►
From YouTube: TCC 10/20/22 Part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
B
D
Management
item
number:
nine
is
a
amendment
to
an
existing
funding
agreement
for
some
of
our
hopwa
funds.
That's
housing
for
opportunity
for
people
with
AIDS.
We
do
administer
that
for
four
counties.
The
reason
why
it's
on
the
agenda
this
way
is
that
it's
a
three-year
agreement
each
year
was
a
million
dollars
and
by
giving
them
the
additional
thirty
thousand,
it
now
increases
to
the
3.25
million
marks.
So
it
does
require
majority
vote.
C
D
Our
funds
are
always
reimbursable
funds,
so
this
was
additional
funding
that
came
down.
I
applaud,
K
on
and
her
team
when
they
do
a
good
job.
The
feds
like
to
give
additional
money,
which
then
obviously
means
more
work
to
push
that
money
out.
But
this
is
the
third
year
of
the
agreement.
So
we've
already
allocated
those
first
two
years,
and
this
would
be
an
additional
thirty
thousand
perfect.
C
D
E
D
B
C
C
F
Department,
if
you
will,
with.
G
F
A
F
This
this
is
a
the
plant
can't
run
without
a
place
to
dispose
of
the
Ash
and
and
that's
what
we're
looking
for.
I
I
can.
C
B
A
Morris
Massey
legal
department,
Mr
Shelby
and
I
attended
a
meeting
of
the
citizens
budget
and
finance
committee
last
Friday
and
we
discussed
the
current
rules
and
that
pertain
to
them
by
city
council.
A
Marty
Mr,
Shelby
and
I
worked
on
a
draft
resolution
to
incorporate
their
comments
and
where
he's
handing
it
out
for
your
review
since
we
didn't
get
it
to
you
until
today,
we're
not
asking
that
you
approved
the
resolution
today,
but
just
to
take
a
look
at
it
and
if
you
think,
if
you
have
any
comments
or
questions,
were
both
available
to
answer
them
or
make
changes
to
the
resolution,
if
you
so,
if
you
think
we
need
to
make
some
changes
in
fact,
there's
a
a
blank
there
for
councilman
Goods
appointee
to
the
committee,
since
Mr
Johnson
resigned,
effective,
October
1st,
so
we
will
be
in
a
position
if,
after
we
get
your
questions
or
comments
and
get
those
answered
or
incorporated
into
this,
to
bring
it
back
to
you
for
adoption,
this
will
just
re-adopt
and
Toto
and
total
in
totality
all
the
rules
that
would
be
applicable
to
this
committee.
D
Weren't
hurt,
would
you
want
to
come
back
in
two
weeks
for
this?
That's.
G
If
I
can
yeah
Martin,
Shelby
city,
council
attorney
and
I
want
to
thank
Mr
Massey
for
all
the
work
that
he's
put
in
on
this
and
and
I
appreciate
all
his
all
his
efforts
I
did
attend
with
Mr
Massey
the
meeting
this
past
Friday.
G
It
was
I
thought
a
a
very
productive
meeting
they've.
The
committee
is
working
closely
with
Mr
Perry,
the
budget
officer
working
out
a
work
plan
for
the
coming
year,
they're
going
to
be
meeting
on
a
monthly
basis
and
I'm
I'm
very
happy
to
see
that.
Thank
you
for
all
the
work
that
you've
done
and
also
that
this
is
going
to
be
certainly
on
track.
A
E
A
G
Should
I
should
also
point
out
that
they
did
actually
review
the
purpose
of
the
committee
and
the
committee's
decision?
You
will
be
if
you
wish
to
see
the
minutes
they
haven't
been
prepared
yet,
but
the
purpose
is
unchanged
from
the
previous
two
ordinances.
Is
that
correct
the
resolutions.
C
C
H
And
before
Mr
chairman
may,
I
say
some
things:
councilman
Viera.
Thank
you
very
much,
sir
I
I.
We
have
some
really
good
people
coming
up
to
to
speak
on
something
that
is.
That
is
a
really
big
deal
for
our
city
of
Tampa.
H
It's
going
to
be
50
years,
since
we
hired
our
first
Tampa
police
officer
who
was
a
woman,
and
that
was
the
late
Lenora
booth
and
there's
some
I
have
Mr
Brian
Sullivan,
putting
up
a
couple
of
pictures,
there's
Lenora
Booth
when
she
was
sworn
in
and
there's
a
picture
of
her
also
in
about
73
or
74.
So
it's
something
that's
so
important.
You
know
today
and
and
Clara
Reynolds
with
the
crisis
center.
H
H
It
continues
to
go
up
inch
up
little
by
little
by
little,
but
here
in
Tampa
we
have
our
our
Pioneer
of
Officer
booth
and
for
me,
when
I
saw
this
that
we
were
going
to
have
the
50-year
Mark
I
wanted
to
do
a
memorial
on
this
centering
on
not
just
on
Lenora
Booth,
but
on
others
who
have
come
after
her
in
in
different
areas:
Etc,
first
African-American,
female
officer,
our
first
Latina
female
officer,
etc,
etc.
For
me,
this
is
about
respect
for
law
enforcement
officers.
H
Now
it's
it
I
I
did
some
research
in
Claire
and
I
talked
about
this
for
for
Lenora
Booth,
who
would
become
the
first
woman
to
serve
as
the
Tampa
police
officer
at
the
age
of
24
she's,
a
USF
graduate
would
major
in
Psychology
see
what
served
for
12
years
as
a
Tampa
police
officer
and
investigate
sex
crimes
against
children,
become
a
detective
and
was
promoted
to
his
sergeant
in
April
of
1982..
H
She
was
adamant
that
she
had
not
apply
to
become
a
Pioneer,
but
she
happened
to
be
a
Pioneer
right
by
virtue
of
of
what
she
did.
She
took
on
many
high-profile
arrests
in
cases
all
of
which
she
was
a
protector
for
people
who
needed
protecting
she
protected
the
community
from
drugs.
She
protected
the
community
from
sex
offenders
and
other
people
than
rapists
Etc,
some
of
them
more
high
profile
cases
included
1974
when
she
arrested
a
17
year
old,
near
Blake,
High
School
for
raping
a
14
year
old.
H
A
very
difficult
case
to
take
on
in
1978
I
was
talking
to
Clara
about
this.
She
had
a
very
interesting
case
where
she
and
another
officer
dodged
an
ambush.
It
appears
by
a
narcisco
junior
Alvarez.
They
had
gone
undercover
as
part
of
vice
and
purchased
in
1978,
360
thousand
dollars
worth
of
cocaine.
So
that's
that's
a
lot
of
money,
that's
a
lot
of
money
and
as
apparently
they
were
leaving
the
scene.
I.
Guess
the
the
drug
dealer
said
hey.
H
H
J
K
H
Disproportionately
affects
women.
Obviously
she
was
also
a
Pioneer
major
Williams
who
would
suffer
at
1993.
She
told
a
reporter
she
suffered
from
sexual
harassment
and-
and
she
was
public
about
the
journey
that
she
would
take,
which
many
many
women
and,
of
course
took
in
October
of
2009
Jane
Castor
would
become
Tampa's
first
female
chief
of
police.
So
what
what
I
want
to
see
out
of
this
and
we've
talked
about?
H
This
is
a
memorial
to
those
women
police
officers
who
have
served
over
the
last
50
years,
many
of
the
other
firsts,
but
with
a
real
Central
emphasis
on
Lenora
Booth,
who
is
our
our
true
Pioneer
and
our
Tampa
hero
and
and
we
we
love
her.
We
love
her
memory
and
we
love
her
daughter
Claire.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Mr
chair
foreign.
L
I
am
so
grateful
and
so
appreciative
for
this
opportunity
on
behalf
of
my
mother,
who.
M
M
I
N
Here,
on
behalf
of
the
police
department,
I
appreciate
councilman,
Vera
and
Council
support
of
this
wonderful
idea.
I
have
been
in
contact
with
Ms
Reynolds,
as
well
as
other
members
of
the
Tampa
Police
Department
and
the
community,
and
we're
going
to
come
up
with
something
that
is
appropriate
to
memorialize
officer
Booth,
as
well
as
every
single
Tampa
police
officer
who's
been
an
outstanding
officer
and
a
woman
over
the
last
50
years.
N
We've
got
plenty,
as
you
all
saw
this
morning,
we'll
set
a
date
in
March,
which
is
women's
history
month
and
I.
Can,
if
you'd
like
to
come
back
before
then,
to
give
you
some
more
details
where
and
essentially
in
the
initial
discussions
about
a
fitting
and
suitable
memorial.
For
this
occasion.
H
N
Just
Captain
Kimberly
Hill
I'm
over
the
support
services
Bureau
here
on
behalf
of
Chief
O'connor,
who
is
so
passionate
about
this,
so
thank
you
to
all
of
you.
This
is
such
an
honor
and
we're
really
excited
about
it.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
H
You
we
appreciate
your
time,
thank
you
and
and
if
I'm
and
if
I
may
one
last
thing
I
also
want
to
acknowledge
I
know
we
have
some
folks
here
because
you
serve.
We
are
the
executive
director
right
of
the
crisis
center
and
we
have
two
other
folks
from
the
crisis
that
are
going
to
embarrass
them
if
they
wanted
to
come
up
and
introduce
themselves,
please
if
y'all
want.
H
You
Council,
thank
you
appreciate
it
very
much,
thank
you
and
if
I
may
Mr
chairman
motion
for
that,
is
that
okay
to
come
back
in,
let's
see
January
fifth
of
2023.,
we.
C
C
H
I
O
Yes,
I'll
see
a
win
administrative
neighborhood
and
Community
Affairs
Council.
You
ask
us
to
come
before
you
to
present
an
anti-littering
campaign
and
I
have
what
I
want
to
do
is
take
you
back
a
little
bit
before
I
show
you
what
we
have
to
show.
You
is
that
over
a
year
ago,
you
asked
us
there
were
questions
pertaining
to
signage
with
litter.
Then
we
went
from
the
can
we
have
a
450
or
500.50
fine
with
the
littering
and
then
from
there.
O
We
move
forward
to
several
months
ago,
where
you
asked
for
us
to
have
an
education
and
awareness
campaign
for
littering
as
well.
So
what
I'm
presenting
before
you
today
is
my
presentation
or
a
video
that
we
have
for
on
our
littering
campaign.
That
I
would
like
to
share
and
then
I'll
hit
item
number
35..
So
if
the
cttd
team,
if
you
can
queue
up
that
to.
E
H
H
D
O
In
addition
to
that,
we
I
would
like
just
to
highlight
the
partnership
that
we
have
and
continue
to
have,
with
a
keep
Tampa
Bay
beautiful.
Over
the
last
fiscal
year
we
have
removed
almost
260
000
pounds
of
litter
and
debris.
We
removed
almost
1500
pounds
of
invasive
species
as
well
as
administered
62
adoption
contracts.
Now
these
adoption
contracts.
These
are
the
contracts
where
you
see
groups
adopting
an
area,
so
these
groups
commit
to
four
cleanups
a
year
and
the
specific
areas
that
they
have
actually
adopted.
O
Additionally,
with
the
litter
skimmer,
the
amount
of
debris
that
we
have
removed
from
our
waterways
has
been
over.
The
last
quarter
over
the
last
quarter,
from
July
to
the
beginning
of
October
has
been
16
000
pounds.
So
we
will
continue
these
campaigns,
but
we're
moving
it
more
from
just
a
city
hall,
Centric,
Focus
education
and
cleanup
process
and
moving
it
more
into
the
communities
and
what
I
mean
by
that
is
that
we
will
be
using
our
neighborhood
associations
to
be
to
form
a
littering
task
force.
O
So
through
director
magell
Janelle
McGregor's
office,
we
will
have
those
touch
points
in
those
neighborhood
associations
and
getting
getting
the
neighborhoods
getting
the
public
involved
in
the
literal
and
the
campaigns
as
well.
E
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
information
and
for
the
video
everybody
that
that
was
a
part
of
making
that
it's
very,
very
good
and
what
I
do
like
is
it
links
to
a
website
that
shows
you
per
statute
or
per
the
code,
how
the
fines
accrue,
or
you
know
what
happens
first.
Second,
third
time,
offense
I
think
it's
great
I
I,
look
forward
to
sharing
this
on
social
media
and
get
people
more
involved.
E
E
One
who
was
here
this
morning
who
goes
up
and
down
the
river
picking
up
trash
in
his
kayak
or
goes
out
with
other
organizations
and
they'll,
take
a
mild
stretch
of
road
and
they're
picking
up
trash
on
wherever
they're
at,
but
they
are
very
proactive
in
doing
that.
So
again,
I
look
forward
to
sharing
this
on
social
media
and
I
and
I
appreciate
account
for
supporting
this
and
and
making
this
happen,
because
we
have
a
serious
lettering
situation
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
also
and
I'm
sure
you're
going
to
go
into
this.
E
But
item
number
35
Regarding
why
we
have
to
spend
a
hundred
dollars
why
we
are
asked
to
spend
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
with
an
outside
firm
and
the
reason
I
said
before
you
begin
is
I
am
fully
confident
and
I
know
that
we
have
the
best
and
the
brightest
in
the
city
of
Tampa
that
why
do
we
need
to
go
outside
when
the
best
people
are
already
here?
So
I'll?
Stop
there.
O
Yes,
sir,
and
while
we're
still
on
number
24,
if
I
would
like
to
make
sure.
O
Item
number
35
is
part
of
a
grant
and
EPA
Grant
500,
000,
Grant
and
part
of
the
grant
was
a
carve
out
that
will
provide
the
educational
program
for
the
transfer.
The
trash
free,
Bay
case
study,
so
the
EPA
has
tasks
the
awardees
with
identifying
those
areas
within
the
city
that
were
our
sore
spots,
our
collection
areas
for
debris.
Once
those
areas
are
identified,
then
the
next
step
is
to
do
an
education
campaign
around
those
actual
areas.
So
this
is
part
of
a
a
grant.
O
A
EPA
Grant
is
not
directly
City
funds
that
actually
be
going
that
are
used
for
this
project.
There
was
a
question
this
morning
about
the
the
person
who's
actually
providing
the
work
not
being
part
of
the
the
city
of
Tampa,
with
not
being
part
of
our
community.
The
woman
who
actually
won
the
grant
is
Evo
City
woman
owned
certified
and
is
a
local
within
the
city
of
Tampa.
O
Odessa,
the
first
in
Odessa,
okay
and
and
she
actually
has
a
little
the
local
area
here
office
here
on
Kennedy.
E
Thank
you
very
much
again.
I
look
forward
to
sharing
this
with
the
with
the
public
on
social
media.
I
know
the
comments
are
going
to
be
well
there's
trash
here
right
now,
I
want
to
come,
get
it
well,
you
know
nobody's
ever
happy,
but
at
least
we're
moving
forward
with
something
I
think,
as
councilwoman
hertek
mentioned,
when
we
were
making
these
motions
back,
I
think
in
July,
28th
or
even
before,
an
education
campaign
before
we
went
straight
into
enforcement.
E
So
that
was
a
wonderful
suggestion
by
her
that
we're
doing-
and
you
know,
and
our
star
councilman
Miranda-
that
was
great
in
the
video
that
was.
They
know
that
I
pick
up
my
garbage,
that's
right,
so
thank
you,
sir.
Thank.
D
I
love
the
idea
of
a
campaign,
I
love
that,
but
this
is
the
slogan.
Just
isn't
very
memorable
like
how
many
of
you
went
to
to
University
of
Florida
anybody?
Okay,
it's
keep
it
in
the
can
get
her
fan.
I
mean
like
it's
something
that
you
will
always
remember
and
I.
Don't
I
can't
remember
the
slogan
already
I'm
concerned
about
that,
because
it
needs
to
be
catchy.
It
needs
to
be
something
that
people
are
going
to
remember
and
I
hate
to
say,
make
it
rhyme,
but
really
make
it
rhyme
it
no
seriously.
D
That's
how
put
it
in
the
can
Gator
fan
and
now
that
they
recycle
it's
put
it
in
the
can
Greener
Gator
fan,
so
they
can.
They
can
feed
on
that,
and
it's
it's
just
one
of
those
things
that
if
you
want
to
get
people
really
involved,
you
kind
of
have
to
make
it
more
catchy,
and
so
I
would
encourage
that.
D
I
would
also
encourage
number
35
before
we
go
ahead
and
do
that
to
start
your
groups
to
start
your
community
engagement
with
the
neighborhoods,
because,
as
Mr
hatch
mentioned
this
morning,
he
can
tell
you
exactly
where
the
trash
is,
and
so
before
we
spend
this
hundred
thousand
dollars,
see
what
the
community
has
to
say
and
I
would
have
recommended
the
same
thing
before
really
rolling
out
this
entire
thing.
D
Just
to
talk
to
the
community
and
make
sure
that
this
kind
of
I
mean
it's,
it's
I
mean
I,
actually
love
the
the
skull
and
crossbones
can
we
can
we
come
up
with
a
slogan
that
that
centers
around
that
I,
don't
I
mean
the
first
thing
comes
to
mind.
Is
Tampa
isn't
trashy,
but
that's
not
a
that's,
probably
not
a
good
one,
so
that
can
be
for
that
can
be
perceived
in
many
ways,
but
just
something.
That's
just
a
little
more
I
don't
know
just.
D
Yeah
I
I
think
that
would
really
help
because,
like
I
said
once
once
this
got
out,
I
got
multiple
emails
last
night
saying
no,
we
should
do
this.
We
should
do
that.
So
believe
me,
the
community
has
opinions
and
I
think
they
could
do
an
awesome
job
with
that
and
I
love
the
energy
behind
it.
I
just
think
we
need
a
little
bit
more
to
to
make
it
really
sing.
Yes,.
O
K
You
know
my
my
other
job
is
his
marketing
communication
branding
anything
it's
same.
You,
you
didn't
go
through
this
process
rather,
but
the
same
thing
with
the
CRA
logo.
Any
any
creative
should
have
a
brief.
That's
based
on
the
strategy
that's
being
used,
and
in
this
case
it's
it's.
It
comes
under
a
lot
of
headings,
but
but
one
of
them
is
social
marketing
or
behavioral
change,
communication
and
and
there's
a
lot
of
science
behind
it.
K
I'm
sure,
there's
I
haven't
researched
this
particular
topic,
but
there's
got
to
be
a
lot
of
science
behind
getting
people
to
helping
people
to
understand
that
they
need
to
act
on
it,
because
really
it's
not
just
whether
somebody
remembers
it
whether
they
actually
put
the
garbage
in
the
trash
can
or
whatever
it.
If,
whatever
the
creative
is.
If
you
all
come
back,
it
would
be
good
to
know
what
the
what
the
Behavioral
Science
was
behind
it.
K
For
example,
the
logo
I
assume
that
that
that
that
that's
based
on
some
Behavioral
Science
that
says
you
want
to
equate
trash
with
poison
or
something
that's
dangerous.
So
if
it,
if
it's
somebody
trying
to
quit
it
with
a
box
or
some
kind
of
Tampa
pirate
thing,
that's
a
different,
but
it
would
be
if
we
knew
the
science
behind
it,
then
it
wouldn't
make
the
the
review
of
it
potentially
subjective
and
and
ultimately
we'll
see
whether
people
acted
on
it
or
not.
A
Good
afternoon
Council
McLean
Evans
assistant,
City
attorney
on
item
number
35.
I,
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
that
500
000
Grant
was
approved
for
acceptance
by
Council
in
March.
It
is
a
three-year
timeline,
if
not
spent
by
the
end
of
2024,
we
lose
it.
It
has
specific
deliverables
that
have
to
be
met
because
of
needing
council's
approval.
The
bid
process,
selecting
a
vendor
where
I
just
want
to
make.
You
aware
there
is
a
timeline,
and
if
we
don't
meet
it,
we
are
potentially
in
breach
of
our
agreement
with
the
EPA.
C
Well,
I
was
going
since
that
is
councilwoman.
Her
tax
committee
I
was
going
to
ask
her
if
she
would
like
to
make
the
motion
or
save
it
with
her
her
items
that
she
will
be
moving
later
on.
C
I
D
Again,
I
would
really
love
for
for
you
to
get
the
process
started
with
neighborhood
involvement
before
coming
up
with
with
a
plan,
because
if
we
come
up
with
a
plan,
it
doesn't
matter
when
the
deadline
is
we're.
Just
spending
money
to
spend
money
and
I
would
really
prefer
that
the
community
be
a
part
of
that,
because,
if
I
mean
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
a
trash
campaign
can
go
far.
D
But
if
we
don't
have
the
community's
input,
then
so,
if
we
could
possibly
bring
that
back
in
February,
is
that
enough
time
to
probably
get
something
started?
Oh.
A
The
grant
has
all
right,
McLean,
Evans
assistant,
City
attorney.
It
has
quarterly
reporting
to
the
federal
government
and
so
for
the
first
three
quarters
at
this
point.
It's
been
nothing,
nothing,
nothing
when
there
was
supposed
to
be
deliverables,
and
this
first
hundred
thousand
dollars
is
for
the
assessment.
My
understanding
is
I'm.
A
Not
the
expert
in
this
I
just
happen
to
be
the
only
one
available
it's
for
assessment
of
existing
data
from
Dot
and
keep
the
rivers,
beautiful
and
other
sorts
of
sources
that
already
have
data
on
on
on
the
origination
of
trash,
so
that
they
can
Target
the
sources
and
then
there
are
I
would
encourage
you
to
read
the
details
of
the
Grant
and
the
resolution
from
March
3rd.
It
was
also
included
as
backup,
but
it
has
Outreach,
for
example,
I
believe,
like
600
contacts
or
something
by
the
close
of
the
grant.
A
I
I
understand
that
and
I'm
not
an
expert
in
none
of
this
stuff,
but
and
I'm
not
criticizing.
What's
here
now,
but
I
think
you
got
to
throw
with
a
can
and
a
paper
and
all
of
a
sudden,
you
see
an
image
of
a
mountain
made
of
track
trash
paper
and
cans
and
said
you
know
whatever
you
want
to
say,
but
you
got
to
have
it
related
to
something
and
the
public.
Today,
that's
less
patient
America
everything
is
free,
including
throwing
your
fresh,
your
trash
away.
That's
how
it
looks.
I
I
mean
you
know,
no
matter
what
tree
you
take
in
the
whole
country,
not
only
here
you're
going
to
find
that
all
over
and
the
highways
I
only
drive
a
little
bit
from
Armenia
downtown
and
every
other
day
you
see
a
sweeper
keeping
up
the
side
of
the
road,
because
people
throw
everything
out
the
window
and
it's
a
habit.
It's
a
disease.
D
C
Your
other
motions
for
your
committee
miss
when
you
did
say
an
acronym
that
I
really
needs
to
be
brought
to
the
table
fdot.
Yes,
some
of
the
places
in
this
town
that
have
the
largest
accumulations
of
trash
or
a
long
entrance
and
exit
ramps.
Now
I,
don't
know
whether
people
are
throwing
it
out
their
window
as
they're
driving
down
the
interstate
or
people
are
walking
by
and
just
Trump
I
haven't
seen
that
much
garbage
in
one
spot,
then,
along
our
entrance
and
exits.
I
know
that
there
are
companies
that
the
fdot
contracts-
yes,.
O
C
C
We're
down
down
to
agenda
item
number
28
I
believe
is
that
correct.
23.,
I
I
am
sorry
agenda
item
number
23.,
CM,
22-77,
617.
D
G
Shelby
city,
council
attorney
and
first
of
all,
this
was
a
real
effort
on
the
part
of
the
clerk
and
I
want
to
thank
carencia
sagala
and
the
city
clerk
Shirley,
Fox
Knowles
for
the
efforts
they
put
in
every
council
member
should
have
gotten
a
binder
that
gives
you
the
information
that
has
been
requested
to
you
I
appreciate
that
they
also
did
something
that
I
asked
them
to
do
on
the
basis
of
something
that
I
pulled
from
my
files,
which
is
18
years
old,
I'm,
going
to
show
it
to
you
right
now.
G
You
can
see
Pam
maorio
is
the
mayor.
It
stated
August
26th
of
2004.
per
your
request.
I
have
researched
my
records
from
Shirley
Fox
Knowles,
the
city
clerk
at
the
time,
who
is
our
city
clerk
today
regarding
amendments
that
have
been
made
to
the
Charter
of
the
city
of
Tampa
for
the
period
from
January
26
1989
through
September
12
2002,
and
is
also
attached
each
ordinance
to
that
and
I'd
like
to
just
be
able
to
pass
that
out.
G
Thank
you
and
the
reason
I'm
bringing
that
to
your
attention
is
it's
because
it's
very
instructive,
because
there
was
talk
about
relying
solely
on
the
charter
review
commission,
which
was
not
created
until
the
voters
accepted
that
on
the
ballot
which
was
placed
there
by
the
city
council
at
the
time
for
them
to
decide
whether
to
adopt
the
concept
of
a
charter,
review,
commission
and
one
of
the
major
goals
of
having
a
charter
review
commission
is
to
put
within
the
charter
a
provision
that
allows
for
periodic
reviews,
but
that
doesn't
bar
you
under
the
charter
or
state
statute
from
passing
ordinances
at
any
time
during
a
an
election
or
a
special
election.
G
If
you
want
to
send
it
to
be
able
to
put
before
the
voters
a
question
to
amend
the
charter,
particularly
if
it's
something
that
is
pressing,
something
that
is
needed
and
something
that
you
as
city
council
want
to
be
able
to
put
in
front
of
the
voters
to
amend
the
charter.
So
it's
a
fascinating
discussion.
G
It
shows
the
ordinance
number
the
description
whether
it
was
adopted
by
when
it
was
adopted
by
the
council,
the
date
the
election
was
held
and
the
vote
and
actually
Council.
When
you
look
through
it,
some
of
them
were
undefeated
and,
frankly,
I
believe
there
was
at
least
one
of
them
that
was
vetoed
by
the
mayor.
So
the
fact
is,
there
are
a
lot
of
checks
and
balances
in
the
system,
but
every
Charter
Amendment
up
until
this
point
to
the
creation
of
the
Charter
review.
G
Commission
went
before
the
voters
by
ordinance
of
this
board,
so
I
just
wanted
that
to
be
made
clear
and
for
you
to
have
the
benefit
of
seeing
what
previous
City
councils
had
done,
what
they
brought
before
the
voters
and
what
the
the
result
was.
So
thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
that
and
by
the
way
I
did
forward
a
copy
of
this
to
the
City
attorney
as
well.
Marnie.
K
Could
you
please
email
it
to
us,
so
see
it
just
so.
We
have
electronically.
K
The
other
thing
is,
there
was
some
when
we
were
talking
about
the
charter.
The
last
time
we
were
supposed
to
modify
the
charter.
There
was
some
feedback
from
the
community.
I
think
somebody
messaged
this,
but
they
said
you
need
to
follow
the
process
and
and
the
charter
review
commission
is
the
process.
K
Well,
the
charter
clearly
says
there
are
two
options
to
modify
the
charter
city
council
can
do
it
and
we
happen
to
have
a
lot
of
experience
from
the
charter
review
Commission
on
here,
and
the
other
way
is
the
charter,
the
the
charter
review
commission,
which
which
we,
as
a
charter
review
commission,
put
in
the
charter
with
the
voters,
but
in
either
of
those
choices,
even
if,
even
if,
when
we
meet
in
our
Workshop,
even
if
we
suggest
following
the
charter,
even
if
city
council
suggests
modifying
the
charter,
it
still
has
to
go
to
the
voters.
K
The
voters
ultimately
have
to
decide
what
to
do,
but
there's
a
third
way
that
the
charter
has
been
modified
and
I
would
just
ask
all
of
you
all
to
be
aware
of
it,
and
it
is
through
the
opinions
of
City
attorneys.
K
We
have
City
Council
on
the
charter
review.
Commission
have
to
go
to
the
voters
to
get
to
get
the
charter
changed,
but
we've
seen
opinions
by
former
city
attorneys
that
radically
change
the
charter.
One
of
them
is
the
one
that
says
that
the
legal
department
has
the
right
to
settle.
Lawsuits,
approve
the
contract
of
a
lawsuit
and
then
pay
it
without
city
council
approval.
Clearly
I've
had
other
attorneys.
Clearly,
that's
not
accurate.
It's
not
what
the
charter
says.
K
Another
one
is
that
only
the
mayor
has
the
right
to
to
name
buildings,
and
there
are
others,
and
the
legal
department
is
relying
on
those
opinions
as
if
they
were
from
a
judge,
as
I
said
this
morning.
If
we,
if
we,
if
we
have
a
disagreement
with
with
the
legal
department,
is
our
legal
team
and
if
you
hire
a
lawyer
on
your
own,
you
can
you
can
challenge
them,
you
can
talk
to
them.
You
can
ask
them
questions.
K
We
that
this
city
has
acted.
A
lot
like
the
legal
department
is
the
judicial
branch
of
the
city,
and
it
isn't.
It
is
the
legal
they're,
the
legal
advisors,
the
our
only
choices
are
to
go
to
outside
attorney,
which
which
nobody
trusts,
because
because
of
the
way
it's
handled,
we
could
go
to
a
judge
which
really
requires
a
lawsuit
or
you
could
go
to
the
attorney
general
or
some
other
third
party,
and
so
my
my
point
is
not
to
review
all
the
cases
right
now
and
I.
K
Don't
want
to
review
that
case,
but
the
the
point
is
for
my
colleagues
to
please
pay
attention
because
we
not
only
have
to
look
at
potentially
modifying
the
charter.
We've
got
to
clean
up
some
of
these
opinions
that
are
sitting
out
there
that
change
the
charter
without
voter
approval.
They
change
the
charter
with
one
or
two
paragraphs
by
a
City
attorney.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you
absolutely
I.
Thank
you.
Mr
chair,
yeah
I
mean
I
I
have
philosophically
no
problem
with
the
city
council
seeking
to
amend
the
charter
through
voters.
I,
don't
have
any
problem
philosophically
with
that
I
I
think
we
have
to
be
careful
not
to
you
know,
do
it
without
much
in
in
a
way
that
is
reactive
and
without
the
contemplation
Etc
there's
some
folks
who
go
no
Charter
amendments
outside
of
the
every
10-year
processor.
Or
what
have
you
I?
Don't
agree
with
that?
I!
Don't
think!
H
That's
the
the
reasonable
way
to
go
forward.
I
do
think
there
are
some
proposed
ones
that
either
Merit
serious
consideration
or
that
that
I
would
support.
I
talked
about
one,
for
example,
patterned
after
the
27th
Amendment,
but
we
have
to
be
very
careful
in
terms
of
finding
you
know
one
situation
that
that
may
be
interpreted
one
way
or
the
other
and
using
it
to
fundamentally
change
our
Charter
provision
in
within
our
Charter
I.
Don't
believe
a
lot.
A
lot
of
people
say
our
city
of
Tampa
charter.
That's
like
the
Constitution.
No,
it's
not!
H
It
is
our
constitution,
but
it's
not
to
be
given
deference.
Like
the
United
States
Constitution
from
1787,
it's
not,
we
can
amend
it
right,
that's
totally
fine
and
we
can
liberally
amend
it
if
we
want
through
specific
Provisions.
However,
it's
it's
something
that's
to
be
done
with
with
some
care
and
consideration
Etc,
so
I
wouldn't
favor,
going
out
there
liberally
and
in
going
forward,
but
I'm
not
opposed
to
amending
it
on
specific
limited
Provisions.
We
just
need
to
give
it
due
thought
in
consideration.
Thank
you.
Anyone.
E
Shelby
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
for
this
information
because
it's
fascinating
to
see
you
know
the
history
going
back
to
I,
think
1989,
1990
or
so,
and
the
changes
that
were
attempted
and
the
changes
that
or
the
Amendments
that
were
were
passed
or
not
passed
or
vetoed.
And
you
know
just
from
my
own
personal
knowledge,
I
appreciate
it.
E
It's
something
that
I
never
thought
of,
because
we
looked
at
the
1970s
Charter
and
then
the
charter
review
commission
that
that
came
aboard
and
the
changes
that
were
made
but
I
never
really
studied
the
in-between.
So
I
appreciate
the
information.
Thank
you.
Councilman.
Q
This
council
is
empowered
to
do
a
job.
We
are
the
legislative
branch
of
government
as
a
person
who
set
on
the
charter
review.
We
didn't
agree
on
everything
we
came
to
compromise,
but
when
I
look
back
on
those
days
that
I
sat
on
there
and
I
read
now
and
I
always
refer
to
that
one
day
me
and
Miss
hertech
was
right
next
to
each
other
and
when
one
of
the
River
just
was
red,
I
was
like
I.
Q
Didn't
remember
that
you
recall
that
I
said
I,
don't
remember
us
saying
that
or
whatever
and
and
but
again
you
you're
new,
so
you
go
along
to
get
along
because
you
said
well,
you
don't
want
to
write.
You
know
what
maybe
we
did
it
didn't,
but
my
mom's
like
that's,
not
what
we
said
we
wanted
to
do,
but
now
actually
sitting
in
position
here
and
sometimes
you're
when
you're
involved.
Q
It's
your
best
teacher,
because
now
you
have
that
experience
and
now
I've
had
the
experience
of
sitting
here
and
seeing
some
of
the
things
that
come
before
us
and
in
some
of
the
opinions
I'm
like
and
some
of
the
unclarity
sometimes
and
some
of
one's
opinion.
Well,
that's
your
opinion.
I
have
a
problem
with
that
opinion.
Q
This
is
where
the
arguments
come
in
and
infighting
comes
in
because
we
don't
have
a
true
balance
of
the
power.
There's
two
forms
of
government
here,
so
I'm
informed
in
favor
of
looking
at
some
of
the
things
that
have
been
going
on
going
on
our
four
years.
That
I
believe
need
to
be
looked
at,
need
to
be
tweaked
because
the
voters
have
questioned
as
well.
Q
So
there
are
a
couple
of
things:
Mr
Shelby,
you
know,
I've,
had
you
written
two
or
three
things
down
that
I'm
serious
about
looking
concerning
to
talk
with
this
counselor
when
it
comes
to
our
Workshop
to
making
sure
those
go
to
the
voters,
because
we
have
to
look
how
we're
running
and
sitting
and
making
sure
that
what
we
say
it's
right
and
what
the
charter
says
is
right
and
not
of
one's
opinion
or
interpretation.
G
G
C
G
Q
Mr
chairman
Shelby,
in
reference
to
the
workshop,
have
you
employed
that
individual
still
or
that
person
going
to
be
coming
on
board
or
is
how
is
that
going
to
operate?
Well.
G
G
Person
is
available
for
November
1st.
That
person
was
originally
contracted
from
nine
to
noon.
If
you
want
that,
person
to
stay
the
entire
day
would
cost
an
additional
sixteen
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
they're
ready
for
Council
to
say
how
they
want
to
go
whether
they
want
them
for
the
morning
whether
they
want
them
for
the
whole
day
or
if
it's
council's
decision
to
not
have
it
I
would
have
to
inform
them
and
we'd
have
to
negotiate
how
much
money
has
been
spent.
Thus
far
on
preparation
for
the
workshop.
Q
If
you
you
have
this
information,
you
need
to
get
that
to
us,
so
we
can
act
upon
it.
If
we
have
this
person,
sixteen
hundred
dollars
ain't,
no
money
amount
of
money
we
spend
in
the
city.
So
so,
if
it
needs
to
be
done,
you
need
to
let
us
know.
This
is
your
recommendation,
so
we
can
vote
up
or
down
and
move
forward.
G
Well,
sir
I
have
to
share
with
you
that
I
just
literally
found
this
out
yesterday
and
I
told
them
that
I
would
have
an
answer
for
them
by
the
end
of
this
meeting
today
and
I
was
going
to
bring
it
up
under
a
new
business,
so
you
can
either
decide
it
now
or
you
can
decide
it
later
and
move
along
with
the
public
business.
Your
call.
K
G
My
recommendation
is
for
you
to
decide
whether
you
want
it
from
nine
to
noon
and
if
so,
you
can
have
the
facilitator
for
the
price.
That's
already
been
negotiated.
If
you
want
to
have
that
person
available
for
the
whole
day,
if
you
think
it'll
take
the
whole
day
that
personal
cost
an
extra
16.50,
it's
council's
pleasure.
This
is
not
my
and
the
reason.
One
of
the
reasons
Mr
councilman
goes.
One
of
the
reasons
that
I
was
in
favor
of
a
facilitator
is
Because.
Q
This
lady
who's
going
to
do
a
job
I'm
going
to
pay
her
for
the
whole
day.
Why
won't
people
have
a
day?
You
don't
know
how
long
it
may
take
us
we're
talking
about
the
charter
here
so
I
mean
my
recommendation
or
my
motion
would
be
to
go
ahead
and
go
ahead
and
have
this
lady
secure
for
the
whole
day.
We
have
her
ready.
We
move
on
God's.
H
We
want
to
have
a
meeting
on
this
very
passionate
subject
that
is
run
is
as
efficiently
as
possible
and
not
have
it
on
on
our
chair
to
who
does
a
fine
job
by
the
way,
but
in
other
words,
put
a
lot
of
pressure
on
any
chair.
Whether
any
of
us
are
to
do
that,
I
think
to
give
it
to
another
person,
who's
being
paid
by
the
hour.
I
think
is
a
smart
idea.
That's
just
that's
just
my
opinion.
I
think
it's
good
Cosby
Carlson.
K
Yeah
it
the
last
time
we
talked
about
this
I
proposed
a
process
which
I
think
we
voted
into
being
part
of
that
I
would
suggest
that
we
give
that
process
to
the
facilitator
and
I.
Don't
know
this
facilitator,
but
some
facilitators
try
to
do
lots
of
fancy
things
to
try
to
do
team
building
and
all
kinds
of
stuff.
This
needs
to
be
a
very
efficient
process
where
I
think
we.
K
What
we
agreed
was
that
each
of
us
will
present
an
idea,
we'll
discuss
it
briefly
and
then
we'll
vote
it
up
or
down,
and
we
also
said
that
in
this
case
it
would
need
Super
majority,
because
it
would
have
to
be
veto
proof
and
that's
the
same
thing
that
the
city
council
did
last
time
so
I
I
would
suggest
that
we
give
that
process
to
the
facilitator
and
then,
let's,
let's
say
we
want
to
give
everybody
a
chance
to
talk,
but
it
should
go
fast.
It
shouldn't
have
any
kind
of
extraneous
stuff,
councilman.
D
H
A
D
Other
then
it
well,
but
if
it
comes
back
to
us
then
then
we
can
make
that
determination.
But
I
still
think
four
to
three
is
is
a
pretty
good
measure.
It
still
shows
a
majority
support
from
the
council,
but
I.
That's
what
that's
the
only
change
I
would
make,
but
I
wholeheartedly
agree.
Let's
just
have
her
all
day.
G
May
I
address
that
very
thank
you
may
address
that
very
briefly,
for
artificial
action
of
counsel
requires
four
votes.
Super
majority
surely
makes
it
veto
and
sends
a
message
to
the
mayor
to
veto,
but
in
order
to
effectuate
action,
a
vote
of
four
can
still
go
to
the
mayor
and
again
the
remedy
for
the
mayor
is
provided
for
in
the
charter
and
it's
called
The
veto.
And
if
you
look
at
the
history
that
I
provided
to
you,
there
was
a
case
where
it
was
vetoed
and
that
veto
was
not
overridden.
G
K
G
Q
C
K
Yeah,
just
one
more
thing:
real
quickly:
I
mentioned
a
few
minutes
ago,
a
specific
case
about
about
the
the
the
former
city
attorney's
opinion
on
on
City
attorney,
signing
settlement
agreements
and
then
paying
them,
and
in
that
case
I
wanted
you
all
to
know.
I
talked
to
Marty
and
Ms
Zellman
about
that
the
other
day
and
I.
Don't
think
that
has
to
that's
an
example
where
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
handle
that
in
a
charter
change.
K
Instead,
what
I
proposed
is
that
we
get
a
an
ordinance
that
will
supersede
the
the
attorney's
opinion
and
and
and
that
that
it
will
be
outlined
there.
I
think
there
has
to
be
reasonable.
There
has
to
be
some
dollar
limit,
maybe
it's
50
000
or
something
like
that
under
which
the
City
attorney
can
negotiate
and
pay
out,
but
above
a
certain
amount,
the
city
council
should
maintain
its
power.
What
that
City
former
city
attorney's
opinion
does?
K
K
D
That's
just
mine
I.
This
is
a
resolution
and
I
just
wanted
to
be
able
to
read
it
publicly,
because
the
only
time
we
talked
about
it
was
at
the
end
of
a
meeting
when
no
one
was
here
so
just
before
we
vote.
D
This
is
a
resolution
recognizing
October
2022
as
domestic
violence,
Awareness
Month
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
urging
all
public
and
private
institutions
and
all
citizens
in
the
city
of
Tampa
and
the
State
of
Florida
to
support
domestic
violence
survivors
and
take
a
stand
against
all
form
of
violence
and
abuse
in
relationships
supporting
education
prevention,
Interventional
intervention
and
law
enforcement
efforts
around
domestic
violence
and
expressing
support
for
agencies,
organizations
and
individuals
who
provide
advise
advocacy
efforts,
services
and
assistance
to
victims.
D
C
B
B
K
D
I
move
items
34
through
42.,
exactly.
C
C
C
C
B
B
K
K
Q
And
it
refers
to
57-58
as
I
was
at
the
conference
last
week,
and
it's
probably
the
last
time,
I
vote
on
an
s
p,
because
the
cfp
for
cras
is
the
guiding
binding
laws
versus
an
sap.
So
we
just
wasted
a
whole
bunch
of
money
on
some
saps
that
we
should
have
never
even
had
written
from
what
I've
learned
from
the
conference.
These
Tampa
spent
over
360
thousand
dollars.
Q
It's
a
lot
of
money
that
we
could
have
used
to
go
to
the
place
or
update
to
see
it.
The
CMP
plan
that
actually
is
the
guy
who
bylaws
of
your
cras
but
I'll,
go
ahead
and
support
to
get
this
out
of
the
way
and
they've
been
waiting
a
long
time
for
their
money,
but
in
the
future,
I'll
be
very
late
to
vote
for
the
sap
foreign.
C
B
Q
B
R
C
R
This
item
number
68
is
before
you
upon
the
filing
of
an
amended
and
restated
petition
to
establish
the
k-bar
3
K
Bar
Ranch,
three
Community
Development
District.
It
was
filed
by
Cruz
and
Douglas
LLC.
R
Some
of
you
may
be
familiar
with
the
Community
Development
districts.
They
are
special
local
units
of
special
purpose
government
and
the
simplest
way
to
describe
them
is
that
they
provide
for
the
financing,
operation
and
maintenance
of
various
public
infrastructure
within
the
boundaries
of
the
district.
N
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Tucker
Matthew
I'm
with
the
law
firm
of
cruise
and
excuse
me,
I'm
with
the
law
firm
of
q-tac
rock,
representing
Cruz
and
Douglas
LLC
with
me
on.
The
phone
are
also
several
representatives
of
the
petitioner
Jessica
Mahoney
and
Tim
plate
with
height
development
as
well
excellent
job,
reviewing
the
nature
of
cdds.
Also
by
way
of
background
the
council
may
remember.
In
the
summer
you
amended
the
boundaries
of
the
kabar
ranch,
2
CDD,
to
remove
property
from
that
Community
Development
District
this.
N
That
property
is
now
proposed
to
be
included
within
this
k-bar
Ranch
3
CDD.
Overall,
the
district
is
proposing
a
total
of
66
million
dollars
in
public
improvements
to
provide
within
the
district's
boundaries.
It
consists
of
approximately
372
Acres
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Council
may
have,
and
certainly
here
to
answer
and
respond
to
public
comment
as
it's
received
any.
C
I
Improvements
said
District
to
be
located
entirely
in
the
boundaries
of
the
city
of
Tampa,
the
same
being
more
particularly
described
in
section
twos
from
here
of
pursuant
to
chapter
190,
Florida
Statutes
naming
the
district,
and
the
initial
members
of
the
District
of
Board
of
Supervisors
consented
to
the
exercise
of
certain
special
powers
by
The
District
Board
of
supervisor.
Pursuant
to
subsection,
190.012
comma,
two
parentheses,
2
Florida
statute
providing
preservability
providing
an
effective
date.
We.
B
C
C
Thank
you
agenda
item
number
69
file,
number
ta,
CPA,
22-03,.
A
Good
afternoon
or
good
afternoon,
same
Thomas
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff
item
69
is
ta-cpa
2203
a
map
of
mint
for
seven
folios,
generally
located
west
of
North
Albany
Avenue
South
of
West
North,
8th
Street
and
East
of
North
Westland
Avenue.
The
request
is
to
change
the
future
land
use
from
Community
mixes
35
to
Urban
mix
C60.
You
approve
this
amendment
at
your
hearing
on
September
22nd
and
it's
back
for
you
today
for
a
second
reading.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
available
for
questions.
Any.
S
Good
afternoon
Council
David
singer
101
East
Kennedy
here
in
Tampa,
Suite
2800..
We
rest
on
our
hearing
from
September
22nd
on
the
Planning
Commission
Amendment,
and
ask
for
your
approval
here
for
any
questions.
S
S
R
C
P
A
Thomas
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff
item
70
is
tacpa
2209
a
map
Amendment
for
multiple
folios
generally
located
Northeast
of
the
intersection
of
West
Barn
Avenue
and
South
MacDill
Avenue.
The
request
is
to
change
the
future
land
use
from
residential
10
and
residential
20
to
residential
attend.
You
approve
this
amendment
at
your
hearing,
September
22nd,
and
it's
back
for
you
today
for
your
second
reading.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
C
K
K
Council
I'm
just
available
for
questions,
I
appreciate
your
your
approval.
E
Thank
you
very
much
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
ordinance
amending
the
Imagine
2040
Tampa
conference
plan,
future
Landing
settlement,
future
Landings
map
for
the
property
located
at
6522,
65
24,
65,
26,
South,
McDowell,
Avenue
and
folio
number
is
136391.000
and
one
three
six:
three,
not
two
392.000
from
residential
R20
and
residential
attend
to
residential
r10r10,
providing
for
a
repeal
of
ordinances
in
Conflict,
providing
for
severability
providing
effectivity.
We.
A
Comments
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff-
this
is
item
71,
tacpa
2210,
a
map
Amendment
for
the
property
is
located
at
3204
and
3210
West
Cypress
Street
from
residential
20
to
community
mixes
35..
You
approve
this
amendment
after
September
22nd
hearing
it's
back
for
you
today
for
a
second
reading.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
C
H
You
councilman
Vera,
yes,
sir
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
on
second
reading
adoption,
an
ordinance
amending
the
Imagine
2040
Tampa,
comprehensive,
planned
future
Lane
view
settlement
future
Lane
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
3204
and
32
and
3210
West,
Cypress
Street
from
residential
20
or
20
to
mixed
Community,
mixed
use,
35
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
and
conflict,
providing
perceptability
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,
we.
C
You
very
much
jet
item
number
72
file,
number
ta,
CPA,
22-11,
Sam,.
A
two
Community
mixed
use:
35
and
residential
10..
You
approved
this
amendment
at
your
hearing
on
September
22nd
and
is
back
before
you
for
a
second
reading.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank.
C
R
C
Councilman
Goose,
all
in
favor,
that
was
the
girls.
C
T
C
A
C
I
You,
chairman
item
number,
73
file,
number
vac,
20-22
alerts
being
presented
for
second
reading,
an
ordinance
to
the
city
of
Tampa,
Florida,
vacating,
closing
discontinuing
and
abandoning
that
Eloise
certain
parts
of
Cypress
Street,
North,
Boulevard
and
Edison
Avenue
rights
of
way,
all
of
which
located
south
of
Arch
Street
north
of
Lemon,
Street,
West
of
North,
Boulevard
and
east
of
Delaware
Avenue.
Within
the
plan
of
knoll
subdivision
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
Hillsborough,
County
Florida
within
the
pat
of
no
subdivision
in
the
city.
I
Oh
I,
already
read
that
didn't:
I
City
of
Tampa,
Hillsborough,
County,
Florida,
more
prescribed
in
section
two
thereof,
subject
to
certain
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions
as
more
particularly
set
forth,
were
then
providing
for
enforcement
and
penalties
for
violation,
providing
for
definition,
interpretations
and
repealing
conflicts,
providing
preservability
providing
an
effective
date.
Second
motion.
M
Good
afternoon,
chairman
Council
Deshawn
dog
development
coordination.
This
item
also
goes
with
the
vacating
item,
73,
which
was
just
voted
upon,
but
this
item
is
before
you
today
for
second
reading.
The
applicant
is
Ashley
Glenn,
Holdings,
they're
being
represented
by
Catherine
Coyle
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions
any.
A
C
Q
Chairman
re-z-22-42,
what
has
been
presented
for
second
reading
adoption
in
order
to
rezoning
property
driven
city
of
904
and
1120
North
Boulevard
909,
911,
913
and
1002
West
Cypress
Street
and
902-906
912
and
914
North,
Edison
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
moving
to
described
in
section
one
from
zoning,
District
classification,
RS,
50,
residential
single
family
and
RM
24
residential
multi-family
to
PD
plan
development,
residential
multi-family
and
mixed-use
Commercial,
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
C
B
T
S
Good
afternoon
again
Council,
this
is
the
second
of
three
still
not
the
zoning.
Yet
this
is
just
the
vacating.
We
rest
again
on
our
presentation
from
September
22nd
here
to
answer
any
questions.
Any.
B
P
Is
Amy
saying
development
coordination?
This
is
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
at
a
location,
1724
North
Nebraska
Avenue
proposed
su-2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales
for
a
restaurant
consumption
on
premises
only
for
the
sale
of
beer
and
wine
cyclines
have
been
turning
the
city
clerk's
office
I'm
here
for
any
questions,
any.
C
C
D
C
Close
by
Council
Magoo
seconded
by
councilwoman
hurt
councilman
Maniscalco.
A
E
Is
phone
number
ab2-22-04
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption,
an
ordinance
approving
a
special
use,
permit
S2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
restaurant
consumption
on
premises
only
and
making
lawful
the
sale
of
beer
and
wine
at
or
from
that
certain
lot
plot
or
attractive
land
located
at
1724,
North
Nebraska,
Avenue,
Tampa
Florida
is
more
particularly
described
in
section
two,
providing
that
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinances
and
conflict
are
repaired,
repealed
providing
an
effective
date.
Thank
you.
C
P
Development
coordination-
this
is
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
at
the
locations
1802
and
1804
East
4th
Avenue.
This
is
a
proposed
su-2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales.
Small
venue,
consumption
on
premises
only
is
for
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor
side
plans
have
been
turned
into
the
state
clerk's
office
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
D
B
B
A
A
C
H
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
and
ordinance
approving
a
special
use
permit
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
small
venue,
consumption
on
premises
only
in
making
lawful
the
sale
of
beverages,
regardless
of
alcoholic
content,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor.
On
that
certain
plot
of
attractive
land
located
1802
and
1804
East
4th
Avenue
Tampa
Florida
has
more
particularly
described
in
section
2,
providing
that
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinances
and
conflict
are
repealed.
Providing
effective.
C
C
You,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
I'm
sorry
I
have
a
slip
of
the
tongue
and
it's
just
it:
okay,
China
item
number
78
file,
number
re-z,
22,
Dash,
14.,.
P
Thanks
so
much
there's
any
sane
development
coordination.
This
is
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
at
a
locations
6522-6524
and
6526
South,
MacDill,
Avenue
and
foil
numbers,
one
three,
six,
three,
nine
one
point:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero
and
one
three:
six:
three:
nine
two
point:
zero:
zero:
zero
zero
proposed
re
zoning
from
rs60
residential
single
family,
2pd
plan
development,
residential
single
family
attached
site
flies
have
been
turned
into
the
city
clerk's
office.
Here
for
any
questions,
any
questions.
C
B
C
C
P
There's
any
Hussein
development
coordination.
This
case
is
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
at
the
locations:
1401
1409
1411,
1413
and
1415
East
29th
Avenue
and
3510
North
15th
Street.
This
is
a
proposed
rezoning
from
RS
50,
residential
single
family
and
CI
commercial,
intensive,
2pd
plan
development,
residential
single-family,
semi-detached
and
detached
side.
Plans
have
been
turned
in
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
Any
questions.
A
Thank
you:
Council
Catherine
Coyle
domain
homes,
5703
South,
MacDill,
Avenue,
I'm,
available
for
any
questions
and
I
respectfully
request
your
approval.
C
C
No
one
online.
Thank
you
very
much
motion
made
by
councilman
maniscotto
seconded
by
councilman
Rand,
all
in
favor,
aye
councilman.
I
C
Yes,
you,
you
are
correct:
councilman
gooch,.
Q
My
name
is
Jim
rez-2247
we've
been
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
in
ordinance,
free
zoning
property
in
the
University
of
1401
1409
1411,
14
13
and
14
15
East
29th
Avenue
and
3510
North
15th
Street
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
Florida
movie,
described
in
section
one
from
zoning;
District,
that's
location,
rs50,
residency
and
family
and
CI
commercial,
intensive
to
PD,
plane,
development,
residential
senior
family
and
some
of
the
attack
and
attack
providing
effective
date.
Exactly.
P
Is
an
insane
development
coordination?
This
case
is
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
at
the
location,
6202
Interbay,
Boulevard
and
6001
South
Martindale
Avenue.
This
proposed
rezone
from
rs60
residential
single
family
and
CN
commercial
neighborhood,
2pd
plan
development,
residential
single-family,
detached
side
plans
have
been
turned
in
come
here
for
any
questions.
Any.
G
B
A
A
P
Zane
Hussein
did
all
the
coordination.
This
case
is
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
and
the
locations
2110
West
North
A,
Street
105
and
107
North
Westland
Avenue,
106
110
and
112
North
Albany
Avenue,
108,
North,
Albany,
Avenue
Unit,
one
and
number
two
unit,
two
and
two
one
zero
one,
two
one
one:
seven
and
two
one:
two
one
West
Kennedy
Boulevard.
This
proposed
rezoning
from
CG
commercial,
General
and
rm16
residential
multi-family
2pd
plan
development,
residential
multi-family
retail
sales,
restaurant
and
personal
services.
P
S
Good
afternoon
again,
Council
David,
singer,
101
East
Kennedy
I've
been
sworn
now.
We
are
at
the
third
of
the
three
and
we
now
we
are
at
the
rezoning
portion
and
I
again
reincorporate
all
of
the
testimony
and
presentation
given
on
September
the
22nd
and
I'm
here
to
report
just
a
few
things
that
have
happened
since
then.
That
hopefully,
will
answer
some
questions.
If
anyone
still
has
them,
there
was
a
question
about
loading
and
deliveries.
We
believe
some
pretty
significant
progress
has
been
made.
S
Mr
Sutra
you
had
asked
if
there
was
possibility
for
additional
areas,
we
have
repurposed
that
additional
area
directly
behind
the
Jersey
mics
into
additional
loading
opportunity,
we're
also
working
with
the
city
on
the
spot
parking
spots
on
North,
A
Street
to
be
30-minute
spots
dedicated
to
deliveries
and
dedicated
to
ride,
share
so
that'll
take
some
of
the
burden
off.
What
otherwise
would
be
the
garage,
but
those
deliveries
also
will
be
able
to
be
made
right
behind
where
that
Jersey
Mike
sits.
Now.
S
Second,
as
you
recall,
there
was
a
pretty
robust
discussion
about
relocation
of
tenants
and
new
landlords
coming
in
and
discussion
with,
with
your
attorneys
and
with
us
about
how
perhaps
that
was
not
appropriate
to
be
considered
and
again.
I
do
not
want
to
suggest
that
it
is
appropriate
to
be
considered.
S
However,
there
was
significant
public
testimony
and
so
I
do
feel
it's
appropriate
to
tell
you
that
the
house
of
Shadows,
who
had
a
significant
number
of
correspondence
with
you
in
your
judicial
inbox,
quasi-judicial
inbox,
has
withdrawn
their
opposition
after
discussion
with
the
applicant,
and
that
was
able
to
be
done.
As
you
recall,
we
were
not
allowed
to
speak
with
the
tenants
without
landlord
permission.
S
After
the
hearing
we
got
the
landlord's
permission
and
we
spoke
with
the
house
of
Shadows,
and
the
house
of
Shadows
owners
have
withdrawn
their
resistance
to
this
rezoning
third
question:
will
it
be
built
Mr
Sutro?
There
is
strong
economic
incentive
for
this
to
be
rebuilt.
There's
been
a
fair
amount
of
money
that
has
already
been
poured
into
this
number.
One
number
two,
as
you
know,
PD
rezonings.
S
If
they
are
not
built
within
five
years,
they
revert
back
to
their
original
zoning,
so
there
is
that
protection
that
the
code
builds
in
for
PDS
and
third,
this
is
not
a
new
developer.
These
are
folks
with
the
track
record.
They've
done
this
around
the
country,
they've
invested
time
and
money
and
fully
intend
to
build,
and
hopefully
that
answers
your
question
on
that
issue.
The
last
thing
I'll
bring
up
you.
S
You
recognize
that
Miss
Mandel
is
here
with
us
in
Council
today,
similar
to
the
discussion
that
we
had
on
the
22nd
of
September.
There
is
concern
about
parking
and
parking
for
Jersey
mics
and,
where
they're
going
to
park
again,
I'll
remind
you.
The
parking
remains
unchanged
out
front
of
the
building
and
also
I
will
point
you
to
the
site
plan
that
specifically
calls
for
their
use,
their
restaurant
and
retail
use
to
have
28
spaces.
S
It's
in
the
site
plan
can't
be
changed,
so
that's
where
we
are
I
will
also
remind
you
before
I,
step
aside,
that
this
application
has
significant
Community
Support.
The
community
outreach
was
significant
over
2
000
contacts
made
by
this
applicant
to
members
of
the
community
and
they
remain
endorsed
by
the
Northside
Park
civic
association
and
the
North
Hyde
Park
business
Alliance.
That
was
re-upped
even
after
the
last
hearing.
Q
S
I
can
only
speak
to
House
of
Beauty
and
House
of
Shadows.
There
has
been
Community,
they
have
withdrawn
their
opposition.
S
S
The
applicant
has
agreed
they
can
stay
throughout
the
entire
lease
term,
and
so
that
is
the
same
thing
they
would
get
with
their
current
landlord
or
this
applicant
or
anyone
that
would
come
after
to
potentially
purchase
this
property.
You
can
only
get
what
you
agree
to
in
your
lease
and
they're
going
to
honor
the
full
lease.
N
For
the
record,
Julia
Mandel,
with
the
law
firm
of
gray,
Robinson,
401,
East,
Jackson
Street
I'm
here
representing
a
jam
food
Incorporated,
Bill
Atkins,
is
here
with
me
and
he
is
the
operator
of
the
Jersey
Mike's
and
is
the
tenant
in
the
building
where
the
Jersey
Mike's
currently
resides
I'm,
going
to
try
and
use
this,
but
I
might
not
do
it
correctly
before
I
get
started
as
it
relates
to
the
zoning
I
felt,
like
I
needed
to
clarify
an
issue
that
had
come
up
at
the
previous
hearing
and
that
related
to
the
approval
of
the
Jersey
Mike's
and
what
they
were
granted
as
part
of
their
original
approval.
N
This
is
the
original
plan
that
they
were
approved
for
when
they
came
in
for
a
change
of
use
in
2012.,
they
were
granted
the
opportunity
to
be
in
this
location
as
a
restaurant,
with
28
parking
spaces,
and
so
since
it
was
questioned
whether
or
not
there
was
an
actual
approval
of
the
city
of
Tampa,
I
actually
have
I'm,
not
enrolling
them,
but
I
have
the
stamp
plans
of
the
city
of
Tampa.
Somebody
wants
to
have
that
conversation
that
can
show
it,
but
that
was
an
actual
approval
during
that
process
during
their
zoning
review.
N
So
this
is
how
the
site
currently
is
configured
and
it
shows
the
parking
in
the
center.
The
furniture
store-
and
this
is
the
Jersey
Mike's,
with
the
parking
in
the
front
and
all
of
the
parking
spots
were
available
for
the
Jersey
mics
for
parking,
as
well
as
a
dumpster
location.
The
use
of
the
alley
for
their
deliveries,
Our
concern
is
the
change
to
that
configuration.
Jersey
Mike's
has
a
a
jam.
N
Foods
has
a
lease
and
has
had
a
lease
on
this
property
since
2012,
there's
five
more
years
on
this
lease
and
so
they're
they're
not
in
the
same
position,
maybe
some
of
the
other
tenants
they
they
have
the
right
to
remain
in
this
location.
This
is
the
current
proposed
site
plan
and
I'm
going
to
address
what
Mr
singer
had
said
in
terms
of
what's
rights
are
granted
in
here
because
I'm
not
sure,
I
either
agree
with
that,
or
we
may
need
some
clarification.
The
way
this
site
plan
is
set
up.
N
Is
it
in
essence,
cuts
off
the
alley?
Access
for
the
purposes
of
delivery
has
no
location
for
a
dumpster
for
this
out
parcel
whether
or
not
this
remains
at
Jersey
Mike's
or
it
goes
into
some
other
use.
There's
an
out
parcel
here
that,
in
essence,
through
this
site
plan,
has
about
11
spaces
in
the
front.
No
access
on
the
site
plan
for
deliveries
and
no
location
that
I
can
see
for
dumpster
access.
It
is
also
designated
as
retail.
So
even
if
Jersey
Mike's
goes
away.
N
That
remains
to
answer
the
question
or
to
speak
to
what
Mr
singer
said.
I
think
we
need
some
clarification
as
to
whether
or
not
won
the
site
plan,
as
Mr
singer
suggests,
does
provide
for
the
access
here
for
for
deliveries
and
also
the
site
plan
waves
parking,
so
I'm
not
sure
it's
accurate
to
say
that
Jersey
Mike's
in
this
out
parcel
has
been
granted
28
spaces.
In
fact,
I
would
I
would
say
that
they
haven't
and
there's
nothing
on
the
site
plan
that
specifically
grants
that
so
I
would
ask
for
some
clarification
of
that.
N
C
A
A
Oh
okay,
yes,
yes,
my
name
is
Louis
Simmons
I
stay
1507,
West,
North,
B,
Street
Tampa
last
month,
I
came
here
and
spoke
on
behalf
of
the
developers,
and
my
immediate
concern
was
when
it
rains
Kennedy
Boulevard
flows
up
in
that
area
and
all
the
traffic
from
Kennedy.
You
know
debates
on
North
5th,
Street,
so
we're
now
North
B.
It's
almost
like
a
super
highway
because
all
the
trucks
and
everything
come
through
as
I
had
meetings
and
things
and
with
the
Hyde
Park
Association
and
meetings
with
the
developer
and
stuff.
A
A
So
that
was
my
actually
the
main
concern
then
I
started
looking
around
in
my
designated
neighborhood
and
I
was
noticing
that,
yes,
we
need
more
house
in
that
area,
but
yet
because
everyone
is
actually
coming
into
that
main
area,
because
it's
recorded
the
Yuppie
area,
because
it's
so
close
to
downtown
close
to
the
airport
close
to
High
Park,
assertive
towards
on
Howard
and
East
access
are
all
around
so
I
say:
that's
gonna,
be
a
jumping.
A
A
nice
jump
off
spot
a
spot
everywhere
to
come
and
go
and
I
don't
have
no
animosity
or
no
bad
feelings
about
the
ability
to
come
in
there
matter
of
fact,
I
enjoyed
to
see
it
come
there
because
I'd
like
to
see
more
residents,
come
in
and
redo
the
streets
redo
it
the
storm
drains
and
the
sewage
area
in
that
area.
So
from
my
proposal,
if
it's
worth
anything
that
I
would
like
to
see
the
facility
move
forward
and
Thrive.
A
I
A
C
A
My
name
is
Nathan
Hagan
I
live
in.
J
There's
just
not
enough
options
in
that
in
that
neighborhood.
That
includes
other
types
of
housing.
Besides
large
apartment
buildings,
but
I'll
just
say:
I'm
I'm
excited
to
have
this
project
here
in
my
neighborhood.
H
In
that
product
of
of
Kennedy
and
is
a
good
model
for
the
future
development
that
happens
down
there,
hopefully.
A
Course,
consistent
with
our
objective
and
the
comp
plan
and
our
upcoming
compliance,
so
I'm
in
favor
of
this
project
and
I
I
want
to
say
it
down
as
quickly
as
possible.
Thank
you.
P
Is
any
Hussein
development
coordination?
Speaking
on
the
parking
I
know
that
it
was
mentioned
that
the
site
plan
States
that
there's
parking
designated
for
Jersey
Mike's?
It
does
not
state
that
on
a
site
plan,
it
shows
what's
required,
but
there's
no
actual
concrete
clarification
on
what's
being
provided
just
for
that
Jersey
Mike's.
P
S
S
The
existing
restaurant,
the
existing
retail
you'll,
see
that
right
in
the
middle,
where
it
says
retail
parking
required.
Restaurant
existing
2505
retail
existing
2100
go
ahead
over
to
the
right
where
it
says,
required.
Parking
you'll
see
the
number
20
and
you'll
see
the
number
eight
20
and
8
equal
28.
That
is
required
parking
for
this
retail
and
restaurant.
Now,
what
we're
not
going
to
do
and
what
we
never
do
in
a
zoning
hearing
is
talk
about
where
specifically,
a
retail
tenant's
parking
is
going
to
be
designated
in
a
parking
garage.
S
That's
private
agreement
between
the
landlord
and
the
Tenant.
They
have
to
have
28
spaces.
We
want
them
to
be
successful.
Of
course
we
want
them
to
be
successful
and
remember
from
back
on
September
22nd,
when
we
showed
the
site
plan
where
the
door
from
that
parking
garage
exits
is
about
10
feet
to
the
front
door
of
the
Jersey
Mike's.
S
Go
down
a
little
bit
right
here.
This
is
the
door
from
the
parking
garage,
and
this
is
the
entrance
to
the
building
it's
right
there.
So
there
is
enough
parking
provided
it's
required
under
the
site
plan.
Of
course
we
want
them
to
be
successful.
It's
in
everyone's
interest
for
them
to
be
successful
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions
about
any
of
that.
Q
Q
And
I
think
it's
I
guess
play
on
words.
You
can
say
but
I
see
where
you've
indicated,
28
plus
or
eight
is
eight
but
I
think
I.
Think
with
the
petitioner.
With
the
the
objection
there
was
thinking
that
their
spaces
were
for
them
in
a
certain
location,
but
you
continue
that
you're
saying
you
you're
giving
them
28,
no
matter
what
a
location
is
you're
saying
the
location
is
close
enough
or
they'll
be
able
to
handle
their
business.
S
S
S
No
one
is
suggesting
Miss
Mandel
can't
tell
you
that
no
one
can
tell
you
that
what
we
can
tell
you
is
there's
going
to
be
parking
available
for
them
and
we
want
them
to
be
successful
and
we're
mandated
to
have
that
parking
under
the
site.
C
C
Put
put
your
sheet
back
down
there
if
you
do
not
mind,
you
should
well
not
that
I'm
going
to
give
testimony,
but
is
there
another
retail
next
to
Jersey
Mike's,
there's.
C
C
S
C
S
So
let
me
answer
it.
This
way,
I
think
that
people,
when
they
Park
want
to
be
as
close
to
their
home
as
they
can
for
the
residents
and
if
you
look
at
these
spaces
that
are
here,
these
are
the
farthest
away
from
people's
homes.
They
are
the
closest
to
the
retail
and
so
without
being
able
to
actually
commit
to
you
today
that
those
are
going
to
be
retail
spots,
I
think
Common,
Sense
and
Sensibility
would
suggest
that
we
would
do
everything
in
our
power
to
make
sure
that
those
are
retail
spots.
S
C
N
N
Of
course,
so
I
understand
again
Julie
Mandel,
representing
the
Jersey
Mike's
building,
so
I
understand
what
the
what
the
city
staff
Mr
singer
are
saying
is
that
when
you
apportion
the
parking
not
withstanding
where
it
is,
I
would
agree
that
that's
that's
a
secondary
issue.
N
When
you
apportion
the
parking,
the
out
parcel
will
have
the
have
the
allotment,
not
designation,
but
the
allotment
of
28
spaces
and
therefore
the
waiver
that
is
being
requested
for
parking
is
not
going
towards
that
out
parcel
and
the
numbers
for
that
out
parcel
it's
going
towards
the
remainder
of
the
site.
If
that
is
what
Mr
singer
is
saying,
and
the
city
agrees
that
that
is
what
is
actually
on
the
site
plan,
then
I
I
think
at
least
that
issue
has
been
discussed.
N
G
S
I
I
think
Miss
Mandel
encapsulated
the
first
part,
exactly
right
that
the
28
spaces
are
apportioned
and
allotted
to
the
retail
and
restaurant
out
parcel.
Yes,
the
second
part
is
a
little
more
complicated
in
that
those
28
spaces
which
are
added
to
the
total
of
the
PD,
encapsulate
the
entirety
of
the
parking
on
site.
So
there's
343
parking
spaces
on
site.
28
of
them
go
to
the
retail
and
restaurant,
but
it's
not
343
Plus
28..
D
File
number
Rez,
22-71
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption:
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
2110
West
North
A,
Street
105
and
107
North
Westland
Avenue,
106
110
and
112
North
Albany
Avenue,
108,
North,
Albany,
Avenue
number
one
and
number
two
and
2101
2117
and
2121
West
Kennedy
Boulevard
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
Section
1
from
zoning
classifications,
CG,
commercial
General
and
rm16
residential
multi-family
to
PD
plan
development,
residential
multi-family
retail
sales,
restaurant
personal
services
providing
an
effective
date.
I'm.
P
Is
insane
development
coordination,
this
case
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
at
the
location,
2907
West
Bay
to
Bay
Boulevard
and
foyo
number
one:
two:
seven:
zero.
Eight
three
point:
zero:
zero,
zero
zero
proposed
rezoning
from
PD
plan
development,
2pd
plan,
Development,
Office,
business,
professional
retail
sales,
restaurant
bar
lounge
and
residential
multi-family
side
plans
have
been
turned
in
to
the
city
clerk's
office
I'm.
Here
for
any
questions,
any
questions.
D
Good
afternoon
for
the
record
Abby
park
with
Garner
Hudson
400
North
Ashley
Drive,
like
Sam
mentioned,
we
made
the
request
for
revisions
and
are
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
we
request.
Your
approval
on
this.
H
Yes,
sir,
thank
you.
Mr
chair,
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
adoption
in
order
to
rezoning
proper
and
general
vicinity
of
2907
West
Bay
to
Bay
Boulevard
and
folio
number
one,
two:
seven:
zero,
eight
three
dot:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
more
particularly
described
than
section
one
from
zoning;
District
classification,
PD
plan
development
to
PD
plan,
Development,
Office,
business,
professional
retail
sales,
restaurant
bar
lounge
and
residential
multifamily,
providing
effective
date.
C
Motion
to
withdrawal
agenda
item
number
83
by
councilman,
Vera
seconded
by
councilman
Miranda,
all
in
favor.
Thank
you.
Jed
item
number
84
file,
number
vac,
22-14.
H
Good
afternoon
city
council,
Ron
wigginton
legal
department,
Mr
Shelby,
has
requested
that
I
pass
out
the
the
infamous
regarding
vacating
items,
I'd
like
to
give
credit
to
the
author,
who
just
left
Julia
Mandel.
To
summarize
some
of
the
main
points
of
that
memo
and
I'll
give
you
a
chance
to
pass
it
out.
First.
H
Thank
you
so
again
to
summarize
some
of
the
main
points
of
the
memo.
First,
that
the
applicant
has
the
burden
of
establishing
that
the
vacating
request
serves
a
public
purpose
and
serves
in
the
best
interest
of
the
public.
Next
city
council
has
broad
discretion
in
making
the
decision
to
approve
or
disapprove
the
vacating
request
and
same
will
not
be
disturbed,
except
in
the
case
of
clear
abuse
of
discretion,
or
unless
there
is
an
evasion
of
private
property
rights.
H
And
finally,
some
of
the
factors
to
consider
when,
during
your
deliberations,
include
that
are
not
limited
to
will
the
vacating
alleviate
or
relieve
the
public
from
the
cost
of
maintaining
the
subject
Alleyway?
Will
the
vacating
alleviate
a
public
nuises
such
as
dumping
or
curtail
criminal
activity?
Well,
the
vacating
Foster
Redevelopment
of
the
abutting
properties.
Will
an
abutting
Property
Owners
access
to
the
property
be
completely
cut
off
or
substantially
diminished
as
a
result
of
the
vacating.
H
Now
the
notice
requirements
were
not
mentioned
are
discussed
in
the
memo.
But
since
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
lately
about
Miss
notice,
I'd
like
to
Briefly
summarize
what
is
required
for
vacatings
first,
there
is
the
Post-it
notice,
which
is
the
same
as
for
all
land
use
decisions
that
includes
posting
a
sign
at
either
end
of
the
alleyway.
That
sign
must
be
placed
within
no
or
I'm.
H
Sorry,
yeah,
no
or
excuse
me
no
later
than
30
days
prior
to
the
hearing
and
no
later
than
60
days
prior
to
the
hearing,
and
it
must
be
visible
from
the
street.
Next
is
the
Good
Neighbor
notice.
Now
the
Good
Neighbor
notice
only
requires
notice
to
participating
organizations
which
is
the
HOA
neighborhood
and
Civic
associations.
It
does
not
include
Good
Neighbor
notice
to
the
participating
Neighbors,
which
that's
the
250
foot
radius
that
you've
probably
heard
about
before.
H
T
T
T
T
T
T
Staff
have
no
objections
to
this
vacating
request.
Easement
reservations
are
needed
for
Wastewater
storm
water,
Chico,
Frontier
and
Spectrum
natural
resources,
so
you
must
comply
with
chapter
27
in
regard
to
tree
preservation
and
site
design
for
any
improvements
placed
adjacent
to
trees
in
a
vacate
area.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions.
F
F
Is
that
showing
up?
Well,
as
the
city
staff
has
pointed
out,
this
is
a
a
right
angled
Alleyway
that
runs
behind
these
homes,
on
Stroud
and
behind
the
townhouses
and
the
Chicago
subdivision.
F
F
F
F
The
biggest
issue
that
I
think
that
you
know
I've
talked
to
some
of
the
neighbors
briefly
before
the
hearing
started,
and
it
seemed
to
be
that
they
were
concerned
regarding
the
vacating.
What
would
happen
post
vacating
and
generally?
What
happens
is
that
the
abutting
property
owners
on
either
side
are
entitled
to
one
half
of
the
vacated
portion.
F
F
The
only
way
you
can
get
to
that
is
either
through
the
rear
yards
of
of
the
abutting
townhouses
on
the
on
the
North
side
or
the
single
family
homes.
On
the
south
side,
one
of
the
the
thing
I
guess
the
concerns
are:
if
it's,
if
this
property
I'm
sorry
the
alley
is
not
vacated,
then
all
of
those
areas
that
I
showed
you
in
pink
are
in
violation
every
one
of
them
we've
in
the
in
the
petition.
F
There
is
a
request
from
the
city
to
reserve
easements
over
the
entire
length
and
width
of
the
act
of
the
alley,
which
means
you
cannot
build
on
it.
It
essentially
becomes
a
green
space.
In
addition
to
that,
on,
the
north
side
of
the
alley
is
a
permanent
20-foot,
stormwater
easement
that
also
can't
be
built
on
so
I
I'm,
not
really
sure
I.
Think
I've
addressed
all
of
the
concerns
that
they've
raised
regarding
that
EMS
doesn't
ever
want
to
use
the
alley.
F
F
It's
not
wide
enough.
It
makes
a
90
degree
turn
it's
obstructed.
F
Basically,
it's
unused
I,
don't
know
what
else
I
can
tell
you,
except
that
it's
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city,
the
best
interest
of
public
purpose,
to
vacate
this.
It's
not
been
maintained
and
it
would
serve
a
public
purpose
to
vacate
this
and
return.
It
and
I
think
that
most
of
your
council
members
remember
that
an
alley
is
originally
part
of
the
original
plot
for
the
adjacent
Property
Owners.
F
It's
controlled
and
owned
underlying
and
fee
by
the
by
those
individual
property
owners
and
it's
held
in
trust
by
the
city
and
that
we're
asking
you
to
release
the
in
trust
portion
and
return
it
back
to
the
property
owners
for
their
control.
Again,
nothing
can
be
built
in
there
with
those
easements
and
the
easements
have
been
reserved
for
utilities,
including
Tico
and
people's
gas
and
and
whatever
telephone
Verizon.
Whatever
cable,
TV
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
F
I
think
that
it's
in
the
the
general
intent
of
the
code
is
that
when
an
alley
is
not
being
used
for
its
intended
purpose,
and
it
cannot
be
used
for
its
intended
purpose,
then
it
should
be
returned
to
the
adjacent
Property
Owners,
as
was
provided
for
in
the
code.
I.
Think
we've
demonstrated
that,
with
the
photographs
that
I've
shown
you,
the
survey
was
conducted
by
the
city
of
Tampa's
survey
crew.
Not
it
was
an
independent
survey
crew,
not
not
one
commissioned
by
us
or
the
adjacent
property
owners.
F
F
F
Swear
to
I
mean
I
can't
tell
you
under
oath
that
that
belongs
to
the
people
in
South.
But
yes,
something's
going
to
happen
here
and
regarding
these
encroachments
yeah.
D
D
C
H
Certainly,
there
is
opportunities
for
people
to
acquire
other
properties.
However,
I
just
want
to
be
sure
or
be
clear
that,
generally
speaking,
when
you
vacate
an
Alleyway,
the
abutting
property
owners
on
both
sides,
it
goes
down
to
the
center
line
and
gets
divided
both
sides.
However,
yes,
there
is
case
law
that
says
that
if
a
subdivision
has
the
alleyway
to
itself
and
then
the
the
subdivision
to
the
north
of
that
does
not
include
the
alleyway,
then
there
could
be
some
argument
that
one
side
gets
it
and
not
the
other.
C
H
C
C
Bishop
mccullini,
that
did
that
finish
your
I'm
going
to
take
Papa
comments.
C
L
My
name
is
Kim
Price
I
live
at
2410
West
Chicago
Avenue,
we're
on
the
north
end
of
that
abutment
that
they're
talking
about
I,
don't
know
if
you
all
have
any
of
this
information.
I
have
nice
eight
copies
for
you.
If
you'd
like
one
is
my
objection.
The
second
is
a
Blow
by
blow
account
of
all
of
the
conversations
I
have
had
with
all
of
the
city
officials
for
the
last
two
years
coming
January
trying
to
reinstate
that
alleyway
interesting
two
sections.
C
Thank
you,
there's
two
sections.
L
So
two
pages
each
person-
one
is
my-
is
my
objection.
The
second
one
is
the
conversations
we
have
been
trying
to
reinstate
this
Alleyway
since
pretty
much
February
of
2021
we're
coming
up
on
almost
two
years.
Yes,
it
is
true,
they
have
all
been
encroaching
on
it.
We
want
it
back
because
we
are
a
fee,
simple,
Town
Homes,
but
we
are
joined.
L
So
one
of
the
comments
that
was
made
was
that
access
was
cut
off
completely
half
more
than
half
of
us
will
have
no
access
to
the
back
of
our
property
and,
while
12
feet
doesn't
seem
like
much
to
anybody
else,
we've
got
a
dead
tree
that
cannot
be
ground
out.
We've
got
people
who
would
like
to
build
and
contrary
to
what
the
attorney
earlier
had
said,
there
is
room
for
an
an
area
to
be
built
up.
I
personally
have
done
that.
City
gave
me
a
permit.
L
I
have
a
footer
I
added
250
square
feet
to
my
to
my
townhouse
did
not
encroach
on
any
of
the
easement,
and
but
there
are
sections
where
we
will
never
be
able
to
get
to
the
back.
That's
where
our
utilities
are.
That's.
Where
our
electric,
our
AC
units,
are
and
and
again
this
is
as
he
mentioned,
this
is
where
spectrum
and
all
that
is
I
spoke
with
Alan
Vila,
who
sent
me
to
Kevin
Amos,
who
sent
me
that
Eric
Cotton
spoke
with
lucky
Wade.
L
All
of
those
surveys
that
were
done
were
done
at
my
request.
That's
not
something
the
city
just
did.
This
is
not
20
years
going
up
with
lots
of
litigation.
Litigation
is
going
to
happen.
Is
that
if
you
vacate
this
alley-
and
they
say
you
each
get
half
the
city
washes
its
hands
of
that
Alleyway
and
we
get
to
litigate
for
the
our
six
feet,
because
you're
not
going
to
have
anything
to
do
with
it,
but
we
have
to
fight
for
it.
So
the
litigation
comes
to
us.
L
L
I
have
sent
letters
to
councilman
Carlson
back
in
January
and
twice,
as
did
other
people
within
my
within
my
area,
I'm,
giving
you
the
background
of
why
this
has
even
come
up
and
I
have
a
neighbor
who
has
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
it,
but
we
truly
need
you
to
deny
thank
you.
Do.
Q
T
Yeah
and
I
can't
speak
on
that
I'd
like
to
have
Ron
speak
on
that,
but
from
from
what
I've
seen
in
the
history
of
it,
it's
never
been
used
technically,
as
an
alley
doesn't
look
to
be
it
that
way,
and
that's
just
the
facts
that
I
have
but
to
reinstate
it.
You're
talking
about
clearing
that
building
a
new
road
and
transportation
Mobility
has
to
be
involved
with
that
and
that's
another
story
at
another
time.
Q
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
what
she's
what
she
says
that
that
Community
there
that
you
can
see
they,
whatever
they've
done,
they've
done
and
they're
saying
they've
asked
the
city
in
reference
to
leaving
it
the
way
it
was
versus
US
faking
it
vacating
it
I'm,
just
wondering
why
why
we
didn't
respond
to
them
or
if
they're
not
looking
to
have
us
re
rebuild
the
road
in
there
I'm
trying
to
figure
that
out.
Why
is
I.
T
L
T
Q
H
Just
like
Ross
I'm
not
able
to
speak
for
other
departments
and
what
action
they
have
taken
or
not
taken
or
what
Communications
they've
had
I'm,
not
privy
to
that
so
unfortunately,
I'm
unable
to
answer
your
question
in
that
regard,
all
right.
Thank
you.
G
K
The
city
city
council
attorney
just
pointed
out
to
me
that
in
this
correspondence
we
just
got
it
says
that
I,
it
missed
probably
said:
I
heard
back
from
Bill
Carlson,
my
initial
email
I
received
a
email
in
January
I
think
you
said
they
filed
in
March,
but
my
just
to
read
it
out
for
the
record.
My
response
says
thanks
for
reaching
out.
This
is
something
that
would
likely
be
handled
by
code
enforcement.
At
the
time,
I
was
not
aware
of
any
I'm
copying
my
legislative
Aid.
K
To
put
you
in
touch
with
them.
City
council,
mostly
deals
with
land
use
issues,
the
budget
and
creating
new
laws.
City
staff-
don't
report
to
us,
but
they're,
usually
are
good
about
following
up
and
then
the
other
day
there
was
an
email
which
I
copied
the
Quasi
box
on
just
to
do
this
price.
Just
saying,
thank
you
for
your
email
city,
council
members
are
not
allowed
to
engage
in
discussions
about
land
use
issues,
but
I
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
we
received
your
email
and
put
in
the
record.
G
Wanted
to
show
you
there
if
I
can
just
for
the
record.
Thank
you
for
that
disclosure
and
just
a
reminder
for
Council
for
today,
for
this
hearing
or
any
other
hearings
coming
forth.
If
there
have
been
any
ex
parte
Communications
any
verbal
Communications
that
before
going
forward,
you
disclose
the
sum
and
substance
of
that
and
with
whom
it
occurred.
K
Thank
you.
What
he's
saying
is
that
it's
we're
required,
because
this
is
a
quasi
digital
hearing,
we're
required
to
disclose
any
conversations
we
had
with
anyone.
The
the
initial
email
that
that
you
and
I
exchanged
didn't
talk
about
any
content.
I
just
read
it
out,
but
it
was
before
they
filed,
but
the
second
one
I
did
copy
the
Quasi
box.
Thank
you.
C
C
L
Briefly,
if
you'll
notice,
on
there
everything
that
I
copied
says
on
the
bottom,
this
is
public
record,
because
it's
all
conversations
that
I
had
with
the
various
law
enforcement.
But
we
were
also
notified
July
of
last
year.
That
notices
were
getting
ready
to
be
sent
by
inspector
Segura
to
all
of
the
people
who
were
encroaching
on
the
alleyway
and
they
were
quietly
going
to
start
requiring
them.
They
give
them
a
period
of
time,
never
heard
anything
after
that
and
the
city
just
decided
that
they
were
going
to
let
it
go.
Thank.
C
T
C
T
See
there
you
go
okay,
yeah
all
right!
Thank
you!
So,
just
here
with
you,
so
the
comment
about
unused
Ally
or
there's
comments
about
overgrown
or
grass
I
mean
this
is
actually
a
picture
of
the
alley
on
the
Stroud
side.
That
is
the
as
you
can
see,
2409,
who
is
the
petitioner
owner
and
developer?
That
is
the
backyard
which
is
the
alley.
T
So
the
problem
that's
supposed
for
us
is
that
the
other
side
of
the
streets
taking
over
the
12-foot
alley
and
extended
their
backyards
and
I
have
a
couple
other
pictures
that
demonstrate
that
to
you.
But
you
know
these
comments
about
it's
unused
or
we
don't
want
access
it's
incorrect
and
we
have
been
trying
to
work
with
the
city
to
regain
access.
T
So
if
you,
if
you
look
at
a
couple
of
the
photos,
what
you
see
is
the
encroachments
that
you're
not
looking
at
the
map
you're
actually
looking
at
this
picture,
some
encroachments
in
the
alley
and
then
I
think
the
biggest
point
that
I
would
make
here
today
to
make
sure
that
you
see
it
is
imagine
this.
This
photo
shows
multiple
photos
of
things
that
people
have
had
in
their
backyard
and
again
we're
fee
simple,
there's
no
other
way
to
get
to
the
back.
T
So
you
have
to
walk
through
the
inside
of
your
townhouse
and
out
the
front
door,
and
vice
versa,
to
take
construction
or
yard
debris
and
things
of
that
nature
out
and
as
well
as
there's
room
in
the
back.
People
are
building
sun
rooms
and
different
things
because
it
doesn't
encroach
on
the
easement
part
of
the
reason
that
we
have
a
defense
is
because
Charlotte
had
already
taken
over
the
alley.
So,
if
like
I,
can
put
a
gate
up,
I
can
swap
out
my
fence
and
put
a
gate
up.
T
But
what
would
be
the
point
in
putting
up
a
gate
if
you're
opening
it
into
somebody's
yard?
I
mean
that
that
really
would
have
bow
well
for
prophecy,
so
again
just
a
picture
of
some
of
those
encroachments
and
then,
if
you
can
just
show
them
that
bottom
and
then
I
think
what
you
see
here
again
is
some
renderings
and
the
pictures
in
the
middle
showing
the
town
homes.
T
What
that
shows
you
is
that
we
don't
have
access
to
the
backyard
and
that's
really
what
we
want
and
we're
just
asking
you
to
whatever
that
solution
is
to
work
with
us,
because
we
just
need
access
to
our
the
back
of
our
property.
T
R
R
K
Legal
or
staff,
maybe
while
these
leaders
are
still
standing
there,
but
if,
if
the
neighbors
thought
that
they
were
applying
for
a
process
to
reopen,
could
you
tell
us
what
that
process
was
and,
and
how
did
this
one
supersede
that
or
did
it?
Can
you
just
tell
us
it's
like
dual
kind
of
dual
processes
somehow,
as.
K
Think
they
it
based
on
what
the
testimony
they
just
gave,
they
thought
they
were
working
with
the
city
to
reopen
the
alley.
What's
what
was
the
status
of
that
process?
And
did
it
start
before
after
this.
H
Again,
unfortunately,
I
was
not
privy
to
those
negotiations,
so
I
don't
know
what
efforts
were
made
to
reopen
the
alleyway
or
what
requests
have
been
made.
I
know
that
there
have
been
requests,
but
I
don't
know
what
the
action
was
taken
by
the
city,
whether
it
be
the
mobility
department
or
code
enforcement.
D
H
And
in
that
case
that
be
the
council's
pleasure,
then
I
would
recommend
that
you
continue
the
first
reading.
H
E
I
You
have
two
parties,
but
it's
already
closed
on
both
sides
and
somebody's
using
some
parts
of
the
alley,
and
somebody
wants
that
part
of
the
alley
so
I
think
there's
a
squabble
between
the
homeowners
right.
Not
us
I
would
concur
yes,
but
it's
a
city,
land
and
somebody's
taking
over
I'm.
Not
here,
that's
somebody
else
to
decide
just.
H
To
be
right
here,
somebody
I'm
sorry,
it
is
not
city
land.
The
only
interest
of
the
city
may
have
is
an
easement,
whether
it
be
right
away,
utility
or
otherwise.
A
fee.
C
Ma'am
can
I
ask
you
a
question.
Please,
yes,
can
you
put
back
that
photo
that
has
the
blue
lawn
chairs
that
somebody
has
taken
over
the
d
e
sure?
Thank
you
that
that
final
fence
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
that
picture,
is
that
your
fence.
T
T
C
T
Exact,
yes
right,
that's
correct!
So
we
haven't
had
access
and
par,
and
if
you
look
at
it
this
is
an
alley.
What
does
this
cause?
That
I
I
didn't
I
neglected
to
mention
earlier
is
different
issues
with
the
neighbors,
because
you
have
to
look
at
it.
We
own
that
entire
block,
because
we
have
a
21
unit.
C
T
And
and
technically
that's
that's
correct,
but
technically
they're
Crossing
the
parking
lot
of
a
a
town,
a
Condo
building
to
get
there
so
technically
for
us
to
get
to
our
back,
which
has
happened,
that
we
got
a
condemn,
City
tree
in
the
back
of
one
of
the
properties.
They
had
to
get
permission
from
a
Stroud
homeowner
to
go
through
their
yard
in
order
to
get
to
the
property.
But
if
the
alley
was
there
like,
it
should
be,
they
would
not
have
to
do
that
and
then
they
did
damage
to
their
yard.
T
The
owner
had
to
pay
for
it
as
a
responsibility
because
they
had
to
get
gain
access
through
Stroud.
That's
also
was
the
issue
with
the
particular
property.
That's
shown
there
was
a
dog
bite,
because
a
foster
dog
was
in
the
back
on
our
side
and
a
child
reached
under
the
fence
and
the
dog
bit
their
hand,
and
if,
if
the
alley
was
there,
that
would
have
created
space
for
that
incident
not
to
happen.
So
we
were
like
what's
going
to
happen
next.
C
I
Mr
chairman,
yes,
I
I,.
C
Asking
questions
I
wanted
I
wanted
to
be
able
to
get
my
questions
before
we
went
to
continue
with
all
due
respect,
councilman
that
I've
been
emphasizing
this.
You
all
have
all
this
unlimited
time
to
talk,
but
before
we
go
make
a
movement,
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
have
my
say
or
Michael.
Oh
yes,
right
now:
okay,
yes,.
A
Ma'am
please
Dr
Risa
Gardner
I
am
at
2403
West
Stroud
I'm,
one
of
the
quote:
Stroud
Misfits,
that
the
condo
is
referring
to.
A
We
are
on
the
the
far
east
side
of
Stroud
and
Glenn,
which
is
I,
don't
know
sure
how
this
works.
You've
got
you.
Have
it
correct
you?
Have
it
correct?
Okay,
so
we
are.
A
We
are
we're
here
on
Stroud,
okay,
we're
here.
This
is
the
side
here.
First
of
all,
there's
nothing
built
here
this.
These
are
bricks
in
sand
that
the
city
gave
us
permission
to
put.
It
was
a
dirt
driveway.
So
basically
we
didn't
claim
it.
We
just
put
the
bricks
in.
We
were
given
permission
to
do
so.
I've
been
at
the
house
since
1989.,
okay,
I
bought
the
house.
The
fence
was
up,
it
wasn't
the
plastic
one,
it
was.
A
wooden
fence
was
up
okay
and
long
story
short.
A
When
they
did
change
the
fence
were
in
reference
to
the
dog
bite.
The
fence
has
a
gap.
This
big,
the
people
that
put
the
fence
up
left,
rested
rebar
and
wire
sticking
out.
Okay,
so
anybody
putting
their
hand
through
the
fence.
Number
one
could
have
gotten
cut
okay,
and
if
it
was
an
alley
anybody
anybody
could
walk
back.
There
stick
their
hands
and
there
would
be
more
people
sticking
their
hands
underneath
the
fence.
A
Okay,
that
is,
you,
can
check
it
at
rusted,
rebar,
wire
and
broken
glass
all
along
the
bottom,
so
the
fence
has
been
there
since
before
1989..
A
The
only
way
for
these
people
to
have
access
to
the
back
of
their
property
would
be
to
open
up
a
space.
Okay,
if
they
give
us
six
feet
and
we
do
six
feet,
guess
what
there's
still
no
space
so
for
them
to
get
out
the
back
which
they
bought
the
condos.
There
was
no
access
to
the
back.
Okay,
it
would
have
to
be
made
an
alley,
an
open
alley,
I
guess
where
you
clear-cut,
take
down
good
200
year
old
oak
trees.
A
To
do
so,
there
was
another
I'm
going
to
make
a
reference
to
this,
because
I
really
feel
that
there
are
some
people
in
the
condos
that
are
misleading,
making
misleading
statements.
There
was
a
letter
discussing
how
dangerous
it
was
not
to
have
back
access.
There
was
a
fire
they
mentioned
where
a
gentleman
died
because
they
quote
couldn't
have
access.
The
fire
was
on
the
North
side.
A
It
did
not
butt
up
to
the
neighbors
on
Stroud,
it
was
on
the
North
side
and
if
you
notice,
Chicago
was
a
big
Street
for
them
to
get
down
the
gentleman
actually,
a
friend
of
mine's
sister
was
staying
with
this
gentleman.
He
was
disabled
and
couldn't
get
out
of
the
condo.
It
had
nothing
to
do
with
access
the
fire
trucks
were
there
instantly
I
heard
them
and
I
went
around
and
I
saw
what.
D
F
I
mean
I
I.
Just
think
that
you
know,
we've
we've
gone
far
afield
of
of
this.
This
issue,
their
design
issues
regarding
their
townhouses
have
nothing
to
do
with
vacating
the
alley.
Every
every
one
of
those
properties
is
designed
exactly
the
same
way.
They're
all
fenced
off
I
mean
I've.
Looked
at
that
alley,
I
haven't
seen
a
single
gate
that
accesses
it
off
of
the
the
Chicago
side.
None
I
mean
if
it's
a
council's
wishes
to
continue
this
for
additional
discussion
for
Mobility.
They
I
showed
you
the
checklist
they
signed
off
on
this.
F
The
city
does
not
have
the
money
to
reinstate,
to
reopen
and
pave
this
alley.
They
don't
have
it.
They
barely
have
enough
money
to
maintain
the
alleys
we
have
and
that's
why
they
signed
off
on
it
EMS
and
the
Emergency
Services
they
signed
off
on
it.
They
don't
access
it
by,
but
via
the
rear.
They
have
a
very
wide
Street
in
the
front
on
the
Chicago
side,
with
the
access
for
all
of
these
things.
F
G
He
has
the
right
to
have
it
heard
if
that's
his
decision,
if
he
objects
to
the
continuance,
then
certainly
he
he
goes
forward
with
whatever
council's
decision
is,
if
Council
believes
that
they
need
a
continuance.
Q
I,
don't
remember
what
a
roses
is:
I
have
I
want
staff
here
to
ask
whatever
questions
I
want
to
add
in
the
Shelby.
So
my
thing
is
this:
if,
if
the
councilman
is
asking
for
a
continue,
because
she
has
other
questions
as
well,
I
don't
understand
why
we
can't
go
in
on
the
advice
of
the
attorney
already
said
that
we
have
more
questions
that
he
can't
answer
or
Ross
the
staff
can
answer.
He
would
suggest
that
we
go
and
do
a
continuance.
G
F
Not
objecting
the
only
thing
is
I,
don't
I
mean
people
have
already
testified.
I
think
that
that
testimony
ought
to
be
enough
and
sufficient
for
this.
For
this.
G
G
Now,
what
happens
to
the
people
who've
been
waiting
online
and
also
I
should
point
out
Council
that
there
are
other
hearings
to
be
heard
today,
and
there
are
other
people
to
testify
and
I
hear
that
we're
going
to
be
losing
another
council
member
shortly.
So
I
just
want
to
be
clear
on
that.
So
let's
just
what?
What
is
it
council's
pleasure
with
regard
to
the
people
who
are
waiting
to
testify
they
are
on?
They
are
online
they've
been
waiting.
It
is
now
what
4
50
in
the
afternoon.
If.
Q
It's
continued.
They
can
testify
that
the
next
time
it
brings
it
comes
back
but
I'm
just
saying.
If,
if
we
have
questions
and
Mr
Wayne,
they
can't
answer
them
and
neither
can
Ross
I,
don't
understand
why
we're
going
down
this
road.
If
we
still
have
questions
and
after
going
five
o'clock-
and
you
know,
staff
is
not
here
to
answer
those
questions.
Q
Ross
is
here
it
met
with
the
question
of
Ross.
Is
here
we
don't
know
when
this
application
was
filed
previously
for
reinstatement.
We
don't
know.
Why
was
it?
Why
was
it
not
reinstate?
I
mean
we
have
questions
about
what's
going
on?
If
we,
we
don't
know
yeah.
T
I'd
like
to
speak
on
that
as
far
as
reinstatements,
they
petitioners
don't
come
to
Land
Development
to
or
my
department
to
reinstate
an
alley
only
to
vacate.
We
only
do
encroachments
release
of
easements.
That's
that's
what
we
deal
with.
Obviously,
as
far
as
code
enforcements
again,
I
can't
speak
on
that
and
I,
don't
know
when
they
filed
a
code
violation
or
when,
when
a
citation
was
I.
T
Q
Research
needs
to
be
done,
I
don't
care
about.
If
the
city
doesn't
want
to
go
and
pay
finale,
we
got
plenty
alleys
that
are
that
that
are
not
closed,
that
are
not
paid
that
have
all
kind
of
stuff
in
them.
So
to
me
about
a
role
being
paid
I,
don't
really
care
about
that!
I
just
want
the
information
to
find
out
what
what
these
folks
were
saying.
First,
if
they
didn't
have
an
opportunity,
these
folks
didn't
have
opportunity
to
get
their
case
heard
yeah.
Q
Q
D
So
I
mean
we
just
got
this,
this
email
thread
and
again
I
haven't
had
time
to
read
it
because
I
just
got
it,
but
it
looks
for
on
if,
if
I'm,
just
looking
through
it,
it
looks
like
code
enforcement,
neighborhood
enhancement
was
involved,
looks
like
development,
growth
and
management
was
involved,
looks
like
the
city.
D
Surveyor
was
involved,
so
we
just
have
a
lot
of
things
and
I
mean
I,
don't
have
enough
time
to
code
enforcement
supervisor
and
then
Bill
Carlson,
which
we
already
talked
about
and
now
we're
back
to
code
enforcement,
neighborhood
enhancement,
so
I
I.
So
those
folks,
the
people
who
are
on
this
email
it
would
be
handy
so
that
they
could
help
provide
the
timeline.
What
we're
looking
for
is
a
timeline
of
how
this
all
started
with
like
how
did
it
all
start?
How
do
we
get
this
nice
survey?
D
H
I
understand
councilwoman
Ron,
wigginson
legal
department
and
yes,
I
understand
who
needs
to
be
present
for
the
next
hearing.
If
you
will,
however,
I
would
like
to
make
a
comment
as
to
the
people
that
have
not
had
an
opportunity
to
make
their
public
comments.
I
would
recommend
that
they
be
her
because
number
one
they
could
have
an
impact
on
whether
you
want
to
continue
this
case
or
not,
and
then
number
two.
They
may
not
be
available
for
the
continued
first
reading,
so
I
think
it
would
be
appropriate.
I
H
I
A
I
H
H
F
K
Question
with
us,
Miss
price
I,
just
I
just
scanned
the
emails
and
it
it
looks
like
it
started
with
my
office,
where
we
we
diagnose
it
as
a
Code
Enforcement
issue,
and
you
were
going
back
and
forth
with
Kevin
Amos,
who
was
in
code
enforcement.
L
Was
a
729
which
is
about
page
four
at
the
very
bottom
you'll
see
that
Kevin
Amos
sent
us
notice
that
they
were
quietly
starting
to
provide
notices
to
the
people
in
Stroud
as
to
their
encroachment,
and
they
would
be
given
ample
time
and
a
certain
amount
of
time
to
remedy
it
and
get
everything
off
of
there.
L
Haven't
well
lucky
Wade
Clarence,
Wade,
Kevin,
Amos,
Eric,
Cotton,
Nicole
segora,
who
is
the
inspector
all
of
those
people?
Are
the
people
I've
dealt
with
Barbara
Lynch,
who
has
been
the
one
who
has
told
me
where
to
go
to
each
time,
but
I've
just
been
chasing
my
tail
ever
I
mean
it's
been
almost
two
years
and
I
would
like
to
say
under
no
circumstances
is
anything
of
this
punitive
or
there's
nothing
about
this,
except
for
the
fact
that
we
would
like
to
build
on
the
back
of
our
property.
K
C
B
C
B
A
How's
it
going
my
name
is
Robert
montanino
I've
been
a
homeowner
of
2408,
West,
Chicago
Avenue
since
2018,
and
would
just
like
say
my
case
that
I
am
against
the
abolishment
of
the
alleyway.
The
attorney
earlier
said
that
there
has
been
no
use
of
the
alleyway
and
I
feel
like
this
is
a
bit
of
misrepresentation,
because
the
owners
on
West
Stroud
Avenue
have
illegally
encroached
on
12
feet
that
the
alleyway
was
supposed
to
be
built
upon
foreign.
A
Because
of
this,
and
due
to
the
fact
that
our
houses
are
not
freestanding
homes,
it
is
difficult
for
us
to
access
the
back
of
our
house
to
have
either
people
come
work
on.
It
do
renovations
to
the
house
access
large
pieces
of
equipment
such
as
our
AC
units,
and
because
of
this
we
are
denied
some
of
the
access
that
the
people
on
West
Stroud
are
entitled
to
and
because
of
their
illegal
use
of
the
alleyway
of
the
12
feet
that
they
have
built
upon.
A
A
12
feet
the
entire:
this
you
know
the
entire
alleyway,
so
that
defense
on
the
west
chicago
side
is,
is
it's
not
in
Alleyway
and
I?
Guess:
there's
no
fence
on
the
other
side
on
the
west
shroud.
No,
it's
just
their
backyards.
Essentially!
Oh,
that's
all
I
have
said
Thank.
B
G
A
Thank
you
account
numbers.
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
times
day
and
thank
you
for
your
patience.
I
know
a
five
o'clock.
Testimony
right
now
is
probably
testing
everyone's
patience,
but
thank
you
for
your
time.
I
just
wanted
to
say
as
a.
N
New
homeowner
in
this
town
home
that
I
believe
the
panels
at
the
back.
There
was
a
bit
of
statement
about
how
we,
the
defense,
was
built
and
its
access
was
kind
of
blocked
off
kind
of
on
our
hands,
and
rather
the
panels
slide
out
pretty
easily
I.
Don't
think
that
it
would
have
been
in
our
best
interest
to
build
a
fence.
A
G
D
H
Going
to
be
several
staff
members
that
need
to
be
notified
and
prepared,
I
would
request
at
least
45
days
unless
the
applicant
has
any
objection
for
it.
45
days
or.
M
C
J
B
B
C
I
K
A
I
just
set
it
up
there
I'm
sorry
I
had
no
idea.
It
was
up
there,
okay,
so
here's
what
I
want
to
point
out.
There
are
seven
letters
against
this
in
opposition
to
this
in
a
Stella
that
have
been
in
there
since
August.
There's
no
excuse
for
this
stuff
coming
up
last
minute
and
appearing
this
was
misnoticed
before
and
you
know
I'm
sorry,
but
people
do
things
that
they're
not
allowed
to
do
without
permission,
but
that
doesn't
excuse
them
doing
that
so
I
I'm,
just
I'm,
really
really
confused
about
how
we
should
vacate
this
Alleyway.
A
That's
actually
needed
those
folks.
If
they
want
to
cut
down
a
tree,
they
will
either
have
to
get
permission
from
one
of
the
people
on
the
south
side
or
they
have
to
drag
it
through
their
house
there's
no
way
around.
They
don't
have
sides
to
the
house
and
I
mean
but
seven
letters
in
a
sellout
and
we're
showing
up
here
and
how
many
code
enforcements
were
filed.
That's
the
real
answer,
that's
the
real
question.
How
many
times
did
they
call
code
enforcement
and
they
asked
for
assistance
from
code
enforcement
before
this
vacation
was
ever
filed?
A
This
to
me,
is
just
it
yeah.
It
needs
to
be
postponed,
but
it
actually
just
needs
to
be
returned
to
what
it
should
be,
which
is
an
Alleyway,
and
these
folks
who
live
on
Chicago
didn't
make
a
big
deal
out
of
it,
because
they're
nice
people
that
doesn't
entitle
everybody
else
to
steal
the
land
behind
their
house.
Sorry,
not
sorry.
Y'all
have.
D
I
did
but
the
date
what
what's
45
days
from
now
sounds
like
December.
D
Okay,
Grand,
and
so
that
would
bring
us
to
the
17th
and
if
we
could
make
that
time,
certain
at
1
30.
Since
that's
when
our.
G
B
C
D
K
G
I
can
clarify
it
because
the
answer
is
barring
any
changes
that
they
can't
speak
again,
but
if
there
is
something
that
does
substantively
change
and
I,
don't
think
it
is
because
to
vacate
they
normally
would
not
have
the
opportunity
to
speak
again.
G
I
By
writing.
Yeah
give
councilman
Miranda
I'm,
not
disagreeing
with
our
City
attorney
Council
attorney,
but,
however
whatever's
coming
the
new
people
are
coming,
that
they're
being
new
testimony
so
you're
going
to
avoid
these
individuals
from
questioning
the
people
that
are
coming
in.
That
may
present
a
testimony
that
you
want
to
hear
it's
not
fair
to
them,
because
they
haven't
heard
the
testimony
of
the
land
you
officers
or
whoever
yeah.
K
G
Right
well,
the
thing
is
that
it
won't
be.
It
won't
be
new
testimony
from
the
petitioner
from
Mr
nicolini,
and
the
thing
is
we
we've
had
issues
where
the
first
person
who
speaks
the
the
last
person
who
speaks
wants
to
address
something
they
heard
before
and
and
we
don't
allow
that
during
the
same
hearing.
G
We're
talking
about
the
people
who
you
heard
testimony
from
today
right
whether
they
would
have
the
opportunity
to
come
back
and
take
another
three
minutes,
and
at
first
and
and
normally
normally
at
during
regular
rezonings.
We
do
not
allow
that
if
you
feel
and
they're
present
that
you
want
to
ask
them
questions,
that's
one
thing,
but
to
give
everybody
another
opportunity
to
rehash
what
they've
already
previously
said
would
be
redundant.
I
Days
here
again
Sherman,
this
is
not
a
zoning
Haver.
This
is
not
a
zoning.
This
is
a
hearing
that
how
would
I
feel?
How
would
anyone
here
feel
if
you
were
one
here
that
gave
testimony
today
and
there's
some
people
coming
in,
and
you
can't
speak
because
you
were
to
give
up
your
three
minutes
to
me.
That's
unconstitutional
yeah.
G
No
I,
I
I,
understand
Mr
Miranda's
point
and
I
I
respect
that
and
that
being
the
case
as
long
as
people
are
on
notice.
That
council
is
willing
to
do
that.
Then
they
are
on
notice
that
they
can
do
it
and
that's
fine
too.
So
you
can
make
that
part
of
your
motion
if
you
wish,
or
just
by
unanimous
consent,
either
way.
C
C
K
C
K
Mr,
chairman
Charles
yep,
just
scheduling
thing
I,
have
to
pick
up
my
kids
before
six,
so
I
need
to
have
a
hard
stop
about
5
30.
there's
a
big
case
coming
up
in
two
or
three
cases.
I
can
either
leave
at
5
30,
and
if
we
haven't
hit
that
one
then
I
won't
be
here
or
the
alternative
is
that
we
an
alternative,
is
we
can
move
that
one
forward
or
another
alternative?
Is
that
I
can
go,
get
my
kids
and
hope
that
I
make
it
back
in
time?
C
Spent
the
greater
part
of
the
day
talking
about
84
cases
that,
in
my
opinion,
could
have
been
heard
by
two
o'clock
in
the
afternoon.
So
if
you
wish
to
look
at
the
audience
right
there
and
ask
them,
can
we
move
the
case
that
you're
interested
in
or
that
you
feel
is
the
most
important
please
by
all
means,
do
then
make
a
motion
yeah
go
ahead.
C
C
Q
G
K
It
was
just
to
move
item
number
89
to
be
the
next
item
and
there
was
oh
because
I
my
choices
are
I
either
have
to
leave
at
5,
30
or
I
have
to
go,
get
my
kids
and
bring
them
back
here,
and
so
the
solution
we
talked
about
was
putting
item
to
89.
Next,
there.
K
K
Q
K
C
C
R
You,
sir
I'm
just
waiting
on
my
PowerPoint
to
pop
up
on
the
screen.
Here
there
it
is
okay
there
it
is
so
Council.
This
is
a
public
hearing
on
consideration
of
a
recommended
order
on
a
petition
for
a
review
of
formal
decision
number
21-125.
R
R
So
the
subject
properties
of
the
formal
decision
were
two
properties
located
in
Ybor
City
at
1916
and
1918
East
5th
Avenue
prior
to
2000.
These
properties
were
zoned
yc6
and
in
2000
the
city
initiated
an
area-wide
rezoning,
but
property
owners
could
at
the
time,
opt
out
of
that
area-wide
rezoning
by
submitting
a
letter
to
the
city
requesting
that
they
be
excluded
from
the
rezoning.
R
R
For
reasons
that
we're
not
clear
of
at
this
point,
the
properties
weren't
inadvertently
rezoned
from
yc6
to
yc7,
so
the
authorized
agent
Mr
cardi
in
May
of
last
year,
2021
filed
an
application
requesting
a
formal
determination
for
these
two
properties,
because
his
desire
was
to
use
these
two
properties
as
parking
lots.
And
so
the
zoning
classification
is
important
because
the
yc6
classification
that
the
properties
were
originally
allows
parking
as
a
principal
use.
R
The
zoning
administrator
issued
a
decision
letter
on
August
30th
of
2021,
determining
that
the
properties
were,
in
fact
inadvertently,
rezoned
or
reclassified
to
YC
yc7
and
based
on
the
letter
that
the
city
received
from
2000
requesting
exclusion
of
these
properties.
The
properties
should
have
retained
their
yc6
classification.
R
So
Mr
Caldwell
in
response
to
the
formal
decision
letter
filed
a
petition
for
review
under
the
code,
because
it's
of
the
type
of
decision
it
is
it
undergoes
a
review
hearing
before
a
hearing
officer
and
that
hearing
officer
is
the
one
who
conducts
a
de
novo
hearing
where
he
does
fact-finding
and
you
know,
evaluates
the
evidence
and
the
testimony
and
then
issues
a
recommended
order.
And
that
is
the
order.
That's
before
Council
for
consideration
today.
R
So
based
upon
the
findings
of
facts
and
conclusions
of
law
and
the
evidence
that
the
hearing
officer
heard
and
testimony
that
he
received
during
the
hearing,
the
hearing
officer
recommended
upholding
the
zoning
administrator's
decision
that
determined
that
the
property
should
have
retained
their
yc6
zoning
classification.
That
again
allows
parking
as
a
principal
use.
For
these
two
lots.
R
The
hearing
officer
also
recommended
that
the
city
take
corrective
action
to
reclassify
both
of
these
lots
to
the
yc6
classification
so
again
councils.
The
purpose
of
this
public
hearing
is
for
Council
to
consider
the
recommendation
of
the
hearing
officer
and
again,
that
was
to
deny
the
petition
for
review
and
affirm
the
zoning
administrator's
formal
decision.
So,
following
this
public
hearing,
Council
has
a
number
of
possible
actions
that
it
could
take.
It
could
either
adopt
the
recommended
order
as
the
final
order
it
could
modify
the
recommended
order.
R
It
could
reject
the
recommended
order
or
it
could
remand
the
matter
back
to
the
hearing
officer
for
further
fact-finding.
If
you
determine
that
that
is
necessary.
So
in
a
moment
I'm
going
to
talk
about
exceptions
and
oral
argument
that
are
also
provided
for
under
the
code,
but
we
have.
We
have
received
a
number
of
exceptions
and
we
have
received
a
number
of
requests
for
oral
arguments.
R
So,
under
the
code
all
parties
are
entitled
to
provide
or
have
10
working
days
prior
to
the
date
Council
hearing
to
file
exceptions
to
the
recommended
order
with
the
city
clerk.
So
those
exceptions
have
to
consist
of
objections
to
the
findings
of
fact
or
conclusions
of
law
that
are
contained
in
the
hearing
officer's
recommended
order.
The
exceptions
have
to
identify
what
portion
of
the
recommended
order
they
are
disputing
and
they
also
have
to
provide
a
basis
for
the
exception.
R
Once
the
clerk
receives
all
those
exceptions.
The
clerk
then
forwards
hearing
officer's
recommended
order
and
the
exceptions
to
city
council,
along
with
all
of
the
evidence,
the
documentary
evidence
that
was
received
during
the
hearing
and
for
this
for
this
particular
hearing.
The
clerk
did
forward
those
to
city
council
via
email
on
October
12th
of
2022..
R
So
again,
city
council
can
also
allow
oral
argument
upon
the
request
upon
its
own
motion
or
upon
a
request
being
filed
by
a
party.
So
if
a
party
is
going
to
request
oral
argument,
the
party
must
do
so
by
filing
a
request
for
oral
argument,
concurrent
with
the
filing
of
any
exceptions
to
the
recommended
order
and
city
council
under
the
code
may
only
allow
for
oral
argument
if
they
find
that
the
hearing
officer
did
not
address
a
matter
that
was
introduced
into
the
record
at
the
hearing
officer
hearing
or
the
recommended
order
contains
an
ambiguity.
R
City
council
may
also
limit
the
scope
of
oral
argument,
and
it
is
your
city,
council,
attorney's
Duty
under
the
code,
to
review
the
request
for
oral
argument
and
the
exceptions
and
make
a
recommendation
as
to
whether
they
meet
the
criteria
under
the
code.
So
if
Council
allows
oral
argument,
I
just
want
you
to
be
aware
that
under
the
code,
the
content
of
the
testimony
has
to
be
the
same
as
the
testimony
that
was
offered
at
the
hearing
officer,
hearing
staff
and
each
party
are
allowed
up
to
10
minutes
to
speak
under
oral
argument.
R
Non-Party
participants
have
three
minutes
to
speak
and
no
person
may
submit
any
new
evidence
to
city
council
again.
We
did
receive
a
number
of
exceptions
and
requests
for
oral
argument.
In
a
moment,
I'll
have
Mr
Mr
Shelby
provide
your
recommendation
or
his
recommendation
as
to
whether
those
meet
the
criteria
under
the
code,
but
the
legal
department
has
reviewed
the
various
exceptions
that
we
have
received,
and
we
do
believe
that
there
may
be
additional
fact-finding
that
may
be
required
and
warranted
in
this
case,
and
so
certainly
Council.
G
May
I
address
that.
Please
Mr,
chairman,
sorry
statutorily
is
that
called
for
in
the
statute
in
the
code
to
remand
without
a
specific
discussion,
because
what
you
and
I
have
not
had
that
discussion
as
to
a
recommendation.
G
G
C
I'm
going
to
go
first
with
councilwoman,
her
attack
and
councilman
Carlson
councilman
Goods
I
have
a
procedural
question.
You
go
back
to
what
you
were
saying
about
we
hearing
testimony,
but
it
has
to
be
the
same
testimony
that
was
given.
Is
that
what
you
said?
Yes,
sir?
That's
correct
if
we
do
not
have
minutes
or
or
recognize
I'm,
not
asking
him
to
write
or
or
records
of
what
was
said
to
what
context
is
it
that
it
has
to
be
the
same?
Testimony.
C
Did
yeah,
that's
just
so
wanting
the
rest
of
the
council
members
to
know
the
people
that
are
out
in
the
eye
the
people
that
are
on
watching
this
until
to
know
that
that,
even
though
we
don't
have
the
physical
records
in
front
of
us
or
the
or
the
or
are
the
the
what
you
want
to
call
it
the
records
of
it?
How
are
we
supposed
to
know
whether
it's
the
same
or
not?
Please,
yes,.
R
Thank
you,
Mr.
Thank
you.
Mr
chair,
Susan
Johnsonville,
as
we
legal
department,
Miss,
Pettis,
Michael
and
I,
do
have
a
record
of
statements
that
were
made
during
the
hearing.
So
we
will
be
able
to
confirm
with
each
speaker
whether
or
not
they
are
and
finding
their
comments
to
those
that
were
made
in
front
of
the
hearing
officer
whether
they're
exceeding.
D
So
yes,
like
chairman
citro
I,
also
watched
the
hour
and
15
minute
videos
and
I
I,
just
I
had
a
couple
of
questions.
Before
we
even
get
started
one's
a
formal
decision
is
issued.
How
long
does
someone
have
to
rebut
that.
D
C
K
I
also
watched
the
video
and
read
the
documents
it.
It
seems
to
me
that
the
case
centered
around
the
document
that
was
provided
from
2000
and-
and
you
presented
it
as
fact
it
half
or
half
or
so
of
the
discussion-
was
about
the
custody
of
that
document
and
the
petitioner
testified
that
they
had
submitted
it
and
that
they
found
it
in
a
box.
But
the
city
did
not
prevent
present
any
testimony
as
to
having
found
it
in
their
files.
So
my
question
is:
is
there
any
new?
K
Is
there
any
new
testimony
or
evidence?
Has
the
city
done
any
kind
of
forensic
look
to
see?
I
I,
don't
know
if
that's
kept
in
the
clerk's
office
or
real
estate
or
somewhere
else,
but
is
there?
Is
there
any
City
testimony
that
that
document
existed
and
if
not,
what's
the
policy
of
the
city
regarding
claims
made
by
any
kind
of
petitioner?
If
a
document
does
not,
if
there's
no
record
of
a
document
of
the
city.
C
G
G
K
K
G
R
There
may
be
other
matters,
I
mean
I.
There
may
be
other
matters
that
related
to
this,
that
you
would
like
to
remand,
for
so
it
may
be
worthwhile
to
to
hear
from
if
it's
council's
pleasure,
I
mean
Mr.
Shelby
could
provide
you
with
his
recommendation
on
whether
or
not
special
exceptions
and
requests
for
oral
arguments
satisfy
the
code,
and
then
council
could
determine
whether
you
would
like
to
hear
oral
argument,
and
then
we
could
take
action
after
that.
I'm
certainly
happy
to.
Q
Q
I
want
to
waste
a
whole
bunch
of
time.
Hearing
oral
argument
when
you've
already
said
stated,
there's
some
issues
that
are
going
on
and
more
fact-finding
needs
to
be
done.
It's
clear,
that's
been
clear.
I've
looked
at
it
radically!
Last
time
we
talked
about
the
document.
We
talked
about
the
y6y7
the
to
me
this.
This
was
does
yc7
Super
cy6
I
mean
I.
There
are
other
questions
that
need
to
be
asked
and
I
don't
want
to
waste
a
lot
of
time
with
us,
Mrs
Shelby.
Q
How
do
we
need
to
craft
it
with
the
language
to
go
to
live
in?
In
my
opinion,
I'm
going
to
support
it,
be
remanded
back
to
the
magistrate
to
ask
those
back
playing
questions
about
the
y6y7
that
supersedes
it
and
those
documents
or
or
the
the
fact
find
about
the
documents
I
mean.
That's
that's
That's.
The
basis
of
this
whole
case
right
now.
It's
the
document.
He
did
it
so
I
I
mean
thank
you.
D
I
forgot,
my
my
my
line
is
is
similar.
My
line
of
questioning
is
similar
to
councilman
Carlson,
in
that
this
says
here
that
no
person
may
submit
new
evidence.
I
I
have
watched
the
video.
So
if
you're
telling
me
that
you
can't
give
us
any
and
any
new
evidence
tonight,
the
chain
of
custody
for
that
letter
is
is
critical.
Like
I
I
need
to
know.
R
Well,
you
excuse
me
Susan
Johnson
Velez
legal
department,
so
so
again
we
would
I
would
ask
if,
if
Council
would
like
to
remand
it
back,
then
with
specific
information
that
you
would
that
you
were
asking
for
additional
fact-finding
on,
so
that
we
can
help
direct
the
hearing
officer
and
and
direct
staff
in
in
terms
of
bringing
this
back
to
the
hearing
Master
for
further
fact.
Finding.
R
I
G
It
Mr
chairman
Council
complains
when
we
spend
a
lot
of
time
asking
questions
when
we
can
get
to
the
meat
of
the
matter.
There
are
people
here
who
are
filing
and
follow
the
procedure
and
want
to
be
able
to
have
their
exceptions.
Heard
Mr
michelini
is
also
requested
oral
argument.
He
would
be
able
to
address
it.
G
Provided
you
in
front
of
you,
each
have
a
physical
copy
of
this
order.
Now,
with
the
findings
of
fact-
and
you
also
have
what
was
provided
to
you
previously
by
the
city
attorney's
office-
the
relevant
sections
of
2761-
that
states
specif
specifically
in
the
final
order,
what
you
must
do-
and
it
has
to
be
very,
very
specific-
and
you
have
to
make
very
specific
findings.
So
you
have
people
who
went,
who
were
here
perhaps
at
a
previous
time
to
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
they've
gone
through
the
process
of
doing
that.
G
They
are
here
now
at
5,
30
5,
on
Thursday
afternoon
after
a
long
day
and
there's
questions
now
as
to
whether
they
want
to
be
heard
or
not.
My
suggestion
is,
you
can
have
all
your
questions
formulated
at
the
end
of
the
process
and
you'll
have
a
record
to
be
able
to
bring
back
to
the
hearing
officer
to
be
able
to
address
your
questions.
That's
my
position
and
I'm
prepared
to
make
a
recommendation.
If
you
wish
to
hear
it.
K
We've
we
we're
no
new
evidence,
councilmember
hertek
already
said:
there's
no
new
evidence
allowed.
We
we
all
watch
the
video.
There
seems
to
be
consensus
that
the
central
document
it
that
that
one
document,
the
the
custody
of
that
document
and
whether
that
whether
it
ever
existed
on
the
city
side
is,
is
the
the
central
question
to
it
and
so
I
I
think
we
should
remand
it.
Why?
Why
go
through
and
hear
everybody
say
the
same
thing
they
said
at
the
other
hearing
when
we
know
that
that
document
is
Central
to
it.
C
D
D
So
by
remanding
this
the
letter
is
mentioned
in
conclusions
of
law,
but
not
in
findings
of
fact
so
I
this
is
frustrating
foreign.
D
We
can't
we
can't
introduce
new
evidence-
let's,
let's,
let's
just
let's
just
remand
this
so
so,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
ask
specific
questions,
I
would
specifically
ask
that
they
mentioned
the
letter
in
the
findings
of
fact,.
K
Yeah,
just
we
were
manned
it
back
and
asked
that
they
review
the
chain
of
custody
and
and
get
evidence
as
to
whether
it
existed
in
the
city
and
I
would
suggest
in
addition
to
that
evidence
of
the
other
applications
that
the
applicant
testified
were
made
and
the
response
that
was
given
by
the
city
confirming
that
those
were
made
and
that
the
changes
were
made
which
they
testified
to
and
that
and
that
the
city
also
provide
testimony
as
to
what
happens
in
a
case
if,
if,
if
the
city
cannot
provide
evidence
of
the
document
existed
on
the
city
Side,
what
is
the
is
the
protocol
of
the
city
regarding
that
and
an
example.
K
D
Do
we
I
want
the
letter,
but
I
want
the
the
subsequent
properties
that
were
mentioned
in
the
in
the
presentation
about
the
other
letters
that
also
asked
for
this
same
request,
because
I
I
we
we
have
gotten
that
documentation,
but
there
are
questions
surrounding
that
so
and,
and
so
I
absolutely
appreciate
the
fact
that
not
only
do
we
want
the
copies
of
the
letters
and
when
they
were
received,
but
but
what
type
of
response
did
the
city
give
to
those.
D
When,
when
this
was
initially
requested
in
2000,
several
letters
were
sent,
we
were
given
testimony
that
several
other
letters
were
sent
but
I
believe
maybe
some
of
those
I
think
some
of
those
came
from
the
city
and
some
of
those
didn't
so
I
would
like
to
get
all
those
letters
that
went
to
different
folios.
Isn't
that
what
you
were
asking.
K
For
Mr
chair
the
the
applicant
as
I
remember,
it
testified
in
the
hearing
that
that
he
sent
similar
letters
on
other
properties
and
that
the
the
the
existing
zoning
was
retained,
and
so
the
city
must
have
sent
some
kind
of
response
to
them
and
so
verification
that
that
those
other
letters
exist
in
the
files
and
then
and
then
the-
and
this
is
in
2000
not
later
on
verification
that
those
documents
exist
in
the
file
and
that
the
zoning
wasn't
changed.
That's
not
from
the
petitioner
they've
already
testified
to
that.
K
This
is
from
the
city
and
then
and
then
the
same
thing
about
about
this
letter.
Did
this
letter
exist?
Was
there
any
what?
Whatever
the
correspondence
back
to
the
petitioner
was
on?
The
other
cases
that
they
applied
simultaneously
was
a
response
back
to
the
petitioner
on
this
one,
because
if
there
was
a
response,
but
the
letter
doesn't
exist
in
a
file,
that's
that's
written
the
evidence.
K
But
right
now
it
sounded
like
from
the
hearing
that
the
the
hearing
officer
accepted
the
letter,
as
fact,
even
though
it
only
exists
from
the
petitioner
and
and
so
we
you
know
we
we
want
to.
We
want
to
look
at
the
evidence
around
or
the
hearing
message
should
look
at
the
evidence
around
that
and
and
then
the
third
thing
that
I
suggested
was
what
is
the?
What
is
the
policy
of
the
city
if
it?
K
If,
if,
if
someone
claims
that
a
document
exists
and
the
city
can't
find
it,
does
it,
does
the
city
take
their
word,
for
it?
Do
they
do
some
kind
of
I,
don't
know
what
their
response
is,
but
this
I
use
the
example
of
the.
If
somebody
got
married,
if
somebody
says
they
got
married
and
this
doesn't
exist
in
the
clerk's
filing,
but
somebody
says
they
have
a
letter.
Does
that
does
that
help?
Does
then
the
clerk
put
it
in
the
file
or
not
I,
don't
know.
Q
I'm
glad
you
brought
that
point
up,
I
can't
make
any
names,
but
there
was
a
situation
that
happened
with
with
a
citizen,
the
same
type
of
situation,
and
so
he
says
we
can't
find
anything.
So
this
has
to
be
the
way
it
is
because
you
couldn't
find
anything
so
I
see
the
point
you're
making,
but
I
guess
for
me
is
the
seven
supersede
six.
R
So
if
the
property
retained
its
original
yc6
zoning,
then
it
can
be
used
today
by
write
as
a
parking
lot
having
been
rezoned
to
yc7,
which
does
not
permit
parking
as
a
principal
use
it
it
could
not
be
used.
It
cannot
be
used
as
Apartments.
So
that's
that's
the
difference
it
was.
It
was
actually
a
form.
You
know
area-wide
rezoning
and
adopted
an
ordinance
rezoning
right.
Okay,.
Q
I'm
with
you,
okay,
okay,
but
I-
do
think
that
you
know
we're.
There's
a
missing
link
missing
and
those
three
points.
I
think
we
need
to
find
out
to
make
a
good
base
decision.
And
again
my
recommendation
would
be
remand
until
the
hearing
officer
managed
to
keep
looking
through.
That
and
also
the
city
be
accountable
to
explain
their
side.
K
Right
I
I
heard
the
hearing
officers
say
in
the
testimony
that,
in
some
of
the
questioning
that
he
could
just
based
on
on
verbal
testimony,
make
a
judgment
about
whether
a
document
exists
or
not
and
I
don't
know.
If
that's
true
that
he
can
do
that.
But
our
specific
question
is
that
we
want
to
see
the
written
evidence.
We
want
to
see
the
evidence
that
it
existed
at
the
city,
not
that
he
made
a
judgment
as
to
as
to
somebody's
testimony
to
somebody's
verbal
testimony.
I.
D
C
E
R
Johnson
was
legal
tomorrow.
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
it's
council's
discretion
to
open
for
oral
argument
at
this
hearing
or
not.
It
appears
that
Council
I
mean
I,
advise
you
that,
in
my
in
my
initial
presentation
and
so
Council
decided
without
oral
argument
to
remand
the
matter
back
to
the
hearing
officer
and
so
right.
That's
where
that's
where
we
are
at
this
point.
There
will
be
after
additional
fact
finding
by
the
hearing
officer
there
will
be
a
new
recommended
order.
R
G
So
you
now
there
was
no
motion
to
open
or
totally
clear
on
that.
There
was
no
motion
to
open
oral
argument.
Therefore,
it
was
not
necessary
then,
to
review
the
request
for
oral
argument.
It
says
the
request
shall
be
based
upon
the
criteria
described
in
subsection.
One
above
the
city,
council
attorney
shall
review
the
request
for
all
argument
and
make
a
recommendation
as
to
whether
the
oral
argument
meets
the
criteria
that
was
done,
but
I
did
not
make
my
request.
C
T
C
Mr
Mr
samance
I'm,
sorry
to
the
representatives
that
just
walked
in
the
door,
the
representatives
that
just
walked
into
my
door,
this
door.
You
did
hear
my
statement
that
we
only
have
five.
There
has
to
be
four
votes,
one
way
or
the
other.
T
This
application
was
filed
with
the
city
of
Tampa
on
April
28
2022.
yep
African
owns
property
located
in
the
North
side
of
the
alley
that
is
pressed
to
be
vacated.
The
applicant's
reason
for
the
application
is
to
repair
clean,
outgrowth
and
unmaintained
city
property.
The
alley
was
created
by
subdivision
flat.
The
existing
right-of-way
is
approximately
six
thousand
square
feet.
T
T
Staff
have
Noel
Jackson's
vacating
request.
Easement
reservation
is
needed
for
Wastewater.
Natural
resources
must
comply
with
chapter
27
in
regard
to
tree
preservation
and
site
design,
for
any
improvements
placed
at
Jason's
trees
in
a
vacated
area
includes
my
presentation,
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions.
E
A
A
It
seems
that
most
Neighbors
in
that
to
the
left
and
to
the
right
of
me
have
done
that
in
some
way,
shape
or
form,
but
I
think
we're
running
into
a
similar
continuance
situation
where
we
would
have
all
parties
involved,
probably
on
the
same
case
date
of
that
11
17..
A
A
Actually
we're
all
positive,
so
it
was
just
basically
I'm
turning
it
into
a
green
space
anyway.
So
there
were
no
objections.
C
Q
All
right,
vac
22-19,
only
represented
for
further
in
consideration
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
vacant,
closing
discontinuing
and
abandon
their
Alleyway
located
north
of
Ohio
Avenue
south
of
Indiana
Avenue
East,
Apartment,
Avenue
and
west
of
Myrtle
Avenue
within
the
Platte
of
North
Riverside
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
Hillsborough
County
of
Florida,
and
want
to
describe
in
section
2
here
of
subject
to
certain
comments.
Conditions
as
more
particularly
set.
Fourth
hearing
providing
full
enforcement
leads
for
violations,
providing
for
definition,
interpretations
and
repealing
conflicts,
providing
facility
providing
effective
date.
C
B
T
T
T
T
T
Staff
does
object
to
this
vacant
air
request.
Easement
reservations
are
needed
overall
for
transportation,
Mobility
storm
water,
Tico,
Tico
people's
gas
spectrum
and
Frontier
natural
resources
comply
with
chapter
27
in
regard
to
tree
preservation
and
site
design
for
any
improvements,
Place
adjacent
to
trees
in
any
vacated
area.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions,
any
questions.
D
D
A
R
I
C
D
File
number
vac,
22-24
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
and
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
vacating,
closing
discontinuing
and
abandoning
Those
portions
of
Arch
Street
and
Edison
Avenue
rights
of
way
located
north
of
Cass
Street,
south
of
LaSalle
Street
East
of
Monroe
Street
and
West
of
North
Boulevard
within
the
plats
of
maps
of
Monroe's
and
clewis.
Addition
to
West
Tampa
and
Knolls
subdivision
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Hillsborough
County
Florida,
as
more
fully
described
in
section
2
here
of
subject
to
certain
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions
as
more
particularly
set
forth
herein.
D
B
M
Good
evening
city
council,
kamaria
Pettis
Michael
from
the
city
attorney's
office
file,
number
sgb
22-10
is
regarding
the
property
located
at
1280
East
Harrison
Street.
This
is
regarding
a
petition
for
review
that
was
filed
by
the
authorization
for
the
property
owner
the
authorization
for
the
property
requested
from
staff
to
allow
the
height
for
a
lot
for
height
for
Lots,
5
and
12,
located
within
the
Encore
development
to
be
developers
two
and
two
FAA
and
hcaa
height
limitations,
and
to
update
the
project.
M
Vision
book
and
Zoning
site
plan
notes
to
reflect
this
allowance
staff
determined
that
the
request
meets
the
criteria
for
a
substantial
change
and
deny
the
request
earlier.
Provided
city
council
city
council
should
have
been
provided,
the
relevant
code,
sections,
which
is
27-138,
subsection,
7
and
27-61,
along
with
sample
motions
and
the
rules
of
procedures
for
city
council,
to
conduct
this
hearing
the
standard
of
review.
M
Regarding
this
request,
this
petition
for
review
is,
according
to
founding
section
27-61
subsection
J
subsection
3,
which
states
that
city
council
can
conduct
a
de
novo
standard
of
review,
which
means
city
council
can
accept
new
evidence,
take
public
testimony
and
make
a
decision
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
petition
does
meet
through
the
substantial
change
criteria.
As
outlined
in
code
section
27-138
subsection
7.,
the
staff
member
present
to
explain
the
request
from
the
property
owners
miss
lashon
doc.
M
She
is
the
president
she'll
go
over
the
application
and
her
decision
regarding
this
item
after
city
council.
Here's
all
the
evidence
regarding
this
item.
City
council
can
affirm
the
decision
by
staff
and
thereby
deny
the
request
for
the
proposed
change
in
SUV,
2210
or
city
council
can
overturn
the
decision
by
staff
and
thereby
Grant
the
request
for
the
proposed
change
in
sgb
22-10
and
the
proposed
changes
are
regarding
our
easy
14-020.
M
Thank
you
so
much
Council,
lashon
dock
development,
coordination
and
I'd
like
to
present
to
you
a
presentation
for
this
item.
So
as
kamaria
has
mentioned,
this
is
an
appeal
hearing
of
a
substantial
Change
review
decision.
M
The
applicant
is
Jake
Kramer
and
the
request
is
a
review
of
section
27-138.
This
is
for
the
Encore
property,
which
I
will
show
you
shortly.
I
have
an
area
of
the
project
area
and
this
is
to
allow
the
height
to
be
determined
pursuant
to
FAA
and
hcaa
limitations,
and
that
is
for
the
two
lots:
lots,
5
and
12,
which
I
will
show
you
now
and
also
to
update
the
associated
Vision
growth
and
site
plan,
which
runs
along
with
the
current
PD.
M
So
this
is
an
aerial
of
the
site,
and
this
is
the
all
of
the
lots
that
are
identified
in
red
are
pro
or
a
part
of
the
project
area.
This
is
new
seal
Parkway.
That's
on
the
south.
This
is
Central
that
borders
on
the
west.
This
is
Nebraska
Avenue,
which
borders
on
the
East
and
I've
identified
each
lot
that
is
located
within
the
project
area.
M
Here
are
the
two
lots
which
are
under
this
request:
lot
5
and
lot
12.,
and
then
also
you
can
see
that
this
is
bounded
by
the
CBD,
the
central
business
district.
You
can
see
the
CBD
2
and
cbd-1
designations,
but
as
a
matter
of
fact,
Lot
10
has
a
dual
zoning
with
the
southern
end
being
located
in
the
cbd2
special
district.
M
So
what
I
provided
next
for
your
council
is
a
chart
just
to
show
you
the
development
within
the
project,
so
the
requested
height
just
so
you're
aware
it
would
apply
only
to
those
two
lots:
5
and
12..
Those
are
the
two
vacant
Lots
within
the
project
area.
The
other
lots
have
either
been
developed
or
they
have
been
approved
for
development.
M
Lot
8
has
its
entitlements
approved
through
an
incremental
review.
Lot
10
is
currently
in
process
of
receiving
permits,
so
if
it
were
granted,
it
would
only
apply
to
those
vacant.
Lots
and
I
have
some
pictures
of
the
site.
M
So
in
the
upper
left
is
the
you
can
see:
Meacham
Urban
Farm,
that's
lot
one
and
then
in
the
upper
right
is
Lots
two
and
three
in
the
lower
left
corner.
We
have
lots,
seven
and
nine
respectively
and
lot.
Six
is
the
middle
portion
of
the
project,
and
then
we
have
lots
four
and
eleven.
This
is
lot
four
and
that's
lot
11..
So
the
lots
that
are
in
question
are
Behind
These,
Lots.
M
So
next,
for
you,
I've
blown
up
the
actual
site
plan,
the
approved
PD
plan,
so
the
Encore
development
contains
28
Acres.
What
I
provided
for
you
is
the
detail
of
the
lots
that
are
included
within
the
approval.
The
Lots,
which
are
identified
in
green,
have
already
been
developed,
the
lots
that
are
highlighted
in
yellow
5
and
12
on
Nebraska.
Those
are
the
vacant
Lots
in
the
lots
that
are
under
this
request.
M
M
So
under
consideration,
staff
reviewed
the
history
of
the
approvals
with
the
reasonings
on
The
Encore
development
site.
We
looked
at
the
site
plan
note
as
it
was
initially
approved,
with
the
first
approval
for
the
rezoning.
The
note
originally
mentioned,
the
building
height
for
Lots,
nine
and
ten
would
be
governed
by
the
FAA
and
the
hcaa,
and
then
it
also
references
as
far
as
the
height
within
the
site
plan
itself
on
each
lot
it
lists
the
height,
so
you
can
see
just
to
go
back
just
a
second.
M
You
can
see
on
the
site
plan
each
lot
on
some
of
the
Lots.
It
mentions
the
height.
So
that's
what's
referred
to
when
we're
mentioning
that
so
in
2007
there
was
a
site
plan.
Note
that
mentioned
the
maximum
height,
that's
governed
by
FAA
in
the
hcaa,
and
then
the
maximum
height
is
also
shown
by
a
lot
on
the
site
plan.
It
was
just
in
two
places
on
the
current
approval
and
14,
and
so
staff
felt
that
we
just
wanted
to
make
sure
it
is
clarified
through
this
request
that
we
could
not
do
that
administratively.
M
M
M
M
The
only
option
would
have
been
for
those
two
lots
for
the
developer
or
the
applicant
to
come
in
and
rezone
to
another
PD,
which
would
have
split
the
project
and
staff
did
not
feel
that
those
two
lots
should
have
its
own
PD
designation.
It
just
makes
sense
to
keep
the
project
whole
in
one.
So
we
took
all
of
those
things
into
consideration,
but
staff
has
no
objections.
We
are
in
support.
Yeah
I
was
going
to
ask
you.
I
M
M
And
that
concludes
my
presentation.
Council
I
know
it's
late,
but
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions
much
early.
C
A
Thank
you,
Jay
Cramer,
with
Stearns
Weaver,
Miller,
401,
East,
Jackson
Street
here
representing
Orient
development
and
the
doctors,
Karen
and
palavi
Patel
family
office
they're,
the
developers,
the
bad
news
is
you're
not
going
to
get
to
talk
to
the
Charming
Mr
Leroy
Moore
from
Tampa
Housing
Authority.
Tonight
he
had
to
leave
for
a
board
meeting.
He
was
here
in
support.
The
good
news
is
I'm
not
going
to
give
you
our
full
presentation
because
of
the
late
hour
that
said,
I
would
like
to
introduce
you
to
the
developer.
This
is
very,
very
exciting.
A
J
Guys,
my
name
is
Chad
tujog
from
the
Patel
family
office.
I
totally
agree
with
what
Jake's
saying
in
alignment
with
Dr
Kieran
Patel
he's
very
pinpoint
in
his
drive
to
create
access
and
it's
accessed
in
so
many
ways
and
a
lot
of
it
that
we
see
is
with
the
medical
school
access
to
Medical
Education,
which
creates
access
to
health
care
and
then
in
this
kind
of
project.
It's
a
fact.
Similarly,
that
works
access
to
home
ownership
in
the
form
of
more
affordable
housing.
It
is
a
grocery
store.
J
So
it's
it's
an
independent
concept,
that's
tailored
to
the
area.
He
does
feel
pretty
strongly
that
as
downtown
grows.
This
will
be
the
central
part
and
anchor
kind
of
in
the
future
and
it'll
marry
the
entire
kind
of
Tampa
downtown
area.
What
we
see
is
it
now
is.
It
is
extending
North,
and
this
really
contributes
to
that
and
then
also
there's.
You
know
about
80
000
square
feet
of
medical
office
building,
that's
intended
so
in
in
every
way.
J
It's
just
a
Central
Access
for
everybody
of
all
kind
of
Economic
Opportunity
to
to
be
catered
to
and
to
have
the
opportunity
to
be
equal
in
in
where
they
live
and
how
they,
you
know,
are
provided
care
and
the
other
thing
just
as
a
small
thing.
As
we
see
like
a
large
Exodus
of
you
know,
Workforce
Teachers
Health,
Care
Providers.
They
can't
afford
anywhere
to
live.
So
the
intent
of
the
development
is
also
to
be
ownership
opportunity
at
a
lower
entry
rate.
J
So
that's
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at
I'll
stop
I
I
know
we're
all
a
little
hypoglycemic.
So
thanks
so
with.
A
That
we
would
ask
for
your
approval
tonight,
and
so
the
vote
would
be
to
overturn
the
staff
decision
with
staff
support.
I
This
is
the
most
unique
day,
I've
ever
actually
all
because
they're
they're
overturned
the
the
city's
staff
and
the
city
staff
is
telling
us
they're
for
it.
So
I
mean
it's
just
it's
like
juggling
today,
I
feel
like
I'm
in
a
circus
which
I
enjoy.
C
E
Just
a
comment
glad
to
see
this:
you
know
we
have
a
housing
crisis
all
across
the
board.
You
mentioned,
you
know
from
teaching
to
Medical
to
there's
an
affordability
issue
everywhere.
You.
E
And,
of
course,
you
know
you're
not
going
to
have
a
a
successful,
a
neighborhood
without
you
know,
Grocery
and
fresh
fruit.
I
know
you
have
the
the
channel
Publix
nearby,
but
this
is
going
to
be
within
that
community
that
people
can
walk
a
few
steps
to
the
grocery
store,
so
great
great,
a
great
project.
Thank
you.
I
J
So
the
grocer-
and
you
know
the
way
that
it's
been
socialized
in
our
conversations,
the
grocer
can't
be
someone
like
a
Walmart
green
or
something
like
that.
Just
in
the
spirit
of
what
we've
been
discussing
with
the
Tha.
So
we've
gone
through
the
due
diligence
of
getting
an
Independent
Grocer
that
will
serve
the
community
in
a
broad
way
and
Dr
Karen
Patel
has
taken
upon
himself
to
say:
hey
well
worst
case
scenario.
J
Is
that
I
will
do
it
myself,
and
so
we
do
have
actually,
luckily
he's
not
going
to
be
there
as
a
cashier
or
anything
like
that.
He's
obviously
just
putting
it
together,
but
so
it'll
be
an
Independent
Grocer
it'll
be
about
24
000
square
feet
on
the
ground
floor,
it'll
be
eight
stories
as
the
podium
and
then
residential
above
it.
J
The
top
two
floors
right
now,
as
it's
mapped
out
of
the
podium,
will
be
medical
office
building
and
it'll
all
be
medical
access,
and
so
we've
already
gotten
quite
a
bit
of.
We
have
no
idea
how
we're
going
to
allocate
that.
Q
Q
L
J
Yes,
that's
great
great
point,
so
I
think
right
now,
if
you
look
at
the
average
conveyance
of
real
property
in
downtown
Tampa,
it's
like
a
million
dollars
for
a
condo,
a
thousand
dollars
a
square
foot.
So
we're
is
that
that's
about
what
it
is
right
for
the
new
builds
where
it's
Carlton
things
like
that,
but
our
goal
is
to
get
very
low
entry
point
by
reducing
the
size.
It's
not
micro
units,
it's
quite
it's
a
little
bit
bigger
than
that
quite
different,
very
efficient!
J
There's
a
project
in
Miami
that
we
modeled
it
off
of
called
Legacy.
So
it's
incredibly
efficient
happy
to
share
it
with
you.
It's
there's
no
wasted
space
in
the
units
there's
about
220
units
that
are
going
to
be
they're,
not
micro,
but
it's
smaller
in
size,
very
close
that
average
square
footage
is
600
square
feet.
J
A
I
Many,
how
many
floors
eight
floors
of
apartments
or
six
floors
of
our.
A
C
Anyone
else
quick
question
FAA
was
involved
because
the
90
east
at
Tampa,
International
Airport.
I
C
F
So
David
Smith
Stearns,
Weber
Miller,
so
the
when
we
you
know
Senate,
you
do
any
applications
that
involve
any
height
the
aviation
Authority
gets
involved.
They
basically
just
identify
what
the
runway
path
is
that
they're
concerned
with
90.
C
F
C
F
A
A
C
Q
C
E
So
the
motion
that
I'd
like
to
make
is
to
overturn
the
denial.
Therefore,
granting
this,
which
is
file,
number
s?
U,
b-22-10-c
I
moved
to
overturn
the
zoning
administrators
denial
of
the
proposed
change
requests
in
sub
22-10
for
the
property
located
at
1280
East
Harrison
Street,
because
the
petitioner
has
demonstrated
that
the
application
is
not
a
substantial
change.
According
to
the
standards
set
forth
Hearing
in
section
27-1387,
but
also
in
hearing
from
the
city.
There
were
no
objections.
E
We
did
not
have
any
public
objections
and
I
believe
that
they
meet
the
makeup
and
character
of
The
Encore
District,
as
well
as
meet
the
goals
of
the
Encore
District,
in
the
sense
that
it
will
be
providing
Community
amenities
and
much
needed
housing
and
a
high
quality
product
that
we
can
all
be
very
proud
of.
Thank
you.
Second.
C
B
I
Chairman
move
88
to
resend
88
cannot
be
heard.
We've
got
to
re-notice
to
remove.
C
I
I
I
I
C
Q
Thank
you,
sir.
We've
had
a
lot
of
incidents
over
the
NFL
yet
Senator.
Two
years
ago,
I
asked
about
the
fencing
to
be
put
around
a
replaced
that
was
torn
out
over
there,
as
it
hasn't
been
done.
I,
like
the
make
a
motion
that
the
Parks
and
Recreation
install
the
fencing
of
the
Jacksonville
NFL
yet
Center
and
with
any
recommendations
from
the
CRA
with
funding
as
well.
You
can
bring
up
your
bank
wake
up
report
November.
Third,
second.
Q
G
Q
G
A
G
E
Q
Right
last
one
for
today
we
had
one
of
our
great
Solid
Waste
workers
do
a
great
job
the
place
to
go
to
the
Nationals,
the
the
solid
waste
convention
they
had.
Q
He
didn't,
he
didn't
take
a
prize
home,
but
I
want
to
recognize
him
getting
that
far
at
least
and
attempt
city
council
give
a
conversation
to
John
benningsley
on
November
8th,
we're
competing
in
the
El
Paso
for
the
national
swanna
rodeo
he's
the
only
second
he's
only
the
second
employee
to
compete
at
a
national
level
in
history,
for
the
City
of
Taylor,
Solid,
Waste,
I.
Think
excellent.
E
D
And
I've
been
talking
to
water
department
about
this,
so
I'm
moving
that
staff
update
with
the
feedback
from
the
Florida
dep,
which
is
scheduled
for
November
3rd
under
staff
reports,
an
unfision
unfinished
business
regarding
the
beneficial
use,
question
about
the
cities
discharged
be
continued
to
December,
1st
2021,
22.,
sorry
and
then
second.
D
C
D
Okay
and
then
I
would
like
to
make
to
make
a
motion
to
require
the
design
criteria
packages
be
added
to
to
the
required
sire
documentation
for
all
design,
build
contract,
approval
requests.
C
C
C
C
C
G
Shelby,
yes,
Mr,
chairman
I,
have
a
request
and
I've
talked
to
Abby,
Phil
and
I've
talked
to
the
clerk's
office.
It
can
be
done.
It's
for
next
week's
Workshop
is
to
group
all
of
the
development
items
together
on
the
workshop
and
put
them
first
because
they
usually,
for
whatever
reason,
not
take
until
the
end.
These
are
very
important
and
and
I'd
appreciate
Council,
giving
consideration
to
having
them
first
on
the
agenda.
As
a
group.