►
From YouTube: Public Works and Utilities for May 11, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
D
B
H
A
D
J
J
B
B
B
B
D
B
B
B
B
D
B
B
F
E
F
E
Come
to
view
the
a
distance,
the
aeration
project
is
gonna,
do
multiple
things
one.
It's
gonna
extend
the
control
system
into
the
secondary
process.
It's
gonna
replace
structure,
including
isolation,
valves
that
control
it's
gonna,
it's
gonna
replace
the
the
blower
system.
All
of
these
things
treat
challenges
for
the
for
the
facility
is
how
they
look
at
managing
the
aeration
system.
E
So
again,
this
is
gonna.
Get
us
a
long
ways,
I
believe
what
you're
asking
me
is
as
well.
The
plan
still
experience
upsets
but
I
be
an
issue
answer
is
I
still
do
anticipate
that
the
plant
potentially
could
still
become
upset.
So
what
will
be
when
is
equipping
the
facility
with
the
ability
to
respond
faster
and
with
more
precision
in
the
controls
that
they
make.
E
F
E
E
F
E
Accounts
of
your
coupler
can
I,
don't
know
that
could
speak
to
the
specifics
of
the
actual
opening
of
the
golf
course.
I
do
know
that
the
Marty
Sanchez
golf
course
in
the
MRC
both
have
on-site
storage
I'm
in
their
pawns.
So
if
there
is
a
dramatic
difference
between
the
two
I
apologize,
I
I
couldn't
speak
to
that.
F
For
us-
and
you
know,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
get
something
for
that
and
you're
telling
me
that
you
think
we
will
that
it's
pretty
good
chance
that
it
may
make,
may
not
be
sufficient
in
the
future.
But
should
we
do
this?
It
will
make
a
big
difference
and
I
guess.
What's
what
is
the
significance
of
81
calendar
days?
It's
an
odd
number.
E
F
K
F
F
What's
going
on
with
the
Marty
Sanchez,
with
the
MRC
and
and
especially
the
golf
course
and
anticipated
opening
I
think
are
at
least
my
constituents
that
I
know
are
pretty
they're
getting
pretty
antsy,
and
you
know
we've
gotten
a
lot
of
stop
we'll
stop,
though,
and
since
we're
all
kind
of
stuck
stuck
doing,
you
know
filling
up
our
time
with
whatever
an
opportunity
for
golf
is
something
that's
that's
become
very
important
to
a
lot
of
people.
So
thank
you
very
much.
If
you
could
email
me,
that
would
be
great.
B
B
H
B
I
I
I
Are
you
ok?
Was
it
heavy
founder,
titled,
Mountain,
River,
consulting
yeah,
I?
Guess
really
it
would
be
after
page
12
and
the
caption
on
it
is
not
River
consulting
and
in
the
middle
of
the
page,
it's
upper
third,
it
says
position
senior
JD,
Edwards
specialist
fee
for
our
135.
You
got
it.
Thank
you.
I
got
ya
for
sure.
Nancy.
C
L
C
So
what
it
is,
is
it's
the
third
year
of
a
four-year
contract,
and
we
do
need
to
bring
this
forward
to
all
of
the
committees
each
year
to
increase
that
third
or
fourth
year.
So
this
would
be
the
third
year
of
theoretically
a
four-year
contract
with
Mountain
River.
They
are
the
consulting
group
that
works
with
our
current.
You
see
is
billing
system.
C
They
have
been
instrumental
in
creating
the
ties
between
our
you
see
is
billing
system
and
the
financial
system,
so
the
e1
system
that
we
used
to
that
financed
used
to
have,
and
now,
of
course,
munis
that
we've
moved
into.
So
this
is
just
that
additional
third
year
or
four
they're,
all
teen
I,
guess
you
could
say
knowledge
and
better
IT
support.
Unfortunately,
then,
what
potentially
our
IT
department
since
they're,
so
few
of
them
to
make
sure
that
our
system
builds
correctly
and
and
works
for
our
utility
customers?
C
I
C
$750
act
for
the
first
year
was
two
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
the
second
year
it
did
increase,
which
is
the
current
fiscal
year
that
we're
in
now
to
seven
hundred
thousand,
and
we
will
be
asking
for
that.
Seven
hundred
thousand
for
next
fiscal
year,
however,
of
course
hope
that
we
don't
need
to
spend
that
much.
Okay,.
I
I
Here's
here's
my
problem
with
this:
we're
contracting
for
$700,000
the
way
I
understand
this
for
a
hundred
and
thirty-five
dollars
an
hour
plus
travel
and
per
diem
I.
Suppose
that
comes
out
to
almost
fifty
two
hundred
hours,
which
is
two
and
a
half
full-time
people
at
two
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars
a
year.
It
just
seems
way
too
expensive.
How
can
it
possibly
be
this
much
money?
I
C
I
do
understand
your
your
concern
and
I
do
know.
You
know
we
review
every
item
that
the
Mountain
River
consults
to
have
phone
message
or
phone
calls
with
them.
One
of
the
individuals
actually
that
is
under
this
contract
lives
here
in
Santa,
Fe
and
she's,
actually
retired
city
employee.
So
she
really
does
have
the
most
background
and
experience
for
what
we
need
through
this
system.
Unfortunately,
the
UC
is
system
is
this
twenty
years
old
and
there
aren't
a
whole
lot
of
consultants
or
even
employees
that
we
could
hire.
C
You
know
to
work
an
eight-hour
day
through
the
city
and
that's
unfortunately
where
or
why
we're
kind
of
where
we're
at
right
now,
with
mountain
river,
we
will
hopefully
be
bringing
forward
in
the
next
couple
of
months,
the
movement
from
away
from
you
CIS
and
into
a
new
billing
system
which
is
through
advanced
and
then
at
some
point.
You
know
in
the
near
future.
This
mountain
river
contract
would
have
almost
ceased
to
exist
once
we
have
that
new
billing
system
up
and
running
and-
and
you
know-
and
moving
forward
with
that
new
system.
C
But
yes,
the
hundred
and
thirty-five
dollars
does
seem
very
steep.
There
is
no,
at
this
point,
travel
or
per
diem,
or
anything
like
that
due
to
the
individual
living
here
in
Santa
Fe.
So
there
isn't
any
at
least
that
cost,
but
there
is
135
dollars
per
hour
when
you
know
something
is
either
needed
to
be
rewritten
or
the
interfaces
between.
C
I
We're
talking
about
5200
hours
that
that
seems
impossible
to
me,
I
mean
that's
hot,
bring
a
consultant
to
two
and
a
half
full-time
people
at
two
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars
a
year,
each
I
and
we're
looking
at
it
again
for
a
cure,
fiscally
I,
just
I,
don't
think
I
can
support
this.
If
we
better
a
retired
person
that
has
found
themselves
a
secondary
gig
at
135
dollars
an
hour
good
for
them,
but
two
for
two
and
a
half
full-time
people
I
just
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
me.
I
B
F
C
Well,
we're
losing
the
communication
between
our
billing
system
and
the
financial
system,
the
immunised
system.
We
will
be
able
to
actually
have
the
communication
between
our
billing
system
to
get
it
into
the
finance
system,
so
the
revenues
that
we
receive
through
our
villain
system
then
would
not
communicate
with
the
muna
system.
So
we
would
really
be
looking
at
two
different
financial
systems
and
I
I.
Don't
believe
that
that's
what
Finance
you
know
wants
us
to
do.
C
The
the
muna
system
is
the
new
financial
system
that
we
do
need
to
report
to
the
state
with,
so
it
would
be
losing
all
of
that
interaction.
The
IT
department,
I,
know
uses
or
assists
with.
You
know
the
the
mountain
river
contract
with
items
that
they
you
know,
need
mountain
rivers,
consulting
for
I'm,
sorry,
I'm,
not
an
IT
expert,
so
I'm
not
sure
I'd
have
to
get.
You
know
some
answers
from
Josh
Alessio
to
tell
you
specifically
what
she
might
be
working
on
with
you
know
the
IT
department
and
then
just
our
billing
system
itself.
C
We
do
have
and
had
some
issues
just
you
know,
Thursday
in
our
billing
of
cycle
3
or
excuse
me
cycle
1.
You
know
just
in
that.
If
you
don't
do
the
billing
in
a
specific
order
through
this
checklist,
then
unfortunately,
you've
got
to
stop
the
billing
sort
of
reset
it.
With
the
help
of
these
consultants
that
can
do
the
things
on
the
back
side
or
the
IT
side.
I
guess
you
could
say
you
know
and
and
I
mean
our
billing
right
now
takes
about
three
hours
at
night,
every
Thursday
after
five
o'clock.
C
So
once
we've
basically
shut
down
the
system,
then
we
you
know,
do
the
billing
for
the
three
hours.
So
it
is
quite
labor
intensive
and
I
really
would
I
would
really
hope
that
we
could,
you
know,
find
a
middle
ground
again.
I
don't
want
to
spend
the
whole
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
either,
but
unfortunately
there
are
some
things
that
we
just
don't
have
the
expertise
here
to
fix,
for
you
know
the
customers
and
for
the
bills
that
go
out
each
week.
Thank.
F
Was
a
receiver,
a
really
bad
utility
service
billing,
the
worst
I've
ever
seen
it
was
just
awful
and
I
couldn't
fix
it,
and
city
can
fix.
It
was
just
it
was
terrible
and
I'd
hate
to
go
back
to
those
days.
You
know
so
no
I
I
guess.
Yes,
it
is
a
lot
of
money,
but
it
maybe
it
could
be
more
if
we
didn't
have
a
reliable
person
working
with
us
on
this
and
and
too
bad
it
cost
this
much.
But
if
you
don't
spend
the
whole
seven
hundred,
that
would
be
great.
F
Maybe
maybe
we
wouldn't,
but
my
question,
and
initially
when
I
hold
this
is
it
did
say
that
she
asked
for
this
in
your
next
year's
budget
request
and
knowing
what
we're
going
through
now
with
you
know
pretty
hard
times
and
we're
seeing
this
contract
now?
What
if
we
approve
this,
but
then
the
you're
not
successful
in
getting
this
money?
What
happens
then
Oh.
C
If
the
budgets
not
approved,
then,
unfortunately
all
of
our
trucks
would
have
to
be
looked
at
and
either
cut
or
we'd
have
the
30
day
clause
to
cancel
it.
So
you
know
really,
as
we
move
forward
I'm
sure
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
departments
that
are
bringing
contracts
forward
now
in
May
and
June
that
need
to
start
in
July,
but
the
budget
may
or
may
not
be
approved.
F
H
C
You
know,
what's
come
up,
I
do
know
that
the
conversion
into
or
with
munis
has
been
a
little
bit,
probably
higher
than
what
I
would
like
each
week
just
to
make
sure
that
you
know
that
that
communication
is
happening
from
the
finance
from
the
new
finance
system.
In
our
you
know,
in
our
you
CIS
systems,
okay,.
H
H
If
the
money
is
there
they're
going
to
do
their
work
to
try
to
get
every
single
penny
from
it
and
that's
you
know
it's
capitalism
they're
going
to
do
their
best
to
do
that.
So
then.
My
next
question
is
you
know
why
four
years
and
what?
What
are
the
next
steps
after
this
contract
is
done?
If,
if
our
systems
don't
necessarily
talk
to
each
other
and
the
consultant
is
the
expert-
that's
kind
of
guiding
us
what
happens
next?
C
Can't
speak
for
the
many
years
ago.
I
can
speak,
of
course,
for
about
the
last
year
and
we
are
still
simultaneously
trying
to
bring
forward
a
new
billing
system,
which
is
an
advanced.
It's
called
advanced
where
you
know
we're
trying
to
bring
that
forward,
which
then
ultimately
will
almost
eliminate
the
Mountain
River
Consulting
Group.
C
You
know
so
that
the
advanced
new
billing
system
will
talk
to
the
munis
billing
system
for
finance
or
I
should
say
for
for
the
whole
city's
finance,
and
you
know
this.
This
middle
kind
of
consultant
then
basically
goes
away
once
we
have
advanced
and
everything
is
written
in
code
correctly
and
from
our
billing
system.
It'll
go
straight
into
munis
and
there
there
shouldn't
be
either
need
I.
C
The
advanced
system,
the
the
initial
startup
for
that
was
back
in
2013
and
it
had
stalled
out.
The
the
the
advanced
company
was
here
for
several
months
and
for
whatever
reason
at
that
time
it
was
Version.
Three
we
just
couldn't,
or
utility
billing
couldn't
get
the
advanced
system
to
work
for
what
we
needed
to
do
for
billing
of
the
trash
and
billing
for
wastewater.
C
So
there
has
been
sort
of
a
temporary
on
hold
I
guess
you
could
say
advanced
was
they
have
now
moved
to
a
version,
for
they
did
an
upgrade
on
their.
You
know
on
their
software.
They
do
believe
that
now,
with
what
we
do,
Bill
out
of
UC,
is
they
have
upgraded
their
systems
so
that
their
version
four
will
allow
us
to
basically
do
everything
that
we
asked
for
them
to
do
back
in
version
three
that
couldn't
happen
so
right
now,
I
would
say:
Mountain
River
is
the
kind
of
band-aid.
C
That's
helped
us
over
the
last
couple
of
years
to
get
advanced
moving
in
the
right
direction.
We
had
to
renegotiate
con
max.
We
had
to
renegotiate
dollar
amounts
with
advanced,
and
that
is
like
I
said.
Hopefully,
what
I
bring
forward
I'm,
hoping
next
public
utility
meeting?
Excuse
me?
Public
works
public
utility
meeting
now
in
May
worst
case.
It
would
be
the
first
meeting
in
June,
but
we
do
believe
that
we
do
have
a
good
contract
now
renegotiated
with
advance
so
that
we
could
move
forward.
H
C
H
Now,
I
think
that
we
it's
prudent
of
us
to
start
looking
at
next
steps,
given
that
this
is
the
contract
or
this
current
MOU
is
entering
in
three
or
four,
and
so
we
want
to
start
planning
and
not
because
this
is
a
lot
of
money,
I'm
gonna
line
with
counsel
and
down.
This
is
a
lot
of
money
and
we
should
be
looking
at
how
we
can
be
getting
away
from
bringing
on
high-priced
consultants
and
and
I
understand.
They
are
going
to
be
necessary
at
times,
but
for
four
years
in
a
row.
H
A
C
I
Just
saying
that
this
contract
allows
them
to
bill
the
three
consultants
between
the
three
of
them:
it's
a
hundred
hours
a
week
that
we're
paying
and
consulting
fees
and
just
I,
don't
know
it
seems
like.
Maybe
we
could
have
picked
up
the
ball
on
some
of
this
and
and
been
able
to
have
done
some
of
this
work
ourselves.
I
Advance
that's
been
a
long
process
if
we've
been
working
on
that
since
2013
I'm
concerned
about
how
that's
going
to
work
out,
I
mean
that'll,
be
we're
talking
about
that.
Maybe
in
20
21
22
that's
going
to
be
a
nine
year
old
system.
By
the
time
we
get
it
up
and
running.
This
is
a
20
year
old
system
that,
just
year
after
year,
it's
700
thousand
dollars,
and
it
doesn't
matter
to
me
that
it's
an
enterprise
fund
and
that
the
fund
is
generating
the
money
to
pay
for
it.
I
B
Thank
You
councilman
Dale
any
other
questions,
Nancy
I.
Think
of
my
questions
were
asked
by
staff
already,
but
I'm
sorry
by
councillors
already,
but
I
have
to
tend
to
agree.
I
wouldn't
want.
You
know.
Jd
Edwards
at
some
point
has
to
go
away
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
that
point.
So
I'll
support
this
for
now,
but
would
like
to
see
it.
F
B
D
G
Did
this
pass
the
Finance
Committee,
no
mr.
chairman,
and
it
hasn't
gone
to
finance
I,
look
at
the
agenda.
It
says
it's
scheduled
for
the
18th
and
I
was
going
to
suggest
whether
this
passed
or
not
that
when
it
before
it
gets
to
or
not
finance,
we
have
maybe
IT
support
and
other
departments
that
may
want
to
chime
in
on
this
as
to
it
was
important,
and
why
we're
continuing
to
use
this
service
I
agree.
B
I
M
Mr.
chairman,
absolute
consulars,
the
a
comm
contract
is
an
ongoing
contract
that
is
used
primarily
for
damage
and
earring
work
and
for
the
Associated
Water
Resources
engineering
and
study
work.
A
calm
has
been.
This
is
a
four
year
contract
and
we've
used
it
for
to
investigate
and
do
a
analysis
of
safety
analysis
of
the
our
two
dams,
Nichols
and
McClure,
and
we've
done
a
semi
quantitative
risk
assessment
that
has
identified
and
helped
prioritize
dam
safety
related
improvements
that
are
required,
and
then
we
followed
that
up.
M
Then
we
will
continue
the
rehabilitation
plans
for
nickels
that
not
that
works
and
we've
got
the
30
percent
design,
and
this
is
basically
a
stepwise
process
and
and
they're
also
working-
and
these
are
all
this
is
done.
In
conjunction
we've
met
with
the
dam
safety
bureau
on
all
key
steps
of
our
work
plan
and
to
get
their
input
on
this
as
they
are
the
regulatory
agency.
M
The
house
approve,
the
any
dam,
design,
changes
and,
and
one
thing
that
they'll
require-
is
an
update
at
the
hydrological,
a
flood,
hydrological
study
and
that's
that's
being
asked
of
anytime.
You
go
and
do
a
large
project
we're
going
to
be
looking
at,
especially
during
climate
there's,
new
criteria
for
looking
at
the
u.s.
storm
events
and
how
fast
reservoirs
would
be
filled
and
the
potential
for
flooding
over
the
top
and
and
then
we're
also
several
smaller
tasks
that
we
are
working
on
or
have
just
completed
this
here.
But
and
they
are
a
snowmelt
prediction
tool.
M
So
we
can
gauge
the
runoffs
of
the
watershed.
The
snowpack
and
a-come
serves
as
the
city
of
Santa
Fe
as
dam
owner,
our
our
engineer,
and
this
is
and
they
perform
well
so
emergency
action
planning
services.
So
if
there's
ever
an
event,
we
have
a
nationally-recognized
dam
engineering
and
Water
Resources
consult
available
and
locally
the
Albuquerque
office,
Don
Lopez,
who
was
with
the
dam
safety,
Bureau
and
corps
of
engineers,
it's
under
contract,
to
make
immediate
visits
and
consultations
for
dam
safety.
M
This
contract
is
task-oriented
deliverables
and
right
now
we're
seeing
a
four-year
contract
well
get
us
through
Nichols
dam,
rehabilitation
and
and
actually
McClure
Dam
is
going
to
have
to
have
the
same
improvements
to
the
outlet
conduits,
although
not
quite
as
expensive,
because
it's
not
a
terminal
reservoir,
but
it
will
have
to
have
a
similar
set
of
improvements.
Well,.
M
Both
Nichols
and
McClure
had
the
inclined
intakes
installed
to
replace
intake
towers
and,
and
what
the
the
prime
that
we're
doing
now
is
the
outlet
conduit.
This
is
a
five
foot
diameter
conduit
that
goes
from
the
bottom
of
the
reservoir
through
the
dam
in
Bank.
Myth
has
been
identified
during
State
Engineer
inspections,
as
well
as
our
own
engineering
inspections,
its
it
needs
to
be
realigned,
which
is
typical
of
dams
and
in
the
hundred-year-old
ranges
where
we're
starting
to
be.
I
I'm,
looking
at
page
44
or
57
in
our
packet
I,
don't
know
that
you
necessarily
need
to
go
there.
It's
talking
about
the
payment
schedule
for
fee,
it's
section,
three
point
three
point
one,
and
it
says
for
services
rendered
the
owner
shall
pay
the
engineer
at
the
rate
of
two
point:
nine
seven
times
direct
payroll
cost.
I
M
That's
a
my
experience
in
our
water
engineering,
it's
about
a
three
to
one
fee
and
the
and
these
are
in
competitive
proposals
and
not
that
that's
very
close,
sometimes
they're.
You
know
a
little
bit
more
or
less,
but
they're
usually
like
there's
this
2.97
and
typically
it
might
be.
Maybe
two
point:
eight
five,
that's
just
the
standard
ugly
did.
We
was.
I
M
B
D
B
J
N
D
N
N
I
have
spoken
with
the
architect.
You
know
I,
think
there's
you
know
there
potentially
might
be
ways
to
to
D
scope,
some
of
it
potentially
I
actually
reached
out
to
Franken
as
well.
They
had
you
know
in
terms
of
maybe
some
impact
from
Kovac
getting
material
might
have
been
an
issue
that
raised
some
of
the
price
some
of
the
cost.
They
also
had
some
issues
with
some
subcontractors
and
I'm
not
getting
a
good
response
on
certain
trades
with
training
and
some
specialized
concrete
work.
O
O
So
if
the
station
does
not
move
forward,
we
will
have
to
renegotiate
the
annexation
coverage
with
the
county,
but
public
safety
stick
will
still
be
provided
for
that
area
and
then
again
the
biggest
concern
for
me
as
the
fire
chief
is
the
recurring
cost
of
needing
six
positions
for
that
fire
station.
Three
is
company
officers,
captains
and
three
driver
engineers.
Those
are
recurring
costs
of
the
captain's
position
is
about
$120,000
a
year
salary
and
benefits
times
3,
and
then
the
engineer
driver
is
about
$90,000
recurring
times
3.
O
B
J
The
price
of
these
bids
came
in
at
is
weighing
heavy
on
our
decision
on
whether
the
project
or
not.
So
once
we
talked
to
the
county
and
see
how
he
continued
coverage
by
the
county
looks
like
we'll
be
able
to
come
back
to
you
guys
with
a
more
permanent
combination.
If
we
don't
move
forward
the
project
it
does
free
up,
you
know
be
seven
million
dollars
or
so
of
capital
funds
or
capitalizable
expensive.
This
upcoming
fiscal.
L
B
O
B
Okay
and
then
one
final
question,
probably
for
all
three
of
you
is
this
fire
station
had
some
additional
aspects
to
it
that
may
or
may
not
have
been
needed.
One
was
the
tower
which,
at
one
point
I
know
you
felt
was
necessary.
The
other
one
was
individual
bathrooms
for,
for
everyone.
Is
there
a
way
to
relook
at
that
and
see
if,
if
it
can
come
down
and
possibly
be
rebid
or
is?
Is
that
just
minimal
dollars
in
the
grand
scheme
of
things.
O
Mr.
chairs,
far
as
the
tower
goes,
that
was
going
to
provide
a
secondary
radio
site.
Currently
we
have
one
radio
sites
of
that
prime
site
as
they
referred
to
it.
If
they
were
to
go
down,
we
don't
have
a
back-up
plan,
so
that
tower
was
going
to
be
utilized
for
two
reasons:
one
is
a
training
facility
and
one
as
a
secondary
communications
tower,
where
a
point-to-point
microwave
would
be
pointed
from
the
tower
to
the
re-see,
see
that
that's
the
main
reason
for
the
tower:
the
secondary
of
the
bathrooms.
O
It's
more
for
cancer
prevention,
we're
trying
to
do
a
decon
area
of
going
from
a
hot
zone
to
alarms
onto
a
cold
zone
where
the
firefighters
have
their
living
quarters,
so
we're
trying
to
do
a
gross
decon
initially
when
they
ride
back
to
the
station
and
then
separating
them
from
their
living
quarters.
So
that
was
the
reasoning
for
that
for
that
zone
the
separate
bathrooms
mr.
Rane
did
you
want
to
add.
N
Yeah
I
just
want
to
add
that
they
have
spoken
with
the
architect
and
the
tower
is
a
significant
cost.
Just
just
FYI
I
mean
if,
if
we're
to
take
it
out,
it
would
be
a
significant
savings.
It
would
take
some
effort
and
some
time
to
do
that,
although
it's
you
know
it's.
So
it's
to
the
side,
it's
fairly
isolated,
to
be
fairly
easy
to
in
terms
of
the
drawings
and
designed
it
to
take
it
out.
So
it
is,
it
is
a
significant.
F
I
in
reducing
costs
for
the
station
I
would
not
be
in
favor
of
reducing
the
decontamination
portion,
because
I
think
that
is
really
important
to
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
firefighters
and
it's
it's
not.
You
hardly
ever
get
a
chance
to
have
an
impact
on
decontamination
because
of
all
of
our
fire
stations
are
already
built
and
don't
include
that.
But
if
you
look
at
statistics
on
health
and
firefighters,
cancer
is
you
know
from
contaminants
is,
is
really
really
high
and
it's
a
big
big
risk.
F
O
Mr.
chair
I
believe
we
had
700
excuse
me,
which
7
million
dollars
for
this
project.
It
started
off
at
4.5
where
that
number
came
from
I'm,
not
sure,
and
then,
when
we
were
doing
the
GRT
bond,
a
million
dollars
was
transferred
from
the
radio
project
to
help
supplement
the
fire
station
bill,
as
well
as
impact
fees
but
I
believe
the
cost
for
that
project
was
about
7
million.
L
J
Thank
you
guys
was
regarding
information
from
our
bond
Council
on
how
we
can
utilize
some
of
our
funds.
um
As
explaining
in
general
obligation
bond
money
is
limited
to
what
went
out
to
the
voters,
so
we'll
use
that
information
to
help
us
make
our
decisions
on
on
how
to
prioritize
that
money,
but
the
gross
receipts,
tax
bond
money,
making
bond
money
and
previous
sponsor
of
that
kite
whose
bond
proceeds
are
flexible
to
a
degree.
So
what
we're
gonna
do
is
put
together.
We're
gonna
start
working
on
this
one.
J
This
is
the
capital
projects
that
were
working
on
and
kind
of
figure
out
on
what
possible
money
we
could
repurpose.
The
flip
side
of
this
of
this
process
is
to
determine
the
spending,
and
so
there's
some
kind
of
accounting
exercise
that
has
to
be
done
once
we
determine
what
we're
going
to
spend
it
on
and
their
life
expectancy,
and
it
has
to
be
a
percentage
of
the
life
of
the
bond
so
anyways.
Once
we
get
all
that
information
together,
I
mean
how
much
of
that
money
we
can
reappropriation.
B
Very
good,
thank
you,
John
any
thing
from
the
Committee
on
what
John
just
said.
All
right
see
nothing
next
round,
two
matters
from
the
chair:
I
have
nothing
just
wanted
to.
Thank
you
all
for
being
here
tonight
continue
to
be
safe.
Now
this
is
getting
frustrating
for
everybody,
especially
now
that
the
weather's
getting
warm
but
hang
in
there
we'll
all
get
through
this.