►
From YouTube: TCC PM 4/28/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
C
Shelby,
yes,
thank
you,
mr
chairman
members
of
city
council,
martin
shelby
city
council
attorney
today
is
thursday
april
28
2022,
and
we
are
here
at
city,
old
city
hall
and
for
tonight's
quasi-ducal
and
land-use
hearings.
C
The
public
and
the
citizens
of
tampa
are
able
to
watch,
listen
and
view
this
meeting
on
spectrum
channel
640
frontier
channel
15
and
on
the
internet
at
tampa.
Dot,
gov
forward,
slash,
live
stream
and
members
of
the
public
may
participate
at
city
council
either
in
person
here
in
the
city,
council
chambers,
at
old
city
hall,
315,
east
kennedy,
boulevard
or
virtually
through
video
teleconferencing
referred
to
by
florida
statutes
and
rules.
C
You
must
have
access
to
a
communications
media
technology
device
such
as
a
tablet
or
a
computer
equipped
with
a
camera
or
microphone
that
will
enable
you
to
be
seen
and
heard
by
city
council
and
all
other
participants
for
these
specific
two-way
video,
virtual
meeting
formats,
cell
phones
and
smartphones
are
not
compatible
as
they
will
not
allow
you
to
share
your
camera
when
connected
now.
With
regard
to
the
go
to
meeting
platform,
there
is
a
chat,
chat
box
available
members
of
the
public.
D
A
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
if
mr
ottenberg,
we
need
to
swear
him
in
just
for
this
continuance.
Sir.
No!
No
okay,
mr
ottenberg,
if
you're
on
please
turn
on
your
camera
there,
you
are
and
I'll
mute
yourself
good
evening.
Yes,
sir.
F
I
F
H
That
were
hurt
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
so
we'd
like
some
time
to
work
on
those
items
and
address
city
council
and
the
residents.
I
A
A
For
june
23
2022
at
501
pm
roll
call.
E
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
next
item
that
there
is
a
request
for
continuance.
We
have
a
letter
submitted
by
julia
mandel,
requesting
that
ab2-21-21
item
number
11
be
continued
to
june
23
2022
at
501
pm.
Do
you
have
anybody?
That's
here
to
speak
on
item
11,
just
a
continuance
seeing
none
hearing.
None
do
we
have
anybody
registered
for
item
11,
no
miss.
B
A
A
I
Good
evening
item
number
one
is
apa.
I
would
like
to
share
my
screen
for
a
quick
presentation.
I
I
This
is
a
publicly
initiated
amendment.
The
state
updated
the
coastal
hazard
area
for
local
governments
in
tampa.
Recently,
the
coastline
had
a
hazard
area.
It's
set
by
state
first
state
on
the
screen.
You'll
see
coastal
management
policy
1.1.2.
A
A
I
E
E
E
B
I
I
I
I
Will
be
two
maps
on
the
screen
which
are
currently
adopted
in
the
comprehensive
plan
with
these
updated
maps
now.
I
Sorry,
gentlemen,
the
planning
commission
recommends
city
council
adopt
math
amendment
page
2124.
At
this
time.
My.
A
A
I
Sure
I'm
moving
orange
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
ordinance
amending
the
imagine
to
any
40
tampa
comprehensive,
planned
future
land
use
element
to
update
the
future
land
use
map
alpha?
U
at
f
l?
U
m
and
coastal
high
hazard
area
shhha
public
access
map
providing
for
repeal
of
wall
run
instances
and
conflict,
providing
for
some
ability
providing
an
effective
claim.
E
M
This
is
danny
collins
with
your
planning
commission
staff.
The
next
three
three
amendments
are
park,
amendments
I'll
go
through
each
one
individually,
let's
get
started
next.
Three
amendments
we'll
be
looking
at
is
tacpa
2131
to
interbay,
pool
ta,
cpa,
2132,
mlk,
junior
recreation
center
and
tacpa
2133
usf
park
just
a
quick
background.
M
All
three
amendments
are
probably
initiated.
Whoops,
sorry
about
that.
All
three
amendments
are
publicly
were
publicly
initiated
to
recognize
existing
city
of
tampa
parks.
Each
park
is
listed
on
the
city
of
tampa's
dedicated
park
list
and
that's
section.
6
16-91
of
the
land
development
code
and
all
sites
would
be
recognized
through
the
recreation,
open
space
feature,
land
use,
designation.
M
The
all
parks,
the
planning
commission,
reviewed
all
parts
and
found
it
consistent
in
promoting
recreation
and
open
space
opportunities
throughout
the
city.
Our
first
park
is
ticpa
131,
it's
in
our
inner
bay
pool,
it's
in
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
it's
within
the
heights.
Neighborhood.
M
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject,
site
and
surrounding
properties.
Subject:
site
is
located
at
the
northeast
corner
of
south
manhattan
avenue
and
west
australia
street
the
uses
to
the
west
of
the
site
of
south
manhattan
avenue
are
predominantly
residential.
M
There
are
some
residential
uses
to
the
north
and
south
of
the
subject
site,
and
this
is
an
image
looking
at
the
site
from
south
manhattan
avenue.
This
is
another
image.
Looking
sorry,
this
is
another
image.
Looking
at
the
entrance
to
the
pool
on
the
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
public
semi-public
future
land
use
designation
that
land
use
is
present
to
the
north,
east
and
south
of
the
site
on
directly
to
the
west
of
the
site.
M
M
Currently
the
subject
site,
we
cannot
determine
the
maximum
intensities
under
the
public,
semi-public
designation.
Those
are
typically
determined
at
the
time
of
permitting.
But
this
would
this
amendment
would
remove
any
potential
residential
non-residential
development
on
the
subject
site
based
on
those
considerations.
Funding
commissions
recommends
that
the
proposed
map
amendment
tacpa
2131,
become
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
imagine
2040
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation.
E
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chair
file.
Number
tacpa
21-31
ordinance
being
presented
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
amending
the
imagine,
2040
tampa
comprehensive
plan,
future
land
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
4321,
west
australia,
street
otherwise
known
as
interbay
pool
from
public
semi-public
pqp
to
recreational
open
space,
ros,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
in
conflict,
providing
for
several
ability
providing
an
effective
date.
Okay,.
E
B
M
Our
next
case
is
tacpa
2132.
It's
for
martin
luther
king
jr
recreation,
complex,
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
it's
in
the
west
river
neighborhood.
M
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject's
site
and
surrounding
properties.
The
subject
site
is
generally
north
of
west
spruce
streets
and
to
the
west
of
north
oregon
avenue.
M
M
Currently
the
subject
site
is
recognized
in
the
neighborhood
mixed
use.
35
future
land
use
designation.
That
designation
is
to
the
north
east
and
south
of
the
subject
site
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
Site
are
partials
recognized
under
the
residential
35
destination,
as
proposed.
The
subject
site
would
be
recognized
under
the
recreational
open
space
destination.
M
This
map
amendment
will
remove
the
consideration
of
191
dwelling
units
or
356
175
55
square
feet
of
presidential
or
non-residential
uses
from
the
subject
site
kind
of
commission
review.
The
proposed
map
amendment
tacpa
2132
and
recommends
that
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
imagine
2040
conference
plan.
This
concludes
my
presence.
A
E
I
Thanks
jim
file
number
ta-cpa
21-32
or
has
been
presented
first-round
consideration
known
as
amending
the
imagine
2040
tampa
government
plan
future
land
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
22
under
north
oregon
avenue,
otherwise
known
as
dartmouth.
King
junior
recreation,
complex
from
neighborhood
mixed
use,
35
nmu,
35
to
recreational
slash,
open
space,
ro
r,
o
s,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
orders
in
conflict
providing
for
severability
providing
effective
date.
E
C
M
Our
last
amendment
for
tonight
is
tacpa
2133,
it's
usf
park.
It's
in
the
central
temple
planning
district,
it's
within
the
tampa
downtown
partner
ship.
It's
also
with
nicholson
hazard
area
in
the
central
business
district
periphery.
The
subject
site
is
shown
here
on
our
aerial
map.
It's
online
in
this
black
color,
it's
along
just
to
the
west
of
south
drive
on
the
south
of
the
salmon
expressway
here,
is
an
image
looking
at
subject
site
from
south
ashley
drive.
M
This
is
looking
at
this
subject's.
Looking
east
from
the
subject
site
or
south
ashley
drive.
The
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
public
semi-public
designation,
the
cbd
future
lanes
designation
is
generally
found,
north
east
and
south
of
the
subject
site
across
from
the
subject
site
to
the
west.
Our
parcel
is
recognized
under
the
rmu
100
and
the
recreational
open
space
designation
along
the
water.
M
This
map
amendment
would
recognize
the
entire
site
under
the
recreation
open
space
designation,
here's
a
slide
showing
the
potential
impacts
of
the
proposed
change.
This
will
remove
any
potential
residential
or
non-residential
development.
From
the
subject
site,
the
planning
commission
reviewed
the
request
and
found
it
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
imagine
2040
tampa
conference
plan.
This
conclusion.
A
A
E
You,
chairman
item
number,
five
number
ta,
slash
cpa,
23-33
orders
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
an
artist
amending
the
image,
2040
tampa
comprehensive
plan,
future
land
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
225,
south
ashley
drive
otherwise
known
as
usf
park
from
public
semi
public,
for
instance,
is
p,
slash,
q,
p,
slash
q
parenthesis,
I
mean
to
recreation,
slash,
open
space,
r,
o
slash
o
s,
providing
for
repealable
awareness
and
conflict
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
B
E
A
B
A
D
It's
a
continued
public
hearing
from
march
10
2022..
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
re-zone
the
property
at
3003
west
cypress
street
from
cg
commercial
general
to
pd
plan
plan
development
to
develop
with
the
residential
single
family
attached.
Now
turn
it
over
to
mr
collins,
with
the
planning
commission.
M
This
is
danny
collins
again
with
the
planning
commission's
staff
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
first
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
west.
Tampa
urban
village
on
the
closest
transit.
Stop
is
approximately
130
feet
west
of
the
subject
site
along
west
cypress
street.
The
stop
is
served
by
route
10,
providing
connections
to
tampa
international
airport
in
downtown
tampa
hostess
public
recreation
recreation
facility.
Villa
brothers
park
is
located
approximately
1
600
feet
to
the
southeast
of
the
site.
Subject:
site
is
located
within
a
level
e
evacuation
zone.
M
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
and
the
surrounding
properties
on
the
subject
site
is
generally
east
of
mcdell
of
the
intersection
of
mcdill
and
west
cypress
street.
It's
on
the
north
side
of
west
cypress
street
there
are
non-residential
uses
directly
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
Site
on
to
the
north
east
and
south
are
residential
uses.
M
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
entire
subject
site
is
recognized
under
the
community.
Mixed
use,
35
future
land
use
designation
on
that
cmu
35
is
present
along
the
north
side
of
west
cypress
street.
The
south
side
of
west
cypress
street
is
predominantly
recognized
under
the
residential
20
future
land
use
designation
and
then,
as
you,
transition
south
and
then
also
north
of
the
subject,
cited
transitions
to
a
residential
10
single
single-family
neighbor.
M
The
planning
commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
application,
found
no
adverse
impacts
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
This
portion
of
west
cypress
street
is
20
is
developed
at
27
percent
of
the
density
anticipated
under
the
community
mix
use
35
designation.
M
This
is
primarily
due
to
west
cypress
street
product,
primarily
consisting
of
single-family
detached
homes
and
commercial
uses.
Along
this
segment,
the
request
proposes:
47,
a
single
family
attached
units
and
an
overall
density
of
23
units
per
acre,
which
is
below
the
density.
That's
anticipated
under
the
cmu
35
designation.
M
Additionally,
the
subject
site
is
located
on
a
collective
roadway
along
the
periphery
of
a
neighborhood,
where
single-family
attached
units
are
encouraged
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
plan
development
addresses
the
mixed-use
quarter.
Policies
by
by
placing
the
proposed
residential
units
close
to
the
public
rights
of
way
and
including
the
orientation
of
the
front
door,
neighborhood,
sidewalk
and
street.
The
pd
provides
internal
connections
will
help
which
will
help
ensure
pedestrian
safety
accessibility
and
help
create
a
more
walkable
urban
environment
along
cyprus.
M
The
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comp
plan,
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population
by
developing
the
site
at
a
density
of
23.26
units
per
acre,
the
press
will
add
additional
housing
opportunities
to
the
growing
central
tampa
planning
district.
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
under
utilized
land.
To
ensure
inadequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
present
and
future
populations
based
on.
M
A
D
Yes,
sir,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
chair
eric
cotton,
illinois
coordination
make
sure
my
screen.
Please.
D
Thank
you
so
again,
this
is
our
rezoning
raz21127
for
a
property
of
3003
west
cypress
street,
as
mr
collins
alluded
to
the
applicant,
is
seeking
to
to
develop
the
property
with
single
families
attached
development.
The
applicant
is
asking
for
four
waivers.
D
The
first
is
to
reduce
the
southern
setback
along
the
the
front
yard
setback,
which
is
because
this
is
in
west
tampa,
which
is
based
on
block
average,
from
25
down
to
10
feet,
to
reduce
the
backup
width
from
six
feet
to
two
feet,
and
when
I,
when
I
show
the
sidecut
I'll
review
these
so
council
knows
where
these
requests
are
at
to
allow
for
40
of
the
47
ground
floor
entrances
not
to
face
a
public
street
and
to.
D
So
this
is,
this:
property
is
at
the
corner
of
new
jersey
and
cyprus.
This
is
the
original
plaque
it
was
planted
back
in
1919,
consists
of
10
units
or
10
watts
properties
surrounding
this
development.
The
development
here
is
highlighted
in
the
red
to
the
north.
D
His
single
family
development
along
the
west,
which
is
over
here,
is
developed
with
commercial
commercial
property
across
new
jersey
in
the
south
across
of
cyprus
on
the
south
side
is
a
mixture
of
commercial
and
some
residential,
and,
let's
see
sorry
about
this,
and
so
the
zoning
across
the
street
is
cnn
and
and
pd,
along
with
some
single
family
again
proposed
uses
for
eight
single
family
attached
plans.
This
is
the
existing
site
plan
we
go.
Let
me
go
to
the
actual,
develop
the
proposed
develop
plan
on
here.
So
this
is
the.
D
This
is
the
proposed
development
on
the
site,
so
just
going
through
the
waivers
and
looking
at
the
site
plan
itself,
the
required
setback
along
cyprus
is
should
be
25
feet.
As
you
can
see,
I
read
this
area
right
through
here.
It's
only
10.
again.
This
is
based
on
block
average,
the
backup
space,
as
somebody
backs
out
of
the
garages
on
these
townhomes
here
here
and
here
on
the
along
new
jersey.
D
D
So
that's
one
of
the
other
ways,
and
the
last
wave
of
course
is
the
building
separation,
which
I
stated
for
between
lots,
buildings,
h,
g
and
f.
D
D
D
Again,
finding
was
was
inconsistent.
Modifications
must
be
made
to
the
site
plan,
as
it
stated
in
the
revision
sheet
between
first
and
second
reading.
If
council
is
inclined
to
approve
it.
Additionally,
the
following
note
must
be
added:
there's
a
release
of
eastern
application
going
through
the
same
process
that
says
no
construction
is
allowed
in
the
easement
area
until
the
release
of
eastman
is.
G
Good
evening,
mr
chairman,
council
members,
my
name
is
david
mechanic,
305
south
boulevard,
tampa
florida.
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
onyx
and
east
with
me,
is
jacob
egan
with
onyx
and
east.
Also
with
me
is
greg
roth
engineer
with
bowler
engineering,
michael
yates,
a
certified
transportation,
planner
and
aaron
barker
an
architect,
and
I
would
ask
to
enter
their
resumes
into
the
record.
G
Since
I
walked
away
from
the
mics,
I
didn't
finish
my
sentence
but
enter
those
resumes
as
expert
witnesses.
In
this
case
I
would
just
like
to
mention.
I
was
just
handed
some
florida
department
of
transportation
document.
I
have
no
idea
what
it
is
or
how
it
pertains
to
this
project,
so
I
cannot
address
it.
Of
course,.
G
Before
I
introduce
mr
roth,
I
just
want
to
make
a
few
key
points.
Our
permitted
density
on
this
site
is
60
units
and
we
are
only
proposing
47
units,
so
we
are
well
below
the
permitted
density.
I'd
also
like
to
point
out
that
the
staff,
both
the
city,
zoning
staff
and
planning
commission
staff
determined
that
the
uses
that
we
are
proposing
are
compatible
with
the
neighborhood,
and
they
also
pointed
out
that
we
further
an
objective
of
the
cup
principle
plan
to
provide
for
infill
housing
in
in
tampa,
which
is
sorely
needed.
G
G
That
code
section
was
not
amended
to
affect
single-family
attached
housing,
which
is
essentially
the
same
housing
type
single-family
attached,
as
my
client
is
proposing
to
build.
It
is
a
town
home,
and
so
for
that
reason
we
don't
understand
why
there
would
be
a
distinction,
and
that
alone
would
justify
the
waiver
that
we
are
asking
for
at
this
time.
I'd
like
to
ask
mr
ross
to
address
the
project
in
general
and
the
waivers
mr.
G
G
F
Good
evening,
gregory
roth,
with
bowler
licensed
civil
engineer
address
is
3820
north
dale
boulevard
and
I
have
been
sworn
in
and
we
do
have
a
powerpoint.
Is
there
a
way
to.
A
Get
that
on
the
screen
I
show
here
onyx
east
and
there
we
go
that.
F
There
we
go
okay,
perfect,
so
first
we're
going
to
walk
through
the
site
plan,
and
just
so
you
just
bring
everybody
back
to
where
we
are
there's
an
existing
structure
on
site
with
some
surface
parking
and
there
are
two
existing
driveways
that
access
cypress
street.
As
mentioned,
the
proposed
development
is
47
townhome
units,
few
simple
townhomes
and
we
have
we're
proposing
two
driveways
one
on
cypress
and
one
on
new
jersey.
F
F
We
are
proposing
underground,
stormwater
and
just
kind
of
want
to
get
through
into
the
waiver,
so
we
can
talk
about
a
couple
of
them
in
particular,
so
the
first
waiver
is
the
block
average
setback
for
the
buildings
that
are
along
cypress
from
25
feet
down
to
10
feet.
It's
worth
noting
that
for
the
west
tampa
overlay,
the
parcel
takes
up
the
entire
block,
and
so
it
will
establish
the
block
average.
F
The
25
foot
setback
is
referenced
from
the
rm24
zoning
requirements.
The
second
waiver
is
the
backup
waiver
from
six
foot
and
to
two
feet
in
width.
We
physically
can
provide,
and,
as
you
can
see,
there's
two
areas
where
that
we're
asking
for
that.
It's
a
long
new
jersey,
where
you'd
back
out
from
the
garages
from
the
town
homes,
we
could
physically
provide
the
six
feet.
But
instead
of
asking
for
a
six
for
this
waiver,
we
would
actually
be
asking
for
a
landscape
pua
buffer
waiver.
F
So
we
studied
both
options
to
see
which
was
the
the
least
intrusive.
And
so
we
ran
auto
turn
with
a
f
150
super
cab
truck
backing
out
of
that
western
most
garage,
and
you
can
see
in
the
lower
right
corner
there.
That's
kind
of
a
zoom
in
of
the
exhibit
showing
that
that
truck
pulling
out
and
has
no
issue
backing
out
getting
into
and
out
of
the
garage
in
the
westernmost
spot.
F
Without
asking
for
this
waiver
there's
just
no
way
to
to
make
that
work.
We
did
look
at
multiple
options
for
a
site
plan
as
well
to
try
and
try
and
see
if
there
was
a
way
to
reduce
the
waiver,
but
by
doing
that,
it
would
actually
require
us
to
add
other
waivers
as
in
reducing
some
of
the
parking
or
impacting
some
of
the
existing
trees
that
we
were
trying
to
save
with
a
site
plan.
F
So
again,
that's
the
reason
for
that
backup
or
for
that
waiver
there
and
then
the
final
waiver
would
be
reduce
the
building
separation
from
15
feet
to
9
feet
and
again
we
can
accommodate
this
one.
But
what
would
happen
is
we'd
impact,
the
trees
that
we're
looking
to
preserve
north
of
the
the
eastern
row
of
buildings
and
on
the
south
end
so
from
now
I'll
turn
it
over
to
michael
yates,
to
discuss
traffic.
L
L
L
K
O
Thank
you
good
evening,
I'm
jacob
egan,
I'm
at
2002
east
4th
avenue,
I'm
with
onyx
and
east
the
applicant
I'm
going
to
flip
through
a
couple
of
slides
here.
O
I
just
want
to
talk
really
briefly
about
the
site
and
looking
at
it
and
the
intention
that
was
put
into
it
to
blend
in
with
the
uses
directly
to
the
west,
as
we
described
as
a
grocery
store.
Having
intensive
commercial
two
buildings
down
to
the
east
is
a
lessee
bakery
again
a
heavy
commercial
and
then
obviously
to
the
north
of
us
is
single-family
residential
has
been
described
previously.
O
We
view
this
as
a
great
blend
between
the
various
uses.
We
are
under
the
density
allowed
of
60
units.
We
are
at
47,
so
we
are
carrying
from
the
commercial
into
the
residential
component
of
the
neighborhood.
I
also
wanted
to
point
out
that,
with
the
architectural
style
that
aaron
just
described,
this
was
very
intentionally
designed
to
match.
The
west.
Tampa
district
in
general
historically
is
a
heavy
spanish
mediterranean
architectural
style.
So
the
reasoning
for
the
the
elevations
is
to
blend
in
with
the
neighborhood.
G
A
It's
it's.
It's.
P
Integrated,
my
name
is
sandy
sanchez
and
I
have
two
people
that
are
going
to
you
who
have
signed
to
give
me
moment
of
their
time.
I
had
three
other
people,
but
the
weather
has
kept
them
back,
so
I'll
try
to
do
the
best.
I
can,
I
think
it's
one
of
the
situations
with
the
david
and
goliath
here,
but
nevertheless
we're
going
to
try
and
do
something
with
the
material
we
have.
P
I
P
You
have
the
packet
in
front
of
you,
so
you
should
be.
You
should
be
fine.
Okay,
my
name
is
sandy
sanchez
and
I'm
from
the
armory
gardens
civic
association
and
I'm
here
to
ask
you
to
deny
these
waivers
that
are
needed
for
this
development
to
proceed.
I'm
sorry,
I'm
soaking
wet
anyway!
Please
look
at
item
one
number
one.
P
Cyprus
is
the
only
possibility
for
this
corridor
think
about
it.
Ironically,
I
had
already
exchanged
emails
with
kristin
carson
of
the
fdot
on
march
23rd
of
this
year,
and
she
confirmed
do's
t
still
owns
the
property
across
from
jefferson
high
school
on
cyprus
and
there
are
still
plans
to
go
forward
with
intermodal
transportation
center
glenn.
Please
see
this
item
one
for
confirmation
of
this
information.
P
Now
I
would
ask
you
to
look
at
items
two
and
three,
which
are
the
transportation,
the
traffic
reports
submitted
by
the
developer,
the
print
page
of
this
document
states.
The
report
was
submitted
in
august
of
2021,
but
if
you
look
further
to
the
third
page,
you
will
see
that
the
articles
for
this
report
were
from
2017..
P
P
To
further
the
emphasis
on
the
obsolete
material,
the
last
page
of
the
report
has
a
copy
of
the
temple
level
of
service
report
from
2015
again
seven
years
ago.
At
this
point,
it
was
rated
as
a
d
e
is
failing
with
the
traffic
today
this
that
report
would
fail.
If
it
please
look,
items
number
four
and
five
you'll
see
the
traffic
the
real
traffic
that
is
in
the
neighborhood.
P
The
yellow
lines
going
north
and
south
are
the
major
thoroughfares
through
our
neighborhood.
The
green
line
going
around
it
is
the
neighborhood
itself
that
is
expected
is
going
to
be
influenced
by
this
decision.
You
make
the
pink
lines
going
through
are
the
lines
that
other
people
take
to
cut
through
our
neighborhoods.
P
Please
notice
all
the
stop
lights
around
our
neighborhood,
and
you
will
see
that
on
the
corner
of
havana
and
kennedy,
there's
a
new
stop
light
going
up
and
there's
also
a
new
stoplight
going
up
at
arch
when
midtown
puts
in
their
16
story.
Building
those
roads
go
directly
into
the
neighborhood
north
of
cyprus.
P
P
I'm
always
amazed.
When
one
department
marks
a
plan
consistent
the
developer
does
nothing
and
then
the
plan
is
found
consistent.
Both
reports
are
moving
targets.
Nothing
changed
from
the
city
planning
report.
The
west
tampa
overlay
is
still
in
effect.
You
have
to
wonder
how
other
elderlies
in
this
city
remain
get
respect,
but
the
west
tampa
overlay
is
ignored.
P
If
you
grant
these
waivers,
which
are
also
totally
opposed
to
the
west,
tampa
overlay,
you
will
jeopardize
the
ability
to
comply
with
the
dot's
plans.
You
will
not
be
able
to
claim
eminent
domain
and
therefore
swelt
the
opportunity
to
give
this
community
the
relief
from
heavy
traffic
due
to
overbuilding
and
make
it
impossible
to
move
forward
with
mass
transportation,
they're
so
badly
needed.
Thank.
A
D
G
O
Sir,
my
name
is
christopher
swiggin.
I
am
the
vice
president
for
the
offer
park,
neighborhood
association,
army
gardens
and
oakford
park,
neighborhood
associations
as
well.
The
residents
of
this
west
tampa
neighborhood.
Ask
council
members
to
consider
these
points
from
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
as
competent
survival
evidence
to
deny
this
rezone
request.
The
development
is
not
consistent
with
the
west.
O
Hampton
neighborhood
point
one
city
of
tampa
2040,
comprehensive
plan,
page
87
land
use
policy,
9.5.4
utilize,
single-family
categories
to
maintain
the
current
density
and
character
of
existing
single-family
areas,
protect
areas
of
the
lowest
intensity
of
development
that
are
currently
in
predominantly
single-family
residential
use
or
that
have
environmental
or
infrastructural
constraints
such
as
environmentally
critical
areas
or
respond
to
community
plan
policies
for
opportunities
for
redevelopment
or
info
development
that
maintains
the
single
family
character
of
an
area
but
allows
for
a
greater
range
of
residential
housing
types.
O
We
ask
we
would
ask
city
council
to
protect
the
desire
to
remain
a
lower
density.
Neighborhood
point
two
city
of
tampa
2040
comprehensive
plan,
page
7173
policy,
2.2.3,
develop
community
plans
for
those
areas
of
the
city
expected
to
experience
significant
growth.
Each
plant
should
reflect
the
neighbor's
neighborhood's
history
character.
Current
conditions
needs
values
and
visions.
The
neighborhood
of
west
tampa
is
a
single
family
detached
home
neighborhood,
their
character
is
single-family
detached
homes.
O
Their
current
condition
is
90
single-family
detached
homes,
their
vision
and
goals
are
to
remain
single-family
detached
homes
in
this
neighborhood
0.3
land
use
policy
9.1.2,
which
is
encourage,
sensitive,
encourages,
sensitive
design
and
site
plans
in
urban
neighborhoods
that
mitigate
the
scale
of
larger
buildings,
through
careful
use
of
building
massive
setbacks,
fast
fast
aids
articulation,
fenestration
and
articular
or
architectural
design.
Sorry,
the
west
hampton
neighborhood
currently
does
not
contain
any
four-story
residential
homes.
For
that
matter,
this
neighborhood
does
not
contain
any,
but
one
three-story
home
at
this
point.
O
The
west,
hampton
neighborhood,
current
0.4,
page
86
land
use
policy,
9.5.2,
maintain
the
character
of
single-family
residential
areas
and
discourage
the
demolition
of
single-family
homes,
residents
and
displacement
of
residents
in
a
way
that
encourages
rehabilitation
and
provides
housing
opportunities
to
the
city.
This
the
character
of
single
family
area
includes
youth
development
and
density
characteristics.
We
asked
city
council
to
maintain
this
neighborhood's
density
characteristics.
A
R
A
R
R
They
go
into
quite
a
bit
of
detail
that
includes
case
and
point
of
different
sections
of
the
code
that
need
to
be
looked
at.
I
would
like
to
start
out
with
saying
that
the
city
actually
isn't
being
built
according
to
the
code.
This
is
a
great
picture
that
city
staff
was
allowed
to
share
how
to
access
this.
You
can
see
the
entire
neighborhood
all
over
the
city,
it's
being
built
by
pd's.
R
We've
come
in
front
of
you
over
and
over
and
over
again
saying
that
city
is
not
being
built
according
to
code,
it's
being
built
according
to
exception.
This
is
no
difference.
Someone
in
staff
needs
to
go
through
the
west
tampa
overlay.
There
are
a
number
of
points
that
are
listed
out
in
detail
that
I
won't
have
time
to
go
through
in
three
minutes,
but
the
staff
report
needs
to
consider
every
detail
in
that
report
and
say
why
they're
not
requiring
that
the
other
thing
is.
We
need
a
lot
of
legal
help
in
the
community.
R
It
seems,
like
words,
mean
some
things
in
one
meeting
and
another
meeting
words
mean
something
else.
The
code
is
very
clear
when
the
word
shall
is
used,
it's
mandatory
there's
an
interpretation
which
is
in
2741
within
the
west,
tampa
overlay,
I
say:
there's
felt
suspenders
and
two
zippers,
because
it
says
that
waiver
of
these
requirements
is
not
an
option,
as
the
code
specifically
states
shall
come
shall
comply
with
the
standards
and
clarifies
the
cases
of
conflict,
the
more
restricted
standards
of
apply
and
further.
R
It
states
that
there's
minimum
requirements
that
must
be
met
into
order
to
obtain
approval.
So
how
those
those
words
that
we
work
so
hard
to
get
in
the
code
aren't
followed
is
a
mystery
to
us
that
we
need
help
with
that.
The
other
thing
is,
I
don't
understand,
with
anastasia
barnes
letter
from
march
1st
of
2002.
R
She
goes
in
and
says
that
staff
would
so
would
support
waving
certain
items.
Why
are
they
supporting
it?
They're
in
conflict
with
the
west
tampa
overlay
that
the
neighborhood
works
so
hard
to
get,
and
also
the
pd
is
not
appropriate
for
this
site.
We've
said
it
over
and
over
and
over
again
the
other
thing
is
is
jumping
through
here.
You've
got
a
parking
requirement
that
says
that
it
could
create
some
potential
safety
issues
whenever
there
is
a
staff
report
that
highlights
potential
safety
issues.
I
think
the
city
needs
to
quantify
and
characterize.
R
Do
you
have
any
exposure
for
that?
And
then
please
also
look
at
the
section
27
241
g,
which
talks
about
maximizing
efficient
mass
transit
opportunities
and
the
potential
for
easement
dedication
and
transit
shelters.
I
don't
see
that
in
the
record.
I
thank
you
so
much
for
listening
to
us
we're
we
almost
feel
like.
Sometimes
our
discussion
is
meaningless,
because
when
we
come
in
front
of
you,
the
code
doesn't
match.
Oh
and
one
other
thing,
if
I
may
miss
barnes,
actually
said
that
the
14
feet
may
have
finished.
R
I
have
for
years
said
that
the
footnote
to
section
27
156,
means
that
the
yards
are
supposed
to
increase
by
height
over
30
feet
on
all
yards.
Miss
barnes
says
that
in
this
memo
that
she
has,
that
is
not
being
applied,
you're
doing
a
wedding
cake,
that's
nowhere
in
the
code.
It
is
also
that
same
information
was
provided
to
you
in
beach
park.
In
the
expert
witness
report.
R
L
L
I'm
speaking
today
to
echo
the
40-plus
residents
that
have
written
in
today
to
oppose
this
redistricting
project,
the
first
most
obvious
issue
being
the
my
adjacent
lodge,
did
not
have
47
homes
packed
upon
it.
One
perfectly
acquainted
the
change
in
progress.
I
would
have
expected
four,
perhaps
six
unattached
homes
at
the
maximum.
The
number
47
doesn't
just
cross
the
boundary
of
absurd.
It
lapsed
the
boundary
several
times.
This
is
the
equivalent
of
an
entire
neighborhood
being
overloaded
into
a
single
lot.
L
I
have
a
number
of
concerns
which
I
would
like
to
address
in
order
of
urgency.
The
first
is
traffic
which
already
predates
this
issue.
Cyprus
is
unusable
during
peak
hours
and
my
street
has
cars
speeding
down
at
all
times,
because
we
have
no
sidewalks.
I
have
to
risk
my
dog's
life
to
scurry
to
a
major
road
with
some
sunless
protection
on
a
daily
basis.
My
next-door
neighbor.
Recently
had
her
mailbox
level,
which
I
would
like
to
supply
here,
because
we
have
no
sidewalks
and
everybody
speeds
down
our
road.
L
L
I'm
concerned
about
the
life
of
our
beautiful
oak
trees,
two
of
which
are
going
to
be
unfairly
cut
down,
as
the
construction
starts,
I'm
concerned
about
drainage
as
the
green
space
is
going
to
be
paved
over
and
we're
going
to
have
to
worry
about
how
much
water
that
used
to
be
swept
away
into
our
ditches
are
going
to
be
covered
by
concrete.
I'm
worried
about
the
layout
the
trash
compactor
of
this.
L
I
chose
this
neighborhood
for
the
quaint,
peaceful
nature
and
consistent
layout
of
unattached
homes.
Please
do
not
put
us
through
this
ordeal.
It
is
by
any
objective
account
an
inconsistent,
alien
addition
and
a
precedent
for
future
invasions
of
the
same
kind.
Thank
you
very
much.
The
quality
life
of
our
neighborhood
is
in
your
hands.
F
Take
them
out
on
the
way
in
evening
john
diorio,
I
live
at
22210
north
woodland
avenue,
I'm
the
current
president
of
the
oakford
park,
neighborhood
association,
and
here
speaking
on
behalf
of
all
of
my
neighbors,
who
heavily
oppose
this
project.
Simply
put
this
request
is
not
done,
does
not
demonstrate
compliance
with
all
applicable
overlay
standards.
A
waiver
of
these
requirements
is
not
an
option.
As
the
code
specifically
states,
applications
shall
comply
with
these
standards
and
clarifies
that
in
cases
of
conflict,
the
more
restrictive
standards
shall
apply
and
further
states.
F
There
are
minimum
requirements
that
must
be
met
in
order
to
obtain
design
approval.
Approving
this
request
undermines
all
of
the
safeguards
that
were
established
to
accomplish
accomplish
the
intent
of
the
west
tampa
overlay
district.
Additionally,
the
applicant
has
not
demonstrated
consistency
with
the
requirements
established
in
section
27-241e2.
F
Simply
we
have
witnessed
in
support
of
the
growth
of
this
neighborhood
we've
seen
the
wawa
and
midtown
complex
go
up,
but
our
neighborhood
in
oakford
park,
armory
gardens
west
tampa,
is
continually
negatively
impacted
by
all
this
growth.
There's
a
traffic
safety
concerns
we're
continuing
to
move
forward
without
community
in
mind.
F
Without
the
people
who
live
here
in
mind,
we're
making
decisions
that
don't
put
the
people
first,
on
top
of
putting
the
cart
before
the
horse,
as
sandy
said
earlier,
we
don't
have
the
infrastructure
to
support
this,
yet
we're
going
to
throw
something
in
that
we
can't
continue
to
build
on
and
the
neighbors
that
live
there.
The
people
who
live
move
into
this
development
won't
be
able
to
navigate
the
streets,
so
we
have
to
move
forward
with
these
people
in
mind.
Increased
density
is
not
the
answer.
F
We
have
to
think
quality
over
quantity
and
we
have
to
ask
ourselves:
how
does
this
type
of
development
help
the
neighborhood?
How
does
this
help
the
people
for
not
moving
the
people
in
mind?
Then
our
focus
is
off
track.
If
we
want
to
make
the
city
great,
we
have
to
make
great
plans.
If
we
want
to
make
this
better,
then
we
have
to
make
better
decisions,
and
if
we
really
care
about
our
community
and
the
people
who
live
here,
then
we
have
to
care
and
respect
about
our
decision.
Thank
you.
Thank.
K
Hi,
my
name
is
carol
ann
bennett,
I'm
a
lifelong
resident
of
tampa.
In
addition
to
the
dozens
of
letters
you
received
from
individuals,
you
also
received
letters
from
many
neighborhood
organizations,
davis,
islands,
bayshore
gardens
virginia
park,
oakford
park,
armory
gardens
and
the
tampa
tree
advocacy
group
pd
zonings,
like
this,
are
becoming
a
greater
and
greater
concern
to
neighborhood
groups,
because
pds
are
being
misused
and
abused.
K
Section
27-226
says
pds
are
supposed
to
be
used
for
unique
conditions
which
other
zoning
cannot
accommodate.
Rm24
zoning
allows
48
units
on
this
property
lu
policy.
1.2.28
says
the
purpose
of
pd's
is
to
allow
development
consistent
with
a
land
use
designation,
but
not
permitted
in
standard
zoning
standard.
Rm24
zoning
is
consistent
with
the
land
use
designation
of
this
property.
K
K
K
This
waiver
they're
asking
for
that,
violates
the
west
tampa
overlay
to
reduce
the
setback
from
25
to
10
feet.
There's
no
room
for
to
adjust
the
infrastructure
in
the
in
the
future
for
the
transit
quarter,
which
vic
bday
says,
is
the
only
transit
quarter
from
downtown
to
the
airport.
You
won't
be
able
to
add
a
turn
lane,
a
bike
lane
a
trolley
lane,
a
bus
stop
or
a
wider
sidewalk
to
make
the
neighborhood
more
valuable.
You
take
away
options
for
the
future
they
emphasize.
This
is
cmu.
K
Mu
stands
for
mixed
use.
Where
is
the
mixed
use?
The
mixed
use
that
gets
people
out
of
their
cars?
They
say
this
is
the
only
way
to
solve
the
affordable
housing
crisis.
Where
is
the
affordable
housing?
Neighborhoods
are
alarmed
at
the
loss
of
commercial
property.
Commercial
property
provides
jobs,
jobs
in
the
neighborhood
gets
cars
off.
The
street.
Neighborhoods
are
alarmed
by
pd's
that
undermine
city
planning
and
zoning
and
are
becoming
the
rule
instead
of
the
exception.
K
K
You
want
to
save
money,
stop
wasting
buckets
of
city
resources
and
taxpayers,
money
on
rezonings
and
pd's,
stop
feeding
them.
Candy
they'll
only
come
back
for
more
and
more
and
more.
You
can't
satisfy
an
addiction.
It's
never
enough.
The
more
you
feed
it.
The
bigger
it
gets
reasonable
uses
for
this
property
is
commercial
that
provides
jobs.
Reasonable
use
is
rm24,
reasonable
use
of
single
family
homes.
K
I
J
Good
evening
council,
my
name
is
nathan
hagan.
I
live
in
north
hyde
park,
which
is
an
adjacent
neighborhood
to
this.
I'm
very
conflicted
on
this
project.
First
of
all,
I
support
the
density
completely.
I
think
it
should
be
more
dense.
You
guys
probably
know
that
I
I
would
not
be
able
to
live
in
this
part
of
town.
If
I
did
not
live
if
we
did
not
have
townhomes
in
north
hyde
park,
I
don't
know
where
I
would
be,
but
I
would
not
be
in
that.
Neighborhood
townhomes
are
more
affordable
than
single-family
homes.
J
If
a
developer
is
building
a
single-family
home
on
that
property.
Instead
of
this,
that
home
is
going
to
be
more
expensive
than
the
townhouse
that
is
going
to
be
in
here.
So
when
we
talk
about
affordable
housing,
no,
this
is
not
workforce
housing
but
I'll.
Tell
you
what
what
goes
there
instead
will
be
a
800,
900,
000
villa
or
maybe
a
700
000
bill.
It
will
be
more
expensive
than
what
these
town
homes
will
be.
If
there
are
six
homes
on
this
property,
it'll
be
more
expensive
than
if
we
put
47
homes
on
it.
J
J
I
there's
just
no
other
way
around
it.
This
is
a
downtown
neighborhood,
not
a
suburb
as
a
traffic
corridor.
I
I'm
you
know.
I
have
a
lot
of
respect
to
people
who
spoke
before
me,
but
when
we
start
talking
about
transit,
oriented
development,
we're
gonna
be
talking
about
more
housing,
not
less.
The
fact
that
it's
a
transit
corridor
means
that
this
is
actually
more
appropriate
than
four
or
five
or
six
single-family
homes.
That
would
be
a
huge
waste
opportunity
if
we
built
six
homes
on
this
transit
corridor.
J
So
I
I
really
hope
we
don't
do
that,
but
I
say
I'm
conflicted
because
I
I
think
that
this
project
could
be
a
lot
better.
I
think
that
the
neighborhood
could
be
a
lot
happier
with
what
what
came
what
could
come
here.
I
think
that
it
should
be
mixed
used.
I
think
that
there
should
be
affordable
housing
they're,
not
using
a
bonus
density
for
anything.
Much
less
affordable
housing.
That's
a
question
that
we
should
be
asking
I'm
very
confused
about
that.
J
So
you
know
I
hate
that
they're
doing
this
by
pd.
Again,
I
completely
agree
with
the
neighborhoods
on
this.
We
need
to
stop
relying
on
pds.
We
need
zoning
reform.
This
is
an
issue
that
was
inherited
by
this
council.
This
council
has
an
opportunity
to
address
some
specific
issues
relating
to
it,
but
we
should
not
be
doing
these
things
by
pd
we
should
have.
We
should
legislate
our
values
in
housing
in
our
zoning
code
I
have
no.
J
Ultimately,
I
think
I
have
to
support
this
project,
because
I'd
have
no
confidence
that
if
this
project
is
rejected
today,
what
will
come
next
would
better.
I
believe,
looking
at
looking
at
this,
that
if
this
does
not
get
approved
as
it
is,
the
solution
is
that
there
will
be
fewer
homes
on
it
and
that's
it.
I
don't
really
know
what
other
term
did
what
the
alternative
is.
I
don't
think
they're
going
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
put
a
60
unit
apartment
complex
here
with
mixed
use
like
I
want.
J
S
Hello,
my
name
is
bobby
creighton.
S
Many
of
the
speakers
here
have
made
some
very,
very
excellent
points,
and
I
do
not
envy
you
all
on
the
council
having
to
deliberate
between
these
differing
perspectives.
The
neighborhood
defenders
have
made
some
very
good
points.
S
You
know
they
came
to
this
neighborhood
expecting
a
certain
way
of
life,
a
certain
environment
that
they
wanted
to
live
in,
but
at
some
point
we
have
to
face
the
fact
that
we
are
in
the
middle
of
a
housing
crisis
right
now
and
that's
not
going
to
end
anytime
soon,
based
on
the
projections
that
we've
all
seen,
one
of
the
the
previous
speakers
mentioned
quantity
as
an
issue,
the
quantity
of
the
homes.
S
S
Housing
and
bigger
housing
on
these
same
size
lots.
We
need
to
be
thinking
strategically
about
how
we
can
advance
the
city
and
right
now
we're
really
we're
really
in
a
crucial
moment
about
deciding
what
tampa
is
going
to
become
and
what
sort
of
city
we
want
to
be.
And
you
know
instances
like
this
are
just
a
microcosm
of
that
that
you
all
see
every
day
60
approximately
of
the
city
is
zoned
for
single
family.
You
know
you
can
kind
of
ballpark.
S
S
If
that's
the
case,
you
know
why?
Don't
we
look
at
the
code
and
update
the
code
so
that
we
don't
have
to
go
through
this
process
again
and
again
and
again,
we
can
finally
make
a
determination
about
what
we
want
to
be
as
a
city.
What
we
want
our
city
to
look
like
what
kind
of
people
we
want
to
welcome
to
our
city
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
that
extends
to
the
comprehensive
plan
that
extends
to
the
zoning
code
that
extends
to
conversations
with
planners
and
urban
designers.
S
S
Ultimately,
I
would
say
I
have
to
support
this
project,
even
though
I
I
hear
the
people
who
live
in
this
neighborhood
and
I
definitely
sympathize
and
empathize
with
their
position
but
zooming
out
to
look
at
the
city
as
a
whole.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
consider
the
number
of
units
and
housing
that
will
become
available
if
this
is
built.
Thank
you.
Thank.
L
Good
afternoon,
everyone
good
evening,
andrew
aubrey,
505
north
gomez,
I'm
going
to
introduce
some
facts
here
that
I
pulled
off
the
gis
system
for
hillsborough
county
85
percent
of
the
homes.
What
I
did
is
I
looked
at
hillsborough
county.
I
looked
at
275
to
the
north
armenia
to
the
east
kennedy
to
the
south
and
heims
to
the
west.
86
of
those
properties
are
single
family,
86
percent.
So
for
somebody
to
tell
you
that
you
know
the
the
neighborhood
needs
to
be
changing,
we
agree.
The
neighborhood
is
changing.
L
There's
a
lot
of
development
going
on
there's
a
lot
of
double
lots
that
have
been
purchased.
There's
a
lot
of
things
that
have
happened
in
the
last
comprehensive
reform
that
rezoned
huge
swaths
of
land,
so
that
we
didn't
have
to
do
this
pd
thing
every
single
time.
I've
come
before
you
guys
so
many
times
over
the
last
10
years,
because
it's
always
this
exception
game
that
we're
playing.
L
Why
not
stick
to
the
the
comprehensive
land
use
reform,
where's,
all
the
staff,
resources
and
time
that
goes
into
those
reports
and
then
every
time
we
just
decide
to
change
it.
So
if
you
see
here
of
the
townhomes
that
are
in
this
neighborhood,
there
are
37
properties.
10
of
those
there
are
10
developments,
total
okay
of
those
seven
are
detached.
So
this
is
what
you
guys
did
east
of
habana.
You
said:
hey,
let's
take
a
property
single
family
home.
L
L
So
if
we
want
to
talk
about
being
consistent
with
the
neighborhood,
where
is
another
four-story
building
in
our
neighborhood
and
where's,
the
next
one
gonna
be
because
we're
gonna
keep
doing
this
pd
thing
over
and
over
and
over,
and
it's
going
to
be
a
hodgepodge,
let's
gross
some,
some
political
muster,
let's
re-zone
some
huge
swaths
of
land
and
let's
let
the
developers
go
there
and
play,
but
it
can't
just
keep
happening
piecemeal
by
piecemeal,
it's
breaking
up
our
city
and
the
fabric.
The
reason
most
of
us
bought
in
this
neighborhood
is
because
it's
single-family
home.
L
Another
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
is
the
parking
there's,
not
enough
parking,
the
streets
that
this
is
going
to
be
on
the
overflow
there's
no
street
parking.
So
when
they
people
start
having
parties
at
this
place
and
events
where's
the
overflow
gonna
go
in
a
road
that
doesn't
have
on
street
parking,
there's
not
enough
parking.
L
Got
a
more
points
this
this
lot
was
originally
plotted
for
10
units
now
we're
proposing
47..
I
know
people
have
mentioned
six.
It's
10
lots
gomez.
The
exit
of
this
is
going
to
be
a
left
on
left
situation
on
cyprus,
it's
going
to
cause
accidents.
This
is
why
we
went
to
the
si
the
state
and
got
money
for
heims,
because
there
was
left
unless
accidents
that
cost
fatalities.
This
is
going
to
cause
another
one.
L
And
again,
I
can't
stress
enough:
this
is
non-conforming
for
the
neighborhood.
It's
not
what,
as
you
see
here,
I'd
like
to
enter
this
into
the
into
the
record
and
that's
all
I
have.
P
A
Mr
shelby
is
that
possible
the
two
people
that
were
supposed
to
give
up
their
time
to
miss
sanchez
are
here.
Could
we
give
her
two
minutes
I'll,
be
glad.
C
C
P
P
P
P
The
foundry
with
250
units
opened
in
march.
This
is
just
a
sidebar
60
days
later
they
have
only
rented
50
of
them,
and
that
is
because
they
are
unaffordable.
The
same
thing
is
going
to
happen
in
this
situation:
not
affordable,
housing.
This
studio
apartments
rent
at
there
for
eighteen
hundred
dollars.
The
three
bedrooms
are
five
thousand
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars.
Could
that
be
the
reason
why
they're
empty
they're
not
affordable?.
P
A
H
A
We
have
a
few
people
that
are
online
to
speak.
I
believe
you
were
sworn
in.
Okay,
yes,
ma'am,
stephanie,
poynter,
miss
jim.
A
I
K
Neighborhood
leader,
good
evening,
gentlemen,
first
of
all,
I
prepared
this
speech
a
month
ago
before
that
last
minute,
continuance,
which
I
thought
we
were
talking
about,
getting
rid
of.
It's
all
hurry
up
and
get
ready
and
then
oh
by
the
way
we
changed
our
minds.
I
want
to
talk
about
two
things
that
are
a
little
bit
different.
K
One
is
side
waivers
for
setbacks
and
sidewalks,
I'm
not
an
expert,
and
I
couldn't
find
the
exact
numbers,
but
I
like
bound
numbers
so
assuming
that
the
lot
is
approximately
100
by
200
250,
the
23
foot
reduction
and
setback
sent
back
to
the
south
gives
them
an
additional
2300
square
feet.
The
13
foot
reduction
on
the
left
gives
them
3
250
square
feet.
The
three
foot
reduction
on
the
east
gives
them
750
square
feet.
That
is
a
total
of
6.
K
The
city
to
bless
them
with
to
give
away
the
brighter
place-
I'm
sorry,
but
as
a
citizen,
I'm
offended,
but
they
expect
you
to
give
away
our
land
the
land
that
we
are
probably
going
to
need
for
mass
transit
one
day
at
least
for
jesus.
Listen,
let's
get
it.
A
couple
of
feet
is
reasonable,
but
whoa
you
talked
about
taking
it
in
for
a
mile,
cal
am
was
on
it.
K
I
just
want
to
say
this
out
loud
because
it
really
rubs
me
along
the
applicants
are
asking
for
basically
an
entire
extra
lot
of
setback
and
we
only
get
a
four
foot
sidewalk
on
the
east
side.
Yeah
I'd
argue
that
they
should
build
smaller
units
that
can
be
more
efficient
with
the
land
that
they
have,
rather
than
encroaching
on
our
city's
green
space.
I'll
ask
why
there
are
no
sidewalks
planned
for
this
project
that
will
support
pedestrian
traffic,
including
to
those
folks
who
live
in
the
community.
K
Don't
allow
these
ridiculous
favors
send
the
developer
back
to
get
a
better
plan
and
honestly
they
showed
you
pictures
beside
walks,
but
they're
not
on
the
plans
unless
they
change
something-
and
I
don't
know
about
it-
I
mean
I'm
not
an
expert
but
in
my
opinion,
if
you're
going
to
build
a
house-
and
you
want
to
build
all
these
units-
why
are
you
not
building
the
sidewalks
too?
I
guess
it's
just
to
question
them.
K
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Yes
ma'am
next
speaker
chairman,
if
I
could,
but.
C
Mr
xiaoviyesser,
yes,
just
for
the
purposes
of
making
sure
the
record
is
clear
and
to
advise
counsel.
Council
member
goode's
comments
with
regard
to
information
that
he
learned
on,
I
guess
to
tell
television.
C
I
Q
Tamara
opsahl,
I
live
in
armory
gardens
and
I
previously
sent
an
email
rather
long.
Most
of
my
key
points
are
in
there
and
I
kind
of
threw
my
presentation
out
the
window,
because
so
many
of
the
other
people
from
my
neighborhood
spoke
on
a
lot
of
key
points.
So
what
I'm
going
to
focus
on
is
this
city
and
plant
county
planners
talk
a
lot
about
walkability
of
neighbors
as
a
priority,
and
I
also
want
to
say
in
front
that
I'm
not
against
urban
density.
Q
I
think
urban
density
is
a
good
thing,
but
only
if
it's
done
right,
not
if
it's
done
in
a
way
that
makes
a
neighborhood
that
negatively
affects
the
existing
neighborhood,
I'm
not
an
expert
traffic
engineer
or
city
planner,
but
I
have
been
hit
by
a
car
and
I'm
going
to
talk
to
you
about
the
perspective
of
this
project.
Q
As
someone
who
tries
to
drive
a
car
as
little
as
possible,
my
main
modes
of
transportation
are
I
walk.
I
take
my
bike
or
I
take
my
new
electric
suit,
so
this
project
just
contributes
to
more
of
the
same.
It's
the
same
old
car,
centric
dangerous
by
design.
Q
We're
already
one
of
the
most
dangerous
metro
areas
in
the
united
states-
and
this
is
just
more
of
the
state
people
here
have
already
talked
about
congestion,
so
congestion
usually
just
gives
me
more
motivation
to
either
walk
or
ride
my
bike
or
take
my
scooter,
but
guess
what
all
that
congestion
just
makes
it
even
more
dangerous.
For
me
to
do
any
of
those
three
things
and
I'm
going
to
focus
on
one
example
of
this
plan
and
another
example
of
how
projects
are
designed
as
car
centric.
Q
Take
a
look
at
that
drive
that
enters
onto
cyprus,
those
curves
where
the
the
drive
is
curved.
Instead
of
at
a
straight
angle.
Those
curves
are
designed
to
make
it
so
that
the
cars
can
whiz
in
and
out
more
quickly
from
that
exit
or
entrance,
and
guess
what
they
don't
look
for
pedestrians.
They
don't
look
for
people
in
in
wheelchairs
or
pushing
throwers
or
on
electric
scooters.
They
don't
look.
Q
In
those
times
when
traffic
on
cyprus
is
backed
up
for
a
mile,
it's
dangerous
people
are
gonna,
get
hit,
I've
been
hit,
I've
come
close
to
being
hit
more
than
once,
and
not
a
single
one
of
those
times
was
it
my
fault.
It
was
because
the
driver
was
in
a
rush,
get
on
or
off
of
that
busy
road
as
quickly
as
they
could
they're,
usually
also
looking
at
home.
So
this
is
more
dangerous
by
design
it
does
not
improve
our
neighborhood.
Q
A
Dangerous
for
us.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
Do
you
have
anybody?
That's
registered
all
right.
That
would
conclude
public
comment,
mr
mechanic.
It's
your
rebuttal
time,
sir.
G
Yes,
sir,
mr
chairman,
council
members
david
mechanic,
we
will
try
to
be
as
brief
as
we
can.
There
were
a
number
of
comments
and
I
would
ask
your
indulgence
if
we
need
an
extra
minute
or
two
in
a
moment,
I'm
going
to
ask
michael
yates
to
address
the
traffic
issues,
but
I'd
like
to
try
and
recap
our
responses
to
all
the
other
comments.
G
We
embraced
the
idea
that
cypress
street
is
a
transit
corridor
in
a
transportation
corridor
and
every
planning
book
you
will
ever
read,
including
tampa's
comprehensive
plan,
encourages
higher
densities
in
transit
and
transportation
quarters.
That's
where
you
want
density
in
order
to
promote
the
usage
of
transit.
Everybody
knows
that,
but
my
client
is
not
pushing
the
envelope.
We
are
asking
for
78
of
the
density
that
is
allowed
on
this
property.
G
G
There
are
complaints
about
our
parking
and
about
impacts
to
trees.
We
are
fully
complying
with
the
code.
There's
no
parking
waiver.
There
is
no
tree
waiver.
There
is
no
request
to
take
down
a
grand
tree.
My
client
has
tried
desperately
to
avoid
asking
for
waivers,
and
I-
and
I
would
point
out
that
I
I
think
every
person
every
developer
would
be
happy
if
your
euclidean
zoning
districts
allowed
for
reasonable
urban
development.
G
Urban
infill
development,
your
euclidean
zoning
districts-
were
developed,
I
think
about
30
years
ago,
and
they
do
not
anticipate
or
allow
for
the
type
of
urban
infill
development
that
the
city
is
seeking
today,
and
so
my
client
would
be
more
than
happy
not
to
have
to
file
a
pd,
but
that's
not
the
case
under
the
current
code.
But
with
that
I'd
like
to
ask
mr
yates
to
address
the
traffic
issue.
L
Good
evening,
michael
yates,
with
palm
traffic,
I'm
going
to
put
up
the
on
the
elmo
this
slide
from
our
presentation.
So
the
we
got
a
couple
of
comments
on
the
traffic
study,
one
that
it
was
done
in
august
of
2021.
L
L
L
This
is
just
a
compendium
of
the
trip
generation
for
various
uses,
and
so
it
is
they've
now
come
out
with
the
11th
edition
in
january
of
this
year,
but
at
the
time
of
the
filing,
this
was
the
latest
edition
of
the
ite
trip
generation.
It
is
current
data.
It
is
a
compendium
of
20
years
of
traffic
data,
so
all
of
that
is
consistent
with
the
way
we
do
it.
The
second
comment
we
got
was
on
the
level
of
service
report
that
the
hillsborough
county
npo
produces
that's
the
city
of
tampa
portion
of
it.
L
L
G
Thank
you,
and
I
I
would
just
like
to
make
one
final
point
or
two
final
points.
The
mr
yates
initially
pointed
out
that
we
have
cg
zoning
on
the
property
general
commercial
that
would
allow
commercial
uses
far
that
would
generate
far
more
traffic.
We
could
put
a
mcdonald's
on
this
property
and
generate
far
more
traffic
than
what
we
are
generating
and
I
would
just
remind
council,
the
urban
design
department
found
this
project
consistent
with
the
west
tampa
overlay.
Thank
you.
A
E
I
have
made
that
statement.
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chair
file.
Number
rec
21-127
ordinance
being
presented
first
reading,
consideration
enormous
reason
under
the
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
3003
west
cyprus,
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
to
district
classification,
cg
commercial
to
pd,
plan
development,
single
family
attached,
providing
an
effective
date,
and
the
petitioner
has
met
the
burden
of
proof
under
sections.
It
meets
with
the
compliance
with
the
goals,
objectives,
policy
of
the
comprehensive
plan
the
applicant
is
considered.
E
The
application
excuse
me
is
consistent
with
the
housing
chapter
1.3,
which
ensures
that
adequate
amount
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs,
prevalence
and
finance
capability
of
campus
housing
under
the
land
development
code.
27-136
proposed
use,
promotes
effectiveness
and
sustainable
use
of
land
and
infrastructure.
As
for
the
waivers,
the
design
of
the
proposed
development
is
unique.
Therefore,
it
needs
the
waivers
and
revisions
between
first
and
second
reading.
E
B
C
And
pursuant
to
rule
6h,
if
a
motion
acquisition
matter
fails
to
receive
at
least
four
votes,
the
motion
fails
and
if
another
motion
in
order
is
not
made,
the
public
hearing
shall
be
automatically
reopened
and
continued
to
a
time
certain
at
the
next
regular
scheduled
council
meeting
and
just
a
reminder
next
week
is
your
next
regular
meeting
that
is
may
5th,
and
we
do
know
of
one
council
member
being
absent.
So
we.
C
If,
if
there's
no
objection
may
19th,
I
suspect
we
have
a
full
council.
Perhaps
I
think.
C
C
A
Miranda
second
council
member
seiture,
all
in
favor
all
right.
The
case
is
the
hearing-
is
reopened.
C
Yes
and
now,
there's
no
motion
on
the
floor,
but
obviously
the
council
members
who
are
absent
would
have
to
prepare
and
view
the
record
in
advance
of
the
hearing.
So
that
would
be
what
time
madam
clerk
on
may
19th
2022.
E
That's
fine
yeah.
You
have
to
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
continue
to
may
19th
at
10
30
a.m.
C
C
A
K
B
I
B
I
D
I
I
D
Good
evening,
council
eric
cotton
element
coordination
item
number
eight
is
rec
21-135
for
a
property
located
at
3218
west
paul
avenue.
The
applicant
is
mark
mobley,
he's
asking
to
rezone
from
rs-60
presidential
single-family
to
rs-50
residential
single
family.
I'll
turn
it
over
to
mr
collins,
with
the
planning
commission.
M
Good
evening
this
is
danny
collins
again
with
your
planning
commission
staff.
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
south.
Tampa
planning
district
and
more
specifically,
the
interbay
south
afghani
neighborhood
closest
public
transit
stuff
is
approximately
three-quarters
of
a
mile
southwest
of
the
site.
At
the
intersection
of
south
dale
maverick
highway
and
west
valley's
point
boulevard
foster
park
is
the
closest
public
parking
located
approximately
one
and
one
quarter
mile
to
the
northwest
of
the
subject
site.
The
subject
site
is
within
evacuation
zone
v.
M
Here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
and
surrounding
properties.
It's
generally
located
south
east
of
west
paul
avenue
and
south
sheridan
road.
It's
the
third
lot
east
of
that
intersection.
The
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
residential
in
character
with
family
residences.
Surrounding
the
subject
site
here
is
the
I'm
sorry
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation.
M
A
designation
allows
consideration
of
the
10
dwelling
units
per
acre.
It
is
typically
described
as
low
density
residential
sport,
low
density
residential
uses
that
r10
is
surrounded,
surrounds
the
subject
site
on
all
sides.
That's
represented
by
this
orange
tannish
color
on
the
cmu
35
is
to
the
north
of
this
is
approximately
two
blocks
north
of
the
subject
site
along
west
sandy
boulevard
planning,
commission
staff
reviewed
the
application
and
found
no
adverse
impacts
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
M
The
segment
of
west
palm
avenue,
excluding
the
site
has
an
existing
density
of
5.93
dwelling
units
per
acre
and
that's
based
on
19
sample
sites.
The
existing
density
of
this
block
is
59
of
the
density
that
can
be
considered
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation,
which
is
well
below
the
10
volume
units
per
acre.
That's
anticipating
that
designation.
M
The
site
can
be
considered
for
one
unit
at
our
overall
density
of
six
point
two
point:
five
millimeters
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
density
anticipated
under
the
r10
designation
and
is
only
five
percent
higher
than
the
existing
block
density
of
this
segment
of
west
palm
of
west
paul
avenue.
Finding
commission
staff
have
reviewed
lotlists
along
the
segment
of
west
paul
avenue
lot
widths
range
from
50
feet
to
150,
with
the
majority
of
the
lotus
rate,
ranging
from
50
to
60
feet.
M
The
lot
width
of
the
subject
site
is
50
feet
for
the
submitted
site
plan,
taking
into
consideration
the
existing
block
density
and
range
of
lot
lists
along
the
segment
of
west
paul
avenue.
The
planning
commission
staff
finds
the
request
will
provide
a
residential
development
that
will
be
built
within
the
existing
street
block
and
lock
configuration
of
the
neighborhood.
M
D
D
So
again,
this
property
is
already.
This
request
is
rec
21135.
The
applicant
is
marked
mobley
represented
by
steve
miccolini
for
property
at
3218,
west
hall
avenue
again.
This
is
euclidean
request.
There
are
no
waivers.
The
request
is
to
go
from
rs60
residential
single
family
to
rs50
residential
single
family.
This
is
a
planted
lot
on.
The
screen.
Right
now
is
a
lot
as
planted,
which
is
approximately
50
by
134.,
submitted
a
survey
of
the
property,
as
you
can
tell
the
this
has
an
existing
one-story
garage.
D
This
is
the
zoning.
The
the
ariel
we're
showing
the
zoning
to
the
north
is
rs50.
Residential
single
family
to
the
south,
east
and
west
are
all
rs
60,
although
there
is,
if
you
go
down
the
block
or
long
fall,
you
do
see
a
smattering
of
rs50
in
the
neighborhood.
D
Again,
there
are
no
waivers,
as
it
says
there
is
no
site
plan
to
review.
This
is
the
the
consistency
map
so
to
speak.
That
shows
the
development
pattern
in
the
area
this.
This
is
the
property
in
question.
D
Rezoning,
the
property
from
rs
60
to
rf50
will
make
this
a
conforming
line
again
60
feet.
The
rs-60
requires
60
feet
of
width.
This
light
only
has
50.
The
rs50
allows
for
the
50
foot
long
council
have
any.
T
Good
evening,
council,
steve
michelini,
representing
mark
mobley
and
their
custom
home
company
regarding
the
rezoning
requesting
rs50
with
current
zoning
as
rs-60
as
the
staff
has
pointed
out,
from
both
the
planning
commission
and
the
city
staff.
They
found
it
consistent
and
they
had
no
objections.
This
is
a
euclidean
zoning,
so
we,
unless
we
file
for
a
variance
of
some
other
kind
during
development,
we
have
to
meet
the
existing
codes
regarding
setbacks
and
height
and
all
of
the
other
development
standards.
T
So,
given
that
these
lots
are
extremely
large
and
there
should
be
no
difficulty
whatsoever
regarding
the
development
pattern
to
enable
this
to
go
forward,
the
I
don't
I
mean
in
the
past,
I
have
gone
through,
and
I've
listed
all
of
the
different
consistencies
that
were
found
by
the
planning
commission
by
the
city
staff
and
instead
of
reading
all
of
them
and
going
through
each
one
of
these
notes.
T
I
prefer
that
you
ask
that
these
be
received
and
filed
and
made
part
of
the
record,
but
it's
the
the
planning
commission,
the
city
staff
report,
finding
it
consistent.
I
know
it's
lengthy,
but
you
know
it's
the
objective
of
land
uses
under
the
city
planning
strategy.
T
It's
the
land
use
objectives
there
that
are
contained
in
the
development
regulations,
goals
and
objectives
and
policies
and
the
land
use
objectives
contain
their
end.
Under
the
eight
point
process,
the
overall
residential
development
and
redevelopment
land
use
policies,
single
family
areas,
land
use
policies,
neighborhood
community
plan
policies
and
their
overall
analysis
finding
that
it
was
consistent.
T
So,
like
I
said,
I'm
to
save
time
and
to
if
you
just
adopt
this
by
reference,
I
would
appreciate
it
it's
part
of
the
record.
Anyway,
we
are
found
consistent.
We
believe
that
this
is
be
a
great
addition.
This
is
underutilized
because
there's
only
a
garage
on
this
particular
parcel-
and
this
is
a
perfect
example
of
underutilized
property
that
can
be
used
for
single-family
development.
I'll,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
and
respectfully
requesting
your
approval.
A
Any
questions
for
the
applicant
hearing:
none
do
we
have
anybody
in
the
public
that
wishes
to
speak
on
item
number.
Eight,
all
right.
We
I
see.
No
one,
there
is
no
one
registered
for
number
eight.
Is
that
correct.
A
From
councilman
good
serving
councilman
miranda,
all
in
favor
aye
any
opposed
who
was
next
councilman,
oh
councilmember
goods.
Would
you
like
to
read
number
eight.
I
Rez
21-135
order
has
been
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration,
ordinance
reasoning
properly
in
the
general
center
of
3218
west
paul
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
what
will
be
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
district
application,
rs60
residential
single
family
to
rs50
residential
signal
family
provided
an
effective
date.
Second,.
E
E
A
B
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Eric
cotton
from
dillon
coronation
on
next
number.
Nine
is
rec
2204.
This
is
for
a
property
at
2303,
north
jefferson
street.
The
request
is
to
resign
it
from
rm24
to
pd
plan
development
for
a
single
family,
residential
detached
property.
Now
deferring
mr
collins,
with
the
planning
commission.
M
This
is
danny
collins
again
with
your
planning.
Commission
staff
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically,
the
tampa
heights
urban
village,
the
closest
transit
stop
is,
is
located
east
of
the
subject
site
at
the
intersection
of
east
26th
avenue,
and
I'm
sorry,
I
listened.
The
subject
site
is
not
located
within
an
evacuation
zone.
The
closest
public
recreation
facility,
fernando
mesa
park,
is
located
0.12
miles
to
the
southwest
of
the
subject.
M
M
Just
north
of
east
global
drive
parcel
is
recognized
under
the
residential
and
designation
planning.
Commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
application,
found
no
adverse
impacts
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
This
portion
of
north
jefferson
street
between
east
ross
avenue
and
east
of
mill
avenue
has
an
existing
density
of
8.54
units
per
acre.
M
The
existing
density
of
this
portion
of
north
jefferson
is
approximately
24
percent
of
the
allowable
density
plan
for
under
the
r35
future
land
use
designation.
This
request
will
offer
one
single
family
attached
residential
unit
at
an
overall
density
of
25
million
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
density
anticipated
under
the
r35
future
land
use
designation.
M
The
proposed
rezonings
forced
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comp
plan
as
it
relates
to
housing.
The
city's
population
tampa
comprehensive
plan,
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
that
medical
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
campus
present
and
future
populations.
M
The
subject
site
is
with
tampa
heights
urban
village
infield
policy,
1.1
17,
seeks
to
direct
the
greatest
share
of
roads
to
urban
centers
and
villages
such
as
the
tampa
heights
urban
village.
The
request
supports
this
policy
direction
and
will
provide
additional
housing
opportunities
within
the
tampa
white
server
village,
based
on
these
considerations,
applying
commission
staff
lines
and
requests
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
D
Thank
you.
I
share
my
screen.
Thank
you.
So
again,
this
is
rec
2204.
The
applicant
is
christopher
beckwith
represented
by
lori
duvall
for
property
at
2303.,
north
jefferson
street.
Again
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
from
rm24
to
pd
plan
development.
The
request
is
to
build
a
single
family
home
on
the
property.
D
The
property
is
a
little
under
2
000
square
feet.
The
proposed
building
will
be
about
around
995
square
feet.
This
is
the
property
in
question.
It's
in
the
heart
of
tampa
in
tampa
heights,
south
of
columbus
drive
right
along
jefferson,
property
to
the
north
is
zoned
rm-24
to
the
north
and
west.
Both
watts
are
currently
vacant
to
the
east
and
the
south
they're
also
zoned,
around
24
and
developed
with
residential
multi-family.
D
D
These
were
discovered
while
I
was
prepping
for
tonight's
hearing.
I
have
emailed
both
the
applicant
and
the
city
clerk's
office.
Those
revisions
would,
you
would
cost,
would
like
me
to
read
this
into
the
record.
Actually,
let
me
show
you
the
site
plan.
First,
this
is
the
proposed
site
plan
saved
a
lot,
a
lot
with
a
single
family
home
being
proposed.
This
is
two-story
single-family
home,
and
this
is
just
the
elevations
of
the
property
itself.
D
D
Okay,
we'll
do
add
a
note
to
the
site
plan
below
the
tree
table
quote
as
per
section
27
284.2.4
three
20
inch
laurel
oaks
and
one
stable
pump
were
removed
from
the
property
without
a
permit.
Violator
is
subject
to
a
three-time
triple
permit
fee
of
369
required
mitigation
is
three
type
one
penalty
trees
at
three
inches
dbh
or
payment
of
450
per
tree
and
six
type
one
mitigation
trees
at
two
and
a
half
dbh
or
payment
of
300
per
fee
total
amount
if
paid,
will
be
3519
dollars.
D
This
reflects
from
code
case
22
cod
22
305,
section
27
284.4.1
table
284.4.1
a
provide
the
full
city
of
tampa
tree
table
of
dentists
and
credits
and
do
not
abbreviate
the
tree
table.
Show
six
foot
notes
as
well
use
an
additional
page
if
necessary,
site
data
table
needs
to
be
revised,
showing
the
requirements
of
section
27
284.3.3
table
3.3
on
the
site
plan
require
trees.
One
one
tree
for
two
thousand
square
feet
of
parcel.
Extending
the
building
footprint.
D
The
calculation
should
be
one
tree
add
a
note
to
the
site
plan
about
protective
radius
during
construction
for
27,
284.1.1
and
tech
manual.
8.2
tree
protection
comply
with
truck
protection
requirements,
provide
show
true
protection
for
grand
trees,
32
inches
and
plus
20
feet
from
the
edge
of
trunk
to
close
the
edge
of
improvement,
specimen
trees,
24
feet,
24
inches
to
31
inches
15
feet
from
the
edge
of
trunk
to
closest
edge
of
improvement
and
protected
trees,
23
inches
and
less
10
feet
from
the
edge
of
trunk
to
the
closest
tree
improvement.
A
O
North
river
shore
drive
tampa
I'd
like
to
address
the
trees.
First,
I
don't
own
the
property.
I
have
it
under
contract
dependent
on
the
rezoning.
The
owner
took
the
trees
out
based
on
a
tree
report
that
he
has
so
he
actually
has
a
tree
consultation
scheduled
with
the
city
lawyers
on
june
1st,
so
just
want
to
make
that
clear.
O
O
E
C
O
The
property
without
having
gone
through
this
process
so,
as
eric
mentioned,
so
we're
trying
to
rezone
a
pd
because
it
doesn't
it's
a
non-conforming
lot.
It's
only
35
feet
wide
57
feet
deep,
so
it's
very
small,
but
it's
originally
plotted
that
way.
O
O
The
north
side
would
be
three
which
is
basically
just
like
a
portico
all
the
way
down
that
side,
the
the
front
setback
is
seven
and
the
rear
is
11..
So
if
you
saw
in
the
pictures,
there's
a
the
lot
just
to
the
south
right
here.
This
is
a
multi-family
unit
and
that
set
back
on
jefferson.
It's
literally
on
the
sidewalk.
O
It's
like
maybe
one
foot,
the
the
lot
to
the
north
is
it
vacant,
and
then
this
lot
right
here,
I
believe,
was
actually
just
rezoned
for
a
duplex
and
their
side,
set
back
to
jefferson
was
seven
feet,
so
I
mean
this
house
would
actually
be
consistent
with
that
one
and
actually
sit
behind
the
the
apartment
complex
right
there.
O
It's
like
a
four
unit
and
the
the
structure
itself
again
the
side
set
back
to
this
side
of
the
house.
This
would
be
five
feet
away.
The
structure
here
would
be
five
feet
away.
The
portico
would
be
three
and
there's
a
the
the
parking
there's
two
parking
spots.
We
did
them
tandem
because
having
them
next
to
each
other
would
basically
just
be
the
entire
width
of
the
lot.
So
that
was
the
only
way
it
would
really
work.
O
On
this,
the
front
is
seven
and
the
the
rear
is
just
over
11.
O
A
J
J
I
didn't
know
about
this
project
until
I
looked
at
the
agenda
today,
but
I
was
surprised
to
see
that
there
was
an
rm24
going
to
a
pd
that
seemed
very
strange
to
me
and
set
off
somewhere
in
my
head,
and
I
was
pleased
to
see
that
it's
because
it
was
a
2000
square
foot
lot
and
one
of
the
worst
one
one
of
the
most
impactful
examples
of
exclusionary
zoning,
which
is
a
word
I've
been
trying
to
educate
the
community
about.
J
You
know
the
rules
that
we
set
in
place
80
years
ago
that
have
made
housing
very
unaffordable.
A
lot
of
the
city
of
tampa
minimum
lot
sizes
are
one
of
those
things
having
large
lot
size.
Requirements
makes
housing
more
expensive
and
I
and
I
applaud
the
applicant
for
well-
it
wasn't
up
to
them
because
it
was
already
plotted
this
way,
but
you
know
I
think
this
is
a
good
example
of
of
the
kinds
of
housing
that
we
need
to
start
thinking
about
legalizing
in
more
parts
of
the
city.
J
So
I
know
there's
some
issues
with
the
trees
and
it's
it's
a
very
novel
thing
to
see.
But
you
know
I'm
pleased
to
see
some
diversity
in
housing
in
tampa.
D
It
was
taken
off,
I
believe
they
went
to
a
formal
decision
back
in
2018
and
it's
part
of
a
larger
lot.
It
was
split
off
illegally
sometime
in
the
past.
It
was
then
purchased
purchased.
The
person
who
owned
it
in
2018
came
for
a
formal
decision
for
the
zoning
administrator
to
try
to
determine
that.
That
was
a
legal
line
of
record,
but
was
unable
to
unable
to
do
that.
So
the
only
way
to
rectify
the
situation
is
to
come
before
council
for
a
rezoning
application.
E
So
this
lot
cannot
be
used
for
anything
else,
but
if
there's
a
change
of
exchange
of
views,
correct.
A
E
Chairman
foul
number,
nine
number
rd
22-04
who,
in
order
is
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
in
order
to
re-zoning
property
general
vicinity
of
2303
north
jefferson
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
scribe
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classifications,
rm24
residential
multifamily
to
pd
plan
development,
residential
single-family
detached
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,
we.
C
Yes
did
that
include
both
I'm
sorry,
if
I
missed
it,
did
that
include
the
revision
sheet
and
the
additional
revised
revision
sheet
that
was
ready.
E
Q
B
A
B
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Next,
up
on
the
agenda
is
rdz
21
129
for
a
property
located
at
105,
107,
109,
east
26th
avenue
was
a
pair
of
series
of
a
couple
of
blocks.
Currently
is
on
rs50
the
applicant's
requesting
to
rezone
it
to
rm18.
M
Good
evening
council,
this
is
danny
collins
again
with
your
planet,
commission
staff.
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
central
town
of
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
within
the
tampa
heights.
Urban
village.
The
closest
transit
stop,
is
located
a
block
one
block
east
of
the
subject
site
at
the
intersection
of
east
26th
avenue
and
north
florida
avenue.
M
M
This
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
in
the
surrounding
properties.
You'll
see
the
subject.
Site
is
generally
east
of
the
intersection.
I'm
sorry
west
of
the
intersection
of
east
26th
avenue
and
north
florida
avenue
there
are
non-residential
uses
predominantly
located
along
florida
avenue
and
then
it
transitions
to
residential
uses.
As
you
move
west
off
florida
avenue.
M
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
within
the
residential
20
future
land
use
designation.
That
r20
is
to
the
north,
west
and
south
of
the
subject
site
along
florida.
Avenue
are
parcels
recognized
under
the
community,
commercial
35,
future
land
use
designation
and
then,
as
you
move
about
two
blocks
west
of
the
subject
site
are
parcels
recognized
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use,
designation
atlantic
commission
staff
reviewed
the
application
without
no
adverse
impacts
and
surrounding
neighborhoods.
M
This
portion
of
east
26th
avenue
between
north
tampa
avenue
and
north
florida
avenue
is
presently
underdeveloped.
Segment
is
developed
at
5.87
dwellings
per
acre,
which
is
29
percent
of
the
0.9
of
the
density.
That's
anticipated
under
the
r20
future
land
use
designation,
residential
multi-family
18
zoning
district
is
consistent
with
the
density
anticipated
under
the
r20
designation
and
welfare
development.
That's
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area.
M
The
request
supports
many
of
the
policies.
The
comp
plan,
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population.
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land.
To
ensure
adequate
supply
of
housing
as
well
would
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
president
and
future
populations.
M
Additionally,
the
copper
comprehensive
plan
seeks
to
direct
the
greatest
share
of
growth
to
the
urban
centers
and
villages.
The
proposed
plan
of
development
supports
this
policy
objection
by
creating
additional
housing
opportunities
within
the
tampa
heights.
Urban
village
comprehensive
plan
encourages
multi-family
and
attached
single
family
residential
uses
to
be
designed
to
include
orientation
of
the
front
door
to
a
neighborhood,
sidewalk
and
streets,
and
those
are
that's
land
use
policy.
9.2.6,
future
development
of
the
site
for
multi-family
or
attached
single
family
residential
uses
should
address
all
c
direction
in
the
future.
M
D
Thank
you
eric
cotton
development
coordination.
Again
this
is
rec
21
129.
The
applicant
is
benjamin
buckley
he's
represented
by
roberta
b
curry
again.
This
is
for
three
last
addresses
105
107
and
109
east
26th
avenue.
D
Again
there
is
a
site
plan
involved
in
the
waivers.
This
is
euclidean
request
to
go
from
rs50
residential
single
family
to
our
18
residential
multifamily.
This
is
the
original
plat.
Unfortunately,
it's
oriented
where
north
is
to
the
right,
but
it
is
three-plated.
Lots
of
the
property
surrounding
property
to
the
east
is
zone.
Ci
is
developed
with
commercial
uses
to
the
north
and
south
and
west
are
all
rs50
all
developed.
The
property
to
the
north
is
known
as
multi
is
developed
as
multi-family
and
to
the
south
in
western
or
single-family
zoning
districts
are
developed
with
single-family.
D
D
Just
as
as
as
aside,
this
would
be
an
appropriate
step
down
from
residential
single
family
going
into
multi-family
from
the
more
intense
ci
zoning
uses.
As
you
go
into
the
residential
neighborhood
and
then
some
photos
of
the
site
again,
it's
currently
vacant-
this
is
this.
D
This
is
a
site
too.
I
take
that
back
because
of
the
size
of
the
site.
It's
has
some
vacant
property
along
with
a
single
family
home
on
it.
This
is
the
view
to
the
west,
and
this
is
the
view
to
the
north
and
across
the,
and
this
is
the
east.
This
is
the
commercial
to
the
east,
and
this
is
this:
if
you
looking
down
the
property
going
back
towards
the
main
road,
again
cal
stacked
on
the
request,
consistent
any
questions,
we
won't
have
an
answer
for
you.
N
Good
evening,
chairman
and
council
members,
my
name
is
fedor
rodriguez.
My
address
is
607
west
martin
luther
king
woolworth
in
tampa.
I
am
representing
miss
curry
and
national
property
reports
to
honor
the
other
two
lots.
Mr
buckley
is
here
with
me:
he's
the
president
of
national
property
reports
and
we're
here
on
our
request
for
euclidean
rezoning
to
rm18
for
the
properties
located
at
105
to
109
east
26th
street.
N
Okay,
so
in
this
survey
it
shows
that
there's
three
parcels
of
property-
they
they've
owned
these
properties
for
about
10
years
now
that
would
like
to
develop
the
properties
to
create
a
setting
that
would
allow
for
smaller,
yet
more
comfortable
dwellings
within
the
city
limits
addressing
the
middle
missing
middle
housing
needs
as
well
as
fit
well
fitting.
Well
within
the
mayor,
casters
planning
initiatives,
there's
there's
actually
two
single-family
properties
on
the
on
these
three
lots.
There's
one
vacant
lot.
N
This
is
a
messy
middle
example,
and
these
are
examples
of
the
similar
properties
around
tampa
these.
These
are
in
the
soho
district,
which
are
stone
rm24,
as
required
by
the
city.
The
owners
of
the
property
requested
meetings
with
the
civic
associations
associated
were
affected
by
the
requested
zoning.
They
were
able
to
speak
with
three
of
them.
N
N
It
shows
several
smaller
properties
that
would
be
built
on
on
the
on
this
property,
so
the
owners
wouldn't
want
to
spend
any
more
money
on
this
without
having
some
assurance
that
that
this
is
what
the
city
would
be
would
approve,
so
providing
the
rma
team
would
give
them
would
give
the
owners
that
assurance
that
the
that
they
could
actually
build
this
sort
of
thing.
It
may
be
different,
but
this
is
a
conceptual
design.
N
N
N
The
requested
rezoning
meets
with
the
land
development
code
long-range
comprehensive
plan,
as
well
as
a
tampa
envision
plan.
These
items,
the
item
highlighted
in
yellow,
are
points
from
the
comprehensive
plan
used
as
president
by
council
in
prior
resonant
requests.
The
one
marked
with
an
asterisk
in
red
have
been
possibly
referred
referenced
by
by
the
staff
in
the
report
today
and
that's
part
of
the
the
presentation
there
is
presently
one
there's
presently
one
house
on
on
on
the
two
lots
on
the
three
lots.
N
I'm
sorry,
both
of
these
residents
are
presently
rented
at
no
charge
to
the
tenants,
basically
to
help
avoid
having
the
residences
be
vacant.
N
The
rezoning
to
rm18
would
give
the
owners
a
possibility
of
building
up
to
three
single
family
residents
at
each
resold
parcel
or
up
to
nine
dwellings.
On
the
three
result,
parcels
combined,
multiple
single
family
residents
per
parcel
will
likely
address
cost
concerns
to
potential
buyers,
as
less
land
would
be
involved
in
each
purchase
and
sale.
Temporary
residents
want
to
be
as
close
to
downtown
as
possible.
Approving
this
resonating
request
for
rmit
helps
toward
that
end
and
is
also
helpful
in
the
current
housing
shortage
that
we
are
experiencing.
N
There
is
an
alley
there's
an
alley
to
the
south,
to
the
three
parcels
providing
access
to
tampa
street.
We
do
not
foresee
parking
as
being
an
issue.
Parking
will
be
on
site
and
access
through
the
existing
alley.
26Th
street
is
actually
wider
than
the
typical
residential
street
in
this
area,
as
apparently
it
is
a
road
where
the
former
trolley
was
used
to
run
run.
N
The
owners
wish
to
be
contributors
to
the
advancement
of
our
city
and
we
believe
that
what
we're
requesting
is
very
much
in
line
with
the
development
vision
containing
the
comprehensive
and
innovation
plans,
as
well
as
many
casters
intentions
for
the
city.
We
respectfully
requested
to
approve
our
requests
for
the
euclidean
real
zoning
from
rs50
to
rm18.
N
N
A
A
All
right:
do
you
have
anybody
in
the
public?
That's
here
to
speak
on
this
item.
Item
number
10.:
I
see
no
one
and
there's
nobody
registered
to
speak
if
there's,
no
any
other,
all
right,
okay,
motion
to
close
from
councilman
goose
and
councilman
miranda,
all
in
favor
all
right
in
the
opposed
councilman
veer.
Would
you
mind?
Reading
item
number
10?
Yes,.
I
Sir,
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading:
consideration
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
general
of
the
city
of
105-107-109,
east
26th
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs50
residential
single-family
to
rm18
residential
multi-family,
providing
an
effective
date.
B
D
D
D
This
is
this
is
a
request
for
an
alcoholic
beverage
for
a
large
venue.
The
proposed
uses
shoppers
goods.
They
would
like
to
do
large
venue
for
consumption,
on-premise
and
off-premise
in
package
sales,
so
the
property
currently
has
two
alcohol
permits
on
it.
One
was
in
a
two
aps.
This
is,
let
me
just
start
to
the
front.
This
is
for
a
public
grocery
store.
D
There's
the
main
store
has
a
two
aps.
The
liquor
store
has
a
three
ps
they're,
proposing
to
go
to
a
large
venue,
they're
requesting
roughly
64
281
total
square
feet.
61
500
roughly
will
be
indoors
and
about
2800
square
feet
would
be
out
outside.
D
Their
hours
of
operation
will
be
proposed
to
be
for
the
main
store,
7
a.m,
to
10
p.m,
monday,
through
sunday,
in
the
liquor
store
from
10
a.m,
to
10
p.m.
D
Monday,
through
sunday,
they're
asking
for
two
waivers
from
the
av
requirements,
one
is
a
distance
separation
from
other
places
that
are
wet,
which
I
believe
this
is
the
target
store
from
250
square
250
feet
to
122
feet
and
from
residential
uses
from
250
feet
to
67
feet
again,
the
target
store
is
what's
closest
to
them
for
the
surprisingly
sales
alcohol,
they
have
a
2
aps
and
there's
facial
village
condominium,
which
is
67
feet
away.
Those
are
the
two
waivers
requested.
D
D
You
can
see
the
condominiums
to
the
north
target's
sort
to
the
west
and
across
the
street
is
you
know,
stripped
commercial
of
wagwan
and
chick-fil-a,
and
the
starbucks
is
actually
on
the
same
public
on
the
same
property
as
the
public
we've
had
it
inconsistent
because
of
the
waivers
requested
from
the
distance
separation,
and
there
are
some
minor
corrections
to
the
site
plan
that
need
to
be
made
in
first
second
reading,
although
hold
on
a
second,
please,
I
don't
see
a
revision
sheet
attached
to
the
staff
report.
D
Within
the
staff
report
itself,
there
are
some
revisions
requested
list
waivers
ended
up
on
the
second
page
of
the
business
operation.
We
just
talked
about
update
the
aerial
map
on
the
site
plan,
update
the
title
to
read:
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
special
use,
two
large
venue,
marijuana
liquor,
consumption
on
premise,
package,
sales
off
package
sales
for
consumption
off-premise,
and
to
update
the
address
council.
Have
any
questions
for.
H
H
Perfect
so,
as
staff
has
indicated,
this
is
a
request
for
a
large
venue,
beer,
wine
and
liquor
consumption
on
premise
and
package
sales
off-premise.
It's
kind
of
a
large
description.
That
sounds
like
we're
doing
a
big
bar,
but
this
is
a
sip
and
stroll
concept
for
our
publix.
Basically,
we'll
have
beer
and
wine
people
will
be
able
to
shop,
walk
around,
enjoy
beer
and
wine
and
get
their
groceries
and
go
home
and
also
have
package
sales.
H
H
The
reason
for
us
to
come
back
in
other
than
the
2cop
aspect
of
it
is
that
a
drive-in
window
was
placed
on
the
west
side
for
pharmacy.
That
came
to
council.
I
believe
in
a
special
use
approval
not
too
long
ago,
they've,
relocated.
The
package
store
to
the
east
side
of
the
property,
which
is
right
here,
and
this
is
the
redeveloped
store,
the
mezzanine
area
and
the
outdoor
seating
outdoor
seating
is
just
designed
for
people
to
get
a
deli
sandwich
that
do
get
a
beer.
H
H
The
waivers
we
have
requested
have
been
itemized
by
staff,
but
this
just
gives
an
orientation
here's
the
property
line
for
target,
here's
the
store
line
from
the
not
the
new
store,
but
what
will
be
the
location
that
requires
the
distance
separation
and
also
on
the
back?
It
should
be
noted
both
of
these
waivers.
Essentially,
these
stores
have
been
in
relationship
to
one
another.
Just
like
this.
For
probably
20
years,
there
are
additional
residential
properties
that
are
further
away
across
heims,
but
essentially
the
building
is
not
getting
any
closer
to
them.
H
So,
based
upon
staff's
review
of
the
standards
for
mixed-use
corridors,
we
respectively
request
granting
the
waivers
and
approval
of
the
special
use
again.
The
intent
is,
is
for
the
main
store
body
to
be
able
to
have
sip
and
stroll
and
package
sales
to
occur
from
the
liquor
store.
Be
glad
to
answer
any
questions.
Counseling.
E
They're
going
to
have
on
sale,
I
mean
on
on
premise:
consumption
consumption,
but
you're
going
to
have
a
separate
liquor
store.
Yes,
you
got
beer
and
wine
in
the
store,
but
you're
going
to
have
a
separate,
hard
liquor
store
so
to
be
able
to
drink
regardless.
What
was
to
say,
regardless
of
alcohol
content
in
the
store,
someone
would
have
to
first
go
to
the
package
store,
put
it
underneath
their
arm
go
into
the
store
and
get
their
tonic
for
their
gin
or
their
ginger
beer
for
their
moscow
mule
to
have
a
sip
and
straw
they.
H
Right,
no
well,
it's
hard,
it's
not
a
yes
or
no
answer,
because
the
licensing
that's
associated
with
it.
The
description
in
the
tampa
code
for
the
type
of
what
zoning
you
ask
for
does
not
necessarily
match
up
with
the
type
of
licensing
you
get
from.
The
state.
Two
cop
would
be
a
beer
wine
on-premise
consumption
license,
which
is
what
publics
will
be
seeking
for
the
large
venue
space
and
the
package
sales
would
be
solely
the
the
hard
liquor
would
be
in
a
separate
building,
as
required
by
state
law.
H
E
E
H
D
E
D
Council,
mr
cotton,
yes,
mr
teacher,
so
through
the
alcohol
licensing
by
the
state,
they
will
not
be
able
to
sell
package
at
the
liquor
store
portion.
You
can't
you
cannot
open
and
consume
within.
I
believe
it's
500
feet
by
city
by
city
regulations.
This
the
package
store
the
liquor
portion.
The
liquor
store
is
selling
package
only
inside
of
the
grocery
store
itself.
That's
where
the
three
aps
is.
The
3ps
is
coming
from
inside
the
grocery
store
itself,
where
they
sell
the
beer
and
wine.
D
E
The
definitive
word
there
was
legally
okay,
then
let
me
go
about
it
from
this.
This
angle,
you're
gonna,
have
consumption
on
premise:
in
a
61
plus
thousand
square
foot,
building.
H
Yes,
sir
yeah,
it's
just
like
green
wise
grocers,
just
like
trader
does
it's
it's
basically
whole
foods,
those
those
locations
are
have
sip
and
stroll
we'll
just
call
it.
H
E
H
I
would
have
never
left
the
store
it
doesn't.
It
doesn't
happen,
it
doesn't
happen
a
lot.
In
other
words,
this
is
a
new
lucky's
who
was
all
over
florida
until
they
went
bankrupt,
but
they
had
that
concept.
Whole
foods
has
been
doing
it
across
the
state.
Green
wise
grocers
are
doing
it.
This
is
the
only
difference
here.
This
is
not
a
green,
wise
grocer.
H
I
H
Basically,
they
have
now
they
have
a
deli.
All
all
you
know,
publics
have
a
deli
area.
Many
of
them
have
a
seating
area
for
people
eat
their
deli
sandwiches.
This
will
allow
them
people
to
buy
a
beer
or
get
a
glass
of
wine
from
the
pores
area
and
consume
that,
while
they
are
either
having
their
sandwich
or
walking
around
the
store
in
the
grocery
store.
I
E
H
E
H
E
Just
people,
I
don't
I
mean
I
vote
for
alcohol,
I
don't
drink,
but
I
mean
it's
just
I'm
never
drunk.
That
doesn't
mean
I'm
good
or
bad,
but
it
just.
E
E
Consumer
goods,
this
allows
them
so
so,
if
the
alcohol
sales
really
starts,
sticking
up
then
also
see
in
the
store
is
brillo,
pads,
fabuloso,
cleaner
and
maybe
bag
of
chips
and
the
rest
will
be
aisles
of
alcohol.
I
just
felt
I
I
just
envisioning
something
changing
over
the
course
of
time.
The
liability
is
bearish,
yeah
really
really
big
and
they
got
a
big
brand
name
and.
E
A
The
the
ghost
the
ghost
in
the
third
row
we
have
stephanie
poynter
registered
online,
miss
poynter.
A
K
There
we
go,
there
are
grocery
stores
all
over
the
state
of
florida
who
have
this
concept.
This
is
not
something
brand
new,
please
for
the
lore.
Please
help
us
out
in
south
tampa.
We
have
nothing.
At
least
this
is
the
ability
to
have
a
cocktail.
My
husband
might
actually
go
to
the
grocery
store
with
me
because
he
can
build
it
up
to
the
bar.
K
C
E
A
You
very
much
do
we
have
anybody
else
or
that's
it.
You
know
I've
seen
this
at
at
whole
foods.
They
do
it,
they
do
it
at
the
green
wise
down
here.
You
know
it's
just
just
how
it
is
you
know,
but
as
councilman
miranda
said
it's
a
lot,
the
liability
is
theirs.
You
know
it's
on
their
property
and
you
know
so
it
is
what
it
is.
Moving
folks
motion
closed
from
councilman
miranda,
councilman
goose,
all
in
favor,
aye,
aye
councilman,
see
trigger
deferring.
You
may.
I
What's
been
presented
for
first
reconsideration
orders
providing
a
special
use
permit
s2
for
alcohol
beverage
sales,
large
venue,
consumption
on
premises
and
package
sales
such
as
all-person
consumption,
and
making
lawful
the
seal
of
beverages
regardless
of
alcohol
content,
beer,
wine
and
alcohol
on
that
certain
lot
plot
or
tract
of
land
located
at
36
15
36
17,
which
gained
boulevard
timber
floor
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
4,
provided
that
all
orders
in
particular
ordinance
and
conflict,
are
repealed.
Report
ordinance,
9429-8
and
rescinding
special
use.
One
s1
v11-401
providing
an
effective
date.
C
D
A
A
I
I
have
just
one
this
morning
I
made
a
motion
and
a
reference
to
hud.
I
had
a
conversation
with
mr
shelby
and
our
economic
advisory
administrator
and
legal
for
housing,
and
we
need
to
make
some
revisions
to
that
emotions
to
men.
A
A
Okay,
we
have
a
much
from
council
member
good,
second
from
council
member
miranda,
all
in
favor
aye
anything
else,
sir.
That's
illegal!
Yes,
sir
councilman
citro,
nothing.
I
Just
really
quick,
if
I
may,
we
have
memorial
day
coming
up
at
the
end
of
may
and
we
always
invite
some
gold
star
families
to
come
and
briefly
speak.
I
would
ask
that
that
be
said.
First
on
the
agenda
on,
I
think
it
is
may
26th.
A
A
A
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
a
commendation
to
the
international
peace
run
team
on
may
4th
at
a
location
to
be
determined.
J
We
have
a
motion
by
councilman
or
chairman
scout
second,
by
councilman.
I
believe
it
was
first
citro
all
in
favor
any
opposed
anything.
I
C
Yes,
mr
chairman,
last
week
the
council
voted
to
put
councilwoman
hertac
on
the
affordable
housing
advisory
committee
and
the
motion
was
cut
to
come
back
next
week,
which
I
mistakenly
said
next
week
instead
of
may
5th.
C
So
I
would
ask
that
council,
so
it
appears
on
the
agenda
for
a
vote
to
a
resolution
approving
ratifying
and
confirming
the
appointment
of
city
of
tampa
council
member
lynn,
hertac,
a
locally
elected
official
to
fill
a
vacancy
on
the
affordable
housing
advisory
committee
for
the
remainder
of
a
three-year
term,
ending
september
17th
of
2023
providing
an
effective
date.
I'm
going
to
give
the
copy
of
the
first
page
to
the
clerk
and
defeat.