►
Description
City of San José, California
Community & Economic Development Committee of September 26, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=987869&GUID=4996ABF6-2A16-42A2-A3F8-9B583AF2A5F7
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
E
B
Welcome
everyone
to
the
community,
Economic
Development
Committee
I'm
here
in
person
with
staff
and
the
rest
of
my
Council
colleagues
are
virtual
Lucky
them
before
we
begin
I'd
just
like
to
establish
the
orders
of
the
day
and
and
the
code
of
conduct,
and
that
is
to
remind
everybody
that
that
both
the
committee
members
and
members
of
the
public
to
follow
our
code
of
conduct
at
this
meeting.
This
includes
comment
commenting
on
the
specific
agenda
item
only
and
addressing
the
full
body.
B
Public
speakers
will
not
engage
in
a
conversation
with
the
chair
or
council
members,
Commissioners
or
staff.
All
members
of
the
committee
staff
and
public
are
expected
to
refrain
from
abusive
language,
repeated
failure
to
comply
with
the
code
of
conduct
which
will
disturb,
disrupt
or
impede
the
orderly
conduct
of
this
meeting.
May
result
in
the
removal
of
this
meeting
this
meeting.
This
meeting
of
the
CED
committee
will
now
come
to
order.
I've
been
dying
to
do
this.
B
Clerk
call
the
roll,
so
there
I'm
one
step
ahead.
All
right.
We
do
have
a
rather
large
agenda
today,
so
it
at
some
point.
I
may
ask
those
from
the
public
to
speak
for
one
minute,
we're
not
going
to
start
there
we're
going
to
start
with
two
minutes,
but
it
really
depends
on
how
long
our
meeting
is,
because
we
have
some
really
deep
conversations
that
we
want
to
have
on
on
some
pretty
heavy
com.
Heavy
topics.
With
that
I'm
going
to
move
through
the
agenda.
B
E
Blair
Beekman
here
I
guess
we're
at
the
end
of
September
I.
Just
wanted
to
this
is
a
for
art.
Commission
work
plan.
E
Things
for
2022-23
I
just
wanted
to
offer
a
friendly
reminder
that
when
our
commission
does
its
work
when
they
wade
into
the
Waters
of
surveillance,
technology
and
law
enforcement
and
data
collection,
I
hope
they
can
be
careful
and
and
really
look
towards
ideas
of
beauty
as
how
to
answer
questions
as
opposed
to
working
towards
restriction
and
yeah
Beauty
and
openness
before
restriction,
which
I
think
the
Arts
commission
has
a
bit
of
a
trouble
with,
and
so
I
hope
that
that
can
be
taken
to
into
account
and
the
use
of
surveillance
Tech
within
the
Arts
commission
process.
E
I
think
should
be
very
much
questioned
and
you
know
those
sort
of
practices.
I
think
we
should
really
concentrate
on
on
our
on
our
good
and
our
positive
and
good
luck
in
those
efforts
we
want
to.
We
want
a
full
community
process
and
an
integrated
Community
process
and
I
hope
that
that
can
be
towards
the
concepts
of
real
openness
and
sharing
and
understanding
that
respects
all
people.
Instead
of
closing
people
off
and
and
being
exclusive,
thank
you.
B
F
B
B
G
Good
afternoon,
chair
Foley
and
council
members,
thank
you
for
having
us
here
today:
I'm
Kristen,
Clements
I'm,
a
division
manager
with
the
housing
department
and
with
me
here,
Emily
Hislop,
also,
a
division
manager
overseeing
our
rent,
stabilization
and
eviction,
help
centers
and
instead
of
Reagan
Henninger.
Today
we
have
our
esteem
director,
Jackie
Morales
verand
in
Residence.
G
Next
slide.
Please!
Oh
that's
me
next
slide.
Please
thank
you
today,
we're
here
to
give
you
a
status
update
on
progress
on
our
top
four
priorities
under
our
Citywide
anti-displacement
strategy,
which
the
city
council
approved
in
September
2020..
This
slide
shows
the
top
four
recommendations
that
we
have
prioritized.
G
Today's
report
focuses
on
recommendation
number
one:
the
city's
work
on
eviction
prevention,
as
the
memo
notes,
work
on
number
two
tenant
preferences
number
three,
a
Copa
program
proposal
and
number
four
work
on
our
housing
commissions
lived
experience
seat
were
deferred
largely
in
the
past
quarter
due
to
staff's
need
to
focus
on
creating
a
draft
sixth
cycle
housing.
Accountant.
However,
work
on
priority.
Four
is
speeding
a
pace
now
because
we
have
a
new
staff
member
staffed
to
it
and
we'll
give
you
an
update
at
the
end
of
the
presentation.
G
H
Thank
you
Chris
Kristen
good
afternoon,
just
as
an
update,
the
first,
the
city
of
San
Jose,
with
the
covid-19
state
rental
assistance
program.
As
of
September
17th,
128.1
million
dollars
has
been
paid
to
Property
Owners
on
behalf
of
10
702
households.
H
107.8
million
of
that
84
was
paid
on
behalf
of
9152
very
an
extremely
low
income.
Households,
49.3
of
applicants
have
been
from
latinx,
headed
households
and
62.6
well,
over
the
majority
have
been
in
extremely
low
income.
Households
for
reference
and
extremely
Inc.
Low-Income
household
is
a
household
that
earns
a
total
of
30
percent
of
the
area,
median
income
for
a
family
of
foreign
Santa,
Clara
County.
That
is
earning
less
than
fifty
thousand
five
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
for
very
low
income.
H
Really
briefly,
there
was
a
legal
challenge
brought
against
this
California
covid-19
rental
assistance
program
which,
due
to
a
preliminary
injunction,
has
put
it
put
a
temporary
hold
on
the
program
issuing
denials
in
many
cases,
alleging
that
many
denials
were
unjust
and
that
tenants
were
provided
with
inadequate
information
and
no
meaningful
meaningful
way
to
appeal
their
application
decision,
and
this
means
there's
still
work
to
do
for
the
eviction
prevention,
help
center
and
helping
tenants
open
up
some
cases
or
try
to
get
funding
when
they
were
underfunded.
H
Next
slide,
as
we
updated
the
committee
at
our
last
meeting,
the
city
in
partnership
with,
at
the
time
the
county,
Sacred,
Heart,
Community,
Services
destination
home
and
the
project
Sentinel
Court
mediation
program
launched
an
eviction
diversion
and
settlement
program
as
a
review.
This
is
a
temporary
targeted
program
to
intervene
in
evictions
of
tenants
that
wear
the
tech.
The
eviction
is
based
in
whole
or
impart
on
non-payment
of
rent.
H
H
H
We
also
updated
you
last
time
that
we
were
excited
on
June
1st,
to
launch
a
unlawful
detainer
Court
Clinic,
with
a
bunch
of
Partners
as
part
of
a
holistic
approach,
to
helping
litigants
both
landlords
and
attorneys,
who
are
involved
in
unlawful
detainer
actions.
This
Clinic
happens
at
the
courthouse.
H
Our
partners
are,
of
course,
the
court,
the
county,
the
Court's
self-help
center
Sacred
Heart
destination
home
and
the
project
Sentinel
Court
mediation
program,
it's
open
to
both
tenants
and
landlords
who
are
involved
in
eviction,
actions,
litigants,
get
assistance
with
court
filings
or
legal
referrals,
access
and
connections
to
mediation,
services
and
other
resources
to
help
resolve
the
court.
Action
avoid
judgment
and
work
towards
stable
housing.
H
H
Before
reviewing
this
slide,
I
just
want
to
give
a
top
level
view
of
everything
that
eviction
prevention
help
team.
Does
they
have
three
main
efforts?
These
The
Help
Center
Services,
is
what
was
originally
established
with
the
eviction
prevention
help
center,
where
staff
is
helping
people
with
appeals
pending
applications
getting
connected
to
Legal,
Services
and
general
inquiries
about
eviction.
H
We.
Our
second
effort,
is
our
presence
at
court,
not
only
during
the
ud
clinic,
but
also
having
staff
on
site
during
two
days
of
the
unlawful
detainer
Court
calendar
to
help
people
look
up,
statuses
of
their
rental
assistance,
application
and
then
third,
the
third
main
effort
has
been
this
eviction
diversion
and
settlement
program
quickly
in
the
fourth
quarter
of
21
fiscal
year
of
21-22,
the
results
of
staff's
work
at
the
eviction
prevention,
help
centers
and
at
court
625
households
during
the
quarter
were
assisted
in
person,
either
completing
or
appealing
rent
relief
applications.
H
2241
were
assisted
by
phone.
Almost
240
households
received
legal
services
from
our
walk-in
and
virtual
daily
legal
Services,
help
from
Bay
Area,
Legal
and
law
Foundation.
We
participated
in
18,
Outreach
events
and
in
community
engagements
and
at
least
60
households
were
assisted,
while
at
court
good
news
for
eviction
diversion
and
settlement
program.
We
of
the
68
cases
we
have
started
since
the
May
launch.
So
far,
470
000
has
been
paid
or
will
be
paid
to
Property
Owners
on
behalf
of
25
San
Jose
tenant
household.
H
H
I
just
want
to
give
a
shout
out
that
the
12
plus
eviction
help
center
analysts
and
Navigators
as
well
as
Sacred.
Hearts
team
have
really
hustled
in
the
last
three
plus
months
to
prevent
these
59
households
from
being
forcibly
evicted
through
an
unlawful
detainer
judgment.
This
has
stabilized
some
of
the
households
in
their
current
housing
and
allowed
others
more
time
to
get
back
on
their
feet
or
to
find
other
housing.
H
G
Thanks
Emily,
so
looking
forward
over
the
next
few
months
on
the
priorities
number
two
three
and
four
for
the
anti-displacement
strategy:
first,
on
tenant
preferences,
Senator
Cortese
sponsored
Senate,
Bill,
649,
SB
649,
actually,
that
two-year
Bill
the
governor
has,
until
this
Friday
to
either
veto
or
sign
this
bill
that
we've
worked
hard
on
together
with
two
co-sponsors,
including
somos
Mayfair.
G
This
bill
would
enable
anti-displacement
tenant
preferences
to
be
used
reliably
on
affordable
housing
deals
that
also
use
tax
credits
and
or
Bond
financing.
If
that
bill
passes,
we
will
be
in
good
shape
to
implement
preferences
as
soon
as
we
design
them
and
the
council
passes
them.
G
G
Now
that
this
first
draft
housing
element
has
been
submitted
to
the
state
and
was
submitted
on
the
16th
of
September,
we
are
starting
to
refocus
on
a
draft
program
proposal
for
Copa.
After
eight
months
of
meetings
and
program
design,
last
year,
staff
posted
a
draft
program
proposal
only
in
November,
and
then
we
held
seven
public
meetings
on
this
proposal
in
December,
January
and
February.
G
But
then
we
paused
this
work
until
about
four
weeks
ago.
So,
given
this
pause,
we
will
refresh
our
program
proposal
based
on
that
public
input
that
we
received
and
we've
scheduled,
two
public
meetings
on
the
revised
proposal,
November
14th
and
November
17th,
which
is
on
our
website.
We're
also
going
to
take
that
take
in
that
feedback
and
then
break
for
the
holiday
and
do
some
more
public
Outreach
in
January
our
plans
to
bring
the
program
proposal
to
the
Housing
Commission
and
to
full
Council
in
the
spring.
G
We
continue
to
coordinate
with
somos
Mayfair
on
a
Copa
proposal,
as
they
have
a
grant
to
do
this
work
with
the
city
through
the
San
Francisco
Foundation,
to
ensure
that
the
voice
of
residents
most
affected
by
displacement
are
reflected
in
the
program
design
ly
for
the
lived
experience
seat
on
the
Housing
and
Community
Development
Commission
in
the
next
two
months.
Housing
staff
will
be
working
very
closely
with
the
clerk's
office
and
the
mayor's
office.
G
Finally,
we
did
want
to
note
that
the
as
the
memo
States
over
the
last
19
months
staff
has
given
14
updates
on
our
work
to
the
council
and
to
two
Council
committees.
G
These
are
all
listed
on
page
three,
as
you
can
imagine,
this
has
been
a
bit
of
a
heavy
lift
and
so
moving
forward
our
intentions
to
bring
General
updates
on
different
recommendations
under
the
strategy.
Two
times
a
year
to
NSE,
which
is
appropriate,
given
the
type
of
work
that
would
be
done
under
most
of
the
remaining
recommendations
of
the
anti-displacement
strategy,
and
with
that
we're
available
for
questions.
B
Thank
you,
Kristen,
Emily
and
Jackie
for
being
here.
Let's
go
to
the
Met
first
to
the
members
of
the
public.
Is
there
any
one
with
their
hands
raised.
J
B
E
Hi
Claire
Beekman
here
thanks
a
lot
for
this
item.
A
good
learning
experience
with
this
item-
I
guess
hopefully
all
I
can
do-
is
I
heard
you're
going
through
some
review
of
six
cycle.
Things.
I
guess
is
that
with
a
you
know,
Regional
Housing
issues,
good
luck
with
that
sort
of
work.
It's
always
been.
My
hope
that
you
could
review
mixed
income
ideas
and
what
those
Concepts
can
develop,
help
develop
for
a
very
low
and
and
extremely
low
within
the
concepts
of
a
moderate
and
more
higher
income.
E
Okay,
thank
you,
council
person
holy
to
speak
to
any
displacement
issues.
I
I
I
think
all
I
can
do
at
this
time
is
offer
reminders
of
the
importance
of
are
wanting
to
fund
programs,
so
people
aren't
displaced
and
that
there
can
be
safeguards.
E
So
it's
that
sort
of
thing
we
have
to
organize
with
ourselves
and
learn
how
to
be
more
open
and
sharing
about
and
clear
with
each
other
as
a
community
process
and
that's
how
we
grow,
because
we
know
how
to
do
this
step.
Well,
we
just
have
to
be
open
about
how
we
do
this
well
and
a
quick
reminder
that
you
know
with
homeless
death
statistics
on
the
streets
that
are
being
counted
at
this
time.
That's
a
new
statistic
around
Vision,
zero
thinking.
E
Let's
respect
that
and
try
to
work
towards
homeless
deaths
that
are
happening
on
our
roads
and
such
and
let's
talk
about
that
openly.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you.
Moving
back
to
the
committee,
do
any
of
my
Council
colleagues
have
their
hand
raised
I,
don't
see
it.
Do
you
want
I'm,
sorry,
you
know
I,
don't
know
how
to
use
this
thing
so
you're
the
mayor
today,
council,
member
Esparza,
thank
you
and
it's
even
flashing
at
me,
blue
flashing
view.
Look
at.
D
How
that
works?
Okay,
so
I
had
a
few
questions.
So
I
noticed
that
most
of
the
help
assistance
that
we're
offering
is
on
the
phone.
In
fact,
let
me
go
back
to
the
presentation.
D
H
We
are
open
for
walk-ins
people
call
us
first
and
some
of
the
legal
services
because
we're
able
to
fill
intakes
out
for
behalf
of
people
on
behalf
of
people
outside
of
the
hours
that
the
legal
services
are.
Sometimes
they
don't
even
come
in
that
they
get
called
by
law,
Foundation
or
very
illegal
Aid.
In
the
interim
period,
Bay
Area
Legal
Aid
is
still
virtual.
Two
days
a
week.
H
The
option
to
walk
in
is
has
been
open
the
entire
year
and
it's
not
by
appointment.
Only
we
see
people
at
City
Hall.
We
see
people
at
Franklin
McKinley.
We
see
people
at
court.
We
need
to
see
people
at
our
administrative
location
as
well.
Yeah.
D
H
Not
the
message
we
are
giving,
we
suggest
people
call,
because
if
somebody
just
received
an
unlawful
detainer
a
few
days
prior,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
they
go
to
a
place
where
they
can
get
assistance
filing
an
answer.
But
nobody
is
stopped
from
coming
in.
We
don't
require
appointments,
we're
open
seven
days
a
week.
We
are
open
from
one
to
eight
on
Wednesdays
at
one
location,
but
really
it's
so.
H
We
make
sure
that
they
connect
connected
to
help,
because,
if
they're,
they
need
to
file
an
answer
to
a
lawsuit
that
day,
we
want
to
send
them
to
the
self-help
center
or
directly
to
law
Foundation,
where
there
will
be
people
there
who
can
assist
them
with
that
filing
it
may
not.
Necessarily.
There
may
not
be
hours
necessarily
available
to
do
that.
Work
on
the
day
that
they're
calling
because
our
hours
are
staggered
of
when
we
offer
legal
services,
but.
D
Right
right,
I'm,
aware
I
just
think
we
need
to
revisit
some
of
our
messaging,
because
once
we
put
something
out
there,
even
if
we
change
it
or
even
if
we
change
the
wording
once
it's
out,
it
lives
out
there.
People
do
call
my
office
and
we
have
some
materials
that
that
have
that
and
so
I
think
it
would
just
be
helpful
again
because
that
it's
interesting
that
most
folks
are
getting
helped
over
the
phone.
D
Yet
in
previous
memos
and
reports,
the
whole
idea
was
that
folks
could
sit
down
and
talk
with
folks
that
they
needed
help
in
the
prior
iteration.
Not
the
current
one,
but
in
the
prior
iteration
folks
needed
help
uploading
documents
and
had
a
lot
of
questions
about
what
types
of
documents
would
be
accepted,
and
it's
difficult
sometimes
to
do
that
by
phone.
C
Yeah,
let
me
jump
in
on
this
one.
Just
I'm,
Jackie,
Merlin's
friend
I'm,
the
director
of
Housing
and
I,
think
you're
right.
You've
seen
that
shift,
because
the
majority
of
the
work
prior
to
this
was
mostly
about
helping
people
with
their
applications.
But
right
now
we've
shifted
a
lot
of
work
towards
actually
stopping
evictions
which,
because
of
the
timeline
you
have
three
days
in
which
to
answer.
C
People
have
to
be
responded
to
fairly
quickly
and
so
we're
finding
it
to
be
as
effective
in
terms
of
having
a
conversation
over
the
phone
to
make
sure
they
don't
come
in
to
see
us,
because
we
can't
provide
legal
advice.
So
in
some
ways
we're
potentially
the
least
helpful
when
you're
facing
an
eviction
where
we
can
be
helpful,
is
ensuring
they
get
connected
to
the
right
resources
for
that
particular
concern.
But
we
are
more
narrowly
focused
on
actually
helping
people
with
the
applications.
C
D
We
were
the
last
County
to
offer
our
own
rental
assistance
sort
of
separately
from
that,
given
that
the
deadline
to
commit
the
funds
is
September
30th
is
there
any
way
that
we
will
in
the
two
days
left
when
we
get
a
reprieve
from
that
deadline,
or
would
we
be
able
to
give
out
any
remaining
funds
out
of
this
out
of
this
County?
Would
what
could
happen
with
that
in
the
future?
What
do
we
think
is
going
to
happen.
H
So
we
have
all
of
we're
still
getting
referrals
and
putting
them
on
a
waitlist,
It's
Our
intention
to
go
to
council
to
get
approval
to
use
some
other
source
of
funding
to
put
into
this
program.
It
will
be
a
little
bit
easier
than
the
federal
funding,
but
we
can't
get
an
extension
on
this
Federal
funding.
What
we
have
done
is
conditionally
improved
most
of
the
most
of
the
applicants.
H
We
have
in
queue
so
that
we
can
obligate
as
much
of
that
funding
as
possible,
but-
and
we
are
working
with
Sacred,
Heart
and
destination
home
for
ways
to
kind
of
bridge,
a
gap
because
it
will
take
some
time
to
go
to
to
council
to
get
approval,
but
we're
already
working
with
Sacred
Heart
for
how
to
continue
this
program
through
the
end
of
the
year.
We
have
ongoing
discussions
with
both
landlord
and
tenant
attorneys
they're.
They
trust
this
program.
H
They
come
to
us
so
and
many
times
the
unlawful
detainer
doesn't
get
calendared
for
trial
for
quite
a
while.
So,
there's
time
and
everyone's,
it's
a
it's
a
collaborative
effort,
it's
benefiting
everybody
involved.
C
But
I
would
add
that
we've
had
conversations
with
the
destination
home
and
they're
equally
as
concerned
about
what
they're,
seeing
in
the
number
of
evictions
and
so
I,
know
they're
trying
to
come
up
with
strategies
on
how
we
get
you
know
early
on
in
the
eviction.
They
were
very
successful
in
raising
money
from
the
private
sector
and
then
what
happened
was
that
huge
influx
of
eviction
prevention,
money
came,
and
so
people
were
like.
We
don't
have
to
do
anything
because
now
you
know,
there's
a
real
resource
available.
C
Statewide
I
think
now
that
people
can
see
that
resources
gone,
and
we
have
clear
data
that
evictions
are
up,
that
we
are
hoping
that
we
can
also
Implement
a
strategy
with
destination
home.
Leading
the
way
to
raise
some
public
I
mean
private
money
in
addition
to
public
money.
D
I,
the
chronicle
has
spent
a
few
days
covering
this
in
lots
of
different
ways.
They've
done
some
really
interesting,
analyzes
they're
up
all
over
the
Bay
Area
and-
and
we
can
expect
that
this
is
just
the
beginning.
Are
we
talking
with
any
of
our
partner
regions
or
in
the
Bay
Area?
D
You
mentioned
our
non-profit
Partners,
but
any
other
county
or
city
or
other
government
agencies
about
how
to
partner
to
make
to
do
joint
funding
or
I
know.
Some
folks
are
talking
about
Regional
measures.
But
what
are
we?
What
conversations
are
we
having
in
the
Bay
Area
yeah.
C
It
were
in
a
somewhat
different
position
than
Oakland
and
San
Francisco,
because
I
think
Oakland
had
some
other
eviction
laws
that
had
preceded
the
state
law.
That
said,
okay
city
is
you
can
no
longer
pass
these
types
of
legislation
so
they're
in
a
slightly
different
situation,
so
I
do
meet
with
San,
Francisco
and
Oakland
to
share
information.
C
San
Francisco
has
always
had
a
much
richer,
deeper
source
of
funding
than
San
Jose
has,
and
so
they
have
been
able
to
implement
programs,
but
frankly,
they
have
been
more
challenged
in
working
with
their
nonprofits
than
we
have,
and
so
they've
kind
of
slowed
down
releasing
money
because
of
the
implementation
challenges
they
have
and
then,
of
course
we
are
in
conversations
with
the
regional
entity
baffa
regarding
you
know
what
work
they
can
be
doing
around
anti-displacement
San
Francisco
Foundation
has
also
been
very
supportive
regarding
work
on
what
we
can
do
around
these
issues
as
well.
D
Thank
you,
I
think
an
eviction
is
one
thing
and
then
I
think
in
in
my
district.
Actually
in
the
east
side
in
neighboring
districts,
I've
seen
really
large
rent
increases
from
15
20
percent,
which
is
another
way
to
get
people
to
move
right
and
so
I
think
we're
in
for
an
interesting
couple
of
years
and
then
I'll
take
the
third
question.
I
have
offline.
Thank
you!
That's
it
for
me.
Madam
chair.
B
Whoops,
thank
you
I.
Thank
you
for
the
report
on
the
strategy.
One
for
anti-displacement,
but
I
had
a
couple
of
comments
regarding
the
Copa
and
coming
back
to
us
for
future
reports.
Christian.
You
had
mentioned
that
you
intended
to
go
back
to
NAC,
but
the
city
council
instructed
to
come
back
here
as
well.
So
we'd
really
like
to
see
you
back
here
when
you
bring
back
the
next
three
strategies.
B
I
think
it's
important
since
we
do
look
at
housing
quite
a
bit
and
these
issues
so
I
think
it's
all
part
of
what
this
committee
should
be
hearing
and
seeing
in
addition
to
NSE
I
realize
it's
extra
time,
but
it's
really
helpful
if
you
could
be
here
for
this
committee
since
particularly
in
all
of
these
areas,
We've
Been
instrumental
in
helping
move
them
forward
as
well.
So
I'd
love
to
see
these
back
here
and
whoever's
on
this
committee
next
year.
I
don't
really
know
sure.
C
B
C
Was
the
original
Council
instruction?
It
would
be
our
proposal
that
when
we
go
forward
with
the
next
Council
item,
an
action
item
that
we
asked
the
council
to
support,
reducing
that
to
once
each
every
six
months
so
twice.
D
Yeah
I
was
gonna,
say
I'm,
okay
with
that,
and
if
there
are
any
I
I,
do
expect
a
lot
of
change
in
this
area
in
the
next
couple
years,
because
of
all
the
issues
everybody's
facing
and
so
in
between
that
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
do
an
info
memo,
because
I
think
there
are
going
to
be
a
lot
of
things
that
we're
going
to
be
responding
to
and
things
that
we
will
be
advocating
for
as
a
city.
C
Would
say
the
one
thing
we
didn't
touch
on,
but
that
is
definitely
on
my
mind
is
that
you
know
our
intent
is
also
to
look
at
legislative
opportunities
in
order
to
strengthen
tenant
protections
on
a
Statewide
basis
or
to
provide
more
guidance
in
these
areas
or
even
information.
You
know
you
cannot
it's
really
difficult
to
get
specific
information
about,
what's
happening
with
evictions
who's
being
evicted.
For
what
reason?
C
It's
only
thankful
to
the
work
that
the
staff
has
done,
that
they've
been
able
to
get
some
of
the
information,
but
you
should
not
have
to
rely
on
relationship
building.
It
should
be
open
records
that
allow
cities
to
better
understand
what's
happening
in
our
community,
so
that
is
one
area
that
we
hope
to
build.
A
more
robust
program
on
is
how
to
get
some
State
legislation.
That
is
more
supportive
of
these
activities.
B
So
if
you
could
include
that
instead
of
and
I
would
say,
relying
on
any
form
of
communication,
just
relying
on
putting
it
in
a
on
our
website-
and
you
may
have
chosen-
have
decided
you're
going
to
reach
out
in
other
ways
too.
But
we
need
to
be
as
proactive
as
possible
because
a
lot
has
changed
and
there's
a
there's,
a
lot
of
movie
pieces
with
culpa
that
will
be
changed
as
comments
come
in
and
as
numbers
are
run
and
as
the
as
we
hit
a
recession
or
we
don't
things,
things
could
affect.
B
What
comes
forward
with
this,
so
anything
you
can
do
to
encourage
and
involve
all
of
our
stakeholders
would
be
greatly
appreciated.
Yes,.
B
G
And
we're
encouraging
everyone
to
sign
up
for
e-blasts
it's
it's
close
to
a
thousand
people.
Now.
B
B
G
G
D
Yeah,
just
a
quick
follow-up,
that's
a
really
important
point
I!
Also
to
combat
the
misinformation
out
there
and
I
know
right
before
Christmas
I
got
some
really
heartbreaking
letters
from
Mobile
Home
Park
residents
that
thought
that
they
were
going
to
lose
their
homes,
because
that's
what
some
you
know
through
a
game
of
telephone.
That's
the
message.
C
D
They
received
and
we
worked
really
hard
to
make
sure
that
they
got
all
the
information
before
Christmas
so
that
they,
you
know,
wouldn't
have
to
like
wait
a
week
or
whatever
to
get
a
response,
but
I
think
those
graphics
and
I
think
that's
something
where
all
the
council
offices
can
help
too
is
just
to
share
it
on
social
media
and
say
you
can
go
here
and
so
that
we
keep
pushing
it
out
throughout
the
year
because,
along
with
the
email
blast,
it's
it's,
but
the
partners
is
a
really
really
great
Point
so
that
they
know
where
to
go.
B
Wonderful,
so
is
there
a
motion
to
accept
the
report.
D
K
K
K
B
A
Good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
Nancy
Klein,
director
of
office
of
Economic
Development
cultural
Affairs,
happy
to
be
here.
I
just
wanted
to
say
yes,
indeed,
this
is
a
little
bit
of
a
different
report.
A
It
is
quarterly
that
we
come
to
you
to
give
you
a
status
update
and
there
will
be
at
least
a
little
bit
of
conversation
on
the
Consultants,
which
we've
successfully
hired
and
we're
very
excited
about
their
tremendously
skilled
and
already
proven
work
in
San
Jose,
because
we
want
to
work
deftly
fastly
and
with
a
lot
of
great
thought.
As
we
move
forward.
A
L
Empty
blog
is
a
lot
deputy
director
for
economic
development
good
afternoon
Madam,
chair
and
Committee
Member.
So
this
is
just
a
very
brief
outline
of
the
Four
Points
that
we
are
going
to
be
going
over
in
today's
quarterly
status
report.
L
So,
as
you
are
all
very
well
aware,
back
in
June
of
2021,
the
council
approved
the
Berryessa
Flea
Market
South
side
rezoning
project
as
part
of
that
project.
Council
adopted
a
variety
of
measures
with
the
intention
of
supporting
vendors
as
the
site
transitions
from
a
flea
market
to
a
Transit
oriented
development.
L
Council,
also
directed
oedca
staff
to
reach
out
to
vendors,
offer
resources,
technical
support
and
engage
them
in
the
planning
process.
Next,
Council
directed
the
property
owner
to
contribute
5
million
dollars
towards
a
vendor
transition
fund
for
the
primary
purpose
of
assisting
vendors
with
relocation
costs.
The
city
has
also
set
aside
2.5
million
dollars
for
this
fund.
L
L
The
July
2022
report
states
that
the
property
owner
submitted
applications
to
the
planning
department
for
a
master,
planned
development
permit
and
a
tentative
map,
and
those
were
in
the
October
2021
report.
These
applications
are
still
under
review
by
the
city
and
the
master
plan
development.
Permit
application
will
be
subject
to
approval
at
a
planning
director's
hearing.
L
The
property
owner
has
not
initiated
any
physical
activity
associated
with
the
Redevelopment
of
the
site
under
the
plan
development
zoning.
For
this
reason,
the
quarterly
reports
have
indicated
that
no
vendors
have
been
relocated
or
displaced,
which
the
property
owner
is
defining
as
involuntarily
removing
vendors
from
the
market
due
to
physical
changes
to
the
site.
L
The
latest
report
in
July
of
2022
does
indicate
the
termination
of
two
vendors
due
to
licensing
agreement
issues
and
now
I'd
like
to
turn
it
over
to
the
presentation
to
Nathan
who's.
Going
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
consultant
work
staff
has
engaged
in.
M
Thank
you
blog
a
I'd
like
to
give
you
a
status
report
on
the
consultant
work,
starting
with
the
consultant
selected
to
help
stand
up
The
Advisory
Group.
M
M
The
charter
will,
at
a
minimum,
describe
the
composition
of
the
group
membership
terms
and
member
selection
process
with
a
charter
in
place.
The
next
step
will
be
to
select
the
specific
Advisory
Group
members
using
the
process
established
in
the
charter,
and
our
goal
is
to
complete
these
steps
as
soon
as
we
can
and
start
Advisory
Group
meetings
in
the
spring
of
2023.
M
foreign,
so
as
part
of
the
August
30th
approval,
Council
directed
OED
CA
to
move
forward
immediately
with
two
pieces
of
research
on
public
market
operations
and
an
alternative
site
assessment
with
estellano
advisors.
As
our
prime
contractor
estellano
has
a
lot
of
experience
on
the
west
coast
and
locally
worked
on
establishing
the
community
stabilization
fund
as
part
of
the
Google
downtown
west
project.
M
Now
at
the
August
30th
meeting
Council
expressed
concern
that
any
relocation
of
the
Berryessa
Flea
Market
to
an
area
near
the
Capital
Flea
Market
could
impact
vendors
at
that
market
and
so
Council
authorized
an
additional
twenty.
Five
thousand
dollars
to
study
any
potential
impacts
on
the
Capital
Flea
Market
and
conduct
Outreach
with
those
vendors
in
the
event
that
the
alternative
site
assessment
explores
potential
sites
there
and
we've
been
working
to
implement
that
into
our
contract.
M
So
staff
has
been
meeting
regularly
with
vendor
representatives
and
Community
leaders
since
June
of
last
year,
including
representatives
from
the
Berryessa
Flea
Market
Association,
and
we're
also
working
with
the
vendor
Community
to
provide
multilingual
resources
that
can
help
their
businesses
right
now.
This
includes
providing
connections
to
existing
technical
assistance,
relevant
grants
and
loans
and
potential
customized
assistance
programs
as
well.
For
example,
we
recently
worked
with
a
non-profit
called
marketlink
to
host
a
vendor
electronic
benefit,
transfer
training
to
assist
some
Flea
Market
vendors
in
becoming
EBT
and
CalFresh
authorized
to
help
them
expand
their
customer
base.
L
And
so,
in
summary,
staff
is
working
quickly
to
execute
the
agreements
and
Advance
The
Advisory
Group
formation
and
the
real
estate
and
operational
studies
that
we
have
on
tap.
We
will
continue
to
work
with
the
community
vendor
Community,
providing
multilingual
resources
and
engaging
them
in
the
various
work
streams
that
we've
laid
out
and,
in
the
meantime,
we
look
forward
for
ways
to
support
the
vendor
community
and
their
business
needs
both
short
and
longer
term.
L
B
E
Hi,
thank
you
very
bigman
here,
a
real
thank
you
that
you've
described
at
the
one
of
the
roles
of
The,
Advisory
Board
will
be
to
help
and
design
the
future
of
the
of
the
free
market
area
and
to
really
question.
You
know
how
current
five
acres
can
be
broadened
a
bit
to
maybe
seven
eight
or
ten
acres,
even
and
and
with
that,
helping
in
an
overall
architectural
design
of
the
future
of
the
place
with
input
from
everyday
community
and
people
who've
been
around
the
flea
market
for
so
long.
E
I
think
that's
a
really
really
interesting
idea
that
offers
you
know:
City
cooperation,
Community
cooperation
and
that's
that's.
How
to
I
think
address
this
sort
of
issue
that
the
flea
market
has
been
so
vital
to
all
of
us
for
so
long.
It's
it's
to
invite
Community
input
in
the
future
design
of
the
place.
I
think
it's
an
awesome
idea
and
good
luck:
how
to
work
those
sort
of
Concepts
that
it
sounds
like
you're
you're
working
towards.
Thank
you.
E
I
wanted
to
quickly
offer
boy.
You
know
in
my
weirdness
I
I
hope
it
isn't
too
weird
for
yourselves,
but
just
to
bring
it
out.
You
know
how
my
feelings
about
possible
upcoming
earthquake
in
2023
now
I'm,
not
sure,
but
I
feel
to
mention
it
at
this
time
and
Blair.
E
I
was
going
to
mention
it
about
out
was
a
see
if
this
is
relevant,
that
how
will
it
relate
to
asking
people
to
start
leaving
the
flea
market
in
the
summer
of
2023
and
if
that
thinking
is
needed,
if
an
earthquake
is
possibly
coming,
I
don't
know,
but
just
to
mention
that
and
be
open
about
it
years.
Thanks
for
your
patience
and
allowing
me
to
say
this
at
this
time,
thank
you.
E
A
K
Market
owners,
as
the
city
moves.
A
Through
the
vendor
engagement
process-
and
we
look
forward
to
continuing
to
facilitate
the
city's
engagement
on
site
with
the
vendors
and
I'm
available,
if
there's
any
questions,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Eric
before
I
go
back
to
the
committee.
I
do
notice
that
we
have
a
lot
of
telephone
callers
on
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone
knows
how
to
raise
their
hand,
so
you
just
click
star
nine.
To
raise
your
hand
if
you'd
like
to
speak
for
public
comment
and
back
to
the
committee.
N
M
N
What
is
the
source
of
those
twenty
five
thousand
dollars.
A
N
O
And
would
you
refresh
my
memory
was?
Was
that
already
baked
into.
A
Thank
you
again.
Councilmember
the
funds
are
for
these
related
studies
and
initial
work
or
continuing
work,
better
said
with
the
vendor,
so
the
Outreach
and
the
analysis
is
in
line
with
the
the
dollars
and
Nathan
is
just
letting
me
know
that
the
25
000
apologize
I
got
that
wrong
is
from
the
flea
market
Reserve
that
was
transferred
to
the
city.
O
That
Reserve
was
meant
to
be
used
for
these.
These
activities.
A
Yes,
in
particular,
the
reserve
is
geared
toward
assisting
with
a
the
what
is
next
for
the
vendors
it
could
be
either
in
help
moving
to
new
site
or
sites
or
in
direct
payments,
eventually
to
to
the
vendors
hasn't
been
determined.
Quite
yet.
M
Can
I
add
on
one
one
thing:
real
quick
I
just
wanted
to
make
clear
and
thank
you
again
for
your
question:
Nathan
Donato
Weinstein
with
OED
CA,
so
the
when
we
say
flea
market
Reserve
that
specifically
refers
to
the
city's
2.5
million
dollar
contribution.
It's
not
the
money
from
the
flea
market
owner
and
when
on
August
30th.
When
Council
approved
the
act,
the
various
actions
we
brought
to
you.
It
included
those
actions
included
about
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
coming
from
them.
M
A
E
D
E
B
Moving
on
to
the
next
item,
which
is
the
mobile
home
park,
land
use
designation
status
report
before
we
get
to
the
presentation.
I
just
want
to
announce
earlier
I
mentioned
that
we
would
continue
on
for
two
minutes
of
public
comment
and
seeing
that
our
committee
is
moving
along
quicker
than
I
had
anticipated.
We
will
stay
at
two
minutes
in
public
comments,
so
no
need
whoever's,
calling
and
I
know.
We
probably
have
a
lot
of
people
online
to
who
are
calling
in
no
need
to
adjust
your
speech
with
that.
Q
Hi
Michael
Brio,
deputy
director
of
Citywide
planning,
I'm
joined
by
Bryce
Grubbs,
who
is
a
planner
in
our
Citywide
and
is
really
I,
want
to
give
him
credit
for
being
the
author
of
the
memo
that
you
receive
in
the
analysis,
this
is
his.
He
came
from
UC
San
Diego,
and
this
is
his
first
memo
he's
only
been
with
us,
I
think
for
five
months,
so
I
just
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Bryce
for
all
his
great
work
today
welcome.
Q
Okay,
let's
get
the
show
on
the
road
here
so
a
little
bit
of
background
on
how
we
got
where
we
are
here
today.
So
if
you
remember
back
prior
to
2015
the
Winchester
mobile
home
park,
was
they
made
an
announce
that
they
were
going
to
close
the
park
and
and
sell
it
to
I
think
it
was
Toll
Brothers
development
for
redeveloping
that
site.
Q
It
caused
a
lot
of
trepidation
and
raised
a
lot
of
issues
related
to
mobile
home
parks
and
the
need
to
further
preserve
them,
but
also
to
define
or
concrete
what
what
the
closure
process
should
be.
So
we're
coming
out
of
that.
As
a
result
of
that
Mobile
Home
Park
closure
process,
the
council
approved
a
number
of
zoning
code.
Amendments.
Excuse
me,
General
plan
amendments
and
a
city
council
policy,
6-33
related
to
the
conversion
of
mobile
home
parks
to
other
use.
Q
So
that
was
the
the
largest
body
of
work
and
the
largest
step
the
city
has
taken
in
years
to
preserve
mobile
home
parks
and
provide
more
clarity
on
if
they're,
going
to
close
what
that
closure
process
needs
to
entail.
Q
In
2017,
the
city
council
directed
staff
to
analyze
additional
General
plan
amendments
to
to
further
promote
preservation,
including
potentially
creating
a
new
mobile
home
park,
designation,
potentially
designating
some
parks
for
commercial
or
industrial
uses.
Etc
in
2018
staff
presented
a
city
council
with
an
analysis
of
the
potential
General
plan
amendments,
the
resources
that
were
needed
to
complete
that
work
as
well,
and
our
recommendation.
How
to
move
forward
in
2019
staff,
initiated
work
to
create
a
new
mobile
home
park.
Q
General
plan
Landis
designation
and
apply
it
to
the
two
parks
at
the
most
risk
of
of
Redevelopment
or
closure,
and
those
were
mountain
spring
and
Council.
District
7
and
West
Winds
mobile
home
park
in
North
San
Jose
in
2020.
Q
The
city
council
applied
the
new
mobile
home
park,
designation
to
both
those
both
those
mobile
home
parks,
which
had
had
an
urban
residential
land
he's
a
designation
which
allowed
higher
density
residential
uses
and
staff
believe
that
could
be
an
incentive
for
redevelopment
and
and
mind
you
one
of
the
parts
of
the
time
West
Winds
was
going
through
a
mobile
home
park
operator
change
and
there
was
some
inkling
that
there
could
be
some
significant
changes
to
that
Park
in
the
near
future.
Q
At
that
time,
city
council
directed
stats,
initiate
General
appointments
for
all
the
remaining
mobile
home
parks
in
San,
Jose
I
think
it's
56
of
them,
but
then,
of
course,
the
pandemic
hit.
The
city's
priorities
shifted,
shelter
in
place
happened,
and
this
work
item
was
was
paused.
We
did
not
obtain
the
money
to
do
this
work
and
the
item
was
essentially
put
on
hold
so
fast
forward
to
2022.
Q
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
as
part
of
this
past
20
fiscal
year,
22-23
budget
process
related
to
funding
the
completion
or
partial
completion
of
redesignating,
the
remaining
mobile
home
parks
to
a
mobile
home
park,
designation
to
add
a
further
layer.
A
further
entitlement
process
before
those
Parks
could
re
redevelop
or
close
as
part
of
the
budget
process.
Q
The
council
allocated
thirty
thousand
dollars
to
to
redesignate
five
of
the
mobile
home
parks,
at
least
five
of
the
mobile
home
parks
at
the
greatest
risk
of
Redevelopment
and
staff
directed
staff
to
I'm.
Sorry,
Council
directed
us
staff
to
return
a
CD
CD
committee
here
today
with
an
analysis
of
the
five
mobile
home
parks
that
should
be
prioritized
for
redesignation
and
that's
what
we're
going
to
talk
about
today
and
is
in
the
memo.
Q
Q
Q
Pursuant
to
the
Strategic
Econo
economics
opportunity,
housing
feasibility
report
that
analyze
the
feasibility
of
building
town
homes
on
single-family
Lots
in
San
Jose,
and
then
we
also
analyze
the
prevailing
densities
around
the
existing
parks
to
understand
whether
what
how
the
prevailing
density
could
facilitate
the
conversion
of
those
parks
to
a
new
residential
development
and
I'm
going
to
get
in
a
little
more
detail
on
these
as
we
move
forward.
Q
So
the
first
I
have
to
really
stretch
my
neck
here.
The
first
criteria
was
to
look
at
those
existing
mobile
home
parks
that
had
a
residential
land
use,
designation,
residential
neighbor,
landy's
designation.
Q
The
point
of
this
is
that
these
Parks
already
have
a
residential
designation
and
in
theory
they
could
actually
redevelop
under
that
existing
designation
now
without
a
general
plan
change,
so
that
I
think
we
felt
that
that
was
the
really
important
criteria
to
add
the
first
one
to
look
at
is
if
we
want
to
add
another
entitlement
process
to
this
overall
closure
and
Redevelopment
that
we
really
should
be
looking
at
those
that
could
move
forward
now
without
any
council
discretion
on
a
general
plan.
Q
Yet
I
should
mention
all
the
other
Parks
that
currently
exist
the
remaining.
What
is
that
13
or
so
have
an
industrial
or
commercial
Landes
designation?
So
we,
those
parks,
would
need
already
a
general
plan.
Q
Amendment
to
move
forward
with
closure
and
and
Redevelopment
I
should
mention
that
parks
that
are
designated
currently
for
commercial
or
industrial
uses
would
not
not
that
they
couldn't,
but
we
don't
anticipate
that
they
would
redevelop,
given
that
housing
generally
is
a
higher
and
better
use
from
a
real
estate
economics
perspective
than
commercial
and
Industrial
in
most
cases
in
San
Jose.
Q
Q
So
the
second
analysis
we're
looking
at
these
strong
and
moderate
on
Market
sub
areas,
the
tier
one
and
tier
two
from
this
strategic
economics
analysis
of
financial
feasibility
for
opportunity
housing.
Q
We
didn't
we're
not
able
to
complete
a
financial
analysis
specifically
on
the
Redevelopment
of
mobile
home
parks,
but
we
thought
that
this
was
a
good
proxy
that
we
could
use
to
understand
the
viability
of
redeveloping
parks,
because
it
did
look
at
redeveloping
existing
single-family
properties
with
uses
such
as
town
homes,
for
example.
Q
So
this
this
report
gave
us
an
opportunity
to
help
us
access
the
risk
of
Redevelopment
on
economic
factors
and
and
Townhomes
and
small
lot.
Single-Family
were
identified
as
a
as
feasible
in
some
Market
areas
and
mind.
You
want
to
say,
feasible,
feasible
in
that
you
need
to
redevelop
an
existing
piece
of
residential,
which
is
what
the
study
looked
like.
Q
So
what
we
found
out
is
there
are
three
Parks
identified
in
this
tier
one
market:
category
Oak
Crest
Lamplighter
and
a
Quail
Hollow.
There
were
no
Parks
identified
in
tier
two
and
the
remaining
Parks
were
were
identified
to
be
in
tier
three,
which
is
the
lowest
market
for
Townhomes
or
housing
Townhomes
housing
in
this
case.
Q
So
then,
the
third
criteria
that
we
used
was
looking
at
prevailing
density
around
the
the
existing
mobile
home
parks,
the
12
that
are
designated
the
the
12
that
that
we
identified.
Q
So
we
looked
at
I'm.
Sorry,
that's
we
looked
at
the
prevailing
density
of
the
42
that
are
designated
residential
neighborhood
I
just
want
to
know
that
in
the
well
hang
on
I'll
back
up
for
a
second.
So
the
reason
why
we
use
the
prevailing
density
is
because
the
residential
neighborhood
Landis
designation
in
the
general
plan
is
generally
designated
for
single-family
homes
at
eight
trillions,
the
acre.
That's
your
typical
density
that
you'll
see
in
San
Jose,
the
type
of
housings
that
was
built
in
the
1950s
60s
70s
80s
into
the
90s.
Q
However,
there
is
a
provision
in
that
land
use
designation
that
allows
you
to
go
up
to
16
dwelling
units.
The
acre,
if
the
prevailing
density
of
the
residential
development
in
a
neighborhood
is,
is
higher
than
eight
Wings,
the
acre
up
to
16
billionth
per
acre.
So
we
did
an
analysis
of
the
prevailing
density
around
these
parts
again,
the
idea
is
if
the
prevailing
density
is
around
16.
Let
me
step
back
for
a
minute
and
16
dwelling
units.
The
acre
is
generally
the
lower
end
of
what
we'll
see
for
townhome
development.
Q
So
the
idea
is
where
are
there
parks,
where
the
prevailing
density
is
such
that
the
parks
could
redevelop
with
Town
Homes
without
the
need
for
a
general
plan
amendment
to
be
approved
by
Council,
because
the
prevailing
density
is
such
that
they
could
be
consistent
with
the
RN
Landing
designation
and
build
town?
So
that's
what
we
were
getting
at
again.
Q
They
could
do
this
town
home
development
without
an
amendment,
and
we
focus
on
Townhomes,
because
our
town
homes,
there's
a
strong
market
for
town
homes
and
Townhomes
are
are
are
sense
and
understanding
as
town
homes
are
more
would
be
more
profitable
in
many
cases
than
your
more
traditional
single-family
homes.
You
can
get
more
units
on
on
the
same
amount
of
land
and
they
do
command
high
prices
still.
Q
So
what
we
came
up
with
is
12
Parks
designated
residential
neighborhood
that
have
a
prevailing
density
of
16,
dwell
units
or
eight
or
greater
I
do
want
to
note.
There
is
a
typo
in
the
memo
with
how
which
housing,
commissioner
Martha
O'connell
noted
and
I-
want
to
give
her
credit
for
that.
It's
actually
12
Parks,
the
Texas
13,
but
the
correct
number
is
12
and
that's
12
that
you
see
on
the
map
and
it's
well.
That's
in
the
memo
as
well.
Q
Q
How
do
we
get
to
five
because
we
have
sufficient
money
to
do
more
than
three,
and
so
we
decided
to
use
look
at
the
gross
acreage
of
the
12
with
the
idea
that
the
top
largest
two
would
be
selected
to
be
prioritized
for
redesignation
in
that
batch
of
the
first
five,
and
so
the
idea
is
that
larger
Parks
might
be
more
attractive
for
redevelopment,
because
there's
larger,
there's
more
opportunities,
you
know
financially.
Q
Q
So,
at
the
end
of
the
analysis,
the
five
that
we're
recommending
moving
forward
now,
the
thirty
thousand
dollars
that
Council
gave
us-
is
Oak
Crest,
Lamplighter,
Quail,
Hollow,
Chateau,
De,
Lasalle
and
Mill
Pond
one
and
there
they
are
shown
in
the
map.
Two
in
District
Seven,
one
I,
think
it's
District,
Six
and
the
other
two
are
in
District
Four.
Q
Q
Q
We
are
planning
to
submit
a
budget
request
for
next
fiscal
year,
2324
for
funding
to
complete
General
plan
amendments
and
all
of
the
remaining
mobile
home
parks.
It
is
something
that
we
do
need
to
do
to
align
the
general
plan
with
the
zoning.
In
this
case
it's
aligning.
Q
Q
Q
The
environmental
analysis,
as
well
as
translation
and
meeting
materials
and
interpretation
at
the
meeting.
I
think
many
of
these
Parks
have
people
that
don't
speak.
English.
That's
really
going
to
be
important,
and
we
anticipate
that
that
most
of
that,
thirty
thousand,
if
not
all
of
it,
will
be
used
to
for
changing
the
designation
on
five
Parks.
Q
What
is
what
we're
not
in
what
is
not
in
that
budget
is
that
staff
time
to
do
the
work
so
we're
I'm
going
to
use
our
existing
Staffing
Resources
within
our
department
or
division
to
complete
this
work
and
have
planners
planners
kind
of
weave
in
this
work
as
part
of
their
existing
assignments.
Q
So
if
the
council
did
want
to
move
forward
with
elevating,
actually
I
think
it's
it's
12,
not
13,
but
whether
it's
13
or
12
of
the
other
parks
that
have
a
prevailing
density,
that's
higher
than
16,
that's
something
that
could
be
done,
but
we
would
need
to
put
in
a
bind
your
budget
request
for
that,
and
it
would
be
on
average,
more
money
than
the
thirty
thousand
dollars
for
five
just
because
we
wouldn't
have
staff
to
do
that.
Q
So
our
approach
would
be
to
hire
a
consultant
or
a
peak
staffer
to
manage
those
processes,
and
that
concludes
staff
recommend.
Excuse
me
staff's
presentation.
Thank
you.
B
O
Ahead
Nancy,
thank
you.
My
name
is
Nancy
Stevens
and
I
live
in
Mill
Pond
too.
I
wanted
to
make
some
comments
related
to
Christopher
Burton's
letter
to
the
committee
I
fail
to
understand
why,
when
the
city
began
its
efforts
back
in
2015
to
take
action
to
preserve
mobile
home
parks
in
response
to
the
effort
to
close
and
covert
Westminster
Ranch
Mobile
Home
Park,
why
General
Plan
used
amendments
protecting
all
mobile
home
parks
were
not
put
in
place
at
that
time,
regardless
of
the
size
of
the
mobile
home
park?
O
Instead,
analysis
continues
year
after
year
after
year,
every
time
this
topic
comes
up
for
discussion,
the
anxiety,
anxiousness
and
fear
levels
of
the
families
and
seniors
living
in
these
mobile
home
parks,
Rises
we're
fearful
of
losing
our
homes
and
some
of
or
all
of
our
hard-earned
money
spent
to
purchase
them.
Many
would
be
at
risk
of
becoming
homeless
and
or
having
to
move
out
of
the
area
away
from
extended
family
friends
and
medical
care
so
forth,
I'm,
sick
and
tired
of
living.
O
This
way
most
of
the
people
I
know
in
my
community
are
thrilled
to
live
here,
but
many
are
on
a
fixed
income.
If
I
must
move
apparently
Bakersfield
is
the
most
affordable
City
in
the
state
to
live
in.
If
that
did
not
prove
to
be
physic,
financially
feasible,
Mississippi
would
be
the
cheapest
state
in
this
United
States
to
live.
Neither
of
these
options
appeals
to
me
and
why
should
I
be
forced
to
move
hundreds
thousands
miles
away
to
survive
economic
times
are
hard
enough.
O
Without
this
added
worry,
let's
not
wait
until
staff
is
aware
of
any
intent
to
convert
a
mobile
home
park
in
the
city,
because
that
could
be
too
little
too
late.
I
support
the
mobile
home
park,
land
use,
designation
for
the
five
Parks
deemed
at
risk
and
all
other
mobile
home
parks
in
San
Jose.
Thank
you,
foreign.
A
N
Oh,
it's
Donna
Sanchez,
my
name
is
Donna
Sanchez
and
I
live
in
Quail
Hollow
mobile
home
park,
I
support
the
mobile
home
park,
land
use
student
designation
for
the
five
Parks
listed
and
for
all
of
the
parks
in
San
Jose.
Thank
you
and
I
would
really
hate
to
lose.
My
mobile
home
I
love.
It
and
I
am
a
visually
impaired,
handicapped
person,
and
it
would
be
very
detrimental
for
me
to
lose
this.
Thank.
A
N
Hello,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
I
am
Judy
arcanot
and
I
live
in
Quail
Hollow
in
San,
Jose
and
I
support
the
mobile
home
mobile
home
park,
land
use
designation
for
Quail
Hollow,
the
other
five
under
consideration
and,
in
fact
all
the
parks
in
San,
Jose
I
was
born
and
raised
here
in
San
Jose
and
at
71
years
of
age,
I'm
retired,
and
on
a
fixed
income.
Quail
Hollow
is
a
senior
mobile
home
park
and
allows
me
to
continue
to
live
in
San
Jose
near
my
children.
I
Hi,
my
name
is
Glenna
halcroft.
Last
week
the
mobile
home
land
use
designation
status
report
listed
five
parts
considered
the
most
risk
for
redevelopment.
We
are
currently
in
our
seventh
year
of
requesting
this
designation
for
the
remaining
56
parks.
I
I
there
were
emails
from
the
planning
department
which
were
conflicting
with
each
other.
When
the
city
council
voted
to
support
the
designation
in
June
2020,
we
were
jubilant,
but
it
didn't
last
long.
We
had
to
battle
again
for
funding.
Earlier
this
year
we
were
weary
of
the
incessant
foot
dragging
and
the
excuses.
I
E
Here,
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
offer
a
good
luck
to
the
people
who
are
the
mobile
home
park.
People
who
are
you
know,
trying
to
defend
their
homes
and
and
really
work
on
this
issue,
as
city
government
seems
to
relentlessly
push
forward
with
planning
and
ideas
for
the
future
of
mobile
home
parks,
a
real
good
luck
to
listen
to
the
to
the
mobile
home
park,
owners
and
and
they're
thinking
on
this
matter,
and
thank
you
Marianne.
N
This
is
Marion
fricano.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
oh
okay,
great
well,
thank
you
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
you.
I
am
a
resident
of
Oakcrest,
Park
and
I've
lived
here
for
20
years,
and
what
I
love
about
our
park
is
that
it
doesn't
discriminate
as
to
age
or
race,
and
we
know
our
neighbors
and
it
truly
feels
like
a
community.
As
you
know,
there's
150
residences
here
and
most
of
them
are
maintained
to
a
high
level
of
standards.
N
Oh
Chris
is
one
of
the
only
low-cost,
affordable
places
left
in
San
Jose,
as
are
the
rest
of
the
mobile
home
parks,
and
since
we
pay
for
our
own
maintenance,
it's
low
cost
to
the
city
of
San
Jose.
Additionally,
our
homes
are
fairly
close
together
using
the
existing
space
wisely.
Quite
a
few
of
us
have
actual
yards
and
two
car
garages
I
personally
have
a
front
backyard
devoted
to
pollinators,
such
as
monarchs
and
gold,
fritillaries
bumblebees
many
species
of
birds.
Some
of
my
neighbors
have
the
same
kinds
of
yards
devoted
to
pollinators
and
birds.
N
I
Hi
Martha
O'connell
regional
manager
for
gsmol
I'd,
like
to
give
a
huge
shout
out
to
Michael
Brio,
who
has
produced
an
outstanding
report
that
I
am
hopeful,
is
going
to
restore
some
trust
from
the
mobile
home
Community
to
the
government
I'm.
Looking
at
page
three
and
I'd
like
to
thank
him
for
putting
in
writing
that
in
2020,
the
city
council
directed
staff
to
initiate
the
general
plan
Amendment
for
all
remaining
mobile
home
parks.
And
yes,
we
understand
that
then
covet
hit
the
reason
I'm
so
grateful
for
that.
I
Michael
is
because
there
was
a
big
discussion
in
Spotlight
where
the
mayor
was
saying.
Well,
we
never
actually
did
that
and
a
huge
shout
out
to
council
person
Esparza
who
actually
did
the
research
and
read
the
motion
from
2020
into
the
record.
So
thanks
a
lot
on
in
the
memo
on
page,
nine
I
totally
support
the
225
000
to
300
000
to
continue
the
work
to
get
all
the
parks.
Redesignated
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
that
is
a
drop
in
the
bucket
for
money.
That
money
equates
to
3.75
tiny
homes.
I
So,
for
the
same
amount
of
money
that
you
were,
you
would
spend
on
building
three
tiny
homes.
You
can
give
an
extra
layer
of
protection
to
the
10
000
plus
Mobile
Home
Spaces,
that
represent
probably
the
last
Bastion
of
affordable
housing
ownership
in
the
city
of
San
Jose.
So
CED
look
forward
to
your
sending
this
to
council
and
look
forward
to
the
meeting
on
October
18th.
Thank
you.
I
A
N
Hi
good
afternoon,
I'm
speaking
from
the
baby
boomer
generation,
baby
boomers
are
born
between
1946
and
1964..
Between
now
and
2030,
10
000
Baby
Boomers
will
be
reaching
retirement
each
day
with
lower
domestic
oil
and
recent
coven
issues
we
have
inflation,
salaries
are
lower
and
retirement
savings
have
decreased.
N
I
My
name
is
Gary
Schaefer
and
I
live
at
Oak.
Crest,
Estates
and
I
would
like
to
say
that
I
support
the
mobile
home
plan,
Park
use
designation
for
the
five
Parks
listed
in
for
all
the
parks
in
San
Jose
Oakcrest
Estates
has
been
a
lifesaver
for
me.
I've
lived
in
the
area
since
1990
and
have
been
totally
unable
to
afford
any
housing
or
home
ownership
in
this
area,
because
simply
housing
is
unaffordable.
I
A
N
All
right
good
afternoon
and
thank
you,
council
members
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
on
this
topic.
My
name
is
Nick
and
I
live
in
the
Quail
Hollow
mobile
home
park.
I
have
been
here
about
six
years
and
I
truly
support
the
mobile
home
park.
Land
use
designation
for
the
five
Parks
listed
and
for
all
the
parks
in
San
Jose.
Our
community
out
here
is
tremendous.
N
Council
members,
you
spoke
earlier
about
tenants,
rights
and
displacement
due
to
landlords
and
high
rents
that
we
see
in
this
area.
Among
other
issues
passing
this
would
be
such
a
huge
accomplishment
for
all
of
the
folks
that
live
in
our
communities,
just
to
give
them
that
stability
that
brought
them
here
to
begin
with
in
San
Jose
I
really
appreciate
your
time.
I
do
hope
that
you
are
able
to
budget
this
in
there.
It
is
truly
important
for
everyone
that
lives
here
and
thank
you
for
your
time.
N
K
Hi
I'm
Ricky
Antonio
I've
lived
in
a
five
mile
circle.
My
whole
life
in
Quail
Hollow
mobile
home
park,
is
in
this
five
mile
circle.
I'm
proud
of
our
community
I've
lived
here.
My
whole
life,
I'm,
65.
I've,
helped
build
this
community
and
San
Jose
foreign
Hollow
has
been
a
lifesaver.
We
need
affordable
housing
for
senior
citizens
that
have
been
the
Trailblazers
I,
do
support
the
mobile
home
park,
land
use
designation
for
the
five
Parks
listed
and
for
all
the
parks
in
San
Jose.
M
A
I
A
Don't
like
living
worrying
about
this
every
day,
like
I,
have
from
many
years
and
I.
N
N
I
support
the
mobile
park,
land
use,
designation
for
the
five
Parks
listed
and
for
all
the
parks
in
San,
Jose
I'm,
so
I'm
gonna
cry,
but
this
is
really
stressful
on
all
of
us
to
have
to
go
through
this
again.
Thank
you
for
for
taking
my
call,
and
anyway,
thanks
bye.
A
Wallace
Wallace,
it
looks
like
your
Zoom
is
outdated,
I'm
not
able
to
allow
you
to
speak.
We
do
have
a
few
more
callers
left.
So,
if
you'd
like
to
leave
the
meeting
and
update
your
application
really
quickly
and
then
rejoin
and
raise
your
hand
again,
I
can
call
on
you
then
I'll
move
on
to
Jill
borders.
F
Hi,
thank
you.
I
actually
wasn't
going
to
speak
today,
but
I
just
heard
the
last
woman
and
thought
I
just
really
needed
to
say
something:
sorry,
yes,
this
has
been
incredibly
stressful.
I
first
want
to
thank
council
member
Esparza
for
her
dedication
on
this
issue
and
others
there
that
care
so
much.
It
means
a
lot
to
us.
F
I
also
want
to
speak
to
somebody
who
mentioned
something
about
the
fear-mongering
going
on
I
assure
you
that
I
have
stayed
silent
and
not
told
and
talked
to
anybody
in
my
Park
about
anything
anymore,
lest
we
be
accused
of
fear-mongering
very
frustrating
to
try
to
advocate
for
yourself
on
the
one
hand
and,
on
the
other
hand,
be
then
accused
of
fear-mongering
in
2012
after
our
landlord
gave
us
notice
so
that
he
could
sell
to
a
developer
and
bulldoze
down
our
rental
home
to
build
this
giant
mcmansion
fine.
F
We
took
the
money
that
we
had
saved,
someday,
hopefully
buy
a
home
with
the
land
underneath
it
and
instead
decided
to
buy
a
mobile
home
and
take
a
chance
to
stay,
because
we
were
both
born
and
raised
in
San
Jose
and
we
love
it
here
and
I
received
a
phone
call
from
the
city
two
years
later,
asking
me
to
come
to
a
focus
group
to
talk
about
conversions
of
mobile
home
parks.
Well.
Needless
to
say,
the
first
thing
you
think
of
is:
should
we
put
that
ten
thousand
dollar
replacement
roof
on?
F
Should
we,
you
know
xnay
the
seven
thousand
dollars
that
we
were
supposed
to
fix
that
etc,
etc.
But
here
we
are,
we've
stayed
and
I
have
so
much
research
I've
done
so
much,
but
I
want
to
tell
you
what's
at
stake
here
today
and
it's
our
values.
Our
values
are
what's
at
stake.
Do
we
value
the
people
that
choose
to
stay
here
or
do
we
just
need
them
to
leave
and
we
chose
to
stay
and
I
would
like
to
be
valued
for
that.
A
A
Yes,
hello,
my
name
is
Rebecca
Royce
and
I'm
resident
of
Oakcrest
Mobile
Home
Park
as
a
mobile
home
park,
resident
I'm
able
to
afford
to
live
and
work
as
a
registered
nurse
in
the
Bay
Area,
while
financially
supporting
a
young
adult
full-time
student
at
San,
Jose,
State,
University,
I,
pay,
property
taxes
and
sales
taxes,
I
participate
in
Civic
Life
as
a
voter
without
exception.
A
I
have
seen
and
have
experienced
how
the
punishing
cost
of
housing
here
has
driven
scores
of
low
and
middle
income
residents
into
states
of
houselessness
or
mortgage
or
rent
poverty
in
order
to
remain
modestly
housed.
Please
consider
that
the
affordability
of
San
Jose's
mobile
home
parks
enables
a
great
many
of
US
citizens
and
taxpayers
to
remain
housed
in
this
city
that
we
love,
who
would
otherwise
not
be
able
to
afford
to
do
so.
I
support
extending
the
mobile
home
park,
land
use
designation
to
all
San
Jose
Parks.
Thank
you
for
your
service
Alice.
N
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
good?
My
name
is
Alice
of
Alice
arth
and
I
live
here
in
Bell
Pond.
For
the
last
seven
years
we
moved
into
this
well-maintained
park.
We
thought
it
would
be
a
nice
way
to
stay
in
San
Jose.
We
remodeled
our
coach
and
are
very
happy
here.
We
support
or
I
support.
My
husband
supports
this
mobile
home
park.
Land
use
designation
for
all
of
the
parks
in
San
Jose,
and
we
do
need
the
assurance
that
the
land
that
our
mobile
homes
are
on
will
not
be
taken
by
developers.
N
That's
really
in
many
ways
creating
more
homeless
residents.
Our
Parks
I
feel
are
well
maintained,
offer
a
good
quality
of
life
in
San
Jose.
So
we
need
the
assurance
that
our
homes
will
not
be
taken
from
us.
So
we're
asking
you
to
give
us
the
protection
we
need
from
Big
development
and
losing
our
home
sites.
So
thank
you
for
listening
to
us
and
taking
our
feelings
into
account
on
your
vote.
Thank
you.
J
I
My
name
is
Gary
Smith
I
live
in
Mill
Pond,
my
wife
and
Judy
and
I
both
support
the
recommendation
to
sort
of
the
land
use
designation
for
all
the
parks.
We've
lived
there
22
years.
We
love
it
here,
it's
a
great
place
to
live
and
we
cannot
afford
to
move
somewhere
else.
So
please
go
ahead
with
this
recommendation.
S
Yes,
hello,
my
name
is
John
Pini
I
live
in
Oak
Crest
Estates
I've
been
here
for
a
little
over
10
years
and
I
support
the
mobile
home
park.
Land
use
designation
for
our
park
and
for
all
the
parks
being
spoken
of
I'd
like
to
say
that
I
moved
here
because
it
was
affordable
for
me
at
the
time
as
I
approach,
retirement
I,
don't
see
me
being
able
to
live
in
another
at
another
location
in
the
in
this
in
the
in
the
Santa
Clara
County
or
in
the
greater
Bay
Area
in
general.
S
The
the
the
city
and
county
is
has
is
always
talking
about
affordable
housing,
and
it
seems
that
the
mobile
home
Community
has
been
that
for
me
and
I.
Don't
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
to
to
take
down
already
existing,
affordable
housing
to
people
and
build
whether
it's
town,
homes
or
whatever
other
affordable
housing?
That
is
on
the
agenda
when
starting
existence
and
working
for
this
community
okress,
as
was
mentioned
earlier,
is
a
very,
very
personable
community.
S
A
lot
of
the
neighbors
know
each
other
here
and
we
have
very
nice
land
uses
here
and
I
just
want
to.
Thank
you
for
your
time
for
listening
and
appreciate
your
consideration.
A
N
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
okay,
my
name
is
Candace
and
I
live
also
in
Oak
press.
The
states
I
moved
here
10
years
ago,
and
it
has
really
been
a
dream,
come
true
that
I
can
afford
to
live
in
San
Jose
and
work
in
San,
Jose
and
I
want
to
just
applaud
those
who
have
come
before
me
today
and
I
would
hope
that
the
staff
and
the
council
would
really
pay
attention
to
our
voices
and
not
just
to
the
developers
who
might
bring
in
some
more
profitable
land
use.
That's
not
right.
N
We
have
enough
that
has
been
built
up
in
this
North
San
Jose
area.
I.
Don't
think
we
need
any
more,
and
we
also
need
to
think
about
the
water
use
here
something
I'm
concerned
about
with
the
continued
drought.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
and
I
want
to
let
you
know
that
I
support
the
mobile
home
park,
land
use
designation
for
the
five
parts
listed
and
for
all
parks
in
San
Jose.
We
would
really
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
F
N
A
N
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
okay,
I'm,
Linda
eels
and
I
live
in
Oakcrest
Estates
I
have
been
here
30
years
it
will
be
31
years
in
November.
This
was
the
only
home
that
my
husband
and
I
could
afford
my
husband
passed
away
five
years
ago,
and
this
is
the
home
that
I
had
hoped
that
I
would
live
in
until
the
day
I
die.
I
have
nowhere
else
to
go.
I
love
this
place.
I've
been
here
like
I,
said
for
over
30
years.
N
It
is
the
only
affordable
housing
that
we
have
in
this
County
and
I
support
the
Mobile
Home
Park
youth
land,
designation
for
the
five
parks
that
are
listed
and
for
all
of
the
parks
in
San
Jose.
If
you
really
want
to
help
people
get
affordable
housing,
then
you
need
to
keep
the
mobile
home
parks.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
your
presentation
and
Bryce.
Thank
you
for
your
first
memo.
It
was
extremely
well
written
and
the
presentation
was
really
helpful.
I
want
to
also
thank
all
of
the
members
of
the
public
who've
called
in
and
expressed
their
support
of
the
mobile
home
parks
that
they
live
in
I
know
many
of
them
and
they're,
lovely
and
they're
natural,
affordable
housing
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
and
we
need
to
protect
and
preserve
them
as
much
as
possible.
B
B
As
many
of
us
pushed
to
push
this
land
use
designation
and
this
funding
in
the
most
recent
budget
cycle,
we
got
5
five
and
the
five
are
before
us
today,
but
hopefully
we're
going
to
come
back
with
all
of
them
at
some
point,
because
I
think
it
is
really
critical
and
it's
an
emotional
time.
I
and
I
unders
I
hear
in
many
of
your
voices
the
concern
and
worry
that
you
have
so
the
reason.
B
One
of
the
reasons
that
I
was
an
advocate
for
moving
this
forward
was
because
of
the
peace
of
mind
that
it
will
give
you
and
that's
so
important
that
you
have
that
peace
of
mind.
So
let
let's
see
what
we
can
do
to
take
away
some
of
that
concern
and
move
forward
with
that
I'll
call
on
council
member
Esparza.
B
D
You
cheerfully
I
also
would
like
to
thank
all
the
our
mobile
home
park
residents,
who
called
in
today
and
spoke
very
passionately.
I
know
many
of
you
reorganized
your
day
so
that
you
could
be
here
for
this
meeting
and
and
they're,
rightfully
demanding
our
actions
to
protect
their
community
and
to
protect
their
housing,
I
and
I
know.
Also.
Many
residents
are
going
to
be
listening
and
watching
this
after
the
fact
so
I'm
going
to
make
a
couple
of
statements
and
then
I
have
some
questions.
D
That
I
think
will
be
helpful
like
to
point
out
that
as
a
region
and
as
our
city,
we
have
a
policy
to
prioritize
the
three
p's
and
that's
protection,
preservation
and
production
protection
for
current
residents
to
avoid
displacement
and
two
preservation
of
existing
housing.
That's
affordable
for
lower
and
middle
income
residents
in
our
mobile
home
parks.
D
And
this
current
land
use
designation
for
mobile
home
parks
in
San
Jose
are
a
mixture
of
various
designations,
Bryce
excellent
memo.
Thank
you,
and
you
mentioned
that
there
are
42
residential
neighborhoods
designations,
but
it
goes
everything
from
residential
neighborhood
to
heavy
Industrial
I,
don't
think
it's
Humane
or
practical
to
keep
the
current
designation
and
I,
don't
think
it's
Humane
or
practical
for
us
not
to
protect
our
residents
in
a
housing
crisis.
D
So
I'm
going
to
ask
a
couple
of
questions.
One
is:
we
had
previously
looked
at
the
prevailing
density
and
now
we're
adding
Park
size
to
the
criteria.
Can
you
please
explain
that
change
or
that
addition,
because
I
know
there
there
have
been
some
changes
and
that's
why
we
added
this.
Can
you
explain
that
for
our
folks
to
understand.
Q
Sure
so
so,
first
you
start
with
the
42
residential
neighborhoods
and
then
you
layer
on
top
the
ones
that
are
in
tier
two
tier
two,
meaning
that
there's
a
strong
or
moderately
strong
market
for
redevelopment
with
town
homes,
and
there
were
only
three
parks
that
fell
into
tier
one
or
tier
two.
Actually
they
fill
in
fill
in
a
tier
one.
So
then
good
question
is
well.
Q
We
then
the
next
analysis
looked
at
well,
let's
look
at
the
prevailing
density
such
that
the
density
is
16
to
1
units
or
acre
or
more
such
that
they
could
redevelop
with
Town
Homes
without
a
general
plan
Amendment
and
then,
but
there
were
12
of
those,
so
we
didn't
have
enough
funding
to
do
all
12
of
them.
So
the
question
was:
how
do
we
narrow
it
down
to
something
that
fits
within
our
budget,
which
is
which
is
five?
Q
Secondly,
the
thought
is
it's
a
theory,
but
the
theory
is
that
that
parks
that
are
larger
might
be
more
more
desirable
or
there
might
be
more
interest
in
redevelop
them,
because
the
process
to
close
and
then
redevelop
a
mobile,
it's
a
rather
lengthy
process,
there's
potentially
more
homes
and
more
profit
that
could
be
generated
going
to
redevelop
those
larger
profits.
Hence
someone
might
be
more
willing
to
get
risk.
That's
a
theory.
We
don't
know
that
for
sure.
Q
D
Q
Q
You
can
potentially
make
more
profit
so
so
and
up
so,
the
idea
is:
if
someone
a
developer
is
going
to
redevelop
a
mobile
home
park,
they
would
likely
desire
to
redevelop
it
with
a
different
or
higher
intensity
residential
use
than
the
existing
mobile,
and,
if
it's
commercial
or
industrial,
you
would
already
to
build
that
residential
you'd
already
have
to
go
through
a
general
plan.
Amendment
process
and
the
council
would
have
to
approve
that.
So
that's
a
thinking
behind
that.
D
Thank
you
thank
you
for
that
Clarity,
so
I,
and
thank
you
for
the
analysis.
It
was
really
well
done.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
we
will
continue
I
know
to
share
it
with
our
residents,
because
I
think
you
laid
out
things
pretty
clearly
I
and
I'd
like
to
speak
to
the
memo
that
I
submitted
this
morning
and
I
hope
my
colleagues
have
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it.
D
So
just
to
recap:
the
action
that
Council
took
on
March
10
2020
when
we
applied
the
mobile
home
park,
land
use
designation
to
Mountain
Springs
into
West
Winds.
The
council
unanimously
directed
that
staff
begin,
the
necessary
environmental
reviews
and
the
work
to
amend
the
Envision
2040
General
plan
to
apply
the
mobile
home
park,
designation
to
the
remaining
56
mobile
home
parks
in
the
city
and
that
included
direction
to
bring
back
the
resolutions
no
later
than
March
2021..
D
D
But
you
know,
one
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
point
out
was
that
this
pandemic
and
our
challenges
have
only
highlighted
the
need
to
protect
this
type
of
housing.
Further
to
to
protect.
We
realize
how
vulnerable
people
are
so
to
me.
D
It
just
shows
how
important
this
is
so
for
housing
for
lower
and
middle
income,
families,
housing
for
seniors,
for
people
on
fixed
incomes
who
wouldn't
even
be
able
to
stay
in
our
city,
otherwise,
and
so
for
two
and
a
half
years
over
35
000
residents
of
our
mobile
home
parks
have
been
waiting
for
us
to
complete
this
work,
and
so
we
need
to
move
forward.
And,
frankly,
we
need
to
move
forward
on
protecting
all
of
our
mobile
home
parks,
beginning
with
the
13
identified
by
staff
as
having
surrounding
prevailing
densities.
D
That
could
possibly
does
not
mean
that
this
is
coming
means
that
it's
a
possibility
based
on
the
analysis
that
could
possibly
make
them
attractive
for
development
and
those
parks
are
Oak.
Crest,
Lamplighter,
Quail,
Hollow,
Chateau,
LaSalle,
Mill,
Pond,
Caribbean's,
Hometown,
San,
Jose
mobile
home,
an
RV
park,
San
Jose
trailer
park,
La
Buona,
Vita
sunshadow
and
Silver
Creek,
Mobile,
Estates
and
so
I
asked
staff
that
when
we
return
to
Council
in
October,
they
bring
us
a
plan.
D
And
you
mentioned
the
mid-year
budget
review,
including
any
resources
needed
to
ensure
that
these
13
parks
are
prioritized
and
that
the
we
will
work
to
move
forward
to
give
them
that
mobile
home
park
designation
as
soon
as
possible,
and
that's
less
than
a
quarter
of
the
remaining
56
parks
that
we
were
asking
for
originally.
D
So,
with
that
I'd
like
to
move
to
direct
staff
to
return
to
council
with
a
plan
to
begin
necessary
environmental
reviews
and
work
to
amend
the
general
plan,
land
use
designation
of
the
12
Parks
found
in
its
analysis
to
have
surrounding
prevailing
densities.
That
would
support
potential
Redevelopment
and
to
cross-reference
this
to
Council
on
October,
25th,
18th.
Sorry,
October
18th
to
cross
reference
this
to
Council
on
October
18th.
K
D
Great,
thank
you.
Thank
you
and
then
I'd
also
like
to
ask
staff,
because
there's
there's
so
much
anxiety
on
this
I
mean
frankly
I'm,
so
appreciative
of
the
folks
that
were
able
to
call
in
because
people
are
there's
a
tremendous
amount
of
anxiety
throughout
our
city
on
this
issue
that
when
this
does
come
to
council,
that
we
address
the
need
and
a
plan
to
how
we're
gonna
what
it'll
take
to
get
to
all
of
them,
but
starting
with
these
13
most
at
risk.
D
B
Great.
Thank
you
so
much
turning
to
council
member
Mahan.
K
K
I
thought
it
was
excellent,
was
really
helpful
to
see
the
analysis
as
you
kind
of
ran
through
the
history
I
mean
it
just
reminds
me
that
we
need
to
be
really
careful
when
we
communicate
that
we're
going
to
do
something
to
the
pub
you
know
on
behalf
of
the
public
and
then
to
have
this
level
of
uncertainty
and
back
and
forth
really
erodes
trust
in
City
Hall,
so
I'm
I'm
glad
that
we're
moving
forward,
but
clearly
it
has
been
far
too
slow
and
incremental
and
I
think
we
heard
that
reflect
in
the
public
comment.
K
I
want
to
thank
everybody
who
commented
I,
think
some
of
you
know
my
I've
referenced
before
my
my
my
aunt,
my
favorite
aunts
and
my
my
grandmother
lived.
The
reason
they
were
able
to
own
was
that
they
lived
in
a
mobile
park
for
40
some
years
and
were
similarly
always
worried
about
what
would
happen
to
the
land
under
their
homes.
So
I
I
appreciate
the
efforts
that
have
been
made
here.
K
I
really
appreciate:
councilman
sparza's
memo
I
had
kind
of
questions
along
similar
lines,
but
I'm
glad
that
she
laid
it
out
so
well
in
writing
and
fully
support
that
direction
and
I
think
Martha
made
the
right
point
that
this
is
really
a
small
investment
to
offer
some
much
needed
security
and
and
sense
of
stability
and
safety
to
a
lot
of
people
in
our
community.
So
I
appreciate
the
direction
we're
going
in
very
happy
to
support
the
motion,
and
that
was
that
was
all
I
had
sure.
Thank
you.
P
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
I
Echo,
the
appreciation
of
Staff,
as
well
as
council
member.
As
far
as
on
this
direction
here,
I
think
we
I
know
I
appreciate,
but
I
think
we'll
appreciate
the
analysis.
That's
come
out
of
this
being
able
to
determine
these
13
what
we
would
consider
most
vulnerable
mobile
home
park
sites
and
I
I
agree
with
the
direction
presented.
I
just
have
a
question
for
staff.
P
Let's
say
we
are
able
to
allocate
the
funding
necessary
for
these
13
cards
rather
than
just
the
private
you
currently
are
planning
to
to
move
forward
with
on
the
land
use
change.
Do
you
have
the
capacity
to
do
that
and
what's
the
timeline?
Look
like.
Q
Sure
I
can
respond
to
that
respond
to
that
councilmember.
So
we
don't
have
the
capacity
now
to
add
13
to
the
workload
of
our
existing
staff.
So
what
we
would
do,
assuming
we
put
in
a
budget
request
and
assuming
we
get
the
budget,
we
would
use
that
money
to
hire
what
we
call
a
peak,
staffer
or
a
consultant.
That
is
a
consultant
that
would
sit
in
our
office
and
while
we
would
manage
them,
they
would
do
the
day-to-day
work
of
taking
the
general
plan
amendments
through
the
process,
so
that
that
would
be
our
approach.
Q
The
money
would
go.
The
additional
money
we
would
need
would
go
to
things
like
noticing
for
Community
meetings
and
public
hearings
and
translation
interpretation.
The
sequa,
but
the
biggest
chunk
will
be
to
hire
a
staff
person
to
a
consultant's
opportunity
to
do
that.
Work.
P
Okay,
so
that
would
be
the
plan
then,
and
that
would
be
what
we
would
ultimately
have
to
approve
the
budget
for
it
and
that
thus,
we
wouldn't
necessarily
have
to
delay
progress
on
this.
Besides
the
delay
of
potentially
number
one
getting
the
funding
approved
and
then
number
two
actually
onboarding
somebody
correct
correct.
Q
So
I'm
a
little
hazy
on
when
the
money
would
come
to
the
request,
but
our
plan
now
is
to
start
the
five
in
Spring
just
that's
kind
of
looking
at
the
when
our
staff
has
some
capacity
to
take
this
on.
But
if
we
do
get
the
budget
mid-year
budget
request
approved,
we
would
start
at
the
same
time
as
we
do
the
five,
so
it
wouldn't
affect
the
overall
schedule.
P
In
addition,
I
I
would
Echo
the
comments
that
we've
heard
from
the
public
speakers
that
came
out
and
and
appreciate
them
coming
out
the
emotions
that
they
shared
and
they're
extremely
well
validated,
considering
the
the
challenges
that
we
have
here
and
the
potential
for
for
them
losing
their
homes
places
some
of
them
that
they've
called
home
their
whole
life
and
so
I
definitely
am
I'm
interested
in
seeing
the
remainder
of
the
mobile
home
parts
as
well,
even
if
we
don't
believe
them
to
be
the
most
vulnerable
I'm
interested
in
that.
P
O
Thank
you,
chair,
Foley,
I,
I,
just
I
wanted
to
thank
the
the
public
for
coming
out
and
and
speaking
on
this
issue
and
and
what
it
means
to
them
personally
to
be
able
to
stay
in
the
city
that
they
love
over
the
years
we've
been
talking
about
anti-displacement
strategies
and
I
know
that
for
the
last
eight
years,
among
among
some
of
the
first
folks
that
came
into
my
office
to
talk
to
me
about
the
most
pressing
issues
was
was
Martha
and
some
of
the
other
Advocates
talking
up
on
mobile
home
conversions
or
the
threat
of
mobile
home,
conversions
and
and
truly
helping
me
understand
what
this
meant
for
this.
O
We're
looking
at
displacement,
strategies
or
or
how
to
intervene.
I
should
say,
as
folks
are
being
displaced
and
we
talk
about
communities
being
gentrified.
I
really
I
really
appreciate
all
the
work.
O
That's
been
done
by
staff,
I,
appreciate,
council
member
sparza's
motion
and
but
truly
really
appreciate
the
ongoing
and
consistent
advocacy
on
behalf
of
our
community
and
and
I
I
couldn't
agree
more
that
that
this
roller
coaster
of
emotions
needs
to
stop
and
we
need
to
give
individuals
and
their
families
and
their
children
a
sense
of
place,
but
also
a
sense
of
stability
and
security.
What
a
stressful
time
to
be
to
be
dealing
with
this
on
top
of
everything
else
that
we're
trying
to
recover
from
over
the
past
several
years.
O
I
I
do
want
to
say
that
that
I
thought
that
Martha's
example
of
the
tiny
homes
and
to
them
so
I
just
wanted
to
thank
again
all
of
the
public
for
speaking
up
and
for
making
sure
that
this
is.
You
know
that
the
the
point
is
really
driven
to
each
and
every
one
of
us
I'll
be
here
only
a
few
more
months.
O
My
Council
colleagues
will
carry
on
this
this
very
worthwhile
fight
until
we
make
sure
that
we
protect
every
resident
here
in
the
city
thanks
chair.
B
Thank
you
very
much,
I.
Remember
the
March
10th
meeting
very
well.
It
was
our
last
meeting
in
public
and
I.
Remember
Martha
O'connell,
sitting
right
over
there
and
her
concerns
in
the
community's
concerns
about
mobile
home
parks
and
I.
Remember
the
commitment
that
we
made
then,
and
we
tell
our
kids,
to
follow
through
on
their
commitments
and
as
adults
and
as
policy
makers.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
happens.
We
need
to
set
that
as
a
model
for
our
families
and
children
that
when
we
commit
to
something
we're
going
to
follow
through.
B
So
this
motion
is
the
beginning
of
us
following
through
it's
not
completely
yet,
but
it
is,
it
is
so
so
important.
Q
This
is
we're
doing
this
with
the
existing
staff
we
have
and
the
existing
workload
they
currently
have
on
their
plate,
as
we
put
in
a
budget
request.
Let
me
just
say
one
option
could
be:
is
that
we
look
at
some
additional
money
to
hire
a
peak
staff.
To
do
I
mean
well
the
five.
The
five
are
in
the
13..
Q
Q
Right
so
yeah
so
right,
so
we,
if
we
do
the
if
we're
requesting
the
money
through
that
the
city's
standard
mid-year
process,
that's
one
sort
of
timeline
in
terms
of
we
can
get
the
money
if
Council
I'm,
not
sure
how
that
would
work.
But
if
Council
found
the
money
on
the
18
that
would
expect
tide,
it.
Q
B
As
they're
all
now
staff's
hedging
over
here,
a
little
bit
no
I'm
just
kidding
they're,
not
not
at
all
I
I
just
want
to
leave
you
with
that.
This
is
about
peace
of
mind,
it's
bringing
removing
an
area
of
concern
with
over
30
000
residents,
and
so
we
need
to
proceed
with
Godspeed
and
with
that,
let's
vote.
P
A
K
B
D
Thank
you,
Chad
Lisa,
Joyner
and
Steve
Dobson
will
be
joining
to
make.
J
Council,
member
Foley
and
the
rest
of
the
council
members,
I'm
Lisa
Joyner,
deputy
director
of
the
building
division
of
pbce
and
I'm
joined
by
James
Dobson,
our
Deputy
Chief
and
Fire
Marshal
of
the
San
Jose
Fire
Department,
as
well
as
our
director
Chris
Burton,
and
we're
here
to
talk
to
you
today
about
our
2022
California
building
standards,
code.
Adoption.
J
All
right,
so,
every
three
years
the
building
codes
are
updated
and
adopted
by
the
state
we
are
currently
on
the
2019
building
cycle
and
effective.
This
coming
January
is
the
2022
California
building
codes,
which
are
based
on
the
2021
International
building
codes
as
the
model
code,
and
this
ordinance
in
turn
translates
our
building
codes
to
our
municipal
code.
Title
24
of
our
immunostal
code
is
the
technical
codes
with
the
building
code
and
title
17
is
the
fire
code.
J
So
what
will
this
ordinance
accomplish?
So
we
will
adopt
the
2022
edition
of
the
California
building
codes
with
local
amendments,
we'll
be
able
to
update
previously
adopted
amendments
to
the
2022
California
codes
to
match
current
code
language
and
references,
and
we'll
also
be
able
to
update
the
municipal
code
to
remove
any
amendments
we
previously
have
that
have
now
been
incorporated
into
the
building
codes,
so
jurisdictions
are
permitted
to
modify
the
state
adopted,
building
standards
to
make
them
more
restrictive.
J
Nevertheless,
then,
the
code,
as
long
as
the
modifications
are
deemed
necessary
due
to
special
local
climatic,
geological
or
topographical
conditions
that
could
affect
our
residents.
So
we
live
in
an
area
that
has
potential
for
high
seismic
activity,
we're
a
very
densely
populated
area.
So
we
are
very
concerned
about
significant
damage
from
earthquakes.
Then
we're
also
concerned
about
increased
Hazard
for
spread
magnitude
and
severity
of
potential
fires
within
the
city.
J
So
what
are
we
recommending?
So
for
the
title?
24
building
code
amendments?
We
are
going
to
retain
four
local
amendments
that
we've
had
as
we
move
on
to
the
2022
building
and
residential
codes
and
those
are
related
to
building
separations
special
testing
and
inspections
for
concrete
foundations.
Gypsum
board
chairwalls
embraced
wall
panels
that
disallow
the
use
of
certain
materials
and
construction
methods
like
chipboard
and
stucco
that
don't
perform
well
as
lateral
elements
and
we
are
not
proposing
any
additional
amendments
to
Title
24
as
a
result
of
the
2022
building
codes
being
adopted
and.
R
Good
afternoon
Madam
chairperson
Foley
council
members
and
attendance
City
staff
and
the
public
I'm
James
Dobson
Deputy,
Fire
Chief
and
fire
marshal
for
the
San
Jose
Fire
Department,
the
San
Jose
fire
department
works
in
collaboration
with
other
other
fire
departments
within
the
county,
in
the
greater
Bay
Area,
to
establish
consistent
amendments
and
provide
for
the
health,
welfare
and
safety
of
our
local
residents.
R
R
These
were
incorporated
into
the
2022
code
and
are
now
no
longer
necessary
in
an
amendment.
We've
removed
the
prohibition
for
a
combination,
standpipe
sprinkler
system.
R
We've
also
made
some
amendments
to
some
of
the
standards
that
we
utilize,
which
is
NFPA
when
we
deal
with
sprinklers
for
the
NFPA
1313d
13r
systems,
we've
also
removed
or
appealed
amendments
for
NFPA,
14,
20,
24,
72
122
as
well.
We're
reverting
to
the
standards
in
the
current
or
a
proposed
2022
California
fire
code.
R
We
are
also
repealing
NFPA
19
13
13
D
13r
14,
20,
24
72
standards
and
reverting
to
the
standard.
So
there's
two
different
types
there.
So
there's
seven.
There.
R
These
modifications
are
for
minor
Clarity
Corrections,
such
as
just
trying
to
make
sure
that
what
we
have
written
in
our
codes
makes
sense
that
is
easily
understood
by
our
business
Community,
as
well
as
our
inspectors
that
are
doing
and
plan
reviewers
we're
also
incorporating
some
long-term
policy
into
code
at
the
recommendation
of
our
business
community.
R
We
are
doing
one
additional
amendment
that
is
to
deal
with
the
inspection,
testing
and
maintenance
requirements
and
the
addition
actually
deals
with
how
contractors
will
notify
the
fire
department
and
the
city
through
our
compliance
service
engine
who's
contracted
by
the
city
of
San
Jose,
we're
going
to
retain
85
amendments
all
again
to
provide
for
the
health,
welfare
and
safety
of
our
local
residents
going
away
from
the
California
fire
code.
R
B
So
conclude,
your
presentation.
That
concludes
our
presentation.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that
presentation,
Lisa
and
deputy
chief
Dobson.
It
was
very
interesting
and
the
report
was
very
interesting
as
well.
I've,
never
read,
building
codes
like
that,
so
that
was
really
a
lot
to
digest,
but
interesting
and
informative.
Let's
turn
to
the
members
of
the
public.
E
All
right,
thank
you
for
Beekman
here,
thanks
a
lot
for
this
item.
This
is
your
continuing
work
to
offer
the
community.
What
are
your
preparedness
practices,
emergency
preparedness
practices
so
as
a
whole,
Community,
open
effort
and
I
just
wanted
to
really
again.
Thank
yourselves
for
this
work.
I
as
I've
been
trying
to
explain
it's.
My
understanding
that
if
we
do
this
sort
of
work
in
San,
Jose
It
prepares
us
for
good
funding.
Federal
funding
dollars
by
say
2024.
E
I've
always
been
interested.
Does
this
have
an
ad
component
to
actually
be
preparing
this
for
a
possible
earthquake
in
2023.?
Thank
you
again
for
your
patience.
How
I
try
to
offer
those
words
only
to
illuminate
or
I?
Don't
know
if
that's
the
right
word,
but
just
so,
we
can
be
aware
of
choices.
How
to
view
such
a
situation
for
2023
I'm,
not
sure
what
to
expect
effect
of
the
year,
but
to
say
the
words
can
at
least
give
us
some
thought
about
choices.
E
How
we
can
think
and
work
I
hope,
that's
an
open
conversation.
We
have
and
good
luck
with
all
the
cert
work.
That's
going
on
also
at
this
time,
and
this
is
just
great
work.
E
I
think
San
Jose
has
been
a
model
example
for
the
Bay
Area
how
to
involve
a
disaster
preparedness,
emergency
preparedness,
as
part
of
you,
know,
Health
and
Human
Services
and
racial
Equity
ideas
that,
if
you
think
about
it
in
those
terms,
that's
that's
a
good
future
plan
to
be
working
towards
that
I
think
can
give
good
examples
for
for
other
Bay
Area
cities.
Thank
you.
A
G
G
B
N
B
B
E
Yeah,
it
was
a
really
packed
meeting
of
items.
Thank
you,
I!
Guess,
I
guess!
For
me
you
know
I,
I'm
really
gonna
make
it
a
point.
This
fall
that
I
I
felt
the
alpr
study
session
item
agenda
item
a
council
a
few
weeks
ago.
Didn't
go
very
well
I
mean
we
really
got
to
understand
that
pluck
we're
being
told
by
city
government
a
few
times
at
their
public
meetings,
that
they're
being
given
at
least
a
72-hour
window
of
of
data
that's
being
collected
for
themselves.
E
We
have
to
learn
to
really
line
up
these
things
right
and
do
it
right
and
do
it
openly
and
honestly,
and
we
can't
just
say
that
we've
done
our
our
due
diligence
and
we've
done
enough
work
on
the
subject
which
is
what's
interesting
because
I
think
San
Jose,
City
government
is
is
being
prepared
and
groomed.
Two
really
ask
these
questions
more.
E
How
can
it
be
a
more
open,
accessible
process
with
the
community,
and
we
should
celebrate
that
and
once
you
work
towards
what
what
staff
has
been,
how
staff
is
being
built
basically
to
ask
these
sort
of
questions
of
the
future
of
the
public
and
get
feedback
and
get
understanding
and
and
have
a
clear
policy
practices
in
place
and
not
just
kind
of
this
muddled,
National
Security.
We
have
to
protect
ourselves
kind
of
thing.
We
can
really
be
open
and
trusting
and
that
it
won't
hurt
anything.
E
So
good
luck
in
those
efforts
and
to
quickly
offer
you
know
it's.
It's
been
a
week
at
the
U.N
at
this
time,
I've
learned
a
lot:
how
to
understand
better
understand
the
positions
of
Russia
and
Ukraine
I'm.
Sorry,
where
I've
been
wrong
in
the
past
months
and
talking
about
these
issues,
all
I
can
say
is
I
hope,
I've
made
able
to
make
clear
that
we
don't
say
it
often
enough
that
that
Russia
really
wants
a
kind
of
a
port
area
in
the
Black
Sea,
and
we
should
at
least
know
that
that's.