►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of March 10, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=844355&GUID=A910FBBD-8C26-4E1C-952A-091B44022044
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
B
B
B
D
Okay,
thank
you.
Vice
mayor
chappie
jones,
paul
soto,
this
agenda
just
came
up
like
maybe
maybe
within
the
hour
I
haven't
had
time
to
prepare.
I
I
need
at
least
a
few
days
in
advance,
we're
we're
getting
kind
of
like
just
shafted
with
procedure.
I
mean
it
it.
This
is
a
very
critical
time
in
san
jose
politics,
economics
people
are
dying
on
the
east
side,
we're
getting
dogged
out
by
the
governor.
I
mean
I
mean.
Do
I
really
have
to
like
say
it
this
blatantly
to
you.
D
We
know
we're
getting
shafted
and
we're
being
denied
the
ability
to
democratically
affect
the
changes
that
are
absolutely
necessary
in
this
city.
You
know,
I
mean
what
is
it
going
to
take
for
our
government
to
understand
that
the
citizenry
is
not
playing
with
the
government,
we're
just
not
we're
not
playing
with
you,
but
you
are
playing
with
us.
You
know
I'm
being
denied
my
constitutionally
protected
right
to
participate
in
the
democratic
process.
D
This
is
it
right
here
and
I'm
being
denied
that,
because
these
agendas
are
being
posted
minutes
before
these
meetings,
and
so
that's
number
one
number
two
is
that
on
this
agenda
item
4.1
4.2:
I
would,
I
don't
want
them
taken
together.
These
are
separate
issues
and
I
would
like
them
to
take
be
taken
as
separate
issues,
so
I
can
comment
on
each
one
of
them.
D
Okay,
number.
That's
number
one
number
two:
if
we
can
have
a
time
certainty
on
these,
so
that
people
so
that
I
can
prepare
you
know
some
people
in
in
the
community
that
are
going
to
want
to
participate
in
these
particular
this
particular
agenda
items.
So
you
know
I,
if
I
don't.
I
can't
believe
that
I'm
asking
my
government
to
if
I
could
please
participate
in
the
democratic
process,
but
if
that's
what
it
takes
in
order
to
to
serve
the
needs
of
my
people.
I'll
do
that.
Thank
you.
D
B
C
I'm
definitely
working
on
educating
the
public
on
how
everything's
working
and
I'm
I'm
not
sure
where
that
timer's
coming
from
so
there
I'm
working
on
videos.
So
I
did
a
video
on
how
to
read
the
rules
committee
and
I'm
working
on
finding
the
time
to
do
like
a
coffee
with
the
clerk
online
like
an
online
zoom,
where
people
can
ask
questions,
so
I
can
explain
some
of
these
things.
The
brown
act,
as
you
know,
allows
for
72
hours
before
a
meeting
to
post
the
agenda.
C
What
we
do
in
the
city
of
san
jose
is
we
have
the
rules
and
open
government
committee
which
meets
to
set
the
the
to
set
the
agenda
in
a
lot
of
other
cities,
and
this
is
you
know.
As
you
know,
san
jose
is
not
my
first
municipality,
so
in
other
cities,
what
we
did
was
the
city
staff
put
together
the
agendas
and
we
posted
the
agendas
before
the
meeting.
There
was
no
process
where
the
the
council
met
before
the
meeting
to
go
over
the
agenda
to
set
time
certains
to
add
items.
C
There
was
no
time
for
the
public
to
have
comments
ahead
on
that
agenda.
So
that's
kind
of
what
today
is,
I
don't
know
if
I'm
excited,
because
this
is
off
the
cuff.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
explaining
it
correctly
or
clearly,
but
the
agendas
for
today
are
posted
at
the
last
minute
because
the
for
rules,
because
we're
just
putting
them
together,
future
the
rules
agenda
and
all
the
items
that
aren't
related
to
the
two
future
council
agendas.
Those
were
posted
a
week
ahead
of
time
or
four
day,
four
days
ahead
of
time.
C
You
know,
on
monday,
for
two
weeks
out,
it's
impossible
for
us
to
post
them
on
fridays
with
everything
else,
unless
we
back
up
all
of
the
timelines
and
we're
already
backed
up
because
we
post
10
days
out
so
now
we're
at
you,
we
would
be
asking
staff
to
have
items
three
weeks
ahead
of
a
meeting
so
like
the
agenda
for
the
23rd.
This
is
the
first
time
anybody's
seeing
it
because
it's
not
even
finished
this
is
the
the
chance
where
you
guys
can
add
things
to
it.
C
You
can
change
things
and
then
we'll
we'll
look
at
it
again
next
week,
so
the
public
will
have
a
whole
week
ahead
of
us
even
having
the
meeting
to
look
at
it
and
talk
next
week
about
anything
that
they
have
questions
about
or
want
to
time
certain.
So
it's
like
yes
we're
working
on
it.
No
we're
not
working
on
it,
because
the
sunshine
process
itself
is
making
everything
available
way
ahead.
If
we
didn't
have
rules,
the
agenda
would
just
post
this
friday.
C
That
would
be
the
first.
The
public
is
seeing
it
so
they're,
actually
seeing
it
a
few
days
before
they
would
normally
see
it.
So
that's
why
I
think,
based
on
these
questions,
it
would
be
really
good
for
me
to
have
like
a
coffee
with
the
clerk.
So
people
can
ask
those
questions
and
I
can
explain
it-
maybe
explain
it
a
little
bit
better
than
I'm
explaining
it
right
now.
B
B
If
the
expectation
is
that
they
should
have
early
access
to
that
agenda,
then
that's
one
thing,
but
if
we
set
the
expectations
that
this
is
the
first
look
for
everyone
on
that
that
agenda
and
they'll
have
proper,
multiple
opportunities
to
have
input,
then
that
expectation
is
set
yes,
but
there
needs
to
be
some.
Some
education
goes
along
with
that.
E
F
Happy
wednesday
thanks,
that
was
a
really
good
explanation
by
tony.
That
was
fairly
good.
Coffee
with
a
city
clerk
sounds
like
a
great
idea:
yeah
there's
two
items
on
the
agenda
that
were
of
interest
to
me:
smartwave
technology,
for
the
east
side
that
you
know
these
are
bridging
the
digital
divide.
Issues
that
you
know
is
my
formal.
F
You
know
way
to
work
at
this
time
that,
for
whenever
you
say
the
terms
digital
divide
to
bridge
the
digital
divide,
however,
you
say
that
it
should
be
included.
The
ideas
of
open
public
policy
should
be
included
in
those
practices.
I
think
that
is
a
more
rounded
way
to
talk
about
our
future
and
it
invites
a
just
a
more
harmonious
community
process,
which
I
think
we
all
want
and
need
at
this
difficult
time
in
our
lives.
It's
good
fun,
stuff,
open
public
policy.
I
don't
think
it
has
to
be
fearful.
F
We
there
can
be
ways
to
make
it
an
enjoyable,
enjoyable
process
for
all
of
us
about
the
issues
of
there's
police
reform
issues
that
you
know.
That
was
someone
addressed
by
at
open
forum
yesterday
by
three.
You
know
important
regular
activists
of
san
jose
and
you
know
they're
they're
interested
in
the
assistant
police
chief
from
pittsburgh
as
an
outside
voice,
and
so
I
I
respect
that
a
lot
you
know
and
I'm
not.
I
have
my
own
feelings,
but
I'm
very
much.
F
It
is
to
me
it's
between
those
two
people
mata
and
an
assistant
police
chief
from
pittsburgh,
and
I
just
wanted
to
remind
you
know
I
reviewed
the
the
police
review
session.
They
had
police
commission
committee
session,
they
had
you
know
there
and
the
ideas
of
reimagine
that
that
that
the
police
will
be
involved
with
in
the
future
and
all
the
cooperative
good
work.
There
has
to
be
remembering
that
it's
to
practice
minimum
practices
of
police,
that's
an
important
goal.
Thank
you.
G
Yeah
thank
you,
chair,
and
I
appreciate
you
interjecting
there
and
asking
tony
for
some
clarification.
I
think
there
definitely
needs
to
be
some
level
of
expectation
on
what
you
know.
We
see
here
at
this
agenda
and
recognize
that
at
some
point,
there's
always
going
to
be
a
first
look
for
everybody,
including
us
on
the
council
and,
and
we
want
to
be
able
to
have
enough
time
for
people
to
chime
in
and
in
this
instance,
you
know.
I
think
we
recognize
that
we
get
a
couple
bites
of
the
apple
at
this.
G
These
further
out
draft
agendas,
but
we
certainly
need
to
be
clear
so
that
that
way
everybody
that's
trying
to
participate
can
can
be
made.
Aware
of
you
know
what
it
is
they're
looking
at
and
and
if
it
is
the
first
time-
and
you
know
so,
I
think
nonetheless,
it
certainly
has
come
up
a
couple
times
and
it's
you
know
if
you
want
to
participate
in
the
process,
you
know
you
and
you
see
something
pop
up
just
30
minutes
beforehand.
G
You
know.
Clearly
it
puts
you
at
a
disadvantage,
but
I
think
in
this
case
being
on
this
committee.
We
equally
are
at
the
same
disadvantage
because
we
see
it
at
the
same
time,
so
it's
not
necessarily
that
our
we're
subjecting
our
community
to
anything
any
different
than
we
are
subjecting
ourselves
to
it's.
It's
just
unfortunate
because
at
some
point
we
need
to
to
have
this
information
come
out
and
having
it
come
out
as
soon
as
possible.
G
Gives
us
an
opportunity
to
then
make
amendments
and
adjustments
with
a
lot
of
time
in
advance,
and
so
that
then
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
say,
for
instance,
you
know
next
week
to
discuss
a
little
further
on.
You
know
what
this
next
item
will
be,
which
is
the
23rd
agenda
like
we're
doing
today
with
this
16th
agenda,
and
with
that
in
mind
on
the
16th
agenda,
I
want
to
clarify
one
thing,
because
paul
did
bring
it
up.
I
don't
believe
we
are
looking
at
hearing
4.1
and
4.2
together
right.
G
G
E
G
Okay,
so
outside
of
the
mayor's
budget
message,
I
don't
see
anything
that
looks
like
we're
going
to
be
taking
significant
amount
of
time.
Besides
these
two
items
4.1
and
4.2,
so
I
am
a
little
nervous
about
setting
a
time.
That's
it's
later.
If
it
looks
like
we
may
actually
get
to
them
sooner.
So
I
don't
know.
Maybe
chair:
do
you
have
any
any
wise
input
or
or
staff
on
what
your
thoughts
might
be
on
on
this?
If
maybe
we,
this
is
the
chance
we
we
talked
about
this
before
this
might
be
a
chance.
E
Just
one
thing
you
could
do
as
a
committee
is
have
4.1
and
4.2
heard
last,
so
that
you're
not
restricted
to
any
time
specific
thing,
but
those
will
come
up
obviously
much
later
in
the
meeting
and
closer
to
when
people
are
off
work.
So
that
is
one
option,
but
we
did
not
recommend
that
so
that
the
rules
committee
had
flexibility
on
moving
that
around
today.
G
If
we
do
end
up
moving
through
a
little
quicker,
then
the
worst
case
scenario
is
we
take
a
little
bit
of
a
break,
but
right
so
I
would
maybe
prefer
the
not
to
be
heard
before
and
and
we
we
do-
we
do
you
know,
hear
them
in
succession
and
I
don't
know,
might
suggest
not
to
be
heard
before
something
like
four
o'clock
or
something.
But
I
I'm
willing
to
take
suggestions
on
that
or
hear
from
my
colleagues
or
staff
on
what
your
thoughts
might
be.
This
is
all
a
guessing
game,
so
yeah.
B
G
A
H
Yeah
well,
that
was
actually
what
I
was
going
to
suggest
was
four
o'clock,
because
we
could
get
through
it
quickly
and
if
you
have
to
take
a
little
bit
of
a
break
with
three
to
get
to
wait
till
four.
I
think
that's
reasonable.
So
so
I
support
that.
The
only
thing
I
would
just
say
is
that
this
this
agenda
was
actually
has
been
online
on
the
city's
website
since
last
tuesday
afternoon,
because
we
approved
it
first
time
at
last
week's
rules
community.
H
So
I'm
just
just
so
the
people
understanding
the
public
is
a
little
confusing
after
the
first
reading.
It
gets
posted
publicly
and
it's
there
for
the
whole
week
before
the
second
reading,
and
the
second
reading
is
what
we
really
have
more
of
an
opportunity
to
play
around
with
the
details
on
the
agenda
and
it's
that
new
agenda,
the
23rd
agenda
that
is
brand
new
to
all
of
us
and
we're
kind
of
just
preliminarily
approving
anyway,
before
next
week's
meeting.
H
So
I
I
appreciated
that
tony
gave
us
that
overview
about
the
work
it
takes
to
get
all
these
things
together
in
a
timely
manner
and
that
and
sort
of
a
reminder
of
the
brown
act
requirements
that
were
going
way
above
and
beyond
by
posting
things
even
further
in
advance
than
the
law
requires
us
to.
So
I
appreciate
all
the
work
that
staff
does
to
get
all
these
things
out
in
a
timely
manner,
and
even
though
it's
so
frustrating
to
some
of
us
that
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
time
to
review
that
second
agenda.
H
A
C
B
B
B
A
Hi
marcel
o'connell,
representing
golden
state
manufactured
homeowners
association,
drawing
your
attention
to
8.3.
There
might
be
significant
public
interest
in
this.
I
encourage
you
to
do
a
reasonable
time
a
time.
Certain.
Last
time
you
were
discussing
an
issue
that
the
mobile
home
residents
were
very
concerned
about.
It
was
the
continued
freeze
on
rent
increases.
A
We
had
a
bunch
of
speakers
lined
up
I'm
not
throwing
stones
at
you
guys,
I'm
just
telling
you
the
truth.
The
meeting
went
on
so
long.
I
was
getting
emails
and
phone
calls
from
people
saying
we
just
cannot
hang
we
can't
hang
on
this
phone
or
in
front
of
this
tv
for
this
long,
and
so
they
dropped
out
and
they
did
not
testify.
A
So
I'm
hoping
that
you
can
not
do
that
this
time
around,
but
I
will
also
add.
I
can't
predict
how
many
people
are
going
to
show
up
to
speak
because,
honestly,
when
they
wait
on
the
phone
for
hours
and
hours,
they
get
disillusioned
and
they
say
hey
martha.
We
did
it
the
first
time
and
we
didn't
even
get
a
chance
to
speak
so
we're
out
of
here
we're
not
doing
it
again.
So
please
keep
that
in
mind
if
you
want
to
maximize
public
participation
on
this
item,
please
give
us
a
reasonable
time
certain.
Thank
you.
F
Hi
to
try
to
clarify
my
last
words
from
the
previous
public
comment.
You
know
it's
a
matter
that
we're
considering
you
know
we're
all
in
a
process
of
cooperation
with
the
future
of
reimagine,
but
from
that
we
can
be,
and
from
that
there
has
to
be
an
idea
of
minimal
practices
that
has
to
be
involved
with
that
of
the
future
of
policing,
a
police
of
the
police
department
for
this
agenda
item
for
the
agenda
items
on
coveted
issues.
F
F
D
Yes,
thank
you
vice
mayor.
Thank
you
for
the
sensitivity
with
regard
to
the
time
sensitive
issue,
and
I
didn't
understand
anything
that
was
said.
I
know
it
makes
sense
to
you,
but
it
just
didn't
make
sense
to
me.
I
just
don't
comprehend
it
once
I
get
it
I'll
get
it,
but
I
just
don't
understand
it
anyways
with
respect
to
8.1
8.2.
D
These
what's
happening
with
these
grant
programs
is
that
the
city
is
writing
these
grants,
saying
that
they're
going
to
help
out
this
one
particular
community,
which
is
the
community
in
8.2
and
what
they
do
is
they
get
the
grant
money
and
then
they
put
it
to
use,
but
it's
to
fortify
these
quote-unquote,
affordable
housing
places
and
it's
at
the
expense
of
these
people
that
are
suffering
and
experiencing
the
poverty.
It
never
really
actually
goes
directly
to
them,
and
so
I've
seen
this
over
and
over
again
and
it's
it's,
it's
really
offensive.
D
I
don't
care
if
it's
legal,
who
cares
if
it's
legal,
we
really
need
to
move
away
from
this.
Well,
is
this
legal
like
us
making
the
assumption
that,
because
it's
legal,
it's
moral
and
it's
ethical
and
so
long
as
I
have
the
legal
protection,
then
I
could
do
something
immoral
and
unethical
see.
We
need
to
really
get
away
from
that
kind
of
thinking,
because
I
think
that
has
infected
our
our
government.
H
Yeah
first
question
is
this:
has
some
pretty
major
items
on
this
agenda
and
I
don't
I
think
it's
a
little
early
for
us
to
get
time
certain
we
can
do
that
next
week,
but
certainly
the
homelessness
report,
the
the
water
hearing.
If
it
happens
that
day
and
the
and
the
item
8.3
as
well
on
rent
assistance
are
all
things
that
we
would
try
to
schedule
in
some
way
to
make
them
time
certain.
H
E
Yeah,
council,
member
cohen
and
rules
committee,
my
understanding
is
that
the
mayor's
office
and
our
department
of
environmental
services
have
engaged
san
jose
water
company
to
have
this
discussion
and
I
believe,
a
memorandum
to
the
rules
committee
for
agending
agendizing.
That
would
probably
come
before
this
committee
next
week.
So
I,
what
I
believe
is
the
clerk
is
just
putting
that
on
there,
so
that
you
guys
can
see
kind
of
the
overall
outlook
of
what
the
agenda
might
or
may
not
be.
E
H
Thanks
so
I'll
make
a
motion
that
we've
approved
this
agenda,
we
have
to
change
the
closed
session
time
to
nine
o'clock,
so
that
that
amendment.
I
also
noticed
by
the
way
that
on
sec
number
3.2
on
this
agenda
and
actually
the
last
one,
it
hasn't
been
corrected.
It
still
says
9
30
there
as
well-
and
it's
probably
a
minor
point,
but
you
know
we
should
probably
correct
the
9
30
to
9
o'clock
in
both
of
those
locations.
A
G
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
would
agree.
I
think
this.
This
can
be
a
pretty
heavy
agenda
and
I
think
we
can
wait
till
next
week
to
give
any
time
certain,
but
I
do
think
we
we
will
need
to
to
try
and
do
a
couple
time
certains
here
or
at
least
give
some
indication
of
when
some
of
these
items
will
be
heard,
because
we'll
have
a
lot
of
interest,
so
I
won't
dive
into
that
now,
but
I
think
that's
it
I'll.
H
A
B
C
B
B
F
Ahead
blair
hi
thank
you
that
you're
having
a
second
meeting
on
coveted
issues
for
this
item.
I
I
I
hope
it
can
be.
My
you
know
from
from
from
my
previous
item
that
you
know
the
whole
point
of
this
kobe
tomokovic.
You
know
it
I
you
know.
I
hope
it
can
be
a
familiar
subject
for
myself,
but
kovid
is
not
the
fault
of
the
everyday
person
and
we're
learning
a
system
where
the
everyday
person
does
not
have
to
be
held
accountable.
F
I
mean,
does
not
have
to.
Basically,
you
know,
pay
its
debt
basically
and
that's
a
lot
to
learn
and
that's
you
know
not
easy
for
us
to
do,
because
we
feel
everyone
should
be
guilty
in
this
life
and
they
owe
money
to
somebody
somewhere
at
some
time
I
mean
that's
just
like
an
american
fact
of
life
that
that
somehow
that's
the
way
it
should
work
and
but
we're
learning
a
system.
Now
that
you
know
this,
kobet
is
not
our
fault
and
we
should
not
have
to
pay
back
its
debt.
F
I
mean
an
everyday
person
shouldn't
anyway,
you
know
and
that
that
takes
a
lot
of
practice
by
both
owners
and
tenants
and
and
and
community
and
government.
So
you
know
good
luck
in
how
we
do
that
at
this
time.
You
know
the
the
work
that
I
do
is
about
the
accountability
of
technology
in
this
many
forms
is
the
ideas
of
you
know:
sustainability.
What
is
really
positive
sustainability
and
how
do
we,
you
know,
work
to
create
a
future
that
doesn't
harm
each
other.
F
Basically,
and
I
I
just
ask
for
patients
that
you
know
we
work
through
this
time
together.
I
think
it
can
lead
to
how
to
address.
You
know
that
we
don't
hurt
each
other
on
in
large
scale,
social
planning
ideas
in
the
future,
and
it's
those
sort
of
efforts
that
I
hope
we
have
patients
to
to
work
with
and
talk
about
it
in
this
upcoming
workshop.
Thank
you.
D
Thank
you
vice
mayor.
What
I'd
like
number
one
get
rid
of
the
gong
just
just
just
next
day
on
the
gong
day,
just
just
get
it
out
of
there.
I
mean
that
was
really
like
dehumanizing,
you
know
for
for
such
a
sensitive
subject,
that's
number
one
number
two
is
we
really
have
to
see
we
elect
you
to
protect
us,
that's
what
we
that's
that's
what
you
do
and
that's
what
you
signed
up
for
is
to
protect
the
community.
D
D
What
I
fear
is
the
language
of
the
unheard
is
a
riot
martin
luther
king
jr
stated
this
and
he
was
trying
to
tell
the
government
that
there
is
a
dna
when
a
social
upheaval
happens
and
when
you
examine
the
dna,
when
you
look
at
it
on
its
molecular
level,
you
can
see
how
it
happened
that
there
was
all
of
this
neglect.
All
of
this
indifference,
all
of
this
apathy
towards
the
suffering
of
people
that
cannot
protect
themselves
that
are
living
impoverished
and
that
poverty
was
created.
Poverty
in
this
city
is
created.
D
B
E
B
B
F
Can
thank
you,
blair,
beekman
here
yeah.
You
know
we
are
looking
for
ways
in
this
really
difficult
time
to
not
hurt
each
other.
I
think
that
should
be
the
goal
among
stall
outs,
and
I
feel
it's
working
on
that
goal
that
we
can
address.
So
these
errors
of
cobit
will
never
happen
again.
Basically,
and
that
comes
from
this
time
we
work
now
in
not
hurting
each
other,
I
feel,
and
so
with
this
issue,
I
I
feel
that
the
water
department
is
coming
up
with.
F
People
do
not
have
to
pay
as
much,
but
yet
you
know
covet
has
created
such
an
extraordinary
stock
market
situation
that
rich
people
are
living
awesomely
I
mean
they
are
set
right
now,
so
there's
you're
figuring
out
a
system
that
you
know
more
richer.
People
can
can
pay
a
higher
price
for
water
for
garbage
for
community
energy
and
lower
income.
People
do
not
have
to
pay
as
much
to
the
subsidy
process.
F
I
think
san
jose
would
be
a
good
practice,
beginning
practice
how
to
do
that,
and
you
know
it's
just
and
maybe
maybe
there's
ways
to
leave
the
subsidy
all
together,
but
still
offer
the
tiered
system
or
some
way
that
that
you
know
of
a
good,
fair
share
that
the
people
can
be
safe
and
comfortable
and
not
be
overcharged,
and
so
good
luck
in
how
you
work
on
this
issue
and
it's
a
lot.
It's
a
big
one.
So
thank
you.
B
D
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
the
the
bearers
of
the
maximum
weight
is
going
to
be
the
chicano
community,
the
you
know
the
latino
community,
the
chicano.
I
prefer
the
chicano
community
and
we
really
need
to
put
on
record
what
is
the
city
going
to
do
about
this,
because
we
keep
saying
we
keep
like.
It's
almost
implied
that
well,
if
you
can't
afford
to
live
here,
that
means
you're
too
poor
that
ergo
you
need
to
just
leave,
but
that's
not
the
truth.
D
Poverty
is
being
created
and
it's
being
it's
being
exercised
in
terms
of
the
gentrification.
What
that
looks
like
it's
being
exercised
on
a
population
that
has
already
experienced
its
own
modern
plague,
it
has
wiped
out
50
of
the
deaths
in
this
city
I
mean,
and
we
we
don't
really
like,
have
a
like
a
response
to
that.
There
needs
to
be
a
visceral
response.
A
humane
response,
and
much
of
that
suffering
is
generational.
D
Redlining
states
that
if
you
were
not
good
enough
to
martin
luther
king
stated
if
you
say
that
I
am
not
good
enough
to
live
next
to
you.
If
you
are
saying
that
I
am
not
good
enough
to
work
with
you
if
you're
saying
that
I'm
not
good
enough
to
go
to
the
same
schools
as
you,
you
were
saying
consciously
or
subconsciously
that
I
do
not
deserve
to
exist.
D
B
H
Yeah,
thank
you.
Nice
mayor,
I
have
been
talking
with
the
wall,
had
a
meeting
with
the
water
district
last
week.
Actually
talking
about
various
things
that
they're
working
on
this,
this
meeting
is,
you
know,
discuss
some
of
their
big
initiatives
like
groundwater,
recharge
and
expanding
their
their
water
purification
system.
I
expressed
some
concern
to
them
that
scheduling
this
meeting
within
the
same
week
as
we'd
be
having
potentially
a
public
hearing
with
san
jose
water.
H
Would
they
cause
a
lot
of
confusion
about
this
meeting
having
to
do
with
rates,
and
since
this
is
a
meeting
with
valley,
water
and
the
other
one
is
san
jose
water?
I
just
want
us
to
be
very
aware
that
this
is
a
very
different
organization
and
has
nothing
to
do
with
rates,
and
it's
not
valley
water
that
is
proposing
to
increase
rates,
but
san
jose
water
company.
E
H
Even
I
can't
say
that
the
san
jose
water
company
and
that
this
meeting
on
the
20
on
the
19th
with
valley
water,
has
nothing
to
do
with
rates
and
it's
not
the
same
organization,
that's
proposing
to
increase
rates.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
that,
because
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
how
this
would
be
articulated,
given
that
these
two
things
are
happening
in
the
same
month,.
B
H
C
A
A
F
F
A
D
There
is
literal
blood
on
those
deeds,
because
the
the
oppression
and
the
death
that
happened
in
salsa
puedes
is
directly
connected
to
the
redlining
that
happened
in
willow
glen.
You
can't
dissociate
the
two.
So
when
we
talk
about
redlining
in
the
general
sense
from
the
dyes,
we
really
need
to
be
more
explicit
about
what
did
that
mean
socially
and
I'll?
Give
you
one
example.
I
don't
speak
spanish.
Why?
D
Because
it
was
allowed
for
the
teachers
in
san
jose,
unified
school
district
to
beat
humiliate
degrade
children
in
san
jose,
unified
school
district
as
a
part
of
this
larger
system
of
segregation
and
discrimination
against
chicanos.
At
the
same
time,
she
was
forced
to
stand
up
and
pledge
allegiance
to
a
flag
that
guaranteed
her.
B
C
A
B
F
Hi,
thank
you
vlad
beekman
here
there
is
a
lot
of
retroactive
approval
of
dumpster
date,
items
on
on
the
consent
calendar,
and
it
was
just
a
nice
reminder
to
myself
that
I
I
feel
that
dumpster
days
can
really
be
a
way
to
actually
bring
like
all
parts
of
a
neighborhood
together.
You
know
the
homeless
parts,
the
everyday
people
are,
you
know
homeowners
and
you
know
just
a
hot
pod
of
interesting
people
and
it's
a
way
to
just
meet
people.
F
I
mean
that's
it's
ideal
and
I
I
hope
that
that
can
be
continued,
because
it
is
the
good
communication
between
different
groups
of
society.
That,
I
think,
is
what
is
important
in
this
life
and
that's
why
I
love
mixed
income,
housing
ideas
so
much,
and
you
know
just
to
totally
sequester
and
you
know,
keep
people
secluded
from
from
different
groups
in
this
life
is
a
bit
harmful.
F
I
think
I
think,
there's
a
much
better,
interesting
mix
when
everybody's
all
together
and
for
people
to
socialize
and
connect
and
through
dumpster
day
stuff,
is
important.
I
think
for
a
local
neighborhood
in
a
community
in
a
city.
So
good
luck
with
that
issue-
and
you
know
so
I
didn't
mean
to
ruffle
feathers
with
my
ch
ch
sr
awards,
but
you
know
it
was
my
intention
just
to
kind
of
give.
F
C
A
Good
afternoon
council
members
jewelry
city
author,
as
vice
mayor
mentioned,
we
have
our
monthly
report
activities
for
february
2021,
we've
got
a
number
of
projects
underway.
We
have
a
few
things
we'll
be
coming
out
either
have
already
been
released
in
march
or
coming
out
shortly
in
march,
as
you
saw
in
the
earlier
agendas
the
balance
of
our
work
plan
in
progress
of
our
work
plans.
Attached
to
the
memo,
I
asked
the
approved
monthly
report,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
F
I
boy
we've
been
here,
glad
you
caught
and
caught
it
my
hand
was
raised
a
little
late.
Thank
you
to
decide.
You
know
I
I
I'm
in
love
with
the
fact
of
this
item
and
all
the
things
that
it
offers
each
month
and
I
think
it's
a
great
way
just
to
offer
a
reminder
that
if
anyone
from
the
public
you
know
wants
to
really
comment
on
how
the
city
is
working
to
review
this
monthly
audit
process,
I
mean
there's
just
a
ton
of
things
they're
working
on
including
police
issues.
F
You
know
that
a
person
can
address
here
at
this
time
and
have
their
voice
be
heard.
So
with
that
all
said,
I
want
to
voice
my
feelings
about
community
energy
compliance,
clean
energy
risk,
energy
risk
management
practices,
and
you
know
it's
been
a
bit
of
a
learning
experience
for
san
jose
community
energy.
I've
been
attending
east
bay,
community
energy
meetings
and
they
really
just
went
full
full
hole
into
the
subsidy
program,
ideas
and
from
that
they
were
able
to
create.
You
know
their
their
entire
portfolio
for
this
year.
F
That
is
mostly
clean
energy
and
they
don't
have
to
rely
on
dirty
fossil
fuel
energy.
The
way
san
jose
is
at
this
time
now
san
jose
is
now
asking
themselves
what
is
good
subsidy
ideas
and
plans,
so
I
just
thought
I
would
throw
that
out
there
informationally
and
you
know
good
luck.
What
we
can
do.
I
I
have
a
you
know.
I
feel
we
have
to
start
to
address
nuclear
now
and
learn
how
to
step
away
from
it,
not
move
forward
into
it.
F
As
council
person
jones
has
offered,
and
in
the
next
few
years
really
make
commitments
to
our
really.
You
know
important
renewable
ideas
and
overall
good
practices.
We
don't
have
to
grow
apathetic
in
the
next
few
years.
We
can
grow
strong
and
and
build
a
good
practice
and
and
help
transition
out
of
future
natural
disaster
problems
easier,
I
think,
with
good
ideals
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
B
D
You're
still
on
you
yeah,
what
happened
is
that
yeah?
Well,
what
happens
is
we're
not
a
mute?
What
happens
is
that
it
doesn't
trigger
because
of
zoom.
Sometimes
the
zoom
like
when
you
say,
go
ahead.
It
doesn't
immediately
come
up
for
us
to
mute,
and
so
sometimes
it's
frustrating
because
there's
nothing
there,
but
you're
asking
us
like,
as
if
there's
some
issue
on
our
end
and
it's
not,
and
that's
that's
like
one
of
the
frustrating
things
about
having
these
meetings
within
the
context
of
kovit,
I
mean
we,
we
don't.
D
D
D
Father
got
you
man,
I
got
you.
Thank
you.
What
I'd
like
to
ask?
What
I'd
like
to
ask
is
with
respect
to
the
the
auditor
connection
is
an
organization
that
does
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
advocacy
and
I'm
looking
through
it,
and
I
I
the
only
time
that
is
any
public
acknowledgement
of
nonprofits
in
the
city
is
is
somos
and
they
do
excellent
work.
I
know
victor
does
excellent
work.
I
know
camille
excellent
work.
However,
I
think
we
need
to
start
expanding.
D
Our
outreach
connection
has
probably
15
departments
to
deal
with
impacted
juvenile
impacted
kids.
They
deal
with
cps,
they
deal
with
mothers,
I
mean
just
today,
I'm
passing
out
formula
and
diapers
to
senora's
coming
the
connection
you
know
and,
and
so
I'd
really
like
to
like
at
least
pose
the
question.
Why
has
there
been
no
outreach
with
connection?
Thank
you.
D
B
A
A
I
could
this
is
henry
from
the
mayor's
office.
I
just
want
to
address
paul's
concern,
really
quick
about
the
lag
between
being
able
to
mute
and
being
allowed
to
speak.
Sometimes
when
there's
a
transition
back
and
forth
between
public
comment
and
coming
back
to
council,
there's
a
there's,
a
delay
between
my
ability
to
quickly
provide
him
the
ability
to
speak
in
the
meeting.
G
The
screen
that
is
that
is
in
charge
of
of
you
know,
trying
to
move
on
to
some
of
the
tasks
like
hitting
unmute
or
inviting
people
to
speak
and
stuff
like
that,
and
it
can
easily
get
forgotten
even
by
myself
right
as
we're
in
this
world
of
technology
that
you're
just
kind
of
assuming,
as
we
make
comments
or
expect
for
like
the
next
things
to
move
along
or
whatever
it
may
be,
that
there's
actually,
typically
a
human
being
behind
there
having
to
to
kind
of
make
things
happen.
So
I
appreciate
you
mentioning
that.
F
Hi,
it's
claire
beekman,
I
got
the
unmute.
Should
I
just
go
they'll
go
ahead:
blair,
okay,
thank
you.
Hi
blair,
beekman
thanks
a
lot
for
the
meeting
today.
Thank
you
for
your
patience
to
hear
my
attempts
at
being
simple
and
informational
and
that
yeah
to
give
you
know
for
you
to
give
simple
informational
ideas.
So
you
can
help
to
help
make
your
own
decisions.
That's
my
goal.
F
So
thank
you
to
henry
and
both
henry
and
paul,
for
you
know,
and
you
know,
council
person
paralyzed
everybody
just
establishing
that
you
know
there
can
be
a
bit
of
a
lag.
Sometimes
I
have
that
problem
too,
and
it
was
nice
to
hear
thanks.
I
hope
you
know
we
had
a
rules
and
open
government
a
couple
weeks
ago
that
I
hope
you
can
consider
versatility
with
a
clock.
You
know
everything
doesn't
have
to
be
60
seconds.
Sometimes
it
can
be.
You
know
80
seconds
90
seconds.
F
I
think
that
the
80
to
90
seconds
can
be
a
good
variation,
but
that
it's
a
little
tough
to
to
learn
how
to
coordinate
that
we're
all
used
to
the
either
60
seconds
or
120
seconds.
So
you
know
good
luck
in
how
you
do
that.
I
think
80
and
90
seconds
is
an
important
extra
tool
to
learn
how
to
use,
and
that
takes
time
to
navigate
I
about
yesterday's
meeting
about
airport
issues.
I
again
I
understand
that
you've
been
practicing.
F
You
know
jet
fuel
ideas,
you
know
for
a
long
time
now.
I
just
have
very
very
many
concerns.
That's
bad
practices
overall
about
just
you
want
to
just
burn
a
ton
of
more
jet
fuel
in
order
to
hide
from
better
high-rise
heights,
and
that's
really
hurtful
I
mean
you
want
to
rebuild
the
airline
industry
basically,
and
that
is
circle
with
10
seconds.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
I've
learned
incredibly
good
practices
of
what
voting
rights
can
be
and
what
voting
rights
were
practiced
in
this
last
election
time.
F
D
Thank
you,
paul
soto,
I'm
reading
from
the
california
research
bureau,
california,
state
library,
quote
the
1850
act
and
subsequent
amendments
facilitated,
removing
california,
indians
from
their
traditional
lands
separating
at
least
a
generation
of
children
and
adults
from
their
families,
languages
and
cultures,
from
1850
to
1865
and
indenturing,
indian
children
and
adults
to
whites.
The
relevant
sections
provided
that
any
person
can
go
before
a
justice
of
the
peace
to
obtain
indian
children
for
indenture
the
justice
determined
whether
or
not
compulsory
means
were
used
to
obtain
the
child.
D
D
I
know
government
itself
is
going
to
be
slow
in
the
process.
Willow
glenn
has
this.
We
have
allowed
for
the
residents
of
willow
glen
to
have
this.
This
sense
of
entitlement
and
this
inflated
sense
that
they
are
entitled
to
previous
lex.
Previous
lex
is
a
term
that
is
used
in
law,
it's
latin
and
what
it
means
is
previous
lex
separate
law,
which
means
that
you
have
a
problem.
D
That's
where
we
get
the
word
privilege
that
somehow
or
another
the
residents
of
willow
glenn
think
that
they
are
privileged
and
they
have
separate
laws
that
don't
apply
to
everybody
else,
and
I
would
venture
to
say,
according
to
this
document,
we
know
how
that
that
was
built
and
predicated
upon.
Thank
you.