►
From YouTube: Public Works & Utilities Meeting 4/25/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
E
B
C
B
A
B
B
B
E
B
B
B
D
I
just
wanted
to
uh
provide
the
committee
with
an
overview
of
some
of
the
things
happening
um
with
water
at
the
moment.
I
trust
everyone
can
see
my
screen.
Let
me
know
if
you
can't
um
just
move
so
we
did
just
complete
our
annual
report
and
uh
we
included
the
executive
summary
in
the
packet,
um
and
I
will
include
some
of
the
key
figures
from
the
report
in
this
presentation,
but
really
and
it's
about
a
22-page
report,
it's
available
on
our
website
and
and
in
many
ways
it's
written
for
members
of
this
committee.
D
D
We
turned
the
canyon
road
water
treatment
plant
off
for
almost
seven
weeks
um
from
june
well
into
july,
and
this
was
sort
of
a
proof
that
that
we
could
serve
the
entire
city
during
peak
demand
without
that,
that's
that
source
of
water.
So
this
was
a
helpful
sort
of
experiment.
Let's
not
it's
um
a
helpful
exercise
that
we
went
through
that
helps
us
understand
how
to
do
that.
D
We
try
and
use
that
preferentially
and
we
try
and
save
our
well
water
for
for
times
of
drought,
and
I
think
it's
worth
noting
that
even
in
2021,
which
was
a
dry
year,
almost
80
percent
of
the
water
that
we
did
treat
and
deliver
to
our
customers
came
from
the
rivers
and
and
the
well
production
was
about
20
and
and
quite
a
bit
below
what
we
think
our
total
sustainable
ability
to
produce
from
those
wells
would
be.
And
so
we
expect
that
water
levels
continued
to
rise
in
in
our
wells
and
in
our
aquifers.
D
Last
year
on
the
reservoir
storage
side
of
things,
we
started
the
year
with
more
water
and
storage,
both
on
the
santa
fe
river
shown
on
the
left
and
on
the
chama
system
on
the
right
than
we
ended
up
with
it's
worth,
pointing
out
that
these
scales
are
very
different.
So
we
ended
with
over
12
000
acre
feet
of
storage,
uh
either
in
heron
or
abiquiu,
compared
to
less
than
a
thousand
acre
feet
of
storage
on
the
santa
fe
river.
D
D
And
in
terms
of
looking
forward
to
the
next
year,
this
chart
on
the
left
is
there's
a
lot
going
on
in
here,
but
it's
a
pretty
neat
chart
that
shows
this
is
essentially
water
stored
in
the
snowpack
as
uh
from
october
through
july
and
the
the
colors
show.
Historically,
um
the
green
is
the
median
so
where
we
would
be
in
and
then
the
purple
is
the
maximum.
D
But
um
with
these
winds
and
and
this
dry
weather
that
we're
experiencing
now,
um
it's
still
not
a
great
year
on
the
santa
fe
river,
but
based
on
that
information,
we
then
make
a
plan
on
how
we
want
to
try
and
use
our
resources
for
the
year,
and
this
is
our
annual
operating
plan
at
this
time,
and
this
is
for
city
and
county
combined.
So
it
adds
up
to
a
bigger
number.
D
The
cash
balance
is
the
green
line,
and
then
our
debt
is
the
the
purple
line
on
the
bottom
and
the
cash
expenditures
in
red.
I
guess
just
one
thing
to
point
out
is
that
we
have
nearly
90
million
dollars
in
just
four
capital
projects
on
the
horizon
and
we
expect
that
those
will
draw
down
our
cash
reserves
and
we
probably
will
or
we're
planning
to
bond
some
portion,
probably
of
the
san
juan
chamber,
return
flow
project.
D
So
those
projections
show
our
cash
balance
being
drawn
down
and
taking
on
some
debt
associated
with
these
new
projects
and
just
to
sort
of
give
an
order
of
magnitude
and
list
those
projects.
We
have
the
nichols
dam
outlet,
conduit,
rebuild
that's
going
to
start
in
the
next
year
or
so.
uh
The
construction
estimates
keep
going
up.
It's
close
to
it's
around
19
million
dollars
is
the
latest
estimate.
We
have
um
we're
we're
doing
a
big
uh
renovation
at
the
canyon
road
plant
on
the
order
of
13
million
dollars.
D
Mcclure
will
be
a
couple
years
out
similar
to
what
we're
doing
at
nichols,
so
we're
just
estimating
a
similar
amount,
and
then
the
san
juan
chamber
return
flow
project
at
35
million
dollars.
I
think
we're
all
aware
of
what's
happening
with
inflation
and
supply
chains
and
costs,
and
so
these
are.
These
are
tentative
numbers.
The
the
nichols
number
is
the
best.
The
rest
of
these
could
continue
to
rise
almost
every
time.
So
we
ask
somebody
for
the
for
the
latest
estimate
uh
an
update
on
the
san
juan
trauma
return
flow
project.
D
In
that
way,
the
the
status
of
that
is
that
we
did
submit
a
return
flow
credit
application
with
the
office
of
the
state
engineer
in
november
and
we're
hoping
by
the
end
of
this
month,
just
in
the
next
few
days
that
that
will
actually
be
publicly
noticed.
um
We
are
in
um
the
nepa
process.
We
held
two
successful
public
scoping
meetings
last
year
in
november
and
then
based
on
that
information,
we're
refining
our
proposal
for
the
actual
nepa
analysis
and
targeting
a
nepa
document.
D
Every
april,
the
um
director
of
city
of
santa
fe
water
is
required
by
code
to
provide
um
a
memo
to
the
city
manager,
um
we're
recommending
whether
we
should
be
in
a
state
of
water
emergency,
and
we
have
recommended
that
we
do
not
need.
uh
We
are
not
in
a
water
emergency.
This
year
um
we
we
previously
presented
to
this
committee,
the
santa
fe
water
resources
indicator,
which
was
included
in
that
memo
as
a
potential
pilot
to
use
in
future
years,
instead
of
what's
currently
used
as
a
comparison
of
operational
demand
and
operational
supply.
D
According
to
all
three
of
those
methods.
uh
Well,
there's
two
methods:
there's
an
administrative
procedures,
method,
there's
we.
We
supplement
that
with
staff
estimates,
because
there
are
some
things
about
those
administrative
procedures
that
are
a
little
out
of
date,
but
in
either
case
they
actually
come
up
with
a
surprisingly
similar
number
that
we
do
have
plenty
of
space
between
what
we
could
supply
and
what
we
expect
will
be
the
demand
and
then
the
water
resources
indicator
as
a
potentially
a
different
way
to
do
that
going
forward.
D
um
We
have
uh
our
annual,
what's
up
with
water
public
webinar
occurring
on
thursday,
either
at
9
00
a.m
or
7
p.m.
So
it's
the
same.
Information
twice
encourage
anyone
to
to
listen
into
that.
If
you
can
and
also
oops
excuse
me
recently,
did
a
presentation
in
a
format
called
pechakucha,
where
you
basically
have
20
images
with
20
seconds
each,
and
the
idea
of
this
presentation
was
to
answer
the
question:
do
we
have
water
for
growth,
because
I
believe
that
is
a
question
that
you're
often
asked?
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
uh
Thank
you
councillor,
garcia.
uh
Thank
you.
Jesse
really
appreciate
the
update.
um
I
just
got
one
quick
question
for
you,
and
you
mentioned
that
you
had
sent
a
memo
to
the
city
manager,
saying
there
wasn't
a
water
emergency
roof
this
year,
but
given
we're
barely
finishing
up
april,
um
it's
the
extreme
drought
around
us
has
wildfires
eating
up
our
state
alive.
E
No
is
that
is
it
possible
to
change
that
status?
I
mean
I'd
hate
for
us
to
be
with
the
mindset
that
there's
no
emergency,
we're
good,
where
I
think
we
should
be
looking
at
the
situation
at
hand
and
saying
there's
not
an
emergency
for
the
next
30
days,
we'll
reevaluate
or
what?
What
is
that
process?
Maybe
that
is
the
next
step.
If
you
can
help
clarify
director
roach,
that
would
be
fantastic.
D
But
I
think
this
is
something
that
that
we're
developing
in
a
process
and
at
the
moment
we
really
just
according
following
strictly.
According
to
code,
we
would
calculate
our
operational
demand
and
our
operational
supply
and
and
conclude
that
we're
not
currently
in
an
emergency.
um
I
I'm
willing
to
stand
by
that,
but
I
completely
understand
the
the
intent
of
your
question.
E
Okay,
thank
you.
So
the
way
it
stands
it's
we
we
won't
rescind
that
emergency
memo
um
is
there
a
time
where
you
might
reconsider
it.
um
The
reason
I
ask
is
we're
we're
about
to
get
into.
I
mean
folks
are
going
to
start
their
planting
season
and
I'd
hate
for
us
to
get
into
a
situation
where
uh
folks
uh
do
their
planting
and
we
get
into
a
situation
where
we
we
have
a
water
emergency
situation
and
people
lose
their
crops,
and
I
I
just
want
us
to
go
into
this
this
summer
diligently.
E
E
E
Sometimes
the
data
is
just
not
showing
what
the
actual
situation
is.
I
mean
we're,
I
I
I
don't
know,
I'm
just
a
bit
concerned
that
we're
using
the
language
we're
not
in
a
water
emergency
when
I
think
that's
a
bit
misleading,
but
I
I
appreciate
the
the
update
jesse.
I
really
do,
and
uh
maybe
this
is
something
I
can
connect
with
you
offline
more
about
just
to
learn
more
about
the
data
and
the
process.
A
A
Thank
you
for
that
answer.
I
um
I
also
have
a
a
question.
I
guess
then,
and
we
in
regards
to
um
I
hear
a
lot
um
when
you
do
your
presentations
about
uh
our
um
our
well
waters.
Our
aquifers
are
money
in
the
bank,
so
to
speak,
and
that's
I've
heard
that
many
many
times,
and
so,
um
if
we
are
in
a
situation
where
we
need
to
depend
on
that
water,
how
long
will
it
last
us
I
mean,
especially
with
the
size
of
our
city
and
how
it's
growing.
D
D
But
we
don't
want
to
put
ourselves
in
that
position
um
and
so
we're
in
a
good
sha
and
we're
in
good
shape
now
and
we're
watching
the
the
well
levels
come
back
up
and
part
of
that
um
water
resources
indicator
that
we've
developed
to
try
and
help
guide.
Our
seasonal
conservation
policy
is
looking
at
how
hard
we're
hitting
the
wells,
and
so,
if
we
start
to
use
them
more,
that's
gonna
that
indicator
will
start
to
reflect
it
and
we'd
start
asking
people
to
to
use
less
water.
D
A
A
They
see
the
buildings,
they
see
the
apartments
they
see
you
name
it
and-
and
I
know
a
lot
can
be
said
about
conservation
and
quite
a
lot
can
be
said
about
uh
you-
know,
uh
housing,
design
and
and
the
steps
that
we're
taking
time
and
time
again
to
to
to
save
water
into
ration.
Water
is
the
best
if
you
can,
but
you
know
the
the
the
majority
of
people
come
and
they
say
well,
where
are
we
getting
the
water
from?
And
I'm
glad
that
you
have
the
presentation
there?
A
A
Concern
is
that
it
you
see
the
drought
drought
around
us.
You
see
it's
not
raining
like
it
like
it
used
to
in
the
past,
we're
not
getting
the
snowpack
that
we
have,
and
so
it's
a
concern
and
in
the
case
that
we
would
need
to
to
um
put
the
city
on
alert
then
I
think
that's
something
that
needs
to
be
looked
at
and
that's
just
my
my
two
cents.
Thank
you
very
much.
G
Hey
thank
you,
uh
mr
chair.
um
I
think
these
are.
These
are
great
questions
um
and
questions.
I
think,
as
counselors,
we
all
hear
a
lot
um
from
the
community
and
ones
that
I
think
um
we've
been
trying
really
hard
to
answer
and
they
are
uh
sometimes
it's
you.
You
really
have
to
spend
a
little
time
um
to
understand
our
um
our
situation,
our
water
supply
system.
G
I
think
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
the
um
the
presentation
that
uh
director
roach
did
about
a
week
ago
that
he's
offering
um
I
I
would
uh
you
know,
direct
lots
of
people
to
it,
because
I
think
it
helps
answer
these
questions
and
I
think
um
one
of
the
concerns
you
know
that
I've
had
since
becoming
a
counselor.
Is
this
disconnect
between
us
looking
outside
and
saying?
Hey
it
didn't
snow
as
much
hey,
it's
not
raining
as
much.
We
must
be
in
a
crisis.
G
We
must
be
having
a
problem
and,
on
the
other
hand,
you
know
if
you
look
at
our
water
resources
where
we
get
our
water
and
what
our
demand
is
are
those
two
things
are
are
lining
up
in
ways
that
say
we
are
not
in
a
crisis
now
we
know
from
our
studies
that
in
the
future
we
may
have
uh
shortages
in.
I
don't
know,
30
years,
25
years,
what's
the
what's
the
year,
25
30.
D
G
I
believe,
even
at
the
last
meeting
director
roach
walked
us
through.
That
is
one
answer
um
for
developing
what
we
want
the
community
to
do
at
varying
drought
levels,
and
so
it's
a
that
model
shows
will
give
us
a
a
drought
level
it
will.
It
will
make
a
determination
based
on
the
data,
what
level
of
drought
we're
in
and
then
working
with
the
county's
water
policy,
advisory
board
and
the
city's
water
conservation
committee.
G
D
G
So
you
know,
if
we're
in
green
we're,
probably
pretty
good,
we
should
always
be
conserving.
We
should
always
you
know,
be
valuing
water
as
as
uh
as
the
important
uh
resource
that
it
is.
If
we're
in
you
know,
if
we're
in
yellow
hey,
that
may
be
a
place
where
we
want
to
ask
more
of
our
residents
uh
more
of
the
people
of
the
community.
G
G
G
G
um
There
are
answers,
there
is
work
being
done,
it's
why
we
have
the
40
and
80
year
water
planning
cycles
going
on,
because
we
need
to
be
able
to
answer
these
questions
well
in
advance
of
being
in
an
actual
crisis,
um
and
I
guess
the
only
thing
I
would
say
is
jesse
the
presentation
that
you're
doing
on.
I
think
it's
thursday.
What's
up
with
water,
that
is
a
webinar
is,
is
will
that
be
available
on
demand
on
your
website?.
D
G
G
E
I
did
mr
chair,
I'm
good.
Thank
you
uh
quick
question
director
roach
is
this,
is
I
guess
a
water
101
question
maybe,
but
is
precipitation
needed
to
charge
our
aquifers?
So
I
guess
my
question
is:
if
it's
not
raining
or
snowing,
we're
not
getting
that
precipitation,
our
aquifers
aren't
going
to
be
charging,
as
as
they
should
be.
E
E
D
E
Okay,
thank
you.
I
really
appreciate
that.
I
guess
from
my
perspective,
I
like
to
look
at
our
reservoirs
in
regards
to
what's
being
produced
by
mother
nature,
what's
being
put
into
our
system
naturally,
and
when
our
aquifers
are
not
being
charged
naturally
and
we're
not
at
a
hundred
percent
um
and
it's
gradually
declining
every
year.
E
I
think
that
does
cause
some
concern,
uh
so
I
I,
if
possible,
is
it?
Can
you
send
us
data
on
our
reservoir
storage
over
the
last
50
years
and
what
that's
looked
like?
I
know
that
we
just
got
some
recent
data
where
I
don't
want
to
mistake
it,
but
it
was
extremely
low
and
it'd
be
interesting
to
see
where
we've
gone
over
the
last
50
years.
E
With
with
our
with
our
reservoir
storage,
um
I
guess
the
kind
of
follow-up
question
since
the
counselor
lee
garcia
brought
it
up
in
regards
to
the
pipeline.
um
The
downstream
users
just
to
clarify
their
access
to
untreated
water
is
going
to
go
up.
They
will
have
access
to
water,
but
their
access
to
untreated
water
is
going
to
go
down.
D
D
D
You
know
20
50
years
to
one
that
is
mostly
dominated
by
a
constant,
a
relatively
constant
supply
of
water
from
from
uh
our
our
water
treatment
plant
um
and
and
we're
talking
about
reducing
that
that
amount
that
we
discharged
to
the
santa
fe
river
in
proportion
to
how
much
san
juan
chamber
water
we
are
using.
So
we
think
of
it
as
water
that
we
sort
of
paid
to
bring
into
the
watershed
is
the
water
that
we're
peeling
back
off.
E
E
Is
it
going
to
be
uh
we're
pumping
out
eight
acre
feet
of
treated
water
and
one
one
acre
of
untreated?
And
I
know
you
can't
do
that
because
they're
going
to
mix
I'm
just,
I
guess
my
my
concern
for
the
downstream
users
are,
is
that
is
the
majority
of
their
water
going
to
be
treated
water
versus
natural,
untreated
water
that
they're
used
to
receiving.
D
So
in
your
example
of
10
acre
feet.
If,
if
they,
if
there
was
10
acre
feet
available
before
the
city
was
in
play,
then
there's
probably
10
times
that
has
become
available
through
effluent
and
now
we're
and
now
we're
going
to
peel.
Some
of
that
back
and
and
this
stuff
gets
pretty
complicated
and
it's
hard
to
sort
of
explain
it
without
looking
at
a
map
and-
and
you
know
sitting
together.
So
I
would
would
very
much
welcome
um
if
you
have
the
time
to
to
sit
with
me
or
my
team
and
talk
through
these
things.
D
But
I
will
also
say
that
there
is
a
pretty
in
detail
a
pretty
detailed
um
we're
working
on
a
lot
of
the
hydrology
of
the
lower
santa
fe
river
as
we
prepare
for
the
permanent
process
and
nepa.
So
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
the
questions
that
you
have
may
be
answered
in
the
next
six
months,
or
so
with
some
of
the
the
work
that
we're
doing.
But
if,
if
the
answers
are
not
satisfactory,
that
I'm
trying
to
give
now
more
than
happy
to
sit
with
you
at
any
point
and
try
and
explain
them
further.
E
Okay,
thank
you,
director,
roach
and,
as
you
said,
it's
it's
complicated.
Definitely
not
a
water
expert
like
you
and
I'm
just
trying
to
get
my
head
wrapped
around
this
whole
process.
So
um
thank
you.
I
really
appreciate
you
trying
to
uh
put
it
in
in
layman's
terms
for
me
just
because
I
think
sometimes
that's
the
easiest
to
digest
and
understand,
especially
for
me,
and
I
just
appreciate
you
kind
of
giving
more
of
a
thorough
overview
of
and
responses
to
the
questions
I
had.
I
definitely
appreciate
it.
No
more
questions,
mr
chair.
Thank
you,
director,
rich.
G
G
um
So
you
know,
and
now
we're
we're
in
the
permitting
process
for
the
return
flow
pipeline
so
that
we
can
fully
utilize
uh
our
uh
san
juan
chamber
water
and
make
sure
that
we're
not
wasting
any
of
that.
So
to
me
that
the
next
thing
we're
going
to
need
to
do
is-
and-
and
I
don't
know
you
know-
I'm
sure
uh
the
water
division
may
have
things
maybe
even
prior
to
this.
But
to
me
I
think
we've
got
to
get
serious
about
um
aquifer
storage
and
recovery
and
there's
also
much
more.
G
We
can
do
in
in
water
conservation.
You
know,
we've
done
a
lot
with
residential,
we
there's
more
to
be
done
in
commercial,
and
that
is
some
of
the
work
that's
going
on
with
the
water
conservation
committee,
and
so
I
think,
uh
there's
a
lot
um
a
lot.
We
can
still
do
uh
to
be
more
resilient
and
to
again
use
this
resource
um
very
wisely
very
carefully,
because
nobody,
we
need
to
have
the
water.
This
community
needs
to
thrive
and
live,
so
just
thought:
I'd
throw
that
out
there.
Mr
chair,
thank
you.
B
B
D
uh
I
would
say
all
the
water
that
goes
out
of
the
treatment
plant
and
goes
downstream
is
treated
there's
also.
Storm
flows
there's
other
water
that
can
enter
the
river
system
that
wouldn't
be
treated
effluent,
but
on
a
day
when
it's
not
raining
before
you
hit
spring
systems
downstream,
all
the
water
would
be
in
that
location
between
the
treatment
plant
and
the
next
set
of
inflows
would
be
treated
effluent.
D
B
Just
wanted
to
clarify
that
and
then
um
you
know
you,
you
gave
your
outlook
on
water
and
I'm
glad
looking
pretty
good,
but
I
think
we
send
mixed
messages
when
we
talk
about
water
here,
but
then
we
cancel
things
like
the
fishing
derby
and
not
that
I
disagree.
I
think
we
probably
need
to
cancel
it
because
I
do
have
water
concerns.
Just
like
everybody
else,
and
I
hear
it
from
everybody
else,
but
do
you
think
we're
sending
mixed
messages
when
we,
when
we
say
the
two
things
that
we're
saying.
D
D
We
will
bypass
a
certain
amount
of
water
to
the
river,
um
but
we
might
not
have
the
river
inflows
on
the
date
of
the
fishing
derby
to
actually
support
the
amount
of
water
that
I
believe
the
biologists
would
want
us
to.
So
I'm
I'm
not
expert
on
on
the
fishing
derby,
but
I
I
understand
your
point
that
maybe
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
mixed
message
here.
If
we
say
we're
fine,
but
we
don't
have
enough
water
for
the
fishing
derby.
B
D
B
B
So
I
think
we've
had
this
conversation
before
about
trying
to
explain
in
layman's
terms
how
water
paper
water
rights
translate
water
in
your
cup
or
water
at
your
at
your
faucet,
and
I
think
that's
a
hard
thing
to
grasp
for
a
lot
of
people,
including
probably
some
of
the
counselors
some
of
us,
um
and
I
don't
know
what
the
best
way
to
get
that
messaging
out.
But
I
think
when
you
try
to
explain
water
rights
when
you're
building
an
apartment
complex,
um
it's
hard
to
grasp
the
idea
of
how
water
rights
turn
uh
paper.
G
B
B
A
F
um
Chairman
uh
councillor
lee
garcia,
thank
you
so
much
for
that
question.
um
Actually
it
is
uh
not
our
standard
process
to
do
internal
design.
The
city
has
never
well
hasn't,
for
quite
some
time
had
engineering
professional
services
on
staff.
To
that
extent,
to
be
able
to
do
all
the
design
work
for
our
extensive
road
projects,
these
are
for
the
trail
projects.
The
road
projects,
like
those
big
design
packages
that
you'll
see,
um
and
so
we
don't
normally
do
those
in-house.
There
are
engineering
positions
in
public
works
actually
too
at
this
well.
A
B
G
uh
I'm
prepared
to
introduce
this
item
if
you're
ready
for
that.
Yes,
okay,
so
this
is
consideration
of
a
resolution
uh
adopting
the
city
of
santa
fe's
fiscal
year,
2022
2023
operating
budget
and
organizational
chart.
uh
The
sponsors
are
the
mayor
and
myself
and
uh
the
staff
on
this
is
uh
our
finance
director,
mary
mccoy,
and
we
are
introducing
this
tonight
and
it
will
be
in
front
of
the
governing
body
on
wednesday
night.
B
H
Director
jones,
uh
mr
chair,
just
a
brief
comment.
um
I
think
there
was
some
great
discussion
today,
definitely
around
some
complex
item
and
so
just
make
sure
it
wasn't
missed,
but
we're
absolutely
willing
to
meet
with
any
counselor
kind
of
going
off
for
tours
of
the
facility.
I
would
say
if
you've
already
seen
it,
I
would
see
it
again.
H
um
So
the
information
is
real
time,
and
so
again
we
just
want
to
make
sure
everyone
knows
that
we're
available
to
to
me
to
answer
your
questions,
to
go
in
depth
um
to
try
to
gain
as
much
understanding
and
confidence
from
the
governing
body.
So
we
are
available
to
do
that.
Just
wanted
to
state
that
no
other
matters,
mr
chair,
thank
you.
B
We
can
we've
had
meetings,
I
think
of
water
as
well
um
and
then
at
waste
water.
So
um
we
will
and
including
bdd.
I
think
if,
uh
if
we
can
get
out
there,
so
we'll
try
to
get
that
done
as
we've
done
in
the
past
and
I'll
give
everyone
an
opportunity
to
really
view
those
areas
and
be
able
to
ask
more
in-depth
questions
if
needed.
B
Also
our
next
meeting
monday
may
9th
ms
mihalsik
did
ask
if
we
could,
on
a
trial
basis,
have
the
meeting
in
person.
um
I
think
they're
thinking
the
the
governing
body
meeting
on
the
following
wednesday
would
be
an
in
person.
So
they
want
to
use
us
as
a
trial
period
for
our
trial
session
for
prior
to
governing
bodies
so
which
I've
agreed
to
um
stay
tuned,
we'll
see
if
they're
actually
ready
for
it
or
not.