►
From YouTube: MAY 1, 2023 | Transportation & Environment Committee
Description
City of San José, California
Transportation & Environment Committee of May 1, 2023.
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1080768&GUID=851C744F-B204-43E5-AC33-91911D48B7EE
A
A
A
A
A
C
We
have
four
I'm
Foley's
not
going
to
be
here
today,
so
we
can
do
in
person
exploding
yeah
all
right
before
we
begin.
We
want
to
remind
everybody
that
we
should
follow.
Our
code
of
conduct
includes
commenting
on
specific
agenda
items
and
addressing
the
full
body.
C
All
members
of
the
committee
staff
and
public
are
expected
to
refrain
from
abusive
language
failure
to
comply
with
the
code
of
conduct
which
will
disturb,
disrupt
or
impede
the
orderly
conduct
of
this
meeting
will
result
in
removal
from
the
meeting
and
we're
starting
with
a
review
of
the
work
plan.
We
have
we're
switching
swapping
one
item
off
of
today's
agenda
with
an
item
that
originally
had
been
scheduled
for
June.
Those
are
items
one
and
two
under
work
plans.
C
So
I
will
entertain
a
motion
to
combine
one
and
two
to
defer
the
urban
forestry
report
and
move
the
regional
transportation
activity
report
to
May
motion.
E
Hi
Blair
Beekman
here
thanks
for
the
meeting
today,
happy
May
1st
to
everyone
what
was
I
gonna,
say:
oh
to
talk
about
the
Regional
Transportation
semi
report
issues.
Good
luck
with
that
topic
matter
of
discussion,
it's
important
to
ourselves,
I
think
I,
think
you
know
my
feelings
on
such
matters.
I
think
I'll
bring
these
things
up
better
during
the
regular
agenda
today
and
hopefully,
we'll
have
a
good
meeting
today.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
so
much
now
we're
on
to
consent
calendar
a
motion
to
approve
consent.
There's
one
item
on
consent.
B
C
C
G
Good
afternoon
John
Russo,
director
of
transportation,
for
this
item,
we
do
have
some
guests
I'd
like
to
introduce
online
we've
got
Michelle.
Burchard
is
going
to
be
addressing
the
committee
she's.
The
executive
director
of
Caltrain
and
with
us
here
at
the
booth
is
Casey
fromson
she's,
going
to
be
doing
a
presentation
on
update
of
Caltrain
electrification.
I've
got
Jessica
deputy
director
dot,
so
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Michelle,
and
she
is
online.
H
Great
John
thanks,
so
much
really
appreciate
the
introduction
council
members,
I'm
Michelle
Bouchard,
the
executive
director
for
Caltrain
I'm,
joined
by
frampson
who's
in
the
room
with
you.
She
is
our
chief
of
communications.
We
wanted
to
thank
you
so
much
for
this
opportunity
to
present
this
item.
It's
a
it's
one
of
the
most
transformational
programs
that
we
have
have
ever
had
with
Caltrain,
and
it's
transformational
in
many
respects.
H
It's
a
transformational
for
our
Riders.
It's
transformational
for
the
communities
through
which
we
operate,
and
it's
transformational
for
for
the
environment,
and
so
the
reason
why
we
love
being
able
to
present
to
you
today
is
because
we
think
the
benefits
of
this
project
syncs
up
sync
up
really
nicely
with
the
committee's
goals
of
promoting
environmental
sustainability,
efficient
transportation
and
enhancing.
H
We
have
been
inactive
construction
on
this
program
since
2017
when
we
issued
notices
to
proceed
and
now
we're
in
the
home
stretch
this
next
year.
It'll
be
critical
for
us,
as
we've
intensified
work
on
the
right-of-way
to
complete
the
power
system.
That
will
be
propelling
our
brand
new
trains,
and
my
hope
is,
if
you
haven't
seen
these
trains,
four
of
them
live
just
up
the
street
from
you
in
our
maintenance
facility.
H
We
will
be
having
a
few
events
over
the
course
of
the
of
the
next
year
to
be
able
to
highlight
that
we
are
about
to
be
in
Revenue
Service
and
in
fact
many
of
you
will
be
able
to
see
trains
that
are
actually
being
tested
in
the
summer
as
right
now
we're
seeking
to
finalize
the
the
the
testing
on
the
southern
end
of
our
traction
power
system.
H
H
I
think
there
is
one
important
and
invisible
example
of
that
support
in
the
fact
that
over
the
course
of
the
last
several
months,
we
have
been
lucky
enough
to
complete
our
project
budget
through
grants
from
the
federal
government,
but
most
notably
from
the
state
of
California,
never
would
have
gotten
those
funds
if
it
weren't
for
all
of
the
support
that
we
received
and
was
conveyed
to
to
the
governor
and
the
Department
of
Transportation.
H
So
the
punch
line
is,
we
will
be
having
Revenue
Service
on
this
Corridor
in
these
new
trains
by
the
fall
of
2024.
We've
got
a
ton
of
work
to
continue
to
do
in
terms
of
completing
the
construction,
but
also
in
terms
of
transitioning
Caltrain's
organization,
from
one
that
currently
operates.
Just
diesel
trains
to
one
that
maintains
and
operates
electric
trains
so
with
that
also
want
to
give
a
special
thanks
to
Vice,
chair
Davis
for
her
leadership
on
the
Caltrain
board.
H
She's
been
a
critical
source
of
support
and
advice
and
policy
guidance
over
the
course
of
the
last
six
years.
So
really
appreciate
that,
and
with
that
I'd
like
to
hand
it
over
to
Casey,
so
she
can
run
you
through
our
presentation.
Thank
you.
I
Foreign
Casey
Thompson
Chief
Communications
officer.
Thank
you
so
much
for
having
us
here
today.
I
want
to
start
by
thanking
my
two
colleagues
on
on
my
right
and
left.
I
The
city
has
been
really
really
amazing
to
work
with
and
I
I
deeply
appreciate
the
support
that
your
staff
has
provided
throughout
the
history
of
this
project
and
for
the
many
other
projects
that
we're
working
together
on
Michelle
stole
most
of
my
thunder
so
I
basically
just
could
get
to
give
the
pictures,
and
so
that's
always
helpful
and
just
to
recap
so
you're
getting
in
one
more
time
kind
of
a
little
bit
more
details
of
where
we
are
on
the
electrification
project,
say
anything
just
a
reminder
of
the
Caltrain
Corridor.
I
It's
77
miles
from
San
Francisco,
all
the
way
down
to
Gilroy,
but
you'll
notice.
Here,
there's
kind
of
a
difference
between
those
two
and
it's
important
to
explain
why
Caltrain
owns
a
portion
of
the
corridor
between
San
Francisco
and
tamien
station
in
San
Jose.
So
when
we
talk
about
the
electrification
project
and
the
improvements
that
we're
doing
specifically
with
this
project,
it's
occurring
within
that
Corridor,
because
the
portion
south
of
that
is
owned
by
Union
Pacific,
which
is
a
freight
railroad
line.
I
We
certainly
have
other
projects
and
plans
in
the
works
and
we'll
talk
about
those,
but
the
focus
today
will
be
on
the
portion
of
the
corridor.
That
Caltrain
owns
a
few
of
the
other
statistics
up
there
is
that
it's
a
really
unique
system
commuter
railroads
across
the
country
typically
go
into
one
job
center,
but
Caltrain
has
always
had
a
bi-directional
commute.
So
while
there
are
many
people
traveling
into
San
Francisco,
the
second
busiest
station
is
actually
in
Palo,
Alto
and
dear
Don's,
number
three,
so
Silicon
Valley
and
all
those
places
that
we
serve.
I
It's
really
going
in
both
directions
that
we
see
people
traveling
on
the
coral
we
have
many
at
grade.
Crossings
include
including
several
in
San
Jose.
So
we
are
working
on
some
overall
efforts
to
look
at
a
corridor
approach
to
that,
and
then
you
can
see
where
we
were
pre-pandemic.
You
know
one
statistic
there
that
speaks
to
some
challenges.
We
have
financially
is
on
the
fare
box
side,
so
Caltrain
used
to
have
70
of
its
operating
funds
come
from
the
fares.
I
We
got
from
Riders
we're
still
at
a
lower
ridership
point
today
than
what
we
want
to
be
in
the
future,
and
so
that
provides
some
challenges
for
us
and
we're
again
working
with
lots
of
Partners
to
see
what
we
can
secure
at
the
state
level
for
that,
as
well
as
potentially
a
regional
one,
but
we
have
a
strong
Corridor
that
has
so
many
different
communities
up
and
down
of
it
and
we're
really
happy
and
pleased
that
we're
right
around
the
corner
for
electrifying
it.
I
So
let
me
give
you
a
few
details
about
that
before
we
hit
those
details.
A
few
more
high-level
Concepts
to
know
is
the
Caltrain
board
in
2019
adopted
a
2040
service
Vision.
So
it
made
sure
that
we're
thinking
about
after
we
Electrify
what
are
some
of
the
other
projects
and
plans
we
want
to
have
on
the
horizon
and
as
part
of
that
Vision
we
talked
about.
I
I
really
get
excited
about
this
because
it
is
such
a
moment
in
our
history
that
Abraham
Lincoln
was
the
president.
When
people
fart
started
first
riding
Caltrain
as
a
passenger
service-
and
you
can
see
it
was
a
steam
system.
Now,
we've
had
diesel
trains
for
many
years,
and
we
are
all
at
this
moment
in
time.
I
As
part
of
that
overall
Vision,
we
want
to
get
to
a
hundred
percent
fully
zero
emission
Corridor
and
we
have
some
grant
opportunities
that
we're
going
after
we're,
also
working
on
with
the
state
of
California
about
a
a
battery
electric
train
that
will
be
able
to
go
down
on
that
Gilroy
portion.
So,
even
though
we're
doing
75
with
this
project,
we
have
plans
to
have
a
fully
zero
emission
Corridor
in
the
future.
I
A
few
details
about
the
project,
the
foundation.
So
we
had
over
3000
of
those
in
place
throughout
the
corridor.
It's
over
150
year
old
Corridor.
So
you
can
imagine
we
were
very
pleased
when
we
stopped
digging
in
the
ground
and
finding
interesting
things
there
and
are
now.
The
vast
majority
of
the
work
is
above
ground.
I
So
it's
really
putting
the
final
touches
and
getting
the
last
few
polls
in
place,
stringing
the
wire
putting
the
traction
power
facilities
in
there
and
then
doing
this
integrated
testing
that
as
Michelle
mentioned,
that
really
puts
all
the
pieces
together.
We
already
have
a
couple
train
sets
on
the
quarter.
You
can
see
the
pictures
of
them
now
and
we
expect
to
have
Revenue
Service,
so
that
means
passengers
on
trains
by
September
of
next
year,
and
we
are
very
very
happy
that
the
project
is
fully
funded.
I
I
So
not
only
is
it
kind
of
a
clean
slick
design,
but
even
in
the
bathrooms
we
have
baby
changing
tables
which
I
know
Jessica
and
I
have
talked
about
having
little
kids
now
you
know,
I
didn't
have
kids
when
I
started
this
project
10
years
ago,
but
I
do
now
and
I
appreciate
that
we're
going
to
have
amenities
such
as
that
and
we'll
have
Wi-Fi
on
there
we'll
have
plugs
at
every
seat.
You
know
it
really
is
going
to
be
something
that
we
should
be
proud
of
in
Silicon
Valley.
I
We
spent
a
decent
amount
of
time,
looking
at
our
job
kind
of
history
and
where
we
created
it
and
really
for
a
project.
That's
in
California.
I
You
may
not
always
think
about
it,
but
we
have
literally
created
jobs
in
36,
different
states,
and
so
we've
gone
back
through
that
job
kind
of
train
and
through
our
suppliers
to
see
where
those
are
from,
and
that
has
also
helped
us
as
we've
gone
after
funding
for
different
large
Federal
sources
of
having
partners
in
other
states
be
part
of
this
and
really
show
that
these
big
Mega
projects
really
do
impact
the
whole
country.
I
One
place
that
we
like
to
highlight
and
I
know
that
council
member
Davis
hasn't
been
there
herself,
that
is
in
Utah,
and
so
Utah
is
actually
where
the
trains
are
being
built,
and
this
facility
was
created
in
large
part
because
they
secured
the
first
contract
with
Caltrain,
and
so
they
have
now
over
400
employees.
There
a
whole
local
apprenticeship
program
there
it's
by
America,
and
this
is
one
we
just
like
to
highlight
that
you
know
these.
These
projects
really
can
create
jobs
across
the
country
and
then
help
strengthen
and
deepen
our
partnership
in
other
areas.
I
And
then
the
last
one
is
just
to
end
on
our
level
of
support.
We're
not
going
to
go
into
lots
and
lots
of
slides
here,
but
we're
happy
to
take
questions.
But
we
really
could
not
have
been
here
without
the
support
on
so
many
different
levels
and
as
Michelle
said,
we
started.
Construction
in
2017
have
gone
through
a
pandemic,
but
now
we
are
at
the
very
end
of
this
project
and
so
excited
to
deliver
this
to
all
the
communities
and
the
supporters
that
have
been
with
us
throughout
this
process.
C
Well,
thank
you
so
much
for
that
report.
Casey
on
the
it
was
really
important
project.
Let's
start
with
public
comment.
F
J
J
Also
from
the
Horseshoe,
that
report
was
painful
to
listen
to
it's
a
joke.
It's
a
mock
and
I'm
going
to
tell
you
why
number
one
Equity
you're
abusing
that
word:
don't
do
it
again,
get
Equity
out
of
your
mouth
and
quit
talking
about
it
because
we're
not
we're
not
concerned
with
your
version
or
your
interpretation
of
what
Equity
means
to
us.
J
You
see
because
that
train
runs
through
my
body.
You
need
to
learn
a
little
bit
of
History.
The
reason
why
that
train
ran
through
that
Barrio.
It
was
so
it
could
Institute
Willow
Glen
as
a
city
in
1927.,
and
that
is
what
formed
the
Masonic
Lodge
in
Willow
Gwen,
the
one
that's
sitting
back
of
Cathedral
of
Faith,
so
it
was
racism
that
put
that
line
through
there,
so
you
mock
Equity
when
you
start
talking
about
it
so
like
just
get
that
out
of
your
out
of
your
presentations
number
two.
J
This
is
why
Google
has
stopped
construction,
see
because
you
have
to
have
this
infrastructure
in
place
first,
so
that
Google
can
be
built
on
top
of
it.
That's
why?
So
you
guys
are
a
choke
man.
I
mean
you
guys
are
lying
to
the
people.
You
continue
to
lie,
and
my
role
as
a
citizen
of
this
community
is
continue
to
check
you
on
your
on
your
sociopathic
line
to
the
public,
because
that's
what
you're
doing
you're
going
to
demolish
half
of
the
houses
in
the
Barrio
in
the
Horseshoe,
because
four
tracks
have
to
go
through
there.
J
Remember
I
have
six
years
of
consistent
attendance
at
these
meetings,
so
I
can
connect
the
dots
and
when
you're,
lying
and
I
know
when
you're,
lying
and
I
can
call
you
out
when
you're
lying,
because
I
have
a
photographic
memory.
I
remember
the
documents
that
I
read
so
I
know
what
I'm
talking
about
go
back
and
double
check
them
and
you'll
see
that
everything
that
I'm
telling
you
right
now
is
verbatim
true,
it's
a
fact.
So
quit
lying
and
keep
Equity
out
your
mouth.
F
E
Hi
I'm
Gloria
Beekman
here,
as
this
item
is
called
the
regional
transportation
activities
quarterly
report.
It's
got
a
bunch
of
Transportation
activities
on
it
that
I
hope
I
can
talk
about.
If
it's
time,
if
that's
okay
with
everyone,
there
is
a
few
items
about
Regional
Highway
projects
and
Rail
and
Transit
things,
and
that
includes
Bart,
stuff,
High-Speed
Rail
giridon
station
geared
on
to
the
airport
for
a
real
reminder
that
really
be
considering
the
morale
of
VTA
Light
Rail
drivers.
E
As
you
make
decisions
about
you
know,
the
future
of
airport
use
just
think
about
them.
E
Think
about
how
they
can
be
happy
and
and
content
in
this
process
do
do
something
positive
for
them,
as
you're
thinking
of
the
airport
project,
a
reminder
that
it's
my
understanding
that
the
BART
tunneling
won't
start
happening
until
at
least
the
summer
of
2024,
because
the
tunneling
equipment
won't
be
here
until
then
an
important
thought
to
consider
and
that
I
think
it's
important
to
really
honestly
consider
in
the
future
of
High-Speed
Rail
how
High-Speed
Rail
can
be
a
part
of
an
entire
Bay,
Area
experience
and
I
know
you
guys
want
to
really
focus
on
it.
E
That
I
hope
we
can
learn
to
more
openly
talk
about,
be
cooperative
about
and
I
think
that
would
just
make
from
a
more
enjoyable
process
for
everyone,
and
it's
an
important
reminder
that
and
to
to
conclude,
as
always,
you
know
always
be
considering
that
we're
we're
moving
towards
a
public
safety
future
that
what
open
public
policies
and
accountability,
how
that
adds
and
lends
to
the
importance
of
Public
Safety.
It
adds
to
community
Harmony
in
our
better
selves.
Thank
you
back.
C
All
right,
thank
you.
I
know
that
council,
member
of
Davis,
would
love
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
this,
so
I'll.
Let
her
start.
K
Chair
and
thank
you
Michelle
and
Casey
for
your
presentation.
First,
can
you
address
the
there
was
a
public
comment
that
talked
about
four
tracks
and
having
to
to
take
homes.
Can
you
address
that
issue.
I
Yeah
so
as
part
of
the
electrification
project,
we're
not
doing
any
of
that
work.
The
project
really
is
installing
an
overhead
contact
system.
So
those
are
poles
that
are
on
our
right-of-way
and
getting
brand
new
trains,
and
so
there's
not
additional
large,
takes
there's
no
tracks.
I,
think
that
would
be
reference
to
maybe
some
of
the
other
future
projects
that
are
in
the
works
and.
L
Jessica
zank
I'll
build
on
that
briefly,
because
the
caller
Mr
Soto
was
accurately
remembering
that
in
the
Diridon
Station
oriented
of
work
a
few
years
ago,
as
we
looked
at
the
number
of
trains
coming
into
and
out
of
Diridon
Station,
there
is
the
potential
for
three
or
four
trains
tracks.
Excuse
me
three
or
four
tracks,
south
of
Diridon
Station
in
the
future.
Today,
there's
only
two,
and
so
that
is
likely
what
he
was
thinking
of
and
he's
absolutely
right
that
that
is
the
analysis
to
date
that
three
or
four
tracks
would
be.
L
K
Chance,
thank
you.
I
I,
appreciate
that
reminder,
and
that
is
again.
I
just
want
to
Echo
what
you've
said:
Jess
that
that
that's
for
the
expanded,
Diridon
Station
plan,
which
is
really
just
a
concept
right
now
and
and
also
would
require,
would
require
a
high-speed
rail
to
have
firm
plans
on
what
their
schedule.
K
There
are
trains
that
are
already
here,
which
is
very
exciting
and
there's
tons
of
work
going
on.
So,
if
you've,
if
you've
been
at
Diridon
Station
recently
you'll
already
see
the
overhead
contact
system
is
up,
we've
got
poles
and
wires
and
all
kinds
of
good
stuff
and
if
you're,
if
you're,
ever
crossing
a
Caltrain
track
now
in
in
the
South
Bay,
all
of
that
stuff
is
already
up
there.
K
What
you've
said
about
the
equity
piece
as
well,
being
able
to
have
faster
midday
service
being
able
to
have
more
weekend
service
is
very
important
for
folks
who
don't
have
regular
eight
to
five
schedules,
and-
and
there
are
a
lot
of
people
who
live
along
the
corridor,
who
are
going
to
benefit
from
reduced
and
really
eliminated
emissions,
because
we
will
be
running
electric
trains
rather
than
diesel
spewing
into
the
air.
So
those
are
very
important
features
of
this
project
that
I'm
really
proud
to
have
been
a
part
of.
K
M
Thank
you,
chair,
yeah,
I,
I
too.
You
know
I
immediately
prior
to
to
the
appointment.
I
was
an
avid
Caltrain
user
on
my
way
to
Stanford
University
every
you
know
couple
days
a
week
and
I
I
too,
am
very
excited
to
see,
see
the
electrification
and
the
the
electric
service.
But
you
know
I
I
did
want
to
commend
my
colleague
Vice
chair
Davis,
because
I
know.
M
Without
her
leadership
we
would
not
and
her
push
for
Wi-Fi
I
know
we
would
not
have
Wi-Fi
enabled
trains
so
I
wanted
to
just
publicly
commend
her
and
give
her
Kudos
because
I
know
she's
been
a
a
certain
advocate
for
that.
So
kudos
to
that
to
you,
Vice,
chair,
Davis
and
you
know,
I'm
excited
to
see,
see
it
move
forward
and
and
to
be
a
writer.
Thank
you.
C
All
right,
thank
you
and
we're
going
to
try
to
figure
out
after
councilmember
Davis
turns
out
how
to
keep
her
on
the
Caltrain
board,
we'll
we'll
look
into
that.
I
did
have
a
first
of
all
I
want
to.
Thank
you
also
for
the
presentation.
This
is
one
of
the
most
important
Transportation
projects.
That's
happening
anywhere
in
California
for
sure
I
mean
dirty
diesel
trains
I
mean
it's
great.
Trains
are
have
always
been
important.
C
Part
of
the
infrastructure,
but
diesel
trains
are
are
particularly
dirty
and
we've
kind
of
lived
with
it,
but
we
shouldn't
have
too
much
longer
and
I'm
glad
we
won't
be
living
with
it.
Much
longer
on
that
Corridor.
Just
a
couple
of
questions
as
part
of
this
are
all
the
great
separations
on
the
peninsula,
complete
or
they'll,
be
complete
by
next
year.
Is
that.
I
Oh
man,
that
would
be
amazing,
I'd,
have
a
very
different
presentation.
If
that
was
the
case,
unfortunately
not,
and
so
there
are
almost
70
at
grade
Crossings
along
the
entire
Caltrain
Corridor,
so
around
30
in
the
portion
that
Caltrain
owns
and
there's
20
or
so
that
are
active
right
now.
The
city
of
San
Jose
has
several
and
there's
several
other
in
different
stages,
close
to
construction,
Readiness
to
still
in
the
design
phase.
What
we
are
undertaking,
which
we
are
you
know,
was
a
much
needed
thing
and
actually
spun
out
of
the
Caltrain
business
plan.
I
Is
you
know?
Is
there
a
way
for
us
to
be
thinking
about
grade
separations
at
a
corridor
level?
Are
there
some
efficiencies
that
we
could
have?
You
know
you
know?
Are
there
some
consensus
building,
you
know
funding
that
we
can
put
together,
and
so,
when
we
advocate
for
funding
and
grade
separations
on
the
quarter,
we
can
do
it
with
a
quarter
lens
versus
what
happens
today.
I
Is
everyone
really
works
on
their
own
Crossing
and
we
kind
of
support
each
other,
but
it's
everyone's
doing
their
own
and
with
that
many
Crossings
in
the
the
magnitude
that
was
in
the
business
plan,
put
that
at
11
billion
dollars,
and
so
that
was
finished
in
2019,
so
I
imagine
the
numbers
gone
up
and
not
done
down.
This
is
a
hidden
Mega
project
that
we
really
have
to
put
some
thought
into,
and
so
we
have
monthly
meetings
with
elected
officials
throughout
the
corridor.
I
To
start
to
think
about
that,
Corridor
lens
that
we
could
put
on
grade
separations
and
is
there
something
that
we
can
do
better
than
what
we've
done
in
the
past?
If
we
want
to
continue
to
increase
service,
we
we
really
do
need
to
make
sure
that
that
East-West
connection
works
well
for
communities
along
with
it.
C
All
right,
thank
you
and
I
guess.
This
leads
to
my
my
next
question.
It's
all
related,
because,
obviously
the
goal
is
that
these
tracks
were
and
I
talked
to
Jessica
a
little
bit
about
this,
but
these
tracks
will
be
used
for
High-Speed
Rail.
Eventually,
it's
going
to
be
a
shared
system
and
I
know.
Obviously,
High-Speed
Rail
will
need
grade
separation
to
be
part
of
High-Speed
Rail.
I
Okay,
so
we
obviously
work
very
closely
with
high-speed
rails
since
we're
putting
in
infrastructure
that
is
going
to
be
compatible.
So
the
same
infrastructure
we're
putting
in
place
for
the
Caltrain
electrification
project
is
what
they're
putting
in
place
in
the
Central
Valley.
Now
their
service
kind
of
parameters
in
the
Central
Valley
are
much
different
than
what
they
would
be
doing
on
the
Caltrain
Corridor,
where
they
would
be
going
no
faster
than
110
miles
per
hour
and
they
are
not
legally
required
to
grade
separate.
I
It
doesn't
mean
that
it's
not
desired
and
shouldn't
be
in
place
for
many
communities
and
I
think
you
know
that
is
part.
One
of
the
reasons
that
Caltrain
is
stepping
forward
to
see
what
we
can
do
to
continue
to
advance
those,
but
just
factually
it's
not
part
of
their
project
that
they've
defined.
L
And
council
member
I'd
only
add
that
what
prompted
your
questions
partially
kind
of
a
table
articulating
the
cost
increases
of
the
High-Speed
Rail
Project
in.
A
L
And
so,
while
we're
going
to
search
down
the
actual
article,
the
actual
table
and
get
a
more
complete
answer,
our
colleagues
at
high
speed
rail
have
given
some
sense
of
why
this
could
be.
They
they're
not
familiar
with
the
article,
but
they
basically
boiled
it
down
to
three
things,
one
of
which
is
depending
on
how
the
article
pulled
together.
L
The
other
basic
issue
is
that
you
know
going
through
the
environmental
process
which
high
speed
rail
did
recently
gave
a
lot
more
information
about
precisely
what
was
needed:
Beyond
just
electrification
for
the
surface,
for
the
project,
so
that
could
include
you
know,
station
modifications
or
where
polls
may
need
to
change
for
Speed,
or
you
know
curvature
issues,
and
then
the
Light
maintenance
facility
was
also
not
really
well
understood
at
the
beginning
of
the
process.
So
that's
that's
what
they
can
tell
you
without
having
access
to
the
article,
but
we'll
definitely
follow
up.
First.
C
So
it's
a
one-year
change
that
segments
from
San
Jose
to
Gilroy
and
Gilroy's
across
to
Central
Valley
had
no
changes
in
cost,
but
the
only
changing
cost
was
on
the
San
Jose
to
San
Francisco
segment,
which
they
had
a
year
ago
said,
would
be
1.7
billion,
and
now
it's
saying
would
be
5
billion.
It
was
a
200
percent
increase
in
cost,
and
so
I
was
curious
as
to
why
that
segment,
especially
since
work's
being
done
now,
would
cost
that
much
more
it
again.
C
You
could
be
right,
I
mean
it
might,
you
know,
might
be
how
they
got
their
data
and
what
how
it's
being
counted,
but
their
total
amount
is
5
billion,
so
that
doesn't
even
include
the
great
separation
that
also.
You
clarified
that
for
me
as
well
that
that's
not
part
of
what
this
escalation
is
in
their
cost
yeah
anyway.
C
Just
just
a
curiosity,
not
something
that
we
can
necessarily
dig
into
today,
but
I
was
I,
guess
I'm
interested
in
financially
in
understanding
how
their
system
will
be
compatible
with
what
you're
doing
and
what
will
need
to
be
done
to
make
sure
that
high
speed
rail
eventually
will
be
able
to
get
all
the
way
to
San
Francisco,
although
it'll
be
way
past
all
of
our
10
years,
when
that
happens
unfortunately,
and
how?
What
is
the
total
cost
of?
What's
been
done?
Just
for
the
electrification
project,.
C
Great
all
right,
thank
you,
I,
don't
have
any
other
questions.
Anyone
else
before
we
make
a
motion
accept
a
motion
to
accept
the
report.
C
G
You
again
folks
come
down
John
risto,
director
of
transportation
and
joining
me
here
is
Liam
Cruz
our
division
manager
for
traffic
safety,
Lieutenant
Sherry
with
San
Jose
police
department
and
Jesse
Mintz
Roth.
Our
program
manager
for
vision,
zero
and
Jesse
will
be
doing
the
presentation
for
us
today.
O
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Jesse
mins,
Roth
and
I'm
the
vision,
zero
manager
from
dot
in
this
presentation.
It
will
talk
about
traffic.
Fatality
numbers
I
want
to
acknowledge
that,
although
they
are
represented
here
in
numeric
Forum,
that
these
are
people
who
are
someone's
loved
ones,
friends
or
neighbors.
By
giving
these
presentations
and
working
on
the
many
initiatives
I'll
be
touching
on
today,
I
and
we
at
the
Department
of
Transportation
are
working
with
you
to
reduce
traffic
fatalities
and
severe
injuries.
O
On
the
left
side
of
the
graph
above,
it
shows
how
San
Jose
traffic
fatalities
have
doubled
in
the
last
10
years
and
that
in
2022
we
had
the
highest
number
of
traffic
fatalities
on
record
with
65
traffic
fatalities.
Following
a
three-year
tie
for
the
previous
high
of
60
traffic
fatalities
in
2015,
2019
and
2021.
O
on
the
right
graph,
it
shows
how
2022
in
the
yellow
line,
started
out
with
10
traffic
fatalities
in
January
2022
alone
and
continued
its
unprecedented
steep
slope
until
April
2022.
The
other
corridors
in
the
year
had
more
typical
slopes.
Compared
to
recent
years.
The
orange
bars
represent
the
ranges
in
the
last
five
years
of
traffic
fatality
data.
By
month,
the
year
2022
started
higher
than
any
January
on
record,
stayed
high
and
ended
highest,
although
2023
is
not
shown
on
the
slide.
It's
worth
noting
that
2023's
numbers
are
a
lot
lower.
O
As
of
today
May
1,
there
are
13
traffic
fatalities
that
come
from
12
crashes
compared
to
30
on
the
same
date,
in
2022,
10
of
the
13
or
77
percent.
Are
people
killed
while
walking
this
very
high
percentage
is,
among
the
reasons,
we're
working
with
a
consultant
on
a
pedestrian
safety
plan
in
the
districts
with
the
most
traffic
fatalities
which
I
will
describe
on
a
later
slide
people
to
go
into
the
2022
traffic
fatality
Trends
people
killed
while
walking
made
up
32
or
49
of
traffic
fatalities
in
2022.
O
Also
the
highest
on
record
63
percent
occurred
in
Dark
Hours
28
head
speeding
is
a
contributing
factor.
82
percent
occurred
on
major
roadways,
with
posted
speed
limits
of
35
miles
per
hour
or
higher
in
2022.
Several
roadways
and
major
roadways
not
designated
as
priority
safety
corridors
saw
an
unusually
high
number
of
fatalities
such
as
Santa,
Teresa,
Boulevard
and
parts
of
White
Road.
These
new
trends
point
to
the
need
to
update
the
priority
safety
corridors
using
newer
data.
O
We
worked
with
data
scientists
to
update
our
priority
safety
corridors
using
2017-2021
five-year
crash
data,
which
was
the
most
recent
data
years
available.
They
explored
using
different
methodologies
used
in
California
cities
and
the
one
we
selected
is
very
similar
to
San
Francisco's.
It
takes
into
account
minor
and
moderate
injury
as
well
still,
while
still
putting
more
weight
on
fatal
and
severe
injuries.
We
heard
interest
from
our
elected
officials
and
including
minor
and
moderate
injuries
and
in
a
city
this
large.
O
We
agree
that
this
will
give
us
a
bigger
data
set
of
injury
crashes,
with
a
notion
that
an
injury
from
the
same
crash
can
differ
by
person
such
as
a
young
adult
versus
an
older
adult,
in
that
a
minor
or
moderate
injury
can
be
very
close
to
a
severe
or
fatal
one
in
in
adding
more
priority
safety
corridors.
We're
moving
from
covering
about
a
third
of
fatal
and
severe
injuries
to
almost
half.
This
is
in
alignment
with
other
Vision
zero
cities.
O
I'd
like
to
note
that
we
kept
our
27
priority
safety
corridors
where
projects
were
completed
and
we
will
consider
removing
them
if
our
data
shows
that
fatal
and
severe
injuries
have
gone
down.
Our
findings
show
that
40
to
45
percent
of
minor
and
moderate
injuries
are
included
on
the
new
priority
safety
corridor
map
released.
Today
there
were
17
streets
on
70
Ridgeway
miles
before,
which
was
3
percent
of
San
Jose's,
roadway
Network,
and
now
there
are
30
streets.
O
Totaling
150
miles,
which
is
six
percent
of
the
San
Jose
roadway,
Network
and
68
are
within
Equity
priority
areas
defined
by
the
Metropolitan
Transportation
Commission.
So,
basically,
the
way
that
the
map
on
the
right
side
works
is
that
the
new
priority
safety
corridors
are
in
blue.
The
equity
priority
areas
are
in
the
yellow
background
and
streets
highlighted
in
yellow,
have
had
recent
Vision
zero
safety
improvements
and
they
will
be
evaluated
for
project
performance
and
injury
reduction
after
one
year
of
after
data
is
available
and
entered
into
our
system
moving
to
accomplishments
and
upcoming
work.
O
In
the
2022
to
2023
fiscal
year,
we
built
9.2
miles
of
quick,
build
projects
on
the
2017
parity
safety
corridor
map
and
upcoming
work
includes
14.1
miles
on
the
2017
priority
safety
corridor
map.
With
today's
release
of
the
2023
priority
safety
corridor
map,
this
will
open
up
more
project
coordination,
opportunities,
foreign.
O
Moving
to
Grants
on
the
priority
safety
corridors,
dot
received
74
million
dollars
in
Grants
for
Capital
Construction
last
year,
of
which
55
million
was
on
priority
safety
corridors
and
at
fatal
and
severe
injury
locations.
The
largest
single
Grant
received
was
36.3
million
dollars
from
the
obag
program
for
Story
Road
and
Key
Street,
and
the
second
largest
was
a
state
earmark
for
10
million
dollars
for
Center
Road.
O
O
Just
a
few
blocks
east
of
City
Hall
The
Campaign
will
run
for
three
months
in
three
languages
and
include
Billboards
bus
shelters,
street
light
poles,
laminated
posters
on
the
street
radio,
ads
digital
ads,
broadcast
radio
ads
in
Spanish
and
Vietnamese
digital
ads,
including
social
media,
Digital,
streaming
and
audio,
and
video
and
we'd
like
to
thank
the
VTA
for
contributing
30,
Transit,
shelters
and
10
bus
Tails.
Our
consultant
will
also
be
working
with
community-based
Partners
attending
events
and
distributing
Outreach
materials,
and
there
will
be
an
evaluation
of
the
campaign
afterwards.
O
And
finally,
we
want
to
touch
on
legislative
updates,
dot
works
with
intergovernmental
relations,
other
California
cities
and
the
California
city
transportation
initiative
to
improve
Traffic
Safety
through
legislation.
One
bill
that
we
wanted
to
note
is
the
ab645
bill.
This
speed
safety
camera
bill
that
recently
passed
the
transportation
and
privacy
Committees
of
the
State
Assembly
and
is
going
to
the
Appropriations
Committee
in
mid-may,
and
that
is
it.
Thank
you.
F
E
All
right
Beekman
here
thanks
a
lot
for
on
the
previous
side,
I'm
a
good
conversation
on
the
future
of
great
separation
issues
along
the
peninsula
to
consider
the
great
separation
issues
on
the
East
Bay
Side,
to
bring
those
two
concepts
together
can
proved
to
be
some
interesting
work
for
yourselves.
E
Hopefully
with
that
said
a
thank
you
for
talking
about
Vision
zero
this
year,
and
it's
just
really
nice
to
hear
that
traffic
deaths
are
way
down
and
that's
really
nice
to
hear,
as
always,
a
real
good
luck
that
we
have
a
real
responsibility
to
be
very
clear
about
how
to
re-report
Vision,
zero
death
statistics,
KSI
statistics,
statistics,
I,
think
they're
called.
E
We
have
been
starting
to
count
homeless
people
who
are
killed
each
year
because
of
a
traffic
deaths.
We
did
not
do
that
before.
This
is
a
you
know,
Five
Short
years
ago.
We
were
not
doing
that
and
we're
trying
to
do
that
more
now
and
those
numbers
are
getting
mixed
up
in
these
larger
numbers
of
Vision
zero
death
statistics
each
year.
So
we
have
to
really
be
clear
how
we're
talking
about
it,
and
we
have
to
be
really
clear
that
we
have
to
be
considering.
E
You
know
certain
programs
for
for
our
own
house
how
to
address
their
deaths
as
well,
that
I
I
know
people
like
Gail
osmer
are
interested
in
and
always
can
be
wanting
to
talk
to
yourselves
about
at
boy.
I
guess
just
another
reminder
how
important
that
that
conversation
is
and
as
important
as
Public
Safety
is.
E
We
have
to
be
really
really
clear:
how
we
talk
about
our
statistics
in
the
future
and
really
work
towards
an
accountability
of
a
community
of
a
community
process
and
that's
part
of
the
whole
strategy
of
open
public
policies
and
Public
Safety
working
together
towards
that
good,
positive,
sustainable,
Community,
Harmony.
N
Hi
there
wasn't
planning
on
speaking,
but
just
thought
I'd
chime
in
real
quickly.
My
name
is
Rob
Moore
I'm,
a
Los
Gatos,
Town,
council,
member
and
I
just
want
to.
Thank
you
all
for
your
attention
to
these
important
issues,
and
this
is
something
we're
paying
attention
to
really
closely
in
Los,
Gatos
and
I.
Think
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
for
partnership
along
a
lot
of
our
shared
roadways,
especially
places
like
Blossom
Hill
Road,
where
we've
had
recent
fatalities.
So
thanks
again
look
forward
to
working
with
you
all
in
this
important
work.
D
Thank
you,
chair,
I,
want
to
just
start
out
by
really
mentioning
how
much
I
appreciate
staff
for
their
important
work
on
what
I
feel
is
a
major
responsibility
of
our
city,
which
is
to
ensure
the
safety
of
our
residents
as
they
navigate
their
communities
and
neighborhoods
I'm
excited
to
see
the
list
of
upcoming
safety
projects
both
identifying
Jackson,
Avenue
and
McKee
Road
in
in
District
Five.
Both
of
those
arteries
have
seen
their
share
of
you
know.
D
You
know,
as
the
former
president
of
the
Santa
Clara
County
Board
of
Education
I,
think
you
know
making
sure
that
our
children,
as
they
navigate
to
and
from
school,
really
is
a
shared
priority
of
our
our
city
and
our
school
districts,
and
there
are
many
situations
in
which
schools
have
interactions
with
youth
or
families
where
they
can
learn
where
these
vulnerable
abilities
are
so,
including
them
really
creates
a
selfie,
a
healthy,
a
healthier
and
safer
environment
for
all,
and
with
that
I'd
like
to
accept
the
report.
Thank
you.
C
All
right,
thank
you,
I,
don't
see
any
other
questions
from
colleagues
I'm
going
to
ask
a
couple
questions
and
just
make
a
couple
comments.
I
I
know
we're
all
hit
hard
whenever
we
have
any
fatality
I
two
of
the
17
fatalities
this
year
have
been
in
District
Four,
actually,
sadly,
and
and
often
we
see
them,
many
of
them
are
not
on
the
corridors
that
are
identified.
C
As
you
know,
these
Vision
zero
corridors
so
I
do
appreciate
that
that
some
of
the
effort
is
around
improving
driving
habits,
safe
driving,
putting
up
the
reminders
how
to
behave
because
a
lot
of
the
time
again
it's
behavior
of
drivers
or
even
pedestrians,
who
aren't
necessarily
walking
in
crosswalks,
and
we
have
to
figure
out
how
to
how
to
improve
that.
I.
C
Do
have
a
question
about
you
know
the
area
when
these
happen
the
neighborhoods
get
particularly
on
high
notice,
and
they
get
very
stressed
about
thinking,
something's
wrong
on
the
street
and
the
one
we
had
on
Morel
this
year.
The
neighbors
keep
wanting
more
enforcement
there.
They
talk
about
they're
watching
now.
Everybody
who
speeds
and-
and
you
know,
work
with
our
office
to
try
to
get
the
traffic
enforcement
unit
out
and
I've
been
very
happy
that
our
our
captains
work
with
me
and
and
send
enforcement
units
out
when
there's
a
request
in
a
street.
C
But
what
we
learned
last
week
was
an
interesting
thing.
I
didn't
know
about
before,
and
they
said
we
can't
do
traffic
enforcement
on
Morel
because
it
this
the
speed
study
hasn't
been
updated.
So
I
just
want
to
understand
that
a
little
better.
What
is
the
process
by
you
know
that
we
have
to
follow
before
we
can
actually
do
enforcement
on
certain
corridors.
That
surprise
me.
We
have
speed
limits
on
streets
and
I
was
surprised
to
hear
that
we
have
to
wait
for
a
study
to
be
done
before
we
can
do
enforcement
there.
P
Thank
you,
council
member
Cohen,
lamb
Cruz
with
the
Department
of
Transportation,
we're
currently
in
the
process,
or
we
just
hired
a
consultant
to
get
our
surveys
up
to
speed
they're.
Currently
either
they
have
to
read,
be
redone.
When
there's
roadway
configuration
on
the
street
during
the
clovid
period,
we
did
not
collect
speed
surveys,
just
because
of
the
potential
of
you
know
with
faster
speeds,
people
driving
a
little
bit
faster.
C
P
Construate
just
to
understand
what
the
free
flow
speed
of
the
roadway
is
and
by
law
they
would
have
to
set,
they
would
have
to
set
the
speed
limit.
Based
off
of
you
know
the
roadway.
What
the
free
flow
speed
of
the
roadway
is.
So
that's
why
we
try
to
make
improvements
on
a
roadway
to
either
calm.
You
know
traffic
by
lowering
the
speeds
which
would
allow
us
to
drop
the
speed
limit.
P
P
The
new
bill-
it
actually
does
has
a
provision
in
there
where
we
no
longer
have
to
do
that.
P
C
I
appreciate
that
I
mean
I,
think
our
the
residents
feel
that
we're
they're
being
ignored
when
they
ask
for
this
kind
of
enforcement
and
are
not
getting
it
and
and
even
from
my
perspective-
and
we
know
this
to
be
true-
that
even
just
the
visibility
of
somebody
on
the
street
often
is
a
reminder
to
people
and
they
they
think
they
think
it
through
for
for
a
long
period
after
as
long
as
they're,
even
just
seeing
somebody
there.
C
So
I'll
continue
to
work
with
our
local
Captain
about
how
we
can
get
some
visibility
on
some
of
these
corridors.
Q
O
Q
Till
by
14
years,
by
14
years,
so
we
are,
we
are
conducting
enforcement
for
Speed,
and
it
really
is
what
mechanism
on
how
we're
doing
enforcement
for
Speed
really
determines
on
whether
we
can
speed
whether
we
can
issue
the
citation
on
85
percent
of
what
the
average
speed
the
speed
of
the
roadway
is
yeah.
C
But
that's
what
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
just
one
other
question
or
you
want
you
had
a
weighted
ranking
you're
using
I,
certainly
appreciate
that
we're
expanding
looking
at
where
the
high
priority
corridors
are
not
just
by
fatalities
because,
in
my
mind,
actually
any
accident
any
place
where
there's
a
large
number
of
accidents
should
be
a
place
that
we're
focused
on
regardless
of
the
severity
of
injury,
because
you
know
we
know
that
just
a
little
bit
higher
speed
or
a
little
bit
inches
one
way
or
the
other
could
change
something
from
an
injury
to
a
fatality.
C
And
you
know,
even
near
misses
are
important.
You
know
where
people
are
finding
that
there's
they're
almost
getting
hit
by
cars
is
also
an
indication
that
something
may
happen
in
the
future.
So
I
appreciate
that
we're
expanding
our
definition
but
I
see
that
you're
doing
a
weight
right
where
you
have
three
a
fatality
counts
three
times
as
much
or
Fatality
and
severe
injury,
I
guess
counting
three
times
as
much
as
a
minor
injury.
C
Just
one
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
clarify
that
I'm
I'm
just
going
to
express
my
my
thought
that
I'm
not
sure
that
weight
makes
much
difference
because,
as
I
said,
the
difference
between
an
injury
and
a
fatality
or
an
injury
and
a
severe
injury
might
just
be
a
circumstance
and
not
necessarily
an
indication
that
this
street
is
more
safe.
C
So
just
just
my
thoughts
on
that
I'm
and
I'd
be
curious
to
see
some
of
the
data
as
well,
and
we
always
talk
about
fatality
data,
but
we
never
really
see
the
chart.
That
shows
us
how
many
serious
injuries
are
there,
how
many
minor
injury
accidents
so
maybe
in
a
future
report
having
a
table
that
similar
to
the
one
that
shows
us
the
trend
of
of
fatalities?
What
are
the
trends
we're
seeing
across
the
city
on
injury
accidents
and
even
accidents
as
a
whole?
M
Chair
brief
comment:
I
I,
just
I
mean
obviously
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
bringing
this
this
report
to
us
and
our
update
on
on
our
vision,
zero
priority
site.
M
You
know,
I,
think
it's
important
to
understand
where,
where
we're
putting
our
efforts
as
a
city
and
where
we're
focusing
on
with
regards
to
you
know
reducing
pedestrian
or
incidents
on
the
road
and
so
I
guess,
my
one
of
the
questions
that
I
had
is
just.
Is
it
nationally
that
the
trend
is
going
up
with
like
pedestrian
fatalities
in
whole
or
why?
Why
can
we
attribute
the
jump
such
a
drastic
jump
from
one
year
to
the
next.
O
O
Pedestrian
fatalities
have
been
really
really
steeply
increasing
and
the
thing
that
happened
in
2009
is
smartphones,
and
so
that
has
been,
and
so
you
know,
the
the
way
that
tends
to
be
described
in
the
industry
is
distraction
and
there's
certainly
a
lot
of
finger
pointing
around
who
is
distracted
but
I,
guess
I
would
say
it's
all
modes
and
also
the
sort
of
notion
of
a
you
know.
O
A
smartphone
I
think
in
2009
was
a
discreet
thing,
and
today
you
know
you
have
entire
vehicles
that
are
basically
a
steering
wheel
and
a
tablet.
So
I
think
that
it's
a
little
bit
more
involved
today.
A
O
But
nonetheless
you
know
I
think
it's
you
know.
Everyone's
got
notifications
running
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
can
do
as
government
is
basically
have
billboard
campaigns
where
we
tell
people
not
to
run
notifications
on
their
vehicle,
which
is
very
common.
M
Oh
great:
well,
you
know
on
that.
On
that
note,
I
know
we
just
had
distracted
drivers,
Awareness
Month
in
April,
and
we
I
know
because
on
the
council,
I
think
we
we
did
a
proclamation
for
the
month,
but
in
addition
to
that,
the
Outreach
and
engagement
efforts
at
your
office
and
Dot
is
doing,
which
is
great.
I,
see,
I,
see
the
signage
throughout
as
I
I'm
driving
from
event
to
event.
M
In
my
district
I
I'd
also
like
to
offer
my
office
to
to
help
with
the
Outreach
and
engagement,
because
I
mean
we
also
have
a
you
know,
a
good
portion
of
people
that
we
reach
on
a
daily
or
in
our
weekly
basis.
Because
of
the
engagement
that
we
do.
M
So
that's
my
comment
with
regards
to
outreach,
and,
secondly,
you
know
I
think
it's
it's
important
that
we,
we
are
working
with
our
schools
and
again
I
just
want
to
Echo
I
mean
one
of
one
of
the
middle
schools.
In
my
district
Quimby
Oak,
we
just
had
a
child
that
was
hit
for
the
second
child
in
a
matter
of
three
months,
and
so
so.
M
This
is
something
that
you
know:
Quimby
Oak
they're
very
concerned
about
this,
as
am
I,
and
so
you
know
well,
while
it's
nice
to
get
an
update,
it's
you
know
it's
it's
our
job
to
be
realistic
of,
like
you
know,
making
sure
that
we're
you
know
letting
staff
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do
on
this
and
and
and
you
know,
I'm
I'm
I'm
excited
towards
the
progress
that
we're
making,
but
you
know
being
Mindful
and
realistic
to
to
the
the
what's
what's
out
there
now.
Thank
you.
C
Yeah
and
thank
you
for
those
comments
and
and
around
schools,
it's
definitely
important
for
us
to
continue
to
do
that.
Education,
work
and
some
of
the
worst
drivers.
We
ever
see
our
parents
dropping
their
kids
off
at
school
and-
and
you
know
so
anyway-
I
mean
they
get
frustrated
by
all
the
traffic
they
make
u-turns
where
they
shouldn't
there's
all
kinds
of
crazy
things
happening
in
front
of
school.
C
So
I
appreciate
that
we've
we've
done
that
effort
with
school,
with
safety
Outreach
at
schools,
but
also
partnering
with
the
traffic
enforcement
unit
to
be
out
in
front
of
schools
as
often
as
possible
in
the
mornings
and
afternoons
during
those
crazy
times
and
without
necessarily
pointing
fingers
at
anyone,
and
it
clearly
I
think
the
smartphone
use
for
both
drivers
and
pedestrians
has
been
a
problem.
I
mean
pedestrians,
I
think
often
are
walking
with
their
and
I'm,
not
going
to
claim
to
be
entirely
innocent
all
the
time.
C
But
pedestrians
are
often
looking
down
at
their
phone
while
they're
crossing
streets
and
that's
you
know
clearly
a
a
potential
risk
amplifier
in
that
case
anyway.
I
think
that's
it
for
our
comments.
So
we'll
move
on
to
a
vote
to
accept
this
report.
C
R
G
Thank
you
Khalid
again,
John
Russo,
director
of
Transportation.
This
second
slide
gives
a
good
idea
of
the
disparate
partners
that
we
have
throughout
the
city
that
deal
with
different
areas
of
vehicle
blight
and
since
the
Inception
of
San
Jose
3-1-1,
abandoned
vehicles
has
been
one
of
the
most
requested
Services.
All
of
you
have
actually
experienced
that
coming
through
your
your
districts.
G
Some
of
these
existing
workflows
that
we
have
been
using
like
tracking
and
customer
Communications
are
happening
through
disparate
systems,
which
we
intend
to
actually
streamline
and
improve
on.
There
are
many
challenges
influence
a
vehicle
blight
situation
in
San
Jose,
for
example,
the
significant
volume
of
vehicles
on
city
streets
has
led
to
an
increase
in
competition
for
limited
numbers
of
parking
spaces
throughout
the
city.
In
fact,
what
we
do
estimate
is:
there's
approximately
2.3
vehicles
for
every
potential
driver
within
the
city,
so
that
presents
a
lot
of
vehicles
that
we're
now
dealing
with
within
the
city.
G
Our
team
is
aware
of
those
impact
enforcement
actions
have
on
helping
to
approve
the
condition
of
San
Jose
streets,
as
well
as
impacts
felt
by
those
who
receive
the
enforcement
action.
So
we
know
it's
an
important
job,
making
sure
that
the
city
is
well
enforced
and
blight
taken
care
of.
But
there
are
some
other
implications
that
we
need
to
take
into
consideration.
As
we
consider
enforcement
I'm
going
to
hand
the
next
presentation
off
to
Heather
Hoshi.
S
S
Complexity
and
breadth
of
vehicle-related
complaints
has
evolved
in
recent
years
and
has
been
impacted
by
many
and
often
compounding
factors.
A
visible
increase
in
the
number
of
vehicles
being
used
for
shelter
and
demand
for
limited
parking
in
densely
populated
neighborhoods
is
elevated.
The
level
of
concern
expressed
by
residents,
siled
systems,
processes
and
departments,
coupled
with
enforcement
and
operational
limitations,
have
tested
the
patience
of
those
requesting
services
and
looking
to
the
city
to
take
action.
S
S
The
abandoned
vehicle
service
has
been
the
lowest
rated
San
Jose
3-1-1
service
for
multiple
years
in
fiscal
year,
2122
only
16
percent
of
customers,
rated
the
service
as
good
or
very
good,
motivated
by
the
city
initiatives,
roadmap
for
fiscal
2223,
the
mayor's
March
budget
message
and
poor
Communications
satisfaction
ratings,
a
multi-departmental
vehicle
blight
process.
Redesign
project
was
initiated
to
gain
a
better
understanding
of
vehicle-related
issues
and
find
comprehensive
solutions
to
ensure
true
collaboration
and
satisfied
customers.
S
This
helped
the
team
to
keep
the
human
perspective
front
and
center
during
all
steps
of
the
redesign
process
bringing
together
constituents,
city
council
staff
and
the
multiple
City
departments
responsible
for
addressing
vehicle-related
complaints,
user
interviews
and
Outreach
was
conducted.
The
process
provided
insight
into
customer
pain,
points
and
perceptions
about
vehicle
blight.
S
According
to
DMV
data,
as
of
April
23,
there
are
approximately
1.5
million
Vehicles
registered
in
San
Jose,
estimating
that
there
are
close
to
500
656
000
San
Jose
residents
that
are
of
driving
age
and
potentially
licensed
to
derive.
This
implies
that
there
are
around
2.3
vehicles
for
every
one
driver
living
in
San
Jose.
S
S
Foreign
customers
are
utilizing.
The
San
Jose
3-1-1
abandoned
vehicle
reporting
tool
to
alert
the
city
of
all
types
of
vehicle-related
issues,
not
just
abandoned
vehicles.
Additionally,
customers
report
vehicle-related
issues
to
multiple
departments
through
a
variety
of
channels
to
better
understand
the
specific
vehicle
concerns
and
issues.
Customers
are
reporting
staff,
reviewed
reports
from
San,
Jose,
311,
Dot,
pbce
and
sjpd.
The
tone
and
subject
matter
of
customer
concerns
was
very
similar
across
all
departments.
S
A
funnel
analysis
was
completed
and
the
results
you
see
here
are
based
on
dot
specific
data,
siled
systems
and
manual
data
collection.
Methods
made
it
difficult
to
compile
a
clean
and
full
city-wide
data
set
dot.
Data
was
singled
out
for
use
because
it
was
the
most
complete,
accessible
and
accurate
data
set
available.
It
is
important
to
acknowledge
that
this
data
set
gives
us
a
look
into
what
constituents
are
concerned
about
and
Reporting.
However,
it
provides
a
narrow
view
of
the
volume
of
concerns
expressed
by
constituents
across
all
city-wide
Services
systems.
S
Again,
the
types
of
concerns
are
well
represented,
but
the
volume
of
those
concerns
is
understated
here.
The
bubble,
diagram
diagram
notes
that
for
DOT
General
illegal
parking
issues,
including
requests
for
parking
Vehicles
parked
Vehicles
over
72
hours,
were
by
far
the
most
voice
concerned
at
75
percent.
S
To
our
customers,
through
data,
we
divided
their
concerns
into
three
categories
in
order
to
better
design
solutions
that
will
work
and
ensure
impact
awareness,
starting
at
the
far
left
of
the
slide.
You
will
see
an
example
of
an
abandoned
vehicle.
Approximately
12
percent
of
vehicles
reported
through
San
Jose
3-1-1
belong
in
this
category.
S
Concerns
following
falling
under
this
category,
tend
to
be
less
complex
and
display
specific
conditions
making
them
easy
to
identify.
In
addition,
these
concerns
have
direct
and
clear
enforcement
mechanisms
and
processes.
They
are
typically
towable
vehicles
in
the
middle.
You
will
see
an
example
of
an
illegally
parked
vehicle.
Approximately
72
percent
of
reported
Vehicles
belong
in
this
category.
S
Concerns
falling
under
this
category
tend
to
be
more
widely
varied.
For
example,
Vehicles
park
for
72
hours
at
a
red,
curb
fire
hydrant
in
a
bike
lane
or
other
General
illegal
parking
concerns
are
included
here
per
the
California
vehicle
code.
The
only
legal
enforcement
mechanism
allowed
for
most
parking
violations
is
a
citation
to
the
far
right
of
the
slide.
You
will
see
an
example
of
vehicle
blight
or
public
nuisance.
Approximately
16
percent
of
reported
vehicles
that
do
not
have
a
direct
tie
to
parking
or
other
enforcement
violation
fall
here.
S
This
can
include
new
nuisance
concerns
about
dirty
vehicles
or
vehicles
with
cosmetic
damage.
Certain
types
of
vehicles
like
a
boat
or
a
trailer
or
a
motorhome
lived
in
vehicles
or
Vehicles
leaking
waste
or
full
of
trash,
while
parking
enforcement
action
often
isn't
legal
legally
feasible.
In
these
cases,
options
to
help
mitigate
some
of
the
reporting
customers
angst
may
be
available
through
referrals
to
vehicle
blight
partners.
For
example,
a
lived-in
vehicle
cannot
be
towed,
but
when
referred
to
the
housing
department,
Outreach
can
be
provided
and
services
offered
to
the
inhabitants.
S
S
Overlaying,
the
team's
data
analysis
work
with
the
human-centered
design
process.
Seven
Focus
areas
notice
noted
here
were
identified
as
Improvement
opportunity
areas.
It
is
expected
that
enhancements
and
updates
that
work
to
address
these
seven
key
areas
will
have
positive
impacts
on
vehicle
blight
and
customer
service.
In
addition,
as
it
anticipated
that
this
work
will
encourage
continued
and
hopeful
elevated
engagement
and
use
of
San
Jose
3-1-1.
S
Each
of
the
seven
Focus
areas
touched
on
identified
stakeholder
and
customer
pain
points
that
are
impacting
customer
usability,
satisfaction
and
outcomes.
Creative
Solutions
to
address
these
challenges
have
been
identified
and
prioritized
by
staff
in
several
Focus
areas.
Significant
work
is
already
underway.
S
Dot
has
initiated
a
limited
pilot
program
focused
on
investigating
Vehicles
reported
as
being
stored
on
public
streets
through
the
pilot.
We
hope
to
be
able
to
better
understand
several
data
points
that
we
will
use
to
develop
a
future
long-term,
effective
solution
to
this
issue.
Specifically,
we
are
looking
to
understand
outcomes.
Will
the
program
have
notable
impacts
on
vehicle
blight
and
related
issues?
Will
Vehicles
move?
Will
they
be
able
to?
Will
we
be
able
to
change
driver
Behavior?
S
What
will
the
impacts
that
a
full
program
may
have
on
resources
and
what
impact
will
72-hour
investigations
have
with
the
issuance
of
citations
versus
toes
and
how
will
that
impact
customer
service
Additionally?
The
pilot
will
serve
as
an
opportunity
to
test
new
vehicle
qualifying
criteria
and
other
program
framework
I'd
like
to
introduce
Olympia
Williams
with
beautify
San
Jose.
So
she
can
speak
to
the
progress
being
made
on
the
city's
approach
to
addressing
lived-in
vehicles.
T
Good
afternoon
committee
members,
currently
there
is
an
interdepartmental
group
developing
a
recommendation
on
how
to
address
lived-in
Vehicles
when
people
are
non-compliant
with
good
neighbor
rules.
Examples
of
non-compliant
vehicles
may
include
personal
items
being
stored
on
the
sidewalks
and
streets,
Vehicles,
draining
bio
waste
onto
streets
or
into
storm
water
drains
and
other
issues
that
may
lead
to
the
need
to
Abate
a
vehicle.
We
will
be
returning
to
Council
in
the
next
few
months,
with
more
information
on
this
I
now
like
to
turn
it
over
to
Zane.
U
Good
afternoon,
Zane
Barnes
with
the
office
of
intergovernmental
relations
policies,
legislation
and
legal
approaches
are
being
pursued
for
the
following
potential
actions.
A
new
parking
program
to
prohibit
the
parking
of
certain
Vehicles,
parked
or
being
stored
on
city
streets.
U
Consider
revising
the
current
approach
to
enforcing
inspired
vehicle
registration
by
adjusting
the
enforcement
trigger
to
identify
vehicles
with
registration
expired
over
six
months,
but
less
than
one
year.
This
could
result
in
the
issuance
of
additional
citations
and
or
Towing
of
vehicles,
thereby
increasing
the
rate
of
violation
capture
three
create
an
ordinance
to
Define
public
nuisance
and
extreme
blight,
allowing
further
immediate
cleaning,
towing
or
junking
of
vehicles.
If
the
imminent
threat
is
posed
to
life
or
property,
including
pedestrians,
cyclists,
Vehicles,
Etc
and
any
Associated
enforcement
programs
and
teams
required
to
provide
the
service.
U
Fourth
establish
a
Citywide
lived-in
Vehicle
Enforcement
enforcement
options
and
approach
policy,
including
the
addition
of
any
necessary
new
or
updated
ordinances
or
Municipal
codes.
The
enforcement
of
lived-in
vehicles
is
currently
limited
by
the
San
Jose
Municipal
Code
and
California
state
law
next
slide.
U
U
U
U
We're
continuing
to
be
engaged
on
this
legislation
with
our
lobbying
team
and
will
closely
monitor
if
this
comes
out
of
the
assembly.
Appropriations
Committee,
the
biggest
issue
here
may
be
the
state
mandated
requirement
that
may
increase
costs
for
the
city
of
San
Jose
and
with
that
I'll
pass
on
to
Khalid.
R
The
the
cross
Department
of
Vehicle
blight
team
has
concluded
the
process
redesign
phase
and
currently
focus
on
developing
the
functional
design
for
the
new
service
request
and
take
process.
Small
and
medium
enhancements
are
regularly
implemented,
while
focusing
on
the
large
enhancements
by
the
end
of
this
year.
This
approach
allows
us
to
test
and
measure
the
impact
of
new
changes
and
make
the
necessary
adjustment
as
needed.
S
We
have
work
done
to
analyze
and
understand
constituent
concerns
and
the
human-centered
design
process.
The
team
has
begun
working
to
implement
improvements
and
enhancements
along
the
way
highlights
accomplish,
highlighted
accomplishments
include
the
completion
of
the
re-engineering
of
San,
Jose
3-1-1
vehicle
blight,
Service
delivery
process,
the
expansion
of
abandoned
vehicle
investigation
criteria
and
warm
handoffs
between
departments
that
have
been
already
initiated
with
handoffs
to
Partners
and
outside
agencies.
In
phase
two.
S
The
team's
most
visual
accomplishment
to
date,
however,
is
the
abandoned
vehicles
investigation's
outcome
map.
In
order
to
provide
more
transparency
to
Residents,
we
recently
launched
phase
one
of
an
abandoned,
vehicle's
investigations
outcome
map
here,
a
constituent
can
type
in
their
address
and
view
vehicle
abatement
activity
in
a
certain
area.
The
map
identifies
where
investigations
have
occurred
and
the
results
of,
though,
invest
those
investigations.
S
Did
the
vehicle
comply
with
vehicle
parking
rules
and
regulations,
or
was
it
towed?
Users
can
customize
the
map
to
see
activities
derived
from
proactive
patrols
or
San
Jose
311
service
requests
activity
can
also
be
filtered
by
specific
Council
District
phase.
One
of
the
map
includes
a
limited
data
set
from
July
2022
to
December
22..
However,
future
phases
will
bring
the
data
current.
R
We
have
an
advanced
or
dashboard
capabilities
to
promote
transparency
and
enhance
our
ability
to
recognize
and
track
our
progress.
We
launched
the
customer
satisfaction
dashboard
in
March
of
this
year
and
added
the
abandoned
vehicle
investigation
outcome
dashboard
last
week
as
anticipated,
the
enhancements
initiated
by
the
team
have
started
are
already
improving.
Customer
service
satisfaction
scores
as
indicated
on
the
bottom
right
graph
of
the
San
jose311
performance
dashboard.
R
There
is
an
upward
Trend
in
the
customer,
satisfaction
scores
for
abandoned
vehicles,
services
from
14
in
June
of
2022
to
29
in
March
2023.,
the
airport
customer
satisfaction
report
was
updated
this
morning
and
we
gained
another
one
percent
since
March
bringing
the
customer
satisfaction
rate
to
30.
To
date,
we
are
encouraged
by
The
Continuous
Improvement,
achieved
in
the
customer
satisfaction
over
the
last
nine
months
and
realize
that
more
work
is
needed
to
achieve
our
goals.
This
concludes
our
presentation
and
staff
is
available
for
questions
and
feedback.
J
Paul's
total
from
the
Horseshoe
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
reference
the
urbanization
there
was
a
very
clear
cognitive
effect,
not
a
correlation,
but
a
causative
effect,
because
in
your
presentation
you
stated
urbanization
was
the
title
and
then
you
said:
increased
lived
in
vehicles,
so
you
made
the
connection
not
me.
This
is
not
my
opinion.
J
This
is
your
fact
so
now
that
we
have
this
link
in
this
causative
effect
between
urbanization
and
increase
in
vehicles,
you
have
to
assume
responsibility
within
the
Planning
Commission,
because
you
are
the
ones
that
are
increasing
the
market
rate
density
and
market
rate
housing
pushing
those
through
at
95
to
115
percent
every
single
year
year
after
year.
So
start
assuming
some
responsibility
for
that,
because
you
just
made
the
connection.
That's
number
one
number
two
is
that:
how
is
this
going
to
be
tied
in
with
Boise
versus
Martin
versus
Boise?
J
You
see
because
city
streets
it
qualifies
under
Martin
versus
Boise,
so
you
you
you're
you're,
going
to
have
some
lawsuits.
Man
coming,
you
know
so
prepare
for
that
beautify.
Sj
is
going
to
be
on
the
hook
for
it
too,
because
you're
going
to
be
named.
That
lawsuit,
because
you're
violating
Martin
versus
Boise
number
three
leave
a
being
102
1082
alone.
Just
leave
it
alone.
You
know
you're
not
going
to
challenge
us
Carl
road,
because
this
has
been
this
has
been
vetted
by
some
people
that
are
experts
in
this.
J
Obviously
you're,
not
you
have
a
the
developers
are
the
ones
that
are
running
this.
This
city
you're
running
this
console
too
so
I
don't
want
to
I,
don't
care
about
what
developers
want
I,
don't
care
about
your
oh
well,
clean
energy.
We
need
to
get
these
cars
off
the
road,
I
really
don't
care
about
it,
so
leave
AB
1082
as
written
and
oh
yeah.
How
do
you
define?
How
do
you
Blair.
E
Hi
Blair
Big
Ben
here
thanks
for
the
words
that
ball
on
the
previous
item
for
myself
or
on
this
item,
I
guess
for
myself,
I
would
like
to
I
was
I
was
pretty
busy
on
this
item.
Doing
things
and
I
will
review
it.
E
Definitely
what
has
interested
me
to
myself
about
this
item
is
how
it
can
relate
to
the
future
of
safe
parking,
encampment
issues
for
RVs
and
and
where
that
stands,
and
again,
as
I
mentioned
in
the
previous
item,
Gail
osmer
could
be
a
really
good
source
to
to
be
facilitating
conversation
and
dialogue
about
what
what
is
best
for
the
future
of
we're.
Exactly
a
good
RV
and
cameras
can
go
I.
Think
yourselves!
E
That,
a
few
weeks
ago,
you
had
an
I
item
on
unhoused
issues
that
was
just
really
strangely
sorely
lacking
any
sort
of
City
staff
presentation
that
I
guess
I
hope
this
is
an
item.
E
That's
trying
to
make
up
to
that
and
I
I
we'd
have
to
be
able
to
talk
about,
you
know
and
say
parking
issues
and
and
the
importance
of
a
city-sponsored
sites
and,
however,
the
conversation
is
I
hope
that
was
being
accomplished
on
this
item
today
and
it
can
be
talked
about
in
up
in
the
upcoming
Council
discussion
committee
discussion
other
than
that,
thanks
for
your
time,.
C
D
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
staff
for
all
your
hard
work
to
create
a
transparent
and
streamlined
solution
and
process
for
vehicle
blight
vehicle
blight
is
a
major
concern
in
my
district
East
San
Jose.
Every
time.
D
Every
day
my
staff
receives
phone
calls
from
residents
whether
it's
abandoned
vehicles
lived
in
vehicles,
vehicle-related
blight,
it's
something
that
comes
up
in
you
know,
coffee
meetings
and
and
everything
so
I
appreciate
your
work
on
this
I'm
excited
to
see
a
pilot
for
handling
bio
waste
and
excess
trash
regarding
lived-in
Vehicles,
because
that's
also
something
I
get
calls
for
as
well.
It's
important
to
me
that
we
find
a
way
to
address
blight
and
health
concerns
regarding
lived-in
vehicles
in
our
neighborhoods,
while
also
avoiding
treating
our
our
unhoused
neighbors
with
cruelty.
D
T
Yes,
so
we
launched
a
pilot
program
to
address
lived-in
vehicles
really
focusing
on
biowaste
and
trash
around
those
lived
in
vehicles.
The
program
started
the
first
24
days
we
collected
about
11,
000
gallons
of
waste
that
needed
to
be
disposed
of,
so
we're
able
to
get
that
off,
sidewalks
streets
and
other
containers.
What
we
also
did
is
work
with
people
to
provide
appropriate
containers
because
oftentimes
people
may
have
a
gray
water
or
black
water
tank.
That's
not
working
properly
at
this
time.
D
T
We
just
started
March
13th
March.
D
T
We've
learned
is
that
people
are
extremely
appreciative
of
the
service.
It
takes
care
of
the
person,
that's
unhoused,
living
in
a
vehicle,
and
it
also
takes
good
care
of
the
neighborhood
or
businesses
where
people
may
be
living.
So
it's
probably
one
of
our
most
popular
services
that
we
provide.
That's.
D
Great
no
thank
you
appreciate
that.
Also
in
regards
to
proactive
patrolling,
can
you
give
me
just
a
little
bit
more
details
of
what
proactive
petroleum
looks
like
in
the
field.
S
Sure
parking
compliance
officers,
Patrol
every
city
street,
approximately
every
14
or
so
days,
looking
to
identify
vehicles
that
meet
current
vehicle
abatement
criteria
and
then
we'll
initiate
an
investigation
as
part
of
our
beautify
our
blight
work.
We
have
re-envisioned
that
program
and
identified
that
there
are
areas
that
we
probably
don't
need
to
Patrol
on
such
a
frequent
basis
and
that
there
are
areas
that
need
additional
patrols.
S
D
Parking
is
another
one
of
those
hot
button
issues
that
I
get
in
neighborhood
association
meetings-
people
you
know
in
East,
San
Jose.
There
is
no
parking.
People
are
parking
on
lawns,
they're
parking
on
on
sidewalks,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
it
is
the
residents.
So
it's
kind
of
hard
to
develop
a
pathway
forward
when
the
individuals
would
be
holding
accountable.
Are
the
people
who
live
in
the
neighborhoods
we're
trying
to
make
safe
and
clean?
D
S
The
PCU
has
struggled
with
a
significant
vacancy
rate
bouncing
around
any
anywhere
between
during
covid.
It
was
in
the
hot
in
the
low
20s
and
it
is
right
now
in
the
15
range,
so
improving
Unfortunately.
D
Thank
you,
I
I,
appreciate
that
and
then
finally,
on
the
need
for
a
new
lived-in
vehicle
enforcement
ordinance.
Definitely
something
I'm
interested
in
learning
more
about
I
know
these
discussions
are
still
early
in
the
process,
but
can
any
more
details
be
shared
about
what
the
and
and
I'll
be
all
goal
of
the
ordinance
would
be.
T
So
we
have
an
interdepartmental
group:
that's
working
closely
together
to
craft.
How
do
we
both
educate
people
about
when
we
need
them
to
make
changes,
for
example,
not
letting
bioaste
out
into
the
street
right
so
really
focus
on
an
education,
but
also
saying
in
those
very
limited
situations
when
and
if
what,
if
we
ever
needed
to
tow
or
remove
a
vehicle,
what
would
be
that
criteria?
We
don't
anticipate
that
being
kind
of
the
norm.
T
That
would
be
more
of
a
one-off,
we're
really
looking
to
take
an
education
and
Outreach
approach
to
helping
people
kind
of
come
into
compliance
like
we
have
a
trash
program.
We
want
you
to
bag
your
trash
and
we'll
pick
it
up.
We
want
you
not
to
let
bio
waste
out
onto
the
streets.
We
want
you
to
store
things
inside
of
your
vehicle
or
I
always
tell
people
or
attached
to
your
vehicle,
but
not
on
the
sidewalks
and
streets.
D
I
I
appreciate
the
concept
of
this
ordinance
because
we
do
see
a
lot
of
individuals
storing
bikes
trash
on
the
street
and,
like,
like
residents,
call
me
and
they're
like.
Oh,
what
are
you
doing
about
this
RV
and
it's
like?
We
don't
have
a
a
towing
policy,
but
then
also
it's
like
we
don't
have
any
other
policy
to
hold
the
individual
accountable
and
if
you
own
a
home,
you
know
you
can't
just
build
a
deck
without
including
the
city.
So
how
can
there
be
like
lived
in
vehicles
without
having
the
city
somewhat?
D
Have
an
ordinance
so
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
that
as
it
moves
forward?
Is
there
anything
in
this
conversation
of
lived
in
vehicles?
What
I
have
in
my
district?
We
just
did
a
great
a
project
on
San
Antonio
for
a
bike
lane
and
then
boom
RVs
up
and
down.
San
Antonio
parked
right
in
the
bike
lane.
So
isn't
any
thoughts
in
regards
to
like
lived
in
vehicles
if
they're,
essentially
blocking
Transit
infrastructure
and
what
what
we
may
do
in
that
situation.
Yeah.
T
So,
as
part
of
our
group,
we
are
looking
at
situations
such
as
that,
like
I
said.
Our
first
strategy
is
always
to
try
to
work
with
the
person,
and
usually
the
teams
will
go
out
and
say:
can
you
move
up
four
feet
and
you're
outside
of
the
bike
lane
and
most
people
will
work
with
us
in
those
situations
we
have
found
that
cooperation
tends
to
work,
but
then
we're
also
saying
what
would
need
to
be
done
if
people
didn't
want
to
comply
with
those
types
of
things.
D
All
right,
no
I
I
appreciate
that
and
I'm
interested.
You
know
to
hear
the
thoughts
of
my
colleagues.
I
know
that
this
is
a
huge
topic
of
discussion
and
in
my
area,
so
yeah
I
appreciate
this
conversation
looking
forward
to
it
moving
forward.
Thank
you.
C
Okay,
before
I
acknowledge
councilor
Davis
just
want
to
remind
the
group
that
this
motion
requires
accepting
the
report
and
cross-referencing
it
to
Council
on
May
16th.
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
for
this
report
and
the
presentation
and
all
the
work
that
has
gone
into
it.
I
have
one
clarifying
question
before
I
get
into
kind
of
the
more
details
for
the
on
side.
Six,
when
you
were
talking
about
all
registered
Vehicles,
is
that
trailers
RVs
boats
motorcycles,
not
just
cars
and
trucks.
K
Thanks
good
to
know
and
then
on
slide,
11
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
the
different
colors
with
the
policies
for
I
think
it
was
slide.
11.
K
And
while,
while
that's
being
pulled
up,
I
want
to
ask
Olympia
a
little
bit
more
detail
about
the
lived-in
vehicle
ordinance,
so
you
talked
in
terms
of
this:
the
scope
about
bio
waste,
trash
requirements,
how
to
store
items
and
then
compliance
or
kind
of
parking
compliance
when
towing
might
be
needed,
and
what
that
would
look
like
is
that
the
is
that
the
extent
of
the
scope
are
there
other
items
that
would
I
mean
that's
pretty
comprehensive.
I
just
want
to
check
the
rest.
Those.
T
Are
the
areas
so
I
want
to
say
that
I'm
not
sure
if
this
will
be
an
ordinance
or
a
policy
at
this
time
we
are
bringing
that
recommendation
forward,
though
the
areas
that
you
outlined
or
the
areas
that
we're
focused
on
at
this
particular
time
around
lived-in,
Vehicles,
okay,.
T
K
I
I
just
want
to
Echo
councilmember
Ortiz's
enthusiasm
for
having
that
come
back
to
us.
I
think
that
has
been
a
huge
sort,
a
huge
source
of
consternation
I
will
say
with
with
my
residence
and
a
lot
of
calls
to
our
office.
In
addition
to
that,
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
ex.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
in
this.
This
3x3,
as
as
Rob,
was
calling.
It
are
the
blue
ones,
items
that
are
underway
or
items
that
you're
wanting
our
feedback
on.
S
Yes,
the
ones
highlighted
in
blue
are
the
ones
that
we
would
like
feedback
from
committee
and
then
ultimately,
Counsel
on
to
help
us
frame
the
direction
you
would
like
us
to
to
pursue.
K
Okay,
great
because
when
I
saw
the
prohibition
of
on
vehicles
on
Trails
I
thought
we
already
had
taken
care
of
that.
S
K
Okay,
got
it
and
so,
and
we're
working
on
that
I
believe
there's
items
coming
in
the
next
budget
about
kind
of
hardscaping
prevention
of
that
I
believe
that
is
correct.
Yes,
okay,
regarding
restricting
the
types
of
unpowered
vehicles
on
city
streets.
Are
we
talking
about
the
72
hour
rule
or
are
we
talking
about
like
never
having
a
boat
on
the
street.
S
So
those
vehicles
have
parked
on
the
street
are
hold
to
the
72
hours
so
that
all
that
already
includes
those
types
of
vehicles.
This
would
be
additional
levels
of
of
prohibitation
for
those
types
of
vehicles
being
on
the
street
for
any
particular
reason,
or
maybe
only
during
active
loading
and
unloading
of
your
you
know,
personal
RV
or
your
boat,
getting
it
ready
to
go
or
come
back
from
a
trip
or
something
like
that.
That
is
what
we're
looking
at
an
additional
layer.
K
Okay,
so
maybe
under
24
hours,
kind
of
a
thing,
potentially
okay,
that
makes
sense
to
me.
Can
we
talk
a
little
bit
about
I?
Know
I,
can't
remember
who
was
addressing
this,
but
following
up
on
vehicles
that
have
been
reported,
that's
been
something
I
hear
about
a
lot
in
my
office
when
they
say
there
was
no
follow-up
with
them
or
that
the
request
was
closed,
but
nothing
had
happened.
They
could
still
see
the
car
right
out
there
and
it's
under
a
thick
layer
of
dust,
for
example,
what's
happening
with
the
communication
piece.
S
So
we
are
looking
to
deploy
significant
enhancements
to
the
communication
piece,
both
in
setting
expectations
up
front
for
customers
and
then
through
the
process.
So
one
of
the
items
that
we'll
we're
looking
at
is
a
kind
of
where,
if
we,
if
we
close
the
case,
they
give
the
constituent
the
opportunity
to
reopen
and
provide
additional
information.
S
Another
option
would
be
for
us
to
communicate
through
enhanced
notifications
when
they
are
putting
in
the
service
request,
so
communicating
if
this
vehicle
has
been
recently
investigated,
what
the
outcomes
of
that
were,
allowing
customers
to
kind
of
piggyback
on
already
existing
service
requests
to
get
those
updates,
because
sometimes
to
reduce
duplication
in
the
current
system.
If
we're
already
investigating
that
vehicle
through
a
different
reporting
party,
we
won't
open
a
new
request,
but
that
individual
then
doesn't
get
those
notifications
and
doesn't
know
what's
going
on
with
that
investigation.
S
R
If
I
can
jump
in,
there
are
a
couple
things
we
have
already
implemented
some
of
the
enhancements.
We're
producting
one
of
the
options
to
allow
the
public
to
reopen
a
closed
ticket
which
we
they
believe
might
be
were
closed
prematurely.
So
we're
doing
up
on
just
to
see
how
how
would
be
what
would
be
the
impact
and
then
we're
also
looking
to
see
how
we
can
enhance
the
system
to
make
it
more
intuitive
for
them
to
rebuttal
or
to
provide
additional
information.
R
I
think
some
of
the
other
things
that
we're
looking
at
is
some
of
the
requirements
for
investigation.
R
There
are
a
lot
of
restrictions
that
we're
trying
to
ease
some
of
the
restrictions
to
widen
the
the
window,
where
Vehicles
will
be
investigated
more
frequently,
I
think
the
memo
has
already
stated
that
we're
adding
more
capacity
to
investigate
up
to
10
000
additional
incidents
per
year,
so
I
think
all
of
that
is
going
to
increase
our
ability
to
respond
and
improve
some
of
them
that
we
can
do
now
and
we
are
doing
it
without
requiring
the
system
enhancements.
R
Some
of
the
just
collaboration,
some
of
them
some
manually
for
the
311
call
center
to
receive
and
triage,
and
some
of
them
did
require
a
little
bit
longer
our
goal
to
complete
the
15
items
that
we
listed
for
enhancements
by
the
end
of
the
year
and
and
we're
going
to
make.
Hopefully
some
progress
as
we
as
we
can
see
and
as
we
have
indicated,
some
of
the
enhancement
that
we
made
already
is
paying
off
and
we're
seeing
some
some
positive
results,
not
something
that
we
can
brag
about
yet.
K
I,
I,
just
I,
think
the
communication
piece
has
been
extremely
difficult
and
the
frustration
level
when
someone
sees
a
car
stay
in
the
same
spot
or
maybe
move
three
feet
backwards
or
forwards
for
weeks
or
months
on
end
that
frustration
level
is
high
and
it
just
ramps
up
and
a
car
that
is
parked
for
a
long
time
might
not
might
not
be
blight
when
it
starts
out,
but
it
attracts
you
know,
I
mean
it
just
if
it's
there
from
the
summer
to
the
fall
and
leaves
come
down
and
trash
accumulates
around
it,
just
by
virtue
of
they're
not
being
able
to
be
street
sweeping
in
that
spot
and
and
they
report
it
and
nothing
happens,
which
this
has
happened
in
multiple
areas.
K
I've
gotten
lots
of
emails
about
this
that
interaction
with
the
city
when
they
report
it
and
it's
closed
and
nothing
happens,
and
they
can
still
see
it
and
it's
getting
worse
day
by
day
is,
is
not
a
positive
interaction
with
the
city,
and
then
they
call
our
office
or
they
email
our
office
and
they
say
I
think
I
did
everything
right.
I
reported
it,
it
was
closed,
but
nothing
happened
and
we
have
to
communicate
back
to
them.
K
Yes,
because
it
doesn't
fit
the
criteria
that
can't
be
the
right
answer
and
so
I
wanna
I,
just
I,
don't
understand
how
on
slide
11.
That
process
is
changing
in
any
way
other
than
communicating
to
them
that
it
just
doesn't
meet
the
criteria,
and
we
just
have
to
educate
people
about
that.
But
that's
not
they
see
the
72-hour.
K
S
So
we
are
piloting
the
72-hour
enforcement
dot
is
currently
doing
a
pilot
to
understand
what
the
outcomes
of
that
and
deploying
that
on
a
larger
scale
would
look
like
what
we,
what
resource
it
was.
It
would
take
what
impacts
it
would
have
to
the
streets
and
customer
service
ratings.
S
So
we
anticipate
that
with
some
additional
Staffing
through
the
abandoned
vehicle
Reserve
fund,
that
we
will
be
able
to
add
some
additional
contract
staff
to
allow
for
10
000
more
investigations
annually,
and
we
will
use
that
to
again
kind
of
mold
and
and
figure
out
what
the
best
approach
to
the
72-hour
enforcement
piece
is
and
then
hopefully
be
able
to
deploy
a
larger
program
based
on
what
we
learned
from
the
pilot.
So
what's
the
timeline
on
the
pilot,
so
the
pilot
is
currently
underway.
S
It
just
started
at
the
beginning
of
this
month,
so
I
think
last
month.
So
oh
gosh,
it's
May
all
right!
Sorry!
Last
month,
we've
done
about
a
hundred
investigations.
So
far,
so
it's
it's
very
early
in
the
stage
and
we
will
go
through
the
end
of
this
or
the
end
of
this
fiscal
year
and
then
that
funding
hopefully
will
be
available
starting
next
fiscal
year
to
ramp
up
to
10
000,
more
more
investigations
for
the
year.
S
A
R
Doing
April
May
June
yeah
the
plan
is
to
come
back
and
and
represent
what
we're
defining
in
about
six
months
or
so,
and
we
can
coordinate
that.
Okay,
if
I
can
address
the
question
a
little
bit
a
different
way.
There
are
two
types
of
vehicles
that
we
can
address:
ones
that
qualify
for
a
citation
or
Towing
and
and
those
who
don't
qualify
because
they
they
just
there
is
no
legal
way
for
us
to
address
them.
R
The
increase
in
Staffing
and
contractors
to
do
more
about
10
000,
more
investigations
will
allow
us
to
address
the
ones
that
we
can
enforce
more.
So
we
should
see
some
improvement
from
that
perspective
that
once
we
cannot
address
because
they
illegally
there's
nothing.
We
can
do
because
they're
not
violating
anything.
We
are
improving
our
communication
by
number
one,
the
map
that
we
demonstrated
for
the
performance,
so
at
least
people
can
see
that
we
have
activities
and
we're
demonstrating
that
we
are
doing
something
about
it.
R
It
just
there
are
some
restrictions
and
legal
limitation
to
what
we
can
do
and
the
second
part
we
are
looking
to
ways
to
take
a
picture
before
and
after
just
to
show
them
that
the
car
did
move
or
we
we
couldn't
find
enough
evidence
to
take
actions
and
we're
hoping
through
that
process
that
we,
the
improved
communication,
will
at
least
bring
understanding
and
education
to
the
public.
And
hopefully
that
will
make
him
more
understanding
and
more
accepting
all
the
of
the
results.
V
Just
to
kind
of
put
it
all
in
a
package,
so
the
10
000
hours
do
pair
with
heavier
citation,
so
we
are
going
to
use
the
citation
mechanism
more
often
and
more
loudly.
We
also
going
to
broaden
those
criteria
so
that
we
are
going
to
try
to
enforce
more
there's,
never
been
kind
of
a
Reconciliation
between
the
criteria
we
use
and
how
effective
it
is.
V
There
is
a
piece
of
communication
and
education,
because
there
are
some
cases
where
there's
a
lot
of
cases
where
we
see
people
just
don't
like
where
people
park
or
their
cars
and
in
those
cases
we
do
have
to
tell
people
that
it's.
It
is
legal
that
the
streets
usage
is
for
everyone.
Continuous
improvement
with
compassion
is
one.
We're
gonna
have
to
really
work
on
the
legislative.
V
Our
processes
and
thresholds
there's
also
an
intensity
on
our
focus
on
intensity
areas
so
where
there
is
more
complaining
by
multiple
people
in
certain
areas,
they're
going
to
hear
that
and
they're
also
not
going
to
hear.
That's,
not
us
called
another
city
Department,
which
we've
heard
from
councils.
V
K
M
C
All
right,
thank
you
and
I
appreciate
that
councilmember
Davis
left
the
easy
question
for
the
end,
because
I
was
going
to
be
the
broken
record
that
I
feel
like
I
am,
and
every
time
we
hear
this
report
and
and
just
talk
about,
I
think
the
disconnect
between
the
expectations
of
the
residents
and
what
our
enforcement
is
and
I
know.
That
was
just
that
line
of
questioning,
but
I
still
feel
like
we're,
not
quite
there.
C
You
know
I
I,
hear
statements
like
like
were
said
and
I
appreciate.
This
I
mean
there's
certain
criteria
that
we've
been
using
for
towing
and
we
say
well,
this
person
wasn't
violating
anything
well,
except
for
the
72-hour
ordinance
I
mean
that
is
a
violation
of
an
ordinance.
So
it's
really
hard
for
those
of
us
who
have
to
respond
to
constituent
concerns
on
a
daily
basis
when
they
say
to
us
what
we've
been
told.
This
isn't
a
violation,
but
this
vehicle
has
been
here
for
six
weeks.
C
It
hasn't
moved
right,
so
there's
a
disconnect
and
it's
puts
it
a
lot
of
us
in
a
bad
in
a
very
difficult
position.
Most
of
the
people
who
are
calling
and
saying
that
to
us
aren't
as
nice
as
the
one
that
apparently
councilmember
Davis
heard
from
who
said
who
said
I
think
I
did
everything
right.
No,
that's
not
what
they're
saying
to
us
and
they're
saying
to
us:
I
reported
this
vehicle,
and
then
it's
been
here
for
six
weeks
and
you're
not
doing
your
job
right,
I
mean
so
I
still
want
to
understand.
C
What
is
it
that
we
need
to
do
from
an
ordinance
standpoint
in
a
city
standpoint
to
make
sure
that
we're
being
consistent
and
clear
and
and
also
following
our
rules,
I've
been
torn,
but
in
my
own
head
about
what
the
right
approach
is,
because
you
know
we
could
say
well,
look
if
we're
not
going
to
force
this,
we
ought
to
change
the
ordinance.
On
the
other
hand,
we
want
to
send
the
message
to
Residents.
C
You
really
shouldn't
leave
Vehicles
more
than
72
hours
as
somebody
who
got
a
ticket
when
I
lived
in
Berkeley
30
years
ago
for
parking
on
the
street
on
street
sweeping
day
where
they
actually
enforce
that
that
rule
about
allowing
the
trees
to
be
swept.
It's
frustrating
to
live
in
a
place
that
you
know.
We
have
a
rule
says
you
shouldn't
Park
on
street
sweeping
day:
half
people
don't
know
when
that
day
is
and
but
but
the
ones
who
don't
move
their
car.
We
just
have
areas
that
don't
get
swept
right.
C
V
And
if
you
can
Heather,
can
you
step
through
what
the
72-hour
enforcement
process
looks
like
from
from
when
the
resident
sees
it
into
the
kind
of
the
timeline.
S
So
we
receive
a
service
request
in
the
team
reviews
the
service
Crest
triages
it
via
the
pictures
and
the
information
provided
if
it
qualifies
it
is
then
sent
to
an
officer.
So
that's
the
next
day.
Probably
then,
the
officer
responds
and
attempts
to
locate
the
vehicle
in
the
field.
S
If
it's
located,
we
leave
a
warning
notice
on
the
vehicle
indicating
that
these
are
the
potential
violations
and
giving
you
a
warning
and
explaining
how
to
comply
with
the
rules
and
regulations
that
they
may
be
in
violation
of
they
collect
evidence
and
then
no
less
than
72
hours
later
they
return
to
the
vehicle.
We
are
not
aggressively
enforcing,
so
that
is
usually
around
a
five
day
return
on
that
day.
They
if
they
locate
the
vehicle-
and
it
isn't,
has
demonstrated
that
it's
in
violation
it
can
be
towed
or
cited
depending
on
the
violation.
S
C
For
that,
that
timeline
makes
sense
to
me,
and
certainly
I'm,
okay
with
communicating
that
I
think
the
part
of
it
that
was
sort
of
parenthetical
in
your
statement
was
the
if
it
qualifies
right
as
far
as
I
mean
I
understand
what
that
means
right.
If
the
vehicles
have
certain
additional
criteria,
Beyond
just
having
been
parked
on
the
street
blight
of
registration,
that
tags
that
are
outdated,
smashed
Windows
inoperable
whatever
all
those
things,
but
if
it
doesn't
meet
those
criteria,
it's
still
in
violation
of
an
ordinance
that
says
they
can't
be
there
for
72
hours.
C
I
know
so
I'm
just
curious
about
whether
or
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
for
is
some
messaging
from
the
city
as
to
what
we
really
should
be
telling
residents
about
what
the
rules
are,
so
that
it's
it's
clear
that
yes,
we're
trying
to
encourage
people
to
move
their
vehicles,
but
in
reality
they
can
drive
their
vehicle
around
the
block
and
come
back
and
and
it's
legal
or
in
reality,
we're
not
going
to
even
hold
them
to
that
requirement,
because
we
we
either.
C
We
can't
because
it's
just
too
many
vehicles
to
do
that,
for
we
also
want
to
be
sensitive
to
the
to
the
issues
that
are
in
real
in
many
neighborhoods,
where
there
just
aren't
other
places
to
put
cars.
We
what
we
need
to
be
honest,
as
all
I've
been
saying,
we
need
to
be
honest
with
the
residents
and
I,
not
I,
think
we
need
to
think
through
what
that
Honesty
looks
like
it's
not
clear
to
me.
What
that
honestly
looks
like
I,
don't
want
to
send
a
blanket
statement
out
to
everybody
it's
free
for
all.
C
Now
you
don't
have
to
move
your
vehicles.
On
the
other
hand,
I
don't
believe
we're
ever
going
to
be
80
satisfaction
on
the
vehicle
abandoned
vehicle
line.
As
long
as
we
are
not
enforcing
an
ordinance
that
we
have.
That
says
you
can't
leave
your
vehicle
in
front
of
my
house.
Right
I
mean
that's
what
it
is
for
most
people,
if
there's
a
vehicle
in
front
of
my
house,
so
that's
the
the
part
I
hope
that
we'll
think
about
as
a
city
and
what
we're
going
to
do
about
that.
V
C
A
couple
other
questions,
some
of
the
other
items
you
know
our
RV
parking
and
biowaste
has
been
a
big
issue
and
we
have
one
in
our
vehicle
that
seems,
and
one
in
our
district,
that
seems
to
be
dumping
regularly
right
on
one
of
the
streets
and
we
get
the
report.
I
know
that
there
was
this
before
this
issue
of
well,
it's
a
different
department
has
to
deal
with
it.
We've
often
told
we've
had
trouble
communicating
with
the
residents
around
where
this
vehicle
is
dumping
on
the
street.
C
That
well,
you
know,
there's
not
really.
Nobody.
No
Department
knows
who's
supposed
to
come
and
take
care
of
this
I
I
sounds
like
we're
getting
better
at
that
and
I
hope
that'll
improve.
It
seems
to
me
that,
when
that's
happening,
that's
almost
an
emergency
situation
that
we
we
shouldn't
when
we
are
informed.
This
dumping
is
happening.
We
should
have
a
strike
team
that
gets
out
and
deals
with
it
really
quickly,
especially
if
we
had
you
know
the
rains
earlier
this
year,
we
would
hear
about
dumping.
C
So
just
just
some
input
on
that.
That
item
and
the
last
thing
I'm
going
to
ask
a
second
and
last
thing,
I'm
going
to
ask
about
you
know
we
there's
this
trade-off
between
our
lived
in
vehicles
RVs
and
where
they're
parking
and
some
safety
that
comes
from
that.
Obviously,
if
they're
in
a
crosswalk
they're
on
red
curve
in
front
of
a
fire
hydrant,
we
don't
what
is
our
policy?
C
T
Thank
you
for
the
question
council
member.
So,
if
someone's
in
front
of
a
fire
hydrant
or
Red
Zone,
usually
those
calls
typically
go
to
sjpd
and
PD
will
usually
have
the
person
move
back,
move
forward,
move
back
or
find
another
area
if
they
happen
when
the
bsj
team
is
out
and
they're
servicing
a
vehicle,
picking
up
trash
or
bio
waste,
and
we
see
someone's
close
to
a
fire,
hydrant
or
Red
Zone,
they
educate
them
on.
You
can't
be
here,
you
can
be
towed.
You
cannot
be
in
these
areas
or
parked
across
the
sidewalk.
T
C
And
the
extension
of
that,
for
me,
is
when
vehicles
are
blocking
the
visibility
of
people
pulling
out
of
driveways
and
around
corners,
and
we
have
the
example
in
our
part
of
the
district,
where
we
have
all
those
Vehicles
along
an
industrial
street.
But
cars
are
trying
to
pull
out
of
parking
lots
and
because
of
all
the
RVs
there,
they
can't
see
what's
coming
down
that
street.
C
T
So
I'll
tell
you
when
we
get
those
issues
around
line
of
sight,
I
usually
just
reach
right
out
to
our
partners
in
dot,
because
they're
able
to
assess
that
and
determine
like.
If
is
this
vehicle
in
a
place
where
there's
a
line
of
sight,
we'll
continue
to
work
closely
with
DOT
on
those
particular
issues.
Okay,.
C
Thank
you
and
then
the
last
thing
I
was
very
interested
by
that
data
about
how
many
vehicles
there
are
registered
in
the
city
for
driver
I
mean
it's
crazy.
It's
not
per
household
those
are
two
and
a
half
vehicles
per
licensed
driver
in
theory
and
I'm
curious.
If
we,
if
we
can
at
some
point
disaggregate
that
data.
This
is
kind
of
a
peripheral,
I
thought.
But
we
talk
a
lot
about
how
younger
residents
and
don't
have
as
many
vehicles
do.
We
have.
C
Can
we
sort
of
start
to
learn,
maybe
about
age
and
all
that,
so
we
can
understand
how
our
parking,
ordinances
and
other
things
need
to
be
adjusted,
because
we
tell
our
residents
when
we
when
we
eliminate
parking
minimums.
For
example,
don't
worry
people
don't
have
as
many
cars
now
as
they
used
to?
But
when
you
hear
data
that
says,
there's
two
and
a
half
Cars
per
registered
driver
I.
Wonder
if
we're
being
honest
with
ourselves
about
where
all
those
cars
are
going
to
go.
R
Thank
you
for
the
question.
We
are
trying
to
get
the
full
data
set
from
the
DMV,
so
we
can
do
our
full
analysis
to
see
the
type
of
cars,
business
or
private
motorcycles,
and
things
like
that.
We
are
restricted
to
what
the
DMV
is
willing
to
share
with
us,
but
that's
definitely
what
we.
R
C
And
is
my
illustrious
colleague
here
pointed
out,
obviously
they're,
not
all
personal
vehicles,
but
but
it's
just
I
mean
just
raised
a
curiosity
in
my
mind
about
whether
we
can
learn
more
from
that
data
by
diving
into
it.
A
little
more
deeply
I
appreciate
that
I
think
that's
it
for
my
questions.
I
know
that
I'm
sure
in
a
couple
weeks
we're
gonna
have
a
vigorous
discussion
with
the
entire
Council.
So
we'll
leave
the
rest
for
then
and
move
on
to
a
vote.
B
Yeah
I'll
I'll
go
ahead
and
call
out
then
for
anyone
online,
so
Candelas,
yes,
Ortiz
aye,
Davis,
yes,
Cohen
hi!
Thank
you.
Hi.
F
J
Also
from
the
Horseshoe
thank
you
for
an
excellent
meeting,
I'm
going
to
be
referencing
this
when
this
comes
up
to
council.
I
really
hope
that
I
did
not
hear
because
it
troubled
me
that
there
was
a
rationale
that
was
given
by
District
Four
that
somehow
or
another
people
looking
on
their
phones
might
have
been
responsible
for
their
death.
J
That
was
very,
very
troubling
to
hear
from
from
this
committee
that
the
a
rationale
was
actually
provided
to
give
justification
for
their
murder
on
the
street.
Secondly,
I
would
ask
District
Six
representatives
to
never
challenge
my
memory
again.
J
I
have
like
I
said:
I
think
it's
been
already
noticed
by
now
by
previous
council
members
that
I
have
a
photographic
memory,
so
any
documents
that
I
read
I
can
log
and
I
can
reference
them
at
will
and
I
attend,
probably
more
meetings
than
all
of
you,
combined
in
the
past
couple
of
years,
I
literally
go
and
attend
every
single
meeting,
so
I'm
equipped
with
information
that
you
don't
have,
and
so
please
don't
ever
try
to
challenge
me
publicly
like
that
again
because,
as
you
were
today,
you'll
be
embarrassed
and
you'll
be
shown
that
I
understand
what
is
happening
to
my
city.
J
It's
genocide
with
manners
is
what's
happening
and
it's
done
with
the
cooperation
of
certain
members
of
this
particular
committee
that
think
that
they
are
they're
just
self-promoting.
The
politicians
here
are
promoting
themselves
and
it'll
be
kind
of
exposed.
You
know
in
the
near
future
so
don't
think
that
you're
getting
away
with
anything
because
you're,
not
we
see
it
and
you're
going
to
be
called
out
on
it.
Thank
you.
F
E
Hi
Blair
Beekman
here
I
hope
it
was
noticed
this
past
weekend
that
I
guess
it
started.
Friday,
that
is
the
governor,
is
starting
to
bring
in
CHP
and
National
Guard
to
the
city
of
San
Francisco,
to
address
fentanyl
issues
and
I.
Think
some
of
that
is
supposed
to
return
down
in
San
Jose
as
well.
E
They
have
said
is
with
the
intention
that
they
want
to
get
high-end
persons,
but
it
really
offers
the
risk
that
they're
going
to
be
nailing
people
at
the
local
level,
who
maybe
shouldn't
have
to
be
nailed.
I've
been
trying
to
figure
out
conversation
and
talking
points
on
this
subject.
E
I
think
it's
really
important
that
people
don't
get
hurt
and
that
we
really
concentrate
our
thinking
on
what
is
our
institutions,
like
our
police
departments,
our
hospitals,
and
and
put
a
focus
on
on
how
the
distribution
from
those
places
is
possibly
having
a
pretty
large
effective
of
Fentanyl
distribution
overall
in
local
communities?
E
It's
a
tough
subject
but
I
think
if
we
want
to
address
it,
that's
the
more
honest
approach
in
how
to
address
what
we're
where
we're
at
right
now
and
then
I
think
possibly
plug
several
week
leaks
and
make
things
work
towards
that
better
future
of
how
to
how
to
address
fentanyl
overall,
and
so
good
luck
with
that
and
at
the
local
level.
What
about
the
idea
of
fentanyl
test
scripts
along
with
Narcan
I?
E
Think
the
test
strips
to
test,
if
you
know
fentanyl,
is
in
someone's
drugs
can
be
a
great
helpful
tool
that
I
hope
we
can
talk
more
about
get
more
accessibility
for
the
public
about
and
I
had
some
comments
about
my
rules:
how
at
the
rules
in
open
government
all
the
weird
things
that
happened,
I
want
to
be
forgiving
about
it,
I
hope
we
can
talk
more
about
that
in
the
future,
and
I
want
to
do
good
practices.