►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of March 24, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=844357&GUID=685F86A6-3055-400E-88B7-470189534641
A
B
B
B
C
The
joint
meeting
for
the
rules
and
open
government
committee
and
committee
of
the
whole
tony
can
you
take
roll
call.
Please.
E
E
B
C
So
tony
I
I
know
I
had
a
hard
time
hearing
hearing
that
bid.
I
don't
know
how,
if
the
audience
was
able
to.
D
Okay,
I'm
not
used
to
sharing
videos
with
audio
okay.
I
don't
know
what
I
did
wrong,
but
I
do
have
a
word
document.
I
can
throw
up
there
that
has
the
same
information
but
in
english
yeah.
Let's,
let's
put
that
up
for
writing,
I
should
I.
C
B
D
And
then,
as
as
a
reminder
if
the
public
speakers
are
being
interpreted
in
order
to
hear
them,
you
will
also,
as
panelists
need
to
go
to
the
interpretation
button
at
the
bottom
switch
over
to
the
the
english
or
spanish
channel,
the
spanish
channel,
to
hear
the
to
hear
the
translation
got.
C
It
thank
you
so
next
we're
going
to
review
the
council
meeting
agenda
for
tuesday
march
30th.
B
C
B
D
It
was
it's
added
this
language
to
explore
installation
of
physical
barriers
at
wide
intersections.
So
that's
added
that
was
based
on
ghoul's
direction.
C
C
D
F
Great
hi,
thank
you,
blair,
beekman.
Here
thanks
for
the
meeting
last
night,
it
was
interesting
kind
of
sad
but
interesting
that
we're
all
able
to
state
our
point
of
views
and
our
good
ideals
and
we
move
forward
and
together
basically
and
begin
our
work.
So
thank
you
yeah.
It
was
sad
and
encouraging
both-
I
guess
for
the
few
items
today
of
interest
on
this
agenda
item
for
the
street
racing
and
the
sideshow
issues
as
I've
been
trying
to
offer
the
past
month.
F
You
know
if
you're
going
to
be
having
county-wide
commissions
on
the
process
you
know
and
and
possible
technology
use
for
the
side
shows.
Why
not
consider
inviting
you
know
the
aclu
and
care.
You
know
american
islamic
relations
council
of
american
islamic
relations.
You
know
to
the
process
and
asked
them
to
speak
on
on
on
issues
of
of
open
public
policy
and
and
good
civil
protection
practices
at
this
time.
F
F
So
it's
an
interesting
concept.
I
hope
you
can
work
on
it
and
about
the
the
other
is
another
item
about
government
practices
during
council
meetings.
I
just
don't
have
enough
time
now.
Maybe
I
can
talk
about
it
during
a
public
comment,
open
forum
and
thank
you.
C
Thank
you.
The
person
whose
number
ends
in
9306.
A
Move
the
to
adopt
the
agenda
with
the
add
sheet.
C
H
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
ask
for
the
illegal
street
racing
item
which
I
just
lost
the
I
had
the
ad
sheet
up
instead
of
the
agenda,
so
I
don't
remember
the
number
but
for
the
illegal
street
racing
item,
could
we
say
that
that's
not
before
four?
H
C
That's
fine
if
it's
all
right
with
the
seconder.
C
C
C
C
C
F
F
Hi,
where
are
we
coming
here?
Thank
you.
There's
an
item
about
bike
sharing
bike
plan
issues.
You
know
the
future
of
bike
pathways,
all
the
good
stuff,
and
you
know
I'm
really
interested
how
you're
doing
work
on
the
east
side.
F
F
It's
really
encouraging,
and
I
know
in
attending
vta
meetings
that
you
know
the
the
new
concepts
of
equity,
we're
starting
to
ask
new
questions
of
previous
vta
plans
and
work
plans
towards
bike
trails
and
how
they
were
previously
working,
not
that
it
was
so
bad
necessarily,
but
that
we're
simply
improving
and
we're
having
we're
developing
more
interesting
ideas.
F
Now,
for
for
the
ideas
of
equity
and
issues
of
the
east
side,
and
that
respects
I
I
I
would
imagine,
the
goal
is
to
respect
all
parts
of
a
community
in
working
on
east
side,
issues
of
bike
lanes
and
the
fact
that
the
vta
is
currently
working
on
a
super
highway
bike.
Lane
structure
in
north
san
jose
it's
interesting,
but
it
doesn't
fully
address.
You
know
south
san,
jose
and
east
san
jose,
and
I
wonder
how
you
know
your
good
efforts.
F
Will
you
know
san
jose
seem
to
have
an
important
purpose
in
having
to
help
the
vta
at
this
time,
and-
and
I
I
hope
it
can
be-
a
good
purpose
to
show
you
know:
east
side,
ideas
and
south
san
jose
ideas
and
good
luck
in
your
efforts.
I
thought
I'd
just
make
it
known
what
I
know
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
C
Mute
right
looks
like
the
person
might
be
having
some
problems
so
you're
off
mute
now.
The
person
you
did
was
ending
in
9306
of
which
we
just
lost
so
hung
you're.
Next,
so
go
ahead.
J
I
work
in
the
family
hotel
5
over
5
years,
so
I
want
to
return
to
work
together
as
soon
as
possible.
Can
you
help
us
support
us?
Thank
you,
sir.
C
All
right,
actually,
we
have
one
more
public
speaker.
J
C
Yeah
I
I
gathered
that
he
was
on
and
off
so
quickly.
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
to
state
that.
But
yes,
I
believe
those
speakers
were
trying
to
speak
on
that
other
item.
So
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
bring
it
back
to
the
committee
and
if
I
can
get
a
motion.
A
C
So,
typically,
when
we
don't
have
an
official
rules,
meeting
staff
still
will
hold
a
meeting
and
make
changes
to
to
the
agenda.
Okay
and
and
lee.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
walk
us
through
how
that
that
could
possibly
work.
E
D
Hi,
this
is
tony
so
to
throw
monkey
wrench
in
it.
We
do
not
have
a
rules
in
lou
for
next
week,
but
if
that
has
changes
that
we
need
to
make
on
the
agenda,
we
can
make
those
changes,
but
it's
generally,
if
it's
something
that
needs
to
be
to
happen
under
orders
of
the
day,
we
can
do
that
we
would
just
put
language
on
there.
That's
like
please
accept
that.
You
know
a
time
certain
or
a
deferral
or
so
we
can
still
do
it,
but
it'll
just
look
a
little
different
on
the
agenda.
D
F
F
C
C
C
If
you're
on
mute,
please
hit
star
six
to
take
yourself
off.
C
Mute
please
hit
star
six.
C
All
right,
it's
been
moved
and
seconded
tony
marinus.
B
B
D
C
Aye,
thank
you.
Okay
next
is
the
public
record
and
I
will
go
to
the
public
first
and
again,
the
person
whose
number
ends
in
9306.,
let's
see
if
we
can
get
it
to
be
successful.
This
time.
C
L
L
E
C
A
C
F
C
Next
is
g2
nomination
of
the
alameda
park.
How
do
you
pronounce
that
dev
chili
she
avenue
historic
district
and
I
see
a
hand
raised
same
person.
C
93066
we're
gonna,
give
it
one
one
more
shot.
If
you
could
take
yourself
off
mute
and
go
ahead.
J
J
Yes,
my
name
is
anna
chin.
I
work
at
freyman,
hotel
and
20
years
so
please
to
return
to
work.
C
Anna
you're
speaking
on
the
an
item-
that's
gonna
is
coming
up
next,
but
we
appreciate
your
input
and
you
can
also
raise
your
hand
for
the
item
when
it
comes
up
as
well.
Thank
you
all
right
bring
it
back
to
the
committee.
Councilmember
davis.
H
Thank
you
pretty
straightforward
item
thanks
to
staff
for
giving
it
the
green
light.
They've
been
working
with
the
neighborhood
on
sheley
avenue,
for
this
historic
district
for
probably
about
two
years
already
and
of
course,
many
years
before
that,
but
we're
getting
close
to
the
end,
and
so
this
is
sort
of
just
the
next
step.
So
move
approval.
C
And
rosalind,
I
see
that
you're
you're
here:
did
you
have
any
input
or
should
we
just
keep
moving.
C
That's
why
I
figured
also
councilman
reyes.
Do
you
have
a
comment.
L
Yes,
I
do,
and
I
I
appreciate
the
support
for
to
designate
historical
site
throughout
the
city
of
san
jose.
It's
a
way
of
honoring
our
history,
it's
on
honor
of
looking
back
and
saying.
That's
where
we
were.
This
is
where
we
are
now
and
in
between
in
terms
of
looking
back
where
we
were
and
where
we
are
now
there's
some
history.
L
L
Talk
about
the
red
lighting
that
has
happened
in
our
in
our
city,
and
I
know
this
particular
neighborhood
was
also
built
exclusively
to
not
have
people
of
color
in
it
or
documents
that
were
part
of
that
redlining
and-
and
so
it
was,
I
think,
back
in
1937,
no
black
or
foreign-born
residents
lived
in
that
neighborhood
and
I
would
say,
there's
probably
a
chance
that
that
continues
to
happen,
with
some
exceptions,
of
course,
and
so
for
me.
L
I
I
really
want
us
to
be
mindful
of
what
the
history
has
been
for
the
city
of
san
jose
and
that
some
of
these
single-family
homes
are
were
a
way
to
keep
people
of
color
out
of
neighborhoods,
and
so
I
want
to
make
a
substitute
motion.
L
I
will,
of
course
include
the
memo
that
my
council
colleague
has
put
forward,
but
I
would
I
with
with
this
edition,
and
that
is
to
put
the
the
work
that
staff
has
this
needs
to
do
on
this
on
hold
until
after
we
can
get
some
staff
analysis
from
the
upcoming
fair
housing
work
plan,
items
that
will
be
coming
to
nsc
and
then
later
to
council
this
year.
L
So
you
know
I,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
continue
to
push
for
historical
preservation,
but
we
also
need
to
be
very
aware
and
very
very
sensitive
to
the
effects
of
our
action
to
lock
in
racist
policies
of
the
past,
such
as
segregation
and
redlining.
So
we
need
to
have
this
fair
housing
work
plan
as
as
an
overlay
to
the
work.
That's
being
done
here,.
C
Thank
you,
councilmember
councilmember
davis,.
C
That's
too
motion,
and
is
there
a
second.
G
I'll
second,
it
for
purpose
of
discussion
at
the
moment,
so.
H
Rosalind,
can
you
explain
if
the
if
those
are
the
same
staff
working
on
on
those
two
items?
My
understanding
was:
these
are
completely
different
staff
working
on
historic
preservation,
and
maybe,
if
you
want
to
talk
about
historic
preservation,
what
that
designation
means
it
might
be
helpful.
I
Or
thank
you,
council
member,
so
the
procedure
for
nominating
historic
districts
in
the
city
is
actually
covered
in
armenian
code
in
title
13
and
and
basically
you
know,
we,
the
city,
considers
his
nominations
for
historic
districts
based
on
a
series
of
information
that
is
provided.
So
obviously
the
city
is
looking
at
a
statement
of
an
area's
historical
significance,
cultural
value,
architectural
and
design
value.
I
We
obviously
require
drawings
and
or
photographs
or
other
materials
that
provide
the
documentation
of
that
history
and
then,
of
course,
we're
looking
for
a
map
to
identify
the
proposed
area.
So
our
historic
preservation
program
is
located
in
the
planning
division
of
pbce,
and
this
is
a
separate
department
and
staff.
That's
working
on
not
working
on
the
fair
housing
work
plan
which,
of
course,
is
housed
in
the
housing.
H
Department,
thank
you
so
we're
talking
about
two
completely
different
staff,
different
staffs
working
on
on
these
items.
I'm
not
going
to
be
supporting
this
substitute
motion.
I
think
these
neighbors
have
have
been
working
and
waiting
and
working
with
pbce,
and
this
is
completely
separate
from
from
the
work
plan
that
that
house
member.
B
C
Any
customer
worries
I
see
you
still
have
your
hand
up.
L
L
The
issue
here
is
that
we
both
sat
in
the
general
plan
task
force
and
when
the
topic
of
opportunity
housing
came
up,
I
heard
a
lot
of
neighbors,
not
only
in
district
3,
but
in
district
6
and
a
lot
of
areas
of
san
jose
where
these
single-family
homes
translate
into
white
neighborhoods,
use
a
historical
preservation
as
an
excuse
not
to
build
multiple
multi-housing
units,
which
basically
are
duplexes
and
four
plexes
that
are
already
part
of
this
neighborhood,
but
those
that
verbiage
elicits
the
imagery
of
people
of
color
moving
into
your
neighborhood,
and
so
we
had
about
two
hours
worth
of
comments,
because
somebody
decided,
I
probably
it
was
david
pandori
who
decided
to
misinform
people
about
opportunity,
housing
and
commissioner
pierre
luigi
continues
to
do
this
in
district
six
and
and
from
what
I
understand.
L
The
single
families
house
permit
would
need
to
go
to
the
director's
hearing
and
then
may
require
community
meetings,
so
this
is
all
interrelated,
and
this
is
why
I
wanted
to
have
this
have
an
overlay
with
a
fair
housing
plan
to
make
sure
that
this
is
not
the
intent
of
this
neighborhood
to
do
to
continue
to
segregate
themselves
and
to
protect
themselves
from
opportunity.
Housing.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
and
appreciate
the
the
context
there.
I
was
that's
why
I
seconded
it,
because
I
wanted
to
be
able
to
discuss
it.
I
I
wasn't
certain
sort
of
where
that
was
coming
from
it
looked
like
it
was
green,
lit
from
staff,
and
so
I
didn't
see
any
concern
there.
Maybe
rosa
you
can
help
answer.
G
I
don't
suspect
that
what
councilmember
anas
is
saying
is
false.
I've
also
heard
this
notion
coming
from
my
own
community
members,
in
the
interest
of
trying
to
oppose
opportunity
housing.
Is
that
something
possible
that
that?
Indeed,
if
somebody
were
you
know,
residents
were
able
to
to
get
a
recognition
like
this,
that
that
would
then
help
them
to
be
able
to
opt
out
or
have
their
neighborhood
not
be
included
in
opportunity.
Housing.
I
I
However,
currently,
as
staff
has
been
thinking
about
the
opportunity,
housing
concept
is
that
it
would
apply
to
historic
districts.
That's
the
current
concept,
obviously
staff-
and
we
had
talked
about
this
with
the
general
plan
for
your
review
task
force.
I
We
would
also
be
looking
at
design
standards
or
measures
along
with
that
which
we
are
looking
to
do
really
for
opportunity,
housing
across
the
city
as
well.
So
that's
the
current
concept
again,
because
it's
a
concept
and
its
proposal
and
again
it's
a
separate
work
plan
item
in
our
department.
It's
separate
from
our
historic
preservation
program.
I
don't
want
to
confuse
the
two
because
there's
there
are
two
separate
work
items
but
currently,
as
proposed
opportunity,
housing
would
would
be
applied
to
historic
districts
as
well.
L
Can
I
interject
councilman,
probably
so
I
can
tell
you
where,
and
I
can
cite
where
I
got
this
information.
B
L
So
this
is
coming
from
jared
ferguson,
as
well
as
jessica
within
our
own,
our
city
of
san
jose
and
the
housing
catalyst
office
of
economic
development
for
for
jared,
not
sure,
I
think
jessica's,
probably
in
pbce.
But
this
is
where
I
got
that
information.
L
They
said
that
they
would
that
these
historical,
historic
preservation
areas
would
have
to
file
a
single
family
house
permit
and
then
they
would
have
to
go
to
a
director's
hearing
and
then
require
a
community
meeting.
So
this
is,
you
know
I
didn't
get
this
from
thin
air.
This
is
something
that
staff
has
given
to
me
and
I'm
not
opposing
the
historical
preservation.
L
Designation,
what
I'm
asking
is
to
have
the
fair
housing
work
plan
and
the
staff
that
oversees
that
take
a
look
at
this
and
have
an
overlay
of
that
work
with
this
to
see
if,
if
it
is
in
line,
indeed,
are
we
continuing
to
segregate
neighborhoods
by
designating
them
historical,
because
I
can
tell
you,
I
live
five
minutes
away
from
a
barn
that
has
horses
and
has
orchards,
and
I
could
very
well
say
that
my
district
has
some
very
meaningful
historical
areas,
and
I
could
see
my
district
also
doing
the
same
thing
in
order
to
protect
themselves
from
what
they
think
of
opportunity.
L
Housing
is
is
is
going
to
create
for
them,
and
I
know
roslyn.
You
just
were
in
my
district
about
a
week
ago
talking
about
opportunity,
housing
and
there's
a
lot
of
misinformation
about
that,
and
so
I
think
it's
creating
possibly
some
folks
to
continue
with
this
preservation,
maybe
strategy.
L
C
All
right,
thank
you.
Sorry
if
I.
G
I
I'm
not
sure
if
I
have
a
specific
answer
to
that
question
right
now,
council
member
I
mean.
Obviously
it
would
require
our
planning
staff
to
coordinate
with
the
housing
department
staff
on
their
work
on
fair
housing,
I'm
not
sure
about
their
work
plan
and
their
schedule,
so
we
would
have
to
coordinate
with
them
along
those
lines.
G
Okay
and
it
sounds
like
based
on
what
I'm
looking
at
and
I'll
ask
councilmember
davis-
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
urgency
in
this,
and-
and
I
would
obviously
myself
as
well
like
for
for
this-
to
be
supported
without
any
sort
of
clout
over
it
is
there.
I
know
you
said
you
wouldn't
be
in
favor
of
of
this
direction.
Is
there
some
sort
of
urgency
where
you
wouldn't
want
to
try
to
alleviate
this
concern
that
maybe
there's
you
know,
there's
a
there's
some
some
other
ill
intent
on
on
doing
this.
H
So
I'll
tell
you,
council,
member
perales,
I
live
in
a
neighborhood
that
had
this
historic
designation
happen
during
my
term
and
I
do
not
live
in
a
contributing
house,
but
the
process
took
12
years
to
get
done
because
it
was
started
right
before
the
last
recession
and
then
it
got
put
on
a
shelf
and
the
person
who
was
working
on
it
left
and
there
was
no
historic
preservation
officer
for
many
years,
so
the
other,
the
sheili
that
we're
bringing
forward
now
had
started
that
process
right
around
the
same
time,
so
they're
going
on
now,
almost
15
years.
H
It's
not.
This
has
nothing
to
do
with
opportunity
housing
because
they
started
this
process
long
long
ago
and
what
their
major
concern
was
and
why
they
ramped
up
their
activities
was
before
this.
When
google
started
buying
property
and
they
were
concerned
about
their
homes
are
all
much
their
small
homes
more
like
what
people
considered.
You
know,
starter
homes,
they're
all
sort
of
one
story.
H
Some
of
them
are
two
stories,
but
very
few
of
them
are
and
they're
worried
about
their
the
value
of
their
land
and
losing
the
structures
because
of
speculators
coming
in
to
actually
you
know
just
do
the
cookie
cutter
mcmansions,
because
it's
going
to
be
within
walking
distance
to
the
google
property.
It
had
nothing
to
do
with
opportunity
housing.
It
had
more
to
do
with
worrying
about
losing
the
structures
and
the
the
historic
street,
which
is
it's
a
really
cute
street.
H
If
you've
ever
been
down
there
and
there's
plenty
of
just
one
or
two
blocks
away
there,
there
are
apartment
buildings.
So
I
don't
think
that
that's
not
a
concern
for
for
the
people
on
the
street.
They
know
they
live
in
a
you
know:
it's
downtown
adjacent,
it's
not
downtown,
but
it's
very
much
wanting
to
keep
the
the
cohesive
design
of
the
of
the
street
intact
and
worrying
about
the
the
google
impact
to
the
industry.
H
So
that
was
where
that
was
where
it
came
from,
and
that's
why
they
had
some
urgency
in
the
last
couple
of
years.
Well,
since
you
know
since
the
announcement,
what
was
it
2017.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
for
that
context
and
rosa.
Maybe
can
you
tell
me
this
here
what
what
what
we
would
be
potentially
moving
forward,
would
be
a
nomination
and
it
would
initiate
a
process
right.
So
what
what
does
that
actually
look
like?
Can
you
kind
of
walk
us
through
what
actually
gets
triggered
here.
I
Or
so,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
you're
right
council
member,
this
is
step
one.
A
nomination
of
a
proposed
historic
district,
so
staff
would
gather
all
of
those
materials.
The
statement.
That's
that's
going
to
be
required,
making
sure
that
there's
been
adequate
community
outreach
and
in
fact,
we've
been
working
with
the
community
and
they've
actually
got
documentation
of
the
previous
community
outreach
and
engagement.
I
We
would
bring
together
all
of
the
photographs,
the
documentation,
the
drawings
that
are
going
to
be
required
for
the
application,
as
well
as
the
mapping
and
in
terms
of
next
steps.
The
application
would
go
to
the
historic
landmarks
commission
for
their
review
and
recommendation.
I
G
Okay,
thank
you,
and
are
you
aware,
in
your
conversations
with
the
community
here
of
the
the
prior
work
they
had
done?
I
am
aware
of
the
the
the
north
willow
glenn
gardner
community,
where
councilmember
davis
was
was
relating
to
and
aware
of
how
how
many
years
they've
been
working
on
that?
Are
you
aware
of
the
the
timeline?
Does
that
match
up
with
what
council
member
davis
was
saying.
I
I
So
I
guess
that's
from
the
early
2000s
or
to
2010,
and
so
many
of
those
desires
and
recommendations
for
both
conservation
area
and
historic
district
came
out
of
that
that
work
with
the
community.
So,
yes,
it
has
taken
quite
some
time
due
to
staffing
impacts,
to
actually
move
forward
with
with
many
of
those
recommendations.
G
Okay,
thank
you
yeah,
I'm
aware
of
that
within
again
that
that
the
area
around
council
davis's
where
she
lives-
and
so
I
don't
disagree
with
councilmember,
dennis
that
there
could
be
potentially
some
other
interesting
or
other
interests
in
why
someone
would
want
this
designation.
G
G
At
the
same
time,
I
I
also
recognize
the
impacts
that
the
community
has
had
due
to
historical
redlining
in
other
racist
policies
and-
and-
and
you
know
we
just
have
to
be
cognizant
of
that
as
we
move
forward
and
and
in
order
to
actually
look
at
undoing
some
of
those
historical
wrongs.
G
If
there
are
decisions
that
we
make
today,
for
instance
like
giving
historical
designations,
I
think
we
should
be
aware
of
that.
I
think
that's
what
councilmember
arenas
is
saying
is:
let's,
let's
make
sure
of
that?
What
I,
what
I
don't
necessarily
want
to
do
is
utilize
this
particular
this
particular
community,
as
as
kind
of
the
the
the
catalyst
or
the
guinea
pig.
G
If
you
will
to
say
hey,
let's
not
move
forward
on
this
work
that
you've
been
doing
for
years,
because
we
we
feel
as
though
we
really
want
to
compare
this
historical,
these
historic
designations
with
the
with
the
work
really
on
fair
housing,
and
so
I
I
can
support
in
a
you
know
in
a
separate
line
of
work,
councilman
red
dennis
the.
G
So
if
you're
you're
interested
in
in
moving
something
else,
you
know
in
regards
to
to
that
action.
I'd
be
comfortable
with
supporting
that,
but
I
I
won't
support.
I
won't
support
that
today.
I
will
support
the
underlying
motion.
Thanks.
C
Thank
you,
council,
member
calling.
A
I
think
councilmember
peralta's
kind
of
covered
what
I
was
going
to
say.
I
I'm
just
wasn't
sure
about
how
this
what
what
what
specifically
councilman
moranis
was
looking
for
as
far
as
timing
on
this,
because
this
is
this
looks
like
it's
a
first
step
starting
a
process
that
would
still
come
to
council
for
approval,
and
so
it
was
the
recommendation
to
to
delay
starting
the
process
or
to
delay
bringing
it
to
council.
It's
not
even
clear.
A
A
That's
correct
right,
so
I
I'm
so
I'm
not
sure
how
what
specifically
the
motion
would
be,
but
I
anyway
so
I've
been
like
councilmember
reynolds,
explain
if
she,
if
there's
something,
I'm
misunderstanding,
but
I
know
it's
her
hands
up
so
she'll
be
speaking
next
anyway.
So
that's
all
I
want
to
say
is
I
don't
see
how
this
necessarily
you
know
how
it
affects
the
timeline
and
why
it
should
affect
the
beginning
of
the
process
rather
than
the
approval
at
the
end.
If,
in
fact,
that's
something
the
council
wants
to
discuss
later.
L
Rings
sure,
and-
and
both
of
you
are
right-
I'm
not
trying
to
stop
the
process,
and
I
could
compromise
in
terms
of
having
my
motion
reflect
to
allow
for
that
process
to
begin
the
one
that
roseanne
just
finished,
describing
in
terms
of
you
know,
gathering
the
photos
having
the
the
staff
move
along
that,
but
before
before
it
is
designated
to
have
a
bit
of
a
review
from
the
fair
housing
plan
or
from
the
staff
that
are
in
charge
of
the
fair
housing
plan.
L
And-
and
this
is-
and
this
is
the
reason
why
councilmember
davis
just
finished
saying
that
there
was
a
motivation
outside
of
having
this
historical
preservation
designation
and
it
was
because
of
google
and
it
was
to
protect
their
properties.
So
it
wasn't
the
original
intent
that
was
meant
12
years
ago.
L
It
was
a
recent
interest
and
in
her
memo
marie
this
particular
district
derives
its
importance
from
being
an
intact
intact
representation
of
early
suburban
development
in
the
greater
san
jose
area,
with
identifying
an
attributes
embodied
in
its
single
family,
residential
architecture,
pattern
of
development
and
continuous
residential
setting.
So
why
make
mention
of
that?
L
I
want
to
make
sure
that
when
we
designate
something
historical,
that
we
also
recognize
that
in
that
and
keep
it
intact,
the
representation
of
early
suburban
development,
it's
not
necessarily
something
that
san
jose
should
be
completely
proud
of,
because
that
means
that
that
was
an
all-white
neighborhood
and
what
I'm
asking
is
for
their
for
there
to
be
historical
context
to
that,
and
so
an
overlay
with
a
fair
housing
plan
or
the
staff
of
the
fair
housing
plan,
or
at
least
some
input
from
them
to
recognize.
L
L
Well,
we
are
not
in
early
suburban
development
they're
next
to
the
downtown
area,
and-
and
I
I
have
got
to
say
that,
even
though
you
say
this
started
12
years
ago,
there
is
some
recent
motivation,
and
I
wouldn't
expect
for
that
to
be
revealed
now
in
terms
of
outside
of
just
google.
Obviously
it
was
google
and
and
their
fear
of
having
their
neighborhood
disrupt
look
differently,
and
maybe
it
should
maybe
it
should
have
more
faces
of
color
in
it,
and
maybe
we
should
have
more
ownership
by
people
of
color.
L
So
at
the
very
least,
I'd
like
to
have
some
recognition
of
of
those
those
racially
inequitable
policies
that
allowed
for
this
type
of
early
suburban
development
to
exist
in
san
jose
and
to
call
it
historical,
is
an
offense
and
an
insult
to
the
rest
of
us
who
could
not
live
in
that
neighborhood
until
as
of
late.
L
C
All
right,
councilmember
davis,.
H
Well,
do
you
respect
council
member
arenas?
If
you
want
the
historic
preservation
process
to
change?
Please
don't
do
it
by
ambushing
me
at
a
rules
meeting
on
a
random
wednesday,
bring
your
own
memo
to
change
the
process
and
not
to
punish
one
neighborhood.
That's
been
working
for
a
dozen
years
and
they've
been
working
on
it.
The
reason
it
amped
up
is
because
they
were
afraid
not
of
their
neighbors
changing
but
of
the
structures
changing
they
like
the
way
the
houses.
Look,
it's
a
beautiful
tree-lined
street
with
hundred-year-old
houses
that
was
not
in
danger.
H
H
C
Okay
and
I
will
go
to
councilmember
peralta-
I
just
want
to
say
that,
based
on
everything,
I've
heard,
I
feel
very
confident
that
the
motivation
behind
the
neighborhood
wanted
wanting
to
have
the
historic
designation
is
sincere
and
it's
not
motivated
by
concerns
about
opportunity,
housing
and
also
what
I
heard
from
councilmember
davis
was
also
that
the
prospect
of
google
coming
in
was
a
motivator
for
them
in
terms
of
their
timeline
and
not
to
actually
make
the
designation
itself
so
rosalind.
C
If
we
move
forward
with
the
original
motion
or
the
underlying
motion,
what
or
where
are
there
opportunities
to
at
least
address
some
of
councilmember
arranges
cons?
His
concerns
about
some
of
the
overlays
that
she's
concerned
about?
Is
there
you
laid
out
the
process,
but
are?
Are
there
points
in
the
process
where
we
can
have
that
type
of
analysis
or
study
done?
C
That's
not
going
to
require
extensive
staff
resources.
I
Care,
I
I
think
that,
as
we
develop
the
specific
tasks
for
the
nomination,
you
know
that
we
can
develop
some
work
plan
items
where,
by
which
and
working
with
the
community
as
as
well
in
compiling
you
know
all
of
the
aspects
of
the
history
of
the
area,
we're
certainly
open
to
working
with
housing,
department,
staff
and
really
other
city
staff
and
pulling
that
information
together.
Again,
I
do
want
to
emphasize.
I
There
will
be
opportunity.
This
is
a
public
process
right,
so
you
know
there'll
be
public
hearings
on
the
matter,
both
at
the
historic
landmarks
commission,
as
well
as
the
planning
commission,
so
there's
opportunity
for
the
public
to
provide
comments,
and
perhaps
you
know,
make
make
recommendations
right
and
forward
those
to
the
city
council.
Again,
it's
a
city
council's
final
action
right.
I
B
Councilmember
problems.
G
Yeah,
thank
you,
and
I
think,
certainly
you
know,
based
on
the
memorandum-
was
not
necessarily
expecting
the
depth
of
this
conversation
as
it
has
been
today.
G
I
I
was
not
contacted
by
anybody
from
housing
as
it
it
seems
like
councilman
radanas
was
so
I
didn't
have
that
context
coming
in
simply
just
looking
at
the
staff
response
here
on
on
the
work
and
having
experienced
myself
in
designating
historic
districts
on
what
that
looks
like,
but
I
do
think
councilmember
dennis
gets
sort
of
dives
deeper
into
a
much
broader
conversation,
which
is
why
I
think
we're
we're
sort
of.
We
don't
really
have
the
answers
to
it
today,
because
we
haven't
done
that.
G
We
haven't
asked
the
questions
in
the
past
in
regards
to
things
like:
should
we
be
giving
historic
district
designations
to
areas
in
our
city
that,
were,
you
know,
mapped
out
through
redlining?
I
think
I
think
those
are
big
questions,
no
doubt
right
and
I
think
actually
worthy
of
us
looking
at.
I
don't
think
we're
gonna
be
able
to
accomplish
that,
though,
here
at
rules,
especially
without
anybody
from
I
think
that
the
housing
end
of
things
to
be
able
to
respond
to
some
of
hey.
What
would
they
do?
G
How
would
they
partner?
How
could
we
include
some
of
the
fair
housing
work
and
what
does
that
actually
look
like
to
ensure
that,
if
we
were
to,
you
know,
come
forward
staffs
to
come
forward
at
the
conclusion
of
this
work,
with
a
historic
district
designation
to
the
council
that
we
could
feel
comfortable,
accepting
that
and
so
and
rosen
obviously
can't
answer
all
of
that,
because
she's
her
end
is
the
second
half
of
that,
and
it
doesn't
look
like
we
have.
G
I
don't
think
anybody
joined
from
from
housing
correct,
yet
no
so
so
that
would
be
that's
that's
my
my
main
concern.
So
really,
I
don't
think
we
have.
I
don't
think
we
have
the
right
staff
here
to
give
us
the
second
half
of
this
equation.
So
as
much
as
you
know,
I
think
I
I
agree
that
what
councilmember
lenos
is
asking
for
is
something
we
should
be
considering.
G
You
know
putting
that
forward
and
asking
for
that
as
well
with
you
councilman
ennis,
but
I
don't
think
tying
it
to
this
item
today
is,
is
the
right
way
to
go
about
it
personally
and,
and
I
and
I
I
would
support
it,
I
would
support
looking
at
the
the
process
itself
and
what
areas
we
designate,
and
I
think
you
brought
up
some
really
good
points,
but
I
I
don't
necessarily
think
that
that
this
is
the
right
space
to
to
to
be
able
to
to
get
that
work
done,
and
I
think
that
we
need
the
right
staff
here
as
well
to
be
able
to
respond
to
see
what
that
looks
like.
G
So
I
think
it's
unfortunate
that
maybe
you've
heard
from
some
of
the
the
team
working
on
the
fair
housing,
but
that
they're
they're,
not
necessarily
here
with
us
today,
to
be
able
to
describe
a
little
bit
about
what
what
they
would
be
intent
on
doing
it
does
sound
like,
though
rosalind
you
just
responded
that
there
could
still
be
ways
to
include
some
of
that
you're
you're
not
familiar
with
it.
I
know
why
right
because
that's
not
what's
been
done
in
the
process
before,
but
it
sounds
like
you're
open
to
that.
I
That's
right,
councilmember,
we
we
would
be
open
to
it
and
you
know-
and
I
think
also
you
know,
the
issue
is
a
much
broader
one.
That's
just
not
specifically
to
this
particular
neighborhood
and-
and
I
think
it
would,
there
would
be
opportunity
right
to
approach
it
with
a
more
comprehensive
lens
and
so
that
it's
a
city-wide
discussion
as
well.
G
Yeah,
I
agree,
I
think
the
conversation
is
worthy
and
in
fact
never
like,
I
said
never
thought
of
those
two
in
regards
to
the
the
you
know,
efforts
of
a
community
wanting
to
have
a
historic
district,
designation
and
then
really
should
we
be.
You
know
thinking
much
more
deeply
on
that,
so
I
appreciate
it
being
brought
up
and
I
would
support
that
work
and
I
think,
looks
like
we
can
include
some
of
that
discussion
organically.
C
G
C
G
Doing
rosalind
with
with
this
as
we
if
we
move
forward,
but
I
I'm
happy
to
again
and
I'll
pass
it
back
over
to
councilman
dennis,
but
I'm
happy
to
work
with
you
on
something
to
bring
forward
to
actually
make
it.
You.
E
G
Little
bit
more
comprehensive
in
in
across
the
city
versus
just
tied
into
this
one.
This
one
community.
L
Thank
you
and
I
appreciate
that
council
member
perales.
I
think
what
I'm
saying
is
being
heard,
and
I
appreciate
that,
and
that
is
what
historically,
what
some
of
these
neighborhoods
represent
for
people
of
color
for
people
who
haven't
been
able
to
move
into
one
of
these
neighborhoods,
who
probably
won't
and
for
for
that
kind
of
context,
to
continue
to
exist.
L
And
you
know
I
want
to.
I
want
to
say
that
I
wish
that
my
colleague
was
really
mad
about
the
history
of
segregation
in
her
district
and
what
this
might
represent
to
many
of
us
versus
being
upset
at
me
for
submitting
this
substitute
motion,
and
I
would
have
expected
for
you
to
recognize
what
it
would
mean
in
terms
of
equity
for
people
of
color,
because
policy
can
also
lead
to
segregation,
as
we
have
seen
in
red
lining.
L
And
so
it
is
my
right
to
continue
to
talk
about
this
as
long
as
I'm
allowed
and-
and
I'm
really
sad,
that
you
missed
an
opportunity
to
make
this
right
and
to
actually
offer
a
lot
of
our
people
of
color
who've
been
redlined,
who
have
had
a
long
history
here
in
san
jose,
because
my
my
my
parents
have
been
here
we're
a
couple
of
generations
here
and
we're
still
not
able
to
move
into
your
specific
district.
L
So
I
will
be
supporting
mine.
I
can
see
I
can
count,
and
I
just
lastly
would
like
to
would
like
to
ask
for
us
to
continue
to
take
a
look
at
these
policies,
as
they
are
not
simply
what
they
look
like
and
they're
not
going
to
do
exactly
what
they
say.
They
are.
We
know,
because
we
deal
with
these
kind
with
policies
every
single
week
and
inadvertently.
L
They
create
some
inequities
for
some
of
our
communities,
and
so
this
is
one
of
those
policies,
and
so
not
only
is
it
my
right
to
talk
about
this.
It
is
also
my
right
and
my
duty
to
stand
up
and
to
develop
other
policies,
and
so
thank
you
for
encouraging
me
to
do
that,
because
that
is
exactly
what
I
will
be
doing.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you,
councilmember
rayson,
thank
you
for
the
committee.
Everybody
has
a
right
to
express
their
opinion
and
oftentimes.
We
have
different
perspectives,
but
I'm
going
to
try
to
make
attempt
an
attempt
to
turn
down
the
temperature
a
little
bit
and
just
acknowledge
all
of
you
and
your
your
perspectives
and
viewpoints
and
everybody
that
I've
heard
today
has
actually
brought
new
information
and
a
new
perspective
for
me
on
some
musicians
too.
So
I
I
appreciate
that.
C
There's
no
other
comments.
We
have
a
substitute
motion
on
the
floor,
so
tony
roll
call.
Please
arenas.
B
G
D
D
E
C
C
Next
is
nathan.
D
A
D
Okay,
thank
you.
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
need
to
do
and
if,
if
a
speaker
has
like
a
lot
to
say
we
need
to,
we
need
them
to
stop
every
so
often
while
they're
speaking
so
the
interpreter
can
come
in
so
they
don't
have
to
recite
the
whole
two
minutes
at
once.
D
D
I
don't
know
every
30
seconds
or
so
and
allow
the
interpreter
to
come
in
and
interpret
what
you're
saying
for
the
I'm.
Almost
a
commission
committee
for
the
committee
yeah,
the
one.
C
C
D
B
Hey
good
afternoon,
chair
jones,
vice
mayor,
browse
and
rule
committee
members,
thank
you
for
giving
us
a
minute
to
share
our
thoughts
here.
More
specifically,
some
concerns
at
the
moment
regarding
the
proposed
return
together
ordinance.
We
understand
and
appreciate
the
memo
from
council,
member
paralysis
and
cohen,
and
the
desire
for
hospitality
rehire
ordinance
city-wide,
but
we
should
be
careful
to
impose
a
hiring
process.
As
we
are
cognizant,
some
of
these
businesses
would
default
to
rehiring
former
employees
without
this
policy
in
place.
I
will
note
one
of
our
hospitality
members
has
strong
concerns
about
this.
B
Is
they
currently
abide
by
their
own
policy
that
reflects
much
of
what
is
being
presented
today,
I.e
rehiring
by
seniority?
Also,
it
has
the
excuse
me
also.
It
has
been
difficult
to
get
a
response
from
former
employees
as
well,
so
part
of
this
could
be
that
former
employees
are
claiming
edd
and
federal
aid
that
are
equal,
the
same
or
sometimes
more
than
what
they
could
be
bid
returning
onto
the
job,
which
leads
into
question
about
the
legalities
of
back
pay
and
how
that
is
enforced.
These
are
just
a
few
concerns
from
one
member.
B
Apart
from
that,
there
are
some
legal
implications
and
other
liabilities
that
our
business
community
will
need
to
consider
as
well.
We
would
greatly
appreciate
it
if
we
and
our
business
members
had
more
time
to
vet
the
proposed
ordinance
prior
to
voting
on
this
today
and
eventually
the
council.
We
had
less
than
a
week
to
consider
this
item
and
that
was
supposed
to
know
18th,
but
once
again
appreciate
the
candor
here.
Thank
you.
F
Hi,
thank
you
for
this
item.
I
thought
it.
It
should
be
a
time
that
I
you
know.
I
try
to
learn
to
to
offer
a
few
things
that
can
be
kind
of
matter-of-fact
and
obvious,
but
yet
we
don't
really
want
to
talk
about
them
and
it's
hard
to
do
that
work,
and
so
thanks
for
your
patience
here
and
me
only
trying
to
learn
how
to
practice,
how
to
do
that
myself,
there's
a
concept
of
aerosol
vaccines,
that's
an
important
part
of
the
covid
healing
process.
F
You
know
and
part
of
what
I
think
is
how
you
know
it's
part
of
the
hvac
systems
and
how
kids
can
go
back
to
school
and
that,
I
think,
was
a
major
part.
Yet
it's
a
subject.
People
don't
want
to
really
openly
talk
about
and
acknowledge,
and
I'm
I
hope
that
my
speaking
about
it
here
just
allows
that
space
to
happen
where
it
can
be.
Okay,
like
to
ask,
is
your
hvac
system
at
your
school
using
a
certain
aerosol
vaccine.
C
F
B
C
J
C
J
Good
afternoon
everyone
I'm
jocelyn
morrison.
I
worked
at
the
fairmont
hotel
for
30
years
and,
and
I
would
just
like
to
say
that
our
hotel
has
closed
and
we
are
all
laid
off.
It's
a
very
sad
time
is
someone
translating
this
or
you
just
want
me
to
keep
going,
keep
going.
J
J
C
Thank
you,
maji
maja,.
B
C
Thank
you,
maria.
J
J
J
K
Yes,
hi,
how
are
you
guys?
My
name
is
miss
ryan
mendoza.
I
work
at
cisco
systems
and
I
want
you
guys
to
please
support
this,
build
that
that's
gonna
help
all
my
brothers
and
sisters
from
the
hospitality
work
continue.
The
only
thing
guys
we
wanna
just
go
back
to
work.
Okay,
make
these
guys
from
the
hotels
and
the
hospitality
industry.
Do
the
right
thing.
You
guys
know
what
to
do.
Please
just
just
just
make
it
happen.
Please
give
us
a
chance.
M
Thank
you
vice
mayor
jones
and
city
council
members.
My
name
is
eddie
trong
from
the
silicon
valley
organization,
the
region's
largest
chamber
of
commerce,
I'm
here
today
to
voice
my
organization's
concerns
that
there
has
not
been
sufficient
time
to
conduct
stakeholder
outreach
and
that
the
city
should
conduct
a
thoughtful
outreach
process
before
rushing
to
enact
any
new
organs
by
april
6..
The
proposed
policy
would
require
private
employers
to
rehire
laid
off
employees
by
order
of
seniority
without
much
consideration
about
the
new
legal
complexities.
M
That
would
create
many
employers
that
we
have
spoken
to
may
find
themselves
attempting
to
manage
these
news
complexities
instead
of
rehiring
employees
once
the
economy
balances
back.
Additionally,
the
proposed
ordinance
would
allow
the
city
of
san
jose
to
pursue
litigation
against
hospitality,
employers
and
potentially
require
them
to
pay
back
wages
for
the
affected
employee.
This
will
be
a
tremendous
new
legal
liability.
When
really,
we
should
be
focusing
on
accelerating
vaccinations,
opening
the
economy
and
getting
more
people
back
to
work
with
a
dignified
job.
M
The
memo
does
not
identify
a
covered
employer
that
would
be
subject
to
the
ordinance,
but
they
do
identify
card
rooms.
Event.
Centers
of
more
than
50
000
square
foot
feet,
food
service
contractors
and
hotels
that
may
be
required
to
comply
with
the
proposed
law
because
it
was
identified
in
determined
definitions
at
the
end
of
the
day.
Government
can
do
just
as
much
harm
as
it
can
do.
Good.
M
It
would
not
benefit
our
community
if
the
city
council
were
to
adopt
an
ordinance
that
is
copy
pasted
from
another
city
in
a
matter
of
weeks.
We
urge
you
to
take
a
more
thoughtful
process
and
the
svo
stands
ready
to
assist
you
with
stakeholder
outreach
with
the
hospitality
industry
to
get
their
feedback
on
the
matter.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
of
my
comments.
C
C
C
C
Okay,
we
lost
you
iris.
B
I
need
please
that
you
give
them
back
their
job
to
have
conscious
and
not
to
have
the
conscious
enough
that
it's
a
year
that
we
have
not
been
working,
that
they
have
not
been
working
and
we
all
have
a
family
that
has
to
support
that.
We
have
to
support.
Please
help
them.
Everybody
needs
to
work.
We
have
families
to
support
and
care
for.
C
And
thank
you
luis.
N
Good
afternoon
vice
mayor
council
members,
louise
auerhan
with
working
partnerships,
usa-
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
introducing
and
encourage
support
for
this
policy.
The
proposed
return
together
policy
is
a
lifeline
for
san
jose
workers
who
have
been
affected
and
are
still
affected
by
mass
layoffs
and
the
ongoing
economic
downturn
due
to
covet
19..
N
Tens
of
thousands
of
our
neighbors
are
still
laid
off
due
to
the
pandemic
and
don't
know
when
they'll
go
back
to
work,
hotel
event
and
hospitality.
Workers,
as
we
all
know,
are
among
the
hardest
hit,
and
many
of
them
will
not
go
back
quickly.
They
face
many
months
before
those
industries
fully
recover.
Maybe
even
years
hotel
employment
in
santa
clara
county
remains
down
more
than
any
other
industry
due
to
covid
and
as
we
also
know,
the
workers
in
these
industries
are
overwhelmingly
people
of
color
immigrants
and
women.
N
Exactly
the
people
who
have
already
been
hardest
hit
in
many
other
ways
by
covet
19.
and
now
many
of
those
people
fear
that,
even
when
their
industries
finally
do
start
to
reopen,
long-time
workers
might
be
left
out.
People
who
have
committed
decades
of
their
life
to
those
jobs
may
be
excluded
from
returning
to
work
as
council
members,
you
have
the
opportunity
here
to
give
workers
hope
that
they
will
have
jobs
to
go
back
to
when
things
eventually
get
better.
N
This
isn't
newer
novel
cities
across
california,
including
santa
clara
right
next
door,
have
already
passed
similar
policies
to
help
provide
hope
to
those
hardest-hit.
Workers
workers
urgently
need
this
little
piece
of
security
and
hope,
as
you've
heard
from
so
many
today.
Please
support
this
policy
so
that
we
can
all
begin
to
return
together.
Thank
you.
C
Okay:
let's
try
again
sarah.
J
C
J
Ahead:
okay,
sorry
so
hi,
my
name
is
laura
reyes
and
I
am
a
member
of
the
unite
here.
Local
19
and
I
stand
with
san
jose
hospitality
workers
in
supporting
to
return
together
ordinance.
We
all
deserve
to
have
a
job.
I
mean
they
don't
want
to
live
in
state
assistance.
They
want
to
work,
they
want
to
be
available
to
provide
for
their
own
families.
The
pandemic
is,
nobody
else,
nobody's
fault
they
do
deserve
to
get
back
to
work.
C
J
Hi,
my
name's
sarah
mcdermott,
I'm
the
political
director
of
unite
here,
local
19
and
I'd
like
to
thank
council
member
perales
for
championing
this
issue.
Along
with
council
members,
cohen
and
jimenez
coven
19
has
devastated
hospitality
workers
with
an
estimated
90
of
hotel
workers
out
of
work
nationally
one
year
into
the
to
unemployment.
J
Hospitality
workers
are
asking
for
one
thing:
the
right
to
to
get
their
former
jobs
back
as
the
industry
returns.
We
have
already
secured
the
right
to
recall
from
many
of
our
union.
Employers,
including
doubletree
hilton
hyatt,
place
holiday,
inn
marriott
and
team
san
jose,
but
we
must
make
sure
that
all
hospitality
workers
have
this
right.
Unfortunately,
some
hotels
have
yet
to
sign
on
to
this
simple
no-cost
commitment.
The
recent
closure
of
the
fairmont
san
jose
for
rebranding
highlights
the
need
for
this
ordinance.
J
O
Yes,
thank
you
vice
mayor
when
a
piece
of
legislation
comes
forth
that
serves
the
purposes
of
justice,
of
the
dignity
of
the
of
the
human
being
and
the
dignity
of
the
worker,
the
ones
that
sustain
and
do
the
work
that
no
one
else
will
do,
and
they
do
it
with
pride
and
they
do
it
with
dignity
every
single
time
that
they
show
up
to
work.
O
And
so
I
think
that
this
this
piece
of
legislation
fits
that
in
terms
of
what
comes
forth
from
the
city,
to
protect
its
citizens
and
to
to
to
give
them
justice.
Because
what
has
befallen
us
is
unjust
in
so
many
layered
ways.
O
And
so
I
really
want
to
thank
you,
because
on
multiple
layers,
you
gave
the
voice
that
they
slapped
out
of
my
mother's
mouth,
when
they
taught
her
that
it
was
a
shameful,
humiliating
thing
to
be
mexican
in
this
city
and
that's
what
built
willow
glenn
now
to
vice
mayor
chappie
jones.
I
wouldn't
exactly
ask
you
to
lower
the
temperature
if
it
was
an
issue
that
involved
the
brothers.
I
would
ask
you
to
extend
thank.
C
B
J
Hi
good
afternoon,
council
members,
my
name
is
dolores
dominguez,
and
I
am
a
work
at
banquet
service
at
the
double
three
san
jose
for
17
years,
working
at
the
double
3,
I
have
been
able
to
build
a
life.
I'm
proud
of
my
two
children
having
had
a
great
health
coverage
and
a
stable
home
in
march
of
2020,
my
co-workers
and
I
were
laid
off
because
of
the
coding
item
pandemic.
J
J
I
am
proud
to
be
a
part
of
a
strong
union
and
fat
for
those
protections,
and
today
we
stand
with
all
the
hospitality
workers
in
san
jose
to
supporting
the
return
work
or
the
nuns
in
the
hospitality
industry.
So
many
service
workers
are
immigrant
women
like
me
who
have
fought
to
improve
conditions
across
our
industry.
All
hospitality
workers
should
have
the
basic
right
to
recall.
That's
why
we
stand
here
today,
united
as
our
hospitality
workers
to
call
for
action
by
the
city.
Thank
you
have
a
good
day.
C
J
Yes,
my
name
is
myra
rodriguez
and
I've
worked
for
the
fairmont
hotel
for
more
than
15
years,
and
I
am
here
and
I
stand
with
the
san
jose
hospitality
workers
in
supporting
the
return
together
ordinance.
It
hasn't
been
easy
and
we
ask
for
you,
council
members
to
please
help
us
in
this
issue.
I
would
appreciate
it
so
much
god
bless
and
have
a
wonderful
day.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
united
here
local
19.
C
J
Ahead,
lady,
okay,
my
name
is
leti
herrera
flores
and
I
work
at
nan
union
hotel.
I
am
a
resident
at
san
jose.
Please
make
sure
all
employers
do
the
right
thing
and
gives
them
to
say
hospitality
workers,
their
former
jobs
back
as
trouble
returns.
Please
stand
with
hospitality
workers
and
pass
the
return
together
ordinance.
Thank
you.
K
You
hear
me:
yes,
okay,
you
hear
me
right.
Yes,
yes,
we
can
okay,
okay
good
afternoon.
My
name
is
I'm
a
higher
place,
downtown
san
jose
I've
been
working
there
for
35
years,
I'm
also
a
member.
I
unite
here.
K
Local
19,
I'm
here
to
propose
the
now
and
may
following
hospitality
for
workers
have
come
together
doing
this
pandemic
and
we
are
doing
full
distribution
three
days
a
week
and
also
I've
been
helping
people
to
get
a
register
and
getting
appointments
for
the
vaccine
and
also
getting
local
members
of
the
local
19
to
get
a
health
care
insurance
healthcare.
K
B
For
30
years
I
have
been
able
to
bring
my
family
forward
and
now
that
this
happened
like
a
bucket
of
cold
water
to
all
san
jose
and
the
whole
entire
united
states.
The
only
thing
I
ask
is
that
you
help
us
because
we
need
we
are
very
bad
and
we
need
your
support
and
we
hope
you
can
support
us,
and
I
wish
you
a
good
day.
B
C
N
Thank
you,
and
I
there
were
just
a
few
concerns
that
I
had
about
our
office's
ability
to
do
some
of
the
things
that
are
recommended
in
the
memo
and
those
are
which
we're
just
ill-equipped,
and
I
learned
pointedly,
as
we
were
going
through,
the
grocery
store
ordinance
to
provide
informational,
memos
and
those
kinds
of
things.
That
really
is
best
done
by
oed
or
other
staff.
And
then
I
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
do
any
research
on
it.
N
I
think
lee
did
we.
I
think
we
were
talking
about
this
coming
to
being
referred
to
council
on
the
13th
for
direction.
At
that
point,.
C
G
Yeah,
thank
you
and
I
know
there
wasn't
a
response
from
from
staff
on
the
early
consideration
response
form.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
what
your
intent,
nor
was
to
to
sort
of
give
that
indication
here
in
your
your
comment.
So
it
sounds
like
that's
what
it
was
correct.
E
Yeah-
and
I
can
speak
to
that,
council
member-
I
think,
as
nora
indicated
even
before,
there's
a
form
here
kind
of
lessons
learned
from
from
previous
ordinance.
There's
a
lot
more
information.
The
administration
would
want,
as
nora
does
that
research
to
be
able
to
clearly
articulate
to
you
whether
it
is
a
green
or
a
yellow
light,
and,
quite
frankly,
to
hear
your
own
kind
of
expectations
on
that
implementation
and
enforcement,
because
part
of
it
could
read
fairly
simple,
but
the
other
part
could
be
fairly
time
intensive.
E
So
I
think
you
know
letting
the
attorney's
office
do
that
research
bring
it
to
you
in
close
session,
so
matt
myself
and
others
can
make
a
clear
recommendation
on
what
that
would
look
like
from
our
perspective.
G
Great
thank
you
yen,
happy
to
engage
in
that
for
the
conversation,
whether
being
in
closed
session
and
I'm
comfortable.
Although
I've
asked
for
the
sixth
on
on
one
week
further,
if
that's
what
staff
needs
to
be
able
to
come
back-
and
I
can
say
much
like-
I
think-
we've
we've
addressed
in
the
past
with
some
of
these
ordinances-
there's
not
a
strong
desire
to
have
some
sort
of
robust.
G
You
know
enforcement
action
tied
to
it
at
the
end
that
you
know
it's
really
something
that
we
would
be
looking
at
an
individual
coming
forward
right,
bringing
something
you
know
action
forward
based
on
on
if
they
feel
that
they
were
if
their
employer
was
not
following
the
ordinance
and
that's
very
consistent,
I
think
across
the
board
what
we've
done
before
so
then
that
way,
we're
not
necessarily
out
there
being
some
sort
of
enforcement
arm
on
it
and
appreciate
that
so
I'll
just
jump
into
some
of
my
comments.
G
G
You
serve
in
an
industry
that
does
not
have
you
know
tremendous
anticipation
for
for
being
able
to
reopen
soon,
as,
as
you
know,
information
comes
out
around
things
like
the
moving
in
the
tears
to
orange
tear
that
still
doesn't
give
you
this
green
light
to
be
able
to
know
that
you
can
come
back
to
work
soon,
but
I
know
what
it
does
do
it
gives
you.
G
A
sense
of
hope
gives
you
a
sense
of
hope
that,
sometime
later
this
year
and
by
all
indications,
actually,
there
is
industry
reports
that
are
showing,
as
my
memo
detailed,
that
we
may
see
hotel
industry
back
at
a
55
capacity
and
the
fact
that
we
keep
moving
in
a
positive
direction.
G
I
know
gives
individuals
that
spoke
today,
hope
that
they
will
be
able
to
return
to
work,
but
where
that
hope
can
completely
be
eliminated
would
be
if
they
were
not
given
any
kind
of
assurance
that
they
can
go
and
return
to
a
job.
As
we
heard
from
some
of
the
speakers
that
they've
been
at
for
29
30
years.
G
To
me,
this
is
a
no-brainer
policy.
I
think
that's
why
we've
seen
it
passed
by
a
lot
of
cities
up
and
down
the
state
and
in
fact
why
I
think
it's
already
been
embraced
by
a
number
of
hotels,
for
instance
the
hilton
hyatt
place
holiday,
inn
marriott
and
by
team
san
jose
again,
because
I
think
this
is
a
no-brainer
policy
to
be
able
to
really
offer
workers
their
job
right,
give
a
priority
and
and
send
that
signal
to
them
that
hey
as
our
industry
is
able
to
reopen.
G
We
want
to
go
to
those
workers
that
have
served
us
and
served
our
community
for
decades,
and
and
really
that's
that's
the
goal
here.
It's
no
secret.
What's
happened
to
our
hospitality
industry,
90
of
hospitality
workers
have
been
out
of
work
due
to
this
pandemic,
one
of
the
hardest
hit
industries,
as
we
know,
not
someone
that
can
simply
do
as
we've
done
here
in
in
so
many
in
the
in
in
silicon
valley,
in
the
tech
community.
G
Even
us
here
on
the
council
being
able
to
work
from
home
remotely
not
have
our
paychecks
impacted.
These
individuals
are
standing
regularly
in
food
lines,
as
as
sarah
mcdermott
stated
in
regards
to
their
members.
G
G
They're
asking
to
go
back
to
work,
not
asking
to
to
to
have
handouts,
they're,
simply
asking
to
be
offered
a
job
back,
and
that's
why?
My
colleagues
and
I
councilmember
cohen
here-
thank
you
and
councilmember
jimenez
put
forth
this
memo
so
that
we
can
all
return
to
work
together,
and
this
is
a
no-cost
way
for
us
to
be
able
to
promote
recovery,
a
path
for
our
hospitality
workers
to
be
able
to
rebuild
their
livelihoods.
G
That
know
how
to
do
this
work
should
be
the
ones
that
did
go
back
to
work
and
we
want
all
3,
000
plus
workers
here
to
be
called
back
to
work
in
san
jose,
and
we
know
that
neighboring
cities,
as
I
pointed
out
san
diego
oakland
san
francisco
santa
clara
most
recently,
have
all
passed
these
ordinances
and-
and
so
really
that's
that's
our
interest
here
to
see
that
we
can
do
the
same.
G
This
hasn't
been
a
reinvention
of
the
will.
You
see
the
the
the
draft
language
is
simply
that
that's
been
brought
up
to
help
staff,
certainly-
and
we've
done
this
before-
there's
no
intent
that
we
that
we
adopt
the
language
word
by
word,
but
merely
to
not
have
to
reinvent
the
wheel
on
something
that's
now
passed
across
the
state
and
lastly,
I'll
say
just
in
regards
to
the
concerns
raised
by
sjda
and
the
svo
on
timing.
G
G
I
submitted
a
memo
and
under
the
regular
process
a
week
later,
it's
arrived
here
at
rules
and
now
we're
discussing
when
it's
going
to
come
back
to
council,
which
I
was
requesting
two
weeks
and
now
we're
looking
at
three
and
so
there's
no
sort
of
rush
timing.
G
Here
this
is
simply
a
regular
process
and
I'm
happy
to
connect
with
with
both
your
organizations
and
any
other
stakeholders
that
feel
they
have
concerns
prior
to
that
april,
13th
date-
and
I
will
say
that,
based
on
some
of
the
comments
that
you
may
have
missed
some
of
the
language
in
the
memo,
because
it
does
actually
include
considerations
for
seniority
and
again
it's
just
it's
the
draft
language
that
we
have
here
to
be
able
to
move
forward
and
and
happy
to
be
able
to
meet
on
that
regard.
G
So
thank
you
to
staff
nora
for
your
your
response.
It
sounds
like
you'll
be
able
to
come
back
and
have
a
more
in-depth
conversation
with
us.
I
hope
that
all
my
colleagues
can
support
this
again.
What
I
feel
is
really
a
no-brainer
action
to
move
forward
and
with
that
all
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
memo
cosigned
by
me
and
councilman,
cohen
and
jimenez.
Second,
all.
B
G
A
Yeah
I'm
councilmember
perales
said
you
know.
I
agree
with
everything
he
said,
so
I
don't
I'm
not
going
to
take
much
time
except
thank
the
people,
members
of
the
public
who
came
to
speak
and
talk
about
their
experiences
and
help
us
understand
how
important
this
is
to
to
them
and
their
families,
and
so
I
appreciate
them
being
here
just
just
a
question
regarding
timeline
april
13th
sounds
like
april.
13Th
is
a
good
time
to
bring
this
back
to
discuss.
A
N
I,
if
the
question
is
to
me
and.
A
N
N
Impossible,
it
looked
like
you
were
looking
at
lee
and
I
got
that
lee's
gonna
write
it.
That's
great.
That's
the
best
news.
I've
had
anyway
the
we
would
like
the
direction
on
the
13th
rather
than
having
to
bring
it
back
and
and
part
of
the
reason
is.
I
do
want
an
opportunity
to
coordinate
with
the
city
manager's
office.
N
We
we
had
some
post-coordination
recently
on
the
grocery
bill
and
oed
was
most
helpful
in
in
putting
together
information
that
our
office
just
isn't
really
equipped
to
provide
and-
and
I
think
we
were
pretty
flat-footed
with
the
public,
so
I'd
like
to
get
that
coordination
in
place.
A
I
guess
that
would
mean
that
the
motion
would
be
more,
that
we
would
be
bringing
this
back
for
discussion
on
the
13th
for
preparation
for
for
direction
at
that
time
to
prepare
an
ordinance.
A
G
Yeah,
I
would
prefer
to
to
be
able
to
discuss
some,
even
if
it
was
a
draft
I
mean
that
would
give
us
something
more
to
discuss.
That's
why
I've
kind
of
provided
a
draft
here
right
so
to
aid
you
in
that,
if
we're
merely
having
a
similar
discussion
to
what
we're
having
today,
which
is
maybe
more
staff
there,
but
there
hasn't
really
been
any
thought
in
language,
then
I
don't
know
how
fruitful
that
will
be.
So
is
that
possible
that
that
you
actually
could
come
back
with
something
that
we
can
debate
on.
N
I,
if
it's
the
13th,
I
think
we
can
come
back
with
a
with
a
draft
and
then
have
areas
where
identify
areas
either
where
we
have
some
concerns,
and
we
want
to
review
that
with
the
council
and
or
get
a
little
more
direction
on
certain
issues
as
as
they
may
come
up.
One
of
the
things,
for
example,
is
right
now
it's
structured
for
our
office
to
be
litigating
issues.
N
If,
if
the
ordinance
isn't
followed,
that's
not
how
the
grocery
ordinance
was,
and
that's
that
may
or
may
not
be
a
big
demand
on
our
office,
but
it
it.
N
I
I
can
see
how
there
may
be
evidentiary
issues
and
trying
to
track
down
the
information
we
would
need
to
have
and
all
of
that,
because
it's
different
than,
for
example,
a
construction
company
that
has
to
provide
us
with
their
wage
records
that
are
under
penalty
of
perjury,
that
that's
easier
to
chase
in
many
ways
than
perhaps
some
of
the
problems
that
might
occur
with
this.
G
G
You
know
change
and
make
more
relevant
for
for
us
or
give
us
other
options
that
make
more
sense
and
and
that
I
just
would
rather
have
a
more
fruitful
conversation
then,
rather
than
maybe
a
repeat
conversation
of
this
with
just
more
people,
so
that
would
be
helpful
if,
if
it
sounds
like
you
can
do
it
and
it
sounds
like
you
does,
or
it
sounds
like
you
can.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you.
I'm
gonna
have
my
message
in
spanish
because
I
know
there
was
a
lot
of
spanish
speakers.
B
B
L
L
Their
organization
for
their
support
and
support
and
their
network
that
they've
created
the
recognition
of
loss
of
work
that
is
out
of
their
control
and
asked
them
to
speak
once
again
when
this
item
comes
to
us
with
the
full
council
and
the
mayor,
and
and
lastly,
I
want
to
say
that
there
were
some
folks
that
that
called
in
and
obviously
I'm
gonna
support
this.
L
Based
on
my
message
now,
I
think
you
can
surmise
that,
and
I
was
really
disappointed
to
hear
some
people,
especially
from
the
business
community,
saying
you
know
that
what
they
needed
to
do
was
focus
on
some
of
the
complexities
of
of
recovery
versus
you
know
being
bound
to
this
return
together.
Ordinance
which
to
me
does
not
make
sense,
because
this
facilitates
the
rehiring
and
the
reduction
of
retraining.
L
That
will
be
very
beneficial
for
a
lot
of
this
industry,
and
so
I'm
going
to
continue
to
support
it.
I
hope
that
that
our
business
is
here
in
san
jose
can
see
those
same
benefits
that
when
you
train
a
new
set
of
folks,
that's
that's
a
loss
right.
That's
a
loss
of
of
the
training
that
you
actually
garnered
before
and
that
you
invested
before
the
loss
of
jobs
and
before
this
pandemic.
That
was
out
of
the
really
out
of
control
of
the
the
employees
that
were
impacted.
L
Thank
you
for
all
the
advocates
who
also
made
the
time
to
pull
people
together
and
really
get
a
feel
for
who's
out
there.
In
terms
of
when
we
talk
about
people
who
have
lost
their
jobs,
people
who
are
in
food
lines,
people
who
are
really
just
struggling.
These
are
the
voices.
Unfortunately,
we
can't
see
their
faces,
but
these
are.
These
are
the
folks
and
so
the
one.
L
In
the
same,
when
we
talk
about
other
policies,
these
are
the
same
folks,
and
so
when
we
want
recovery,
when
we
want
to
make
sure
that
folks
are
not
homeless,
then
we
have
to
do
things
like
this
to
make
sure
that
people
get
back
to
work
quickly.
Thank
you.
C
O
Yes,
paul
soto
from
the
horseshoe,
a
quote
from
martin
luther
king.
Our
nation
was
born
in
genocide.
We
are
perhaps
the
only
nation
which
tried,
as
a
matter
of
national
policy,
to
wipe
out
its
indigenous
population.
Moreover,
we
elevated
that
tragic
experience
into
a
noble
crusade.
O
O
Now
either
sbo
is
sociopathic
and
a
sociopath
is
just
somebody
that
is
literally
incapable
of
experiencing
human
compassion
and
compassion
is
twofold:
number
one,
the
subjective
feeling
of
empathy
or
sympathy
and
these
objective,
meaning
that
the
person
is
now
compelled
to
do
something
to
alleviate
that
suffering.
They
had
an
opportunity
here
and
they
showed
their
true
colors,
so
I'm
gonna
just
leave
it
at
that.
B
Thank
you,
paul
blair,.
F
All
right
boy,
weakman
here
it's
a
tough
march.
Sorry,
you
know
I
I
really
one
of
my
words.
I
know
they
didn't
speak
to
the
item
on
the
previous
item,
but
I
I
really
try
to
make
my
words
connect
to
the
item.
Subject
matter,
I
never
try
to
stray
off
a
subject.
I
have
a
real
specific
purpose.
When
I
speak
on
subject
matter,
do
you
speak?
F
You
know
to
to
related
subjects,
and
I
think
aerosol
vaccines
have
played
an
important
part
in
our
and
our
development,
how
we
we've
been
working
the
past
six
months
and
it
should
be
acknowledged
and
talked
about
and
it
shouldn't
be
a
fearful
subject.
F
So,
thanks
with
that
said
about
the
council
council
person
cohen's
memo
to
come
up
with
with
new
ideas
for
the
public
meeting
process,
I
hope
that
maybe
you
can
have
a
color
coordinated
system
for
when
you
update,
council
agendas,
red,
yellow
and
green
red.
F
Being
you
know,
green
being,
you
know
two
weeks
before
an
agenda
appears
yellow
bean
if
you
make
changes
within
72
hours
and
red
bean,
if
you
make
changes
within
24
hours,
and
that
could
be,
you
know
on
the
on
the
on
the
website,
and
you
can
just
quickly
see
the
red,
yellow,
green
and
know
where
the
agendas
are
at
and
about
the.
Thank
you
for
the
spanish
translation.
Good
luck
on
on
hiring
I'll
talk
about
that
issue
more.
F
I
wish
a
city
employees
can
do
that
job
and
work
out
with
union
people
how
that
can
be.
They
can
do
it
for
a
much
cheaper
price.
I
feel,
and,
to
conclude,
you
know,
I
really
liked
everyone
had
interesting
words.
A
council
person
in
arenas
made
something
very
open
and
clear
what
we
have
to
work
on,
and
you
know
we
missed
an
opportunity
to
to
to
have
the
east
side
issues.
The
whole
purpose
of
google
is
to
address
east
side
issues
and
that
could
have
been
a
good
opportunity
to
do
that.
F
I
hope
staff
will
look
over
sylvia
raynes's
ideas.
Thank
you.
N
Hi,
martha
o'connell.
I
have
an
observation.
It's
it's
not
a
criticism,
it's
something
that
I
just
discovered
today.
I
I
called
into
the
meeting
on
the
telephone
and
when
the
folks
were
talking
in
spanish,
obviously
the
telephone
couldn't
translate
what
they
were
saying,
because
I'm
interested
in
listening
to
my
fellow
citizens.
N
So
I
I
ran
in
the
back
room
and
I
hopped
on
the
computer
and
I
got
on
to
you,
know,
watch
a
public
meeting
and
there
was
nothing
well.
Maybe
there
was,
but
I
just
didn't
see
any
way
to
translate
on
the
computer
what
the
people
were
saying.
So
I
don't
know
what
we
can
do
about
it,
but
I
for
one,
as
a
non-spanish
speaker
would
like
to
know
what
my
spanish-speaking
fellow
citizens
are
saying.
Thank
you.