►
From YouTube: Public Works and Utilities for April 26, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
C
A
C
E
A
A
E
A
A
A
A
A
F
F
Gov
has
the
annual
report
in
it.
This
presentation
is
just
five
slides,
uh
including
um
excuse
me
that
it
is
new,
but
I
did
email
it
to
the
members
of
the
committee
about
an
hour
ago.
Okay,
great
thank
you,
yeah
and,
let's
see
I'm
having
trouble
sharing
without
it,
taking
over
my
zoom.
So
just
one
second
here.
F
A
B
F
Looking
at
the
recap
of
last
year
and
outlook
of
this
year,
I'm
just
going
to
show
two
of
the
six.
I'm
not
going
to
go
over
the
system
overview
with
the
committee
and
look
a
little
bit
at
drought
and
water
and
growth,
which
seem
to
be
um
on
everyone's
mind.
Right
now.
I
do
have
the
full
slide
deck
available
if
the
committee
would
like
to
go
into
depth
on
any
of
these
items.
F
So
last
year,
city
of
santa
fe
water
produced
about
8
800,
acre
feet
for
distribution
into
our
potable
system.
About
half
of
that
came
from
the
buckman
direct
diversion
shown
here
in
green
um
about
30
uh
came
from
the
santa
fe
river
via
the
canyon,
road
water
treatment
plant,
and
the
remainder
was
supplied
by
wells,
which
we
do
use
continuously,
mostly
to
make
sure
that
they're
available
for
use
at
any
point.
F
That
leads
me
to
sort
of
the
second
question
that
a
lot
of
people
have,
and
I
think
it's
a
natural
question
when
you,
um
even
if
you're
not
new
to
santa
fe.
um
We
we
all
understand
that
we
live
in
a
in
a
desert
and
that
water
is
precious
and
we
see
a
lot
of
building
happening
around
the
city
and
the
obvious
question
to
most
people
is
where's
that
water
gonna
come
from
and
again
I
won't
reread
this,
but
we
we
are
in
currently
in
a
sustainable
position
where
we
are
resting.
F
Our
wells
for
these
periods,
but,
more
importantly,
in
terms
of
water
and
growth
city
code,
connects
land
use
planning
directly
to
water
supply
by
requiring
the
developers
offset
new
demand
on
the
system
and
currently
develop
do
this
by
bringing
water
rights
from
the
rio
grande
to
the
buckman
welfare
permit
and
those
water
rights
allow
us
to
pump
more
water
from
that
well
field.
Over
the
long
term.
F
The
connection
of
new
demand
to
available
water
resources
in
the
buckmin
oil
field
may
be
re-evaluated
if
we're
able
to
expand
our
available
surface
water
supply
with
the
planned
san
chamber,
turnflow
project
and
finally
long-range
water
resources.
Planning
is
ongoing
to
assure
that
we
provide
a
safe,
reliable
and
resilient
water
supply
to
meet
santa
fe's
needs.
F
um
So
we
did
bring
an
informational
item
to
the
full
council
at
the
beginning
of
this
year
and
then,
in
february
and
april
respectively.
We
got
some
good
um
sort
of
support
from
the
bdd
board
and
the
rio
grande
compact
commission
for
the
project,
and
earlier
this
month
we
sort
of
formally
started
the
nepa.
The
national
environmental
protection
act
permit
process
by
submitting
applications
to
blm
and
the
forest
service
for
construction
on
public
lands,
largely
in
the
existing
utility
corridor.
F
The
item
that
was
pulled
on
consent
is
related
to
a
county
agreement
on
partnership
in
the
project,
and
so
I'll
speak
to
that
more
in
the
next
part
of
this
meeting
and
we're
targeting
in
mid-may
to
informational,
webinar
specific
to
the
project
for
for
the
public
that
is
interested
and
then
starting
to
get
information
out
about
the
project.
The
week
of
may
17th
with
a
target
date
to
start
nepa
scoping,
which
is
the
nepa
permit
process.
F
The
office
of
the
state
engineer,
permit
process
and
a
request
for
proposals
for
engineering
design
for
the
design
of
the
project
itself.
So
this
is
all
coming
quickly
now
and-
and
I
would
guess,
although
the
drought
is
on
everyone's
minds,
the
the
return
flow
project
will
still
get
a
fair
bit
of
attention.
So
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
committee
was
aware
of
this
timeline
and
staff
is
available
for
answering
questions
or
presenting
information
as
as
desired,
and
with
that
I
would
stand
for
questions
and
stop
sharing
so
that
everyone
can
see
each
other.
A
F
A
A
G
G
We
know
that
a
lot
of
people
put
in
a
lot
more
outdoor
plants
and
gardens
as
a
result
of
covid.
We
know
that
there's
you
know
water
being
used
in
that
sector
now,
so
we
really
are
focusing
on
that.
For
the
spring
you
know
is
looking
at
the
gpc
gpcd
data
to
drive
the
different
programs
that
we
have
to
help
people
still
bring
down
that
outdoor
demand,
despite
having
planted
so
many
additional
things
last
spring.
A
G
um
Mr
chair,
you
know
in
in
2019,
you
know
we
we
hit
a
pretty
low,
uh
gpcd
2020.
It's
just
was
just
so
different,
um
but
I
still
think
that
there
is
room
for
us
to
improve
um
on
the
residential
end
now
with
all
of
these
new
outdoor
plantings
that
have
gone
in
with
a
lot
of
the
different
programs
that
we
have
established.
G
F
Mr
chair
I'll
start
and
then
let
shannon
and
christine
chime
in
um
the
if
we
can
reduce
outdoor
use,
it
shouldn't
reduce
effluent
uh
our
influence
to
the
to
the
wastewater
treatment
plant.
But,
as
we
have
seen
for
the
last
25
years
as
we
have
reduced
total
potable
water
use,
some
of
that
reduction
has
been
indoors,
and
so
the
effluent
has
has
been
reduced.
A
similar
amount.
A
A
F
It's
a
it's
a
really
good
question
and
I
think
if
we
do
get
the
return
flow
pipeline
in
place,
I
think
we
have
a
strategic
we
need
to.
um
It
becomes
strategically,
I
think,
more
important
for
us
to
reduce
outdoor
demand
or
outdoor
use
of
potable
water.
Let's
say
than
maybe
indoor
use
of
potable
water.
G
Sorry,
if
I
could
just
add
you
know,
one
program
that
we
would
have
to
consider
like
other
cities
have
had
to
consider
is
our
laundry
to
landscape,
where
we
encourage
people
to
pull
water
from
their
washing
machine.
You
know
and
apply
it
onto
their
outdoor
landscape.
That
specific
program
is
something
we
would
have
to
really
reconsider.
G
Moving
forward,
we
haven't
had
too
many
people
apply
for
that
rebate,
but
we
do
know
that
there
are
a
lot
of
gray
water
systems
out
there,
but
in
that
case
we're
taking
away
water
that
would
eventual
that
would
have
gone
um
to
the
wastewater
treatment
plant,
and
so
that's
a
direct.
um
You
know
program
that
would
influence
that
that
we're
already
having
discussions
on
that
currently.
H
Mr
chair,
thank
you,
members
of
the
committee.
um
I
think
uh
miss
chavez
and
director
roach
did
a
good
job,
um
but
I
think
really
just
to
recap,
what's
what's
being
discussed,
is
um
the
city
has
done
a
really
amazing
job
with
conservation
efforts
on
our
potable
water
side,
uh
we've
seen
amazing
gains,
we've
seen
resiliency
and
robustness
being
added
into
our
drinking
water
system.
H
As
you
alluded,
we
do
classify
it
into
two
terms,
really:
what
in
the
utility
we
call
consumed,
which
is
water
that
the
customer
uses
that
doesn't
get
returned
to
the
sanitary
sewer?
What
isn't
consumed
does
get
returned?
There
are
particular
programs
that
that
do
target
that
portion
of
the
water
uh
we
talk
about
low
flow,
toilets,
uh
great
water
systems.
H
H
They
work
side
by
side
through
a
study
to
really
look
at
how
treated
effluent
is
used
along
with
the
return
flow
pipeline,
where
we
see
this
as
a
resource
for
the
city
and
ask
ourselves
what
is
you
know?
What
is
the
best
use
for
this
treated
effluent
and
are
we
using
it
in
a
diligent
and
an
effective
manner?
H
A
I
E
E
A
A
I
F
It
I
would
start
I
apologize
mr
chair,
I
would
add,
there
is
one
provision
in
the
agreement
that
says
that,
in
good
faith,
we
will
enter
into
negotiation
or
discussions
with
the
county
and
las
campanas
about
a
variety
of
effluent.
Use
agreements
to
see
if
there's
a
more
efficient
way
to
to
structure
those
agreements.
A
A
A
A
D
A
D
Yes,
sir,
at
the
last
uh
public
works
and
public
utilities
committee
meeting
uh
the
utilities
department
presented
their
quarterly
training
report
and
public
works
committed
to
presenting
that
at
this
meeting.
um
But
we've
decided
to
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
the
next
meeting
when
counselor
v
hill
koppler
will
be
president.
A
A
D
Sure,
thank
you
chairman.
um
Let's
see
I'm
going
to
get
my
handy-dandy
little
cheat
sheet
out
here,
I'm
going
to
go
to
the
website.
The
website
is
really
great.
If
you
haven't
already
connected
to
it,
it's
uh
santa
fe
led
dot.
Com
will
get
you
there
um
and
it
has
uh
all
the
specific
locations
and
a
bunch
of
information,
and
so
we
had
the
grand
opening
of
our
demonstration
sites
on
friday
night
um
and
we
had
staff
present
at
two
of
the
sites.
D
uh
The
one
at
frenchie's
field
and
the
one
at
jaguar,
drive
and
there's
also
one
at
governor
miles
governor
miles
is
the
really
residential
um
demonstration,
that's
the
one
that
has
lights,
that
are
the
lumen
and
color
that
would
be
considered
for
the
residential
areas.
So
that's
an
important
one
for
everyone
to
go
by
and
see,
and
then
uh
jaguar
drive
is
between
paseo
del
sol
and
avenida
contenta
right
near
the
um
cesar
chavez,
elementary
school.
D
In
fact,
you
can
park
at
the
school
and
go
and
see
it,
and
then
the
other
demonstration
is
on
st
michael's
drive
west
of
5th
street
um
and
we're
so
we
had
a
pretty
good
turnout
at
frenchies.
I
think
there
was
it
well
at
jaguar
drive.
We
got
to
talk
to
a
lot
of
people,
we
got
a
bunch
of
feedback
and
and
had
our
own
experience
of
the
demonstration,
which
was
really
valuable
and
we've
already
got
the
team
working
on
some
additional
uh
work
for
the
demonstrations
and
the
design
based
on
the
feedback.
D
um
One
of
the
things
that
we
got
a
lot
of
requests
for
was
uh
the
back
shield.
You
know
because
people
have
uh
some
uh
street
lights
shine
in
their
windows,
and
so
they
want
to.
We
now
will
be
able
to
put
an
additional
shield,
if
that's
the
case,
and
and
so
they
wanted
to
see
what
that
looked
like.
So
we
were
gonna
put
one
of
those
at
each
site
and
um
we
got
feedback
that
people.
So
it's
a
it
was
a
blind
double-blind
test.
D
I
didn't
even
know
which
lights
were
which,
and
so
it
was
just
like-
walk
through
experience
and
provide
feedback
based
on
like
the
numbers.
Each
poll
that
a
street
light
is
on
has
a
a
poster
on
it
and
a
number:
uh
a
qr
code,
a
website
address
and
a
phone
number
to
call
with
feedback,
and-
um
and
so
it
was
great
actually
to
be
out
there
and
not
know
and
just
kind
of
get
the
experience
of
the
lights.
D
But
we
are
going
to
be
releasing
this
week
a
sheet
that
tells
you
all
about
what
you're
seeing
out
there.
So
what
are
the
colors?
What's
the
pattern
on
the
ground?
What
are
the
lumens
at
the
different
um
locations
so
we'll
be
providing
all
those
details
and
probably
inviting
people
to
come,
see
um
any
modifications
that
we
do
to
the
demonstrations
based
on
the
feedback?
And
so
I
hope
to
get
those
uh
you
know,
get
an
update
from
the
team
on
that
and
maybe
get
them
installed
by
next
friday.
H
C
Miss
wheelers
spoke
about
modifications
because
there
was
a
lot
of
concern
friday
night
in
regards
to
the
lighting
that
was
available,
the
the
products
that
were
available
um
feedback
that
was
heard,
etc,
because
I
I
do
have
a
laundry
list
of
questions
that
either
arose
from
friday
night
or
that
constituents
have
uh
sent
either
to
me-
or
I
think
there
was.
I've
even
saw
some
to
the
entire
governing
body
that
I
was
going
to
just
send
along
to
to
get
asked.
C
C
We
really
need
to
present
the
the
menu
of
options
available
to
folks,
and
I
think
that's
probably
one
of
the
biggest
concerns
I
heard
on
friday
was
that
the
options
available
at
one
location
was
very
limited
in
scope.
You
didn't
have
your
whole
menu
of
options.
This
is
what
we're
planning
on
presenting,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
miss
wheeler,
that
is
going
to
be
part
of
the
changes,
but
I
I
would
really
hope
that
we
we
present
the
lighting
in
a
manner
where
it
is
everything
I
think
you
know.
C
C
Most
folks
know
what
they
want.
They
do
the
research
they
they
make
sure
that
when
they're
investing
their
resources
that
it's
going
to
be
a
product
that
they're
not
going
to
want
to
turn
in
within
four
days
or
five
days,
whatever
it
may
be,
that
they're
really
committed
to
that
product,
and
so
in
that
instance,
going
to
blind
test.
The
product
was
not
the
right
process
to
me,
and
I
think
I
don't
know
if
that
was
a
city
process
or
adelchia.
C
um
If
it
was
delcias,
then
it's
it's
evidence
that
they
don't
understand.
The
community
engagement
process,
and
that
was
another
concern
from
folks
was
delcia,
has
no
experience
engaging
the
community.
I
think
this
the
this
uh
I
can't
remember
cheyenne's
last
name
but
cheyenne
mentioned
that's
not
delqia's
role,
they
don't
they
don't
engage
the
community
they're
the
service
providers,
not
the
community
engagers,
so
having
them
being
put
in
that
position
was
really
a
unique
first
time,
instance
for
them,
and
I
think
it's
obvious.
C
The
community
is
very
concerned
about
the
process,
the
speed
of
the
process
and
the
the
way
at
least
there's
been
so
many
hiccups
along
the
way,
and
there
was
a
lot
on
friday
and
I
do
hope
we
can
get
the
process
cleaned
up
that
way.
The
the
community
can
ultimately
understand
what
they're
investing
in,
because
we
we
need
to
ensure
that,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
they
we
have
their
support
and
right
now
I
do
not
believe
we
have
that
it
was.
C
C
That
way,
it
helps
to
get
that
information
out
to
the
community,
because
if
one
person
has
a
question,
I'm
sure
there's
probably
at
least
five
or
six
or
many
others
that
have
that
same
question
and
the
faq
is,
I
think,
it's
necessary
for
this
process,
um
but
but
I
will
like
my
intention
is
to
that
way.
The
other
governing
body
members
can
and
can
uh
hear
my
concerns
about
the
process.
I
was
planning
on
providing
more
of
an
update
on
wednesday
and
not
in
the
limited
capacities
now,
but
uh
I
encourage
folks
to
get
out.