►
From YouTube: MAR 7, 2022 | Transportation & Environment Committee
Description
City of San José, California
Transportation & Environment Committee of March 7, 2022.
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=929729&GUID=EBA22BB4-1036-4CA3-BCE7-4980E5880F67
A
B
This
includes
commenting
on
the
specific
agenda
item
only
and
addressing
the
full
body,
not
individual
members
of
the
committee
public
speakers
will
not
engage
in
conversation
with
the
chair
with
specific
council
members
or
staff.
All
members
of
the
committee
staff
and
public
are
expected
to
refrain
from
abusive
language.
B
C
B
Davis,
I'm
here
and
councilmember
foley
just
logged
in.
Thank
you
all
right.
We
don't
have
orders
of
the
day
on
here.
We
do
have
a
review
of
the
work
plan,
but
I
would
like
to
ask
the
committee
if
we
could
hear
items
five
and
six
first
before
the
other
items.
If
there
is
no
objection,
we'll
just
go
forward
with
that.
B
A
D
Oh
there,
you
can
hear
me,
okay,
good,
thank
you
so
much
yeah.
The
review
of
the
work
plan
is
very
critical
as
we
go
forward
in
our
climate
emergency
and
that
we
are
not
doing
enough
to
make
our
roads
safe.
In
terms
of
we
see
that
in
regards
to
all
the
deaths
on
our
street
every
day,
there's
another
death-
and
you
know,
and-
and
you
know
don't
even
mention
that
it
doesn't
mention
the
disabled.
D
D
Coyote
valley
status,
report,
okay,
so
that
was
it
specifically
on
the
work
plan,
the
that's
the
referral.
Okay,
that's
fine!
So
it's
a
deferral
of
the
coyote
valley
work
plan.
So,
yes,
I
have
a
trouble
with
the
deferral
in
regards
to
you
know.
We
really
need
to
be
supporting
urban
agriculture
and
the
work
plan
needs
to
be
really
embracing
that,
throughout
our
city,
a
work
plan
to
make
san
jose
a
food
garden.
D
Again,
as
we
face
the
the
issues
of
our
climate
crisis
that
we
have
to
start
growing
food
locally
and
so
to
defer
the
develop.
You
know
any
issues
about
coyote
valley,
especially
because
it's
being
challenged
you
know
from
the
landowners
are
challenging.
D
It's
saying
that
they,
you
know
they
want
whatever
they
want
for
their
development
and
that
how
dare
san
jose,
stop
the
development
and
we
need
to
be.
You
know:
re
re,
designing
our
general
plan
to
include
agriculture
and
that's
where
you
know:
we've
gone
off
the
rails
in
our
silicon
valley.
You
know
designing
of
our.
You
know
the
valley
of
hearts
delight
originally
to
become
silicon
valley.
You
know
I
mean
there's
some
benefits
to
that.
D
Our
internet
is
a
development,
is
a
is
a
good
thing,
but
we
really
need
to
get
back
to
basics
in
terms
of
our
survival
and
that's
what
is
on
the
you
know
the
ipcc,
the
current
you
know
the
current
report
is
saying
that
delay
is
back
to
the.
B
Committee,
thank
you
on
item
c.
There
are
no
items
on
the
consent
calendar
so
we'll
move
to
item
d
reports
to
the
committee
and
we
will
start
with
item
5
assembly
bill
43
speed
limit
setting
john.
Would
you
like
to
kick
it.
B
F
G
A
H
G
H
I
K
You,
john
sorry,
I
was
just
checking
if
I
was
unmuted
okay,
good
afternoon
committee
members
and
members
of
the
public.
My
name
is
lam
cruz,
I'm
with
the
department
of
transportation,
division
manager,
overseeing
traffic
safety
I'll,
be
giving
the
presentation
today
on
assembly
bill
43
speed
limit
setting.
I
have
with
me
assistant
director,
laura
wells
on
the
panel
she'll,
be
here
to
also
assist
with
questions,
since
she
was
involved
with
the
development
of
this
bill.
K
So
assembly
bill
ab43
was
authorized
by
assembly
friedman,
and
this
was
passed.
Last
fall.
Certain
provisions
became
available
on
january
1st
of
2022.
K
It
also
gives
us
the
flexibility
to
lower
the
speed
limit
in
business
activity.
Districts
there's
also
some
details
that
still
need
to
be
worked
out.
Caltrans
is
in
the
process
of
developing
a
criteria
for
high
injury
roadways,
as
well
as
a
high
pedestrian
and
bicyclist
generator.
K
This
provision
becomes
available
on
june
30th
2024
or
when
judicial
council
develops
an
online
tool
for
adjudicating
traffic
infractions,
whichever
becomes
available
sooner.
This
bill
also
allows
us
to
extend
our
engineering
and
traffic
surveys
to
14
years.
These
surveys
are
important
because
it
gives
our
officers
the
ability
to
enforce
speed
using
their
radar
guns
surveys.
They
usually
need
to
be
redone
every
seven
years.
Prior
to
this
bill,
we
were
able
to
extend
it
to
ten
years
if
there
are
no
significant
changes
to
the
roadway.
K
This
bill
allows
us
to
extend
it
to
14
years,
as
many
of
you
are
probably
well
aware
during
coba
time,
you
know,
with
people
driving
less,
there
was
less
traffic
on
the
roadways
and
speeds
have
gone
up
at
that
time.
We
did
not
think
it
was
advisable
to
redo
our
engineering
traffic
surveys,
so
we
do
see,
so
we
will
be
taking
advantage
of
this
opportunity
and
applying
it
where
it
makes
sense.
K
So
for
the
business
activity
districts
there
are
criterias
to
it.
There
could
only
be
four
lanes
maximum
a
maximum
posted
speed
limit
of
30
miles
per
hour,
the
segment
prior
and
after
after
it
can
only
be
a
five
mile
per
hour
difference.
It
also
needs
to
meet
three
of
the
following.
K
Four
criterias
50
of
the
street
consists
needs
to
consist
of
retailer
dining
that
opens
directly
onto
the
sidewalks
signals
or
stop
signs
cannot
be
no
more
than
600
feet
apart,
uncontrolled,
more
crosswalks
or
it
and
or
it
needs
to
meet,
have
to
have
on-street
parking.
The
business
activity
district
is
basically
a
new
category
of
primo
flashy
speed
limit,
which
is
similar
to
school
zones.
K
So,
based
on
our
first
assessment,
we
were
able
to
identify
six
streets
where
we
could
lower
the
speed
limit
to
20
miles
per
hour.
The
six
streets
are
evergreen
village
square
in
downtown.
L
This
sounds
I'm
a
bit
concerned
about
this
bill.
It
sounds
like
it
can
really
help
what
you
know.
Bicycle
advocates
and
local
people
of
local
neighborhoods
really
are
looking
for
what
they
need
for
their
future
planning
of
safer
streets
for
our
local
community
future
and
I'm
really
for
the
ideas
of
a
20
mile
an
hour
speed
limits
in
in
you
know,
business
zones
and
the
like,
you
know,
I'm
all
for
the
slower
streets
idea.
Incredibly,
so
it's
just
a
matter
of
the
technology
use.
L
That's
involved
that
I
I
will
always
be
apprehensive
about
using
more
and
more
technology
to
you
know,
to
define
and
enforce
our
policies
of
how
we
can
move
slower
with
our
with
our
automobile
traffic
in
the
future.
L
If
you
do
go
forward
with
you
know,
technology
practices
to
enforce
and
to
monitor
and
data
collect
for
slower
speed
issues,
I
mean,
as
always,
if
you
can
make
that
technology
just
open
and
accountable
and
understandable
to
the
everyday
public,
that's
part
of
the
keys
to
our
future.
L
It
isn't
just
the
technology
itself,
it's
having
open
public
policies,
that's
going
to
help
define
the
future
of
our
sustainability,
more
workable
communities
in
our
future
and
our
future,
and
and
really
the
ideas
of
vision,
zero
behind
community
harmony
and,
and
you
know
better
practices
for
ourselves,
and
it
builds
community
harmony
with
with
more
openness
and
accountability.
L
So,
just
a
reminder
of
those
things
and
good
luck
on
how
we
can
work
to
keep
things
slow
thanks.
A
lot.
D
Yeah,
thank
you
tessa
woodman
c,
and
I
I'd
like
to
put
into
the
record
that
I
guess
it's
what's
her
name
tony
tabor
just
shuts
me
off
cuts
me
off
because
the
way
vice
mayor
jones
has
always
said
he
would
say.
Okay
get
back
onto
the
topic,
you
don't
just
cut
people
off
you.
Let
them
know
that
if
you
feel
that
they're
not
on
the
topic,
you
don't
just
shut
them
off
and
give
tony
tabor
the
right
to
or
whoever
gets
the
right
to
just
shut
it
down.
D
So
hopefully
that
gets
in
the
record.
You
know
so
that
that's
that
issue,
but
the
issue
of
you
know
slowing
our
streets
down
is
so
critical
not
only
for
our
fossil
fuel
use
but
for
the
saving
of
our
our
lives
literally,
and
so
we
have
to
do
that
more
and
so
we're
very
supportive
of
20
miles
per
hour.
That
is
where
so
much
less
damage
happens
and
we
need
to
do
that
in
all
our
roads.
D
Actually-
and
so
you
know-
and
and
the
thing
is,
we
really
need
to
make
this
code
of
conduct
whatever
now?
Are
you
saying
whatever
anyway,
and
so
the
basic
thing
that
I'm
saying
is
that
you
know
we
need
to
make
these
things
more
available
to
the
public.
This
data
that
you're,
you
know,
even
this
issue
of
certain
roads
are
the
ones
that
are
available
to
be
slowed
down.
D
That's
good,
but
there
needs
to
be
a
way
that
we
can
access
the
data
of
the
dot
so
that
when
we
have
complaints,
they
don't
just
go
into
a
garbage.
Can
you
know
because
that's
what's
been
happening
in
terms
of
stockton
avenue
in
regards
to
the
concerns
that
I
have
and
on
taylor
street
and
all
the
streets
that
intersect
stockton
there's
no
database
where
that
gets
reported,
and
so
and
even
the
you
know
they
say:
there's
been
a
lot
of
injuries.
D
You
know
we
that
needs
to
be
open
to
the
public
and
also
so
that
we
can.
When
we
make
a
complaint,
we
can
see
it
registered
because
you
know
when
I
speak
to
my
council
member,
she
says:
well,
it's
not
on
the
not
on
the
agenda
or
something
like
that.
It
needs
to
be
on
it.
Oh
and
not
enough,
people
have
complained,
and
it
should
be
enough
that
one
person
complain.
A
Hi,
yes,
edgar
ariana
here
with
california
walks,
walk
san
jose
just
in
support
of
the
reading
of
this
bill,
and
you
know
contextualizing
it
with
what
is
san
jose.
A
I
hope
that
the
engineering
follows
suit
with
the
setting
of
the
speed
limit,
not
just
you
know,
putting
a
policy
in
place
and
hoping
that
everybody's
gonna
play
fair.
There
needs
to
be
the
engineering
and
the
education
side
of
it,
so
thinking
long
term.
I
hope
you
know
that
the
reading
of
this
bill
allowed
in
this
arena
is
not
just
for
setting
enforcement
standards,
but
for
you
know
really
putting
some,
I
don't
know
kindling
for,
for
what
is
the
engineering
and
the
educational
fixes
as
well?
A
Avery
hi,
I
just
I
was
gonna,
say
something,
but
the
last
person
said
it
wonderfully.
I
would
love
to
see
more
than
just
signs
posted
and
tickets,
given,
but
engineering
done
to
make
streets
narrower,
maybe
give
more
space
to
bikes,
maybe
even
separate
space
and
pedestrians,
and
maybe
that
can
help
beyond.
M
C
Hi
I'm
strongly
supportive
of
reducing
speeds,
especially
in
the
japan
town
quarter.
This
is,
as
the
callers
have
mentioned,
just
one
tool
in
the
tool
kit,
but
yeah.
I
think
it's
great
that
this
is
now
an
option.
C
Recently
I
was
riding
in
japantown
on
the
the
very
segment
mentioned
in
the
report
and
rather
than
taking
the
sidewalk
because
it
was
crowded
with
pedestrians.
C
I
took
the
lane
because
there's
no
bike
lanes
either
in
the
angled
parking-
and
I
was
with
my
girlfriend
and
the
car
behind
me
was
respectful,
but
the
car
behind
them
was
very
angry
at
the
speed
we
were
all
going
at
and
we
have
electric
bikes.
We
were
actually
going.
You
know
a
good
speed,
probably
close
to
you,
know
15
miles
per
hour
and
he
punished
so
he
zoomed
past
the
car
behind
us
and
then
punished
past
us
and
he
screamed
at
the
top
of
his
lungs
outside
of
his
window.
That.
F
C
Belonged
on
the
sidewalk,
and
I
think
it's
incredibly
important
because
you
know
I've
been
trying
to
convince
my
girlfriend
that
riding
around
in
san
jose,
especially
downtown,
is
pretty
safe,
and
I
did
follow
up
with
the
dot
and
the
d3
office
to
try
to
get
some
kind
of.
C
C
You
know
close
to
the
speed
limit,
so
so,
of
course,
bringing
it
down
to
20
miles
per
hour,
makes
that
a
lot
easier
as
well
so
yeah
overall,
I'm
very
supportive
and
I'm
glad
to
see
some
of
the
bigger
cities
already
moving
on
this,
whether
it's
open,
I
think
san
francisco
and
la
as
well.
Thank
you.
F
Hi,
thank
you.
This
is
jill
borders
and
I
am
so
grateful
that
there
is
something
being
done
and
talked
about
to
reduce
speed
limits,
I'm
all
for
reducing
speed
wherever
we
can
in
our
cities.
I
wanted
to
comment
and
hope
that
I
can
just
bring
up
this
one
street
that
you
might
want
to
look
and
add
to
the
list,
because
it's
such
a
unique
circumstance
in
my
opinion,
I
have
to
travel
it
every
day.
F
Obviously
I
live
off
of
winfield
boulevard
between
blossom
hill,
road
and
coleman
avenue,
and
so
winfield
has
become
an
absolute
sort
of
racetrack
to
get
people
to
get
from
coleman.
If
they've
been
in
almaden
or
wherever
and
to
get
to
blossom
hill,
it
really
becomes
almost
like
a
little
racetrack.
In
the
morning.
People
may
be
trying
to
bypass
one
area
to
get
to
another,
but
this
is
a
light
industrial
area
on
one
entire
side
of
side
of
the
street,
and
it's
residential,
of
course,
for
our
mobile
home
park.
F
So
there's
there's
no
crosswalk
anywhere,
not
that
anyone
would
use
one
I'm
not
advocating
for
that,
but
all
the
workers
will
park
their
car
and
then
run
across
and
because
it's
a
lot
of
auto
body
shops,
a
lot
of
people
will
park
their
auto
body
or
excuse
me
their
cars
for
either
painting
or
repair,
and
so
you
all
day
long
every
day
we
have
people
running
back
and
forth
so
teaching.
F
For
example,
my
teenager
to
drive
was
an
absolute
terrifying
experience
because
it's
like
frogger
with
people
on
winfield,
so
I'm
just
letting
you
know
if
you
want
to
consider
reducing
a
speed
limit
anywhere
in
the
city
and
prevent
what
could
be
a
horrible
eventual
pedestrian
accident.
You
will
consider
looking
at
the
street
of
winfield
between
coleman,
avenue
and
blossom
hill
road,
because
there
are
pedestrians
on
it
every
day,
crossing
intentionally
purposefully
to
get
to
where
they
need
to.
N
Hi,
yes,
can
you
hear
me
cool
yeah?
Speaking
of
you
cool,
oh
yeah.
I
agree
strongly
on
this
because
so
here
I
hope
that
you
guys
can
implement
that
in
kerner
and
monterey
road.
I
see
they
already
put
cameras
in
there
and
already
put
a
green
fence
on
one
side
of
the
street,
because
that
that
right
there
is
very
dangerous,
and
I
hope
that
you
can
look
also
in
the
east
side
of
san
jose.
Okay,
because
there's
some
streets
are
like
behind
park
away
right
there
in
cinderella.
N
They
run
like
crazy
out
of
the
out
of
the
hopkins
street,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
do
something
also
in
the
side
of
town,
because
we
need
it.
Okay-
and
I
agree
with
the
bicyclists-
we
need
to
wait,
give
them
the
right
away,
they're,
trying
to
save
the
environment.
They
get
up
earlier
to
go
to
work
and
the
bike.
N
O
Okay,
let's
start
with
timing
the
lights
and
fixing
the
potholes
and
repaving
the
roads.
First,
this
whole
speed
limit
thing
is
another.
What
I
call
zero
vision,
you
guys
call
it
vision
zero.
I
call
it
zero
vision,
but
some
road
repavings
on
cherry
avenue
are
quite
nice.
Good,
painting,
good
bike
lanes
other
places
not
so
much
downtown
is
terrible.
It's
a
failure.
Whoever
did
the
bike
lanes
downtown
is
a
loser.
O
Some
of
the
bike
lanes,
like
I
say,
are
good.
Others
are
very
non-intuitive
for
both
cyclists
and
drivers
keep
in
mind.
Drivers
are
the
ones
who
pay
the
taxes
and
the
fees
for
everything.
Bicyclists,
don't
sorry
people,
but
you
just
don't
your
bicycle-
doesn't
have
a
registration
sticker
on
it.
Like
my
car
does?
Okay,
anybody
can
ride
a
bike,
but
you
know,
but
not
everybody
can
drive
a
car
that
whole
privilege
thing.
O
So,
if
I
have
a
privilege
to
drive
on
the
road,
I
shouldn't
have
to
be
inconvenienced
with
non-intuitive
roads,
potholes
badly
painted
lanes
bike
lanes
that
overtake
an
entire
lane
where
you
can
barely
even
drive
on.
Like
I
say,
some
things
are
good,
but
a
lot
of
things
are
terrible
done
in
what
I
call
the
san
jose
way
right,
really
bad,
not
very
good,
zero
vision,
that's
what
it's
all
about
in
this
town,
so
get
it
straight,
but
I
mean
you
guys
want
to
do
what
you
did
downtown
the
rest
of
the
city.
O
That's
a
fail!
Okay,
look
at
your
downtown!
It's
a
fail
who's
down
there!
Nobody,
but
bums,
puking!
Okay,
that's
who's!
They're!
On
bicycles,
too!
Isn't
that
good
they're,
not
at
least
they're?
Not!
You
know,
you
know,
leaving
a
carbon
footprint.
The
only
the
only
footprint
you
see
is
someone
who
walked
through
their
vomit.
That's
what
you
see
down
there
or
or
or
you
know
something
else.
You
know
we
can't
even
talk
about.
I
get
kicked
off.
They
get
kicked
off
the
air
because
they
might
say
a
bad
word.
H
H
Narrowing
lanes
and
lowering
the
speed
limit
will
slow
down
traffic
and
slowing
down
traffic
will
eliminate
some
of
the
injuries
we
have
on
the
road
and
pedestrian
deaths.
But
I'm
wondering
how
lamb,
how
were
those
streets
selected
that
you
listed
in
your
presentation.
K
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
did
look
at
the
ones
that
are
classified
as
business
or
business
districts.
We
looked
at
those
and
we
took
a
closer
look
and
looked
at
the
criteria.
The
four
that
I
had
mentioned
to
see
if
they
meet
three
of
the
four
of
the
following
criterias,
which
is
it
needs
to
have
fifty
percent
of
retail
or
dining
that
fronts
the
street.
K
You
know
if
it
had
controlled
stopping
stops,
such
as
a
signal
or
stop
sign,
no
more
than
600
feet
apart
on
street
parking
and
or
unmarked
crosswalks.
So
we
had
to
go
through
that
exercise
and
really
determine
if
it
was
eligible
or
not.
So
that's
that's
the
first
round
of
it
and
you
know,
like
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
are
procuring
consultant
services
and
we'll
be
identifying,
hopefully
more
that
we
could
bring
so
that
we
can
lower
the
speeds
on
streets
beyond
the
ones
that
I
presented
earlier.
K
H
K
Yes,
like
I
mentioned
it
was
like
50,
we
would
need
to
have
50
of
retailer
dining
for
it
to
be
eligible,
or
at
least
that's
one
of
the
criteria.
H
Okay,
so
this
is
why?
Because
one
of
the
streets
that
comes
to
mind
to
me
is
curtner
and
it
curtin
probably
doesn't
meet
the
business
district
criteria
along
many
of
its
stretches
most
of
its
residential
along
its
stretches
until
you
get,
you
know
closer
to
monterey
road.
Well,
you
know
lincoln
avenue
and
almaden.
H
The
next
question
I
had
is,
I
know
these
are
our
streets,
but
we've
recently
had
several
pedestrian
deaths
on
an
expressway
on
almaden
expressway
near
foxworthy,
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
have
or
how
we
would
discuss
with
our
some
of
our
partnerships
like
the
county
to
lower
the
speed
limit
in
those
stretches.
H
K
So
maybe
I
can
touch
a
little
bit
on
what
you
mentioned
earlier,
for
example
curtner.
Although
it
doesn't
meet
a
business
activity
district
it
you
know
likely,
may
fall
un
under
other
provisions
that
I
mentioned
where
caltrans
is
developing.
What
a
high
injury
roadway
is
where
we
can
take
a
five
mile
per
hour
reduction.
K
So
when
those
provisions
become
available,
we'll
also
be
evaluating
safety
corridors,
where
we
can
take
that
additional
reduction
in
terms
of
your
response
to
our
coordination
with
the
county,
I'm
not
sure
if
we
want
to
reserve
it
for
the
next
item,
but
maybe
I
can
quickly
touch
on
it
because
I
know
jesse's
going
to
give
a
presentation
on
the
data
piece,
but
we
are
in
coordination
with
them.
We
have
evaluated.
K
You
know
what
our
top
intersections
are
that
intersect
with
the
county.
They
are
looking
at
our
data
to
see
if
you
know
it
aligns
with
theirs,
and
they
will
be
discussing
a
plan
on
how
we
can
improve
those
intersections
together.
They
do
have
an
active
transportation
plan
as
well
to
see
if
there's
opportunity
for
us
to
leverage.
Some
of
you
know
the
projects
that
would
go
into
that
plan.
H
I
I
appreciate
that
and
if
this
comes
up
under
jesse's
report,
I'll
I'll
bring
it
up
there
too,
but
I
would
suspect
that
a
year
ago,
foxworthy
and
almaden
expressway
would
not
rise
to
the
level
of
concern,
because
I
don't
think
there
were
any
injuries
or
fatalities
right
there.
But
in
the
last
two
months
we've
had
three
fatalities
and
one
serious
injury.
H
So
it's
something's
happening
right
there
that
we
need
to
address
address
immediately,
so
I'll,
just
throw
that
out
there
and
hope
that
we
continue
to
look
at
that
with
the
county
because
it
is
county
and
we
need
some
some
assistance
in
that
intersection.
I
think
so
with
that.
I
look
forward
to
the
vision,
zero
report,
which
I
think
is
probably
next.
Thank
you
lamb.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
fully
councilmember
perales.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
appreciate
the
update
as
well.
I'm
excited
and
looking
forward
to
this
opportunity.
Obviously
it's
going
to
be
a
couple
years
before
we
can.
We
can
see
the
full
implementation
of
it
and
I'm
a
little
concerned
in
regards
to
how
restrictive
it
looks
and
and
some
of
the
limited
corridors
that
we
will
potentially
be
able
to
reduce
the
speed
and,
as
I
understand,
only
only
five
miles
per
hour,
less
than
what
is
currently
posted.
So
I
I
I
like
the
streets
that
you've
mentioned
already.
G
I
would
agree
with
some
of
the
the
speakers
on
the
benefits
there,
but
but
surprised
to
to
see
other
corridors
that
may
not
be
there,
for
instance,
lincoln
avenue,
I'm
not
sure
what
the
speed
limit
there
is
now.
Maybe
our
chair
knows
it.
G
And
I'm
curious
chair
if
you're
surprised
about
that
as
well,
I
thought
maybe
lincoln
would
be
included.
B
G
Ask
it
forwarding
that
question
through
I,
I
was
just
surprised
as
knowing
how
potentially
similar
that
corridor
is
to
some
of
the
other
streets,
like
you
know,
jackson,
japan,
town
and
santa
clara
street,
so
maybe
lamb.
You
could
help
in
that
regard,
and
and
then
you
can
make
it
more
broad
of
an
answer
too,
as
well
like,
for
instance,
leaking
as
a
specific
street,
but
then
maybe
other
streets
that
would
be
similar
in
how
what
was
what
was
it
that
disqualified
them.
K
J
Do
you
want
me
to
to
sure
okay,
so
lincoln
avenue
between
minnesota
and
co
definitely
meets
the
intent
of
the
bill
in
terms
of
classifying
it
as
an
urban
business
activity
district?
The
factor
that
is
is
disqualifying.
J
It
is
the
approach
to
lincoln
avenue
to
the
south
is
35
miles
per
hour
and
the
bill
in
order
to
establish
a
25
mile
per
hour
business
activity
district.
The
approaches
on
either
end
need
to
be
no
more
than
30
miles
per
hour
and
then
to
establish
a
20
mile
per
hour
business
activity
district.
The
approaches
need
to
be
no
more
than
25
miles
per
hour.
J
J
Or
can
we
look
at
a
segment,
the
the
initial
sections
of
lincoln
avenue
that
are
25
and
establish
a
a
slightly
smaller
segment
of
a
business
activity
district
that
is
20.,
so
we
would
meet
the
criteria
of
the
bill.
It
would
be
25
initially
coming
in
and
and
a
smaller
stretch
would
be.
Would
be
the
20.,
and
so
we
need
to
to
look
at
that
and
look
at
what
makes
sense.
J
G
Okay,
yeah
and
I'll,
like
remember,
davis,
expand
on
that,
but
it
makes
more
sense
now
and-
and
it
sounds
like
it's-
the
varying
speed
limits,
especially
the
ones
entering
into
the
corridor
there
you
mentioned
about
potentially
reducing
those
speed
limits.
Isn't
that
aren't
we
in
the
same
boat,
though
right
where
it's
becomes
challenging
right?
That's
why
this
assembly
bill
was
a
benefit
because
it's
hopefully
making
it
easier
to
reduce
speed
limit.
So
how
is
it
that
it?
You
know
that
we
could
potentially
reduce
the
speed
limit
entering
this
corridor
on
lincoln.
G
J
G
Have
right
now
to
change
it,
which
is
much
more
right
intensive
of
a
procedure?
Okay,
yes,
okay,
yeah!
I
would
personally
you
know
whether
it's
lincoln
avenue
or
other
corridors
in
the
city.
I
would,
I
would
love
to
see
you
know
which
ones
came
close
right,
that
they
meet,
as
you
mentioned,
lincoln,
meets
the
spirit
right
off
of
an
area
that
we
would
want
to
do
this
at
and
then
see
what
we
need
to
do
and
if
we
need
to
go
through
a
more
lengthier
process
of
reducing.
G
You
know
the
incoming
speed
limits.
Then
maybe
we
do
that
right
and
we
try
to
take
advantage,
because
I
do
think
that
right,
we
unfortunately
are
in
a
a
region
of
the
country
that
was
built
around
the
automobile
and
it
was
built
around
moving
as
fast
as
possible
between
you
know,
point
a
and
b,
and
because
of
that
you
know
we
have
this,
this
layout
of
roadways
that
we
have
today
and
we
have
the
speed
limits
that
we
have
today
and,
more
importantly,
or
more
challenging.
G
I
should
say
we
have
these
protections
on.
You
know
how
we
can
reduce
the
speed
limits
and
how
we
can
install
traffic,
calming
barriers
or
traffic
signals
and
stop
signs
right.
It's
it's!
It's
a
everything
is
catered
towards,
moving
as
quickly
as
possible
between
point
a
and
b
in
a
vehicle
that
is
sort
of
you
know.
G
That
is
priority,
one
that
that
has
been
in
existence
for
so
long
that
all
the
policies
and
and
parameters
to
get
around
that
are
are
making
it
more
challenging
to
do
what
today,
I
think
we
have
much
more
of
an
appetite
from
our
community
to
what
which
is
to
actually
slow
down
some
of
the
traffic,
especially
in
some
of
these
corridors,
make
it
safer
right,
put
more
traffic
coming
in
traffic
signals,
and
you
know
and
really
make
it
these,
these
multimodal
streets
where
it's
safer
for
everybody,
whether
they're
pedestrians
or
bicyclists,
or
in
cars,
and
so
but
but
again,
it's.
G
It
is
not
very
easy
and
I've
learned
that
over
the
years
on
how
difficult
it
has
been
to
do
things
like
change
the
speed
limit
or
reduce
the
speed
limit,
I
should
say-
and-
and
that's
why
I
was
excited
about
this
assembly
bill,
but
it's
it
is
looking
to
have
sort
of
barely
put
a
dent
in
in
the
process,
so
maybe
not
as
effective
as
I
was
hoping
it
would
be,
and
I'm
hoping
that
staff
will
be
able
to
help
us.
G
You
know
figure
out
how
we
can
make
it
even
more
effective
and
add
more
corridors
to
to
that
list.
That's
it
for
my
questions.
For
now.
I
appreciate
staff's
engagement
on
this
and
bringing
it
back
and
I'll
turn
it
over
now.
Thanks.
B
Thank
you
councilmember.
Probably,
I
very
much
appreciate
your
comments
and
and
share
the
disappointment
that
assembly
bill
343
was
not
more
wide-ranging
lam.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
for
your
presentation,
a
couple.
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
I
thought
perhaps
just
to
circle
back
to
the
lincoln
avenue
issue.
I
thought
perhaps
it
might
have
been
about
the
south,
the
south
approach
and
because
it
is
a
higher
speed
limit,
but
it
did
also.
I
was
wondering
about
the
lanes
when
we're
talking
about
four
lanes
for
traffic
lanes
maximum.
K
Defer
to
laura
it's.
B
B
If
it
is
not
a
traffic
signal
mark
crosswalk,
but
it
is
a
a
lighted
crosswalk
does
that
count
as
uncontrolled?
Still,
yes,
okay
good!
So
you
know,
even
if
you
can
push
the
button
and
and
have
the
flashing
lights
that
can
that
counts
as
sort
of
uncontrolled
right,
correct.
Okay,
it's
interesting.
They
started
with
the
business
districts,
given
that
I
share
council
member
foley's
concern
particularly
about
about
our
intersections
by
almaden
expressway
and
our
intersection
or
our
curtner
lane
of
trot
lanes
of
travel.
B
J
So
so
the
establishment
by
the
judicial
council
of
an
online
tool
for
infractions
and
it's
more
than
just
traffic
infractions,
was
already
state
law.
J
So
before
we
can
implement
that
aspect
of
the
bill,
one
caltrans
has
to
develop
the
guidelines
because
the
state
there
were
concerns
about
having
each
city
doing
something
different,
so
caltrans
needs
to
develop
the
guidelines
which
we
anticipate
will
occur
within
the
same
time
frame
that
the
judicial
council
has
to
develop
this
online
adjudication
tool.
So
there
was
a
concern,
and
with
regards
to
that
is,
if
we're
lowering
the
speed
limit
conceivably,
there
might
be
more
citations
being
issued,
and
so
there
was
a
desire
to
have
this
tool.
J
Guidelines,
so
I
am
on
a
it's
a
mouthful
california,
traffic
control
devices
committee
is
the
body
that
advises
caltrans
on
changes
to
the
california
manual
of
uniform
traffic
control
devices.
So
I
am
on
a
subcommittee
of
that
broader
committee
to
make
sure
they
incorporate
ab43
correctly,
and
there
is
a
one
of
our
meetings
is
going
to
be
meeting
the
group
within
caltrans.
That
is
dividing
that
is
developing
the
guidelines
for
how
safety
corridors
will
be
determined
and
how
the
high
pedestrian
bicyclist
generators
will
be
determined.
B
Great
and
thank
you
one
of
the
cr,
I'm
glad
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
one
of
the
criteria
that
might
be
useful
is
to
talk
about
when
we're
looking
at
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
looking
at
proximity
to
schools
as
opposed
to
having
to
go
out
and
count
and
try
to
figure
out,
especially
because
we're
trying
to
we
may
not
have
the
walkers
and
bikers
before
we
lower
the
speed
limit.
B
But
if
we
lower
the
speed
limit
in
those
areas,
we
will
be
able
to
incur
better,
encourage,
walking
and
biking,
as
I
think
most
kids
should
be
getting
all
those
ways
anyway.
So
I
would,
I
would
put
that
forward
as
a
potential
criterion
to
consider
and
that
would,
by
the
way
that
would
take
care
of
the
that
stretch
of
lincoln
avenue
as
well.
That's
over
30
miles
an
hour
now,
because
it
is
in
proximity
to
three
schools.
B
Just
off
the
top
of
my
head.
There
may
be
more
and
and
daycares
so
maybe
put
that
in
there
as
well
and.
B
Right
and
then
I
think,
lamb,
you
mentioned,
having
a
consultant
to
identify
the
all
the
eligible
streets
in
in
the
city
that
that
could
be
part
of
this
program.
What's
the
timeline
for
getting
that
consultant
and
for
the
consultant's
report
to
come
back
to
us
sure.
K
So
we
have
the
rfq
posted
last
week,
so
that
closes
at
the
end
of
march-
and
you
know,
with
just
kind
of
the
administrative
process,
hope
to
get
them
on
board.
In
the
summer
time
frame.
K
K
So
I
don't
have
that
timeline
on
hand.
We
on
you
know
we'll
be
giving
them
a
batch
of
the
ones
that
need
to
be
extended.
I
don't
have
that,
but
I
can
get
that
to
you
in
terms
of
the
timeline.
B
Great
thank
you
and-
and
I
appreciate
that-
we're
working
together
with
the
county
and
plumbing
them
for
pots
of
money
to
help
with
some
of
this
work
to
improve
our
safety
at
shared
intersections.
So
I
very
much
appreciate
that.
B
B
G
L
B
I
Chair
this
is
john
risto
again
director
of
transportation,
and
this
is
a
very
serious
issue
that
we
wanted
to
bring
to
the
committee
to
restate
it.
I
know
this
committee
knows
very
well.
City
of
san
jose
has
a
vision,
zero
program
with
the
objective
to
actually
reduce
that
trend
of
fatalities
and
significant
injuries
as
a
result
of
car
crashes,
and
what
we
have
here
is
a
pretty
serious
issue
of
an
increase
of
crashes
that
has
resulted
in
fatalities
during
the
first
few
months
of
2022.
So
that's
why
we're
here
to
talk
about
that?
I
Well,
you
know
that
we
agree,
and
this
is
something
that
we're
taking
seriously.
This
is
a
san
jose
issue,
so
while
it
may
be
happening
in
the
california
or
nation,
this
is
something
that
we
need
to
deal
with,
and
we
know
that
we
need
to
redouble
our
efforts
to
actually
try
to
get
this
trend
reversed
and
see.
I
If
we
can
make
these
streets
safer
with
the
good
thing
is,
we
do
have
a
very,
very
effective
vision,
zero
task
force
that
both
councilman
foley
and
perales
are
intimately
involved
with
and
helping
us
to
get
to
that
level.
I
But
these
results,
it's
all
about
results
and
right
now
we're
seeing
significant
increase
and
we
we
need
to
actually
take
a
look
at
what's
going
on
and
then
redouble
efforts
to
try
to
reverse
that.
So
today,
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
data
behind
a
lot
of
this
and
then
what
we
think
we
can
do
with
that
jessie
vince
ross
is
our
vision.
Zero
program
manager
is
going
to
give
a
presentation,
and
we
also
have
sergeant
palmer
from
the
police
department
that
will
also
participate
in
this
presentation.
I
P
My
name
is
jesse
mintzeroth
and
I'm
the
vision,
zero
program
manager
at
the
department
of
transportation
and,
as
john
said,
I'm
joined
by
sergeant
justin
palmer
from
the
police
department
and
also
lamb
crews,
who
just
presented
the
last
presentation,
will
also
help
during
q
a
so
a
bit
of
a
well
actually.
I
just
want
to
start
with
the
picture
on
this
slide,
which
is
one
of
the
recently
built
quick,
build
projects
that
is
part
of
the
vision,
zero
program.
P
This
is
on
story
road
at
mcinnis,
and
it
is
in
the
west
crosswalk,
and
it
shows
an
example
of
some
of
the
street
redesign
work
that
we're
doing
by
showing
the
new
yellow
thing
which,
with
the
standing
vertical
delineators,
are
create
a
area
that
has
more
refuge
for
pedestrians
crossing
the
street,
and
also
you
can
see
that
it
slows
turns
for
vehicles
who
are
making
the
conflicting
left
turn
here.
So,
as
I
begin
talking
about
sorry
about
that,
we're
gonna
unblur
that
about
the
data
piece.
P
I
just
wanna
give
the
disclaimer
that,
of
course,
when
we
talk
about
vision,
zero,
we're
often
talking
about
traffic
fatalities,
injuries
that
is
generally
what
I'm
presenting
here
about.
And
you
know
these
are
numbers
but
they're
also
our
neighbors.
So
in
a
sense
I
feel
badly
that
they
can
seem
a
little.
They
can
seem
quite
abstracted
and
graphs,
but
they
are
still
friends
and
neighbors
here
in
san
jose.
So
to
talk
about
the
traffic
fatalities
in
2021
in
the
beginning
of
2022.
P
Looking
at
2021
itself
on
the
right
cumulative
fatalities
by
month
is
the
light
blue
line
and,
as
john
was
just
saying
in
the
introduction
in
2021,
as
we
began
the
year
following
on
2020,
which
was
a
lower
number
compared
to
2019
or
2021,
we
had
a.
P
We
were
on
the
low
side
of
the
range
of
the
last
five
recent
years
of
data,
which
are
shown
in
gray
2016
to
2020.,
but
then,
when
we
got
to
june,
the
2021
line
began
to
go
above
and
really
quite
far
above
the
recent
five-year
range
and
what
happened
in
june
2021
was
the
reopening
of
the
economy
in
california,
after
I
guess
the
first
part
of
the
pandemic
there,
and
so
you
know,
we
had
the
same
level
of
alarm
that
I
think
many
of
you
have
in
the
audience
today.
P
Seeing
the
2021
line
go
above
and
just
begin
hearing
about
way
more
fatalities
than
we
would
be
anticipating,
particularly
at
each
of
these
times
of
year.
In
2021,
though,
at
the
end
of
the
year,
the
line
the
blue
line
for
2021
went
into
the
range
of
the
last
five
recent
years,
and
that's
because,
in
november
and
december
we
tend
to
see
more
traffic
fatalities
due
to
daylight
savings
time,
which
means
that
commute
times
are
occurring
in
darkness.
P
P
We
are
way
above
where
we
typically
are
at
the
beginning
of
the
year,
so
this
data
shows
up
to
march
2nd,
but
actually
today
we
just
heard
that
there
are
two
delayed
fatalities
that
are
not
shown
in
this
graph.
So
in
2022,
as
of
what
we
know
right
now,
we're
up
to
20
traffic
fatalities,
which
is
far
above
what
we
typically
see
in
the
beginning
of
the
year.
P
So
we
anticipate
that
for
july
to
december
2021
that
the
yellow
line
should
be
about
10
higher
in
the
second
half
of
the
year,
but
we'll
have
those
in
soon
just
not
yet
so
on
the
left
for
cumulative
injuries
by
month
effectively
in
2021.
The
number
of
injuries
is
very
much
within
the
typical
range,
but
then
on
the
right.
The
fatal
and
severe
injuries
is
again
similar
to
traffic
fatalities
high
and
so
basically,
the
injuries
are
tending
more
severe
than
in
typical
years.
P
Looking
at
traffic
fatalities
by
street
user
type,
people
who
are
killed
while
walking,
are
still
the
biggest
group
every
year
now
in
the
last
five
years,
beginning
in
2017,
and
that
fact
may
be
a
little
surprising
to
people
just
reflecting
that
walking
is
not
the
very
highly
used
mode
of
transportation
here
in
san
jose
motor
vehicle
occupants,
though
that's
you
know
much
more
common
mode
choice
and
they
are
the
second
largest
group
of
traffic
fatalities
and
then
in
2021.
P
One
thing
that
we
saw-
that's
really
interesting
is
the
growth
in
motorcyclist
fatalities,
and
that
may
speak
to
something
that
we're
understanding
more
as
we
read
more
national
news
stories,
which
is
seemingly
a
growth
in
recreational
driving,
and
so
that
is
a
little
bit
of
speculation
on
my
part,
but
also
we
understand
that
they're
from
reading
some
recent
national
news
stories
that
there's
been
an
observation
of
more
young
and
more
male
people
have
driven
more
during
the
pandemic
compared
to
the
majority
of
the
population
which
drove
less.
P
If
you
look
at
traffic
fatality
trends
in
2021,
I've
already
mentioned
that
people
killed
while
walking
were
the
biggest
group
at
23
traffic
fatalities.
So
at
total
we
have
60
traffic
fatalities
that
were
part
of
that
occurred
as
part
of
58
crashes.
P
Two
of
them
are
in
the
county's
jurisdiction
and
15
of
them
or
56
lane
miles
or
rather
center
line
miles
are
in
the
city's
jurisdiction
this
year
in
2021,
rather,
48
of
the
fatalities
occurred
on
the
priority
safety
corridors,
which
is
higher
than
usual,
and
that
in
itself,
just
helps
show
that
the
strategy
to
focus
on
those
lane
on
those
roadways
is
the
right
strategy.
Those
are
that's
where
they
keep
hiring.
They
keep
happening
even
more
among
the
parody
safety
corridors.
P
Another
thing
that
we've
noticed
is
that
a
lot
of
them
occur
when
it's
dark
out,
and
so
that
is
42
of
the
fatalities
or
70.
I
already
mentioned
the
growth
in
motorcyclist
fatalities
and
among
the
23
people
killed
while
walking.
Another
thing
that
we've
noticed
is
that
a
large
percent
of
them
70
occur
outside
crosswalks
and
outside
crosswalks
itself
is
a
diverse
group.
P
P
73
of
these
traffic
fatalities
occurred
with
a
male
driver
and
part
of
the
reason
that
we're
interested
in
that
is
that,
right
now
the
city
is
beginning
to
work
with
a
marketer
that
works
on
behavioral
change
topics,
and
so
we
will
be
working
with
them
this
year
to
do
safety,
messaging
campaigns
and
part
of
that
is
knowing
who
to
direct
those
campaigns
to,
and
so
this
type
of
intel
about,
who's
driving
the
cars
involved
in
traffic
fatalities
is
part
of
the
work
that
they
do
and
we
do
with
them
to
make
sure
that
the
message
goes
to
the
right
audience
and
then,
lastly,
the
top
factor
leading
to
fatal
or
severe
injury
in
san
jose
is
speeding
and
among
so,
and
so
that
is
also
30
of
fatalities
in
2021..
P
Looking
at
specifically,
the
posted
speed
limit
where
they
occurred,
so
88
of
them
occur
on
on
roadways
that
have
a
posted
speed
limit
of
35
miles
per
hour
or
faster,
and
this
graph
this
chart-
and
this
point
sort
of
relates
back
to
the
previous
presentation
that
lamb
gave
about
ab43.
P
But
as
lamb
mentioned,
there
are
provisions
in
av-43
for
streets
like
our
priority
safety
corridors
that
will
be
figured
out
between
now
and
2024,
which
should
allow
us
to
reduce
speeds
on
these
corridors
that
have
35
mile
an
hour
posted
or
faster.
So
so
that's
you
know.
Basically,
we
were
quite
interested
on
these
on
the
priority
safety
corridors
that
have
35
mile
an
hour
posted
or
faster,
and,
as
I
mentioned,
18
of
the
60
fatalities
are
due
to
speeding
and
also
just
that,
it's
our
top
down
factor.
P
P
And
if
you
that's
so
that's
the
total
number
of
people
killed
while
walking
in
2021
in
the
yellow
line.
But
then,
if
you
look
at
the
brownish
line
below
it,
then
that's
20
of
them
are
on
roadways
that
have
a
posted,
35
mil
an
hour
or
faster.
P
And
then,
if
you
look
at
the
blue
set
of
lines,
there's
60
traffic
fatalities
in
2021
and
53
of
them
are
on
a
roadway
with
a
posted
speed
limit
of
35
or
more
so.
You
can
see
in
2021
that
those
two
lines
in
both
of
these
cases
are
really
close
to
each
other
and
some
other
years
have
also
been
really
close
to
each
other,
particularly
for
pedestrians
in
2017..
P
So
this
is
definitely
an
interest
area
for
us,
as
we
do
analyses
into
the
data
to
try
and
basically
get
useful
insights
that
we
can
action
based
on
the
data,
and
so
there's
this
slide
that
we
have
looking
at
the
traffic
fatalities
that
occurred
so
far
in
2022
and
without
reading
it
line
by
line.
I
just
want
to
generalize
that
the
yellow
lines
are
people
killed
while
walking
the
orange
lines
are
people
killable,
cycling,
the
blue,
our
motor
vehicle
occupants
and
gray
are
motorcyclists
and
of
the
fatalities.
So
far
this
year,
the
one
that's
generated.
P
The
most
press
is
the
double
pedestrian
fatality
that
occurred
on
almaden
expressway
near
foxworthy,
and
then
there
was
also
another
fatality
involving
a
cyclist
that
occurred
at
that
same
intersection.
So
in
2022,
that
intersection
is
the
one
that
has
had
the
most
traffic
fatalities
and
so
looking
at
the
2022
data-
and
this
is
my
last
slide-
we
have
50
of
them
on
priority
safety
corridors.
P
The
intersection
I
just
mentioned-
albanian
expressway
and
foxworthy
has
three
fatalities
in
2022
and,
as
was
mentioned
during
the
last
presentation,
this
intersection
is
in
the
jurisdiction
of
the
county,
and
so
we
are
working
with
them
as
particularly
since
that
happened,
and
we
can
get
into
that
more
during
q.
P
A
four
of
them
occurred
on
white
road,
although
I'll
add
that
another
of
the
delayed
fatals
that
we
just
heard
about
since
doing
these
slides
was
also
on
white
road
83
of
them
during
dark
hours,
56
of
them
involved
people
walking
and
nine
of
the
tens
and
ninety
percent
are
outside
of
crosswalks
six,
with
speeding
as
a
factor
and
six
as
we're
hit
and
runs,
and
so
that
is
the
end
of
my
presentation.
A
D
Okay,
good,
thank
you
very
much
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much
yeah.
I
was
talking
to
my
husband,
kat
woodman
c
climatologist
and
biologist
and
engineer
about
how
we
need
to
change
our
roads,
and
he
had
some
very,
very
good
suggestions
in
that.
If
we
have
a
vision,
zero,
we
must
engineer
the
road
to
be
vision,
zero.
It's
the
same
thing
with
our
climate
crisis,
we're
saying
we're
gonna,
be
carbon
neutral.
What
is
the?
What
is
what
does
he
call
it?
The
decision-making
tree
and
the
decision-making
tree
that
he's
proposing
that
we
have
on
our
roads.
D
Is
that
any
road
that
has
two
lanes
in
the
same
direction?
One
lane
becomes
a
bicycle
lane
and
it's
not
and
the
way
we
get
vision
zero
is
we
put
a
concrete
barrier
between
the
cars
and
the
bicyclists,
and
on
top
of
that,
we
give
it
a
door
zone.
We
strike
for
the
door
zone
so
that
when
those
cars
open
up
their
doors,
they
don't
they
don't
hit
the
bicyclists
and
have
an
accident,
and
so
we
need
to
engineer
our
roads
for
vision,
zero
and
that's
what
we're
talking
about.
D
So
when
you
have
two
lanes
going
in
the
same
direction,
one
of
those
lanes
becomes
a
bicyclist
bites
the
lane
and
as
I
designed
it,
where
it
is
separated
from
the
the
from
the
traffic,
because
the
car
car
drivers
have
shown
themselves
to
be
irresponsible.
We
know
that
we
see
it
in
the
the
reports
that
show
forty
thousand
dead
every
year
in
the
us
and
three
million
injured
every
year,
so
they
have
showed
themselves
to
be
irresponsible.
D
We
must
engineer
our
roads
for
safety
and
and
when
we
do
that,
you
know
we
have
to
make
decisions
about
where's
the
money
to
make
all
this
concrete-
and
you
know
concrete-
produces
a
lot
of
co2
gas
emissions.
You
know
greenhouse
gas,
so
that's
where
we
have
to
cut
the
measure
b
has
to
be
all
about
creating
safe
walking
for
bicyclists
and
pedestrians,
not
about
you,
know,
13,
highway
extensions,
and
you
know
all
the
other
things
that
are
measured,
be
even
the
tunnel
that
is
being
built
for
bart
has
to
stop.
C
Hi,
so
I
just
wanted
to
talk
about
the
presentation
mr
rosso
mentioned
the
trend
of
high
deaths
started
last
year,
and
while
that
may
be
true,
it's
important
to
note
that
60
deaths
happened
in
2015
too,
which
tied
a
20
or
25
year,
high
of
death.
So
it's
it's
not
a
new
problem.
It
didn't
just
start
last
year
and
the
five
year
average
of
deaths
between
2010
and
2015
was
35
and
now
we're
at
60.
Plus,
you
know
on
a
record
pace
this
year.
It's
not
a
new
problem.
C
It's
been
around
since
2015
when
the
city
pledged
division,
zero
and
we're
going
backwards.
I
want
to
talk
specifically
about
kwembi
road,
which
has
a
problematic
40
miles
per
hour.
Speed
limit,
as
we
know,
that's
kind
of
the
area
where
things
become
very
dangerous
and
the.
C
C
Has
no
bike
lane
in
either
direction
and
it's
an
important
connector
to
the
eastridge
transit
center,
the
new
arcadia
ballparks,
the
future
light
rail,
stop
the
mall,
etc,
and
so
there's
not
even
room
for
bike
lanes.
Currently
they
can't
re,
they
won't
reduce
lanes,
because
you
know
the
car
centric
viewpoint
that
there's
too
high
of
traffic
volume
so
once
again
we're
favoring
cars,
even
though
our
bike
plan
designates
that
as
a
protected
bike
lane,
and
so
now,
it's
probably
just
gonna
end
up
having
a
narrow
bike
lane
with
maybe
some
flex
posts.
C
A
Yeah,
thank
you,
edgar
ardiano,
here
again
just
kind
of
curious
what
actions
are
being
done
to
address
the
seventy
percent
or
even
ninety
percent
of
pedestrians
being
outside
the
crosswalk?
It's
odd
that
that
specific
data
point
is
emphasized
as
like
a
higher
percentage.
If
you
think
about
it.
All
these,
I
don't
know
fatalities
are
a
cause
of
vehicle
violence
or
traffic
violence
due
to
a
vehicle,
so
yeah,
just
it's
just
odd
that
that's
the
bigger
number
out
of
all
the
other
ones.
A
That
being
said,
though,
and
I'm
sorry
I'm
I
had
the
presentation
open
and
I
was
hoping
to
reference
it
either
way,
though
I
I
think
there
should
be
some
more
analysis
done
on
these
numbers
as
well.
It
seems
like
there's
mail
and
after
hours
or
in
the
dark
trends
happening,
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
probably
a
workforce
program
or
more
opportunities
that
occupy
these
folks,
as
opposed
to
having
you
know,
speeding
happen
on
our
roads,
there's
probably
other
fixes
other
than
just
engineering
enforcement
and
even
the
educational
piece.
A
We
should
look
at
this
more
holistically
and
look
at
what
those
numbers
are
saying
again.
There's
a
clear
trend
there
that
maybe,
after
you
know
business
is
over
the
streets
are
rather
empty
and
they're
more
easy
to
speed
on,
and
so
I
think,
if
there's
more
job
opportunities
or
a
way
to
collaborate
with
the
business
partners
in
the
area
to
you
know,
provide
those
opportunities,
so
there's
there's
less
speeders
and
more
people
actually
and
workplaces.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
L
All
right,
thank
you,
claire
beefman,
thanks
a
lot
for
this
item.
You
know
I
the
the
fact
that
there's
been
so
many
deaths
in
the
beginning
of
this
year,
prophet
fatalities
with
pedestrian.
You
know,
I
don't
want
to
argue
with
that.
L
I
want
to
really
respect
that
a
lot,
but
at
the
same
time
as
I've
been
always
trying
to
say
for
the
past
few
years,
we
are
developing
a
different
way
to
talk
about
statistics,
about
vision,
zero,
ksi
statistics
and
we
have
in
the
past
and
we're
learning
to
count
homeless
people
who
are
now
being
killed
by
by
vehicles.
We
didn't
do
that
in
the
past.
These
are
ideas
of
equity,
they're,
really
important
and
good.
L
Those
are
going
to
bring
up
the
numbers
of
death
a
lot
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
our
homeless
victims.
A
lot
more
now
so
good
for
that
and
good
that
we're
noticing
these
things,
but
it
has
to
be
within
a
perspective,
I
think,
of
how
considering
how
we
used
to
count
ksi's
statistics.
So
the
number
60
is
not
so
large
when
they
actually
were
60
in
the
past,
but
we
just
weren't
counting
them
all
because
they
were
homeless
people
and
they're
icky.
L
But
now
we
are
so
you
know
good
luck,
how
we
can
do
that
and
and
not
inflate
the
numbers.
This
is
a
really
really
important
argument
we're
having
within
san
jose
city
government.
We've
got
to
do
this
honestly
and
we've
got
to
do
it
decently
openly
and
accountably.
We
got
to
be
accountable
with
each
other.
We
all
want
funding
correct,
but
we
got
to
do
it
in
decent
terms.
Good
luck!
L
How
you
can
organize
yourselves
with
you
know
the
future
of
these
programs
and
and
statistical
data
collecting
with
things
like
the
mayor's
using
the
man's
gang
prevention
task
force,
ideas
and,
as
always,
the
accountability
and
openness
with
data
and
technology
practices
can
really
help
out
this
process.
A
lot
really
help
to
organize
how
we
can
all
move
forward
in
the
future
with
these
sort
of
projects.
Thank
you.
F
F
I
do
want
to
know
why
out
of
the
crosswalk
deaths
are
happening
at
a
higher
rate.
Have
we
become
a
society
that
is
lacking
in
sort
of
basic
responsibility?
When
I
was
raising
my
daughter,
we
did
not
ever
under
any
circumstances
ever
literally.
That
was
the
lesson
she
taught.
We
got
taught
cross
the
street
if
it
was
easier
if
it
was
closer.
If
the
city
is
built
around
cars,
I
don't
care
we're
walking
all
the
way
down
to
the
crosswalk
crossing
and
we
will
walk
all
the
way
back
to
that
store.
F
If
that's
where
we
need
to
go,
and
so
I
guess
my
point
is
this:
is
I
want
to
know
what
population
outside
of
those
crosswalks
are
we
dealing
with
in
terms
of
that
decision?
Making
capability
are
the,
for
example.
We
didn't
break
that
down
into
male
or
female,
but
are
there
more
males
that
are
crossing
after
hours
late
at
night,
someone
mentioned
after
working
or
something
that's
a
possibility,
but
I
don't
want
to
be
afraid
of
the
data
I
want
to
know
who
it
is.
I
want
to
know
who
it
is.
F
You
know
why
they
are
crossing,
why
it's
a
challenge
to
either
wear
light
clothing
at
night
to
go
to
a
crosswalk,
because
I
I
am
a
very
responsible
driver
and
I
drive
very
slow,
especially
at
night.
I
pretend
like
it's
raining
everywhere
I
go
and
I
have
almost
hit
people
that
are
just
jumping
out,
so
that
is
something
I
just
want
to
talk
about.
N
Hi
yeah,
so
apparently
everybody
spoke.
Thank
you
for
all
the
speakers
that
spoke
before
me.
Everybody
asked
kind
of
my
questions
I
wanted
to
know
too,
and
also
too,
with
the
bill
43,
the
one
it
was
before
I
was
gonna,
say:
here's
all
the
information,
but
this
is
the
the
san
jose
ambition.
N
That's
pretty
cool,
but
let's,
let's
use
these
numbers
to
really
evaluate
you
know
of
of
of
the
progress
we're
doing
with
the
quality
with
mr
blair
said
about
the
quality
and
thank
you
for
calling
them
house
people
over
here
in
the
in
the
project,
because
I
don't
think
the
homeless.
N
I
think
the
house
that's
a
difference
between
those
two
words
and
to
me
they
are
house
because
they
have
a
home
and
the
heart,
but
thank
you
for
including
them
because
they're
part
of
society,
like
everybody
else,
and
thank
you
for
all
the
data.
It's
very
interesting
and
I'm
learning
a
lot
and
please
please
do
something
about
the
the
the
tally
road
and
also
to
the
mclaughlin
from
capitol
to
to
to
tally
and
mclaughlin.
That's
40
miles
an
hour.
I
think
we
don't
need
that.
N
I
think
we
can
lower
that
and
I
hope
I
hope
we
can
do
something
about
it,
and
I
think
I
like
the
san
jose
vision
and
in
this
one
I
agree
with
you
guys
you
guys
do
good
job
there.
Thank
you.
J
H
G
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much
and
I
first
off
shared
you
having
moved
this
important
item
up
from
may,
especially
considering
all
that
happened
this
past
year
and
then,
unfortunately,
as
we
see
just
in
the
first
few
weeks
and
now
months
of
this
year,
really
really
dramatic
and
alarming
statistics
that
we
have
and-
and
so
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
as
well
for
bringing
this
forward
sooner
than
had
originally
planned
and
and
my
as
well
my
vision,
zero
task
force
members,
including
vice
chair,
pam,
foley,
for
for
all
the
collaboration
over
the
past
year
and
a
half
this
task
force
form
because
of
our
recognition
of
where
we
have
gone.
G
Quite
frankly,
as
one
of
the
speakers
noted
since
we
began
this
effort
of
of
vision,
zero
and
and
and
really
tragically,
where
we've
seen
that
the
numbers
of
individuals
killed
or
severely
injured,
go
since
then,
and
our
effort
is
to
try
and
reverse
that
trend
and
unfortunately
we're
not
seeing
you
know
we're
we're
putting
in
more
effort,
but
we're
not
seeing
the
results
at
the
moment
we're
seeing
once
again
the
the
opposite.
And
so
I
think
it
really
is.
G
It's
gonna
necessitate
a
much
deeper
dive
and
and
even
further
resources
to
to
try
and
really
reverse
this.
This
trend.
As
chair
of
the
task
force,
I
have
been
pleased
certainly
to
see
some
of
the
strides
that
we've
made
since
the
adoption
of
our
action
plan
in
2019.
G
G
I
also
know
that
we've
had
a
tough
two
years
with
covid
and
with
it
we've
learned
a
lot
about
the
the
changes
of
behavior
on
on
our
streets
and,
however
it
it
feels
that
not
much
has
changed
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
ksi's
and
and
I
do
think
it'll
be
appropriate
to
evaluate
within
our
vision,
zero
program
what
is
working
and
what
is
not
and
how
we
can
improve.
G
G
Beings
that
we're
seeing
fatalities
occur
in
all
parts
of
our
city
and
really
with
the
the
severity
of
it.
I
think
it
warrants
that
level
of
urgency
and
deliberation
with
the
full
council,
and
I
wanted
to
initially
ask
staff
just
for
your
response
on
the
recommendations
listed
in
my
mentor.
I
Thank
councilmember,
john
director
of
transportation
again
and
yes,
actually,
we've
taken
a
real
close
look
at
that
and
I
believe
we
can
support
all
of
those
it.
It
really
is
contingent
on
further
actions.
It
is
a
resource
of
requirements
that
really
are
going
to
need
us
to
be
able
or
that
we
will
need
in
order
to
really
do
all
those
things
on
there,
and
I
think
you
knew
that
as
you
wrote
that,
but
yes,
we
can
support
all
that
there.
There
will
necessarily
be
some
further
actions
on
council,
though.
G
Great
thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
the
response
there.
You
know
I
I
I
have
also
had
the
opportunity
of
serving
now
seven
and
going
to
my
eighth
year
of
the
mayor's
game
prevention
task
force
and
you
know
all
been,
although
it's
been
in
existence
for
for
30
plus
years
or
just
just
about
30
years,.
G
It's
it
hasn't
completely
eliminated,
you
know
gang
violence
or
youth
violence,
and
but
it's
done
a
tremendous
job
within
that
task,
force
in
really
curving
and
capping
that
violence
and
but
it's
taken
significant
resources
and
significant
collaboration
and
consistent
collaboration
and
resources
as
well
and
with
where
I
see
our
traffic
related
fatalities
and
and
injuries
super
injuries
going.
I
think
we're
going
to
need
ultimately
that
level
of
resource
and
and
effort
and
consistency.
G
G
But
I
do
think
that
when
you
look
at
the
numbers,
we
are
averaging
twice
as
many
traffic
related
fatalities,
as
as
we
do
homicides
and
and
and
many
many
more
than
than
gang-related
homicides
and
and
again
we
we
have
now
a
process,
a
long
time
process
where
we're
able
to
invest
in
time
and
resources
to
address
gang
violence,
and
I
think
we're
going
to
need
to
to
mimic
that
and
really
do
something
similar
when
it
comes
to.
If
we're
going
to
try
to
lower
these
numbers
and
really
get
down
to
zero.
G
I
want
to
I
want
to
thank
as
well
walk
san
jose
for
submitting
their
their
comments,
and
I
know
my
staff
was
working
to
sync
up
with
them.
Last
week.
We
did
just
get
their
their
response
today
and
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
fully
vet
them.
G
Even
myself
did
get
a
chance
to
read
over
them,
but
I'm
happy
to
include
in
my
motion
that
both
well
for
one,
I
I'll
direct
my
staff
to
help
reach
out
to
them,
but
to
ensure
that
we
can
consider
those
for
deliberation
and
ask
staff
to
do
so
before
we
come
to
the
full
council-
and
I
do
want
to
close
and
say
that
that
my
heart
goes
out
to
all
the
family
members
who
have
lost
a
loved
one
on
our
streets
and
I'm
cognizant.
G
And
when
we
talk
about
those
who
have
perished
on
our
streets,
that
they're
more
than
than
a
data
point
their
life
taken
too
soon
and
us
we
will
and
we
must
do
better
and
we
we
do
recognize
that
at
the
beginning
of
every
vision,
zero
task
force
meeting
and
just
wanted
to
to
highlight
that
here
and
with
that
said,
I
I
would
like
to
move
my
memo
with
the
addition
that
we
do
review
and
consider
walk
san
jose
suggestions.
A
A
Thank
you.
I
I
also
wanted
to
just
add
my
voice
that
this
is
a
really
heartbreaking
topic
and,
with
you
know,
real
people
and
real
families
that
are
impacted
by
the
numbers
that
are
reflected
in
the
presentations.
A
I
I
actually
wanted
to
say
just
have
a
couple
of
comments
number
one.
I
I
still
strongly
believe
that
our
unhoused
outreach
teams
must
be
a
part
of
this
work
and
and
that
we
must
coordinate
with
housing.
To
do
that.
If
you
look
at
the
locations,
there
are
some
encampments
near
there
and
if
you
look
at
the
hours
you
know
there
are
very
real
risks
that
are
being
taken
and
we
just
need
additional
outreach.
A
The
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
do
is
actually
send
a
big
thank
you
to
our
dot
department,
the
the
barriers
on
monterey,
monterey
and
curtiner
have
gone
up
and
the
build
outs
have
been
completed
and
it
looks
great
I've
gotten
some
positive
feedback
so
far,
it's
brand
new,
and
I
know
that
this
is
a
pilot.
So
I
look
forward
to
seeing
how
you
know,
hopefully
that
can
decrease
the
numbers
of
fatalities
along
monterey
and
kurtner,
but
I
just
wanted
to
to
say
a
big
thank
you
to
the
team.
A
I
know
they
worked
really
hard
on
it,
and
and
and
hopefully
we
can
add
that
to
our
toolbox-
and
actually
the
last
thing
I
wanted
to
just
say
is
we're
going
to
need
a
lot
of
things
in
our
toolbox.
You
know,
for
example,
you
know
curtin
or
monterey
might
be
different
from
from
gaia
willow,
which
will
probably
be
a
different
approach
to
almaden
and
foxworthy.
I
I
know
that
little
turn
off
quite
well.
A
You
know
you
have
people
turning
off
on
high
speeds
and
imagine
doing
that
at
night
and
then
not
seeing
you
know
someone
in
a
crosswalk
until
it's
or
they're
worn
in
the
crosswalk
right
and
it
can
be
dark
at
night,
and
so
that
might
require
a
different
type
of
barrier.
A
B
Council,
member
esporza,
I
have
one
question
about
the
the
quick
builds,
I
think
were
all
the
quick
builds
done
on
priority
safety
corridors.
P
I
believe
that
we
have
some
that
are
not
on
priority
safety
corridors,
but
the
sort
of
focus
of
the
team
that
was
created
to
do
them
on
arterials
is
on
priority
safety
corridors.
So.
B
Great
so
do
we
have
before
and
after
data
of
the
quick
builds
that
were
that
we're
tracking
on
whether
or
not
we're
we're
limiting
we're
actually
being
successful
with
the
quick
builds,
whether
it's
with
fatalities.
I
know
I
it's
it's.
I
I
hesitate
to
say
this
and
I
am.
I
am
cognizant
and
sensitive
to
the
fact
that
we're
talking
about
data
here,
but
there
are
more
injuries
than
there
are
fatalities,
and
so
it
may
be
easier
to
track
the
or
quicker
at
least
to
track
the
injuries
as
opposed
to
fatalities.
B
P
It's
a
great
question,
so
we
are
creating
the
ability
to,
or
you
know
the
yeah.
I
guess
the
capacity
to
do.
This
is
currently
a
little
bit
limited
because
we
haven't
done
it
much
in
the
past
and
at
the
moment,
we're
talking
to
consultants
about
studying
our
most
recent
corridor
project
to
do
an
evaluation,
but
as
we
move
forward,
we
want
to
do
it
a
lot
more.
So
I
think
we
need
to
go
from
sort
of
this.
P
Maybe
the
one
or
two
evaluations
that
we're
doing
now
to
a
sort
of
more
of
a
strategy
is
probably
the
way
to
put
it
but
sort
of
the
base
of
the.
So
I
think
that
your
question
is
great.
One
of
the
sort
of
underlying
points
in
response
is
just
that.
Typically,
you
have
to
wait
about
a
year
of
after
data
in
order
for
there
to
be
enough
after
data
to
compare
to
the
before
data,
but
then
once
there
is
that
after
data,
you
know,
the
question
is
like:
how
do
you?
How
do
you
get
it?
P
How
do
you
put
it
together?
What
types
of
data
are
there
so
in
the
way
that
we've
approached
consultants
to
do
a
potential
report
about
this?
You
know
we're
asking
them
to
propose
and
put
together
with
us
that
strategy
for
what
the
types
are
so,
for
example,
crash
data.
That's
when
that's
a
data
type
that
you
want
to
have
about
a
year
of
after
data
for,
but
you
know,
if
you
are
very
organized
about
the
strategy
going
forward,
you
collect
your
before
data.
P
You
collect
your
after
data
for
volumes,
for
you
know,
speeds,
let's
say
ideally
we'll
go
down
that
path
and
put
together
that
type
of
strategy
and
do
all
of
that
in
a
very
consistent
way
at
the
moment,
we're
just
sort
of
putting
together
the
program
of
studying
these
projects.
So
at
the
moment
I
would
say
we're
planning
to
do
a
study
like
I've
described
for
center
road,
but
we
don't
yet
have
this
analysis
pieced
together
for
every
project.
B
Okay,
so
the
consultant
is
going
to
be
doing
it
for
center
road,
but
are
they
going
to
help
us
set
up
this
system
of
data
collection
that
you
were
referring
to
jesse,
because
it
seems
honestly,
it
seems
really
like
a
waste
of
money
to
just
have
one
study
on
one
corridor.
When
we
would
be
a
lot,
I
mean,
of
course
I
go
straight
to
regression
and
and
looking
at
statistically
different
types
of
quick
builds
and
what
their
relative
success
might
be.
B
But
if,
if
we're
just
looking
at
one
corridor,
it
would
be
beneficial
to
have
that
one
corridor
for
for
the
consultant
to
to
look
at
the
one
corridor,
but
then
to
give
us
recommendations
for
how
we
should
be
looking
at
all
of
our
corridors
as
we're
doing
these
quick
build
projects
or
any
if
they
don't
even
need
to
necessarily
be
quick,
build
projects
right,
because
we're
doing
a
lot
of
re-engineering
of
the
and
reconfiguring
of
streets
while
we're
doing
repaving
as
well.
So
I
would.
K
So
I'd
like
to
add
a
little
bit
to
what
jesse
said
we
did
hire
1ft
to
help
us
develop
the
program,
we're
working
with
a
consultant
to
evaluate
a
few
streets,
including
mclaughlin
as
well
as
center
and
mclaughlin,
was
more
of
a
capital
project
rather
than
a
quick,
build
project.
Because
we'd
like
to
know,
you
know
how
the
improvements
worked
on
the
street.
Just
like
jesse
mentioned.
K
We
do
need
a
little
bit
time
to
evaluate
the
crash
data,
but
there
are
other
pieces,
such
as
the
speeds,
as
well,
as
you
know,
surveying
the
community
to
see
how
they
feel
just
like
center.
We
did
get
a
lot
of
feedback.
As
you
know,
many
of
you
may
have
heard
at
the
task
force
in
recent
tne
meetings.
K
Where,
although
you
know
we
don't
have
the
crash
data
to
look
at
the
post
evaluation,
we
are
hearing
from
the
community
that
it
does
feel
safer
when
they
drive
out
there
and
when
they
walk
and
when
they
bike
out
there.
So
that
piece
of
data
is
also
just
as
important
to
us
is
getting
immediate
feedback
from
the
residents.
B
K
Yeah
they're
developing
you
know,
because
there's
different
type
of
data
that
we'd
like
to
collect
each
corridor
location
is
different
and
we'll
be
working
with
the
consultant
to
see.
You
know
which
piece
of
data
is
important
for
us
to
determine
the
effectiveness
of
either
the
location
or
the
corridor,
and
it
it
varies,
but
yeah
we
would
like
to
evaluate
a
handful
of
them.
Would
we
be
able
to
evaluate
every
single
one?
You
know
that
might
be
cross
cost
prohibitive,
but
we
will
do
you
know
ones,
especially
on
the
vision,
zero
corridors.
B
But
I'm
talking
about
something
much
more
much
broader,
where
we're
actually
trying
to
look
at
all
of
our
projects
and
collecting
a
similar
set
of
metrics
so
that
we
can
say
are
we
actually,
I
mean
honestly
when,
when
I
start
with
a
research
project
or
when
I
should
probably
use
past
tense
at
this
point,
since
I'm
six
years
on
the
council
and
haven't
been
doing
research
projects
when
you
start
with
a
research
project
or
when
I
did,
you
start
first
with
what
is
what
is
the
question
that
we
want
to
answer
or
a
set
of
questions
that
we
want
to
answer
and
really
with
these
quick
build
projects?
B
Yes,
I
understand,
and
I
agree
that
doofy
do
people
feel
safer
immediately
is
one
of
the
questions,
but
the
real
question
that
we
want
to
answer
is:
are
people
actually
safer,
so
I
don't
and-
and
we
have
very
specific
outcomes
that
that
are
you
know
the
pre
and
the
post
are
pretty
simple.
When
we're
talking
about,
were
there
were
there
fewer
injuries?
Were
there
fewer
severe
injuries?
Were
there
fewer
fatalities
and
then
maybe
a
score
for
you
know
overall.
B
Where,
where
you
know
you
a
fatality
is
obviously
more
serious
than
a
than
a
smaller
injury
right
and
so
you'd
want
to
look
at
those.
But
I
guess
I
don't
understand
why
the
data
collection
would
be
or
should
be
different
in
the
different
corridors,
regardless
of
the
fact
that
the
quick
build
solution
may
be
different,
we
really
want
to
know
the
same
thing
across
all
of
those.
P
So
I
would
say
it's
at
this
point:
sort
of
an
issue
of
scaling
up
this
practice
of
creating
this
capacity
to
do
these
studies,
I
in
my
previous
work
in
a
different
city.
We
had
a
whole
lot
of
people
working
on
this,
and
here
we
have
well.
We
have
one
fte
that
fte
also
works
on
other
things,
and
so
and
also
that
fte
is
new,
so
you
know
going
from
where
we
are
now
to
where
other
cities
have
like
quite
a
large
practice
in
this
area.
P
I
think
it's
sort
of
a
choice
really
about
you
know
investment,
but
also
just
how
to
scale
it
up
to
one
of
those
bigger
strategies.
There
are
a
lot
of
data
tools
out
there
that
could
help
us
do
that,
but
also
you
know
coming
from
the
place
for
at
to
the
place.
Other
cities
are
it's
all
the
same
sort
of
thing
about.
P
You
know
whether
we
how
we
sort
of
have
the
fte
within
dot
work
on
it
and
also,
for
example,
data
products
that
we
could
be
subscribing
to,
but
are
not
currently
are
also
a
lot
more
money
that
we're
not
currently.
Spending
on
that
type
of
thing,
so
I
guess
that's
how
I
would
look
at
it
in
terms
of
whether
or
not
like
do
we
know
what
the
program
looks
like
in
other
cities
that
do
a
lot
of
this?
Yes,
so
we
have
been
looking
into
that
as
well.
K
And
and
also
another
piece
and
sorry,
let
me
clarify
when
I
meant
that
we
would
only
look
at
some.
I
mean
in
a
more
comprehensive
way,
but
we
do
have
a
data
analytics
tool
where
we
are
able
to
run
crashes
before
the
project
and
crashes
after
so
we
have.
We
are
in
the
process
of
developing
that
tool,
and
that
is
an
important
aspect
for
us
to
look
at
for
the
projects
in
terms
of
crashes.
B
B
Why
we're
doing
it
and
not
just
do
analysis
for
the
sake
of
analysis,
but
I
I
just
think
if
we're
doing
a
bunch
of
different
kinds
of
quick
builds
and
we
want
the
reason
we're
doing
them
is
because
they're,
quick
and
they're
cheap
right,
but
we
also
want
them
to
be
effective
because,
if
they're
not
effective,
they're,
quick
and
they're
cheap,
but
really
they're
expensive,
because
they're,
unnecessary
or
they're
the
wrong
thing.
So
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
of
are
we
are
we
doing
these
with
an
eye
too?
B
We
want
to
make
sure
we
understand
what
the
best
solutions
are.
What
where
we
get
the
most
bang
for
our
buck,
where
we
improve
safety,
the
most
for
every
dollar
that
we're
spending
and
again
I
I
am
sensitive
to
the
fact
that
we're
talking
about
people
and
we're
talking,
not
just
numbers,
but
the
numbers
do
tell
us
really
important
story
and
do
help
us
determine
how
we
can
keep
the
most
number
of
people,
the
safest
on
on
the
most
number
of
corridors.
B
B
I
I
just
can't
emphasize
enough
how
disturbing
the
news
has
been
almost
every
day
when
I
open
the
paper,
and
we
have
another
fatality
and-
and
I
know
that
I
know
jesse,
you
were
you
were
saying,
the
the
injuries
are
getting
more
severe.
So
it's
it's
not.
You
know
across
the
board,
we're
not
seeing
more
injuries
and
more
severe
injuries
and
and
more
fatalities.
B
We're
seeing
fewer
less
serious
injuries,
that's
even
more
concerning
to
me
because
we're
talking
about
a
greater
cost
to
you
know
our
the
families
who
have
who
are
losing
people
on
our
streets
because
of
these
because
of
these
crashes.
So
I
just
I,
I
want
us
to
be
able
to
use
data
as
as
efficiently
as
possible
to
be
able
to
to
help
us
solve
this
problem.
K
Yeah,
I
think
that
makes
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
with
the
development
of
this
data,
analytic
linux
tool,
we're
expecting
to
be
able
to
run
just
kind
of
you
know
what
you
mentioned.
Additionally,
I
do
want
to
mention
that
we
do
look
at
caltrans
and
also
federal
highway
administration's
data
as
well
to
help
us
identify
improvements
because
they
do
give
us
these
crash
reduction
factors
that
we
take
into
account.
K
But,
additionally,
you
know
each
site
is
different
and
being
able
to
use
this
tool
to
see
what
we
actually
did
is
also
just
as
important.
Okay,
thank.
B
You
all
right,
do
any
of
my
colleagues
have
any
other
questions
or
comments.
Oh
hi
colleen.
J
A
Might
be
helpful
to
have
a
date
of.
A
With
the
agenda
so
just
to
clarify
the
direction
moving
forward.
B
Council,
member
perales:
it's
not
in
the
public
record
for
this
item.
I
think
it
just
came
to
our
emails.
So
if
you
have
the
date
that
that
came
in
and.
B
G
A
D
I
B
All
right
that
motion
carries
so
we'll
go
back
to
item
number
one
in
section
d
of
our
agenda,
and
that
is
revisions
to
the
city
of
san
jose's,
water,
efficient
landscape,
ordinance,
jeff.
M
Great
thank
you
good
morning,
good
afternoon,
I'm
sorry,
jeff
provenzano,
deputy
director
environmental
services
department
for
the
water
resources
division.
We
have
a
new
item
for
you
today.
It's
been
a
while,
since
we've
been
back
in
front
of
council
or
this
committee
to
talk
about
it.
It's
our
water,
efficient
landscape
ordinance,
particularly
some
proposed
amendments
that
we'd
like
to
bring
forward
to
council
in
a
couple
weeks.
P
M
Quick
background:
california
first
enacted
model
water,
efficient
landscape,
ordinance
in
1993,
our
city,
san
jose,
adopted
our
first
version
of
this
in
1994
with
two
amendments
in
the
past
20
years,
then
the
main
point
of
the
water
efficient
landscape,
ordinance
per
the
state,
is
to
save
water
through
efficient
landscape
design,
installation
and
maintenance.
M
When
looking
at
possible
amendments
to
this,
there
were
three
main
drivers
that
were
kind
of
spurring
us
forward.
The
first
one
kind
of
relates
to
the
graph
on
the
on
the
left
there
as
a
representation
right
now
we're
currently
in
either
an
extreme
or
exceptional
drought.
M
This
is
how
we
ended
last
calendar
year
did
not
really
get
the
water
or
snow
that
we
were
anticipating
that
we'd
get
this
year,
so
most
likely
we'll
be
continue
to
be
in
an
extreme
or
exceptional
drought
through
the
rest
of
the
calendar
year,
if
not
next
year.
M
In
addition
to
that
this,
this
short-term
drought,
the
way
things
are
looking
now
is
that
we'll
continue
to
have
declining
snowpack,
declining,
reliable
water
supplies,
really
will
force
us
to
adapt
to
climate
change
and
strengthen
our
climate
change
resiliency
and
one
of
the
ways
we
can
do.
That,
of
course,
is
to
reduce
our
reliance
on
imported
water
supplies
and
decrease
our
water
usage
overall.
M
Another
driver
for
us
was
there
council
directed
us
to
come
back
with
changes
to
willow.
That
would
require
only
planting
of
drought,
tolerant
landscapes
and
new
developments,
but,
along
with
that,
were
two
other
parameters
that
we
really
used
in
in
our
evaluation
of
possible
amendments
and
those
were
to
not
impede
our
efforts
to
green
areas
of
san
jose
that
have
historically
seen
under
investment
and
also
too,
to
support
reductions
of
tree
plantings
and
tree
canopy
and
landscape
plantings
to
reduce
urban
urban
heat
island
effect
and,
of
course,
the
third
driver.
For
us.
M
This
slide
here
it's
a
little
bit
detailed,
but
there's
just
one
point
I
want
to.
I
wanted
to
call
your
attention
to
really
on
the
two
columns
to
the
right
on
the
top.
One
is
a
turfgrass
kentucky
bluegrass.
This
is
the
typical
type
of
grass
you'd
see
in
a
front
yard
here
in
the
san
jose
area
and
the
one
below
it
is
a
little
less
common,
but
it's
called
bermuda
grass.
M
It's
typically
referred
to
as
a
low
water
usage
grass,
but
when
we
compare
those
two
native
california
landscape
of
trees,
ground
cover
and
shrubs,
you
can
see
that
both
types
of
grass
use
significantly
more
water
per
square
footage
than
native
non-invasive
species.
M
M
Sorry,
38,
000
gallons
of
water
annually
is
needed
to
water
that
that
turf
for
that
grass,
if
that
were
to
be
converted
to
low
water
usage,
that's
about
76,
000,
gallons
annually
of
water
usage
and
if
that
same
area
would
be
converted
to
a
low
water
usage
down
to
about
4,
000,
gallon
gallons.
So
a
significant
reduction
up
to
a
90
reduction
in
outside
watering,
just
by
going
from
high
water,
using
turf
down
to
native
landscape.
M
This
slide
here,
one
of
the
one
of
the
factors
that
we
looked
at
for
this
was
native
plants,
but
I
want
to
kind
of
broaden
that
topic
a
little
bit
and
kind
of
think
about
how
to
explain
this
to
you
really
what
it
comes
down
to
is
soil
health
and
native
plants
more
in
that
the
soil
and
the
plants
together
create
a
particular
ecosystem,
and-
and
it's
really
the
goal
for
us-
that
we
want
to
focus
on
to
achieve
that
ecosystem
by
planting
native
plants
is
to
to
support
soil,
health
and
and
the
reason
why
is
soil.
M
Health
is
a
factor
of
three
things:
it's
water
in
the
ground,
it's
nutrients
and
it's
air
and
you
get
those
three
combined
with
the
right
type
of
plants
native
landscape.
The
root
structure,
together
with
the
plants
and
the
moisture
in
the
water,
creates
a
biodiverse
ecosystem
of
bacteria
microorganisms.
M
You
see
a
little
little
circle
there
with
little
squiggly
lines,
so
there's
a
whole
biome
that
exists
in
the
soil,
and
this
is
important
for
us,
because
the
healthier
that
soil
is
the
more
moisture
it
retains
and
the
more
the
healthier
it
is.
The
more
it
pulls
carbon,
it's
called
carbon
sequestering,
the
more
carbon
is
pulled
out
of
the
atmosphere
and
stored
in
a
stable
form
in
that
soil,
and
some
research
has
shown
that
the
higher
levels
of
carbon
sequestration
and
pulling
that
carbon
in
can
last
in
the
soil
for
decades,
if
not
centuries.
M
So,
when
we're
looking
at
possible
amendments
recommendations
to
council
on
what
could
be
a
good
strategy
forward,
we
really
focus
back
on
these
native
plants
because
of
their
role
in
supporting
that
soil,
health
and
helping
achieve
carbon
sequestration.
M
One
of
the
other
factors
we
also
looked
at
was
urban
heat
land
effect,
of
course,
to
reduce
hardscape
was
one
way
that
we
have
looked
at
of
achieving
that
another
is
to
focus
on
again
planting
native
trees
and
ground
cover
and
promoting
urban
tree
canopy
that
little
graphic
there
on
the
right
hand,
side
that
kind
of
goes
along
with
the
previous
discussion.
I
I
just
had
on
on
the
health
of
the
soil.
M
M
We
also
considered
changes
to
irrigation
design,
the
three
common
ones
there,
I'm
sure
you're
familiar
with
spray,
irrigation
drip,
irrigation
and
bubblers.
So
we
looked
at
how
we
could
possibly
change
some
rules
around
those
two
to
support
our
goals,
and
I
know
you're
you're
on
the
edge
of
your
seat
here.
So
these
are
the
key
amendments
that
we
came
up
with
the
current
and
again,
willow
has
been
in
our
municipal
code
going
back
almost
20
years,
and
we
do
have
it
in
there
now.
M
So
what
we're
looking
at
are
amendments
the
top
one.
There
is
on
eligibility
or
applicability
right
now.
New
construction
with
landscape
of
landscape
areas,
greater
than
500
square
feet,
have
to
follow
this
municipal
code
section
we're
revising
that
revising
that
to
say
all
new
construction
we're
also
going
so
far
as
to
recommend
that
we
prohibit
high
water
using
plants.
M
We're
also
recommending
to
prohibit
turf,
except
in
designated
recreation
areas,
so
turf
is
allowed,
but
not
not
for
aesthetic
purposes,
it'd
really
be
in
areas
that
are
going
to
be
used
actively
used
for
recreation
and
hardscape.
Our
current
municipal
code
has
no
limitations
on
hardscape,
so
one
of
our
recommendations
is
to
allow
no
more
than
50
percent
of
the
available
landscape
area
can
be
converted
to
hardscape
and
finally
irrigation.
That
was
the
last
one.
We
talked
about
we're
recommending
that
drip
or
bubbler
systems
are
used,
except
where
turf
is
permitted.
M
And
what
that
concludes
our
presentation
on
this
slide.
You'll
see
a
few
of
the
stakeholder
engagement
groups
that
we've
met
with
over
the
past
couple
months
to
kind
of
get
their
feedback
and
buy-in
on
our
on
our
recommended
amendments,
and
with
that
we're
available
for
questions.
D
Oh,
thank
you
so
much.
Okay,
great.
I
just
wanted
to
read
what
my
husband,
this
climate
scientist,
biologist
futurist,
is
saying,
because
climate
change
is
real.
Therefore,
we
must
leave
fossil
fuels
in
the
ground.
D
Therefore,
most
people
will
not
be
able
to
drive
you
can
now
you
can
replace.
This
word
drive.
He
was
recall
he
was
referring
originally
to
what
was
about
the
transportation
issues,
but
you
can
replace
drive
with
provide
food
for
themselves,
provide
water,
provide
energy,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
threat
right
now
and
then
he
says.
Therefore,
most
people
will
not
be
able
to
drive
eat
their
food
feed
themselves.
D
That
type
of
thing,
therefore,
more
people
will
be
in
bicycles.
More
people
will
need
to
stay
home
to
grow
food,
including
children.
Therefore,
we
must
have
safe
engineered
controls
and
because
we
are
deliberately
excluding
political
and
economic
considerations,
our
only
driving
consideration
is
public
safety.
D
So
what
he
was
referring
to,
of
course,
is
like
I
said
how
our
roads,
we
need,
to
put
our
I've,
been
saying
all
of
measure
b,
all
of
measure
b,
monies
that
are
being
put
into
highways
and
into
into
bart
need
to
be
put
into
making
our
roads
safe,
because
what
cat
is
saying
is
that
all
of
us
are
going
to
have
to
stop
driving
and
therefore
we
need
to
make
it
very
safe
for
even
including
children,
that's
safe.
D
What
they
really
say,
safety
is,
is
that
somebody
from
children
to
80
is
going
to
be
okay
and
it's
the
same
issue
in
terms
of
food
security.
We
have
food
security
issues.
We
have
to
be
focusing
on
that
in
terms
of
our
agriculture.
So
that's
how
I'm
relating
it
to
this
topic,
but
it
was
really
in
regards
to.
We
accept
that
climate
change
is
real.
Fossil
fuels
must
be
kept
in
the
ground.
We
must
change,
and
we
must
engineer
the
change
and
put
all
and
stop
thinking
about
politics
and
economics
only
think
about
public,
safe.
L
All
claire
beekman
here,
thanks
for
the
words
of
tessa,
for
myself,
just
a
few
comments
on
this
item.
It
sounds
kind
of
interesting
that
you
want
to
work
with
the
idea
of
natural
plants
for
our
future
most
of
the
plants
that
you
look
at
up
in
the
hills
and
the
weeds
grow
in
the
summer
time
and
turn
green
in
the
winter.
Those
are
plants
and
meats
that
have
been
come
around
since
the
spanish
came
in
the
1700s
earlier
and
earlier.
I
guess
so.
L
We
have
a
new
set
of
plants
and
so
you're
addressing
a
native
plant
issue.
So
thank
you
for
that.
I
wanted
to
hopefully
remind
that
as
we're
trying
to
find
important,
good
new
ways
of
landscaping,
they
were
kind
of
stepping
on
the
toes
of
different
people
from
different
neighborhoods
and
different
communities
of
of
san
jose,
and
I
that
was
a
few
years
ago.
I
think
we're
really
trying
to
work
on
that
issue
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
communication
within
each
neighborhood
and
the
people
of
each
neighborhood
to
find
out.
L
You
know
what
what
sort
of
new
plants
can
be
built
for
or
can
be
planted
for.
Our
future,
you
know
growth
and
our
future.
You
know,
understanding
of
you,
know
water,
drainage
and,
and
all
that
good
stuff.
So
good
luck,
how
you
talk
with
individuals
and
and
little
people
of
local
neighborhoods
with
these
sort
of
projects?
It's
really
important.
I
think
we're
learning
better
how
to
do
that,
and
I
will
definitely
try
to
use
the
word
unhoused
in
the
future.
I
really
should
learn
to
do
that
more.
O
O
They
drop
a
lot
of
things
that
you
don't
want.
So
if
you're
going
to
lecture
people
on
what
landscaping
should
be,
I
really
have
to
say
you
guys
are
no
position
to
do
so.
You
know,
can
you
fix
the
roads?
First,
pave
them.
You
know
fix
the
puddles,
maybe
make
sure
that
all
the
sprinklers
at
all
the
parks
around
city
hall
are
all
working
better
than
you
know
being
going
off
at
three
o'clock
in
the
morning
with
you
know,
one
broken
sprinkler
head
spraying
water
everywhere.
It's
all.
O
You
know
something
all
these
city
owned
areas
where
you
have
the
most
water
waste
you
could
ever
imagine
so
for
you
to
lecture
the
public
for
the
city
council
to
do
so.
I
find
it
a
bit
a
bit
ridiculous
that
you
guys
can
pick
and
choose
the
right
plants.
Really
you
guys
are
going
to
do
that.
O
I
don't
think
so.
Every
you
know
you
guys
are
wrong
on
almost
every
decision
that
you
make,
and
this
is
definitely
one
of
them.
I
mean
you
can
give
advice
of
what
could
be
good,
but
you
guys
are
gonna,
have
mandates
you
guys,
love
mandates
and
fees
and
fines
and
permits,
and
all
these
things
you
guys
should
be
ashamed
of
yourself.
You
can't
even
manage
your
city
hall.
Look
at
that
city
hall.
Look
at
the
death
star
with
a
waste
of
water,
going
on
there
too
yeah
look
at
your
downs.
O
F
Hi,
the
last
caller
should
not
move
into
a
mobile
home
park
because
they
they
have
strict
rules
about
what
you
can
plan,
but
I'm
very
happy
here,
and
I
wanted
to
comment
on
the
fact
that
mobile
home
parks
are
known
to
be
obviously
more
dense.
F
In
addition,
you
know
there
are
strict
guidelines
about
what
we
can
plant
and
a
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
water
efficiency
so
and
also
even
sprinklers,
there's
guidelines
on
those
as
well,
so
that
they
aren't
spraying
all
over
the
place
and
there's
no
overrun
so
oftentimes.
I
think
that
mobile
homes
have
this.
You
know
little
bad
wrap
or
something
here
and
there
and
some
people
would
like
to
see
us
be
something
else
someday,
but
a
lot
of
times.
You
know
I
really
want
to
acknowledge
how
really
energy
efficient
and
different.
F
You
know
savings
that
you
can
have
in
mobile
home
parks
as
far
as
environmental,
so
we
don't
have
any
lawns
around
here.
We
have
minimal
plants,
and
I
think
this
this
would
be
a
good
place
to
even
market.
You
know
whether
the
city
wants
to
or
not
somehow
for
people
to
start
even
taking
some
of
their
plants
that
are
outside
shrubs
or
whatnot
and
using
native
plants,
because
we're
all
about
saving
water
and
saving
money.
So
thank
you
so
much.
The
report
was
really
excellent.
Thank
you.
E
It's
okay,
that
doesn't
I'm
willing
to
defer
the
door
doesn't
matter,
but
anyway,
thank
you
for
the
presentation,
it's
obviously
very
important
topic
and
becomes
more
so
every
day
we
have
that
beautiful
sunshine
outside.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
a
few
questions
about
the.
Can
you
put
the
slide
back
up,
which
has
the
actual
changes
and
recommendations.
E
I
just
want,
I
just
want
to
understand
what,
where
this
is
meant
to
apply.
Obviously
this
applies
to
new
construction
of
buildings
and
and
large
developments
right,
but
is
this?
Is
this
and
I
assume
it's
also
meant
if
there
were
new
single-family
home
development
as
well,
any
any
new
construction.
M
Yeah,
so
it
would
apply
the
way
the
way
it
works
now
is.
It
applies
to
anyone
who's
coming
in
to
do
new
construction
that
has
to
get
a
permit
through
us,
and
so
it
doesn't,
it
won't
capture
anyone
it
won't
make
anyone
have
to
come
in
and
get
a
permit
only
if
they're
coming
in,
to
get
a
permit
for
something
else.
So.
E
If
there
anything
that,
if
you
were
doing
new
construction
on
your
home,
that
required
a
permit,
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
put
in
anything
new
that
violated
these
rules.
But
you
wouldn't
have
to
change
what
you
have
existing
unless
it
were
being
done
as
part
of
that
construction.
M
Correct
only
if
you,
as
part
of
that
we're
going
to
redo
your
landscape
as
part
of
that
that
whole
process
as
part
of
that
work.
E
Yes,
but
if
you
were,
if
you
were
doing
redoing
your
landscape
on
your
own,
which
doesn't
require
a
permit,
then
there's
really
no
rules
that
we
can
enforce
in
that
regard,
right,
correct
and
then
the
hardscape
limitation.
Obviously
that's
also
for
applies
to.
So
all
of
these
apply
to
all
of
those
types
of
construction
that
require
permits,
yes,
okay
and
then
again
with
the
sprinkler.
M
E
Okay
and
then
and
on
that
item,
if
you
were
putting
in
native
plants
and
other
and
other
things
are
required,
watering
you'd
have
to
put
in
drip
bubbler's
system
with
it,
but
not
sprinklers.
M
Yeah,
that's
correct,
and-
and
I
would
I
should
have
added
to
the
the
bubbler
and
the
drip
system
are
specifically
designed
for
low
water
use
plants,
so
they
work
really
well
for
that
that
plant
type
not
so
well
for
high
water
using
plants.
So.
M
M
E
And
I
just
want
to
also
say
that
we
ought
to
be.
I
know
the
water
district
has
funding
to
convert
existing
lawns,
and
you
know
they
do
some
promotion,
but
I
have
found
that
we
don't
promote
it
enough
that
people
don't
really
know
about
it.
So
maybe,
as
part
of
this,
we
ought
to
be
figuring
out
how
we,
as
a
city,
can
partner
with
the
water
district
to
promote
their
rebates,
that
they
have
to
try
to
encourage
people
to
do
conversions
of
their
existing.
E
M
You're
right
every
every
water
retailer
actively
participates
in
that
program
and
encourages
it.
Can
we
do
more
absolutely,
especially
as
we
head
through
this
drought,
it'll
be
imperative,
so
we're
actually
anticipating
will
be
a
larger
component
for
us
over
the
next
couple
years
is
not
only
to
to
get
more
people
signed
up
with
valley,
water
and
a
rebate
there,
but
also
look
at
other
grant
opportunities
to
expand
the
program
even
beyond
what
valley
water
offers
right
now.
M
H
H
You
jeff
thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
about
this
slide
as
well,
so
just
to
follow
up
on
the
new
construction.
M
H
Okay,
then,
why
are
we
limiting
the
hardscape
from
prior
is
no
recommend
no
limitation
and
in
the
proposed
change,
limiting
it
to
50?
M
And
that
one
goes
back
to
the
urban
heat
island
effect
and
then
also
the
carbon
sequestering
aspect.
M
So
the
goal
with
that
would
be
to
reduce
the
amount
of
heating
of
the
the
pervious
or
impervious
service
to
to
really
have
that
healthy
soil
with
the
plants,
the
corresponding
plants
that
absorb
the
heat
a
little
bit
more
without
radiating
it
back
out
it's
more
from.
If
I
answer
that,
let
me
see
if
I
can
put
that
a
different
way.
It's
really
to
address
urban
heat
island.
A
Okay,
can
we
add
that
we're?
We
don't
want
paved
over
lots
in
the
city
and
that's
not
helpful,
as
jeff
mentioned
from
our
carbon
sequestration,
but
it
also
can
result
in
additional
heating
required
for
the
home
and
and
other
other
impacts,
so
we're
trying
to
balance
water
use
and
kind
of,
like
all
the
climate
goals.
H
Okay,
I
I
appreciate
that,
but
it
might
be
cheaper
for
some
folks
to
put
in
a
hardscape
in
their
backyard,
for
example,
and
plant
put
plants
in
pots
in
their
backyard
or
trees.
That
sort
of
thing,
so
I
I
I
mean
I
understand
the
environment.
Thank
you
for
the
environmental
answer.
I
understand
that,
but
limiting
it
to
50,
I'm
not
sure
I
I
I
just
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
big
issue,
but
I'm
just
kind
of
curious
as
to
the
50
and
and
I'm
not
sure
we
need
that
in
there
frankly.
A
And
also,
as
you
might
imagine,
organizations
like
beekeeper
and
others
reminded
us
that
you
know
when
there's
too
much
hardscape
the
runoff
of
water
is
also
not
not
helpful
to
our
waterways
and
so
trying
to
balance
multiple
multiple
initiatives.
Jeff.
Could
you
help
us
out
a
little
bit
and
what
is
the
definition
of
hardscape.
J
M
M
This
is
really
for
new
construction,
which
primarily
is
a
frontage
along
the
road
run
frontage
along
the
roadway
and
if
it
was
a
single-family
home
which
are
rare
now
and
if
there
was
landscape
as
part
of
that,
it's
really
just
the
front
yard
yeah
part
of
that
project.
So
anyone
that
wants
to
do.
We
tried
to
stay
away
from
anything
in
the
backyard.
So
don't
do
something
back
there
that
they're,
not
they're
not
caught
up
in
this.
H
H
Well,
actually,
I'm
talking
about
major
construction
projects,
development,
construction
in
particular,
I
have
one
in
district,
nine
cambrian
park
plaza
cambrian
village
that
will
have
seven
acres
of
parks
being
installed,
and
one
of
it
is
in
a
substantial,
green
grass
area,
where
the
idea
is
that
kids
will
be
playing.
So
I'm
just
wondering
how
the
what
effect
this
proposal
will
have
on
that
development
and
that
component
income
in
particular.
M
H
Okay,
so
can
you
define
then
just
help
me
understand
what
a
recreational
area
is.
I
mean
I
understand
if
it's
a
soccer
field,
that's
a
recreational
area.
This
is
more
of
a
kids,
are
going
to
throw
a
frisbee
and
you
know,
play
hack-a-sack
and
that
kind
of
thing
so
they're
just
hanging
out
with
a
blanket
and
having
a
good
time
so
tell
it.
Does
that
consi?
Is
that
there's
still
an
exemption
and
that's
considered
recreational.
P
M
H
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
fully,
councilmember
perales,
you
had
your
hand
up
and
it
went
down.
I
just
wanted
to
check.
G
Yeah,
sorry,
actually,
my
question
was
answered
through
anthem,
foley's
questions
thanks.
B
Great
perfect,
thank
you.
I
just
have
a
couple
of
questions.
The
first
one,
the
so
parks,
was
just
telling
we
had
an
issue
at
del
monte
park
with
our
drip
irrigation
system
being
eaten
up
by
rodents,
so
I'm
I
would
normally
have
no
problem
with
drip
bubbler
requirements,
except
that
they
are
maybe
not
as
sturdy
as
as
this
the
sprinkler
system.
So
I'm
wondering
if
we've
taken
that
into
account
or
if
that
was
a
part
of
any
of
the
comments.
M
No,
but
there
are
different
ways
of
doing
bubbler
irrigation
systems.
For
example,
you
could
do
hard
pvc
pipes
which,
with
the
with
the
little
hoses
coming
off
of
it,
so
there
are
different
methods
of
of
achieving
the
end
result.
B
Okay
and
I
did
notice
in
your
stakeholder
engagement,
you
didn't
have
any
list
of
builders
or
there
was
one
landscape
management
and
I'm
wondering
if
the
outreach
I
mean
I
I
understand.
B
I
understand
that
these
stakeholders
are
easy
to
to
outreach
too,
but
when
you
say
you
reached
out
to
the
department
of
pbce,
did
they
reach
out
to
their
stakeholders
as
well,
because
I
didn't
see
any
builders
on
here.
M
No,
the
the
only
one
that
we
really
reached
out
to
was
the
water
and
energy
committee
for
the
chamber
of
commerce,
which
was
populated
by
different
business
entities.
Large
large
companies
around
the
the
south
bay,
and
so
that
was
that
was
the
business
aspect
that
we
went
to,
but
not
a
developer
aspect.
B
Okay,
since
this
I
have
a
problem
with
that
I'll
just
be
frank
about
it.
I
have
a
problem
with
that,
because
we're
not
talking
about
the
average
company
doesn't
build
a
headquarters
more
than
once
in
a
few
decades.
I
know
adobe's
building
on
right
now,
and
a
lot
of
them
are
leasing
that
are
members
of
chamber
of
commerce
or
already
have
their
office
parks
and
aren't
doing
a
bunch
of
construction
and
we're.
B
I
think
this
will
affect
the
the
developers
of
large
and
small
residential
projects.
The
most
and
not
outreaching
to
them
is
a
huge
hole
in
your
stakeholder
engagement,
and
so
what
what
I
I
mean?
I'm
all
these
changes
seem
relatively
fine
for
me,
but
my
first,
the
first
thing
that
popped
up
for
me
was
okay,
high
water
use
plants
are
prohibited
and
we're
encouraging
native
plants,
but
what
about
fruit?
Trees
use
a
lot
of
water
and
I
would
think
that
those
would
be
desirable.
M
Absolutely
yeah
we'll
go
back
and
try
to
get
that
engagement
done
prior
to
coming
back
to
council
and
when
it
comes
to
usually
the
and
well
I'll,
go
back
and
double
check,
but
fruit,
trees,
vegetable
gardens,
any
edible
plants
are
typically
exempt
and
we'll
go
back
and
make
sure
that
that
carried
through
with
these
new
amendments,
but
any
any
fruit
or
food
bearing
plants
are
usually
exempt
from
watering
restrictions
and
any
other
type
of
planting
restrictions.
B
B
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I
would
like
to
ask
the
maker
of
the
motion
to
delay.
I
think
staff
is
probably
going
to
want
a
little
more
time
than
seven
days
to
do
their
outreach
to
the
stakeholders.
I'd
like
the
maker
of
the
motion
to
delay
the
referral
which,
in
the
memo
is
listed
as
for
march
15th,
which
is
next
tuesday
for
maybe
a
few
more
weeks,
so
jeff
and
his
team
have
some
time
to
do
some
more
stakeholder
outreach.
E
I
mean
I'm
okay
with
the
referral
I'm
trying,
I'm
having
I'm
struggling
with
the
with
understanding
what
the
objections
would
be
in
in
this
case,
but
I
you
know,
I
mean
it
doesn't
really
matter
to
me
about
the
timing,
except
that,
as
we
all
know,
those
of
us
on
the
rules
committee
know
making
sure
that
we
have
good
balance
of
things
on
different
agendas
is
important,
and
so
I
I
always
hate
to
defer
things
unnecessarily,
but
I
so
I
mean
having
a
couple
more
weeks
to
do
that.
Outreach
is
okay
with
me.
M
Well,
we
kind
of
looked
around
for
developer
stakeholder
groups
that
we
could
get
in
touch
with,
but
none
were
really.
You
know,
none
that
really
popped
out
as
a
as
a
go-to
so
and.
A
One,
you
can't
remember
we'll
work
with
economic
development
and
pvce
to
define
the
the
most
appropriate
way
to
get
to
the
target
audience
that
you're
suggesting
and
if
we
could
have
until
at
least
you
know
the
first
week
or
two
of
april,
that
would
help
us
ensure
that
that
feedback
works
its
way
into
the
memo.
B
E
B
Thank
you.
I
just
think
it's
really
important
to
ground
truth.
Our
proposed
changes
for
the
folks
who
are
going
to
be
most
impacted
by
it
and
in
the
absence
of
going
out
to
everyone,
who's
planning,
a
renovation
in
their
home,
the
I'm
sure
there's
a
landscaper
association
as
well,
but
but
the
bia
came
up
for
me
just
immediately
that
that
was
not
on
the
stakeholder
list
and
they're
the
ones
building
homes.
B
So
I
I
agree
council,
member
cohen,
I
don't
know
what
the
issues
might
be
with
these
or
what
the
suggestions
might
be,
but
that's
sort
of
the
point:
we're
not
the
we're,
not
the
people
on
the
ground
having
to
implement
these
after
they
are
enacted
council
member
fully.
H
Yes,
thank
you
councilmember
davis,
for
bringing
that
up.
I
actually
had
that
on
my
list
to
ask
that
question
about
the
stakeholder
groups
too
and
notice
that
they
were
missing.
So
I'm
glad
as
the
maker
of
the
second
to
extend
to
the
time
frame
to
bring
it
to
council
to
allow
for
that
engagement,
and
I
think,
starting
with
the
bia,
is
a
good
place
to
start.
B
F
E
B
Q
Good
afternoon,
everyone,
I'm
david
olson
division
manager
with
environmental
services,
just
want
to
get
right
into
the
presentation.
Q
Q
Q
Of
the
dewatered
biosolids
management
strategy
in
june
staff
finalized
the
procurement
documents
for
off-site
disposition
contracts.
They
were
advertised
in
november
and
were
due
last
month.
Staff
anticipates
awarding
a
few
disposition
agreements
in
the
coming
months,
as
no
single
proposer
has
enough
capacity
currently
to
manage
all
the
facilities.
Q
Cip
worked
with
contractors
to
develop
robust
sequencing
plans
for
startup
and
commissioning
activities.
This
advanced
work
laid
the
foundation
for
successful
pre-operational,
functional
and
operational
testing
of
the
new
equipment
which
allowed
the
treatment
area
to
be
put
back
in
service
before
the
wet
season.
Q
During
this
reporting
period,
we
had
23
active
projects.
This
chart
shows
that
20
of
them
are
being
delivered
by
the
design
bid,
build
delivery
method.
The
projects
highlighted
in
green
are
those
that
advance
the
stage
in
our
project
delivery
model.
The
other
three
projects
are
being
delivered
delivered
using
the
progressive
design,
build
approach.
Q
The
project
will
rehabilitate
and
make
process
improvements
to
a
small
number
of
admiration
tanks
in
order
to
evaluate
the
performance
of
the
selected
technology
prior
to
full-scale
implementation
staff
also
finalized
the
scope
of
the
new
headworks
access
road
project,
which
we'll
construct
from
a
permanent
road
from
the
rwf's
construction
entrance
to
the
new
headworks
iii
transfer
point
for
septic,
hauling
and
chemical
trucks.
The
scope
will
also
include
proper
drainage
and
spill
protection
for
the
road.
Q
We
also
had
six
projects
in
design
and
bid
during
this
time
the
city
opened
bids
for
the
outfall
channel
project
in
august
and
council
awarded
that
construction
contract
in
october
and
construction
began.
Just
at
the
beginning
of
this
year.
The
city
also
received
bids
for
the
storm
drain
system
improvements
project.
This
month
we
are
recommending
award
of
construction
contract
to
tpec
council
and
finally,
during
this
period,
the
design
builder
for
the
dewatering
project
completed
the
60
design.
They
also
began
early
work,
our
early
site,
prep
work
and
final
design.
Q
Q
We're
looking
east
over
the
new
headworks
facility,
with
the
existing
rwf
to
the
left
of
the
trees
in
the
foreground
is
the
new
grit
removal
facility
and
to
the
left
is
the
building?
Is
the
new
electrical
building
as
we
pass
over
the
grill
building,
you
can
see
five
covered
openings
where
the
new
raw
sewage
pumps
will
be
located.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
D
D
Then
we
get
back
to
this
statement
that
the
climate,
scientists
and
biologists
are
saying,
because
climate
change
is
real.
Therefore,
we
must
leave
fossil
fuels
in
the
ground.
That
means
becoming
very
hyper
local
in
terms
of
our
water
supply.
You
know
that
we
have
to
be
collecting
our
water
and
these
have
to
be
requirements,
not
just
if
you'd
like.
Therefore,
most
people
will
not
be
able
to
drive
or
collect
water
or
or
grow
food,
and
therefore
more
people
will
be
in
in
bicycles,
they're,
going
to
have
to
start
growing
food.
D
You
know
these
are
the
things
that
are
happening
and
the
children
need
to
learn
this,
because
we
have
our
society
with
women
working.
We
have
lost
all
the
skills
of
knowing
how
to
preserve
in
the
ancient
ways.
We
say
that
we're
on
a
lonely
territory.
We
have
to
go
back
to
the
ohlone
ways,
and
so
therefore,
we
must
have
safe
engineered
controls
and
because
we
are
deliberately
excluding
political
and
economic
considerations,
that's
very
important.
Our
only
driving
consideration
is
public
safety,
and
that
has
to
go
in
on
all
levels
of
our
of
our
world.
L
All
right,
thanks
for
the
words
of
tessa
yeah,
we're
really
trying
to
understand
that
in
san
jose.
What
is
the
future
of
good
community
public
safety
ideas
you're
trying
to
talk
about
a
future
of
a
natural
disaster,
preparedness
practices
that
we
can
do
as
a
community?
L
L
Tesla
said
it
nicely,
I'm
trying
to
figure
out.
You
know
the
same
thing
that
you're
giving
these
waste
water
reports
recently
and
there's
not
much
mention
of
sea
level
rise
issues,
and
I
know
you
don't
want
to
create
an
alarmist
sense
of
things,
and
you
don't
want
to
be.
I
don't
know
just
over
emphasizing
things,
but
I
think
it's
really
important
that
as
you're
delivering
these
new
reports
on
the
future
of
the
waste
water
management
facilities
and
their
issues
that
you
politely
learn
to
include.
L
You
know
how
you're
also
doing
this
work
to
mitigate
sea
level
rise
and
addressing
sea
level
rise
issues.
It's
just
a
factual
part
of
our
lives
at
this
time,
and
I
I
think
you
should
start
reporting
it
to
ourselves,
so
we
can
be
clear
what
steps
we're
taking
at
this
time.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
in
mean-spirited
in
any
way
it
just.
It
can
be
factual
and
it
needs
to
be
factual.
L
I
think
we
need
to
know
exactly
why
we're
doing
things
we
are
at
this
time,
because
I
think
a
lot
of
it
does
have
to
do
with
the
incredible
sea
level
rise
issues
we're
facing
in
the
south
bay
and
so
good
luck,
how
you
can
learn
to
talk
about
these
things
more
open
in
terms
simply
of
sea
level
rise
issues,
and
this
was
the
work
that
david
wall
a
public
commenter.
He
used
to
be
a
part
of
this
work,
just
a
hi
to
him
at
this
time.
B
E
Yeah
just
just
quickly,
I
wanted
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
staff
at
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
marianna
david
knapp,
all
of
you
who
do
who,
who
keep
track
manage
these
this.
This
huge
number
of
complicated
projects,
it's
the
work
you're
doing
is-
is
like
what
big
corporations
are
doing
in
major
production
facilities.
This
is
this
is
not
typical
city,
city,
work
or
city
municipal
work.
E
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
that,
because
the
number
of
projects
happening
at
one
time
the
amount
of
upgrades
being
done
all
on
behalf
of
so
many
residents
around.
You
know
the
entire
valley,
and
not
just
san
jose
and
reminding
people
that
this
is
the
largest
wastewater
plant
in
the
western
united
states.
So
it's
a
pretty
impressive
endeavor,
so
I
just
want
to
thank
you
also
assure
the
community
that
sea
level
rise
is
a
primary
concern
of
ours.
We
talk
about
it
regularly.
E
I
certainly
do
with
staff,
and
I
expect
to
have
conversations
on
that
topic
as
we
move
forward
in
the
budget
season,
so
really
important,
especially
given
the
location
of
the
wastewater
plant
and
what's
happening
nearby,
so
we'll
definitely
be
having
those
conversations
so
anyway,
I
want
to
thank
you
and
move
the
report.
B
E
A
B
I
Yes,
thank
you
chair
and
we're
ready
to
jump
into
this
frank
farschu
he's
going
to
do
presentation
on
where
we
are
with
our
pavement
program.
So
if
you
want
to
pull
that
up
frank
and
let's
keep
going,
thank
you.
R
R
So,
let's
just
from
underneath
the
big
picture,
so
if
you,
if
we
were
to
open
the
hood
and
look
underneath
it,
this
is
what
we
will
see.
So
we
have
two
major
categories
of
our
streets.
We
have
major
streets,
arterials
and
collectors.
That's
967
miles
our
streets
with
an
average
pci
in
a
very
good
shape
at
76.,
two-thirds
of
our
network's
still
residential
and
that's
1552
miles
with
a
pci
average
pci
of
63..
R
Now,
if
we
go
a
little
deeper
into
each
category,
as
you
can
see
on
major
streets,
we
have
a.
We
see
a
totally
different
picture
right,
so
we
have
74
of
those
967
in
a
a
to
or
a
b
category
or
in
terms
of
payment
condition
index,
that's
good
to
excellent,
with
the
rest
spread
between
c
and
d
and
f,
and
that
speaks
to
the
oh.
R
You
know
overall
program
that
we've
been
doing
especially
the
augmented
program
since
2014
20
to
2014
and
with
all
the
mileage
and
focus
that
we've
been
doing
on
major
streets
on
residential
streets,
though
we
are
also
making
progress,
but
we
we
have.
We
have
a
lot
more
work
to
do
on
this
side,
as
you
can
see
only
45,
so
less
than
half
or
in
that
good
category.
We
started
this
program
really
with
our
contractual
payment
maintenance
work
back
in
2019.
R
So
now,
let's
look
at
the
big
picture.
So
what
do
we
see
if
we
just
look
at
the
entire
network
and
how
and
also
how
we're
progressing
so
on
the
major
street
side,
comparing
year
over
years
from
2021
to
2022?
So
our
major
streets
is
hovering
around
77.
It
has
dropped
by
one
point.
This
is
again
a
projection
from
a
street
saver
and
database
and
analysis,
but
on
the
residential
side,
we
have
moved
up
by
a
point
so
again
keep
my.
R
I
keep
in
mind
that
we
we're
talking
about
a
thousand
five
hundred
fifty
two
miles
of
street.
So
even
though
we're
moving
at
full
speed
on
the
on
this
network-
and
you
know
especially
on
the
residential
still
going
to
take
some
time
before
we
see
the
the
overall
network
going
on,
but
overall
we're
happy
with
the
with
with
the
projection
and
the
increase
in
the
conditions.
R
So
again
from
year
over
year,
we
have
seen
that
increase
and
also
please
keep
in
mind.
These
are
projections,
as
of
when
we
run
those
scenarios
in
a
street
saver.
R
From
funding
from
funding
and
needs
level,
so
we
we
always
refer
to
this
pyramid
so
again
a
big
picture.
We
have
our
pothole,
which
is
our
in-house
program
where
we
say
address
any
safety
of
the
potholes
and
program
management.
So
that's
that's
all
funded
as
well
as
our
major
streets
and
now
residential
as
well.
So
the
overall
funding
annual
need
is
83.5
million
out
of
that,
7
million
goes
to
pothole
and
program
management
and
the
risk
is
distributed
between
the
network
based
on
the
mileage
again
right.
R
So
the
major
streets
is
967
that
requires
a
funding
of
21
million,
roughly
versus
residential,
with
54
at
55.2
million.
So
again
the
numbers
and
the
backlogs
all
I'll
refer
in
the
in
the
others.
Slides
and
there's
also
be
more
detail
analysis
in
the
report.
R
This
goes
to
the
next
slide,
so
the
historical
condition
again
going
back
to
2014
when
we
really
started
increasing
the
number
of
mileage
on
pavement
maintenance
side.
So
just
just
so,
you
know,
as
some
of
you
know,
before
2014
we
were
doing
anywhere
from
20
to
30
40
miles
per
year,
but
2014.
R
That's
when
we
started
like
increasing
that
to
over
60
miles
and
just
keeping
whatever
the
funding
that
we
were
getting
quickly
getting
those
projects
out
into
the
construction
it
took
a
couple
of
years
before
we
saw
the
actual
improvement,
but
that
bump
that
you
see
from
2016
to
2017.
That's
when
we,
I
did
have
one
full
inspection
of
our
network,
so
we
actually
found
our
network
to
be
in
a
better
shape
than
we
thought
it
was.
R
So
that's
that's
the
reason
behind
that
jump
and
then
from
then
from
that
time
you
know
we,
our
pci,
has
been
again
on
a
growth
and
increase
projection,
so
we
have
been
using
vta
measure
b
and
measure
t
funds,
so
btmgb
was
held
for
a
couple
of
years,
but
we
had
an
opportunity
to
put
all
the
projects
that
we
had
in
those
two
years
in
one
year
and
we
saw
that
we
were
seeing
the
result
of
that
and
also
ongoing
next
life
piece
so
also
on
the
under
funding
status.
R
So
this
this
is
a
familiar
slide
for
some
of
you,
but
you've
seen
it
in
the
previous
years.
So
we
are
for
right.
Now
we
are
funded,
our
annual
funding
required
to
get
obtained.
70
pci
is
83.5.
R
Our
average
funding
over
the
next
over
the
next
10
years
is
80,
81.2
million.
So
we
over
the
next
10
years.
We
have
a
small
shortage
of
funding,
but
we're
still,
as
you
can
see,
you
know,
for
the
next
few
years
we
are
well
funded
and
the
drop
after
27
28
fiscal
year
is
mainly
because
of
the
major
majority
funds
that
go
away
and
we're
hoping
to
you
know.
R
By
that
time
our
goal
is
to
get
to
every
single
residential
streets
by
that
time
and
do
at
least
one
maintenance
on
those
streets
and
keep
the
network
in
good
shape.
So
we
could
maintain
it
at
the
lower
level
of
funding
and
also,
we
think
in
future
we
could.
We
could
have
grant
opportunities
and,
as
you
can
see
in
this
graph,
even
after
20
2028,
we
are
going
to
be
well
above
50
million
dollars
here.
R
Our
deferred
maintenance
backlog
projection
so
again
just
a
little
background.
So
this
is
the
projection
that
we
do
every
year
by
running,
we
have
a
pavement
management
system
in
place.
We
input
all
the
data
and
we
run
that
and
then
we'll
ask
that
we'll
you
know,
get
the
results
from
from
the
from
the
software
of
what
what
would
be
our
maintenance
backlog.
So
you
know
very
different
story
where
we
are
compared
to
three
years
ago,
as
you
can
see
in
this
graph.
R
So
back
three
years
ago,
this
projection
was
over
1.1
billion.
If
you
know,
if
he
kept
at
that,
you
know
the
funding
at
that
level,
but
because
of
you
know
the
funding
and
also
just
getting
these
projects
out,
as
you
can
see
that
backlog
is
getting
crushed
and
it's
going
down
so
this
year
it's
gone
up
a
little
bit
in
the
outer
ears,
as
you
can
see
in
this
in
this
graph.
R
R
so
next
year.
Next
slide,
please
overall
production,
history
of
our
network
and
where
we
are
again,
we
have
some
some
spikes
and
valleys
here,
as
you
can
see.
But
you
know
2014,
as
I
mentioned,
is
when
we
started
our
aggressive
payment
maintenance
program
and
every
funding
that
the
city
and
the
council
allocated.
R
We
tried
to
get
it,
get
it
out
on
the
streets
as
quickly
as
possible,
so
you
can
see
that
projection.
66,
85,
96,
113
and
2019
is
that
one
year
that
I
mentioned,
we
had
two
years
of
meteor
measure
b,
that
we
were
we
had
planned
and
designed
and
we
were
able
to
just
go
out
for
delivery
in
one
year.
R
So
that's
a
big
spike
there,
and
this
year
we
also
we're
going
to
actually
have
the
biggest
program
that
we've
had
since
2014
with
300
miles,
but
53
miles
of
those
are
from
deferred
deferred
from
last
year.
R
R
So
with
that
I'll
hand
it
over
to
my
colleague
annie
yes,
so
she
will
be
speaking
to
you
know,
to
actual
project,
go
down
to
the
project
level
and
more
details
on
that
annie.
Please
take
over.
A
Good
afternoon,
everyone
for
our
2022
pavement
construction
season.
We
have
29
projects
with
a
goal
to
maintain
250
miles
within
the
city
out
of
those
29
projects,
15
are
in
the
category
of
major
construction
contracts
and
the
award
dates
are
shown
on
the
tables.
The
two
projects
highlighted
have
already
been
awarded.
A
A
In
our
local
neighborhood
streets
network,
it
is
organized
of
135,
geographically
contiguous,
pavement,
maintenance
zones.
These
zones
were
broken
down
with
the
gold
for
efficient
planning
and
delivery
of
pavement
programs
maximizing
work
completed
in
our
neighborhood
area
and
to
provide
geographic
spread
across
the
city.
In
our
planning
phase,
we
do
consider
equity
priority
communities
as
a
tool.
A
A
This
year
we
plan
to
have
13,
minor
and
10
major
construction
projects
for
the
local
and
neighborhood
streets
program,
which
is
about
9
191
miles,
and
we
have
a
total
funding
of
63
million.
That
is
mainly
from
measure
t
and
measure
b.
We
are
mainly
focusing
on
zones
that
are
considered
poor
or
failed
areas
to
maximize
our
cost-effective
treatment
and
approximately
458
miles
have
been
maintained
in
the
last
three
years,
which
is
about
30
percent
of
our
network.
B
N
Yes,
I'm
mr
mendoza,
I'm
calling
from
district
7,
and
I
see
the
reports.
I
mean
it's
21
million
and
the
budget
grants,
and
then
you
get
63
mills
from
d
and
t
and
still
my
spirits
that
I
commute
every
day
from
tully,
okay
to
lucretia
and
not
even
payment
like
the
pictures.
Are
there,
so
I
elena's
when
you're
coming
back
and
you're
going
over
and
tally
row
and
that's
a
main
street.
That's
a
main
street
that
gets
you
to
101.
N
Okay,
it's
a
big
pack
hole,
that's
been
there
since,
I
think
2019.
and
you
guys
say
it's
full
speed.
So
we
need
to
put
more
speed
to
this.
Okay,
it's
not
enough.
We
need
to
do
more
with
the
10th
biggest
city
and
the
whole
nation.
Okay,
and
I
think
this
is
not
right.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
D
Okay,
good
90
seconds,
she
said:
okay,
good,
so,
okay,
fine,
that's
fine!
You
want
to
do
it
there,
fine,
okay,
good.
So,
basically,
what
I'm
saying
is
the
same
thing.
This
is
the
department
of
transportation
and
the
environment,
and
when
we're
looking
at
taking
measure
b,
monies
that
are
from
our
consumer
purchases,
our
tax
dollars
and
putting
it
just
to
pave
our
roads
without
addressing
our
real
goal,
which
is
to
eliminate
pedestrian
and
walking
deaths
and
disability.
D
That
needs
to
be
our
goal
and
the
way
the
goal
the
decision
tree
is
because
climate
change
is
real.
Therefore,
we
must
leave
fossil
fuels
in
the
ground.
Therefore,
most
people
will
not
be
able
to
drive.
Therefore,
more
people
will
be
in
bicycles,
including
children.
Therefore,
we
must
have
safe
engineer
controls
and
because
we
are
deliberately
excluding
politics
and
economic
considerations,
our
only
driving
consideration
is
public
safety,
and
so
that
needs
to
be
as
we
go
forward,
and
so
you
know
that,
like
kat
said,
is
that
we
need
to
put
cement.
D
We
need
to
use
our
cement
budget
to
put
separation
between
the
bicyclists
and
the
cars
and
the
door
zone.
We
make.
We
make
zebra
lines
for
the
desert
zone.
These
are
how
we
get
people
out
of
their
car,
because
people
are
scared
to
ride
their
bicycle.
I
know
that
okay,
they're
scared,
they
don't
feel
safe.
We
have
to
change
to
make
them
feel
safe,
and
this
is
the
only
way
we're
going
to
go
forward.
You
know
to
provide
this
public
safety
is
we
have
to
engineer
the
safety
into
our
roads
and
he
designed
it.
L
Claire
beekman
hi
claire
beef,
been
here
thanks
a
lot
council
president
davis
for
starting
the
timer
at
one
minute,
30
seconds.
That
offers
a
lot
of
flexibility.
I
think
for
ourselves
in
the
future.
Thank
you
to
speak
to
continue
ideas
of
natural
disaster,
preparedness
which
I
think
san
jose
is
doing
a
remarkably
good
job
at
measure.
T
public
oversight.
You
know
specifically
designed
funding,
for
you
know
the
reach,
the
re
structuring
of
overpasses
and
and
bridges
in
san
jose.
L
You
know
whatever
that
term
is,
I
can't
remember
right
now,
so
you
know
it
we're.
Considering
these
things
and
preparing
well-
and
I
think
you
know,
measure
t
over
public
oversight
board
deserves
credit
for
that
they've
been
wanting
to
develop
a
process
that
can
be
more
publicly
accessible
for
their
commission
process
and
they've
been
talking
about
that
since
at
least
last
summer-
and
you
know
that
perfectly
brings
up
the
ideas
of
you-
know
the
accountability
and
and
oversight
guidelines
with
technology
that
is
specifically
meant
to
help
ourselves
as
community
facilitate.
L
You
know,
good
practices
and
better
conversations
and
and
openness
about
issues
so
they're
asking
those
questions.
I
think
we
should
answer
and
to
be
preparing
ourselves.
You
know,
for
whatever
natural
disasters
are
in
our
future,
that's
important
and
to
practice,
openness
and
accountability,
as
always
just
incredibly
decent
and
good-hearted
for
all
of
us.
Thank
you.
O
O
The
roads
need
to
be
paved
and
properly
painted,
like
they
did
on
cherry
avenue,
I
mean
I'm
going
to
give
give
san
jose
a
little
cred
for
actually
doing
something
right,
but
one
only
few
things
the
city
has
done
right
in
my
whole
life
because
is
a
repave
and
repaint
part
of
cherry
avenue,
it's
great
for
everybody,
but
it
seems
as
if
they
can
only
do
it
on
one
block
and
then
the
rest
of
it's
all
screwed
up.
O
That's
what
san
jose
does
they
like
to
screw
it
up
and
then
charge
you
more
in
taxes
and
have
all
these
committees
to
study
things
for
50
years?
It's
a
joke.
This
city
is
a
joke.
I
mean:
can
you
imagine
sister
city?
I
bet
russia
is
happy
to
get
rid
of
san
jose.
Could
you
imagine
coming
all
the
way
from
russia
and
coming
to
this
place
going?
This
is
hard,
the
civic
silicon
valley
really
wow.
We
don't
have
cities
this
bad
in
russia
under
putin.
B
B
E
B
H
A
B
Yes,
okay,
right,
thank
you
given
that
and
I
I
thank
you
dot
for
allowing
us
to
defer
one
of
your
many
items
on
today's
calendar.
We
will
move
to
open
forum
and
again
I
would
like
to
ask
for
90
90
seconds.
Please.
O
Yeah,
I
just
like
to
say
thanks
to
the
pam
foley's
captain,
tavaldes
and
sjpd,
for
making
me
woke
about
calling
in
these
city
council
meetings.
You
know
these
guys,
you
know
once
you
have
a
bad
deal
with
your
city
and
your
government,
it's
hard
not
to
forget
now.
Is
it
pam
foley
told
me
to
forget:
what's
happened
in
the
past,
I
guess
maybe
everybody
else
in
the
world
who's.
You
know
supposed
to
forgive
like
say
the
people,
people
who
fought
for
civil
rights.
O
Are
they
just
supposed
to
just
forget
what
what
their
police
department
did
to
them?
What
their
government
did
to
them?
There's
a
reason
why
people
don't
like
this
city,
you,
don't
you
don't
treat
people
right,
whether
it's
the
police
or
the
permit
department,
a
terrible
city?
It
really
is.
You
should
all
be
ashamed
of
yourself.
I
can't
say
it
enough.
You're
downtown,
I
mean
really.
You
guys
have
sister
cities.
Imagine
when
they
come
visit.
O
Oh,
my
god,
I
couldn't
imagine
coming
from
around
the
world
and
seeing
downtown
san
jose
five
blocks
any
which
way
from
city
hall
walking
around
you
guys
must
have
to
shield
these
people
when
they
come
to
visit.
Your
crappy
town
should
be
ashamed
of.
How
that
whole
downtown
looks.
It
should
be
a
vibrant
place
and
it's
not.
D
D
A
D
Fine,
okay,
fine
sweetheart,
very
good,
all
right
sweetie,
so
thank
you
for
sending
it
again.
Thank
you,
sweetheart,
okay.
Well,
you
know.
I'm
just
saying
that
we
need
to
lead
by
leadership.
Lead
by
by
example,
are
our
our
public
servants,
who
are
our
staff,
and
specifically
I'm
thinking
of
john
and
risdel
redon,
whatever
rise
or
whatever
his
name
is
the
head
of
our
d.o.t.
He
needs
to
lead
by
example.
D
We
lost
some
very
good
staff
for
the
d.o.t
that
were
bicyclists
and
they
they
got
fired
it's
terrible
and
he
gets
it.
So
he
has
a
big
second
tension.
This
is
wrong,
and
so
we
need
the
leadership
from
our
our
government
too.
Our
government
has
failed
us,
that's
why
we
have
our
climate
crisis
and
that's
why
my
son
is
running
for
for
the
mayor,
because
his
platform
is
to
make
san
jose
a
food
garden
again
and
keep
fossil
fuels
in
the
ground.
D
That
has
to
be
we're
not
talking
about
politics
and
economics,
we're
talking
about
public
safety
and
it
needs
to
be
our
priority,
and
we
need
to
get
that
message
out
and
I
shouldn't
having
to
pay
eight
thousand
dollars.
Anyone
who
wants
to
run
for
office
has
to
pay
eight
thousand
to
get
their
message
out
or
their
bio
that
should
be
included
in
our
tax
dollars.
We've
been
having
to
raise
eight
thousand
dollars
because
money
is
the
root
of
all
evil
and
it's
being
fueled
by
fossil
fuels.
D
We
see
that
with
what's
happening
in
russia
right
now,
we
are
fueling
his
military
campaign
with
our
purchases
and
so
to
make
our
our
campaigns.
You
have
to
raise
eight
thousand
dollars
to
get
your
message
out
when
we
have
a
climate
emergency
and
we
need
help,
and
so
that
needs
to
go
away.
We
need
to
pay
for
that
with
our
tax
dollars.
The
voter's
guide
for
our
politicians.
N
Hi,
yes,
thank
you
for
these
meetings.
I've
been
learning
a
lot.
Thank
you,
the
speakers
that
spoke
before
me
from
all
of
them.
I
learned
a
lot
blair.
Thank
you
for
not
on
noticing
what
I
say.
Thank
you
you
don't
have
to,
but
I
respect
you
a
lot.
You
are
very
good
human
being
very
intelligent.
I
hope
I
keep
learning
from
you
and
I
would
like
to
ask
the
city
council.
N
I
mean
other
silicon,
so
the
committees
right
and
the
and
to
see
if
they
can
have
like,
like
how
you
guys
do
it
right
now
or
to
talk
about
openly,
whatever
you
want
to
talk
about,
but
maybe
in
the
end,
if
somebody
has
a
question,
they
can
have
at
least
one
question
per
person.
You
know
if
it's
you
know
and
something
that
you
guys
can
answer
right
there.
So
we
can
have
more
clear
understanding
by
the
end
of
the
meeting.
N
You
know,
because
sometimes
it
just
both
votes
and
and
everything
goes
too
quick
and
and
stuff
like
that
there
and
we're
trying
to
keep
up
so
maybe
like
a
question
like
a
qa
and
the
end
at
least
one.
If
it
has
to
do
with
the
agenda
of
that
day,
thank
you.
F
Thank
you
two
quick
comments.
One
is,
I
just
want
to
keep
it
on
the
minds
of
everybody
in
city
council
that
we
need
to
push
to
get
the
mobile
home
zoning
overlay
put
over
the
58
mobile
home
parks
in
the
city
that
was
voted
on
and
thanks
to
council
member,
you
know
pam,
foley
and
raul
perales
and
sergio
jimenez,
jimenez
and
maya
esparza,
and
you
guys
pushed
to
get
that
done
and
I'm
really
grateful.
F
I
just
want
to
see
it
happen,
so
if
we
could
work
on
that
to
get
that
overlay
actually
on
the
land
use
map,
I
would
really
appreciate
it.
The
second
thing
is
when
we
pass
something
a
development
project
like
on
blossom
hill
road,
where
the
fish
market
is,
we
need
to
hold
developers
accountable
and
the
owners
of
property
to
clean
it
up,
while
they're
waiting
for
the
planning
process
to
go
through
their
weeds
everywhere
and
garbage
starting
to
pile
up
at
that
property.
So
thank
you
back.