►
From YouTube: NOV 1, 2021 | Transportation & Environment Committee
Description
City of San José, California
Transportation & Environment Committee of November 1, 2021.
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=897916&GUID=BD24BA79-B34D-42E0-A633-DAFAF6BEA15F
A
A
A
A
D
A
B
C
Thank
you
hi.
This
is
tony
tabor
city
clerk.
I
saw
that
counselor
perales
did
not
get
a
panelist
invite,
so
he
just
sent
it
so
he
may
be
joining
a
little
bit
late.
A
B
Well,
while
we
were
waiting
since
we
have
quorum,
let's
go
over
item
b
the
review
of
the
work
plan.
I
think
we
need
a
motion.
Is
that
correct,
I'm
seeing
a
nod
from
colleen,
so
we
need
a
nod
to
drop
the
two
items
on
the
review
of
the
work
plan.
C
B
F
Hi,
laura
beekman
here
happy
monday,
happy
november.
Are
you
gonna
be
able
to
talk
about?
Can
I
talk
about
work
plan
items
at
this
time
too?.
F
Sure,
thank
you
to
speak
about
the
the
semi-annual
climate
smart
plan
report
that
you
canceled
or
that
you've
dropped
because
of
the
upcoming
study
session.
F
That's
next
week,
next
monday,
on
climate,
smart
issues,
I
was
very
nicely
spoken
at
the
charter
process
last
week
that
the
climate
smart
plan
is
just
one
of
many
ways
that
we
can
and
we
need
to
be
working
on
the
future
of
green
sustainability
issues,
and
you
know,
I
hope,
the
the
work
plan
of
the
climate
smart
plan
can
be
made
available
if,
if
a
person
asks
and
so
I'll
be
looking
forward
to
this
item
next
monday
and
thanks
for
having
it
it's
there's
climate
talks
going
on
right
now
that
it
can
be
interesting
if
we
can
start
considering
more
climate
ideas
and
what
can
work
around
climate
ideas.
F
F
I
wanted
to
also
ask
about
the
sequa
process
and
the
consent
calendar,
as
this
is
a
report
about
it.
I
do
not
know
the
depth
of
the
of
the
years-long
argument
of
how
people
are
trying
to
streamline
and
get
rid
of
sql.
Basically,
I,
but
I
don't
think
that's
necessarily
a
very
good
idea,
and
I
think
we
should
really
respect
what
secret
can
try
to
work
for
and
towards
and
just
its
oversight
process
in
itself
boy.
I
think
it's
really
really
important
how
we
need
to
talk
about
that
and
streamline
that
fine.
F
I
I
can
understand
that,
but
I
I
just
think
things
are
being
thrown
away,
good
things
and
we're
not
addressing
good
things
because
of
because
of
these
feelings
about
sequa
and
wanting
to
be
more
efficient
with
it
when
we,
when
it
does
a
really
good
service,
possibly
and
look
for
where
it
does
a
really
good
service,
an
important
service
of
oversight,
and
let's
learn
to
practice
that
and
talk
about
that
more,
I
think,
is
all
I
can
try
to
help
with
right
now
at
this
time.
Thanks
a
lot.
B
A
You
guys
seem
to
be
obsessed
with
it
kind
of
like
prince
charles
or
you
guys
going
to
want
to
take
a
war-like
approach
to
to
this.
You
know
you're
going
to
have
going
to
have
people
on
the
street
like
sjpd
in
their
riot
gear,
making
sure
that
you're
going
to
do
all
the
proper
things
to
protect
the
environment.
A
You
know
you're
gonna,
I
mean
you're
gonna
make
it
so
it's
gonna,
be
a
police
state
for
environmental
policies,
because
that's
what's
being
proposed
right
now
over
there
with
your
with:
let's
go
brandon,
you
know
your
your
your
dear
leader
over
there,
charles
and
all
these
other
monkey
monks.
You
guys
know
what
I'm
talking
about
come
on
come
on.
This
is
on
the
environment.
D
Good,
thank
you,
sweetie,
okay,
good.
So,
oh,
I
have
to
turn
my
speaker
down
on
this
thing.
Okay,
good!
So
anyway,
we're
talking
about
sequa.
The
one
thing
we
were
referring
to
is
that
the
state
of
california
has
made
it
easier
to
like
bypass
our
sequa.
That
was
a
big
thing
that
one
second,
that
the
mayor
I
mean
governor
newsom
was
saying
is
like
oh
okay.
D
D
Just
for
housing,
not
to
say
housing
is
important,
but
I
think
we
can
do
both
and
we
need
to
keep
doing
both,
or
else
we
won't
have
our
home,
which
is
you
know,
care
for
our
common
home
is
what
we
need
to
always
be
thinking
about,
and
you
know
not
to
bypass
the
sequa
just
so
we
build
housing
and
you
know
so
that
that's
a
real
issue
and
that
we
need
to
always
be
considering
environmental
impacts
in
regards
to
all
of
our
our
build,
because
actually
we
need
to
be
in
a
de-growth
mode.
D
That's
how
we're
going
to
our
our
fossil
fuel
emissions
is
all
about
growth,
and
so,
when
we're
we're
growing
and
saying
oh
we're
building
housing.
But
if
we're
not
taking
into
account
the
impacts
into
the
environment,
we
won't
have.
You
know
a
life
on
earth.
So
this
is
what
we
have
to
keep
doing,
and
it's
always
good
to
have
companion.
D
You
know
really
look
at
how
we're
building,
because
even
that's
what
catherine
matthewson
was
saying,
we're
building
very
straight
boxes,
and
we
really
need
to
make
sure
we
have
balconies
around
all
everything
and
we
have
rooftop
gardens
and
plants
like
she
did
in
singapore,
where
she
really
created
a
wonderful.
You
know
plant
life
all
over
our
building.
G
Yes,
thank
you.
Chair
davis,
my
name
is
andrew
boone
and
I
was
reviewing
the
report
for
this
item.
The
mitigation
monitoring
and
reporting
program,
which
regards
mitigated
negative
declarations,
meaning
that,
in
an
environmental
review,
a
full
environmental
review
doesn't
have
to
be
conducted
for
a
project
because
it
has
only
minor
environmental
impacts.
I
understand
that
that's
appropriate
for
many
projects,
but
I
was
alarmed
to
see
that
that's
included
for
the
winchester
ranch
housing
project,
so
my
understanding
is
what's
happening.
G
There
is
that
low
income
residents
are
going
to
be
displaced
and
replaced
with
higher
income
residents,
so
the
mobile
home
park,
that
is,
there,
will
be
replaced
with
new
apartments,
so
displacing
low-income
people
and
replacing
them
with
high
income
people.
So,
first
of
all,
that's
a
really
bad
idea.
There
should
always
be
housing
provided
for
lower
income
people
when
they're
kicked
out
of
their
long-term
homes,
as
in
the
winchester
ranch
case
and
a
mitigated.
Negative
declaration
does
not
seem
to
be
appropriate.
G
There
are
major
impacts
when
that
is
done,
and
I
would
simply
like
to
see
the
the
displacement
of
low-income
residents
included
as
one
of
those
environmental
impacts
when
people
have
to
move
some
of
them
becoming
homeless,
perhaps
or
unhoused
excuse
me
that
results
in
environmental
impacts.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you.
I
just
like
to
comment
that
in
the
case
of
winchester
ranch,
that's
it
for
our
public
speakers
for
the
consent
calendar.
In
the
case
of
the
winchester
ranch
project,
all
of
the
residents
were
offered
a
spot
at
their
current
rent
in
the
new
building.
B
We
will
now
take
roll
on
the
consent
calendar,
and
I
know
that
guys
and
cohen
are
back.
Are
here.
B
H
B
I
All
right
great,
thank
you.
Okay,
just
getting
started,
I'm
david
olson
division
manager
with
the
capital
program
at
the
rwf,
I'm
here
to
present
the
semi-annual
report
occurring
january
through
september
of
2021..
We
are
the
largest
capital
program
at
the
city
and
we
are
in
the
seventh
year
of
a
10-year
program,
valued
at
roughly
1.4
billion
dollars.
Through
the
end
of
june
2021,
we
had
committed
nearly
800
million
for
planning,
design
and
construction
of
critical
rehabilitation
projects
at
the
facility.
I
During
this
period
we
made
significant
progress
in
key
program
areas.
Earlier
this
year,
staff
finalized
the
watered
biosolids
management
strategy
that
city
council
approved
in
june.
It
consists
of
off-site
disposition
contracts
which
are
anticipated
to
be
advertised
before
the
end
of
the
year,
then
implementing
an
on-site
fertilizer
partner
facility
and
eventually
expanding
land
application
of
biosolids
on
local
natural
working
needs.
I
During
this
reporting
period,
staff
also
completed
a
program-wide
safety
review
to
strengthen
our
health
and
safety
program.
With
lessons
learned
in
industry
best
practices,
the
review
found
that
the
safety
program
is
working
well,
as
evidenced
by
the
cip,
achieving
more
than
one
million
hours
of
safe
work,
with
no
reportable
incidents
to
the
occupational
safety
and
health
administration.
I
Key
strengths
of
the
program
include
routine
workplace
inspections,
effective
administration
of
our
under
control
insurance
program
and
the
strong
collaboration
between
cip,
o
m
and
contractor
staff.
The
review
did
identify
a
few
opportunities
for
improvements,
including
a
clear
communication
of
safety
requirements
to
on-site
personnel
and
visitors.
I
Increased
staffing
for
safety
enforcement
and
improved
infrastructure
for
pedestrian
safety,
based
on
the
review
staff,
has
hired
a
new
health
and
safety
assistant
to
help
with
enforcement,
install
new
safety
banners
throughout
the
facility
and
improve
pedestrian
corridors
in
crossings
and
construction
areas
and,
finally,
in
july
of
2021
staff
completed
the
process.
Optimization
study,
which
evaluated
the
facility's
liquid
treatment
processes
in
a
holistic
manner
to
determine
potential
changes
needed
to
ensure
compliance
with
future
regulatory
requirements.
I
The
study
recommended
implementing
simultaneous
nitrification
and
denitrification
technology
to
meet
these
current
and
future
permit
limits.
Advantages
of
this
technology
include
enhanced
nitrogen
removal
over
a
smaller
footprint
and
lower
energy
consumption,
as
recommended
by
the
study,
the
staff
has
initiated
a
new
project
which
will
implement
the
technology,
modifications
and
rehabilitate
a
limited
number
of
tanks.
After
the
project
is
completed,
processor
engineering
and
o
m
staff
will
conduct
a
technology
demonstration
to
determine
the
optimal
parameters
for
full
implementation
of
the
technology.
I
During
this
period,
we
have
23
active
projects.
This
chart
shows
that
we
have
20
projects
in
the
design
bid
build
method.
The
projects
highlighted
in
green
are
ones
that
advance
the
stage
in
our
project
delivery
model.
During
this
reporting
period,
the
other
three
projects
are
being
delivered
using
a
progressive
design,
build
approach.
I
During
this
period,
we
have
six
design
six
projects
in
design
or
bid
the
facility
wide
water
project
completed
field
trenching
for
underground
utilities.
In
march
and
the
designer
completed,
the
30
design
in
august
city
opened
bids
for
the
outfall
channel
project
in
august
and
council
just
awarded
that
construction
contract
last
week,
construction
will
begin
in
january.
I
The
storm
drain
project
is
currently
out
to
bid
an
award
is
anticipated
early
next
year
and
finally,
for
our
dev
watering
project,
we
completed
the
60
design.
The
design
builder
also
began
earlier
site,
work,
prep
and
final
design
in
august
and
negotiations.
The
final
guaranteed
maximum
price
is
ongoing
and
expected
to
be
completed
by
december.
I
I
I
On
this
slide
in
the
upper
left,
the
contractor
is
welding,
stainless
steel,
digester
gas,
pipe
atop.
One
of
the
four
digesters
that
are
being
rehabbed
for
thermophilic
operations
in
the
lower
left
is
a
contractor
is
connecting
stainless
steel
pipe
to
the
separator
tank
which
captures
the
liquid
condensate
from
digester
gas
before
it
is
fed
to
the
gas
compressor.
Building
the
photos
on
the
right
show
the
functional
testing
of
sludge
screening
equipment
with
water.
I
I
This
is
the
alignment
and
flow
path
of
the
new
digester
gas.
Pipe
rack
where
gas
is
produced
in
the
guide
digesters
is
fed
to
the
gas
compressor
building
and
then
fed
into
the
new
cogeneration
facility
in
the
upper
right
is
the
newly
rehabilitated
dissolved
air
floatation,
thickening
tanks
with
new
covers
for
odor
control?
I
This
slide
shows
the
construction
progress
of
the
three
main
components
of
the
new
headworks
on
the
upper
left
is
where
the
raw
sewage
from
the
collection
system
is
first
directed
into
the
screening
structure
via
a
new
108
inch
pipe
from
there.
The
flow
will
go
through
three
new
multi-rake
bar
screens
and
then
through
120
inch
pipe
in
the
raw
sewage
pump
station
bottom
left
and
on.
The
right
is
the
grit
removal
facility,
which
is
following
the
pumping
grid,
is
removed
using
six
multi-tray
vortex
grit
units.
I
This
slide
is
just
showing
the
installation
of
the
new
96-inch
pipe
that
will
convey
the
effluent
from
the
new
headworks
to
the
downstream
processes
at
the
plant.
One
of
the
more
complex
elements
of
the
construction
involved
routing
this
eight
foot
diameter
pipe
beneath
numerous
utilities
and
duct
banks
required
a
shorting
system
shown
in
left
photo
that
was
utilized
to
safely
install
the
pipe
while
keeping
all
the
surrounding
infrastructure
intact.
I
K
I
K
B
Thank
you
that
digester
and
thickener
project
has
been
quite
a
long
one.
I've
been
hearing
about
it,
my
my
entire
time
in
in
office,
it's
nice
to
see
it's
nearing
the
end
of
the
project,
we'll
go
to
members
of
the
public
public
comment.
First,
the
first
speaker
before
I
call
on
the
first
speaker.
I
just
want
to
say
you
know
it's
important
to
stick
to
the
topic
and
also
please
avoid
insulting
anyone
in
your
public
comments.
A
First
of
all,
how
dare
you
lecture
me?
I
insulted
nobody.
Okay,
you
have
no
right
to
lecture
me
on
what
is
my
two
minutes.
Okay
and
I
was
on
topic-
you
didn't
like
it
so
for
you
to
lecture
me,
shame
on
you,
but
I'm
going
to
be
on
topic
right
now.
I
want
to
thank
the
people
down
at
wastewater
who
who
keep
our
environment
clean
versus
city
council,
I'd
hate
to
see
if
you
guys
ever
had
to
run
the
wastewater
facility.
A
I
could
just
imagine
it'd
be
a
disaster
just
like
the
downtown
that
you
guys
have
look
at
that
place,
plywood
city
all
right,
so
I
called
up
to
thank
somebody
dev.
How
dare
you,
how
dare
the
person
who
lets
her
dog
run
at
the
park
when
it's
illegal
to
do
so?
How
dare
you?
How
dare
you
lecture
me
on
what
I'm
supposed
to
say?
That
is
disgusting?
A
D
Thank
you.
Wait,
let's
see,
did
I
get
the
unused?
Do
you
hear
me?
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you,
okay,
good.
I
guess
for
some
reason
it
wasn't
the
unm
okay
good.
Thank
you!
Well,
waste
water.
You
know
we
really
need
to
be
creating
education
in
our
community
of
how
to
live
sustainably
on
our
earth.
As
you
can
see,
you
know
this
very
intense
project
is
absolutely
not
human
scale.
I
mean
it's
it's
you
know
it's
beyond
almost
a
comprehension.
D
What
they're
doing
with
our
wastewater
and
as
well
as
our
solid
waste
is
another
whole
level
of
of
complications,
and
so
so,
basically,
when
we're
dealing
with
our
waste
water,
how
do
we
capture
our
waste
water?
So
we
don't
lose
a
lot
of
our
water
to
become
in
the
wastewater
system
where
it's
got
to
be
processed
that
we
need
to
be
doing
that
at
our
local
level.
D
Everything
needs
to
become
hyper
local
as
we
go
forward
to
survive
as
a
species
and
that
it's
these
complications
and
this
very
fossil
fuel
enriched
systems
that
I'm
sure
this
waste
water
management
is
using.
That's
you
know,
that's
something
to
think
about.
When
we
talk
about.
You
know
right
right
now
we
would
be
in
a
transition.
D
How
to
you
know
we
need
to
be,
you
know,
water
capture
and
how
to
clean
the
water,
so
it
can
even
be
drinkable.
You
know
these
are
survival
instincts
that
we
have
to
get
back
to
basics,
and
these
are
what
the
city
has
to
be.
Educating
us
on
is
how
to
survive.
You
know
have
the
people
survive
as
we
make
the
mass
transitions
that
we
have
to
make,
so
we
can
survive.
G
Hello,
chair
davis,
I
believe
you
unmuted
me
should
I.
G
Thank
you,
chair
davis.
This
is
andrew
boone
and
I
agree
wholeheartedly
with
the
previous
speaker,
tessa
woodmancy,
and
that
the
scale
of
the
san
jose
santa
clara
regional
wastewater
facility
is
determined
by
how
much
waste
goes
into
it,
and
one
of
the
components
of
that
is
how
we
are
using
fossil
fuels
and
many
other
materials.
So
the
city
and
the
county
should
pursue
also
a
program
or
expand
current
programs
of
how
do
we
reduce
our
waste?
How
do
we
reduce
the
materials
we
use?
G
We
need
that
to
address
catastrophic
climate
change
anyway,
and
it
would
reduce
how
much
waste
gets
treated
in
the
end.
I'm
saying
look
at
the
supply
the
is
it
the
demand
side
of
the
problem.
I'll
show
you
how
you
would
say
it,
the
the
amount
of
waste
going
in
needs
to
be
less
so
that
we
don't
have
to
have
expanding
the
facility
and
making
more
expensive,
more
environmentally
damaging
processes.
G
F
Thank
you
hi.
My
phone
is
going
to
something
really
weird
right
now.
I
do
not
know
what
I'm
on
a
different
laptop
computer.
Now
I
wanted
to
quickly
just
thank
yourselves
for
this
item.
It
was
nice
to
see
the
overhead
aerial
pictures.
F
There
was
a
really
good
session
in
using
the
drone,
I
think,
for
for
a
bunch
of
work
at
the
wastewater
facility
that
I
think
really
people
were
really
happy
about,
and
they
talked
about
at
the
meeting
that
it's
a
real
relief
to
have
the
use
of
the
drone
for
these
sort
of
aerial
pictures
and
gets
a
good
perspective
on
things.
F
So
you
know,
I'm
learning
that
you
know
there
is
a
science
to
to
drone
use.
I
just
hope
it
can
be
learned
to
used
well
and
openly
and
and
we
can
feel
safe
and
trusting
to
to
to
offer
practices
open
and
and
trustingly,
so
to
continue
and
and
what
andrew
boone
just
mentioned.
F
You
know
the
wastewater
facility
can
be
a
really
good
harbinger,
a
facilitator
to
understand
the
future
of
sea
level
rise
issues
for
our
area
and
the
work
that
they
have
to
do
to
mitigate
sea
level
rise.
So
good
luck
in
addressing
the
sea
level
rise
issues
with
this
wastewater
facility
and
and
the
new
better
practices
that
we're
trying
to
learn
at
this
time,
and
thanks
for
this
item.
A
H
B
I
just
have
before
we
take
the
vote.
I
I
just
want
to
ask
knapp
or
kerry
if
you
want
to
address
the
the
potential
issue
of
of
flooding
and
the
the
wastewater
facility
being
right
next
to
the
bay.
L
H
I'll
take
a
shot
at
it:
first,
gary
so
yeah
committee,
chair
davis
and
others
in
the
public
yeah.
We
have
a
number
of
projects
that
we
have
in
our
books.
If
you
will
to
to
plan
for
potential
sea
level,
potential
eventual
sea
level
rise
as
well
as
riverine
flooding.
We
have
our
outfall
channel
project
final
effluent
pump
station
project,
as
well
as
a
flood
control
project.
Currently
the
scope
of
that
flood
control
project
is
just
to
address
riverine
flooding,
but,
as
david
mentioned
his
presentation,
you
know
there's
some
issues.
H
If
you
will
going
on
with
the
largest
shoreline
project
that
the
army
corps
and
valley
water
are
sponsoring,
so
in
anticipation
of
not
quite
knowing
where
that's
going
to
go
just
yet,
our
staff
is
looking
to
rescue
that
and
look
at
potential
alternatives.
If,
indeed,
we
need
to
protect
the
facility
ourselves,
we
can
do
that.
We
can
have
a
multiple
multi-phase
project
to
address
again
riverine
shoreline
sea
level,
but
that's
just
for
the
facility.
B
It
clerk
can
we
go
ahead
and
have
the
roll
fully.
I
corrales.
B
A
B
M
M
M
So
before
we
begin,
we
will
have
a
short
video
courtesy
of
santa
clara
valley,
urban
runoff
pollution
prevention
program.
That
explains
how
stormwater
runoff
contributes
to
water
pollution.
A
Roads,
streets
rooftops,
driveways
and
sidewalks.
We
see
these
every
day
and
probably
don't
think
about
how
they
contribute
to
water
pollution
in
natural
landscapes,
most
rainwater
soaks
into
the
soil.
However,
in
urban
areas,
hard
surfaces
such
as
driveways,
sidewalks
and
streets
prevent
rainwater
from
soaking
into
the
ground.
Rainwater
that
does
not
soak
into
the
ground
is
called
stormwater
runoff
as
storm
water,
runoff
flows
over
heart.
M
Thank
you
essentially,
the
essentially
the
municipal
regional
stormwater
permit
under
the
federal
clean
water
act
is
intended
to
address
water
pollution
found
in
storm
water,
runoff,
creeks
and
rivers
that
eventually
discharges
into
art.
What,
in
our
case,
the
san
francisco
bay,
the
city
and
environmental
services
department
has
the
non-discretionary
authority
to
ensure
city-wide
compliance
with
the
permit
requirements,
both
internally
with
our
partner
departments
and
externally,
with
private
owners.
M
M
Since
september
2010
to
2021,
the
water
board
has
issued
the
tentative
draft
order.
Now
we
see
more
specific
language
that
may
be
incorporated
into
the
future.
Permit
and
jeff
sinclair
will
go
into
more
details
of
the
major
changes
and
challenges
with
implementing
the
future
stormwater
permit.
Take
it
away
jeff.
J
All
right,
thank
you,
regina!
Thank
you,
members
of
the
committee.
My
name
is
jeff
sinclair
senior
environmental
program
manager,
I'm
happy
to
present
to
you
on
the
stormwater
program.
Stormwater
permit,
so
I'm
going
to
start
with
the
c3
provision
which
deals
with
stormwater
runoff
from
new
and
redevelopment
projects
that
create
or
replace
impervious
services.
J
So
in
the
bottom
right
hand,
corner
is
an
example
of
a
green
and
green
stormwater
infrastructure
facility
called
a
bioretention
facility,
and
so
this
treats
stormwater
runoff
through
soil
and
plant
filtration
and
then
above
that
are
some
representations
of
the
project
sizes
shown
in
the
table.
The
majority
of
projects
are
covered
currently
under
a
10
000
square
foot
threshold.
J
That
threshold
is
being
reduced
to
5
000
square
feet
and
will
include
the
public,
right-of-way
and
trails
as
part
of
the
project
footprint.
As
seen
in
the
top
right
corner.
There's
a
red
outline
around
that
building.
That
was
an
actual
project
that
fell
under
the
10
000
square
foot
threshold,
but
would
now
be
regulated
under
the
next
permit.
J
Single-Family
homes
are
currently
exempt
as
standalone
projects,
but
under
the
next
project
on
the
next
permit
homes
that
are
10
000
square
feet
in
size.
Those
are
the
roof
areas
and
driveways
combined
that
produce
the
runoff.
Those
would
be
regulated
and
required
to
put
these
types
of
buyer
retention.
Facilities
in
you
can
see
the
type
of
size
in
the
picture
on
the
right.
J
Under
the
current
permit,
we
developed
a
gsi
plan
to
help
guide
us
through
implementation
of
greenstorm,
our
infrastructure
and
in
the
next
permit.
They
want
to
see
implementation,
as
demonstrated
by
these
new
requirements,
specifically
they're,
going
to
require
10
acres,
be
treated
by
gsi,
which
will
be
met
by
the
city's
green
stormwater
infrastructure
regional
project,
the
first
one
in
the
county
that
will
treat
over
200
acres
and
will
be
located
at
the
river
oaks
pump
station.
J
Under
the
current
permit,
we
had
a
requirement
to
meet
80
percent
reduction
and
when
I
talk
about
80
or
the
percentages,
it's
from
the
storm
drain
itself,
so
it's
not
necessarily
representative
of
what's
in
the
creek,
we
did.
We
accomplished
that
and
exceeded
it
through
implementation
of
large
trash
capture
devices.
I.
J
No
problem
additional
online
programs,
such
as
anti-litter,
public
literature
cans
and
other
online
cleanups,
have
helped
get
us
towards
our
goals,
in
addition
to
our
in
creek
efforts
that
serve
a
great
purpose
of
getting
the
community
out
there
and
cleaning
up
our
creeks
through
a
direct
discharge
program
which
just
deals
with
discharges
from
unhoused
communities
and
and
illegal
dumping,
as
well
as
additional
creek
cleanups
and
source
control.
Bans
such
as
banning
single-use
plastics
and
polystyrenes
those
made
up
in
a
35
total
credit
and
the
tentative
order
proposes
to
remove
that.
J
In
addition,
we
reported
last
this
past
june.
The
the
these
full
trash
capture
requirements
would
apply
to
private
properties.
At
that
time,
the
threshold
was
for
properties
that
were
ten
thousand
square
feet
or
larger.
However,
the
tentative
order
removed
that
threshold-
and
it
now
applies
to
all
properties
that
connect
directly
into
our
storm
super
system,
as
reported
this
past
june.
This
would
disproportionately
affect
our
areas
in
the
three
lowest
medium
household
income
ranges,
as
shown
on
the
map.
J
Provision
c12
deals
with
pcbs,
pcbs
exist
in
unhealthy
and
toxic
quantities
in
the
bay
and
our
particular
importance
to
the
water
board.
As
such,
we
are
required
to
implement
control
measures
to
address
them
and
in
the
next
permit,
they're
proposing
approximately
300
acres
in
san
jose
of
old
industrial
areas.
That
may
have
pcbs
to
be
addressed
through
green
storm
infrastructure,
large
trash
capture,
street
sweeping
or
other
methods.
J
J
Our
intent
is
to
have
the
water
board
focus
on
just
those
areas
of
known
pcb
levels.
Pcbs
and
demolition
will
also
have
increased
requirements.
Currently,
there's
a
self-certification
process
through
building
applications
and
in
the
next
permit,
applicants
will
be
required
to
notify
the
water
board
epa
and
the
city
prior
to
demolishing
a
building.
The
city
will
be
all
required
to
inspect
demolition
projects,
as
well
as
confirm
that
pcb
lane
material
was
disposed
of
properly.
J
J
Finally,
there
are
two
new
requirements
in
the
next
permit
proposed
and
one
is
related
to
cost
reporting
for
capital,
o
m
and
staff
time
related
to
implementing
the
stormwater
permit.
However,
the
level
of
detail
is
yet
to
be
determined
and
we
will
be
working
with
the
water
board
to
develop
a
framework
that
will
include
the
methodology,
expectations
and
the
guidance
for
that
cost
reporting.
M
Thanks
jeff
so
right
now
the
city
is
in
the
process
of
providing
comments
to
the
water
board
and
at
a
high
level.
What
we're
going
to
focus.
These
comments
are
essentially
to
align
and
provide
additional
time
to
comply
with
the
permit
terms
by
2027
prioritize
provisions
in
the
permit
that
will
provide
greater
impact
to
water
quality
and
last
eliminate
administrative
burden.
B
Thank
you
we'll
go
to
the
public
first,
so
woodmancy.
D
Thank
you.
Well,
that's
a
big
list
of
things.
I
mean
that
that
he
was
addressing
and
they
both
were
addressing,
and
I
was
just
looking
up
pcbs
to
understand
that
you
know,
and
one
of
the
things
I
found
out
is
it
comes
from
electrical
equipment.
Like
our
trans,
you
know
transmission
line,
our
transformers
a
lot
of
that
electric
technology
and
that's
where
and
I'm
not
sure
about
this,
but
if
we
have
well,
I
know
for
sure
that
we
need
to
localize
our
solar
ins.
D
Our
electrical
insulation
needs
to
become
hyper
local
that
we
need
to,
you
know,
have
rooftop,
solar
and
and
battery
backup.
You
know
to
very
much
localize
to
get
off
of
the
transmission
lines
and
the
transformers-
and
you
know,
coming
long
distances
and
creating
these
pcbs
along
the
way
of
our
infrastructure.
D
So
that's
a
change
that
needs
to
happen
and
then
the
other
issue.
So
that's
you
know
localizing
our
solar
electrical
generation
and
power
source.
So
we
don't
have
the
transmission
lines
and
then
the
other
thing
was
waste.
You
know
you
know,
and
and
also
then,
the
greening
of
our
cities,
the
greening
we
need
to
green
san
jose.
That's
that's
the
message.
D
That's
even
what
prince
charles
was
saying
that
you
know
we
have
to
rebuild
nature
and
as
we're
as
he's
at
the
cop
26
today
you
know
having
nature,
and
that
was
what
my
husband,
the
biologist
is
saying
is
that
we
have
to
live
much
more
densely
densely
on
each
block.
D
He
was
saying
we
need
to
move
it
to
become
dense
and
the
rest
of
the
block
is
aggrava
is,
is
growing
our
food
so
that
our
neighborhoods
can
become
self-sufficient
and
and
that's
where
you
can
have
the
more
you
know,
recharging
the
aquifer
and
then
collecting
the
water
off
of
the
roofs
and
the
the
aquifer
becomes
our
backup
of
our
water.
But
you
know
we
need
to
create
more
land
that
we're
doing
that
and
we
can't
be
building.
You
know
we
have
to
de-growth,
that's
what
de-growth
means
so
that
we
can
be.
D
G
Thank
you
sure
davis.
This
is
andrew
boone.
I
basically
wanted
to
comment
on
again.
This
is
an
issue
of
there's
too
much
pollution,
there's
too
much
going
into
our
into
the
creeks
and
rivers
and
into
the
bay,
and
where
is
it
coming
from
it's
mostly
coming
from
overuse
of
fossil
fuels,
the
extremely
high
number
of
cars
being
operated
in
san
jose,
a
large
number
of
airplanes,
and
it
just
reminds
me
of
the
song:
don't
it
always
seem
to
go
that
you
don't
know
what
you've
got
till
it's
gone?
G
G
It's
surface
parking,
lots
and
wide
streets
of
and
highways,
and
all
this
concrete
that
are
the
impermeable
surfaces
causing
the
pollutants
to
go
into
the
water.
We
need
to
reduce
the
not
the
amount
of
impermeable
surfaces
and
just
making
sure
that
new
development
includes
bio
retention,
areas
that
isn't
enough.
That's
a
tiny,
tiny
sliver.
We
need
to
convert
the
parking
lots
back
to
plants
back
to
natural
spaces.
G
We
need
to
replace
the
parking
lots
and
the
highways
and
all
these
impermeable
surfaces
with
with
the
paradise
that
we
used
to
have-
and
I
don't
I
don't
mean,
do
it
all
at
once,
but
bit
by
bit,
we
need
to
plant
trees.
We
need
to
grow
our
own
food
here
locally
in
san
jose,
and
this
will
do
more
than
anything
else
to
reduce
pollution
going
into
our
creeks
and
streams.
Thank
you.
F
F
For
now
I
hope
rajani
can
be
okay,
yeah,
it's
nice
to
see
he's
working
on
this.
I
guess
I
can
just
thanks
for
the
words
of
the
previous
two
speakers
and
I
guess
a
nod
to
paul
soto
who,
after
a
month
now,
I
think
I'm
starting
to
miss
him.
I
think
I'll
I'll
start
talking
about
him
more
this
month
hope
he
can
come
back
soon
wherever
he
may
be.
F
We
me
paul,
and
I
used
to
consider
you
know
that
for
as
much
as
what
andrew
boone
just
talked
about,
you
know
the
future
of
what
we
can
do
with
parking
lot
issues.
It's
my
hope
that
you
know
there's
a
bit
of
sensitivity
involved.
People
on
the
east
side
were
a
bit
concerned
about
how
these
good
new
parking-
you
know,
environmental
ideas
and
water
runoff
issues
for
parking
lots.
F
There
was
a
bit
of
a
question
about
it
maybe
a
year
ago-
and
I
know
you
guys
have
all
been
working
on
the
issue
to
try
to
work
something
out
with
it.
Good
luck,
how
this
negotiation
process
is
going
and
that
is
sensitive
to
all
sides
of
a
community.
The
the
future
of
a
good
environment
should
be
the
goal,
and
it's
from
that.
F
H
Yes,
thank
you
and
thank
you
for
this
presentation.
A
couple
of
questions.
The
the
permit
that
we're
talking
about
for
next
summer
is
the
permit
from
the
I
guess.
It's
federal
government
on
on
wastewater
runoff
is
that
right.
M
H
State
water
board,
state
water
board
right
and
but
we
have
the
new
our
new
procedures
and
permit
process
for
development.
When
will
that
be
proposed
and
take
effect.
H
It'll
take
effect
next
july
as
well,
and
so
and
in
addition
to
that,
are
we
as
we
go
forward
with
updating
our
bike
lanes
and
other
road
infrastructure
improvements.
I
know
there's
been
talk
about
some
of
this
green
infrastructure
for
drainage,
using
some
of
those
new
installations
to
to
put
in
that
greenery.
That
will
allow
storm
water
to
run
through
natural
filtering
rather
than
into
storm
drains.
H
F
N
Think
I
can
take
that
one
on
council
member
colin,
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
nuanced
answer.
So
so,
first
of
all,
first
of
all,
as
jeff
went
through
the
the
presentation
you
know
the
requirements
to
add
green
infrastructure
are
really
triggered
if
the
sub
base
is
disturbed
on
paving,
which
doesn't
really
happen
with
most
of
the
work.
We
do.
The
only
example
I
can
think
of
in
the
last
year
that
would
have
required
under
these
new
rules,
gsi
provisions
would
have
been.
N
There
was
a
concrete
project
we
did
under
alma
that
might
have,
because
of
how
deep
it
went,
triggered
the
gsi
requirements.
So,
as
far
as
you
know
the
requirements
go,
you
know
it's
probably
not
a
dramatic
impact.
We
would
expect
immediately.
Now
to
your
other
point,
you
know
I.
I
think
it
is
a
best
practice
to
be
considered
as
far
as
adding
green
infrastructure,
when
major
upgrades
to
lanes
and
roadways
are
being
made,
it
comes
down
to
resources.
In
the
end,
you
know
as
you
as
you
install
green
infrastructure.
N
Those
items
need
to
be
maintained.
They're
they're,
typically
high
maintenance.
You
know
they
require
lots
of
landscape
maintenance,
soil
trade,
outs
and
stuff
like
that,
so
so
it
can
be
pretty
substantial.
So
I
would
say
you
know
the
planning,
the
planning
group
and
then
dot
is
always
looking
at
these
things,
and
there
are
several,
I
think
examples
of
green
infrastructure
being
implemented
on
roadways,
but
I
don't
think
it
is
something
that
is
fully
resourced
to
the
level
where
we're
going
to
roll
out.
You
know
massive
green
infrastructure
this
year.
H
And
I
obviously
that's
that's
a
major
point.
Is
these:
these
are
always
traded
off
between
what
we
spend
now,
what
we
spend
later
and
and
how
we
get
resources
to
to
make
the
right
changes
up
front
both
for
our
environment,
but
also
for
the
infrastructure
costs
later,
and
I
guess
an
interesting
question
that
you
just
triggered
in
my
mind,
you
talked
about
the
maintenance
of
these
green,
this
green
infrastructure,
obviously
there's
maintenance
and
cost
to
having
water
running
into
the
storm
drains
as
well.
H
Right,
so
is
there
some
kind
of
way
to
compare
the
maintenance
of
the
storm
drain
infrastructure
versus
how
what
maintenance
would
be
if
we
eventually
were
to
replace
a
lot
of
it?
With
more
of
this
green
methodology,.
A
So
councilmember-
and
I
you
know
it's
a
work
in
progress
as
rick
as
rick
mentioned,
and
you
know
we
we
don't
want
to
spend
too
much
time
until
the
regulations
are
finalized.
A
But
but
I
know
I
can
speak
for
all
the
departments:
public
works,
dot
and
esd
that
we're
we're
going
to
be
committed
to
implementing
at
a
minimum.
What
is
required
of
us-
and
we're
going
to
you
know,
aspire
to
do
everything
possible,
but
certainly
resources
are
limited,
but
we
don't
know
yet
we
have
a
lot
to
learn
and-
and
I
know
that
matthew
nowan
is
from
public
works-
is
looking
at
kind
of
that
cost
roi
balance
and
and
how
do
you?
A
How
do
you
make
sure
you're
spending
a
dollar
that
doesn't
require
three
dollars
of
maintenance?
But
we
we
it's
a
big
system
and
we
just
don't
have
those
answers
yet.
H
You
know
I
appreciate
that
and
that-
and
I
know
that
this
is
complicated-
it's
so
easy.
There's
no
easy
question
answers
to
this,
but
it's
thought-provoking
and
I
want
to
just
raise
some
of
the
questions
back
to
the
the
how
this
affects
private
landowners.
Right
now
you
mentioned
single-family
homes
are
exempt.
This
is
this.
This
includes
it's
not
just
single
family
home,
but
it
includes
like
duplexes
and
other
types
of
homes
on
on
single
lots
is
that
is
that
the
current,
the
current
exemption.
J
Yes,
it
impacts,
multi-family
dwellings,
commercial,
industrial
properties
of
a
certain
size,
currently
single
family
homes
as
standalone
projects.
So
if
you
were
to
just
build
one
home
somewhere,
that
would
be
exempt,
but
if
you
were
to
build
30
homes
that
development
would
be
required
under
this
permit
and
the
next
one.
The
change
that's
happening
is
related
to
the
single
family
homes,
just
the
the
individual
homes
and
those
would
be
triggering
it
at
10
000
square
feet.
So.
H
10
000
square
feet,
so
it's
gonna
ask
if
this
applies
to
like
an
adu
construction
or
something
on
a
home,
but
presumably
those
wouldn't
be
bigger
than
big
enough
to
trigger
this
right
right
and
when
people
are
paving
their
their
front
yards,
for
example
like
they
do
sometimes
without
getting
the
right
permits
and
things.
I
guess
again,
it
would
have
to
be
a
pretty
large
project
in
order
for
that
to
trigger
this
requirement.
J
K
J
C
B
I
have
a
couple
I
want
to
thank
councilmember
cohen
for
for
his
questions.
I'm
not
sure
if
I
heard
it
or
if
we
just
don't
know
yet,
but
these
proposed
changes,
if
they
just
in
terms
of
trash
capture
devices,
how
much
would
that
cost
the
city
to
to
implement.
M
B
So
I
I
read
that
part
in
the
in
the
memo
about
a
trash
capture
device
for
specific.
You
know
like
a
private
business.
Would
that
be?
B
Is
that
cost
effective
to
do
or
could
we
have
a
number
of
a
number
of
property
owners
that
would
be
required
to
have
one
of
those?
Could
they
pay
into
a
system
to
pay
for
a
larger
trash
capture
device.
M
Yet
I'll
take
a
stab
and
if
you
want
to
right
now,
we
don't
know
because
right
it's
saying
for
all
property
private
properties,
which
obviously
is
not
extremely
cost
effective,
and
will
it
really
address
the
trash?
That's
within
this
storm
sewer
system
with
you
know
that
that's
a
concern
we
have
so
I
mean
as
we
as
we
once
this
tentative
order.
Is
you
know
official,
that's
definitely
the
next
step
to
further
analyze
and
see.
B
Okay,
it
might
be
helpful
to
when
we're
commenting
to
have
some
at
least
back
of
the
envelope
calculations,
to
to
give
them
a
sense
of
of
what
they're,
really
what
they're
really
asking
for
and
and
small
businesses.
I
mean
when
we're
talking
about
133
000
for
a
small
business.
B
You
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
ongoing
mate
operating
and
maintenance
costs
for
our
green
stormwater
infrastructure.
Can
you
just
ballpark
that
what
does
it
cost
for
our
park?
Avenue,
for
example,
because
we
have
multiple
locations
along
park,
avenue
that
have
that
green
storm
water
infrastructure?
Do
we
know
what
we
spend
annually
on?
I.
N
N
No,
it
is
what
kind
of,
but
it's
it's
446
is
the
stormwater
maintenance
fund
or
stormwater
capital
fund,
not
capital
fund.
Sorry
operations
fund
that
we
use
for
maintaining
most
of
these
facilities.
A
B
L
B
K
Good
afternoon
joe
royce
city
otter,
I'm
here
with
brittany,
lin
or
brittany
harvey
and
maurice
lynn
from
my
office
and
brittany's,
bringing
up
her
screen
here,
we're
here
to
present
our
audit
of
municipal
water,
billing
and
customer
service.
The
city
can
take
steps
to
enhance
customer
service
during
an
unprecedented
time.
K
We
had
four
findings
and
the
first
finding
was
that
billing
process
ensures
accurate
billing
statements
to
customers.
Bills
are
distributed
to
community
water
customers
on
a
bi-monthly
basis
before
going
out
bills,
go
through
a
series
of
reviews
to
ensure
that
billed
amounts
are
correct
before
being
sent
to
a
customer
and
that's
showing
the
flow
chart
here.
K
K
This
is
by
either
staff
within
the
maybe
sending
people
out
in
the
field
or
it
could
be
cleared
in
the
office
we
sent
before
being
billed.
All
flags
must
be
cleared
before
before
being
sent.
We
sampled
over
500
bills
to
test
whether
they
were
generated
appropriately,
aligned
with
council
approved
rates
and
matched
customer
information
in
cis,
the
city's
utility
utility
billing
system
in
our
sample.
We
found
that
bills
and
inputs
for
actually
our
second
finding
is
that
many
water
can
take
steps
to
better
notify
customers
and
respond
to
leaks.
K
K
Just
29
of
customers
were
notified
potential
leaks
as
identified
in
system
this,
primarily
because
the
leak
notification
process
is
a
manual
process
with
esd
staff,
providing
leaked
notifications
via
email,
letters
and
phone
calls,
in
addition
to
the
manual
nature
of
the
process,
another
hurdle
is
that
only
a
portion
of
customers
have
a
registered
email
with
muni
water
by
collecting
additional
contact
information
from
customers
and
potentially
using
existing
tools.
The
city
could
expand
leaked
notices.
For
example,
the
city
uses
a
third
war
party
platform
to
provide
enrolled
customers,
water
use
reports.
K
Also
noted
earlier
that
abnormal
bills
are
flagged
for
review.
This
is
set
based
on
set
criteria
that
were
established
in
2016,
to,
for
example,
identify
customers
with
higher
or
lower
than
expected
water
usage
or
some
other
potential
indicator
of
a
problem.
In
some
instances,
the
bills
are
flagged
for
review.
K
The
bills
that
are
flake
for
review
require
water
systems
operator
to
investigate
whether
the
meter
is
working
properly.
However,
most
of
the
investigations
meter
investigations
find
that
the
meter
is
working
properly.
However,
we
did
note
that
water
leaked
data
suggests
that
criteria
for
investigating
potential
water
leaks
may
be
too
high.
K
In
this
finding,
we
made
recommendations
to
collect
additional
contact,
information
from
customers
and
potentially
automate
the
leak
notification
process,
periodically
evaluate
the
criteria
used
for
meter
investigations,
streamlining
the
service
order
process.
We
noted
that
currently
it's
a
paper-based
process,
that's
managed
by
two
separate
teams
and,
lastly,
updating
the
methodology
used
to
assess
performance.
K
Our
third
finding
is
that
muni
water
can
enhance
customer
service
by
making
more
information
available
or
accessible.
The
city
provides
information
to
beauty,
water
customers
in
several
ways,
including
through
its
website,
social
media,
mail
notices
and
forces,
buy
mental
bills.
Customers
are
notified
through
these
channels
with
information
about
their
water
service,
including
service
charges.
They
owe
potential
water
shutoffs
in
the
wa
and
water
conservation
practices.
K
Partly
this
is
because
the
program
began
right
before
the
kobit
19
pandemic
and
at
the
start
of
the
pandemic,
the
state
enacted
a
water
shutoff
moratorium,
which
removed
the
risk
of
customers
being
disconnected
from
service.
Also,
the
process
is
not
customer
friendly.
For
example,
it
requires
customers
to
print
out
an
english
only
form
and
visit
city
hall,
which
was
of
course
closed
for
much
of
the
last
year.
K
We
noted
some
additional
areas
of
improvement
in
this
finding,
including
website
content
can
be
more
consistent
across
departments
such
as
in
the
fkqs.
Not
all
customer
facing
materials
are
translated
to
both
spanish
and
vietnamese.
Can
you
the
use
of
plain
language
for
some
notices,
such
as
the
late
payments
notice
and
notice
determination?
K
Our
last
finding
is
that
customers
are
facing
financial
burdens
due
to
the
pandemic.
The
cova
19
pandemic
has
had
a
significant
financial
toll
on
muny
water
customers.
As
of
june
2021,
more
than
1100
muni
water
customers
owed
a
combined
1.1
million
dollars
over
two
balances,
which
is
more
18
times
more
than
what
was
owed
in
december
2019
prior
to
the
pandemic.
K
So
we
had
one
recommendation
this:
finding
that
to
address
the
financial
burdens
of
the
pandemic
and
uni
water
customers,
the
city
to
implement
a
combination
of
strategies
to
assist
customers
potentially
including
automatic
enrollment
into
payment
plans,
outreach
about
state
or
local
assistance
programs
or
distributing
financial
assistance
to
customers.
If
available.
K
Our
auto
report
includes
a
total
of
13
recommendations,
we'd
like
to
thank
the
environmental
services
department,
the
finance
department,
the
information
technology
department,
the
city
attorney's
office
and
the
budget
office
for
their
time,
information,
insight
and
cooperation
during
the
process.
The
audit
report
is
available
on
our
website.
I
ask
that
you
accept
the
report
and
cross-reference
the
november
16th
meeting
of
the
city
council
and
I
think
I
don't
know
who
I'm
turning
over
I'll
turn
over
to
maybe
jeff
for
the
administration's
response
or.
O
I'll
take
a
stab
at
the
first
go
around
good
afternoon:
jeff
provenzano,
deputy
director
environmental
services
department,
and
we
there's
a
response.
We
provided
responses
to
each
of
the
recommendations
and
generally
we
accept
and
agree
with
all
the
recommendations.
Most
of
them,
I
think,
are
green
lighted
and
that
we
are
going
to
be
working
on
them
actually
started
working
on
them
already.
O
Some
of
the
other
ones
require
a
little
bit
more
thought
and
planning
around,
and
perhaps
some
resources
and
funding,
but
and
generally
agree
with
them
as
just
how
quickly
we
can
get
them
done
and
with
that
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions.
D
Good
well,
I
really
appreciate
mr
rice,
this
house,
he
pronounces
his
name.
I
think
I
did
it
right
that
he
does
a
great
job
on
auditing
and
auditing
is
so
important
and
I'm
just
so
impressed
that
the
city
does
that
and
I'd
love
to
see.
You
know
auditing
is
what
we're
looking
at
in
terms
of
our
fossil
fuel
use.
D
But
you
know
I
know
it's
inside
off
topic,
but
that's
what
we
need
in
our
community
is
to
be
auditing
the
fossil
fuel
use
of
our
city
and
our
well
just
starting
with
our
city
anyway,
and
so
with
our
water
use.
D
So
I
appreciate
mr
rice
bringing
that
out
in
terms
of
the
auditing
he
was
doing,
but
even
the
san
jose
water
company,
that
I'm
part
of
they
don't
make
it
easy
to
find
those
programs
and
they're
not
advertising
them
like
maybe
like
pg
e
does
so
they
can
do
better
about
that
in
general
to
advertise
their
discounted
rate
for
low
income
and
in
terms
of
our
water
usage.
D
Of
course,
we've
got
to
learn
to
capture
our
rainwater
and
and
that
that
type
of
thing
and
the
program
the
the
water
companies
do
have
programs
for
that.
So
we
need
to
all
be
getting
our
cisterns
and
figuring
out
those
ways
of
conserving,
as
we
go
forward
in
our
drought,
because
even
we
are
still
in,
they
call
it
a
mega
drought
that
we've
been
in,
and
you
know
that
that's
important
that
we
don't
give
up.
We
have
done
that
in
the
past.
D
M
F
Hi,
thank
you
blair
beekman
here
I
have
trouble
pronouncing
the
auditor's
name
as
well.
I
think
it's
joe
roy
joe
raw,
it's
french
and
and
learning
how
to
say.
French
names
can
be
difficult
raw
or
maybe
that's
how
you
say
it
roy
or
roy
yeah.
Thank
you
for
this
item.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
that.
F
Yeah
with
there's
a
future
of
you
know,
this
is
kind
of
my
time
to
to
be
a
friendly
reminder
of
the
importance
of
the
future
of
subsidy
in
this
age
of
cobit
19.
and
how
we're
getting
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
state
and
federal
funding
help
at
this
time.
F
That
can
make
the
subsidy
process
easier
to
talk
about
amongst
ourselves
and
what
you
know,
a
reminder
that
you
know
city
government
can
can
do
their
part
to
make
a
subsidy
ideas
more
understandable
and
accessible
to
the
everyday
community
and
for
everyday
community
to
learn
to
better
ask
what
what
choices
are
available
to
them,
because
there
there
can
be
many
choices
available
in
subsidy,
help
that
that
can
be
of
help
at
this
time.
And
it's
it's
it's
hard
to
learn
to
not
be
afraid
to
ask
for
that.
F
So
good
luck
to
community
how
they
can
ask
if
they
want
to
the
available
choices
with
subsidies
at
this
time-
and
I
think
city
government
is
learning
how
they
can
can
be
more
open
in
offering
what
choices
are
available
and
that's
our
way
of
learning
and
in
this
covet
age.
Good
luck
to
ourselves
and
thank
you
for
deciding.
B
Okay,
while
people
are
thinking,
I
just
had
one
question
and
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
for
jeff,
but
about
the
administration
response
recommendation
number
four:
to
streamline
the
service
order
process
esd
in
coordination
with
itd
should
update
the
process
to
enable
staff
to
coordinate
service
orders
electronically
and
the
target
date
for
completion
is
december.
2022
will
that
require
it
looks
like
it
might
require
some?
O
I'll
take
the
I'll
start
on
that
and
see
if
anyone
else
wants
to
jump
in,
I
think
what
we're
what
we're
saying
there
is
that
by
december
2022
we
will
do
an
analysis
and
see
what
it
is
that
we
have
to
do.
Yes,
we're
anticipating
that
implementation
to
be
able
to
be
a
little
bit
different
would
require
a
budget
action
and
and
staff
allocation
to
get
that
over
the
goal
line.
I
think
what
we're
saying
here
is
an
analysis
by
2022
of
what
we
could
do
going
forward.
B
Okay,
joe,
is
that
I
just
I
just
want
to
make
sure
so
when
joe
gives
us
our
updates
he's
he's
using
these
target
dates
for
completion.
As
closing
out
that
recommendation
isn't
that
right,
joe.
A
K
K
What
are
some
other
options
outside
of
a
complete
re-engineering
of
of
of
a
system
that
is
just
a
few
years
old.
I
think
in
the
long
term
what
jeff
is
describing
yes,
but
is
there
a
way
that
we
can
get
away
from
having
a
a
hand,
a
piece
of
paper
put
in
someone's
inbox
that
somebody
has
to
come
in
and
pick
up
take
out,
the
field
fill
out
come
back
in
put
back
in
someone's
inbox,
and
then
they
have
to
transcribe
it
into
the
system.
K
Yeah.
Can
we
do
something
in
the
interim
to
to
to
address
that?
So
I
think
long-term.
What
that
broader
re-engineering
is
the
longer-term
goal.
Is
there
something
in
the
intermediate
we
can
do
to
get
away
from
that
based
process?
And
that's
what
we're
hoping
for?
That's
why
we
wrote
the
recommendation,
as
is
without
saying
we
wrote
it
at
a
pretty
high
level
of
just.
I
think
it's
just
some
way
of
I'm
trying
to
remember
the
specific
language.
B
O
They're
working
with
them
will
be
important
to
kind
of
figure
out
the
analysis,
what
tools
we
can
have,
and
so
I
think
they
may
be
able
to
provide
a
little
bit
more
in-depth
answer
on
what
we
need
to
do
to
get
there.
B
We
will
be
phasing
in
our
completion
of
this
recommendation.
You
know
we'll
do
the
quick
and
dirty
will
be
done
by
december
2022,
the
full
you
know,
enhanced
improved
process
will
be
done
by
december,
2024
or
whatever.
I
just
think,
that's
really
important
for
us
to
know,
as
opposed
to
just
giving
us
what
we
want
to
hear.
C
Thanks,
yes,
I
had
a
couple
of
questions.
One
of
them
was
on
the
leaks,
the
the
notifications
so
mentioned
that
there
are
9
000
emails
and
we
only
have
9
000
emails
and
then
we've
been
doing
it.
Letters
and
phone
calls
are.
Can
you
give
me
some
more
detail
on
the
ability
to
tax
as
well.
O
I'm
sorry
councilmember.
Can
you
repeat
that
question.
O
O
So
we
don't
have
that
the
data
separated
that
way
in
our
billing
system
and
our
customer
customer
database.
So
there
they
are
options.
I
think
that's
what
we're
saying
is
we'll
go
back
and
look
at
how
we
can
ramp
up
our
contact
information,
our
customer
profiles,
in
order
to
be
a
little
bit
better
at
doing
outreach
and
getting
in
contact
with
people.
C
O
O
Ideally,
it
would
be
under
the
customer
profile
of
what
language
they
would
prefer
that
we
communicate
in,
and
we
would
then
send
out
notifications
under
their
preference,
but
in
general,
yes,
going
forward.
We
can,
I
think,
with
all
of
our
forms,
is
to
do
more
translations
than
what
we
were
doing
historically.
C
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
in
terms
of
the
requiring
the
325
beyond
the
average.
O
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
statistic
that
you're
mentioning
it
was
that
the
the
parameters
that
we
detect
some
parameters-
that's
correct,
yeah.
Okay,
thank
you
yeah,
so
we
in
our
billing
system.
It's
it's
simply.
It's
the
the
meters
that
we
have
currently
are
set
up
to
provide
a
notification
to
us
when
it
detects
that
there
might
be
a
potential
leak.
These
are
not
leaks
themselves.
O
Necessarily,
it's
just
it's
a
it's
a
program
that
gives
us
an
estimate
that
there
might
be
something
that's
occurring
there
and
one
of
the
recommendations
is
to
go
in
there
and
to
modify
the
parameters
which
we're
looking
at
now
to
minimize
the
amount
of
work
orders.
There's
a
there's,
labor
involved
to
go
out
and
look
at
each
one
change
the
parameters
to
reduce
the
amount
of
staff
time
and
potentially
reallocate
that
staff
time
to
something
else,
such
as
as
a
more
customer
service
oriented.
C
Thank
you.
I
mean
it
also
impacts
somebody's
ability
to
pay
right.
I
had
a
question
on
the
the
third
finding
around
information
access.
C
I
I
think
there
have
been
other
concerns
shared
about
the
fact
that
many
pieces
of
information
aren't
translated
or
only
translated
into
one
lang,
one
other
language
and
that's
obviously
not
helpful
in
a
city.
That's
as
diverse
as
san
jose
is
one
of
the
things
that
also
caught.
My
attention
was
that
a
lot
of
the
information
is
only
available
through
links
to
pdfs
on
the
website,
including
information
on
the
low-income
designation
for
qualified
rate
payers
and
the
fact
that
we
currently
have
no
payers
utilizing
that
program.
O
Yes,
it's
evolved
over
time
right
before
covet
hit.
We
were
in
front
of
council
with
the
recommendation
that
council
accepted
that
updated
our
our
notification
process
and
customer
shutoff
process,
including
the
low-income
program,
along
with
that
were
the
requirements
of
putting
information
on
this
program
in
six
different
languages,
which
I
think
are
identified
there
in
the
report.
O
Previously,
we
had
been
translating
in
english
and
two
other
languages,
spanish
and
vietnamese,
or
the
other
two
that
we
primarily
translated
in
the
other
ones
that
were
added
in
as
part
of
this.
This
program
were
korean
dollar,
vietnam,
sorry
korean
tagalog,
spanish,
vietnamese,
chinese
and,
of
course,
english
and
so
going
forward.
I
think
that's
one
of
the
recommendations
which
staff
have
accepted
and
are
working
on
now
is
to
take
the
other
process
and
processes
and
forms
that
are
either
just
english,
based
or
english,
spanish
and
vietnamese,
and
going
full
six
language
translations
on
everything.
O
And
then
I
believe
the
other
question
was
on
the
amount
of
enrollment
or
lack
of
enrollment
in
a
low
income
program
that
the
establishment
of
that
program
and
the
forums
was
right
before
covid.
O
I
think
joe
mentioned
this
when
we
stopped
doing
shutoffs
and
the
notification
process
around
shutoffs
that
inadvertently
about
the
triggers,
for
all
of
that
was
that
low-income
program
and
so
by
stopping
everything
that
program
and
enrolling
people
wasn't
occurring,
because
we
simply
weren't
shutting
people
off
or
questioning
or
contacting
them
on
lack
of
unity,
but
going
forward
it'll
be
important.
We're
gonna
be
at
some
point,
we'll
be
re-implementing
that
program
and
and
we
anticipate
an
increase,
definitely
an
increase
in
enrollment
in
the
low
income
program.
C
Yeah,
you
know,
I
understand
that,
because
there
were
no
shutoffs,
so
we
just
kicked
the
can
down
the
road
on
the
pandemic
financial
burden.
I
believe
that
director,
gary
kremen
from
valley
water,
is
leading
an
effort
to
create
a
fund
on
their
end.
So
I
know
that
there's
the
other.
There
are
the
other
funds,
but
this
would
be
a
local
fund.
In
addition
to
add
to
the
pot
to
assist
rate
payers
with
their
bills,
are,
are
you
coordinating
with
them.
O
O
I
don't
believe
the
details
are
are
finalized,
yet,
where
it
had
kind
of
ended
off
was
that
what
that
we
know
of
was
it'd,
be
a
loan
type
program
for
the
city
for
us
to
take.
We've
looked
at
that
for
us
to
take
on
a
loan.
There
are
some
administrative
and
legal
hurdles
that
we
have
to
go
through
to
to
take
a
loan
from
valley
water,
and
what
we
have
advocated
for
is
that
they
provide
a
direct
funding
program
to
residents
or
potentially
that
they
would
in
their
water
rates.
P
O
Would
be
another
way
of
helping
going
forward?
You
may
be
familiar,
they
have
a
just
one
fee
which
we
have
to
then
pass
on
equally
to
everybody.
If
they
were
to
do
a
lower
subsidized
tier,
we
could
pass
on
that
lower
amount
too.
So
yeah
definitely
participating
in
ways
they
could
restructure
and
provide
more
assistance.
O
Our
primary,
though
other
than
valley
water,
the
primary
area
that
we're
looking
at
to
help
assist,
is
participating
in
the
state
or
regis
program,
and
so
that
one
looks
like
it's
definitely
doable
and
we're
hoping
to
come
back
to
council
in
a
couple
weeks
with
the
council
memo
on
on
this
and
some
recommendations
and
applying
within
the
month
or
so
to
participate
in
that
program.
C
So
so
valley
water
is
pursuing
the
loan,
that's
new,
so
I
had
been
told
that
they
were
going
to
create
a
fund
and
that
mechanism
was
was
what's
being
tried,
what's
they're
trying
to
figure
out,
so
I
had
been
unaware
of
the
shift
to
a
loan
program.
B
B
A
L
A
P
Thank
you,
john,
and
I'm
accompanied
by
lam
cruz,
who
is
dot's
division
manager
for
transportation
safety
on
the
panel
afterwards.
P
P
Okay,
there
we
go
okay,
so
san
jose
traffic
fatalities
in
the
last
10
years.
P
First
off,
I
would
like
to
acknowledge
that
I
will
be
talking
about
traffic
fatalities
and
that
these
are
not
just
these
numbers
on
the
page
but
they're,
also
our
friends,
family
and
neighbors,
and
when
we
talk
about
that,
it's
just
important
to
begin
with
that
in
2020,
first
off
san
jose
traffic
fatalities
doubled
in
the
last
10
years,
and
I'm
going
to
be
talking
about
these
trends
more
on
the
next
slides
in
2020
we
saw
the
numbers
go
down
a
bit,
but
in
2021
so
far
we're
seeing
them
probably
go
back
up.
P
So
this
slide
looks
at
the
first
three
quarters
of
the
year
ending
in
september
30th,
and
at
that
point
we
had
47
traffic
fatalities,
19
of
them
people
killed
while
walking.
If
you
look
at
the
recent
years
before
2020
and
2019
is
a
higher
number
both
for
traffic
fatalities
and
also
for
people
hit
while
walking
at
this
point
of
the
year.
The
other
number
that's
really
a
jump
out
in
these
numbers
is
peter
people
killed.
P
While
on
motorcycle,
there
are
eight
so
far
in
2021,
and
we've
never
had
that
many
before
in
the
last
five
years,
looking
at
2021
on
injuries,
which
lags
a
little
bit
in
the
way
that
we
put
it
in
the
data
they
are
menu
manually
entered
so
we're
showing
up
to
the
end
of
july.
P
You
can
see
for
cumulative
injuries
by
month
that
in
2021
and
the
blue
line
were
below
the
usual
range.
But
if
you
look
at
fatal
and
severe
injuries,
which
is
abbreviated
as
ksi,
the
number
is
at
the
top
of
the
range
on
the
top
right.
And
if
you
look
at
cumulative
traffic
fatalities
by
month,
the
blue
line
goes
from
below
the
range
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
sort
of
crossing
through
the
normal
range
around
june,
notably
the
state
reopened
on
june
15th.
P
And
then,
as
you
go
above.
It
goes
above
the
range
beginning
in
july,
so
we're
currently
above
the
range
and
also
the
there's,
particularly
a
big
jump.
If
you
compare
quarter,
3
20
21
to
quarter
3,
20
20.
P
So
to
look
at
year
to
date,
there
are
47
traffic
fatalities
up
to
the
end
of
september,
22
of
them
or
47
are
on
the
priority
safety
corridors
that
is
higher
than
usual.
We
typically
see
30
to
40
percent
in
a
year,
and
notably,
a
lot
of
them
have
been
on
monterey
road,
four
of
those
seven.
P
I
already
mentioned
that
we've
had
a
very
high
number
for
motorcycles
this
year
and
one
of
the
big
groups,
or,
as
I
mentioned,
is
people
killed
while
walking,
so
they
are
19
of
the
47
or
40
percent
of
that
19
people
12
are
outside
of
crosswalks,
and
so
we're
interested
to
find
out
more
about
that
you
know.
Is
it
close
to?
Is
it
close
to
a
crosswalk
or
or
far
from
a
crosswalk,
but
we're
we're
going
to
do
more
analysis.
P
There
33
or
70
percent
involve
a
male
driver
and
15
of
the
47
have
speeding
as
a
factor
as
a
note.
Speeding
is
the
top
known
factor
contributing
to
fatal
and
severe
injuries
in
san
jose.
P
So
just
to
put
this
slide
in
more
context.
We
wanted
to
show
how
that
looks
in
the
last
five
years
of
data.
Basically,
so
2016
to
2020
are
all
full
data
years
and
2021
is
the
partial
date
of
the
year
up
to
the
end
of
september,
and
so
I
mentioned
before
that
41
of
47
was
87,
and
that
is
the
percentage
of
fatalities
that
occur
on
a
posted
speed
limit
corridor
35
mile
an
hour
higher.
P
If
you
look
specifically
at
pedestrian
fatalities,
which
are
19,
then
16
of
those
19,
which
is
84
in
2021,
are
again
on
the
roadways
that
have
a
posted
35
mile
per
hour,
speed
limit
and
higher.
P
So
you
may
wonder
what
we
could
do
to
change
the
speed
limit,
and
so
one
of
the
big
developments
in
2021
is
that
the
assembly
has
passed
and
the
governor
has
signed
a
bill
called
ab43
and
ab43
offers
flexibility
to
jurisdictions
to
lower
the
speed
limit
in
some
cases,
and
so
while
not
all
the
provisions
of
the
bill
will
be
available
at
first,
the
ones
that
will
be
available
starting
in
2022,
are
for
roads
continuous
with
the
business
activity
district
which,
from
our
premier,
our
preliminary
analysis
could
be
used
on
about
eight
miles
of
roadway
in
san
jose
and
about
two
of
those
miles
are
on
vision,
zero,
priority
safety
corridors
and
all
the
other
provisions
of
the
bill,
such
as
what
a
high
injury
network
means
will
require
caltrans
to
work
with
california.
P
Three
of
those
are
quick,
build
projects,
and
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
the
vision,
zero
action
plan,
the
most
recent
one
was
passed
at
the
beginning
of
2020,
so
the
quick
field
team
was
only
created
in
2020,
so
these
projects
have
been
created
since
then,
so
in
roughly
one
year's
time
the
capital
projects.
P
So
the
of
the
quick
build
projects
we
have
center
road,
which
is
the
biggest
one
freedale
avenue
a
bit
shorter
and
and
a
few
intersections
on
story,
road,
which
is
the
first
phase
of
that
project
on
in
terms
of
capital
projects.
We
have
mclaughlin
avenue
and
white
road
and
both
of
those
projects
took
about
five
years
to
complete
they're,
both
funded
by
the
highway
safety
improvement
program,
otherwise
known
as
hcip,
and
so
that
process
just
takes
a
long
time
because
of
the
way
the
capital
grant
administration
and
process
works.
P
There
are
also
43
pedestrian
and
roadway
safety
improvement
projects
which
an
example
of
those
are
enhanced,
crosswalks
with
flashing
beacons,
center
line
or
edgeline
projects.
There
were
also
58
traffic
signal
projects,
predominantly
signal
timing,
adjustments
and
there
were
113
bike
projects.
If
you
don't
know
the
different
types
of
classes
of
black
bike
projects,
the
ones
that
we'll
call
out
are
the
protected
ones
which
are
called
class
four,
and
there
were
two
bike
boulevards
among
them
on
10th
and
11th
street.
P
P
We
also
have
two
capital
improvement
projects,
tully
road
and
mckee
road,
both
of
those
are
funded
by
the
one
bay
area
grant
program
known
as
obag,
and
so
those
grants
were
originated
in
2016
and
are
coming
up
to
be
built
in
the
coming
fiscal
year,
as
well
as
again
the
types
of
projects
that
we
mentioned
before
46
pedestrian
and
roadway
safety
projects,
83
traffic
signal
projects,
16
intersection
safety
projects
from
our
citywide
collision
review
program,
as
well
as
36
bike
projects.
P
We're
also
starting
some
new
work.
We
are
doing
sorry
rather
some
new
programs.
These
are
independent
of
the
sort
of
road
redesign
work.
One
of
them
is
the
vision,
zero
safety
messaging
contract
with
the
consultant
mig
it
just.
P
It
is
focused
in
the
council
districts
that
have
the
most
fatal
and
severe
injuries
which
are
districts
three,
five,
six
and
seven,
but
there
are
also
a
whole
suite
of
strategies
that
we'll
be
having
the
consultants,
research
and
convene
working
groups
about,
and
I
won't
get
into
the
list
of
them,
but
that's
the
sort
of
city-wide
aspect
of
the
program.
P
Looking
at
some
of
the
before
and
afters.
This
is
mclaughlin
avenue
at
autobahn
drive
looking
south
this
3.2
mile
project
from
interstate
280,
the
capital
expressway,
is
three
miles
long
and
you
can
see
in
the
before
that
it
was
a
pretty
big
open
street
and
in
the
after
we
have
the
planted
median
we've
added
crosswalks
with
flashing
beacons,
and
this
was
completed
in
winter
2020
and
was
a
3.3
million
dollars
that
was
funded
with
federal
money.
P
P
We
used
a
complete
street
study
that
had
been
completed,
and
I
believe
april
2020
to
implement
the
major
quick,
build
improvements
and
because
that
it
was
a
quick,
build
project.
We're
able
to
see
the
improvements
built
sooner
than
we
would
be
able
to
with
a
capital
project,
and
so
this
four
mile
stretch
from
astoria
road
to
monterey
road,
the
quick
build
section
of
it
cost
about
345
thousand
dollars
and
it
was
completed
in
summer
2021.
P
and
now
I
am
going
to
press
play
on
this.
Video
and
you'll
be
able
to
see
center
road
before
and
after,
but
I
won't
play
too
much
of
it.
Just
given
my
internet
connection
may
not
allow
it
to
go
too
fast.
P
So,
depending
on
what
you
can
see
on
your
end,
you
can
see
the
before
and
after
where
there
are
a
buffered
bike
lane
with
vertical
delineators
in
the
after,
and
here
we
are
just
north
of
capital
expressway,
coming
up
to
that
same
section,
data
sway
where,
before
there
were
two
lanes
here,
it
was
a
bobble
neck,
and
this
redesign
has
those
two
lanes
be
more
continuous
and
connected
basically
bringing
vehicles
through
here.
P
L
So
chair
we've
completed
a
presentation.
D
Great,
I
was
just
appreciate
the
the
meeting
and
I
was
writing
lamb
crews
because
you
mentioned
that
he
was
the
head
of
safety
good,
and
so
what
I
was
saying
tim
is
that
we
need
to
put
in
your
database
stockton
avenue,
and
you
know
this
is
where
we
don't
have
this
like
it
needs
to
be
more
transparent.
I
appreciate
vision,
zero,
but
we
need
transparency
and
access
to
these.
These
databases
and
this
information.
D
So
we
can
see
like
I've,
been
complaining
about
stockton
avenue
and
other
even
members
of
shasta
hancher
park.
Neighborhood
association
have
said
that
we
needed
to
improve
stockton
avenue,
and
this
is
like,
maybe
15
years
back
or
so
so
you
know
I
want
this
in
a
database
that
we
can
know
and-
and
I
even
talked
to
chair
dave,
dev
davis,
which
I
appreciate
it
because
I
told
her
and
she
appreciated
and
liked
it
that
we
need
a
a
median,
a
tree-lined
median
in
the
center
of
stockton
avenue
to
engineer
us.
D
You
know
the
slowness
into
the
you
know:
traffic
calming
into
the
street
because
it's
too
wide
and
yes,
it's
a
35
mile,
an
hour
street,
and
I
hope
that
we
could
get
that
down
to
20.
and
that's
how
it
should
be
running
through
our
neighborhood.
But
like
andrew
boone
was
saying
we
have
to
engineer,
and
my
husband
says
as
well:
we
have
to
engineer
these
roads
to
be
for
traffic
calming
and
to
slow
the
traffic,
so
on
stockton
avenue
put
it
in
this
database,
whatever
that
is,
that
gets
capital
improvements.
D
F
Hi
greg
beekman
here
thanks
a
lot
for
the
words
of
tessa.
I
mean
she.
She
really
said
it
nicely.
I
think,
there's
ways
that
we
can
talk
about
a
future
of
community
safety
issues
and
and
that
community
safety
can
ask
the
questions
of
what
are
good,
open
public
policies
and
data
collection.
F
You
know
for
the
technology
and
community
safety
needs
that
that
will
be
needed
for
these
vision,
zero
issues,
the
two
I
feel,
can
really
work
hand
in
hand
together.
They
can
work
well
together
and,
in
fact,
with
these
upcoming
new
strategies
to
consider
the
future
vision,
zero.
You
know
it's,
it's
the
open
public
policy,
ideas
that
that
speak
to
the
ideas
of
community
harmony
and
you
know
which
is
such
an
important
concept
to
the
initial
ideas
of
what
vision
zero
is
supposed
to
be
about.
It's
not
just
about
the
future
of
surveillance,
tech.
F
It's
a
it's!
It's
a
number
of
issues
concerning
green
sustainability.
I
don't
know
neighborhood
communication.
F
You
know
ourselves
just
talking
with
each
other
more
being
more
open
with
each
other,
and
you
know
that's
why
I
think
open
public
policies
can
really
help
move
along
a
good
process
of
the
future
of
vision,
zero
with
that
said,
I
hope
the
ksi
issue
is
learning
to
work
itself
out:
you're
you're,
you're,
receiving
new
ways
of
to
use
equity,
to
discuss
the
future
of
how
to
understand
statistics
and
reporting
on
more
homeless
people
being
killed
than
you
were
able
to
report
in
years
previous,
and
it
would
be
sad
if
you
would
be
using
these
statistics
to
manipulate
things
and
manipulate
our
future
funding
and
such
so
good
luck
to
really
practice
well,
the
future
of
how
to
report
ksi
statistics
to
yourselves
and
to
the
public.
A
A
You
have
all
shown
great
leadership
in
trying
to
make
our
street
safer
for
everyone,
and
I
truly
appreciate
that
what
I
am
concerned
about
is
that
your
political
leadership
and
the
urgency
you
express
often
isn't,
in
my
perspective,
always
matched
by
staff
in
the
pandemic.
San
jose
was
the
only
city
in
the
bay
area,
maybe
in
the
nation
that
didn't
implement,
slow
streets
staff
is
still
using
questionable
and
outdated
policy
guidelines
for
implementing
street
calming
on
residential
streets.
A
This
legislative
session,
san
jose
failed
to
support
important
transportation
builds
such
as
the
bill
to
decriminize
jaywalking.
As
far
as
I'm
aware,
while
cities
like
san
francisco
or
even
la
are
planning
to
use
the
mentioned
ab43
to
aggressively
lower
speed
limits
on
roads
in
their
cities,
I
couldn't
find
any
mention
of
actually
implementing
lower
speed
limits
in
san
jose
anywhere
in
their
staff
report.
It
is
also
worth
noting
how
the
funding
towards
highway
projects
compares
to
the
division
zero
project
budget.
A
A
A
Verbally
abused
the
chair
threatened
to
come
down
and
personally
confront
her.
The
statements
were
threatening
and
actually
disruptive
to
the
business
of
the
meeting.
Although
the
brown
act
allows
for
criticism
of
the
policies,
procedures,
services
and
acts
or
admissions
of
the
city,
council,
verbal
and
physical
threats
are
not
acceptable
and
not
tolerated
at
any
meeting.
So
this
particular
caller
is
no
longer
permitted
to
comment
at
this
meeting.
While
the
comments
are
under
review.
G
G
G
You
need
to
invest
much
more
time
and
money
into
fixing
the
streets.
The
staff
is
aware.
I
see
from
the
report
that
the
cause
is
correctly
identified.
High
car
speeds
on
wide
arterial
streets.
We
know
what's
causing
this,
but
the
city
council
is
not
directing
the
d.o.t
to
change
it.
The
streets
need
to
have
fewer
lanes
in
them,
so
cars
don't
drive
so
fast
and
we
need
to
put
more
money
into
it.
G
This
isn't
just
to
save
people's
lives
but
to
address
catastrophic
climate
change.
The
fact
that
there's
so
many
cars
driving
so
fast
killing,
so
many
people
means
that
people
don't
walk
or
bike
very
much
in
san
jose,
and
the
overall
problem
is
that
the
city
continues
to
engage
in
this
austerity.
Budgeting
policy.
Where
the
mayor
says,
we
can't
raise
taxes
on
corporations
or
they'll
flee
the
city
that
is
absolutely
false.
Oakland
and
san
francisco
tax
large
corporations
at
a
much
higher
level
than
we
do
in
san
jose.
L
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much
chair
and
appreciate
the
the
staff
report
and
the
update.
I
have
the
pleasure
of
sharing
the
vision,
zero
task
force,
along
with
our
co-chair
councilmember
foley,
and
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
work.
That's
gone
on
now,
but
unfortunately,
as
we
see
the
data
showing
and
last
year
felt
promising,
but
I
think
we
knew
it
was
potentially
going
to
be
an
anomaly
year.
L
The
numbers
keep
rising
and,
and
that
absolutely
is,
is
cause
for
concern.
And
I
appreciate
that
we
have
the
task
force
and
we'll
be
able
to
drill
down
even
further
on
that
but
important
to
get
this
update
for
the
full
committee
and
and
continue
to
move
forward
with
our
work
and
prioritizing
how
we
can
actually
realize
our
our
vision
of
getting
down
to
zero.
L
We
had
asked
for
through
the
through
the
task
force
an
rfp
to
evaluate
and
revamp
our
education
and
outreach
process,
and
I
know
the
firm
mig
has
been
procured
and
then
last
week
my
understanding
kicked
off
its
consultant
study
and
I
wanted
to
see
what
the
timeline
is
for
their
recommendations
to
be
returning
to
the
task
force,
or
even
this
committee.
P
We
do
have
that
as
a
I,
I
don't
believe
I
know
the
number,
or
rather
the
date
off
hand,
but
we
do
have
a
timeline
that
we
can
share
with
you
for
all
the
deliverables
from
that
consultant.
In
my
recollection,
I
think
that
the
first
sections
of
their
first
deliverable
phase,
one,
I
believe,
ends
or
in
spring
roughly
so
I
suspect
that
we'll
be
hearing
from
them
in
spring
when
they're
sort
of
they
have
an
overlap
between
the
first
and
second
phases
of
the
contract.
P
L
L
And
thank
you
for
prefacing
the
discussion,
as
we
do
in
all
of
our
vision,
zero
task
force
meeting
on,
obviously
that
this
is
the
data
we're
looking
at,
but
we're
talking
about
actual
lost
lives
here,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
family
members
and
loved
ones
that
will
participate
with
us
in
those
meetings.
So
I
appreciate
you
prefacing
that
as
well.
L
Looking
at
this
slide,
the
the
I
know
there's
you
know
some
alarming
trends
all
over
the
place,
but
the
biggest
one
for
me
and
where
I
think
we
have
an
opportunity
to
make
a
difference
is
on
this
priority
safety
corridors,
22
of
those
fatalities,
and,
as
you
stated,
that
is
higher
than
what
we
traditionally
see,
and
that
is
where
we
have
made
a
dedicated
focus,
or
at
least
we've
now
dedicated
to
make
the
focus
on
on
improvements
in
those
those
corridors.
L
And
what
I'd
like
to
see-
and
I
think,
a
goal
for
at
least
the
the
division
zero
task
force
should
be
to
as
if
we're
prioritizing
those
areas
should
be
to
get
down
to
zero
in
those
areas
much
more
quickly
than
than
not
and
so
going.
The
opposite
direction
is
concerning,
because
that
is
those
are
areas
again
where
we're
making
investments
you
saw
the
or
you
demonstrated
that,
with
the
video
and
the
slides
on
on
some
of
the
improvements
we
made.
L
Can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
these
22
fatalities
in
priority
safety
corridors,
and
were
you
know
any
of
them?
Were
they?
Whether
in
areas
where
we've
already
made
investments
or
areas
where
we're
going
to
be
making
investments,
or
were
they
just
along
those
corridors
and
sort
of
outside
of
areas
that
we've
been
been
focused
on
immediately.
P
To
make
a
general
comment,
I
attempted
to
do
this
on
the
slides,
but
there
are
the
quick
build
projects
which
are
the
projects
that
we've
originated
about
a
year
ago
are
trying
to
make
quick,
basically
responses,
whereas
the
capital
projects
which
we
originated
in
many
cases
years
ago
are
just
now
coming
in
so
there's
a
weird
kind
of
disconnect
between
sort
of
making
investments,
because
we
have
made
the
investments
in
the
past,
but
it
takes
such
a
long
time
to
deliver
on
them
if
they're
a
capital
investment.
P
So
the
the
intention
of
the
quick
build
program
is
to
be
able
to
make
those
responses
more
quickly,
but
there's
still
obviously
sort
of
capacity
limitations
on
the
quick
build
program.
So
for
the
six
miles
of
streets
that
we
built
in
the
first
year
of
the
quick
build
program,
you
know
obviously
that's
great
going
from
zero,
but
there
are
56
miles
of
these
roadways
that
are
within
the
city
jurisdiction.
P
You
know
many
of
them
do
have
capital
pro
projects
that
are
underway
and
are
likely
to
be
delivered
soon
or
like
two
of
them
will
be
delivered
the
next
fiscal
year,
but
that
still
is
not
the
majority
of
those
56
miles.
So
it's
challenging
to
describe
that.
But
you
know
we
are
working
on
projects
on
those
streets
and
those
fatalities
are
occurring
on
places
that
we
have
given
attention
to.
But
you
know
you
know.
However
much
capacity
we
have
in
the
quick
build
program
is
effectively
a
limitation
on
how
much
we
can
address.
Q
So
I'd
also
like
to
quickly
note
that
for
the
priority
safety
corridors,
where
we
have
made
improvements
recently,
we
do
intend
to
go
back
and
do
some
pre
and
post
project
evaluation,
where
we'll
be
measuring
the
effectiveness
of
the
project
and
doing
tweaks
if
needed.
So
that
is
part
of
our
work
plan.
L
Thank
you
for
jumping
in
lamb.
Can
you
let
us
know
when
you
will
be
presenting
that
that
information?
Will
you
be
bringing
that
to
the
vision,
zero
task
force?
Will
that
be
coming
here
to
this
committee
as
well?
My
next
question
was
going
to
be
along
those
lines
anyway.
So.
Q
Absolutely
we
typically
like
to
look
at
about
12
to
18
months
data
after
the
project,
and
once
we
do
that
evaluation,
you
know
we'll
be
looking
at
a
variation
of
crashes,
speed
data,
also
qualitative
data
in
the
next
couple
of
months,
we'll
be
going
out
to
center
road
and
doing
a
survey
to
see
you
know.
Do
people
generally
feel
safer,
walking
and
biking
out
there
so
we'll
be
bringing
that
information
back
to
the
task
force.
L
Okay,
great
yeah,
that
was
going
to
be
my
next
question
and
then
looking
at
that,
thank
you
jesse.
For
going
to
this
slide.
The
idea
was,
I
know,
we've
got
a
lot
of
projects
completed,
but
specifically,
my
my
area
of
focus
right
now
is
on
those
priority
safety
corridors
and,
and
then
I
know
I
think,
slide
10.
You
have
the
upcoming
work.
L
If
you
wanted
to
skip
to
that
real
quick,
obviously,
a
a
number
of
projects
as
well
underway
and,
as
you
stated,
certainly
the
quick
build
coming
online
much
more
quickly.
That's
hence
the
name
and
it's
it's
focused
in
those
areas,
but
the
projects
themselves,
more
primitive
projects
take
a
lot
longer
that
12
to
18
months.
L
I
understand
that
the
need
to
be
able
to
get
some
real
data
after
a
project
comes
in,
but
I
do
think
that
it's
important
for
us
to
to
know
sooner
than
later,
whether
or
not
these
investments
of
quick
builds
and
the
actual
projects
specifically
again
in
these
priority
safety
corridors,
if
they're
working
or
not-
and
in
that
way
we
can,
you
know
we
can
retool
if
we
need
to-
and
so
I'd
like
to
have,
you
know
some
check
in
if
we
can
and
we
can,
we
don't
need
to
go
out
there
and
gather
any
sort
of
any
other
data.
L
Are
we
still
seeing
high
numbers
of
ksi's
in
some
of
these
priority
safety
corridors,
where
we
have
already
made
an
investment,
and
did
it
come,
you
know?
Did
they
happen
after
before?
I
think
we
can.
We
can
do
that
analysis,
our
our
own,
before
necessarily
the
traditional
12,
to
18
months
of
of
looking
back
on
that
project.
L
So
I'd
like
to
do
that
through
the
the
the
task
force-
and
I
imagine
this
committee
would
would
you
know-
appreciate,
hearing
the
updates
on
that,
as
well
as,
as
the
information
comes
in
I'd
like
to
be
able
to
say
definitively
right,
that
the
investments
that
we're
making
are
making
a
difference
and
then
show
that
through
the
data,
but
if
they
aren't
I'd
like
to
know
that
sooner
than
later,
so
then
that
we
can,
we
can
understand.
Hey,
are
these
quick
builds?
Are
they
just
not
working
right?
L
The
way
that
we
thought
or
are
some
of
these
project
improvements?
Are
they
not
necessarily
working
the
way
that
we
thought
or
way
that
we
had
hoped
they
would
and
then
that
way
we
can
retool
what
we're
doing
with
the
next
projects
down
the
line,
rather
than
just
continue
to
move
full
steam
ahead
on
these
projects,
assuming
that
that
they're
going
to
work?
L
That's
that's
just
certainly
my
interest
and
through
the
the
task
force.
I
think
we
can
make
some
of
those
requests,
but
I
wanted
to
be
able
to
to
get
that
here
to
staff
now
and
again
appreciate
the
work.
I
appreciate
this
update
from
the
state
on
an
opportunity
on
being
able
to
adjust
speed
limit
assembly
bill
43,
but
I
know
that
was
just
signed
and
that's
going
to
take
some
time
as
was
stated,
but
I
do
think
that
there's
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities.
L
We
know
the
continued
trend
of
of
speeding
being
really
the
highest
factor
and
if
we
can
do
more
about
that,
obviously
that's
a
tremendous
help
for
us
as
a
tool
here
locally.
I
don't
have
any
other
questions
appreciate
that
the
staff
update
and
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
status
report.
E
B
E
Member
foley,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
councilmember
perales,
for
your
comments.
I
had
several
of
the
same
thoughts,
particularly
about
the
quick
builds.
Are
they
working
and
getting
an
update
as
to
whether
they
are
will
be
really
helpful?
So
I
look
forward
to
having
that
information.
E
I'm
can
we
go
back
to
slide
five,
the
I'm
I'm
I'm
alarmed,
and
I'm
not
really
alarmed
by
this
number
that
it
continues
up,
and
I
know
that
speed
is
a
big
factor
everywhere
we
go.
People
are
driving
way
over
the
speed
limit
and
it's
it's
dangerous
and
it's
killing
people
and
injuring
people.
Can
you
tell
me
jesse
of
the
32
fatalities
that
we've
had
in
the
dark
hours?
E
G
P
We
do
have
a
read
on
that,
although
I
don't
know
that
I
have
that
number
right
this
second,
but
I
can
tell
you
that,
through
working
on
the
vision,
zero
task
force,
we
have
engaged
our
partner
on
that
data
point
more
often
they
are
the
medi,
the
county
middle
exa,
medical
examiner
coroner.
P
We
had
previously
been
working
with
them
on
an
annual
basis
where
we
would
basically
get
in
contact
with
them
in
january
and
ask
about
the
previous
year,
but
now
the
after
what
happened
on
monterey
road,
we
got
in
contact
with
them
like
two
extra
times,
I
believe
so
far
this
year.
So
I'd
have
to
look
through
old
emails
to
tell
you
what
our
number
is
as
of
that
point,
but
we
don't
have
the
number
updated
to
this
moment.
E
E
I
live
on
an
intersection
with
a
four-way
stop
and
people
were
flying
through
it
in
a
residential
neighborhood,
where
there's
lots
of
kids
driving
walking
around.
So
I'm
worried
that
we're
gonna
see
a
lot
of
injuries
that
have
occurred
from
last
night
or,
let's
hope,
not
any
fatalities,
but
people
are
driving
so
recklessly
all
over
the
place,
and
it's
not.
P
I
think
the
most
general
answer
is
that
roadway
redesign
has
been
proven
effective
in
other
cities
and
there's
you
know.
Obviously
we
do
roadway
redesign
here,
but
I
think
the
sort
of
work
that's
discussed
in
our
various
programs.
You
know
a
lot
more
could
be
done.
This
is
a
big
city,
though,
and
I
think
the
typical
issue
that
we
face
is
just
you
know.
There
are
a
lot
of
streets
here
and
we're
not
a
huge
government.
P
So
you
know
the
amount
of
stuff
that
we
can
get
to
in
a
year,
for
example,
is
not
huge,
I'm
not,
but
you
know
we
do
do
a
lot
of
things.
We
had
some
slides
in
this
presentation.
You
know.
Obviously,
if
we
had
200
projects
last
year
and
200
projects
next
year,
you
know
we're
obviously
doing
a
lot
of
work.
P
Nonetheless,
we
are
a
large
city,
so
you
asked
about
the
dark
hours
we
are
and
you
asked
specifically
about
what
we
could
do
to
educate
unhoused
people
about
safety
in
the
dark
hours.
So
I,
when,
when
you
said
that
I
just
lightly
moved
away
from
this
image
behind
me
that
says
look
out
when
it's
dark
out,
which
is
a
campaign
that
we
created
in-house
last
year
and
that
we're
thinking
about
being
the
basis
for
an
outreach
flyer
that
we
are
going
to
be
distributing
to
unhoused
people
around
monterey
and
curtin
ortelli.
P
Although
we've
talked
to
the
housing
department,
because
they
have
done
outreach
to
that
house
population
and
they
would
like
us
to
make
it
clearer
than
that,
so,
for
example,
if
we
made
a
version
of
this
poster
that
says
specifically
use
signalized
crosswalks,
that
is
something
that
we're
considering
doing,
and
that
is
one
of
our
tasks
that
is
in
the
rules.
Memo
that
follows
the
fatalities
there.
E
What
if
we
just
thinking
out
of
the
box,
you
know
bicyclists,
have
these
flashing
lights
that
they
can
put
on
their
bikes?
What
if
we
purchase
them
and
handed
them
out
when
we
go
to
the
encampments,
then
at
least
they
have
a
light
that
is
flashing
as
they're
as
they're
walking
around
I
mean
that
would
be
good
for
everybody,
but
in
the
dark
I
I
feel
we're
going
to
see
more
unhoused
wandering
around
than
not,
but
I
could
be
wrong
about
that.
P
We
we
do
buy
those
and
we
do
distribute
them,
but
we
could
consider
distributing
them
directly
to
that
population,
in
this
case
we're
trying
to
look
for
things
that
we
can
use
in
that
location,
but
also
use
in
other
future
locations.
P
So
we
have
been
thinking
about
reflective
things,
for
example,
one
of
the
complicated
things,
and
that
is
talking
to
people
who
do
that
type
of
outreach
already
and
trying
to
like
ask
them
what
they
think
people
would
keep,
and
sometimes
the
things
that
we
want
to
give
them
are
not
the
things
they
would
keep,
but
that
one
does
seem
you
know
fairly
promising
as
they
go.
So
we
could.
We
could,
you
know,
distribute
those.
E
That's
that's
a
good
point.
We
may
pass
a
mountain
that
may
not
be
something
they
want
to
utilize
and
the
the
advocates
may
know
they
probably
know,
certainly
much
better
than
I
do.
Can
you
give
me
an
update?
I
saw
hillsdale
on
your
to
come.
E
I
thought
it
was
happening
right
now
where
one
lane
is
being
removed
on
either
direction
on
both
directions
and
that
would
slow
down
the
traffic
on
hillsdale
substantially
and
with
and
include
the
quick
build
of
the
bike
lanes
and
center
divide
and
all
that.
But
I
understand
it's
pushed
back.
Can
you
tell
me
why
and
when
it
might
be
implemented.
Q
Sure
I
yeah
I
can
provide
that
update
due
to
winter
suspension.
Basically,
you
know
what,
due
to
the
weather,
they
plan
to
implement
the
project
in
or
implement
the
pavement
project
next
spring.
So
our
the
striping
work
and
the
quick
build
improvements
will
come
later
in
the
spring
of
2022..
E
Okay,
so
it's
weather
related,
okay,
one
other
question
I
had
thank
you.
Lamb
jesse,
is
about
ab43.
You
mentioned
that's
a
great,
a
good
thing,
but
you
mentioned
that
it's
only
in
business
activities
direct
districts.
Currently,
I'm
not
sure
what
that
means.
So
is
that,
like
lincoln
avenue
that
we
could
slow
down
traffic
on
lincoln
avenue,
not
suggesting
we
should,
but
just
knowing
there's
a
lot
of
foot
traffic
on
lincoln
avenue.
Is
that
one
area
or
those
are
the
kind
of
business
districts
that
we
can
do
something
now.
P
In
a
word,
yes,
there
are
there's
a
there's:
we've
we
have
a
map
of
business
activity,
districts
in
the
city
of
san
jose
and
yes,
lincoln
avenue
is
one
of
them
and
so
we're
basically
looking
at
the
map
where
they
intersect,
where
that,
where
the
business
activity
maps
over
streets
that
are
continuous,
so
it'd
make
more
sense,
for
example,
to
have
a
main
street
through
a
business
activity
district
than
a
side
street.
P
So
we
have
that's
where
we
got
the
preliminary
number
of
eight
miles
of
roadways
that
passed
through
those
business
activity.
Districts
two
of
two
miles
are
vision:
zero,
priority
safety
corridors.
P
So
that's
basically
we're
at
the
point
now
where
we've
analyzed
what
those
streets
are,
but
we
haven't
brought
them
forth
yet
so
that
may
be
the
next
step.
E
And
then,
as
far
as
future
implications
or
applications
of
ab43,
when
might
we
see
recommendations
from
you
on
how
we
can
how
and
where
we
can
reduce
speed,
I'm
thinking
of
streets
like
hoosier
in
district
9,
where
we've
already
narrowed
it
down
to
one
lane
in
either
directions,
but
there
was
a
fatality
not
long
ago
and
about
a
month
after
that
there
was
an
injury
accident
in
the
same
area.
E
So
it
seems
that
being
able
to
have
some
flexibility
and
slowing
down
on
that
street
and
others.
That's
just
one,
I'm
very
familiar
with
because
of
my
district.
How?
How
or
when
will
you
be
coming
back
to
us
with
a
recommendation
on
how
we
might
be
able
to
lower
street
lower
speed
zone,
speed
limits
in
other
areas
of
the
city.
P
I
think,
in
the
specific
part
of
the
question
about
the
business
activity
district
streets,
that
that
seems
like
something
we
could
do
fairly
soon.
At
least
it's
something
that
we're
discussing
internally,
but
on
the
subject
of
a
more
specific
street,
which
is
one
we're
also
discussing
internally,
that's
a
little
more
specific
to
the
people
working
on
that
project.
So
I
don't
know
when
they
intend
to
come
back.
Lamb
may
have
a
better
idea
on
that.
One.
Q
This
is
lamkur
speaking
so
just
to
clarify
on
that
piece.
That's
the
piece
for
on
jessie's
slide.
Where
implementation,
we
would
have
to
wait
for
the
county
to
develop
an
online
tool
to
ensure
that
we
provide
access
for
those
who
want
to
contest
moving
violations,
so
that
is
one
of
the
criterias
before
we
can
establish
that
part
of
the
process.
E
So
do
we
know,
do
we
have
any
idea
from
the
county
when
they
might
implement
that
or
take
that
up
for
implementation?
It
sounds
like
a
long
process.
Q
I
know
that
they're
required
to
do
it
by
june
of
2024,
but
I
don't
know
exactly
where
they
are
in
the
process
and
it's
something
that
we
we
could
coordinate
and
you
know
find
out.
Okay,.
E
So,
sadly,
we're
a
long
ways
away
from
doing
anything
because
it
has
to
do
with
enforcement
and
then
contesting
a
ticket
if,
if
a
violator
receives
one,
is
that
right.
P
E
Right
and
I'm
looking
at
lowering
the
speed
as
a
way
to
force
drivers
to
drive
slower,
so
the
ab43
is
a
great
tool,
but
it
sounds
like
there's
going
to
be
several
years
that
it
will
take
us
or
a
few
years
before
we
can
actually
implement
it
fully.
So
I
I
look
forward
to
being
able
to
implement
it
forward
fully.
E
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment.
One
of
the
callers
talked
about
manipulation
of
data,
and
I
just
have
to
defend
that
statement.
That
makes
me
very
frustrated
that
people
think
we
would
manipulate
the
data
in
a
in
a
way
that
might
harm
our
pedestrians.
E
I
think,
as
a
city,
we
work
really
hard
to
keep
our
pedestrians
safe
and
to
allege
that
we're
manipulating
the
data
just
as
inaccurate,
and
I
really
can't
let
couldn't
let
that
statement
stand
and,
and
with
that
I
will.
I
will
move
on
and
and
conclude
my
comments,
but
I
I
really
appreciate
this
vision,
zero
report
and
anyone
who
wants
more
information.
Please
come
to
the
next
vision,
zero
task
force,
which
is
coming
up
where
we
discuss
these
details
in
great
in
great
depth.
E
But
thank
you
jesse
and
lam
for
your
work
thus
far,
and
I
look
forward
to
more
information
and
making
ours
continuing
to
work
together
to
make
our
streets
safe.
Thank.
P
P
They
can
go
to
the
maps
and
data
tab
and
it
shows
the
priority
safety
corridor
map
and
also
there's
a
tool
where
anyone
can
look
up
any
street
in
san
jose
and
look
at
all
of
the
crashes
injuries
that
have
occurred
there
and
you
know
really
just
search
the
data
themselves,
so
in
case
people
are
watching.
This
are
not
aware
of
that.
I
think
it's
great
to
know
about.
Q
Hi,
this
is
lam
again
just
wanted
to
clarify
it's
the
state
judicial
county,
that's
supposed
to
make
the
online
tool
for
us
and
another
note
to
your
comment
on
camden
and
kuzer.
Q
E
One
of
those
tools
was
slowing,
putting
slowing
the
speed
down,
but
I'm
not
sure
we
can
do
that
yet,
but
there
are
other
ways
we
can
force
the
street
to
slow
down
narrowing
the
street.
That
sort
of
thing,
so
thank
you
for
working
with
my
staff
on
that.
It's
been
a
difficult
year
in
that
intersect
in
that
area.
C
Thanks
ma'am
chair
first
off,
I,
I
saw
the
photos
of
center
in
the
presentation
and
I
really
wanted
to
thank
lamb
and
jessie
and
lily,
and
everybody
on
the
team
for
all
their
hard
work.
On
center
we
had
some
horrible
horrible
accidents
and,
and
the
team
really
stepped
up,
and
while
division
zero
for
all
of
center
is,
is
a
much
bigger
project.
C
C
I
also
had
a
comment
on
the
center
road
in
the
report.
It
does
talk
about.
Oh
my
god
thrown
out
of
here
sorry
hold
on.
C
Having
technical
issues
so
the
the
report
mentions
center
road
and
all
the
things
that
came
out
from
the
community
meetings
and
that
the
number
one
thing
that
was
actually
requested
by
residents,
particularly
on
the
southern
half
of
center,
was
more
lighting,
and
it's
something
that
has
emerged
actually
close
to
story
road
as
well.
That
folks
have
asked
for
more
lighting
when
we
look
at
the
slide
that
has
the
the
dark
hours
that
we
had
68
of
fatalities
this
year
and
dark
hours.
C
Why
do
you
think
that
is?
I
know
we
just
had
a
a
conversation
about
kurtner
and
monterey,
but
you
know
are
we?
Are
we
looking
at
the
corridors
in
terms
of
kurtner?
Monterey
is
a
little
bit
of
a
monster
in
in
terms
of
people,
possibly
driving
under
the
influence
late
at
night
right,
but
there
are
other
streets
where
it's
just
frankly
hard
to
see.
Are
we
capturing
our
ability
to
use
lighting?
Are
we
delving
deeper
into
the
dark
hours
issue.
P
We
have
not
done
that
much
yet,
and
I
would
say
that
we,
you
know.
Obviously
we
do
have
our
street
light
team
and
they
probably
do
have
their
their
metric,
for
you
know
their
standard
of
lightness
on
all
roads.
I
I
don't.
P
I
would
say
I'm
very
intrigued
by
that
number
and
also
that
we're
sort
of
aware
that,
for
example,
this
time
of
year
that
we're
entering
right
now
november
to
march,
we
typically
see
a
spike
in
fatalities
due
to
more
darkness,
occur
overlapping
with
commute
hours,
and
so
we
do
typically
have
a
campaign
that
we
run
at
this
time
of
year
that
we
last
year
we
called
lookout
when
it's
dark
out,
but
I
think
that
it's
like
many
of
the
areas
that
we
turn
up
in
these
analyses.
P
I
don't
want
to
say
that
we've
done
all
that
we
can
do
to
analyze
and
respond.
I
think
that
we,
you
know,
I'm
actually
glad
that
we've
identified
that
that's
an
area
that
we
really
should
be
looking
into
more,
even
though
we
have
looked
into
it
before
so
I'm
interested
to
see
what
we
could
do.
P
We
are
doing
a
led
upgrade,
but
I'm
that
lamb
are
you
familiar
with
with
the
information
about
the
led
upgrade.
Q
So
I
know
that
the
whole
street
light
led
upgrade
they're
doing
it.
Citywide
in
terms
of
you
know
where
they
are
exactly
in
the
process.
I
would
need
to
follow
up,
but
to
your
question
or
to
your
comment
on
the
center
road
feedback
about
streetlight
upgrades
or
you
know,
lack
of
lighting.
We
did
as
part
of
that
project
implement,
I
want
to
say
maybe
one
or
two
dozen
street
lights
by
brightening
it
as
part
of
that
project.
So
we
did
hear
you
know
the
feedback
from
the
community.
Q
We
went
back
and
then
we
did
some
analysis
and
brightened
up
those
specific
streetlights.
Q
And
then
the
city-wide
streetlights
will
all
be
upgraded
early
next
year.
C
And
are
we
prioritizing
the
vision,
zero
corridors
for
that.
P
I
believe
yes,
the
the
center
road
team
is
watching
this
meeting
and
said
that
there
were
23
led
replacements
done
on
center
road.
C
C
I
also
wanted
to
councilman
foley
asked
a
lot
of
really
good
questions,
and
some
of
those
were
questions
that
I
was
going
to
ask
around
homelessness.
Are
we
also
reaching
out?
I
will
say,
for
center
tully
monterey
story,
some
of
the
feedback
I'm
getting
on
the
calls
for
service
the
911
calls
or
when
fire
goes
out
onto
medical
calls.
C
Are
we
indicate
that
there's
potential
to
have
some
behavioral
health
issues
as
well
at
night?
Are
we
coordinating
with
the
county's
behavioral
health
team
to
do
outreach,
particularly
at
night
or
about
hey?
You
know,
we've
got
folks
oding
at
night,
you
know
and
along
some
major
corridors
are
we
doing
any
outreach
to
try
and
bring
that
number
down,
and
I
realize
that
doesn't
impact
all
the
quarters.
I'm
just
talking
about
sort
of
certain
corridors
that
I'm
aware
of
where
that's
an
issue.
P
So
after
the
monterey
curtain
or
tully
fatalities,
we've
been
in
contact
with
more
partner
departments,
so
we
talked
to
housing
and
they
have.
I
understand,
two
vendors
they
work
with,
and
then
we
asked
them
about
this.
It
was
new
for
us
to
learn
about
how
the
county
has
additional
vendors
and
the
county.
Vendors
are
the
ones
that
do
the
behavioral
health
work,
and
so
we
have
yet
to
talk
to
that
department
directly.
P
So
I
don't
know
that
I
can
answer
that
question,
but
I'm
happy
that
we're
happy
rather
through
the
work
that
we've
done
around
on
monterey
and
kurt
nortelli.
I'm
glad
that
we've
learned
about
the
other
vendors
and
about
the
county
department
that
administers
those
services,
so
I
think,
there's
more
potential
to
get
in
touch
with
them
directly.
To
answer
that
question.
C
Thank
you,
and
it
also
might
be
helpful
to
connect
with
the
fire
department
just
to
have
some
conversations.
C
I
had
another
question
on
the
the
outside
of
crosswalks
issues.
Why
do
we
think
that
is
I
mean?
Is
it
I
mean
homeless
encampments?
Is
it
covered?
Where
just
you
know,
the
streets
were
empty
for
so
long
and
people
got
used
to
it
are
we
are
we
coordinating
looking
at
that
and
also
looking
at
the
time
of
day
in
terms
of
of
that
as
well.
P
I
had
some
speculative
answers
to
this
one.
I
mean
they're
all
sort
of
a
little
academic,
but
we
do
want
to
know
more
as
a
quick
answer,
but
within
the
world
of
the
pedestrian
safety
plan
that
we're
just
originating
now
and
we're
going
to
bring
on
a
consultant-
and
this
is
one
of
the
areas
that
we
really
want
them
to
look
into.
There's
a
big
range
here
between
sort
of
right
outside
the
crosswalk
or
sort
of
near
to
an
existing
crosswalk
versus
you
know
really
really
far
from
the
signalized
crosswalk.
P
Both
of
those
situations
exist
on
a
lot
of
our
priority
safety
corridors,
and
I
mean
a
lot
of
the
priority
safety
corridors
are
big,
wide,
fast
streets
that
were
really
designed
for
cars
so
as
the
land
use
on
them
changes,
which
is,
we
see
a
lot
of
right
now
around
the
city.
Monterey
road
is
a
great
example.
P
Actually,
you
can
tell
when
you
look
at
it
on
satellite
google
maps
that
it
used
to
be
very
industrial,
and
then,
if
you
look,
for
example,
at
monterey,
curtin
tully,
you
have
a
mall
on
the
west
and
you
have
dense
housing
on
the
east,
and
so
there
have
not
been,
for
example,
many
more
signalized
crossings
added
at
the
same
time
as
we
you
know,
build
those
buildings.
So
how
then,
do
you
sort
of
correct
for
that?
P
And-
and
so
that's
one
of
the
big
questions
that
we
really
want
the
consultant
to
help
us
answer
like
how,
if
we
want
to,
for
example,
build
new
signalized
intersections
in
those
areas
between
existing
signalized
intersections?
How
would
they
propose
that
we
prioritize
them
and
also
afford
them?
So
I
think
that
it's
a
really
good
big
question
and
we
really
want
to
answer
it
within
the
realm
of
that
plan
that
we're
just
about
to
begin
now.
F
C
C
C
Right
and
then
you
know
there
are
apartment
buildings
and
county
buildings
where
you
have
a
lot
of
people
taking
the
bus
and
then
crossing
the
street
and
and
and
people
living
in
the
apartments
crossing
the
street
to
take
a
bus
right,
so
that
is
designed
sort
of
where
you're
definitely
gonna
have,
and
that's
where
you
put
in
the
build-outs,
which
I'm
very
grateful
for,
thank
you
and
and
so
that
sort
of
generates
some
activity,
whereas
kourtner
in
monterey
on
kerner
monterey,
there's
again,
it's
a
monster
intersection
right,
you
sort
of
have
everything
under
the
sun,
but
it's
a
main
artery
at
night.
C
It's
a
main
arter
if
you've
been
out
clubbing
and
you're
going
home.
Now,
it's
a
main
artery.
If
you're
a
distribution
center
and
you've
got
trucks
coming
out.
So
it's
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
different
flavor.
So
that's
that's
something
I'm
interested
in
getting
some
more
information
on.
You
also
touched
on
something
I
wanted
to
bring
up,
which
is
development
next
to
industrial
areas.
C
You
know
the
development
on
monterey,
predates
me,
and
but
it's
very
active
industrial
area
and
and
it's
growing
and
in
fact
I
had
a
question
about
little
orchard
barnard
being
designated
one
of
the
five
I'm
not
aware
of
pd
giving
that
information.
I'm
not
aware
of
a
high
number
of
like
crashes
in
that
intersection.
I
will
say
that
it
is
right
next
to
an
amazon
hub
right,
so
there's
a
high
high
high
volume
of
those
those
amazon
band,
truck
things
in
and
out
all
the
time.
C
Yes,
there's
a
mobile
home
park,
but
you're
not
going
to
see
residents
crossing
that
street
because
there's
a
lot
of
other
stuff
going
on
there
too.
So
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
the
issue
of
of
industrial
areas
and
the
need
for
us
to
coordinate
with
them
on
vision,
zero.
How
are
we
working
like
we've
got
some
major
distribution
hubs
in
this
area
in
some
of
our
vision,
zero
areas,
it
includes
curtin
or
monterey,
although
I
think
that
was
kind
of
its
own
sort
of
thing.
C
But
but
there
are
these
other
areas
where
you've
got
high
volume
of
trucks
going
through
it
are
we
working
with
those
industrial
businesses?
And
frankly,
I
also
say-
and
you
touched
on
this
in
the
in
the
report-
but
you
know
we
really
need
to
choose
right
or
is:
is
an
area
going
to
be
industrial
or
is
it
going
to
be
housing
or
what?
But
it's,
I
think,
unsafe
to
put
certain
activities
in
high
volume,
industrial
areas
so
that
that
was
the
other
question.
Are
we
reaching
out
to
any
of
our
industrial
partners.
P
A
quick
response,
I
guess,
is
that
urban
freight
is
a
policy
area
within
transportation
that
we
haven't
done
tons
with
yet,
but
there
is
someone
in
the
dot
planning
side
who
is
working
on
that
area
who
recently
joined
the
department
within
the
last
year,
and
so
I've
had
a
little
bit
of
conversations
with
her.
There
are
cities
that
work
on
that
area.
We
haven't
done
much
there
yet,
but
I
have
I
do
you
know
insofar
as
being
division,
zero
manager
attend.
P
You
know
basically
sort
of
what's
going
on
in
the
vision,
zero
world
right
now
and
that
topic
is
addressed.
So
I
am
aware
of
some
things
we
could
do
regards
to
truck
design.
For
example,
some
some
cities
actually
have
a
big
fleet
of
their
own
where
they
adopt
different
types
of
truck
designs
and
the
potential
to
do
outreach
with
big
industrial
you
know
uses
in
the
city
is
something
we
could
do.
P
I
don't
know
how
actively
that's
done
in
other
cities,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
so
I
would
say
that
that's
sort
of
an
emerging
side
of
vision,
zero,
but
it's
a
good
idea.
The
other
thing
that
you
touched
on
is
just
the
changing
land
use.
I
don't
know
necessarily
that
those
things
all
can't
coexist,
but
they,
you
know
just
sort
of
acknowledging
that
the
land
use
is
changing
and
what
the
land
use
changing
means
for
the
roads
is,
I
think,
a
useful
thing
to
do
so.
P
You
know,
particularly
in
this
point,
about
the
way
that
our
roads
were
designed
and
the
fact
that
most
of
our
traffic
fatalities
are
people
killed.
While
walking
is
a
useful
thing
to
acknowledge,
you
know
so
in
in
the
service
of
the
greater
goal
of
bringing
down
traffic
fatalities,
you
know
we
need
more
pedestrian
safety
infrastructure
to
work
on
that
and
there's
a
lot
of
you
know
potential
to
add
that.
So
I
think
the
difficulty,
though,
is
that
a
lot
of
it
can
be
quite
expensive.
P
So,
for
example,
the
quick
filled
work
that
we
do
now
is
on
the
more
affordable
end
of
the
of
the
range,
whereas,
for
example,
adding
more
signalized
crosswalks
is
more
expensive,
so
coming
up
with
the
strategy
to
do.
That
is
something
that
I
think
is
really
important
for
the
future
of
our
development
of
the
vision,
zero
plan
here
in
san
jose.
C
And
have
we
so
I'll
also
just
kind
of
share
that
at
this
point
I
think
you
know
the
county
has
developments
and
measure
a
developments
and
other
things
that
they
might
do
in
other
parts
of
the
city
that
you
know
and
with
all
the
state
bills
and
everything
this
might
be
something
that
we
share
with
them
in
terms
of
division,
zero
corridors,
so
that
potentially,
that
could
be
mitigated
by
development
a
little
bit
more
and
I'm
just
again
basing
that,
on
my
experience
in
district
seven,
I
know
not.
C
Every
district
is
like
that
by
any
means,
but
there's
just
a
lot
of
development
that
had
been
put
in
after
the
fact
where
we
just
didn't
have
any
mitigation,
so
all
right
with
that
I'll,
just
I'll
stop
right
there.
Thank
you.
H
All
right,
councilmember
davis
had
to
leave
so
we'll
move
to
a
vote,
because
we
have
a
motion
in
second
on
this
item.
B
A
H
A
Yes,
yes,
we
can.
Okay,
hey.
I
love
the
ideas
and
a
lot
of
good
ideas
going
on.
Well,
I
just
I
I
just
had
a
thought:
why
don't
we
focus
on
like
inspiring
the
people
you
know
to
like
maybe
care
to
slow
down?
You
know
maybe
like
we
could
have
maybe
like
a
song
or
something
on
the
radios.
A
If
we
had
local
artists
or
something
you
know
try
to
inspire
people
to
to
care
about,
like
you
know,
slowing
down,
I
think
it
would
do
a
lot
of
good.
I
know
that
david
hume
talked
about
reasoning
only
ever
always
being
slave
to
the
passions.
A
You
know
we,
we
can
know
all
the
data
we
want.
You
know,
but
but
we
won't
really
do
anything
about
it.
Unless
we
really
care,
you
know,
and
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
really
powerful
thing
really.
Oh,
that's
all.
I
had
to
say
thank.
F
Hi
blair
here
thanks
for
the
words
of
that
previous
callers
nice
to
hear
I
hope
we
can
return
some
time.
I
guess
you
know.
I
guess
I
gotta
go
with
my
heavy
first
and
you
know
to
respond
a
bit
to
council
person
holy
who
just
spoke.
You
know
it
was
my
understanding.
It's
been
kind
of
a
hard-fought
debate
about
how
to
decide
the
future
of
ksi
statistics
over
the
past
few
years.
They
may
be
going
getting
over
a
hump
and
and
finding
a
good
direction
at
this
time.
F
I'm
sorry.
I
didn't
report
that
better,
but
I
I
think
I
I'm
fairly
accurate
in
what
I've
been
describing
and
that
needs
to
be
discussed
and
and
open.
It
needs
to
be
open.
We
can't
just
simply
blank
it
and
brush
it
under
the
rug,
but
I
thank
you
for
the
attempts.
I
will
try
my
best
towards
feel-good
notions
as
well
as
much
as
we
can,
but
we
have
to.
We
have
to
note
things
sometimes
and
and
be
open
how
to
talk
about
things
too.
F
Sorry
for
the
trouble
I'll
try
to
speak
on
a
few
items.
I
want
to
talk
about
it.
This
time,
at
the
open
forum,
mass
use
is
important.
You
know
the
the
cohort
may
be
rising
in
in
england
and
in
russia
at
this
time,
so
we
have
to
continue
the
mass
use
ideas.
F
I
had
a
few
other
items.
Oh,
I
wanted
to
thank
tessa
the
way
she
described
how
she
used.
The
name
described
the
name,
joe
roy,
her
own
words
to
describe
what
how
she
felt
it
sounded
like
were
really
interesting.
I
thought-
and
I
didn't
want
to
at
all
hurt
her
interpretation
of
his
name
that
I
thought
was
more
interesting
than
mine
in
interpretations.
F
What
else
there's
a
real
important
city
charter
meeting
tonight.
It's
gonna
talk
about
study
session
issues,
a
wide
range
of
issues
that
I
I
think
can
be
helpful
in
understanding
and
putting
into
frame
what
we're
working
towards
to
our
future.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you
vice,
chair
cohen,
this
is
andrew
boone
and
I'd
like
to
thank
the
city
for
hosting
a
second
viva
caye
event.
This
november
7th,
I
mean
second
this
year,
I
believe,
before
this
year
it's
only
been
one
one
viva
caye
per
year.
This
is
where
a
large
route,
five
or
six
miles
of
streets,
are
closed
to
car
traffic,
so
that
people
can
use
the
streets
for
walking,
bicycling
skating,
dancing
enjoying
life,
and
I
went
to
the
viba
kai
event
two
months.
G
I
think
it
was
a
couple
months
ago
and
it
was
it
was
fantastic.
I
was
blown
away
about
how
many
people
were
out
there.
The
crowds-
and
this
is
very
important.
I
hope
that
the
city
will
someday
hold
even
more
than
two
events
per
year.
San
francisco
has
been
hosting
eight
open
street
events,
their
equivalent
of
viva
kaye,
since
they
started
about
10
years
ago.
Until
the
pandemic,
the
viva
caye
allows
people
to
see
an
alternative
for
the
future
of
the
streets.
G
It
allows
us
to
see
that
the
streets
don't
just
have
to
be
for
cars.
We
have
a
solution
here.
We
can
make
streets
not
just
death
traffic,
sewer,
just
death
zones,
but
we
can
make
them
for
people
for
a
future
that
we
need
to
build,
and
it
shouldn't
just
be
for
five
hours
on
one
day
that
streets
are
closed
to
cars.
This
is
the
way
some
of
our
streets
should
be
all
the
time
there
need
to
be
streets,
at
least
in
downtown
san
jose,
that
are
car
free
streets.
G
D
Thank
you
vice
chair,
david,
cohn,
doing
a
good
job
yeah.
Well,
I
was
talking
to
my
husband.
Well,
I
was
very
inspired
that
councilwoman
pam
foley's
compassion
towards
her
fellow
human
being
in
regards
to
the
homeless
people
being
a
pri
primarily
on
our
streets.
Yes,
that's
very
true
they're,
the
only
ones
that
walk
down
my
block.
Very
you
know,
most
of
the
time
I
say
hi.
How
are
you
are
you
homeless?
D
I
mean
yes,
I'm
homeless,
you
know,
and
so
I'm
not
saying
all
the
people
that
walk
on
my
block,
but
a
lot
of
people
when
I'm
out
are
homeless
because
they're,
the
ones
that
aren't
in
the
cars
destroying
our
planet.
You
know-
and
so
this
is,
you
know
the
reality,
but
I
appreciated
that
pam
foley
was
saying
that
we
needed
to
give
them
some
device
so
that
they
could
be
more
well-lit
and
the
you
know.
D
You
always
come
up
with
some
battery
oriented
thing,
but
that's
not
really
sustainable
and
something
that
can
last
forever
because
they
don't,
and
so
we,
my
husband's
idea
was-
and
I
thought
I
was
going
to
deal
with
vests.
You
know
if
we
got
them.
You
know
those
great
vests,
that
you
know
people
wear
that
for
their
bicycles
or
workers
and
that
they
have
pockets.
D
I
mean
they're,
really
a
nice
addition
to
your
to
your
going
out
on
the
street
because
they
have
pockets
and
so
that
that
seemed
like
a
great
idea
to
give
everyone
vests
anyway,
the
homeless
people,
and
so-
and
that
was
one
idea,
and
then
you
know
what
andrew
was
talking
about.
Yes,
we
need
car
free
downtown,
and
I
was
talking
to
my
girlfriend
catherine
matthewson,
who
actually
talked
at
the
charter
review
commission
and
she
at
first
didn't
go
for
it.
D
But
then,
when
we
were
talking
about
she
says
in
singapore,
they
actually
do
do
that
and
they
only
allow
the
trucks
in,
hopefully,
they'll
become
electrified
and
our
buses
hopefully
come
electrified.
And
then
you
know
we
just
get
rid
of
our
car
traffic
and
that's
how
they
do
it
in
singapore
singapore.
So
we
could
do
that
with
the
google
village
and
the
downtown,
I
think,
would
really
improve
downtown.