►
From YouTube: Architectural Review Commission 01042021
Description
Architectural Review Commission 01042021
A
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
the
january
4
2021
public
hearing
for
the
city
of
tampa's
architectural
review,
commission
welcome
everyone.
My
name
is
zachary
greco,
chair
of
the
commission.
If
you're
here
to
present
a
project,
you'll
have
limited
time
to
make
your
presentation,
so
we
suggest
being
thorough
but
concise.
A
A
Your
project
should
be
presented
in
the
following
order:
site
plan,
elevations
architectural
details
and
wall
sections
staff
will
then
present
the
staff
report
and
will
then
ask
the
public
for
comment
following
your
presentation.
The
commissioners
will
be
asking
questions
in
the
same
order
as
the
presentation,
please
state
and
spell
your
name
clearly.
If
you
are
here
to
speak
for
or
against
a
project,
your
time
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes.
So
take
some
time
now.
A
To
summarize
your
comments,
because
three
minutes
go
by
very
quickly
following
public
comment,
the
applicant
will
have
five
minutes
for
rebuttal.
The
public
hearing
will
then
be
closed.
The
only
comments
which
will
be
allowed
after
the
public
hearing
is
closed
will
be
in
response
to
any
questions
from
the
commissioners.
A
The
arc
can
only
act
on
items
that
are
within
our
specific
jurisdictional
responsibility.
Owner
and
agents
are
independently
responsible
to
obtain
any
appropriate
permits
and
or
approvals.
If
you
haven't
already
done
so,
please
silence
all
cell
phones.
At
this
point
I'll
ask
my
fellow
commissioners,
starting
on
my
right
to
introduce
themselves.
C
E
Good
evening,
commissioners
dennis
fernandez
architecture,
review
and
historic
preservation
manager
happy
new
year
and
welcome
to
our
first
public
hearing
of
2021.
We
have
just
two
cases
this
evening,
so
we're
anticipating
that
to
hopefully
be
a
brief
meeting
for
you.
I
do
have
the
administrative
approvals
for
december
2020
that
will
be
added
to
the
record
and
just
for
the
record,
we
will
be
holding
another
public
hearing
for
our
january
cycle
on
wednesday
january
6th.
F
F
A
E
E
C
E
And
for
our
first
case
ms
lund
will
introduce
introduce
the
case
and
hold
the
photo
essay.
Thank
you.
F
Good
evening,
commissioners,
elaine
lund,
city
of
tampa
historic
preservation,
staff,
you'll
notice.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
cannot
be
heard
this
evening
due
to
a
misnotis
so
we're
moving
on
to
arc
21-73.
F
Powhatan,
this
is
the
present
day,
ariel
of
the
property
you
can
see.
It
hasn't
changed
much
since
then,
there's
a
still
the
house
with
the
porch,
along
the
northwest
side
there
and
a
small
accessory
structure
in
the
rear.
F
D
F
And
finally,
here
the
the
rear
elevation,
the
east
side
of
the
building,
you
can
see
that
there
has
been
a
little
bit
of
work,
it's
more
evident
on
the
rear,
with
the
replacement
windows
in
this
area.
F
There's
been
some
work
with
the
the
roof
as
well,
and
the
overhangs
and
rafters
the
property
does
have
exposed
rafter
tails
and
there
are
just
a
few
brackets
in
the
gable
ends
that
are
a
little
difficult
to
see
in
that
shot,
but
they
are
there
and
then
this
building
also
has
a
few
grouped
windows,
both
double
and
triple
see.
The
framing
casing
for
the
windows
is
pretty
typical
of
what
we
would
expect
to
see
of
a
building
a
bungalow
of
this
era
and
then
moving
along
the
street.
F
F
G
G
The
existing
layout
of
the
house,
which
you'll
see
in
the
plans,
is
a
little
unusual
for
a
bungalow.
It
has
a
very,
very
large
front
porch,
it
has
a
single
bathroom,
but
the
bathroom
is
in
the
rear
in
most
bungalows,
it's
towards
the
side
between
the
front
and
back
bedrooms.
So
so
those
kind
of
things
created
some
design
challenges
for
us
and
also
the
kitchen
fairly
small
and
there's
a
challenge
on
how
to
make
the
kitchen
bigger
and
make
the
space
more
open
and
more
functional
for
my
client.
G
G
This
on
okay,
so
if
we
can
go
to
the
projector
and
then
maybe
zoom
in
I'm
going
to
move
this,
so
it
looks
a
little
better
okay.
So
this
was
the
house
when
she
bought
it.
You
can
see
the
the
soffits
are.
The
rafters
are
all
concealed
by
the
vinyl
soffits.
It
had
an
appropriately
screened
porch,
but
she
wanted
to
open
that
up.
So
she
had
had
that
opened
up
which
you'll
see
in
some
later
pictures
and
I
believe
they
were
in
elaine's
pictures
as
well.
Just
moving
around
the
house.
G
On
this
on
the
along
the
foundation,
there's
really
no
foundation
screen
enclosure,
but
it's
kind
of
interesting
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
flare
to
the
siding
here.
So
all
the
piers
are
set
back
about
six
inches
and
the
bottom
course
of
siding
is
only
about
six
or
eight
inches
from
grade,
but
we'll
be
removing
this
and
doing
something
more
appropriate
for
the
foundation
screen
closure.
G
G
Again,
it
had
all
aluminum
closure
and
all
the
utilities
back
here,
there's
a
it's
not
on
city
water,
it's
a
well!
So
all
this
stuff
has
to
go
away
and
get
relocated.
If
we're
going
to
do
anything
to
the
back
of
the
house
and
again
over
here,
you
can
see
the
inappropriate
windows
and
also,
if
you
look
closely,
you
can
see
the
I
don't
know
if
y'all
can
zoom
in
a
little
bit,
the
siding
is
a
different
exposure
on
the
siding,
the
then
this
is
kind
of
going
back
around.
G
So
this
is
the
front
opened
up.
There's
a
very
nice
vented
gable
on
the
front,
which
is
just
very
simple,
orthogonal
sort
of
lattice,
the
brackets
here,
which
are
basically
four
by
six
but
they're
a
little
bit
unusual
and
that
they're
set
up
rather
than
lower,
with
the
bar
draft
or
sitting
on
top
of
it.
So
we're
going
to
keep
that
same
detail,
but
you
can
see
most
of
the
wood
rafters
and
the
roof
deck
are
in
pretty
good
shape.
G
So
as
far
as
the
site,
orientation
and
other
things
like
that,
you
know
the
the
front
of
the
house
and
everything's
gonna
remain,
as
is
with
the
exception
of
opening
up
the
porch
and
the
work
I
mentioned
on
the
rafter
tails.
But
there
is
some
sight
stuff.
The
the
apron
here
is
all
beat
up
and
not
in
very
good
shape,
so
she's
going
to
replace
that
in
part
of
the
sidewalk,
the
driveway
is
actually
in
pretty
good
condition,
so
we'll
probably
keep
it.
G
But
if
there
is
any
damage
to
it,
then
we're
going
to
just
sort
of
repair
it
in
kind.
The
other
thing
this
is
a
transportation
comment
to
remove
this
little
walkway.
I
know
the
last
hearing
that
I
was
presented
a
project
here,
there's
some
debate
on
that.
But
that's
a
transportation
comment.
So
that's
why
that's
there,
as
you
can
see
on
the
site
plan,
we're
bumping
up
a
little
bit
to
the
north.
This
is
going
to
be
an
additional
bathroom
here.
G
On
the
south
side,
we're
bumping
out
here
and
but
because
we're
going
a
little
bit
south
of
this
side,
yard
setback
we're
getting
a
design
exception.
The
design
exception
was
supposed
to
have
been
reviewed
and
approved
by
december
21st
and
it
hasn't.
I've
talked
to
urban
design
several
times,
but
they
are
very
backed
up
on
cases
but-
and
I
think
that's
one
of
the
conditions
that
elaine
actually
has
in
the
staff
report
about
that
design
exception.
G
G
Okay,
this
is
the
existing
slash
demolition
plan.
So
these
are
the
two
bedrooms
that
I
was
talking
about
and
then
there's
like
a
back
porch,
that's
very
typical
of
bungalows
that
was
enclosed
and
turned
into
condition
space.
But
the
bathroom
was
here
and
so,
and
the
utility
room
was
here,
so
it
really
prevented
any
kind
of
connection
to
the
backyard.
G
G
This
is
we're
keeping
most
of
this
as
original
as
much
as
possible
in
the
center
of
the
house.
But
this
area
is
we're
kind
of
creating
like
a
portal
to
transition
to
the
kitchen,
but
we
struggled
a
lot
with
the
width
of
the
kitchen
here
to
get
it
to
work
with
an
island
and
the
necessary
counters
and
everything
that
we
need.
So
that's
what
kind
of
forced
us
to
bump
out
here
on
the
side
and
but
we
felt
it
important
to
keep
a
couple
windows.
G
G
We
really
couldn't
push
it
out
all
the
way
here,
but
we
sort
of
compromised
with
the
just
pushing
out
the
foot
here,
which
can
be
easily
accomplished
just
by
hand,
levering
the
floor
joists,
which
are
running
this
way
and
then
the
master
suite
just
a
bedroom
with
a
pair
of
windows
on
on
the
north
and
the
south
side,
and
then
a
large
closet
and
bathroom
the
way
she
wanted
it.
The
electric
meter
and
the
utilities
get
moved
back
here.
G
G
G
G
On
the
elevations
may
need
to
zoom
out
a
little
bit
on
this
one.
There
we
go
okay
on
the
front.
You
really
there's
really
no
change
except
you
see
a
little
bit
of
the
rear
addition
for
the
bathroom
right
here
and
then
you
see
this,
but
these
are
they're,
screened,
so
they're
way,
far
back
looking
on
the
south
side
or
the
right
side
of
the
house,.
G
This
is
existing
elevation,
so
basically,
these
original
windows
and
this
these
all
go
away,
and
then
now
this
is
where
the
kitchen
is,
which
is
basically
from
here
to
here,
which
bumps
out,
which
provides
the
transition
to
the
new
and
then
this
is
where
the
office
is
and
the
in
the
bedroom
in
the
back.
This
is
a
small
window
in
the
shower
just
to
provide
some
additional
natural
light
and
ventilation,
and
I
think
you
can
see
a
little
bit
on
here.
The
little
flared
skirt,
that's
existing
and
we're
going
to
recreate.
G
G
On
the
rear
elevation
this
this
basically
all
gets
covered
up
because
of
what
we're
adding,
but
you
will
still
see
a
little
bit
of
the
pork
casher
roof
back
here.
But
this
is
this
addition
to
the
north
bathroom
and
then
this
is
the
kitchen
on
the
side,
and
then
this
is
in
the
back,
even
though
she
had
a
closet
back
here.
We
needed
to
have
some
sort
of
window,
so
that
kind
of
dictated
how
the
closet
was
laid
out
so
that
we
could
get
a
decent
sized
window
here.
G
So
we're
going
to
have
a
little
bit
more
exposed
foundation,
screen
enclosure
on
the
porch
and
then
on
the
on
the
north
side.
This
is
the
existing
front
porch
and
then
so
all
this
remains
unchanged.
So
this
is
basically
where
this
little
bump
out
is
for
the
bathroom,
but
it
again
it
has
a
similar
gable
vent,
a
smaller
proportioned
window
to
fit
with
the
smaller
size
mask
pumping
out
on
the
side,
and
then
you
can
see
the
porch
from
the
side
and
then
the
master
bedroom
going
off
to
the
side.
There.
G
So
maybe
if
the
camera
could
zoom
in
and
then
I'll
move
it
up
as
we
as
I
move
down
I'll
start
at
the
top,
so
basically
we
have
engineered
roof
trusses,
but
we'll
have
two
by
six
rafter
tails
which
will
match
the
existing
construction.
G
We'll
have
two
by
four
frame
walls:
the
windows
which
I'll
show
you
the
window
details
base
inside
the
wood
flooring
is
all
similar
to
the
existing
down.
Here.
The
reason
that
the
siding
comes
down
so
low
is
this
little
flare
doesn't
really
happen
until
approximately
where
the
floor
level
is
because
you
have
your
perimeter
beam
and
you
have
your
floor
joist
sitting
on
top
of
that,
so
that
skirt
comes
all
the
way
down
here.
So
you
only
have
about
eight,
almost
nine
inches
there.
G
So
we'll
back
here
at
the
pier
we
will
do
a
little
screen
enclosure.
It
will
just
be
an
orthogonal
lattice
to
match
the
gables.
That
was
one
of
the
comments
that
staff
had.
G
This
is
actually
a
section
at
the
bump
out
at
the
kitchen,
so
you
can
see
I'll
start
at
the
bottom
here.
So
again,
this
this
construction
is
all
similar
to
the
previous
detail,
with
the
flared
skirt
and
the
the
beam
configuration.
This
shows
the
existing
beam
and
pier
and
then
the
part
of
the
skirt
and
siding
that
goes
away.
G
The
window
details
are
we're
doing
wood
windows
which
will
match.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
zoom
in
a
little
bit
more
to
this,
but
the
wood
windows
will
match
as
much
as
we
can
to
the
existing
windows.
It's
always
a
challenge
to
get
wood
windows
that
meet
code
and
also
appropriate
for
the
historic
house,
but
basically
the
you
know
it
has
the
like
the
two
inch
wood
cell
with
the
three
quarter
inch
border
round
underneath
and
then
you
have
the
wood
window
that
all
the
interior
trims
can
match.
G
Existing
the
head
casing
is
just
a
very
simple
two
by
with
the
with
the
drip
cap
and
then
the
jam
and
the
mullions
are
basically
similar
to
the
existing.
With
the
same
same
thing.
G
In
regards
to
the
materials
and
details,
we
are
going
to
re-roof
the
entire
house,
so
we
will
be
using
dimensional
asphalt,
shingles
with
a
variegated
color
like
that.
G
G
And
as
as
I
mentioned,
and
unfortunately
I
do
not
have
a
wood
window
sample,
but
there's
only
like
three
or
four
companies
that
most
projects
in
seminole
heights
and
hyde
park
use
so
we'll
certainly
work
with
staff
to
make
sure
we
get
the
appropriate
window
for
that.
So
with
that.
Well,
let
me
make
sure
I
got
all
the
conditions.
G
Let's
see,
as
I
mentioned,
about
the
setback
and
the
design
exception.
I
talked
about
the
screen
enclosure
for
the
mechanical
units.
G
F
A
All
right
at
this
point
we'll
open
the
hearing
to
any
public
comment
scene
hearing
no
one.
The
commissioners
will
now
ask
questions
regarding
the
project.
Is
there
a
commissioner
that
would
like
to
begin.
C
I
I
do
have
a
couple
questions.
Mr
dobbs,
can
you
just
walk
through
the
elevation
and
point
out
where
all
the
foundations
will
have
the
enclosure
on
the
copies
that
we
have
here?
It
only
appears
that
the
rear
porch
is
actually
getting
enclosure
at
the
foundation.
G
G
G
Well,
first
off
all
the
foundations
are
basically
going
to
be
brick
piers
up
to
match
the
existing.
Even
though
you
can't
really
see
the
brick
mirrors
because
they're
this
is
so
shallow
and
they're
set
back
but
anyway.
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
have
at
the
porch.
I
did
not
draw
it
here,
but
that's
probably
what
we're
going
to
do
here,
because
we
need
to
have
something
there,
so
so
it
would
be
there
and
and
then
like
on
the
back
elevation.
G
You
know
where
we
have
again.
We
have
an
intermediate
pier,
so
so
these
areas
would
have
that
similar
foundation,
enclosure
and
and
sorry
I
don't
have
that
more
detailed
but
except
I
do
have
it
shown
on.
I
don't
know
how
much
the
camera
can
zoom
in,
but
I
did
show
it
right
here.
G
G
G
G
C
So
wherever
they
exist
currently,
if,
if
you
find
that
you
need
to-
or
you
want
to
replace
them,
is
that
an
intent.
C
A
C
G
C
G
G
G
G
Because
I
didn't,
I
forgot
to
mention
it:
it's
just
going
to
be
tongue
and
groove
southern
yellow
pine
with
you
know
like
it,
it's
basically
going
to
match
it's
the
front.
Porch
it'll
be
three
quarter
inch
material.
It
won't
have
gaps
like
a
lot
of
cheap
porches
do
where
they
just
buy.
You
know
five
quarter
by
six
off
the
shelf
at
home
depot.
This
will
be
tongue
and
groove
pt
painted
and
it
will
match
the
front
porch.
G
Oh,
no,
no,
oh
I'm
sorry,
yeah.
The
ceiling
that
I
didn't
mention
on
the
the
soffits
are
all
the
typical
1x4
v-groove
bead
board.
And
yes,
the
porch
would
have
the
same
sort
of
bead
board
as
the
front
porch.
D
I
have
a
question
regarding
your
kitchen
addition
and
your
south
side
yard.
You
may
mention
that
you
are
approaching
or
have
approached
without
a
resolution
at
this
time
a
design
exception
with
the
city
of
tampa.
Can
you
go
into
more
detail
about
that
and
how
that
may
differ?
If
you
will,
from
a
sidebar
setback
exception.
G
Sure,
okay,
yeah
and
these
design
exceptions
are
fairly
common
in
summer
heights
for
for
for
various
reasons,
but
typically
it's
a
modest
reduction
in
the
setback.
I
believe
it's
15,
so
for
a
seven
foot,
setback
side,
yard
setback.
It
works
out
to
be
about
a
foot.
So
so
usually
we
get
a
design
exception,
it's
no
less
than
six
feet
on
the
rear.
G
Sometimes
when
people
ask
for
them
on
the
rear
that
15
works
out
to
be
about
two
feet,
you
know,
of
course,
we're
not
asking
for
that,
so
so
we're
less
than
six
feet
on
our
projection.
It's
because
we're
only
bumping
it
out
two
feet
from
the
existing
building
and
the
existing
building
is
eight
feet
from
the
property
line
which
is
dimensioned
on
the
survey.
G
So,
of
course,
as
with
any
design
exceptional
variants,
we
always
try
and
avoid
having
to
get
it
because
it's
extra
time
and
cost
and
you
always
risk
it
not
getting
approved.
But
but
I
feel
like
on
a
house
like
this:
it's
we
sort
of
don't
have
a
choice
and
it's
it
was
just
a
relatively
simple
solution
by
getting
the
design
exception.
A
G
A
G
G
If,
if
the
I
don't
know,
if
the
we
can
go
yeah,
I
don't
know
how
closely
you
can
zoom
into
this
area.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
the
the
the
lattice
on
the
existing
gable
and
vents
are
basically
an
inch
and
a
half
by
like
3
8
of
an
inch
which
is
typical
lattice
of
that
period,
and
it
does
have
a
little
sill
that
runs
along
the
bottom,
and
the
the
openings
or
spaces
in
the
lattice
are
basically
square
and
so
on.
The
addition,
because,
typically
most
my
clients
go
with
an
unvented
attic.
G
So
so
then
the
vents
aren't
working
anymore.
So
what
we
do
is
we
take
something
like
mdo
or
some
sort
of
smooth
board
and
put
it
on
the
gable
in
paint
it
black
and
then
apply
the
lattice
directly
to
that,
and
it
looks
exactly
like
the
original
lattice
and
and
we
we
can,
we
can
have
a
condition
of
building
a
little
sample
or
whatever
for
the
staff
to
approve,
because
that's
such
an
important
character,
defining
detail
to
get.
G
A
G
Yeah-
and
I
had
matched
that
during
my
presentation,
but
basically
what
my
client
did.
She
bought
this
house
she's.
This
is
her
second
historic
house
and
she
was
all
gung-ho
and
she
opened
up
the
front.
Porch
was
the
one
thing
she
did
and
then
the
other
thing
was
she
removed
all
the
aluminum
soffits
that
were
there
before.
If
here
you
can
see
where
they
used
to
be
in
this
picture-
and
I
actually
have
a
picture
of
the
front
before
it
was
even
removed
yeah
this.
G
A
G
We
yeah
we
intend
to
fix
that
sort
of
clipped
end
these.
This
bar
drafter,
which
you
can
see
in
this
detail,.
G
Right
here
is
it's
just
two
by
material,
never
was
painted
or
finished,
and
then
it
was
clipped
at
the
bottom.
That's
not
the
way.
It
typically
is
it's.
This
continues
down
and
you
have
a
plum
cut,
and
if
you
go
back
to
the
the
detail
that
I
had
shown,
I
show
the
rafter
tail
right
here
and
right
below.
It
is
another
line
which
is
actually
the
bar
drafter.
That's
beyond
that,
so
yeah.
So
basically
we're
going
to
do
something
to
fix
that.
So
it's
a
plumb
cut
and
same
thing.
A
A
G
That
I
don't
know
if
she's
going
to
use
the
well
water
or
connect.
Actually,
let
me
correct
myself:
she
is
going
to
use
city
water
because
she
had
a
water
meter
put
in
recently,
so
she'll
probably
use
that
well
as
irrigation.
I
think
we
avoided
it.
It's
in
this
area
back
here,
the
gas
water
heater,
that's
a
little
tricky
to
locate
because
you
can't
have
it
within.
I
think
five
feet
of
a
vented
window,
and
so
we
tried
to
have
it
sort
of
in
a
central.
G
G
Yes,
no
serving
the
whole
house,
yeah
yeah,
you
see
them.
Unfortunately,
a
lot
of
times
people
put
them
on
their
house
and
they
put
them
on
the
street
side,
and
I
think
it's
because
the
plumbers
are
very
proud
of
their
work.
And
so
you
see
these
big.
You
know
they're
they're,
like
18
by
24
or
36,
with
all
the
pipes
and
stuff.
So
this
will
be
on
the
side
behind
that
that
fence
that
I
had
mentioned.
A
And
then
the
only
I
have
two
additional
comments.
The
first
one
is.
It
looks
like
on
your
plan,
you're
missing
two
windows
adjacent
to
the
fire
place.
They
show
up
on
the
elevations,
but
it
looks.
G
I
want
to
explain
that,
let's
see
if
I
have
a
picture
of
it
yeah
when
I
was
when
I
was
doing
the
site
survey,
I
could
actually
see
evidence
that
there
used
to
be
a
window
on
either
side
of
the
fireplace,
and
so
I
never
put
it
in
plan,
but
I
put
it
in
elevation
and
never
went
back
to
talk
with
my
client
about
that.
G
So
I
think
what
we,
what
I
need
to
be
presenting
here
for
clarity,
is
that
these
windows
should
be
removed
from
the
elevation,
but
if
we,
if
we,
my
client,
does
decide
to
put
him
in
we'll
work
with
staff
to
make
sure
that
they're
the
appropriate
window,
but
but
right
now,
this
is
the
existing
condition,
and
this
this
will
remain
with
no
work
being
done
in
that
area.
Okay,.
A
And
then
the
last
tiny
little
thing,
your
title
block
has
the
wrong
arc
number
and
it
just
is
a
oh.
A
G
G
C
I
have
one
more
question:
I'm
sorry,
I
just
want
to
talk
about
the
fencing.
Is
it
the
intent
to
maintain
the
what
looks
like
a
chain
link
four
foot
or
three
foot
on
the
driveway
side,
as
it
is.
C
G
So
we
figured
you
know
it's
definitely
not
appropriate,
but
we
aren't
modifying
it
in
any
way,
but
certainly
if
that
ends
up
getting
replaced,
it
will
be
something
that
will
be
similar
to
what
we're
doing
on
the
south
side
and
also
we'll
work
closely
with
staff
on
the
details
of
it
like,
for
example,
this
is
a
good
location
for
it,
because
it's
set
back
from
the
front.
You
know
between
these
windows
right
here.
C
B
What,
then,
is
the
extent
of
the
wood
fence
that
you're
adding.
G
It's
just
on
the
south
side
to
because
right
now,
there's
there's
nothing
there,
so
we
need
to
put
something
there.
So
it
it's
right
here.
I
don't
know
if
it's
it's
drawn
with
a
couple
green
lines
and
it
would
be
there's
some
dining
room
windows
here
and
what
would
have
been
the
two
original
windows
on
either
side
of
the
fireplace.
So
that's
it
that
fence
would
be
within
that
location
which.
G
A
C
I
feel
like
this
is
really
in
the
right
direction.
Strong
project.
D
A
condition
yes
do.
We
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we
make
note
of
staff
coordination
for
the
foundation
screening,
which
is
discussed
at
length,
but
not
really
adequately
shown
on
these
documents.
The
potential
reintroduction
of
flanking
windows
on
the
fireplace.
D
Okay
and
then
do
we
want
to
have
staff
review
anything
about
the
defense
details
or
are
we
kind
of
copacetic
on
that.
D
B
I
moved
to
grant
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
drawings
and
documents
presented
at
this
public
hearing
in
arc
21-73
for
the
property
located
at
5607
north
swanee
avenue,
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
final
window
specification
be
approved
by
staff,
that
the
design
exception
be
approved,
that
the
foundation
screen,
enclosure
verbiage
be
updated
on
the
drawings
and
final
coordination
with
staff
and
any
final
updates
on
the
windows
on
either
side
of
the
fireplace
be
approved
by
staff.
Because
based
upon
the
finding
of
facts,
the
proposed
project
is
consistent
with
the
seminole
heights
design.
B
Guidelines
of
the
city
of
tampa.
For
the
following
reasons
that
the
orientation
alignment
and
details
are
consistent
with
the
guidelines.
A
C
H
H
H
Looking
from
above,
you
see
more
of
a
traditional
application
over
here
with
the
with
a
block
in
the
lots
with
the
alley
behind
it,
and
then
you
have
kind
of
this
leftover
area
and
the
property
questions
over
here.
So
this
is
kind
of
an
atypical
situation.
H
H
H
H
H
I
Good
evening
board
members,
my
name
is
missy
shoecraft
and
I
represent
the
applicant
george
bowen,
who
is
at
1904
west
watrus,
as
the
staff
described.
This
is
in
the
rs-60
zone
in
the
hyde
park,
historic
district.
This
is
a
request
for
a
second
story
edition
over
the
existing
first
story.
There
are
no
variances
at
this
time
requested.
I
I
This
shows
you
the
existing
first
floor
plan,
which
includes
a
remodeling
of
the
existing
kitchen
and
then,
as
I
mentioned,
taking
the
existing
utilities
here
and
moving
them
to
the
back
of
the
house
and
putting
in
a
small
bump
out
here
on
the
side
to
make
a
larger
kitchen
with
a
pantry
and
a
washer
and
dryer
off
the
back
door
with
a
small
stoop
and
deck
leading
to
the
backyard.
The
existing
deck
remains.
I
The
proposal
for
the
second
story
is
a
master
suite,
with
a
set
of
stairs
that
are
coming
up
from
the
first
floor,
adjacent
to
the
kitchen,
with
a
closet,
a
bathroom
and
then
a
master
bedroom
on
the
back
of
the
house
for
your
reference.
This
elevation
is
62
feet
from
the
front
property
line
and
we
have
a
couple
massing
studies
to
show
you
as
well.
I
So
this
is
the
existing
and
proposed
front
and
rear
elevation,
starting
with
the
front,
as
you
can
see,
it's
a
very
typical
bungalow
with
a
gabled
roof
and
then
a
hipped
porch.
This
is
the
bump
out
that
was
described
earlier
with
the
addition
on
the
back,
and
this
is
the
second
story
which
is
a
large
cross
gable
on
the
rear
elevation,
which
is
very
typical
of
bungalows
of
this
era
in
hyde
park.
I
I
I
And
these
are
the
side
elevations,
this
being
the
south,
not
south
east
elevation,
I
believe
which
would
remain
intact
for
the
original
portion
of
the
house.
Up
until
this
point,
and
then
at
that
point,
this
is
the
bump
out
with
the
three
windows
to
give
some
lighting
into
the
kitchen
and
then
the
upstairs
master
bedroom
suite.
I
Again,
showing
the
second
story
edition
over
the
existing
first
story
edition.
So
there
are
no
changes
to
the
first
story,
except
for
the
east
side
bump
out,
as
discussed,
the
siding
which
is
lap
siding,
would
match
the
existing
condition.
The
knee
brackets,
as
well
as
the
outriggers,
would
match
the
existing
condition,
as
would
the
corner
boards.
The
shingle
roofing,
which
is
a
asphalt
shingle,
dimensional
shingle,
would
match
the
existing
condition
as
well
as
well
as
all
the
trim
details
around
the
windows,
and
I
have
photographs
of
what
is
existing
now.
I
Excuse
me
with
the
lap
wood
siding
and
the
wood
double
hung
windows
with
the
bead
board
between
the
outriggers
and
the
rafter
tails,
which
we
cut
to
match
the
existing
condition.
The
overhang
is
three
feet
and
the
roof
slope
is
12
over
3.25
with
the
shingles
to
match
the
existing
condition.
I
I
I
This
is
a
picture
of
some
of
the
detail
on
the
existing
house,
which
has
the
I
don't
know
what
and
they're
outriggers,
but
I
don't
really
know
the
name
of
this
particular
version.
This
has
a
plastic
soffit
which
we
would
not
replicate
on
the
new
edition.
This
is
the
picture
of
the
lap
siding.
I
And
this
is
the
next
photograph
is
really
a
picture
of
the
existing
exterior
trim
conditions,
which
is
very
typical
of
the
hyde
park
trim
which
we
would
replicate
as
well.
I
I
To
match
this
version,
which
is
full
light
there
to
get
as
much
light
as
possible
into
the
laundry
area,
the
shingles
would
be
match
the
existing
condition
in
their
dimensional
asphalt.
Shingles,
the
current
lighting
looks
like
it
was
updated,
I'm
going
to
say
in
the
early
80s
maybe,
and
we
would
like
to
upgrade
them
into
something
a
little
more
period.
I
H
H
It's
not
required,
but
just
a
point
of
reference,
possibly
incorporating
some
awnings
over
the
rear
doors,
provide
additional
information
of
the
termination
of
the
siding
as
it
meets
grade.
This
one
also
like
the
first
case
that
you
saw
this
evening-
has
a
very
shallow
peer
reveal.
So
how
is
that
going
to
be
treated
and
just
additional
information
on
the
deck
and
the
on
the
rear
elevation.
A
I
So
the
existing
condition
varies.
There
is
no,
so
the
siding
sits
above
the
ground,
but
there's
no
a
skirt.
So
you
can
see
some
of
the
exposed,
brick
piers,
and
we
would
replicate
that
so
the
applicant
does
not
want
to
have
a
lattice
finish.
For
example,
he
prefers
to
keep
it
open
and
that
varies
around
the
house.
With
the
you
know
the
almost
100
years
of
grade
building
up
around
the
house.
I
It's
for
sure
we
would
keep
the
siding
at
least
12
inches
above
the
ground,
but
that's
how
it
would
terminate
so
it
matches
the
existing
condition.
It's
just
that
the
height
of
the
siding
has
changed
over
time
on
the
base.
B
Has
consideration
been
given
to
an
awning
above
the
rear
door.
I
Not
at
this
time,
but
we
could
do
one
typically.
What
we
do
is
a
sort
of
a
small
gable
with
knee
brackets
on
either
side,
and
I'm
sure
the
applicant
will
be
fine
with
that
there
is
the
rear
setback
at
the
moment
is
at
over
25
feet
just
over
25
feet.
So,
even
if
we
did
a
gabled
bracket
awning
on
the
wood,
obviously
to
match
the
existing
condition
on
the
porch,
it
would
not
encroach
on
the
setback.
B
And
then
the
back
deck,
I
believe,
is
existing
yes
and
then
this
small
little
addition
with
the
stairs
is
that
to
match
the
existing.
C
I
did
note
that
there
were
two
original
windows
in
the
original
kitchen
that
were
removed,
and
then
new
windows
were
put
in
place.
Obviously,
because
the
kitchen
has
changed.
Is
there
any
consideration
for
those
existing
windows
being
reused,
relocated
anywhere
else
on
the.
C
C
D
Perhaps
in
addition
to
that,
the
you
know-
maybe
perhaps
instead
of
having
the
three
windows
in
your
pantry
mudroom
area,
take
those
two
windows
out
of
the
existing
kitchen
place
that
there
and
registry
with
the
second
story
window.
So
you
have
an
alignment
there
and
you've
got
the
whole
package
going
to
you,
because
I
know
you're
concerned
about
light
in
that
back
corner.
But
you
would
still
have
those
two
windows
there
and
the
divided
light
door
on
its
contingent
wall.
I
I
C
A
D
And
I
find
your
the
addition
windows
to
be
a
little
bit
on
the
quirky
side,
but
I'm
I'm
not
objecting
to
that,
because
your
addition
is
so
far
set
back
on
the
front
plane
and
the
front
block
of
the
house
that
really
noticing
that
difference
is
not
very
material.
D
A
A
A
A
I
C
C
I
I
A
I
A
A
A
A
I
A
C
Actually
do
have
to
follow
it
to
the
fence
question.
You
had
said
that
the
owner
that
the
fence
is
now
at
the
on
this
is
on
the
bump,
outside
that
the
fence
now
ends
at
the
rear
of
the
house.
I
believe
and
that
she
knew
the
owner
no
longer
wants
the
fence,
as
forward
as
it
was
before,
which
appeared
to
be
before
the
bump
out.
I
No,
I'm
sorry,
the
drawings
are
incorrect.
The
fence
currently
sits
all
the
way
back
towards
the
end
of
the
property
like
it
shows
in
the
photo.
So
there
is
no
request
to
have
a
fence
up
towards
the
bump
bow.
Can
you.
C
C
So
then
continuing
note
number
seven
says:
relocated
water,
heater
and
softeners
they're
on
the
opposite.
The
other
side.
C
Do
you
see
a
note
number
seven
to
the?
I
don't
know
to
the
left
of
that
fence
panel.
That's
missing
with
the
node
number!
Seven!
Yes,.
C
C
I
A
I
I
A
A
B
I
have
only
noted,
if,
if
feasible,
to
reuse
the
windows
that
are
being
removed
from
the
existing
structure
for
the
windows
at
the
front
of
the
structure,
to
be
period-appropriate
material
rather
than
the
aluminum
on
the
rear
and
for
all
of
the
utilities
to
be
located
at
the
rear
of
the.
C
Structure
in
terms
of
the
windows
discussion,
I
feel
like
my
thing's
so
far
away,
was
it
the
material
or
was
it
the
upper
sash
having
some
sort
of
detailing
that
was
more?
Here's.
B
C
Okay,
but
anyway,
this
is
on
the
same
sheet,
so
it's
easier
to
see
it
together.
So
you
can
see
that
in
the
existing
it's
capable
of
having
that
detailing.
D
D
D
Another
item
I'd
like
to
bring
up,
if
I
may
is
the
idea
of
weather
cover
for
the
rear
doors,
and
I
know
the
applicant
and
the
agent
for
the
applicant
has
discussed
the
potential
of
doing
some
sort
of
a-frame
structure
on
brackets.
To
accomplish
that,
I
could
see
other
alternatives,
as
well
as
an
example
of
a
cloth
awning
as
an
example,
or
even
if
you
wanted
to
in
an
aluminum
awning.
That
would
be
more
period
correct
for
this.
There
are
a
number
of
other
options
for
this
purpose.
D
A
The
only
additional
one
I
would
state-
and
it's
probably
on
the
the
site
plan
as
well
as
the
the
floor
plans
that
were
presented
to
us,
is
just
making
sure
that
the
some
of
the
keynote
items,
the
fence,
the
elevation
or
the
equipment
just
gets
updated
to
match.
What
was
discussed
tonight
as
well.
C
A
C
C
Sorry
for
the
property
located
at
1904
west
watras
avenue
in
the
hyde
park,
historic
district
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
existing
kitchen
double
paired
windows
be
reconsidered
for
reuse
dependent
on
their
condition
in
the
new
pantry
location,
that
the
front
windows
of
the
new
addition
be
re-evaluated
and
considered
to
have
a
similar
mutton
pattern.
Of.
As
to
the
original.
C
C
Oh
and
then,
if
awnings
are
added
to
the
rear
doors
which
are
highly
recommended
to
protect
the
opening
that
they
be
coordinated
and
approved
by
staff,
because
based
upon
the
finding
a
fact
proposed
project
is
consistent
with
the
hyde
park,
design
guidelines.
C
Based
on
the
scale,
height
and
width,
the
massing
and
building
form
the
orientation
and
the
site
coverage
that
they
may.
The
addition
maintains
materials
within
the
districts
that
the
trim
and
detail
are
consistent
because,
yes,
sorry
and
that's
and
the
roof
forms
are
consistent.