►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of October 13, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=897416&GUID=7F4FAC84-F784-439F-9823-8EEE7E844021
A
A
A
A
C
B
And
yasmin,
can
you
take
roll
please.
D
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
E
Okay,
so
I
get
two
minutes
to
talk
about
well
the
things
that
were
on
the
agenda
that
I
was
shared
with
and
looking
at
it
that
I
was
concerned
about.
One
was
about
the
airport.
You
know
to
give
the
southwest,
I
think
we're
giving
them
some
benefits,
or
some
you
know,
price
reductions
and
as
a
taxpayer.
I
do
not
want
that
to
happen
because
of
our
climate
crisis,
that
we
shouldn't
be
supporting
fossil
fuel
based
industries
going
forward
and
that
that's
that
comment
in
regards
to
that
that
we
need
to
work
on.
E
You
know
reducing
our
fossil
fuels
to
zero
and
that
you
know
our
planes
are
not
flying
without
fossil
fuels,
so
that
that's
that
issue
and
in
addition
there
were
issues
about
our
our
covid
response,
and
you
know
our
emergency
response,
and
you
know
the
the
thing
is:
is
that
we're
not
go
moving
away
from
our
covid
crisis
because
of
our
human
behavior
that
is
having
us
flying
everywhere
around
the
world
and
that
this
type
of
behavior
is
what's
adding
to
our
our
crisis
of
of
our
cova
crisis,
our
health
crisis
and
the
the
largest
health
crisis
that
the
who
is
saying
the
world
health
organization
is
climate
crisis,
and
so
how
we're
going
to
cope-
and
I
know
we-
you
know-
we've
been
using
that
muscle
with
our
covid,
but
you
know
we
have
to
use
it
better
to
cope.
E
It's
no
longer
can
we,
you
know,
reduce
our
climate
crisis.
We
I
mean
we
can
we
have
to
do
that
as
well,
but
really
coping
with
it
is
really
our.
Our
challenge
now
is
to
cope
with
our
climate
crisis
and
that
creating
resilient
neighborhoods
is
really
has
to
be
our
focus.
And
how
do
we
do
that?
We
create
food
security
and
those
type
of
issues
by
growing
food
locally,
and
that
is
where
we
need
to
change.
B
Thank
you,
blair.
F
Hi,
laura
beekman
here,
happy
mid-october,
do
you
have
issues
of
southwest
airlines
and
you
have
issues
of
kobit
19,
prolonging
the
local
emergency
process.
I
hope
I
can
speak
a
few
words
about
about.
F
You
know
the
southwest
issues,
if
that's
okay,
this
past
weekend,
to
try
to
offer
a
bit
of
clarification,
it's
my
understanding
that
the
the
pilots
walked
out
because
of
the
issue
of
of
the
vaccine
mandate
process
that
the
owners
of
southwest
demanded
on
the
pilots
and
the
pilots
refused.
F
I
think
this
is
a
part
of
a
series
of
what
I've
been
trying
to
address
to
yourselves
recently
that
we
have
to
continue
the
efforts
to
develop.
What
can
be
what
is
the
vaccine
process?
What
are
we
dealing
with?
What
are
we
addressing
and
how
can
we
talk
about
it
together
more
this
fall?
Well,
you
know
it's
good
parts,
it's
bad
parts.
You
know
what
can
be
flexibility,
ideas
and
practices.
F
It's
important
stuff.
The
vta
is
working
on
issues
that
I
invite
people
to
look
into
that
we
have
to
consider
that
there
are.
There
is
technology
practices
of
this
that
the
the
purpose
of
open
public
policy
ideas
that
I
talk
about
can
become
incredibly
important
at
this
time
and
meaningful
and
ways
to
create
that
good
dialogue
we're
trying
to
learn
how
to
talk
about
these
issues.
F
So
I
I
hope
that
you
know
the
open
public
policy
stuff
ideas.
I've
been
doing
for
years
can
really
help
out
right
now
and
it's
where
all
parts
of
the
community
can
develop
a
more
open,
good,
friendly
dialogue.
This
fall
about
open
public
policy
practices,
responsible
good
guidelines,
and
this
is
how
we
work
through
this
covered
era
together.
G
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time.
I
hope
I'm
reading
this
added
agenda
correctly,
that
we
will
be
adding
district
3
representative
for
the
very
important
redistricting
commission,
I'm
very
concerned
about
the
current
maps
that
I've
looked
at
where
san
jose
state,
north
and
south
campus
are
being
split.
G
Negley
park
and
san
jose
state
north
campus
is
being
moved
to
one
group
and
the
other
parts
of
san
jose
state
are
in
another
district.
This
is
a
very
large
community.
33
000
students
attend
san
jose
state,
it's
a
major
institution
downtown
and
splitting
this
the
way
it
apparently
proposed
by
I'm
looking
at
it
is
splitting
this
community.
It
may
not
be
a
community
that
we
think
of
in
terms
of
of
race
or
ethnicity,
but
it
is
a
community
of
similar
people
living
together
around
the
area.
G
That
area
has
san
jose
state
has
an
impact
on
the
area
around
it.
We
shouldn't
be
moving
communities
and
not
having
the
students
represented
and
such
a
large
institution
not
represented
as
a
whole.
So
I'm
hoping
the
new
district
3
representative
will
look
at
san
jose
state
as
a
community
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
that
being
appointed
so
that
that
district
can
be
represented
again.
Thank
you
very
much.
Raul
perez,
I'm
looking
forward
to
a
great
candidate
that
you're
going
to
suggest.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
and
for
listening
to
my
concerns.
B
Thank
you
bringing
it
back
to
the
committee
actually
see
tony.
You
have
your
hand
raised.
H
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
say
that
the
draft
maps
that
have
been
released
are
first
draft
only
they're
not
approved
they're,
not
close
to
being
approved.
The
commission
did
send
the
consultants
back
to
the
drawing
board.
We
have
a
commission
meeting
tomorrow
night
to
discuss
the
second
round
of
draft
maps
that
we
just
posted,
so
I
would
encourage
the
person
who's
attending
to
go
on
our
website
and
get
the
information
for
the
redistricting
commission
tomorrow.
B
Thank
you,
tony
council
member
perales,.
I
Yeah,
thank
you,
and
we
were
unfortunate
in
that.
The
person
that
had
applied
and
been
selected
by
a
church
represent
district
3
did
resign,
and
so
we've
now
been
through
the
process
of
promoting
and
soliciting
somebody
to
replace
her,
and
I
will
say
that
we
will
have
that
selection
in
and
we'll
make
that
appointment.
As
the
ad
sheet
says
next
week,.
B
Great.
Thank
you,
council,
member,
since
you
who
are
you
or
a
counselor
cohen
I'll.
I
I
apologize,
I
didn't
take
that
opportunity
vice
mayor
I'll
second
great.
A
K
A
J
I
B
B
All
right
next
is
the
city
council
agenda
for
tuesday
october
26th.
L
B
F
Hi
blair
beekman
here
to
comment
on
there's
some
sort
of
continuing
work
on
the
zoom
hybrid
meeting
issues
and
questions.
I
I
hope
this
can
be
a
time
that
I
can
ask
questions
about
zoom,
and
you
know
the
fact
that
this
can
be
a
part
of
the
conversation.
This
fall
about
how
to
better
talk
about
covet
issues
and
to
make
this
an
open
conversation
to
continue
that
an
open
conversation.
F
It's
really
important,
and
I
I
guess
we're
starting
to
go
through
that
now
and
understand
that
now,
as
has
been
I've
been
trying
to
say
these
words
for
the
past
few
months
about
the
issues
of
subcommittee
and
the
zoom
process,
I've
been
learning
that,
yes,.
B
My
career,
can
you
go
back
to
the
agenda?
Please.
F
Okay,
all
right,
I've
got
issues
with
that,
but
I
will
very
much
respect
what
you're
asking
at
this
time
and
to
go
on
to
the
encampment
issues.
Thank
you.
Incredibly,
my
gosh.
You
know
the
portable
idea
was
brought
here
a
couple
weeks
ago
by
council
person,
mayhem
that
it
was
not
very
agreed
upon
and
that
we
need
to
work
with
more
established
practices
that
man
also
mentioned
himself
and
one
of
those
being.
F
I
think
he
was
implying
the
idea
of
the
encampment
process,
and
lo
and
behold
here
it
is,
you
know
what
is
the
future
of
the
government
sponsored
encampment
process?
It's
an
idea.
That's
been
practiced
and
studied
for
years
boy.
I
really
hope
it's
time
we
can
do
this
and
make
real
small
homeless
encampments
around
the
city.
People
been
working
on
this
issue
for
a
long
time
as
and
as
part
of
the
overall
strategy
how
to
work
on
homeless
issues.
I
think
it
can
be
really
good.
F
E
Yes,
in
regards
to
the
zoom,
you
know
using
our
technology
to
encourage
our
democracy.
This
is
very
important
and
so
the
whole
zoom
technology
needs
to
go
on
forever
as
we
go
forward.
As
you
know,
community
based
involvement
is
very
critical.
Like
matt
mahan
has
said,
you
know
that
our
our
solutions
are
going
to
come
from
the
ground
up,
and
so
that's
the
people
and
that
you
know
all
of
our.
You
know
public
comments
and
things
like
that
are
very
critical
to
our.
E
You
know
solving
the
critical
issues
that
we're
facing
and
we
need
the
best
minds
to
be
put
on
that,
and
so
therefore
we
need
to
the
biggest
you
know,
catchment
of
of
our
public,
to
get
that
kind
of
creative
thinking
and
problem
solving
so
really
want
to
support
the
zoom.
E
You
know
technologies
to
create
more
democracy
and,
as
best
that
we
can
improve
that
you
know
to
make
it
as
accessible
as
possible
to
all
of
us
is
really
important,
and
then
you
know
what
we
were
talking
about
is
what
we're
talking
about
is
using
our
technologies
to
increase
our
community
engagement
and
our
democratic
principles,
and
that's
why
I
was
going
to
bring
up
the
issues
of
our
subcommittees,
that
they
too
should
be
open
and
it's
a
very
critical
issue,
as
we
go
forward
that
these
these
issues
you
know,
like
I
say
you
know
our
climate
crisis.
E
We
need
to
know
the
future
generations
need
to
know
what
happened
in
terms
of
where
we're
going
into
our
catastrophe
that
we're
going
into
so
having
our
subcommittees
to
be
open
is
very
critical
as
long
as
as
well
as
our
zoom
meetings.
You
know
that
creates
that
openness
of
our
democracy
and
that's
what
I'm
saying
is
that
our
subcommittees
have
to
have
viewing
into
them
public
engagement,
either
recording
of
the
subcommittees
so
that
we
can
get.
B
Thank
you,
tessa
all
right,
bringing
it
back
to
the
committee.
G
B
All
right,
they
moved
in
second
yasmin.
A
M
A
B
B
Is
the
meeting
schedule,
and
that
is
a
overview
of
senate
bill,
9
and
senate
bill
10
and
implications
to
planning
policy
and
zoning
regulations
study
session
and
the
first
public
speaker
is
tessa.
E
Yes,
the
whole
issue
of
senate
bill
9
and
10
that
is
trying
to
intensify
our
living
environment
is
very
critical
to
our
survival,
and
so,
when
we're
fighting
that
you
know,
we
really
have
to
look
at
what
is
it
that
we're
really
fighting?
And
I
think
that-
and
you
know
what
what
impacts
our
community
is:
noise
and
pollution
cars
and
how
they
impact
our
neighborhood.
They
kill
us,
they
pollute
and
make
noise.
So
the
the
issues
as
we
go
forward
to
say
that
nine
and
ten
you
know
we
need
to
fight
that.
E
I
think,
is
wrong
because
we
have,
we
will
have.
My
husband
has
been
saying
as
a
climate
scientist
we're
going
to
have
40x
more
people
in
in
san
jose.
That
is,
we
have
a
million
there'll,
be
40
million
because
of
that
our
lands
are
becoming
uninhabitable
around
our
own
country
and
there
are
no
borders,
and-
and
you
know
you
don't
need
visas
to
travel
within
our
country,
so
within
our
country
we're
having
so
many
uninhabitable
spaces,
the
south,
the
north,
you
know
everywhere
everywhere,
east,
and
so
we
know
40
million
coming.
E
This
is
this
is
our
future
and
we
need
to
be
preparing.
So
what
we
really
need
is
government
over
business
in
regards
to
you
know.
Well,
we
need
government
control
to
have
quality
of
life.
We
need
noise
ordinances
that
are
really
enforced.
We
need
no
no
our
streets
to
become
home
zones
so
that
cars
aren't
going
down
our
streets.
We
really
need
to
be
putting
our
cars
we
have
to
have.
E
You
know
we
should
be
building
with
no
car
infrastructure
as
we
go
into
our
more
hyper
local
economy
where
we
all
our
needs
are
met
locally.
We
don't
need
cars
and
that's
way
we
need
to
be
going
and
you
know
not
to
be
fighting
the
identification
of
of
housing
in
our
communities.
So
I
think
it
is
an
ill
ill
path
that
we're
we're
fighting
to
be
fighting
for
that,
but
we
need
to
create
more.
G
First,
I
want
to
thank
the
council
very
much
for
taking
up
looking
at
sb9
and
sb10
and
the
implications
on
planning
and
zoning.
I
hope
we'll
all
listen
carefully
and
I
hope
we
all
study
well.
I
hope
we'll
listen
to
each
other,
both
sides
so
that
we
can
come
up
with
the
very
best
for
our
city
and
hope
that
we
have
lots
of
constructive
input
and
wonderful
questions
from
the
council
to
the
staff
and
to
others
that
may
be
in
attendance.
G
B
Thank
you
bring
it
back
to
the
committee.
Can
I
get
a
motion
please.
B
B
Yes,
all
right
motion
passes.
Next
item
is
the
public
record
and
first
speaker
is
blair,
go
ahead,
blair.
F
Hi,
thank
you
to
speak
to
my
own
letter
and
to
the
letters
about
mr
montana
issues.
My
letter
tries
to
summarize
some
of
my
feelings
from
the
rules
in
open
government
meeting
a
couple
weeks
ago
with
council
person,
mayhem
and
his
housing
ideas,
portable
housing
ideas
among
many
ideas
possible
in
housing
at
this
time
for
a
homeless
community.
F
I
thought
it
was.
It
was
interesting,
interesting
efforts.
It
wasn't
fully
appreciated
and
maybe
it's
a
bit
of
an
experience.
I
tried
to
offer
suggestions
of
how
to
really
rely
on
our
practices
we
know
well
and
what
we
do
well
at
this
time
and
with
so
much
subsidy
funding
coming
in
to
to
use
that
money
for
in
in
practice,
good
terms
of
programs.
F
We
already
know,
I
think
that
can
help
things
a
lot
and
from
there
that's
what's
exciting,
we
can
start
to
address
more
experimental
ideas
like
the
government,
sponsored
housing
issues
or
encampment
issues,
and
that
I
know
council
person
perales
is
interested
in
as
well,
and
he's
he's
been
on
this
for
a
number
of
years
too.
F
So
we're
thinking
of
imaginative
ideas.
Thank
you,
and
that
comes
to
the
government-sponsored
state
parking
programs
at
vista
montana,
that
I,
I
think
I
hope
we
can
learn
to
work
together
in
the
very
least,
maybe
to
develop
a
future
notification
process
for
future
places.
For
this.
If
this
situation
arises
again,
to
have
a
notification
process
in
place
can
be
interesting.
I
think
for
ourselves.
Working
on
that
can
be
interesting
and
how
to
talk
about
these
sort
of
issues
and
to
really
remind
again
are
there
certain
fennel
plants?
F
I
think
that
michelle
obama
used
to
mention
that
can
really
help
leech
out
the
soil
for
arsenic
and
other
poisons.
E
Oh,
thank
you
very
much
yes.
So
the
vista
montana
issue
is
a
very
critical
issue
in
our
community
and
because
it
really
shows
to
light
what
we
have
been
experiencing
in
my
neighborhood
as
well
is
the
lack
of
communication
from
our
government
and
its
policies
and
its
planning.
You
know,
even
in
this
case,
in
this
case
it
wasn't
deep
planning.
E
It
was
emerging,
so
supposedly
quote
unquote
emergency
planning,
but
it
needs
the
the
community
engagement
and
the
community
outreach
that
wasn't
experienced
and
and
the
frustration
that
these
neighbors
have
been
experiencing
is
the
same
frustration
my
neighbors
have
been
experiencing
in
the
garden
alameda
and
every
time
like
I
go
to
see,
deb
davis
or
raul,
perales
or
matt
mayhem.
They
say,
don't
talk
about
615..
E
The
reason
we're
having
trouble
with
615
is
because
it's
putting
commercial
into
our
neighborhood
and
we
have
been
injured
by
the
commercial
in
our
neighborhood.
We
and
just
like
the
vista
montana,
is
concerned
about
the
injury
to
their
community.
You
know
when
you're
doing
these
things
to
our
community,
which
is
already
been
injured,
we're
already
a
community
at
risk
in
terms
of
our
pollution
and
the
impacts
in
our
neighbor,
the
death
and
disability
in
our
neighborhood,
and
then
you
put
more
commercial
into
our
neighborhood,
and
you
say
it's
good
for
the
community
that
it's
it's.
E
You
know
making
money
for
the
city,
city,
city
coffers,
but
you
did
not
communicate
with
our
neighborhood.
You
did
not
tell
our
neighborhood
that
this
is
what
your
your
plan
for
our
city
is
that
when
you
know-
and
this
is
where
we're
having
the
breakdown-
and
I
was
thinking
about
even
with
our
you
know-
redistricting-
we
really
need
most
probably
neighborhood
districts.
We
need
to
become.
You
know.
Our
neighborhood
needs
to
become
very
viable
about
what
we
want
in
our
neighborhood,
and
that
was
the
movement
of
what
the
villa
montana
is
saying.
E
N
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
vice
chair
anyway,
I'm
calling
regarding
the
debacle
and
the
mess
that
is
going
on
at
vista
montana
and
reading
some
of
these
letters.
As
soon
as
we
can.
We
need
to
take
this
whole
property
out
of
the
housing
department.
N
People
are
getting
broken
into
by
other
unhoused
folks,
climbing
over
the
fence.
Nothing
is
being
done.
Nobody
is
taking
care
of
there's
one
person
living
out
there.
I
I
don't
know
if
any
of
you
know
how
much
we're
spending
on
this
disaster,
and
I
call
it
a
disaster
because
it's
going
against
the
unhoused
people,
it's
gonna,
be
for
nine
months,
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
there's
one
person
living
there.
N
One
person
the
security
guard
that
goes
to
sleeps
they've,
had
break-ins
nobody's,
contacting
the
residents
of
the
rv's
that
got
broken
into
they
have
been
broken
into
nobody's
talked
to
them.
It's
it's
a
mess,
there's
no
electricity.
We
need
to
do
something.
I
mean
it's
a
it's
a
wonderful
program
but
who's
running
it.
N
It
needs
to
get
out
of
the
hand
because
it's
doing
an
injustice
to
the
homeless,
and
I
get
calls
all
the
time
from
folks
the
unhoused
and
they're
disgusted
with
this
whole
thing.
They
want
to
move
into
their
rvs,
but
two
of
them
three
of
them
aren't
livable,
because
the
city
and
home
first
hasn't
done
anything
about
fixing
them
when
they've
been
destroyed,
they
were
destroyed
at
component
and
now
two
of
them
have
been
destroyed
under
safe
parking
at
vista
montana.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
gary.
B
Okay,
we're
not
able
to
hear
gary
so
we're
going
to
bring
it
back
to
the
committee
and
gary
we'll
give
you
the
opportunity
to
speak
later
on
the
meeting.
If
we
can
get
you
in
all
right
bring
it
back
to
the
committee.
B
A
M
O
Wonderful,
thank
you
honorable
vice
mayor
and
the
honorable
rules
committee.
This
is
peter
ortiz,
I'm
a
trustee
for
the
santa
clara
county
board
of
education
and
community
leader
in
district
five.
I'm
calling
to
speak
in
support
of
council
member
carrasco's
memo
for
the
council
to
build
support
for
assembly
bill
1400,
the
california
guaranteed
health
care
for
all
act.
O
Currently,
three
million
californians
have
no
health
care
coverage.
Nearly
one-third
of
the
californians
who
do
have
coverage
have
reported,
delaying
or
skipping
necessary
health
care
over
the
last
year
due
to
cost,
and
though
conditions
have
improved
because
of
the
vaccine.
The
pandemic
has
ravaged
the
state
of
california
disproportionately
infecting
and
killing
working
fit
working-class
families
and
people
of
color,
especially
killing
residents
of
east
san
jose.
O
O
B
Thank
you.
Email
address,
starting
with
bro
greg
m.
P
So
I
ask
why
does
this
richest
country
in
the
world
that
spends
by
far
the
most
on
health
care
have
the
highest
number
of
reported
cases
and
deaths
in
the
world
from
covet?
Why
are
communities
of
color
hit
so
much
harder
by
covid,
a
family,
usa,
families,
usa,
study
in
march
of
this
year
pointed
out
that
40
of
covet
cases
and
30
percent
of
covet
deaths
were
associated
with
the
lack
or
inadequacy
of
access
to
health
care
assembly.
Bill
1400
would
transform
the
current
profit
driven
system
to
one
dedicated
to
restoring
and
improving
health.
P
I
hope
that
the
city
of
san
jose
will
consider
joining
los
angeles,
oakland,
san
francisco,
santa
barbara
and
other
california
cities,
as
well
as
santa
clara
county,
to
call
for
a
new
system
that
puts
the
health
of
the
people
over
profits
and
guarantees
easy
access
to
comprehensive
health
care
to
all
california
residents,
the
one
that
would
be
established
by
the
guaranteed
healthcare
for
all
act
of
2021
cow
care
or
ab
1400..
K
K
The
only
way
to
guarantee
care
is
for
all
is
for
all
to
have
a
single-payer
system.
Someone
dear
to
me,
is
in
danger
of
losing
medical
insurance
due
to
divorce.
Her
insurance
has
always
been
through
her
husband's
employment
because
she
has
been
a
stay-at-home
mom
with
three
children.
A
divorce
settlement
might
limit
her
coverage
to
only
a
couple
of
years.
Please
adopt
a
position
of
support
of
council
member
cross
coast
memo
to
support
ap
1400,
the
california
guaranteed
health
care
for
all
act,
also
known
as
child
care.
Thank
you.
So
much.
P
Can
you
hear
me
now
loud
and
clear,
okay,
great
okay,
this
is
bill
wallace.
I
live
in
district
9
and
I
am
a
member
of
the
california
alliance
for
retired
americans.
I
have
retired
from
the
city
of
santa
clara.
P
P
B
Thank
you,
tessa.
E
E
But
what
we
really
have
to
look
at
is
the
things
that
are
causing
us
disease
and
and
work
on,
preventing
that-
and
I
I
was
just
thinking
about
you
know-
somebody
was
caught
speaking
from
the
school,
the
county
school
board
and
in
our
neighborhood
district
six
we
have
a
farmer's
market,
that's
not
providing
food
stamps
that
needs
to
change.
Food
is
our
medicine
and
we
and
open-air
food
markets
need
to
be
available
to
all
and
they're
not,
and
so
that
needs
to
be
changed.
E
We
need
to
really
make
sure
that
our
school,
our
school
at
lincoln,
high
school,
you
know
that
is
using
public
lands,
is
providing
food
stamp
availability
for
all
the
people
who
need
that
and
that
the
our
farmer's
market
is
not,
and
it's
it's
a
racist
attitude
and
this
needs
to
be
changed
as
soon
as
possible,
and
then
I
was
thinking
about
our
air
pollution
that
also
makes
our
our
disadvantaged
communities
vulnerable
to
pollution,
which
is
the
precursor
made
made.
You
know
coven
much
worse.
E
You
know
this
is
a
respiratory
illness,
and
so
we
need
to
be
banning
our
gas
leaf
blowers
immediately.
You
know
even
and
right
now
the
state
of
california
is
going
to
give
money
back
to
you
know
the
low-income
landscapers
only
so
we
need
to
ban
it
so
that
all
our
our
our
leaf
blowers
are
banned.
You
know
that
needs
to
be
across
our
whole
city
as
we
are
experiencing
so
much
coveted
problems
so
that
that's
that
issue
and
then
the
issue
of
cars.
E
C
Great,
thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you
so
much
for
this
opportunity.
Honorable
council
members,
my
name
is
mimi
spreadbury
and
I'm
a
part
of
orchard
city
indivisible.
I
am
a
constituent
of
district
2..
It
was
very
nice
to
see
many
council
members
at
the
rose,
white
and
blue
block
party.
I
suppose
they
did
this
year,
so
I
am
speaking
to
you
asking
for
your
support.
Please
for
ab1400
our
healthcare
system
in
this
country
and
in
our
area,
was
in
dire
straits
before
covid
and
I'm
afraid
covet.
C
So
ab
1400
is
a
guaranteed
health
care
for
all
act
which
would
enact
a
single-payer
health
care
program,
cal
care
for
all
residents
in
the
state
of
california.
It
would
include
medical
dental
hearing,
vision,
mental
health,
reproductive
and
long-term
care.
Every
person
living
in
california
would
be
included
regardless
of
income
level,
immigration
status,
prior
health
conditions
or
ability
to
pay
undocumented
california
residents
would
also
be
included.
There
would
be
no
more
in-network
or
out-of-network
for
providers.
C
If
you
can
see
any
you
can
see
any
doctor
or
hospital
of
your
choice,
and
I
recently
had
a
family
member,
an
older
family
member
that
had
to
go
to
the
er,
and
luckily
it
turned
out
to
be
nothing
of
serious
consequence,
but
she
could
not
go
to
her
hospital
of
choice,
which
was
el
camino
hospital,
because
there
are
turn-away
ambulances
at
this
time,
so
she
had
to
go
to
stanford
hospital
and
she
doesn't
know
if
the
doctors
who
saw
her
are
in
network
neck.
Yet
so
please
keep
that
consideration
and
approve
ab1400.
F
Hi
claire
beekman
here
I
just
wanted
to
thank
all
the
years
of
work.
People
have
been
doing
on
this
issue.
You
got
a
previous
speaker,
greg
miller
from
san
jose
who's
been
working.
F
You
know
for
a
number
of
years
on
this
issue
and
then
just
a
thank
you
to
him
and
and
to
all
the
efforts
of
people
in
san
jose
that
this
is
finally
happening
coming
to
fruition
at
the
state
level,
and
it's
nice
that
kara
is
working
on
it
and
just
good
luck
to
everyone's
efforts
for
this
incredibly
important
issue.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
let's
go
to
the
next
person
and
hopefully
she
can
get
it
updated
in
time.
Uthra.
A
Excellent,
thank
you
so
much
for
everyone
here
today
and
I
really
appreciate
all
the
speakers
before
me.
I'm
a
physician
practicing
in
the
bay
area.
I
reside
in
san
jose,
and
it
is
this
year,
more
than
ever,
it's
been
so
clear
that
we
really
need
it's
time
for
us
to
have
a
universal
healthcare
coverage.
San
jose
is
one
of
the
richest
cities
in
the
country,
if
not
in
the
world.
Yet
we
have
people
who
don't
who
lack
access
to
health
care
as
a
practicing
physician.
A
Unfortunately,
a
lot
of
doctors
can't
really
do
that
because
of
the
complexity
of
the
healthcare
system
that
we
have
today
and
the
way
the
you
know
contracting
with
insurance
companies
and
others
make
it
so
difficult
for
doctors
to
really
be
and
non-independent.
A
So
I
consider
myself
lucky
as
well
as
at
the
same
time
you
know
having
being
in
having
my
own
business.
It's
been
very
hard
for
me
to
get
coverage
for
my
own
family,
believe
it
or
not.
You
know,
as
a
physician-
and
you
know
so-
healthcare
ab
1400
bill
will
guarantee
health
care
for
all
will
allow
entrepreneurs,
small
businesses,
physicians,
you
name
it.
People
can
practice,
however,
they
want
to.
A
They
will
have
the
ability
to
keep
their
relationships
with
their
doctors,
no
matter
where
they
are
or
where
they
are
in
terms
of
their
career,
trajectories
and
will
allow
people
to
choose
the
hospitals
and
the
the
group
of
physicians
that
they
wish
to
continue
to
practice
with.
I
believe
it
will
only
enhance
the
practice
of
medicine.
It
will
actually
allow
doctors
to
compete
on
best
practices
on
and
not
on.
You
know
which
insurance
pay
the
most
and,
in
my
opinion,
it
is
really
the
right
thing
to
do.
This
is.
H
H
H
H
B
Yeah,
your
connection
is
a
little
spotty
keep
going.
Hopefully.
A
Okay,
so
I
just
want
to
thank
councilwoman
carrasco,
member
ashkawa
and
the
single-payer.
A
We
have
a
system
that
is
highly
dependent
on
prices
and,
with
this
coveted
we've
seen
our
health
deteriorated
because
of
the
lack
of
going
out
and
the
lack
of
preventative
measures
that
we
haven't
been
able
to
do
to
covet.
A
I
feel
that
this
has
been
a
really
unfair
system
for
everyone
that
can
afford
and
there's
families
that
have
to
choose
between
keeping
that
extra
600
or
getting
health
care
for
their
family,
and
these
are
choices
that
we
shouldn't
have
to
be
making
health
care
should
be
something
that
everyone
should
be
entitled
to,
because
this
is
our
health
and
a
lot
of
times.
A
We
don't
prioritize
it
until
we
are
sick
and
we
don't
see
or
value
it
until
we
are
in
a
hospital
bed
when
it's
too
late,
we
shouldn't
have
to
get
to
that
point.
We
should
be
able
to
see
a
doctor
and
not
worry
about
having
to
pay
for
it.
I
want
to
thank
you
guys
for
everything
you
do
today
and
everyone
in
the
healthcare
single
healthcare
coalition.
Thank
you
all
for
your
efforts
and
I'm
just
urging
you
guys
to
support
this
today.
Thank
you.
B
R
Oh
thank
you
chair.
Thank
you
vice
mayor
and
I'm
not
sure.
If
you
can
hear
me,
I've
had
I've
got
horrible
connection
today.
R
Awesome
well,
I
I
stand
before
the
committee
in
the
hopes
that
my
council
colleagues
will
approve
ab1400
to
move
forward
to
the
rest
of
the
city
council,
as
you
heard
the
other
speakers
who
were
so
incredibly
eloquent
and
passionate
about
making
sure
that
all
our
residents
are
insured,
and
this
is
a
big
difference
between
being
underinsured
or
not
insured
at
all.
So
this
is
ab
1400
by
assembly
members,
colorado
lee
in
santiago.
It's
the
guaranteed
health
for
all
act,
and
I
don't
need
to.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
put
my
videos.
R
Sorry
here
we
go.
Let's,
let's
try!
I
I
I
don't
need
to
remind
all
of
you.
We've
been
talking
about
it
for
the
past
18
months,
covet
19.
If
there
was
ever
a
bright
spot
about
covert
19,
it's
just
that
it.
It
un
unveiled
all
of
the
inequities
that
we're
living
through
in
our
communities.
We
know
that
in
san
jose
and
in
santa
clara
county,
some
of
the
hardest
hit
communities
were
on
the
east
side
of
san
jose
nine
five,
one,
two,
seven,
nine
five,
one,
two,
two,
nine
five
one
one
six.
R
These
were
communities
that
were
also
in
the
downtown
area
and
part
of
evergreen
as
well,
and
we
know
why
part
of
it
is
that
they
were
living
in
close
quarters.
They
were
our
essential
workers,
generations
of
under
investment
in
these
communities
and,
of
course,
a
lack
of
access
to
quality
health
care
pre-covet.
So
so
all
of
this
combined
only
only
added
up
to
disaster
for
our
communities.
So
I
stand
before
you
in
the
hopes
that
you
will
consider
supporting
ab1400
I
want
to.
R
I
want
to
truly
extend
my
my
gratitude
to
the
assembly
members,
the
co-authors
of
the
bill
to
the
coalition.
That's
been
working
so
hard
to
educate
all
of
us
and
make
sure
that
this
that
this
happens
and
truly
for
all
those
advocates
who
are
out
there
making
sure
that
our
residents
can
depend
on
on
a
healthier
system.
R
R
Many
of
you
know
I
I
I
had
the
honor
of
standing
bedside
by
both
my
mother
and
my
father
when
they
transitioned
my
father
died
of
complications
of
alzheimer's,
my
mother
of
skin
cancer
and
at
one
point
my
father
was-
was
consuming.
15
different
medications
on
a
daily
basis
and
october
was
our
deadline.
October
november
december,
all
their
medication
came
out
of
my
my
pocket.
R
As
a
result,
back
in
2010,
I
had
to
file
bankruptcy
because
the
debt
was
was,
it
was
just
unsurmountable
and
you
know
I
had.
I
was
one
of
those
families
that
had
to
make
a
choice
back
then
about
keeping
my
little
ones.
I
had
three
little
ones
and
a
young
teenager
whether
I
kept
them
in
their
extracurricular
activities
and
truly
october.
R
Through
december,
I
had
to
pull
diego
abby
and
paloma
from
gymnastics
from
ballet
classes
and
from
sports,
because
I
just
could
not
afford
as
an
only
child,
to
keep
up
with
my
parents
medication.
This
would
this
would
allow
families
not
to
have
to
make
those
heart-wrenching
choices
and
and
really
set
health
as
their
as
their
priority.
R
There
are
some
things
that
we
absolutely
cannot.
Control
covet.
19
was
uncontrollable,
it
it
scooped
down
on
us
and
it
devastated
our
communities,
but
there
are
some
things
that
we
can
control
and
we
can
at
least
support
a
bill
that
is
being
considered
in
sacramento,
with
the
hopes
of
insuring
our
residents.
The
added
benefit
of
this
is
that
it
allows
us
to
also
support
small
businesses
who
have
been
devastated
by
covet
19,
who
are
struggling
to
keep
their
employees,
who
are
now
letting
go
of
employees.
R
This
is
a
new
flock
of
uninsured
employees
that
have
never
been
in
this
situation,
but
but
ab1400
allows
us
to
support
businesses
by
cutting
down
on
the
cost
by
making
sure
that
our
residents
are
healthy
and
by
guaranteeing
quality
healthcare.
So
I
just
want
to
extend
a
usc
study.
If
you,
if
you'll
grant
me
the
moment,
a
usc
study
found
that
latino
immigrants
of
working
age
are
11
times
more
likely
to
die
from
covet
than
u.s
born
men
and
women
who
are
not
latino.
R
Our
latino
residents
have
been
our
essential
workers.
They
deserve
to
to
be
taken
care
of
and
to
have
affordable
health
care.
I'm
sure
that
you
all
will
agree.
Lastly,
there's
a
ucsf
study
that
states
that,
across
all
political
spectrum,
there
is
near
consensus
among
economists
that
a
single-payer
system
would
save
money.
R
R
B
Thank
you
councilmember.
I
I
see
that
lucy
hopefully
was
able
to
upgrade
her
her
zoom.
So
I'm
going
to
give
her
an
opportunity
to
speak.
I
see
her.
She
has
her
hand
raised
so
lucy
go
ahead.
L
Pepe
hi,
thank
you
all
so
much
for
being
here,
and
my
name
is
lucy
keaver
and
I'm
a
member
of
santa
terra
county
single-payer
healthcare
coalition,
and
I
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
your
service
during
this,
especially
during
this
covet
period.
You.
H
L
A
really
tough
job
and
thank
you
so
much
councilmember
carrasco
and
assembly
member
colorado
for
really
pushing
this
bill
for
being
champions,
and
I
want
to
thank
my
own
councilman
from
district
three
rule
paralysis.
Who
was
with
us
from
the
start
when
we
went
and
visited
him
back
in
february.
L
L
I
want
california,
the
fifth
largest
economy
on
the
entire
planet,
to
take
care
of
our
business,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
understands
that
in
the
state
of
california,
70
percent
of
every
health
care
dollar
that
is
spent
comes
from
some
government
source
already
and
when
we
add
the
other
money,
that's
in
the
system,
we
can
easily
cover
everybody
comprehensively
and
we'll
have
money
left
over
and
just
to
touch
again
on
the
other
side
of
the
businesses.
L
Businesses
don't
go
into
business
to
be
in
the
health
care
business,
but
that's
what
happens,
especially
for
our
small
businesses,
who
are
trying
to
keep
employees.
You
know
from
leaving
to
go
to
different
jobs
just
because
of
health
insurance,
but
they
are
in
the
business
to
make
money
and
provide
things
that
people
want
need,
and
so
we
really
need
to
stop.
You
know
you
know
destroying
our
and
crushing
our
small
businesses.
L
There
is
a
movie,
I
highly
recommend
it's
called
fix
it
healthcare
at
the
tipping
point
and
it
is
put
out
by
a
businessman
who
did
a
deep
dive
on
this
health
care
and
his
costs.
Thank
you
so
much
and
please
support
ab
1400.
B
Great,
thank
you
very
much,
so
the
next
bring
it
back
to
the
committee.
Councilmember
cohen,.
J
Yeah,
thank
you
I'll,
be
brief,
because
we
I
spoke
about
this
once
before
this
year.
As
a
long
time
supporter
of
single-payer
health
care,
I
spoke
extensively
at
the
april
wheels
meeting
that
just
came
forward
about
why
this
is
important,
and
so
I
don't
want
to
feel
like
we
have
to
rehash.
J
Although
we've
also
heard
a
lot
from
members
of
the
public
and
from
councilmember
carrasco,
this
bill
was
held
over
for
a
second
year,
so
we
never
brought
it
to
council
before,
but
this
the
rules
committee
did
approve
moving
this
forward
back
at
that
time.
So
I'd
like
to
move
approval
of
this
again
and
bring
it
to
council
in
the
near
future,
so
you
can
support
it.
K
B
All
right,
councilmember,
perales.
I
Yeah,
thank
you
appreciate
councilmember
glasgow.
Bringing
this
back
up.
I
too
was
supportive
of
this
as
it
came
before
us
earlier
and
considering
it's
now,
gonna
be
coming
into
the
the
new
year,
we'll
be
coming
in
just
in
a
few
months,
interested
in
and
obviously
seeing
how
this
is
able
to
progress.
I
I
did
I
have
a
question
for
alex.
I
know
you've
joined
us
here.
Did
you
have
any
other
updates
for
us
or
in
regards
to
the
consideration
or
where
ab1400
is
currently
at.
Q
Yes,
thank
you,
alexandria,
felton
inter-governmental
relations
officer
at
the
city
of
san
jose.
So
as
staff
we
are
reviewing
ab
1400
and,
and
you
know,
to
understand
the
implications
to
the
city,
and
we
were
also
recently
briefed
by
assemblymember
caller
staff
and
they
provided
more
details
on
the
status
of
the
bill
and
some
of
the
related
advocacy
activity.
And
so,
as
others
mentioned,
it
is
currently
a
two-year
bill.
Q
Why
there's
a
lot
of
effort
to
rally
support
because
it
must
be
taken
up
by
a
policy
committee
by
the
end
of
january
in
order
to
move
forward.
And
so
I
know
that
the
assembly,
member
and
his
team
are,
you
know,
ongoing
part
of
ongoing
and
evolving
conversations
on
funding
options.
There
currently
aren't
any
details
or
provisions
additional
details
or
provisions
that
kind
of
share
at
this
time,
but
I
think,
as
staff
I
mean
we're
looking
forward
to
seeing
additional
analysis
on
on
the
cost
and
the
implement.
Q
You
know
the
implications
for
the
city
and
I
think
that,
if
it
moves
forward,
we
would
be
prepared
to
bring
an
additional
analysis
for
the
to
lend
to
that
conversation
at
council.
If
it
moves
forward
out
of
the
rules
committee.
I
Okay,
thank
you
and
I
I
do
think
it
will
move
out
of
this
committee,
so
I
do
have
an
interest
in
in
some
questions
as
you
bring
it
forward,
and
I
don't
know
if
they'll
be
able
to
be
answered
just
yet.
In
my
reading
of
the
language,
I
saw
one
area
that
I
I
had
of
interest,
which
was,
if
you
were
out
of
state,
for
instance,
on
vacation
or
something
like
that
and
you're
in
need
of
medical
care.
I
I
Maybe
I
I
missed
it,
but
in
regards
to
things
like
retirement,
that's
one
of
the
issues
that
comes
up
now
with
city
employees,
those
that
say,
for
instance,
have
had
kaiser
their
entire
career
and
then,
when
they
retire
there,
a
lot
of
them
are
looking
for
areas
in
the
the
country
to
move
to
that
has
kaiser
as
a
you
know,
as
a
healthcare
provider,
because
that's
you
know,
that's
their
coverage.
I
They
have,
and
so
they're
looking
for
that
and
ultimately
limited
to
that,
I
didn't
see
anything
in
there
and
I
don't
know
if
you
know
offhand
now,
if
not,
that
would
be
just
one
area.
I'd
be
interested
in
kind
of
hearing
how
they're
dealing
with
that
when
you
bring
this
back
to
the
council.
Q
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
arenas.
K
Thank
you
chair.
I
want
to
first
just
thank
all
the
speakers
for
are
calling
in
and
giving
us
their
input
and
their
insights
in
terms
of
how
healthcare,
if
impacted
or
affects
our
lives
and
the
lives
of
the
people
who
are
around
us,
that
we
love
one
of
the
things
that
I
and
also
let
me
not
forget,
council,
member
kadasco,
for
bringing
this
forward.
Thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward
and
keeping
our
our
community
at
the
focus
and
at
the
forefront.
K
I
know
that
you've
been
one
of
the
you
know
a
huge
advocate
for
our
latino
community,
especially
during
covid,
because
they
were
the
most
impacted.
K
K
But
this
is
according
to
maldef
and
what
they
pointed
out
was
that
there
has
been
a
huge
disinvestment
in
the
latino
community,
a
systemic
as,
as
you
know,
we've
seen
in
this
county
that
the
vaccine
rates
are
not
as
high
for
our
latino
community
as
they
are
for
others
and
there's
something
systemic,
deep
rooted
in
terms
of
that
disservice,
and
our
systems
are
now
trying
to
fix
for
that
right.
We're
trying
to
make
have
place-based
strategies
and
language
appropriate
strategies
to
to
address
some
of
those
things.
K
But
I'm
not
sure
you
know
this
is
way
beyond
what
we're
responsible
for
here
in
our
in
our
respective
roles.
But
I
can't
help
but
think
that
that
what
happens
here
at
the
county
happens
at
a
larger
rate
throughout
california
and
in
that
systemically
latinos
have
been
underserved
and
that
there
might
be.
K
You
know,
medical
for
our
families.
But
there
aren't
any
medical
providers
that
accept
medi-cal
for
the
particular
field
of
expertise,
and
so
I
hope
that
that
maybe
our
igr
folks
can
bring
in
some
of
this
analysis
in
terms
of
how
would
this?
How
would
this
address,
if,
if
we
have
a
healthcare
for
all
I'll,
be
obviously
everybody's
starting
at
the
same
rate?
K
You
know
there
is
no
distinction,
but
there
has
been
some
systemically
some
underserved
populations
and
there
could
be
you
know
less
offices
and
in
certain
parts
of
town,
less
something
or
other
that
would
impede
health
care
for
the
most
vulnerable
and
especially
for
latino
communities
and
people
of
color.
And
so
I
don't
know
if
that
has
been
taken
into
consideration
with
this
bill
and
if
igr
is,
if
there's
anything
that
you
can
bring
in
in
terms
of
what
maldef
is
is
stating.
Q
Thank
you,
council
member.
We
can
definitely
look
into
that.
I
haven't
seen
anything
in
terms
of
connecting
that
that
that
correlation
between
place
and
health
outcomes
in
regard
to
ab
1400,
I
mean
I,
I
I'm
aware
that
there
is
significant
literature
out
there
around
around
that
issue,
but
I
mean
we
can.
We
can
definitely
look
at
that
in
regards
to
there's,
if
there's
any
analysis
or
if
it's
something
that
the
the
authors
of
the
bill
have
considered.
Instead
of
drafting
and
developing
the
proposal.
K
Thank
you
alex.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
whatever
we
we
do
and
whatever
we
support
that,
we,
we
very
consciously
take
a
look
at
that
system
and
kind
and
try
to
address
or
undo
or
at
least
identify
what
has
systemically
disadvantaged
some
communities
versus
others
and
we're
having
these
these
kinds
of
very
concrete
conversations
in
land
use,
but
we're
not
having
it
in
health
care
we're
dealing
with
it
as
we've
gone
through
the
testing
and
we've
gone
through
the
vaccinations
and
we've
gone
through.
K
You
know
the
lack
of
health
care
for
some
of
our
communities,
and
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
opportunity
to
see
if
there
is
systemically
some
misgivings
about
providing
care
for
for
people
of
color
anyways,
I
I
you
know,
I
don't
mean
to
rain
on
anybody's
parade,
because
I
I
absolutely
will
be
voting
yes
on
this,
and
I
I
think
this
is
wonderful.
Hopefully
this
is
something
that
our
state
can
fund
and
that
this
can
come
to
fruition.
K
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
all
people
of
color
as
we
are
moving
towards
equity
and
race-based.
K
Policies
that
we
take
those
two
areas
of
concern
into
mind
when
we
are
supporting
some
some
of
these
bills
that
are
coming
across
our
death.
So
once
again
thank
you
so
much
councilmember
carrasco
and
can
and
assemblymember
colorado,
I'm
sure
that
he's
busy
doing
some
other
things.
But
you
know
my
thanks
out.
I
send
them,
send
them
thanks
out
into
the
universe
for
leading
this
effort.
Anyways.
Thank
you
so
so
much.
M
Thank
you
just
wanna
make
sure
I
understand
exactly
what
you
said
before
alexandria.
There
have
been
no
additional
details
on
a
funding
source
for
this
bill.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
that's
correct,
and
is
there
a
cost
estimate
for
this.
M
Okay
and
then
my
understanding-
I
maybe
don't
remember
the
calendar
correctly,
but
is
the
legislature
in
session
right
now.
Q
No,
the
legislature's
not
in
session
they
don't
reconvene
until
january,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
other
reasons
why
we
haven't
seen
amendments
because
they
can't
put
amendments
into
prints
until
the
legislature,
reconvenes
and
so
the
first
step
right
now
is.
This
is
sort
of
the
busy
period
in
the
fall
where
people
are
readying.
Lawmakers
are
readying
their
bills
to
reintroduce
at
the
start
of
the
year,
which
is
why
there's
sort
of
the
advocacy
effort
that's
sort
of
happening,
and
then
it's
underway
at
the
moment.
M
And
normally
so
I
I
got
caught
on
a
process
question
when
I
put
in
a
memo
about
opposing
sb,
nine
and
ten
when
the
legislature
was
in
session
and
my
colleagues
who
are
so
eager
to
approve
this
item
and
move
it
on
to
council
didn't
even
second,
my
my
motion.
So
I'm
a
little
bit
confused
about
how
this
process
might
be
different
than
what
we
were
going
through
at
the
time,
which
was
a
bill
that
was
which
were
bills
that
were
active
and
not
yet
passed.
M
So
this
bill
is
inactive
and
the
legislature's,
not
even
in
session.
So
I'm
not
clear
on
why
we
should
take
action
outside
the
regular
process
and
I'm
interested
alexandria
for
you
to.
Let
us
know
what
is
the
normal
process
that
you
go
through
for
us
between
now
and
when
the
legislature
will
come
back
to
session.
Q
So,
in
in
terms
of
the
process
that
we're
sort
of
going
through
right
now
to
prepare
for
the
next
session
is
that
we
are
evaluating
a
number
of
different
bills.
So
there
is
a
process
right
now
sort
of
looking
at
the
city's
legislative
program
and
the
policies
that
it
supports
instead
of
adding
and
refining
that
we're
also
hearing
from
legislative
offices
about
the
bills
from
within
our
delegation
and
more
broadly,
that
they're
planning
on
reintroducing
next
year.
So
that's
one
that
we've
actually
heard
from
assemblymember
caller's
office
on
ab-1400.
Q
So
that's
one
of
the
bills
that
we've
heard
about
and
that,
and
so
that's
kind
of
the
process
that
we
go
to
go
through
in
terms
of
preparing
for
the
next
session.
You
know
I
I
can't
speak
too
specifically
how
we
decide
whether
or
not
especially
within
in
terms
of
the
bill
being
inactive
versus
active.
I
think
that
you
know,
I
think
the
thought
is
that
this
the
bill
was
active
earlier
this
year,
that
it
had
already
gone
through
rules
and
that
the
assembly
member
was
planning
to
reintroduce
it.
M
Okay,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
that.
So
I'm
I'm
concerned
that
this
this
bill
has
no
new
information
about
a
funding
source
or
about
total
costs.
However,
I'm
not
interested
in
being
told
another
time
that
my
bill
is
going
to
be
out
of
order
and
out
of
process.
So
in
the
spirit
of
camaraderie,
I
will
vote
to
move
this
forward
to
the
full
council
and
hope
that
my
colleagues
in
the
future
would
do
something
the
same.
M
B
Councilmember
crossco,
we
did,
you
want
to
directly
address
councilmember
davis's
question.
Yes,.
R
Thank
you
so
much
and
and
I've
asked
the
exact
same
questions,
although
I
will
tell
you
that
I
think
it's
more
costly
to
have
sick
people
and
people
who
don't
have
insurance
or
who
are
not
using
it
or
or
not,
using
it
correctly
and
not
getting
preventative
care.
We've
seen
we've
seen
that
for
many
folks
who
don't
have
insurance
their
their
primary
doctor
and
their
primary
care
is
the
emergency
room,
and
so,
at
the
end
of
the
day
we
pay
for
that
anyway.
R
So
I
hope
that
you
know
there
was
a
caller
that
that
said
it
most
most
succinctly
and
eloquently
we're
the
fifth
largest
power
in
the
entire
world.
To
me,
I
know
that
this
is
a
values
vote
at
the
end
of
the
day,
and-
and
you
know
we
we
put
our
money
where,
where
our
values
are
for
me,
I
saw
the
devastation
that
covid
the
way
that
kobet
just
ravished
my
community,
the
district,
and
I
want
to
remind
everybody-
you
know
they.
R
They
belong
to
each
and
every
one
of
us
and
we
represent
them,
and
so
I
hope
I
hope
I
I
understand
the
concerns
council
member
davis
we'll
have
that
discussion
further
in
a
couple
of
weeks
if
this
moves
forward
at
city
council,
but
I
contend
and
and
so
do
many
other
economists
that
having
the
emergency
room
as
your
primary
doctor
is
a
lot
more
expensive
than
than
providing
coverage
for
our
families
and
being
able
to
have
that
preventative
care,
as
well
as
being
able
to
have
access
to
good
quality
healthcare
for
the
residents
that
currently
do
not
have
it.
R
They
do
not
have
it,
and
so
I
know
that
that's
difficult,
sometimes
to
understand
when,
when
you
don't
represent,
you
know
these
really
really
underserved
communities,
but
I
hope
that
we
can
provide
those
stats
and
those
numbers
for
you
and
convince
you
to
support
ab1400.
J
Yeah
and
I
had
extensive
conversations
with
our
accounts
with
assemblymember
power
back
in
the
spring,
and
I
think
I
talked
about
that
at
the
spring
meeting.
I
asked
him
about
how
to
get
from
a
to
b
and,
as
he
said,
it's
not
about
getting
a
b.
J
It's
about
getting
more
like
abc,
there's
a
lot
of
steps
that
have
happened
between
this
bill
coming
forward
and
implementation,
and
the
plan
in
this
bill
is
a
multi-year
transition
period
that,
with
a
lot
of
details
to
be
worked
out
in
committee,
and
I
think
supporting
single-payer
doesn't
mean
that
we
support
that
we're
supporting
the
specific
funding
mechanism,
what
we
do
know
and
even
simpler
than
what
councilman
lacresta
said.
The
current
system
is
more
expensive
than
single-payer
period.
There's
no
doubt
about
that.
J
J
Given
the
infrastructure,
that's
in
place
to
support
the
current
system
to
a
single-payer
system
which
will
be
cheaper
in
the
long
run
and
which
will
be
actually
better
for
business
because
as
one
one
caller
pointed
out,
it's
always
been
surprising
to
me
that
businesses
feel
like
it's
their
that
it's
they
have
to
provide
the
service
of
hiring
large
hr
staffs
to
implement
health
insurance
policies
for
their
employees.
It's
a
very
costly
thing
for
businesses.
J
It's
also
a
costly
thing
for
medical
providers
who
have
entire
staffs
of
people
in
their
offices
whose
job
it
is
to
figure
out
all
the
policies
and
prior
paperwork
to
all
the
different
insurance
companies
that
they
have
to
deal
with.
Instead
of
having
a
single
place
to
go
so
there's
there
are
clearly
cost
efficiencies
in
the
system
where
the
money
will
come
from
is
actually
pretty
straightforward
because
of
where
the
money
comes
from
now.
J
The
question
really
is
how
you
transition
from
all
those
people
working
in
the
area
of
health
insurance
companies,
hr
in
businesses
and
and
building
all
of
these
paramedical
practices
and
repurpose
those
people
to
a
system.
That's
single
player
and
that
process
will
have
to
be
worked
out
by
the
legislature
with
a
multi-year
transition
period.
J
That
will
slowly
get
us
from
a
to
z,
but
you
know,
I
trust
that
the
legislature
isn't
going
to
know,
but
I
know
based
on
conversations
I've
had
with
members
of
the
legislature
that
they
understand
the
complexities
of
that
and
that
they
will
work
to
solve
that
as
part
of
passing
the
bill.
But
I
do
think
it's
important
for
for
us
to
say
the
current
system
is
broken.
J
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
councilman
carrasco.
Also,
thank
you
for
your
your
leadership
in
in
moving
this
moving
this
forward.
B
I
have
to
trying
to
be
consistent
and,
as
everybody
knows
and
hears,
I'm
a
big
process
person
and
I
was
before
even
councilmember
davis
spoke
when
my
turn
came
around
to
speak.
B
Hopefully
I
can
count,
and
so
I
know,
there's
enough
votes
to
move
this
forward,
but
I
I
just
can't
support
it
again,
just
to
be
consistent
and
just
to
follow
process,
but
I'm
looking
forward
to
a
thorough
in
extensive
analysis
alex
you
know
from
your
team
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
a
robust
debate
and
discussion
on
this
item.
B
So
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
there's,
no
other
go
ahead.
Councilmember
davis.
M
D
D
I
would
just
say.
Obviously
a
lot
needs
to
happen
with
this
piece
of
legislation,
as
councilmember
cohen
pointed
out,
so
we
will
be
coming
forward
in
november
with
the
intergovernmental
relations
work
plan
on
what
happened
in
the
last
year
and
kind
of
a
look
forward
into
what
we're
prioritizing
for
the
next
year.
So
that
is
another
option
to
discuss
this
piece
of
legislation
at
that
hearing
and
and
kind
of
prioritizing
it
with
the
existing
work
plan
and
and
the
other
work
that
you've
given
to
igr.
D
But,
as
alex
pointed
out,
a
lot
of
our
analysis
is
going
to
be
dependent
on
the
analysis
that
comes
out
of
sacramento,
specifically
legislative
analysts
office,
and
then
the
the
committee
process
in
sacramento
is
fairly
robust
and
committee.
Consultants
will
will
kind
of
bear
a
lot
of
the
responsibility
for
that
analysis
and
that
is
supposed
to
be
impartial,
and
so
we
rely
on
that
analysis
when
we
bring
things
forward
to
you.
D
So
if
it's
some
of
the
data,
a
deep
dive
into
the
mechanics
of
the
bill
january,
would
be
a
much
better
time
frame.
But
if
it's
a
support
and
concept
and
and
really
talking
more
about
the
single
pair
system
versus
the
implementation
of
the
bill,
we
can
have
that
discussion
in
november
when
we
bring
forward
the
igr
report
and
prioritize
it
within
the
existing
work
program.
B
I
don't
remember
councilmember
reynolds.
Are
you
okay,
sure?
Okay,
all
right
is
there
anything
else
on
on
that?
If
not
yasmine.
B
B
All
right
next
item
is
the
water
shores
decoration
and
we're
gonna
go
to
the
public
first
and
brian.
S
Hello,
thank
you
for
bringing
this
up
and
I
I
think
it's
important
that
we
do
that.
I
know
I've
already
cut
back
to
15
20
and
I'm
hoping
that
you
can
work
with
the
water
district.
I
find
the
water
district
and
those
other
creatures
at
the
sorry,
those
other
people
at
the
california,
public
utilities,
commission
and
I
shouldn't
have
said:
that's
not
a
problem,
they're,
just
very
frustrated,
I'm
hoping
in
some
way.
During
this
discussion
we
can
find
a
way
for
everybody
to
work
together.
S
The
city
works
really
well
with
the
people
in
the
city,
but
the
water
district.
They
don't
like
public
comment,
that's
made
for
very
sure.
They
don't
like
the
city
to
say
anything,
they're
all
experts
and
we're
not,
which
is
fine,
but
they
don't
explain
anything
and
it
seems
like
a
lot
of
the
water
shortage.
Issues
have
come
up
because
of
communication
issues
granted
that
we
can't
make
make
it
rain,
maybe
eventually
we
will
be
able
to,
but
not
now.
S
So
I
hope
that
I
I
don't
know
how
to
work
right,
but
I
hope
vice
mayor
you
get
what
I
mean.
I
appreciate
what
the
council's
leadership
on
this
has
been.
I
wish
the
district,
and
especially
the
california
public
utilities,
commission
was
like
you
when
it
comes
to
running
a
meeting.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you.
Well,
yes,
we
definitely
need
to
deal
with
our
water
shortage.
As
we
can
see.
You
know
the
rivers
are
all
down
the
you
know
our
even
our
hydroelectric
is
down
because
of
that.
So
our
electricity
is
being
affected
by
our
drought,
and
so
it's
already
started.
I
mean
the
intensification
of
how
low
all
of
our
reserves
are
and
if
we
don't
get
rain
this
year,
which
is
a
possibility,
we're
going
to
be
in
a
very
a
bad
place,
but
we
really
need
to
be
creating
the
resiliency
of
our
community.
E
It's
part
of
what
needs
to
happen
in
our
neighborhoods
that
we
do
need
resiliency
and
to
learn
to
capture
our
water,
to
figure
out
how
to
do
that.
So
we
need
to
have
trainings
in
our
community
and
how
our
government
can
support
us
in
doing
that
which,
with
the
the
you
know,
the
water
districts
are
providing
free
or
reduced
cause
for
water
capture
and
cisterns
and
cistern
building.
E
But
you
know,
I
think
that
as
a
community
is
where
we
need
to
build
our
resiliency
and
how
our
neighborhoods
can
become
stronger
and
not
only
with
for
resiliency,
but
even
for
our
you
know
political
power
to
influence
what
is
happening
in
our
neighborhood.
E
So
I
think
this
needs
to
be
a
a
new
meme
in
our
communities
is
to
really
build
our
resiliency
and
and
gather
together
as
a
network
like
that
was
what
the
grange
movement
was
back
in
the
late
1800s
was,
you
know,
coalescing
people
to
work
together
and
actually
their
whole
mission
was
to
become
patrons
of
husbandry,
and
that's
where
we
need
to
go
away
from.
We
need
food
instead
of
lawns,
so
we
have
to
change
our
watering
practices
so
that
we
have
more
resiliency
instead
of
the
lawns
that
don't
provide
food.
E
So
we
really
have
to
prioritize
all
of
our
lands
to
be
productive
in
terms
of
our
water
use
as
well.
F
Hi,
thank
you
I'll.
Try
to
be
quick
and
simple
with
this
item.
Just
a
reminder
from
myself
with
these
water
issues,
you
know
the
issue
of
subsidy
at
the
local
level
has
been
really
important
to
be
learning
about
that.
F
I
think
you
know,
with
the
housing
issues
that
we've
been
making
strides
to
make
it
a
more
open,
accessible,
understandable
process
with
the
public
that
we've
got
a
ton
of
new
subsidy
process
money
coming
in
with
that
with
these
water
issues,
I
I
hope
we
can
talk
to
local
community
how
they
can
be
given
breaks,
and
you
know
it
works
with
community
energy
that
way
itself
garbage
issues
and,
overall,
good
luck
in
how
we
can
we're
going
to
next
couple
years
are
going
to
be
pretty
difficult.
B
Thank
you.
That's
the
end
of
public
comments,
bringing
it
back
to
the
committee
and
council
member
davis.
M
Thank
you.
So
we
put
this
memo
forward
because
we
have
a
number
of
organizations
that
have
to
do
with
water
in
our
city
and
we
wanted
to
provide
some
consistency
for
all
of
our
residents
and
and
the
ability
to
communicate
effectively
with
them
about
what
options
are
available
to
them.
To
help
to
help
conserve
water,
which
is
what
we
so
desperately
need.
And
I
wanted
to.
I
see
that
carrie
and
jeff
are
here,
and
I
wanted
to
give
them
an
opportunity
to
to
weigh
in
and
and
also
I'll
move
the
memo.
I
B
All
right,
carrie
or
jeff,
you
want
to
take
advantage
of
that
invitation
to
weigh
in
or
or
not.
D
I
can
jump
in
vice
mayor
first,
okay,
yes,
we
do
have
carrie
and
jeff
on.
If
there's
there's
any
subject
matter,
questions
as
they
are.
The
experts
on
this
right
would.
D
Yes,
staff
does
have
an
early
consideration
form
out,
so
I
would
ask
the
rules
committee
actually,
in
addition
to
the
memo,
actually
moved
the
early
consideration
form
a
great
majority
of
it
is
green,
lit
as
we
can
absorb
some
of
that
work,
but
there
are
workload
and
capacity
issues
associated
with
some
of
them.
That
would
require
additional
analysis
or
be
better
served
in
a
conversation
around
future
road
map
or
budget
process.
So
it
asks
you
to
include
the
early
consideration
for
them
as
well.
M
I
Yeah,
I
just
appreciate
staff,
you
know
submitting
that
early
consideration
form
and
recognizing
a
lot
of
what
we
asked
for
right.
We're
we're
curious
as
well.
The
the
workload
on
what
that
takes,
and
so
again
appreciate,
is
seeing
that
and
seeing
what
is
greenlit
and
what
may
need
a
little
bit
more
discussion
in
determining
resources
or
prioritization.
I
I
You
know
for
our
community
here
locally,
especially
with
what
we're
facing
because
of
our
reservoir
being
empty
at
the
moment,
and
so
appreciate
the
work
here
and-
and
I
don't-
I
don't
think
there
was
anybody
from
the
mayor's
team
to
speak
on
the
item,
but
I'm
happy
to
support
it
as
well.
Moving
forward
thanks.
B
Thank
you
councilmember
lee,
so
under
early
consideration,
some
of
the
items
are
green.
Some
are
yellow
on
the
yellow
items.
Typically,
how
do
we?
How
would
we
handle
those
process?
Speaking.
D
Yeah,
so
it
depends
on
the
the
item.
Actually,
we
handle
it
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
so
we
usually
refer
those
into
priority
setting,
which
is
really
the
road
map
process.
D
Now,
if
it
is
a
budgetary
issue,
we
would
refer
to
the
budget
process
and
so
staff
tracks
those
referrals
and
we
bring
those
forward
as
such
other
times,
we've
played
around
with
the
language
at
the
rules
committee
to
see
if
we
can
turn
yellow
to
green
in
the
past,
but
but
typically
they're
referred
into
the
budget
process
or
the
roadmap
process,
and
then
the
administration
has
a
responsibility
to
bring
those
forward
in
those
processes.
D
No,
the
the
rules
committee
has
the
authority
to
dictate
this
work,
especially
you
know
as
we're
green
lighting,
it
so
there's
agreement
with
staff,
and
so
the
the
next
time
that
you
would
see
some
of
this
or
the
whole
council
would
see.
This
is
when
we
start
bringing
some
of
these
greenland
items
back
to
the
council,
but
there's
no
direction
in
here
that
the
actual
direction
needs
to
be
approved
by
the
council,
since
it
is
part
of
existing
workload.
B
Okay,
so
the
maker
of
the
motion
has
the
discretion
to
either
direct
those
yellow
items
to
a
priority
setting
or
just
continue
to
move
them
on
the
council,
and
I
know
that
there
was
item
four,
which
you
you
feel,
if
there's
just
one
modification
to
the
the
memo
that
it
could
go
from,
yellow
to
green.
D
Sure
and
I'd
ask
carrie
or
jeff
to
jump
in,
but
recommendation
four
is
to
conduct
and
report
on
an
internal
review
of
city
departments
to
ensure
that
every
department
has
exceeded
the
goal
of
15
water
reduction,
consumption
and-
and
it
is
actually
it
sounds,
it
doesn't
sound
complicated
but
tracking.
That
is
actually
a
bit
more
complicated,
the
way
we're
structured,
and
so,
if
we're
tracking,
that,
on
a
city-wide
basis,
just
the
city
as
a
whole,
we
can
change
that
to
a
green
light
right
now.
Yes,.
A
A
J
A
F
Hi,
thank
you
blair,
beekman
here,
thanks
for
the
meeting
today,
it
was
very
interesting.
I
guess
I
wanted
to
first
apologize
a
bit
for
I
got
a
bit
overheated
last
week
at
smart
cities
committee.
I
had
points
to
made.
You
know
we're
going
through
this.
I
I
think
I
want
a
bit
more
respect
about
how
I
am
addressed
at
public
comment
time,
but
at
the
same
time
I
need
to
practice
just
the
better
practices
of
the
process,
and
I
want
to
respect
that.
F
I
hope
we
can
work
to
work
that
out.
I'm
sorry
I
got
upset
there.
Are
there
were
a
few
items
from
that
last
week
I
wanted
to
mention
from
the
accounting
report.
You
know
I
just
wanted
to
remind
that.
Cyber
security
practices
that
joe
roy
will
be
working
on
are
to
me.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
an
effort
of
warfare
and
continual
war.
It's
you
know.
F
We
can
really
address
the
ideas
of
peace
in
cyber
security
practices,
the
same
as
we
are
with
with
other
data
collection
issues
of
the
city
and
open
democracy,
and
those
are
the
practices
that
can
help
people
understand
what
what
is
our
good
practices
and
rules
of
the
road.
I'm
really
sorry,
for
there
was
community
equity
items
about
our
digital
equity
items
that
I'm
I'm
really
sorry.
I
wanted
to
offer
my
important
words
to
learn
how
to
work.
F
You
know
hand
in
hand
with
open
public
policies
and
digital
equity
ideas,
and
just
to
always
note
that
it's
an
important
combination
we
work
for
in
the
future,
and
I
don't
want
to
hurt
that
and
and
to
the
mayor's
issues
of
ai
issues
that
we
have
to
be.
You
know,
as
as
I've
been
trying
to
say,
real,
open-minded
and
open-hearted,
with
caring
of
democratic
practices
and
good
equity
ideas.
S
Brian
yeah,
oh
I
forgot
brian
darby,
I'm
thank
you
and
I
I
sort
of
what
I
was
speaking
about
is
a
communication
at
every
council
meeting
at
sometimes
the
planning
commission,
the
other
commission's
people
say
reach
out
reach
out
through
emails,
faxes
phone
you
know
in
in
you
know
like
public
comment
here
and
I
have
to
sort
of
qualify.
Blair
too
is
I've
made
several
calls
to
six
to
one
to
eight
and
I
think
to
ten,
I'm
not
sure
that
and
no
response-
and
I
know
the
staff
is
busy.
S
We
hear
that
all
the
time
and
I'm
not
saying
that
to
be
little
staff
because
they
work
very
hard
as
to
you,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
but
so
do
we
and
we
take
that
extra
time
to
call
we
take
the
extra
time
to
write
emails.
We
take
extra
time
to
point
out
situations
that
we
see
extremely
dangerous
in
the
city,
for
instance
over
by
the
santana
west,
the
crosswalk
on
olin
avenue
is
blocked,
so
people
have
to
cross
on
the
other
side,
there's
no
time
crosswalk
there.
S
I
almost
saw
four
kids
get
hit
at
their
because
somebody
was
going
fast
and
blew
through
the
light,
which
is
another
thing:
winchester
and
stevens
creek
winchester
and
monroe,
I'm
not
winchester
steven
street
stevens
creek
and
monroe
hamilton
and
meridian
people
blow
through
lights
all
the
time,
and
I
mean
all
the
time.
People
almost
get
hit
all
the
time,
and
I
understand
that
you
can't
have
a
policeman
on
every
corner.
If
I
remember
right,
there's
only
20
officers
that
do
traffic
enforcement-
and
my
point
is,
I
don't
know
how
to
reach
out
anymore.
S
I
can
come
to
these
meetings.
I
can
talk
and
I
mean
people.
Listen,
it's
appreciated,
but
we
don't
hear
anything
back.
You
know
and
it's
supposed
to
be
a
two-way
street
and
if
you
can't
even
return,
call
or
trip
if
it's
not
able
easy
to
return
calls.
Two
minutes
is
very
hard
to
explain
something
in
open
forum
and
the
note
and
file
is
also
very
frustrating.
That
means
it
just
got
stuck
in
the
back.
I
don't
even
know
what
it's
used
for.
To
be
honest,
thank
you.
B
Thank
you
brian.
You
know
how
to
get
a
hold
of
me
directly
so
reach
out
to
me.
I
can
follow
up
with
you.
Tessa.
E
Okay,
yeah,
I
got
it,
but
I
don't
see
oh
there.
It
is.
Thank
you
all
right.
Well,
thank
you
vice
mayor
for
even
responding
that
he
has
your
personal
phone
number.
I
guess
I
I
would
like
your
personal
phone
number
too,
and
you
know
what
brian
thank
you
brian.
We
love
you
we
appreciate,
you
you
know
is
saying,
is
what
I've
been
saying.
I
I
call
you
know
one
through
ten,
you
know
and
or
and
the
city
manager's
office
and
the
clerk's
office.
E
You
know,
and
the
thing
is
that
you
know
the
messages
we
get
is
we're
we're
out
because
of
covid
we'll
get
back
to
you
when
we're
back
in
in
the
office
we're
back
at
city
hall,
you
know
yeah
that
will
never
come.
I
don't
even
want
you
to
be
back
in
city
hall,
it's
important
that
you
stay
home
and
work
at
home.
E
I
understand
that,
but
why-
and
it
is
the
city
manager,
so
I'm
pointing
this
to
the
city
manager
is
that
the
city
manager
is
responsible,
that
they
could
not
figure
out
how
to
get
those
phones
transferred
to
your
workplace
at
home.
You
know
this
is
the
city
of
the
silicon
valley,
every
other
vendor
that
I
work
with
is
working
at
home
and
it's
transferred
voice
over
ip,
and
yet
you
don't
do
that,
and
we
know
why
you
don't
do
that,
because
you
don't
want
to
hear
from
us.
E
You
don't
want
to
hear
from
us,
and
you
know
what
did
it
take
20
calls
it
took
of
bloom
energy
to
have
it
passed
that
we
would
pass
that
gas
that
we
put
gas
into
our
environmental.
You
know
supposedly
fossil
fuel
free,
you
know
clean
san
jose,
we
you
know
it
took
them.
Even
20
calls
to
get
to
you,
but
they
got
to
you.
They
got
they
got
to
you.
E
We
don't
get
to
you,
you
don't
respond
and
that's
why
we're
in
a
crisis
that
we're
in
because
we're
not
building
the
resiliency
that
we
need
and
I've
been
talking
to
you
about
that
that
we
need
resiliency
and
that
we
need
to
have
transformational
change
and
transformational
change
means.
You
take
that
bus
depot
that
has
caused
the
the
disease
and
disability
in
my
neighborhood,
the
diesel
bus
depot
it's
across
from
my
home,
and
you
turn
it
into
a
garden
and
turn
it
into
the
valley
of
hearts.