
that's
why
they
received
the
scores
that
they
did.
F
Great,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that
clarification.
So,
based
on
what
I'm
hearing
in
in
the
information
that's
being
provided,
I
I
don't
see
a
justification
to
uphold
the
appeal,
so
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
accept
staff's
recommendation.
Q
A
All
right,
council,
member
khan.
P
P
F
And
it
was
run
through
the
city's
purchasing
department
and
as
a
standard
city
procurement.
P
Okay
and
the
I
just,
I
guess
my
only
question
is:
is
there
concern
with
monk
in
your
department
about
shifting
to
a
different
tool
about
how
they'll
proceed
with
a
different
tool.
B
G
Into
a
new
agreement
with
a
different
provider.
F
And
logical
has
agreed
to
provide
us
with
the
service
for
three
more
months,
obviously
we're
paying
for
it,
but
they
they
did
agree
to
do
that,
and
we
appreciate
that.
P
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
I
guess
the
process
question
for
jennifer,
maybe
or
when
we
when
we're
there's
a
difference.
In
my,
I
guess
in
my
mind,
there's
a
difference
between
going
out
for
a
new
product
or
going
out
for
a
renewal,
a
point
at
which
our
contract
expires
and
we're
either
renewing
or
looking
for
alternatives.
P
It
sounds
to
me,
like
the
bitter
that
logical
had
rolled
over
an
existing
price,
that
they
were
that
the
city
was
paying
didn't
escalate
their
price.
We
do.
We
have
a
process
by
which
I
know
price
obviously
is
an
important
point,
but
do
we
have
a
process
by
which
we
would
go
back
and
say,
hey,
you
know
you're
our
current
vendor
we're
getting
other
bids,
you
know
what
can
you
do
or
is
it
just?
P
They
have
one
shot
at
crate,
putting
in
a
bid
and-
and
that's
that's
the
end
of
it-
I
mean
it
seems
to
me-
there's
a
difference
between
a
or
maybe
there
shouldn't
should
or
shouldn't
be.
Maybe
someone
can
explain
to
me
whether
there
should
or
shouldn't
be
a
difference
between
going
out
for
a
new
product
versus
a
a
renewal.
F
Know
they
have
to
pretend
that
they
don't
know
anything
about
you
and
you
have
to
talk
about
your
talents
and
your
skills.
So
every
time
we
do
this,
it's
a
way
for
us
to
test
the
market,
see
what's
available
for
the
departments
that
they're
looking
for
see
if
the
pricing
is
still
in
compliance
and
it's
a
way
to
kind
of
refresh
the
opportunity
for
businesses
to
do
business
with
the
city,
so
each
vendor
needs
to
approach
it
like
the
city
doesn't
know
anything
about
them
when
they
respond
to
the
rfp.
F
P
A
Okay,
the
motion
is
from
the
vice
mayor.
Let's
vote.
B
F
F
A
Okay,
we're
gonna
call
one
item
and
then
we're
gonna
break
for
dinner
and
that
item
we're
gonna
jump
ahead
item
4.1
because
the
chief
has
been
patiently
waiting
here
for
us.
That
is
the
amendment
to
chapter
1134,
title
11
of
the
munich
code
relating
to
the
regulation
of
cruising.
A
I
don't
believe
there
is
a
presentation.
Is
there.
A
Okay,
that's
a
no!
So
let's
go
to
council
member
paralysis.
I
also
have
speakers
councilman.
I
think
we
have
some
public
species.
We've
got.
Let's
go
to
the
public.
First.
F
It's
a
lifestyle,
and
it's
long
overdue
for
the
city
of
san
jose
to
recognize
the
change
and
growth
that
low
riders
have
undergone
to
become
community
servants
and
economic
drivers
from
backpack
giveaways
to
turkey
drives
or
mobilizing
support
from
mom
and
pop
shops.
During
a
time
of
financial
crisis,
the
lowrider
community
has
done
so
much
to
to
to
drive
san
jose
forward
and
it's
important
for
the
city
to
not
hold
them
back.
F
K
Well,
hello,
mayor
city,
council
members,
my
name
is
flavio.
K
I
actually
represent
the
sacramento
lowrider
commission,
I'm
here
today
to
share
with
you
and
to
speak
to
you
about
this
ordinance
in
the
late
80s
and
going
into
the
90s.
These
ordinances
came
into
california
as
a
way
to
be
able
to
deal
with
the
gang
problems
that
were
happening
in
california
and
in
that
process.
K
When
they
created
these
ordinances,
what
they
did
was
they
threw
a
net
out
into
the
communities
that
were
represented
by
many
african-american
and
brown
communities
and
what
they
did
was
they
netted
a
community,
the
low
rider
community
that
has
been
in
existence
for
many
years
prior
to
these
ordinances
coming
in
and
what
they
did
was
they
racially
profiled
brown
communities
and
said
every
single
person
that
is
in
one
of
these
beautiful
arts
canvases
on
four
wheels
is
now
a
gang
member
and
it's
sad
to
say
that
this
ordinance
spread
from
sacramento
and
all
throughout
california
as
sacramento
brought
there
no
cruising
ordinance
in
88.
K
But
let
me
tell
you
just
a
few:
just
a
month
ago,
they
repealed
that
ordinance
and
said.
We
no
longer
see
this
as
an
issue
that
is
profiling,
our
communities,
but
it's
an
issue
that
needs
to
be
removed
and
taken
off
of
our
books.
K
Has
brought
into
the
assembly
assembly
member
a
a
176
acr
176,
and
this
is
asking
the
cities
and
police
across
california
to
celebrate
the
low-riding
culture
across
california.
K
I'm
a
local
artist,
lifelong
resident,
lowrider,
enthusiast
and
former
employee
with
the
san
jose
parks
and
recreation
department
for
over
10
years.
I
was
the
designer
that
was
requested
by
the
racial
equity
office
to
develop
a
banner
signage
to
post
at
community
centers
libraries
and
on
city
hall
itself
that
read.
F
N
Good
afternoon
council,
my
name
is
john
o'yoah.
K
Clearly
there
were
problems
associated
with
low
writing,
but
low
riders
themselves
are
hard-working
honest
people
who
give
back
to
the
community.
As
the
commander
previously
stated,
I
would
employ
you
and
I
would
urge
you
to
repeal
the
cruising
ban
as
low
riding
has
evolved
immensely
from
the
confines
of
our
barrio
experience
to
a
global
worldwide
phenomenon
that
is
celebrated
as
artistic
and
an
expression
of
cultural
pride.
K
K
B
D
D
You
know
with
all
the
sideshow
issues
going
on
and
such
that
to
learn
to
find
that
balance
and
what
that
can
be
and
what
it
is
it's
important,
and
so
it's
nice
that
council
person
perales
is
leading
this
effort,
and
I
really
like
his
leadership
on
this.
D
I
trust
what
he's
saying
and
doing
with
this
issue,
so
you
know
good
luck
and
how
we
can
tell
the
differences
of
these
things
and
what
I
think
is
more
important
more
than
anything
else
is
that
you
know
for
the
sideshow
community
to
understand
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
these
cruising
ideas
and
with
sideshow
issues
themselves.
D
I
think
we're
trying
to
be
somewhat
agreeable
in
some
ways
and
negotiable
and
for
the
for
the
sideshow
community
understand
that
what
city
government
is
working
towards
and
with
these
cruising
sort
of
measures,
that's
the
way
we
build
our
community
future
and
that
and
then
it
makes
asks
of
them
what
you
know
they
maybe
won't
fully
do
in
the
future
and
and
respect
a
bit
more
and
so
good
luck
in
our
efforts.
D
You
know
what
the
give
and
take
is
for
ourselves
with
this
sort
of
issues,
and
I
think
it's
a
really
positive
good
learning
experience
it's
unique
to
san
jose
and
good
luck.
How
we
can
continue
these
sort
of
good
efforts.
Thank
you.
K
T
To
other
efforts
that
have
gone
on
throughout
the
state
we
are,
the
city
of
national
city
is
the
only
city
in
the
county
that
has
an
ordinance
that
bans
cruising.
We
are.
We
have
been
working
diligently
to
repeal
our
own
ordinance,
so
we're
really
here
in
solidarity
and
appreciation
in
corazon
with
our
friends
and
our
brothers
and
sisters
out
in
san
jose
when
we
encourage
the
city
council
to
repeal
this
very
antiquated
law.
We
know
that
our
leaders
in
the
past
have
not
really
represented
the
interests
of
latinos
and
there's.
T
It
is
no
mistake
that
you
have
laws
like
this
that
were
instituted
at
the
1990s
chicanos,
more
than
most
understand
how
it
felt
to
be
criminalized
and
to
target
with
prop
187
with
prop
227
and
prop
209.
So
it's
important
that
we
rectify
a
lot
of
these
institutional
ills
and
remove
relics
of
institutional
racism
within
our
community.
So
I
hope
that
you
continue
to
support
this
council
member
perales,
who
has
presented
this
item
before
you
and
we're
here
with
our
brothers
and
sisters.
B
K
K
Many
years
have
passed
and
it's
a
perfect
time
as
san
jose
possesses
a
rich
history.
Thriving
culture
and
amazing
diversity
within
it
assembly
concur
resolution
176,
as
introduced
by
the
assembly
member
louis
rivas,
was
adopted
and
passed
to
senate
yesterday.
K
This
measure
would
celebrate
the
history
and
culture
of
cruising
and
encourage
encourage
local
officials
and
law
enforcement
to
work
with
local
car
clubs
to
conduct
safe
cruising
events
repealing
municipal
code
11.34
along
with
acr
176,
coincides
perfectly.
I
support
council
member
raul
perales
to
repeal
ordinance
11.34.
F
Good
afternoon
city,
council,
united
low
rider
council
and
council
member
perales,
I
salute
you
for
standing
up.
My
name
is
francine
mata,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
sacramento
lowrider
commission.
I
also
am
vice
chair
of
vita
del
oro
arts
foundation
and
founder
of
sacramento
men's
resource
center.
I
started
off
my
career
in
policy
with
the
legislative
bureau
for
20
years.
I'm
now
still
in
state
service.
F
I'm
here
to
ask
that
you
repealed
a
no
cruising
ordinance.
It's
an
old
form
of
prejudice
and
racism.
There
are
traffic
laws
that
already
cover
any
traffic
violations
being
made.
I'm
also
asking
that
you
do
not
impose
any
fees
or
permits,
as
this
does
not
follow
through
with
you
know,
repealing
the
the
no
cruising
act,
our
cities
and
san
jose
residents
already
paid
taxes
to
drive
our
streets
and
our
freeways
a
little
bit
about
the
lowrider
community.
F
The
lowrider
community
consists
of
business
owners,
teachers,
professors,
lawyers,
mothers,
construction
workers,
leaders,
followers,
students,
multicultural
community.
Let
me
say
that
again
we're
multicultural
community
which
engage
with
families,
youth,
teens,
elders,
it's
a
form
of
mental
health.
We
bring
economic
growth
to
the
cities
that
we
are.
If
you
look
at
all
the
events
that
the
lowrider
community
has
throughout
the
year,
we
are
the
group
that
has
been
you
know
the
silent
giant
that
doesn't
ask
for
so
many
funds
and
whatnot,
which
we
should
be
getting.
F
But
you
know
we
have
community
engagement,
we
take
kids
and
youth
and
engage
families
and
take
them
off
the
streets
for
eight
to
ten
hours
a
day.
At
the
events
you
can
see
our
low
riders
be
seen
supporting
businesses.
B
F
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
hi,
I'm
also
a
board
member
of
the
united
low
rider
council
of
san
jose,
I'm
also
a
local
business
owner
within
the
city
of
san
jose,
and
I'm
asking
the
city
council
to
repeal
this
racially
motivated
motivated
ordinance.
F
We
need
to
refocus
our
resources
on
other
issues
such
as
the
sideshows.
That's
now
evolved
in
the
city
of
san
jose.
I'm
asking
the
council
to
please
refocus
our
resources
by
repealing
this
ordinance.
B
K
I
am
also
a
proud
participant
serve
our
community
through
the
san
jose
lowrider
council,
I'm
an
employee
of
vta
and
I
sit
on
the
chair
for
the
a2
local
265
latino
caucus-
and
I
am
here
in
support
of
my
fellow
hermanas
and
hermanos
across
the
board
across
the
state
of
california
that
stand
up
and
asking
for
the
repeal
and
demand
on
the
cruising.
Just
one
thing
for
myself.
K
I
think
we
heard
all
the
pleas,
but
as
for
myself,
as
a
vta
operator,
there's
nothing
more
that
I,
like
you
know,
for
a
mental
health
outlet
was
to
wait
for
that
weekend
on
a
sunday
to
get
into
my
car
cruise
up
and
down
downtown.
See
some
folks
take
my
family
with
me
and
for
me,
that's
an
outlet.
So
I
just
want
to
leave
that
there
raul
foreign.
B
K
Good
afternoon,
mayor
and
and
council,
my
name
is
marcus
bush
I
serve
as
the
vice
mayor
for
the
city
of
national
city
in
california,
just
outside
of
san,
diego
and
here
to
stand
in
solidarity
with
the
lowrider
community
support
council
member.
Oh
I'm
gonna
miss
pronouncement,
but
but
also
sorry,
miss
pronounce
that
and
just
be
in
solidarity
too,
with
the
united
low
rider
council,
with
with
of
san
jose
with
the
lowrider
loretta
commission
in
sacramento,
everyone
said
it.
K
You
know
these
are
discriminatory
laws.
We
know
this,
it's
it
is
criminalizing
culture,
it's
and
it's
not
just
chicano
culture,
it's
also
african-american
and
black
culture
too,
and
you
know
we
we
have
this
in
in
the
san
diego
region.
It's
you
know
personal
to
me
as
well,
being
being
black
being
mexican,
and
this
is
more
than
just
about
the
cars
it's
about
the
the
music.
It's
the
art,
it's
it's
the
food,
it's
the
people
gathering
together
and
just
celebrating
and
family
oriented,
so
really
urge
support
of
this.
K
It's
a
safe
activity
like
they
say,
low
and
slow.
So
it
is
something
that
families
enjoy
and
something
that
also
brings
an
economic
benefit,
and
I
want
to
share
with
council.
I
just
actually
met
with
our
economic
development
director
here
at
the
city
of
national
city,
so
we
had
an
amazingly
successful
event.
K
Last
month,
the
first
inaugural
one
and
businesses
up
and
down
highland
avenue,
which
is
the
historic
rural
spot
in
the
san
diego
area,
20
to
30
percent
increase
in
their
in
their
businesses
and
their
receipts
and
revenue
that
day
for
the
cruising,
and
so
I
urge
you
all
to
support
this.
Unfortunately,
in
national
city,
you
know
our
our
communities
have
been
fighting
this
for
a
year
and
a
half
and
our
council
hasn't
seen
the
value
of
it.
K
I
hope
that
changes,
there's
gonna,
be
up
and
down
it's
a
movement
up
and
down
the
state
and
and
also
encourage
you
guys
not
to
charge
for
these
cruises
either
absorb
intent
fees.
Thank
you.
K
Hello,
this
is
david
paul
from
united
lowrider
council.
Get
to
hear
I'm
in
favor
of
removing
the
cruising
ordinance.
I'm
a
lifelong
san
jose
resident
san
jose
is
one
of
the
pillars
of
the
low
rider
culture.
Regardless
of
the
no
cruising
signs
the
culture
has
thrived
in
many
ways
we
have
more
than
50
car
clubs,
not
including
those
who
choose
to
ride
solo.
K
It
seems
there
is
a
larger
amount
of
youth
getting
involved
in
the
culture
as
well.
The
culture
is
not
strictly
chicano.
There
are
many
nationalities
that
are
part
of
the
culture
we
are
active
in
the
community,
just
like
most
people
have
already
been
saying
with
the
toy
drives
and
food
drives,
and
so
on.
You
know
working
with
non-profits
kaiser
hospital,
san
jose
public
library,
events,
vivek
ayas
and
roosevelt
community
center.
K
K
The
san
jose
lowrider
community
shares
the
city's
same
desire
to
have
safe
streets
and
a
lawful
city.
We
appreciate
the
respect
and
profession
of
san
jose.
Pedia
has
given
us
to
this
point
and
looking
forward
to
building
a
closer
relationship
with
them
in
hopes
of
setting
a
good
example
for
our
youth.
K
M
Yeah
thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
to
the
the
speakers
that
joined
us
today.
I'm
not
going
to
rehash
what
I've
written
in
a
memo
and
then
what
the
speakers
have
said
and
actually
that
she
presented
a
a
good
history
within
his
memo
and
actually
laid
out.
I
think
the
the
argument
why
we
should
be
revoking
this
ordinance,
so
I
will
just
share
our
connection
here
in
the
city
with
the
low-riding
community
here
in
the
city
of
of
san
jose.
M
It
was
actually
the
late
90s
myself
just
over
a
decade
after
we
had
had
the
the
band
put
on
on
cruising
here
as
a
teenager
with
my
car
club,
the
impalas
car
club
here
in
san
jose,
where
I
volunteered
regularly
for
toy
drives
and
in
fact
it
was
at
the
newly
opened
washington
youth
center,
where
I
went
there
and
we
packed
up
our
cars
with
toys
that
had
been
donated
and
and
then
we
went
and
drove
them
around
the
community
at
specific
houses
as
if
we
were
santa
claus,
but
it
was,
it
was
a
low
rider
santa
claus
coming
by
and
and
it
was,
there
were
many
events
like
that.
M
We
participated
at
car
shows
actually
at
juvenile
hall,
through
my
car
club,
trying
to
inspire
youth
to
a
more
positive
direction
in
life
and
and
then
you
know
a
number
of
of
of
other
ways
that
just
I
think
the
the
lowrider
community
has
been
involved
in
personally
me
over
the
years,
but
more
recently,
certainly
something
that's
been
embraced
by
our
city.
M
I
was
excited
and
really
this
conversation
started
on
the
opportunity
to
repeal
this
ordinance
back
when
at
mlk
junior
library
a
few
years
ago,
we
hosted
a
history
of
low
writing
here
with
our
library.
Our
library
has
continued
to
partner
and
in
fact
there
most
recently
they
were
set
to
host
a
summer
reading
or
summer
learning.
Excuse
me
at
hillview
library
and
with
the
the
lowrider
council,
which
you
heard
you
heard
a
number
of
their
board.
Members
speak
up
today,
partnering
with
our
city.
M
M
I
think
we
are
all
pretty
aware
of
the
differences
between
the
traditional
culture
of
the
low-riding
community
and
then
some
of
the
maybe
negative
elements
that
they,
it
has
unfortunately
been
associated
with
over
the
last
number
of
decades
and
and
they're
just
two
very
different
things
that,
unfortunately,
were
meshed
together
almost
40
years
ago,
when
we
put
together
a
a
a
law
that,
in
my
mind,
was
blatantly
discriminatory
and
racist
and
when
you
look
at
the
wording
of
what
is
actually
being
banned,
and
thank
you
chief
for
again
for
highlighting
the
history
here,
it
states
cruising
is
the
repetitive
driving
of
any
motor
vehicle
past
a
traffic
control
point
in
congested
traffic
at
or
near
the
traffic
control
point.
M
And
that's
it!
That's
that's
the
that's
that
you,
you
could
essentially
in
traffic
in
downtown.
If
you
miss
your
your
your
turn
off
and
you
get
lost
and
you
you
go
around
a
couple
times,
you
can
essentially
be
in
violation
of
this
ordinance.
It
was
very,
very
broad
and
unfortunately,
was
utilized
very
broadly
in
an
attempt
to
stop
some
other
things.
M
M
So
we've
now
seen
cities
across
the
state
begin
to
look
at
this
and
thank
you
to
the
participants
from
national
city,
their
vice
mayor
and
and
lowrider
council
up
in
sacramento,
where
most
recently
right,
we
we
have
seen
their
mayor
steinberg
led
a
charge
to
repeal
their
cruising
ban,
and
hopefully
we
can
join
history
today
and
and
be
able
to
unanimously,
as
a
council
understand
that
this
is
not
a
policy
that
we
should
embrace
any
longer.
M
It's
not
one
quite
frankly,
and
our
police
department
admits
to
it
that
they
they
actually
utilize
right,
one
that
they're
issuing
citations
for.
But
in
fact
there
are
a
number
of
things
that
we
know
are
still
very
dangerous
that
we
have
not
only
municipal
codes.
We
have
even
better.
We
have
california
vehicle
code
violations
for
them.
Things
like
reckless
driving
speed
contest
exhibition
of
speed,
the
donuts
that
you
see
the
spinning
attires.
The
side
shows
that
we
know
that
we're
all
very
much
focused
on
all
of
those
things
are
still
very
much
illegal.
M
We
absolutely
want
our
police
department
to
focus
on
those,
and-
and
this
doesn't
stop
any
of
that
from
happening,
and
so
I
I
thank
again
the
speakers
for
it,
and
hopefully
my
colleagues
are
willing
to
join
in
a
unanimous
support
of
this.
So
I
will
make
the
motion
to
accept
the
repeal
of
the
ordinance
that
our
city
attorney
has
strapped
it
up.
A
First,
how
does
the,
how
do
you
in
the
department
view
this
this
regulation
today.
R
As
well
good
afternoon,
eric
council
and
city
manager,
as
council
member
perales
had
mentioned,
this
is
a
tool
that
has
been
there
for
years
and
it's
something
that
if
we
were
to
use
we,
we
used
it
in
conjunction
with
the
other
laws
on
the
books,
and
I
understand
that
there's
laws
on
the
books
currently
that
we
also
don't
use
but
it's
there,
and
I
think
that
the
issue
that
we
have
with
with
with
the
amount
of
vehicles
on
the
streets,
as
pointed
out
in
the
memo,
is
the
difficulty
of
movement
for
both
pedestrians
and
the
vehicles.
R
It's
the
gatherings
as
an
officer
and
as
a
captain,
I
personally
and
even
as
the
chief
now
have
seen
the
vehicles
and
again
I
understand
the
the
culture
and
what
we're
trying
to
do-
and
you
know
what
you
know
the
clubs
are
trying
to
do
right
is,
to
you
know,
go
up
and
down
the
street
show
off
the
canvases
that
were
mentioned.
R
You
know
nice
cars
that
they
have,
but
you
know
we've
we've
seen
that
during
the
cinco
de
mayo,
or
up
the
upcoming
hot
august
nights
right
on
story,
road,
where,
unfortunately,
there's
individuals
and
cars
that
take
over
a
a
shop
shopping
center
right
and
and
do
loiter,
they
do
drink
drugs
are
there
and
there's
violence
and
it
does
impact
our
community.
It
impacts
our
business.
So
that's
you
know,
in
addition
to
all
the
other
things
that
officers
respond
to
so
again.
F
R
Memo,
I
suggested
a
alternative
to
a
repeal
right
because
it
does
impact
our
community
and
our
businesses,
and
you
know
we
need
something.
A
perfect
example
is
the
the
car
show
in
el
viso
that
the
santos
family
puts
out.
They
have
low
riders
there.
So
an
event
that
is
sanctioned
where
you
know
there's
a
safety
plan
in
place
and
it
keeps
the
community
and
and
the
drivers
of
these
vehicles
safe
as
well.
R
I
think
that's
something
where
we
can
come
to
some
type
of
compromise
for
the
safety
of
everyone.
A
I
want
to
acknowledge
my
colleague,
councilmember
pross,
for
bringing
this
forward.
I
first
do
recognize
and
appreciate
this
is
an
important
part
of
san
jose
culture
and
our
community,
and
I
also
do
not
doubt
that
this
law
could
have
been
used
and
was
used
in
prior
decades
in
a
discriminatory
way.
A
I,
I
would
venture
to
guess
that
did
happen,
because,
as
I
look
at
the
text
of
the
ordinance,
it
seems
to
be
very
broad,
very
general,
and
I
would
I
guess,
question
whether
or
not
it
would
even
be
constitutional
under
due
process
standard
due
process
standard,
just
because
again
there's
a
lot
of
innocuous
conduct
that
could
get
caught
up
in
in
this
ordinance.
A
I
also
remember,
though,
coming
in
as
a
councilmember
in
2007,
and
we
were
trying
to
do
something
about
tackling
the
challenges
we
had
in
downtown
with
at
the
time
a
lot
of
nightclubs
where
we
were
having
shootings.
We
were
having
stabbings
and
a
couple
of
large
events.
You
know
I
can
remember
saint
patrick's
day
or
mardi
gras
or
cinco
de
mayo,
but
one
you
know
one
or
two
of
them
were.
A
You
know
it
was
pretty
chaotic
downtown
and
so
the
the
club
owners
and
the
downtown
association
and
the
community
and
the
police
everybody
got
together,
and
we
we
decided.
There
were
a
few
things
we
needed
to
do
to
reduce
the
need
for
police
engagement
in
ways
that
we
knew
were
going
to
lead
to
a
lot
of
conflict
that
is
officers
getting
into
kind
of
combat
with
drunken
attendees
at
a
nightclub.
A
This
is
15
years
ago,
the
irrigation
of
a
lot
of
cars
and
a
lot
of
congestion
and
so
forth,
made
it
very
difficult
for
the
police
to
be
able
to
clear
the
area
when
the
cubs
clubs
were
shutting
down
and
they
needed
to
get
people
out
of
the
area
because
they
knew
the
more
that
folks
hung
around
after
2
am
the
more
problems
there
would
be,
and
so
I'm
just
trying
to
sort
of
you
know.
I
I'm
quite
open
to
the
concept
of
let's
eliminate
this
thing,
particularly
if
it's
a
vestige
of
discriminatory
enforcement.
A
No
one
would
call
that
I
guess
the
latin
they'd
use
in
law
school
as
male
imperium.
Nobody,
that's
just
innately
bad,
it's
not
everybody.
Does
it
and
it's
certainly
not
innately
bad,
just
because
somebody's
shown
off
their
car,
and
so
I
guess
I'm
receptive
to
making
this
much
better.
So
it
could
be
made
much
more
specific,
so
we're
not
leaving
it
open
to.
A
Sort
of
officer
discretion
not
to
suggest
anything
about
our
officers
today,
but
I
think
we
recognize
what
has
happened
in
the
past
and-
and
I
just
I
guess
the
question
chief
is
hey.
Do
you
have
other
tools
that
you
can
deal
with
very
crowded
situations
where
you
got
to
clear
an
area
after
the
big
event?
A
Maybe
there's
been
some
unrest
during
the
event,
particularly
if
it's
a
you
know,
a
festival
and
people
are
drinking,
and
you
know
young
people
have
too
much
and
whatever
it
might
be,
and
you
just
want
to
get
people
out
of
there.
So
you
don't
have
sort
of
the
toxic
mix
of
a
lot
of
young
males
with
alcohol
in
them
in
a
ca
in
a
in
a
place,
you
know
after
2
a.m.
You
just
need
to
move
people
home.
R
You
mayor
all
the
tools
that
we'll
have
in
place
are
things
that
were
mentioned
earlier
today.
We
can
enforce
the
existing
vehicle
laws,
penal
code
laws,
in
addition
to
doing
traffic,
diversions
and
things
of
that
nature,
to
clear
an
area,
as
we
know,
or
as
I
know
as
well-
is
that
it's
resource
intensive.
R
However,
it
is
doable
so
we
can
do
or
implement
those
measures
to
clear
an
area
out
if
needed.
But
again
the
the
issue
is,
is
when
there's
violence
or
some
type
of
criminal
activity
that
is
occurring
right,
that
we
have
to
take
out
those
resources
and
deal
with
the
the
problem
at
hand.
So
we
do
have
tools
in
place
which
we
can
implement.
R
It
will
be
resource.
Intensive.
Much
like
the
side
shows,
are
when
two
or
three
hundred
cars
show
up.
So
you
know
we'll
do
the
best
that
we
can
with
the
resources
that
we
have,
and
I
I
think
that
knowing
and
one
of
the
alternatives
that
I
that
we
laid
out
in
the
memo
is
to
maybe
determine
when
these
events
are
occurring.
R
So
while
we
are
well
prepared
to
address,
if
you
know
there
are
any
issues
or
we
are
aware
of
those
events
or
those
number
of
pedestrians
or
vehicles
in
a
specific
area,
so
we
can
address
it
if
needed.
So
I
think
that's
why
we
propose
an
alternative
to
whoever
is
a
sponsor
of
these
type
of
events.
Can
contact
us
and
we
can,
you
know,
work
with
them
to
again
create
a
safety
plan,
so
we
can
keep
our
community
and
businesses
safe.
A
Yeah,
I
guess
I
just
say
I
you
know
if,
if
what
you
conclude
is
you
need
some
other
tool
and
having
an
ordinance,
that's
much
more
specific
about
the
conduct
that
you
want
to
prohibit
would
enable
you
to
have
that
tool.
I'd
be
very
receptive
as
I
reread
this
ordinance.
I
think
it
is
too
broad
and
obviously
any
ordinance.
A
That's
too
broad
that
captures
too
much
behavior
is
very
susceptible
to
discriminatory
application,
and-
and
so
you
know
for
that
reason,
I'm
going
to
support
this
motion,
but
I
again
I
just
want
to
sort
of
invite
this
ongoing
conversation
about
how
do
we
make
sure
that
police
have
the
tools
so
that
that
don't
need
to
be
in
situations
where
they're
confronting
a
large
number
of
patrons
who
are
coming
out
of
a
bar
at
2
a.m?
A
You
know
we're
trying
to
minimize
those
kinds
of
conflicts.
The
last
thing
I'd
say
is
this
again,
I'm
certain
you
know
somebody
said
to
me:
hey.
There
was
discriminatory
application
of
this
in
the
1990s
and
council
member
peralta.
I
think
you
make
a
strong
case
for
that
in
your
memorandum,
although
is
that
picture
of
you?
That's
quite
a
haircut.
You
had
then
boy
a
lot
of
hair
sense.
In
any
event,
you
know
and
kevin
follows
makes
a
very
convincing
argument
with
that.
A
A
In
this
case,
I
just
looked
at
the
memo
and
I
guess
the
motion
was
made
by
councilmember
alvarez,
who
I
don't
know
that
was
seconded
by
a
council
member
williams,
iowa
williams,
aiola
williams,
who
was
of
course
first
black
council
member
in
our
city,
forrest
williams,
of
course,
who
led
the
effort
in
2007.
I
know
did
so
in
the
downtown
when
this
was
recommended.
A
As
a
strategy,
I
know
did
so
with
with
a
very
a
clear
intent
to
simply
do
well
by
the
city
without
any
discriminatory
intent,
and
so
I
just
would
hesitate
to
pass
judgment
on
others
who
may
be
quite
well
intended,
recognizing
that
even
the
best
of
intentions
can
result
in
discriminatory
treatment
if
laws
are
are
too
broad
or
too
vague.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
Just
a
just
a
quick
question.
I'm
trying
to
understand
chief
sort
of
you
know
I
can
understand.
Obviously,
if
we
repeal
this,
I
I
guess
the
officers
will
then
no
longer
be
allowed
to
pull
over
folks
that
they
perceive
to
be
cruising
because
this
municipal
is
no
longer
going
to
be
on
the
books.
Correct.
R
Yes,
and
as
council
member
perales
pointed
out
that
we
haven't
used
that
citation.
C
R
Sure,
council,
member,
as
I
mentioned,
there's
if
you
have
ever
look
at
looked
at
a
penal
code
book.
There's
all
these
laws
on
on
the
books
right
and
this
is
just
would
be
another
tool,
but
as
had
that's
on
the
books
for
us
to
use
but
has,
as
has
been
mentioned,
we
have
other
items
that
or
pinocco's
or
vehicles
that
we
can
refer
to
in
lieu
of
this
ordinance.
R
C
And
I
guess
for
me
the
the
son,
you
know
and
let
me
just
back
up
a
little
bit
so
like
counseling
up
for
alex
I'm
a
little
older
than
him,
but
I
used
to
I
used
to
cruise
as
he
did,
but
I
wasn't
part
of
a
car
club,
and
so
you
hear
a
lot
of
the
comments
from
the
lowrider.
You
know
the
folks
that
drive
the
low
riders
and
part
of
the
clubs
car
clubs,
which
I
very
much
appreciate,
because
they're
sort
of
the
organized
bunch
of
folks
that
go
out
there
right.
C
But
I
do
I
would
concede
and
agree
that
there
are
a
host
of
other
people
that
aren't
part
of
car
clubs
that
are
not
in
low
riders.
That
at
times-
and
I
say
this
because
I
was
one
of
those
kids-
that
at
times
are
causing
trouble
for
a
host
of
different
things,
doing
a
host
of
different
things
in
and
outside
the
vehicle.
And
so
so
so
I
I
think
it's
important
just
to
acknowledge
that
there
are
things
that
happen
while
cruising
is
taking
place,
not
necessarily
tied
to
the
low
riders.
C
The
people
in
the
in
the
nice
cars
but
tied
to
folks
that
are
sometimes
in
the
normal
cars,
the
honda
civics,
if
you
will
and
so
but
but
it
seems
to
me
that,
even
if
we
repeal
this,
which
in
my
mind
simply
because
it
seems
to
not
have
been
utilized
all
that
much
to
me-
and
this
is
the
troubling
aspect
for
me-
is
that
it
seems
to
me
to
just
simply
be
there
to
be
utilized
as
a
pretext
to
stop
people.
C
And
that's
that's
what
I
think
is
a
little
dangerous
about
this
and
the
fact
that
it's
been
utilized,
because
I've
been
sat
on
the
curve
many
times
over
the
course
of
my
lifetime
living
growing
up
in
east
san
jose,
and
so
I
know
full
well
what
council
member
has
perales
has
described
and
for
no
reason,
never
arrested.
Nothing
like
that.
Just
simply
pulled
over,
because
you
know
a
vehicle
was
too
low
or
we
drove
by
maybe
a
little
too
frequently.
And
so
I
guess
you
know
I'm
going
to
be
supportive
of
this.
C
But
I
just
don't.
I
still
don't
quite
understand
exactly
what
we're
losing
if
we
approve
this
and
repeat
and
take
this
off
the
books,
because
in
my
mind,
some
of
the
stuff
that
does
in
fact
happen
out
there
right
some
of
the
the
burnouts
and
people
drinking
and
doing
a
host
of
things
and
things
in
parking
lots.
C
It
seems
to
me
that
there's
other
tools
that
are
already
utilized
to
to
address
some
of
those
issues
and
those
aren't
going
away
and
we're
not
shedding
those
simply
because
we're
revealing
this,
and
so
I
just
don't
see
a
very
convincing
reason
not
to
do
this
I'd
be
you
know
happy.
Obviously
I
think
only
time
will
tell
how
this
shakes
out,
but
in
my
mind
I
just
don't.
C
T
Thank
you.
I
was
actually
going
to
discuss
the
same
point
that
councilmember
has
just
finish
talking
about
and
that's
to
his
point
about
not
having
a
single
citation
in
the
last.
You
know
how
many
of
her
years
it
means
that
we
never
really
needed
this
ordinance
repealed,
but
it's
rather
the
custom
and
the
approach
to
the
community
that
actually,
I
think,
needs
to
get
revisited.
T
I
don't
think
that
just
repealing
the
the
ordinances
is
going
to
change
the
interactions
or
isn't
going
to
encourage
people
to
start
cruising
and
getting
all
out
of
control
at.
I
don't
think
that
we
should
jump
to
those
conclusions,
but
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
have
conversations
with
our
community
about
what
this
means.
T
There's
always
I
I
I'm
also
going
to
share
an
admit
that
I
also
participated
in
cruising.
I
was
never
in
a
in
a
car
club,
but
I
enjoyed
cruising
every
now
and
then
down
on
king
and
story,
and
it
was
always
a
lot
of
fun.
It
reminded
me
of
some
of
the
customs
that
some
small
towns
have
obviously
were
in
in
cars,
but
when
I
would
visit
mexico
as
a
young
kid,
there
was
a
garden.
T
It's
always
a
garden
in
front
of
a
church
as
a
central
location
of
the
downtown
of
any
small
town
and
in
this
small
town
that
my
mom
was
born
in
girls
would
walk
on
the
inside
of
this.
So
there
would
be
like
this
whole
plaza
that
you
would
walk
around.
T
Girls
would
go
clockwise
and
the
boys
would
go
counterclockwise
and-
and
that
was
a
kind
of
a
version
of
cruising
if
you
will
using
your
own
two
legs.
T
But
it
was
a
a
way
for
the
youth
of
that
town
to
connect
to
get
to
know
each
other
and-
and
I
think
every
town
thinks
of
something
slightly
different.
What
what
concerns
me
here
is
that
we're
going
to
repeal
this
ordinance,
but
we
are
still
not,
or
our
officers
are
still
not
going
to
accept
somebody
slowing
down
on
story,
king
or
slowing
down
on
santa
clara
and
actually
for
some
of
those
folks
who
love
to
cruise
to
allow
for
cruising
to
happen.
T
But
the
other
thing
is
the
the
the
practicality
of
it
and
and
what
we
actually
do
and
so
have
knowing
that
this
ordinance
has
never
been
cited,
for
any
citation
tells
me
that
that
what
officers
are
doing
out
there
are
is,
you
know,
they're
using
obviously
other
laws
that
we
have
in
order
to
prevent
folks
from
cruising.
T
So
how
are
we
going
to
have
this
conversation
and
chief,
I'm
interested
in
hearing
from
you,
because
I
I
think
this
belongs
under
maybe
the
reimagining
of
public
safety,
where
we
have
these
conversations
with
our
community
and
we
talk
about
what
this
means.
We
talk
about
bringing
back
the
crew
the
cruising
lifestyle
that
a
lot
of
folks
are
just
really
enjoy,
and
but
what
that
means
and
what
are
those
parameters?
T
I
know
that
you
have
two
an
option
of
having
a
six
month
trial,
but
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
to
have
a
trial
if
we
don't
have
a
conversation
with
our
community
first,
how
do
you
propose
that
we
begin
that
conversation
in
order
to
to
actually
change
those
interactions
on
the
street
with
our
community.
R
Thank
you,
council,
member.
Well,
the
community
does
reach
out
to
us
every
time,
there's
a
sideshow
or
there's
an
impacted
community
right
that
you
know.
There's
cars,
racing
driving,
rush
recklessly
doing
donuts
things
of
that
nature.
So
we
do
get
the
calls
and
again
we
respond
when
we
have
the
resources
to
do
so.
You
know
we
just
have
much
like
fireworks
right.
We
have
to
do
a
campaign
and
we're
willing
to
work
with
the
county.
R
T
Okay,
I'm
gonna
support
the
motions
on
the
floor
because
I
obviously
want
this
repealed.
I
just
don't
know
that
it's
going
to
work
if
we
don't
have
the
conversations
with
our
our
communities
in
a
very
structured
way.
If
we
and-
and
I
know
that
you're
open
to
that
chief,
I
think
it's
going
to
take
a
more
general
invitation
to
our
community
to
let
them
know
what
is
now
permissible,
because
I
think
we
need
to
show
what
the
parameters
are.
T
What
would
be
appropriate
because,
even
even
up
to
you
know
to
this
year,
I
know
that
there's
an
effort,
every
cinco
de
mayo
to
to
manage
our
brown
youth
around
community.
I
think
people
sometimes
are
afraid
that
when
there's
one
too
many
of
us
on
the
street
that
you
know
that
there
it's
going
to
be
a
riot,
it's
going
to
be
a
violent
altercation,
and
I
think
that
this
is
this.
T
T
We're
going
to
set
up
our
brown
community
to
to
fail
here
if,
if
we
don't
set
them
up
for
success-
and
I
I
do
like
that
idea
of
having
this
be
a
lot
more
organized
it-
I
don't
know
that
people
who
are
not
of
color,
don't
I
don't
know
that
you
necessarily
understand
what
it
means
to
drive
while
brown,
while
black.
T
When
I
drive
with
my
husband
and
he
gets
stopped,
he
you
know,
he's
six
feet
tall
and
he
gets
treated
very
differently
and-
and
I
I
never
noticed-
but
I
I
I
thought
about
it
when
I
was
last
year
when
our
protests
were
happening,
because
I
didn't
bring
my
son
downtown
as
he
is
also
six
feet,
he
would
be
looked
at
as
an
adult
and
and
maybe
treated
as
an
adult
based
on
his
slugs,
and
you
do
get
treated
differently.
T
You
get
treated
differently
and
I'm
I'm
I'm
just
hoping
that
that
this
ordinance
is
this
repeal
of
this
ordinance
has
a
lot
more
meaning
than
than
just
dropping
it
from
the
books.
M
F
M
The
council
members,
I
was
also
contacted
by
council
member,
a
former
council
member
and
supervisor
black
alvarado,
who
was
part
of
the
initial
ban,
aware
of
their
intent
and
again
that's
why
I
mentioned
that
within
my
my
memo,
I
think
at
the
same
time,
I
appreciate
you
understand
a
lot
better
than
I
do
mayor
as
a
lawyer
or
recovering
lawyer
as
to
why
the
language
itself
right
is,
is
indeed,
I
think,
not
something
that
that
any
of
us
at
this
point
should
accept,
and
at
the
same
time
I
know
even
our
our
lowrider
community
is
very
much
interested
in
you
know
how
do
these
events
remain
safe
and
crime
free?
M
When
you
put
tens
of
thousands
hundred
thousand
dollars
into
your
classic
car,
you
also
don't
want
the
sideshow
activity,
the
legal
activity
right-
and
I
I
know
because
they've
mentioned
it
to
me-
they've-
been
more
than
happy
to
meet
up
with
the
police
department
chiefs.
You
know
yourself
or
someone
within
your
your
administration
to
talk
about.
How
do
we
move
forward
right
more
productively?
M
Maybe
it
is
a
part
of
the
rematching
process,
or
it's
initially
just
starts
off
as
a
side
conversation
but
they're
very
much
interested
in
that
large
events.
I
also
want
to
ensure
we
differentiate
the
two
right
traditional
cruising.
When
I
would
you
know
my
parents
would
take
my
sister
and
I,
when
we
were
little
kids
literally
just
my
parents
taking
the
car,
we're
driving
down,
downtown
and
go
to
east
side
and
go
home.
It
wasn't
like
a
coordinated
event.
It
wasn't
because
somebody
put
it
together.
M
M
You
know
the
types
of
events
when
you're
you're
coordinating
a
meetup
where
you're
promoting
it
for
thousands
of
cars
that
come
into
a
parking
lot,
and
you
know
that's
different
than
what
I
think
what
we're
talking
about
today.
The
act
of
cruising
that's
been
banned,
so
I
think
you
know
we
can
have
that
conversation.
I
don't
know
if
we'll
get
to
it
before
the
end
of
the
year,
but
I'm
happy
to
try
and
see.
M
If
we
can,
you
know
agendize
something
through
psp's
right
to
have
a
conversation,
but
if
not,
I
think
that
conversation
absolutely
can
happen
on
its
own,
and
I
know
that
the
loretta
council
would
be
welcome
to
have
that
conversation.
A
Thank
you
thank
you,
councilmember,
and
I
just
thought
for
a
suggestion.
If
the
department
believes
this
is
important
to
have
as
a
tool
in
those
unique
circumstances
now,
I'd
say:
let's
define
those
unique
circumstances.
For
example
saying
you
know
when
there
has
been
violent
activity
on
a
particular
block
in
the
prior
hour,
then
the
police
have
the
ability
or
after
2
a.m,
or
just
to
be
very
specific.
So
that
way
you
have
the
tool
when
you
need
it,
but
it's
not
so
broad
as
to
result
in.
A
I
think
what
we've,
what
we've
heard
much
about
so
anyway.
Thank
you.
I
think
it's
been
a
good
conversation.
Let's,
let's
vote
on
councilmember
paulus's
motion.
F
A
Hi
I
lied
when
I
said
it's
the
last
thing
before
dinner,
jennifer
chambery's
been
very
patient
and
I
think
she
either
needs
to
get
back
to
work
or
home
one
or
the
other,
but
she's
been
here
for
several
hours.
Item
4.1
4.3
3.6
rather
are
the
sideline
agreements
with
several
of
our
bargaining
units,
aea,
abmei
and
camp
and
unit
99,
which
is
not
a,
I
guess,
a
bargaining
unit
but
they're
a
group
of
our
employees
spending
amending
the
city
of
san
jose
pay
plan.
There's
no
presentation
on
this.
I
A
Oh,
that's
a
good
point.
I
got
a
memorandum
there.
Would
you
mind,
including
that
when
they're
councilmember
frost?
Yes
right?
Yes,
that's!
Okay,
with
councilmember,
foley,
okay,
great,
let's
go
to
the
public!
Are
there
any?
Is
there
any
public
on
this
item?
Specifically
item
3.6?
There's
no
public
comment.
Okay!
F
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
We're
going
to
take
a
break
for
for
dinner.
Now
it's
6
30..
I
know
we've
got
members
of
the
public
and
others
who
are
waiting
for
us.
What
do
you
mean?
Can
we
do
this
6
30,
6,
30?
Okay,
that's
all
it's
all
reassembled
at
6
30.!
Thank
you.