►
From YouTube: AUG 9, 2023 | Planning Commission
Description
City of San José, California
Planning Commission, August 9, 2023.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: pending
A
B
B
C
Good
evening
it's
6
30
calling
the
meeting
to
order.
My
name
is
Justin
lardenwa
and
I.
Am
the
chair
of
the
Planning
Commission?
Welcome
to
the
Planning
Commission
meeting.
Please
remember
to
turn
off
your
cell
phones,
myself
included
the
parking
validation
machine
for
the
garage
under
City
Hall
is
located
at
the
rear
of
the
chambers
following
roll
call.
During
summer
of
hearing
procedure,
we
will
review
how
the
public
May
provide
comment
during
today's
session.
C
C
Thank
you
now
we'll
do
the
roll
call
myself
Justin
Arden,
while
the
chairs
are
I'm
here,
Vice,
chair
and
else
wise.
D
C
Oh
and
just
so,
everyone
knows
there
is
a
button
to
the
right
on
the
tablet
of
a
person
with
sound
waves
coming
out
of
their
mouth.
That's
the
one
you
need
to
have
to
speak,
commissioner
barrosio.
C
It's
over
on
the
right,
but
we
heard
you,
commissioner
Bickford
commissioner
Cantrell
here,
commissioner
Casey.
C
Garcia
here,
commissioner
oliveirio
commissioner
Rosario
here,
commissioner
tordillos
here
and
commissioner
young
here
all
right
for
the
summary
of
hearing
procedures.
If
you
want
to
address
the
commission,
please
fill
out
a
speaker
card
located
on
the
table
near
the
audio
visual
technician
and
deposit
the
completed
card
in
the
basket.
There
are
also
speaker
cards
on
the
back
of
the
chambers
and
at
the
side
entrance
procedure
for
this
hearing
is,
or
also
if
you're
on
Zoom.
You
can
raise
your
hand.
C
Procedure
for
this
hearing
is
as
follows:
after
staff's
presentation,
applicants
and
or
repellents
may
take
make
up
to
a
five
minute
presentation.
During
the
public
comment
period,
the
chair
will
call
out
names
on
the
submitted
speaker
cards
and
the
order
received
for
those
members
of
the
public
who
attend
in
person,
as
your
name
is
called
line
up
in
front
of
the
microphone
at
the
front
of
the
chamber
for
members
of
the
public
who
attend
by
teleconference.
C
The
meeting
technician
will
connect
those
persons
who
desire
to
speak
to
speak
to
the
commission,
so
they
may
be
heard
generally.
Each
speaker
will
be
given
up
to
two
minutes
for
public
testimony
and
speakers
using
a
translator
will
have
up
to
four
minutes
at
the
discretion
of
the
chair.
The
time
allowed
to
each
speaker
may
be
changed
depending
on
the
number
of
items
on
the
agenda
number
of
speakers
and
other
factors.
Speakers
using
a
translator
will
have
double
the
time
allotted
after
the
public.
C
Testimony
the
applicant
and
or
repellent
may
make
closing
remarks
for
up
to
an
additional
five
minutes.
Planning
Commissioners
may
ask
questions
of
the
speakers.
Response
to
commission
questions
will
not
reduce
the
speaker's
time
allowance.
The
public
hearing
will
then
be
closed
and
the
Planning
Commission
will
take
action
on
the
item.
The
Planning
Commission
May
request
staff
to
respond
to
the
public
testimony
ask
staff
questions
and
discuss
the
item.
C
The
planning
commission's
action
on
rezonings,
pre-zonings
and
general
plan
amendments
and
code
amendments
is
only
advisory
to
the
city
council.
The
city
council
will
hold
public
hearings
on
these
items.
Section
20.120.400
of
the
municipal
code
provides
procedures
for
legal
protests,
the
city
council
on
rezonings
and
pre-zonings.
The
landing
commission's
actions
on
conditional
use
permits
is
appealable
to
the
city
council
in
accordance
with
Section
20.100.220,
the
municipal
code
agendas
and
all
staff
reports
for
this
meeting
may
be
accessed
at
the
planning
commission's
website.
I
assume
I,
don't
have
to
read
off
the
URL
now.
C
Okay,
all
right
so
call
to
order
and
Orders
of
the
day
before
we
begin
I
want
to
remind
the
Planning,
Commission
and
members
of
the
public
to
follow
our
code
of
conduct
and
meetings.
This
includes
commenting
on
the
specific
agenda
item
only
and
addressing
the
full
body.
Public
speakers
will
not
engage
in
a
conversation
with
Commissioners
or
staff.
All
members
of
the
Planning
Commission
staff
and
the
public
are
expected
to
refrain
from
abusive
language,
repeated
failure
to
comply
with
the
code
of
conduct
which
will
disturb,
disrupt
or
impede
the
orderly
conduct
of
this
meeting.
C
May
result
in
removal
from
the
meeting
this
meeting.
The
Planning
Commission
will
now
come
to
order
all
right
public
comment
to
so
this
is
the
time
for
public
comments
to
plan
a
commission
on
non-agendized
items
for
members
of
the
public
who
attended
in
person.
Please
follow
speaker's
card
and
give
it
to
technician
for
members
of
the
public
who
joined
by
teleconference.
Please
use
the
raise
hand
feature
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
to
raise
a
hand
to
speak
each
member
of
the
public
May
address
the
commission
for
up
to
two
minutes.
C
The
commission
cannot
take
any
formal
action
without
the
item
being
properly
noticed
and
placed
on
an
agenda
in
response
to
the
public
comment.
The
Planning
Commission
is
limited
to
the
following
options:
responding
to
statements
made
or
questions
posed
by
members
of
the
public
or
requesting
staff
to
report
on
a
matter
at
a
subsequent
meeting
or
directing
staff
to
place
the
item
on
a
future
agenda
and
do
we
have
any
speakers
for
public
comment
for
items
not
on
the
agenda.
C
Here,
yes,
all
right,
yeah,
there's
a
microphone
right.
There
just
come
over
and
state
your
name,
and
you
have
two
minutes
two
minutes.
F
Good
evening,
members
of
the
San
Jose
Planning
Commission,
my
name
is
Rigo
Gallardo
I'm,
a
carpenter
from
Carpenters
Local
405
in
San
Jose
as
a
union
carpenter
and
a
proud
resident
of
this
beautiful
Community
I
stand
before
you
today
to
advocate
for
crucial
area
labor
standards
that
will
not
only
benefit
workers
but
also
enhance
the
overall
well-being
of
our
city,
I'm
here
to
Champion
the
importance
of
a
livable
wage,
accessible,
Health,
Care,
a
commitment
to
accredited
apprenticeship
programs
and
the
significance
of
local
hire.
F
First
and
foremost,
let's
talk
about
livable
wage.
We
are
the
backbone
of
the
construction
industry
working
tirelessly
to
build
and
improve
our
community.
However,
it
is
disheartening
to
see
many
of
us
struggle
to
make
ends
meet
due
to
inadequate
wages.
A
livable
wage
is
not
only
is
not
just
about
survival.
It's
about
thriving
and
being
able
to
support
our
families
with
unity
and
pride
by
ensuring
a
livable
wage
for
carpenters
and
other
workers.
We
can
strengthen
the
very
Foundation
of
our
community
access
to
Affordable
and
Comprehensive
Health
Care
is
not
a
luxury.
F
F
Apprenticeship
programs
are
delightfully
lifeblood
of
skilled
trades.
Like
carpentry.
These
programs
offer
Hands-On
training,
mentorship
and
a
pathway
to
fulfilling
career.
By
committing
to
accredited
apprenticeship
programs,
we
can
ensure
that
the
next
generation
of
Carpenters
or
trades
people
are
well
prepared
to
meet
the
demands
of
our
every
evolving
industry.
F
Additionally,
local
hires
of
Paramount
importance,
many
of
us
call
San
Jose
our
home,
and
it
should
be
a
place
where
we
can
both
live
and
work
commuting.
Long
distances
for
work
not
only
takes
a
toll
on
our
well-being,
but
also
contributes
to
traffic
congestion
and
environmental
impacts
by
prioritizing
local
hire.
We
Foster
a
stronger
sense
of
community
and
promotes
sustainability,
I
implore,
the
San
Jose
Planning
Commission
to
Champion
these
area
labor
standards
and
take
a
proactive
approach
to
like
myself
and
by
ensuring
a
liberal
wage
Access
to
Health,
Care,
Credit,
apprenticeship,
programs
and
local
hire.
F
You
not
only
uplift
the
workforce,
but
also
contribute
to
the
prosperity
and
Harmony
of
our
beloved
town
or
City.
Let
us
work
together
to
create
an
environment
where
all
workers
can
Thrive
where
our
hard
work
is
valued
and
where
we
can
continue
to
build
a
better
future
for
San
Jose
the
art
decision.
Your
decision
on
these
labor
standards
will
have
a
lasting
impact
and
I
sincerely
hope
you
choose
to
stand
on
stand
with
us
in
creating
a
more
just
and
Equitable
Community.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration.
Thank.
C
C
I
see,
okay,
thank
you
all
right
is
there
any
additional
public
comment,
seeing
none
we'll
move
on
to
deferrals
and
removals
from
the
calendar.
Any
items
scheduled
for
hearing
this
evening,
which
deferral
is
being
requested,
will
be
taken
out
of
order
to
be
heard.
First
on
the
matter
of
deferral
or
removal,
staff
will
provide
an
update
on
the
items
for
which
deferral
or
removal
is
being
requested.
C
If
you
want
to
change
any
of
the
deferral,
dates
recommended
or
speak
to
the
question
of
deferring
or
removing
these
or
any
other
items,
you
should
say
so
at
this
time
for
members
of
the
public
are
join
by
teleconference.
Please
use
the
raise
hand
feature
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
to
raise
a
hand
to
speak
staff.
Do
we
have
any
items
to
defer
today,
none
from
stuff?
Thank
you,
Robert
all.
C
Okay,
yeah
we'll
discuss
that
during
the
consent-
calendar,
okay,
cool
yeah,
all
right,
so
we're
moving
on
to
the
consent
calendar
as
alluded
to
and
let's
see,
there's
currently
the
minutes
from
a
previous
meeting
on
July
12th
on
the
agenda
on
the
consent
calendar
and
it
sounds
like
there
are
Corrections
that
need
to
be
made.
Yeah.
H
G
C
G
I
C
J
C
C
Oh,
maybe
it's
just
a
list:
okay,
I'll
just
read
through
what
I've
got
here:
Vice,
chair
or
Nellis,
sorry
just
to
be
clear
where
this
is
the
motion
to
approve
the
consent.
Calendar
Vice,
chair
on
elsewise.
K
C
Commissioner
Bickford
is
absent.
Is
that
correct
commissioner
Cantrell.
C
H
C
All
right
now
we
will
move
on
to
the
public
hearing
now
items
a
through
G
are
annual
compliance
review
hearings,
and
my
understanding
is
that
there
will
be
a
single
presentation
on
all
of
them.
Is
that
correct.
C
And
I've
been
advised
by
the
City
attorney
that
on
one
of
these
items,
sorry
give
me
just
a
second.
C
Yes,
yeah
on
item
5D,
several
Commissioners
have
a
conflict,
so
my
under
my
advice
from
City
attorneys
that
will
take
the
presentation
and
then
afterwards
we'll
vote
on
each
item
individually
and
at
that
time
those
Commissioners
can
State
their
recusal
all
right.
So
let's
go
ahead
with
the
presentation.
L
Needing
chair
and
members
of
the
commission,
this
is
the
annual
compliance
review
hearing
for
the
seven
active
development
agreements
in
the
city.
These
include
Cisco
and
North,
San,
Jose
properties
in
Japantown
apple
and
North,
San,
Jose,
eBay,
PayPal
and
North
San
Jose
Hitachi,
Western
Digital
in
South,
San
Jose
and
eq2
Exeter,
Vista,
Montana,
Park,
Equity,
Tasman
Apartments,
also
in
North,
San,
Jose
and
finally,
Google
in
the
downtown
west
area.
L
As
backgrounds,
state
law
authorizes
development
agreements
between
local
agencies
and
developers
or
owners.
Development
agreements
in
the
city
are
regulated
through
Title
18
of
the
municipal
code.
These
seven
development
agreements
have
been
adopted
by
the
city
council,
state
law
and
the
municipal
code
required
that
the
city
conduct
annual
compliance
reviews
to
ensure
that
these
developers
are
in
compliance
with
the
terms
and
conditions
of
their
DA's,
which
is
why
this
item
is
before
you
tonight.
L
L
Each
of
these
mdas
are
associated
with
different
land
use
entitlements
and
have
unique
terms
and
conditions.
Staff
has
completed
an
assessment
of
these
da
terms
and
has
concluded
the
developers,
aren't
compliance
for
the
period
between
July,
1st
2023
and
June
30th
2024,
as
outlined
in
Greater
detail
in
the
staff
report.
L
C
Thank
you
Patrick,
as
mentioned
earlier,
that
presentation
pertained
to
items
5A
through
5G,
but
we're
going
to
have
discussion
of
those
items
individually.
So
the
first
is
da10-001,
which
is
the
annual
compliance
review
hearing
for
the
Cisco
Systems
development
agreement.
Do
we
have
any
public
comment
on
that
item.
C
J
Thank
you,
chair
I,
just
have
one
small
clarification,
I
think
so.
On
page
five
of
the
staff
report
talks
about
additional
parking
can
be
used
as
intensification
of
use
and
I.
Just
wonder
if
you
could
explain
that
to
me.
It
kind
of
doesn't
make
sense,
but
if
you
could
explain
it,
that
would
be
great.
Yes,.
L
For
that
project,
the
the
campus,
the
industrial
r
d
campus,
was
developed
with
basically
r
d
buildings
that
are
designed
to
not
occupy
as
many
people
as
a
normal
tech
office.
Would
it's
more
spread
out
inside
and
so
the
intent
of
having
additional
parking
qualify
as
intensification
was
basically
to
provide
for
more
people
to
work
in
those
buildings.
So
the
requirement
was
either
construct
more
square
footage,
more
office
space
or
make
more
intensive
utilization
of
the
existing
office
space.
So
they
did
that
by
providing
105
percent
of
the
parking
requirement.
J
J
C
H
C
Seeing
none
will
go
to
a
vote.
D
H
K
C
Commissioner
Rosario
yes
Commissioner
of
tordios.
Yes,
commissioner
young,
yes,
myself,
yes
and
commissioner
blickford
is
absent
all
right,
so
the
step
that
passes
with
a
do
I
need
to
read
off
the
vote.
I
I
think
the
technician
told
me
that
it's
not
showing
on
Zoom
what
the
vote
is
so
in
that
case,
so
that
would
be
10
yeah
10,
yes,
zero,
no
and
one
absence
yeah.
Thank
you,
Robert
all
right,
so
we're
moving
on
to
item
5B,
which
is
da14-003.
C
C
Seeing
none
will
go
to
the
commission
for
any
discussion
or
motions.
Oh
commissioner,
tordios,
let
me
go
ahead.
E
Thank
you.
Just
one,
quick
question
for
staff.
I
saw
on
the
staff
report
that
the
agreement
is
set
to
end
in
2024,
but
construction
of
the
center
for
the
creative
arts
isn't
required
to
start
until
2027..
Is
there
any
mechanism
to
actually
enforce
the
construction
start
for
the
center
for
the
creative
arts.
M
Good
evening,
chair
and
members
of
the
commissioner
Nancy
Klein,
director
of
Economic
Development
and
cultural
Affairs,
there
isn't
a
mechanism
specifically
to
force
a
start,
but
the
ability
to
have
the
benefits
of
the
D.A
subside
or
go
away
in
2027,
which
are
important
benefits
so
talking
to
the
developer.
Recently.
They
fully
intend
to
move
forward
and
we'll
see
what
market
conditions
are.
M
G
D
C
K
C
Professor
Rosario,
yes,
commissioner
tortillos.
Yes,
commissioner
young,
yes,
myself,
yes
and
commissioner
Bigfoot
is
absent,
so
I
believe
that
passes
with
10.
Yes,
zero,
no
and
one
absence
great,
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
item.
This
is
5c
da15-002,
the
annual
compliance
review
hearing
for
the
Apple
Inc
development
agreement.
Do
we
have
any
public
comment
for
this
item.
C
Yeah
and
thanks
for
the
feedback
like
I
mentioned,
this
is
a
new
system,
so
we're
still
learning
all
right,
so
I
believe
there
was
no
public
comment
on
this
item.
So
we'll
go
to
the
commission
for
any
discussion.
C
L
At
this
time,
no,
the
water
department
is
not
indicated,
a
need
for
the
wells
at
this
point,
but
just
the
ability
to
drill
them
if
needed,.
D
C
C
All
right
we're
moving
on
to
item
5D.
This
is
da21-001
the
annual
compliance
review
hearing
for
the
downtown
west
development
agreement,
and
it
is
my
understanding
that
several
Commissioners
need
to
recuse
themselves
on
this
item.
So
I
believe
the
procedure
is
that
they
would
State
the
reason
for
their
recusal
and
then
exit
the
meeting
for
the
remainder
of
this
item
and
then
return
afterwards.
I
There's
discussion:
oh
yeah.
If
there's
discussion
on
this
item,
I
don't
want
to
make
folks
leave
unless
there's.
G
C
I
N
C
Okay,
so
commercial
brosi,
are
you
recusing
yourself
when
in
doubt
sit
it
out?
Yes,.
C
I
Sorry,
yeah
I
didn't
need
to
recuse
myself.
Also
I
have
more
than
the
threshold
of
stock
on
Google.
C
E
I
C
Q
B
Q
Okay
and
then,
when
do
I
say,
go
when
I
hit
the
green
thing:
okay,
okay,
so
I
am
a
resident
of
that
area
near
the
dariadon.
Whatever
so
and
I
deal
with
a
lot
of
unhoused
people
and
everything
and
I'm
worried
I'm
worried
about
the
unhoused,
where
they're
going
to
go
I'm
worried
about
the
is
Google
who's
Google.
Are
you
Google?
No,
are
they
bringing
jobs
to
the
area?
I'm?
Not.
This
is
not
funny
young
man,
you
City
attorney
I'm,
not
laughing.
This
is
not
a
laughing
manic.
There's
no
jobs!
Q
I
realize
I
heard
that
Google's
a
lot
of
the
people
were
making
400
000
a
year.
Okay,
they
can
afford
to
live
wherever
they
are.
There's
a
lot
there's
a
community
of
people
who
don't
make
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year.
What
about
the
kids?
What
about
the
parking
like?
What
exactly
is
be
I
haven't
seen
any.
This
is
the
first
meeting
because
they
used
to
have
them
at
the
houses.
I
haven't
seen,
Google
come,
who
is
Google,
I
haven't
seen
even
one
come
I
haven't.
Q
You
know,
I
got
this
little
post,
skirt
or
whatever
like.
We
need
more
involvement,
you
know,
I
have
a
son,
I
would
love
for
him
to
work
at
Google.
You
know,
I
would
want
I
want
him
to
make
four
hundred
thousand
dollars,
but
where
are
we
going
to
park
like
I
need?
Where
is
the
sitting
planning
where's
the
blueprint?
You
know,
I
know
the
thing
across
the
street
from
housing
they're
building
that,
but
what
else
is
going
on
like
this
summer
there
were
no
summer
youth
programs
for
the
kids.
Why
can't
Google
do
that?
Q
Like
you
know,
you
want
to
take
all
of
this,
but
what
are
you
giving
back?
What
are
you
giving
back
to
the
community?
You
know:
are
you
guys
implementing
anything?
Okay?
Where
are
they
giving
10
they're?
Giving
one
percent
you
know?
Are
they?
Is
there
any
plans
for
the
unhouses
and
any
plans
for
the
minority
youth?
Is
it
any
plans
for
people
who
don't
are
nowhere
near
the
property
level,
the
Baseline
like
nothing,
you
know,
and
he
thinks
this
is
funny.
This
City
Attorney
office
I
saw
you
laughing.
Yes,
you
did.
You
were.
C
Thank
you.
No,
it's
just
two
minutes
per
person
per
item,
though
you're
welcome
to
speak
on
further
items.
Is
there
any
further
public
comment
on
this
item
and
I'll
ask
staff?
Do
you
have
any
response
to
any
of
the
issues
raised
during
public
comment
on
this
item.
M
Nancy
Klein,
director
of
Economic
Development
city
of
San,
Jose
I,
want
to
make
sure
that
several
of
the
council
Commissioners
sorry
who
are
here
today
might
not
have
been
familiar
with
the
literally
thousands
of
meetings
that
went
forward
on
the
Google
project
and
would
be
happy
to
spend
some
time
afterward
to
to
share
some
more
detail.
The
the
development
agreement
that
you're
reviewing
does
include
200
million
dollars
of
community
benefit,
which
is
on
top
of
the
4
000
units
of
Housing,
and
fully
1
000
units
of
of
housing
that
are
affordable
of
that.
M
So
there
was
an
extensive
series
of
benefits
that
came
to
the
city
or
are
coming
to
the
city
through
the
downtown
west
development
and,
unlike
many
Community
benefits
plans,
Google
has
already
begun
paying
on
them,
even
though
the
bulk
of
the
development
or
the
development
proper
has
not
yet
begun.
So
the
city
has
received
7.5
million
dollars
to
be
expended
toward
assisting
in
displacement
and
toward
job
growth
and
job
training.
So
there's
already
work
begun
through
the
dollars
and
through
the
efforts
and
the
community
meanings
of
which
many
many
organizations
were
involved
expressly
echoed.
C
C
All
right,
so
we
had
public
comment
and
had
some
input
from
staff
we're
going
to
go
to
the
commission
now.
Is
there
any
discussion
or
motions
to
be
made
on
this
item.
H
C
D
Yeah
I'd
like
to
ask
staff:
how
has
the
pandemic
really
impacted
some
of
these
development
agreements,
because
I've
heard
that
there's
been
some
delay
in
some
of
the
Google
plans?
So
if
you
could
elaborate
on
that
a
bit.
M
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
question,
commissioner.
The
pandemic,
as
with
many
companies
they
Google,
is
in
a
period
of
reassessing
what
their
Staffing
demand
is.
They
have
stated
publicly
and
transparently
that
Google
remains
very
committed
to
the
dyrdon
station
area
and
they're
excited
about
many
of
the
things
that
are
happening
like
the
electrification,
electrification
of
Caltrain,
which
will
be
starting
its
implementation
in
September
of
2024..
So
the
commitment
Remains,
the
specific
timing
of
when
construction
will
start,
has
not
been
identified
as
yet.
J
Thank
you,
chair
I
had
a
question
actually
on
the
Autumn
Street
Parcels
that
were
given
to
the
city.
Could
you
just
amplify
on
that
because
I
it's
the
first
I've
heard
of
that
thanks.
M
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
question
as
well,
so
there
are
Parcels,
as
you
mentioned,
on
Autumn
Street,
that
the
housing
department,
the
whole
point,
was
to
move
ahead
and
get
affordable
housing
development
happening
in
the
area
as
as
a
way
to
address
potential
displacement
or
likely
displacement.
So
the
project
that
has
been
identified
is
the
opportunity
to
redevelop
life
moves,
keeping
a
shelter
so
that
Diridon
remains
a
place
for
everyone.
M
The
center
Parcels
which
Google
gave
to
the
city
housing
department
and
then
the
Housing
Authority
property,
and
there
was
a
request
for
proposals
and
the
Housing
Authority
was
the
successful
bidder
and
there
are
plans
to
develop
what
will
take
place
and
that
process
is
moving
along
so
as
intended.
Affordable
housing
will
happen.
First
in
the
area.
J
Great,
so
just
to
clarify
that
project's
going
to
move
ahead,
regardless
of
when
Google
starts
their
construction.
Correct,
that's
correct!
Okay,.
J
C
I'd
just
like
to
remind
the
public
that
during
a
meeting
there's
a
time
for
public
comment,
and
that
is
the
opportunity
to
give
input
on
an
item.
We
accept
written
public
comment
in
advance
of
the
meeting.
Would
it
be
helpful
if
staff
could
State
like
the
right
way
to
give
feedback
after
this
meeting.
L
Yeah
I
believe
Nancy
made
an
offer
to
contact
you
or
you
may
be
able
to
contact
her
for
specific
questions
on
that.
So
we
can
provide
information
if
you
can
provide
us.
Your
contact
information.
C
Seeing
none
will
move
on
to
a
vote.
Vice
chairman
ellis-wise.
H
K
C
N
C
D
I
just
had
a
question
in
regard
to
it,
looks
like
this
development
agreement
will
expire
next
year
and
I
see
that
they
have
an
outstanding
recordation
of
final
tentative
map,
and
they
only
have
one
year
to
do
that.
Will
they
be
doing
that
in
this
I
mean
because
sometimes
that
could
take
about
a
year,
sometimes.
L
P
D
L
In
this
case,
no,
the
agreement
provided
for
a
specific
term
for
the
tentative
map,
normally
tentative
Maps
expire
within
160
days
of
being
approved
or
approximately
that
time
frame.
But
this
one
allowed
the
map
to
be
valid
for
the
entire
term
of
the
agreement
of
20
years.
So
it
would
not.
This
particular
map
would
not
be
subject
to
an
extension.
P
C
D
C
Commission
Ambrosio,
yes,
commissioner
Cantrell.
Yes,
commissioner
Casey.
Yes,
commissioner
Garcia.
Yes,
commissioner
oliverio.
Yes,
commissioner
Rosario.
Yes,
commissioner
tortillas.
Yes,
commissioner,
young,
yes
and
myself:
yes,
so
that
is
10,
yes,
zero!
No
and
commissioner
Bickford
is
absent.
So
one
absence
all
right,
we'll
continue
on
to
item
5f,
which
is
D.A
Hitachi.
C
C
C
C
C
I
might
not
pronounced
that
right.
This
is
the
annual
compliance
review
hearing
for
the
novellis
development
agreement.
Is
there
any
public
comment
on
this
item.
D
Yeah
I
had
a
question
regarding
it
looks
like
they
have
27
Acres
of
industrial
that
they
have
not
built,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
know
if
I
mean
because
recently
we've
approved
some
projects
that
we've
lost,
some
industrial
lands
would
be
really
nice
to
have
some
industrial
land.
So
I
just
wanted
to
know
what,
as
staff
you
see
is
going
to
happen
with
this
property.
That's
27,
Acres.
L
We
haven't
had
any
indication
from
the
developers
on
what
time
they
might
want
to
develop
this
property.
If
they
choose
not
to
develop
the
property
within
the
time
frame
of
the
DA,
they
always
have
the
ability
to
apply
for
a
standard
development
permit.
To
do
that,
that's
all
staff
is
aware
of
at
this
point.
There
may
be
someone
from
eqt
Exeter.
L
C
Sorry
on
Zoom,
okay
yeah!
Just
if
you
could
answer
that
question.
L
R
Sorry,
it
says:
Eric
Dale,
director
of
property
management
for
ECT
Exeter.
D
C
G
C
Oh
I'm
I'm.
Sorry,
commissioner
Rosario.
That
was
a
yes
from
you.
That's
right!
Okay,
apologize
all
right,
so
that
is
it
for
the
annual
compliance
review
hearings,
we're
going
to
move
on
to
item
5H.
C
All
right,
so
this
is
item
5H,
pdc22-008,
PD,
22-020,
t22-030
and
er
22-195
plan
development.
Zoning
to
well.
This
is
in
summary,
to
removed
33
trees,
construct
14
multi-family
residential
units,
including
the
conversion
of
existing
single-family
house,
into
a
duplex
and
the
construction
of
12
townhouses
and
Associated
rezoning.
This
is
at
4146
Mitzi
Drive
in
Council,
District
One
and
as
a
reminder
on
the
procedure.
Here
we
will
hear
a
presentation
from
staff.
C
S
Evening,
Commissioners
alcatienza
planning
project
manager
on
the
development
review
team
very
pleased
to
be
bringing
this
project
to
you.
We've
been
working
on
it
since
2018
in
some
form,
so
it's
been
a
while.
S
So
the
project
before
you
is
at
4146,
Mitzi
drive
and
I
just
want
to
give
you
a
bit
of
background
to
set
the
stage.
So
you
understand
what
you're,
seeing
today
so
in
October
of
2020,
the
planning
director
approved
a
special
use
permit
for
a
40
unit
apartment
building
on
this
site
and
with
that
project
it
also
included
the
on-site
relocation
of
the
existing
Graves
house
that
was
built
in
1868.
S
However,
in
November
of
2022,
the
graves
house
was
partially
destroyed
in
a
fire,
so
the
applicant
altered
that
description
to
include
instead
of
the
relocation
and
Rehabilitation
now
the
full
reconstruction
of
the
house.
So
in
May
of
this
past
year
of
May
of
this
year,
2023
the
graves
house
was
fully
demolished
and
partially
salvaged.
S
So
it's
just
a
bit
of
background
to
get
you
where
we
are
today.
So
the
project
before
you
right
now
is
a
planned
development.
Zoning
District,
so
the
existing
Zoning
for
the
site
is
urban
residential
and
this
new
zoning
District
would
be
a
planned
development.
Zoning
District
to
accommodate
both
the
townhouses
and
the
Reconstruction
of
the
graves
house.
S
So
with
that
is
a
plan
development
permit
and
that
would
allow
the
removal
of
all
33
trees
on
site.
As
well
as
the
Reconstruction
of
the
graves
house
as
a
duplex
and
that
reconstruction
is
conditioned
to
occur
under
the
direction
of
a
qualified,
historic
architect
and
the
project
would
be
consistent
with
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards
for
reconstruction.
S
So
in
addition
to
that
Graves
house
reconstruction,
we
have
again
the
construction
of
12
townhouses
and
those
are
configured
in
four
three-story
buildings
and
they're,
served
by
a
private
driveway
off
of
Ranchero
way
and
then
to
support
that
the
applicant
is
proposed,
subdividing
a
lot.
So
it's
one
parcel
today.
It
will
be
subdivided
into
two
parcels
and
then
allow
up
to
14
residential
Condominiums,
so
the
12
town
houses
and
then
the
two
in
the
graves
house
in
terms
of
project
review.
S
So
this
project
was
reviewed
for
conformance
with
the
general
plan
land
use,
designation
of
urban
residential,
as
well
as
the
municipal
code
requirements,
any
City
standard.
City
excuse
me:
Citywide
design,
standards
and
guidelines,
city,
council
policy,
6-30
for
public
Outreach.
We
did
hold
a
community
meeting
for
the
original
iteration
of
this
project,
as
well
as
this
version
of
the
project
and
then
with
conformance
to
California,
Environmental,
Quality
Act.
S
So,
with
regards
to
environmental
review
that
original
project
that
I
talked
about
that
special
use
permit
for
the
40
unit,
Department
building,
for
that
an
initial
study
and
mitigated
negative
Declaration
was
prepared
for
that
project
in
accordance
with
sequa
as
part
of
this
project.
An
addendum
to
that
initial
study
was
prepared,
so
no
new,
significant
impacts
or
impacts
were
identified
for
this
proposed
project,
as
the
site
no
longer
contains
a
historical
resource.
S
So
instead
that
reconstruction
is
included
as
a
condition
of
the
plan
development
permit
and
in
the
development
standards
of
the
plan
development
zoning.
So
one
of
the
attachments
to
your
staff
report
includes
development
standards
for
this
specific
plan
development,
zoning
district,
and
that
does
include
the
requirements
to
reconstruct
the
house
up
to
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards
and
then.
Lastly,
the
remaining
identified
mitigation
measures
are
included
in
the
mmrp
which
is
attached
to
your
draft
SQL
resolution,
and
that
is
essentially
a
continuation
of
what
was
already
approved
with
that
previous
Apartment
project.
S
So
with
that
I
will
pass
it
off
to
the
applicant's
representative,
Eric
shaneauer.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
well,.
C
Mr
Shannon,
so
yeah
we'll
have
five
minutes
for
this
presentation.
O
F
F
O
That
was
the
Fairfield
Inn
on
Monterey
Road
that
you
all
saw
about
a
month
ago.
Apparently,
it's
still
in
the
system,
and
it
has
I'll
get
started
while
he's
pulling
up
this,
my
name
is
Eric
shaneauer
and
I
represent
the
applicant
on
this
project.
Chair
lard,
Noir
members
of
the
commission.
Thank
you
for
having
us.
O
This
project
is
an
opportunity
to
provide
for
sale
housing
in
a
neighborhood
where
there's
very
little
new
housing
being
built.
So
it's
a
good
opportunity,
and
let
me
now
that
we're
up,
let
me
get
to
the
first
screen,
and
so
we
think
it's
a
good
opportunity
for
people
to
establish
roots
in
the
in
the
neighborhood,
with
entry-level
housing
in
the
form
of
town
homes
and
two
new
condos
in
a
reconstructed,
historic
building.
O
Another
benefit
of
the
project
to
the
neighborhood
is,
if
you
look
at
the
pictures
on
the
bottom
of
the
screen,
the
three
in
the
bottom.
There
are
no
sidewalks
along
this
property
and
there
is
basically
a
masonry
and
other
type
of
wall
around
the
property
Walling
it
off
from
the
neighborhood.
So,
with
this
development
we
will.
This
is
the
new
site
plan,
we'll
be
adding
new
city
standard,
sidewalks,
Street,
trees,
street
lights
along
Ranchero
way,
as
well
as
Mitzi
drive,
so
it'll
complete
the
neighborhood
and
create
a
safe
place
for
pedestrians
to
walk.
O
The
Cornerstone
of
the
whole
project
is
the
Reconstruction
of
the
Graves
house,
which
I'm
going
to
show
you
in
the
moment,
and
we
want
to
thank
the
preservation,
Action
Council
and
also
our
historic
architect,
John
froley,
for
their
consultation
on
the
plan,
and
this
is
what
we
will.
This
is
what
we
are
required
to
reconstruct.
O
So
the
house
will
emulate
the
historic
character
of
the
building
that
burned
during
the
demolition
we
did
Salvage
pieces
of
the
facade
so
that
we
can
reuse
pieces
and
also
recreate
pieces
of
the
facade.
So
it
is
as
authentic
as
possible,
and
the
front
of
the
facade
is
the
most
representative
of
of
the
structure
and
that's
going
to
now
have
a
prominent,
which
is
viewed
here
on
the
bottom
left.
That'll
have
a
prominent
position
on
the
public
Street
fronting
on
Mitzi
for
everyone
to
enjoy
in
the
neighborhood
and
so
for
all
those
reasons.
O
The
developer's
commitment
to
rebuild
this
building,
providing
for
sale,
housing
in
a
neighborhood
and
cleaning
up
a
blighted
property
that
has
been
a
nuisance
for
the
neighborhood
with
homeless
and
other
problems.
We
hope
that
you
will
agree
with
staff
and
recommend
approval
of
the
project
to
the
city
council
and
we're
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
we'll
now
go
on
to
public
comment.
If
there
is
any
of
a
public,
commenter
keep
just
go
ahead
and
bring
me
the
card.
C
T
Thank
you,
Commissioners
appreciate
the
time
very
much
I
sent
a
letter
via
email
just
before
the
meeting
I
apologize
for
the
lateness
of
it,
but
there
is
no
Ambush
here.
T
It
provides
housing
that
complements
the
neighborhood
one
of
the
things
that
Pac
learned
in
its
engagement
with
the
neighbors
is
that
was
a
location
that
was
in
crisis
and
there
was
a
lot
going
on
there.
That
was
not
good
for
the
neighborhood
the
developer
has
committed
to,
and
we
trust
them
to
do
what
they've
said.
We
trust
the
land
use
consultant
deeply.
T
T
They've
agreed
as
Eric
had
mentioned,
they're
widening
the
street
they're,
putting
a
sidewalk
in
nothing
does
more
for
a
community
than
making
it
walkable,
and
it
does
that
and
what
we've
seen
and
I
literally
prayed
with
a
tormented
man
who
was
living
in
that
house,
and
you
could
tell
he
was
flipping
a
Bic
lighter,
as
we
were
talking
just
as
a
tick
that
that
house
was
not
going
to
survive
through
our
you
know,
planning
process.
It
takes
time
to
do
these
things.
We
know
that
we're
a
part
of
that
process.
C
Great
so
that
you're
gonna
all
right,
yeah,
sorry
I'm,
not
sure
who
meant
is
that
you
John.
C
Anyways
yeah,
so
the
person
on
Zoom
go
ahead
and
unmute
yourself
and
state.
Your
name
and
you'll
have
two
minutes.
R
My
name
is
Rose
Forrest
and
with
my
husband,
John
bors
lived
at
4145,
Mitzi,
Drive
and
overall
I
think
the
project
we're
much
happier
with
this
than
what
was
planned
originally.
So
that's
good
I
think
we
missed
the
second
meeting.
We
made
it
to
the
original
meeting,
but
we
missed
the
second
meeting
and
so
there's
probably
a
good
reason
for
this,
but
I
brought
it
up
at
the
first
meeting
and
didn't
get
a
good
answer.
R
I
think
but
they're
at
the
property
I,
don't
know
if
you
remember
the
he
had
a
picture
of
it
up,
but
there's
five
very
tall
palm
trees
along
Ranch,
hair
away
that
are
beautiful.
Palm
trees
and
I
I
know
they're
planning
to
widen
the
street,
which
actually
concerns
me
a
little
bit
from
the
standpoint
of
I.
Think
cars
will
move
faster
down
that
street
now,
but
I
think
even
with
the
widening
there
might
be
a
way
to
save
and
protect
a
sidewalk
like
if
you
look
at
go
back
to
that
picture.
R
If
you
see
this,
the
sidewalk
on
the
other
side
of
the
street
there's
palm
trees
and
you
feel
kind
of
protected
when
you're
walking
there,
because
it's
the
sidewalk,
the
palm
trees
and
the
street
so
anyway,
overall
I
I
do
think
that
it'll
make
I'm.
You
know
we're
happy
that
they
changed
the
entrance
over
to
Ranchero
the
first
project,
had
it
coming
directly
into
our
house,
so
I
think
overall,
happy
just
would
look
at
that
possibility
of
leaving
those
palm
trees
if
at
all
possible
in
the
widening
of
that
street.
C
That's
like
we
do
oh
yeah!
Well,
yes,
and
so
we'll
allow
the
applicant
to
return
for
another
five
minute
presentation.
O
Eric
shaneauer
representing
the
applicant
first
of
all,
just
want
to
thank
Mike
with
the
preservation
Action
Council.
This
has
been
a
very
collaborative
effort,
as
he
mentioned
often
often
there's
contention
when
it
comes
to
a
historic
or
candidate
historic
building.
In
this
case,
the
developer
was
committed
from
the
beginning
to
preserve
this
building.
Unfortunately,
a
fire
occurred,
and
so
we're
trying
to
make
lemonade
out
of
the
situation,
and
you
can
see
from
the
architectural
plans
it's
going
to
be
a
really
nice
building
when
it's
done,
even
though
it's
not
the
original.
O
O
So
the
width
of
Ranchero
that
exists
throughout
the
neighborhood
will
be
maintained
in
front
of
our
property,
the
the
obviously
it's
going
to
be
wider
because
it
doesn't
have
sidewalks
now,
but
we're
not
we're
not
expanding
it
any
bigger
than
what
exists
in
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
as
per
the
direction
of
Public
Works
and
the
palm
trees
on
our
property
cannot
be
saved
because
they're
in
the
way
of
building
the
new
sidewalk.
But
the
commenter
mentioned
the
benefit
of
having
trees.
O
It
sounded
like
between
in
the
park
strip
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
vehicle
lanes
and
part
of
building
the
city
standard
sidewalk
is,
we
will
have
a
park
strip
with
new
Street
trees
planted
so
that'll
create
a
buffer
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
travel
Lanes.
In
addition,
we'll
be
adding
on
street
parking
that
doesn't
exist
today,
we'll
create
yet
another
buffer
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
travel
Lanes.
C
P
C
N
C
Second,
from
commissioner
Rosario
any
discussion:
okay,
we've
got
it
on
here,
commissioner,
toward
dios.
Go
ahead.
E
Sorry
I
just
had
a
couple
questions
for
staff
and
then
one
question
for
the
applicant
yeah
go
ahead.
Okay,
first
question
was
just
for
the
applicant,
so
as
I
Was
preparing
for
today's
hearing,
I
noticed
that
it
seems
like
the
site
in
question,
is
listed
for
sale.
So
I
was
just
curious.
If
the
applicant
was
you
know,
planning
on
developing
the
project
or
you
know,
selling
the
entitled
project.
O
The
the
owners
and
developer
haven't
made
a
decision,
yet
we're
exploring
options
to
see
if
there's
someone
else
who
would
would
prefer
to
to
do
the
development
awesome.
Thank
you,
but
we
may
build
it.
It
just
depends
on
what
the
Market's
telling
us
yeah.
E
Understood,
thank
you
and
then
my
other
questions
are
for
City
staff,
so
one
was
related
to
the
condition.
There
was
a
note
that
reconstruction
of
the
graves
house
was
a
condition
for
the
PD
permit.
Would
that
condition
kind
of
transfer
if
the
property
were
to
be
sold.
S
E
S
It
is,
but
they
will
be
paying
the
in-lu
fee
any
changes
to
that
moving
forward.
Just
so,
the
commission
is
aware
any
changes
to
projects
that
have
inclusionary
housing
conditions
if,
between
the
time
that
the
applicant,
if
in
the
time
the
project
is
approved
and
they
go
to
construction,
they
want
to
change
that.
It
actually
has
to
come
back
to
the
hearing
body.
So
some
food
for
thought
for
the
future.
E
Thank
you
and
then
my
final
question
was
just
the
note
on
the
actual
density
of
the
project.
I
saw
that
there
was
a
note
in
the
staff
report
that
this
appears
to
be
below
the
minimum
density
for
the
urban
residential
land
use
designation.
The
staff
report
mentioned
that
the
residential
density
should
be
prescriptive
unless
there's
some
secret
impact,
so
I
was
curious
if
staff
could
elaborate
a
little
bit
on.
S
So
this
is
actually
one
of
the
key
components
of
the
project.
Is
that
because
there
is
a
historic
component
to
it,
our
general
plan
basically
allows
you
to
reduce
density.
It
doesn't
specify
how
much
and
so
early
on
in
discussions
with
the
applicant,
we
were
really
pushing
for
them
to
get
as
much
density
as
possible,
while
also
maintaining
the
Graves
house,
and
so
ultimately,
we
came
out
to
27
dwelling
units
of
the
acre
close
to
30,
but
not
quite
but
the
goal
is
to
preserve
the
historic
resource.
E
N
Good
afternoon
it
was
the
commissioner
David
Keon
principal,
quieter,
City
and
Department
of
UT,
so
from
a
perspective
of
a
historic
resource
because
it
was
destroyed,
it
is
no
longer
considered
a
historic
resource
for
the
purpose
of
sequa.
However,
it
is
being
rebuilt
as
basically
wrap
up
what
was
previously
there,
but
you
know
because
it's
being
rebuilt
as
a
replica.
That's
why
this
exception
that
Alex
is
talking
about,
would
apply.
E
Thank
you,
yeah
I,
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
I,
think
you
know
there's
a
lot
to
like
in
this
project.
I
definitely
would
love
to
see
the
graves
house
reconstructed.
The
improvements
to
add
sidewalks
to
this
neighborhood
would
obviously
be
good
for
everyone
in
the
community.
I
think
I
just
struggle
a
little
bit
with
this
exemption
to
the
density.
E
I
know
a
few
weeks
ago,
we've
reviewed
a
project
where
it
included
single-family
homes
quite
close
to
a
BART
station
and
at
the
time
we
kind
of
said
you
know
these
were
previous
land
use
decisions
that
were
made,
and
now
as
long
as
developers
play
by
those
rules.
You
know
we
have
to
respect
that.
So
I
struggle
a
little
bit
here
where
we
seem
to
be
on
the
other
side
of
that
equation.
Where
now
the
density
is
below
what
previous
land
use,
decisions
seemed
to
dictate
would
be
appropriate.
S
S
Maybe
just
consider
is
that,
so
this
is
not
in
a
growth
area
and
it
is
what
I
would
say
is
a
transition
zone
between
two
areas.
We
have
very
high
density
apartment
buildings
to
the
east
of
the
site,
and
then
you
know
your
typical
single-family
ranches
to
the
west,
and
so
this
you
could
see.
This
is
some
sort
of
a
transition
zone
as
well,
but
I
mean
no
taking
on
the
fact
that
it
is
below
the
density
allowed.
E
D
Yeah
I
had
a
question
and
you
answered
it
right
now.
I
was
wondering
about
neighborhood
compatibility,
I'm
not
familiar
with
this
neighborhood
with
the
density.
I
really
wanted
to
know,
but
it
looks
like
you
answered
it
yeah
and
is
there
any
other
historical
structures
in
that
area?
Besides
this
no
I.
S
Actually,
don't
think
there
are.
We
have
the
historic
preservation
officer
on
the
line
if
you'd
like
Dana
are
you
there.
G
U
This
house
was
built
over
140
years
ago
and
it
used
to
consist
of
a
lot
of
Ranch
Land,
and
so
obviously
it's
been
carved.
You
know
down
to
what
it
is
now
to
such
a
small
parcel,
but
you
know
in
the
course
of
that
it's
all
been
developed
over
time.
So
this
is
that
they,
it
was
hopefully
we'll
be
again
a
remnant
of
that
that
time
from
the
1860s.
D
Thank
you,
Dana
I
also
commend
the
Developers
for
including
the
the
historic
structure.
Thank
you.
I
think
this
is
a
perfect
example
of.
What's
the
right
thing
to
do,
thank
you.
C
Is
that
all
great
I
have
a
question
myself?
Just
I
didn't
realize
until
tonight
that
there
was
no
sidewalk
along
the
property
and
when
I've
seen
that
in
the
past,
in
West,
San
Jose,
usually
it's
because
it
was
previously
a
county
pocket
that
was
relatively
recently
annexed.
Is
that
the
case
here
or
yeah.
S
C
Okay
and
then
also
just
if
I
can
give
commentary
here,
I
live
fairly
close
to
this
neighborhood,
not
close
enough.
That
I
have
to
accuse
myself,
thankfully,
and
I
I
used
to
live
in
this
neighborhood
and
I.
C
Just
you
know
when
I
say,
like
the
reconstruction
of
the
graves
house,
is
gorgeous
and
is
very
similar
to
a
lot
of
the
older
buildings
in
this
general
area
of
West,
San
Jose
and
as
staff
mentioned,
this
is
an
area
that
is
very
near
low
density
apartments
and
so
the
and
near
areas
with
townhouses
so
definitely
similar
to
what's
already
there
and
seems
to
be
a
great
fit
for
the
neighborhood.
C
H
Thanks
actually
I
just
have
a
curiosity
actually
for
the
the
owner
or
the
developer
of
the
property.
I'm
I'm
conf
I'm,
just
wondering:
isn't
this
basically
development
gold?
H
O
The
primary
Challenge
and
first
of
all
the
at
this
moment
the
property
is
not
listed
for
sale.
Commissioner
tordillos
I
think
saw
a
previous
listing
that
has
expired,
but
but
because
of
the
challenges
in
the
financing
market
and
the
capital
market
right
now
we're
exploring
all
options.
I
mean
our
goal
is
to
get
this
project
built
as
soon
as
possible
and
have
someone
either
ourselves
or
another
party
that
wants
to
to
build
it
as
approved.
They
have
no
choice,
and
that
means
they
have
to
buy
into
the
historic
reconstruction.
O
So
we're
just
exploring
those
options.
K
H
O
C
Yes,
that's
already
passed
on
this
item?
Do
we
have
anyone
else
on
the
commission
who'd
like
to
speak
on
this
item
and
if
not,
do
we
have
a
motion?
Oh
I
am
so
sorry.
Yes,
commissioner
Casey
had
a
motion
at
the
beginning
of
our
discussion.
My
apologies.
So
if
there's
no
further
discussion
we'll
go
into
a
vote
on
that
motion,
so
this
is
a
to
approve
the
staff
recommendation.
Vice
chair
on
Ellis
wise.
Yes,
commissioner
Ambrosio.
Yes,
commissioner
Cantrell.
K
I
C
Commissioner
Rosario,
yes,
commissioner
tordios:
yes,
commissioner
young,
yes,
myself,
yes
and
commissioner
Bickford
is
absent,
so
we
have
10,
yes,
zero,
no's
and
one
abstention
are
not
abstention.
One
absence
the
motion
is
approved
all
right,
we'll
continue
on
to
referrals
from
city
council
boards,
commissions
or
other
agencies.
Do
we
have
any
of
those.
C
P
Yes,
we
do
yesterday,
all
the
land
use
items,
most
of
which
came
from
this
commission
were
approved
under
consent
and
I
just
go
down
the
list
as
the
conditional
use
permit
and
determination
of
public
convenience
for
certain
real
property
located
at
1750,
Story
Road,
that's
the
target
of
cell
and
then
there's
also
minor
streets
naming
for
private
driveway,
located
east
of
intersection
of
Oakland
Road
and
Rock
Avenue.
That's
in
D4,
it
didn't
come
through.
C
Was
also
approved,
okay,
and
that
concludes
the
report
from
City
Council.
Thank
you.
Robert
B
subcommittee
formation
reports,
outstanding
business,
I
assume
we
don't
have
anything
for
that,
see
commissioner
calendar
and
study
sessions.
Do
you
have
any?
Are
there
any
updates
on
the
commission
calendar.
P
C
All
right,
okay,
so
then
we're
coming
up
on
adjournment.
I
just
want
to
remind
everyone
that
the
parking
validation
meter
is
at
the
top
of
the
room.
You
can
put
your
ticket
in
to
get
free
parking
and
then
also
just
want
to
remind
the
public
that
the
commission's
email
addresses
are
on
our
website
and
that
you're
welcome
to
contact
me
personally
at
any
time,
and
we
will
see
you
all
in
September
all
right
this.
It
is
752
adjourning
the
meeting.