►
From YouTube: Finance Meeting 2/28/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
Or
do
you
want
me
to
yes,
I
can
go
ahead
and
fill
in
if
I
leave
any
out
we're
going
to
be
postponing
items
b,
c
d,
e,
f
and
j.
B
A
Yes,
at
motion
passes.
We
are
now
on
to
the
consent
agenda.
Are
there
items?
The
committee
would
like
to
discuss
this
evening.
A
Okay,
councilwoman
villarreal,
I
see
your
hand
waving
at
me,
I'm
sure
go
ahead
and
go
with
sigma.
Okay,
I
need
to
figure
out
okay,
counselor
lindell,
which
items
would
you
like
to
pull.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
n
is
nancy
q.
A
Counselor
lindell
pulled
it.
Yes,.
A
A
Anything
else
all
right,
counselor
lindell,
would
you
just
review
the
items
pulled
for
romero
worth
sure,
so
I
have
n
r,
a
b
q
and
a
obviously
not
in
alphabetical
order.
A
A
A
All
right,
our
consent
agenda
is
approved.
We
are
now
on
to
approval
of
the
minutes
for
the
finance
committee
february
14th
meeting.
Are
there
changes
from
staff
or
the
committee
and,
if
not,
is
there
a
motion?
A
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
counselors.
Today
with
us,
we
have
our
accounting
officer,
ricky
bejedano,
as
well
as
our
accounting
or
our
audit
coordinator,
stephanie,
woodruff
they're
joining
us
as
well
I'll,
go
ahead
and
start
moving
through
the
agenda.
The
update
that
we
have
for
you
today.
As
far
as
the
overall
timeline
remains
the
same.
We
are
still
on
target
to
produce
the
asifa,
to
submit
to
our
external
auditor
on
march
16th,
so
a
few
weeks
away
and
to
produce
the
final
trial
balance
for
the
auditors
by
the
end
of
march.
C
As
we've
reviewed
in
prior
prior
weekly
updates,
we
have
made
significant
progress
on
a
few
areas,
including
fund
balance
and
net
position.
This
is
considered
100.
Complete.
We've
also
made
significant
progress
on
inner
funds.
This
is
also
considered
100.
C
As
we
reported
last
week,
we
have
made
significant
progress
on
capital
assets
and
ricky
is
joining
us
today
to
give
us
some
insight
to
exactly
what
this
100
percent
complete
means.
Ricky,
do
you
want
to
share
some
of
the
details
about
the
number
of
transactions,
as
well
as
the
dollar
values
that
have
been
reviewed
for
fiscal
year?
21.
G
C
H
H
H
This
is
approximately
51
million
dollars
worth
of
transactions.
Not
all
of
them
were
necessarily
capital
assets,
but
they
have
to
be
mined
through
the
system
to
ensure
they
could
potentially
be
capital
assets.
So
it's
quite
a
heavy
lift
within
our
capital
assets
also,
I
might
add,
our
139
capital
projects
that
are
in
process
those
amount
to
approximately
42
million.
H
H
It's
a
iterative
process.
We
did
find
some
errors
in
some
of
the
work
of
the
contractors.
Our
primary
contractors
review
the
work.
There's
a
number
of
it's
very
common
for
there'll,
be
a
number
of
reviews
of
of
the
work
papers
and
the
samples
that
they've
drawn
redw
is
our
main
contractor
and
there
were
some
errors
found,
which
is
quite
common.
It's
part
of
the
process.
H
C
Thank
you
ricky
for
explaining
that
process.
It's
very
helpful
we're
going
to
move
on
from
capital
assets,
I
think,
as
mr
vajrano
shared
with
us,
this
was
a
significant
lift
in
the
the
stats
that
he
cited
and
quite
quite
significant
progress.
That's
been
made
to
date
on
this
area
moving
forward.
We
have
also
made
significant
progress,
particularly
in
the
last
week,
in
our
deferred,
inflows
and
outflows
as
they
pertain
to
net
pension
and
our
opeb
liability.
That
is
other
post
employment
benefits
like
retiree
health
care.
C
So
what's
up
on
deck
for
the
to
get
us,
the
remainder
of
the
ten
percent
home
is
to
do
the
final
review
this
week
and
as
mr
bahrano
outlined
there
is
that
review
process.
There
are
notes
that
are
given
on
the
work
papers
and
then,
potentially,
something
will
pop
up.
That
needs
to
be
addressed
with
more
detailed
work
or
some
additional
research.
So
that's
what's
remaining
for
this
particular
area.
C
Moving
on
to
the
c5,
we
are
still
on
track.
We
are
about
64
percent,
complete
with
the
c5.
This
touches
all
expenditures
of
federal
awards
across
the
city,
including
for
this
particular
fiscal
year.
The
cares
act,
expenses.
C
For
our
progress
and
liabilities,
we
moved
from
47
to
55
complete
our
target
date,
for
this
was
moved
from
the
end
of
last
week
to
this
coming
week
and
then
by
next
wednesday
for
the
final
review.
What
is
up
again
this
week
is
quality
control
review
of
what
has
been
completed.
As
mr
bejedano
mentioned,
we
still
have
a
significant
ways
to
go
with
that
quality
review
process
to
be
able
to
finalize
the
liabilities
for
fiscal
year
21..
H
Yes,
I
just
think
it's
important
to
point
out
that
within
this
process
a
lot
of
times,
even
if
there
aren't
errors
found
in
the
review,
it
may
generate
questions.
For
example,
as
the
expert
reviewer
is
reviewing
the
work
papers,
it
may
stir
up
ten
more
questions
that
have
to
be
investigated
and
that's
so
that
by
the
time
it
gets
to
the
actual
auditors
every
stone's
been
unturned
as
to
our
knowledge
and
so
that
we
can
move
forward.
H
So
this
is
again
it
might
see
this.
This
isn't
what
I
would
consider
a
bump
in
the
road.
It's
just
we're
trying
to
do
more
investigation
to
make
sure
we
get
it
right.
The
first
time
when
we
turn
it
into
our
auditors,
the
actual
auditors
who
are
cla
the
hope
is-
and
the
probability
is
that
everything
will
have
been
reviewed
to
and
to
such
extent,
that
it
cuts
down
their
work
and
the
time
that
they
have
to
spend
auditing.
C
Moving
on
to
assets,
we
have
increased
the
progress
on
this
from
62
to
65
percent.
This
is
the
biggest
change
in
our
timeline,
as
mr
vajrano
just
mentioned,
with
progress
over
liabilities.
That
also
applies
to
progress
over
assets.
Here
we
are
taking
an
action
taking
extra
time
this.
The
original
date
on
this
was
today
was
february
28th
and
we've
determined
that
we
need
an
additional
three
weeks
to
be
able
to
slow
down
and
continue
a
more
detailed,
thorough
review
over
all
of
our
assets.
C
C
There
will
be
notes
given
about
the
reconciliations,
what
needs
to
be
tightened
up,
what
needs
to
be
refined
and
then
those
notes
will
be
taken
into
consideration.
Those
changes
will
be
made
and
then
we'll
continue
to
make
progress
week
after
week,
as
this
65
number
will
be
bumped
up
to
100
by
march
21st.
C
With
that,
I
think.
That's
the
last
slide
that
we
have,
but
just
did
want
to
say
with
these
updates
to
the
timeline.
We
are
still
on
target
for
march
16th
to
produce
the
cfa
and
march
31st
to
produce
the
city's
final
trial
balance
for
our
auditors.
With
that,
madam
chair
will
stand
for
any
questions.
A
Okay,
director
mccoy,
if
we
could
move
on
to
the
december
2021
gross
receipts,
tax
update,
that'd,
be
great.
C
Yes,
my
pleasure,
we
have
joining
us
today.
Our
planning
and
investment
officer,
bradley
flitch
bradley
will
be
sharing
his
screen.
I
just
wanted
to
say
a
few
words
about
the
information
that
he
will
be
reviewing
very
similar
to
what
we
have
become
accustomed
to
reporting.
This
is
the
monthly
grt
update
that
covers
year
to
year
period
to
period
comparisons
for
gross
receipts
tax,
both
our
distributions,
as
well
as
the
taxable
gross
receipts
for
the
city
of
santa
fe,
which
is
a
good
measure
of
how
our
economy
is
performing.
C
That
being
said,
we
have
also
included
a
slide
ahead
of
the
budget
adjustments
that
are
on
the
agenda
tonight
and
we'll
be
moving
through
the
committee
process
of
where
we
stand
for
the
fiscal
year
for
fiscal
year,
22
from
july
2021
through
december
of
2021.,
so
brad
will
be
sharing
that
information.
If
you
can
keep
that
in
mind,
as
these
budget
adjustments
are
moving
forward,
we
really
are
at
a
really
great
inflection
point
having
half
of
the
year
reported
and
distributed
by
the
taxation
and
revenue
department.
C
We
wanted
to
share
this
good
news
with
the
committee
tonight
and
the
governing
body
as
we
move
forward
to
let
them
know
that
we
do
have
additional
funds
additional
gross
receipts
tax
and
additional
lodgers
tax
available
above
the
conservative
levels
that
we
budgeted
for
in
the
current
year.
With
that
good
news,
we
are
bringing
forward
a
series
of
budget,
multiple
budget
adjustments,
a
little
shy
of
a
dozen
budget
adjustments
for
your
review.
C
These
are
areas
where
we
wanted
to
be
able
to
get
a
head
start
on
the
construction
season
be
able
to
order,
for
example,
police
vehicles
at
this
time,
so
because
we
know
the
lag
time
that
we
are
currently
facing
and
ordering
any
kind
of
vehicles
so
also
important
to
be
able
to
address
the
eviction
moratorium,
that's
being
lifted
other
priority
areas
that
we
didn't
want
to
wait
until
the
new
fiscal
year
to
be
able
to
fund
with
that.
C
We
hope
that
our
team
working
together
will
be
able
to
get
not
only
this
funding
budgeted
with
your
approval,
but
also
be
able
to
move
forward
into
procuring
this
very
quickly
and
a
quick
turnaround.
C
We
look
forward
at
the
future
at
the
next
finance
committee
meeting
to
be
able
to
bring
forward
a
package
for
the
arpa
funding
as
well.
So
keep
in
mind.
We
have
different
buckets
of
money
that
we
are.
We
are
using
to
address
all
of
the
city's
many
priorities,
so
this
is
additional
gross
receipts,
tax
and
lodgers
tax.
C
We
will,
in
the
future,
be
discussing
the
federal
arpa
funding
and
then,
in
april
we
will
pivot
to
discussing
our
fy23
budget
and
then
shortly
after
that,
we'll
begin
discussing
the
opportunities
that
we're
gonna
have
for
a
gross
receipts
tax
back
to
bond
in
the
current
calendar
year.
So
just
a
little
preview
of
what's
ahead
in
our
in
the
actions
that
we're
gonna
be
bringing
forward
through
our
spring
sessions
with
you
all
on
the
finance
committee.
So
with
that
brad.
If
you
can
go
ahead
and
proceed
with
your
update.
I
Thank
you
mary
good
evening,
counselors
chair
yeah.
We
are,
as
we
usually
go
through
our
gross
receipts
tax.
There
is
a
two-month
delay,
so
this
is
the
activity
that
occurred
in
december.
I
Ms
murray
said
it
is
six
months
worth
of
collections,
primary
source
of
revenue
for
the
city,
retail
trade,
the
single
largest
contributor
to
grt
accommodation,
food
service,
construction
and
other
services.
All
it
just
this
month
coincided
at
11
of
each.
You
know
they
contributed
11
each
to
the
total
grt
and
finally
made
up
with
professional
scientific
and
technical
services,
and
those
five
together
make
up
seventy
percent
of
the
total
grc
for
the
city.
I
I
The
biggest
thing
that
has
happened
in
the
last
year
is
on
july,
1st,
the
city
or
the
state
began
tracking
internet
sales
and
remitting
those
proceeds
to
the
city,
and
that's
the
single
biggest
thing.
That's
happened
to
gross
receipts
and,
as
you
can
see,
with
a
very
large
business
community
having
a
really
good
december,
the
city
also
had
the
largest
single
month
distribution.
I
Ever
at
13.7
million.
There
was
a
prior,
I
think,
july.
Two
years
ago
we
had
13.7
million,
but
that
included
a
3.7
million
settlement.
So
this
is
straight
gross
receipts.
I
So,
in
this
case
here
we're
comparing
total
how
much
we
had
received
in
the
first
six
months
and
as
you
can
see,
fy23
we're
substantially
ahead
of
fy22,
and
even
you
know,
fy
21
was
the
prior
high
water
mark
for
the
first
six
months,
and
you
know
that's
nearly
eight
million
dollars
better.
I
I
Accommodation
in
food
service-
this
is
the
tourism
industry,
had
a
really
good
december
at
48.1
million,
it
beat
december
2020
by
28
million
and
it
actually
exceeded
december
2019
by
seven
and
a
half
million
professional
scientific
and
technical
services.
This
is
a
real
shooting
star
right
now,
one
you
know
it's.
It's
a
big
amount,
48
million
in
taxable
gross
receipts.
I
It
grew
35.1
percent
over
december
20
and
80
better
than
december
19..
This
is
one
of
those
industry
sectors
that
grew
through
the
oh.
I
pandemic.
I
almost
forgot
what
it
was
and
but
it
keeps
growing,
and
this
is
really
kind
of
a
shooting
star.
You
want
to
point
this
out.
This
is
where
you
know.
Economic
development
is
really
putting
a
lot
of
their
efforts.
I
I
Information
industry
grew
109.
This
is
where
the
film
industry
resides
and
we've
seen
that
information
industry.
It
was
22
million,
it
grew
45
over
2019
and
it's
106
over
2020
and
then
lastly,
is
the
construction
industry
grew.
20,
grew
taxable
gross
receipts
by
20
over
2020
and
32
over
december
19.
A
A
Perfect
then,
I
can
see
everyone
questions
from
the
committee
on
this
presentation.
A
Don't
see
anybody
waving
at
me,
so
thank
you
brad
and
director
mccoy.
It's
seemingly
good
news,
but
I
worry
how's
your
crystal
ball.
Do
we
do
we
know
where
we're
gonna
level
off
or
when
we're
gonna,
I
don't
know,
get
to
yeah.
I
Well,
madam
chair,
we
actually
discussed
that
somewhat
this
weekend.
As
you
know,
the
events
in
europe
and
and
the
soviet
or
russia
that
will
play
out
it's
playing
out
in
the
global
schemes.
Right
now
in
the
bond
market,
the
stock
market,
global
currencies-
russia
is
a
major
exporter
of
raw
materials.
I
We
may
not
see
the
delays
hit
the
supply
chain
immediately,
but
you
know
they
are
the
largest
producer
of
iron
ore,
copper,
palladium.
The
list
is
actually
extensive,
of
which
they
produce.
Ukraine
is
the
breadbasket
of
europe.
It's
the
single
largest
exporter
of
wheat.
I
This
is
going
to
do
nothing
to
us
abate,
the
inflation
issues,
how
people
feel
and
travel
and
other
issues
that
that
is
right,
now
kind
of
what
we're
wondering.
How
is
that
going
to
impact
launchers
tax?
How
will
it
impact
grt?
What
else
would
it
impact
the
city
and
so
we're
we're?
Looking
we're
looking
into
our
crystal
ball,
we
don't
have
any
answers.
A
Yeah
and
thank
you
for
that-
I
mean,
I
think,
those
all
of
the
you
know
the
we're
not
isolated
from
events.
A
The
international
and
geopolitical
events
that
are
happening
so
it'll
be
interesting
to
see,
and
I
guess
we'll
have
to
have
some
time
to
see
what
we
need
to
do
to
to
be
prepared
for
any
impact
that
comes
our
way
councilwoman
via
real.
You
have
your
hand
up.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Just
a
question
related
to
how
grt
is
affected
by
inflation,
which
you
indicated
it
is
so,
if
there's
high
inflation,
what
do
we
need
to
do?
I?
I
guess
that
some
at
at
certain
times
that
actually
leads
to
recessions.
So
are
we
planning
accordingly?
For
you
know
this
historical
high
plus
there
was
a
lot
of
money
infused
by
the
federal
government.
C
Madam
chair
counselor,
thank
you
for
that
question.
I
think
part
of
what
the
city
has
done
very
robustly
over
the
past
few
years
is
build
up.
Our
rainy
day
fund
build
up
the
undesignated
reserve
levels
to
be
able
to
weather
initially
the
crisis.
If
you
recall
going
back
to
fiscal
year,
21
we
did
use
and
for
the
current
fiscal
year
as
well
the
conversations
we
were
having
last
spring
about
the
use
of
reserve
levels
in
our
recurring
budget.
C
So
that
is
something
that
we
have
been
able
to
to
do
to
build
up
those
rainy
that
rainy
day
fund
and
we've
been
the
beneficiary
of
that.
Through
these
uncertain
times.
I
think
we
will
continue
that
stance
to
ensure
that
we
have
significant
reserve
levels
to
be
able
to
cover
operations.
The
state
mandate
is
a
1
12
of
general
fund
operations.
C
We
know
our
utilities.
Funds
have
different
levels
of
reserve
requirements
as
well.
So
that's
one
way
that
that
our
government
can
prepare
for
the
any
type
of
uncertain
time,
whether
it's
a
pandemic
or
whether
it's
a
geopolitical
instability
and
the
aftermath
that
may
ensue.
E
C
C
So
we
have
that
plus
we
have
an
amount
in
addition
to
that,
to
be
to
remain
in
reserves
in
in
anticipation
for
any
type
of
revenue
fluctuations
to
be
able
to
manage
through
also,
I
think,
as
has
been
cited
by
both
s
p
and
fitch,
in
the
ratings
of
most
recent
ratings
that
were
issued
in
the
fall
the
city
does
have,
because
we
meet
every
two
weeks.
C
Just
like
the
package
before
you
tonight
of
budget
adjustments,
we
do
have
the
ability-
unlike
perhaps
the
state
legislature,
that
has
to
call
a
special
session
into
session.
We
do
have
the
ability
to
both
expand
expenditures,
as
well
as
contract
expenditures,
to
be
able
to
react
very
timely
to
any
type
of
situations.
C
If
you
recall,
it
was
about
two
years
ago,
at
this
time
that
brad
in
our
quarterly
report,
presented
some
anomalies
in
the
stock
market
that
were
driven
by
the
onset
of
of
the
pandemic,
and
that
was
our
one
of
our
initial
signs
that
we
had
to
start
thinking
about
the
last
quarter
of
fiscal
year,
20
a
bit
differently,
and
so
again
we
continue
to
provide
the
information,
whether
it's
on
gross
receipts,
tax
or
information
that
brad
and
his
team.
C
If
you
remember
recall
dr
white
presenting
to
the
committee,
they
track
everything
from
inflation
to
unemployment,
to
our
labor
market,
to
be
able
to
keep
us
more
on
top
of
those
month-to-month
fluctuations
shall
any
changes
occur.
We
would
then
present
to
the
finance
committee,
like
we
did
two
years
ago,.
A
Okay,
councillor.
F
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
everybody
for
the
presentation.
Just
one
quick
question.
I
know
that
one
was
a
one-time
settlement.
We
had
a
one-time
settlement
amount
coming
in
brad.
Can
you
remind
me
what
that
was?
I'm
sorry,
it's
flipping
my
mind
and
I
did
not
write
it
down.
I
That
was
two
years
ago.
It
was
for
3.7
or
through
the
chair
man
chair.
It
was
a
counselor,
it
was
3.7
million,
it
was.
Retailers
were
not
properly
collecting
and
reporting
their
taxes,
and
this
year
we
did
get
a
2.6
2.7
million
dollar
settlement.
That
was
a
legal
settlement
brought
by
a
lawsuit,
I
believe,
albuquerque
sued,
dfa
and
as
a
beneficiary
in
september.
We,
the
city,
received,
I
think
it
was
2.7
million,
2.4
million.
F
A
All
right,
thank
you,
we'll
look
forward
to
future
predictions
and
events
that
we
should
be
paying
attention
to,
as
as
things
change
and
shift
all
right,
we
will
go
on
to.
A
We
have
a
presentation
city
of
santa
fe,
employee
benefits
presentation
by
and
how
do
we
say
that
aeon
and
we
have
alvin
valdez
here?
He
is
the
benefits
and
wellness
supervisor
and
he
has
a
presentation
to
give
to
us
tonight,
thanks
for
being
with
us
alvin
thank.
J
You
very
much
do
we
have
todd
and
or
done
on
the
video.
J
Todd
all
right
todd
will
we
have
todd
burley
from
aeon
he's
going
to
give
us
a
presentation
for
our
fy23
benefits.
That's
coming
up.
Go
ahead!
Todd!
Okay,
I'm
gonna
share
my.
K
K
Everyone
can
see
this,
yes,
okay,
I'm
going
to
leave
it.
Okay
and
I'll,
leave
it
on
this
mode.
So
I
can
still
see
people
we're
going
to
talk
about
three
things
here
today.
First,
we'll
go
over
some
reporting,
it's
actually
through
january
of
22..
It's
been
updated,
we'll
talk
about
the
renewal
projection
for
both
health,
dental
and
all
the
other
benefits,
and
then
there's
some
benchmarking
information
that
we'll
cover
last.
K
Despite
a
recommended
increase
of
9
in
20
fiscal
year,
21
and
11
in
fiscal
year
22
the
rates
were
held
steady.
There
were
some
minimal
benefit
changes
made
in
fiscal
year.
21.
you
can
see.
There
was
some
minor
co-pay
increases
for
office
visits
and
some
limits
on
acupuncture
and
some
other
alternative
therapies,
but
otherwise
there
have
been
no
changes
made
either
to
rates
which
equals
employer,
employee
contributions
or
again,
just
some
minor
changes
in
benefits.
K
Two
years
ago,
next,
we'll
we'll
show,
year
to
date,
with
this
series
of
the
last
two
and
a
half
fiscal
years,
column
c
fiscal
year
20
there
was,
if
you
look
at
row,
15
there's
about
a
400
000
deficit
fiscal
year
21
last
year
there
was
about
a
600
000
deficit.
So
far,
in
the
first
seven
months
of
fiscal
year,
22
there's
about
a
200
000
deficit
deficit,
comparing
what
is
funded
by
both
the
city
and
the
city's
employees
through
their
paycheck
contributions
to
the
expenses
which
are
claims
and
fixed
costs.
K
Those
fixed
costs
are
the
administration
fees
paid
to
cigna,
as
well
as
stop-loss
premiums,
take
the
200,
000
shortfall
so
far
with
a
grain
of
salt.
As
we'll
see
on
this
page,
there
are
two
months
which
are
highlighted
in
yellow,
for
which
the
city
receives
three
paycheck
contributions
from
its
employees.
K
Both
of
those
have
already
occurred
in
this
fiscal
year.
So
you
can
see
that
funding
is
about
2.1
million
in
the
two
paycheck
months.
It's
about
1.4
million,
that's
in
column
d.
If
you
move
out
to
column
h,
you
can
see
that
typically,
what
happens
is
in
those
three
paycheck
months.
The
city
runs
a
surplus
of
half
a
million
dollars
and
then
there
are
losses
for
the
other
five
months,
so
we
expect
losses
from
basically
january
through
june,
of
the
basically
the
remainder
of
the
fiscal
year.
K
As
is
always
the
case,
the
the
the
losses
are
driven
by
your
high
cost.
Claimants
just
wanted
to
show
that
so
far
in
this
fiscal
year.
So
this
is
the
first
six
months
of
the
year,
there's
a
three
claimants
over
two
hundred
thousand
dollars,
one
of
which
the
city
has
stop
loss
at
250
000..
K
So
any
single
claimant
who
exceeds
250
000
on
the
fiscal
year
cigna
pays
the
amount
above
250
000.
The
city
pays
the
first
quarter
of
a
million
dollars,
so
you
can
see
there
have
already
been
two
claimants
who
have
exceeded
that
threshold,
so
the
city
has
recouped
128
000
from
cigna
just
for
comparative
purposes
on
slide.
K
8
will
show
in
the
past
two
fiscal
years
again
there
have
been
14
and
15
claimants,
totaling
three
and
four
million
dollars,
and
you
can
see
on
the
far
right,
the
stop-loss
recoveries
of
440
000
last
fiscal
year
and
1.1
million
in
the
prior.
K
So
where
does
that
leave
the
city
for
the
projected
fiscal
year?
23
cost
we're
tentatively
recommending
an
18.5
increase
to
medical
and
rx
funding.
This
is
based
on
claims
paid
through
december,
as
mentioned
earlier,
due
the
hardship
that
covet
caused
not
only
in
not
not
only
a
healthcare
influence
but
a
general
quality
of
life
influence.
K
K
That
18.5
increase
will
increase
total
funding.
That's
both
city
and
employees
share
from
about
18
million
to
a
little
over
21.,
the
city
funds
76
and
a
half
percent
of
that
total
funding.
So
that's
an
increase
of
a
little
over
two
and
a
half
million
the
employees
fund,
the
remainder
their
paycheck
contributions
would
increase
by
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars.
K
L
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee.
We
have
met
with
the
group
insurance
benefits
advisory
committee
to
review
this
information,
and
union
leadership
will
be
discussing
this
information
with
their
membership
and
provide
the
city
with
information
and
feedback
after
their
discussions
for
consideration,
and
so
our
next
scheduled
meeting
with
them
is
this
week
on
march,
2nd
to
go
over
this
discussions
that
they
had
with
their
membership,
and
so
these
are
the
first
planning
steps
of
the
renewal
process
that
will
happen
through
the
fy
23
budget.
K
Okay,
next
on
slide
11
what
we
want
to
show
we'll
focus
kind
of
on
the
bottom
right
hand
corner
of
this.
What
you'll
see
throughout
this
are
the
employee
bi-weekly
contributions
up
at
the
top
current
fiscal
year,
2022
range
from
87
for
employee
only
to
two
hundred
and
eight
dollars
for
a
family
a
little
bit
more
for
fire,
as
they
have
a
more
generous
benefit
plan
than
other
employees
down
in
the
right
hand,
corner
in
the
far
right.
K
K
K
K
K
The
next
step
we
wanted
to
show
at
that
18.5
increase
how
the
city
of
santa
fe's
contributions
compare
to
the
state
of
new
mexico,
sigma
ppo
plan.
You
see
in
column
a
the
bi-weekly
contributions
range
from
103
per
paycheck
up
to
for
I'm
sorry
for
employee,
only
up
to
a
little
less
than
250
for
family
and
if
you
go
out
to
the
far
right,
you'll
see
that's
still
about
10
lower
for
employee
only
and
about
15
to
20
percent
lower
for
a
family
than
the
state
of
new
mexico
plan.
K
The
fire
contributions
are
kind
of
in
line
with
state
of
new
mexico
for
employee
only
and
roughly
in
line
with
the
state
for
the
other
three
tiers
or
a
little
bit
better.
K
So
this
deductible
and
coinsurance
would
apply
to
inpatient,
outpatient
hospital
services
and
lab
and
x-ray.
We
would
increase
the
out-of-network
deductibles,
but
again,
less
than
two
percent
of
services
are
provided
out
of
network
no
change
to
other
benefits.
Implementing
these
benefit
changes
would
reduce
that
recommended
increase
from
18
and
a
half
percent
down
to
15
percent.
K
There
would
be
there
there
would
be
a
increase
in
benefits
for
behavioral
health
services.
Some
of
you
may
be
familiar
with
the
state
state
senate
bill
317,
which
eliminates
cost
sharing
cost
sharing,
be
being
any
members
out
of
pocket
costs
for
behavioral
health
services.
Both
medical
and
pharmaceutical
behavioral
health
services
would
be
covered
at
a
hundred
percent
if
the
city
were
to
implement
this
for
july,
1
of
2023
there's
no,
no
direct
cost
to
the
city
to
increase
the
benefit
for
those
services.
K
K
We
made
adjustments
for
kovid's
impact
that
coveted
impacts
both
past
present
and
future
historical
adjustments
were
made
for
benefit
changes,
referencing
back
a
few
slides,
again
trend
factors
are
about
six
percent
annually,
and
then
we
trend
all
that
forward
and
that's
how
we
arrive
at
the
percent
increase
more
details
on
this
page,
but
I'm
not
going
to
bore
you
with
the
numbers,
but
that
is
the
end
of
the
presentation
and
I'll
open
it
to
questions.
Should
I
stop
sharing.
A
Yeah,
if
you
would,
we
can
always
go
back
if
we
need
to
if
a
counselor
wants
to
look
at
a
particular
slide.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
questions
and
I
I'm
sorry
I
I
I
didn't
announce
at
the
the
front
end
that
director
salazar
with
human
resources
with
was
with
us
tonight.
Thank
you
for
being
here
and
sorry
for
that
oversight.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
yeah,
this
this
information
takes
a
while
to
absorb
this,
even
though
you
present
it
in
a
similar
fashion
every
year,
but
essentially.
E
With
this
increase,
you
give
us
scenarios
about
how
it
will
change
the
bi-weekly
payments,
I'm
trying
to
find
that
slide.
Let's
see.
E
Are
you
saying,
in
order
to
to
meet
that
percentage,
there's
a
there's
a
breakdown
on
page,
I
think
14
of
the
presentation
about
the
renewal
summary.
I
I
didn't
quite
understand
that
piece
that
you
were
explaining
to
us
about
how
the
benefit
changes
would
result
in
a
15
recommended
increase,
and
then
you
talked
about
deductibles
being
implemented.
Is
that
is
that
what
you're
essentially
saying
that,
with
this
18.5
increase,
that
deductibles
on
certain
certain
services
would
be
included.
A
No,
it's
a
woman.
I
believe
director
salazar
has
her
hand
up
perhaps
like
we
should
go
there.
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair
counselor,
beer,
rael
and
todd
you
can
jump
in
if
you
would
like,
but
the
recommendation
for
an
18.5
increase
would
be
with
the
no
plan
design
changes,
and
so
there
is
a
slide
in
the
presentation
for
a
15
increase
and
to
get
to
a
15.
There
would
have
to
be
some
fun
design
changes,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
this
is.
L
The
purpose
of
this
presentation
is
just
to
give
an
update
on
where
our
plan
is
and
because
we're
getting
close
to
the
budget
season.
We
thought
we
would
include
the
renewal
number
since
we
have
already
started
working
with
the
benefits
advisory
committee
meeting.
That
way
everyone
is
on
the
same
page,
and
everyone
knows
what
we're
looking
at
heading
into
the
budget
season.
L
So
what
we're
hoping
to
do
is
have
these
discussions
with
the
advisory
committee
to
be
able
to
bring
different
options
before
the
governing
body
for
a
vote
before
or
during
the
budget
budget
time.
So
this
is
just
and
any
feedback
or
input
that
you'd
like
for
us
to
go
back
and
look
at
before.
We
present
information
to
the
full
governing
body
during
the
budget
process
would
be
very
helpful.
L
But
again
these
discussions
are
ongoing
with
the
benefits
advisory
committee,
but
we
just
wanted
to
give
the
information
as
we
become
aware
of
it
to
all
all
involved,
because
I
know
it's
a
very
our
benefits
are
very
important
to
all
employees
and
we
don't
take
that
lightly.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
getting
as
much
feedback
and
input
as
we
possibly
can.
E
E
I've
just
noticed
in
some
of
the
other
kind
of
more
proactive
what
I
call
proactive
health
measures.
You
know
acupuncture
the
medical,
massage,
etc,
and
that
was
adjusted
last
year
significantly,
but
this
year
I'm
hearing
that
there's
this
other
third
party,
that's
that's
going
to
be
thrown
into
the
mix
with
cigna.
I
don't
know
if
we
have
control
over
that,
but
they'll
be
doing
this
other
kind
of
formula
of
pay.
Do
you
know
anything
about
that.
L
Via
rail,
I
think
I
think
you
might
be
talking
about
a
third
party
vendor
for
acupuncture
and
massage
therapy.
I
can't
remember
the
name,
but
we
can
get
some
more
details
on
that.
I
think
we've
had
a
little
bit
of
discussion
as
it
was
approaching,
probably
last
fiscal
year,
but
we
can
get
some
more
information
on
that.
E
Yeah
I'd
like
to
know
more
I'd
like
to
know
more
about
that,
because
that
increases
some
fees
for
them
and
there's
some
practitioners
that
are
deciding
that.
Maybe
they
don't
want
to
work
with
the
city
under
the
cigna
plan,
which
I
think
would
be
unfortunate.
So
I'd
like
to
understand
better
with
that
what
that
structure
means
and
then
the
other
question
I
had
is:
what
is
our
contract
with
cigna
again
like?
How
long
do
we
have
that
we've
committed
to
working
with
them
or
to
being
part
of
their
plan.
L
Madam
chair
counselor,
via
real
our
contract
with
cigna,
expires
in
june
of
2023.
So
as
soon
as
this
process
and
open
enrollment
is
over,
we
will
begin
the
rfp
process
and
this
will
be
a
big
year
because
all
of
our
services
are
bundled
into
this
contract.
Essentially,
so
we
will
be
going
out
for
rfp,
because
that
contract
expires
in
a
little
over
a
year.
From
now,.
E
Okay,
I
think
that
would
be
good
for
us
to
start
looking
at
other
providers
and
see
what
else
is
out
there,
because
I,
I
think
we
have
decent
plans,
a
decent
plan
and
there's
pros
and
cons
to
it.
It's
just
there's
other
things.
I've
heard
about
other
plans
that
seem
to
work
better
for
other
government
entities,
but
I'd
like
to
know
more
about
that
later
remind
me
that
the
way
what's
structured,
we
we
run
our
healthcare
program,
essentially
remind
me
the
term.
I
always
forget
what
it's
called:
that's
self-funded
self-funded.
E
L
E
I
think
I
mean
I
don't
know
the
pros
and
cons
of
it
and
I've
been
under
a
plan.
That's
not
self-funded
in
a
government
structure.
So
I
guess
I'm
just
curious
if
we
could,
when
the
time
comes,
to
actually
compare
so
that
we
can
see
what
that
looks
like
what
that
means
for
us,
not
what
we
put
into
it
to
run
it.
But
you
know
we
use
a
on
and
that's
another
additional
expense,
and
I
don't
know
if
everyone
else
that
has
a
self
funded
plan
does
that.
E
L
Yes,
so
every
self-funded
fund
that
I'm
aware
of
local
government
has
a
a
consultant
that
helps
them
with
this
type
of
information,
but
we
can
do
a
pros
and
cons,
and
that
would
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
idea.
We
can
definitely
do
that.
E
Just
so,
we
know
we're
we're
heading
down
the
path
that
we
want
to
and
just
it
confirms
whether
the
the
way
we're
doing
it
makes
sense
or,
if
we've
thought
of
other
ways.
So
I
guess
I
just
would
think
the
comparison
would
be
helpful
and
I
may
have
more
questions
and
details
about
this,
but
some
of
this
I
just
need
to
digest
a
little
bit
longer,
so
I'll
yield
the
floor.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
counselor
counselor,
rivera.
M
Thank
you,
madam
chair
director,
salazar,
who
makes
up
the
benefit
advisory
committee.
L
Madam
chair
counselor
rivera
it's
essentially
the
union
leaders
leadership,
primarily
the
president's
someone
from
hr,
someone
from
finance
and
anybody
else
that
the
city
manager
deems
appropriate.
We
have
been
pretty
flexible
with
the
unions
to
allow
them
a
couple
people.
So
that
way,
it
is
a
lot
of
information
to
absorb
and
understand
so
they
bring
either
one
or
two
additional
members
to
the
meeting.
L
Madam
chair
counselor
rivera-
we
did
have
a
meeting
last
week
to
discuss
this
and
then
prior
to
that,
I
can
get
the
date
for
you.
L
I
know
we
were
meeting
monthly
after
the
budget
cycle
last
year
for
fy
22,
and
I
I
will
say
that
during
the
fall
it
got
a
little
bit
challenging
to
me
every
month
and
I
know
on
their
side
it's
hard
for
them
to
attend
every
meeting,
but
I
can
get
you
the
date
of
the
last
time
we
met
prior
to
this,
but
we
did
have
several
meetings
at
the
beginning
of
the
fiscal
year
and
then
provided
like
the
quarterly
cap
reports
and
then
the
presentations
that
todd
provides
that
aeon
provides
periodically
as
well.
L
Madam
chair
counselor
rivera,
yes
absolutely
so
this
is
essentially
the
same
information
that
was
presented
to
them
the
last
meeting,
but
every
time
we
look
at
any
potential
changes,
we're
always
making
sure
that
it's
in
compliance
with
the
cbas
and
how
they
read
right
now.
M
Yeah
and
then
I
heard
some
discussion
about
maybe
switching
from
cigna,
but
in
reality
this
is.
This
is
the
city's
plan
right?
This
is
our
plan
and
cigna
is
simply
the
administrator
of
that
plan.
Is
that
correct.
L
L
Then
we
find
who
the
carrier
will
be.
So
we
decide
what
we
want
to
offer
as
a
fund,
and
so
it's
not
cigna,
who
offers
that
particular
fund.
I'm
sure
that
different
providers
or
carriers
offer
different
benefits,
but
essentially
we
decide
what
we
want
our
plan
to
look
like,
and
then
we
go
out
for
our
key
to
find
who
the
city
would
like
to
use
as
a
provider
or
a
carrier.
M
K
Madam
care,
counselor
rivera,
this
city
is
free
to
select
the
benefit
plan
of
their
choosing
being
self-funded
with
cigna
you're
you're,
basically
paying
them
to
administer.
Your
claims
handle
customer
service,
your
quote-unquote
renting
their
network,
and
they
also
handle
stop-loss
reimbursements
for
the
city
as
well.
M
All
right-
and
then
I
don't
know
if
this
is
for
you-
miss
salazar
for
todd,
but
you
know
I
know
last
fiscal
year,
you
know
we
we
basically
used
reserves
to
to
kick
the
can
down
the
road
for
lack
of
a
better
term.
M
Is
there
a
way
have
we
looked
at
doing
some
kind
of
phased
in
approach,
maybe
over
the
next
three
years?
So
it's
not
such
a
hit
on
both
the
city
and
the
employees.
L
Madam
chair
counselor
rivera
we
we
have
talked
about
that
in
the
past.
I
think,
because
it's
been
a
few
years
since
we've
had
any
adjustments,
it's
a
little
bit
difficult
because
we're
essentially
trying
to
play
catch-up.
But
certainly
we
can
look
at
that
approach
and
maybe
that's
something.
That's
a
little
bit
easier
to
to
absorb
as
we
go
through
the
discussions
and
the
only
I
would
say
and
todd
again.
L
You
could
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
if
we
have
so
if
we
came
up
with
the
plan-
and
we
said
for
the
next
three
years-
we're
gonna
have
automatic
increases
of
this,
but
then,
if
we
had
a
really
really
bad
year
again
and
the
increases
should
be
more
than
whatever
it
is
that
we
agreed
to,
we
might
have
to
build
in
some
flexibility
with
that.
Just
because
you
know
historically,
for
the
last
few
years,
we've
seen
an
uptick
in
in
claims
and
and
costs.
L
So
I
would
say
that's
a
really
good
way
to
look
at
it.
If
we
can
just
add
some
flexible
language
in
the
event
that
we
really
had
a
bad
year,
it
might
be
a
little
bit
more
than
that,
but
I
I
like
that
idea,
and
I
think
maybe
we
can,
as
we
continue
with
these
discussions,
look
at
something
like
that
as
well.
If
you
would
like
us
to
do
that.
M
M
Thank
you,
and
please
include
us
if
you
can
include
me
at
least
in
in
when
those
meetings
are
at,
and
I
don't
know
if
we're
allowed
to
attend,
but
just
so
we
know
that
the
meetings
are
happening.
That
would
be
great.
F
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair.
I
I
don't
have
too
much
else
to
add,
as
my
colleagues
covered
a
lot
of
ground
there.
Thank
you
both,
but
director
salazar.
We
had
had
some
discussions
last
fiscal
year
about
the
timing
of
our
open
enrollment
and
that
we
have
open
enrollment
in
june,
as
opposed
to
december
november
december,
which
the
end
of
the
year,
the
calendar
year
more
aligns
with,
I
think,
most
businesses,
as
well
as
the
state
exchange,
and
so
I
was
curious
about.
F
We
had
discussed
looking
at
changing
our
open
enrollment
period
to
align
more
with
the
calendar
year
as
opposed
to
the
fiscal
year,
and
I
was
curious
what
you
have
found
about
potentially
realigning.
L
Madam
chair
councillor,
kassad,
thank
you
for
that
question.
We
have
looked
at
it.
I
think
different
governmental
agencies
use
calendar
year
some
fiscal
year.
I
do
think
from
a
fiscal
perspective,
it's
easier
fiscal
year
for
from
an
hr
perspective
and
aca
federal
reporting.
It
is
easier
for
a
calendar
year
and
again,
as
you
mentioned,
because
of
the
open
enrollment
and
to
me
to
get
the
budget
in
and
allow
employees
enough
time,
it
would
be
easier
to
do
it
on
a
calendar
year.
L
With
that
said,
I
like
it,
it
is
split.
Some
people
do
it
fiscally
and
some
do
it
on
a
calendar
year
basis.
We
can
look
at
that
as
we
approach
the
rfp
process,
as
the
cigna
contract
will
be
expiring.
Since
I
think
this
is
a
good
time
to
look
at
it
to
see
if
we
would
migrate
to
a
calendar
year,
but
more
of
that
more
of
that
information
will
come
as
we
approach
the
contract
renewal
for
our
benefits
plan.
F
Wonderful
thank
you
and
I
would
be
curious
if
the
benefits
advisory
committee
does
have
any
input
of
of
what
employees
would
prefer
in
terms
of
as
as
they're
making
their
decisions
about
what
other
plans
might
be
available
to
them.
I
will
just
speak
briefly
to
councilwoman
vitorial's
question
about
the
third
party.
F
F
Actually,
a
vast
majority
of
insurances
in
the
area,
utilize
them
to
be
able
to
to
to
do
the
pay
payouts
for
chiropractic,
massage
and
acupuncture,
so
getting
away
from
from
them
might
be
harder,
and
yes,
they
do
have
a
vastly
different
pay
structure
that
typically
pays
providers
less
from
what
I
have
seen
and
from
what
I
have
heard
and
speaking
with
providers
and
from
helping
submission
insurance
claims.
So
it
will,
I
think,
as
we're
going
out
to
bid
again.
F
This
will
be
an
interesting
conversation
to
have
and
and
something
that
we'll
need
to
look
out
for
and
really
be
aware
of.
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
that
we
can
necessarily
do
within
our
ability
as
a
self-administered
plan,
but
I'm
also
concerned
about
it
and
know
that
there
have
been
some
providers
that
have
dropped
off
our
network
because
of
this
change
of
of
moving
over
to
using
ash
as
a
as
the
reimbursement
for
alternative
medicine,
so
also
very
concerned
about
that
and
look
forward
to
future
conversations
about
that.
A
Thank
you.
I
just
have
a
couple
questions
mostly
just
to
push
this
information
out.
Where
are
we
so
during
covid
we
saw
everybody
stay
home,
not
take
care
of
a
variety
of
health
needs.
We
we've
seen
an
uptick,
have
we
leveled
off
there
and
or
do
we
anticipate
more
doctors,
visits
more
more
claims
being
made
now.
K
Madam
chair
counselors,
we
have
not
seen
an
uptick
claims
in
calendar
year.
2021
were
within
a
couple
of
percent
of
pre-pandemic
levels.
There
still
is
concern,
of
course,
that
there
will
be
increased
severity
of
conditions
and
and
up
to
uptake
in
some
of
the
voluntary
surgeries.
Let's
say
the
you
know
the
knee
hip,
replacements,
etc,
but
we
have
not
seen
that
yet
we
actually
have
an
update
from
aon's
actuaries
later
this
week,
so
I
can
provide
more
updated
information
at
the
next
time
we
meet.
A
Great
and
that's
a
good
segue
to
for
just
I
have
spoken
with
director
salazar
about
doing
these
presentations
a
little
bit
more
frequently,
instead
of
just
once
a
year
just
so
we
can
not
have
so
much
information
presented
all
at
once
and
that
we
kind
of
remember
from
the
last
time.
A
Okay,
this
is
you
know
we
talked
about
this
and
then
you
can
kind
of
add
information
on
top
of
it,
and
I
I
think
it
will
help
us
be
very,
very
much
more
fluent
than
these
these
once
a
year
presentations,
so
we
will
have.
We
will
try
our
best
to
do
a
little
bit
more,
and
I
think
that
will
be
helpful.
A
So
just
to
sum
up,
we
are
so
in
the
last
two
years
and
and
then
including
this
year.
A
K
So,
madam
chair
counselors,
the
the
recommended
increase
two
years
ago,
was
nine
percent.
Last
year's
twelve
percent.
Again
medical
trends
are
in
the
five
to
six
percent
range,
so
barring
benefit
changes
or
any
other
downward
pressure
on
costs,
for
example,
covid
and
q2
q2
calendar
of
2020,
the
basically
the
average
increase
both
locally
and
nationally
is
in
the
five
to
six
percent
range.
A
A
One
is
to
raise
by
15
and
make
some
benefit
changes,
and
then
we
also
may
hear
some
other
ideas
from
the
benefits
advisory
committee,
which
is
meeting
this
week
with
management
to
discuss
their
ideas,
and
you
know
I
I
don't,
I
think,
to
counselor
rivera's
point.
We
may
be
able
to
think
about
how
we
use
our
reserves
to
to
soften
some
of
this.
But
again
the
volatility
makes
that
something
that
that
we'll
really
have
to
to
work
with
to
address.
A
L
Madam
chair,
yes
and
I
apologize
for
my
darkness
of
the
screen-
I
don't
know,
what's
going
on
with
my
lights-
I'm
either
purple
or
another
color,
so
I
apologize
but
yes,
so
our
goal
is
to
was
to
first
present,
all
the
information
to
the
benefits
advisory
committee,
the
same
information
that
you
have
before
you
tonight.
L
So
that
way
they
have
some
time
to
absorb
it,
talk
with
their
membership
and
then
then
come
back
as
a
group
and
talk
about
some
of
the
ideas
that
we
may
have,
as
I
mentioned
to
them
during
our
meeting.
This
is
our
plan.
It
affects
all
city
employees
the
same,
and
so
we
want
to
hear
from
them
and
what
their
members
have
to
say
on
how
we
can
kind
of
close
this
gap.
L
So
I
really
like
the
idea
that
council
rivera
put
forth-
and
this
is
something
that
we
can
definitely
talk
about
this
week
and
then
we
would
come
back
to
you
with
some
other
ideas
and
different
options
before
you
all
have
to
make
a
decision
on
the
funding
level
for
the
budget
process.
So
that
way,
you
know
that
it's
been
discussed
with
the
committee
they've
had
the
opportunity
to
talk
to
their
membership
and
we're
making
the
best
choice
possible
for
this.
For
this
year,.
A
Okay,
great,
I
don't
have
anything
further.
I
don't
see
any
other
hands
up
unless
there's
something
director
salazar,
you
wanted
to
add.
I
think
we
can
move
on
from
this
item.
I
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
for
being
here
tonight
all
right.
A
Going
back
to
my
agenda.
We
are
on
to
our
consent
items
and
I
have
now
put
them
in
alphabetical
order,
so
we'll
take
them
in
that
order
and
council
counselor
cassette.
You
wanted
to
pull
item
a
which
maybe
I
should
tell
people
what
that
is.
The
city
of
santa
fe,
the
employee
nope
wrong
wrong,
hold
on
request
for
approval
of
a
budget
adjustment
resolution
in
the
total
amount
of
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
from
a
legislative
appropriation
to
fy
22
budget
for
diaper,
changing
stations.
F
Thank
you
so
much
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
james
and
sam
for
being
here.
I
was
really
excited
when
we
we
got
this
funded
in
last
year's
session,
so
I'm
really
happy
to
see
the
dollars
come
through.
I
was
just
curious:
how
many
stations
are
we
going
to
be
able
to
get
an
install
with
one
hundred
thousand
dollars.
N
Madam
chair
counselor
cassette,
we
are
getting
48,
diaper
changing
stations
and
it
will
be
in
21,
different
city
facilities.
F
Wonderful,
I
will
not
ask
you
to
read
them
off
right
now,
but
I
would
have
appreciated
the
list
when
you
get
an
opportunity
and
just
to
confirm
we
are
going
to
be
this.
This
is
a
gender
equity
piece
as
well,
so
these
will
not
just
be
installed
in
women's
restrooms,
but
it
will
also
be
installed
in
men's
restrooms,
gender,
neutral
restrooms
and
family
rooms.
Correct.
N
Madam
chair
counselor
cassette,
yes
ma'am.
I
have
a
little
list.
It's
going
to
be
mainly
public
facilities
that
are
used
by
the
public
in
the
city,
recreation,
centers,
monica
eyeball
center
library.
I
at
it's,
the
fire
station,
the
main
building
where
the
public
goes
into
fire
station,
one
as
well,
and
various
recreation
parks
around
the
city
as
well.
F
Wonderful
and
if
you
could
email
me
that
list
that
would
be,
that
would
be
great.
I
I
really
appreciate
that,
and
it
looks
like
councilman
vitoria
also
requested
that-
and
probably
everybody
on
the
committee.
So
thank
you
again.
Thank
you
for
this
work.
I
am
excited
that
we're
finally
moving
forward
with
this.
As
you
all
know,
I
I
have
a
three-year-old,
so
diaper
changing
stations
were
a
big
part
of
my
life
for
a
number
of
years.
Hopefully
we're
moving
out
of
that.
A
M
N
A
Great,
so
we
had
a
motion,
I'm
not
sure
do
we
have
a
second
okay,
councilwoman
villarreal,
all
right.
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
to
approve
this
item.
Can
we
take
a
roll
call,
please
sure
counselor
viral?
Yes,.
A
Yes-
and
I
I
do
think
we
should
put
in
the
packet
the
list
where
these
are
going
as
this
moves
forward
to
the
governing
body.
I
think
the
public
probably
would
like
to
know
so.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
being
here
tonight
all
right.
Moving
on,
we
are
going
to
item
m
councilwoman
v.
Ariel
no
council,
councilor
lindell
pulled
this
item
request
for
approval
of
amendment
number
one
to
contract.
A
D
Just
one
really
quick
question
on
this:
we're
going
from
30
000
to
80
000
and
we
only
have
300
000
allocated,
but
in
the
memo
it
says.
D
It
seems
like
300
000
is
pretty
limited
amount.
We
we
aren't
going
to
get
five
to
10
if
we're
giving
each
one
80.
we're
really
only
at
three
and
a
bit
of
a
fraction
we
is.
Is
that
the
best
use
to
take
ourselves
just
to
three
instead
of
if
we
were
at
30
we'd
have
10,
and
I
realized
that
you
know
the
housing
costs
have
gone
up
so
much,
but
we
can't
find
10
people
10
households
that
the
30
000
would
be
the
difference
for
them
to
get
into
a
home.
O
Madam
chair
counselor
lindell,
thank
you
for
asking
that
question
because
I
think
it's
a
really
important
one
right
now.
The
mark.
The
real
estate
market
is
like
nothing.
Any
of
us
working
in
this
field
have
ever
seen
in
terms
of
how
much
prices
have
gone
up,
but
also
just
the
lack
of
choices
like
there's,
just
not
that
much
for
sale,
we're
sort
of
we're
ramping
up
for
some
new
home
construction,
so
that
will
help
within
the
next
year
or
so.
When
tr
contenta
phase
three
comes
online.
O
We
that
will
also
help
start
a
pipeline
for
folks
who
can
buy
much
much
more
affordable
homes,
but
right
now
those
buyers
and
for
the
cdbg
program.
These
buyers
cannot
earn
more
than
80
of
the
area
median
income.
Many
of
them
earn
substantially
less
than
that.
So
we've
got
buyers
in
the
pipeline,
who
are
mortgage,
ready,
they've
completed
all
their
home.
Buyer
training
and
counseling
they've
been
working
for
many
of
them
for
years
to
pay
off
their
debt
to
save
money,
and
they
just
they
simply
cannot
buy
a
home
even
with
30
000.
O
So
when
homewise
tells
us
hey,
if
we
could
give
some
of
these
families
some
of
them
not
all
of
them,
but
some
of
them,
if
we
could
give
them
additional
resources,
we
can
close
some
of
these
home
purchases.
We
can
actually
get
some
of
these
families
into
homes,
so
I
do
want
to
emphasize
that
this
is
need-based.
This
is
not
just
everybody
walking
through
the
door
gets
eighty
thousand
dollars.
Many
of
these
families
will
get
much
less.
O
Some
of
them
will
probably
get
less
than
30
000,
but
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
those
home
buyers
who
are
in
the
pipeline
and
ready
to
go
that
that
30
000
limit
isn't
what
keeps
them
from
buying
a
home.
That
is
that's
the
intention
here.
I
also
want
to
add
that
homewise
in
particular,
has
a
balance
of
program
income
for
this
community
development
block
grant
program,
and
what
this
means
is
that
they've
had
cdbg
loans
pay
off
recently.
O
Hud
rules
require
that
they
use
that
income
first
before
they
can
even
touch
the
three
hundred
thousand.
So
here
they
are
all
these
people
they
could
help
and
that
thirty
30
000
limit
is
actually
keeping
not
only
the
families
from
purchasing
home,
but
from
keeping
them
from
drawing
down
on
their
entitlement
grant
amount
because
they
have
to
spend
the
program
income
first.
D
I
appreciate
it
I'll
move
for
approval.
A
C
A
Thank
you.
We
are
on
to
item
n
councillor
lindell.
You
also
pulled
this
item
request
for
approval
of
a
budget
amendment
resolution
to
transfer
a
million
dollars
from
the
capital
impact
fee
fees,
roads
fund
to
parks,
wip
construction
for
the
design
and
construction
of
a
connector
road
through
swan
park
and
melissa
mcdonald.
Our
parks
and
open
space
division
director
is
here
there.
She
is,
and
also
regina
wheeler
with
public
works
director
here
as
well.
D
Thank
you
chair,
I
actually
didn't
intend
to
pull.
This
m
was
what
I
intended
to
pull.
I
was
concerned
with
this
that
I
did
have
a
conversation
earlier
today
with
director
wheeler
about
the
capital
improve
these
funds.
We
have
two
different
sources:
road
impact
fees
and
park
impact
fees,
and
I
really
was
not
clear
about
the
use
of
road
impact
fees
for
streets,
which
I
don't
consider
this
a
street
that
they
are
to
be
used
for
arterial
or
collector
streets.
D
I
didn't
really
consider
this
a
street.
I
had
a
discussion
about
it.
I
wasn't
going
to
pull
it,
but
that
was
the
discussion
that
we
had.
Maybe
someone
else
has
something
to
say
about
this
I'll
yield
the
floor.
A
All
right
other
questions
from
the
committee
do
either
of
our
directors
want
to
speak
to
this
just
general
general
information,
since
we
kept
you
madame
chair,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sorry,
councilwoman
councilwoman.
E
Vrael,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
think
the.
What
would
be
helpful
for
all
of
us
is
to
understand
what
is
allowable
for
what
can
be
used
for
the
for
roads
for
the
impact,
the
road
impact
these,
what
it
can
go
towards
because
we'd
always
been
told,
collector
and
arterial,
and
so
if
we
can
get
information,
I
think
the
ciac
got
a
presentation
and
more
information.
E
So
if
that
I
mean
I
went
back
to
try
to
read
that
stuff,
there
was
so
much
there
that
I
I
didn't
have
time.
So
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
give
us
a
clear
indication
that
that's
not
going
to
be
an
issue
for
this
and
and
that
it's
going
towards
more
of
the
of
the
park
infrastructure,
which
also
includes
access.
E
So
if
we
could
just
understand
that
and
I
think
melissa
or
director
mcdonald,
we
talked
briefly
about
it.
So
I
guess
that
I
understand
the
reason
why
you're
doing
that,
so
we
can
have
other
funds
to
go
towards
park
needs.
I
just
don't
want
to
deplete
what
we
the
little.
E
We
have
from
impact
fees
for
roads
and
then
trying
to
understand
how
you
all
decide
to
prioritize,
because
I
know
some
of
it
comes
from
rcip
request
to
get
on
that
list
of
roads
and
and
then
there's
like
bigger
picture
items
that
we
want
to
think
about
holistically
like
what
do.
What
are
we
going
to
need
in
the
future
proactively
for
road
construction,
whether
it's
affordable
housing,
development
or
other
things
that
we
need
to
think
about
in
the
future?
E
I
know
their
state
statute
and
then
we
also
have
city
impact
fee
requirements
and
are
those
two
aligning,
and
so
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
to
get
that
information.
I
think
it
was
in
the
ciac
packet,
but
we
didn't
get
it
here.
This
is
just
real,
it's
just
a
bar,
so
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
get
additional
information
about
the
process
of
prioritization
for
impact
fees
in
general
and
how
we
allocate
them.
G
Madam
chair
councillor
via
reality,
happy
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
that.
We
did.
That
was
part
of
our
presentation
to
the
ciac
as
well.
Besides,
the
presentation
from
assistant
city
attorney
patricia
begali,
who
clarified
that?
Yes,
the
city
and
the
state
code
are
in
alignment,
but
the
state
code
is
big
and
hard
to
understand
and
does
kind
of.
If
you
just
look
at
that,
one
little
sentence
that
they
have,
it
does
sound
like
only
collector
and
arterials
are
eligible,
but
actually
in
the
definition
of
capital
improvements.
G
It
includes
a
broader
definition,
as
does
our
city
code,
and
it's
actually
an
important
distinction
that
the
mpo
pointed
out
that,
if
you
want
to
cause
sprawl
in
your
community,
you'll
only
invest
your
impact
fees
and
big
roads
and
you'll.
Really.
What
what
you
really
want
to
have
is
a
very
vibrant,
productive,
multi-modal
road
network
in
your
city
and
that's
what
this
road
adds.
G
It's
a
big
addition
of
pedestrian
and
bicycle
facilities
to
get
to
this
regional
park
with
the
growth
that's
coming
up
in
that
area,
which
is
tierra
content
to
phase
three
and
and
with
swan
park
being
in
the
top.
Five
priority
for
the
governing
body
that
went
to
the
on
the
icip
this
year,
and
actually
it
has
been
for
a
few
years,
so
we've
been
working
with
the
community
on
swan
park
base
2
for
a
number
of
years.
G
But
to
address
your
question
about
priorities,
it
actually
goes
along
with
what
we
just
said.
The
governing
body
has
a
number
of
opportunities
to
set
priorities
for
us
for
capital
projects
on
an
annual
basis
when
we
adopt
a
transportation
master
plan
or
when
we
adopt
the
icip
and
our
transportation
master
plans
have
some
really
important
projects
on
them
and
that
are
being
funded
by
impact
fees
right
now.
G
So
actually,
ultimately,
it's
those
sort
of
annual
either
funding
cycles
or
governing
body
priority
communications
that
actually
become
the
priorities
for
the
impact
fees,
because
road
projects
are
expensive
and
we
don't
generally
try
to
fund
a
whole
road
project
out
of
impact
fees.
It's
it's.
You
know
usually
a
couple
of
million
dollars,
in
fact,
just
a
good
example
of
that
is
montezuma
sandoval
intersection
it's
at
1.5
million.
Now
that's
just
headlights
and
pedestrian
at
one
intersection,
and
so
what
we
generally
do
is
we
take
the
priority
set
by
the
governing
body.
G
We
work
with
dot
to
give
us
a
majority
of
the
funding,
and
then
we
use
the
impact
fees
as
we
need
like
a
hundred
thousand
more
or
two
hundred
thousand
or
even
five
or
eight
hundred
thousand,
and
then
it's
available
there
right
now
just
to
share
with
you
some
of
the.
So
we
do
we
will.
We
do
have
a
balance
of
1.5
million,
even
with
all
of
these
projects
that
I'm
about
to
name
already
having
been
allocated
some
funds.
G
So
we
have
the
agua
fria
south
meadows
intersection.
Improvements
are
funded
with
some
impact
fees
right
now,
very
important
area
of
growth
and
development,
royal
de
la
chamiso's
crossing
has
quite
a
bit
of
funding
and
we'll
probably
be
seeking
more
as
we
move
into
the
next
phase
of
that
camino
entrada
roundabout,
where
the
south
side,
transit
center
will
be
and
there's
quite
a
bit
of
business
growth
there
richards
avenue,
beckner
road
signal
is,
has
been
allocated:
impact
fees,
aguafria,
south
meadows,
again,
henry
lynch
reconstruction.
G
That
road
is
seriously
underserved
in
that
community,
and
so
we
got
800
000
funding
for
that,
and
so
we
used
matching
funds
from
impact
fees
and
then,
of
course,
the
paseo
del
sol
extension
super
high
priority
for
our
recent
approval
of
tierra
content
to
phase
three,
we
were
able
to
get
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
from
d.o.t
for
that
project.
We've
actually
in
the
process
of
working
up
the
agreement
with
tier
tier
contented,
so
that
we
can
allocate
those
funds
to
them
for
the
design
of
the
co
del
sol.
G
So
it
is
we're
very
dynamic
in
our
on
capital.
We
have
big
gigantic
lists
and
then
we
narrow
them
down,
as
as
they
become
urgent,
but
and
just
to
say
one
more
thing.
The
road
impact
fees
have
1.5
million
dollar
balance.
Now
that
that
doesn't
count
the
impact
fees
collected
in
the
past
year,
so
we
haven't,
got
a
fully
audited
balance,
so
there's
quite
a
bit
of
funds
and
and
then
last
but
not
least,
council
b,
ariel
in
our
dynamic
response
to
our
needs
for
capital.
G
You
raised
the
issue
about
really
doing
a
study
for
agua
fria
with
the
development
that
we're
seeing
there,
and
I
I
conferred
with
eric
ani
as
he
said,
that
he
definitely
thinks
it's
time
for
mpo
to
take
a
sort
of
a
immediate,
medium
and
long-term
look
at
aguaphia
and
really
start
putting
that
on
our
radar
for
a
major
project
whatever
that
needs
and
in
whatever
time
frame.
So
I
think
the
impact
fees
are
really
working.
G
Well,
the
road
impact
fees
are
being
leveraged
well
and-
and
I
think
swan
park's
a
really
high
priority.
So
we're
glad
that
we
can
get
this
piece
done
with
impact
fees.
E
Thank
you
for
that
additional
information.
I
think
the
I
always
think
about
what
you
said
about
mpo,
that
just
supporting
larger
roads
contributes
to
small
sprawl.
I've
heard
the
opposite
to
saying
that
using
impact
fees
for
smaller
roads
can
become
more
political
because
they're
less
part
of
the
whole
network
and
then
there's
these
smaller
roads
in
certain
districts
to
start
getting
funded.
So
there's
two
probably
differences
of
opinion,
and
maybe
both
are
true.
So
I
think
just
to
note
that
when
are
we
going
to
see
the
road
impact
fee
request.
E
Can
you
be
more
specific,
well
right
now
we're
seeing
how
we're
utilizing
some
of
the
impact
fees
for
parks
first
or
in
this
case
for
swamp
park,
but
I'm
just
curious
the
ones
that
you
just
listed
off?
Are
we
going
to
see
that
coming
through
committee
soon.
G
You
already
have
they've
already
been
allocated
to
the
extent
that
any
of
them
are
over
a
sixty
thousand
dollar
bar.
They
have
come
through
the
governing
body,
but
let's
see
this
henry
lynch
yeah,
you.
E
Those,
but
I'm
wondering,
are
those
all
going
to
be
utilizing
impact
fees
to
to
fill
the
gap,
because
there's
other
funds
that
we
also
approved
correct,
correct,
who
knows?
Okay,
so
is
there
any
other
impact,
the
related
projects
that
would
be
seeing
as
it
relates
to
this
budget
adjustment
time
period
that
we're
doing.
G
Right
at
this
very
moment,
I
think
you've
seen
them.
I'm
not
you
know.
Romella
is
processing
a
couple
of
them
that
she
just
got
approved
and
I'm
not
sure
if
they've
already
been
by
this
or
not,
I
have
to
check
them,
but
that
list
is
complete,
so
you've
either
seen
them
or
you'll,
see
them
any
minute.
And
then,
as
you
know,
we
continue
to
do.
G
G
The
other
intersection
south
meadows
rupina
will
is
needing
funds,
but
dot
seems
to
be
ready
to
fund
that.
So
we
will
kind
of
work
in
between
dot
and
impact
visas,
necessary.
E
Okay,
maybe
I'll
just
talk
with
you
to
figure
out
what
we've
seen
and
what
we
haven't,
because
it
was
my
understanding
that
some
of
the
impact
fees
and
being
and
distributing
them,
they
hadn't
we
hadn't
even
had
a
full
balance
or
it
was
an
unaudited
balance
for
the
impact
refund.
E
So
I'm
not
quite
sure
quite
sure
how
we
make
allocations
from
that
when
we
don't
exactly
know
the
balance,
so
I'm
wondering
if
finance
could
give
us
some
insight
on
when
we'll
be
able
to
get
the
impact
fee
fund
balance
the
updated.
Madam.
C
Chair
counselor,
yes,
I'm
happy
to
answer
that.
With
the
completion
of
the
trial
balance,
we
will
have
the
unaudited
numbers
for
fy20.
The
audited
numbers
for
fy21
are
audited
and
complete,
but
it's
the
fy21
that
is
unaudited
and
that
we
will
have
completed
at
the
end
of
march
with
the
final
trial
balance.
G
Got
it
okay,
thank
you,
and
now
madam
chair
counselor
vitoria.
If
I
could
we're
we're
working,
as
I
said,
we're
not
I'm
trying
to
allocate
any
of
those
funds
from
the
last
year
that
haven't
been
sort
of
audited
and
added
to
the
fund
we're
using
a
just
working
away
at
an
older
balance
that
was
provided.
G
That's
fiscal
year:
that's
our
account
balance.
We
believe
after
allocations
as
of
january
31st
2022,
based
on
a
balance
about
a
year
ago,.
E
E
I
think
that's
all
I
have
for
now
I'll,
probably
follow
up
with
you
director,
wheeler,
just
to
understand
some
of
the
stuff
that
was
presented
to
ciac,
which
we
didn't
see,
obviously,
but
just
to
understand
what
was
presented
and
how
it
applies
to
impact
fees
and
what
not?
Not
this,
not
just
the
existing
balance,
but
the
one
the
funding
that
we'll
be
having
in
the
future
too
in
the
near
future
for
this
next
fiscal
year.
So
I
think
that's
it
I'll
yield
the
floor.
Thank
you.
B
Yes,
cancer
viral,
yes,
counselor
cassette,
yes,
counselor
lindell,
yes,
counselor
rivera,
yes
and
councillor
romero
worth.
B
A
Motion
passes
now
we
are
on
to
item
q,
councilman
villarreal.
You
also
pulled
this
item
request
for
approval
of
a
budget
adjustment
resolution
in
the
economic
development
department
in
the
amount
of
250
000
to
fund
a
feasibility
study
and
architectural
plans
for
el
lucero
crossing
led
a
manufacturing
expansion.
E
P
Sure,
good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
council
council
viral,
so
the
the
idea
for
the
crossing,
which
is
actually
at
the
intersection
of
599
and
south
meadows,
there's
a
there's,
a
attractive
line
of
40
acres
that
the
state
has
leased
to
the
city
of
santa
fe
for
50
years,
and
it's
be
used
specifically
for
economic
development
purposes.
Right
now,
the
firehouse
is
going
to
be
built
in
a
portion
of
it,
so
that
that
gives
you
some
reference.
P
The
idea
around
the
elbow
cereal
crossing
just
a
it's
a
project
name
right
now
it
could
be
the
real
name,
but
it's
our
project
name
is
that
I
think
mr
fletch
talked
about
the
growth
of
our
grt,
mainly
with
technology,
but
also
our
food.
Innovation
sector
is
starting
to
explode
and
we
have
a
a
food
business
here.
P
That's
about
to
have
its
second
large
expansion,
because
they're
now
selling
nationwide
and
they're
going
into
e-commerce
and
freeze-dyed
foods,
and
one
of
the
things
we
don't
want
to
do
is
that
we're
competing
with
boulder
colorado
for
them
to
set
up
their
massive
expansion
for
manufacturing.
We
like
to
keep
the
jobs
and
the
manufacturing
here
in
the
city.
So
when
we
looked
at
this
piece
of
land,
the
state
said
used
for
economic
development
purposes.
P
So
that's
the
reason,
the
genesis
of
of
the
idea
and
then,
as
we
started
talking,
we
looked
at
the
community
development
side
and
realize
that
there's
a
food
desert
on
that
side
of
town
and
so
we've
had
some
preliminary
conversations
with
the
food
depot
who's
looking
at
creating
a
non-profit
food
store,
and
so
it
might
also
be
located
in
that
area.
P
On
the
piece
of
land
and
with
available
space
left,
we
may
include
essential
worker
housing,
because
this
expansion
will
require
jobs
and
we're
hoping
that
this
company
will
hire
up
to
60
people
over
five
years.
From
that
standpoint.
So
so
there's
a
lot
of
economic
impact
that
we're
looking
at
and
so
we're
at
the
starting
gate,
with
a
feasibility
study
and
partially
an
architectural
plan
that
comes
forward.
P
The
state
yeah
mount
castlevale,
the
state
owns
the
land,
but
they've
leased
it
to
the
city
of
santa
fe
for
economic
development
purposes,
and
these
are
the
specific
purposes
to
use,
and
so
leda
stands
for
lita
or
the
local
economic
development
act.
So
these
are
lead-up
projects
where
we
promote
incentivize
local
companies
to
expand
in
the
city
of
santa
fe,
so
they're
tied
into
leta,
because
they're,
economic
based
and
so
part
of
their
their
product
or
service
nationwide
and
all
the
the
gross
revenue
attacks
comes
back
to
the
city.
E
Yes,
thank
you
and
that
actually
leads
me
to
my
other
question
about
lita.
So
when
we
have
projects
like
this
or
hubs,
there's
also,
we
usually
use
lida
funds
that
come
from
economic
development,
related
revenues,
and
then
this
case
this
is
coming
from
the
general
fund.
Q
P
Council
viral
the
the
250
is
just
the
first
phase,
it's
feasibility,
so
it
come
from
the
general
fund
from
grt
and
so
think
of
it
as
we're
leveraging
this
growth
jrt
we're
getting
from
our
technology
industry
and
using
it
to
expand
out.
So
that's
what
the
first
250
would
come
from
as
we
build
out
this
hub.
We
may
look
at
getting
a
bond
industrial
revenue
bond
or
a
regular
general
obligation
bond
to
actually
build
out
these.
P
These
fixtures
that
we
would
use
to
lease
two
companies
for
their
expansion
because
we
don't
own
the
land,
so
we'd
have
to
lease
it
out.
E
P
Funds
could
be
used
for
the
building
of
a
specific
building
leader.
Funds
can
be
used
for
that
so
we'll
partner
with
the
state
of
new
mexico
they're
very
interested
in
diversifying
our
economy,
so
we'll
use
a
sort
of
matching
grant
with
them
and
matching
grants
for
us,
and
so
the
city
may
be
using
its
funds
to
build
the
actual
hub
buildings
and
then
have
the
potential
growth
companies
build
out
the
interiors,
and
so
that's
where
they
can
then
find
their
own
capital
financing
and
then
lease
it
back
from
the
city.
P
If
I
could
ma'am
chair
council
very
real
to
your
point
about
leta,
just
just
fyi,
we
have
two
other
lita
projects
coming
down
the
pike
they're
both
doing
expansion,
one
is
for
jobs,
expansion,
the
other
one
is
for
building
a
manufacturing
hub,
so
you'll
see
a
different
way
of
using
lita
for
business
expansion,
so
in
the
next
two
weeks,
we'll
be
back
with
two
more
that
are
actually
more
civil
ready
than
this
one.
E
F
Thank
you,
counselor
cassette.
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair.
I
will
be
very
brief.
Just
wanted
to
make
a
quick
comment
on
something
that
really
excites
me
here
is
looking
at
the
nonprofit
food
co-op
and
really
looking
at
the
food
desert
in
this
area.
This
has
been
a
area
of
of
much
concern
in
my
world,
and
so
I'm
I'm
really
excited
about
this
potential
partnership,
and
I
will
want
to
be
getting
a
lot
of
updates
on
this
one.
F
So
just
a
heads
up,
rich
and
we'll
probably
pull
this
to
quality
of
life
at
some
point
as
well.
So,
but
thank
you
we're
really
looking
at
that
aspect
of
it
too,
because
that
is
part
of
you
know
that
broader
view
of
economic
development
and
what
is
really
needed
in
our
community
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
thriving,
healthy
community
and
as
we're
bringing
in
these
new
workers
as
well
as
many
of
the
individuals
who
already
already
living
in
this
area.
F
So
thank
you
for
your
attention
there
and
your
work
on
that.
That's
all.
A
B
A
A
Thank
you.
That
item
passes.
We
are
on
two
more.
We
have
item
r
councilwoman
villarreal.
You
pulled
this
along
with
councillor
lindell
request
for
approval
of
a
budget
adjustment
resolution
in
the
arts
and
culture
department
in
the
amount
of
three
hundred
thousand
to
fund
community
gallery
city-wide
citywide
exhibition
and
programming,
arts,
education,
cultural
investment
funding
program
and
culture
connects
focused
projects
and
programming.
P
P
Madam
sheriff,
thank
you
very
much.
Director
kamiana
is
on
leave,
and
so
she
she
is
not
here.
To
answer
questions
I
don't
know
if
I
can
answer
all
of
your
questions,
but
I
can
definitely
take
them
and
then
get
back
to
you
on
what
she
wants
to
do
from
the
standpoint
of
the
urchin
culture
department.
A
E
A
D
Sorry,
we've
been,
we've
been
tossing
this
back
and
forth,
so
you
know
I
have
a
fair
number
of
questions
about
this
and
I'm
wondering
if
it
wouldn't
be
more
prudent
to
make
a
motion
to
postpone
until
our
next
meeting,
which
I'm
going
to
make.
I
I
have
a
fair
number
of
questions
about
this,
so
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
postpone
to
our
next
meeting
when
the
director
is
here.
M
A
E
P
P
E
P
Madam
chair
council
burial,
I
can
get
that
question
answered.
I
I
don't
expect
that
they
are.
You
know
shotgunned
in
the
next
couple
weeks
so,
but
I
will
get
an
answer
to
that
question.
I
know
there's
a
there's
quite
a
lot
of
them
that
she
wants
to
launch,
but
I
will
find
out
that
that
answer.
F
So
she
would
be
there
for
the
quality
of
life
on
wednesday,
so
procedural
question,
counselor
merworth-
I
don't
know
if
you
know
the
answer
to
this.
If
it
goes
to
quality
of
life,
passes
quality
of
life.
F
A
C
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question,
madam
chair.
This
is
technically
a
budget
adjustment,
not
a
contract,
still
not
legislation,
but
thank
you.
A
Correct
so
we
so
we
don't
get
to
I'm
just
trying
to
look
here.
A
A
Any
of
what
I
lost
you.
I
lost
you.
Yes,
sir
sorry,
no,
but
the
the
fact
that
it
it's
passed.
One
committee
means
it
goes
back
to
it
doesn't
mean
that
it
goes
on
the
governing
body.
Does
it
it
means.
F
A
A
I
don't
know
because
that's
legislation,
okay
and
we
have
a
motion
here-
to
bring
it
back.
Yeah
we
can,
we
can
consult.
I
mean
I
think
the
bigger
question
is:
is:
is
it
time
sensitive
and
will
it
will
it
going
to
the
governing
body
on
the
30th
of
march
instead
of
our
meeting
next
week?
Is
that
gonna
mess
anything
up
right
and
we
can
consult
with
the
city
attorney's
office
on
whether
what
we're
doing
here
and
bringing
it
back
is?
Okay?
R
So
my
knowledge
of
the
procedures
is
online
with
yours,
so
I'm
not
able
to
be
helpful
for
you,
but
if
you
all
are
sort
of
unsure
go
no
go,
we
are
pushing
as
hard
as
we
can
to
get
this
money
out
the
door
get
it
spent
before
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year,
and
so
is
it
an
emergency,
no
nothing's
on
fire?
No,
but
do
we
want
to
make
sure
we
can
get
it
spent
as
quickly
as
possible
for
the
benefit
of
the
citizens
of
santa
fe?
Absolutely.
A
Okay
and
counselor
cassette,
I
don't
think
you
gave
up
the
floor
back
to
you.
F
Yeah,
I
think
it's
yeah,
I
don't.
Apparently
I
don't
have
anything
worthwhile
to
say,
as
I'm
just
sitting
here
stammering
over
my
words.
Definitely
I
that
is
my
only
concern.
F
Is
that
since,
as
pauline
is
not
here
to
speak
to
that
piece
of
the
the
concern
about
it
being
able
to
get
out,
I'm
not,
I
think
that's
where
I'm
really
struggling
is
because
I
I
don't
know
what
the
impact
would
be
for
us,
bringing
it
back
to
finance,
and
I
I
don't
know
counselor
lindell
if
this
is
something
that
we
might
be
able
to
to
discuss
and
that
if
there's
not
an
impact
that
this
could
be
something
that
we
could
address
at
quality
of
life.
F
F
We
could
figure
that
out.
I
think
that's
just
my
only
concern
is
is
not
knowing
what
the
impact
of
delaying
this
would
be
by
a
couple
of
weeks
and
if
there
would
be
an
impact
or
if
there
wouldn't.
So
I
think
that's
where
I'm
having
a
challenge
director.
P
Thank
you
for
the
madam
chair
and
council
cassette
in
castle
nintendo.
I
was
going
to
suggest
if
castle
lindell
has
some
questions
that
she'd
like
to
get
answered
and
director
kamian
is
not
here.
P
As
I
look
at
the
list,
there's
really
only
one
program
where
I
could
see:
there's
a
probably
a
longer
procurement
period
at
120
000,
but
everything
else
seems
to
be
under
the
60
000
mark.
So.
F
F
I
would
say
that
at
this
moment
I
do
not
feel
comfortable
holding
it
back
without
knowing
what
the
impact
of
holding
it
would
be,
and
until
I
get
get
that
answered,
I
wouldn't
really
want
to
do
that,
as
we
have
another
committee
opportunity
to
take
a
look
at
it,
but
would
be
happy
to
work
with
council
and
bell
in
any
capacity
in
order
to
make
sure
that
that
those
questions
are
answered
at
the
quality
of
life
committee,
which
I
recognize
counselor
lindell
does
not
sit
on
so
that
that
doesn't.
E
Councilwoman
villarreal
well
looking
at
the
schedule,
there's
still
opportunities
to
ask
questions
and
vote
at
the
governing
body
meeting
next
week.
E
So,
even
though
it's
there's
committee
processes,
all
of
us
will
get
another
chance
to
talk
about
them,
and
quality
of
life
are
public
works
and
I
realize
counselor
lindell's
not
on
those
but
governing
body.
We
also
can
pull
items
off
consent
to
talk
about
and
ask
any
additional
questions
that
she
that
maybe
you
didn't
get
answered
in
like
talking
with
staff
directly.
So
there
is
an
opportunity
to
pull
it
again
in
governing
body.
D
Counselor,
linda
so
I'll,
withdraw
my
motion
because
I'll
go
ahead
and
ask
my
questions
now
and
that's
what
I'll
do
but
councilor
rivera?
Will
you
withdraw
your
second?
Yes,
I
will.
N
D
You
try
the
floor
chair.
Yes,
you
do
okay,
my
concerns
about
this
are
that
we
can
go
through
each
one
of
these
separately.
Fifty
thousand
dollars
for
community
gallery
citywide
exhibition
programming.
I
the
thing
that
concerns
me
about
this
entire
packet.
Is
that
there's
no
specificity
to
it?
I
don't
know
who
is
leading
these
programs.
D
I
don't
know
who
is
making
the
decisions
on
them.
I
don't
know
what
the
application
process
is.
I
don't
know
what
the
qualification
process
is,
and
I
it
bothers
me
that
they're
all
for
an
amount
of
money
that,
in
terms
of
contractually
they
never
will
come
back
to
any
committee,
they
will
just
be
put
forth
and
signed
by
the
city
manager,
and
I
think
that
some
of
these.
D
I
mean
in
the
first
one
fifty
thousand
dollar
community
gallery
what
are
programming
costs
for
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
I'd,
like
a
breakdown
of
that,
I
know
what
installation
is.
I
don't
really
know
what
workforce
development
training
is
needed
for
this
kind
of
program
going
on
to
the
next
one.
Fifteen
thousand
for
culture
connects
that's
five
thousand
three
five
thousand
dollar
mini
grants.
D
I
mean,
what's
the
what's
the
who
does
that
get
put
out
to
for
five
thousand
dollars?
What's
the
selection,
who
does
the
selection
on
that?
Fifteen
thousand
for
arts
education,
three
mini
grants
for
another,
five
thousand?
How
how
do
these
things
work,
but
a
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
for
cultural
investment
funding
program?
D
I
really
don't
know
what
that
is.
We've
had
I'd
like
to
know
who
the
other
recipients
were.
It
would
be
nice
to
have
a
list
of
the
recipients
of
these
monies,
and
it
looks
like
all
this
is
is
saying:
well,
we
got
24
recipients,
let's
give
each
one
of
them
another
5
dollars
that
that
seems
indiscriminate
to
me
and
not
based
on
needs
or
really
any
criteria
that
bothers
me.
D
The
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
culture
connects
fe
mus
campaign.
I
really
don't
know
anything
about
that.
I've
never
heard
about
it
before.
What
is
how
does
that
work
for
the
city?
What
does
what
does
that
do,
as
these
are
local
cultural
bearers?
I
I
recognize
all
of
these
people,
of
course,
but
how
is
that
that
they
are
ambassadors
to
cultural
tourism
for
the
city
and
who
selects
them?
How
does
this
work?
I?
D
D
D
It
really
doesn't
have
enough
detail
for
me
to
want
to
say
yes
to
funding
this
three
hundred
thousand
dollars,
there's
so
little
detail
in
it.
I
don't
know
who
decides.
I
don't
know
the
criteria.
I
think
that
this
packet
really
needs
a
fair
amount
of
work,
so
I'll
yield
the
floor.
Chair.
A
Thank
you,
counselor
director
brown.
I
don't
know
you
probably
can't
do
much
with
that
without
the
director
being
here.
I
don't
oh
your
hands
up
so
I'll
call
on
you
and
then
we'll
go
to
other
questions
from
the
committee.
P
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
council
lindelt.
Thank
you
for
your
your
comments
and
and
feedback.
I
I
do
want
to
share
with
the
committee
that
keep
in
mind
that
that
these
programs,
we
only
have
about
three
months
to
implement
them,
and
so
there
is
a
lot
of
sausage
making
that
happens
at
the
staff
level.
P
That
will
come
back
and
I
think
council
lindell
is
right
that
some
of
them
may
not
make
the
governing
body,
but
we
do
have
the
opportunity
to
express
what
they
all
are
in
detail
and
then
this
memo
definitely
would
not
show
who
the
lead
is,
what
the
what
the
impact
is
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
but
those
things
can
be
responded
to.
P
So
I
I
recognize
that
it
may
not
be
clear,
and
I'm
hoping
that
to
most
of
you
that
you
do
understand
what
what
the
you
know,
the
auction
culture
department
is
trying
to
do,
but
I
recognize
that
they
need
a
little
bit
more
specificity
once
the
money
is
in
place,
so
consider
it
a
title
with
an
overview
and
that
we
would
definitely
flesh
it
out
and
be
more
than
happy
to
come
back
to
the
quality
of
life
committee
to
the
governing
body
to
show
what's
happening,
but
the
our
the
three
month
period.
P
You
know
we're
going
to
be
scrambling
to
to
get
those
sausage
made
to
get
it
out
and
get
it
done.
But
as
council
lindell
has
given
his
her
questions
and
feedback,
I
will
get
it
to
director
kamiana
and
hopefully
can
respond
to
some
of
it
by
quality
of
life
and
to
the
governing
body
meeting.
A
Okay
back
to
me,
other
questions
from
the
committee.
A
Okay
or
we
could
move
it
forward
without
recommendation,
that's
another
way
to
do
it.
Counselor
cassette
your
hand
is
up.
F
Yeah,
I
was,
I
was
gonna,
recommend
moving
forward
without
recommendation
with
the
understanding
that
we
would
have
this
conversation
at
quality
of
life
and
also,
I
know
that
council
glendale
does
not
have
a
vote
of
quality
of
life,
but
but
I'd
be
happy
to
bring
up
the
discussion
of
whether
or
not
holding
this
until
the
end
of
march.
F
What
type
of
impact
that
would
have
and
then
potentially
exploring
that
with
the
quality
of
life
committee,
to
send
it
back
to
finance
and
recognizing
that
there
have
been
a
request
for
it
to
go
back
to
finance.
So
that
was
going
to
be.
My
recommendation
was
to
move
it
forward
without
recommendation.
A
Okay-
and
you
know
we
could
also-
you
know,
get
some
answers
to
some
of
these
questions
through
quality
of
life
and
offline.
All
right
is
there
other
discussions
on
the
motion
before
us,
which
is
to
approve.
M
So
if
it
went
it's
clearly
going
to
quality
of
life
and
then
public
school
public
works.
If
director
kamiyama
returned
and
said
that,
there's
you
know
no,
we
can
wait
until
the
the
last
meeting
in
march
to
take
it
to
the
governing
body.
Now
one
of
those
committees
can
always
recommend
that
it
come
back
to
finance
correct
for
the
march
21st
meeting.
A
A
I
don't
think
it
would
be
affected
one
way
or
the
other.
I
just
think
if
we
feel
as
a
group
that
we
don't
have
enough
information
and
we'd
like
more
and
since
we
don't
have
the
director
here,
one
path
forward
would
be
to
move
it
forward
without
without
a
recommendation
versus
approving
it,
which
suggests
that
we're
okay
with
it.
L
M
Madam
chair
I'll,
withdraw
my
second
and
I
think,
support
councilwoman
cassette's
recommendation.
All.
A
Right
so
I
don't
think
we
have
a
second
for
the
motion,
so
we
can
offer
that
so
that
motion
fails
for
lack
of
a
second.
So
we
I
can
entertain
another
motion.
F
A
A
second
with
a
motion,
a
second
to
move
this
item
forward
without
recommendation,
is
their
discussion
on
this
motion.
F
A
Yes,
all
right,
so
we'll
move
it
forward
without
recommendation.
We
are
on
to
our
final
item
of
the
night,
which
is
item
a
b
hold
on.
Let
me
get
there
request
for
approval
of
a
budget
adjustment
resolution
in
the
community
services
department
in
the
amount
of
one
million
dollars
to
fund
eviction,
prevention,
julie,
sanchez,
youth
and
family
services.
Division
director
is
here.
I
don't
think
here
is
kyra.
Here
too,
I
don't
see
carol
all
right,
so
we
have
julie
sanchez
here
and
counselor
lindell.
I
got
it
right
this
time.
D
Thank
you
chair
good
evening,
julie.
D
S
S
We
actually
saw
a
wide
array
of
we
didn't
just
fund
rental
assistance
through
cares,
but
we
gave
options
for
community
members,
and
so
what
we
saw
was
about
85
to
90
percent
of
our
cares
act.
Funding
of
the
I
think
we
got
about.
S
Oh
my
gosh,
5.5
million
that
all
went
to
rental
assistance
and
that
was
from
march
of
2019
through
december
of
2020..
S
For
cares
act
for
what
the
youth
and
family
services
division
was
allocated.
It
was
about
5.5
million.
I
believe,
okay,
roughly
about
90
percent,
went
to
housing,
related
issues.
D
And
we
we
did
have
a
million
dollars
in
arpa
monies
from
the
county.
I
believe
that
was
this
year
that
the
county
directed
to
us
for
rental
assistance.
So
we've
we've
had
a
pretty
sizable
amount.
D
Do
people
qualify
for
this
as
covid
do
they
have
to
does
this
have
to
be
coveted,
related.
S
Madam
chair
councillor,
lindell:
yes,
because
it
is
arpa
funding.
There
does
have
to
be
a
covid
related
incident.
D
So
this
this
million
dollars
that
we're
talking
about
here-
this
isn't
our
money,
though.
S
Madame
cherry
council
lindell,
that's
my
that's
my
yes!
It's.
C
D
So
distribution
of
this
money
is
not
dependent
on
it
being
associated
with
coven,
correct.
S
S
We
have
not,
but
it's
something
that
we
would
love
to
work
on
in
tandem
with
members
of
this
committee,
who
are
interested
in
being
a
part
of
that
process.
D
Well,
I
I
think
that
that's,
I
think
that
would
be
wonderful.
The
thing
that
concerns
me
is
that.
D
How
do
we
set
up
so
that
we
do
have
criteria
on
it
it?
It
just
concerns
me
to
pass
a
million
dollar
allotment
out
of
our
grt.
When
we
don't
have
any
criteria
on
distribution,
I
mean,
does
it
it
doesn't
have
to
be
coveted
related.
Does
the
distribution
go
to
first
come
first
serve?
Who
owes
the
most?
Who
owes
the
least
the
amount
of
time
that
you've
been
in
arrears
on
your
rent?
D
Are
people
eligible
to
receive
rental
assistance
more
than
once,
if
they've
already
received
it?
D
That
follows
the
purpose
of
the
allocation,
but
I
don't
think
that
we've
done
that
and
I'm
concerned
about
it.
We
we've
distributed
well
over
5
million
dollars
and
we
have
two
more
million
if
this
is
passed
to
distribute
and
this
money
is
coming
out
of
our
grt,
this
isn't
federal
or
state
money.
Additionally
from
the
packet,
it
says
that
the
state
still
has
75
million
left
and
that
there
there's
an
expectation
of
152
million
more.
D
Additionally,
from
the
packet,
it
says
that
march
1st
is
the
end
of
the
state
moratorium.
Councilor
romero
worth
informed
me
today
that
that
is
not
the
case.
I
don't
think
there
is
a
date
specific,
but
those
are.
Those
are
real
concerns
that
I
have
that
we
need
to
find
some
criteria
of
how
we
do
this
and
make
sure
that
this
money
is
distributed.
D
A
Okay,
counselor,
I
looks
like
both
julie
sanchez
and
our
city
manager
have
their
hands
up
to
respond
to
your
concerns,
I'd
like
to
give
them
the
opportunity,
I
don't
know
in
which
order
to
take
you.
So
maybe
you
all
want
to.
A
S
So,
thank
you,
madam
chair
counselor
lindell.
I
appreciate
your
concern.
We
did
have
precedence
set
when
we
did
our
cares
act
allocation
for
our
eviction,
prevention
funds
and
that's
actually
the
eligibility
criteria
that
we
were
going
to
continue
to
use
for
this
particular
eviction
prevention
program.
R
Madame
chair
councilman
dell,
thank
you
so
much
for
the
questions.
So
there's
some
information
in
the
packet.
I'm
not
going
gonna,
be
able
to
give
you
in
this
hot
moment,
and
I
apologize
for
that.
Director
ochoa
had
a
conflict
this
evening
and
was
unable
to
be
here,
and
so
I
apologize
for
that
as
well.
R
She
has
been
eyebrow
deep
in
police
chief
search
for
a
while,
so
we
she
had
some
other
things
to
do
tonight.
So
there's
a
couple
things
I
want
to
talk
about.
First
of
all,
the
federal
money
that's
out
there
has
proven
to
be
throughout
this
pandemic
difficult
for
many
people
to
reach.
R
There
are
a
number
of
requirements
that
people
who
are
in
threat
of
eviction
have
to
provide
that
not
everybody
has
when
I
first
graduated
college
and
moved
to
washington
dc.
I
lived
in
a
house
with
five
other
people.
It
was
like
the
real
world
without
the
tv
cameras
or
cool
people,
and
we
shared
elites.
R
But
my
name
wasn't
on
the
lease
I
gave
cash
to
the
person
whose
name
was
on
the
leash
for
the
six
of
us
and
they
paid
so
one
of
the
requirements
to
get
funding
from
e-wrap
is
a
copy
of
your
lease.
R
I
would
have
failed
for
that
right
out
of
college
and
so
part
of
what
the
effort
that
we're
doing
now
and
trying
to
bring
this
million
dollars
is
that
it's
for
direct
cash
assistance
to
those
who
are
frankly
the
most
in
need,
and
it
does
the
most
good.
So
in
my
distinguished
five
and
a
half
week
tenure
here
at
the
city,
my
understanding
is
that
we
have,
in
the
past,
provided
direct
cash
assistance
to
people
in
santa
fe,
and
it's
proven
to
be
very
helpful.
R
As
we've
been
having
conversations
in
the
last
few
weeks
in
city
hall,
with
mayor
webber
and
our
team,
he
has
exhibited
this
frustration
that
I
think
councilman
lindell
you
may
share
as
well,
which
is,
if
there's
all
these
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
out
there
to
to
give.
Why
aren't
we
just
using
that
money
and,
frankly,
it's
very
difficult
to
get,
and
so
what
we
are
facing
right
now
is
it
may
not
be
tomorrow.
R
In
addition
to
the
money
we're
trying
to
get
here,
city
attorney,
aaron
mcsherry
is
working
to
pull
together
an
eviction
legal
fair.
I
don't
that's
not
the
right
term,
but
an
eviction
event.
R
This
saturday,
where
we
get
lawyers
to
volunteer
their
time
to
help
those
who
are
most
in
need,
navigate
this
process
to
try
to
help
them
get
the
paperwork
together
to
file
for
the
e-wrap
for
the
rental
assistance,
and
so
the
reason
that
we're
getting
asking
you
to
support
this
funding
now
is
because
we've
seen
that
it
works
and
it
works
better
than
anything
else
for
keeping
people
in
their
homes.
R
So
I
there
are
some
questions:
councilman
doug,
that
you
have
that
I
think
are
great
and
I'm
sorry
that
I'm
not
in
position-
and
I
think
julia
isn't
necessarily
going
to
decide
to
answer
them
as
well
either.
This
is
not
something
we're
starting
from
scratch.
R
It's
not
something
we're
doing
for
the
first
time,
and
I
think,
if
you
all
were
support
moving
us
forward
to
the
next
committee,
we're
not
planning
to
swindle
anybody,
we're
not
planning
to
pull
a
fast
one
and
rush
it
to
governing
body
on
consent
without
everyone
getting
their
questions
answered.
R
What
we're
asking
for
is
your
assistance
moving
us
forward
as
quickly
as
possible,
because
if
we
do
wait
until
the
end
of
march,
it
may
not
be
5
000
homes
that
are
affected
in
santa
fe,
but
we
will
see
people
evicted
and
there's
a
good
chance.
We
could
have
helped
them,
and
so,
while
again
we're
not
able
to
answer
all
of
your
questions,
we
do
seek
your
support
in
helping
move
this
forward.
What
and
I
can
guarantee
you
we
will
get
you
those
answers
to
your
questions.
F
F
Counselor
merewith
just
texted
me.
Apparently
she
is
having
some
internet
problems.
M
D
C
Requested
that
we
hold
conversation,
she
is
trying
to
connect.
She
just
lost
her
connection,
so
if
we
can
hold
further
conversation
on
this
matter
until
she
rejoins
momentarily
sure.
C
F
R
If
I
may,
director
ochoa
stepped
out
of
her
other
commitment
and
so
director
ochoa.
I
first
of
all
thank
you.
We
lost
the
chair
for
just
a
moment
and
she
asked
that
we're
not
doing
business,
but
can.
S
R
In
light
of
you,
stepping
away
counselor
lindell
had
some
questions
about
how
the
direct
cash
assistance
would
work.
What
is
the
criteria?
Who
gets
the
money
in
what
order
you
know
et
cetera,
okay,.
B
D
D
This
money,
because
it's
grt
money
it
doesn't
even
have
to
be
rental
assistance
based
on
co.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
coveted
related.
D
T
My
connection
is
not
great
either
to
answer
your
question:
counselor
lindell,
the
criteria
for
disbursement
is
that
people
are
facing
eviction.
Obviously,
and
everybody's
situation
is
a
little
bit
different
when
they're
facing
eviction.
Some
people,
as
you
know,
have
legitimate
leases.
Some
people
are
doubling
up
in
other
people's
homes,
and
that
has
made,
as
as
director
sanchez
may
have
said,
getting
those
state
funds
very
difficult
for
some
people.
T
We,
the
beauty
of
the
partnership
we've
had
with
fi
now
called
up
together,
is
that
we
at
the
city
get
to
define
the
criteria
so
with
our
cash
disbursement
in
cares,
which
we
used
the
same
company
for
we
had
to
get
that
money
out
very
quickly.
It
was
a
very
different
situation
and
we
had
three
different
sets
of
criteria
that
are
outlined
actually
in
the
report
that
julie
sent
everyone
a
little
earlier,
which
we
had
previously
shared
with
the
council.
T
We
can
define
what
the
criteria
is
and
we
can
define
what
the
requirements
are
for
proving
the
need,
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
as
strict
as
the
state
process,
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
as
liberal
and
open-ended
as
we
were
in
our
cares
disbursement.
T
We
have
the
ability
and
you
will
see
that
in
the
contract
that
will
come
before
you
to
outline
the
criteria
and
gauge
how
the
funds
are
dispersed.
D
Well,
I
I
think
that
would
be
really
helpful
to
us.
I'm
not
sure
I
mean
has
that
criteria
been
developed.
Do
we
know.
T
What
it
is,
madam
chair,
counselor
lindell.
T
Yes,
when
we
partnered
with
chain
breaker
on
the
previous
disbursement
of
cash,
they
were
very
interested
in
using
the
application
process
to
collect
data
on
the
state
of
their
of
tenants
who
were
in
need
what
they
did
was
they
provided
a
screening
for
us
in
the
first
round
and
determined
if
people
were
eligible
according
to
their
income,
which
in
santa
fe
would
mean
an
indigent
level,
income
of
400
percent
of
federal
poverty
or
less
they
determine
if
they
were
city
residents,
and
then
they
determined
if
they
were
facing
eviction.
T
Based
on
this,
based
on
an
interview
in
the
direct
cash
disbursement
portal
that
applicants
will
be
connected
to,
they
are
directed
to
answer
a
series
of
questions
about
their
status
and
they
attest
to
their
status.
They
upload
identity
documents
and
their
it's
verified
that
they
are
not
duplicating
application.
There
is
the
possibility
of
of
putting
in
more
strict
criteria.
If
we
choose
we
have
found.
T
You
know
that
we
try
to
keep
it
open
for
people
who
are
having
trouble
with
documentation,
but
that
is
up
to
us
and
we
have
previously
developed
the
criteria.
We
can
share
a
copy
of
what
that
application
looked
like
back
in
the
fall
when
we
disburse
the
funds
and
it
can
still
be
adjusted.
The
other
model
that
we're
looking
at
here,
which
is
slightly
different
than
what
we
did
before
and
provides
a
little
more
of
a
accountability
and
gatekeeping.
T
If
you
will
not
to
use
that
in
a
negative
sense
on
the
funds,
is
to
have
our
connect
network
navigators
who
have
already
determined
people's
need
through
their
own
agencies
and
our
screening
tool
connect
certain
individuals
to
the
funding
opportunities
so
rather
than
in
what
we
did
in
the
fall
when
we
disbursed
funds
previously
was
give
people
a
link
to
the
website
where
they
would
apply.
T
We
have
the
capability,
since
this
is
a
somewhat
slower
process
to
have
individual
navigators
verify
that
folks
are
eligible,
excuse
me
and
that
they
will
then
be
given
a
code
that
only
pertains
to
them
and
which
they
will
then
go
through
the
application
process.
The
vendor,
fii,
slash
up
together,
verifies
all
the
identity,
information
and
any
other
documents
that
we
should
require.
D
T
T
That
said,
madam
chair
councillor
lindell,
we
do
not
have
a
contract
in
place
with
this
vendor,
yet
we
hoped
that
it
would
be
an
emergency
procurement
given
the
situation
and
we
would
negotiate
the
terms
at
that
time,
and
I,
madam
chair,
counselor
lindell.
T
I
apologize
for
the
packet
being
a
little
thin
I'll,
be
honest,
this
opportunity
to
first
of
all
the
identification
of
the
additional
funds
and
the
opportunity
to
disperse
the
funds
in
the
light
of
the
looming
eviction,
moratorium,
lift
which
we
understood
was
happening
tomorrow,
but
which
per
city
attorney
mccherry
we
now
understand,
happens
closer
to
the
end
of
march.
The
opportunity
became
available
on
thursday
and
I
honestly
put
the
packet
together
at
that
time,
so
I'm
happy
to
provide
any
additional
materials.
T
I
do
feel
that,
given
the
precipitous
nature
of
the
conditions
in
terms
of
what
people
are
facing,
it's
very
advisable
to
go
forward.
In
my
opinion.
Thank
you.
D
This
this
is,
of
course,
everybody
would
want
to
go
forward
with
this,
and
I'm
sure
that
eventually
we
will.
We
need
to
have
the
regular
reports
on
this,
and
this
is
just
extremely
poor
process.
Friends
to
have
this
come
to
us
the
way
that
it
has
and
to
be
asked
to
fund
out
of
our
gross
receipts
tax,
a
million
dollars
just
in
the
blink
of
an
eye
with
very
very
little
information.
D
You
know
I
don't
appreciate
being
put
into
that
situation
where
I
have
so
many
questions
about
it,
and
you
know
it
looks
like
oh
well,
you
don't
support
this
well,
I
support
it
conceptually,
but
we
need
some
criteria
on
it
and
to
not
be
presented
with
any
criteria
is
not
helpful
for
any
of
us
and
I
don't
think
it's
right
for
us
to
be
put
into
that
position.
D
A
All
right,
my
apologies,
everyone
not
sure
what
happened
there
with
my
internet,
sorry
to
go
out
in
a
critical
moment,
counselor
pass
it.
You
have
your
hand
up.
Thank
you,
madam.
F
Chair,
I
believe
that
city
manager
blair
raised
his
hand
onto
counselor
lindelof,
so
I'll
defer
to
him.
Okay,
all
right,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
still
reorienting
no
problem.
R
R
R
I've
only
done
it
twice
today
to
tell
you
how
grateful
I
am
for
director
ochoa
in
the
heavy
lift
she
has
been
doing
on
encampments
evictions
on
leading
our
police
chief
search
and
she's
doing
an
extraordinary
job,
and
so,
if
there's
any
hard
feelings,
I
hope
they
are
directed
at
me
and
not
at
her,
because
she
is
doing
yeoman's
work
on
behalf
of
all
of
us.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
A
Thank
you
study
manager.
Now
I
will
go
to
council
cassette.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
You
know,
I
completely
understand
the
concern
of
wanting
more
details,
and
I
think
one
of
the
the
challenges
that
we
have
here
is
what
director
ochoa
spoke
to.
That
julie
spoke
to
as
well.
That
john
spoke
to
is:
is
this
complication
that
that
frequently
individuals
who
are
in
need
see
of
so
many
barriers
to
have
to
prove
that
they're
worthy
of
assistance
that
we
frequently
can't
get
it
to
them?
F
And
so,
while
you
know
a
lot
of
the
verification
and
the
processes
and
the
criteria
that
counselor
or
the
director
ochoa
spoke
to,
I'm
you
know,
I'm
glad
that
we
have
those
in
place,
and
you
know
I
know
that
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
some
of
those
with
cares,
and
this
is
this
is
a
little
bit
different.
F
I
think
the
bigger
challenge
is
actually
going
to
be
that
there
are
so
many
individuals
in
need,
and
this
money
is
really
a
drop
in
the
bucket
of
of
what
we
are
going
to
be
facing
as
a
city
and
how
that
ripple
effect
is
going
to
impact
our
community.
You
know
we,
we
know
that
homelessness
is
a
huge
issue.
F
Well,
the
best
way
to
solve
homelessness
is
to
prevent
it,
and
so,
however,
we
can
reduce
the
barriers
for
individuals
to
access
dollars,
knowing
full
well
that
there
are
many
individuals
that
are
not
going
to
be
able
to
access
dollars.
You
know
it's
important
and
I
know
that
it's
going
to
be
a
balancing
act,
and
I
know
that
this
is
going
to
be
a
a
challenge
for
how
we
walk.
F
That
line
of
you
know
making
sure
that
there's
a
criteria
making
sure
that
that
we
are
really
hitting
the
people
that
are
most
in
need
in
our
community
and
and
to
be
able
to
assist
them.
To
be
honest,
I
do
not
envy
you
that,
having
to
figure
that
out
director,
ochoa
and
julie
that
that
will
be,
I
know
a
challenge
because
there
are.
F
F
In
the
in
the
economic
impact
there
are,
there
are
many
of
us
that
that
this
is
it's
been
challenging
for
everyone,
but
the
economic
impact
has
been
has
been
tough,
so
I
completely
agree
it's.
This
information
has
been
extremely
helpful
in
looking
at
how
these
funds
get
dispersed,
but
I
really
am
grateful
that
they
were
found
and
that
we
are
pushing
them
out
and
honestly,
I
wish
they
were
more.
F
I
wish
that
we
could
have
found
more,
and
I
know
that
as
more
dollars
come
through
and
how
we're
able
to
get
those
out
to
people
in
need
and
reduce
those
barriers.
You
know
as
more
federal
funds
or
state
funds
come
through.
I
I
hope
that
we
can
continue
to
seek
how
we
can
really
be
assisting
with
this.
This
new
crisis
that
this
epidemic
is
bringing
towards
us.
So
thank
you.
I'll
yield
the
floor.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you
councilwoman
cassette
for
those
comments.
I
feel
the
same
about
the
urgency
here
and
I
think
we
all
do
and
frankly,
this
piece
of
funding
is
probably
just
going
to
be:
it's
not
going
to
cover
all
the
people
that
actually
will
be
affected
by
eviction,
because
eviction
will
happen
in
different
ways.
I
mean
I'm
already
seeing
it
with
people.
E
I
know
where
their
landlords
are
increasing
their
rent,
just
to
get
them
out,
and
I'm
talking
significant,
like
they're
they're,
actually
increasing
it
by
50
and
those
people
don't
have
much
time
to
actually
adjust
their
living
situation,
and
so
I
mean
I
think
that
this
amount
is
definitely
going
to
be
able
to
like
support
it's
like
one
one
level
of
support.
I
think
what
I
hear
council
lindell
say
is:
our
processes
are
not
consistent
and
I
want
to
bring
up
that
I've
been
bringing
I've
been
having
issues
with
our
budget
adjustment
resolution.
E
E
Actually,
I
think
some
directors
actually
provided
us
some
more
information
if
we
requested
it,
but
I'm
just
bringing
up
this
structure
of
these
is
challenging
for
me
and
I
think
in
this
case
director
choi,
I
I
made
a
assumptions
that
we
were
just
going
to
use
the
structure
we
already
had
that
we
used
with
the
cares
act.
So
I
guess
that
was
what
didn't
give
me
consternation.
E
So
I
think
what
we
would
need
is
just
exactly
what
you
added
all
the
information
details
about
how
the
funding
will
be
dispersed
and
the
criteria
will
be
used
that
we've
been
using
in,
for
you
know
in
the
last
iteration.
So
I
think
just
having
that
information
in
the
next
committee
will
be
helpful,
but
I
just
want
us
to.
I
just
want
to
flag
that
these
budget
adjustments
become
inconsistent
and
depending
on
where
it
comes
from
and
who
who's
wanting
it,
there's
more
information
and
then
there's
less
information.
E
I
actually
disagree
with
counselor
linda,
I
think
the
the
arts
and
culture
department
actually
had
a
lot
of
details
more
than
any
of
the
memos
that
we've
received
for
other
budget
adjustments.
So
I
think
also,
I
know
a
lot
about
those
projects,
so
they
kind
of
don't.
E
I
don't
question
them,
because
I've
heard
about
them
already
in
process
so
and
same
thing
for
this.
I've
heard
about
the
need
to
do
this
and
how
we're
going
to
do
it
and
how
we're
going
to
disburse
funds
quickly
and
the
fact
that
this
is
happening
tomorrow,
even
though
there'll
be
a
period
of
time
that
landlords
will
be
able
to
to
evict
people.
I
just
think
that
this
is
urgent,
so
I
would
just
urge
staff
to
add
more
to
the
memo
for
the
next
committees,
which
are
well.
E
Quality
of
life
is
wednesday,
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
just
a
an
amendment
to
the
memo,
just
to
add
information
so
that
we
know,
and
then
it'll
go
to
the
governing
body
next
week.
So
I
just
wanted
to
talk
about.
I
hope
we
can
improve
our
processes
in
terms
of
making
them
consistent
for,
especially
when
it's
emergency
funds
coming
forward
to
us,
and-
and
this
is
a
good-
I
mean
it's
a
big
amount,
so
I
can
understand
why
we
need
the
scrutiny.
So
that's
all
I'll
say
thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
touch
a
minute
on
the
the
march
1st
deadline.
That's
in
the
memo-
and
I
don't
know
whether
any
of
you
can
and
speak
to
this,
but
it's
my
understanding
from
the
city
attorney's
office
in
emails,
where
she
reached
out
to
local
lawyers
to
help
with
a
volunteer
situation
with
local
attorneys
meeting
with
people
who
are
in
these
situations
and
helping
them
understand
what
their
rights
are,
so
that
they
can
best
help
themselves
in
these
situations.
A
A
A
So
the
stay
could
be
lifted
later,
so
there
is
a
little
bit
of
time
and
then
back
to
the
point
of
we
don't
know
how
fast
people
will
be
evicted
once
that
stay
is
is
is
lifted,
but
I
just
want
to
clarify
the
march
first
and-
and
I
don't
know
kyra,
if
you
can.
Madam.
T
Chair,
yes,
I
believe
city
attorney,
mick
sherry
had
done
the
research
and
sent
that
information
over
the
weekend.
I
believe
it
was
monday,
sunday
or
monday
early
today
that
we
got
the
information
that
there
is
not
necessarily
march
versus
not
necessarily
the
hard
deadline
that
the
court
said,
sort
of
intentionally
left
it
a
little
ambiguous.
T
So
what
getting
the
funding
into
the
budget
would,
in
short
order,
would
do,
would
allow
us
to
go
to
procurement
and
have
the
funds
available
by
the
time
that
evictions
may
increase
due
to
the
more
term
becoming
lifted.
As
the
way
I
see
it,.
A
Right
so
just
wanted
to
clarify
yes,.
A
Right-
and
I
I
guess
you
know
again-
I
I've
missed
some
of
the
conversation.
That's
gone
on
at
kieran
I'll
have
to
go
back
and
watch
the
video
for
a
lot
of
what
you
said.
I'm
very
sorry
to
have
missed
that.
I
I
do
think
that
it,
it's
really
important
that
we
and
we
did
in
quality
of
life.
When
I
was
chair
last
year,
we
did
hear
some
of
the
eviction
reports
that
chain
breaker
has
put
out,
and
I
think
it
has
given
us
a
lot
of
information.
But
there's
been
a
lot.
A
That's
been
happening
since
that
last
report
and
I
think
understanding
kind
of
the
landscape
that
we're
in
would
be
very
important
for
the
council
at
some
point
to
either
in
a
memo
or
in
a
presentation
and
and
to
understand.
You
know
the
different
actors,
the
different
people.
There
are
lots
of
people
working
on
this
problem.
A
This
this
problem
is
an
enormous
problem
and
we
want
to
do
what
we
can
to
to
help
people
who
are
who
are
in
crisis-
and
I-
and
I
totally
understand
that
this
has
come
up
very
very
quickly.
A
But
again,
I
I
do
think
we
need
more
context
so
that
we
do
so
that
we
can
make
these
decisions
and
know
that
we're
making
them
responsibly
and
and
understanding
that
our
role
is
appropriate
and
you
know
that
it
fits
with
all
the
other
things
that
are
going
on
to
to
combat
what
is
a
you
know,
a
pending
crisis
and
very,
very
serious
problem
that
we're
we're
all
very
concerned
about,
and
I
think
you
know
we
we
do
want
to
do
what
we
can
to
help
people.
A
So
I
I
don't
know
with
that.
I
guess
I'll
go
back
to
the
committee.
I
don't
know
where
we
are.
If
everybody's
had
a
chance
to
to
speak
to
this,
I
don't
think
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor.
I
don't
know
what
the
committee
would
like
to
do.
M
A
T
Madam
chair,
may
I
just
say
yeah
that
I
definitely
appreciate
I
do
people
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
it
and
I
deeply
appreciate
the
work
of
the
finance
committee
tonight.
Thank
you
so
much
thank.
A
You
for
being
here,
I
appreciate
it
all
right.
I'm
sorry
did
somebody
wave
at
me
director,
mccoy
you're.
Let's
see,
let's
go
back,
let's
see
if
my
any
of
my
devices
work
now.
C
A
Matters
from
the
chair,
our
next
meeting
monday
march
21st,
and
thank
you
all
tonight
for
for
your
work
on
on
all
these
budget
adjustment
requests
really
appreciate
it
and
thank
you,
staff
appreciate
it.
We're
adjourned.