►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of October 27, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=897418&GUID=0327995C-DB76-4660-BC86-FF3759EDA3FA
A
B
B
C
D
E
Afternoon
everyone
looks
like
we
have
a
quorum,
so
I'm
gonna
I'll
call
the
joint
meeting
for
the
rules
and
open
government
committee
and
committee
of
the
whole
to
order
tony.
Can
we
have
a
roll
call?
Please.
E
E
E
E
E
G
G
It
was
one
of
the
things
that
I
noticed
that
was
in
that
first
agenda
was
about
the
the
zoom
meetings
and,
and
things
like
that,
and
one
of
the
things
that
really
has
been
bothering
me
is
that
we
don't
have
participant
and
chat
function
and
also
we
don't
get
any
response
from
our
questions.
You
know
I
was
at
an
mtc
meeting
about
the
plan
2050
or
whatever
it
was,
and
you
know
when
I
when
people
mentioned
things,
then
they
said
well,
let's
reply
back
to
those
pro
issues.
G
Let's
reply
back
and
wow
that
that
was
special.
I
don't
usually
get
that,
and
so
this
is
our
democratic
processes,
and
especially,
I
felt
that
the
then
putting
the
names,
the
participant
names
and
the
the
chat
function,
and
I
hear
oh,
this
is
like
a
brown
act
and
you
know
who's
running
the
whole
show
is
tony
taper,
because
it's
all
you
know
it's
all
the
city,
clerk,
okay,.
G
I'm
talking
about
our
zoom
meetings
and
how
you
know
this
is
a
new
technology
of
how
we're
doing
this
and
we
need
to
work
together
as
a
community
to
get
this
to
really
work
right
and
it's
not
working
right
yet
and
it's
all
these
new
new
ways
of
us
doing
things,
but
we
have
to
include
the
past
and
make
sure
those
things
that
made
the
past
work
are
still
go
forward
in
our
in
our
digital
world
in
our
virtual
world,
and
that's
what's
missing
is
the
issue
of
the
chat
and
the
participants
and
and
their
names,
and
hopefully
their
email
and
way
to
contact
them.
G
That's
how
we
get
people
power
and
we
need
people
power,
because,
right
now
we
are
being
threatened
as
the
people
because
of
politics
and
business
as
usual,
and
our
climate
crisis
is
going
to
wipe
us
all
out
and
the
only
ones
that
really
care
about
it
are
the
people
and
that's
why
we
need
it
in
our
charter
to
protect
us
from
harm.
We
need
the
climate
crisis
to
be
front
and
center
in
our
in
our
business.
In
our
charter.
E
Thank
you
tessa
in
the
future
that
would
have
been
an
appropriate
topic
for
open
forum,
submit
a
letter
for
the
public
record,
and
you
have
other
venues
to
also
express
yourself
on
those
types
of
topics.
Go
ahead.
Blair.
H
All
right,
thank
you
glory
beekman.
Here
I
wanted
to
speak
on
two
items
today,
3.3
and
3.4.
One
is
covid
19
pandemic
response
economic
recovery
budget
adjustments.
H
I
thought
it
would
be
a
nice
time
to
remind
of
the
importance
of
the
subsidy
process
we're
going
through
at
this
time
and
a
reminder
that
for
city
government
departments
to
make
the
subsidy
process
accessible
and
understandable
to
the
public
what's
available
at
this
time,
the
choices
that
are
available
they're
good
at
that
they
need
a
reminder,
though,
as
we
all
do,
and
they
can
do
their
job
better
and
from
that
hopefully,
a
local
community
can
trust
the
process
better
and
at
least
be
able
to
feel
open
to
ask
questions
about
it
and
where
we
are
at
this
time
with
the
subsidy
process.
H
Item
3.4
is
about
federal
immigration
reform.
This
is
an
item
that
you
know.
It
takes
practice
from
myself
to
learn
how
to
try
to
be
a
part
of
this
good
cause
and
good
purpose.
H
H
That's
important,
and
it's
really
we've
been
working
on
this
for
like
a
number
of
years
now
and
I'm
hopeful
for
it,
and
it's
from
that
as
we're
doing
this
important
good
work,
I
hope
we
can
start
to
also
be
considering
you
know
the
ideas
of
the
actual
border
and
the
concepts
of
you
know.
People
can
go
free
freely,
back
and
forth
across
the
border
to
to
work,
jobs
and
stuff
like
that,
and
we
can
have
good.
H
You
know:
worker
rights
practices
with
that
and
develop
good
practices
with
mexico
themselves
and
central
american
countries
to
look
at
a
broader
picture.
I
hope
we
can
be
one
to
do
that.
Thanks.
Thank.
I
Thank
you.
My
name
is
chris
logan,
organizing
manager
for
sacred
heart
community
service
and
following
the
reimagining
public
safety
work,
and
I'm
commenting
on
the
memo
from
council
members,
jones
and
jimenez.
E
Chris,
chris
sorry
for
interrupting
we're
actually
gonna
get
to
that
that
item
later
on
in
the
agenda.
Okay,
so
you'll
have
more
than
ample
opportunity
to
weigh
in.
E
No
worries
lori.
F
E
All
right,
thank
you
person
with
the
number
ending
in
4963.
F
F
E
G
Okay,
good,
thank
you
so
much
yeah!
Well,
you
know
we
were
talking
on
this
agenda
about
land
use,
there's
a
land
use
issue,
and
actually
it
was
the
one
that
was
also
on
the
prior.
The
prior
one
was
winchester.
This
is
talking
about
actually
related
to
construction
contracts
and
we're
talking
about
building
and
things
like
okay.
Here
it
is.
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Can
you
hear
me?
G
Yes,
you
hear
me
yeah,
okay,
good,
and
we
talked
about
construction
and
and
and
land
like
our
people's
land,
and
it
was
in
the
last
agenda,
but
there's
also
one
here
talking
about
contracts
and
the
money
as
the
money
flows
to
the
city
or
doesn't
flow.
I
mean
these
are
issues
how
our
money
goes,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
were
looking
at
is
selling
our
our
people's
land,
and
this
is
what's
been
happening
over
and
over
is
that
our
land
is
being
used.
G
G
You
know
this
is
what
we're
losing
we're
losing
land
as
we're
building
we
keep
building
and
we're
losing
our
environments
and
that's
what's
happening,
and
so
land
use
is
the
most
critical
thing
and
when
we
have
to
start
using
our
land
to
grow
food,
because
that's
a
beautiful
thing,
we
can
do
as
a
people
and
that's
what
makes
us
like
each
other.
We
have
to
start
loving
each
other
and
when
you
grow
food,
that's
the
most
most
beautiful
thing
you
could
do
for
a
fellow
human
being,
and
so
you
know
that's
that's.
G
E
Thank
you.
Go
ahead,
blair.
H
Hi,
thank
you.
Everyone
here,
there's
items
of
clean
energy
and
definition
of
racial
equity
on
the
november
9th
agenda.
Good
luck
with
these
items,
clean
energy!
You
know
my
feelings.
The
importance
of
renewable
energy
and
local
procurement
at
this
time
can
set
a
really
important
course
for
ourselves
and
and
and
allow
us
our
better
practices
through
the
decade,
no
matter
what
may
happen
in
this
decade
and
to
be
able
to
return
to
our
good
practices
after
possible.
H
Natural
disasters
that's
important,
and
I
think
we
should
work
on
that
rather
than
you
just
settle
for.
Let's
just
dump
everything
in
the
fossil
fuel
and
figure
it
out
afterwards.
So
you
know
it's
good
practices
that
keep
us
to
our
better
selves
and
and
get
us
out
of
calamities,
easier.
The
ideas
of
definition
of
racial
equity
yeah.
This
is
really
important,
stuff,
paul
soto.
I
mean
he
used
to
always
ask
for
these
sort
of
better
definitions.
I'm
trying
to
work
towards
these
better
definitions.
H
I
hope
we're
learning
a
better
language
to
to
to
to
offer
what
the
concepts
of
racial
equity
can
be
and
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
and
talking
about
this
in
an
upcoming
city
charter
item,
that's
important
to
myself
and
to
many
others,
the
ideas
of
in
redistricting,
the
ideas
of
equity.
I
I
I
said
some
words
yesterday
to
try
to
talk
about
this
issue.
H
I
really
muffed
them,
I
didn't
say
them
well,
I
felt
the
c3
ideas
really
speak
incredibly
well
to
the
ideas
of
racial
equity,
but
it's
not
fully
agreeable
yet
and
there
I
think
you
know
with
the
redistricting
ideas.
I
hope
there
can
be
ways
you
know
everybody
can
just.
We
can
really
mediate
and
debate
what
can
be
the
best
ways
to
work
out
of
all
the
good
ideas
that
were
presented
in
all
the
district
maps,
and
I
think
we
can
work
on
it
together
and
come
up
with
some
good
ideas.
K
Thank
you,
I'm
here
to
speak
on
item
two.
The
charter
charter
review
commission.
E
Oh,
yes,
that's
actually.
L
So
the
item
3.4
the
definition
of
racial
equity.
Well,
I
think
we
we
were
kind
of
at
a
cliff.
I
feel
like
we
left
the
left.
This
whole
work
of
round
gear
at
a
cliffhanger.
We
had
two
sessions
with
the
council
to
discuss
what
the
process
would
look
like.
We
were
just
beginning
to
have
discussions.
L
Sorry,
this
light
is
in
my
eyes
we
were
just
beginning
to
have
that
discussion
and
then,
of
course,
you
know
the
terrible
killing
of
george
floyd
and
that
provided
an
opportunity
for
us
to
continue
the
conversation
on
a
social
level,
but
not
really
at
a
council
level.
L
It's
been
kind
of
a
peripheral
conversation
as
it
relates
to
how
we
see
or
reimagine
public
safety
and-
and
you
know
very
so,
there's
issues
that
relate
to
some
of
the
most
impacted
communities
during
the
pandemic
and
those
inequities
have
been
highlighted
because
of
that,
and
so
I
don't
know
that
we're
at
a
point
where
we
can
accept
a
definition
just
yet.
You
know
this
is
a
ger
vetted
definition
and
I
don't
think,
there's
anything
wrong
with
the
definition.
L
I
just
think
that
we
need
a
process
for
us
to
begin
to
discuss
it
have
a
you
know
the
first
part
of
discussion
and
then
actually
vetting
the
the
definition
out
with
some
community
leaders
in
order
us
for
us
to
really
adopt
a
resolution
completely.
L
But
I
don't
know
what
my
other
colleagues
think
here
on
rules
I
just
would
like
for
maybe
have
a
a
slightly
different
process
and
instead
of
adopting
the
resolution
just
begin.
The
discussion
of
a
resolution
or
a
process
towards
a
resolution
that
adopts
the
definition
of
racial
equity.
E
L
Yeah,
I
I
guess
there
there
could
be
memos
that
go
towards
that.
I
just
with
the
end
in
mind,
I
I
I
want
to
avoid
having
a
definitive
outcome
of
adoption
of
a
resolution
that
that
is
just
one
conversation
as
a
result
of
one
conversation
from
the
council,
and
I
think
this
sets
it
up
as
such.
L
I
I
totally
understand
if
you
know,
if
you
want
to
leave
it
the
way
it
is,
and
then
those
of
us
who
are
interested
could
propose
it
slightly
different
so
that
we
can
set
up
the
discussion
differently.
I
just
think
that
if
we
go
into
council
with
this
outcome,
then
this
is
what
you
know.
This
is
what
we're
going
to
check
off
that
night
in
terms
of
a
vote.
E
E
L
I
think
to
discuss
it.
I
think
I'd
like
that
option
when
the
option
of
discussing
the
racial
equity
definition,
as
recommended
by
our
ore
department-
and
I
think
that's
a
good
beginning-
I
just
I
don't
want
it
to
be
the
the
the
beginning
and
the
end
all
in
one
session.
L
It's
quite
a
you
know,
quite
a
big
step
to
take,
and
while
I
know
that
other
cities
have
already
adopted
this
definition,
I
feel
like
it's
a
little
premature,
because
we
we
haven't
had
those
discussions,
and
I
just
want
us
to
be
able
to
benefit
from
having
that
exchange
between
us
and,
more
importantly,
to
have
the
community
vetted
with
us
and
so
yeah
I'll.
E
So
I
needed
an
assist
from
either
lee
nora
or
tony.
Are
we
able
to
just
make
a
a
change
to
like
from
adopt
to
discuss
or
are
we
splitting
hairs
and
you
know
effectively,
that's
what's
gonna
happen
anyway.
So
just
can
you
give
me
a
little
clarity.
B
I
unfortunately,
I
muted
before
normal,
so
you
know,
I
will
say:
council
member
rain
has
totally
totally
get
your
point
and
while
I
haven't
been
directly
involved
in
the
last
two
weeks
on
this,
I
will
say
I
don't
believe
we
think
as
an
administration.
This
is
a
an
ending
at
all.
In
some
ways
you
know
you're
right,
we
were
making
all
this
progress.
Having
conversation
with
council
and
community
covid
came
and
and
stopped
a
lot
of
that
and
a
lot
of
resources.
B
So
in
a
lot
of
ways,
I
think
we
were
thinking.
This
is
a
little
bit
of
a
an
idea
to
refresh,
but
certainly
get
your
point
I
mean
from
our
perspective.
I
think
we
were
we've
got
departments
wanting
to
start
embedding
this
in
their
memos
and
their
decision
making,
and
I
know
you've
seen
that
in
some
of
the
stuff
coming
to
council-
and
you
know,
the
request
from
folks
was
well,
let's
define
what
racial
equity
is,
so
that
we're
all
pointing
to
the
same
thing.
B
I
think,
at
least
from
our
standpoint,
the
the
witness
the
where
we
need
to
be
is
just
having
that
conversation,
so,
whether
we're
adopting
a
resolution
or
discussing
it-
and
you
know,
together
with
the
council
and
with
the
community-
I
think
that's
the
most
important
thing
for
us
at
this
point
so
nora
unless
there's
a
a
legal
issue
which
this
agenda
is
two
weeks
out,
I'm
we're
fine
keeping
it
with
a
resolution,
but
we're
all
we're.
Also
fine,
just
you
know
discussing
it
with
the
council
as
a
starting
point
as
well.
F
And-
and
there
isn't
a
legal
issue:
if,
if
we
change
the
agenda
language
to
bring
forward
for
discussion
it,
it
can
be
handled
that
way.
Yeah.
L
Okay,
well
I'll
make
the
motion
to
accept
this
agenda
with
the
change
of
discussion,
discussing
the
definition
of
racial
equity
versus
what
is
currently
language
now,
which
is
adopt
a
resolution
accepting
the
definition
of
racial
equity.
Oh
wonderful,
thank
you.
F
Let
me
ask
for
some
clarification
there.
Do
you
want
the
rather
than
a
resolution
coming
on
to
the
agenda?
Are
you
looking
just
for
a
staff
memo
on
what
is
contemplated
for
a
definition
for
discussion.
L
Right
and
I
imagine
in
the
memo
they're
already
going,
because
they
do
a
really
good
job
about
the
background
and
how
what
has
been
vetted
as
of
now-
and
I
think
you
know
in
talking
to
student-
I
know
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
among
executive
leadership
in
terms
of
this
discussion
of
this
definition,
and
so
I
think,
there's
quite
a
bit
of
work
to
to
talk
about
and
and
really
to
celebrate.
L
E
All
right
norah
was
that,
would
you
need
it.
F
Yes,
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
for
the
city
manager's
office
since
there
this
is
their
item
that
they're
bringing
forward
and
our
office
that
we,
the
I
the
thought
of
the
ca
of
this
committee-
is
to
not
have
a
resolution
attached
not
have
a
draft
resolution
at
this
point,
but
simply
have
a
staff
memo.
So
that's
what
it
sounds
like
you
want
to
do
and
we
can.
We
can
do
that
and
I
think
it'll
be
clear
for
the
manager's
office.
Then.
M
J
E
H
All
right,
thank
you.
This
item's
been
on
the
agenda
a
lot
recently.
Good
luck
in
these
efforts
to
work
on
this
issue.
You
know
I've
mentioned
before
it'll
be
nice,
how
the
work
of
council
person
perales
with
workplace
counseling
issues.
He
had
a
item
a
few
weeks
ago
about
that
and
how
that
that
can
connect
to
this
work,
good
luck
and
and
those
efforts.
I
think
that
can
be
real
helpful
for
our
future
to
speak
to
the
domestic
violence
and
child
abuse
issues.
H
You
guys
set
up
a
a
santa
clara
county
committee
process.
For
this
I
don't
know
back
in
may
or
april,
and
I
I
was
as
yet
unclear
what
the
police
department
role
and
the
ideas
of
the
peer
review
program
was
going
to
be
how
it's
going
to
work
as
a
part
of
it.
H
It
seemed
unclear
you
got
the
ideas
of
working
with
santa
clara
county
valley,
medical
center
and
the
ywca
down
really
well
and
that
there
was
good
counseling
services
and
prep
ready
for
that,
but
but
what
about
the
peer
review
program
for
for
the
san
jose
police
department
after
these
sort
of
after
these
things
happen?
You
have
a
report
coming
from
the
police
department
about
a
protocol
and
reporting
of
child
sexual
abuse
cases.
What
will
be
the
peer
review
process
after
that?
H
And
are
you
even
working
on
that
yet
because
I
understand,
there's
a
certain
vetting
to
make
sure
that
you're
you're
developing
a
good
counseling
service
and
structure
for
the
peer
review
program.
I
just
hope
you're
doing
those
things
and
making
those
steps.
It
seems
a
really
really
important
program
for
our
future
of
policing
and
counseling
services
and
how
we
can
mellow
out
and
be
open
and
clear
with
each
other
and
that
that's
vitally
needed
for
our
future.
Good
luck,
how
you
can
work
on
it.
Thank
you.
G
Okay,
good!
Thank
you.
Oh
okay,
good!
Thank
you
so
much.
You
know,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
signage
you
put
up.
You
know
gender-based
violence,
which
I'm
trying
to
understand
exactly
what
that
means.
Does
that
say?
Okay,
I
don't
even
know
what
it
means
so
there's
questions
there
and
we
can
go.
We
can
deal
with
that
later
because
I
want
to
get
to.
My
point
is
more
important
and
child
sexual
abuse.
You
know
these
are
not
like
minor
things.
G
You
know
a
check
box,
you
know
we're
done,
we've
done
it.
We
did
that
the
council
agreed
you
you
ten,
who
have
decided
that
you
know
everything
and,
and
that's
not
true,
and
so
what
councilwoman
sylvia
arenas
said
beautifully
is
saying:
hey,
wait.
These
are
big
social
issues
and
I'm
not
sure
that
we
can
just
put
a
check
mark
saying
and
she
kept
saying
and
the
people
we
want
to
get
the
people
involved.
G
You
know-
and
this
is
where
we
need
the
people
involved,
because
we've
got
to
figure
out
how
to
deal
with
this
real,
that
we're
dealing
with
there's
a
lot
of
bad
things
that
are
happening
and
and
so
and
the
worst
of
it
is
our
climate
crisis,
because
that
could
put
an
end
and
I
want
to
say
something
really
important,
because
we
did
not
get
a
message
from
the
city
of
san
jose.
I
did
not
get
a
message
on
my
phone.
Beware,
there's
a
climate
crisis
happening.
There's
a
storm
coming
stay
home.
G
G
E
Thank
you
tessa
also
tessa.
Can
you
be
mindful
of
your
language?
We
have
really
high
viewership
from
the
five
to
nine
age,
demographic,
so
kids
are
watching.
So
please
be
mindful
of
your
language,
bringing
it
back
to
the
committee
councilman
barrios.
L
Thank
you
vice
chair,
I'm
going
to
be
on
my
best
behavior
as
well,
so
I
just
wanted
to
first
of
all
thank
our
our
chair
for
our
pist,
our
public
safety
finance
and
strategic
support
committee,
which
is
our
fellow
colleague
here,
council
member
perales,
for
completing
this.
This
effort.
L
L
I
don't
know
three
and
a
half
years,
or
maybe
four
years,
dare
I
say,
and
we
we're
doing
this,
because
we
know
that
we
need
to
look
at
our
systems
to
make
sure
that
when
these
things
happen,
that
our
survivors
or
those
who
view
them
identify
themselves
as
victims
can
have
the
end.
L
The
best
end
result
in
terms
through
a
tragic
incident
like
this,
and
that
means
from
the
first
point
of
contact
with
our
police
department,
and
our
police
department
has
done
quite
a
bit
of
work
in
terms
of
their
own
survivor-centered
approaches.
Trauma-Informed
approaches
to
our
survivors
as
well
as
they've,
looked
at
their
standing
operating
procedures,
they've
looked
at
their
duty
manual.
So
what
all?
L
That
means
is
that
they're
not
only
just
taking
a
look
at
how
they
interact
with
our
survivors,
but
they're
also
making
sure
that
those
who
come
after
them
and
those
who
are
trained
know
what
these
new
practices
are,
or
these
evolving
practices
are,
and
so
this
is
another
meeting
that,
because
the
issue
is
so
large
and
as
one
of
their
residents
mentioned
it
is,
it
doesn't
end
you're
more
than
welcome
to
join
our
president's
committee.
These
issues
come
to.
We
discuss
this
issue.
L
We
have
a
bi-monthly
report
from
our
police
department
and
we
continually
keep
this
on
the
front
burner
as
we
do
with
all
of
issues
that
relate
to
gender-based
violence
and
sexual
abuse
or
physical
abuse,
and
we
recognize
that
now
our
children
are
attending
school
in
person
and
there
is
potentially
an
opportunity
to
support
those
children,
children
who
might
have
not
been
in
the
best
situation
while
they
stayed
at
home
during
the
pandemic.
L
So
please
come
and
join
us
on
november
5th.
To
be
part
of
this
conversation
be
part
of
the
solutions
and
just
lastly,
thank
you
for
giving
me
this
opportunity
to
just
expand
a
little
bit
about
this.
I
know
that
you
all
have
heard
me
talk
about
this,
but
I
wanted
to
give
our
residents
an
opportunity
to
also
join
our
journey
so
motion
to
approve.
L
E
G
G
Oh
you're
canceling
it
okay,
the
january
4th.
Oh
yes,
you
always
cancel
it
after
the
holidays,
and
so
you
know
you
get
a
lot
of
time
off
and
a
lot
of
benefits
and
you
know
the
and
what
I'm
really
not
happy
with
that.
That's
why
I'm
scolding
you
and
do
I
feel
good
about
you
having
another
day
off
that
you
don't
have
a
meeting?
No,
because
what
happened
when
we
had
this
crisis
that
was
in
our
neighborhood,
there
was
a
lot
of
bad
things
that
needed
that
we
needed
to
stop
doing.
G
We
needed
to
stop
going
to
santa
cruz.
We
needed
to
stop
going
to
san
mateo
san
francisco
and
you
did
not
put
out
an
emergency,
and
I
didn't
like
that,
and
that
was
to
me
that
no,
but
I'm
saying
okay,
you're,
saying
I'm
not
on
topic.
I
know
you're
trying
to
get
another
day
off
and
saying
an
approval.
I
don't
approve
of
your
work,
and-
and
this
is
what
I'm
saying
is
that
I
see
that
I
did
not
get
a
notification
when
there
was
a
crisis.
G
G
E
Thank
you,
tessa
and
just
for
clarification
is
to
cancel
the
council
meeting
not
to
have
a
day
off
bringing
it
back
to
the
committee.
Do
I.
E
M
J
E
G
Okay,
well,
hopefully
you're
even
looking
at
my
letters.
I
don't
even
know
if
you
get
my
letters,
you
know
because
there's
so
many
rules
about
when
it's
got
to
be
in
and
if
it
could
come
in
and
we
have
to
spend
a
lot
of
time.
That's
what
paul
soto
used
to
say.
I
spent
30
hours,
we
don't
even
know
where
paul
soto
is
nobody
talks
about
it
that
paul
soto's
gone.
G
And
so
this
is
where
you
know,
it's
all
blah
blah
that
you
say
you
have
these
committees
and
even
you
know,
even
in
which
we
appreciate
silvia
arenas,
which
was
the
only
person
that
paul
soto
said
was
doing
a
good
job
and
I
think
he
she
is
in
a
lot
of
ways.
She
keeps
reminding
us.
We've
got
to
listen
to
the
people
and
what
we
didn't
do
you
know:
we've
taken
the
land
from
the
people.
G
That
is
the
truth
that
he
told
us
that
we
cut
off
their
heads
and
we
took
everything,
that's
capitalism
and
that's
the
way
we
keep
going
and
capitalism
is
threatened
by
any
changes,
because
that's
what
bread!
The
economic
success
we
have
is
all
the
fossil
fuels
that
took
the
place
of
slavery.
It
took
you
know:
we've
been
abusing
people
and
and
nature
for
profit,
and
that's
where
we're
at
and
you
know,
we've
got
to
change
and
nobody
wants
to
change
except
we're
going
to
be
burned
up
and
we're
going
to
go.
G
Extinct
is
what
everybody's
saying
and
nobody
wants
to
change,
and
you
know
we
see
that
here
in
san
jose,
and
this
is
where
we're
trying
to
make
a
change,
we're
listening,
trying
to
listen
to
the
science,
be
leaders.
Well,
then,
listen
to
us,
you
know
and
and
let
us
have
a
voice
because
it
does
just
because
you
said
you
know
you
voted
on
something
created.
This
climate,
smart
doesn't
mean
it's
working
and
we
see
it's
not
working.
E
Thank
you,
claire.
H
Hi,
where
big
win
here,
thank
you
for
tessa's
words
about
starting
to
you
know
give
our
last.
You
know
our
hopes
to
the
ideas
of
continuing
the
city
charter
process.
I
have
a
couple.
I
have
a
couple
letters
in
the
public
record
about
yeah.
I
hope
I
hope
I
haven't
yeah.
I
don't
want
to
say
our
last
hopes,
but
I
just
hope
we
can
offer
good
hope,
good
hopes
towards
the
future
of
continuing
the
city
charter
process
about.
H
I
have
two
letters
to
the
public
record
that
I
spoke
about
yesterday
at
city
council
about
the
future
of
how
we
can
better
talk
about
the
covid
19
process
and
it's
vaccine
process
in
the
future.
Good
luck
how
he
can
work
on
those
ways
and
good
luck
to
continued
mass
use,
as
kobe
is
apparently
on
the
rise
in
london,
and
that
means
it
may
be
appearing
here
very
soon.
I
wanted
to
speak
quickly
somewhat
to
the
vista
montagna
things.
H
I
mean
good
luck,
how
people
can
work
on
things
I
think
they're.
I
hope
it
can
be
negotiative
for
all
sides
and
we
can,
like
you
know,
have
dialogue
and
all
that
good
stuff,
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
work
on
a
future
of
a
notification
process.
You
know
when,
when
these
sort
of
things
happen
again
like,
for
instance,
with
the
upcoming
encampment
process,
I
think
it
would
just
you
know
the
homeless
sponsored
encampment
process
by
san
jose.
H
I
hope
you
know
there
can
be
good
conversations
with
local
neighborhoods
about
that
issue
with
the
people
of
local
neighborhoods
and
they
can
be
willing
to
want
to
consider
it,
and
I
know
to
fake
notification
process
would,
I
think,
help
and
it's
just
good
practices
and
to
learn
to
practice.
Those
good
practices
together
can
be
of
a
lot
of
help.
I
think
and
hope,
and
finally
thank
you
for
the
agricultural
item.
I
think
that
very
nicely
con.
The
last
item
can
very
nicely
tie
into
a
a
continuation
of
the
of
the.
G
Okay,
good
well,
I've
been
saying
that
we
need
to
read
the
consent
calendar
out.
Doesn't
that
make
sense?
You
know
and
I've
seen
that
at
the
vta
meeting
you
read
it
because,
like
paul
soto
said
we
don't
even
know
where
he
is
anymore
and
we
need
to
learn
from
him
because
his
words
were
so
valuable
to
us.
He
spent
30.
C
G
Learning
you
know
looking
at
the
agenda
and
you
know
I
don't
always
have
30
hours
to
look
at
the
agenda,
but
I'm
sitting
here
listening
to
this
meeting,
I'm
on
the
phone-
I
you
know,
I
push
my
button.
You
know
there's
a
lot
to
do.
You
know
that
a
lot
of
people
can't
do
that
are
old,
and
so
I'm
you
know
representing
the
old
and
the
way
you
know
it
needs
to
be,
and
you
know
you're
you're
transitioning
to
a
virtual
world,
but
not
doing
that.
G
Well,
you
know,
and-
and
so
I'm
seeing
the
problems
that
you're,
you
know
as
a
teacher
that
I
am
that
you're
not
doing
a
great
job
of
doing
this,
and
so
you
know
you
should
read
the
consent
calendar.
So
maybe
to
remind
me
of
something
that
yes,
I
didn't
like
that
you
know,
and
I
don't
have
the
30
hours
to
do
that-
that's
too
much
to
ask
for
people,
so
you
need
to
do
your
job
better
and
take
the
time
to
just
read
the
items
instead
of
showing
us
the
pages
like.
That
means
anything.
G
G
So
I
can
comment
on
it
and
address
the
issues
that
are
really
at
hand,
which
is
what
you're
doing
and
everything
you're
doing
is
wrong
and
that's
what
we
have
to
start
talking
about,
and
you
know
we
you
know
we're
not
doing
that
and
everything
you're
doing
is
wrong
and
we
need
to
vote.
Have
the
people
make
decisions
for
themselves
and
I
actually
am
suggesting
that
I
realize
I
have
a
chance
to
do
that.
G
When
you
talk
about
it's
we're
going
into
realignment
of
our
districts,
I
want
them
very
hyper
local
and
to
have
local
control,
because
that's
how
we
have
you
know.
F
E
G
Okay,
good,
thank
you
so
much.
You
know
really
appreciate
it.
I
asked
my
husband,
you
know
what
he
thought
of
the
of
having
that
letter
coming
from
the
the
vice
mayor
and
and
and
sergio
amenez,
and
he
said
it's
that
they
weren't
expecting
such
a
good
plan
because
they
got
the
public
they
got
cat.
They
got
cat
wood
nancy
to
write
the
to
write
the
charter
review.
Commission.
G
We
got
that
okay
and
and
so,
and
he's
saying
that
we've
got
to
look
at
every
every
department
and
what
their
fossil
fuel
is,
and
then
we
have
to.
On
top
of
that,
we
have
to
have
you
know,
but
we
have
to
share
it.
That's
really
critical
share
it
with
the
people
and
and
also
mitigations
how
they're
going
to
reduce
their
fossil
fuel
use.
That's
what
he's
suggesting
and
I'm
not
hearing
that
I
hear
nothing
from
the
climate.
G
Smart
very
you
know
very
difficult
and
they
even
canceled
the
program
and
they
told
us
it
was
something
to
do
with
equity,
a
million
dollar
project,
whatever
I've
spoken
to
them.
I've
spoken
to
climate
smart
and
have
been
very
unhappy
when
I
found
all
they
were
doing,
is
going
to
car
dealers
to
figure
out
how
to
electrify
our
our
fleet,
and
that
was
that
was
still
we
have
to
de-grow
and
and
then
you
know
that.
G
That's
where
I
know
climate,
smart,
isn't
doing
a
great
job
and
then
for
you
to
say
that
it's
redundant
is
not
true,
because
we
have
a
climate
action.
It's
called
the
climate
crisis,
action,
team
or
commission,
and
that
is
going
to
require
every
department
to
look
at
their
fossil
fuel
use
and
and
have
processes
for
mitigation.
G
And
then
it's
got
to
be
transmitted
to
the
people
that
you
have
to
be
accountable
to,
and
I
love
that
and
of
course
it
has
to
be
in
the
chat.
We
have
to
have
that
accountability
and
that's
what
we're
talking
about
and
that's
in
our
charter
and
it's
one
of
the
appointed
positions
is
the
the
one
who
does
the
you
know
to
make
sure
we're
on
tack
and
we
need
to
be
make
sure
our
climate
action
is
really
on
track
and
that's
the
people's
agenda.
That's
what
we're
trying.
E
Thank
you,
blair.
H
Hi
blair
here
bob
brownstein
at
previous
public
meetings
on
the
city
charter,
has
clearly
stated
the
purpose
of
affordable
housing
measures
with
the
city
charter
is
simply
to
offer
some
broad
perspectives,
guidelines
and
understandings
that
can
be
of
help
towards
better
decision
making
for
the
everyday
community
in
san
jose
in
this
next
decade.
These
are
affordable,
housing
ideas
that
can
offer
a
wide
range
of
flexibility
and
that
can
address
ideas
of
neighborhood
equity,
reimagine,
greeting
sustainability
and
even
local
ohlone
traditions
and
practices.
H
I'm
feeling
the
ideas
I
I'm
hoping
we
can
have
a
continued
study
session
from
the
city
charter
process
into
the
early
spring.
Its
ending
could
coincide
with
the
beginnings
of
the
equity
roundtable,
the
sj
covered
19
economic
forum
and
the
ongoing
work
of
the
reimagined
community
safety
commission.
H
H
H
I
think
those
are
incredibly
good
topics
that
we
can
talk
about
and
and
to
have
us
as
a
as
a
good
starting
point
for
the
these
upcoming
commissions,
and
I
just
hope
you
can
allow
an
extension
of
a
few
months
and
there
may
be
work
to
want
to
place
things
on
it
on
the
charter,
maybe
not,
but
it's
it's
broad
strokes
of
got
good
guidelines.
That
is
the
idea
here.
I
hope
you
can
be
open
to
these.
This
thinking
and
more
conversation.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
elena
or
elena.
K
Thank
you
alina.
I
wanted
to
speak
on
this,
so
the
the
infrastructure
of
our
democracy
under
the
us
constitution
is
supported
by
the
federal
state
and
then
followed
by
counties
and
cities.
So
on
a
local
level
that
infrastructure
is
replicated
via
our
city
constitution.
K
Our
charter
voted
on
through
election
by
the
community,
so
following
the
policies
and
ordinance
to
implement
and
build
upon
the
city
charter-
and
I
disagree
with
your
memo-
you
know
as
an
example,
I
think
that
you
know
article
19
on
urban
sprawl
was
added
to
the
charter,
even
though
there
is
already
a
general
plan
codes,
an
entire
planning
department
and
planning
commission.
Therefore,
following
that
same
notion
and
logic,
I
don't
think
it's
duplicative
to
add
sections
on
police,
climate
or
housing,
which
is
further
supported
by
various
departments,
boards
and
commission.
K
You
know
what
a
charter
amendment
would
add
is
a
guiding
light,
an
umbrella
for
which
all
these
efforts
are
gathered
under
and
working
together,
but
we
aren't
there
yet
we're
still
in
discussion
and
we've
been
studying
with
experts,
people
with
phds,
representing
you
know,
institutions
and
other
areas
of
the
us
for
the
last
11
months.
Going
on
over
100
hours
of
meetings,
so
I
really
urge
the
council
to
let
the
charter
commission
finish
their
work.
Do
not
change
the
rules
on
us
last
minute
like
this.
K
It's
not
fair
work
that
impacts
our
future
generation,
especially
in
regards
to
climate,
which
is
you
know,
the
san
jose
climate
program
only
focuses
on
electrification,
as
tesla
had
already
illustrated,
and
you
know,
council
I
feel,
should
be
rejoiced
and
supportive,
rather
than
divisive,
of
our
efforts
and
using
censorship
tactics
to
remove
our
constitutional
right
to
discuss
these
items
under
the
california
constitution,
article
1,
section
3,
the
people
have
the
right
to
instruct
the
representatives
petition
government
for
redress,
which
these
items
are
definitely
part
of
that
sorry,
grievances
and
assemble
freely
to
consult
for
the
common
good,
and
I
think
we
have
been
attending
these
meetings,
doing
public
comments
showing
up
for
all
of
the
things
and
we're
doing
everything
by
the
rules,
and
I
don't
think
it's
fair
that
you're
changing
the
rules
last
minute
and
taking
away
our
right
to
talk
about
these
items.
I
I
This
memo
this
memo
was
issued
without
the
benefit
of
correspondence
from
anyone
on
the
rpscac
on
september,
13
2021
many
community
leaders
took
time
out
of
their
busy
schedules
to
voice
their
disagreement
with
the
city
manager's
assertion
and
urge
the
charter
commission
to
continue
their
work
on
police
oversight.
Recommendations
in
the
member
dated
october
27
2021,
a
similar
memo
was
issued
by
vice
mayor
chappie,
jones
and
council
member
sergio
to
the
rules
and
open
government
committee
again
without
the
contacting
anyone
on
the
rpscac.
I
We
believe
that
this
is
a
waste
of
government,
time
and
resources
and
disrespectful
to
the
time
that
community
members
have
spent
on
this
process.
This
charter
commission
has
already
done
the
work
held
public
meeting
meetings,
developed
solid
recommendations
and
received
public
input.
It
was
not
a
secret.
The
council
had
time
to
make
a
clarification
in
scope
and
doing
it
now
makes
it
appear
that
they
are
just
trying
to
silence
the
public
and
commission.
I
On
the
issue
of
police
accountability,
you
may
be
pleased
to
know
that
members
of
the
rpsc
and
actually
I'll
stop
here,
because
kiana
steering
committee
member
keanu
will
follow
up
with
the
rest
of
the
letter.
C
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
maria
fuentes,
and
I
am
a
member
of
the
charter
review
commission
and,
as
you
may
know,
because
we
got
received
a
letter
from
vice
mayor,
cathy
jones
and
council
member
sergio
jimenez
on
friday.
We
did
not
discuss
this
at
our
meeting.
I
am
going
to
assume
that
you
this
this
committee,
the
rules
committee
and
the
city
council,
are
not
intending
to
to
change
our
work.
C
As
you
may
know,
we've
had
spent
thousands
of
hours
researching
and
working
on
the
topics
that
we
have
chosen
and
we
are
hoping
to
be
able
to
complete
our
work
and
submit
it
to
you.
According
to
the
deadlines
that
were
required
in
november,
complete
our
meetings
and
also
submit
the
support
in
this
report
in
december,
especially,
I
want
to
emphasize
that.
C
F
Hi,
thank
you.
My
name
is
lori
valdez
and
I
am
a
member
of
the
steering
committee
on.
E
F
Reimagining
public
safety
and
also
on
the
accountability
and
reform
committee-
and
I
want
to
inform
you
how
displeasing
it
is
to
me
as
an
impacted
family
member
of
our
that
of
this
community,
that
the
council
members
that
wrote
those
letters
would
try
to
defeat
the
purpose
of
what
the
charter
commission
and
the
reimagine
public
safety
are
trying
to
work
with
public
safety,
policing,
accountability
and
transparency.
It
seems
like
you
have
been
complacent.
F
You
guys
have
condoned
to
that
pattern
of
behavior
and
you
don't
want
to
see
the
charter
change
to
make
a
difference.
You
know:
there's
family
there's
children
in
our
community
who
are
left
fatherless
and
none
of
you
are
recognizing
these
children.
These
children
are
suffering
you're
talking
about
trauma
that
other
kids
suffer,
but
you
don't
care
about
the
kids
that
the
cops
kill
their
parents.
So
this
work
needs
to
continue
because
there's
a
lot
of
people
in
our
community
who've
been
impacted
and
it
is
not
duplicate.
F
The
charter
commission
is
doing
work
that
needs
to
be
done
through
the
charter
and
we
are
in
unison
with
them,
because
this
is
something
that
has
been
needing
to
be
done
for
a
long
time,
but
it's
always
put
in
the
back
burner
because
you're
so
complicit
with
the
police
or
you
guys
are
afraid
of
the
police,
the
police
unions,
whatever
the
case
may
be,
and
that's
not
right,
the
people
should
be
heard
and
if
not,
if
you
don't
care
about
the
people
our
most
vulnerable,
our
children
should
be
at
the
forefront
of
these
discussions
and
make
sure
that
they
grow
up
in
a
community.
F
They
feel
safe
because
they're
growing
up
fatherless
now,
so
we
need
to
hold
these
officers
accountable
and
these
commissions
that's
what
they
were
assigned
for,
or
were
they
just
just
to
pacify
the
community
after
the
george
floyd?
This
is
what
I
don't
understand.
Let
the
people
do
the
work.
Let
us
have
the
say-
and
you
guys
just
backed
us
up
it's
time,
for
you
guys
to
stop
using
your
power
to
continue
to
defeat
the
purpose
of
the
people
in
our
community
who
want
to
make
a
difference.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
levery
or
I
know
I
messed
that
up
no.
B
Worries
my
name
is
lavere
foster
and
I'm
representing
the
african-american
community
service
agency
and
I'm
also
a
member
of
reimagine
and
public
safety
committee,
and
last
month,
30
community-based
organizations
wrote
a
letter
asking
not
to
block
the
work
on
police
and
oversight
by
the
charter
review.
Commission
and
a
lot
of
these
organizations
also
represent
reimagine
and
public
safety
committee.
I'm
now
going
to
read
a
list
of
the
30
organizations
that
want
you
to
stop
trying
to
block
the
work
of
the
child
review.
Commission.
B
La
raza
round
table
of
california,
the
work
from
the
charter
review
commission
is
already
completed
on
the
topic,
police
and
environment
and
they're
now
moving
towards
voting.
Lastly,
I
just
want
to
say
this
is
a
community
issue
and,
as
such,
should
have
a
unified
approach
by
all
of
the
community.
Thank
you.
E
A
Thank
you,
mr
jones.
I
agree
with
the
speaker's
previous
speakers
in
that
it's
very
discouraging
to
have
the
charter
review
committee
work
on
all
these
issues
and
then,
just
at
the
last
minute,
be
told
that
these
issues
aren't
appropriate
for
the
charter,
housing,
police
oversight,
climate
change
and
others.
A
The
charter
is
the
foundational
document
for
our
city,
and
if
these
are
the
issues
that
the
community
believes
haven't
been
addressed
efficiently,
then
it
shouldn't
just
be
up
to
somebody
inside
the
city
government
vetoing
it,
because
I
don't
know
why
it's
inconvenient
to
talk
about
or
something
climate
change,
police
oversight,
housing.
These
are
things
where
we're
behind.
On
the
these
are
things
that
are
not
fully
addressed
in
plans.
The
climate
action
plan
just
having
a
plan
doesn't
address
climate
change,
we're
not
on
the
path
to
a
sustainable
reduction
in
our
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
police
oversight.
A
That
issue
is
even
further
behind,
and
this
is
like
I
see
this
over
and
over
again.
This
is
like
in
the
culture
of
san
jose
that
when
we,
when
we
don't
like
what
the
residents
are
doing,
we
just
ignore
it.
We
just
have
this
brick
wall.
Put
up
and
people
are
putting
in
a
lot
of
time
and
expertise,
and
it
just
isn't
right
to
not
have
that
reflected.
A
You
know
in
the
city's
documents.
I
urge
you
to
do
what
the
committee
is
recommending
and
incorporate
what
the
community
has
brought
forth
for
reforming
the
charter,
and
that
goes
for
the
general
plan
too.
The
general
plan
is
missing:
components
like
pollution,
there's
nothing
about
any
kind
of
pollution,
air
noise
like
anything
and
please
listen
to
the
people.
Thank
you.
D
Okay,
great,
my
name
is
kiana
simmons
and
I'm
a
steering
committee
member
on
the
reimagining
public
safety
committee.
It
is
ridiculous.
The
way
that
city
officials
are
now
trying
to
undermine
the
people's
work
already
in
progress
and,
as
chris
was
saying,
we
have
been
following
developments
of
the
community
oversight,
discussion
with
the
commission
and
have
prepared
input
to
present
the
commission
members.
One
of
the
members
of
our
steering
committee,
lori
valdez,
has
already
solicited
feedback
from
families
that
have
been
impacted
by
police
violence
and
have
prepared
recommendations
to
submit
commissioners
regarding
this
process.
D
We
are
in
a
crucial
moment,
within
this
country,
an
unprecedented
opportunity
to
address
the
forms
of
systemic
racism
and
oppression
that
have
plagued
people
of
color
for
centuries.
Any
undue
outside
disruptions
to
progress
led
by
the
community
are
disrespectful.
Disruptions
from
elected
officials
and
city
staff
are
intolerable.
D
We
respectfully
request
that
you
stay
out
of
the
way
of
the
people's
business.
Again,
the
efforts
are
not
duplicative.
We
are
reaching
different
audiences
and
operating
on
different
timelines.
If
there
are
procedural
rules
that
are
in
question,
we
request
that
you
review
them.
In
light
of
the
overwhelming
support
of
community
members
to
get
this
done
and
again
my
name
is
kiana.
D
F
F
You
mayor
jones
and
also
council
member
jimenez,
for
your
guidance
to
the
charter
review
commission
also
want
to
express
appreciation
to
city
manager
mcguire
for
her
advisory
memo
to
the
commission
last
month.
F
In
retrospect,
I
do
believe
the
commission
could
have
been
more
clear
or
given
more
clear
direction
and
also,
I
think
the
memo
that's
under
review
today
could
have
been
submitted
sooner,
but
nevertheless
the
commission
still
has
six
or
seven
weeks
to
complete
its
work,
and
the
guidance
in
this
memo
has
the
potential
to
help
the
commission
ensure
that
its
recommendations
focus
on
the
council's
prioritized
issues
and
thor
are
thoroughly
researched,
analyzed
and
formulated.
F
My
name
is
molly
macleod,
and
I
am
glad
that
the
charter
review
work
plan
has
included
policing,
I
recall,
being
at
the
mexican
heritage
plaza
in
january
of
2017,
where
there
was
a
meeting
looking
at
the
powers
of
the
independent
police
auditor
and
pointing
out
that
the
charter
was
the
only
way
to
make
changes
and
since
san
jose
was
on
the
forefront
of
having
the
ipa
win
after
the
rodney
king
beatings.
F
So
much
time
has
passed
since
then,
and
in
fact
the
council
invested
time
in
a
study
session
that
I
recall
participating
in
as
well
on
policing,
and
so
the
recognition
that
this
is
part
of
a
charter
review
work
plan
actually
is
something
that
the
council
has
acknowledged
and
I
think,
is
important
not
to
waste
the
time
and
effort
that's
gone
by.
F
They
are
two
different
things:
one,
the
accountability,
part
versus
the
important
work
of
reimagining
and
considering
alternatives
to
the
alternatives.
The
way
things
are
that
result
in
the
same
effects
over
and
over
and
over,
in
terms
of
who
gets
locked
up
in
jails
and
who
gets
harmed
and
and
hurt
and
killed.
There
is
an
important
part
in
that
on
people
with
disabilities,
those
who
are
incarcerated
or
people
with
disabilities
are
the
biggest
minority
of
those
who
are
in
jails
and
prisons.
F
I'm
really
appreciative
for
sandra
asher's
report
that
will
be
coming
forward
and
includes
information
for
a
town
hall
that
I
helped
set
up
on
october,
7th
for
people
with
disabilities
to
give
impact.
Yes,
our
voices
need
to
be
heard
and
in
the
charter
to
to
put
a
chilling
effect
on
this
work
doesn't
seem
in
alignment
with
the
the
values
and
the
work
that's
been
invested
by
the
council
itself,
so
I'm
opposed
to
the
memos
submitted
by
johnson
jimenez.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
E
E
E
E
All
right,
so
next
person
is
kari.
B
B
Particularly,
you
know,
as
I
think
about
like.
What's
what's
what's
on
the
charter
in
terms
of
police
oversight,
you
know
I
just
have
to
say
it
rings
of
this
conversation,
these
types
of
conversations
that
just
keep
coming
back,
I
hate
hearing
when
people
pull
the
line
of.
Oh
you
know
like.
Why
did
you
bring
up
race
right?
B
B
When
I
think
about
what
it
takes
to,
you
know
like
go
about
solving
these
issues,
and
I
just
like
I,
I
think,
about
how,
like
the
whole
system
that
we
participate
in
leads
to
us
being
here
in
this
context,
where
I
have
to
talk
to
you
guys
about
what
what's
happening
and
how
the
whole
system
needs
to
change
before
we
don't
have
to
have
this
conversation,
and
I
don't
have
to
be
in
this
position.
You
know
in
relation
to
you
guys
right.
B
D
Great
hi
everyone,
my
name
is-
and
I'm
also
part
of
the
charter
review,
commissioner-
and
I'm
here
so
I'll,
be
on
my
own
as
a
community
member
and
just
like
previous
speakers
have
mentioned.
This
is
very
disappointing.
You
know
I
spend
a
lot
of
time,
not
just
like
right.
Our
community
has
spent
a
lot
of
time
getting
the
education
we've
all
got
in
the
education.
We've
brought
different
speakers.
We've
done
research
together,
we've
her
community
we've
been
in
community
and
really
we
we've
drafted
so
far
and
continued
to
draft
amazing
recommendations.
D
I
think
that
are
going
to
benefit
our
city
now
and
in
the
future,
and
I
think
with
that
in
mind
right,
I
want
to
keep
us
going
of
course
and
continue
the
work
that
we're
doing
and
not
sure
what
it's
so
scary.
We
don't
make
we're
an
advisory
board.
We
don't
make
decisions,
unfortunately
we're
an
advisory
board
and
I'm
not
sure
why
that
became
so
scary.
We're
not.
D
Have
those
recommendations
ready
with
community
input
as
well
for
the
council?
So
I
do
once
again.
I
am
here
as
a
community
member
as
a
person
with
a
child
with
that
have
disabilities
that
I
know
that
are
impacted
and
will
hopefully
not,
but
I
potentially
can
be
impacted
by
the
system
because
they're
children
of
color
and
again
one
more
time.
D
B
B
I
want
to
thank
our
council,
member
and
vice
mayor
for
their
memo,
and
I
want
to
recognize
the
hard
work,
the
serious
study,
the
extensive
hours
and
the
public
hearings
and
the
public
comments
that
have
come
before
our
commission,
I'm
especially
pleased
with
the
interest
of
our
community,
and
especially
in
particular
personally,
the
nonprofit
organizations
and
members
of
real
who've
really
followed
our
work
as
well
as
make
comments
along
the
way,
and
I
think
it's
really
made
it
better.
But
my
fellow
commissioners
have
worked
hard
and
have
done
an
incredible
job
as
a
commission.
B
N
Yeah,
if
you,
if
you
want
to
you,
know
redo
law
enforcement,
you
need
to
get
rid
of
the
administration.
The
people
who
have
desk
jobs,
making
a
half
a
million
dollars
a
year
as
captains
and
lieutenants
people
that
they
don't
need
to
be
armed
or
officers
to
do
right.
You
need
to
have
people
out
on
the
street
at
night
time
when
the
crime
really
happens.
N
Okay,
not
not
an
administrative
staff
that
were
as
bankers,
hours
monday
through
friday,
but
somehow
is
able
to
able
to
do
all
kinds
of
overtime
and
everything
else
to
make
a
lot
of
money.
And
meanwhile
the
residents
suffer
right.
I've
been
told
for
10
years.
They
don't
have
enough
money,
michael
yeah,.
E
E
N
N
Okay,
that's
what
I'm
going
to
reimagine,
but
I'm
going
to
reimagine
that
the
southern
division,
where
I
live,
is
going
to
have
more
than
one
person
overnight
with
the
largest
area
in
san
jose
with
crime
going
on
like
there's
no
tomorrow,
I'm
going
to
imagine
that.
Can
you
imagine
that
chappie?
Can
you
imagine
that
for
me?
Maybe
you
guys
city
council
could
try
to
imagine
that.
Let's
imagine
that,
let's,
let's
imagine
more
people
on
the
overnight
shift
when
all
the
crime
happens,
can
we
do
that.
F
F
F
I
I
I
And
government
structure,
accountability
and
the
fifth
directive
by
design
additional
measures
that
will
improve
accountability,
representation
and
inclusion,
and
I
say
by
design
because
it
is
meant
to
be
broad
and
vast,
so
perspectives
can
bubble
up
and
surface
since
we
haven't
had
this
sort
of
commission
happen
in
years.
I
think
that
was
the
intent
commissioners,
you
or
council
members.
You
could
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
and
secondly,
I'm
thinking
that
this
is
the
approach
also
by
design
by
having
more
of
a
democratic
perspective,
inform
our
charter.
I
With
that
said,
we
have
had
a
lot
of
outstanding
speech.
Speakers
come
to
our
study
sessions.
We've
had
professors
from
stanford's
university
woods,
institute
for
the
environment,
parallel
institute
from
hawaii,
professor
and
director
of
their
institute
of
climate
change.
We've
had
local
public
activists
and
climate
scientists.
I
Teachers
come
to
speak
with
us
brian
core,
the
immediate
past,
president
of
the
national
association
of
the
civilian
oversight
and
law
enforcement
and
broad
array
of
commissioners
and
inspector
directors
from
bart
oakland
come
and
speak
to
us,
so
we're
very
informed,
and
we
hope
that
you
will
deliberate
at
session
and
not
stop
now.
Thank
you.
K
Hello,
my
name
is
ernini.
I
am
the
director
of
compassion
and
justice
ministries
at
the
river
church
community,
a
member
of
the
pac
beloved
community
team
and
also
a
part
of
the
reimagining
public
safety
committee.
I
wanted
to
underscore
what
mrs
mccloud
stated.
I
want
to
wholeheartedly
support
the
charter
review
commission,
as
well
as
to
disagree
with
the
vice
mayor's
letter
and
the
council
men's
letter.
The
work
of
the
charter
review
commission
is
both
valuable
for
the
community
as
well
as
both
needed
and
police
oversight
unequivocally
belongs
within
the
charter
review.
K
So
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
measure
g
was
passed
by
city
of
san
jose
overwhelming
support.
77
percent
of
citizens
support
it.
We
support
revising
the
charter
to
include
police
oversight.
We
support
the
work
that
the
commission
is
doing
and
we
are
wholeheartedly
in
disagreement
with
any
attempts
to
thwart
it
to
stop
it
and
prevent
it.
K
So
I
just
wanted
to
unequivocally
represent
myself
my
church,
the
various
communities
that
I'm
associated
with
and
supporting
the
charter
review
commission's
work
and
recommending
listening
to
them
heeding
their
advice,
particularly
over
police
oversight.
That
is
a
mandate
that
measure
g
has
shown
that
the
city
needs
and
wants.
Thank
you
so
much.
D
D
The
public
clearly
rejected
the
previous
memo
by
the
city
manager
to
try
to
stop
policing
oversight
from
being
considered
by
the
charter
commission,
but
it
looks
like
the
vice
mayor
and
council.
Member
jimenez
has
not
taken
the
hint
that
the
public
is
no
longer
going
to
allow
the
city's
silence
on
harm
committed
by
the
police
with
impunity.
D
F
Good
afternoon
I'm
calling
in
as
a
resident
but
also
happen
to
be
on
the
charter
review
commission
as
additionally.
In
no
way
do.
I
speak
for
the
commission,
but
rather
myself,
as
a
community
member,
we're
making
a
recommendation
in
two
weeks
we're
at
the
end
of
our
process.
We
have
followed
all
directives
by
the
chair
and
the
process
and
are
now
at
the
end.
F
This
is
disrespectful
of
our
time.
Thoughtfulness
and
commitment
to
the
community.
To
you
know
at
this
late
stage
of
the
game,
say:
you're
not
going
to
study
what
you're
at
the
end
of
the
process
in.
I
am
absolutely
not
in
favor
of
the
letter
submitted
by
the
vice
mayor
and
council
member
jimenez,
I
also
like
miss
amador
said.
I
also
do
not
understand
why
people
are
so
afraid
of
being
educated
involving
the
community,
and
you
know
listening
to
what
voters
and
this
city
wants.
Thank
you.
C
Hi,
my
name
is
magnolia
siegel.
I
am
a
commissioner
on
the
charter
review
commission,
the
subcommittee
on
accountability,
policing,
inclusion
and
municipal
law,
I'm
speaking
today
on
behalf
of
myself
disagreeing
with
vice
mayor
chappie
jones's
memo
vice
mayor,
we
have
spent
since
the
beginning
of
january
11
months
of
our
lives,
working
on
what
you
told
us,
we're
allowed
to
work
on
which
included,
policing
and
coming
up
with
solutions
to
mitigate
the
climate
crisis.
C
That
was
something
that
you
said.
We
could
work
on
it's
the
fifth
mandate.
We've
spent
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
hours
on
this
in
subcommittee
meetings
in
in
actual
meetings
talking
with
the
community
we're
done
with
our
process.
We
we've
spent
11
months.
We're
done
we're
now
voting
we're
voting
on
11
15..
So
you
are
asking
the
entire
city
council
to
block
the
vote,
because
we're
done
with
our
process,
so
you're
going
to
be
getting
all
of
our
recommendations
on
friday,
and
we
would
have
rather,
we
most
of
us
wouldn't
have
volunteered
for
this.
C
If,
if
we
knew
it
was
only
about
giving
the
mayor,
you
know
more
power
changing
the
election
time,
it
was
really
this
fifth
mandate
actually
helping
the
city
with
its
climate
crisis.
That
and
as
well
as
you
know,
the
policing
oversight
crisis.
We
are
the
weakest
in
amongst
all
of
our
neighbor
cities.
That's
why
we
volunteered
we're
done
with
our
process.
We
are
at
voting.
So
if
you
don't
like
our
recommendations
that
are
coming
out
on
friday,
it's
okay,
please
vote
no
publicly,
but
don't
block
our
process
when
we're
at
the
end
of
it.
F
First,
I
would
like
to
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak.
Second,
I
would
like
to
thank
the
city
manager,
jennifer,
mcguire,
councilman
of
sergey
helmanis
and
vice
mayor
chappie
jones,
for
their
memos
on
the
topic
of
the
charter.
Commission.
The
main
focus
of
the
charter
commission
from
my
reading
was
to
focus
on
the
election
cycle
and
the
powers
invested
in
the
mayor
to
be
increased,
et
cetera
or
not
increased.
F
The
commission
has
in
a
sense
overstepped
its
bounds.
It
has
done
wonderful
work
and
gotten
great
input
on
several
topics,
but
on
some
of
the
topics,
the
input
has
been
very
biased.
Having
listened
to
several
of
the
committee
meetings,
there
was
no
representation
from
the
police
force
or
from
a
police.
F
Captain
or
any
police
input
on
the
police
oversight,
and
they
are
a
major
party
in
that
discussion,
and
so
some
of
the
presentations
haven't
since
been
biased
and
we've
spent,
and
I've
seen
them
spent
very
limited
time
on
the
powers
of
the
mayor,
which
was
one
of
the
top
two
items
we
focused
on.
I
would
really
like
to
see
this
charter
commission
get
focused
on
what
they
were
asked
to
do
and
prioritize,
as
has
been
asked
in
both
of
the
memos.
F
D
Hi,
thank
you.
I'm
councilmember
jones.
My
name
is
darcy
green.
I'm
a
member
of
the
reimagining
public
safety
committee,
advisory
committee
steering
committee,
and
I'm
calling
today
in
support
of
the
letter
submitted
to
you
by
our
steering
committee
and
in
support
of
the
charter
commission.
I
am
passionately
opposed
to
your
october
27th
memo.
Important
work
has
already
been
done.
Public
meetings
have
already
been
held,
they've
developed,
solid
recommendations
and
received
public
input.
D
It
does
not
make
sense
to
not
allow
this
work
in
and
recommendations
to
continue
at
this
point
in
the
process
so
late
in
the
process
to
try
to
throughout
these
efforts
doesn't
make
sense
if
it
were
not
an
effort
simply
to
interrupt
the
process
and
silence
public
voice
around
the
area
of
police
accountability.
D
As
a
member
of
the
reimagining
public
safety
committee,
I
can
tell
you
that
this
work
is
not
duplicative.
This
is
really
beneficial
to
our
process
as
well
the
work
being
done
by
the
charter
commission
in
the
area
of
public
accountability.
It's
not
a
duplication
of
efforts.
The
work
of
the
charter
subcommittee
was
not
done
in
secret.
D
This
committee
and
the
city
council
had
ample
time
to
make
a
clarification
in
scope,
and
doing
so
now
makes
it
appear
that
you
might
just
be
trying
to
silence
the
public
and
commission
around
the
issue
of
police
accountability
after
the
work
has
already
been
done.
I
am
urging
you
to
please
reconsider
this
memo
and
allow
for
this
very
important
information
to
continue
in
the
public
discourse.
Thank.
D
Yes,
my
name
is
pamela
emanuel
and
I'm
the
vice
president
of
doc
outreach
time
and
time
again
this
community,
we,
the
people,
have
stated
our
needs
and
demands,
and
time
and
time
again
the
public
view.
Public
officials
have
tried
to
silence
us,
you
and
you
know
what
a
waste
of
emotional
work
and
time
so
many
of
us
have
put
in
to
stand
our
voices
and
state
what
we
want
in
support
of
having
a
child
review
to
review
police
cruelty
and
to
also
state
what
we
want
to
see
in
our
own
environment
as
well.
D
You
know,
if
you
all,
if
you
guys,
give
us
these
spaces
to
build
out
a
working
process
that
we
want
in
order
to
improve
our
city,
for
you
only
to
take
away
and
shut
the
door
on
our
community
agreements
is
honestly,
it's
disgraceful.
The
tyranny
this
meeting
is
upholding,
is
baffling
and
really
it's
acting
in
the
same
stroke
as
a
dictatorship.
D
You
know
this
community,
we
will
be
heard
and
if
you
all
try
to
denounce
that,
we
will
do
our
due
diligence
as
community
members
to
remove
you,
our
frauds,
to
remove
you
frauds
who,
who
claim
to
be
in
political
power,
to
support
the
people
in
our
environment.
But
what
you're
doing
is
really
just
trying
to
silence
us
to
pass
your
own
hidden
agendas.
F
F
There
are
many
ideas
on
climate
which
I
have
written,
which
I
that
need
to
be
discussed
by
the
climate
crisis,
action
commission
and
by
in
and
needed
against,
be
considered
in
san
jose,
and
we
just
are
not
doing
them.
The
climate
crisis
action
commission
is
not
redundant
with
san
jose's.
Current
climate
smart
program
do
not
block
the
vote
to
remove
the
climate
crisis
action.
Commission.
F
F
E
You
that
is
the
end
of
public
comments.
Actually,
we
have
one
more
mikhail.
B
Thank
you.
I
wanted
to
weigh
in
with
many
of
my
colleagues
and
friends.
My
name
is
mikaez
trametta,
I'm
on
the
steering
committee
of
the
reimagining
public
safety
working
group.
I'd
urge
you,
council,
member
jones
to
withdraw
your
position
and
to
permit
the
work
to
be
finished
and
communicate
it
to
the
full
council.
B
E
Thank
you
now.
That
is
the
end
of
public
comments.
We
want
to.
First
of
all,
thank
all
the
members
of
the
public
who
came
out
and
spoke,
as
you
can
tell.
Your
voices
are
very
loud
and
clear,
and
if
there's
any
feeling
or
perception
that
your
voices
are
trying
to
be
stifled
or
restricted,
I
think
that
you've
proven
that
that's
not
the
case.
E
E
The
purpose
of
our
memo
is
really
to
raise
these
concerns
and
provide
more
clarity
and
expected
outcomes
based
on
a
lot
of
the
public
comments.
There
really
should
have
been
a
process
early
on
in
terms
of
having
this
kind
of
clarity,
because
several
speakers
stated
that
climate
change,
police
reform
or
reimagining
community
safety,
housing
and
other
issues
were
part
of
the
original
direction
of
the
council.
E
The
original
direction
of
the
council
was
governance
structure
and
the
election
cycles
for
the
mayor.
In
the
odd
number
council
districts,
we
did
have
an
additional
clause,
saying
consideration
of
additional
measures
and
potential
charter
amendments
as
needed
that
will
improve
accountability,
representation
and
inclusion
at
san
jose
city
hall.
E
But
my
my
goal
is
to
have
this
commission
prioritize
the
direction
that
council
gave
and
get
that
work
done
and
then,
if
there's
additional
time
to
to
work
on
some
other
things,
then
you
know
that's
possible.
But
even
though
some
folks
feel
like
this
is
the
11th
hour
or
it's
very
late.
E
So
on
that
note,
I
will,
I
see
councilmember
paulus
has
his
hands
raised
hand
raised
so
go
ahead.
Councilmember
cross.
M
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much
vice
mayor
and
appreciate
some
of
the
the
description
or
background
there.
I
want
to
add
a
little
bit
myself
just
for
those
that
may
not
be
completely
aware
of
where
this
direction
all
came
from.
M
As
you
put
in
your
memo,
there
was
a
pretty
lengthy
discussion
in
late
july
of
last
year
and
and
I'm
very
familiar
with
it,
because
the
the
initial
suggestion
of
a
charter
revision
commission
came
from
me
and
the
topic
that
we
had
been
discussing
at
the
time
last
year
was
placing
on
the
ballot
a
number
of
of
governance,
related
items
and
and
powers
for
the
mayor.
M
Some
campaign
finance
reforms.
It
was
quite
a
con,
a
conglomerate
of
of
items
being
put
together,
and
my
experience-
or
I
should
say
my
knowledge
of
how
major
charter
changes
to
our
governance
structure
had
been
conducted
in
the
past,
was
that
they
had
gone
through
the
process
of
a
charter
revision,
commission
and
rather
than
move
hastily
with
some
pretty
some
pretty
large
changes
to
our
governance
structure.
M
I
felt
that
it
was
more
wise
to
go
the
route
of
forming
a
charter
revision
commission
and
allowing
that
charter
revision
commission
to
spend
some
time
understanding,
vetting
out
the
different
options
and
then
ultimately
bringing
forward
recommendations
to
the
council.
M
Then
we
could
decide
how
or
what
we
might
want
to
put
up
on
a
ballot
and
indeed
the
primary
directives
where,
as
you
described
vice
mayor,
there
were-
and
there
was,
that
additional
sort
of
third
line
item
that
left
open
the
opportunity
and
that
the
main
reason
for
that
was
so
that
that
way
we
did
not
confine
potentially
some
ideas
around
participation
of
our
of
our
community
and
and
really
trying
to
better
our
government
structure
here
and
and
restrain
the
charter
vision
commission
from
looking
into
those.
M
But
it
did
not
at
all
specify
other
areas
that
have
now
been
brought
up
and
identified
by
the
charter
revision.
Commission
that
I
would
agree
with
you.
There
seems
to
be
a
misunderstanding
as
to
what
some
of
the
the
parameters
or
specifics
were
in
regards
to
the
goals
of
the
charter
revision,
commission,
and
so
I
think,
a
bit
of
it
has
gotten
either
confused
or
carried
away.
M
But
I
would
also
agree
that
we
are
sort
of
towards
the
end
of
the
process
here,
and
I
understand
the
frustration
that
I
heard
from
a
number
of
our
both
participants
in
in
the
commission
and
and
community
members
and
those
that
are
participating
in
our
reimagining
public
safety
committee
as
well,
and
and
recognize
that
you
know
when
you
see
a
memo
come
out
and
don't
necessarily
have
context
to
it
and
and
then
now
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
to
it,
especially
if
you're,
towards
the
end
of
your
work
on
an
item.
M
You
know
where
the
frustration
comes
from,
so
I
actually
want
to
see
if
we
can
bring
up
the
chair
fred.
I
think
he's
still
on
the
the
call
is
that
correct
and
sorry
I
put
you
on
the
spot
here,
fred,
but
and
I
don't
mean
to
state
that
you're
speaking
for
everybody
on
the
commission,
but
you
have
the
chair
so
since
you're
here,
if
we
can
bring
fred
up-
and
I
wanted
to
ask
him
a
question.
M
Fred,
are
you
able
to
unmute?
Can
you
hear
me
hear
me?
I
can
council
member
great.
Thank
you
very
much
and
again
I
apologize
put
you
on
the
spot
here,
but
thank
you
for
participating,
obviously
in
the
process
and
then
participating
today.
M
There
is
a
obviously
a
goal
that
we
have
in
in
regards
to
getting
recommendations
based
on
the
core
elements
that
we
had
asked
of
the
charter
revision
commission
getting
recommendations
before
we
break
in
december,
and
I
think
you're
aware,
but
maybe
not
everybody
is
but
as
to
why
we
we
have
a
time
limit
on
that.
M
The
reason
why
is
because,
if
we're
going
to
put
something
to
on
a
ballot
to
the
voters
to
change
the
charter,
especially
if
we're
going
to
do
something
that
may
potentially
change
some
of
the
structure
and
makeup
for
the
next
set
of
elected
officials,
including
our
mayor,
that
gets
elected,
we
would
need
to
do
so
at
the
earliest
convenience,
which
would
be
this
next
coming
june
primary
election
and
hence
why
you
know
I
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure-
and
I
think
obviously
you're
aware
of
that,
but
make
sure
everybody
is
aware
that
that's
the
reason
for
this
time
limit
is
that
we
we
specifically
needed
to
get
some
things
done
in
time.
M
M
I
would
actually
personally
hope
it
would
come
a
little
bit
before
december
14th,
because
that's
when
the
council
is
supposed
to
debate
it
right,
giving
us
maybe
some
time
to
look
it
over.
But
but
are
you
poised
to
do
that.
B
Yes,
council
councilmember,
we
are
our
work
plan,
calls
for
us
to
be
finishing
our
work
in
november
and
turning
in
our
work
so
that
it
can
be
posted
on
december
3rd,
which
then
will
be
the
a
bit
able
to
get
to
your
december
14th
deadline.
So
our
work
plan
is
to
do
that.
B
We
are
able
to
make
the
recommendations
on
the
core
issues
that
that
were
raised
in
the
original
institution
memo
we
are,
I
I
see
no
reason
that
that
wouldn't
in
fact,
we've
already
sent
you
one
set
of
recommendations
where
the
public
and
others
gave
us
input
that
it
was
even
more
timely
in
terms
of
the
election
of
the
mayor,
so
that
has
already
gone
to
you
as
one
recommendation
and
the
rest
will
be
coming
on
december
3rd.
As
we
conclude
our
work.
M
M
Okay,
I
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
that's
it
I
mean
for
for
questions
for,
for
you
fred.
Thank
you
for
for
coming
in.
I
too
personally
agree.
I'm
you
know
concerned
through
the
process
on
some
of
the
the
the
expansion
of
what
the
charter
revision
credit
was
looking
into,
but
I
think,
if
you
know,
there's
an
interest
to
bring
forward
some
other
recommendations.
M
You
know
so
be
it.
I'm
not.
I'm
not
concerned
so
long
as
the
original
asks
are
being
answered
and
and
being
met,
and
it
sounds
like
that's
the
case
and
that's
obviously
what
we're
hearing
from
the
chair
here
that
they're
they're
willing
to
commit
to
that
as
they
they
had
before
and
any
other
additional
recommendations
they
may
want
to
bring
forward
with.
That
will
also
come
at
that
same
time.
So
I
I
guess,
I'm
hearing
from
the
chair.
M
I'm
not
concerned
that
they're
not
going
to
meet
that
deadline
and
that
we
will
have
an
opportunity
to
to
debate
those
items
I'll
go
back
to
asking
our
vice
mayor,
then
just
considering
what
chair
forever
just
just
said
that
it
looks
like
they're
going
to
be
able
to
meet
that
deadline.
M
E
So
if
they
are
going
to
meet
that
december,
14th
deadline
that
it
actually
makes
some
of
our
recommendations,
a
moot
point,
so
I
I
recommend
we
just
move
forward
with
my
memo.
E
M
Okay,
yeah,
I
I'm
not
as
concerned.
I
guess
at
this
point
that
they're
not
going
to
meet
the
deadline
and
even
if
they've
gone,
you
know
beyond
some
of
the
core
scope.
It
looks
like
at
least
they're
going
to
incorporate
that
and,
as
has
already
been
you
know,
brought
forward
as
I've
been
been
following
as
well.
Some
of
the
recommendations
from
the
the
core
asks
that
we
had,
I
think,
if
they
you
know
they
want
to
bring
forward
others.
We
can
then
decide
on
the
14th.
M
You
know
where
the
best
placement
for
some
of
those
requests
requests
are.
I
also
want
to
stress
one
other
item
that
this
this
format
here
this.
This
commission
is
not
necessarily
the
only
place
that
the
council
can
generate
ideas
for
revisions
to
our
charter
and,
in
fact,
our
our
reimagining
public
safety
community
advisory
committee
likely
is
going
to
be
bringing
forward
several
suggestions
on
their
own.
That
may
require
charter
changes
and,
even
though
their
title
of
their
committee
is
not
a
charter
review
commission.
M
Indeed,
some
changes
may
require
chartered
charter
amendments,
and
so
I
just
want
to
make
it
very
clear.
I
think
there's
also
maybe
some
concern
that
that
this
you
know
the
work
of
this
charter
review.
Commission
is
the
only
place
that
that
one
can
can
make
some
solid
suggestions
on
on
changes
to
the
charter
and
and
that's
just
not
the
case
and
actually
we're
hoping.
M
I
know
I'm
hoping
personally
that
the
work
that
comes
out
of
the
reimagining
public
safety
committee,
it
does
actually
include
things
that
may
be
broad
enough
to
be
charter
changes
and-
and
it
sounds
like
obviously
they've
been
working
closely
and
I
did
follow
that
response
from
the
rematching
public
safety
committee
at
our
public
safety
committee,
where
they
responded
to
that
letter
from
our
city
manager
and
and
stated
that
they,
you
know,
were
comfortable
with
the
charter
revision
commission's
work
and
and
what
they
might
look
into
and
obviously
could
learn
from
that,
and
I
I
would
agree
with
that.
M
I
think
that,
hopefully
that's
where
those
recommendations
can
land
and
ultimately,
when
that
body
is
done,
the
reimagining
committee
work
is
done.
We
can
incorporate
some
of
those
but
time
sensitive,
wise.
The
issues
that
are
most
time
sensitive
were
those
core
issues
that
we
asked.
The
charter
review
commission
to
look
into
and
to
have
completed
by
this
december,
and
I
think
that's
where
we
really
will
have
to
make
some
time-sensitive
decision
on
come
december,
14th
anything
outside
of
that.
M
I
think
we
certainly
have
some
wiggle
room
on
where
it
goes.
So
I
I
guess
I
I
just
I
don't
know
if
it's
you
know,
maybe
it's
more
harm
than
good
at
this
point
to
sort
of
move
forward
with,
with
the
memo
that
you've
authored
with
councilmember
jimenez.
Considering
that
it
looks
like
you
know,
we'll
get
there
we'll
sort
of
get
to
the
finish
line
that
we'd
hoped
and
then
on
the
14th.
M
We
can,
you
know
we
can
decide
what
to
do
next
versus
maybe
provide.
What
there
already
seems
to
be
is
some
some
lack
of
clarity
and
uncertainty
about
what
this
memo
means
or
what
it
would
do,
and
I
would
agree
some
of
it
would
be
a
complete
point
if,
if
indeed
the
commission
is
going
to
conclude
its
work,
so
at
the
moment
I
I
won't
be
able
to
support
it
moving
forward.
M
I
do
appreciate
that
you
know
again
the
guidance
and
the
the
clarification
and
and
the
encouragement
of
the
commission
to
be
able
to
focus,
and
it
sounds
like
they.
They
will
be
able
to
do
that,
and
I
have
confidence
in
in
that
their
their
chair
foreign
answer.
Thanks.
L
Thank
you.
Some
of
the
questions
that
councilman
perales
asked
actually
clarified
some
of
what
I
was
wondering
and,
and
I'm
just
gonna
pick
up
where
he
left
off,
and
it
sounds
like
the
work
that
this
commission
was
set
to
do,
or
the
two
major
scopes
are
going
to
be
completed
in
the
time
that
we
expect
for
them
to
be
completed,
and
is
that
is
that
the
the
the
top
priority
for
you
vice
mayor,
in
terms
of
if
there
was
something
that
you
wanted
to
get
done
in
this
memo?
L
Great,
I
think
that
there
is
some
benefit
to
one
of
your
items
in
the
memo
says:
direct
the
city
clerk
to
provide
additional
guidance
regarding
c
city
resources
and
funds
to
support
the
charter
review.
Commission
resources
include
assigned
staff
and
our
to
be
prior
prioritized
to
provide
support,
as
it
relates
to
governance,
structure
and
election
cycles,
and
I'm
not
I'm
reading
that,
not
because
you
don't
know
what's
on
your
memo,
but
just
so
that
everybody
else
that's
listening
to
us
can
follow
what
this
item
refers
to.
L
I
don't
I
don't
see
any
efforts
on
your
part
to
halt
or
stop
any
of
the
work.
That's
being
done,
you
said
so
yourself
and
that's
not
the
intention
of
this
this
memo.
I
I
think
the
the
what
we
can
do
here
is
a
happy
medium.
L
Maybe
what
we
could
approve
is
is
item
number
one
and
item
number
three
three
and
leave
the
item
number
two
that
says
regarding,
regarding
other
work
being
done
by
commission,
consider
additional
measures
and
potential
charter
amendments
so
leave
that
piece
out,
but
I'm
I'm
wondering
what
my
I
don't
know
if
I
would
get
a
second
to
that.
E
Actually
I'll
second,
it
councilmember,
because
actually
I
was
going
to
offer
that
up
as
a
compromise,
so
very
comfortable.
L
Wonderful
okay!
Well,
thank
you.
I
think,
with
with
what
we
have
as
an
item
number
one
lee
there's,
is
there
anything
that
sets
the
charter
review
commission
off
track
under
item
number?
One.
B
Sorry,
can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
sorry,
technical
difficulty,
that
might
be
a
better
question
for
tony.
I
don't
believe
that
would
based
off
of
the
information
we
have
on
what
the
charter
commission
is
doing
right
now
and
the
timeline
that
chair
ferreira
just
went
over.
I
wouldn't
see
that
recommendation.
One
would
distract
the
charter
review
committee
now.
J
Yeah,
this
is
tony
tabor
city
clerk.
I
don't
know
if
we
need,
if
we're
not
doing
item
two,
I
don't
know
if
the
resolution
itself
actually
needs
to
be
revised.
J
I
think
it
is
good
to
reinforce
the
the
deadline
to
say
you
know.
We
definitely
want
it
by
these
two
dates.
I,
but
it
does
say
in
the
direction
here
to
amend
the
resolution
establishing
the
crc
to
prioritize
the
two
major
scopes
of
work.
J
So
I
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
amend
the
resolution,
we
can.
We
could
that's
the
attorney's
office,
so
this
this
is
norm
may
need
to
weigh
in
on
that
or
mark
marks
on
the.
L
Listen,
I
don't
want
to
add
any
additional
work
that
may
delay
this
so
just
to
steer
clear
from
this.
I
think
just
move
forward
with
item
number
three,
which
provides
additional
guidance
regarding
city
resources
and
funds
to
support
the
charter
review
commission,
and
so
this
actually
provides
some
support
to
that
to
that
commission
and
so
I'll
I'll
edit.
My
my
motion
that
way.
L
L
Would
hearing
this
item
at
count?
I
don't
know
that
we
need
item
number
four,
because
if
we've
just
we've
figured
out
that
this
is
not
going
to
be
off
track,
I
think
it'll
just
create
another
conversation
that
will
lead
us
back
to
this
same
place
and
that's
the
same
place
is
that
this
commission
is
on
track
with
those
two
major
scopes
that
were
assigned
to
them,
and
so
I
don't
know
that
it's
going
to
lead
any
any
different
vice
mayor.
F
E
J
This
is
a
city
attorney
question
I
mean
I
I
as
the
clerk.
I
understand
the
direction
and
and
we're
on
track.
For
that
too,
I
do
have
a
staff
person
who
is
prioritized
to
support
it.
I've
already
pulled
the
budget
to
make
sure
we're
we're
staying
within
budget,
and
this
is
directing
us
to
just
stop
by
the
end
of
december,
which,
if
everything's
on
track
for
the
december
14th
meeting,
that
would
be
that's
automatically
going
to
be
part
of
it.
F
Nora,
does
the
full
council
need
to
weigh
in
on
this,
as
I
think
they
do
if
there's
going
to
be
direction
to
the
city
clerk?
Yes
it?
I
was
just
going
to
ask
her
if
she
thought
these
things
were
already
going
if
she
needed
additional
direction,
but
yeah
there's
going
to
be
additional
direction
to
the
to
the
city
clerk
that
does
have
to
go
to
the
council.
F
L
But
aren't
we
the
open
government
committee
already
and
so
doesn't
that
qualify
us
to
provide
direction
to
the
city
clerk,
nora.
F
Well,
it's
coming
out
of
council
direction
in
in
the
original
council
memo.
I
think
the
answer,
as
I
understand
it
from
the
clerk
is
that
she's
doing
these
things
already
in
three,
but
because
it
goes
back
to
that
original
council
memo
and
the
original
direction
from
the
council.
F
That's
the
in
the
in
the
resolution
that
established
the
charter
review
commission.
It's
it
really
does
need
to
go
back
to
the.
F
J
J
If
we
were
to
take
this
back
to
council,
I
think
I'd
want
to
include
something
in
the
from
item
1
to
just
complete
all
research
by
november
29th
have
recommendations
submitted
to
council
by
december
14th
that
don't
say
anything
about
amending
the
resolution,
because
we're
not
changing
the
scope
of
work,
we're
just
establishing
in
writing
that
deadline
and
then
also
you
could
do
three
at
the
same
time,
if
it's
going
to
go
to
council,
I
don't
know
if
it's
needed
to
go
to
council
at
this
point,
because
it's
if
you're
telling
us
to
just
stay
with
the
work
plan,
we've
already
got
approved
to
finish
in
time.
L
Okay,
so
it
sounds
like
everything
is,
it
comes
back
around
and
it
sounds
like.
None
of
these
recommendations
are
then
necessary.
So
I'm
going
to
retract
my
motion
from
moving
the
the
the
memo
I
was
hoping
to
that
it
would
be
helpful,
but
it
sounds
like
this
is
on
track
and-
and
I
have
the
assurance
from
our
city
clerk
and-
and
it
sounds
you
know
from
our
chair-
that
this
is
moving
forward.
So
I'm
just
going
to
retract
the
motion
completely.
E
Tony
I'm
just
trying
to
understand.
Wouldn't
it
obviously,
we
all
have
the
expectation
that
you
know
the
work
will
be
completed
by
december
14th.
But
you
know
things
happen
like
everything
else
right,
so
wouldn't
it
be
helpful
for
us
to
at
least
have
some
dates
that
the
council
votes
on
in
the
event
that
you
know,
I
think.
J
I
would
say
that
it
is
helpful
to
establish
that
expectation.
We
have
had
several
requests
to
extend
beyond
november
29th,
so
I
I
think
it
is
helpful
to
bring
forward
november.
29Th
is
the
last
day
year
to
vote
on
it,
because
that
that
gives
them
gives
us
a
few
days
to
transmit
it
to
council
for
the
december
14th.
I
don't
think
it
hurts
to
establish
those
dates.
J
You
know
it's
the
we're,
definitely
not
extending,
because
these
are
the
dates
that
have
been
approved.
We
have
fred
and
has
remained
firm.
I
have
remained
firm
that
we
want
to
have
everything
done
for
the
december
14th
meeting,
but
yeah
it
doesn't
hurt
to
have
that
approved.
Those
dates.
E
Yeah
councilman
is,
I
know,
your
hesitancy
in
terms
of
rehashing
this
conversation,
but
I
think
it
would
be
a
different
conversation.
L
Listen,
I
think
we're
at
the
tail
end
of
this,
and
I
want
to
protect
this
process
and
the
the
work
that
has
been
done
by
our
commission
on
our
chair
here
as
much
as
possible,
and
I
think
that
any
interference
from
us
at
this
point
will
create
maybe
some
havoc,
and
so
I
think,
if
we
have
this
assurance
from
from
tony
a
former
city
clerk
and
from
our
chair
who's,
leading
this,
this
effort
that
we,
I
think
we
just
leave
well
enough
alone.
L
Otherwise
I
think
we
are
going
to
create
maybe
having
them
go
off
track,
and
I
I
do
not
want
to
be
part
of
that
at
all.
I
want
them
to
stay
on
track.
I
want
them
to
help
us
out
with
these
two
scopes
and
hopefully
with
you
know
the
others
that
they've
thought
about
and
integrate
them
into.
Whatever
our
city
manager's
office
thinks
it's
appropriate
or
our
council
thinks
it's
appropriate,
but
I
think
for
now
my
focus
is:
let's
get
to
that
deadline.
M
Yeah
thanks
and
appreciate
that
the
dialogue
with
clarification
based
on
what
I
was
hearing
tony
say
it
sounded
like
recommendation.
Three
also
is
sort
of
already
included,
and
but
yet
she
is
saying
that
maybe
further
clarification
would
be
helpful
and
I
guess
the
reason.
M
Why
is
because
there
have
been
some
expressed
interest
of
maybe
continuing
the
work
past
december,
and
I
I
would
agree
that
you
know
if
we
can
clarify
that
this
was
expected
and
should
end
by
december
14th
and
that's
what
we've
heard
from
the
chair
that
their
recommendations
will
be
submitted
as
as
expected
then
kind
of
going
back
to
my
initial
statements.
I
don't
think,
there's
anything
else
that
we
have
to
do,
and
I
guess
I'll
I'll
ask
this.
J
The
direction
at
the
the
meeting
where
the
charter
view
commission
was
established.
We
had
set
december
14th
as
being
the
day.
The
report
needs
to
go
to
in
front
of
council,
so
that
also
is
an
attorney
interpretation
of
whether
that
means
we
can
submit
a
report
on
the
14th
and
then
say,
oh,
but
we
didn't
finish
these
other
items
that
we
wanted
to.
So
we
want
more
time.
I
don't
know
if
we
can
just
automatically
do
that.
That's
attorney!
I
know
december
14th
has
been
my
deadline
from
the
the
beginning
of
this
commission.
M
Okay,
that
that's
that's
more
helpful
so
and
we
haven't
had
that
request
just
yet.
Obviously
it
sounds
like
tony
you're
saying
some
people
have
expressed
that,
but
we
haven't
had
that
formal
request.
It
does
sound
like
that.
The
chair
of
the
commission
is
stating
that
they'll
have
the
work
submitted
before
that
date,
and
so
we
can.
We
can
make
some
decisions
on
the
14th,
but
maybe
there
is
sort
of
a
possibility
looming
out
there
that
there's
an
interest
to
maybe
carry
on
in
some
of
this.
This
additional
scope.
M
That
was
not
within
the
original
direction
of
the
establishment
of
the
charter
review
commission,
and
I
would
agree
that
if
we
were
to
do
anything
beyond
the
work
that
gets
completed
by
the
14th,
that
should
merit
its
own
conversation,
as
you
know,
on
its
own
from
the
council
and
not
necessarily
just
be
brought
on,
because
there
was
some
scope
creep
and
and
the
work
should
continue.
So
I
I
I
you
know,
respect
that
and
understand.
M
I
think
that's
where
maybe
vice
mayor
you're
you're,
trying
to
to
set
a
definitive
sort
of
deadline
on
some
of
the
work
and
not
necessarily
look
at
the
extension
of
this
to
go
into
an
unknown
time
frame
or
deadline
that
we'd
really
like
the
work
to
be
completed,
as
was
expected
this
december
again,
I
have
full
confidence
in
the
the
chair's
answer
that
that
will
be
done,
and
so
I
do
think
at
the
moment.
The
requests
are,
you
know,
maybe
preemptive
or
unnecessary,
and
what
it's
causing
is
is
some
consternation.
M
I
would
rather
say
hold
this
type
of
recommendation
and
you
know,
and
and
and
only
necessarily
bring
it
up
when
we
have
to
if,
if
indeed
the
charter
review
commission
over
the
next
couple
weeks
said,
hey
we'd
like
to
do
something
different,
but
I'm
also
not
against
sending
a
a
you
know
a
clear
message
in
regards
to
hey.
M
You
know
this
is
exactly
you
know
what
we'd
like
to
to
see
that
what
we
had
originally
asked
for,
and
we
had
originally
asked
for
it
to
be
completed
this
december
and
and
to
make
that
statement
rather
clear.
I
don't
know
if
trying
to
read
over
your
recommendation
three
here
it.
It
essentially
says
that
and
that's
essentially
what
the
clerk
is
looking
at
right
now.
So
I
think
that's
I
think,
that's
fine.
I
think
we
could
move
forward.
I
can
move
forward
still
and
to
support
recommendation
three.
M
I
don't
necessarily
know
if
it
needs
to
come
to
the
council
next
tuesday.
I
don't
know
if
there's
necessarily
a
rush
on
that,
but
you
know
I'm
okay
with
that
that
further
clarification
again,
I'm
also
okay.
If
we
don't
necessarily
make
any
definitive
actions
now,
because
I
do
think
it
is
a
little
preemptive
and
that's
likely
why
we
have
some
some
frustration.
E
Okay,
I
was
on
pins
and
needles
wrong.
I
didn't
I
didn't
know
which
way
you
were
going
to
go
on
that
one
until
till
the
end,
so
that's
accounts
for
radius.
E
Okay,
so
we
had
a
motion
that
was
withdrawn
and
we
didn't
have
a
new
motion.
So
this
item
is
not
going
to
move
forward
at
this
time.
So
on
to
the
next
item,.
G
All
right
good!
Well,
you
know,
as
I
sit
here
and
to
listen
to
your
conversation
today,
you
know
I'm
just
evaluating
the
whole
classroom
scenario
that
we
have,
which
is
now
our
virtual
classroom
to
have
our
democracy,
and
you
know
I
just
you
know
even
didn't
know
like
when
you're
talking
about
first
one.
Second
one,
you
know
there
wasn't
really
pictures
of
what
you
were
talking
about.
Luckily
I
have
my
little
ipad
and
I
can
follow
along,
but
it's
a
lot
of
complexity
that
you
know
we
need
to
build
it
into
the
curriculum.
G
G
You
know
to
make
this
a
classroom,
that's
very
educational
and
so
makes
it
easy
for
us
to
participate
more
of
us,
and
you
know,
even
when
I
go
to
the
see
who's
there,
a
lot
of
you
aren't
even
there
anymore
and
then
I
don't
understand
that
and
then
there's
no
real
participation
list
and
even
when
I
go
to
the
the
transcript,
it
just
says
chamber
that
doesn't
help
me.
So
it's
really
not
good.
G
What's
going
on
and
you
know
as
we
go
forward
in
our
you
know
having
our
democracy
to
be
online,
because
this
is
how
it
should
be
it's
safer
for
us,
and
this
is
how
we
should
be
doing
it
and
you're
not
doing
it,
because
you
want
an
old
business
as
usual,
everybody
running
around
spending
gas
and
money
and
money
money
money.
Anything
that
deals
with
money
is
evil.
Really
that's
the
expression
money
is
the
root
of
all
evil.
That's
a
truism,
so
you
know.
G
G
We've
been
doing
a
lot
of
great
work
with
that
charter
review
commission,
and
so
we
need
to
keep
going
with
it
and
and
so
we're
getting
a
lot
of
good
information
and
that's
what
we
need
as
a
community
to
change
in
terms
of
the
great
changes
we
need
to
affect
our
change
to
live
as
a
species
because
of
our
climate.
E
Thank
you,
blair.
H
Hi
blair,
here
boy
that
was
really
heavy.
The
last
item
just
thank
you
for
everyone's
work
and
efforts.
Item
three
of
the
last
item:
the
memo
it
offered
the
chance
that
we
can
work
on
the
issue
as
a
commission
and
the
commission
can
make
some
of
their
own
choices.
So
thank
you
for
the
memo,
writing
and,
and
our
options
and
choices
to
to
to
work
on
this
issue.
H
On
the
charter
issue
about
this
nse
stuff
yeah,
you
offer
some
interesting
programs,
a
homelessness,
annual
report
and
rent
stabilization
program
strategies.
Thank
you
for
the
homeless
annual
report.
What
like
what
was
talked
about
yesterday
with
you
know
the
the
the
the
housing
land
to
to
try
to
consider
encampment
issues
and
the
possibility
of
a
government-sponsored
encampment
issues.
H
Good
luck
in
talking
with
you
know,
to
create
small
encampments
and
to
talk
with
local
neighbors
in
local
neighborhoods
and
get
their
feelings
and
opinions
how
this
sort
of
system
can
work.
You
know
people
been
working
on
this
for
years.
The
safe
pro
parking
program
has
worked
fairly
well.
That
can
give
some
good
examples.
H
How
we
can
how
we
can
do
this
well,
and
it
could
offer
good
protection
for
people
we
can
offer
people
services
which,
which
will
be
really
important
and
meaningful,
and
about
the
rent,
stabilization
ideas,
boy,
good
luck
with
the
you're,
creating
some
copa,
ideas
that
we're
trying
to
all
understand.
Council
person.
H
Paralysis
has
offered
that
we
can
have
continued
dialogue
on
the
subject
that
I'm
hopeful
how
we
can
have
that
sort
of
dialogue
and
all
sides
can
can
take
a
listen
to
what
we
can
be
doing
with
this
future.
Good
luck!
How
we
can
work
on
these
things.
A
Thank
you,
I'm.
I
understand
that
you
know
the
to
why
things
get
delayed.
You
need
time
to
incorporate
the
impacts
of
the
pandemic
into
the
unhousedness
annual
report
and
the
rent
stabilization
program,
strategic
clan
report,
but
the
problem
is
by
months
you
know
to
february
and
to
may
respectively
on
those
topics
to
not
discuss
them.
I
just
wish
there
would
be
you
know.
The
items
should
still
be
there,
but
perhaps
be
just
scaled
back.
A
Rent
stabilization,
you
know,
is
one
thing
that
the
city's
policy
is
definitely
inadequate.
Thank
you,
council
members,
raul,
perales
and
sylvia
uranus.
I
believe
you
are
among
those
who
voted
for
stronger,
rent
stabilization.
A
This,
the
I
believe
you
we
ended
up
with
a
five
percent
allowed
rent
increases
in
san
jose,
and
that
is
just
not
it
just
does
not
protect
people
that
is
double
the
rate
of
inflation,
typically
and
so
you're
still
by
policy
displacing
the
most
vulnerable
people
with
that
in
oakland
san
francisco,
east
palo
alto
mount
mountain
view.
I
think
many
other
cities
have
set
the
annual
rent
caps
to
the
rate
of
inflation.
A
That
means,
if
you
were
saying
you're,
those
cities
are
saying
if
you're
a
vulnerable
person,
you're
low
income
and
it's
the
no
fault
of
anyone's
that
they're,
they
have
low
incomes.
You
know
this.
This
is
by
design
rigged
economy,
that
they're
extremely
wealthy
people
and
very
poor,
and
the
policy
needs
to
be
that
we
set
the
rent
and
it
doesn't
go
up
over
time.
Please
consider
that
as
a
future
reform
of
the
city's
policy.
Thank
you.
N
N
N
I'm
so
glad
that
I'm
able
to
listen
to
know
how
the
sausage
is
made,
because
it's
ridiculous
the
amount
of
money,
not
just
it's
the
time
and
the
the
the
gushing
about
these
wonderful
people
that
you're
going
to
help.
I
mean
we
need
to
open
up
mental
hospitals
again,
not
not
just
keep
showering
all
this
money
on
these
pie
in
the
sky
programs
that
are
crazy.
I
mean,
if
anything,
you're
going
to
need
to
build
these
build
these
things
away
from
city
city
areas,
because
these
people
are
a
disaster
everywhere
they
go
it's
unfortunate.
N
They
don't
they've
got
mental
health
issues
and
drug
problems
is
terrible,
but
why
should
they
be
living
amongst
us
causing
all
these
problems
with
their
camps
and
everything
else?
Then
you're
gonna
put
them
in
a
shed
or
whatever
you're
gonna.
Do
it's
not
gonna
work
and
by
the
way
you
guys?
Let
people
bad-mouth
me
and
you
don't
cut
them
off
or
reprimand
them
like
you.
Do
me
now
the
people
who
don't
like
me,
that's
fine,
but
they
need
to
follow
the
rules.
E
All
right,
then,
going
back
to
the
committee.
F
E
E
Okay,
tony.
F
M
Yes,
I
think
arenas
was
either
the
maker
of
the
second
of
the
motion.
So
maybe
we
just
clarify
myself
and
councilwoman
davis.
E
Okay:
last
item
is
open
forum.
E
G
Yeah,
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
a
couple
of
things
like
I've
learned
so
much
from
going
to
the
charter
review,
commission
and
there's
a
lot
of
great
they've
got
done
a
lot
really
great
job
of
educating
us
on
a
lot
of
interesting
things,
and
this
is
really
a
great
service
to
our
community.
I've
been
very
educational
like
we
got
to
listen
to
somebody
from
la
and
how
they
run
their
police
department,
and
it
was
much
more.
You
know.
G
People
engaged-
and
I
was
just
talking
to
my
girlfriend-
and
it
was
very,
very
scary-
is
that
her
she's
black,
my
girlfriend
and
you
know
her
children
are
dark-skinned
and
they
got
scots
a
16-year-old
got
stopped
by
the
police
and
because
she
ran
away
or
whatever
you
know,
and
it
was
very,
very,
very
mistreated
and
it
was
like
wait.
Who
do
I
call
about
the
way
she
would?
This
daughter
was
treated
at
the
16
year
old
by
the
police
in
like
richmond
or
whatever,
but
it
was
like.
You
know.
G
We
really
need
commissions
to
really
deal
with
these
issues
and
that's
what
you
heard
and
you
know
yeah.
You
didn't
hear
much
about
the
climate
because
nobody
wants
to
talk
about
the
climate
and
you
know,
but
it's
really
coming
down
hard.
You
know
we're
having
emergencies
and,
like
I
said
you
did
not
notify
us.
That
is
a
sign
that
things
are
really
bad
because
that's
all
we're
talking
about
is
protecting
the
people
and
you
didn't
protect
the
people,
because
you
want
us
to
keep
going
in
capitalism
and
consumerism
he
didn't
want
to.
G
Let
us
know
I
didn't
get
an
alarm
beep
beep
beep
like
we
did
throughout
covet.
I
didn't
get
that
say,
stay
home,
it's
an
emergency.
You
didn't
do
that
and
this
is
why
you
don't
you
know
this.
This
was
what
happened.
We
were
in
a
state
of
emergency
and
we
need
to
get
ready
for
states
of
emergency
and
you're
not
doing
that,
and
then
you
want
to
stop
our
communication
about
it,
which
is
just
to
document.
G
What's
going
on,
that's
the
only
thing
we're
proposing
and
you'll
most
probably
write
it
off
and
that's
what
the
whole
thing
was
about.
When
you
come
with
yours,
we
know
we'll
we'll
reject
those.
So
don't
worry.
The
main
thing
is
politics
and
economic.
E
All
right,
thank
you.
Next
speaker
is
blair.
H
Hi
blair
here
I've
learned
a
lot
from
the
city
charter
process
this
year.
I
hope
I
hope
we
can
think
of
it
as
not
so
partisan,
but
as
needed
functions
for
ourselves.
H
I
learned
that
the
commission
process
is,
I
think
it
was
initially
established
as
kind
of
a
public
entity.
It
was
a
public
revolution.
You
know
to
have
a
commission
process
for
the
good
of
the
public,
so
I'm
a
bit
concerned
that
the
commission
process
subcommittee
process
is
not
being
given
enough
public
support.
It's
been
it's
been
very
closed
because
of
the
vta
events
in
may.
I
think
we're
trying
to
learn
how
to
open
it
up.
There's
three
really
important
commissions
coming
up
in
this
next
year.
H
I
I
hope
that
we
learn
how
to
make
the
public
process
for
the
subcommittee
process
open
and
accessible
and
all
the
steps
we
can
do
to
do
that.
I
hope
we
can
learn
how
to
do
that
at
this
time.
It's
important
we
work
on
this
now
to
quickly
offer
you
know
the
there's
a
november
15th
vote
on
on
environment
issues
for
the
charter.
I
hope
that
you
know
they
may
need
to
go
on
into
the
next
year.
H
I
hope
that
can
be
respected
and
to
also
note
with
30
seconds
left.
I
don't
know
if
it's
quite
the
job
of
the
reimagined
task
force
to
work
on
the
future
of
legal
definitions
of
the
charter.
Why
not
allow
the
charter
commission
to
work
on
those
things
and
grant
them
a
bit
extra
time?
I
hope
I
don't
hurt
a
reimagined
person's
feelings
about
this,
but
I
it
can
be
a
way
to
continue
the
charter
process
with
actual
factual.
You
know
how
does
how
does
the
future.
A
Thank
you
vice
mayor
jones,
I'd
like
to
comment
on
the
upcoming
viva
kaya
event
on
november
7..
I
attended
the
previous
one
a
couple
months
ago
and
was
totally
astounded
by
how
just
fantastic
it
was
to
see
so
many
people
there
out
on
the
streets
which
are
normally
you
know
just
not
not
safe,
not
safe.
Even
for
people
driving
cars
to
use
the
streets
are
so
wide.
A
That's
why
50
to
60
people
get
killed
in
car
crashes
every
year
and
why
the
city
continues
to
generate
enormous
amount
of
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
That's
not
going
to
change
with
a
transition
to
electric
cars.
Electric
cars
still
produce
a
huge
amount
of
greenhouse
gas
emissions
in
their
manufacture,
and
so
what
we
need
to
do
is
have
narrower
streets.
We
need
to
have
fewer
lanes
dedicated
to
that
car
traffic.
A
The
viva
kai
event
brings
a
possibility
for
people
to
imagine
a
different
future
and
I
wholeheartedly
support
these
events
and
would
like
to
see
more
than
two
of
them
per
year.
One
thing
that
for
sure
needs
to
happen
is
fewer
police
officers
at
the
events.
These
are
it's
totally
unnecessary
to
have
such
a
massive
police
presence,
and
it's
very
expensive
san
francisco
and
berkeley.
Don't
do
it
that
way
they
use
volunteers,
keep
up
the
good
work
with.
N
Yeah,
I'm
just
trying
to
write
on
the
last
thing
I
was
talking
about
of
people
backing
out
for
me.
You
guys,
don't
you
guys
are
prejudiced
towards
me.
It's
a
double
standard.
I
want
tony
taber
to
know
that
you
guys
cut
me
off
early
by
the
way
too.
You
guys
like
to
cut
me
off.
You
guys,
love
it
and
I
let
other
people
bad
mouth
me,
because
I'm
the
only
making
the
right
people
angry.
N
I
like
when
I
like
that
attention.
Okay,
but
I
can't
do
it
right,
I'm
not
allowed
to
do
it.
So
if
I
can't
do
it,
nobody
else
should
be
able
to
do
it
to
me
right.
Do
you
guys
understand
that
you
guys
understand
the
double
standard
you
have
for
caller
five
one,
four
zero.
You
know
you
do
you
all
hate
me
down
there,
but
this
is
my
two
minutes:
I'm
a
taxpayer,
I'm
a
voter,
I'm
a
resident!
N
If
you
don't
like
what
I
have
to
say,
that's
too
bad,
I
mean
you
guys,
don't
do
anything
for
me
anyway,
I'm
just
a
squeaky
wheel,
trying
to
get
the
grease.
That's
all,
but
I
want
to
know
one
thing
all
these
you
guys,
like
you
got
to
like
the
rotunda
for
all
these
different
groups
of
people
when's
the
last
time,
you've
done
it
for
italian
americans.
You
know
you
took
away
the
statue
out
of
the
rotunda
right
sam
said:
there
was
going
to
be
an
italian
american
heritage.
N
Week
never
happened,
but
we
like
to
we
like
that
rotunda
for
everybody
else,
for
everybody
else
and
by
the
way,
don't
be
afraid
to
say
christmas.
When
it's
coming
up
you
guys
like
to
say
holiday.
We
mentioned
every
other
holiday
of
every
type
of
religion.
There
is
which
I
love
by
the
way,
I'm
not
against
any
other
religions,
but
I
don't
like
mine
being
left
on
the
back
burner
and
just
happy
holidays.
When
you
people
get
paid
for
christmas,
you
guys
get
paid
overtime.
N
If
you
have
to
work
on
christmas,
so
you
know
be,
don't
be
afraid
to
say
the
holiday
you
get
paid
for
right,
don't
be
afraid.
There's
christmas
in
the
park,
you
guys
say
that
you
guys
tried
to
get
rid
of
that
back
in
the
90s
didn't
work.
It
backfired.
All
that
to
say,
once
again,
you
guys
should
be
ashamed
of
yourselves.
The
way
you
run
this
city,
you
should
be
ashamed
of
yourselves.
How
you
treat
me
no
matter
what
I
am
or
what
I.