►
From YouTube: Public Works and Utilities for June 28, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
E
F
F
G
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
G
G
G
That's
occurred,
and
I
know
that
this
report
says
they're
minor,
which
is
good,
but
I
want
to
know
more
about
what
is
happening
because
I've
gotten
many
many
complaints
and
photos
and
such
of
items
that
have
gone
on
there,
including
uh
um
preparation
of
logs
that
had
to
do
with
sludge
at
the
christus
st
vincent,
and
so
uh
I
just
want
to
know
about
what's
going
on
at
the
wastewater
plant
and
what?
What
were
the
issues
and
what's
being
done
to
address
them?.
A
A
G
But
my
understanding,
my
understanding,
is
that
after
a
certain
amount
of
leakage
happens,
uh
the
epa
the
the
logs
are
recorded
in
up
to
a
certain
amount.
I
can't
remember,
then
epa
has
to
be
called
in
and
um
according
to
staff,
there
was
a
lot
more
leakage
than
what
was
reported
to
avoid
calling
an.
A
A
A
That
day
are
a
few
days
before
from
the
newspaper,
so
we
didn't
have
any
listing
or
any
of
those
pictures
provided
to
us
to
address
the
issues.
So
we
ended
up
with
after
having
the
inspection,
they
brought
the
pictures
with
them.
We
got
to
see
the
pictures
and
we
took
them
to
every
building
where
the
pictures
were
from.
A
We
addressed
each
issue
within
the
day
or
the
next
day
to
get
them
taken
care
of,
and
I
mean
we
try
to
be,
as
you
know,
proactive
as
we
can
with
everything
we
do
and
we're
just
not.
I
mean
I
don't
understand
why
it
doesn't
get
to
us.
You
know
back
to
us
to
tell
us
that
something's
wrong,
so
we
can
take
care
of
the
problem.
G
You
know
the
working
conditions
that
are
there
and
I
don't
know
how,
if
you
all
work
there,
that
you
don't
see
this,
um
you
know
dirty
filthy,
dirty
floors
with
sludge
and
dirty
sinks
and
dirty
everything.
um
I
understand
that
you
know.
Well,
maybe
I
should
ask:
do
you
all
have
a
custodian
that
that
cleans
things
daily
or
do
you
all?
G
But
uh
it
just
really
concerns
me
because
it
brings
out
a
side
out
of
mind
and
that's
what
it
it
brings
to
me.
But
I'm
I'm.
I
want
to
know
about
that.
If
you
guys
even
see
this
and
if
it's
acceptable
to
you
and
secondly,
I
want
to
know
about
the
osha
violations.
I
want
to
know
what
they
are
and
I
want
to
know
what
you're
doing
about
that's.
What
I
expected
this
report
to
be.
A
There
is
no
like
a
plan
preliminary
or
anything
that
they'll
give
you
they'll
they'll
it'll
be
a
written
formal
if
they
cite
you
for
anything,
so
we
haven't
received
that
yet
when
we
do
receive
it,
I
can't
provide
that
um
the
restroom,
I
believe
you
saw
a
picture
of
in
question-
is
not
a
reusable
restroom
here
at
the
plant
and
it's
being
torn
down
the
other
restrooms.
Look
nothing
near
that
those
pictures.
A
So
the
the
general
restrooms
and
the
actual
use
of
used
buildings
there
is
a
person
from
facilities
that
comes
out
and
takes
care
of
those
restrooms
and
does
mopping
that
sort
of
deal
wherever
there's
public
traffic
now
anywhere
else
say
like
if
sledge
is
falling
next
to
a
pump.
That
is
the
operator's
job
to
clean
that
up,
not
the
person
from
facilities
because
they're
not
trained
in
removing
the
area
and
keeping
it
clean
knowing
to
be
working
around
that
equipment.
G
A
So
originally
there
was
no,
there
was
no
say
like
housekeeping
policy
that
was
in
place
other
than
what
the
city
actually
has
in
the
city's
safety
and
policies
we're
actually
working
to
get
one,
that's
more
refined.
So
it
actually
explains
your
area
where
the
areas
are
and
who's
responsible
for
cleaning
the
areas.
A
Well,
right
now,
in
anything
of
in
the
operations
area,
the
operators
should
be
cleaning
up
any
area
that
they're
sled
on
the
floor.
They
should
be
rolling
up
hoses.
They
should
be
taking
care
of
each
location
that
they
work
in
and,
if
they're
not,
then
we
need
to
start
holding
them
more
accountable
for
it.
A
G
A
A
A
Put
a
pretty
much
cut
off
the
wires
cap
them
off
and
put
it
inside
of
the
conduit,
so
it
wouldn't
be
just
hanging
there.
um
That
was
one
that
they
were.
They
did
comment
on
right
away.
The
others
were
mainly
just
walking
around
in
anywhere
that
the
floor
was
wet
or
had
sludge
or
had
a
hose,
a
trip
hazard.
A
So
uh
we
did
also
have
um
just
areas
that
you
know
where
we
have
a
lot
of
construction
going
on
right
now,
so
we
had
areas
that
they
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
know
nobody
is
walking
around
in
those
areas
nobody's
you
know
without
a
vest
or
without
a
helmet.
Without
being
you
know,
on
the
on
the
status
of
like
you
know
that
they're
here
on
the
plant
here
at
the
facility,
so
we
were
showing
them
the
information
we
had
what
everybody
had
to
be
wearing
in
the
areas.
A
A
So
I
mean
it
took
a
while,
but
most
of
it
was
walking
around
trying
to
go
through
buildings.
The
the
buildings
would
say
what
the
picture
was,
but
the
picture
was
taken
directly
on
something
a
few
of
them
were
written
in
the
wrong
building
on
the
on
the
explanation
of
where
it
was
and
we
ended
up
finding
them
in
another
building.
A
A
G
G
A
It's
not
acceptable
and
it's
not
something
that
we
would.
You
know
say
that
is
fine
to
happen
or
we
want
to
address
it
and
make
sure
it
doesn't
happen.
um
One
thing
it's
a
little
difficult
to
explain.
You
know
what
we're
looking
at
and
what
the
issue
was.
The
picture
looks
really.
I
mean
it
looks
interesting
to
see
and
makes
you
really
think
you
know
wow.
What
are
we
doing
out
here?
um
We
could
offer
you
a
tour
if
you'd
like
to
just
come
out
and
look
and
we
could
explain
and
walk
through
each
one.
A
I
mean
if
that
would
help.
I'm
not
sure
you
know
how
to
how
to
explain
it
any
better.
I
mean
no
matter
what
it
it's.
It's,
not
just
something
that
looks
bad,
it's
something
we
want
to
take
care
of,
and
we
don't
want
to
have
issues
with
being
there's.
There's
too
many,
there's
too
many
chances
for
someone
to
get
hurt,
and
that's
the
last
thing
that
we
want
for
someone
to
get
hurt.
I
mean
this
facility
is
big.
There's
a
lot
of
heavy
equipment.
There's
a
lot
of
high
voltage,
electronics!
A
G
I
I
totally
agree
with
you:
I
mean
there's
a
lot
that
could
go
wrong
and
from
the
looks
of
it
some
of
this
stuff,
while
whatever
building
they
are
in
doesn't
matter.
If
it's
still
under
you
know
the
supervision
of
utilities,
it's
important
and
and
when
things
don't
get
addressed,
they
don't
get
better,
they
get
worse,
and
so
you
know
the
the
sludge
and
such
that
I
saw.
I
mean
I
that
didn't
look
like
it
got
built
up
in
in
an
hour
or
a
day.
G
But
I'm
more
uh
concerned
with
making
sure
that
this
doesn't
happen
again
and
that
some
immediate
changes
are
made
and
not
wait
for
the
findings.
I
hope
you're
not
just
waiting
for
the
findings,
because
you
did
do
a
walk
through
with
them
and
probably
learned
a
great
deal,
uh
which
is
part
of
part
of
you,
all's
job
to
make
sure
that
you
know
thing.
There's
a
decent
workplace
number
one
and
a
safe
workplace
uh
all
in
one
and
then
number
two.
G
You
know
it's
almost
impossible
to
to
keep
everything
sparkling
clean
because
you
know
that's
just
the
type
of
business
you're
in,
but
that
but
there's
it
concerns
me
because
the
things
that
you
can't
see
the
the
the
bio
bio,
what
it
what's
the
word,
I'm
looking
for,
I
used
it
earlier.
I
forgot
what
I
was
gonna
say,
but
you
know
the
the
diseases
and
such
that
that
can
be
you
know.
Workers
can
be
exposed
to
uh
with
the
lack
of
cleanliness
it
it
really.
B
Thank
you,
cancer.
Any
other
questions
for
mr
dozier
cnn.
Thank
you,
mr
dozier,
um
and
again
anyone
that
uh
wants
a
tour
of
the
facility.
uh
I
think
several
of
us
counselors
do
on
um
was
it
two
years
ago,
mr
dozier,
I
think
yes,
sir,
mr
terrell
was
about
two
years
yeah.
Anyone
that
wants
to
go
out
there.
I'm
sure
mr
dozier
would
welcome
you
uh
if
we
want
to
do
it
as
a
group.
We
can
do
that
as
well.
So
thank
you
again,
mr
doger.
B
G
B
Thank
you,
counselor
all
right
with
that
we're
on
to
our
consent,
calendar.
The
first
thing
that
was
pulled
was
item,
a
our
request
for
approval
of
contract
with
national
fitness
council
in
the
amount
of
195
560
dollars
and
94
cents,
including
nmgrt,
to
purchase
equipment,
exclusive
key
herring,
artwork
fitness
equipment
and
request
approval
of
bar
in
the
amount
of
250
000
from
neighborhood
park,
impact
fees
to
parks,
construction
for
the
purchase
and
installation
of
fitness
equipment
for
swan
park.
Councilor
garcia.
You
pull
this.
H
J
Mr
chair
counselor
garcia,
I
couldn't
answer
that
um
the
award
was
actually
for.
We
were
out
of
100
cities
invited
to
apply
for
this
opportunity
and
we
were
one
of
ten
cities
that
were
awarded
and
what
this
provides
us
is
a
fitness
court
and
also
the
special
artwork
with
keith
herring,
and
so
that
is
a
license
agreement
and
will
also
serve
as
a
model
or
a
demonstration.
J
H
H
Because
from
what
I'm
reading
from
the
original
letter
that
was
sent
out,
it
says
uh
happy
to
inform
you
that
santa
fe
has
been
selected
as
a
part
of
the
limited
group
of
leading
communities
in
america
to
receive
a
keith
herring.
Fitness
court
license
and
additional
funding
for
a
2021
standard,
nfc
grant,
and
so
I'm
assuming
nfc
is
national
fitness
court
and
so
just
some
clarification
on
that,
because
what
was
the
dollar
amount
awarded
with
this.
J
J
um
We
get
the
other
one
awarded,
but
we
also
will
do
joint
fundraising
in
order
to
cover
the
cost
for
that.
But
we
will
be
able
to
utilize
the
fundraising
machine
that
the
national
fitness
court
campaign
has,
and
also
with
some
of
their
corporate
sponsors,
and
earlier
on.
This
was
something
that
was
awarded
way
back
with
uh
director
john
munoz,
and
he
had
several
partners
in
place.
J
Local
partners,
health
and
wellness
partners
here
in
santa
fe
um
and
then
the
pandemic
and
everything
went
on
hold.
um
So
we
hope
to
circle
back
um
with
those
interested
parties
um
as
we
come
in
through
the
recovery,
and
we
look
at
really
boosting
up
our
health
and
wellness
and
bringing
resources
um
into
communities
here.
H
Okay,
thank
you
and,
and
uh
just
for
clarification
I
mean
the
the
award
we
got
is
from
2021,
so
this
was
mid
pandemic,
not
at
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic.
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
um
so
from
what
I
you
know,
the
information
I
have
that
was
in
addition,
it
was
outside
of
the
information
to
the
public,
and
maybe
this
is
something
we
could
provide
publicly.
H
Given
uh
there
was
not
any
of
the
equipment
slated
to
be,
I
guess
incorporated
into
district
two,
given
that
we
we
do
have
parks
identified
in
district
two,
but
the
parks,
I
guess
that
were
identified
for
the
keith
herring
equipment
were
swan
park,
frenchies
and
santa
fe
rail
yard.
I
think,
from
my
understanding
john
had
mentioned
to
me,
santa
fe
rail
yard
was
a
must
that
was.
It
was
a
sight
that
was
a
an
absolute,
so
are
we
still
moving
forward
with
the
other
two
sites,
the
frenchies
and
santa
fe
rail
yard,.
K
um
Real
quick
just
on
uh
to
mr
chair,
counselor,
garcia,
I'd
like
to
make
a
point
of
clarification
on
the
rail
yard
because
of
the
presence
of
the
rail
yard
master
plan
and
the
conservation
easement
that
exists
in
the
rail
yard.
The
uh
um
addition
of
any
permanent
public
art
is
actually
prohibited,
um
so
we
would
uh
I'm
not
sure
a
structure
like
this.
The
structure
itself
or
the
attendant
art
would
actually
meet
the
criteria
laid
out
in
the
rail
yard,
which
might
complicate
that
being
an
absolute
um
required
site.
H
Oh
no,
no
norris,
thanks
for
that
clarification,
sam
because
it
to
me
then
brings
up
the
question:
if
there
are
those
potential
complications,
why
wouldn't
we
have
worked
with
the
rail
yard
conservancy
before
even
operating
offering
up
that
site,
because
I
think
um
you
know
in
some
instances
I
mr
herring's
artwork
is
widely
renowned
and
I
think
it
to
me.
I
don't
think
it
would
be.
I
don't
know
I
think
I
guess
the
question
is:
were
those
conversations
not
had
with
the
conservancy.
J
Mr
chair
counselor,
garcia
so
early
on,
um
and
I
can't
speak
for
the
former
director
john
munoz,
but
he
was
the
one
who
initiated
the
the
conversation
and
the
site
analysis
was
done
by
national
um
fitness
courts.
um
They
looked
at
a
number
of
factors
of
usage,
access,
pedestrian,
cyclist
and
impact
use,
so
they
identified
those
sites
based
on
a
certain
amount
of
criteria
and
then
based
on
those
three
sites.
It
became
very
apparent
that
we
would
like
to
do
something
on
the
south
side
like
granted
the
rail
yard.
J
We
hadn't
approached
the
rail
yard
corporation
at
that
point
because
we
didn't
know
if
we
were
going
to
be
funded
or
not,
um
but
because
the
city
is
doing
so
many
wonderful
um
investments
within
the
south
side.
It
just
seemed
that
that
would
be
an
additional
um
health
and
wellness
asset
to
go
into
the
city
and
then
looking
at
the
standard
national
fitness
courts
then
to
go
at
there's
another
document.
H
Okay
and
thank
you
paulina
and
just
for
clarification,
I
mean
I
have
absolutely
no
problem
with
this
going
to
swamp
park.
I'm
absolutely
actually
thrilled
that
swan
park
is
getting
the
priority
this.
This
is
awesome.
This
is
going
to
be
a
much
needed
improvement
for
that
park,
and
uh
I
I
think
this
is
just
fantastic
in
that
sense,
um
but
but
so
then
does
that
back
to,
I
guess
the
the
first
part
of
that
question.
J
J
I
just
want
to
make
that
point
of
clarification,
but
there
will
be
that
25
000
seed
money
that
is
given
by
the
national
fit
fitness
court
and
then
we'll
be
able
to
utilize
their
fundraising
machine
so
to
say,
and
also
we'll
follow
up
with
building
the
relationships
that
mr
munoz
had
done.
Prior
to
that.
As
for
our
fundraising
um
efforts
moving
forward
with
the
nationals
um
fitness
court,
we
would
go
back
to
them
um
because
we
have
to
look
at
work
with
their
site
analysis
and
so
frenchies
could
still
be
part
of
the
mix.
J
um
We
probably
will
not
do
anything
in
the
real
rail
yard,
based
on
what
mr
burnett
had
provided
that
information,
but
there
are
a
series
of
other
um
parks
that
would
be
considered.
So
if
we
don't
have
that
confirmed
at
this
point-
and
that
would
be
something
would
be
interested
in
working
with
the
counselors
for
your
input
as
well
as
we
do
that
site
analysis
that
is
conducted
by
the
national
fitness
campaign.
H
D
H
Okay,
thank
you
for
clarifying
that
that
that
really
is
helpful.
So
we've
got
the
25
000
to
help
pay
for
a
second
one.
um
The
remainder
of
those
costs
come
out
of
pocket.
If
we
wanted
to
implement
a
third
fourth,
fifth,
we
can
do
so,
but
we've
got
to
raise
the
funds
or
pay
out
of
pocket.
For
that
correct,
am
I
understanding
that
correctly.
H
H
Okay,
thank
you.
So
much.
That's
that's
really
helpful
because
it's
like,
I
said
it
was
it's.
I
guess
it's
morphed
from
from
the
briefing
I
got,
I
guess,
uh
january
time
frame
when,
when
this
came
across
my
my
desk
back
then
um
okay,
I
got.
I
guess
I
got
no
other
questions.
I
I
think
you
guys
uh
again
pauline
thank
you
for
reaching
out
and
getting
the
approvals
for
this
artwork.
H
um
I
think
you
definitely
have
a
tough
choice
ahead
of
you,
given
the
at
least
from
the
design
components,
and
maybe
I
don't
know
I
guess
maybe
that's
the
question.
Are
we
going
to
let
the
community
decide
uh
what
artwork
that
is
going
to
be
on
there,
given
that
there
is
an
option,
a
different
number
of
options
of
mr
herring's
artwork,
that
is
available
to
be
wrapped
on
this
equipment.
L
um
I
just
I
don't
want
to
make
a
commitment
to
do
three
of
these
or
five
of
these
until
we
see
how
this
works
out
and
see
if
it's
something
that
people
like
um
so
I'm
willing
to
support
this
one.
But
I
want
to
be
clear
that
I'm
not
supporting
three
of
them
or
five
of
them
right
now.
I
want
to
collect
some
data
and
see
if
people
like
these
um
is
this:
the
kind
of
fitness
equipment
that
works
in
our
community
so.
L
L
H
J
B
B
F
H
I
H
I
I
Mr
chair
counselor,
garcia
uh
80
of
the
advertising
is
digital,
um
meaning
that
it
is
the
type
of
advert,
but
it's
banners
that
appear
if
people
are
searching
for
uh
travel
to
new
mexico
travel
in
the
southwest,
uh
historic
or
art
searches,
banners
will
pop
up
and
give
people
an
option
to
explore
more
information
about
santa
fe.
That
is
an
example
of
the
type
of
digital
advertising.
That's
done.
I
As
I
say,
eighty
percent
of
the
of
the
actual
advertising
spend
is
digital,
the
other
twenty
is
primarily
print,
and
that
is
done
in
a
regional
magazines,
meaning
the
magazines
that
serve
phoenix
that
serve
texas
monthly
because
all
of
texas,
the
major
cities,
are
our
market
uh
denver
5280,
and
we
do
a
monthly
insertion
in
new
mexico
magazine
as
well,
because
it's
um
its
subscribers
are
dedicated
uh
interest
in
in
new
mexico.
So
we
we
do
a
a
full
year
by
full
page
ad.
In
that
magazine,.
H
I
I
I
H
B
L
B
Thank
you
we're
on
to
item
j,
which
is
a
resolution
relating
to
income,
disparity
and
inequity,
authorizing
the
execution
of
mou
with
mayors
for
a
guaranteed
income
in
the
santa
fe
community
college,
to
assist
with
launching
a
pilot
project
to
support
young
parents
enrolled
in
the
santa
fe
community
college
and
to
build
support
for
a
guaranteed
income
in
the
city
of
santa
fe.
uh
Councillor
garcia.
You
pull
this
as
well.
H
uh
Thank
you,
mr
paris,
um
so
I
know
that
there's
an
attached
amendment
to
this
item
uh
from
council
romero
worth
that
I
am
in
support
of
and
uh
as
we
move
forward.
I
would
like
to
attach
an
approval
to
this.
um
I
do
say
that
it.
I
don't
feel
that
the
amendment
goes
far
enough
in
regards
to
the
commitment
that
this
uh
I
think
it's
a
little
overreaching
in
some
senses.
H
um
This
is
in
particular,
where
you
know,
I
think,
the
further
resolved,
where
we
urge
president
biden
and
uh
speaker
pelosi
and
senate
majority
leader
schumer
to
develop
a
permanent
federally
guaranteed
income
allocation
and
the
reason
I
state
that
is
it's
not
because
I'm
not
in
belief
of
it.
I
just
think
we
need
to
fully
understand
the
data
and
how
it
impacts
our
city
before
we
uh
give
that
directive.
I
think
it's
a
bit
premature
in
that
sense,
um
so
I
guess
uh
julie,
quick
question
for
you.
H
H
So
yes,
it's
it's,
they
gave
us
and
we've
we're
adopting
whatever
they
gave
us.
We
didn't
really
modify
it
too
much
um
because
I
think,
as
it
was
pointed
out
during
finance
by
council
romero
worth
it
speaks
of
a
city
lobbyist
is
doing
federal
work
and
we
don't
uh
the
lobbyist
doesn't
do
that
and
I
think
we
then
we
would
have
to
hire
somebody,
and
I
don't
think
we're
in
a
position
to
do
that
at
the
moment.
H
H
Okay,
so
we
don't
have
a
specific
dollar
amount,
because
I
know
that
there's
usually
for
an
individual,
that
that's,
for
example,
because
uh
we
might
have
an
individual
with
children,
because
I
think
that's
a
requirement
of
this
or
I
guess.
Let
me
then
ask
that
a
question
is:
is
it
a
requirement
that
the
recipients
of
this
or
that
participants
in
this
program
have
children.
H
It
came
up,
I
think
it
was
at
finance
that
the
participants
are
ultimately
not
required
to
be
in
school.
I
think
we're
kind
of
adding
on
that
component
with
this
initiative
that
we're
uh
proposing
to
implement
that
it's
we're
partnering
up
with
the
schools,
and
these
are
going
to
be
students,
but
it's
ultimately
not
required.
Am
I
understanding
that
correctly?.
N
Mr
chair
um
council,
river
uh
sorry,
council
garcia.
If
I
may,
um
first
of
all,
um
if
it's
okay,
I
think
we
can
quickly.
uh
Let
you
know
what
the
federal
poverty
rate
for
200
is
with
different
children
on
this
meeting.
We're
happy
to
also
provide
it
in
writing,
but
for
a
family
of
two,
which
would
be
a
parent
and
one
child.
N
Anybody
making
under
34
840
a
year
would
qualify
for
a
family
of
three
it's
43
920
and,
as
julie
stated
for
a
family
of
four,
it's
actually
53
000
and
then
even
and
then
it
goes
up
down
up
accordingly.
Depending
on
how
many
children
one
has
um
but
answer
your
question
about
required
uh
whether
it's
required
to
be
a
student
or
not
um
in
order
to
qualify
for
the
opportunity,
in
other
words,
to
enter
the
lottery
that
will
determine
whether
the
person
gets
the
payment.
N
um
You
do
have
to
be
a
student
at
the
community
college
and
a
parent
earning
under
200
federal
poverty
level,
um
but
you
don't
have
to
stay
in
school
to
continue
getting
the
funding
and
the
reason
for
that
is.
Although
we
certainly
hope
that
people
will
choose
to
stay
in
school,
we'll
be
able
to
stay
in
school,
that's
part
of
what
we're
studying
um
in
this
uh
pilot
to
see
if
that
funding
makes
a
difference
or
not,
but
um
you're
not
penalized
for
leaving,
otherwise
we
wouldn't
know
um
whether
or
not
that
made
a
difference.
H
N
H
H
I
think
that
we've
got
a
lot
of
service
industry
workers
that
fall
into
this
category
and
if
we
can
figure
out
how
to
holistically
support
our
community
that
data,
I
would
feel
a
lot
more
comfortable
reaching
out
to,
um
as
proposed
in
this
resolution,
to
the
president,
or
even
you
know,
to
any
other
uh
elected
official
in
that
sense,
with
a
holistic
set
of
data,
saying
look
we've.
This
is
how
it
worked
for
students.
H
This
is
how
it
worked
for
folks
in
the
service
industry.
Given
we're
a
high
tourist
destination.
I
mean
this
is
how
it
worked
for
um
this
other
category
and
given
we've
got
two
hundred
slots,
even
if
we
put
aside
20
for
service
industry
folks,
I
think
you
can
collect
some
some
good
data
that
that
would
be
able
to
help
us
further
justify
uh
supporting
our
community,
and
so
are
we
able
to
modify
this
agreement
in
some
sense
to
open
up
this
opportunity
to
other
than
students.
N
N
I
will
say,
as
I
mentioned
in
quality
of
life,
that
we
do
intend
to
use
some
of
our
arpa
funding
through
the
connect
program
to
open
up
a
similar
type
of
opportunity
to
folks
outside
of
this
cohort,
and
it
wouldn't
be
under
the
same
study
auspices.
But
we
can
explore
whether
we
want
to
do
that
in
an
evaluation
as
well,
um
because
I
recognize
what
you're
saying
in
terms
of
understanding
how
this
could
impact
a
wide
range
of
people.
H
um
But
from
what
I
recall-
and
I
don't
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
have
the
moa
in
front
of
me-
um
we're
to
develop
and
submit
a
work
plan,
and
I
think,
in
a
previous
meeting
you
had
said
you've
already
kind
of
worked
it
out,
but
we
haven't
officially
submitted
the
work
plan
from
from
the
way
the
moa
reads,
and
so
I
guess
that's
where
how
much
I
don't
I
don't
given
that
it
is
one
of
the
best
or
the
best.
I
think
you
said
uh
proposal
submitted.
H
H
In
that
sense,
where
I
I
think
there
is
that
flexibility
to
where
we
can
implement
it
with
students
in
the
fall,
but
we
can
also
modify
them
away
to
include
different
populaces,
um
but,
but
I
I
see
where
you're
coming
from,
given
that
you
want
to
use
our
funds
for
for
something
else.
I
just
um
I
I
think,
given
that
this
is
resources
that
aren't
coming
out
of
our
pocket.
We
should
try
to
holistically
approach
it
in
that
mindset.
H
H
H
M
We
were
able
to
recruit
somebody
locally,
who
happens
to
be
a
master's
level
student
from
unm
who
lives
in
the
city
of
santa
fe
who's
bilingual
and
is
also
a
young
parent
so
um
where
he
should
be
getting
approval
from
u-pen
to
bring
them
on.
um
Hopefully,
we'll
find
out
sometime
this
week.
um
But
that's
really
where
the
stipend
is
going
to
support
the
project
and
that's
paid
directly
from
u-pen
to
the
student.
H
Okay,
um
I
guess
that's
we.
I
think
I
requested
in
the
last
time
if
we
can
include
that
in
the
package
just
so.
The
public
is
well
aware
of
this.
This
uh
fellow
that's
gonna
help
um
and
how
it's
going
to
support
this
project,
because,
with
the
fyr,
that's
zero,
it's
it's
to
me.
I
think
we
need
to
be
able
to
justify
why
it's,
why
there's
not
a
financial
impact
to
the
city
and
how
it's
not
going
to
take
up
any
additional
time
of
city
staff
um
with
that?
No
other
questions,
mr
chair.
H
L
I'm
sorry
I'm
not
really
clear
about
the
purpose
of
this
from
what
I'm
reading
and
what
I've
read
about.
It
is
to
support
young
parents
who
are
dedicated
to
improving
their
circumstances
through
education.
So
I'm
unclear
about
how
just
um
giving
stipends
to
people
folks
working
folks
in
the
community
would
meet.
L
The
purpose
of
what
this
pilot
or
what
this
entire
program
is,
I
understand
that
there's
no
strings
attached
to
it
and
that
people
don't
have
to
stay
in
school.
But
I
think
part
of
the
purpose
of
this
program
is
to
see,
is
to
compare
and
to
look
at
people
that
receive
a
stipend
if
it
allows
them
to
stay
in
school
and
based
on
an
assumption
that
um
staying
in
school
and
getting
an
education
does
over
time
improve
people's
circumstances.
L
Long-Term
improvement
of
circumstances
for
people-
that's
just
a
comment
that
I
have
on
it.
I
think
that
it's,
um
I
think,
it'll
be
really
interesting
data
to
see
if
people
that
do
get
a
stipend
are
able
to
stay
in
school
due
to
their
life
circumstances,
changing
and
additionally,
there'll
be
some
people
that
feel,
I
think,
like
I'm
receiving
this
stipend
and
I
need
to
stay
in
school.
I've
been
I've
been
given
this
opportunity
and
I
don't
want
to
waste
it.
L
B
H
H
B
Thank
you
now
we're
on
the
item
care
resolution,
donating
property
identified
as
635
alto
street
and
resources
to
a
developer
qualified
as
a
grant
under
the
new
mexico,
affordable
housing
act
for
development
of
at
least
five
low-priced
dwelling
units.
I
pull
this
one
off
for
a
quick
question
of
alexandra.
If
you
can
just,
is
there
a
difference
between
low
price
dwelling
units
and
affordable
housing,
and
what
is
that
difference?
If
there
is
one.
O
Thank
you
for
that
question,
mr
chair.
The
difference.
A
low
price
dwelling
unit
is
defined
in
our
city
code,
chapter
26-2,
and
um
what
it
is
is
it's
a
it's.
It's
aiming
for
more
of
the
higher
workforce
housing.
So
it's
the
price
is
set
so
that
it's
affordable
to
summon
at
100
area
median
income
and
then
um
the
actual
income
of
the
person
who
ends
up
with
the
housing
can't
exceed
120
percent
of
area
median
income,
and
that
is
compared
to
our
santa
fe
homes.
Program
pricing
schedule,
which
is
priced
for
much
lower
income
ranges.
O
uh
Mr
chair,
the
decision
was
that
we
felt
that
the
market
wouldn't
be
able
to
bear
the
lower
prices
that
the
developer
wouldn't
be
able
to
build
right
now
we
did
just
really
rough
back
of
the
napkin
type
of
calculation
and
a
very
economical
per
square
foot.
Building
cost
right
now
is
about
300
for
this
kind
of
project,
a
smaller
scale
project.
You
know,
a
big
production
builder
is
probably
building
for
slightly
less
than
that,
but
it's.
O
No,
they
they
will
actually
get
fee
waivers
and
get
other
incentives
from
the
city,
because
they're
providing
there
will
be
a
land
use
restriction
so
that
the
homes
can't
be
flipped
and
resold
for
market
prices,
market
rate
um
and
uh
the
any
difference
in
the
market.
Value
of
the
unit
and
the
low
price
dwelling
unit
price
is
held
by
the
city
or
the
developer.
If
it's
a
non-profit
developer
in
the
form
of
a
lien,
an
affordability
lien
so
that
they're
not
able
to
the
resale
is
controlled.
B
O
So,
mr
chair,
this
lot
is
tiny.
It's
only
a
quarter
of
an
acre,
so
there's
only
five
units
total,
so
that
was
the
trade-off
rather
than
doing
the
lower
priced
inclusion
of
lower
price
units.
This
is
a
hundred
percent
affordable,
essentially,
but
just
at
the
higher
price
point
that
is
defined
in
the
low
price
dwelling
unit.
H
H
H
Renting
is
great,
but
I
want
to
ensure
that
we're,
given
that
we're
giving
up
this
great
resource
in
this
great
asset
in
a
very,
very
high,
highly
desirable
part
of
town,
that
we
give
folks
an
opportunity
to
uh
purchase
a
home
in
that
part
of
the
community
um
that
that
I'm,
I
guess
that
causes
me
very
great
pause
in
this
sense,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
what
are
we
get
then
getting
in
return,
uh
rent
rental
units?
For
folks
um
to
me,
I
think,
that's
sufficient.
H
O
H
Right
so
so
we'll
go
with
counselor
lindell's
90
90k
um
see
that
it's
a
great
opportunity
for
somebody
bringing
home
90k
for
their
family
to
to
purchase
a
home.
There's
not
there's
not
much
opportunity
like
that
in
this
city,
and
I
don't
see
it
for
the
foreseeable
future
and
I
think
that's
where
maybe
we
reconsider
negotiating
and
we
pro
we.
H
We
highly
encourage
that.
I
highly
encourage
that
these
are
uh
this.
These
five
units
become
available
for
for
sale,
not
not
for
rental.
um
I
know
you
mentioned
the
the
current
building
rate
of
uh
300.
I
think
you
said
300
per
square
foot.
um
I
know
that
we're
in
uh
very
unique
times
where
costs
of
construction
are
probably
the
highest
they've
ever
been,
um
but
I
think
the
experts
have
have
project
predicted
that
those
those
rates
are
going
to
go
down
and
I
think
is
it
really
in
our
best
interest
to.
H
H
O
I
would
suggest
that,
just
because
building
costs
are
high,
this
does
not
mean
that
people
don't
more
than
ever
need
affordable
housing,
and
I
also
would
push
back
a
little
bit
that
somehow
home
ownership
is
a
more
uh
more
of
a
valuable
investment
because
with
a
home
ownership
transaction,
the
city's
supporting
the
transaction
once
in
terms
of
of
restricting
the
price
with
a
rental
unit,
the
price
is
restricted
every
single
month,
year
after
year,
tenant
after
tenant.
So
it's
actually
a
much
bigger
benefit
to
provide
to
the
city
and
could
potentially
benefit
many
more
people.
H
I
think
we
need
to
really
start
looking
into
that
that
that
kind
of
development
as
well,
because
if
we
become
oversaturated
with
rentals
you're,
not
going
to
allow
individuals
to
have
that
long-term
investment
in
our
community,
whereas
with
with
rentals,
it's
yes,
it's
great
people
are
in
homes
or
apartments
whatever
it
may
be,
that
that
are
whatever's
been
rented
out,
but
I
think
you,
you
see
a
much
bigger
difference
when
there
are
uh
people
that
are
purchasing
homes.
um
I
think,
if,
given
the
opportunity
folks
would
much
rather
purchase
a
home,
then
rent
to
home.
H
I
think
it's
just
the
market
that
is
unfortunate
in
our
community,
forcing
folks
to
rent
because
they
can't
afford
to
purchase
a
home.
The
costs
are
just
it's
the
craziest
it's
ever
been,
um
but
but
thank
you
for
clarifying
that
there.
There
is
not
a
particular
rush
to
get
this
done.
I
think
I
I
think
this
is
something
we
can
sit
and
if
we
wait
it's
going
to
be
a
better
better
long-term
investment
for
the
community
and
those
individuals
that
will
ultimately
land
up
in
these
homes
that
are
developed
with
that.
L
B
H
B
H
Q
H
D
D
It
included
some
funding
from
utilities,
uh
some
of
the
funding
from
the
financing,
some
funding
from
the
legislative
appropriation,
and
it
did
take
uh
some
time
for
finance
and
public
works
to
get
it
all
worked
out
exactly
right
and
we
missed
the
deadline
for
last
monday
night's
finance
committee
meeting.
So
that's,
why
will
be
a
action
item
on
wednesday?
The
last
governing
body
meeting
of
the
fiscal
year.
D
Yes,
I
understand
your
perspective.
We
have
exactly
the
same
one
because,
as
you
know,
you've
approved
the
contracts
on
february
24th,
which
means
our
contractors
haven't
had
their
purchase
orders
for
over
four
or
five
months.
um
But
uh
you
know
it
was
budget
season,
um
so
we
didn't
have
time
to
sit
down
and
do
that.
um
So
we
it
just
you
know
as
soon
as
we
could
get
the
attention
on
it.
We
started
working
on
it
and
brought
to
you
as
quickly
as
we
could.
H
D
H
I
I
would
rather
ask
them
at
the
governing
body
when
the
broader
public
is
there
to
fully
understand
this
project.
Is
you
are
well
aware,
miss
willer?
This
is
a
very
controversial
project
in
the
way
that
this
is
being
implemented,
and
I
want
to
ensure
that
I
have
my
questions
correctly
formulated
as
I
began.
My
questioning.
I
couldn't
really
understand
what
this
was
when
the
item
was
here
so
now
that
I
have
a
fuller
perspective,
it'll
allow
me
to
better
make
a
presentation
for
wednesday.
R
L
B
H
F
uh
Thank
you,
chair,
garcia.
Thank
you.
Counselors,
uh
of
course,
we're
here
tonight
to
uh
consider
a
resolution
resolution
to
vacate
a
portion
of
galisteo
road
at
zia
road.
um
Of
course,
you
all
know.
On
april
6
and
8th
8,
the
governing
body,
considered
and
approved
a
series
of
requests,
considering
consisting
of
two
general
plan
amendments
two
rezonings
and
a
preliminary
development
plan
for
the
zia
station
zia
road
and
saint
francis
drive
integral
to
the
development
plan,
is
a
realignment
of
the
intersection
of
galisteo
road
and
zia
road.
F
The
approved
preliminary
development
plan
calls
for
the
realignment
of
the
intersection
approximately
200
feet,
west
of
its
current
location
and
improvements
to
the
intersection.
The
full
design
ultimately
calls
for
dedication
of
new
galisteo
right
away
north
of
zera
road
as
well.
However,
just
to
clarify
tonight,
the
committee
is
not
considering
the
dedication
of
new
right-of-way
only
the
vacation
of
the
existing
southern
portion
of
galisteo
under
applicable
state
and
city
laws.
The
request
for
vacation
requires
a
public
hearing
before
committees
and
then
approval
by
the
governing
body
as
owner
of
the
land.
F
If
this,
uh
if
approved
this
approval,
will
result
in
a
resolution
to
allow
the
vacation
um
excuse
me,
the
application
would
then
go
to
the
planning
commission
for
review
and
approval
uh
the
vacation
and
simultaneous
dedication
of
new
galasteo
right
away
in
a
new
alignment,
as
well
as
a
dedication
of
new
galisteo
right
away
north
of
zia.
This
uh
application
will
be
considered
simultaneously
with
the
final
development
plan.
The
planning
commission
has
review
and
approval
authority
of
both.
F
F
F
uh
In
summary,
the
staff
staff
recommends
that
the
governing
body
approve
the
resolution
to
vacate
galicia
right
away,
uh
befitting
their
prior
approval
of
the
zia
station
preliminary
development
plan
and
as
a
necessary
step
towards
the
final
development
plan
approval
in
your
packet.
I've
included
minutes
from
the
prior
meetings,
as
well
as
the
finding
of
fact
conclusions
of
law
to
assist
in
your
consideration
of
this
matter.
So
I
will
leave
my
presentation
at
that.
Of
course,
we
have
the
applicant
here
as
well,
and
we
can
certainly
answer
any
questions
that
the
committee
desires.
Thank
you.
F
uh
We
talked
to
the
applicant
uh
miss
jenkins
and
she's.
She
kind
of
indicated
that
you
know
just
she's
here
to
answer
questions,
put
images
on
the
screen
as
needed,
but
doesn't
necessarily
have
a
presentation
per
se.
We
do
have,
of
course,
uh
full
staff
here
to
assist
in
answering
questions
as
well.
B
C
B
L
First,
I
want
to
say
that
um
I
was
not
present
uh
for
this
case,
so
I
didn't
vote
on
it.
I
was
um
out
of
town
with
a
family
issue,
but
I
do
have
just
one
question
about
this:
was
this
um
always
part
of
the
process
of
that
we
knew
we
would
be
having
to
go
through,
or
did
this
come
up
later
on,
and
um
this
is
in
addition
to
um
what
the
planning
commission
and
and
eventually
the
the
city
council
voted
on.
L
S
S
Members
of
the
committee,
so
we
did
know
all
along
that
this
project,
to
complete
the
development
plan,
as
proposed
in
the
preliminary
development
plan
that
was
coming
forward,
would
require
the
city
to
vacate
a
portion
of
our
existing
right-of-way.
So
basically,
the
city
has
that
portion
of
gallisdale
road,
the
city,
has
an
easement
according
to
the
research
done
by
both
the
landowner
and
our
land
use
department,
property
manager.
So
the
um
that's
a
bit
unusual.
S
Our
regular
planning
commission
process
certainly
contemplates
the
dedication
of
new
right-of-way
streets,
public
infrastructure,
that's
necessary
to
support
a
new
development,
but
we're
not
usually
giving
up
something
that
the
city
already
owns.
So
it
is
an
unusual
situation.
We
did
start
looking
at
this
early
on
to
figure
out
options
for
fulfilling
sort
of
the
legal
process
for
the
city
to
give
up
something
that
we
currently
own,
and
so
that
does
need
approval
by
the
governing
body.
S
Speaking
as
the
owners
as
the
city,
and
so
that's
why
we
have
this
process,
I
think
there's
potentially
other
things
that
could
be
done.
I
know
in
other
situations,
we've
done
things
like
land
swaps
with
other
entities
and
things
like
that,
but
that
seemed
a
little
more
complicated,
since
this
is
actually
very
close
to
the
normal
process
of
a
developer,
dedicating
their
necessary
infrastructure
to
the
city.
S
It's
just
that
little
bit
of
realignment,
and
so
there
is
actually
a
city
ordinance
that
speaks
to
a
process
for
that
and
a
state
statute
that
speaks
to
the
process.
So
we
did
look
at
that
quite
a
long
time
ago.
We
knew
this
was
coming.
The
applicant
wanted
to
see
if
they
could
get
through
that
first
step
of
approvals,
but
certainly
this
piece
was
incorporated
into
all
of
the
plans
that
previously
went
to
planning,
commission
and
governing
body.
H
S
uh
Chair
rivera
counselor,
garcia.
No,
so
what
we're
really
doing
here
is
it's
almost
what
we
would
normally
do
for
any
other
legislation.
It's
really
just
the
resolution
is
the
method
for
the
governing
body
to
to
speak
as
one
body
as
the
owner
of
this
right-of-way
and
so
resolutions.
We
don't
normally
do
public
hearings.
S
The
reason
this
one
was
required
to
be
open
as
a
public
hearing
is
just
because
our
ordinance
specifically
requires
that
that's
not
a
requirement
of
state
law,
and
so
it's
a
bit
of
an
unusual
resolution,
but
it
is
really
just
a
resolution.
It's
a
method
for
the
governing
body
to
to
speak
and
approve
this
um
vacation
of
existing
easement
right
away.
H
H
H
We
were
all
aware
of
the
public
that
came
out
to
speak,
whether
it
was
in
favor
or
not
in
favor
of
this,
and
I
think
we
should
give
the
public
their
fair
opportunity
to
speak
on
the
matter
and
not
have
a
public
hearing
during
a
committee
meeting
so
I'll
make
that
motion
that
this
agenda
item
be
presented
as
a
public
hearing
on
our
july
14th
governing
body
meeting
and
please
that
we
reach
out
to
the
community.
I
don't
even
know
if
the
public
was
even
aware
that
this
public
hearing
was
happening.
H
D
S
um
Chair
rivera,
I'm
honestly
not
sure
what
the
requirement
would
be
for
a
public
hearing
on
a
resolution
where
there's
not
normally,
I
don't
know
of
a
legal
requirement,
so
I'm
not
sure
um
I'm
not
sure
I
would
have
to
review
I,
because
we
don't
normally
do
public
transit
on
resolutions,
um
I'm
not
I,
it
doesn't
trigger
any
of
the
notice
provisions
that
I
normally
apply
and
this
one
is
very
unusual.
The
you
know.
S
So
uh
I
don't
see
anything
necessarily
wrong
with
the
motion
for
the
14th,
but
we
will
want
to
uh
review
legal
requirements
if
that's
and
and
I'm
not
sure.
Ultimately,
who
has
the
authority
to
place
um
something
as
a
public
train
on
the
governing
body
agenda
either?
So
all
questions
I'm
not
familiar
with
an
answer
to
right
now,
but
that
we
can
certainly
look
at.
T
And
chair,
if
I
might
jump
in
on
this
also
um
at
the
governing
body
meetings,
whereas
the
zia
station
preliminary
development,
general
plan
um
and
the
two
rezoning
requirements,
this
was
very
discussed
in
lan
at
length
about
that.
This
would
be
coming
forward
um
and
that
there
was
a
separate
process
for
this,
and
that
was
a
public
hearing
um
and
then
it'll
be
a
second
public
hearing
to
accept
the
dedication
of
the
new
alignment.
This
is
only
for
vacation
and
it's
through
a
resolution,
so
um
the
second
public
hearing
will
be
noticed
um
and
posted.
T
um
What
we
consider
a
second
second
public
hearing
but
it'll
be
heard
by
the
planning
commission
and
then
ultimately,
if
that's
appealed,
then
it
could
be
appealed
to
the
governing
body
that
would
be
heard
also
there.
So
I
just
want
to
throw
it
out
that
there
has
been
a
public
hearing.
Multiple
public
hearings,
there's
been
the
planning
commission.
H
Mr
america,
sorry,
mr
chair,
I
apologize
um
with
that
motion.
There's
nothing
out
of
line
with
it.
We've
put
resolutions
in
a
public
hearing
less
than
30
day
notice.
That's
from
from
my
understanding,
it's
our
ordinances
that
require
the
30-day
notice,
um
and
so
with
that
that
my
motion
still
stands
and
should
it
not
be
uh
put
as
a
public
hearing,
I
would
like
uh
the
public
to
be
well
aware
of
who
who
did
not
approve
of
it,
because
there's
nothing
prohibiting
us
from
having
the
public
hearing
on
the
14th.
H
I
understand
that
we've
had
public
hearings
on
the
past.
It's
just,
but
especially
with
the
project
like
this,
uh
the
more
proactive
and
more
transparent.
We
are
with
this
process,
the
better
we,
as
I
mentioned,
I'm
shocked.
Nobody
showed
up
to
this,
and-
and
I
I
did
did
yellow
signs
go
up
for
the
prop
for
the
public
hearing,
so
I
mean
we.
We
need
to
be
able
to
allow
the
public
to
participate
in
this
process
and,
if
I
I'm,
I
guess,
maybe
noah
how
how
do
we
notify
that?
There's
a
hearing
being
held
tonight.
T
um
Chair
um
counselor,
garcia,
thank
you
for
the
question,
and
um
so
we
did
discuss
it
internally
as
staff.
If
we
need
to
put
up
the
yellow
posters,
um
this
process
is
written
out
in
in
chapter
23
about
how
to
do
the
vacation
and
it's
just
it's
kind
of
a
unique
process,
um
and
then
there's
the
state
statutes
that
kind
of
tell
you
how
you're
supposed
to
do
it
at
a
municipal
level.
um
So
it
didn't
require
public
notification
and
we
did
look
at
it.
T
We
said
and
it
just
it
isn't
required,
um
and
so
that's
why
we
didn't
do
it.
The
only
public
notification
would
be
publishing
of
this
agenda.
um
There's
no
mailing
like
there
would
be
with
an
enn
or
a
public
hearing,
because
it's
not
a
public
hearing
right
now.
um
So
it's
just
a
resolution,
um
and
so
that's.
We
just
followed
the
exact
letter
of
the
process
law
and
I
totally
understand
the
concern,
because
we
have
the
same
issue
with
text
amendments
right
where
there's
not
an
enn
requirement
and
there's
not
a
mailing
requirement.
T
H
Understandable,
thank
you
now
for
that
clarification.
I
really
appreciate
it
and-
and
I
think
that
helps
to
understand
why
folks
aren't
here
tonight,
unless
you're
paying
attention
to
the
committee
agenda,
which
most
folks
probably
aren't
um
they're,
not
aware
of
what's
happening
tonight,
and
so
I
think,
uh
given
that
the
share
interest
of
this
project,
we
need
to
uh
show
best
interest
to
the
community
in
that
sense,
so
I
would
uh
request
that
we
uh
put
up
yellow
signs
for
this.
H
H
uh
Sure
so
my
original
motion
was
to
approve
this
but
schedule
the
meeting
on
the
the
governing
body
into
a
public
hearing
and
so
on.
The
14th,
the.
When
this
item
is
heard,
it's
a
public
hearing.
um
But
then,
after
the
fact,
I
spoke
about
properly
notifying
the
community,
because
it's
come
to
light
that
we
only
notified
the
community
by
uh
the
agenda.
So
I'd
like
to
rescind
my
my
motion
uh
and
hopefully
uh
counselor
beta,
would
because
I
would
like
for
us
to
notify
the
community
in
the
appropriate
manner.
H
Yes,
so
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
this
agenda
item
with
the
requirement
that
the
hearing
that
this
item
be
heard
at
the
july
14th
governing
body
meeting
or
any
subsequent
subsequent
governing
body
meeting.
But
it
has
to
be
a
public
hearing
and
we
have
to
notify
the
public
via
yellow
sign
at
minimum.
B
S
Thank
you.
I
was
just
hoping
for
the
clarification
on
the
exact
requested
type
of
notice,
because
we
have
so
many
different
notice
provisions
and
our
land
use
ordinance
and
then
we're
specifically
applicable
here.
So
I
understand
now,
with
the
the
yellow
sign
request
is
very
clear.
I
appreciate
that.
H
H
D
D
That
was
carrying
a
budgetary
estimate,
that
was
1.5
million
short,
um
but
other
things
have
come
in
uh
in
the
budgets,
but
we're
seeing
such
volatile
pricing
um
that,
as
we
put
these
together,
we'll
identify
items
that
need
new
quotes,
uh
get
those
numbers
tuned
up
and
um
and
then
we'll
be
um
presenting
it.
uh
You
know
meeting
one-on-one
with
counselors
and
um
and
then
bringing
that
through
the
process.
R
No,
I
just
want
to
confirm
that,
but
I
also
want
to
make
it
clear,
mr
chairman,
that
I
think
it's
very
important
that
this
committee
make
a
final
recommendation
on
whatever
the
priorities
are
going
to
be.
Finance
is
just
going
to
do
the
financing
part
and
whatever
is
required
with
that,
but
this
committee,
I
think
it's
very
important
that
you,
under
your
leadership,
mr
chairman,
we
come
up
with
a
final
recommendation
for
the
governing
body
to
consider.
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
that.
Thank
you.
Councillor
abita,
miss
wheeler.
Anything
else.
D
If
I
could
add
to
that,
and
as
we're
putting
that,
as
as
the
conversation
last
week
was
so
helpful
in
the
broader
uh
landscape
of
capital
planning
and
the
go
bond
down
the
road
that
would
be
approved
by
the
voters,
um
as
we
update
the
master
capital
plan
with
the
directors
we'll
be
sort
of
bucketing,
the
different
projects
is
this:
a
deferred
maintenance.
Immediate
need.
P
B
B
So
if
we
can
have
a
presentation
on
that,
that
would
be
uh
wonderful
and
then
I
also
had
a
reminder
and
it's
based
on
uh
probably
uh
starting
a
little
bit
late
last
year,
but
really
started
looking
about
looking
into
the
icip
and
the
cip
lists
that
need
to
be
presented
to
the
legislature
and
again
I
don't
want
to
get
started
too
too
late.
I
know
july
1st
is
probably
a
little
bit
early,
but
just
a
reminder
that
we
probably
need
to
start
looking
at
that
as
well.
D
Thank
you
chairman.
Actually,
it's
very
timely
if
you
remember
that
resolution
with
the
decisions
there's
due
by
september
9th,
usually
to
dfa,
so
it's
the
perfect
time
to
begin
and
we'll
definitely
be
updating
that
list
in
this
whole
process
of
uh
capital
plan
update.
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
reminder.
L
D
Correct
yes,
uh
counselor
and
chairman
um
we've
actually
engaged
a
new
contractor
too,
to
give
us
a
quote,
because
the
other
one
is
just
it's
real:
it's
not
only
high
prices
for
construction,
but
people
are
also
very
busy
and
so
we're
having
trouble
getting
quotes.
So
we've
engaged
another
contractor,
so
both
are
on
the
hook
to
get
us
a
price
for
that
remodel.