►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
A
Now
we
go
to
reports
to
the
committee,
but
before
we
do
that
I'm
supposed
to
acknowledge
that
this
today
is
the
last
day
that
we're
going
to
do
a
Facebook
live
with
my
understanding
and
that
also
that
our
I
guess
our
ratings
have
gone
down.
Since
the
initial
broadcasts
of
my
opportunity
to
be
an
Internet
star
is
phaser
way,
we'll
have
to
figure
out
I
get
the
raise
back
up
anyway,
so
I
just
want
to
make
that
announcement.
So.
E
The
committee
mr.
mayor
and
members
of
the
general
public
Kip
Harkness
deputy
city
manager,
the
first
item,
we're
going
to
walk
through
is
the
Smart
City
Road
map,
and
this
is
a
work
in
progress
and
so
we'll
be
bringing
different
stages
back
to
you
for
your
feedback
and
guidance
along
the
way.
So
this
is
sort
of
at
the
prototype
on
paper
stage
and
the
guiding
principles.
E
Is
it
court
or
what
our
city
can
and
should
do,
and
is
it
actually
achievable
at
scale
using
process,
improvement,
technology
or
both,
and
so
all
of
the
items
that
we'll
be
discussing
in
our
roadmap
are
ones
that
we
want
to
see
as
close
to
the
middle
of
that
Venn
diagram
as
possible
in
that
sweet
spot,
where
we
can
make
a
difference
on
problems
that
matter.
Similarly,
how
we
do
our
work
is
equally
as
important.
E
The
good
news
is
it's
an
iterative
process
that
has
yielded
results,
so
we've
just
had
our
second
birthday
as
an
office
and
as
a
group,
our
roadmap
itself
is
even
less
than
that.
So
you
know
in
tech
they
talked
about
crawling
walking
running
in
terms
of
technology
capabilities,
so
we're
two
year
old
now
and
we've
certainly
crawled
walked
and
we're
running.
We
may
occasionally
hit
some
walls,
but
we
are
definitely
off
and
running.
Some
of
the
key
highlights
that
I
want
to
mention
in
terms
of
successes
out.
E
The
door
is
the
Digital
Inclusion
and
broadband
strategy,
the
broadband
agreements
in
large,
the
my
San
Jose
1.0,
1.1,
1.2,
1.3,
1.4
1.5
and
the
talent
recruitment
initiative,
work
that
has
transformed
our
hiring
and
from
a
crisis
into
actually
an
opportunity
for
a
lot
of
departments.
So
there's
still
a
lot
more
to
be
done.
There,
we've
also
had
some
smaller
scale,
but
equally
as
important
successes,
we've
launched
some
advisory
boards
that
are
helping
us
think.
Through
things,
we
have
really
interesting
partnerships
with
folks
like
Airbnb,
emerging
IOT
strategies
and
real
world
work.
E
Community
led
efforts
from
from
the
Knight
Foundation
to
Code
for
America
to
Code
for
San
Jose
that
have
really
helped
us
translate
your
vision,
closer
and
closer
into
reality.
So
the
challenge
that
you
gave
us
was
really
to
broaden
and
deepen
our
work
around
innovation,
our
original
innovation
roadmap
kind
of
scaled,
mostly
around
innovation
and
impact.
We
had
about
22
projects.
E
So
that's
our
goal
as
we
evolve
the
smart
city
roadmap,
realizing
that
that
middle
portion,
innovation
at
scale
as
impact
is
really
about
bringing
things
to
execution
at
scale,
and
we
have
a
significant
number
of
opportunities
to
do
that.
Based
on
the
work
that
we've
been
successful
at
over
the
last
year.
In
particular,
I'm
gonna
go
back
in
time
and
a
couple
of
years
and
walk
through
it's
a
little
bit
of
an
eye.
E
Chart
but
I
want
to
use
one
single
example
and
deep
dive
into
it
as
how
we
are
going
to
be
approaching
all
of
the
other
strategies
and
what
we
have
learned
about,
what
works
and
what
doesn't
in
our
particular
San
Jose
model
San
Jose
way
so
I'm
gonna
use
broadband
as
the
example
before
we
even
came
out
as
an
innovation
organization,
the
mayor
and
the
mayor's
office
was
working
on
this
with
council
members.
There
was
a
vision,
a
smart
city's
vision
that
was
adopted.
E
There
were
relationships
that
were
built
with
the
fuze
Foundation,
for
example,
and
one
of
the
things
that
came
out
of
this
was
in
addition
to
the
overall
smart
city
strategy,
was
a
direction
to
develop
a
broadband
and
digital
inclusion
strategy,
and
you
provided
budget.
Oh
I
just
want
to
stop
and
repeat
that,
and
you
provided
budget,
because
that
was
extremely
important
to
our
ability
to
actually
do
something
with
what
with
what
was
a
great
idea.
E
Part
of
what
happened
is
Dolan
came
in
very
passionate
about
Digital
Inclusion,
Digital,
Inclusion,
Digital
Inclusion
about
the
95,000
people
who
are
excluded
and
I.
Remember
a
couple
of
conversations
where
I
was
seeking
to
understand,
and
he
basically
said
and
I
said
well.
How
are
we
going
to
get
to
that
so?
E
With
that
you
all
approved
the
strategy.
We
immediately
went
to
an
initial
agreement
with
AT&T,
which
included
the
Digital
Inclusion
fund
first
ever
in
the
nation,
and
then
we're
at
the
point
now,
with
the
large
scale
scale,
agreements
for
AT&T
and
Verizon,
which
we
are
preparing
final
copies.
As
we
speak
for
signatures
in
the
next
couple
of
days,
knocking
on
wood.
So
and
then
you
see
an
e
in
yellow
you
see.
What's
ahead
of
us,
we
actually
have
to
deploy
4,000
small
cells.
E
We
have
to
put
a
thousand
miles
of
fiber
in
the
ground
without
annoying
every
single
one
of
your
residence.
We
have
to
improve
our
small-cell
process
and
technology
in
order
to
move
those
through
and
we
get
to
launch
to
large
scaled
smart
city
zones
as
a
result
of
the
partnership,
as
well
as
launching
the
Digital
Inclusion
strategy.
So
the
good
news
is:
we've
been
very
successful
at
moving
from
idea
to
value
and
now
that
we're
in
value
at
scale
that's
going
to
require
a
lot
more
people
than
our
here
at
this
table
to
implement.
E
We
really
think
this
notion
of
movement
conception
with
a
significant
strategic
role
for
the
mayor's
office
and
the
mayor's
team
in
the
strategy.
Clarification
with
a
very
big
role
for
the
council
and
this
body
and
then
to
execution
with
a
lot
of
responsibility
and
expectation
on
the
city
manager
side
is
exactly
the
model
we
want
to
use
with
the
other
strategies
that
we're
approaching.
E
So,
for
example,
safe
City
strategy
is
not
not
yet
developed.
We
accept
expect
the
safe
city
strategy
to
go
through
a
similar
process.
We
learned
the
broadband
strategy
which,
in
the
end,
will
come
to
your
approval
for
the
direction
and
actually
will
result
in
more
work
on
the
ground
on
the
implementation
side,
once
it's
approved,
so
I
see
at
least
six
design
challenges
for
the
smart
city
roadmap
as
we
evolve.
It
and
I
think
these
are
the
design
challenges
that
we're
going
to
work
through
in
tight
collaboration
with
the
mayor's
office
team
and
others.
E
But
the
six
questions
I
would
put
to
us
are:
how
do
we
deliver
priority
projects
at
scale
from
broadband?
To
my
sounds,
82.0
I
view
the
budget
document
as
a
very
clear
prioritization
document.
If
you
put
money
against
it,
you
have
an
expectation,
that's
delivered.
How
do
we
continue
to
be
brilliant
at
the
basics
in
IT
to
provide
a
strong
technology
foundation?
E
How
do
we
develop
new
policies
from
privacy
to
trenching
to
support
deployment
of
all
of
the
above,
and
how
do
we
nurture
and
create
the
next
set
of
strategies
from
safe
cities
to
digital
inclusion,
in
particular,
safe
cities
and
Digital
Inclusion?
The
larger
question
we
think
is
also:
how
do
you
put
the
city
at
the
center
of
smart
city
and
I
mean
that
in
two
ways
one?
How
do
we
make
sure
that
this
is
actually
a
people,
focus,
not
a
technology,
focused
roadmap
and
two?
E
That'll
mean
a
higher
level
of
agility,
a
greater
deal
of
flexibility,
a
different
way
of
thinking
about
things
like
procurement
and
how
we
work
with
external
partners
and
that's
I,
think
one
of
the
biggest
areas
where
we
had
a
legitimate
critique
against
our
innovation.
1.0
roadmap
is
that
there
wasn't
enough
space
to
take
a
take
into
account.
E
If
I've
got
my
key
right,
the
the
lime
green
post-its,
underneath
the
orange
big
orange
priorities
are
projects
that
are
funded
and
in
progress.
The
orange
post-its
are
product
projects
that
are
initiated
and
in
progress
and
either
partially
funded
or
have
some
potential
fundings
strategy,
but
they've
been
initiated
already.
E
The
fuchsia
posts
are
the
ones
that
are
unfunded,
but
we
are
actively
exploring
and
then
the
sky-blue
post-its
our
projects
that
were
identified
as
unfunded
and
our
backlog,
but
are
certainly
very
interesting,
and
we
need
to
understand
where
they
fall
in
the
prioritization
so
again,
without
without
zooming.
In
enough
that
you
can
read
any
of
the
details
here,
because
I
think
that'd
be
dangerous
to
all
of
us.
E
This
gives
you
a
sense
of
you
know
just
the
scale
of
the
innovation
that
we
are
expecting
of
the
organization
if
this
were
to
be
adopted
as
where
we
were
to
go,
for
example,
and
it's
nowhere
close
to
that
this
would
be
growing
from
about
23
ish
priorities
to
about
a
hundred
priorities
so
about
a
400%
increase
in
the
number
of
projects,
programs
and
initiatives
that
we're
tracking.
If
that's
going
to
be
anything
other
than
just
overwhelming,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
those
are.
E
Actually,
click
back
to
this
slide
of
these
design
challenges,
stop
there
and
open
up
to
any
and
all
feedback
or
questions
that
you
might
have
about
our
approach.
One
last
thing
is:
we
will
be
back
in
the
next
meeting
in
October
with
the
next
iteration
of
this
work,
based
on
any
guidance
that
we
receive
today.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
D
E
E
Think
I
think
it's
actually
helpful
to
at
least
from
a
thought
perspective,
bifurcated
into
two
streams
or
pipelines
of
work,
there's
one
stream
that
are
about
these
kind
of
big
rock
projects
that
are
just
corridor
what
we
are
doing
as
a
city,
I'll
use
my
favorite
one
and
I've
got
my
two
phones,
because
I
get
to
test
out
both
Verizon
and
AT&T.
You
know
when,
when
Jays
work
is
delivered
on
this
and
we
have
the
four
thousand
cells
up,
this
will
be
10
to
50
times
faster
service
for
every
subscriber
in
in
San
Jose.
E
We
know
that
has
to
happen.
We
know
that's
a
priority,
that's
clear!
If
the
only
criteria
is
these
big
rocks
the
danger.
Is
you
cloud
out
a
lot
of
small
and
interesting
stuff
that
you
can
either
learn
from
create
professional
development
opportunities
from
or
will
inform
next
round
of
strategy
or
next
round
of
strategy
development?
Part
of
what
we've
realized
is
that
it
is.
We
need
to
separate
those,
because
those
are
two
ways
of
thinking
in
two
ways
of
acting.
E
So
if
you
have
somebody
who's
who's
on
this
heavy-lift
project,
and
then
you
say:
okay
you're
doing
this,
but
for
now
you
need
to
be
light.
Nimble
that
that
context,
switching
is
like
switching
between
two
languages
that
you're
both
trying
to
learn
at
the
same
time,
and
so
what
we
want
to
do
is
we
want
to
do
less
context,
switching
with
the
teams,
and
we
want
to
create
a
separate
pipeline
for
these
small
wonders
right.
E
So
some
of
the
work
that
the
we've
been
engaged
in,
where
we're
like
hey,
we
might
be
able
to
put
these
charges
out
in
front
of
a
retail
outlet
and
see
how
they're
used
that
doesn't
take
a
whole
lot
of
energy.
We
can
do
it
once
we
can.
We
can
measure
the
data
we
can
learn
from
it.
We
can
time
box
it,
and
then
we
can
say
okay.
How
does
this
inform
our
larger
electric
vehicle
strategy?
How
do
we
want
to
coordinate
with
PG&E?
E
What's
this
bigger
longer-term,
big
rock
that
we
focus
on
execution,
and
so
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
do
a
yes
and
and
be
able
to
say
there
is
space
for
both
part
of
what
we've
realized
is
we
actually
need
a
slightly
separate
team
and
a
slightly
separate
process
for
each
of
those,
because
otherwise
we're
doing
context,
switching
that
causes
each
side
to
suffer
rather
than
brings
value
to
both
of
those
directions.
I,
don't
know
if
that
directly
answered
your
question,
but
I
think
and
I
think
percentage-wise.
D
E
D
E
And
I
think
probably
more
detail
on
that
on.
Tuesdays
is
appropriate,
but
just
top-line
really
quick
as
it
relates
to
the
roadmap.
You
know
part
of
what
we
don't
want
to
do
with
an
innovation
roadmap
is
stop
things
going
forward.
That
makes
sense
in
the
moment,
so
the
top-line,
the
analysis,
was
an
ESCO
which
is
this
way
of
using
the
energy
savings
to
finance
a
lighting
had
some
limitations
and
opportunities,
and
we
taking
advantage
of
that
opportunity.
We've
done
that
in
coordination
with
larger
strategy.
B
E
D
E
A
F
G
F
You
know
I,
don't
think
it
had
ever
dawned
on
me
with
all
these
deployment
of
cells.
That
there's
give
me
a
thousand
miles
of
fiber
laid
and
I'm
sure
it's
dawned
on
you.
But
do
we
have
any
opportunity
to
get
a
big
ones
policy
in
place
or
some
kind
of
requirement
in
place
so
that
we
could
maybe
put
some
public
Fiber
down
where
they're
putting
theirs.
G
Yeah,
as
you
know,
we're
still
working
on
those
agreements,
we
made
sure
there's
nothing
in
the
agreements
that
precludes
us
from
doing
that
right.
Once
we
get
the
agreement
signed,
then
we'll
work
in
parallel
working
with
the
departments
and
external
stakeholders
on
what
a
big
ones
policy
would
look
like
I
think
we
have
the
opportunity
to
help
shape
what
the
policy
looks
like
by
working
with
the
telcos
as
they're
doing
the
trenching
for
these
thousand
miles
and
make
sure
that
they're
synergistic.
So
short
answer
is
yes,
absolutely
and.
G
So
if
we
did
it
ourselves,
it's
about
two
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars
a
mile.
If
we
have
a
joint
trenching
agreement
where
we're
cost-sharing
that
significantly
brings
it
down,
so
don't
have
the
numbers
exactly
do
the
math
in
my
head,
but
I
believe
it
goes
from
like
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
a
mile
to
to
less
than
fifty
thousand
a
mile
if
the
trench
is
already
open
and
then
we're
just
simply
laying
in
our
own
additional
conduit
and
Driver,
and
then
we
have
the
opportunity
to
potentially
lease
it
back
to
further
offset
those
costs.
G
B
G
And
that's
the
only
sticking
point
and
really
based
on
our
strategy
of
not
being
an
ISP
and
focusing
on
digital
inclusion
to
underserved
areas
which
oftentimes
don't
get
served
or
not
in
competition
in
that
situation,
we're
complementary.
So
the
verbal
discussions
have
been
very
positive
about
doing
things
together
during
this
thousand
miles
of
fiber.
That
has
to
be
laid
okay.
F
E
For
example,
we
are
currently
entering
into
a
collaboration
now
with
ster
startup
in
residence
and
they've,
been
working
with
our
procurement
team
tightly.
The
way
that
we
source
the
start-up
in
residence
is
it's
essentially
a
procurement
process.
So
if,
at
the
end
of
the
16
weeks
with
stur,
we
actually
have
something
that
we
want
to
scale,
we
don't
have
to
go.
Okay,
we
like
you,
but
now
we're
going
to
throw
you
back
to
the
wolves
and
you
have
to
go
out
and
compete
with
everybody
else.
We've
already
competed
them,
it
qualifies.
E
So
what
we're
looking
at
over
the
course
of
this
next
year
is
not
full-scale
procurement
reform.
Unless
you
we
get
direction
and
support
on
that,
but
really
more
focused
around
procurement,
as
it
relates
to
technologies
in
smart
city
roadmap
and
figuring
out
where
we
can
do
different
Kermit
methods.
Another
quick
example
where
we're
already
looking
at
that
is
within
the
integrated,
permitting
system
and
doing
more
agile
procurement
methodologies,
for
example.
F
Thanks
KITT
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
express
my
appreciation
that
you're
creating
sort
of
this
separate
stream
to
consider
that
the
Small
Wonders
projects
Minoo
it.
It
is
hard
if
you're
carrying
heavy
boulders
to
juggle
balls,
and
so
we
know
that
both
can
be
important
so
appreciate
you
don't
want
us
to
to
make
room
for
that.
E
We
have
a
city
with
we
have
a
structure
within
the
city
which
are
called
city
service
areas
and
basically
that's
the
way
we
internally
divvy
up
our
work,
wrong,
cross,
departmental
pieces
and
so
conceptually
what
you
might
imagine
is
and
again
prototype
on
paper.
So
this
is
not.
This
is
not
finalized.
You
might
imagine
that
there
might
be
a
group
or
portfolio
of
these
projects
that
relate
to
a
particular
city
service
area.
E
E
Let's
have
a
this
debate,
decide
on
what
the
priorities
are
and
what
we
need
we
can
either
do
and
commit
to,
or
we
need
more
resources
on
with
an
eye
toward
fulfilling
the
goals
and
the
expectations
that
the
council
has
set
out
and
then
out
of
that,
the
idea
would
be
hopefully
for
the
most
part.
It
would
come
back
and
say:
yes,
yes,
yes,
we're
committed
and
on
the
areas
where
we've
got
barriers
or
resources.
E
Part
of
what
we
haven't
had
is
the
opportunity
for
those
debates
internally,
in
a
way
that
the
department
heads
who
are
really
the
drivers
of
the
organization
service,
delivery
are
allowed
to
debate
and
then
own
those
results,
and
we
found
that
the
innovation
cabinet
that
we'd
formed
while
useful
for
a
lot
of
conversations
was
sort
of
or
nathanael
to
the
organization.
It's
a
little
off
to
the
side
into
the
corner,
and
so
we
want
to.
E
D
A
H
I
welcome
back
from
after
Labor
Day
I
wish
Tamara
was
here.
Hopefully
you
can
pass
on
my
words
to
him.
However,
I
can
speak
him
at
this
time
about
the
you
mentioned
one
of
your
first
graphics.
Was
it
offered
police,
dashboard
and
IOT
strategy
ideas?
I
didn't
see
listed
on
there,
the
idea
of
the
accountability
process.
You
know
that
is
a
whole
arm
on
a
whole
field.
H
H
I
know
that
it's
an
expression,
but
it's
just
it
does
amazing
wonders
amazing
things
and
I
just
think
it
needs
to
be
talked
about
more
and
included
often,
and
what
I
mentioned
yesterday
I
think
we're
very
far
ahead
of
places
like
Seattle
in
terms
of
it
like
that,
so
keep
up
this
work.
Iot
strategy,
I'm,
really
disappointed
in
the
big
belly
downtown
I
feel
it's
a
it's
an
IOT
process
that
totally
intimidates
the
heck
out
of
everybody.
Now
that's
the
introduction
of
IOT,
maybe.
E
E
I
You
Kip
good
afternoon,
honorable
mayor
mr.
chair
committee,
members
and
members
of
the
public
again,
my
name
is
Jay
Guevara
I'm,
the
broadband
manager
for
the
city
of
San,
Jose
I
joined
the
city
in
May
after
nine
years
with
the
city
of
Santa
Cruz,
as
their
broadband
manager
and
economic
development
manager
specializing
in
fiber,
optics
small
cells,
other
broadband
technologies
and
especially
approaches
that
include
delivery
through
public-private
partnerships.
I
So
thank
you
wrong.
Button,
what
is
Digital
Inclusion
simply
stated:
Digital
Inclusion
means
people
can
access
afford
and
adopt
the
benefits
of
a
connected
life.
So
we
live
in
a
world
where,
if
that
infrastructure
is
not
near
your
home
either
through
wire,
wireline
or
wirelessly,
you
can't
connect,
if
you,
even
if
you
can
connect,
if
you
do
not
have
the
ability
to
afford
the
devices
or
the
service,
even
through
subsidized
programs.
You.
B
I
Connect
we
live
in
a
world,
then,
is,
if
you
have
that
infrastructure,
the
devices
and
a
service.
But
if
you
don't
have
the
digital
literacy
skills,
you
cannot
enjoy
the
benefits
where
70%
of
job
applications
are
online,
where
our
digital
lives
require
that
connectivity.
So
we
can
participate
more
fully
in
our
communities
and,
whereas
Kipp
earlier
said,
ninety-five
thousand
residents
in
San
Jose
are
not
connected
to
this
digital
life.
I
One
of
these
times,
I'm
gonna,
learn
so
our
Digital
Inclusion
timeline.
As
was
pointed
out
in
the
previous
item,
approved
in
November
2017,
the
broadband
digital
inclusion
strategy.
We
then
in
at
the
same
time,
with
80
agreement
and
May,
the
Digital
Inclusion
fund
was
created
now
ending
the
summer,
we're
post,
Labor
Day,
the
Digital
Inclusion
design
research
has
been
conducted
and
we
are
refining
that
and
we
plan
on
returning
to
this
committee
and
City
Council
and
winner
with
digital
inclusion
recommendations.
I
So
now,
I'd
like
to
transition
and
review
our
approach
and
the
research
with
our
design,
Thank,
You,
Kip,
all
right
so
Digital,
Inclusion
design
and
research,
please,
okay!
So
as
kept
mentioned,
thank
you
to
Facebook
for
their
1
1
million
dollar
donation
that
enabled
us
to
release
an
RFP.
Earlier
this
summer
there
were
three
out
of
four
qualified
respondents
and
we
were
able
to
select
the
Dahlberg
advisors
as
a
consultant
who
just
recently
conducted
interviews,
research
and
benchmarking.
I
Please
so
that
this
slide
in
the
the
subsequent
slide
display
all
the
different
stakeholders
that
we
interviewed
and
conducting
our
research
for
benchmarking
and
best
practices.
You
can
see
broadband
USA,
which
is
a
component
of
the
Department
of
Commerce
office
of
American
affairs,
other
community-based
organizations.
Then
we
move
down
into
potential
funders.
I
Other
cities
work
to
future
programs,
Seattle
and
Kipp.
Can
you
advance
please
Boston
New,
York,
Kansas,
City,
digital
Charlotte,
etc,
digital
nest
out
of
Watsonville
and
Salinas,
with
more
work
programs,
Microsoft's,
AARP,
etc?
So
that's
that's
the
breadth
of
stakeholders
that
we've
interviewed
extensively
to
obtain
best
practices
and
really
define
what
is
what
is
going
to
be
the
best
approach
for
our
unique
community,
so
that
best
approach
can
be
mapped
across
four
different
quadrants.
I
These
are
the
the
best
practices
that
we've
found
in
different
quantities
and
varieties
throughout
these
programs
number
one
convening
and
building
capacity
in
our
ecosystem.
The
city
is
uniquely
resourced
and
located
in
order
to
convene
and
create
the
strategy
so
that
all
these
different
stakeholders
can
work
together
to
affect
change
and
and
reduce
the
number
of
95,000
residents
that
are
excluded
from
the
fold
in
a
digital
life
number
two
direct
services.
We
already
have
some
amazing
and
successful
programs
within
the
San
Jose
Public,
Library,
System
and
parks,
and
recs
and
neighborhood
services.
I
We
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have
can
clear
metrics
that
we
iterate
and
improve
upon
those
metrics,
as
we
measure
our
success
and
growth
for
a
Digital
Inclusion
program
that
really
sets
the
standards
I'd
like
to
remind
this
committee
that
we've
been
talking
about
two
million
dollars
a
year
and
I
want
to
put
some
asterisk
provisos.
That
assumes
that
we
are
at
full
deployment
scale
with
over
4,000
small
cells
on
the
streetlights.
I
I
Next
slide,
please
yeah!
Thank
you.
So
really
our
discussions
now
is.
We
are
wrapping
up.
We
have
not
completed
the
research
and
design
phase,
but
as
we're
wrapping
up,
we
are
yet
again
using
another
Venn
diagram,
but
we
are
looking
at
the
demand
and
need.
We
know
the
demand
and
need
across
a
lot
of
different
demographics.
I
The
neighborhood's
age
groups,
language
groups
spoken
in
the
home,
balancing
that,
with
our
capabilities
and
expertise
in
the
city,
the
capabilities
and
expertise
with
organizations,
community-based
organizations
in
the
ecosystem
and
the
potential
capabilities
and
expertise
of
other
partners
that
we
could
bring
into
this
ecosystem.
Finally,
having
the
high
degree
of
confidence
with
designing
this
program
with
metrics
that
set
us
up
for
success
for
making
impact
to
reduce
those
95,000
people
without
meaningful
digital
life
benefits.
I
I
We
can
expand
digital
inclusion
expertise,
so
it's
not
just
a
group
of
subject
matter
experts
or
over
measuring
impact
with
robust
data.
You
can
iterate
to
improve
and
learn
from
the
data.
We
can
expand
our
fundraising
opportunities,
while
2
million
dollars
at
full
scale
can
sound
like
a
lot.
There
are
also
the
the
realities
that
to
do
something
at
a
further
scale
with
Digital
Inclusion
will
require
fundraising
and
part
with
other
organizations.
I
A
I
Top
level
in
layman's
terms,
we
are
greatly
reducing
that
number
from
95,000
by
you
know:
X
number.
That
means
that
those
people
get
the
affordability,
the
access
and
the
adoption
so
that
they
can
enjoy
the
benefits
of
a
digital
life.
So
the
scale
of
that
I
think
we
need
to
determine
and
the
program
portfolio
of
how
we
strategically
address
that
impact
across
existing
programs
across
different
communities.
Is
this
simply
a
number
of
devices
released
and
people
don't
necessarily
utilize
those
devices?
I
A
Let
me
let
me
give
you
a
little
context.
The
reason.
One
reason
why
I
ask
that
question
is
at
a
high
level.
Yes,
we
do
seen
that
95,000
number
is
a
high
level
goal,
but
but
to
me
it's
more
so
outcomes.
So
we
improving
you,
know,
educational
attainments.
Are
we
improving
job
opportunities
and
getting
more
people
employed?
Are
we
reducing
crime?
I
mean
really
I
want
to
know
what
the
outcomes
are
gonna
be
in
terms
of
our
objectives
and
what
success
looks
like
right.
G
So
so
councilmember
Jones,
you,
chairman
Jones,
you
basically
hit
what
my
response
was
gonna,
be
it
was
kind
of
a
crawl
walk,
run
analogy
again
and
in
Jays
write.
The
first
part
of
the
crawling
is
just
getting
that
access,
so
people
can
take
advantage
of
the
opportunity,
it's
the
digital
literacy,
so
they
understand
how
they
can
take
advantage.
G
Then
we
move
to
the
next
level,
which
are
the
outcomes,
so
educational
outcomes,
healthcare
outcomes,
financial
outcomes,
workforce
outcomes
and
that's
why
the
the
metrics
gathering
is
so
important
is,
is
that
we
know
that
access
to
the
Internet
from
increases
the
likelihood
that
you're
gonna
graduate
from
high
school
in
additional
4%.
You
know
we
know
that
access
to
the
Internet
reduces
the
number
of
physical
visits
to
the
doctor
by
35
percent.
So
part
of
part
of
part
of
what
will
be
done
in
in
this
consulting
phase
is
develop.
G
That
work
plan
for
defining
the
starting
point
of
those
metrics,
and
then
the
actions
and
programs
were
going
to
implement
to
achieve
better
and
better
outcomes.
So
we
act.
So
what
you
ask
is
what
we
have
to
do
and
that's
part
of
the
work
plan
that
the
Dahlberg
and
associates
are
going
to
come
back
to
us,
which
is
also
a
three
to
five
year
plan
of
beginning
the
baseline
measurement
and
and
implementing
programs
to
achieve
those
outcomes.
Great.
J
What
do
we
mean
when
we
say
broadband
I'm?
The
reason
I'm
asking
is
because
my
daughter
now
does
her
homework
solely
on
her
phone
in
eighth
grade.
She
won't
even
open
the
laptop.
So
are
we
counting
smartphone
access
as
broadband
access
and
of
those
95
thousand?
If
we're
not,
does
that
just
mean
they
don't
like
some
people,
don't
have
a
landline
anymore.
We
were
just
talking
about
this
earlier.
They
they
have
internet
access.
They're
connected
it's
just
through
their
phone.
It's
not
there
they're,
just
not
turning
on
a
computer
before.
G
I
Thank
you,
darling,
you're,
absolutely
correct
that
we
are
at
a
watershed
moment
and
how
broadband
is
being
redefined
by
the
technology
shift,
so
5g
and
all
the
promises
of
speed,
increased
capacity
and
latency
benefits
we're
seeing
a
convergence
to
where
it
is
a
flexible
technology,
especially
for
households
that
cannot
necessarily
vore
afford
more
than
one
device.
They
are
going
to
select
a
phone
in
order
to
connect,
because
it's
the
most
flexible
doesn't
matter
where
you
are.
It
can
be
in
your
home
or
elsewhere.
I
With
that
now
removed,
you
suddenly
open
up
a
whole
new
marketplace
that
drops
costs
for
everyone
and,
as
our
broadband
and
digital
inclusion
strategy
has
approached
with
that
hybrid
approach
with
shifting
the
marketplace
and
that
tipping
point.
We
are
now
at
the
precipice
of
that
tipping
point
to
increase
through
market
forces
and
through
our
digital
inclusion
efforts
enabled,
through
the
revenue
generated
through
our
market
force,
programs.
E
E
4G
right,
I,
think
I.
Think
the
question
is
speed
and
utility
right.
So
if
you
know,
if
you
have,
if
you
have
a
feature
phone
or
if
you've
got
a
smart
phone
and
you've
got
a
data
plan
that
you
you
can't
afford
to
use,
you
don't
have
broadband
access,
but
if
your
preference
is
to
use
a
phone
to
do
your
homework
and
you've
got
a
fast
enough
speed
to
be
able
to
do
that
then
effectively.
E
You
have
broadband,
and
this
is
some
of
the
redefinition
that
we're
doing
and
I
think
we'll
hear
from
one
of
the
experts
on
on
how
this
is
used
in
real
life
a
little
bit
and
an
example
of
what
that
kind
of
higher
speed
connectivity
could
do.
We
think
that
that
connectivity
is
becoming
more
important
than
the
form
factor
of
the
device
that
people
choose
to
use
and,
as
you
know,
you
can't
necessarily
make
a
teenager
do
anything
that
they
don't
want
to
do.
J
E
J
G
The
95
so
from
a
research
perspective,
the
95,000
is
based
on
the
2016
American
community
surveys
that
asked
the
San
Jose
Metro
air
if
they
had
internet
access
at
home
or
if
they
had
a
non
phone
device
at
home.
So
it's
the
intersection
of
either
they
don't
have
internet
access
at
home
at
all,
or
they
don't
have
the
appropriate
device
to
allow
them
to
achieve
all
the
outcomes.
We
were
just
talking
about,
okay
and
then
from
more
from
a
from
a
specific
perspective
right
now.
G
Broadband
is
a
term
that
is
defined
by
the
FCC
as
wired
line,
25,
megabits,
download
and
three
megabits
upload
and
the
the
interesting
turn
of
events
we
find
ourselves
as
our
foremost
authority
on
communications
seems
to
be
lagging
behind
technology
and
not
willing
to
actually
say
broadband
should
be
defined
as
faster
than
that,
because
even
at
25
megabits
per
second
in
a
household
of
multiple
Fant,
low-income
families,
only
one
student
can
stream
their
homework.
Video.
The
second
student
won't
be
able
to
do
that.
G
So
so
you
know
I
think
what
we're
going
to
see
is
the
definition
of
broadband.
Maybe
it's
gonna
have
to
happen
at
a
local
level
or
a
state
level
led
by
cities
like
San
Jose
are
gonna,
say
no,
it
should
be
a
hundred
megabits
per
second
up
and
down
and
that's
wired
or
Wireless.
It
doesn't
matter
yeah.
J
Makes
sense
I'd
also
like
to
just
point
out
that
not
everybody
is
doing
homework
and
that
the
needs
of
a
busy
household
with
two
teens
or
more
are
different
than
the
needs
of
a
senior
household
and
they're,
not
gonna,
be
right,
typing
term
papers
they're
not
going
to
be
looking
for
jobs
necessarily,
but
they
do
need
to
be
connected.
So
for
them
a
phone
might
be
fine
because
they
can
FaceTime,
they
can
text,
they
can
maintain
connections
with
with
their
community
and
their
families
and
their
friends.
J
E
And
and
how
we're
thinking
about
that
approach
is
essentially
a
customer
segmentation
approach
and
what
we
think
of
as
broadly
we've
spoken
in
a
broad-brush
about
these
95,000
they're,
probably
about
eight
different
types
of
segments
within
that
there's
the
there's
a
recent
immigrant
family
that
that's
very
low-income,
there's
the
kids
in
school
who
need
to
do
their
homework.
There's
the
elderly
folks
who
need
to
have
access
for
staying,
connected
and
healthcare
and
part
of
what
we'll
do
is
we
get
closer
and
closer
an
implication.
E
Implementation
is
to
break
down
those
customer
segments
and
prioritize
those
customer
segments
and
realize
what
are
the
right
interventions
for
each
of
those
segments
because
getting
a
hand
in
to
and
teaching
a
thirteen-year-old
is
completely
different
than
teaching
his
85
year
old,
first-generation
American,
grandmother
and
and
and
we
need
to
recognize
and
value
the
the
needs
and
capabilities
of
those
different
segments.
So
that's
the
way
we
would
take.
Your
feedback
is
to
look
at
customer
segments.
Do
some
prioritization
of
that
and
also
tailor
the
approaches
to
those
customer
segments.
Thank.
K
As
member
Davis,
we
actually
did
something
that
shows
a
lot
of
local
leadership
as
compared
with
the
national
work
here,
which
is,
we
did
a
streets
or
Street
surveys
with
low-income
families
on
how
they're
using
and
accessing
the
Internet.
So
we
actually
have
the
numbers
around
how
many
families
with
school-aged
children
are
using
mobile
devices
versus
landlines
at
home.
K
What
those
survey
findings
showed
was
that
still
predominantly
in
low-income
families
who
are
mobile
first,
but
they
still
use
laptops
to
do
their
homework
and
they're
going
to
friends
and
relatives
houses
to
get
intermittent
and
access,
so
they
really
aren't
using
their
mobile
phone
today
to
do
their
homework.
That
much
and
part
of
that
is
driven
by
the
cost
of
service.
So
cost
of
service
is
the
number
one
barrier
to
Digital,
Inclusion
and
families
who
are
low-income.
Don't
have
unlimited
data
plans,
and
so
you
know
I
be
happily.
You
know
recirculate.
K
E
So
you
know
we
talked
earlier
about
the
sort
of
chain
from
conception
to
strategy
to
implementation,
or
this
just
change
from
from
idea
to
value,
and
so
this
is,
we've
talked
abstractly
about
Digital
Inclusion
and
we're
going
to
talk
concretely
about
what
it
means
to
apply.
Digital
Inclusion
in
the
real
world
around
the
the
customer
case,
in
this
case
at
the
high
school
student
and
we're
bringing
up
our
leader
and
expert
on
this
Randy
Phelps,
who
is
our
partner
from
Eastside
Union
High
School
District
is
the
CTO.
E
There
comes
from
a
tech
background
and
has
been
our
collaborator
and
a
longtime
champion
for
this
effort.
So
I
won't
steal
any
of
his
thunder,
but
I
will
allow
us
to
begin
to
walk
through
the
presentation.
I
think
Dolan
is
going
to
take
us
there
first
and
then
we'll
have
Randy
up
here
available
to
add
perspective
and
then
take
any
questions
that
you
have
yeah.
G
Thanks
afternoon,
honorable
mayor
councilmember,
Jones
council
members,
members
of
the
public
and
city
staff,
I'm
Dolan
beckel,
director
of
civic
innovation,
it
has
been
a
while,
since
we
talked
about
the
East
Side
Union
High
School
District
community
Wi-Fi.
So
today,
I'm
gonna
provide
a
brief
summary
of
the
expected
outcomes
of
the
project
to
remind
everyone
review.
The
scope
again,
Kip
and
Jay
had
been
diagrams.
I
have
an
actual
presentation
which
I
know
excites.
G
G
As
a
reminder,
the
axis
each
side
outcomes
were
to
provide
free
internet
access
for
all
students,
teachers
and
the
community,
and
that's
important
and
the
community
within
the
surrounding
attendance
areas
of
three
high
schools,
those
being
James
lick
over
felt
and
yerba
buena
that
are
within
the
lowest
income
areas
that
be
San
Jose.
That's
kind
of
the
technology
outcome,
the
the
the
true
outcome
is
we
want
to
advance
student
academic
achievement
through
internet-based
learning
technologies
and
provide
opportunities
for
students
to
connect
a
career
or
college
in
other
forms
of
resources
online.
G
To
give
you
a
little
bit
of
a
geographic
and
technology
scope,
this
is
a
picture
of
the
Eastside
union.
High
school
district
with
over
fell
yerba,
buena
and
James
lick,
so
the
scope
of
the
entire
project
for
all
three
of
those
high
school
attendance
areas
was
free
outdoor
Wi-Fi,
both
within
the
community
and
on
campus.
It
included
the
free
LTE
hotspots
provided
by
the
sprint
1m
he
project,
which
helped
cover
some
quality
and
coverage
gaps.
G
There
are
three
attendance
areas
across
51
thousand
students
and
additional
access
for
teachers
and
administrators
that
doesn't
include
about
seventy
five
thousand
homes
across
those
three
attendance
areas,
and
it
was,
it
remains,
a
very
innovative
partnership
between
a
city
and
a
school
district.
In
that
the
district
funded,
the
installation
and
initial
maintenance.
The
district
performed
the
administration
of
the
user
IDs
in
the
password
in
the
credential
ization,
the
city
managed
the
delivery
of
the
Wi-Fi
network
and
managed
the
permitting
of
devices
on
our
poles,
from
which
we
all
know.
We
learned
a
lot.
G
The
city
is
providing
the
power
for
this.
The
city
is
providing
the
internet
backhaul
and
our
partner
smart
wave
did
the
actual
installation
and
is
doing
the
maintenance
of
the
network.
It
will
be
at
scale,
and
it
almost
is
now.
The
largest
known
public
sector
intervention
in
Digital
Inclusion
using
outdoor
Wi-Fi
technology,
then
specific
to
the
first
pilot,
which
is
the
James
lit
coverage
area.
G
G
There
are
the
Wi-Fi
access
points
around
the
James
lick
high
school,
a
high
degree
of
satisfaction
from
the
district
and
the
students
and
the
teachers
and
the
district
in
the
city
are
currently
evaluating
both
the
user
and
technical
performance
and
identifying
ways
to
measure
the
outcomes
next
I
think
which
is
the
exciting
part,
Randy's
team,
very
short
notice,
with
pretty
much
a
direction
go
interview.
Some
people
put
together
the
following
testimonial,
which
gives
you
an
idea
of
how
well
it's
being
used
in
the
James
like
high
school
area
for
the
students
and
teachers
so
John.
B
My
name
is
rich
and
I'm.
A
junior
before
I
wasn't
able
to
look
at
my
assignments,
like
my
homework,
big
issue
with
that
I'm
Natalie
and
I'm
in
10th
Grade,
trying
to
finish
my
homework
even
though
I
didn't
have
a
computer
or
sometimes
my
phone
did
have
the
Internet
able
to
do
it
now
that
I
have
it.
It
allows
me
to
look
at
assignments
from
other
classes
and
we
use
this
thing
called
flip
for
math.
If
we
ever
have
an
issue,
a
problem
for
math,
we
can
just
look
at
a
video.
B
K
Am
Dorothy
Atkinson
and
I
am
an
integrated,
Math
two
and
math
three
teacher
at
James
Lee.
So
far
in
the
classroom,
community
Wireless
has
been
awesome
because
I
actually
started
recording
homework.
Videos
homework
help
videos
because
a
lot
of
students
would
say
I,
don't
know
how
to
do
this.
My
parents
don't
know
how
to
do
this.
They're
able
to
go
home
and
watch
the
videos
and
get
that
homework,
help
individually
from
me
and
then
they're
more
able
to
get
the
homework
done.
K
I've
definitely
noticed
a
change
in
my
classroom
because
I'm
getting
more
students
who
are
turning
in
homework
and
I've
had
an
improvement
in
actual
questions
because
of
those
homework
videos.
So
they're
able
to
kind
of
reflect
on
what
I'm
saying
in
the
homework
videos
at
home
kind
of
process
it
and
come
back,
be
able
to
ask
me
better
questions.
B
B
G
G
The
council
in
the
mayor's
office
that
back
in
April
of
2016,
approved
the
partnership
and
and
the
the
partnership
to
use
leverage,
the
district's
funding
and
the
city,
resources
and
city
assets
and
City
poles
and
power
that
being
the
Department
of
Public,
Works
and
transportation.
This
was
one
of
our
two
kind
of
pioneering
projects
on
attaching
devices
to
poles,
of
which
the
cities
now
can
have
become
a
nationwide
leader
in
that
area.
G
Information
technology
who
leveraged
our
existing
internet
connection
to
provide
both
fiber
and
a
microwave
shot
to
the
fire
department
to
get
the
Internet
access
to
the
School
District,
the
library
who's
been
working
with
us
on
educational
outcome,
smart
wave,
who's,
our
technology
provider
and,
last
but
not
least,
the
students
and
teachers.
The
James
lick
that
participated
in
the
video
and
are
getting
the
educational
outcomes
and
also
teachers
are
getting
the
workforce
outcomes.
So
it
definitely
took
a
village
to
achieve
that
first
pilot.
G
So
just
some
next
steps,
as
I
said
in
the
beginning,
it
was
it
was
critical
and
we
realized
how
critical
back
in
April
that
this
was
being
opened
up
to
the
public,
which
was
the
basis
by
which
the
school
board
approved
that.
So
we
are,
as
we
speak,
going
to
provide
free
wireless
Internet
access
to
the
public
within
the
James
lick
area
attendance
area.
This
fall
using
a
unique
SSID.
G
We
have
engaged
a
private
sector
fuse
fellow
to
help
us
formulate
the
city's
overall
community
wireless
strategy.
We
know
that
our
current
wickedly
fast
Wi-Fi
is
reaching
the
end
of
its
life
in
many
ways,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
whatever
we
do
around
this
incorporates
the
students
in
the
schools,
the
business
community
for
economic
development,
any
possible
internet
of
things
leverage
so
we're
gonna
be
developing
a
strategy
and
having
a
first
look
at
that
this
fall.
G
The
school
continues
to
evaluate
the
performance
and
we
will
then
be
coming
back.
The
council
was
kind
of
a
revaluation
of
our
wireless
strategy,
which
includes
our
coverage
areas,
our
technology
options
and
our
financial
insulation
and
maintenance
options
next
spring
and
then,
certainly
together
with
that
we'll
be
coming
back
with
the
school
district
on
a
recommendation
on
next
steps
for
yerba
buena
and
over
felt,
but
what's
key
this
year,
the
key
focus
this
year
is
opening
it
up
to
the
community.
G
A
F
G
C
C
Well,
we
canvassed
the
school.
Of
course,
we've
worked
with.
We
actually
worked
with
the
kids
and
the
teachers
at
the
school
and
with
the
principal
David
Porter
and
we're
really
blessed
because
David
Porter
is
absolutely
outstanding
principal
who
also
lives
in
the
neighborhoods,
and
so
he
is
extremely
good.
He
lets
me
know
if
anything's
not
quite
working
the
way
that
we
would
like
and
each
time
we've
addressed
it
without
any
difficulty.
Okay,.
F
I'm,
just
wondering:
is
there
something
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
I
mean
I
know
these
things
always
can
get
a
little
creaky
at
times,
and
it
was
always.
You
know
a
challenge,
one
one
way
or
another.
Are
we
actually
doing
a
survey,
we're
asking
people
the
question
and
they're
giving
us?
We
have
objective
data.
That
kind
of
thing
we.
C
Have
you
know
it's
interesting,
you
know
anecdote
+,
anecdote.
+
anecdote
doesn't
really
equal
data,
at
least
in
our
experience,
because
people
say
one
thing
and
when
we
survey
people
to
death
in
education,
I
don't
know
if
you
we're
constantly
doing
that
and
the
data
we
look
at
as
far
as
getting
it
to
where
we
really
believe
that
it's
accurate
is
difficult.
What
I
would
say
is
first,
we
have
surveyed
our
community
and
they
have
have
reported
that
it
works
more
than
adequately
so.
F
You
know
we
said
that
we
could
look
at
justice,
so
we
know
sure
okay.
That
would
be
helpful
because
I
know
we're
both
investing
in
more
and
expansion,
and
we
just
want
to
understand.
What's
the
satisfaction
rate,
you
know
more
than
the
anecdote
about
Netflix
I
really
want
to
know,
are
we
out
there
measuring
it?
Is
it
50
Mbps
what.
C
C
F
But
actually
being
able
to
measure
the
speed
would
be
helpful
and
actually
hearing.
You
know
some
survey
from
a
user
who
says
yes
it
is
it
satisfies
my
need
that
that's
why
I'm
most
interested
in
I
know
we
can
discern
a
lot
of
different
things
or
infer
different
things
from
the
fact
that
someone's
on
for
a
long
duration,
and
maybe
that
and
they
gave
up
and
they
went.
You
know,
made
dinner
and
came
back.
I
just
don't
know,
and
so
it
would
just
be
helpful
to
have
some
objective
data
understand.
Okay,
it's
working
great.
F
G
F
F
Helpful
because
I'm
sure
you
guys
are
doing
great
work.
It's
just
that.
You
know
we're
making
decisions
about
where
to
spend
the
marginal
dollars.
As
you
guys
are
right
and
we
just
want
to
know.
Okay,
is
it
meeting
the
standard
or
not?
And
we've
had
you
know,
frankly,
a
bad
experience,
I
think
with
Wi-Fi
in
downtown,
and
you
know,
I'd
heard
plenty
of
anecdotes
about
how
great
it
was
going
to
be
and
how
good
it
was.
C
Think
one
advantage
we
had
was
maybe
from
your
experience,
which
was
when
we
work
with
our
folks.
We
set
expectations
mm-hmm,
so
we
described
the
product
accurately
to
them
before
they
got
it
and
because
it's
performed
the
way
we
described
it.
People
have
been
happy
the
actual
performance,
the
throughput,
those
kinds
of
things.
Those
are
hard
numbers.
You
can
they're
easy
to
see
yeah,
but
the
effective
part
about
how
people
feel
about
the
access
has
not
awful
lot
to
how
you
create
the
context.
C
In
our
case,
we
create
a
context
for
our
users,
so
they
would
understand
what
the
experience
would
be
like
they'd
know
it
was
free
and
it
was
for
these
purposes
yeah
if
they
used
it
for
other
things,
they
used
it
for
other
things,
but
and
I
think
that's
really
helped
in
terms
and
I.
Think
that'll
be
reflected
in
survey
results.
Okay,.
F
That'd
be
really
helpful
to
see.
I
agree
both
are
important.
We
want
to
understand
how
its
performing
technically,
but
then
we
also
want
the
survey
data
people
say
scale.
Well,
wonderful
is
this
working
for
you.
You
know
that
would
be
super
helpful
and
then
at
some
point
is
I
know
this
would
take
an
awful
lot
of
study
and
I.
Don't
expect
you
guys
would
have
done
all
this,
but
is
there
any
kind
of
sample
group
where
you're
looking
at
student
performance
before
and
after
they
got
connected
to
say
see?
C
Well,
any
any
research
in
education
side
of
things
is
what's
called
descriptive,
research,
and
so
it's,
the
consequence
of
that
is
I'll.
Give
you
an
example.
In
a
previous
life,
I
worked
on
a
project
where
we
provided
a
laptop
to
every
student
in
the
state
of
Maine.
When
angus
King
was
the
governor
there,
and
that
project
was
a
fantastic
project
it.
It
did
some
revolutionary
things
for
the
state
of
Maine.
C
When
we
had
an
outside
group
that
was
outside
of
our
company
and
outside
the
state
of
Maine
to
study
it,
they
said
that
the
laptops
absolutely
had
an
impact
on
student
performance,
however,
and
the
interpretation
of
things
it
was
like
global
warming
suddenly
was
like
a
50/50
thing.
You
follow
what
I'm
saying
so.
The
good.
F
Student
performance
and
that's
all
we
just
want
to
be
able
to
understand.
As
you
look
at
that
data,
are
you
seeing
for
any
sample
group?
Can
we
see
it
improving
or
not
because
it
and
we
have
to
constantly,
go
out
there
and
justify
to
our
residents?
This
is
worth
investing
in
mm-hmm
and
I'm,
not
saying
it's
not
worth
it.
I
believe
it
is,
but
I
can't
just
say
it
I
need
to
know.
We.
F
C
F
I'd
be
really
helpful.
Randy
I
know
that
we've
been
working
hard
with
your
district
and
with
others
around
creating
a
data,
trust
that
will
enable
us
to
be
able
to
get
how
to
get
data
without
obviously
violating
any
privacy
issues
of
the
child.
And
it's
precisely
for
interventions
like
this,
whether
it's
a
main
mirrors
gang
prevention,
task
force,
work
or
you
know,
after-school
education,
work
or
digital
literacy.
We
want
to
know.
Are
we
moving
the
needle
with
this
investment
or
not?
F
D
The
mayor,
I
took
a
little
bit
of
what
I
wanted
to
say:
I
would
love
to
see
measurements
before
and
after
for
grades,
because
one
of
the
reasons
we
are
paying
for
this
and
there
was
no
no
cost
affiliated
with
with
this
I-
don't
know
you
know.
I
know
we
authorized
payments
to
create
this
program.
I
just
forgot
how
much
it
was
yeah.
G
D
D
D
That
won't
be
the
the
the
end-all
of
measurements
but
and
I'd
love
to
see
like
that.
Maybe
the
grades
that
the
average
grade
that
they
were
given
because
they
could
do
their
homework.
Obviously
that's
what
I
would
would
love
to
see
on
and
also
I'd
love
to
see.
I
know
this
is
probably
easy
to
get
that.
This
kind
of
information
is
how
many
people
actually
used
it
I
know
that
you
can
get
identifiable
pings
or
whatever
on
how
many
people
use
it.
C
B
D
C
D
So
yeah
it
would
be
good
to
see
how
many
people
are
using
it
and
I
don't
want
to
know
if
Johnny
himself
is
using
it
I,
just
like
I
to
get
like
how
many
Johnny's
are
using
it.
So
general
information
I,
don't
necessarily
need
you
know
he.
You
know
he
went
on
the
library's
website
and
that's
not
the
kind
of
information
I'm
looking
for
I'm
like
to
see
like
1500
students
used
it
for
up
to
an
average
of
20
hours
per
week,
or
something
like
that.
C
It's
been
a
it's
been
a
great
partnership
with
with
San
Jose
steam
with
the
mayor
and
and
all
of
you
for
supporting
it
and
like
I
said
for,
for
us,
it's
been
a
great
thing
for
our
kids.
One
of
our
major
initiatives
in
our
district
is,
is
around
equity
and
providing
opportunity
for
people
and
the
people
who
couldn't
be
on
and
we
were
able
to
address
them
district-wide
with
a
different
program
over
the
last
year.
For
us
it's
it's.
C
It's
allowed
us
to
provide
every
student
that
wanted
it
an
opportunity
to
be
on
and
the
chance
and
the
opening
and
the
taste
of
equity
where
they
have
what
the
other
kids
have
and
we
you
know,
we
see
that
as
just
a
huge,
huge
huge
win
for
our
students,
because
they
feel
better
about
things
make.
They
are
more
excited.
The
the
initial
data
that
we
looked
at
that
was
intriguing
to
us.
That
we'd,
like
to
say,
has
to
do
with
this.
Was
that
attendance
was
impacted
at
James
lick.
C
Now
you
have
teenagers,
so
you
know
there's
a
million
different
influencers
in
their
life,
so
ascribing
it
to
just
one
thing
and
saying:
that's:
what's
different,
it's
kind
of
it's
a
stretch
but
I
realized
for
public
purposes.
You
absolutely
have
to
make
the
stretch
once
in
a
while
in
order
to
make
the
case,
but
we've
seen
that
already,
and
we
see
that
our
kids,
who
walk
around
with
the
phones
on
grant
that
Shireen
and
I
worked
on
those
kids
have
a
different
level
of
confidence.
C
They
didn't
have
a
phone
before
and
they
didn't
have
a
smart
phone
and
a
data
plan
and
they
walk
down
the
street
a
little
differently
than
they
did
before,
and
that
was
one
of
our
major
goals
as
they,
the
kids
walk
through
the
world
feeling
as
though
they
have
a
shot,
and
that's
that's
what
this
program
provides
for
them.
Great.
G
The
interest
of
partnership,
we
didn't
make
it
easy
on
the
district
to
do
that.
Do
some
initial
evaluation
because
we
delivered
late.
We
were
learning
a
lot
about
our
polls,
and
so
we
were
significantly
behind
schedule
and
we
did
not
make
the
beginning
of
this
scheduled
school
year
and,
as
some
of
you
know,
if
you
need
a
certain
amount
of
time,
and
so
we
did
not
make
it
easy
because
we
delivered
late
and
then
summer
hits,
and
so
we
now
will
be
in
a
better
position
to
have
a
longer
runway.
G
C
Can
talk
about
them
all
hundred
students,
there's
1200
students,
it's
and
you
figure,
maybe
a
hundred
and
twenty
other
staff,
maybe
140,
but
you
had
nine
thousand
unique
logins
with
real
identities
from
our
organization,
so
even
kids
from
other
schools
were
going
over
into
the
James
like
neighborhood
and
using
the
wireless
which
is
really
cool
because
there
are
some
neat
public
spaces
there.
If
you
had
a
chance,
you
know
a
little
add
here
if
you
have
had
a
chance
to
walk
the
James
like
campus
recently,
you
know
home
of
Jim
Plunkett.
C
You
know
the
Heisman
Trophy
winner.
It
is
absolutely
a
gorgeous
campus.
Now
the
work
that's
been
done
there
in
the
last
like
six
or
seven
years
is
just
absolutely
phenomenal
in
that
place
has
become
a
showplace.
It's
a
new
tech
high,
and
you
know
all
the
numbers
for
that
school
have
been
going
up
for
several
years
in
it.
So
this
this
probe
this
the
the
numbers
that
we
see
in
terms
of
accessing
it.
We
know
people
from
around
the
district
are
going
over
there
and
getting
on
and
using
it,
which
is
great,
excellent.
F
L
Just
on
that
point
in
terms
of
data,
I
don't
know
if
we
can
actually
get
like
kids
great,
so
we
shouldn't
be
able
to
because
of
privacy
concerns,
but
maybe
what
I
used
to
take
something
called
the
star
exam.
I
don't
know
what's
called
that
anymore,
but
some
sort
of
standardized
testing
that
would
be
helpful,
just
kind
of
anecdotally,
but
but
this,
this
discussion
kind
of
made
me
think.
What
is
this
a
closed
network
that
were
aligned
or
is
it
just
open
access
to
the
full
internet?
So.
G
E
L
Don't
know
if
we're
if
we're,
if
they
don't
have
access
to
that,
they
don't
have
access
to
homework
and
and
all
the
positive
of
the
internet
but
they're
also
living,
perhaps
like
I
did
without
the
internet,
which
you
know
playing
outside
more
and
and
you
know
making
their
own
adventures
out
of
like
whatever,
but
but
but
now
they
have
the
Internet.
Of
course,
they're
gonna
be
drawn
to
all
the
good
stuff,
but
there's
gonna
be
with
all
the
negative
as
well.
So
it's
extent
that
we
are
providing
that
bridge.
L
G
A
A
G
G
So
so
that
is
what
the
promise
was
made
to
the
district
to
the
board,
and
so
it
is
an
interesting,
unique
situation
where
you
have
a
platform:
that's
providing
both
very
secure
internet
access
to
children
and
providing
open
Internet
access
to
the
community,
and
that's
why
we're
taking
our
time
to
make
sure
we
deploy
this
correctly
in
compliance
with
all
of
all
privacy
rules
and
making
sure
that
it's
it's?
It's
not
jeopardizing
the
security
of
the
children
when
we're
opening
it
up
to
the
community
portion.
Okay,.
A
H
Hello
and
tried
to
practice
a
certain
stateliness
in
arriving
this
time.
Thank
you
for
this
issue.
I
felt
I
should
start
with
a
question
here
in
the
beginning
and-
and
you
don't
have
to
answer
it,
but
just
to
a
question
for
you
to
think
about
what
do
you
think
of
the
idea
you
know
just
to
totally
you
know
in
my
innocence
and
guesswork
and
how
to
work
with
city
government.
The
idea
of
with
with
this
new
project
for
the
East,
Side,
School,
District
and
you've
talked
about
investors.
H
Why
not
introduce
investors
to
the
idea
of
the
ordinance
process
that
I'm
talking
about
that
you
are
building
and
that
the
County
of
Santa
Clara
has
already
built
and
started
started
upon?
What
do
you
think
the
being
the
reaction
of
investors
would
be?
Do
you
think
they
would
freak
out?
Do
you
think
they
would
be
interested
and
intrigued
at
this
chance
to
connect
different
parts
of
government
with
our
school
system
and
to
teach
our
children?
H
What
is
good
civics
and
what
is
good
government
and
what's
good
business
practices
as
well,
and
you
know
it's
like
and
good
technology
practices.
So
it's
like.
It's
it
could
be
a
cornucopia
of
just
a
bunch
of
choices,
for
students
to
understand
and
I
hope
that
can
be
of
interest
to
you
and
I
hope.
That's
not
frightening
to
you,
because
I
feel
that
you're
still
very
frightened
here
in
San,
Jose
and
I'm
just
trying
to
offer
this
as
ways
so
he
can
relax
and
feel
open
and
to
work
with
stuff.
Thank
you.
H
H
You
know,
we've
had
some
serious
problems
with
the
IPA
and
thank
you
for
your
help
and
working
all
of
that.
There
was
a
serious
police,
dashboard
problems
with
statistics
and
how
to
read,
statistics
and
and
talk
about
statistics
and
I
felt
he
wanted
to
do
a
good
thing
in
the
end
and
and
all
of
a
sudden,
the
board
came
up
with
some
of
the
council
came
up
with
some
interesting
ideas
that
were
innovative
and
that
word
new
in
how
to
talk
about
statistics.
H
You
know
it
takes
work
and
an
effort
and
I
hope
you
can
make
that
effort
to
to
bring
that
out,
and
it
can
be
a
new
truthfulness
for
all
of
us
to
understand
how
to
read
statistics
or
the
police
dashboard
in
the
future
and
stuff
like
that
stuff,
like
that,
and
my
other
comment
was
I'm-
really
worried
about
the
LED
LED
program
and
that
this
is
what
the
bond
money
is
talking
about,
apparently
a
lot.
How
is
this
relating
to
the
basic
question
I
have
in
myself?
H
I,
don't
I,
don't
quite
know
if
I'm
correct,
but
that
you
know
you
need
the
bond
measure.
This
fall
to
pay
for
the
civic
innovation
Department
of
itself.
That
is
supposedly
gone
way
over
budget
and
what
what's
the
discrepancy
there?
Where
is?
Actually
the
bond
money
going
will
be
going?
I
hope
you
can
make
that
clear
to
me
in
the
coming
and
months
and
I'm
worried
about
the
LED
program,
and
so,
but
but
thank
you
for
the
work
on
it
and
that
you're
trying
to
make
it
open.
A
J
G
With
in
the
school
districts,
so
good
good
question
within
and
I
wish,
Randy
had
been
able
to
stay
here.
He
could
probably
address
this
more
eloquently,
but
within
the
students
will
need
to
login
to
the
school
districts
secured
part
of
this
access.
Eastside,
that's
the
only
place
will
they'll
get
their
assignments.
That's
the
only
place
with
little
bit
of
use
the
apps
to
get
to
get
their
assignments.
G
Well,
so
the
apps
to
get
their
assignments,
the
apps
to
communicate
with
their
school
teacher,
the
apps
to
download
videos
will
only
be
accessible
through
that
secured
user,
ID
and
login
that
the
students
have
for
that
access,
II,
side
portion,
so
so
I
think
you're,
correct
and
saying
they
can
use
either
one
when
it
comes
to
the
academic
work
and
the
academic
achievements
and
the
academic
applications.
Those
will
only
be
available
to
them
with
their
user,
ID
and
password
logging
on
from
home.
Does
that
make
sense?
Yes,.
J
I
G
J
We
can
we
actually
get
I'm,
just
thinking
of
trying
to
think
forward
to
the
data
and
how
you're
tracking
it
and
Kip's
nodding
his
head.
He
knows
where
I'm
going
with
this,
so
it
sounds
like
when
the
when
the
free
Wi-Fi
is
available,
we're
actually
better
able
to
track
how
much
time
they're
spending
on
academic
stuff,
because
they'll
just
use
the
free
Wi-Fi
for
their
other
tasks
and
they'll
log,
in
only
when
they
need
to
log
in
for
academic
purposes,
maybe
or
probably
because
it's
a
barrier
right.
G
Short
answer
is
yes,
I'm
expect
it
is
gonna
complicate
some
things
because
you
know
the
publicly
available
googling
for
a
homework
assignment.
They
may
choose
to
do
on
the
publicly
the
free
public,
Wi-Fi
side
of
it.
So
I
think
that's
a
valid
point
that
will
complicate
some
of
it.
Some
of
the
data
collection
and
we'll
have
to
look
at
that.
So.
J
E
This
is
some
of
the
debate
that
we've
been
having
internally
is
again,
echoing
your
comments
earlier
and
some
of
the
comments
in
the
mayor
and
council
member
chemists
and
others
is
how
do
we?
How
do
we
measure
and
how
do
we
best
measure
and
it
you
know
we
don't
have
the
capacity
to
a
PhD
project,
so
I
do
want
to
kind
of
kind
of
pull
down
the
level
of
expectations,
but
in
any
use
of
the
data.
The
the
cleaner.
J
G
L
G
J
D
J
E
And
part
of
what
we
did
is
we
were
such
a
hurry
to
get
started
with
the
implementation
that
we
actually
didn't
have
a
research
pilot
designed
before
we
got
started,
and
so
we're
we're
catching
up
with
ourselves
and
a
couple
of
ways
on
this,
and
we
also
have
to
make
sure
that
what
we're
doing
is
in
collaboration
with
a
school
district.
So
we
we're
sometimes
a
little
more
eager
to
measure
things.
They're,
sometimes
a
little
more
focused
on
getting
the
kids
into
school
and
making
sure
it
operates.
J
M
M
As
regarding
to
the
workplane,
I
would
like
to
put
our
suggestion
or
suggestions
to
see
how
we
could
all
of
us
can
heuristically
reexamine
the
advancement.
You
know
our
next
step
as
to
how
we
could
move
this
Kasich
or
smart,
see
the
improvement
program
forward
and
and
the
recommendation
the
the
idea
is
basically
to
really
set
back
and
think
a
little
bit
about
how
we
can
go
back
and
look
at
what
we
have
learned
so
far
in
one
of
the
areas
that
me
and
my
group
very
concerned
with
is
primary
community
engagement.