►
From YouTube: JUN 23, 2021 | City Council, Continuance from June 22
Description
City of San José, California
City Council, June 23, 2021, Continuance of June 22, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=871409&GUID=14105CD4-80BD-49D4-B2D0-4D94BCFF5CD9
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
I'm
sure
everyone's
feeling
bright-eyed
bushy-tailed
from
last
night.
Thank
you
all
for
your
patience
and
joining
us
again
this
morning.
These
are
obviously
very
important
matters
for
our
community,
so
we'll
call
the
media
order
for
the
morning
of
june
23rd.
This
is,
of
course,
a
continuation
of
last
night
and
I'll.
Ask
tony
if
she
could
please
call
the
roll.
A
C
A
A
D
So
I
just
had
one
more
question
for
council
member
cohen.
I
wanted
to
ask
so
there
are
components
of
different
memos
that
require
the
that
would
require
the
applicant
to
return
to
council
for
approval
before
granting
a
development
permit,
and
I
wanted
to
hear
from
councilmember
cohen
why
that
wasn't
part
of
the
motion.
C
I
thought
I
heard
another
voice.
I
was
just
trying
to
get
help
getting
directed
to
the
item
here,
which
one
is
it
here,
I'm
not
even
looking
at
the
right.
B
Yeah
for
those
in
the
public
who
are
wondering
we
had
a
flurry
of
memos
that
were
filed
yesterday,
so
I
think
everyone's
doing
their
best
to
catch
up
with.
C
The
various
documents-
oh,
I
think
it's
item
three
of
the
of
my
of
the
memo
from
the
mayor
and
myself
jimenez
any
planned
future
development
that
specific
authorizes
detail,
architectural
design
of
a
future
urban
market
and
the
actual
vendor
stall
shall
be
considered
for
approval
by
the
city
council.
And
then
it
says
prior
to
that's
the
middle
of
application
for
the
tv
permit,
property
owners
shall
make
and
complete.
Oh
that's
a
separate
item,
but
3a
is
the
item
it's
in
the
memo
there.
D
So
so
would
you
consider
specifically
bringing
that
before
council
because
it
says
approval
by
council
so,
okay,
there
we
go
a
planned
development.
Permit,
okay,.
D
Okay-
and
I
I
had
so
that's
helpful,
thank
you
because
we
do
have
a
few
memos
and
then
in
councilmember
got
us
post
memo.
So
I
I
have
one
more
question
for
councilmember,
cohen
and
council
member
cut
us.
D
A
C
E
D
E
I
think
that
that
would
also
be
an
issue
we
can
I'll
look
at
that
quickly.
I
think
that
also
is
potentially
an
issue
under
that
same
state
law.
Let
me
look
at
that
quickly.
Beer
do
you
know
off
the
top
of
your
head.
A
A
Okay
by
by
government
agency.
All
of
those
things
could
be
agreed
to
between
the
property
owner
and
the
vendors.
Or
you
know.
The
tenants
that
cannot
be
forced
by
the
city
cannot
be
a
condition
by
this
condition
by
the
city.
A
D
Okay,
that's
helpful,
thank
you
and
I'm
going
back
and
forth
because
we
had
a
lot
of
memos
and
discussions.
C
C
Okay,
in
addition,
the
line
in
in
council
member
problems,
memo
which,
let
me
see
if
I
can
find
the
exact
wording,
which
says
clarifying
language-
that
that
makes
sure
that
the
conditions
of
approval
remain,
in
effect
in
the
event
of
property
transfer.
While
I
think
that's
already
in
there
adding
that
as
an
additional
statement
to
make
sure
it's
clear
is
also
makes
makes
sense,
and
it's
fine
to
add.
So
we
can
add
those
too
okay.
Let.
B
B
Okay,
so
the
motions
demanded
in
two
ways,
one
incorporated
a
mandate
of
a
super
majority
of
vendors
on
the
advisory
group
and
secondly,
with
regard
to
ensuring
that
these
restrictions
run
with
the
property,
regardless
of
who
may
be
a
successor,
is
that
right,
cancer
phone.
A
D
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
I
had
a
one
one
more
thing,
and
actually
this
was
for
vice
mayor
jones.
B
D
Okay,
so
I
had
a
question
about
the
memo
because
I
just
you
know
it
needs
to
be
said.
Frankly,
I
here
we
have
a
a
landmark
in
san
jose.
That's
existed
over
60
years
that
has
brought
that
brings
millions
of
visitors
to
our
city
every
year,
and
it's
made
up
of
mostly
minority
small
businesses
and
and
has,
as
we've
heard,
has
acted
as
an
incubator
for
many
small
businesses,
including
some
that
have
gone
on
to
become
franchises
in
our
city,
and
so
I
I
wanted
to
ask
the
vice
mayor.
D
Why
are
we
trying
to
look
at
county
land
like
that?
We
don't
control
right,
and
so
that's
question
number
one,
because
I
I'll
put
it
out
there.
The
bum
family
is
has
based
their
business
model
off
of
free
land
and
I
don't
think
the
businesses
are
getting
free
rent.
D
So
so
that's
question
number
one
and
then
question
number
two
is:
has
anyone
considered
the
only
other
flea
market
in
the
city
that
again
has
existed
for
generations
and
is
made
of
you
know,
brings
many
visitors
to
our
city
that
consists
of
hundreds
of
minority,
small
businesses
in
our
city,
and
so
I'm
concerned
that
we're
taking
like
an
escape
from
new
york
solution
to
try
and
displace
people
from
a
part
of
the
city
that
they
have
helped
to
grow,
and
then
we're
looking
for
land
that
we
don't
control
to
displace
them.
D
And
so
I
wanted
to
hear
specifically
what
the
thought
was.
There.
F
Thank
you,
councilmember
esparza
and-
and
I
I
totally
agree
with
you-
that
the
flea
market
is
a
treasure
for
the
city.
It's
an
institution,
it's
an
incubator
and
it's
an
example
of
entrepreneurship
and
hard
work
and
and
all
the
things
that
we
should
be
proud
of.
F
But
we
also
have
to
be
realistic
and
and
recognize
that
if
the
flea
market,
as
it
currently
exists,
is
no
longer
going
to
be
able
to
continue
because
of
this
development
that
we
have
to
look
at
alternatives
for
a
lot
of
those
vendors
they're
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
move
to
the
new
market
because
it
won't
be
a
good
fit
for
their
business
model.
It
won't
be
a
good
fit
for
the
the
business
model
of
the
urban
market,
and
so
it's
incumbent
upon
us
to
try
to
find
alternatives.
F
We
in
my
memo
we
stated
you
know,
look
at
county
land.
I
want
to
look
at
city
land.
I
want
to
look
at
private
property,
but
the
county
has
a
lot
of
available
land,
but
in
so
I
think
that
we
should
at
least
explore
the
possibility
or
opportunity
of
utilizing
county
land.
We
might
be
able
to
utilize
it
for
a
reduced
cost
which
will
reduce
the
cost
to
the
vendors
to
be
able
to
utilize
that
space,
and
we
can.
D
So
so
that
concerns
me
because
it's
just
an
open
acknowledgement
that
we're
displacing
folks
from
a
part
of
the
city
that
they
helped
build,
and
so
I
did
want
to.
I
want
to
protect
the
flea
market.
In
my
district
at
least
I
have
a
flea
market,
that's
been
in
existence
over
40
years
and
again
has
hundreds
of
businesses
in
in
in
district
7,
and
I
don't
want
two
flea
markets
mad
at
us.
D
I
think
we
already
have
one
hunger
strike
and
I
don't
think
we
want
a
second
group
of
folks
who
are
angry
at
us
because
we're
bringing
in
essentially
competition
to
their
businesses
that
are
thriving
and
bringing
folks
to
the
city.
D
So
so
thank
you
to
councilmember
cohen
for
accepting
the
super
majority
change
to
ensure
restrictions
run
with
the
property
I'm
going
to
ask
for
one
more,
and
that
is
that
that
we
as
we
explore
that
we
consider
a
two
mile
radius
around
the
capital
flea
market
to
avoid
further
harming
our
small
minority
businesses
that
operate
at
the
city's
only
other
existing
flea
market.
So
I
I'd
like
to
protect
them.
B
Councilman
sparta
will
have
councilman
cohen,
respond
to
your
request
for
friendly
amendment
and
then
we'll
have
to
transition
come
back.
I
get
it.
Yep,
casper
cohen,.
C
Yeah,
that's
fine
with
me,
I
mean
I
I
mean
I
have
no
intention
of
of
you
know
trying
to
create
that
competition.
There
may
be
space
at
the
capitol
flea
market.
For
some
of
the
vendors
I
mean
that's
the
only
thing
we
had
talked
about
before
some
of
the
vendors
might
be
able
to
find
opportunity
there,
but
setting
that
aside,
I'm
perfectly
happy
to
put
in
the
the
that
radius
restriction
that
you
just
recommended.
So
we
can
add
that
as
another
element
of
the
motion.
D
Okay,
thank
you,
and
so
I'm
assuming
this,
the
seconder
accepts
that.
B
You
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
at
some
point
to
hear
from
our
attorneys
whether
or
not
we
can
actually
do
that,
but
we
perhaps
will
give
them
a
moment
to
think
about
it
and
come
back
on
that
issue.
B
D
So
what
I'm
asking
is
to
protect
the
capital
flea
market
and
create
a
two
mile
radius
outside
of
that
in
order
to
protect
that
flea
market,
and
that
is
100
percent
within
our
control.
As
a
city
council.
D
B
To
whether
or
not
precluding
any
competing
flea
market
from
being
within
two
miles
is
lawful,
that
that
is
the
question:
is
that
right.
E
Let
us
let
us
get
a
couple
minutes
looking
at.
That
is
that's
really
not
part
of
this
motion,
so
that's
something
we
can
advise
the
council,
because,
right
now,
as
I
understand
it,
the
motion
is
simply
for
the
for
the
work
that's
being
done
to
identify
other
locations
that
that
work
would
not
include
properties
within
that
radius.
Is
that
right.
B
E
Yeah
and
I,
and
I'm
not
sure
that
we
can
do
that
as
part
of
this
matter,
that
may
be
something
that
the
council
could
do
it
subsequently
in
terms
of
zoning
or
other
council
actions
for
that
area.
But
let
us
look
to
see
if
in
this
particular
for
these
particular
approvals,
if
we
can
bootstrap
that
on,
I'm
not
sure
that
we
can.
E
Hartley
brown
act
and
partly,
I
think
that
the
actions
that
the
council
would
need
to
take
would
be
more
than
just
simply
tied
to
the
approvals
in
this
case.
Right.
A
E
This
particular
project
and
you
you
could
give
direction
for
us
to
come
back
and
for
staff
to
come
back
for
something
like
that,
but
I'm
I'm.
E
I
think
it
would
be
a
real
stretch
to
try
to
tie
that
kind
of
land
use
restriction
for
a
different
parcel
to
these
approvals
that
are
before
the
council
right
now,
but
we'll
we'll.
Look
in
the
meantime.
Also.
B
Okay,
so
to
be
clear,
what's
on
the
on
the
floor
now
and
I'll
clarify
this
with
council
member
cohen,
to
make
her
the
motion
that
that
the
city
shall
not
explore
or
investigate
any
sites
within
a
two
mile
radius
of
the
capital
flea
market
and
perhaps
for
the
city
attorney
and
staff,
to
return
with
the
question
of
whether
the
city
can
actually
prohibit
any
new
flea
market
within
two
miles
of
the
capital
market?
Is
that
that
you're
understanding
remember.
C
That's
my
problem:
my
understanding
was
really
just
the
first
part.
I
mean
I'm
okay
with
the
second
part.
I
think
there's
some
study
warranted
on
the
second
item,
but
I
think
it'd
take
more
work
because
it's
not
you
know
the
question
of
a
competitive
versus
a
symbiotic
kind
of
situation
in
terms
of
the
economic
benefits
of
where
the
market
should
be
located.
G
B
Okay,
councilman
is
that's
you're.
Okay,
with
that
amendment
as
well.
A
As
it
relates
to
two
miles
radius
from
the
capital
flea
market,
that
would
naturally
exclude
the
the
fairgrounds,
and
so
I'm
curious
as
to
how
that
interaction
is-
and
maybe
that's
a
council
member
as
far
as
this
goal
and
totally
understand
that.
But
I
think
the
fairgrounds
is
within
two
miles
of
the
capital
flea
market.
So
if
that
would
naturally
exclude
that
and
I'm
curious
how
that
interacts
with
councilmember
or
vice
mayor
jones's
recommendation.
D
D
B
C
Yeah
I
mean
I,
I
understand,
can't
accept
it
without
the
secondary
agreeing
to
it,
and
I
you
know
I
hearing
the
conversation.
I
think
we
would
need
more
time
to
to
evaluate
this
question.
Interestingly,
the
the
original
goal
of
the
bum
family
10
years
ago
was
to
try
to
negotiate
a
deal
to
move
this
flea
market
to
the
fairgrounds.
That
was
actually
discussed.
C
I
think
pretty
openly
at
the
time
and
the
county
and
couldn't
come
to
an
agreement
and
if
they
had,
then
then
we
wouldn't
be
having
this
discussion
today,
because
that
relocation
would
have
occurred.
So
it
is
an
interesting
question
as
to
whether
that's
a
good
site
or
not,
and-
and
you
know
certainly-
and
then
you
know
right.
B
B
No,
I
went
to,
I
think,
12
or
13
minutes
for
you
as
I
recall,
and
then
it
continued
and
I've
been
quite
lenient
to
recognize
the
fact
that
people
will
hopefully
exercise
some
self-restraint
and
moving
on.
If
you
want
me
to
be
precise
at
9
59
I'll
do
so,
but
I
can
assure
you
I
have
granted
you
and
many
of
my
colleagues
an
enormous
amount
of
leeway
and
the
hope
that
people
would
exercise
through
the
strength
to
comply
with
the
rule
that
you
all
approve.
H
Thank
you,
I
don't
know
about
you
all,
but
I'm
exhausted,
but
this
is
a
really
important
issue
and
I
I
really
I
know
we
don't
have
as
many
vendors
probably
participating
at
this
call
right
now,
as
we
had
last
last
night.
H
But
what
they
had
to
say
is
really
important,
and
I
want
them
to
know
that
I
am
concerned
about
their
financial
success
and
their
fi
and
theirs
and
their
survivability
both
at
the
flea
market
and
going
forward,
and-
and
I
want
to
give
you
all
a
little
background
that
you
all
probably
don't
know
in
the
early
80s,
my
husband
actually
had
a
flea
market
business
where
we
would
go
to
every
friday.
We
would
pack
up
his
stuff
from
our
garage,
we'd,
we'd,
schlep
it
over
to
capital
flea
market.
H
In
occasions,
we'd
go
to
berryessa
if
we
couldn't
get
into
berryessa
we'd
go
to
capital.
Sometimes
I'd
join
him.
That
was
an
exhausting
business,
but
it's
what
we
did
in
order
to
pay
the
bills,
keep
the
lights
on
and
and
put
food
on
our
tables.
Frankly,
we
had
that
business
for
about
10
years
and
it
really
helped
us
to
save
a
little
bit
of
money
so
that
we
could
eventually
buy
our
first
house.
But
so
I
I've
been
where
all
of
those
vendors
are.
It
wasn't
my
business.
H
It
was
my
husband's,
but
I
helped
him
every
step
of
the
way
and
it
is
an
exhausting
business,
and
I
appreciate
the
determination
and
the
entrepreneurial
ship
of
the
the
vendors
in
the
businesses
that
you
have.
I
know
many
of
the
vendors
have
put
their
kids
through
college
on
their
through
their
hard
work
at
the
the
berryessa
flea
market.
So
I
really
appreciate
and
respect
and
have
been
experiencing
that
vendor
that
vendor
business
back
in
the
day.
We
did
that
for
about
10
years
and
I'll
tell
you
it
was
exhausting.
H
We
even
I
have
stories.
I
could
tell
you
about
the
capital
flea
market
that
are
kind
of
fun
and
humorous
and
someday
I'll
share
them
with
you.
But
I
I
just
want
you
to
know
how
I
truly
value
the
time
that
we
spent
with
working
at
the
flea
market
and
what
that
meant
to
us
and
how
it
developed
our
character
and
created
people
who
really
value
hard
work.
H
H
I
want
to
thank
council
member
cohen
for
coming
in
and
working
on
this
issue
as
soon
as
he
did.
I
can't
imagine
having
to
address
such
a
complicated
issue
when
you
for,
when
you
become
a
brand
new
council
member,
but
you
really
worked,
came
together
to
investigate
and
negotiate
the
best
deal
possible
for
the
vendors
and
then
for
crafting
the
the
motion.
We
received
a
lot
of
memos
yesterday
and
they
were
complicated,
so
councilmember
cohen.
H
I
appreciate
you
for
sifting
through
them
and
figuring
out
what
was
important
and
what
needed
to
be
carried
forward.
So
I'm
I
am
supportive
of
the
motion.
I
know
there
is
a
concern
about,
or
discussion
about,
post
funding
till
next
week.
Frankly,
I'm
not
opposed
to
that,
but
I'd
like
to
know
what
will
be
gained
by
postponing
for
a
week.
H
I
don't
agree
with
postponing
for
90
days,
because
I
I
think
we
have
the
bones
of
it,
of
what
needs
to
be
done
to
move
forward
with
this
agreement
in
this
negotiation
today
I
do
have
one
question
and,
and
it
it's
about
the
additional
2.5
million
dollars,
that
is
in
council
member
carrasco's
memo,
and
I
don't
disagree
with
the
funds.
I'm
just
questioning
the
source.
Can
we
allocate
those
funds
from
the
american
rescue
plan?
A
Us
yeah
good
morning,
councilmember
jim,
shannon
city's
budget
director.
I
think
the
the
initial
answer
is
we're
not
sure
I
think
we
would
like
to
be
able
to
revisit
this.
We
come
back
in
the
fall
to
determine
you
know
the
the
nexus
that
we
can
draw
to
those
that
are
economically
impacted
by
coba.
I
think
the
way
it's
currently
structured,
I'm
I'm
a
little
bit
hesitant,
but
I'd
like
more
time
to
try
to
figure
out
what
the
right
nexus
is.
There.
H
Okay,
so
it's
a
it's
a,
maybe
at
this
point
and
then
what
I
would
want
to
know.
In
addition
to,
can
we
use
the
funds?
Is
there
restrictions
on
when
we
must
use
the
funds
by
because
we're
looking
at
if
we're
the
some
of
the
vendors
are
being
displaced?
And
these
funds
are
being
used
for
relocation?
It
may
be
beyond
the
window,
but
I
don't
know
so.
Maybe
the
the
question
for
me
is:
can
they
be
used
and
are
there
any
restrictions
on
how
they
are
distributed?
H
I
really
support
the
creation
of
the
advisory
group
and
the
super
majority.
I
think
that's
important.
It
gives
the
vendors
a
larger
voice
and
will
help
them
craft
the
use
of
those
funds
and
how
they
can
move
forward
with
the
additional
funds
how
they
can
be
allocated,
and
I
think
that's
important.
H
So
all
in
all,
I
am
in
support
of
the
memo
memos
as
they
have
been
crafted
because
it
does
protect
the
vendors
which
we're
all
concerned
about.
It
does
provide
the
developer
to
move
forward
with
the
increased
housing
production
and
the
affordable
housing
production,
which
is
really
important
and
also
the
the
jobs
that
will
be
created
by
this
development.
H
This
has
been
in
the
works
for
over
20
years
that
that
this
land
has
been
open
for
development
and
and
we
knew
development
was
come.
H
It's
it's
unfortunate
that
the
negotiations
with
the
vendors
didn't
didn't
in
occur
until
this
year,
but
that's
history,
and
we
need
to
move
forward
to
help
protect
the
vendors
and
work
with
the
vendors
and
make
this
a
a
positive
thing
for
them
to
do
as
well,
because
we
don't
want
them
to
lose
their
business,
we
don't
want
them
to
be
displaced.
We
want
them
to
continue
to
be
to
thrive
and
be
successful
with
that
I'm
finished.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
So
more
or
less
okay,
so
I'm
going
to
try
and
be
very
succinct
and
and
try
and
get
to
the
point.
So
you
know
truly
what
this
comes
down
to
is
is
is
a
lot,
a
very
large
community
feeling
that
they
were
excluded
from
this
process
and-
and
I
I
first
of
all
I
have
to
say
this-
I
I
I
do
appreciate
the
work
that
d4,
the
new
council
member
and
his
entire
staff
have
put
forward.
I
This
has
inched
us
much
closer
than
we
ever
thought,
and
so
I
appreciate
that
work.
It's
not
easy
work,
as
you
can
see
coming
into
the
council
office,
especially
the
first
30
days
of
getting
sworn
in,
and
I
appreciate
staff's
work,
but
I
really
appreciate
the
interest
and
the
energy
that's
been
put
forward
by
our
community
members,
in
particular
by
those
that
are
at
the
flea
market,
who,
as
you
can
see,
it's
been
difficult
to
organize
for
different
reasons.
I
I
This
is
the
american
dream
and
regardless
of
where
they
work
and
where
they
have
their
business,
we
collectively
make
decisions
for
everyone,
and
I
bring
this
up
because
at
one
point
there
was
a
staff
member
who
said
to
me
and
my
office
that
I
was
not
welcomed
at
a
community
meeting
because
those
residents,
those
individuals,
didn't,
do
business
in
my
district,
they
may
sleep
in
my
district,
but
they
weren't
doing
business
in
my
district,
and
I
want
to
be
very
clear.
I
We
represent
everybody,
even
though
you're
voted
in
by
your
own
district
residents,
and
I
try
and
make
that
point
very
clear,
especially
since
the
pandemic
started,
because
the
pandemic,
at
least
for
me,
really
really
exposed
the
interconnected
weavings
underneath
all
the
masks
that
we
wear
and
all
the
hats
that
we
wear,
and
so
I
want
to
be
very
clear,
I'm
here,
on
behalf
of
of
the
city
of
san
jose,
trying
to
find
a
solution
for
a
very
complex
situation.
I
So,
just
like,
I
felt
excluded
from
this
whole
process
and
and
was
told
you
know,
don't
please
don't
cross
over
this
border.
Your
border
is
on
that
side
and
you
live
on
that
side.
I
Not
on
this
side,
I
can
only
imagine
what
our
vendors
must
have
been
feeling
throughout
this
process,
and
I
know
I
saw
a
picture
yesterday
of
hey
these
are
our
demands,
but
to
have
to
write
them
out
versus
being
at
the
table
where
you
can
negotiate
and
have
conversations
or,
at
the
very
least,
figure
out,
where's
the
sweet
spot
or
what
or
how
do
I?
How
do
I
swallow
this
very
bitter
pill?
I
Sometimes
things
evolve
or
devolve,
and
and
the
only
thing
that
makes
it
a
little
bit
better-
are
the
relationships,
the
human
contact,
the
interactions
that
come
from
that,
and
so
I
have
to
tell
you-
and
I
hope
that
we
heard
it
because
I
heard
it
loud
and
clear
after
several
hours
of
of
public
comment-
that
our
vendors
are
feeling
disrespected
and
disregarded
in
this
process,
and
so
I
marvel
at
this
because
I
do
wonder
as
some
of
the
callers
asked,
if
we
were
of
any
other
hue
or
skin
tone,
would
we
be
treated
in
the
same
way?
I
In
particular,
we
I've
seen
processes
and
decisions
be
made
up
here
in
the
last
seven
years
that
I've
been
in
council
that
I
haven't
been
happy
with,
and
I've
not
been
happy
when
it
particularly
impacts
communities
of
color,
poor
people,
people
who
are
struggling,
and
we
have
the
power
to
ease
their
suffering,
the
challenges
that
they
face
or
the
uncertainties
that
we
impose
upon
them.
I
We
impose
upon
them,
and
so
this
is
one
of
those-
and
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
a
lot.
That's
already
been
baked
into
this
formula,
a
lot
that
has
been
already
baked
into
this
plant
and
we
can't
we
can't
go
back
to
2007
and
change
it,
but
to
when,
when
the
when
there
is
a
a
record
of
not
5,
10,
12
15,
but
many
many
times
over,
more
meetings
with
a
developer.
I
I
These
individuals
recognize
that
they
haven't
had
that
kind
of
accessibility
and
in
fact
I
was
not
brought
into
this
this
conversation
until
literally,
quite
literally,
maybe
a
month
and
a
half
ago,
when
the
vendors
themselves
said
you
know,
I
thought
you
were
in
a
brown
act
on
this
one,
and
I
had
never
been
contacted
by
by
the
other
district
offices
for
me
to
weigh
in
for
me
to
make
a
phone
call
to
reach
out
to
the
vendors
to
engage
with
them
to
at
least
figure
out
how
I
could
be
of
service
to
my
council
colleagues,
in
this
decision
making
and
to
the
bomb
family
and
to
the
vendors,
and
so
again,
I
think
it's
a
an
opportunity
missed
and
an
opportunity
missed
that
will
have
dire
dire
consequences
because
it
is
a
historic
site
and
the
4
million
plus
visitors
that
come
through
those
doors.
I
I
I
And
so
you
know
I
I.
I
don't
believe
that
we
will
get
the
90-day
extension,
but
I
would
really
like
to
entertain
a
weak
extension
and
it's
not
to
find
blame
with
anybody,
but
in
in
council
member
cohn's
own
words,
as
he's
talking
as
we're
discussing
the
fairground
implications,
you
just
said:
I
need
more
time
to
figure
this
out.
I
don't
know
there
are
a
lot
of
unknowns.
I
I
The
domes
on
winchester
across
from
santana
row
and
in
fact
that
wasn't
considered
a
historical
site,
but
we
elevated
that
and
gave
it
great
attention
to
that
detail
and
I'm
going
to
ask
planning
about
that
in
just
a
second.
What
makes
it
different?
What's
the
dome
how's,
the
dome
different
from
the
flea
market?
I
How
does
an
empty
theater
on
winchester
rise
to
such
a
sense
of
urgency
and
preservation
versus
a
site
where
over
430
families
are
making
a
living
for
themselves,
as
well
as
for
their
employees
and
is
a
and
as
a
tourist
attraction
bringing
in
millions
of
visitors
throughout
the
entire
year?.
I
B
Okay
and
the
council
member
will
come
back
to
you
after
that
question
is
answered,
so
we
can
abide
by
the
big
rotation.
Someone
from
planning
wanna
respond.
A
Oh
david
keon
principal
planner,
environmental
review,
so
I
can
respond
to
that.
I
was
actually
the
planner
on
the
santana
west
project
that
had
the
century
21
theater
as
part
of
that
project,
so
I
did
want
to
respond
to
that,
but
both
projects
were
considered
affordable.
Excuse
me:
cultural
resources,
historic
resources
under
the
california
environmental
quality
act.
Therefore,
both
eirs
that
evaluated
those
consider
those
to
be
significant,
unavoidable
impacts
and
both
projects
did
require
statement
of
overwriting
considerations.
B
All
right,
thank
you,
councilmember,
if
you
can
make
it
very
brief.
Yeah.
I
So
just
very
quickly
mayor,
so
as
we're
looking
at
at
the
e
still.
My
question
is:
how
does
the
one
the
one
project
warrant
and
efforts
to
preserve
when
it's
an
empty
building
when
it
wasn't
considered
it?
It
actually
rose
to
the
top
for
consideration
when
it
wasn't
and
we
have
another
historical
site,
providing
livelihoods,
income
and
generating
revenues.
A
Actually
sorry,
this
is
also
what
I
mentioned
during
the
santana
west
approval
of
that
project.
The
city
council
did
consider
demolition
of
the
century
21
and
did
adopt
a
resolution
that
that
would
strip
down
the
century
21
theater
to
allow
it
to
be
used
as
an
auditorium.
So
even
that
project
was
going
to
be,
you
know
was
clear
to
actually
be
removed
with
just
the
frame
remaining,
so
it
wasn't
necessarily
that
that
century
21
theater
dome
was
to
be
preserved
as
part
of
that
project
entirety.
B
I
Just
say
is
thank
you
mayor,
so
much
for
for
being
so
liberal
with
me,
as
others
took
a
lot
of
time,
and
I'm
just
gonna
conclude
with
this
and
give
other
people
an
opportunity
to
speak.
You
know
I
I'm
asking
for
all
I'm
asking
for
is
a
deferral,
I'm
making
a
motion
to
ask
for
a
different
for
just
one
week,
one
week
for
us
to
sit
down
without
pointing
fingers,
but
allowing
allowing
this
to
take
place
and
for
the
vendors
to
at
least
feel
that
they
were
heard.
We.
I
Come
back
to
the
exact
same
solution,
if
eric's
on
the
line,
but
to
be
able
to
have
that
conversation
and
allow
that
bitter
pill
to
be
swallowed
with
a
little
bit
of
sugar.
B
Councilman
across
here
you
just
made,
I
think
a
substitute
motion
is
that
right,
a
second
okay
there's
a
sec
substitute
motion
and
the
second
from
council
member
corrales,
councilman.
J
Yeah,
thank
you
and
actually
because
I
I
I
spoke
last
night,
I'm
actually
happy
to
let
I
don't
know.
F
Mayor
before
we
go
to
council
member
davis,
guys
just
get
a
clarification
on
the
substitute
motion.
Was
it
a
request
for
a
deferral
or
a
continuation.
F
Right
because
mary,
if
if
it's
a
deferral,
then
we
have
to
start
the
whole
process
all
over
again
in
terms.
B
Yeah
I'll
just
be
transparent
here
I
had
texted
our
city
attorney
some
time
ago
to
try
to
determine
whether
it's
going
to
make
any
difference,
because,
frankly,
if
there
are
new
memos
brought
in,
we
may
be
going
all
the
way
through
public
comment
again
anyway
and
I'll
leave
it
to
the
rules
committee
to
figure
out
how
that
can
happen.
Given
all
of
the
many
items
we
have
scheduled
for
next
week
and
our
very
final
meeting
the
fiscal
year
so
nora,
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
speak
on
this
now
or.
E
Yes
and
mayor-
that's
correct:
you
can
continue
this
to
next
week
for
the
vote
and
to
finish
any
council
discussions,
but.
E
Time
during
the
week
to
deal
with
meetings
and
that
sort
of
thing.
B
E
You
would
be
continuing
it
next
week,
just
to
finish
the
council
discussion
and
then
vote
so.
B
E
If
you're
deferring
it
just
or
continuing
the
meeting
to
next
week,
so
that
you
can,
you
can
do
a
little
more
work.
We
there
was
a
an
item.
I
don't
know
a
couple
months
ago
in
the
horseshoe
area,
where
it
was
continued
a
week
and
everything
was
not
reopened,
but
there
weren't
new
memos.
So
let
me
let
me
check
the
new
memo
issue.
B
F
So
can
I
ask
councilman
carrasco,
you
just
change
it
from
a
deferral
to
continuation.
I
Before
we
do
that,
the
question
I
have
for
nora
is,
if
we
change
it
from
from
a
default
continuation
or
either
way
does
does
that
council
member
cohen's
motion
stands,
as
is.
E
As
as
it
would
as
long
as
there,
if
there
isn't
a
vote
on
it,
if
you
continue
it
next
week
to
have
some
discussions,
but
everything
is
still
pending,
then
that's
where
you
would
be.
I
You
know
my
question
is
when
we
do
come
back,
say
it's
a
continuation
and
we
come
back
at
that
point,
since
this
is
the
substitute
motion
will
folks
be
able
to
make
friendly
amendments
or
make
changes
or
whatever
work
we
do
during
the
week.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
an
opportunity,
even
if
there
is
no
comment,
but
that
we
have
an
opportunity
to
as
a
council,
discuss
and
amend
right.
I
I
Okay,
so
so
mayor,
what
I'm
hearing
from
you
is
you
prefer
continuation,
I'm
I'm
happy
to
go
with
a
continuation.
If
I,
if
I,
if
I,
if
I
can
line
up
these
votes,
because
I
think
I
think
it's
important
to
just
have
a
conversation
bring
people
to
the
table.
Allow.
B
Them
to
have
an
opportunity.
You've
made
your
point.
Clearly,
we've
got
to
move
on
if
you're
amending
your
motion
to
a
continuance
rather
than
deferral.
Is
that
what
you
like
to
do
that
time?
Okay?
Is
that
all
right
with
the
secondary?
Yes,
okay,
we're
going
to
come
back
and
nora
is
going
to
give
us
an
opinion
about
whether
it's
it's
going
to
matter
one
way
or
another,
when
she's
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
rules
and
then
we'll
come
back
in
the
meantime,
let's
proceed
with
discussion,
councilmember
davis.
L
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
we
already
voted
on
a
deferral
last
night
and
it
didn't
pass
so
I
don't
know
if
whether
a
deferral
or
a
continuation
matters-
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
thank
you
to
councilmember
cohen,
for
working
with
the
property
owner
and
the
vendors
to
to
devise
a
compromise.
L
It's
clear
from
your
very
detailed
memo
that
it
was
that
you've
taken
everything
possible
into
consideration,
and-
and
I
very
much
appreciate
that
I
know
that's
not
easy
work
and
and
to
do
it
so
quickly,
just
coming
into
office
is
commendable
for
sure.
L
I
I
think
what
is
on
the
table
right
now
in
terms
of
the
the
underlying
motion,
preserves
the
existing
jobs
in
small
businesses
and
provides
a
path
to
that,
while
allowing
for
more
dense
development-
and
I
think
that's
really
important-
because
we're
talking
about
the
only
bart
station
in
san
jose
right
now.
So
I
love
the
urban
market
idea
and
I
think
you
know
having
having
I'm
guessing
the
market.
I've
never
been
there
when
it's
not
a
weekend.
L
L
Would
be
a
good
way
to
ensure
that
the
the
weekend
warriors
as
council,
member
foley
and
her
husband
were
had
space
while
providing
you
know
that
permanent
space
for
the
vendors
who
who
are
there
on
a
daily
basis?
So
I
really
like
the
urban
market
idea
and
I
think,
there's
there's
a
lot
to
work
with
there
and
and
a
compromise
that
can
be
that
can
be
crafted
probably
not
easily,
as
as
we
have
heard
in
the
last
couple
of
days,
but
but
definitely
something
that
can
be
worked
out
over
time.
L
Do
that
business
development
with
the
vendors,
and
I
think,
that's
really
something
that
that
I
had
hoped
that
the
office
of
economic
development
would
would
be
doing
they've,
always
been
a
very
small,
a
small
office
and
directing
them
to
kind
of
start
doing
these
things
with
specific
populations
and
communities.
I
think,
is
a
great
way
to
build
that
strength
and
capacity
in
the
office
of
economic
development.
So
I
really
appreciate
that
I'm
not
going
to
support
the
one
week
deferral.
L
I
still
haven't
heard
to
me
a
compelling
reason
why
we
would
get
somewhere
else
with
the
one
week
deferral.
I
actually
think
the
sooner
we
get
council
member
cohen's
compromise
in
place,
the
the
better
the
relationship
between
the
vendors
and
the
property
owner
and
the
city
will
actually
be,
and
they
can
start
working
towards
something
as
opposed
to
working
at
loggerheads,
which
is
what
I'm
seeing
right
now.
So
I'm
going
to
be
supporting
the
underlying
motion.
I
am
not
going
to
be
supporting
a
one-week
deferral.
Thank
you.
J
Yeah,
thank
you
and
let
me
try
and
answer
some
of
those
concerns
that
and
I
think,
give
some
reasoning
for
what
we're
calling
now
a
continuance
versus
a
deferral,
and
I
think
that
the
reason
why
maybe
this
is
worthwhile
at
this
point
is
because
we've
heard
that
potentially
council
member
foley
may
be
willing
to.
If
convinced-
and
I
think
that's
that's
really
what
I
didn't
have
an
opportunity
to
do.
J
As
we
all
know,
we
simply
had
to
take
an
up
or
down
vote
without
any
explanation,
and
so
I
do
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about.
I
think
that
the
reasons
why
so
number
one,
if
you
look
at
my
memo
and
some
of
the
additions
that
I've
asked
for
which
I
appreciate
councilman
cohen,
has
now
included
a
number
of
them,
but
they're
not
all
included,
and
we
could
do
what
we
typically
do,
which
is
which
is
try
to
hash
things
out
here.
J
Considering
the
10
minute
time,
limit,
we'd
probably
have
to
go
around
three
or
four
times
to
maybe
debate
some
of
these
issues
to
to
get
everything
included,
not
only
in
compelling
you
know
the
maker
of
the
motion
or
the
underlying
motion,
but
a
seconder
as
we
as
we've
seen
as
well
on
right.
We
we,
if
we
make
sausage
here
and
that's
not
necessarily
the
easiest
to
do,
and
additionally,
I
have
some
requests
and
so
does
council
member
carrasco.
J
That
would
require
us
to
make
some
asks
voluntary
asks
of
the
applicant,
and
that's
specifically,
my
recommendation
number
six,
where
I
could
bring
them
up
and
we
can.
We
can
have
a
a
public.
You
know
discussion
around
it
where
we
try
to
see
what
more
is
possible
and-
and
we
can
do
that-
or
I
believe
we
could
continue
this
one
week
and
we
can
likely
have
some
of
those
conversations
to
see
how
much
further
this
item
can
move
and
I'll.
J
J
I
was
told
by
councilman
cohen's
office
that
the
the
applicant,
the
bum
family,
would
walk
away
if
we
asked
for
them
well,
lo
and
behold
over
the
course
of
a
week
and
a
half
a
lot
of
those
got
incorporated
and
the
family
actually
agreed
to
some
of
these
voluntary
asks
and
councilman
cohen,
and
I
were
able
to
to
make
a
lot
of
progress,
and
so
in
just
that
short
time
period.
J
We've
already
seen
a
lot
of
movement,
and
I
appreciate
again,
as
I've
mentioned
number
of
times,
the
work
from
councilman
cohen,
to
get
us
where
we're
at.
What
I
feel
is
that
there
are
there's
actually
a
little
bit
more
room
to
be
able
to
try
to
see
if
we
can't
make
this
even
better
for
everybody
in
involved.
J
J
Thank
you.
So
there
was
this
understanding
from
eric.
Shanhart
was
telling
us
councilman
cohen's
office
and
me
in
the
mayor.
I
believe
as
well
that
there's
this
july
12
nofa
deadline
application
for
an
affordable
housing
grant
and
that
they
needed
to
get
that,
and
hence,
if
we
did
a
one
week,
deferral
which,
by
the
way
again
I
mentioned
it
last
night,
we
could
do
a
special
hearing
on
july
6th
if
we
still
wanted
to
have
the
second
reading,
so
it
still
doesn't
preclude
it.
J
But
what
I've
learned
as
of
late
is
that
it
sounds
like
there's
really
no
likelihood
that
they're
even
going
to
get
approved
for
for
this
grant,
and
so
I
wanted
to
see
if
you
can
speak
a
little
bit
to
that
to
that
grant
process.
It's
the
infield
infrastructure
grant
at
the
state
and
and
just
see
you
know
it.
Do
we
really
think
that
there
is
a
a
concern
here
for
them
losing
an
opportunity
at
that
grant.
D
Yes,
I'm
jackie
morrell's
friend,
I'm
the
director
of
housing.
My
understanding
of
the
infrastructure
grant
after
talking
to
hcd
is
there
are
two
ways
to
apply
one
way
as
an
area,
so
redevelopment
like
the
flea
market
is,
could
qualify
as
a
redevelopment
area.
However,
hcd
did
not
change
the
rules,
and
so
the
applicant
would
have
to
be
the
city
and
not
the
developer,
and
the
city
is
not
prepared
to
submit
an
application.
D
We
would
have
had
to
have
discussions
with
the
flea
market
in
advance
in
order
to
submit
an
application.
So
we
are
not
prepared
as
a
city
to
do
that
at
this
point,
projects
can
submit
and
it's
but
projects
would
have
to
be
much
further
along
there's
20
points
that
are
allocated
for
funding
commitments
on
the
affordable
side
and,
of
course,
there's
we're
nowhere
close
to
having
a
funding
commitment
on
the
affordable
side.
D
So
I
think
because
the
application
requires
or
has
points
for
the
affordable
having
a
funding
commitment
from
a
locality,
they
would
never
be
able
to
achieve
potentially
a
high
enough
score
that
would
make
them
competitive.
J
Thank
you
thank
you,
jackie,
and
I
think
maybe
the
applicant
might
not
be
totally
aware,
but
you
know
I
believe
that
eric
may
be
aware
of
some
of
the
challenges,
because
he
understands
these
grants
very
very
well,
and
we've
had
some
exchanges
on
that,
and
so
I
I
personally
think
and
as
you've
just
described
there
there
honestly
is
no
urgency
that
would
require
us
to
to
take
a
vote
today.
J
Now
I
understand
there
is
the
threat
looming
that
maybe
the
applicant
walks
away,
and
I
feel
that's
unfortunate
that
that's
been
brought
up
a
number
of
times,
but,
as
I
asked
eric
last
night,
he
he
said
that
that
might
be
right.
That
might
be
possibility.
It
wasn't
sort
of
a
definitive.
I
don't
think
they
want
to.
J
I
think
that,
certainly
you
know
what
what
I've
seen
from
the
applicant,
the
bum
family
they're
very
interested
in
moving
forward
with
this
project
and
coming
to
positive
outcomes,
they're
very
interested
in
not
having
a
lot
of
negative
publicity
around
it,
which,
unfortunately,
obviously
right
that's
kind
of
where
it's
gone.
So
I
think
that
they
do
care
and
they
do.
There
is
an
opportunity
to
to
move
a
little
bit
further,
especially
when
you
again,
when
you
look
at
my
memo.
J
Not
all
those
elements
have
been
included,
councilmember
carrasco's
as
well
and
there's
some
asks
of
of
the
applicant
that
we
would
need
to
make,
and
I
will
say
if
a
if
a
continuance
does
not
get
approved
today.
Well,
then,
I
will
likely
raise
my
hand
a
couple
more
times
and
try
to
go
through,
including
some
friendly
amendments
in
the
underlying
motion
ask
the
the
applicant
for
seeing
how
much
more
wiggle
room
there
is.
J
I
think
I
prefer
not
to
do
that
and
instead
have
those
conversations
with
councilman
cohen's
office
in
the
applicant
over
the
course
of
the
next
now
six
days.
It
wouldn't
even
be
a
seven
day
continuance
and
be
able
to
to
hopefully
come
to
a
place
where
there
is
more
consensus
next
week
than
we
have
today.
J
The
last
point
that
I'll
make
is,
we
also
have
vendors
that
are
hunger,
striking,
there's
a
human
element
to
this
as
well,
and
if
we
can
continue
this
to
next
week,
it's
my
understanding
that
then
they
can
end
their
hunger
strike
and
come
back
next
week.
Well,
work
with
us
and
work
with
councilman
cohen's
office
and
work
with
the
applicant
and
try
to
see
how
much
more
we
can
actually
achieve
to
to
pull
this
together.
J
So
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
valid
reasons
as
to
why
we
should
consider
that,
and
I
appreciate
the
dialogue
around
you
know,
could
this
be
a
deferral
or
a
continuance
in
the
benefit
of
that?
Maybe
as
far
as
we,
we
will
just
take
up
the
vote
next
week
versus
a
whole
new
hearing,
I'm
comfortable
with
that.
I
think
right.
We
we
we've,
certainly
been
debating
this
and
hearing
a
lot
and
I'm
comfortable.
J
Even
if
the
motion
that's
on
the
the
table
stood
till
next
week
and
at
that
point,
we're
we're
augmenting
it
with
friendly
amendments,
I'm
comfortable
with
that
and
I'd
like
to
hear
from
nora,
if
indeed
you
were
able
to
find
is
that,
based
on
the
understanding
that
we've
had
in
conversation,
I
don't
know
if
you've
had
an
answer
for
that.
Yet.
E
E
You
would
be
continuing
the
meeting
to
continue
the
council
discussion,
but
I
will
advise
the
council
and
want
you
to
remember
the
brown
act,
and
so
you
can't
be
reaching
agreements
outside
of
the
discussion
here
and
agreements
and
having
discussions
with
each
other
outside
of
any
brown
act,
work
that
you
put
together,
but
you
you
need
to
be
particularly
careful
about
that.
J
Just
as
as
we
as
we
are
right
every
week,
we
just
have
to
be.
We
stick
to
our
brown
axe
on
the
item,
which
is
yeah.
That's
that's
commonplace
for
us,
so
I
think
that
that
should
be
perfectly
fine.
So
let
me
see
if
mr
shanehauer
is
still
here,
I'd
like
to
invite
him
back
up
to
ask
him
around
this
idea
of
a
continuance.
J
K
J
So
curious
now
we're
discussing
the
possibility
of
a
continuance
till
next
week
where
we
can
try
and
have
some
conversations
between
now
and
then
before
we
take
a
vote
and
there's
been
a
you
know.
Obviously
a
couple
letters
or-
or
you
know,
emails
written
as
well
in
letter
form
that
states.
J
If
we
didn't
take
a
vote
yesterday,
which
obviously
we
continued
it
already
to
this
morning,
but
if
we
didn't
take
a
vote,
then
there's
the
potential
that
the
you
know,
everything
that
was
voluntary
on
the
table
gets
pulled
off.
Is
there
more
of
a
stomach
now
from
the
applicant
that
they'd
be
willing
to
still
work
together
for
one
more
week
with
a
continuance.
K
K
K
J
K
Well,
I'm
not
sure
what
the
yes
no
answer
is
we've.
We
obviously
are
comfortable
that
a
decision
today
will
keep
the
voluntary
offers
in
place,
as
you
saw
in
our
letter
that
expired
on
the
22nd,
we
didn't
anticipate
the
meeting
would
roll
into
the
23rd,
so
I
can
definitively
say
that
for
a
decision
made
today
that
all
of
our
voluntary
offers
are
still
on
the
table
for
today
and
we'd
ask
the
council
to
make
a
decision
on
the
memos
that
are
being
moved.
B
Okay-
and
let
me
just
get
absolute
clarity
on
this
machine,
you're
saying
then
the
voluntary
offers
may
not
be
on
the
table
next
week,
or
are
you
saying
that
I
I
just
want
to
get
clarity
here,
so
we
all
understand
what
decision
we're
making.
K
B
D
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
my
colleagues
for
really
engaging
in
the
dialogue
and
and
encouraging
us
to
dialogue,
I'd
like
to
thank
councilman,
perales
and
councilmember
carrasco
and
councilmember
foley
for
being
willing
to
to
give
us
a
few
more
days
to
get
to
have
more
dialogue,
and
in
particular
you
know,
we
do
have
hunger
strikers
here
at
city
hall,
we
have
people
putting
their
their
health,
their
well-being,
their
bodies
on
the
line,
because
it's
it's
the
language
of
the
unheard
right.
D
It's
it's
sort
of
a
last-ditch
effort
to
encourage
us
to
have
more
dialogue,
and
so
I
would
appreciate
a
few
more
days.
I
don't
think
after
what
17
years
that
that
six
days
would
is
asking
too
much,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I'm
heartened
by
the
dialogue
over
the
past
few
minutes
to
to
extend
this
discussion
six
more
days.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
councilman
cohen,.
C
Yeah
first,
I
want
to
ask
maybe
for
dave
for
the
city
manager's
office,
there's
been
some
mention
of
whether
we
would
have
the
ability
to
have
a
second
like
a
special
meeting,
to
do
the
second
reading
to
get
this
done
in
early
july.
What
is
the
capacity
of
the
city
manager's
office
to
do
that?
Not
you
know,
notwithstanding
the
question
as
to
whether
council,
members
and
others
will
be
on
vacation
that
first
week
of
july
and
scattered
around,
but
what
would
be
the
capacity
to
have
a
special
meeting
to
get
this?
A
C
Okay,
okay,
so
I
mean
I
just
want
to
give
a
little
background
about
the
conversations
we've
had,
because
I
know
there's
been
a
lot
of
talk
about.
You
know
whether
we've
engaged
throughout
the
process.
I
mean
I
so
I
started
yesterday
talking
about
how,
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
councilmember
proles
talked
in
my
office
met
talked
about
the
lack
of
engagement
with
the
vendor
association
through
the
you
know,
through
the
past
years,
especially
with
in
the
past
council
member.
C
But
I
know
that
you
know
honestly,
there
weren't
wasn't
much
engagement
with
the
district
four
council
office.
You
know
going
dating
back
all
the
way
to
2003
when
the
bart
project
was
approved.
We
we
reached
out
engaged
with
a
group
with
vendors.
At
that
time
we
had
several
conversations
with
them
in
february
about
what
their
approach
should
be
to
advocate.
C
We
specifically
suggested
that
they
go
to
the
public,
the
planning
commission,
to
express
their
views
on
the
project
because
of
covid
and
the
inability
to
do
in
person.
We
thought
that
was
the
most
effective
way,
so
our
office
specifically
recommended
they
go
to
the
planning
commission
meeting
where
they
went
and
gave
their
comment
and
actually
got
the
deferral
that
the
planning
commission
gave,
which
gave
us
space
to
then
go
back
and
meet.
C
The
planning
commission
recommended
that
there
be
a
face-to-face
meeting
with
the
between
the
bum
family
and
the
vendors
which
occurred
the
they
had
a
specific
face-to-face
meeting
at
the
table.
C
We
met
with
the
vendor
association
again
on
april
9th
and
they
shared
that
list
of
demands
that
you
saw
in
writing,
but
we
had
that
shared
with
us
in
a
face-to-face
meeting
that
was,
they
then
met
with
the
property
owner
on
april
16th
and
shared
their
demands
with
them.
That
was
done
in
person
and
the
bum
family
went
and
worked
on
that
number
one
concern
on
the
list,
which
was:
how
can
we
create
space
in
the
market?
C
There
was
a
little
bit
of
discussion
about
how
that
wasn't
very
much,
and
it
got
increased
to
five
acres
to
be
brought
back
to
the
planning
commission
meeting
on
may
12th.
I
do
want
to
as
an
aside
thank
councilmember
davis
for
comments
about
the
urban
market.
I
think
it
can
be
a
great
a
addition
to
this
site
and
and
also
address
councilmember
crosstalk's
question
about
the
historic
nature
of
the
site.
I
mean
it's
definitely
a
historic
nate
site.
C
C
C
Is
the
cultural
activity
of
that
site?
And
it's
not
you
know
like
in
other
cases
that
there's
a
specific
building
or
structure
that
needs
to
be
preserved,
but
a
culture
that
needs
to
be
preserved
and
that's
what
we
then
set
out
to
try
to
achieve
in
the
new
site
after
the
planning
commission
recommendation
on
may
12th
to
move
forward
with
with
zoning
five
acres
that
would
set
aside
space
for
the
flea
market.
C
We
continued
to
then
discuss
well
what
about
the
financial
arrangements
and
got
the
work
on
an
agreement
with
the
bum
family
to
get
a
financial
seating
for
a
package
that
would
be
put
in
place
and,
and
that
would
be
run
by
a
vendor
group-
a
majority
vendor
group
that
would
be
called
the
flea
market
advisory
group
and
we
continued
to
communicate
with
the
vendors
throughout.
We
had
one
member
of
my
staff
who
was
specifically
assigned
and
I've
the
mayor
thanked
hugo
jimenez
last
night
and
his
remarks.
C
Hugo
has
been
the
liaison
to
the
vendor
association
and
had
specific
discussions
nearly
weekly
with
members
of
the
vendor
association,
to
say:
here's
where
we're
what
we're
working
on
now
and
what
do
you?
You
know?
What
are
your
concerns
and
what
can
we
bring
back
to
the
bums,
so
our
offices
had
those
regular
conversations.
C
We
then
invited
the
vendor
association
to
be
part
of
the
the
discussion
on
how
to
create
that
letter
of
intent
and
they
declined
that
invitation.
So
we
continued
to
push
forward
with
developing
that
letter
of
intent
and
we
continued
pushing
to
the
last
minute
on
some
of
these
things.
As
council
councilmember
perales
pointed
out,
there
were
a
couple
of
items
that
came
up
even
late.
The
question
of
whether
or
not
that
one-year
notice
was
enough
certainty.
C
We
pushed
back
pretty
hard
in
the
last
month
to
say
we
need
some
more.
We
need
is
a
later
date
for
the
mint
for
the
point
at
which
that
notice
could
occur,
and
we
got
agreement
to
move
that
to
make
sure
that
that
notice
couldn't
be
given
before
july
of
2023
to
guarantee
at
least
three
years
of
continuity
of
of
operation
at
the
flea
market.
C
And
then
the
last
item
was
was
getting
agreement
on
whether
the
pd
permits
would
have
to
come
back
to
council
before
being
granted
and-
and
that
was
another
big
negotiation
that
happened
in
the
last
month.
C
C
As
eric
pointed
out
last
night,
you
know
a
face-to-face
meeting
hasn't
been
productive
in
the
current
environment,
but
with
a
new
environment
in
a
vendor-led
flea
market
advisory
group
seated
by
resources
that
now,
thanks
to
councilmember
carrasco,
will
include
another
two
million
dollars
plus
from
the
city.
There's
an
opportunity
now
to
move
forward
in
that
collaborative
way.
So
I
I
believe
that
we
can
make
this
take
this
vote
today
and
move
forward.
I
won't
be
supporting
the
the
delay,
but
you
know
I'm.
C
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
karaska,.
I
Thank
you.
Well,
I
appreciate
the
all
the
comments
and
again
I
appreciate
the
complexity
of
this
of
this
issue
and
the
the
ramifications
of
our
vote
today.
One
way
or
the
other,
I
do
have
a
question
for
for
eric.
If,
if,
if
you
don't
mind,
because
my
understanding
is
that
at
least
one
of
the
items
that
I
included
in
the
memo
can't
be-
and
I
knew
that
it
couldn't
be
enforced,
and
this
is
why
I
didn't
use
that
language,
it
was
a
suggestion.
I
To
the
to
the
applicant
to
freeze
the
the
the
leases
or
to
put
to
implement
leases,
because
my
understanding
is
that
the
vendors
are
on
a
month-to-month
basis
and
so
the
the
question
eric
I
have
for
you
is
you
know
you
and
I
did
meet.
I
We
talked
about
this
and
we
talked
about
the
possibility
of
of
providing
a
tool
that
would
give
the
vendors
a
greater
sense
of
stability
over
these
next
several
years
when
their
future
is
so
unpredictable
and
and
and
I'd
like
to
know
whether
or
not
this
is
something
that
the
bum
family
could
commit
to.
I
we
can't
force
them.
I
I
I
don't
even
know
what
kind
of
language
we
could
put
into
emotion
in
terms
of
just
friendly
conversations-
I
I
don't
know
but
but
you
and
I
did
have
a
very
specific
conversation
about
leases
and
freezing
the
current
rates.
K
Yeah,
so
you
know
as
the
question
about
leases.
First
of
all,
no
vendor
has
a
lease.
K
They
have
a
monthly
license
agreement
to
sell
things
on
our
property,
and
so
it's
a
different
legal
construct,
a
license
agreement
compared
to
a
lease
and
we've
always
had
license
agreements,
but
they've
always
been
month
to
month
at
the
most
never
longer,
but
to
address
the
issue,
because
the
issue
is
is
security
and
continuity,
and
so
in
the
memo
by
councilmember,
cohen,
lucardo
and
jimenez.
K
There's
two
things
in
there
that
work
together
and
the
first
is
the
fact
that
they,
the
vendors,
will
have
three
years
right,
because
the
market's
going
to
be
open
for
three
years
and
there's
a
second
component
in
the
memo
that
says
that,
as
long
as
a
vendor
abides
by
the
rules
and
the
terms
of
their
lease
their
license
agreement,
they
will
not
be
evicted
because
you
know
one
concern
was
that
some
people
felt
they
would
be
evicted
if
they
participated
in
the
process
or
did
you
know
did
something
or
we
didn't?
K
We
didn't
like
them.
Well,
the
the
memo
makes
it
clear
that,
as
long
as
people
abide
by
the
rules
and
terms
of
their
license
agreement,
they
won't
be
evicted
and
therefore
putting
those
two
things
together.
Vendors
have
a
known
three-year
period
that
they'll
be
able
to
be
at
the
flea
market
site
minimum
three
years.
I
And
so
the
license
to
sell.
I
So
is
that
because
for
vendors,
you
can't
do
leases.
I
And
so
do
we
know
whether
a
lease
provides
greater
protections
for
the
tenants,
obviously
protecting
the
landlord
as
well,
but
does
it
provide
greater
greater
security
for-
and
I
don't
know
this-
I
don't
know
anything
about
contracts.
K
K
They
won't
be
randomly
or
unfairly
evicted
that
that
that's
the
main
concern
here
and
so
the
two
provisions
in
the
cohen
jimenez
memo
put
together
assure
that
they
will
be
able
to
operate
on
the
flea
market
site
for
three
years
minimum
and
they
will
not
be
evicted
as
long
as
they
abide
by
the
terms
of
their
their
license
agreement,
and
we
say
terms
we
mean
you
know
they
got
to
pay
the
rent,
that's
due
right.
They
and
there
are
rules
of
conduct
that
you
have
to
follow.
I
And,
and
in
terms
of
and
again
I
I
I
think
that
that
allowing
us
these
next,
you
know
six
days
at
this
point:
it's
not
even
seven
days
anymore,
folks,
we're
we're
we're
running
down
the
clock,
and
the
next
six
days
would
allow
us
an
opportunity
to
explore
the
difference
between
a
license
and
a
lease.
I
The
other
question
eric
is
an
opportunity
for
these
families
who
know
that
that
they
will
be
displaced
from
their
place
of
business.
There's
no
question
about
it.
We
know
this.
This
is
why
we're
trying
to
to
bake
into
this
all
these
other
measures
in
order
to
capture
all
these
folks
that
are
gonna
fall
through
the
cracks,
because
we
know
that
there's
gonna
be
displacement.
I
We
know
that
people
are
not
going
to
survive
the
transition
they're
not
going
to
survive
the
change
from
the
la
pulga,
the
flea
market,
to
an
urban
market
they're
just
not,
and
so
the
the
question
is,
as
they
prepare
themselves
for
a
a
an
unknown
future.
I
Can
we
look
at
freezing
the
current
rental
spaces,
and
I
think
you
had
indicated
that
that
the
rents
haven't
gone
up.
You
know,
although
I
have
an
understanding,
that
the
rates
have
gone
up
for
parking.
So
in
a
sense,
that's
that's
raising
rents
for
folks,
because
it's
quite
expensive
to
park
at
the
flea
market,
but
so
what?
What
can
we
do
to
provide
a
sense
of
security?
I
K
It
doesn't
happen
or
happen,
I
mean
we
have
an
answer
and
that
we're
not
inclined
to
do
that.
I
mean
we're
a
business
also,
and
our
costs
are
going
up
right.
We
have
employees
or
the
costs,
for
our
employees
are
going
up,
the
cost
for
utilities
are
going
up,
the
cost
for
water
is
going
up.
You
all
had
a
session
yesterday
about
san
jose
clean
energy.
Everything
is
going
up
and
so
to
not
be
able
to
have
some
of
your
revenue
go
up
with
your
costs
is
not
a
good
business
model.
K
And
we're
running
a
business,
we're
the
ones
that
we're
the
ones
that
that
keep
the
power
on
we're
the
ones
that
empty
the
tr
empty.
The
trash
right,
we're
we're
the
ones
that
clean
the
toilets,
we're
the
ones
that
clean
the
litter.
So
we
have
a
large
business
to
keep
the
market
running
in
a
good
fashion
and
a
site.
That's
that's
clean
and
safe
and
usable
that
all
has
expense.
I
Of
course,
and-
and-
and
I
don't
have
access
to
the
books-
and
I
don't
have
access
to
that
bottom
line-
but
I
would
I
would
expect
that,
given
what
I
think
is
about
to
happen
either
today
or
six
days
from
now
that
the
bum
family
could
could
figure
out
how
to
help
these
vendors,
who
are
not
wealthy
people,
they're
hard-working
people
who
just
come
in
and
provide
a
benefit
to
the
city
of
san
jose
and
in
turn,
we're
going
to
provide
a
huge
benefit
to
the
bum
family.
I
So
how
do
we
all
co-exist
in
a
way
that
we
can
support
each
other,
especially
families
who
you
know
who
some
of
them
might
be
doing
extremely
well,
but
some
of
them
are
having
to
get
multiple
stalls,
so
they
can
capture
the
clientele,
that's
walking
through
the
flea
market
and
be
able
to
make
ends
meet
and
and
the
pandemic
hit
everybody
very
hard.
I
I
mean
you,
you
indicated
to
me
the
loss
in
revenues
that
the
flea
market
experience,
but
but
to
put
it
in
perspective,
that
line
in
front
of
my
house
where
the
food
is
being
distributed
has
not
gone
down.
It's
gone
up.
We
see
it
wrapped
around
several
blocks,
and
the
last
thing
I
want
is
for
that
line
in
front
of
my
house.
I
By
the
way
I
have
two
distribution
sites
right
in
front
of
my
house
that
that
these
distribution
sites
now
become
even
busier,
because
now
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
feed
the
vendors
and
their
families,
how
we're
going
to
continue
subsidizing
these
families
so
that
they
can
survive
in
a
in
a
not
always
friendly
business
environment.
So
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
I
I
I
I
think
that
that
we're
at
98
percent
of
where,
where
it's
going
to
end
up-
but
I
am
I
am
at
I'm
imploring
with
each
and
every
one
of
you
to
take
into
account-
not
the
numbers,
not
the
bottom
line,
not
the
2007
zoning
vote
that
took
place.
What
I'm
asking
please
look
at
the
human
element.
These
are
families
that
have
been
there
for
over
30
years.
I
Individuals
who
didn't
come
out
here,
asking
for
charity,
but
came
here
and
contributed
and
built
the
city
of
san
jose,
maybe
not
a
techie
worker.
I
agree
with
that.
Maybe
they're
they
don't
speak
analytics
and
lot
log.
I
I
Allow
me
to
finish
eric
and-
and
the
last
thing
I'll
say
is
we
have
an
opportunity,
unlike
in
my
opinion,
unlike
anything
that
we've
seen
here
at
the
council.
I
know
we
deal
with
so
many
important
issues,
but
each
and
every
one
of
you
has
an
opportunity
to
be
part
of
this.
Unbelievable,
incredibly
beautiful
immigrant
story.
I
You
can
flip
the
narrative
on
this.
You
can
be
part
of
a
narrative
that
says
we
supported
an
immigrant
community
who
now
has
children
who
are
attending
four-year
universities,
uc
santa
barbara
uc,
santa
cruz,
san
jose
state
they're,
getting
their
masters
they're,
getting
their
bachelor's
they're
getting
their
masters.
These
are
young,
highly
educated
youth,
who
will
probably
at
some
point
one
day
be
sitting
in
these
seats
where
we
are
today.
I
It
because
I
was
a
the
daughter
of
cannery
workers
who
barely
had
a
third
grade
education
and
could
barely
speak
english
and
had
anyone
seen
my
parents,
no
one
would
have
expected
anything
of
their
children,
so
don't
undermine
or
under
count
what
this
story
could
be,
and
you
can
be
part
of
it.
You
could
be
part
of
this
incredible
immigrant
story.
Thank
you!
That's
it
for
me,
man.
F
Jones,
yes,
thank
you
mayor.
I
I'm
just
gonna
I'll
keep
it
short.
I'm
gonna
support
the
one
week
extension.
I
heard
the
arguments
for
it.
I'm
not
totally
sure
what
can
be
accomplished
in
a
week,
but
I
don't
see
where
there's
any
harm
to
at
least
continuing
the
conversation
for
that
period
of
time
and
and
who
knows,
maybe
something
could
come
out
of
it.
So
I
I
will
support
the
substitute
motion
to
extend,
extend
the
meeting
for
a
week
or
the
topic
for
a
week.
K
B
I'm
gonna
just
offers
that
I
haven't
waited
in
a
while,
so
I
just
offered
my
two
cents,
I
heard
councilmember
carrasco
say
that
we're
about
98
of
the
way
there
and
I
think
you've
heard
from
mr
shane
our
some
resistance
about
pushing
much
further.
The
big
question
for
me
is
whether
or
not
there's
going
to
be
any
voluntary
offer
six
days
from
now,
and
if
the
answer
is
no,
then
I
think
our
mandate
is
pretty
clear.
B
But
if
this
offer
isn't
on
the
table
in
six
days,
we
will
have
set
ourselves
back.
More
importantly,
we
will
have
set
hundreds
of
vendors
back,
not
just
a
little,
but
a
lot
being
able
to
continue
the
urban
market
in
a
form
that
allows
for
five
acres,
plus,
perhaps
more
than
streets
and
weekends,
to
be
able
to
provide
some
kind
of
time
commitment
to
them
so
that
they
have
certainty
in
their
lives.
B
So
they
know
that
they
have
at
least
three
years
to
either
figure
out
a
path
or
commit
and
ensure
that
they
can
stay
there
and
whatever
some
transitional
dollars.
I
don't
think
the
dollars
are
frankly
all
that
significant
here,
one
way
or
another.
But
for
me
the
big
question
is
time
and
place:
are
they
going
to
have
a
place
to
go
and
they're
going
to
have
the
time?
B
And
if
what
we're
hearing
from
mr
shane
hour
is,
I
can't
tell
you
we're
going
to
have
this
still
on
the
table
six
days
from
now
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
this
machete
hour.
This
was
something
that
was
supposed
to
expire
yesterday.
If
this
goes
away
six
days
from
now,
the
difference
is
between
98
and
zero.
If
you
think
that
remaining
two
percent
is
worth,
it
then
go
for
the
deferral
go
for
the
continuance.
B
I
don't
and
that's
why
I'm
not
going
to
support
a
continuance,
and
I
think
it's
perfectly
fine
for
folks
to
say
I
know
I
could
have
negotiated
something
better
than
councilmember
cohen,
but
hopefully
councilmember
cohen
has
explained
for
all
of
us.
This
isn't
something
we
just
he
just
started
a
week
ago.
J
Thanks
mayor
and
I
was
actually
going
to
ask
council
member
foley
if
she
had
felt
you
know
my
explanation
on
reasons
for
continuance
were
was
sufficient,
but
I've
heard
vice
mayor
jones
sounds
as
though
he's
he's
convinced.
So
you
know
I
think
we
may
have
some
support
to
be
able
to
do
that,
but
I
I
I
will
still
go
ahead
and
ask
councilman
foley.
J
I
don't
know
if
you
know
what
my
explanations
were
on
an
opportunity
and
you
know
on
continuance
and
I
will
say
again
to
reiterate:
we
got
really
far
over
just
the
last
week
and
a
half
much
further
than
than
we
were
being
told
we
could
get,
and
so
I
I
absolutely
think
there
is
progress
to
be
made.
We
may
be
close
to
the
end,
but
I
wanted
to
just
see
if
you
were
convinced
on
that.
H
Thank
you,
councilmember
perales,
for
for
asking,
frankly,
I'm
not
sure
I've
been
listening
to
the
debate
and
I've
been
listening
to
mr
shane
auer's
responses
and
with
all
due
respect
eric,
I
don't,
I
don't
believe
I
I
I
feel,
there's
a
little
posturing
going
on
and
thinking
why
the
applicant
would
pull
the
offer
off
the
table
in
a
week,
given
the
increased
development
potential
with
the
plan
if
we
approve
it
going
forward
and
the
additional
profitability
for
that.
So
that's
that's.
H
What's
going
through
my
mind,
I
am
very
thoughtful
about
what
councilmember
cohen
has
to
say.
This
is
his
council
district.
He
has
been
the
lead
negotiator
on
this.
So
that's
why
I'm
still
undecided
councilmember
perales,
because
I
do
listen
to
what
the
council
member
of
the
district
has
to
say
in
his
opinion
so
far
he
said
he
doesn't
support
the
continuance
so
and
I
wouldn't
postpone
a
defer
agree
to
a
deferral,
but
the
continuance
is
more
compelling
because
that
closes
the
public
hearing,
we've
already
heard
from
100
folks,
so
I
on
the
29th.
H
J
Yeah,
no,
I
look
I
I.
I
appreciate
your
frankness
and
and
look
their
reality
right.
I
think,
especially
with
what
we're
hearing
from
the
letters
from
the
bum
family
and
then
what
we're
hearing
from
mr
shane
howard
today
and
I
know
that's
been
councilmember.
Cohen's
main
concern
is
losing
everything,
so
I
I
don't
doubt
right
now
that
there's
a
genuine
concern
on
that
possibility.
I
would
agree
with
you,
though,
that
is
posturing.
J
I
I
have
absolutely
no
belief
or
no
assurity
that
that
I
think
the
bum
family
is
actually
gonna
walk
away.
If
we
continue
this
for
one
week,
especially
considering
that
I
don't
think
we're
asking
for
too
too
much
more
movement,
we're
asking
for
an
opportunity
number
one,
a
little
bit
of
time
and
number
two
to
be
able
to
have
that
conversation
from
now.
J
Until
then-
and-
and
I
I
I
don't
believe
so-
and
so
I
do
want
to
ask
roberto
the
vendors
association
president,
if
he's
still
on
the
line,
if
he
can
raise
his
hand
and
we
can
call
him
up
and
just
for
the
others
that
have
raised
their
hand,
people
that
spoke
yesterday-
I
know
mayor
we
haven't
mentioned
this
yet,
but
we're
we're
done
with
public
comments.
So
I
know
we've
had
people
that
have
been
raising
their
hand
and
and
public
comment
is
complete,
so
I
know
I
don't.
J
I
think
people
may
be
interested
in
speaking,
but
roberto.
I
see
you
raised
your
hand,
can
we
unmute
him.
J
N
J
J
Morning
so
I'm
curious
if
you
believe
that
the
vendors
association
feels
it's
beneficial
to
have
this.
You
know
one
week
continuance
and
that
you
would
be
interested
in
coming
to
the
table
and,
more
importantly,
would
you
be
willing
to
end
your
hunger
strike
because,
obviously,
we're
concerned
about
your
personal
health
as
well?
So
that's
the
question
for
you.
N
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
thank
you,
council,
member
perales,
council,
member
carrasco
and
every
single
council
member
and
the
mayor
as
well
for
the
the
debate
today.
N
I
definitely
appreciate
it
and,
yes,
you
know
we
do
strongly
believe
that
in
one
week
we'll
be
able
to
pencil
down
and
get
those
assurances
that
we
need-
and
you
know
and
a
word
that
me
and
my
colleagues
have
been
saying
frankenstein
these
memos
and
make
something
really
viable
that
lays
out
that
framework
for
us,
the
vendors
for
us,
the
community
for
the
city
and
for
the
landowners
to
develop
something,
that's
really
going
to
be
great,
but
you
know
this
is
probably
the
first
time
we're
actually
brought
to
the
table.
N
So
I
want
to
thank
you,
council,
member
perales,
for
that
and
yeah.
We
do
believe
we
can
get
that
done
through
collaborative
work
and
I
believe
we
would
be
willing
to
stop
the
hunger
strikes
if
we
are
brought
to
the
table.
J
Okay,
thank
you
for
for
your
response.
I
I
appreciate
that,
and,
and
what
I
want
to
you
know
sort
of
make
a
point
here.
Is
this
isn't
just
me
as
a
council,
member
or
any
council
over
here,
trying
to
determine
what
is
best
for
the
vendors?
These
are
actually
vendors
that
a
lot
of
them
have
been
part
of
the
market
for
40
years
right
and
these
are
they
almost
have
a
closer.
J
You
know,
connection
and
relationship
with
the
property
owner
themselves
right
and
and
it's
these
vendors
that
are
asking
that
we're
asking
for
90
days
right,
which
we're
not
we're
not
contemplating
here
we're
contemplating
six
and
giving
them
that
opportunity
to
be
able
to
see
if
we
can't
just
you
know,
cross
that
that
last
two
percent
of
the
line,
that's
where
the
ask
is
coming
from,
and
so
what
I'd
like
to
do
then,
is
actually
call
the
question
on
this
vote.
B
B
J
B
B
So
it
is
a
two-thirds,
okay,
so
we'll
vote
now
on
the
motion
to
call
the
question
or
to
continue
debate.
Tony
jimenez.
Yes,.
A
J
B
No
all
right
the
motion
fails.
Mr
shaynar,
did
you
want
to
respond.
K
I
just
council,
member
council,
member
foley
and
corrales
alluded
to
posturing,
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
something.
You
know
there
is
this
flawed
notion
that
developers
want
the
denser
taller
project
that
somehow
it's
more
valuable
and
actually
in
today's
environment
with
high
construction
costs.
K
The
actual
more
valuable
project
is
the
lower
density
project,
building
housing
in
wood
and
not
high-rise,
building
non-high-rise
office
buildings.
So
just
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that
that
the
the
project
that
we
already
had
approved
in
2007
would
make
us
the
most
money
and
we
would
be
happy
to
build
that.
K
C
Yeah
just
quickly,
you
know
I
I
wanted
to
get
clarification
on
on
the
motion
itself
to
continue
because
there's
a
second
question
about
the
second
reading
and
I
feel
like
we
have
to
make
that
decision
now,
if
we're
asking
council
to
have
a
special
meeting
in
july,
because
there
would
have
to
be
time,
staff
would
have
to
put
into
preparing
for
that
and
getting
it
posted,
especially
since
fourth
of
july
weekend
is
involved.
C
So
I
just
want
a
clarification
as
to
whether
the
motion
for
continuance
includes
calling
a
special
meeting,
and
I
guess
this
there's
a
question
for
eric
in
here
about
the
need
to
have
a
special
meeting
in
july.
If
this
gets
continued
versus
the
ability
versus
the
whether
or
not
then
at
this
point
having
that
second
reading,
the
first
week
of
august
would
change
anything.
C
K
C
B
C
C
C
First
week
of
august
there
was
talk
before
from
councilmember
perales
that,
given
that
there
might
be
some
need-
and
I
don't
you
know-
I-
I
don't
want
to
get
into
the
details-
and
I
don't
know
enough
about
whether
or
not
you
know
any
of
the
reasons
are
valid
or
not,
but
there
had
been
a
desire
to
have
this
done
in
june.
One
of
our
timeline
questions
was
getting
this
done
in
june
and
I
do
want
to
point
out
one
thing
I
didn't
mention
about
the
timeline
was
this
was
scheduled
for
council
in
mid-may.
C
Originally,
it
was
actually
scheduled
last
december
and
got
deferred
and
I'm
glad
it
did
because
we
had
time
to
work
out
some
of
these
solutions
that
weren't
even
contemplated.
Then
this
was
then
scheduled
to
come
to
council
in
mid-may,
so
it
would
be
done
with
lots
of
time
before
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year.
It
was
then
deferred
to
june
8th
because
of
the
planning
commission
delay
and
the
work
we
were
doing
and
then,
when
it
got
to
be
closer
to
june
8th,
we
realized
you
know.
C
C
So
I
just
want
to
you
know:
we've
been
working
hard
to
try
to
get
this
done
by
the
end
of
june,
and
I
wanted
to
find
out
whether
the
intention
here
of
my
fellow
council
members
is
to
try
to
meet
that
obligation
meet
that
promise,
that
we
would
have
this
done
close
to
the
end
of
june
or
if
now
the
idea
is
we
would
come
back
in
beginning
of
august
for
a
second
reading.
I
guess
that's
my
question
for
the
supporters
of
the
motion
too.
B
All
right,
why
don't
we
pose
that?
To
the
maker
of
the
motion,
I
believe
that's
councilman
mccrosko!
That's
all
right!.
I
Sorry,
you
know
I
I
I'm
okay,
coming
back
in
july,
we're
zooming
from
no
matter
where
we
are
in
whatever
corner
of
the
world
we
happen
to
be
in,
and
if
that
is
the
the,
if
that
is
what's
going
to
get
this
over
the
finish
line,
so
be
it
I'm
okay
with
that.
So
that
would
be
what
the
did
you
say
the
first
week
in
july.
I
There's
really
no
no
big
rush
anymore,
because
there's
no
deadline-
or
we
can
do
it-
that
first
week
in
august
I
just
I
just
want
to
get
this
over
the
finish
line.
I
just
want
six
more
days.
C
We
can
leave
that
up
in
the
air.
I
suppose
at
this
point
I
I
will
only
finish
by
saying
that
I'm
particularly
nervous
for
the
flea
market
for
the
vendors
and
for
my
district
about
the
potential
risk
that
we
would
be
putting
any
agreement
in.
I
would
hope
that
the
applicant
will,
you
know,
continue
forward,
because
this,
I
think,
is
a
good
deal
for
everyone
and
preserves
a
key
cultural
and
economic
engine
in
my
district
and
and
it's
also
really
important
for
the
families
that
live
in
our
district,
that
this
project
moved
forward.
C
D
Thank
you.
I
I
just
wanted
to
point
something
out
and,
and
I'm
happy
to
meet
july
or
august
for
the
second
reading.
You
know,
I
think
we
have
a
commitment
to
to
our
residents,
but
given
councilmember
peralta's
questions
with
the
housing
department,
I
think
it
made
it
pretty
clear
that
july
12th
isn't
sort
of
an
actual
deadline,
but,
like
I
said,
I'm
happy
to
do
it
beginning
of
july
or
august
doesn't
matter
to
me.
D
I
would
like
our
city
employees
to
get
july
off,
given
that
we're
still
in
a
pandemic
and
still
dealing
with
cobid
and
all
of
that
regard,
I
think
I
think
city
staff
could
use
a
break
so
I'll
say
that
I
also
really
just
wanted
to
say
like
the
mayor
and
councilmember
cohen,
I'm
at
city
hall
right
now
and
we
have
hunger
strikers
here,
and
so
I
just
want
to
keep
that
in
mind
in
the
decisions
that
we
make.
D
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
all
right,
so
we're
going
to
vote
on
the
deferral
motion
unless
there's
anyone
else
like
to
speak.
I
I
just
want
to
share
like
I
know
that
there
seems
to
be
a
belief
that
there
is
a
varying
level
of
concern
about
the
welfare
of
the
of
the
families
who
are
affected
directly
here.
B
Treasure
and
gathering
place
for
those
of
us
who
might
be
concerned
about
a
deferral,
the
question's
a
little
different,
which
is
you
know
it
may
well
be
right.
This
is
posturing,
and
I
don't
know
if
mr
shane,
our
knows
exactly
what
his
clients
are.
B
Gonna
do
or
not,
and
this
may
well
be
something
that
pans
out
for
that
remaining
two
percent
of
whatever
deal
we
might
think
we
can
get,
but
if
we're
wrong
we're
gambling
with
the
livelihoods
of
430
families,
and
so
it's
fair
to
say,
there's
plenty
be
concerned
on
all
sides
and
we
should
not
simply
blind
ourselves
to
the
risk
on
either
side.
B
G
B
B
M
Okay,
good!
Well,
I
guess
the
issue
of
about
rezoning
is
a
big
issue,
because
we're
dealing
with
that
in
our
neighborhood
and
how
this
whole
event
has
shown
in
terms
of
berryessa
and
other
rezonings.
We
have
been
asking
our
neighborhood
has
been
asking
for
our
property
at
615
stockton
avenue
on
the
corner,
which
is
being
zoned
to
be
neighborhood
commercial
without
the
approval
of
our
neighborhood,
the
same
issues
that
have
been
that
have
been
going
on
with
the
berryessa
that
it
wasn't.
M
There
was
no
community
engagement
to
change
the
zoning
that
is
bringing
us
a
hotel
that
is
bringing
us
the
issues
of
human
trafficking,
sex
trafficking
that
will
happen
in
a
hotel
potentially
like
it
has
happened
in
other
apartments.
To
have
that.
We
do
not
want
that
in
our
community.
B
Thank
you,
michael.
Do
you
want
to
win
here.
G
A
B
I
see
other
folks
who
have
raised
their
hands
on
this
item
and
I
know
I
recognize
the
names
of
people
who
have
spoken
previously
on
the
flea
market
item.
So
let
me
just
say
to
each
one
of
the
speakers.
This
is
specifically
on
a
defer
on
an
unrelated
item.
M
B
D
A
A
B
B
All
right,
the
motion
prevails
with
nine
votes
item.
10.6
michael.
Let
me
just
check
in
with
you.
This
is
the
general
plan
amendment
on
evans,
lane
two
sites
is
this
in
any
way
required
to
be
deferred.
G
D
So,
given
the
29th,
so
we
need
for
this,
could
we
hear
the
presentation
and
do
a
continuance
again
or
should
we
just
defer
everything,
because
the
29th
is
pretty
extensive,
agenda-wise.
G
G
G
All
right
so
item
10.6
before
you
today,
I
was
going
to
say
this
evening-
is
the
city
initiated
general
plan
amendment
to
change
the
landing's
designation
for
mixed
use,
neighborhood
to
urban
residential
on
approximately
a
5.93
acre
site.
G
The
proposed
general
plan
amendment
would
change
the
development
density
on
this
site
from
a
maximum
of
30
dwelling
into
the
acre
and
would
allow
future
development
up
to
a
maximum
of
95
million
to
the
acre.
The
subject.
Property
is
owned
by
the
city
of
san
jose
and
the
proposed
gpa
has
been
brought
forward
by
the
housing
department,
and
I
should
note
that
rachel
and
kemmit
from
the
housing
department
are
joining
me
on
this
in
my
virtual
box.
G
So
here's
the
location
of
the
site
it
is
with.
Within
a
half
a
mile
of
the
curtner
light
rail
urban
village.
G
The
site
is
bounded
by
catalonia,
apartments
to
the
north,
the
willow
glen
estates,
mobile
home
park
to
the
east,
the
evans
lane
wellness
and
recovery
center
to
the
south
and
a
combination
of
land
uses
to
the
west
across
evans.
Lane
a
portion
of
the
site
is
currently
occupied
by
the
emergency
interim
housing
project
approved
by
council
in
the
spring
of
2020,
in
response
to
the
coven
19
emergency
and
the
shelter's
crisis
declaration.
G
The
proposed
general
plan
amendment
is
urban,
residential
and
I've,
which
would
allow
up
to
95
billion
units.
The
acre,
I
should
note
a
virtual
committee
meeting,
was
held
for
this
proposal
on
november
16
2020.
G
there
was
a
community
meeting.
A
response
to
this
concerns
have
been
included
in
the
staff
report.
Initial
study
was
prepared
in
accordance
with
sequa
and
it's
determined.
The
negative
declaration
is
adequate
for
sql
clearance
and
that
there
is
no
significant
impact
on
the
environment
and
the
planning
commission
recommendation
is
to
prove
a
negative
declaration.
According
with
sequa
and
approve
this
general
plan,
amendment
from
m
from
mixed-use
neighborhood
to
urban
residential.
G
We
again.
We
also
ask
that
the
the
council
also
make
a
motion
to
continue
the
general
plan
hearing
cycle
to
june
29th,
and
that
concludes
staff.
Recommendation
presentation
excuse
me
and
we
are
available
for
questions.
B
All
right,
thank
you
very
much,
michael
all,
right,
we're
gonna,
open
public
comment,
because
we
are
now
many
hours
late
on
resolving
these
items
and
because
I'm
going
to
lose
a
quorum
very
soon.
I
just
lost
council
member
2.
we're
going
to
close
public
comment
at
11
10
and
all
public
comment
must
be
specifically
on
this
item:
property
located
on
evans,
lane
tessa.
M
M
Yeah,
okay,
good!
Thank
you!
Sweetie!
Okay,
good!
Thank
you!
So
much!
Yes,
definitely
interested
in
how
general
plan
amendments
are
implemented
in
our
city,
because
we
have
been
at
the
burnt
edge
of
that.
There
have
been
two
general
plan
amendments,
one
that
that
brought
us
a
hotel
into
our
historic
neighborhood.
That
is,
you
know
close
to
the
native
americans
that
have
founded
our
neighborhood.
So
don't
tell
me
that
our
neighborhood
is
commercial.
A
M
I
know
any,
I
know
what
I'm
talking
about
is
the
general
plan
change
and
then,
on
top
of
it
there
was
a
a
affordable
housing
and
then
another
general
plan.
N
I
just
want
to
say
that
again
I
see
that
they
say
there
was
community
outreach.
N
I
would
like
to
know
how
many
people
actually
show
up
to
community
outreach,
as
we've
seen
in
other
developments,
there's
really
not
a
lot
of
input
and
I
don't
see
them
doing
a
lot
of
work
trying
to
get
community
outreach
on
these
important
developments,
and
I
keep
seeing
everywhere
right
now
with
the
flea
market.
I
am
going
to
bring
it
up.
That
is
a
development
that
didn't
get
a
lot
of
community
outreach
and
I'm
still
very
disappointed
in
everyone.
N
I
do
want
to
say
thank
you
to
maya,
esparza,
carrasco
and
perales
for
real
estate.
G
Hi,
as
this
is
a
evans
lane,
project
you've
been
doing
some
important
work
on
evans
lane
about
affordable
housing
ideas
and
help.
Thank
you.
I
really
hope
that
we're
at
the
time
to
be
considering
that
affordable
housing
is
not
just
you
know,
market
rate
or
eighty
percent
of
market
rate.
You
know
we're
talking
eli
bli
and
mixed
income
ideas
that
is
our
future
affordable
housing.
We
need
to
learn
to
more
openly
talk
about
that
and
more
openly
talk
about
that
for
the
future
of
the
flea
market
as
well.
Thank
you.
M
Good
morning,
council,
I
the
reluctance
on
this
part
of
the
city
to
really
put
redlining
out
there
in
city
government
so
that
we
can
examine
just
how
just
how
much
the
mexicans
and
the
blacks
were
deprived
of
of
equal
protection
under
the
law
and
due
process
of
law
and
that
the
city
now
is
profiting
from
that.
M
You
see
you're
making
these
changes
on
land
that
was
acquired
by
the
deprivation
of
those
processes,
these
constitutional
processes.
So
it's
not
legitimate
and
as
a
lawyer
ricardo,
you
know
this.
You
know
that
we
were
deprived
of
that
and
that's
the
reason
why
you
don't
want
to
put
redlining
on
the
map,
so
we
can
examine
it.
Thank.
B
You,
mr
arnold,
we're
speaking
on
the
property
in
evans
lane
which
is
being
upgraded.
M
M
Yeah
speaking
on
evans
lane,
you
know
we
need
to
understand
that
the
developers
do
not
have
clear
holds
on
our
city.
You
guys
are
supposed
to
be
our
representatives.
Do
you
understand
that
you
guys
are
representing
our
interests,
not
just
the
interests
of
those
who
have
money,
not
just
the
interest
of
those
who
have
power?
Okay,
you
are
voted
in
by
our
own
power,
which
is
our
vote.
We
voted
you
guys
in
to
do
what
we
want
you
guys
to
do.
What
we
need
you
guys
to
do,
which
is
to
support
us.
M
B
B
L
Thank
you
mayor.
This
site
does
have
our
emergency
interim
housing
and
we've
been
working
with
the
housing
department
even
before
we
put
the
interim
housing
site
on
there,
so
that
we
could
do
permanent
development
at
the
same
time
as
we
have
the
interim
site.
So
I
would
like
to
move
staff
recommendation
for
this
item
as
well
as
the
continuance
for
the
general
plan
hearing
and
I'm
happy
to
go
into
any
more
detail.
Anybody
wants
about
this
site
because
I've
been
working
on
it
since,
before
I
was
first
elected
in
2016..
L
B
Thank
you
thank
you,
councilmember
davis,
and
by
the
way,
thank
you
for
your
work.
I
know
this
is
also
very
close
to
councilmember
spartacus
district
and
there's
been
obviously
an
enormous
amount
of
activity
in
terms
of
building,
affordable
housing
and
around
these
sites,
so
appreciate
all
the
support
for
the
continued
development,
affordable
housing,
particularly
the
recent
opening
of
a
emergency
housing
facility
there
for
many
families,
councilman
sparsen.
D
D
She
probably
doesn't
remember
this,
but
it
was
a
few
years
ago
there
was
a
discussion
that
I
happened
to
be
in
the
room
on
about
the
density
of
this
project
and
her
first
reaction
was,
we
should
add
more
density
to
it,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
give
her
a
shout
out
and
acknowledge
her
work
on
this
project
and
then
taking
it
from
something
that
there
were.
You
know
huge
groups
of
people
screaming
and
shouting
to
something
that
we're
at
today.
Where
everybody
just
says
yeah.
D
It
makes
sense
it's
what's
best,
so
so
I'll
happily
support
it.
B
A
A
D
B
Hi,
thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
We're
going
to
continue
this
hearing
to
june
the
29th
at
the
time
set
by
the
rules
committee.
I
expect
it
will
be
11
a.m
or
something
like
that,
and
we
will
now
go
to
open
forum
and
I
know
again
we're
losing
our
forum.
So
we
will
hear
public
comments
until
no
later
than
11
20
on
open
forum.
G
Blair
hi.
Thank
you.
I
wanted
to
quickly
comment
that
the
person
for
item
10
10.5,
who
who
missed
out
on,
was
upset
with
public
comments
she
can
and
to
everyone
who's
listening
today.
They
can,
if
they
didn't
get
public
comment.
Time
really
write
to
san
jose
city
government
and
let
your
feelings
be
known.
That
way.
It's
a
it's
a
very
good
way
to
work.
Also.
I
I
wanted
to
quickly
offer
I
said
yesterday,
you
know:
let's
do
it
now,
let's
negotiate
and
work
together
on
these
issues
of
the
flea
market.
G
Now
you
know,
I
should
have
said
something
a
little
different
and
I'm
sorry
if
I
was
a
bit
strong,
but
I
think
there
is
a
way
that
can
be
a
really
cooperative
good
effort
from
all
sides.
I'm
really
still
hopeful
that
process.
Good
luck,
how
we
do
that!
I
had
a
few
weird
words
about
dear
dawn
station
planning,
I'll
offer
that
at
rules
in
open
government
today
thanks
a
lot
for
everyone's
efforts.
The
past
few
days.
M
Yes,
thank
you.
So
what
our
neighborhood
is
demanding
from
our
city
is
that
just
like,
what's
been
happening
in
in
this
berryessa
event?
Is
that
the
public
comment,
the
public
outreach
has
been
so
poor
that
we
have
been
left
with,
not
really
having
any
agency
to
create
the
neighborhood
that
we
want,
and
that
is
what
you
know.
M
You're
you're
fighting
with
the
berryessa
is
that
there
wasn't
enough
community
input
and
that's
what
we're
asking
for
now
too,
that
you
changed
our
general
plan
without
notification
to
to
neighborhood
commercial
right
in
our
our
historic
neighborhood,
then
there
was
a
a
a
chance
for
it
to
become
residential
that
the
developer
and
owner
put
in
a
request
for
resident,
affordable
housing
that
was
denied
because
of
another
general
plan
change
that
we
were
not
alerted
to
that
that
to
keep
residential
away
from
commercial,
so
you're
protecting
businesses
instead
of.
M
N
Hi
again,
I
just
want
to
thank
council
members
that
were
finding
solutions
and
alternative
ways
to.
G
N
Out
for
our
vendors,
martina
carrasco,
raul,
perales
and
vice
mayor,
chappie
and
maya
esparza,
I
really
do
want
to
thank
you
guys,
because
it's
not
easy
being
in
your
chairs,
and
I
know
that
all
of
you
guys
have
to
make
difficult
decisions.
You
know
I
am
not
surprised,
but
dave
davis,
I'm
not
surprised
by
matt
mahan,
and
I
am
not
surprised
but
foley.
They
stick
together
right
and
I
will
make
sure
that
people
vote
you
guys
out.
Dave
david
cohen.
M
This
is
a
piece
of
writing
that
was
written
in
1853
in
california
mexicans.
Is
there
no
remedy
for
you
and
viable
laws
yet
useless
serve?
It
is
true,
certain
judges
and
hypocritical
authorities
cemented
in
evil
and
injustice
to
do
whatever
suits
them
and
to
satisfy
their
vile
avarice
at
the
cost
of
your
patience
and
suffering
rising
in
their
frenzy,
even
to
the
taking
of
life
through
the
treacherous
hands
of
the
bayless.
M
The
wicked
ways
in
which
many
of
you
have
been
often
times
involved
in
persecution,
accompanied
by
circumstances
making
it.
The
more
bitter,
is
now
well
known
these
crimes
being
hid
from
society
under
the
shadow
of
a
horde
like
these
implacable
people,
with
a
haughty
spirit
with
which
suggests
impunity
for
a
life
of
criminality
have
pronounced
that
they
are
superior.
F
Thank
you,
roland.
A
Thank
you
vice
mayor
and
council,
so
I
really
appreciated
the
the
conversation
that
you
had
earlier
on
about,
starting
to
look
for
an
alternate
location
for
the
vendors,
and
especially
you
mentioned
the
vast
acreage
that
the
county
owned
I'd
like
to
bring
to
your
attention.
A
We've
got
an
absolute
pearl
in
a
downward
alif,
which
is
marshall,
cattle,
which
is
256
acres,
and
we
know
for
a
fact
there
will
never
ever
be
any
housing
there,
and
I
would
like
us
to
reach
out
to
the
council
and
start
looking
at
the
deeds
and
see
what
can
could
possibly
be
done
for
that
matter.
We
could
have
a
barrier
replica
think
about
it,
the
amount
of
water
we
could
store
there
and
circulate
the
water
back
and
forth.
You
know
between
marshall
carter
and
berryessa,
but
anyway,
going
back
to
the
vendors.
A
A
Sorry
about
that
vice
mayor,
I
can't
believe
I'm
saying
this,
but
I
think
I
start
to
understand
mr
schroeder's
position
and
appreciate
what
he
has
to
struggle
with
at
times.
A
M
A
M
Hi,
I
would
like
to
just
remind
you
guys
you
need
to
allow
for
the
full
public
comment.
I
understand
that
it's
been
dragging
on.
I
understand
that
you're
only
human
and
you
have
things
to
do
so,
do
we
we
have
things
to
do
as
well.
We
have
lives,
we
have
bills
to
pay,
so
stop
cutting
us
off,
stop
denying
our
speaking
ability.
You
cut
it
down
from
two
minutes
to
one
to
now.
M
Less
than
that,
because
you
cut
us
off
when
we
talk
about
unvoting,
you,
okay,
you
guys
need
to
understand
that
this
is
what
we
have
to
do.
This
is
our
democratic
right.
This
is
our
right
as
citizens
to
do
is
to
speak
to
you
guys,
you
can't
just
unmute.
You
can't
just
mute
us
and
disconnect
us.
We
are
here
and
if
you're
going
to
keep
doing
that
to
us,
then
we
are
going
to
show
up
in
person.
Okay,
I
understand
that
developers
you're,
not
all
evil.
M
F
Thank
you.
Next
up
is
gabby.
N
They
work
really
really
hard
and
non-stop,
and
community
outreach
is
just
another
item
on
the
to-do
list
when
it
comes
to
planning
and
historically,
the
city
has
been
doing
the
bare
minimum
because
of
the
manpower
that
they
have
and
I
think
something
needs
to
change
in
the
way
projects
are
approved
and
developed,
and
I
feel
like
it's
time
the
city
considers
hiring
someone
who
specifically
manages
community
outreach
for
all
projects.
Thank
you.
I
yield
my
time.
F
Thank
you,
catherine.
A
Good
morning,
council,
I
just
like
to
say
that
I
wish
all
the
constituencies
in
the
city
were
treated
with
the
deference
that
the
city
treats
the
developers,
and
I
hope
that
the
county,
you
know,
I
hope
the
city
will
take
up
an
office
of
disability
affairs
like
the
one
that
the
county
voted
to
look
into
yesterday.