►
Description
City of San José
Community & Economic Development Council Committee
View agenda at https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=711313&GUID=5222D1B5-AD06-4681-BA06-458090FF77B9
A
A
B
C
C
Don't
I
don't
know
if
I
have
a
lifeline
here,
I
know
we
had
expected
it
in
the
last
couple
months
and
we
are
in
communication
with
them
and
we
fully
expect
to
be
awarded.
I
can
follow
up
and
see
if
the
staff
has
a
sense
of
of
when
but
I
know.
We
were
generally
comfortable
that
it
would
be
back
at
this
committee.
C
E
This
month
we
have
a
few,
but
mighty
stories
leading
off
with
one
of
the
products
that
Obi
is
very
proud
of.
To
be
able
to
develop
to
produce
is
a
report
on
the
developments
projects
that
are
in
the
pipeline
that
are
added
each
day
of
the
week.
It
seems-
and
this
is
a
report
that
picks
up
the
activities
since
August
since
our
last
report
and
excluding
the
Google
project
which,
as
you
all
know,
filed
its
development
agreement
in
October.
E
We
are
seeing
projects
that
add
the
following
to
our
roster
of
products
in
the
pipeline:
577
residential
units,
1.2
million
square
feet
of
office,
space
and
250,000
square
feet
of
commercial
development.
So
it's
all
good
and
then
there
are
a
few
key
projects
that
are
noted
here
on
the
west
side
of
town
that
are
have
been
filed
and
are
getting
ready
to
be
developed
again
in
the
development
world
of
the
first
project,
funded
and
supported
and
spearheaded
by
the
developer.
E
Jay
Paul
broke
ground
at
the
site
of
200
Park
Avenue
and
there's
a
little
picture
there.
That
I
took
from
Google's
Wayback
Machine,
showing
the
very
sad
little
former
Bank.
Building
that
had
been
at
that
corner
and
if
you
ever
asked
people
what
about
that.
Building
on
the
corner
of
Almaden
and
in
part,
people
would
say
what
building
right
it's,
but
there
will
be
now
19
stories.
E
We're
also
thrilled
to
have
the
opportunity,
with
councilmember
Camus,
to
welcome
living
spaces
to
San
Jose.
This
is
a
very
interesting
business.
It's
it's
privately
held.
They
have
25
stores
across
Nevada,
California
and
Arizona.
This
is
the
only
first
of
their
kind
of
living
spaces
to
be
in
San,
Jose
and
they're
occupying
two
stories
of
what
used
to
be
the
Sears
building
on
the
west
side
of
Oak
Ridge
Mall,
and
it
was
a
very
lively
opening
and
we
appreciate
the
council
members
showing
up
for
that
and
then
finally,
a
little
update
on
City
dance.
E
We
closed
out
our
third
year
of
city
dance
in
the
beginning
of
October
and
are
excited
to
be
able
to
announce
that
the
city
is
going
to
be
putting
on
another
three
years
of
the
program,
and
this
started
way
back
in
2016
with
the
mayor
and
councilmember
Perales
being
asked
by
downtown
employers
for
more
activities
that
would
helped
activate
their
employees
after
work
and
keep
them
downtown.
Instead
of
just
heading
off
to
points
north,
south,
east
and
west,
so
city
dance
has
been
very
successful.
B
B
G
B
D
H
So
our
first
slide,
which
you
can't
see,
shows
that
40%
of
the
households
who
live
in
San
Jose
earn
below
80%
of
the
ami
and
when
you
compare
that
to
the
amount
of
income,
restricted
housing
that
equals
5%,
and
so
basically
we're
just
trying
to
illustrate
that
we
have
a
large
demand
for
housing,
that's
below
80
percent,
which
is
what
our
which
now
can
be
funded
through.
Our
tax
credit
programs-
and
you
can
see
very
little
of
our
housing
stock-
is
actually
income
restricted.
H
You've
seen
this
number
before,
because
we've
added
in
the
aro
units,
which
are
not
income
restricted.
Nor
do
they
have
restrictions
that
tell
us
they
have
to
remain
affordable
over
a
long
period
of
time,
and
so
this
this
was
just
really
to
illustrate
how
little
affordable
housing
we
have
in
comparison
to
the
need
and
demand.
H
Okay,
so
the
next
slide
was
about
the
income,
restricted,
affordable,
housing
and
so
first
of
all,
I
wanted
to
know
councilmember
Perales
on
this
slide.
If
you
look
at
your
numbers,
there
is
an
adjustment,
because
we
added
second
street
to
studios
twice,
so
your
numbers
went
down,
and
so
what
you
can
now
see
is
that
District
seven
has
both
the
most
affordable
and
the
most
developments
that
have
li
apartments
and
the
li
apartments
are
made
up
of
two
large
developments
that
are
in
d7.
H
Both
Markham
Terrace
has
a
303
unit
apartment
building
in
corner
Terra
is
close
to
200
units
for
senior
housing,
and
so
they
make
up
the
majority
of
the
Eloi
units
that
are
in
district
7.
What
this
chart
doesn't
show
is
we
have
a
thousand
units
of
housing,
that's
between
moderate
income
and
low
income
that
we
still
needed
to
clean
up
the
data
on.
H
But
that's
why
you're
not
seeing
those
moderate
income
units
included
in
this
chart?
What
I
also
wanted
to
highlight
was
that,
overall,
we
have
a
very
low
percentage
of
income,
restricted,
affordable
housing
in
our
housing
stock,
that
when
we
were
building
and
we
were
building
robustly,
the
majority
of
the
housing
is
really
50s
and
60
percent
in
the
AMI.
H
H
H
First,
just
review
with
you
what
the
dispersion
policy
was
that
we
put
on
hold,
so
it
was
really
a
positive
statement
policy
statement
that
basically
said.
Affordable
housing
should
go
everywhere
in
the
city
and
it
should
be
welcomed
and
welcomed
in
all
city
council
districts.
The
goal
was
to
balance
and
promote
economic
integration
across
the
city.
It
recognized
that
affordable
developments
in
San
Jose
were
well-designed
and
managed
developments
and
could
also
bring
new
investment
to
struggling
neighborhoods.
The
policy
also
recognized
that
there
are
certain
areas
of
the
city
that
deserve
additional
attention.
H
However,
it
was
clear
that
no
area
should
be
precluded
from
consideration
as
a
site
for
affordable
housing.
It
required
that
we
carefully
consider
the
impact
of
the
affordable
housing
in
the
neighborhood
when
we
cited
affordable,
housing
in
or
next
to
census,
tracts
that
have
50%
or
more
of
residents
that
are
low-income
and
I.
H
Think
what
was
surprising
to
me
when
I
came
here
was
that
the
definition
was
low
income,
because
when
you
look
at
the
definition
of
low-income,
that's
people
who
are
earning
between
seventy
three
thousand
and
one
hundred
and
four
thousand
dollars
a
year
and
anywhere
else
in
the
country.
We
would
not
have
a
problem
citing
people
that
earn
this
income.
Frankly
in
any
neighborhood,
we
wouldn't
say
you
should
think
twice
about
it.
H
So
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
decided
to
put
this
policy
on
hold
was
because
we
believe
that
the
income
targets
just
didn't
adequately
measure
what
we
should
be
considering
today.
The
policy
also
said
that,
if
we
were
going
to
say,
developments
with
these
income
ranges
in
low-income
neighborhoods
that
we
should
also
take
into
effect
into
our
decision-making,
how
close
they
were
or
how
engaged
they
were
with
neighborhood
revitalization
plans
or
if
their
income
mix
was
greater
than
being
concentrated
on
low-income
developments.
H
In
terms
of
how
the
policy
applies,
it
only
applies
to
newly
funded
city
funded,
affordable
housing
development.
The
this
policy
does
not
apply
to
existing
housing
stock
that
we
acquire
and
rehab
affordable
housing-
that's
not
funded
by
the
city.
So,
during
the
time
the
policy
applied,
this
was
bond
only
deals,
but
as
you're
thinking
about
the
future
and
how
it
might
apply,
it
would
not
apply
to
measure
a
funding
funded
projects.
We
also
don't
use
it
when
we're
making
decisions
regarding
shelters
and
in
term
homeless,
solutions.
H
So
I
just
wanted
to
get
a
little
bit
of
context
of
how
we're
beginning
to
think
about
this
policy.
As
we
move
forward
on
your
left,
you
see
the
infamous
cabrini-green
apartments
is
a
HUD
public.
It
was
a
HUD
public
housing
project
and
at
its
peak
it
housed
15,000
people
living
in
mid
rise
in
high-rise
apartments,
with
a
total
of
over
3600
apartments.
In
one
area
it
represented
what
people
thought
was
the
issue
of
concentrated
poverty.
H
It
was
known
for
crime,
gang
violence
and
neglected
conditions
generally
concentrated
poverty
is
characterized
by
significant
distressed,
discriminatory,
citing
long-term
isolation,
structural
racism,
chronic
underfunding
and
stigmatization,
and
these
projects
often
contributed
to
this
phenomenon.
So
the
history
of
why
HUD
Housing
Policy
was
concerned
about
where
you
say
was
because
of
this
phenomenon
that
had
to
do
with
public
housing.
Now
that's
different
than
the
type
of
housing
that
San
Jose
has
funded,
which
is
you
can
see.
There's
a
photograph
or
a
drawing
of
some
of
our
new,
affordable
housing.
H
San
Jose
does
not
have
any
public
housing
sites
anywhere
in
the
city.
All
the
public
housing
has
been
redeveloped
under
the
low-income
housing
tax
credit
program.
The
low-income
housing
tax
credit
program
creates
affordable
housing
with
lower
market
rents
by
offering
taxes
and
incentives
to
property
owned
owners.
H
The
other
thing
that
has
come
into
play
recently
was
that
in
2015,
the
Supreme
Court
heard
the
Texas
Department
of
Housing
Community
Affairs
versus
the
include
inclusive
communities
project
case
the
inclusive
communities
project
alleged
that
the
Texas
tax
credit
agency
had
intentionally
discriminated
against.
African-Americans
by
disproportionately
citing
its
tax
credit
projects
in
majority,
minority
neighborhoods,
for
example,
92%
of
all
housing
units
built
in
Dallas
that
used
tax
credits
were
located
in
majority
minority
census
tracts.
H
The
Supreme
Court
ruled
that
the
policies
that
segregate
minorities
in
poor
neighborhoods,
even
if
they
do
so
unintentionally,
violate
the
Fair
Housing
Act.
This
has
resulted
in
many
communities,
including
the
state
of
California,
looking
at
how
we
can
incentivize
using
our
tax
credit
program
to
cite
projects
and
opportunity
areas
and
we're
going
to
look
more
with
those
opportunity
Maps,
as
we
move
forward
in
this.
So
as
we're
beginning
to
think
of
a
new,
affordable
housing
policy,
citing
policy
we're
looking
at
three
areas
that
we
would
like
our
consultant
to
look
more
into
so
one
is.
H
We
want
to
increase
access
to
opportunity
or
or
high
resource
areas,
so
we
want
to
ensure
that
we're
putting
more
development
in
those
areas.
We
want
to
limit
development
in
what
we're
calling
fragile
neighborhoods,
but
we
also
want
to
have
the
flexibility
to
cite
affordable
housing
in
fragile
neighborhoods
to
promote
Community
Development.
So
it
was
third
element
under
the
dispersion
policy.
If
there
were
special
considerations,
we
should
think
about
when
we're
putting
affordable
housing
in
more
distressed
communities.
H
So
the
first
one
is
these
opportunity
areas.
The
factors
of
the
state
of
California
is
using
to
define
areas
of
opportunities,
includes
indicators
such
as
low
poverty
rates,
adult
education,
employment,
job
proximity,
median
home
values,
environmental
factors,
math
and
reading
proficiency,
high
school,
graduation
rates,
student
poverty
rates
and
finally,
poverty
and
social
and
racial
segregation.
So
they've
actually
done
all
this
research
figured
out
what
the
indicators
are
and
they
have
a
map
and
we're
going
to
show
you
that
map
shortly.
H
The
second
factor
when
we're
thinking
about
what
makes
up
a
fragile,
neighborhood
many
policies.
In
fact,
most
of
the
policies
use
the
poverty
rate
as
a
proxy
for
neighborhood
quality
and
there's.
In
fact,
research
that
supports
that
poverty
is
a
reasonable
proxy
for
neighborhood
quality.
A
neighborhood
with
high
poverty
rate
tends
to
have
a
more
distressed
physical
housing
stock
and
also
has
a
lack
of
positive
influences
on
children
and
families,
and
many
other
different
neighborhood
characteristics
that
make
it
challenging
for
families
to
thrive.
H
So
we
looked
at
the
current
federal
poverty
rate,
which
is
a
twenty
four
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars,
and
if
we
applied
that
poverty
rate
and
called
it
at
the
high
poverty
rate,
we
would
only
have
one
census
tract
in
San
Jose
that
meets
that
definition
of
where
more
than
50%
of
our
residents
for
fall
below
that
poverty
rate.
And
you
can
see
it's
in
district
3
that
one
little
red
dot.
H
H
So
when
we're
talking
about
community
development,
you
know
in
San
Jose
now
that
we
don't
have
redevelopment
funds.
There
are,
but,
though
particularly
targeted
areas
where
we
are
pushing
growth
towards,
and
we
want
to
see
growth
happen,
and
that
includes
things
like
the
Deardon
station
and
other
transit
places
where
we
want
to
provoke
redevelopment.
H
So
if
you
think
of
those
are
those
three
basic
areas
that
we
want
to
explore
with
the
consultant
to
help
us
make
figure
out
what
those
definitions
should
be.
We
also
thought
it
was
important
for
you
to
think
about
some
additional
factors
that
impact
where
we
cite
affordable
housing,
so
the
first
one
which
is
the
fair
housing.
As
you
know,
we've
come
before
you
because
we
are
working
on
our
fair
housing
plan
and
we
are
going
to
use
the
data
that
we
learn
from
that
fair
housing
plan
to
inform
this
work.
H
So
we
talked
about
that.
The
state
has
created
these
opportunity
Maps,
and
you
can
see
that
the
areas
in
red
which
are
in
district
nine,
ten
eight
a
part
of
one
and
way
off
in
that
little
edge
of
four
and
five
are
considered
high
resource
areas,
and
you
can't
see
it
very
well
in
this
map,
but
we're
going
to
show
you
another
that
shows
you
where
San
Jose
is
driving
growth
next
slide.
H
So,
as
you
can
see,
growth
is
kind
of
being
driven
all
the
way
through
to
7,
3,
&,
4
and
then
kind
of
outwards
on
6
and
the
beginning
of
5,
but
the
opportunity
maps
and
our
growth
maps
don't
align
very
well,
and
so
that's
gonna
be
a
challenge
for
us.
If
what,
if
what
we're
being
asked-
or
what
you
would
like
to
see,
is
the
for
us
to
move
into
these
areas,
the
areas
will
be
difficult
because
we.
H
And
more
importantly,
you
can
see
this
map,
which
is
the
map.
The
yellow,
is
all
residential
neighborhoods.
So
it's
low
density,
residential
94%
of
our
residential
area
is
general
planned
of
low
density
for
us
to
have
affordable
housing.
We
need
a
multi-family
higher
density
zoning
in
a
general
plan,
and
you
can
see
we
are
extremely
limited,
then,
on
where
we
can
go,
because
the
general
plan
doesn't
allow
us
to
go
there.
So
this
would
be
another
constraint
in
terms
of
what
would
limit
us
in
going
into
these
other
areas.
H
So
with
that,
what
we
plan
on
asking
the
consultant
to
do
is
to
work
on
defining
those
three
areas
that
we
discussed
with
you
earlier
and
then
to
look
at
these
constraints
in
order
to
create
a
new
policy.
So
we're
going
to
are
we're
all
ears
today
to
see
if
we
should
make
some
adjustments
to
the
RFP
before
we
release
it.
H
We
plan
on
working
on
it
between
the
spring
and
summer
to
do
outreach,
have
the
develop
the
consultant
to
do
some
research
and
work
and
coordinate
with
our
fair
housing
study
and
then
develop
a
sighting
plan,
and
our
hope
is
to
get
to
the
fall
with
a
proposed
policy
and
community
input
on
it
before
we
bring
it
back
to
the
City
Council
before
the
end
of
2020
and
I.
Think
what's
really
important
is
we're
not
going
to
be
releasing
any
NOFA
where
we
would
be
using
our
money?
H
H
Are
there
some
neighborhoods
that
we
believe
are
too
fragile
to
sustain
even
a
small
increase
in
the
number
of
households
living
in
poverty
and
what
would
that
measurement
be
percentage
of
poverty?
Should
we
look
at
race?
What
factors
should
we
consider
for
the
residents
of
affordable
housing?
So
you
know,
depending
upon
what
the
development
looks
like
if
it
has
a
lot
of
extremely
low-income
residents,
should
that
be
a
factor
and
how
much
of
the
development
should
we
care
in
terms
of
that
mix?
H
So
traditionally
we
would
have
had
a
third
extremely
low,
a
third
kind
of
in
the
40s
to
50
and
a
third
to
the
60s
and
I
think
with
that
kind
of
income
mix.
I
would
have
advocated
very
strongly
that
we
be
allowed
to
go
everywhere,
because
there
is
enough
income
mixed
within
the
development
itself
to
offset
any
kind
of
impact
the
development
would
have.
H
However,
we
know
because
of
measure
a
and
because
of
our
45%
policy,
that
we
are
creating
developments
that
are
more
heavily
weighted
on
ili
housing
and
that
that
truly
could
then
have
potentially
of
an
impact
in
a
neighborhood
where
reciting.
So
we
want
to
be
very
mindful
of
the
balance
in
the
mix
and
its
relationship
to
a
neighborhood
and
then.
Lastly,
what
are
the
other
characteristics?
We
should
be
considering
to
demonstrate
that
a
neighborhood
is
changing.
We
also
know,
through
our
anti
displacement
work,
that
we
have
communities
that
are
saying.
H
Please
put
affordable
housing
here,
because
we
know
our
neighborhoods
changing
and
we
want
to
have
an
opportunity
to
stay
and
live
here.
So
there
could
be
factors
that
we
should
be
considering,
regardless
of
the
mix
that
we
want
to
be
in
there
because
of
a
changing
demographic.
So
with
that
I
am.
We
are
open
for
questions.
K
G
Hi,
thank
you
as
council
person.
As
far
as
a
as
far
as
this
memo
talked
about
being
able
to
better
label
ER
units
in
San,
Jose,
I
hope
to
offer
a
few
words
first
to
thank
you
for
this
report
and
to
make
the
words
a
li
and
very
low-income,
familiar
and
accessible
to
ourselves.
It's
it's
nice!
Thank
you.
The
cities
of
Santa
Clara
and
San
Jose,
and
even
the
VTA
have
made
some
incredibly
good
beginnings
in
the
concepts
of
mixed
income.
Housing,
kalsa
housing
advocacy
has
done
a
very
good.
G
Some
very
good
work
on
this
subject
as
well:
I
hope,
casa,
the
VTA
San
Jose
and
Santa
Clara,
and
local
South
Bay
cities
can
learn
to
make
this
clear
to
the
MTC
and
to
those
in
Sacramento
at
this
time
as
well.
The
ideas
of
mixed
income,
housing,
I,
hope
just
mentioning
these
ideas
here
today
can
be
part
of
learning
how
to
offer
a
simple
openness
in
defining
the
practicalities
of
our
society.
G
I
hope
we
are
all
trying
to
learn
that
it
does
not
have
to
be
considered
taboo,
superstitious,
poor
or
poor
manners
and
protocols
to
be
able
to
more
openly
work
towards
and
talk
about
in
public
the
term
and
to
use
the
terms
extremely
low
income:
oh
I,
very
low
income,
vli
and
low
income
and
the
term
mixed
income
housing.
These
have
been
difficult
words
and
subjects
to
really
address
openly,
openly
open
and
thanks
that
it
seems
like
we
are
trying
to
do
that.
Thank
you.
Can.
C
C
J
M
C
B
You
know
I
I,
don't
want
to
set
necessarily
any
precedent
here.
I
just
see
if
the
committee
is
concurring,
would
we
this
is
not
the
way
we
do
things
we
at
a
time,
and
usually
people
will
come
up
and
speak
on
different
portions
of
the
you
know
of
the
presentation.
Each
person
is
usually
assigned
a
couple
minutes
to
go
over
their
portion
of
the
presentation.
B
A
B
B
I
B
I
Hi,
my
name
is
Tina
Morel
I
live
in
the
vendôme
neighborhood
in
district
3
I
want
to
say
thank
you
guys
very
much
for
your
time
today.
Sorry
about
the
the
little
mix-up,
so
I
am
working
with
a
group
of
community
members.
We
all
live
in
district
3
and
we
have
concerns
about
what
we're
seeing
as
an
over
concentration
of
housing
in
district
3,
and
that's
a
concern
for
us
and
so
we're
here
today
to
give
you
information
that
we've
gathered
numbers,
we've
got
some
table.
I
Data
and
I
do
want
to
say
thank
you
to
councilmember
Perales.
We
really
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
have
stepped
up
and
said:
yes,
we'd
need
housing
and
let's
do
it
in
our
district.
First,
that's
fine!
We
don't
have
a
problem
with
that,
but
what
we
do
want
to
see
is
we
want
to
see
a
dispersion
policy
sooner
rather
than
later,
so
that
it
is
equitably
distributed
throughout
all
of
the
council
districts,
the
housing
specifically
supportive,
affordable
and
low
income,
and
also
we
are
very
much
aware
that
housing
is
needed.
I
I
We
want
to
work
with
the
city
on
a
dispersion
policy,
and
we
want
that
dispersion
policy
to
have
a
requirement
in
it
that
whenever
there
is
a
proposed
development
going
through
that
and
it
the
decision-makers
and
also
the
reviewers,
they
have
to
look
at
the
density
that
is
around
wherever
the
housing
is
being
proposed,
so
that
it
prevents
the
over
concentration.
So
that's
my
portion
of
the
presentation.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
Thank.
M
L
And
thank
you
for
listening
to
us
today
and
for
me,
I
want
to
start
with
this
slide.
That
shows
a
category
of
the
types
of
housing
that
we're
presenting
today,
it's
affordable
for
low-income,
but
it's
also
the
supportive
housing
next
slide.
Please
so
on
this
one
is
the
table
that
we
have
of
data,
that
of
all
the
units
inside
the
city
of
San,
Jose,
broken
up
per
district
and
a
unit
to
us
as
a
studio.
L
L
I'm
gonna
go
through
these
district
maps
quickly,
and
so
you
got
district
1
district
to
district
4,
District,
five
district
6
district
7
and
those
two
have
about
3500
units
each
throughout
their
area:
district,
8,
district,
9,
district,
10
and
district
3,
which
has
more
than
4,500
units
within
that
area.
Next
one
please
so:
the
table
of
affordable
and
supportive
housing
units
count
within
the
city
counted
within
the
city
of
San
Jose.
You
can
see
the
top
three.
L
There
are
district
6,
7,
&
3,
which
take
up
about
60%
of
this
type
of
housing
within
the
city
of
San
Jose.
These
numbers
reflect
houses,
housing
units
already
accepting
subsidized
applicants
next
one
please,
and
this
one
here:
we've
separated
up
a
supportive
housing,
which
is
the
the
special
population
that
you
have
and
the
top
three
districts
have
actually
90
percent
more
than
90
percent
of
this
type
of
units
within
their
particular
district
area,
and
this
data
does
not
include
any.
L
And
I'm,
a
resident
of
the
Hyde
Park,
neighborhood
and
I
have
two
minutes
to
make
one
very
essential
point,
and
that's
basically,
that
the
high
concentration
of
affordable
in
supportive
housing
has
stress
and
an
impact
on
communities
and
Robert.
Friant
wrote
an
article
in
Wired
magazine
in
June
of
28th
2018,
where
he
talked
about
the
concentration
of
poverty
and,
if
you
put
all
of
the
affordable
housing
in
one
place,
you
end
up
with
ghettos,
which
was
highlighted
in
the
last
presentation
next
slide
and
Margaret
Worstell
in
her
very
interesting
article.
L
A
sound
approach
to
relating
social
service
facilities
said
that
the
concentration
of
services
and
facilities
can
overwhelm
the
carrying
capacity
of
a
neighborhood,
and
that's
really.
What
we're
trying
to
address
is
the
carrying
capacity
of
a
neighborhood
and
that
economic
demographics
begin
to
deteriorate.
And
so
what
we
are
basically
saying
is
the
challenge
confronting
government
leaders.
You
in
effect
is
to
provide
humane,
dignified
and
comprehensive
solutions
while
at
the
same
time
ensuring
healthy
urban
environments,
and
so
we
believe.
L
We
strongly
believe
that
a
next
slide
strongly
believe
that
a
policy
dispersion
policy
is
essential
to
do
that
and
I'm
kind
of
saddened
to
hear
that
it's
being
postponed
for
yet
another
year
when
housing
is
being
built
as
we
speak.
This
is
so
urgent
and
so
needed
and
we
are
seeing
the
impacts
in
our
neighborhood,
so
I'm
asking
our
leaders
to
hasten
this
kind
of
policy.
C
I'm
Victoria
ketta
from
Japan
Town,
Neighborhood
Association.
The
committee
believes
that
homelessness
and
affordable,
affordable
and
supportive
housing.
The
crisis
is
a
citywide
issue
and
that,
in
order
to
address
us,
we
think
it
will
take
citywide
solutions.
Where
did
we
get
all
this
data
from
there's
a
huge
amount
of
data
and
two
individuals
on
the
committee?
Sonya
and
Antonina
waded
through
a
tremendous
amount
of
data
in
order
to
bring
those
tables
to
you.
They
found
it
quite
daunting
and
difficult
to
go
through
the
city
and
the
county's
data
sources.
C
But
if
you
see
here,
this
is
what
they
went
through
in
order
to
come
up
with
this
comprehensive
list
that
you
see
in
this
presentation.
Who
are
we
we're
a
dedicated
group
of
community
stakeholders
working
to
create
awareness
of
the
urgent
need
for
equitable
dispersion
of
affordable
and
supportive
housing
and
their
related
services
throughout
the
city
of
San
Jose
on
our
committee
are
people
who
represent
Hensley
vendôme,
Spartan,
Keyes,
Northside
horse
man,
Hyde
Park
and
Japantown
neighborhoods
were
a
broad
cross-section
of
neighborhoods
that
represent
district
3.
C
We
reach
out,
we
reached
out
to
other
neighborhoods,
but
we're
not
as
lucky
to
bring
more
individuals
aboard,
but
we
thank
all
individuals
from
all
the
various
neighborhoods
who
have
put
in
a
great
amount
of
time
to
bring
you
this
presentation
and
it
gave
us
an
opportunity
to
once
again
work
with
one
another
to
solve
issues
across
our
neighborhoods,
especially,
we
want
to
thank
Antonina,
attire
and
asagna
lue.
These
two
individuals
put
in
a
vast
amount
of
time
to
bring
you
the
graphs,
the
tables
and
the
data
that
you
see
in
this
presentation.
C
B
K
Hi,
my
name
is
Lance
shoemaker
and
I'm.
The
president
of
the
Hensley
historic
district,
Neighborhood,
Association
and
I'm,
one
of
the
people
who've
been
working
on
this
project
since
last
summer.
A
few
things
I
just
wanted
to
mention.
We've
done
this
presentation
to
a
few
different
neighborhood
associations
and
to
our
districts
SCLC
meeting,
and
sometimes
we
hear
an
issue
for
mother
in
a
question
from
other
council
districts
which
is
well.
K
K
That's
where
the
needs
are
yet
spotlight
magazine
last
week
had
an
article
talking
about
the
new
path
project
at
second
and
Julian,
for
supportive
housing
for
people
who
are
homeless,
and
they
talked
about
the
first
two
residents
of
that
new
project
came
from
an
encampment
in
Morgan
Hill,
and
the
operator
of
that
facility
did
outreach
to
encampments
in
Morgan
Hill
to
bring
them
to
a
house
supportive
housing
project
in
downtown
San
Jose.
We
don't
quite
understand
why
there
was
outreach
to
Morgan
Hill
to
house
people
in
downtown
San
Jose.
Additionally,
at
the
West
Valley
library.
K
K
C
C
B
O
Good
afternoon
so
happy
to
be
here,
thank
you
to
staff
for
a
really
great
report.
It
can
tell
that
there's
some
good
work
that
will
be
coming
in
the
future.
We
submitted
a
letter
on
this
item
and
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
a
few
of
those
individual
points.
One
is
to
assert
our
belief
that
the
objective
of
an
the
objective
of
a
new,
affordable
housing
siting
policy
must
be
to
accelerate
the
production
of
more
affordable
housing
throughout
our
community
residents.
O
In
many
parts
of
our
city
lack
access
to
affordable
housing
options
if
we
are
to
truly
build
a
healthy
and
equitable
community,
who
must
take
steps
to
ensure
that
more
of
our
neighborhoods
contain
quality,
affordable
housing
opportunities,
it's
critical
that
we
develop
a
policy
that
will
facilitate
the
construction
of
more
affordable
housing
in
many
more
locations
throughout
the
city.
In
addition
to
this
policy,
we
urge
the
city
to
explore
potential
policy
and
land-use
changes
that
would
allow
the
expedited
development
of
affordable
housing
on
any
site
near
transit
services
and
other
amenities
destination.
O
Home
stands
ready
to
work
with
you
in
the
development
of
this
new
policy,
including
through
the
work
of
our
housing,
ready,
Communities
initiative
to
educate
and
engage
neighbors
to
create
healthier
happier
neighborhoods
throughout
San
Jose
for
neighbors
who
currently
live
there
and
new
neighbors
to
come.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Robert.
P
P
In
this
little
small
area
and
our
school
already
has
68
or
70
percent
free
and
reduced
lunch,
and
despite
the
fact
that
where
we
get
25
percent
of
our
it's
a
because
it's
Spanish
immersion,
we
get
25
percent
of
our
families
side
of
from
outside
of
the
district.
That
means
all
the
rest
of
the
kids
in
the
neighborhood
are
considered
poor
I.
P
A
A
This
is
going
to
be
an
even
greater
challenge
when
the
next
round
of
Reno
goals
come
out
and
we
have
to
figure
out
how
to
redo
our
housing
element
to
find
new
locations,
and
so
this
is
a
timely
discussion.
We
also
see
this
as
an
opportunity.
We
think
that
this
is
an
opportunity
for
a
generation
of
community
and
political
will
to
increase
opportunities
for
affordable
housing
throughout
the
city.
The
great
news
is
that
our
affordable
housing,
development
and
management
industry
is
remarkably
good
at
what
they
do.
A
A
If
anybody's
interested
I'd
be
glad
to
put
together
a
tour
of
affordable
housing
developments
in
the
city,
if
you've
never
done
that,
it
is
even
for
me
it
was
a
mind-opening
opportunity,
because
not
only
can't
you
tell
witches
market
and
which
is
affordable,
but
often
the
afford
ones
are
the
best
managed
properties
in
the
neighborhood.
This
is
a
challenge.
I
understand
the
concern.
A
Q
Mary
Helen
Dourdan
with
the
working
group
with
pact,
and
thank
you
to
the
staff
and
council
to
continue
continuing
effort
to
explore
so
many
creative
opportunities
and
to
make
sure
our
diverse
families
can
continue
to
be
here.
We
support
that
45%
of
affordable
housing,
develop
for
extremely
low
folks
and
appreciate
the
balance
and
mix
that
was
noted
as
a
challenge.
We,
a
beautiful
economic
and
culturally
integrated
neighborhood,
is
a
benefit
to
us
all
in
San,
Jose
and
a
heritage
we
would
love
to
see
continue.
Q
We
continue
to
seek
and
hope
there'll
be
additional
opportunities
for
the
community
to
have
input
with
the
consultant
that
tired.
This
is
an
a
very
important
policy
that
affects
so
many
folks
within
the
jurisdiction
of
the
city
and
we'd,
also
like
to
note
that
the
dispersion
of
affordable
housing
is
a
really
issue
that
creates
a
lot
of
fear
in
neighborhoods
and
I
appreciate
the
word
destination.
Q
Home
has
been
doing
to
create
conversations
and
hope
that
more
opportunities
and
strategies
will
be
explored
to
get
people
to
sit
down
and
talk
to
each
other
about
a
well
economic
and
culturally
integrated
neighborhoods
and
how
that
benefits.
Us
all
so
we
hope
some
additional
creative
ideas
can
come
but
like
the
one,
the
destination
home
it
has
created
and
beyond.
So
thank
you
again
for
your
work
and
we
look
forward
to
continuing
to
work
with
you.
Thank.
B
H
There
are
going
to
be
times
when,
if
something
is
zoned
residential
and
we're
not
funding
it,
you,
the
law
states
that
we
can't
deny
a
residential
development
from
moving
forward,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
keep
that
in
the
back
of
your
mind
that
if
a
site
is
coming
forward,
there's
no
City
money.
It's
measure
any
money.
We
would
not
have
an
opportunity
to
apply
this
policy
because
it's
new
state
law,
yeah.
B
H
How
we
work
with
our
affordable
housing
and
permit
supportive
housing
is
that
we
do
everything
court
in
a
coordinated
method,
so
San
Jose
is
outreach.
Teams
are
not
going
to
Morgan
Hill,
but
we
have
outreach
teams
throughout
the
county
and
how
we
place.
People
is
through
this
coordinated
assessment,
so
whoever
is
the
most
who
has
the
highest
score
through
this
V
Isis
Baudette,
where
they
do
this
evaluation.
B
H
Because
of
a
fair
housing
concern
there,
we
can't
give
a
priority
to
San
Jose
residents
or
people
who
have
been
in
San
Jose.
We
do
make
additional
outreach
efforts
at
the
time,
then
a
for
de
bill
hasn't
is
going
to
open
up
to
do
outreach
to
the
surrounding
community
to
make
sure
that
all
the
homeless
people
who
are
living
in
the
area
have
an
opportunity
to
sign
up
to
be
on
the
list
and
to
be
evaluated.
That
is
a
priority.
However,
the
development
itself
cannot
prioritize
people
who
are
housed.
H
B
That's
interesting,
I
am
and
I
know
that
the
county
does
a
lot
of
work
with
funding.
Many
of
these
projects,
but
I
have
been
disappointed
that
they
have
not
identified
properties
of
their
own,
especially
over
the
last
three
years
where
they
have
already
known
that
proposition.
A
has
existed
and
I
find
out.
Is
it
a
couple
weeks
ago
that
they
finally
are
starting
to
look
at?
Are
they
are
they
finally
starting
to
look
at
their
own
properties?
B
B
I
steer
out
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
we
that
yeah
I
heard
an
announcement
that
they
are
looking
at
properties
of
their
so
I.
Think
Cindy
Chavez
made
that
announcement
a
couple
weeks
ago.
I
think
it's
a
little
three
years
a
little
too
late,
but
at
least
better
late
than
never
I
am
also
wanted
to
you
know.
You
know
a
lot
of
people
to
think
that
that
we
don't
especially
I
mean
I,
think
I
get
accused
of
not
wanting
of
these
things.
B
This
is
according
to
your
study
than
it
is
for-profit
housing
project,
and
until
we
can,
you
know
until
we
can
actually
deal
with
the
that
disparity
I
think
it's
gonna
be
tough
for
us
to
locate
housing
anywhere,
not
because
we
don't
want
to,
but
because
it
doesn't
make
financial
sense
to
for
the
developer,
to
develop
it.
The
nonprofit
developer
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
that
Jackie,
that
your
office
is
going
to
be
looking
at
ways,
I've
thrown
you
my
own
way
and
you
thrown
ten
million
dollars
at
it.
B
We
can
actually
buy
housing
instead
of
developing
it
from
scratch
and
then
I'm
gonna
continue
harping
on
that.
There
are
projects
that
we
can
buy
everywhere
throughout
every
city
and
create
dispersion
just
by
buying
instead
of
building
and
I.
Think
it's
important
that
we
make
that
a
priority,
not
just
looking
at
this
dispersion
policy,
because
I
think
that
every
policy
that
comes
into
place
actually
actually
makes
it
harder.
Every
regulation
makes
it
harder
to
build
and
I'm,
not
I,
don't
want
things
to
be
harder
to
build.
B
H
B
H
B
J
Great
thank
you.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
the
report.
It
was
really
informative
and
and
to
the
members
of
the
community
community
who
spoke
I'd
like
to
thank
you,
too,
for
sharing
your
thoughts
about
dispersion,
dispersion
and
sharing
the
affordable
housing
development
throughout
the
district
or
throughout
the
city.
I
made
that
comment
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
at
a
city
council
meeting
that
affordable
housing,
low-income
housing
occurs
all
over
the
city
and
we
ought
to
make
it
a
priority
to
build
housing
all
over
the
district
all
over
the
city.
J
J
So
when
you
and
I
talk
Jackie
about,
let's
find
some
important
places
to
build,
affordable
housing
in
district
9,
it's
problematic
because
they're
eliminating
bus
routes
and
the
transportation
isn't
good,
but
hopefully
we
will
be
having
senior
housing
development
and
that
adds
to
our
housing
stock.
But
it's
not
necessarily
affordable.
It's
probably
market
rate
senior
housing,
so
I
I
appreciate
the
need
and
we'll
work
to
spread,
affordable
housing
around
the
district
around
the
city.
I
was
happy
to
see
frankly
that
district
9
had
higher
numbers
of
affordable
housing
than
I
expected.
J
It
was
number
5
in
a
list
of
10
city
council
districts,
that's
impressive!
For
me,
not
I
know
it
doesn't
meet
district
7s
numbers
or
district
threes
numbers,
but
it's
more
than
you
would
anticipate
in
in
district
9.
So
I
was
actually
happy
to
see
that
one
thing
that
would
be
helpful
for
me
is
on
the
the
grid
where
you
showed
all
of
the
number
of
the
different
districts
is
a
total
at
the
bottom.
So
we
could
see
what
the
total
units
are,
the
total
ili
and
the
total
affordable.
J
That
just
gives
me
an
idea
of
I
have
the
percentage,
but
it
gives
me
an
idea
of
what
that
really
means
in
relation
to
each
other
in
caught
in
comments
to
councilmember
Camus
about
the
cost
of
building,
affordable
housing
versus
market
rate
housing.
It's
totally
it's
comparing
apples
to
oranges
there.
They
use
a
different
financing
model
market
rate
lenders,
fund,
market
rate
development,
affordable
housing
developers,
put
pieces
of
funds
together,
and
some
of
those
funds
are
more
expensive.
J
How
can
we
make
that
out
of
affordable
housing
development
I
know
their
affordable
housing
developers
who
do
not
use
City
funds
who
are
building
housing
in
other
areas
in
in
the
city,
but
there
and
a
lot
of
them
are
use
the
counting
funds,
so
these
numbers
won't
even
apply
or
the
what
the
dispersion
policy
wouldn't
apply
because
it
doesn't
relate
to
anyone
who's,
putting
funds
together.
Is
that
correct?
So
if
I'm
they're
getting
part
of
measure
a
and
part
from
the
city
just
right,
because
it's.
H
It's
the
policy
is
used
for
the
city
for
where
we're
funding,
and
so
because
state
law
says
if
it's
a
residential
development
and
they
receive
their
funding
from
the
county.
There
would
be
no
mechanism
by
which
the
city
could
deny
the
development
coming
into
the
city.
You
know
that
would
be
a
challenge
right,
so
the
new
policy
we're
proposing
it
and
it
applied
the
same
way
for
the
dispersion
policy.
It's
for
city
funded
developments
right
and.
J
And
clearly,
we
do
not
want
to
build
anything
that
looks
like
cabrini-green
or
become
something
like
cabrini-green.
The
idea
of
having
diverse
income
populations
living
together
is
beneficial
for
everyone
from
an
economic
standpoint
and
also
creating
a
variety
of
educational
education,
backgrounds,
career
backgrounds,
wealth
backgrounds
is
really
helpful
in
such
a
diverse
population,
that
is,
the
city
of
San
Jose,
so
I'm
all
for
figuring
out
how
we
can
do
this
better
throughout
the
city.
J
J
F
I
wanted
to
start
off
by
pointing
out
that
the
original
dispersion
policy
was
developed
by
then
councilmember
Blanca
Alvarado,
who
was
the
councilmember
for
East
San
Jose,
and
it
was
borne
out
of
her
concern
that
we
would
in
effect,
create
ghettos
in
low-income
communities
and
and
so
and
I'm
sure
she
can
share
her
feelings
with
me.
But
it's
something
I
have
talked
about
with
her
as
well
and
made
her
push
for
that.
F
That
was
in
her
mind,
and
so
we
fast-forward
and
we
you
know
we
put
that
on
pause
and
then
what
do
we
have?
We
have
a
higher
concentration
in
low-income
communities
and
so
I
know
that
my
office
has
certainly
been
asking
for
quite
some
time
in
terms
of
some
data
around
the
dispersion
of
affordable
housing
by
district,
but
also
the
type
of
affordable
housing.
F
Once
you
take
out
the
industrial
area
and
open
space,
large
portion
of
the
district
is
low-income
and
according
to
housing,
zone,
map,
district,
seven
and
surprisingly,
only
district
seven
so
has
the
highest
segregation
and
poverty
within
the
city,
and
so
this
is
what
equity
is
about.
This
is
what
we're
talking
about
in
the
district.
I
have
been
in
my
search
for
data
I,
looked
at
the
total
housing
units
and
the
total
market
rate
units
by
council
district
within
the
city.
My
apologies.
F
So
what
this
data
is
showing
me
is
what
type
of
city,
what
type
of
neighborhoods
are
we
creating?
We
are
Blanka.
Alvarado's
fear
is
coming
true,
certainly
when
it
comes
to
district
7,
and
this
is
the
type
of
data
that
we
need
to
look
at
I
actually
found
it
pretty
eye-opening
as
well.
In
looking
at
the
overall
number
of
market
rate
units
by
district
once
you
subtract,
affordable
housing.
It
goes
from
seven
eight,
five
to
ten
four,
three,
nine
one
and
six.
F
This
is
the
type
of
information
that
one
needs
to
be
data
informed
and
two.
This
is
what
this
is.
What
equity
is
about?
This
is
what
we're
talking
about.
I'm,
a
former
school
board.
Member
and
school
bonds
are
paid
for
by
parcel
taxes,
and
it's
been
an
issue.
I'll
tell
you
when
I
was
on
the
Franklin
McKinley
school
board,
we
used
the
very
last
of
some.
F
So
having
said
those
things,
I
wanted
to
move
on
and
I
wanted
to
address
two
things
that
were
brought
up
today.
First
off
I,
as
District
seven
renascent
place,
is
a
County
funded
county
built
facility
on
county
land
that
will
be
opening
in
district
7,
this
December,
so
the
county
is
building
on
county
land
and
it's
a
hundred
and
sixty
ish
units
162
units.
So
it's
quite
large.
F
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
bring
up
about
buying
housing
developments
and
rehabbing
them.
So
one
of
the
lessons
we
have
learned,
especially
in
district
7,
the
hard
way
and
I'll
bring
up
Markham
Plaza,
which
is
between
mark
and
Plaza
1
and
Markham
Plaza,
that's
300
units
again
300
units
in
a
low-income
community
that
was
built
at
a
time
when
we
did
not
have
services
on-site.
F
We
didn't
have
a
lot
of
the
security
on
site.
We
didn't
have
sort
of
the
entrance
and
egress
that
we
have
learned
that
we
need
it
doesn't
have
all
the
things
that
Renee
someplace
will
have
when
it
opens
in
December
and
so
I'll
give
you
another
example:
Kurt
nurse
studios,
which
is
technically
in
district
6,
but
very
close
to
the
border
of
district
7.
That
was
not
built
to
be
what
it
is
now
and
in
fact
it
is
undergoing
some.
F
It
will
be
undergoing
some
rehab
so
that
the
types
of
services
for
folks
who
are
extremely
low-income
or
who
need
permanent
supportive
housing
can
be
incorporated
into
the
design
of
a
building,
so
I
kind
of
challenge.
The
fact
that
we
can
just
buy
a
building
and
then
turn
it
into
permanent
supportive
housing,
because
there's
a
lot
of
work
that
goes
into
that.
So
I
did
want
to
address
that.
F
So
I
have
two
points.
One
is
the
timeline.
So
originally
the
dispersion
policy
was
going
to
come
back
to
committee
before
the
end
of
the
year
and
I
think
at
the
last
committee
meeting,
we
asked
to
have
a
little
bit
of
extra
time
taken
so
that
we
could
incorporate
some
data
and
now
it's
coming
back
as
fall
of
2020,
and
so
my
question
is
why
the
extra
here.
H
H
You
want
to
explain
with
yes,
sonofa
is
how
we
fund
affordable
housing
developments.
It's
when
we
release,
we
released
a
hundred
million
dollars,
and
in
that
case
we
used
the
Housing
Authority's
definition
of
concentration,
so
they
use
a
20%
definition.
So
I
just
wanted
to
be
clear.
The
reality
is
when
we
stopped
using
the
policy
was
really
when
redevelopment
money
went
away.
There
was
nothing.
We
hadn't
really
been
funding
anything
because
we
didn't
have
any
fun,
so
we
were
pretty
consistently
funding
via
the
policy
and
put
it
on
hold
when
we
realized.
H
We
now
had
a
new
general
plan,
2040
that
really
dictates
where
we're
gonna
go,
and
it's
completely
inconsistent
with
this
and
then
the
numbers
I,
don't
think
we're
talking
about
low-income
people
who
earn
seventy
to
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year,
which
would
be
which
I
don't
think
we
would
want
to
limit
where
they
go.
So
I
think
there
is
a
particular
income
level
where
we're
concerned
about
it's
extremely
poor
and
it's
going
to
really
exasperate
a
particular
condition
that
already
exists
in
a
neighborhood
and
we
have
to
define
what
that
condition
is.
H
H
H
F
Me
finish
so
I
just
I'm,
using
it
as
an
example
of
residents
who
of
a
facility
that
is
outdated
and
I
understand
that
doesn't
apply,
but
we're
talking
about
these
questions
right,
and
so
it's
a
building
that
is
old.
That
has
some
issues
that
have
created
neighborhood
issues
and
so
now
there's
new
funding
that
is
fixing
it.
But
what
I
don't
want
to
minimize
is
the
fact
that
there
have
been
some
issues
in
the
neighborhood
that
everybody
is
now
working
on
fixing
and
so
looking
at.
That
is
an
issue
right
so
and
that's.
H
Why
I
wanted
to
say
that
both
Markham
and
Curtin
er
are
ex
examples,
because
they
are
not
low-income
housing
sites?
They
are
both
sites
that
have
a
hundred
percent
extremely
low-income
residents
that,
unfortunately,
during
the
time
period,
didn't
get
the
adequate
services
that
were
needed.
So
I
think
they
are
good
examples,
but
they
are
not
examples
of
low-income
housing.
There
are
examples
of
exactly
what
we're
talking
about
when
we
have
you
know.
H
Large
300
is
a
large
amount
of
people
all
in
one
income
level
that
are
all
extremely
poor,
because
if
we
pulled
the
data
of
people
who
actually
live
there,
it's
even
lower
than
30%,
so
I
would
agree
with
you.
That's
kind
of
a
lesson
learned
both
Markham
and
Curtin
er
of
what
we
need
to
do
better,
because
we
didn't
get
them
very
well
and.
F
Into
your
point,
so
when
we
pulled
up
in
my
memo
and
I
realize
the
numbers
are
a
little
bit
older
than
what's
in
your
presentation,
but
getting
back
to
the
point
of
dispersion
is
at
every
income
level.
There
should
be
a
dispersion
of
all
the
income
levels
and
I'll
not
to
pick
on
anybody,
but
just
to
use
as
an
example.
F
F
B
D
We
know
that
we
desperately
need
affordable
housing
at
all
income
levels
and
I.
Think
what
this
really
is
for
me
is
is
two
things
one:
it
is
the
development
of
affordable,
housing
and
I
think
that,
if
that's
all,
it
was
some
of
the
the
comments
that
we've
heard
may
have
made
sense.
The
idea
of
you
know:
is
there
an
easy
way
to
build?
The
chairs
comments
in
regards
to
more
policy
could
get
in
the
way
of
development,
affordable,
housing.
I.
D
Don't
disagree
necessarily
with
that,
but
there's
a
second
side
to
this
and
that's
equity
and
social
justice
and
I
think
that
if
we
just
blindly
remove
all
sort
of
our
our
thinking
caps
and
say,
let's
just
make
it
as
easy
as
possible
to
build.
We
see
what
happens
and
it
was
in
your
slide.
Jackie
the
Cabrini
Green
Apartments
is
an
example.
D
When
we're
not
we're
not
thinking,
and
we
just
sort
of
do
we're
gonna
run
into
major
problems
and
and
that's
why
we
need
in
place
smart
policies
that
actually
require
us
to
to
think
about
how
we're
going
to
actually
build
and
where
we're
going
to
be
building,
not
just
low-income
housing.
But
my
colleagues
comments.
D
We
are
willing
to
take
on
these
projects
now
what's
happening,
though,
is
that
as
they
recognize
that
we're
not
doing
this
throughout
the
rest
of
the
city,
they're
frustrated
and
fairly
so
they're,
frustrated
and,
and
so
yeah
I'm,
not
even
necessarily
hearing
right?
What
what
you
may
hear
in
other
parts,
the
community
where
people
are
just
saying
just
don't
do
it
here
and
they
don't
really
care
where
we
do
it.
District
3
residents
are
saying,
go
ahead
and
do
it
in
here
in
our
back
yard.
D
We're
willing
to
support
that,
but
God
forbid
start
to
do
it.
Some
other
places
to
start
to
build
this
much-needed,
affordable
housing
that
we
that
we
need
so
desperately
throughout
other
places,
the
city,
and
if
we
can't,
then
what
is
the
problem
and
what
are
the
challenges?
Why
is
it
potentially
not
as
equitable
or
not
as
fair
I
also
do
think
that
the
reality
is
is
that
certain
places,
a
city
like
district
3,
should
have
a
higher
share
of
lower
income
housing.
D
Indeed,
today
we
have
some
of
the
most
homeless
population
throughout
the
entire
city,
and
that's
why
I'm
using
the
word
equitable,
because
I'm
not
necessarily
saying
we
need
to
have
the
same
number
of
affordable
housing
developments
going
up
throughout
the
whole
city.
Absolutely
they
should
be
equitable
and
you
look
I
think
at
the
the
numbers,
and
maybe
you
can
go
back
to
that.
That's
like
jacking!
D
D
H
H
I
When
we
did
the
christian
klemenz
site,
when
we
did
the
joint
NOFA
in
2016
with
the
housing
authority
and
the
county,
the
rule
was
that
if
the
poverty
rate
in
the
census
tract
was
20
percent
or
greater,
you
could
still
do
a
deal
there.
If
certain
kind
of
mitigating
factors
were
present
and
so
number
one
neighborhoods
would
be
showing
a
signs
of
revitalization
through
movement
and
their
data
on
poverty
or
educational
rates.
I
For
instance,
if
you
knew
market
rate
residences
we're
going
to
be
developed
in
the
same
census
tracts,
and
so
you
know
again,
the
proportion
would
look
quite
different
in
the
future
or
three
if
there
were
neighborhoods
in
which
their
high
public
and
private
investments
in
retail
or
commercial
we're
already
occurring
or
are
going
to
occur.
So
really
that's
about
job
opportunities
for
the
residents.
So.
H
That
is
something
that
the
house
authority
is
bound
to
follow
and
we
can
certainly
go
back
and
look
at
the
developments
that
the
Housing
Authority
is
funding
to
actually
make
sure
that
that
particular
role
was
Alda
specially
now
that
we
can
see
in
the
map
where
those
areas
would
have
met
the
definition.
So
we
have
the
information
we
can
certainly
double-check.
That
would
be
the
last
few
part,
the
last
10
or
11
projects
that
we're
funding
I.
D
Think
it'd
be
worthwhile
to
check,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
there's
some
some
very
gray
language
in
there.
When
you
talk
about
signs
of
revitalization,
if
a
project
like
this
would
show
signs
of
revitalization
of
a
community
like
this
I
I
I'm,
assuming
you
could
find
that
in
any
sort
of
area
of
the
city
or
you
could
try
to
make
that
claim
so.
I
I
have
concerns
I,
guess
just
in
general
about
that.
D
It's
certainly
not
just
the
city's
funding
or
funded
projects,
as
we're
talking
about
today
in
regards
to
County
funded
projects
and
or
or
nonprofit
developers
that
are
sighting
locations
themselves,
and
so
for
me,
that
would
be
a
key
part
and
look
I
was
gonna,
say
and
try
to
make
a
motion
to
make.
You
move
faster
on
getting
a
policy,
because
I
do
think
that
you
know
I
was
hoping
we
were
going
to
be
discussing
a
policy
by
this
time
and
then
maybe
deciding
on
something
at
the
council.
D
You
know
shortly
into
the
new
year
now
it
sounds
like
that's
going
to
be
a
whole
year,
delayed
as
we'll
be
discussing
a
policy
next
fall,
and
it
probably
won't
be
coming
to
terms
on
it
on
an
agreement
with
the
full
council
until
the
end
of
the
year
at
best,
and
maybe
even
a
little
worse
if
it
still
2021
and
so
at
the
same
time,
I
want
to
encourage
that.
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
something
that
is
valuable
and
it's
not
just
sort
of
going
through
the
motion
and
saying
hey.
D
H
Now,
because
we
are
the
City
Housing
Authority
as
well
right
and
we
do
have
some
influence
because
we're
we
represent
the
other
half.
That
is
certainly
a
message
I
can
bring
back
to
the
Housing
Authority
is.
We
would
like
to
be
working
more
cooperatively
in
creating
a
policy,
because
you
know
the
it
is
likely.
C
This
is
such
an
important,
interesting
conversation
having
that
I
want
to
point
out,
there's
there's
also
an
intersection
with
these
state
laws
that
were
recently
passed,
and
the
City
Attorney's
Office
in
partnership
with
the
administration,
is
doing
a
detailed
analysis
of
all
of
those
laws,
and
it
may
be
that
some
of
them
have
unintended
consequences
on
the
horizon.
That
need
to
be
addressed.
For
example,
my
understanding
of
SB
330
basically
would
say
that
if
you
in
your
console
district
have
land
that
is
for
per
the
general
plan,
land
use
designation
of
multi-family
residential.
C
Now
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
control
what
housing
is
developed
in
those
council
districts.
We
would
not
be
able
to
if
the
project
had
no
city
funding
in
it,
especially
being
able
to
say
no
more
over
concentration
of
affordable
housing
in
those
districts.
If
you
have
that
land
use
zoning
and
that
would
be
an
area
of
concern,
I
think
for
all
of
us.
We
need
to
understand
the
implications
of
that,
and
it
may
be
that
some
of
those
laws
need
to
be
modified.
I
think.
D
Yes,
I
think
that's
one
Avenue,
which
is
our
lobbying
efforts
at
the
state,
but
I
do
know
that
the
majority
of
these
these
policies
coming
down
from
the
state,
were
coming
out
of
this.
The
same
sort
of
predicament
we're
in
here
in
the
bay
area,
which
is
there
are
particular
cities
and
particular
parts
of
the
region
that
are
not
developing
their
fair
share.
So
it
wasn't
meant
to
exasperate
the
problem
on
a
community
that
may
have
already
liked
district
7
or
district
3.
D
That's
not
what
they
were
meant
for
and
if,
if
we
just
allow
these
policies
that
come
through
and
only
exasperate
that
problem
rather
than
them
happen
actually
more
equitably,
then
yes,
absolutely
there's
a
problem
and
I.
Don't
think
that
the
legislature
is
that
that
crafted
these
policies
would
be
against
right.
How
do
you
actually
ensure
that
this
gets
used
where
it
should
be
used?
D
So
I
think
we
have
some
things
we
can
do
here
and
others.
Yes,
we
will
have
to
lobby
and
advocate
at
the
state
level
or
at
the
county
level
and
I
think
we
should
and
that's
what
I
think
Jackie.
If,
if
you
need
you
know
another
nine
months
or
so
to
be
able
to
provide
something,
that's
actually
comprehensive
if
it
includes
those
things,
I'm,
not
gonna.
D
Gripe
that
hey,
okay,
it
you
know
it-
it
took
a
little
bit
more
time
if
it
doesn't
know
if
it's
not
comprehensive
enough-
and
it's
really
just
another
city
policy,
that's
only
applying
to
nofas
that
we're
putting
out
and
yet
doesn't
take
into
effect.
You
know
what
what
else
do
we
need
to
do
to
actually
stop
this?
D
To
stop
this
over
concentration,
to
stop
keeping
areas
of
the
city,
poor
and
and
sort
of
blocking
off
the
opportunity
for
this
sort
of
development
in
other
parts
of
the
city,
then
I'm,
you
know,
I
won't
be
happy
and
I
won't
necessarily
be
happy
with
the
delay
at
the
time
and
so
I'm.
Okay,
if
that's
the
case
and
I
see
you
nodding
and
I'm,
hoping
that
that's
something
that
you're
able
to
put
together
and
do
so
just
a
couple
final
comments
chair,
so
the
buying.
D
Even
today,
the
fire
department
is
chiming
in
on
ways
that
they
would
have
wanted
us
to
design
2nd
Street
Studios
differently
and
and
I
was
open
to
the
last
minute
as
well,
that
an
emergency
sort
of
exit
that
was
added
into
that
development
and
so
I
think
that
that
certainly
it
still
plays
a
part
today,
and
so
if
we
were
just
to
walk
into
a
building,
it
wasn't
designed
for
it
for
our
needs,
we're
absolutely
gonna
run
into
to
some
issues.
That's
just
one
issue
of
it.
I
know
there
are.
D
There
are
obviously
a
number
of
others
when
it
does
come
to
to
the
actual
dollars
in
how
those
projects
would
have
had
to
have
been
built
or
bought
or
funded.
But
I,
you
know,
I,
don't
necessarily
I,
don't
challenge
you
for
I.
Think
I
appreciate
that
you're
at
least
finding
or
trying
to
find
alternative
ways
of
being
able
to
get
this
done.
D
H
And
that's
what
number
two
was
supposed
to
mean?
Are
there
some
neighborhoods
too
fragile
to
sustain
even
a
small
increase
in
the
number?
So
do
we
reach
some
point
where
we
say
that
they're,
the
neighborhood
is
so
fragile,
whether
it's
defined
by
poverty
rate
or
something
else
that
it
cannot
absorb
a
certain
type
of
housing,
because
it
just
has
it's
too
stressed
at
this
moment,
and
so
it
wouldn't
be
so.
D
That
we
think
oh,
this
is
the
the
best
and
I
would
say
yes,
it
is
the
best,
but
doesn't
mean
it's
perfect
and
we're
still
finding
those
issues
with
firefighters
being
called
out
and
police
officers
being
called
out
at
high
numbers,
high
levels,
frequently
at
places
like
second
Street
studios
and
one
of
the
major
issues
there
is
that
they
don't
have
a
on-site
physician.
That
was
not
funded
through
the
county
for
that
site
that
could
have
and
still
could
today,
if
we
were
to
change
that,
make
a
huge
difference
on
a
site
like
that.
D
So
if
we
were
to
put
in
these
these
developments,
if
we
are
going
to
I,
think
one
of
the
things
that
we
can
talk
about
again
locally
about
our
own
policy
would
be
to
ensure
that
we
are
also
equitably
distributing
the
other
resources
that
the
city
has
to
ensure
that
these
communities
are
receiving
the
attention
that
they
deserve.
So
that
would
be
my
input
for
as
you
go
forward.
I
will
make
a
motion
to
accept
the
update
from
staff.
I
will
ask
that
we
come
back
with
a
check-in
sooner
than
the
fall
of
next
year.
D
So
at
some
point
you
know
in
between
that.
So
if
you
want
to
say
around
March
or
April
to
be
able
to
at
least
give
us
a
status
update,
I'm
fine,
if
it's
even
similar
to
this,
where
you're
presenting
a
PowerPoint
presentation
but
I
would
like
a
part
to
chime
in
and
at
that
point
to
also
hopefully
have
the
consultant,
be
here
present
who's
working
on
that.
So
that's
the
motion.
R
G
R
Okay,
I
used
to
live
in
Mississippi
and
one
of
the
things
that
you
know
driving
around
Alabama
and
other
states.
People
would
say
thank
God
for
Mississippi,
because
Mississippi
is
number
50
in
terms
of
like
last
of
the
states,
for
poverty
and
and
and
and
so
basically,
other
states
can
feel
less
bad
about
themselves
because
of
Mississippi,
but
but
that's
with
a
federal
poverty
kind
of
measured
that
kind
of
equalizes
things
across
the
board.
R
But
if
you
look
at
numbers
and
you
adjust
for
cost
of
living
and
everything
into
that,
it
actually
I
think
I'm
still
correct.
California
ends
up
being
the
state
with
the
most
poverty
in
the
nation
and
so
I
think
we
have
what
three
million
housing
units
short
across
the
state
and
and
I
was.
You
know
happy
to
follow
the
lead
of
the
council
when
we
decided
to
put
forty
five
percent
of
our
housing
allocation
money
towards
you
know.
R
These
these
projects
to
begin
with,
and
so
my
kind
of
lean
on
this
is
to
try
to
get
to
yes
in
every
instance,
we
can,
wherever
we
have
the
growth
in
parts
of
the
city,
wherever
the
private
developer
has
land
that
they
are
expressing
interest
in
building
these
formal
housing
units
we
should
in
in
you
know,
all
possible
cases,
try
to
support
them.
Unless
we
have
some
sort
of
measure
that
we
can
identify
that
we
don't
want
to
impact
fret
already
fragile
communities.
R
We
don't
want
to
have
an
over
concentration
of
poverty
in
in
one
place.
The
Cabrini
greens
thing
in
Chicago,
if
I'm,
if
I'm,
not
mistaken,
I,
think
the
mayor
as
a
publicity
stunt
of
Chicago
at
the
time
moved
in
to
Cabrini
greens
and
she
only
lasted
like
a
like,
maybe
three
weeks,
and
then
she
left
so
that
that,
but
that's
not
what
we're
doing
in
San
Jose
we're
not
building
what
it
was.
It
1,000
something
units
whatever
they're.
S
R
We're
we're
doing
I,
don't
know
what
we're
doing,
but,
let's
say
200
units
at
a
time
and
III,
don't
think
200
use
at
a
time
really
substantially
up
terms
a
community,
especially
going
back
to
my
you
know,
starting
comment
about
the
measure
of
federal
poverty
not
being
adjusted
for
local
I,
guess,
incomes
and
what
not
being
California
in
California.
There's
a
statistic
we
throw
around
where,
if
you're
living
the
Bay,
Area
and
you're,
not
making
hundred
twenty-five
thousand
dollars
a
year,
you're
your
core.
S
R
And
so,
when
we're
talking
about
extremely
low
income
or
poor-
or
you
know
moderate
income
of
what
right,
and
so,
if
Li,
if
one
25
grand
a
year
is
I,
don't
know
what
it
is.
But
let's
say
it's
the
area
median
income
and
we're
talking
about
forty
five
percent
of
that.
What
we're
looking
at
is
families
or
individuals
who
make
what
fifty
six
thousand
a
year
checking
on
my
math.
It's
something
like
that.
Fifty
something
thousand
a
year
and
I.
Don't
know
that!
R
That's
you
know
something,
but
you
know
I,
don't
know
that
fifteen
thousand
dollars
a
year
income
level
is
something
that
reflects
poorly
on
the
individual.
That
we
would
think
that
you
know.
I,
don't
want
this
person
living
next
to
me
because
you're
making
$50,000
a
year
like
in
Arkansas
or
wherever
you
know,
that's
average
Sal.
R
This
is
starting
to
sound
out
of
college
right,
so
I
mean
that's,
that's
all
I'll,
say
yeah
III
think
I'm
sensitive
to
not
exasperate
in
a
sensitive
community,
and
we
should
have
some
sort
of
threshold
to
measure
that
kind
of
density,
but
but
on
the
whole
I
think
the
the
terminology
that
we're
using
you
know
poor
or
poverty.
It's
it's
a
bit
skewed,
especially
in
the
terms
of
the
you
know,
the
super
rich
area
of
the
bay
area.
R
R
You
know
ili
folks,
you
know
coming
to
live
in
a
neighborhood,
so
I'm
trying
to
get
to
yes,
wherever
we
can,
we
have
a
housing
shortage,
we're
trying
to
build
high-rise,
we're
trying
to
disperse
it
across
the
city
with
you
know:
50
percent
inclusionary
housing
ordinance
and
we
don't
want
to
over
concentration,
but
it
so
the
extent
that
we
can
build
affordable
housing
units.
A
hundred
two
hundred
units
at
a
time.
R
B
Well,
I,
thank
you,
Jackie
and
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
for
the
conference.
I
will
make
one
last
comment:
I
wasn't
talking
about
refurbishing
old
buildings,
I
was
talking
about
buying
brand
new
ones
and
number
two
I
could
tell
you
this
that
unless
we
fix
the
financing
problems,
neither
I
could
tell
you
that
no
no
construction
is
happening
in
my
district,
not
affordable
and
not
a
for-profit.
Nothing
is
going
on.
I
have
maybe
eight
houses
in
the
last
four
years
that
have
been
built
in
my
district.
B
We
need
to
find
a
way
to
build
more
I've
been
extremely.
You
know,
I
I
want
things
being
built,
but
just
things
aren't
penciling
out.
If
you
will
so
all
in
favor
of
this
motion
any
opposed.
Thank
you
very
much.
Are
you
here
for
the
next
one?
No
City
Council
commercial
linkage
fee
for
affordable
housing,
so.
Q
C
This
is
the
commercial
it's
packed,
the
nexus
study
and
feasibility
study
and
it's
being
done
as
a
partnership
between
the
housing
department,
the
Office
of
Economic
Development
and
the
city
manager's
office.
I
want
to
thank
the
team
in
partnership
with
Kaiser
Marsden
and
in
particular,
recognize
Peter
Hamilton
and,
as
the
project
manager
has
done,
a
great
job.
S
All
right,
so
my
name
is
Peter
Hamilton
I'm,
a
senior
executive
analyst
in
the
city,
manager's
office
and
we're
here
today,
as
Kim
mentioned,
to
talk
about
council
priority
nine,
the
commercial
linkage
fee
for
affordable
housing
and
I'm
joined
today
by
Rachel
van
der
Veen,
a
deputy
director
and
our
housing
department,
Chris
Burton,
deputy
director
and
OED
and
David.
Those
am
a
principal
with
kaiser
Marcin
associates
associates
are
consultants
for
this
project.
S
So
in
this
presentation,
we'll
start
off
with
a
brief
history
of
the
project
and
an
overview
of
our
current
status,
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
David
and
he
will
go
over
the
proposed
prototypes
for
the
study
in
some
detail
and
then
we'll
close
with
a
discussion
of
the
project
timeline.
So
on
this
slide,
you
see
this
is
the
direction
we
received
from
the
council
on
March
12th.
S
When
we
were
last
before
the
council
on
this
issue,
we
were
directed
to
conduct
a
nexus
and
feasibility
study
and
prepare
procure
consultants
to
conduct
those
studies
and
also
given
this
additional
direction.
First,
to
consider
a
range
of
pro
of
different
prototypes
and
particular
a
high
tech
office,
prototype
second,
to
conduct
a
sensitivity
analysis
as
part
of
the
feasibility
study,
third
to
include
various
stakeholders
and
our
outreach
efforts
and,
fourth
to
come
back
by
January,
2020
or
as
soon
as
possible.
S
S
Then
the
Nexus
and
feasibility
studies
which
Keizer
Marston
will
be
developing
and
the
Nexus
study
to
demonstrate
the
basis
for
the
fee
and
determine
the
maximum
fee
amount.
The
feasibility
study
to
determine
the
effect
the
the
feet
could
have
on
on
the
economics
of
various
development
prototypes
and
also
as
part
of
their
report.
S
Such
a
fee
award
adopted
and
finally
Kaiser
Marcin
is,
will
be
helping
us
with
public
meetings
and
outreach
such
as
this
meeting
we'll
be
conducting
two
rounds
of
outreach,
one
around
the
prototypes
which
were
undertaking
now
and
then
a
second
early
next
year,
when
the
when
the
draft
study
is
released.
So
with
that,
oh
and
I
would
also
note
that
at
the
September
24th
council
meeting,
the
council
provided
the
staff
direction
to
provide
notice,
along
with
any
permits
for
commercial
projects
that
that
those
projects
could
be
required
to
pay.
N
M
N
N
In
this
case,
we
look
at
jobs
that
are
added
in
new
commercial
buildings,
the
income
levels
of
the
workers
who
hold
those
jobs
and
what
it
costs
to
provide
affordable
housing
to
those
workers
and
that's
becomes
the
basis
for
a
maximum
fee
level
and
the
results
of
a
study
like
that
tend
to
support
very
high
maximum
fee
levels.
And
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
there's
the
second
component
to
the
study,
which
is
to
look
at
the
financial
feasibility
of
implementing
a
new
fee.
N
These
are
the
building
types
that
were
proposing
to
address
this
part
of
the
nexus
study.
The
objective
in
selecting
these
building
types
is
to
cover
a
full
range
of
development
of
the
type
that
could
be
subject
to
a
new
commercial
linkage
fee.
We
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
covering
major
differences
in
employment
density,
because
that's
the
key
driver
of
the
nexus
findings
and
also
the
occupations
of
the
workers
who
are
in
different
types
of
buildings,
and
that
also
drives
the
differences
in
the
nexus
findings.
N
A
couple
things
to
point
out
about
this
list,
we're
proposing
to
include
residential
care,
assisted
living.
That's
a
use
that
sort
of
spans
residential
and
commercial.
It
has
been
subject
to
the
city's,
affordable
housing
impact
fee,
but
only
of
facilities
that
meet
a
certain
definition
which
would
put
them
into
qualifying
as
a
residential
unit.
So
you
have
to
have
a
bathroom
within
the
unit
and
also
a
kitchen
in
order
to
be
subject
to
that:
affordable
housing
impact,
B
and
also
the
inclusionary
program,
which
is
important.
N
In
fact,
B
is
being
phased
out
and
inclusionary
being
phased
in.
That's
true
there
as
well
I
believe
so
we're
suggesting
it
being
covered
by
the
nexus
study
to
provide
the
flexibility
to
implement
a
fee
for
all
projects
of
that
type.
The
other
thing
to
point
out
about
this
is
that
we're
not
suggesting
an
analysis
that
would
address
institutional
uses.
It's
pretty
rare
that
a
commercial
linkage
fee
program
what
why
to
an
institution
we
use,
but
it's
not
unheard
of
what
I'm
talking
about.
There's
things
like
hospitals,.
N
Yeah,
okay,
hospitals,
museums,
schools,
private
schools,
things
like
that,
so
we
can
certainly
add
that
to
the
study.
If
there
were
desire
to
look
at
that,
but
but
as
of
now,
we
haven't
proposed
to
analyze
that
moving
on
to
the
feasibility
study,
the
purpose
there
is
to
provide
information
about
the
economic
feasibility
of
Representative,
non-residential
projects
and
that'll
be
a
key
information
of
information
and
informing
the
selection
of
B
level
distinguishing
feel
level
by
type
of
building
and
by
geographic
area.
N
We
also
want
to
take
care
to
provide
information
that
will
be
helpful
in
understanding
how
projects
with
different
cost
structure
would
and
have
different
feasibility
conditions
like
just
to
give
you
a
specific
example:
you're
one
to
two
story:
office
building,
there's
a
lot
lower
cost
building
than
a
high-rise
office
building,
maybe
and
also
maybe
a
built
on
less
expensive
land,
and
that
just
provides
a
different
result.
So
if
we
just
look
at
one
office
type,
you
know
we
would
be
looking
at
one
or
the
other
and
not
providing
information
about
both.
N
These
are
the
geographic
areas
we're
proposing
to
look
at.
We
wanted
to
group
locations
that
have
similar
market
conditions,
have
been
experiencing
similar
types
of
non-residential
development
and
have
similarities
in
terms
of
land
class
I'm
gonna
move
on
to
some
Maps,
so
you
can
see
more
specifically.
What
we're
talking
about
this
is
a
map
of
the
general
plan
growth
areas,
and
this
is
a
map
with
the
proposed
sub
areas
overlaid
on
those
general
plan,
growth
areas
so
for
North,
San
Jose.
We
have
somewhat
of
an
expansive
definition
of
what
North
San
Jose
is
there.
N
N
What
of
an
expansive
definition
of
what's
downtown,
including
the
the
Deardon
area,
as
part
of
that
and
everything
surrounded
by
101
880
and
the
the
280
was
in
that
downtown
of
vicinity
sub
area
and
then
West
San
Jose
that
needed
to
have
its
own
sub
area,
because
it's
got
generally
stronger
rents
in
that
area.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
had
its
own
sub
area
and
then
Monterey
corridor
and
Edenvale
are
distinctive.
N
Existing
employment
centers
that
we're
proposing
to
address
separately
as
their
own
sub
areas
as
well,
and
then
the
south
and
east
growth
area
covers
a
very
broad
area.
It's
very
large
geographically,
but
in
terms
of
the
development
activity,
that's
been
happening.
It's
it's!
It's
less
than
some
of
the
other
areas.
What
you're
seeing
there
is
some
retail
and
some
some
lower
rise
office?
That's
that's
happening
there.
N
S
So
this
is
the
time
line
that
you
saw
in
the
staff
report,
we're
currently
the
November
2019
prototype
development
and
stakeholder
outreach.
The
prototypes
you
just
heard
described
from
David
the
stakeholder
outreach
will
be
comprised
of
stakeholder
small
stakeholder
meetings
with
both
housing
advocates
and
business
organizations
to
provide
you
know
them.
S
Opportunity
to
get
into
the
details,
have
David
there
and
go
over
the
the
prototypes
and
the
scope
of
the
scope
of
the
project
and
we'll
be
beginning
those
this
week
and
then
we're
also
looking
at
one
public
meeting
for
folks
who
don't
have
an
opportunity
to
attend
the
focus
group
meetings
and
then
well,
president
Morrison
will
conduct.
The
studies
will
will
look
to
have
a
public
draft
early
next
year
and
then
do
another
round
of
outreach
on
that
draft.
And
then
our
target
is
to
get
back
to
Council
by
April
and
that's
our
presentation.
S
B
G
It
was
spoken
at
the
September
City
Council
meeting
that
eight
of
the
total
of
about
thirty
available
spaces
for
certain
high-rise
pees
would
be
suspended.
It
seemed
to
be
implied
by
developers,
a
few
developers
and
a
few
of
the
Downtown
Association
people
that
day
that
the
remaining
22
available,
lots
and
spaces
would
be
open
to
good
negotiation
for
all
sides
and
in
how
we
can
all
return
to
previous
plans
and
ideas
that
could
specifically
focus
on
some
familiar
and
even
some
new
concepts
of
what
can
be
affordable
housing
for
the
future
of
San.
G
Jose
I
wanted
to
remind
yourselves
today
of
these
things
and
that
were
the
events
of
2019.
We
are
starting
to
think
about
human
rights
and
civil
rights
again,
I
feel
a
further
cancelling
of
city
government.
High
high-rise
fee
proposals
at
the
marathon
City
Council
meeting
a
few
weeks
ago
was
not
in
the
spirit
of
how
all
sides
seemed
they
can
be
willing
to
negotiate
at
this
time
we
can
build
a
future
economy
that
can
demand
the
better
ideas
and
ideas
of
human
nature
at
this
time.
Q
Mary
Ellen
Dougherty
with
the
housing
work
group
from
pact.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
There's
such
a
relationship
between
the
item
we
spent
so
much
time
on
and
this
one
if
we're
going
to
do
the
and
I
appreciate
the
conversation
about
equity
and
that
distribution
of
wealth
and
opportunity-
and
this
is
an
opportunity
to
create
funds
and
resources
to
do
that,
and
it
addressed
in
a
more
intense
way.
So
it
is
an
opportunity
to
do
what
we
need
to
do
to
build.
Q
Affordable
housing
also
really
appreciate
the
scope
that
this
includes
that
it's
not
just
focused
in
the
Deardon
area
that
there's
a
wider
view
of
the
impact
that
development
of
the
industry
and
the
technology
world
is
impacting
our
whole
city,
so
to
consider
that
the
commercial
fees
might
be
also
assigned
in
in
in
a
variety
of
ways
to
address
that.
So
the
need
is
really
great.
Our
expectations
are
really
high
and
we
look
forward
to
the
work
that's
being
done
on
this
and
the
opportunity
for
the
community
to
have
further
input.
Thank
you.
O
Hello,
hello,
my
name
is
robert
stromberg
I
work
with
destination
home
I
was
trying
to
think
about
how
to
demonstrate
that
this
is
about
mitigating
future
impact,
as
opposed
to
fixing
a
problem
that
we
already
have.
So
if
we
imagine
a
huge
sinkhole
in
the
middle
of
the
room,
say
10
feet
across
and
every
time
we
add
a
new
person
in
the
room,
the
sinkhole
expands
by
1
foot.
The
commercial
linkage
fee
is
really
to
limit
that
expansion.
So
it's
maybe
not
1
foot,
it's
just
6
inches,
but
it
doesn't
make
the
sinkhole
any
smaller.
O
In
other
words,
the
commercial
linkage
fee
is
essential
because
when
we
add
jobs
we
add
a
need
for
affordable
housing,
a
skyrocketing
rent
burden
and
our
throughout
our
city
demonstrates
it's
one
of
many
important
tools
to
help
get
additional
funding
so
that
we
can
build
the
housing
for
folks
who
need
it
most.
The
need
is
great
and
our
expectations
are
high.
Thank
You.
B
P
Well,
I'll
go
before
blank
Matt
anyway,
I'm
Susan,
price
and
I
am
with
packed,
and
thank
you
for
this
opportunity.
I
do
I
am
concerned
that
the
commercial
language
fee
we
don't
have
RDA
money
anymore,
so
we
have
to
find
a
way
to
to
fund
these
to
fund,
affordable
housing,
and
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
that
there
is
definitely
a
link
between
when
you're
building
buildings
in
which
people
are
going
to
work
and
they're,
going
to
probably
be
coming
from
elsewhere.
P
Then
that
building
should
have
some
linkage
for
paying
for
the
cost
of
the
housing.
So
we
really
need
to
put
have
commercial
linkage
fee
into
new
construction
of
buildings,
especially
high
tech,
but
commercial
as
well
I
mean
in
retail,
but-
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
as
much
of
that
commercial
linkage
fee
goes
toward
affordable
housing
as
possible.
I
mean
by
by
far
the
majority
of
it
I'm,
afraid
and
I've
heard
that
some
city
council
people
don't
think
that
enough
of
it
will
go
to
affordable
housing.
P
A
A
But
I
also
realized.
This
is
dangerous,
because
this
item
is
really
about
how
these
new
jobs
increase
the
demand
for
housing
that
we
don't
have
and
that
we're
struggling
to
build.
In
fact,
some
of
our
existing
affordable
housing
tools
have
sort
of
stopped
working.
The
way
that
we
wanted
them
to,
as
everybody
said,
we're
in
dire
need
of
affordable
housing
in
our
city,
folks
are
paying
more,
people
are
doubling
up,
people
are
leaving,
some
of
them
are
commuting
back
and
some
of
them
are
leaving
forever
elementary
school
enrollments
are
down.
A
Some
of
the
elementary
schools
on
the
east
side
are
down
17%.
Just
since
2015
we
currently
have
a
pipeline
of
between
90
and
120
thousand
jobs
in
San
Jose.
Not
all
of
them
are
going
to
get
built,
but
a
lot
of
them
are
there
all
over
the
city,
and
we
need
affordable
housing
for
these
new
workers
or
our
sinkhole
is
getting
bigger.
We
do
this
all
over
the
county.
This
is
how
this
is
going
to
happen.
A
We're
then
going
to
acknowledge
that
it's
the
lower
wage
industries
and
this
is
sort
of
a
shock.
Sometimes
the
retail
per
square
foot
cost
ends
up
being
higher
than
the
office
square
foot,
because
that's
where
the
low
paid
jobs
are
then
you're
gonna
come
back
and
you're
gonna
figure
out
how
to
address
5%
or
10%
or
15%,
or
if
we're
lucky
20%
of
the
gap
that
we
know
is
being
created
so
it'll
be
a
difficult
discussion.
We're
looking
forward
to
it.
Thank.
R
You
know
I'm
not
opposed
to
the
tool
of
a
commercial
impact
fee
as
a
tool.
I
think
the
application
of
it
in
San
Jose
presently
is
is
not
quite
the
right
time.
For
me,
it's
a
question
of
timing.
I
think
San
Jose
is
not
quite
in
its
city,
yet
it's
not
a
place
where
you
know.
People
or
companies
flock
to
build
and
and
and
so
I
would
like
to
see
us
as
we
approach
that
not
hamper
it
like
get.
R
The
Google
here,
get
the
stuff
and
once
there's
an
anchor
that
it
suddenly
magnet
Li
is
a
magnet
that
attracts
all
this
development.
Then
you
set
up
the
fee
and
you
capture
whatever
you
can
for
for
development,
but
I
think
we
do
have
a
jobs
to
housing
imbalance
and
you
know
of
the
thousand
possible
futures
that
could
possibly
be
out
there.
R
The
multiverse
I
think
there
is
one
that
exists
where
you
have
all
these
jobs
coming
to
San
Jose
and
all
that
means
to
the
people
who
live
in
San
Jose,
suddenly,
don't
go
to
San
Francisco
to
work.
They
just
work
in
San
Jose,
and
so
you
know
once
you
get
that
one-to-one
there
there
there
could
theoretically
be
equilibrium,
I'm,
not
saying
that
will
happen,
but
it's
possible.
B
Council
member,
as
far
as
okay,
so
I
was
I've,
actually
been
opposed
to
this,
not
because
I
don't
believe
that
a
linkage
between
the
job
creation
and
and
the
need
for
housing
exists,
I'm,
actually
convinced
of
it
and
I.
Don't
need
a
study
to
tell
me
it
and
I
also
concur
with
Matthew
Reed
and
he's
I
I.
Don't
often
concur
with
him
and
I.
Think
that
the
the
fact
that
retail
is
is
one
of
the
lower
paying
segments
of
our
job
segment.
It
actually
creates
the
need
for
affordable
housing
rather
than
just
housing.
B
B
Just
when
San
Jose
is
just
starting
to
be
found.
You
know
companies
have
found
their
way
to
San
Jose.
They
haven't
built
yet
we've
gotten
promises,
but
they,
you
know,
I
know
the
Apple
purchased,
88
acres,
but
hasn't
built
a
single
thing
on
their
land.
For
years
you
know,
Google
has
bought
and
said
that
they
were
gonna
develop,
but
you
know
that's
years
and
years
away
and
so
I'm
and
and
if
we
compare
ourselves
to
the
cities
around
us
that
are
creating
housing,
linkage,
fees
or
housing
impact
fees
for
their
businesses.
B
We
have
to
ask
ourselves:
what's
their
housing
to
Jobs
ratio,
if
I
were
Palo,
Alto
and
I
got
six
jobs
for
everyone
for
everyone
house,
then,
yes,
you
should
be
putting
on
a
lot
of
fees,
but
when
20%
of
our
population
is
leaving
San
Jose,
you
know
we
have
a
net
loss
of
population
every
day.
Maybe
we
shouldn't
be,
and
maybe
we
should
be
asking
those
other
cities
around
us
to
create
more
housing
I
that
I
was
have
not
been
on.
B
B
However,
San
Jose
is
in
a
unique
position
where
we
don't
enjoy
the
tax
revenues
from
job
creators,
as
other
cities
around
us
do
and-
and
we
are
constantly
going
to
to
our
constituents,
asking
them
for
more
taxes
that
they
are
getting
the
brunt
of,
and
so
until
we
have
enough
job
creation
word
a
one-to-one
equilibrium.
I
would
never
find
myself
supporting
something
like
this,
although
I
do
believe
it's
if
I
do
believe
it's
fair
I
I
want
to
also
concur
that
it
is
a
fair
thing
to
assume.
D
Oh
go
ahead,
so
I'm
curious
I
had
seen
that
San
Francisco
recently
did
a
study.
They
called
it.
The
jobs
housing
fit
report
where
they
looked
at
their
development
of
both
market
rate
in
affordable
housing,
to
kind
of
I
guess
as
a
production,
housing,
production
and
demand
analysis
is
what
they
they
were.
Calling
it
and
I
was
curious
if
we've
done
something
like
that
as
well.
G
O
D
I
thought
it
was
interesting
at
and
I
didn't
know
if
we
had
done
anything
similar
and
it
just
it
seemed
like
you.
It
helped
to
relate
which
I
think
we
we
know.
We
have
this
issue
as
well,
but
we
just
don't
know
how
what
it
really
looks
like
as
far
as
the
numbers
in
regards
to
the
need
for
say
how
much
market
rate
housing
or
how
much
affordable
housing
and
so
I
wanted
to
see.
If
that
is
something
that
you
can,
maybe
one
just
look
into
this
jobs.
Housing
fit
report
that
San
Francisco
did
see.
D
If
there's
some
relevancy
of
a
similar
analysis,
we
can
do
here
and
then
how
that
might
roll
into
the
CLF
and
then
with
these
fees
right
as
where
we're
putting
it
right.
Where
we're
going
to
be
putting
these
dollars,
we've
already
made
some
goals
that
we
have
in
regards
to.
You
know
the
allocation
of
affordable
housing
that
the
city
has
but
I
think
to
really
understand
this.
D
This
dynamic
between
how
how
we're
building
both
market
rate
and
affordable
it
would
be
an
important
and
then
question
in
regards
to
the
study
itself
from
Kaiser
Marsden,
and
this
comes
in
regards
to
that
the
and
I'm
not
an
expert
here.
This
was
coming
from
community
members
in
regards
to
the
residual
land
value
model
that
they're
using
and
the
concern
was
that
this
is
not
necessarily
a
traditional
I
guess
model
that
is
being
used
and
and
so
one
why?
Why?
What's
the
the
reason
for
not
necessarily
using
a
traditional
model?
D
And
then
is
there
any
concern
in
regards
to
the
assumptions
for
future?
You
know
either
land
values
or
the
the
potentials
that
we
could
have
for
what
the
dollar
or
the
charge.
You
know
the
fee,
maybe
in
the
future,
so
making
sort
of
future
assumption.
So
I'm
just
curious.
If
you're
in
you're,
aware,
if
staff
is
aware
of
this
I
guess
unique
or
sort
of
change
in
a
you
know
a
model
that
they're
using.
S
D
And
so
staff
is
comfortable
with
this,
though
I
mean
you're.
You
feel
as
though
that
so
I'm
gonna
next
we're
here
right
so
I'm
kind
of
looking
to
our
staff
to
say
yes,
we
think,
or
are
we
just
deferring
to
Kaiser
Marcin
saying
sure,
whatever
you
think
is
to
it?
You
know
what
what
sort
of
thought
was
going
into
that
to
say
yeah
we
actually
are
comfortable.
We
think
this
is
gonna
analyze,
what
we
want
to
analyze
and
it's
making
the
right
assumptions
in
regards
to
what
may
happen
in
the
future.
I.
S
D
D
Otherwise,
that's
my
only
questions
and
comments,
so
I
personally
am
really
looking
forward
to
this,
and
I
do
think
that
the
sensitivities
that
need
to
be
analyzed
because
I
don't
disagree
with
what
our
chair
just
said,
that
you
know
we're
competing
here
with
with
neighboring
cities.
I
think
those
sensitivities
need
to
be
considered
in
this
regards
and
we're
not
saying
that
you
know
you.
B
M
Additionally,
since
2009
team,
San
Jose
has
operated
the
San
Jose
Convention
and
Visitor's
Bureau
or
CVB
in
the
management
agreements
between
the
city
and
team
San
Jose,
an
annual
performance
audit
by
the
city
auditor's
office
is
required
to
determine
whether
and
how
well
team
San
Jose
achieved
agreed-upon
performance
targets
that
were
the
basis
for
the
city's
and
sense
of
payment
to
the
organization.
We're
happy
to
report
that
in
fiscal
year,
2018
19
team,
San
Jose
exceeded
its
weighted
incentive
fee
score
and
CVB
performance
targets.
M
Team
San,
Jose
booked
over
170,000
hotel
room
nights
had
an
estimated
economic
impact
of
nearly
139
million
dollars,
exceeded
its
targeting
gross
operating
results,
held
540
days
of
events
at
its
cultural
facilities
and
received
98%
satisfaction
ratings
on
its
customer
service
surveys.
Overall
team
San
Jose
exceeded
its
weighted
and
incentive
fee
score
of
more
than
100%
and
team
San
Jose
that's
qualifies
for
the
incentive
fee
of
$200,000,
as
stipulated
in
the
management
agreement.
Additional
detail
on
the
performance
reports
are
include
in
the
body
of
our
auto
report.
M
There
are
no
wreck
in
this
report
and
with
that
we'd
like
to
thank
team,
San
Jose
and
the
city
manager's
office
for
their
time
and
cooperation
during
the
audit
process,
we
ask
that
you
accept
the
report
and
cross-reference
to
the
December
10th,
the
City
Council
meeting,
and
with
that
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
B
G
Maybe
my
was
the
one
I
didn't
write
in
the
name,
one
so
I
wrote
another
one.
Thank
you
to
ask
you
to
be
totally
learned.
How
to
be
polite.
Can
I
I
wanted
to
speak
about?
Would
it
be
relevant
to
talk
about
here
parking
issues
within
the
seven
city-owned
facilities
that
this
report
is
about?
May
I
speak
on
on
the
parking
issues
connected
with
with
witnesses.
You
would
that
be
okay
here
that.
B
G
D
Just
one
so
I
I
actually
carry
this.
Maybe
you
can
help
answer
so
actually,
I
am
totally
fine
with
the
report
I'll
be
moving
to
accept
this.
My
interest
is
in
regards
to
how
we
might
make
a
recommendation
for
the
makeup
of
the
board
of
team.
San,
Jose
and
I'll
give
you
the
example
of
the
thought
process
so
I'm,
looking
at
the
board
here:
makeup,
hotel
operators,
business
community
arts
and
labor,
but
everything
really
centers
around
the
facilities
and
the
venues
that
team
San
Jose
operates
and
manages.
D
We
are
now
investing
more
and
have
been
over
the
last
couple
years
in
tourism
and
destination,
marketing
partnerships
with
Airport,
right,
certainly,
promotions
and
and
and
what
would
attract
people
not
just
to
these
venues
that
team
San,
Jose
oversees
and
manages,
but
actually
just
attracts
people
to
San
Jose
into
the
region
as
a
whole.
There
have
been
some
recent
controversies.
I
don't
want
to
have
to
get
into
it.
D
You
know
in
regards
to
some
of
the
videos
and
community
members
that
want
to
have
a
say
and
when
I
look
at
the
board
I
think
well,
maybe
there
is
an
opportunity
for
what
might
be
these
partner
companies
or
partner
agencies
in
the
arts
or
whatever
it
may
be,
or
you
know,
sort
of
that
greater
community
that
we
are
now
through
team,
San,
Jose
they're
spearheading
the
promotion
and
destination
marketing
forward
more
than
just
these
venues.
How
might
we
do
that?
T
T
If
you
know,
if
there
was
overall
desire
to
address
that
as
part
of
that
contract,
we
would
want
to
do
it
as
part
of
that
process
and
right
now
we
are
actually
working
with
team
Gina's,
a
to
renegotiate
certain
aspects
of
that
agreement,
and
that
will
come
to
the
full
council
at
the
beginning
of
next
calendar
year.
But
I
will
say
they
do
have
set
classifications
or
types
of
board
members,
but
they
also
have
members
at
large
as
well
and
I
know
several
of
them.
T
You
know
don't
necessarily
they're,
not
representing
labor
or
a
resident
art
partner,
so
they
have
members
at
large,
but
I
will
say:
I
had
the
ability
to
participate
in
the
team.
San
Jose
board
retreats
about
a
week
and
a
half
ago,
and
this
this
is
part
of
their
ongoing
conversations.
They
want
to
see
how
they
can
have
more
robust
destination
marketing
that
has
come
up
as
an
increased
priority
on
behalf
of
their
board,
and
so
they
had
a
very
robust
conversation
about
that.
T
D
And
so
I
want
to
meet
with
maybe
offline
before
the
beginning
of
the
year
before
that
contract
thing
comes
back
because
I
may
have
some
recommendations
and
it
may
be
easier
if
you
know
them
ahead
of
time.
So
then
that
way,
it's
not
sort
of
a
last-minute
change
and
it's
just
incorporated
so,
okay,
very
good.
Thank
you.
I'll
move
to
accept
the
out
of
report.
Okay,
all.
B
F
B
D
G
Thank
you
to
mention
the
ALP
RS
VTA
is
doing
some
incredible
work
with
the
APL
Data
ALPR
data
collection
for
their
parking
lots
and
what
started
as
a
hundred
and
eighty
days
has
now
been
whittled
down
to
90
days,
possibly
in
the
next
few
years.
It
can
come
down
to
45
days
and
that's
you
know
just
our
good
efforts
over
the
past
few
years
and
I
wanted
to
note
it
at
this
time
and
yeah.
So
thank
you
to
note
that
it
was
mentioned
nicely
by
council
person
yep.
G
You
know
we're
trying
to
learn
to
talk
about
better
how
to
talk
about
very
low-income
housing
and
to
talk
about
people
who
are
under
$50,000
who
has
incomes
or
under
50,000.
That's
an
important
goal.
I
think
it's
hard
to
do
that
here.
We
are.
We
always
use
the
$50,000
as
kind
of
a
limit.
I
hope
you
can
learn.
You
know
they're
mixed
income
ideas
that
can
help
a
lot
with
that
and
introduce
that
it
can
be
softer
to
talk
about
for
all
of
us.
G
G
The
entire
community
for
the
12
hours,
City
Council
meeting
of
a
few
weeks
ago,
is
that
they're
after
mistakes
and
missteps
the
past
few
years,
San
Jose,
City,
government
and
community
is
hopefully
we
are
at
a
time
to
begin
to
learn
how
to
seriously
how
to
better
prioritize
the
health
and
welfare
of
the
community
first
in
the
future
of
city
government
decision
making
and
what
is
a
lifelong
learning
process
from
local
community
energy
practices
to
more
responsible
local
technology
practices.
I
keep
trying
to
offer.
G
There
are
guidelines,
dialogue,
sleek
and
legal
precedents
of
accountability
and
openness
to
help
in
the
efforts
to
end
war,
to
create
peace
and
to
work
towards
better
ideas
of
human
society
and
sustainable
community
feature.
I
hope
it
is
this
care
that
can
become
the
important
focus
and
how
to
proceed
with
the
decision-making
for
city,
government
and
community.
It
is
this
humble
effort
that
can
make
for
a
simple
decency
and
practicality
and
a
reminder
of
how
San
Jose
can
already
work
and
how
it
is
already
respected
across
the
country
and
around
the
world.
Thank
you.