►
From YouTube: TCC 3-17-22 part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
D
D
H
D
And
the
next
available
date
would
be
may
5th
of
2022
at
1
30
in
the
afternoon.
Yes-
and
you
should
make
a
note
of
that-
please,
yes,.
B
D
D
We're
up
to
number
four,
mr
chairman,
and
there's
a
request
by
the
legal
department
with
regard
to
that.
A
Good
afternoon
kamaria
pettis
mackel
from
the
city
attorney's
office,
respect
respectfully.
Mr
chair
item
number
four
was
noticed
for
a
public
hearing,
but
it's
not
properly
reflected
on
the
agenda
as
a
result,
we're
asking
respectfully
for
a
continuance
of
item
number
four
and
I
believe
the
clerk
stated
that
the
next
available
date
is
april.
7Th.
D
B
D
We'll
be
on
for
first
reading,
first
reading,
okay,
what
the
time
for
it
it
would
be
under
first
reading.
Consideration
is.
D
A
B
9Am,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
uncle.
That
was
mr
c
mr
maniscalco
seconded
by
mr
miranda.
All
in
favor
all.
E
B
I
B
All
right
saying
about
mr
citroel
roll
call,
citroe.
B
B
Not
no,
no
sir,
not
including
28
and
26,
is
our
day.
I'm
sorry,
sir
okay.
Well,
I
apologize.
I
thought.
Okay,
we
haven't
26
already
earlier.
All
right,
so
that'd
be
27,
28
being
pulled,
miss
carlson
as
a
commenter.
Can
I.
L
Just
make
a
quick
comment
about
29
29,
the
we
allocated
this
money
in
cra
a
long
time
ago
and
tampa
union
station
has
the
windows
are,
are
falling
apart
and
other
things
are
falling
apart.
It
desperately
needs
protection
and
care,
it's
getting
rain
damage
and
other
kinds
of
damage,
and
so
I
I
would
just
thank
the
chief
of
staff
for
for
moving
this
helping
to
move
this
quickly
and
we,
you
know,
for
the
sake
of
our
community
we
need
to.
L
I
would
just
ask
staff
to
please
help
us
help
us
get
this
important
historic
building
repaired
as
quickly
as
possible.
Thank
you.
B
L
B
D
F
Maybe
I
want
to
move
it
again,
no
27
and
then
29
through
32,
omitting
28.
B
D
L
I
just
wanna,
I
just
wanna
vote
no
on
that.
I
think
it's.
I
think
it's
overreaching
for
one
consulting
firm
to
have
so
much
influence
over
the
city,
they're,
going
to
practically
be
embedded
in
every
part
of
the
city
on
a
regular
basis.
There's
no
specific
definition
as
to
how
much
time
they're
going
to
be-
and
it's
it's
great
to
have
outside
advice,
but
we
don't
need
to.
We
don't
need
to
follow
any
one
particular
model.
B
So
I
would
just
I
would
in
that
case,
mr
carlson.
I
I
I
thought
I
read.
Maybe
I
didn't
read
a
good
understanding
of
28.
I
didn't
know
this
was
going
to
be
incorporated
the
whole
city
from
the
bloomberg
consulting
out
of
new
york.
So
maybe
you
might
want
to
look
at
maybe
having
that
disgust
or
pull
for
discussion.
If
that's
the
case
right.
F
K
Good
afternoon
council,
nicole
travis
administrator
for
development
and
economic
opportunity
council,
when
I
started
in
january
24th,
the
application
had
already
been
submitted
for
bloomberg
and
associates
to
to
consider
tampa
as
one
of
the
cities
that
they
take
take
on
similar
to
what
councilman
miranda
just
stated
that
they've
done
work
in
a
lot
of
other
cities.
They
produce
over
4
000
consultant
hours
specific
to
the
projects
and
initiatives
that
that
the
city
needs.
They
look
at
the
cra
plan.
They
look
at
the
strategic
action
plan.
K
How
can
they
help
us
strategize
and
we're
talking
about
consultants
that
are
nationally
recognized
across
the
country,
some
of
which
that
I've
heard
speak
at
numerous
conferences
and
they
give
us
best
practices
and
advice
specific
to
the
issues
that
we're
working
on?
So
a
lot
of
the
issues
that
you
that
have
come
up
since
the
time
that
I've
been
here
are
things
that
we've
identified
with
transportation,
affordable
housing,
real
estate,
transaction
acquisition
and
disposition,
and
also
how
do
we
take
specific
initiatives
for
the
east
tampa
cra
area?
B
L
I
mean
just
like
we
just
hired
an
internal
candidate
for
police
chief
and
we've
hired
a
bunch
of
internal
candidates.
We
have
people
with
lots
of
experience.
I
have
about
25
years
of
experience
of
water
and
the
water
department
seems
to
completely
dismiss
all
of
it.
I
have
about
30
years
of
experience
of
economic
development,
including
advising
the
best
country
in
the
world
at
economic
development,
and
nobody
listens
to
it.
We
talk
about
inclusive
economic
development
and
nobody
listens
to
that,
and
so
now
we're
going
to
embed
an
outside
organization.
L
I've
worked
with
consultants,
I've
been
a
consultant,
and
you
bring
an
organization
like
this
so
embedded
into
the
organization
and
you're
going
to
get
bias
every
every
kind
of
consulting
firm.
Has
that
and
it's
one
point
of
view,
but
it
worries
me
because
they,
the
consultants
always
bring
in
jedi,
I
mean
bloomberg,
is
a
great
brand
and
I'm
sure
they
have
fantastic
consultants,
but
the
the
guy
who's.
L
The
expert
on
competitive
advantage
of
countries,
michael
porter,
google,
his
name
in
that
title
and
you'll,
see
the
controversies
in
countries
when
they
tried
to
advise
them,
and
so
my
my
concern
is
that
is
that
they're
so
embedded
and
there's
no
diversity
of
thought
already
and
the
the
administration
seems
not
to
be
listening
to
any
of
the
internal
ideas
and
then
the
third
thing
you
just
mentioned
cra
and
I
really
object
to
that.
L
B
L
B
L
B
All
right,
he
just
moved
second
by
mr
teatro
vocal.
L
B
K
C
K
Thank
you,
I'm
sorry,
so,
just
a
point
with
the
cra
we've
taken
the
redevelopment
plan
and
the
strategic
action
plan,
they're,
not
making
any
decisions
or
changing
anything
that
happened
strictly
giving
us
strategies
on
how
we
can
get
more
economic
development
jump
started
in
the
area.
These
are
the
things
that
that
you
want,
and
so
that's
what
we're
following
through
and
doubling
down
with
resources.
Doing
this
all
right.
Thank
you.
B
One
mr
miranda
motioned
by
mr
maniscalco
roll
call.
C
H
D
D
The
only
time
we're
going
to
have
to
do
from
this
point
forward
now
that
we're
all
here
in
order
to
save
time,
you
can
still
do
voice
votes
if
council
still
wants
to
or
the
chair
wants
to
do
a
roll
call
vote.
You
can,
if
it's
a
we're
not
set
up
yet
for
vote
and
record
for
second
read
so
you'll
have
to
do
a
vote.
Roll
call
vote
for
that,
but
the
only
time
you'll
have
to
do
for
these
sort
of
things
on
the
consent.
Docket,
a
roll
call
vote
is.
D
L
Yeah,
I
just
you
all
know
how
I
feel
about
the
edc:
it's
not
inclusive
economic
development,
it's
not
the
kind
of
economic
development
you
should
be
doing,
and
so
I'm
just
going
to
vote
now.
B
Mr
pierre
move
items
15-58
second,
second
by
mr
maniscalco,
all
in
favor
all
right.
All
right.
Can
you
pause
your
granny.
I
Move
to
set
or
schedule
this
public
hearing
file
number
su
1-22-19-c
to
may
5th
2020
22
at
1,
30
p.m.
B
D
M
Good
morning,
good
afternoon,
council
ron,
I
am
staff
with
historic
preservation-
item
number
60.
at
first
reading.
I
did
a
complete
presentation.
There
were
no
comments
by
council
at
that
time.
The
motion
was
seven
to
zero
to
move
forward.
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
on
the
ad
valorem
in
front
of
you
this
this
afternoon.
B
How
are
we
getting
back
in
the
swing
of
things?
You
see
that
this
yummy
it's
going
to
take
some
time.
Mr
chair.
B
F
Item
number
65
number
e
2022-8
chapter
27
move
in
order
for
first
reading
adoption,
an
audience
approving
a
historic
preservation,
property
tax
exemption,
application
related
to
the
restoration
renovation,
rehabilitation
of
certain
properties
owned
by
seneca
ventures;
llc
located
at
1619,
east
8th
avenue,
tampa
florida
and
the
ybor
city
historic
district,
based
upon
certain
findings
providing
for
notices
to
the
property,
appraisers
hillsborough
county,
providing
for
severability
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
conflict
providing
an
effective
date.
Thank
you.
B
Say
goodbye,
mr
vieira
roll
call.
C
E
E
B
O
Good
afternoon
council,
susan
johnson,
vales
senior
assistant
city
attorney
council,
this
is
second
reading
on
the
ordinance
that
would
repeal
the
noise
or
ordinance
amendments
that
council
adopted
on
january
13th
of
this
year.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'm
happy
to
answer
them.
We're
gonna
have
time
vote
here.
B
Virtually
I
mean
right
all
right:
let's
see
the
registered
feet.
B
Let's
miss
debbie
cook.
She
always
wants
to
go
to
the
phone
lines
first,
so
we'll
hear
that
first.
P
J
And
with
respect
to
item
number
61,
the.
H
H
I
would
state
to
you.
P
J
The
last
minute,
opposition
to
the
flawed
and
effectively
unenforceable
noise
ordinance
didn't
raise
any
anything
new
that
was
not
already
considered.
C
Q
I'm
sorry
this
is
george
grass.
Are
you
able
to
hear
me?
Yes,
sir,
we
can
I'm
having
issues
connecting
my
video.
Is
it
okay?
If
I
make
my
comments?
Yes,.
Q
All
right
great,
thank
you.
My
name
is
daniel
grass.
I've
been
a
resident
of
tampa
since
2015.,
my
wife
and
I,
and
we
became
residents
of
the
channel
side
district
in
2019,
where
I'm
an
owner
in
the
towers
of
channel
side.
I
live
on
the
20th
floor
and
since
my
residence
in
2019
due
to
different
business
establishments
in
this
area,
there
has
been
a
constant
disruption
of
peace
and
quiet
while
staying
in
my
residence.
Q
Q
This
issue
is
very
challenging
on
several
regards
when
it
comes
to
overall
wellness
relationship,
wellness
things
that
interfere
with
quality
of
life.
So
in
the
last
week
I
have
had
to
call
the
tampa
police
five
times.
Most
of
these
calls
have
always
been
after
10
p.m,
asking
the
same
thing
that
the
establishment
would
be
respectful
of
the
residents
of
the
towers
of
channel
side.
Q
So
I
would
just
ask
that
the
prior
amendments
that
have
gone
forth,
that
there
be
consideration
that
the
channel
side
district
is
not
the
same
as
ybor
and
that
there
needs
to
be
some
form
of
noise
mitigation
to
help
us
find
some
equipoise.
As
far
as
living
in
harmony
where
businesses
can
thrive,
but
also
that
residents
can
maintain
a
good
quality
of
life,
I
appreciate
your
time.
N
Good
afternoon,
thank
you
for
giving
me
a
second
chance.
I'm
sorry
about
this
morning.
All
right
I
reintroduced
myself.
My
name
is
dr
stephen
schwartz,
I'm
a
long
time
resident
of
the
channel
district.
I
am
currently
vice
president
for
the
association
board
of
directors
for
the
towers
of
channel
side.
N
I
have
some
comments
of
my
own,
but
I
promised
to
read
a
letter
of
one
of
my
fellow
board
members
that
meant
to
be
here,
but
couldn't
had
to
be
out
of
town,
so
I'm
going
to
do
both
as
quickly
as
possible
and
should
be
able
to
do
them
well
within
time
range
dear.
This
is
from
michael
leeds,
dear
council
members,
my
name
is
michael
leeds,
I'm
a
resident
of
the
towers
and
channel
side
and
former
channel
side
cac
board
member.
N
Thank
you
for
allowing
my
neighbor
and
fellow
board
member
steven
schwartz
to
read
my
testimony
today
as
I
needed
to
be
out
of
town
for
a
meeting
and
unable
to
attend
the
hearing.
I'm
writing
this
letter
to
show
my
support
for
the
passage
of
the
previous
approved
ordinance
2022-18,
which
was
to
modify
the
city's
noise
ordinance
in
part.
Removing
the
channel
district
from
the
special
exemption
exception
areas,
specifically
I'm
asking
council
to
not
support
the
above
measure,
which
would
repeal
said
ordinance.
N
The
channel
district
has
become
a
thriving
residential
submarket
in
the
downtown
area,
and
it
is
critical
that
the
city
of
tampa
manage
the
balance
between
resident
needs
and
commercial
activities.
Many
cities
across
the
state
with
in
the
metro
area,
including
clearwater,
st
pete
and
sarasota,
have
accomplished
this
objective:
managing
noise
levels
in
thriving
downtown
residential
neighborhoods,
while
allowing
businesses
to
operate
reasonable
hours
of
operation.
Where
noise
impact
is
concerned,
please
take
the
responsible
action
and
vote
to
reject
proposed
case,
allowing
the
previously
approved
ordinance
2022-18
to
be
approved.
Thank
you,
michael
j,
leeds
we
have.
N
We
started
talking
about
this
in
2020
to
the
police,
the
council
and
others
to
address
the
substantial
and
persistent
noise
problem
plaguing
the
channel
district
noise
ordinance
applicable
to
the
channel
district
has
been
unenforceable.
Despite
hundreds
of
calls
to
police,
we
were
relieved
and
excited
and
by
the
hope
that
came
october,
7th
2021
following
the
first
reading
of
the
new
ordinance,
including
a
section
addressing
outside
amplified
sound
new
ordinance,
was
set
to
take
effect
april
2022.
N
We
are
now
somewhat
crushed
by
the
move
to
repeal
that
new
ordinance
before
it
ever
saw
the
light
of
day
city
council
stated.
The
new
ordinance
was
rushed
and
needed
more
time.
However,
for
the
residents
of
the
channel
district,
this
will
extend
our
misery,
which
has
been
ongoing
for
two
years,
without
relief
we
oppose
repeal
and
feel
it
is
a
move
which
is
akin
to
throwing
out
the
baby
with
the
bath
water.
A
delay
will
further
put
off
vital
actions
of
outdoor
noise
control
and
the
five-minute
warning
so
very
well
needed
in
the
channel
district.
N
I
feel
it
is
almost
feels
prejudicial
against
the
residents
of
the
channel
district
to
further
delay
the
relief
for
those
of
us
who
have
been
seeking
help
for
so
long.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you.
Q
Q
R
Q
Live
in
the
05
tier
2205,
as
I
said,
and
I
felt
it
last
night,
the
operating
model
of
this
bar
is
between
10
and
10
pm
and
2.
Am
we
hear
it
every
night?
It
must
stop
and
we
need
your
help
to
stop
it.
What
is
that
noise?
Well,
it
consists
of
bombastic
music
screaming
hollering,
cursing
fighting
all
reverberating
off
of
the
structures
across
the
street
that
weren't
there
when
ajah
was
there.
Q
It
is
also
what
the
other
gentleman
earlier
said.
This
constant
beat
with
deep
woofer
sounds
that
reverberate
through
the
rebar
throughout
the
0.405
tier.
That's
where
you
come
in.
We
need
limits
limits
on
the
time
that
this
bar
can
create
this
noise.
I'm
trusting
that
you
will
agree
and
see
that
this
noise
is
not
reasonable
or
acceptable
in
a
residential
community
bottom
line.
Q
G
Good
afternoon
council,
ernest
mueller,
I'm
here
to
ask
the
city
council
to
go
ahead
and
pass
this
second
reading.
That
would
repeal
those
recent
changes
to
the
city's
noise
ordinance.
Now
I
agree
there
needs
to
be
a
new
noise
ordinance,
but
the
city
needs
a
noise
ordinance
that
is,
balancing
the
expectations,
reasonable
expectations
of
the
residents
and
their
need
for
quiet
and
the
positive
economic
impact
that
the
bar
and
restaurant
industry
has
on
this
city.
G
What
we
have
now
is
an
old
worn
out
noise
ordinance
that
we're
trying
to
patch
it's
like
patching
an
old,
worn
out
tire,
so
I'm
urging
you
to
move
to
go
ahead
and
do
this
and
let's
start
over,
it's
unfortunate
that
the
channel
side
aspect
is
also
part
and
parcel
of
this.
However,
what
this
the
detrimental
effect
that
this
ordinance
is
going
to
have
is
the
big
one
is
the
taking
away
of
that
warning.
G
As
I've
said
before.
In
my
experience
in
code
enforcement
warnings
have
an
85
percent
compliance
rate.
That
means
85
times
out
of
100.
They
are
going
to
work
and
in
in
our
noise
ordinance,
which
is
enforced
right
now
by
the
police
officers
and
the
police
officer.
Data
supports
this
is
that
that
that
compliance
rate
is
much
more
than
85
percent
and
you
get
rid
of
that
effective
enforcement
tool.
That's
going
to
be
detrimental
to
the
effective
enforcement
of
any
noise
ordinance.
G
So
again,
I'm
coming
back
before
you
and
saying
yes,
we
need
noise,
ordinance,
changes
the
I
believe
that
the
industry,
the
bar
and
restaurant
industry
is
galvanized.
I
know
that
my
client
has
and
wants
to
make
changes
wants
to
make
effective
changes
that
is
going
to
be
for
everybody,
so
I
urge
you
to
keep
moving
forward
with
this
repeal
and,
let's
start
over
with
a
21st
century
ordinance.
Thank
you.
R
Good
afternoon,
council,
steve
michellini,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
soho
business
alliance,
which
represents
about
45
different
businesses,
30
of
which
are
restaurants,
and
we,
when
we
first
developed
the
code
for
the
noise
ordinance.
You
may
recall
that
the
warning
was
put
in
there
to
stop
harassment
and
for
incidental
calls
that
may
end
up
with
citations,
and,
as
mr
mueller
has
already
indicated,
your
compliance
rate
is
85
percent
and
it
may
even
be
higher
than
that.
There
are
issues
that
have
not
been
considered
with
this
new
ordinance.
R
They
include
atmospheric
conditions
which
affect
noise,
and
many
of
you
have
heard
about
the
stadium
noise.
That's
that
bounces
off
the
clouds
and
is
heard
all
the
way
into
south
tampa
under
the
new
code.
This
would
become
a
violation
and
it's
not
just
a
stadium.
I
mean
you
have
noise,
that's
transmitted
across
water.
R
We
have
issues
regarding
harbor,
island
and
music
out
there
and
downtown
that
bounces
along
down
the
bay
and
is
heard
as
far
south
as
dallas
point.
So,
anyway,
we're
urging
you
to
continue
with
your
repeal
of
this
ordinance
or,
at
the
very
least,
to
insert
into
it
the
warning
provisions
that
were
previously
there.
They
are
protective
measures,
they're
not
onerous,
and
they
do
protect
both
the
homeowner
as
well
as
the
businesses.
R
You
can't
afford
to
start
issuing
tickets
immediately
or
leave
the
discretion
up
to
the
officer
in
the
field
to
decide
instantaneously,
to
issue
a
ticket
or
not
the
citation
had
a
buffer
in
it,
which
was
the
the
warning
that
was
being
issued
and
the
compliance
at
most.
The
time,
as
ernie
pointed
out,
80
to
95
percent
of
the
time,
resulted
in
immediate
compliance.
R
So
anyone
who
is
a
violator
needs
that
chance
and
would
request
that
you
include
that
if
you
go
forward
with
this
or
if
you
repeal
the
ordinance
as
it
is,
there's
also
a
number
of
citizens
that
are
standing
by
with
the
citizens
committee
made
up
of
business
owners
as
well
as
residents
to
help
adjust
and
craft
new
provisions
for
the
noise
ordinance.
That
would
be
brought
back
to
you.
R
B
O
Correct
susan
johnsonville
senior
assistant
city
attorney
know
that
is
not
correct.
There
is
a
noise
ordinance
on
the
books,
it's
contained
in
chapter
14
of
the
city
code,
the
ordinance
that
is
that
this
ordinance
would
repeal
merely
made
four
very
distinct
amendments
to
the
existing
noise
ordinance.
So
all
this
would
do
was
would
repeal
those
amendments,
but
the
ordinance
as
it
exists
well
as
it
existed
prior
to
those
amendments
would
still
stand
unless
and
until
other
amendments
are
adopted
to
change
those.
So
we
would
have
a
noise
ordinance
on
the
books.
B
For
whatever
reason,
I
know
we
stopped
the
community
conversation
because
I
was
under
impression.
The
community
conversations
were
going
to
continue,
and
in
april
we
would
come
back
and
insert
what
we
do
to
make
the
ordinance
strong,
because
we
have
what
I've
heard
from
the
venice
community
and
the
general
public
at
law.
B
So
we
stopped,
though,
so,
where
are
we
at
with
that
process?
Because,
no
matter
what
we
do,
it's
not
going
to
be
perfectly
right
to
get
close,
because
people
still
have
concerns
from
the
downtown
side,
the
business
community.
So
no
matter
what
we
do
today,
we
still
have
the
issue
of
making
sure
everyone
we're
never
going
to
make
everybody
100
happy,
but
we're
still
going
to
have
the
issue,
but
we're
still
not
engaged
with
the
people
and
the
businesses
to
craft
what
we
need
to
craft.
O
Well
and
mr
chair,
so
what
happened?
We
did
have
the
first
of
those
community
meetings
on
february
15th,
which
was
two
days
before
council
originally
took
up
this
repealing
ordinance.
We've
got
a
lot
of
questions
from
the
members
of
the
public.
If
council
is
going
to
repeal
the
noise
ordinance
amendments
what's
going
to
replace
them,
what
are
you
going
to
do
now?
What's
the
new
proposal,
and
there
was
no
new
proposal,
staff
didn't
have
any
direction
from
council
as
to
what
way
they
wanted
to
go.
O
If
it
wasn't
with
these
specific
amendments
that
we
had
previously,
you
know
presented
to
council,
and
so
that
was
the
concern
was
that
we
didn't
have
anything
any
response
for
the
community
and
without
further
guidance
from
city
council.
We
really
were
at
a
loss
as
to
how
to
move
forward
with
getting
comments
from
an
ordinance
that
was
scheduled
not
to
exist
anymore,
but.
O
Well-
and
I
mean
we'd-
be
happy
to
meet
with
individual
council
members,
but
of
course
we
need
a
motion
from
council
as
a
body.
O
B
Directory
council
tell
me
how
your
office
and
ms
travis
office
needs
to
move
forward,
so
we
can
do
we
need
to
do
for
the
citizens
at
large
in
their
residence
and
the
business
owner.
That's
all
I
care
about
is
how
your
offices
can
move.
The
movies
with
council
is
relying
on
you
to
get
that
information,
because
we
can
hear
from
the
public,
but
you're
going
to
be
wanting
to
craft.
We
need
the
craft
to
make
some
concessions
to
some
of
the
complaints
of
the
citizens
and
the
business
owners.
K
Good
afternoon
again,
council,
nicole
travis
administrator
of
development
and
economic
opportunity,
councilman
goods
from
the
legal
office
and
from
my
office
we
are
going
to
carry
forth
whatever
direction
council
provides.
So
if
you
tell
so,
I
understand
you
want,
you
want
staff
to
tell
you,
we
workshopped
the
items
with
you.
You
and
the
council
voted
on
those
four
items.
That
was
our
direction
to
then
go
to
the
community
and
have
public
meetings.
Now
that
you
are
repealing
that
we're
not
sure
what
the
direction
is,
so
we
need
to
know.
K
B
L
So
so,
just
to
remind
everybody,
we
we
and
staff
spent
a
couple
years
working
on
the
chain,
the
four
changes,
and
then
we
passed
it
and
as
much
as
I
like
former
council
member
dingfelder,
then
he
heard
it
sounded
like
he
heard
a
lot
of
feedback
from
ybor
city,
and
so
he
said
instead
of
fixing
a
a
ordinance
in
place,
let's
cancel
it
and
then
start
over,
and
I
objected
to
that
because
I,
I
think
the
ordinance,
the
ordinance,
let's
just
call
the
ordinance
with
the
four
changes
that
goes
into
effect
when
august
or
something
like
that.
L
Okay,
so
what
we
did
is
we
put
it
far
out
so
that
we
would
have
plenty
of
time
to
have
public
input
and
then
we
could
change
it.
But
at
least
we
have
the
structure
for
something
that
we
have.
If
we,
if
we
cancel
that
part
today,
then
we
have
to
start
over
with
a
whole
new
process
and
propose
something
completely
different,
and
so
I'm
going
to
vote
against
canceling
the
four
changes
again,
because
I
think
it's
better
to
listen
to
the
public
and
modify
it
also.
L
A
G
L
Try
to
edit
the
edit,
whatever
we
need
to
do
for
eboor
and
then
and
then
move
forward.
So
I'm
gonna
vote
against
this
again
because
I
think
it's
better
to
to
edit
the
four
points
then
to
go
back
to
zero.
I.
B
Think
what
mr
ding
from
the
point
was
is
that
and
you're
right,
because
I
was
I
was
under
that
impression
too,
and
I
understood
this
thing.
What
was
saying
is
that
the
business
owners
look
at
it
as
if
we
go
ahead
with
the
original
and
had
that
that
time
out,
they
don't
know
how
to
handle
their
businesses
because
they
don't
know
if
they
start
booking
people
to
start
doing
things,
and
this
happens
now
they
lose
money,
continue
to
have
lawsuits.
B
So
I
think
that
was
the
concern,
so
it's
kind
of
like
how
do
we
fix
that
pose?
I
think
you
can
move
forward
what
you're
saying,
but
how
do
we
fix
that
portion
for
the
business
owners
so
they
feel
they
can
still
do
their
bookings
or
whatever?
Is
that
grandfather?
Let
them
into
that
point?
Or
what
have
you?
B
So,
I
think
that's
the
concern
of
the
business
owner,
which
the
ordinance
I
thought
was
good
and
crafted,
but
it
was
it
needed
a
few
more
tweaks
with
the
ebook
entertainment
issues,
but
the
big
portion
is
if
we
had
moved
forward.
There
was
concern
that
how
could
they
deal
with
their
bookings
and
continue
their
businesses?
So
I
think
that's
their
major
concern
with
the
council.
How
did
you
go
and
fix
that.
L
Just
my
my
second
bite,
the
main
thing,
the
main
point
of
contention
was
the
outdoor
amplified
sound
after
midnight
and
if
you
look
at
most
of
venues
in
ebore,
most
of
them
primarily
have
indoor
capability,
but
there
are
several
that
have
outdoor,
but
we're
not
shutting
it
down.
One
of
the
buildings
says
like
five
floors,
and
this
would
only
impact
the
top
floor
and
it
doesn't
mean
they
would
shut
down.
L
L
Doesn't
it
does
affect
some
businesses,
but
it
doesn't
affect
most
and
it,
and
it
also
impacted
performing
arts
centers
like
the
cuban
club,
and
so
we
we
need
to
make
a.
We
need
to
make
a
carve
out
for
them
and
we
need
to
talk
to
the
the
the
business
owners
in
e-board
that
have
outdoor
amplified
sound
and
try
to
figure
out.
There's
some
kind
of
compromise
that
we
can
add.
S
Mr
vieira,
thank
you,
sir.
I
appreciate
that
yeah
just
my
thoughts.
I
think
the
proper
way
to
go
just
upon
review,
discussing
with
staff
and-
and
I
appreciate
all
of
y'all's
hard
work-
a
hundred
percent
on
this.
I
know
that
that's
it's
been
difficult
with
a
lot
of
back
and
forth.
Etcetera
is
to
number
one
there's
been
discussion,
and
some
folks
talked
about
it
about
some
sort
of
a
a
citizens
committee.
S
S
I
think
it
was
based
on
a
lot
of
concern
from
ybor
city
communities,
business
communities
that
have
been
ravaged
by
covet
19
now
getting
back
on
their
feet
and
then
suddenly,
looking
at
at
regulations
that
may
have
been
repealed
after
they're
going
to
make
all
of
those
changes
and
preparations
a
couple
months
in
a
couple
of
months,
repealed
before
it
takes
place,
talk
about
convoluted.
S
You
know
when
I
take
a
look
at
channel
side
like
I
talked
to
some
of
the
folks
at
channel
site
about
a
week
ago.
You
know
you
have
on
one
side,
you
got
igbor
city,
entertainment
district,
then
you
got
tampa
palms
somewhere
in
between
that
is
channel
side,
and
we
need
to
accommodate
for
that.
So
what
I
would
like
to
see
is
for
us
to
move
forward
from
this
ordinance
so
that
we
can,
like
has
been
said
before
deal
with
the
unique
issues
involved
in
ybor
city.
S
I
think
that
the
ordinance
is
crafted
would
pose
a
threat
there.
So
therefore
repeal
do
some
sort
of
a
committee
with
like,
like
really
fast,
like
in
a
moving
forward
or
really
really
fast
and
then
also
equally
fast,
moving
forward
with
immediate
relief
through
an
ordinance
for
channel
side.
That's
what
I
think.
E
E
E
We
could
have
had
two
meetings
under
our
belt,
that
that
would
have
been
with
the
public
business
owners
and
everybody
else
concerned
about
this
now
my
opinion
we're
too
much
behind
on
paper.
It
looks
like
it's
going
to
be
a
3-3
tie.
Vote
about
this
something's
got
to
give
we're
spending
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
it.
There
are
still
people
that
are
complaining
about
a
place
down
on
south
south
macdill.
E
That
shouldn't
have
been
that
it
shouldn't
have
been
a
bar.
In
my
opinion,
I've
got
bars
and
rest
excuse
me.
This
city
has
got
bars
and
restaurants
opening
up
that
are
infringing
upon
neighborhoods
and
those
people
want
to
go
to
sleep
at
nine
ten
o'clock
at
night,
but
that
bar
is
going
to
be
playing
music
after
midnight.
E
F
F
It
means
exactly
what
it
says
so,
and
I
said
this
before
you
didn't
have
any
problems.
It
was
everyone
had
some
rooftops
had
music
open,
some
didn't
have
it
way
back
in
the
50s
and
the
60s,
but
the
amplifiers
weren't
as
strong
as
they
are.
Today,
you
get
an
amplifier,
this
big,
it's
ten
times
a
hundred
times
more
more
powerful
than
one
the
size
of
this
building.
When
I
was
a
kid
because
the
amperage
you
have
in
it,
so
why
do
we
start
hurting
people?
It's
not
at
nine
o'clock
at
night?
F
It's
not
at
ten
o'clock
at
night
between
the
hours
of
ten
and
two
in
the
morning.
So
there
ought
to
be
some
something
to
have
to
do
with
the
volume
where
it's
heard,
how
it's
hurt.
People
have
to
sleep,
businesses
have
to
succeed,
so
somehow
they've
got
to
mash
together,
come
to
an
understanding,
and
I.
G
F
F
F
These
are
the
things
that
you
have
to
work
out
and
both
sides
are
not
coming
to
the
table,
especially
one
side,
because
I
understand
it's
about
business.
I
understand
it's
about
having
nice
time
and
feelings
and
all
that
great
time.
I
understand
all
that.
However,
somebody's
got
to
sleep
and
you
have
to
have
that
ratio
at
a
certain
hour.
Those
decibels
go
down.
So
people
can't
sleep,
that's
all
it
takes,
but
they
don't
want
to
come
to
any
agreement.
F
That's
how
it
always
is,
and
you'll
have
back
again
with
meters
that
sometimes
are
not
acceptable
in
the
court.
I
guess,
but
you
have
to
have
things
that
that
work
for
both
sides
and
right
now
we're
not
even
close,
so
it
just-
and
I
understand
the
one
you're
talking
about
mr
citro
and
I
understand
the
rest
of
them,
but
listen
in
the
old
days
and
I'm
talking
about
the
old
days
there
was
no
drinking
in
the
streets.
F
F
O
Well,
susan
johnson,
velez
legal
department,
so
if
the
repeal
ordinance
is
not
adopted,
then
the
ordinance
amendments
that
were
adopted
on
january
13th
will
stand
all
right.
So.
B
They
will
stand
so
what
I'm
wondering,
if
that's
the
case,
can
there
be
a
provision,
so
the
business
owners
can
know
it
goes
back
to
their
bookings.
It
goes
back
to
to
money,
it
can
there
be
a
provision
or
something
provided
to
where
we
we
hold
off
and
assure
them
or
say,
listen
and
give
them
that
time
frame.
B
So
if
they
do
have
the
book,
people,
whoever
before
this
thing,
goes
into
effect,
four
or
five
months
down
the
line
that
they'll
be
able
to
be
able
to
adhere
to
those
those
bookings
or
whatever,
and
they
don't
lose
that
or
not
sued,
because
they're
waiting
on
this
council
to
make
a
decision.
B
B
K
One
so
so
couple
things:
it
is:
it's
really
confusing
for
staff,
and
it's
also
confusing
for
the
public
where
we
are
and
what
what's
the
next
steps?
What
is
not
confusing
is
what
the
residents
of
channel
side
are
asking.
So
if
you
were
to
move
forward
and
repeal
this
ordinance,
you
will
be
starting
from
the
beginning
and
we
will
be
starting
over.
I
agree
with
councilman
vieira
that
you
can.
K
So
I
think
you
can
take
immediate
action
if
you,
if
you
so
we're
so
inclined
to
repeal
this
ordinance,
then
make
a
motion
to
direct
staff
to
draft
an
ordinance
to
ex
to
pull
channel
side
out
from
the
business
requirements
and
change
it
to
a
plainly,
audible
susan
is
going
to
correct
all
of
my
legal
terms
in
a
minute
that
that
would
give
immediate
and
you
don't
have
to
put
a
six-month
or
effective,
delayed,
effective
date
for
that
you
can
make
that
effective.
K
Immediately
once
you
approve
that
ordinance,
the
third
is:
if
you
have
an
ad
hoc
committee,
you
have
directed
staff
to
come
back
regarding
defining
entertainment
districts
in
maine
and
there's
no
entertainment
district
by
definition
in
our
code.
So
we
need
to
figure
that
out.
You
can
use
that
workshop
in
instead
to
have
a
report
back
from
this
ad
hoc
committee
that
you
appoint
and
that
we
will
have
something
a
little
sooner
than
later
and
allow
the
business
and
residents
to
try
to
find
a
a
balance,
and
we
would
work
alongside
them
to
do
that.
B
So
very
very
attorney
worked
this
out,
didn't
he
he
just
did
I
just.
S
Did
yeah,
if
I,
if
I
thank
you,
sir,
yes
and
and
that's
what
I
would
suggest
is
as
a
package
which
is
the
three
elements
of
a
committee,
immediate,
repeal
and
then
immediate
relief
right
now
for
channel
side,
and
I
think
what
you
said
is
is
important,
which
is
we
could
be
just
like
starting
over
to
quote
john
lennon's
greatest
solo
song
by
the
way.
S
But
I
I
think
that,
if
taken
is
a
as
a
package,
we're
not
just
repealing
it,
and
I
think
that
a
lot
of
people
in
different
parts
of
the
city
were
very
frustrated
by
the
repeal,
because
it
sends
the
message
that
we're
doing
nothing
well.
By
doing
this,
we're
saying:
listen,
we're
going
to
get
people
together
right
to
deal
with
acutely
affected
areas
to
balance
out
residential
interests
with
business
interests.
S
K
B
L
Thing
is
we
we
need
help
throughout
the
city
and
we
need
more
than
just
a
five-minute
role.
South
tampa
has
sound
problems
all
over
and,
and
she
sort
of
mentioned
this
and
we've.
L
I
would
rather
keep
the
the
thing
as
it
is
and
edit
it
then
cancel
it.
But
if
you
all
go
the
other
direction,
then
then
I
would
just
ask
that
the
rest
of
the
city
has
to
be
included.
We
have
to
look
at
our
neighborhoods
and
figure
out.
What's
reasonable
for
neighborhoods.
L
K
We,
if,
if
you're,
if
you
approve
an
ad
hoc
committee,
you
can
direct
that
commit.
That
could
be
a
part,
a
charge
of
the
committee-
and
I
would
be
my
recommendation-
is
to
do
this
city-wide
and
not
on
a
piecemeal
basis
or
that
helps
with
enforcement.
Every
time
you
know
a
law
enforcement
officer
goes
in.
They
have
to
look
at
the
placard
to
see
what
your
requirements
are,
and
that
would
take
you
out
of
the
business
of
asking
that
question
with
alcohol
sales
license.
You
know
when
they
come
before
you.
E
I
call
me
foolish
if
you
want,
but
you
know
we've
been
talking
about
transparency
all
morning
long,
this
ad
hoc
committee.
Would
it
be
a
committee
that
is
open
to
the
public?
Are
there
going
to
be
minutes
taken?
Is
it
going
to
be
noticed?
You
know,
I
sure
I
want
to
hear
from
the
restaurant
and
bar
owners.
That's
their
livelihood.
I
understand,
but
what's
more
important
is
to
hear
from
the
public
the
citizens
that
are
living
right
next
to
some
of
these
bars
or
down
the
street
from
these
bars.
E
D
So
that
would
I,
I
think,
by
its
nature,
be
a
sunshine
board,
and
that
would
be
the
requirements
if
anybody
thinks
otherwise,
please
say
so,
but
my
understanding
of
the
way
the
law
is
is
once
you
vote
to
delegate
authority
to
come
back
with
recommendations.
They,
you
are,
in
fact
delegating
creating
the
sunshine
board.
L
Just
a
procedural
point:
could
we
please
just
vote
this
up
or
down
and
then,
if
it
passes,
then
maybe
council,
member
vieira
can
make
it
put
his
proposal
into
motion
all.
S
This
would
be
even
though,
as
councilman
carlson
correctly
requested.
This
would
be
as
a
separate
issue
from
the
committee
and
the
immediate
relief
from
channel
side
but
in
my
mind,
they're
all
together
as
one
but
second.
E
You
go
to
me
first,
thank
you.
I
want
to
vote
no
on
this,
but
we
we
need
to
move
forward.
E
I
S
I
would
make
a
motion
with
two
parts
and
please
feel
free
to
amend
it
number
one
directing
staff
to
report
to
us
we
can
get
with
the
time.
I
would
say
I
mean
I
I'd
like
this
as
quick
as
possible.
Let
me
ask
you
guys:
how
long
do
you
all
think
you
need
for
to
come
back
with
the
specifics
of
the
the
committee
ad
hoc
committee
and
whatnot.
K
K
Just
gonna
we're
trying
to
think
through
the
committee
piece
and
that's
what
we're
talking
back
and
forth
and
I'm
I
know
that
adam
harden
has
probably
reached
out
to
some
of
you
about
an
a
committee
just
of
just
saying
that
there
needs
to
be
an
approach,
city-wide
and
balanced.
K
B
I
don't
I
don't.
I
don't
see
that
approach,
I
I
really
don't
I
don't
and
that
our
community,
I
I
see
community
meetings,
you
have
the
business
communities,
you
have
neighborhood
associations,
you
don't
need
to
go
we're
going
too
far.
The
neighborhoods
will
speak
their
piece.
You
have
the
business
owners,
you
know
the
entertainment
districts,
I
don't
think
you
have
to
go
that
stretch
to
have
an
ad
hoc
commit
all
these
things
like
that.
I
just
believe
you
need
to
have
neighborhood
engagement.
B
You
need
to
have
janelle
mcgregor
and
her
group
meet
with
these
neighborhood
associations
come
up
with
their
ideas
and
plans,
and
then
we
put
them
all
and
we
we
do
we
need
to
do.
B
I
just
don't
think
you
need
to
go
that
far
to
having
all
these
sunshine
and
all
this
kind
of
stuff
it
gets
money
there.
It
starts
to
get
political
there.
You
just
need
to
have
good
old-fashioned
community
engagement
talking
to
the
residents
of
those
communities.
You
know
and
talking
to
the
business
owners.
S
And
if
I
may
yeah
thank
you,
sir,
and
I
would
motion
for
so
fo
I'll.
Try
to
put
these
under
one
motion
number
one
for
staff
to
return
to
us
in
a
month.
30
is
that
okay
and
we
can
get
the
date
on
on
an
ad
hoc
committee
and
again,
I
know,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
things
to
fill
in
there
to
discuss
it
with
all
city
councilmen
members.
D
21St
sure
miss
you,
I'm
going
to
direct
your
attention
before
you
have
any
motions,
just
a
reminder,
I
believe
in
the
clerk
and
correct
me,
but
there
is
this
matter
that's
still
set,
although
when
I
read
it,
it
doesn't
make
reference
to
the
noise
ordinance.
But
if
I
look
at
the
third
item
down
on
the
28th
of
april
there's
a
workshop
staff
to
meet
with
the
community
based
on
the
feedback
provided
from
the
community
and
report
on
recommended
men
recommended
amendments
to
the
adopted
ordinance.
D
So
I
I
would
ask
the
council
to
entertain
a
motion
with
regard
to
resolving
that
issue
as
well
after
your
motion.
The
other
thing
council
is,
the
concept
of
a
an
ad
hoc
board,
be
created
by
council
is,
is
going
to
be
very
different
than
the
way
the
chair
described
it.
It
would
almost
take
on
a
life
of
being
almost
like
the
citizen
budget
and
finance
advisory
committee
and
to
meet
with
individual
council
members
to
talk
about
the
board.
D
I
just
want
you
to
know
that
it
would
be
a
sunshine
board
and
it
would
be
much
more
involved
to
form
an
ad
hoc
committee
of
city
council.
That
is
very
unusual.
To
do.
D
We've
had
one
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I'm
going
to
be
asking
council
to
put
the
budget
advisory
committee
on
the
agenda
to
discuss
so
that
being
the
case,
logistically
it
creates
a
lot
more
complexity.
L
The
you
all
probably
know
this
from
your
your
appointees,
but
that
committee
that
he
just
mentioned
is
we're
having
a
hard
time,
staffing
it
and
and
making
sure
that
we
get
a
quorum
and
sunshine
and
everything,
and
I
think
it
would
be
better
to
either
ask
staff
to
come
back
with
a
public
engagement
process
or
ask
them
to
have
a
certain
number
of
meetings.
I
mean
my
ideally.
I
would
recommend
that
we
have
in
an
ideal
situation.
L
We
would
have
eight
meetings
that
two
in
each
district,
one
half
of
them-
would
be
business,
so
one
business
meeting
in
each
district
and
one
neighborhood
meeting
in
each
district
and
invite
all
the
neighborhood
leaders
in
that
district
and
invite
all
the
business
leaders
in
that
district.
So
you
could
hear
from
them
separately,
although
they
might
cross
over.
It
would
be
good
to
hear
from
the
business
leaders,
ideally
by
themselves,
because
then
you'll
be
able
to
hear
their
specific
interests
and
then
the
the
same
with
the
neighbors.
L
S
S
And
I
have
no
objection
to
that,
I
mean,
and
if
that's
where
council
wants
to
go
to
avoid
the
complexity
issues
again,
I
think
that
this
positive
issue
is
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that
the
city
reaches
out
to
all
affected
communities
and
then
uses
the
the
talents
of
of
some
of
the
people
that
have
been
mentioned
for
a
potential
committee.
Whether
it
comes
through
a
committee
or
vigorous
engagement,
either
way
is
fine
with
me,
I
mean,
I
think
it
accomplishes
the
same
goal,
I'm
fine
with
that.
S
But
again
so
so
what
I
will
do,
then,
is,
if
I
may,
is
and
amend
my
motion
for
number
one
for
the
aforementioned
immediate
relief
for
channel
side
to
be
presented
to
us
in
an
ordinance.
What
do
you
all
want.
S
That
I
know
our
friends
that
are
at
genocide
would
love
that
and
then
number
two
for
a
plan
of
public
engagement
to
be
presented.
You
all
can
come
up
with
something
then
maybe
take
that
april
21st
date
to
to
update
us
on
on
the
plan
of
action,
how
it's
going
etcetera.
Is
that
good
with
everybody?
Is
that,
mr
fear,
if
you
don't
mind,
make
it
two
separate.
B
S
S
S
Yes,
sir,
and
then,
and
then
second
for
the
aforementioned
public
engagement
plan
to
be
brought
back
to
us
for
the
status
of
it
on
april
21st.
If
I
may
hear
you
yes
ma'am,
mrs.
K
Yes,
thank
you,
council.
So
the
the
engage,
the
public
engagement
piece.
We
have
no
problem
with
coming
up
with
a
plan
and,
coming
back
to
you
again,
I
do
need
direction
on.
What
exactly
are
we
taking
to
the
public
to
ask
them
for
comments
on
we've?
We
did
that
as
a
part
when
we
did
the
workshops,
we
did
that
we
did
a
lot
of
outreach
and
we
did
a
lot
of
public
and
we
narrowed
it
down
to
the
four
items
that
were
in
the
amendment.
K
B
B
Well,
I
think,
that's,
I
think,
that's
the
behind
the
scenes.
Look,
we
council,
member
that
way
when
you're
out
there,
you
know
what
we're
looking
for
each
district
is
is
unique
in
itself.
You
know
I
have
a
lot
of
entertainment
there,
so
I
call
them
entertainment
districts,
some
people
don't,
but
it
is
what
it
is
some
of
the
entertainment
districts
and
I
think
you
have
to
look
at
one.
What
is
the
entertainment
district,
where
they're
located
at
two?
You
talk
about
decimal
noise
with
your
amplified,
sound,
you
know,
e-board.
B
Everyone
comes
to
tampa
to
go
e-port
how
you
look
at
what
you
say
they
want
to
be
outside,
it's
hot.
They
don't
like
being
inside
and
closed
doors
and
most
of
the
business
owners
have
outside
entertainment.
So
it
comes
down
to
that.
It
comes
down
to
what
decimal
and
what
time
that
has
to
be
discussed
with
the
business
owners,
because
you
have
a
lot
of
people.
Employed,
waitresses
bar
backs
these
guys
they're
working
at
night
outside
in
the
open
air.
B
So
we
have
to
look
at.
I
believe
look
at
that
as
another
aspect.
When
you
look
at
your
neighborhoods,
what
is
the
neighborhood
saying
about
boom
boom
boom?
What
time
should
that
be
cut
down?
I
think
fourth
thing
you
look
at
what
what
what
will
be
the
police's
role
as
far
as
citations
or
five-minute
warnings,
whatever
I
think
those
are
some
of
your
key
components
to
your
noise.
I
mean
and
again
some
people
have
to
be
explained.
You
know
if
there
is
a
is.
You
saw
some
folks
talk
about
the
building.
B
I
can't
help
because
a
building
was
constructed.
Now
you
know
you
have
to
look
at
mr
richard
and
say
a
lot
of
this
new
music
and
stuff.
It's
it's
a
different
time
and
error
how
they
make
this
stuff,
and
it
is
loud.
So
it
has
to
be
characterized
okay
if
it's
inside
of
a
building
how
how
loud
or
how
what
the
amps
can
be
inside
that
build,
so
it
doesn't
vibrate
on
the
rebarb
or
on
the
building
I
mean,
but
you
to
a
business
owner.
B
When
people
hear
noise,
people
are
looking
to
see
where
the
noise
coming
from
and
they
want
to
go
with
a
crowd
at
so
it
has
to
be
to
where
what
or
how
much
sound
could
be
in
that
building.
You
know,
if
there's
a
levels,
then
you
might
have
to
do
a
study
you
might
have
to
have
the
officers
go
out
and
some
some
business
owners.
B
There's
computer
community
leaders
go
in
and
turn
the
music
up
and
say
well
what's
tolerable,
where
is
it
at
and
for
me
those
are
those
probably
my
my
main
points
per
se,
like
any
other.
We
can
chime
in
that.
We
can
bring
this
in
for
our
landing
before
three,
so
we
can
move
on
anyone
else.
Emotions.
B
S
And
and
again
what
I,
what
I
would
ask
is
that
a
community
engagement
plan
be
presented
to
tampa
city
council
on
april
21st
and-
and
I
mean
just
for
the
for
the
sake
of
time,
because
I
think
if
we
start
to
go
on
specifics-
and
I
say
that
respectfully,
I
think
I
think
we
yeah
okay
good.
Thank
you.
So
that's
that's
my
motion.
Thank
you.
B
D
And
yes,
mr
chairman,
for
the
sake
of
cleaning
up
the
agenda,
to
remove
that
item
regarding
noise
from
the
april
28th
workshop,
the
show.
B
A
On
source
of
income
discrimination,
we
provided
you
with
a
substitute
ordinance,
initially
the
ordinance
provided
for
a
march
first
date
of
commencement
of
penalties
due
to
the
timing
and
to
give
us
time
to
educate
the
public.
We've
pushed
that
date
down
to
back
to
june
1st,
but
everything
else
is,
as
it
was
in
the
initial
ordinance
all
right.
So
we
are
here.
If
you
have
any
questions
any.
J
This
is
the
the
senate
bill
of
rights
issue,
and
just
I
was
a
landlord
once
and
frankly,
I
think
the
landlord-tenant
relationship
should
be
left
alone.
If
a
you
know-
and
I
never
cared
where
your
money
anybody's
money
came
from,
and
I
don't
know
that
who
does,
but
I
just
feel
that
this
is
going
to
put
an
undue
burden
on
like
small
landlords,
like
you
know
that
might
have
one
property,
maybe
you
know
like.
J
Maybe
a
elderly
person
ended
up
with
a
property
and
it's
gonna
have
just
you
know
if
there's
some,
if
they
have
to
take
money,
say
from
section
8
or
any
governmental
entity
that
requires
that
requires
inspection,
then
if
they
take
the
money
because
they
can't
refuse
it,
then
they're
going
to
have
to
be
infected,
and,
frankly,
I
wouldn't
well
might
I
was
a
good
landlord,
but
even
still
I
still
wouldn't
want
somebody
coming
in.
J
If
I
make
an
agreement
with
somebody
for
x
amount
of
dollars
from
my
apartment
or
or
unit,
then
it
should
be
just
that
and
it
shouldn't
be
anybody's
business.
What
I
agreed
to
with
a
contract
with
with
a
senate
and
that's
just
simple
basic
contractual
law.
You
know
we
can.
We
can
contract
that
they
have
to
to
live
there
in
the
in
the
mansion.
They
have
to.
You
know,
mow
the
grass.
J
C
B
Right,
we
have
nobody
else
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
the
show,
correct
segment.
It
was
closed
by
mr
madison
scalpel,
someone's
vieira
on
february.
S
And
before
that,
may
I
say
something:
if
I
may,
I
appreciate
you
yeah,
I
I
just
wanted
to
emphasize.
You
know
this
is
a
an
ordinance
that
has
been
in
place
in
the
county.
We
haven't
seen
the
sky
fall
in
the
county,
I
think
to
the
vet
to
the
to
the
to
the
contrary.
What
we've
seen
is
is
tenants
in
in
a
lot
of
apartments
and
different
places.
Number
one
know
their
rights
know.
S
Their
rights
on
habitability
know
their
rights
on
discrimination,
issues
like
the
1968,
fair
housing,
law,
etcetera,
etcetera,
we've
seen
people
empowered
knowing
their
rights
rights
that
were
very,
very
hard
fought
for,
and
second
this
is
an
anti-discrimination
ordinance.
This
is
an
ordinance
that
fights
discrimination,
saying
that
if
your
lawful
source
of
income,
lawful
source
of
income
deals
with
something
like
a
housing,
voucher,
section
8,
if
it's
ssi,
if
it's
ssd,
if
it's
veterans
benefits,
you
may
not
discriminate
based
upon
that
lawful
source
of
income,
it
doesn't
says
you
have
to
take
the
person.
S
It
doesn't
mandate
that
just
that
you
can't
use
that
as
a
consideration
to
deny
somebody
housing
and
given
our
our
housing
crisis
that
we
obviously
have
with
with
the
rental
prices
going
up
about
a
quarter
over
the
last
year.
This
to
me
is
just
a
modicum
of
dignity
whenever
it
comes
to
this
issue,
so
I
I
look
forward
to
passing
this
and
I
think
everybody's
hard
work
chairman
goods
for
first
bringing
this
up.
Thank
you,
sir,
and
I
thank
you
appreciate
it
all
right.
L
Yes,
and
thank
you
for
that
description
that
was
helpful,
I
think
to
everybody.
I'd
like
to
move
file
number
e2022-8.
L
D
of
the
city
of
tampa
code
of
ordinances
in
connection
with
this
new
article,
seven
repealing
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinances
and
conflict
here
with
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
data.
Second.
T
T
T
T
The
applicants
are
steve
michellini
and
john
lum
and
those
four
sections
are
noted
on
the
screen
for
your
convenience
next
slide.
The
first
reading
was
held
on
march
3rd
2022.
It
was
continued
by
council
to
march
17th
today,
with
a
request
for
staff
to
review
the
information
submitted
and
provide
further
evaluation.
T
T
The
first
item
is
section
27
162
yards
between
residential
buildings.
The
current
code
allows
for
when
a
residential
development
contains
more
than
one
building
the
required
structural
separation
is
based
on
a
calculation
associated
with
the
building
massings
the
length,
the
width
and
the
height
of
the
building.
T
The
proposed
change
will
create
a
uniform
application
of
the
separation
distance
requirement.
As
far
as
impacts
go
impacts
will
vary
depending
on
the
constraints
of
the
underlying
zoning
district,
as
well
as
site-specific
details
that
affect
that
formula.
Calculation
and
those
inputs
include
the
proposed
building,
setbacks,
front,
rear
and
side
the
length
of
the
walls,
the
lot
size
and
the
dimensions.
All
of
these
factors
are
going
to
address
whether
or
not
the
calculation
comes
out
higher
than
15
feet
or
lower
than
15
feet.
T
The
current
code
allows
that,
for
each
foot
of
building
height
above
30
feet
in
the
residential
multi-family
district,
the
required
yards
shall
be
increased
by
one
foot
and
the
diagram
on
the
right
shows
conceptually
what
that
means
that
step
up
requirement,
which
is
what
we
call
it's
a
one-for-one
increase
above
the
30
feet
in
height
and
you
can
see
as
the
height
increases,
the
setbacks
have
to
be
increased
and
that
begins
at
30
feet
next
slide.
T
The
applicant
is
requesting
this
amendment
to
create
more
consistency
in
the
residential
building
forms
up
to
35
feet
and
reduce
the
need
to
seek
waivers
for
structures
up
to
35
feet
that
comply
with
the
same
minimum
setbacks
that
are
currently
required
for
buildings
up
to
30
feet
in
height.
So
it's
the
purple
area,
but
the
purple
area
below
the
35
foot
line
next
slide.
T
This
is
important,
though,
for
buildings
that
between
30
and
60
feet
in
height,
the
amendment
also
allows
for
the
following:
exterior
walls
may
be
placed
closer
to
the
front,
rear
and
side
property
lines
than
what
would
be
allowed
under
the
current
code.
The
exact
location
of
that
line
still
depends
on
the
height
of
the
building,
but
walls
exceeding
35
feet
in
height
may
be
placed
up
to
five
feet
closer
to
the
property
lines
in
all
directions,
and
that's
shown
on
the
screen
there.
T
If
you
see
above
the
35
foot
marker,
the
top
of
that
wall
is
now
going
into
the
purple,
whereas
before
it
wouldn't
have
been
out
allowed
to
go
into
the
purple.
So
that's
where
the
walls
are
going
closer
to
the
edges
of
the
property
line.
T
T
All
four
districts
use
the
30
foot
as
the
starting
point
for
the
step
up
increase
with
the
proposed
amendment.
Rm
24
would
be
the
only
multi-family
zoning
district
that
requires
the
step
up,
starting
at
35
rather
than
30..
While
the
amendment
would
establish
a
more
consistent
form
for
buildings
in
the
rm
that
match
single-family
zoning
districts,
it
also
creates
an
inconsistency
in
the
step
up
increase
when
you
compare
it
to
all
of
the
other
districts
that
require
the
step
up.
Increase
next
slide
due
to
the
flexibility
in
form,
mass
and
bulk
in
the
existing
code.
T
The
potential
outcomes
of
the
proposed
amendment
on
individual
site
designs
will
vary
based
upon
project
specific
details,
staff
estimates
if
the
additional
building
envelope
that
purple
area
is
relatively
small
but
could
allow
for
buildings
with
a
five
to
ten
percent
larger
total
floor
area
than
what
would
be
allowed
today
in
rm24,
and
we
just
want
to
note
that
the
maximum
density
or
the
number
of
units
remains
unchanged.
So
the
additional
floor
area
would
only
produce
larger
units.
It
would
not
increase
and
provide
more
housing
units.
T
Next
slide
staff
has
now
evaluated
all
the
potential
scenarios
and
associated
potential
outcomes
of
this
amendment.
This
example
is
just
one
potential
scenario
and
considers
an
ideal
situation
where
no
other
constraints
exist
which
may
impact
the
developable
area
in
consideration
of
the
potential
impact
the
rm24
zoning
accounts
for
about
2.7
percent
of
the
city's
land
area
and
then
on
to
item
three
next
slide.
T
This
is
the
visitor
parking
number
of
on-street
spaces.
Visitor
parking
is
required
for
single
residential
single-family
attached,
semi-detached
multi-family
town
host
style
and
multi-family
uses.
The
code
requires
0.25
spaces
for
unit.
In
all
those
cases.
The
amendment
removes
the
requirement
to
provide
visitor
parking
for
residential
single-family
semi-detached
units
only
next
slide.
T
This
example
this
exemplifies
what
that
discrepancy
is
so
both
of
these
images
are
of
two
unit
structures.
The
unit
on
the
left,
they're,
arranged
side
by
side,
visitor
parking
is
required
on
site
.25
spaces.
The
image
on
the
right
again,
it's
two
units
but
they're
organized
on
top
of
one
another
rather
than
side
by
side.
No
visitor
parking
is
required.
So
when
you
go
to
put
the
visitor
space
on
the
site,
where
do
you
put
it
and
which
unit
do
you
give
it
to
and
who
gets
to
use
it?
T
Yes,
sir,
so
visitor
parking
is
required
on
site
for
the
image
on
the
left,
but
it's
not
required
on
site
for
the
image
on
the
right.
So
that's
the
distinction
that
this
amendment
is
trying
to
correct
it's
trying
to
it's
trying
to
remove
it
for
the
highlighted
section
to
make
them
consistent.
That's
the
intent
because
they're
both
duplexes,
they
both
have
two
units
in
the
same
structure.
T
The
current
code
requires
that
for
multi-family,
townhouse
style
designs,
the
front
entry
must
face
a
street
right
of
way
rather
than
the
side
or
rear
corner
lot
lines.
The
proposed
amendment
allows
front
entrances
facing
the
courtyards
without
the
alternative
design
approval
by
the
zoning
administrator.
T
These
two
images
show
the
impacts
of
the
amendment
and
aid
in
understanding
what
the
the
impact
is
going
to
be
eliminating
the
requirement
for
doors
to
face
the
street
has
the
potential
to
reduce
the
visual
engagement
of
the
street
facing
facade,
which
is
a
common
urban
design
concern
that
is
typically
addressed
through
transparency
such
as
windows
or
through
fenestration.
T
In
addition
to
the
aesthetic
benefits
transparency
requirements
can
also
provide
for
lower
for
life
safety
benefits
such
as
influencing
lower
motorist
speeds
on
adjacent
streets
and
the
additional
opportunity
for
what
we
call
eyes
on
the
street,
which
is
a
crime
prevention
through
environmental
design.
A
septet
best
practice.
T
So
the
image
on
the
left
shows
the
example
that
could
that
could
occur
with
a
zoning
administrator
approval
today
that
if
the
zoning
administ,
that
that
has
the
entrances
facing
the
street
and
the
image
on
the
right
shows
entrances
not
facing
the
street.
But
you
can
see
it's
a
big
difference
and
it's
not
just
because
of
the
entrances
it's
because
of
the
windows
and
all
of
the
other
openings
in
the
building.
So
it's
a
bigger
conversation
than
just
where
the
entrance
of
the
of
the
unit
is
placed.
T
This
is
our
conclusion
statement
about
the
collective
impact
of
all
of
these
amendments
that
was
requested
at
the
prior
meeting.
The
proposed
amendment
may
affect
housing
cost
in
some
situations.
The
amendment
does
not
guarantee,
however,
that
all
new
housing
units
will
be
larger
and
that
costs
will
increase
as
a
result.
The
amendment
also
addresses
the
need
for
similar
projects
to
repeatedly
seek
waivers
in
the
future.
T
This
would
reduce
the
discretionary
review
period
and
could
thus
facilitate
a
timelier
response
from
the
market
in
producing
more
units
to
increase
the
overall
housing
supply
and
calm
increasing
prices,
respecting
both
of
these
two
perspectives.
The
amendment
affects
a
very
limited
amount
of
land
area
city-wide.
Thus,
staff
concludes
that
the
cumulative
impact
of
the
amendment
on
the
overall
housing
supply
would
either
be
limited
or
de
minimis
and
then
just
to
reiterate
the
code,
sections
that
we're
recommending
for
review
are
27
282
and
27
283.
T
B
For
mr
benson,
just
one,
mr
president,
did
you
receive
email
from
citizens
in
reference
to
their
concerns?
B
T
Yes,
sir,
we
pulled
the
relevant
points
out
of
those
items,
the
salient
points
and
incorporated
the
ones
that
reiterated
themselves
over
and
over
again
into
the
points
that
you
saw
on
the
screen
so
that
diagram
with
the
purple.
All
of
that
was
based
upon
the
input
that
we
received
from
the
public
and
from
the
applicant
all.
R
Good
afternoon,
council,
steve
michellini
we're
the
petitioners
on
this
privately
initiated
amendment
request,
and
I
just
received
this
20
minutes
ago,
or
so
so
let
me
just
go
through
first,
you
know
what
we're
requesting
and
and
how
it
how
it's
evaluated,
the
the
request
came
out
of
a
number
of
meetings
that
we
had
with
staff.
R
This
was
a
builders
association
series
of
meetings
that
started
four
years
ago
and
there
were
a
whole
list.
There
were
over
90
items
that
came
up
as
a
part
of
that
discussion
regarding
permitting
and
processing
that
were
to
be
addressed
over
time.
Those
were
whittled
down
continually
to
the
point
where
we
are
now
left
with
four
requests
and
they
are,
and
that's
and
necessarily
in
order
to
establish
the
35
feet
as
a
standard
for
the
height,
and
these
are
typically
smaller
developments.
These
are
not
huge
developments
that
are
that
are
towers.
R
R
You
can
build
to
35
feet
by
right,
so
I'm
not
sure
about
how
we
got
to
the
point
where
this
is
going
to
have
some
negative
impact
it.
Actually,
it
does
not
know
that
there
were
some
comments
about
somehow
affecting
affordable
housing.
R
R
This
is
this
is
the
tenth
hearing
that
we
had,
including
the
neighborhood
meetings
that
we
had
separately,
that
we
were
asked
to
conduct
the
the
areas
that
are
affected
for
24
would
be
the
same
as
if
you
had
a
single
family.
R
R
You
know
if
the
code,
this
is
you're,
inserting
design
standards,
no
one
that
I
know
would
ever
build
something
like
like
that
with
no
windows,
there
are
other
building
codes
that
kick
in.
You
have
life
safety
codes.
You
have
to
have
means
of
egress
for
emergency
means
of
egress.
Or
can
you
not
see
it?
We
got
it
now.
Thank
you.
R
Emergency
means
of
egress.
This
is
typically
what
you
have
and
I
understand
their
concern
about.
You
know
not
having
fenestration
not
having
windows
and
things
like
that,
but
there
are
other
building
codes
that
affect
that,
and
you
also.
Why
would
you
ever
do
that
you're,
preventing
light
and
air
from
getting
into
the
buildings?
R
I
want
to
again
bring
the
council's
attention
that
we
had
the
support
of
the
planning
commission.
It
was
vetted
by
the
staff,
as
well
as
the
planning
commissioners
and
forwarded
to
as
a
recommendation
for
approval
and
again
the
staff
recommended
this
they've
come
before
you.
You
know,
like
I
said,
a
number
of
times
in
workshops,
as
well
as
public
hearings
recommending
the
adoption
of
these
requests.
R
R
This
is
the
the
foot
for
foot
issue
regarding
the
30
going
from
35
feet.
Do
I
need
to
move
that
up.
R
R
Again,
the
staff
has
explained
to
you
and
I
think
that
we've
explained
to
you
that
with
two
units,
it's
hard
to
figure
out
who
controls
and
who
owns
that
third
parking
space
who
controls
it.
If
it's
a
fee,
simple
issue,
then
what
which
one
of
the
apartments
or
which
one
of
the
sides
do
you
assign
that
to
it,
reduces
green
space?
So
we're
constantly
having
to
ask
for
green
space
waivers
for
a
visitor
parking
space
that
doesn't
eliminate
the
already
required
parking
spaces
for
the
garage
and
the
driveway
space.
R
If
we
want
to
start
inserting
design
standards
citywide,
then
all
of
the
codes
have
to
be
reviewed
for
that
not
just
this
one,
but
anyway,
we're
respectfully
requesting
that
you
be
allowed
to
do
that.
There
are
other
building
codes
that
address
the
fenestration,
the
openings
and
the
windows.
R
R
This
is
the
tenth
hearing
that
we've
had
regarding
this
issue
and
again
they've
been
refined,
we're
not
asking
for
something:
it's
not
reasonable
and
considering
the
code.
So
what
happens?
If
you
have
to
go
through
the
design
exception
and
we've
submitted
probably
over
a
hundred
of
them
they're
approved,
none
of
them
have
been
disapproved,
but
what
it
does
add
is
it
adds
cost.
R
It
delays
that
process
and
it,
and
it
sends
you
into
another
process
before
you
can
get
your
permits.
So
you
know
we're
asking
for
relief
from
that.
If
it
were
contentious
and
the
these
design
exceptions
were
not
being
granted,
it
wouldn't
be
an
issue,
and
we
wouldn't
even
be
here
to
talk
to
you
about
it.
They
would
go
through
the
other
process,
who
would
be
a
rezoning
or
would
be
a
design
exception.
R
We
asked
three
different
individuals,
including
eric
cotton
gloria
moreta.
When
she
was
here
myself
and
other
builders,
we
could
never
come
up
with
the
same
dimension
that
these
buildings
were
supposed
to
be
separated
by
now.
This
is
a
minimum
setback
at
15
feet
and
if
you
go
higher
according
to
the
life
safety
code,
you
have
to
increase
that
height
of
the
separation
between
the
building.
So
this
doesn't
relieve
any
of
these
buildings
from
other
meeting
other
codes.
R
R
R
If
you
have
a
hundred
thousand
dollars-
and
you
can
only
build
two-
that's
fifty
thousand
dollars
per
unit
for
the
land
costs
so
into
with
respect
to
affordable
housing.
It
actually
makes
it
less
it's
less
expensive
if
you
allow
the
interior
courtyards
to
exist,
as
opposed
to
you
know,
when
the
linear
picture
that
I
showed
you
staff
had.
R
R
C
J
Hello
again
for
the
table
time
today,
okay
y'all
can
hear
me
ryan.
We.
J
Okay,
thank
you,
okay.
So
I've
been
listening
to
mr
mickelini
here
and
just
a
few
points
to
make
number
one
just
because
staff
approves
something
doesn't
mean
that
it's
the
right
thing
to
do.
If
you'll
remember
recently,
the
staff
approved
a
chemical
plant
and
abutting
a
apartment
complex,
and
that
wasn't
a
good
thing
to
do.
They
didn't
know
about
the
chemical
plant,
it
wasn't
their
fault,
but
again
they
don't
know
what
they
don't
know
sometimes,
but
we
do
so.
J
I
have
there's
already
been
quite
a
few
letters
and
written
into
the
file,
so
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
that,
but
I
know
deputy
summerman
had
sent
some
stuff
and
I
totally
agree
with
her
and
this
mr
michelin.
He
says
just
because
they
were
from
nine
pizzas
to
four
that
doesn't
still
make
it
the
best
thing
to
do
for
our
neighborhoods.
J
He
says,
oh
and
he
showed
a
picture.
They
showed
a
picture
of
these
shared
roofs
and
they're
at
the
same
pitch
and
all
that.
But
I
know
in
our
last
meeting
mrs
poynter
showed
a
picture
that
showed
this
to
the
top
of
the
the
floor
and
how
it
goes
to
start
the
start
of
that
floor
started
like
halfway
up
the
other
building
next
to
it,
so
that
doesn't
sound
like
a
good,
valid
argument.
J
J
So
that's
not
good,
and
in
this
whole
thing
to
me,
is
again.
I've
said
it
before
I'll
say
it
again:
it's
the
fox
mining,
the
hen
house.
I
have
hens
and
I
wouldn't
want
the
fox
anywhere
near
him.
So,
lastly,
you
know,
I
believe
that
we
are
short
a
city
councilman
in
this
and
it
needs
to
be.
It
needs
to
probably
wait
until
we
have
somebody
to
take
the
position
of
the
neighborhoods.
Mr
dingfelder
was
told
to
shut
up.
J
He
was
told
on
the
record
if
y'all
will
recall
on
city
council
by
one
of
one
of
these
developer,
guys
they
told
him
to
actually
shut
up
if
y'all
remember
the
hot
mike
moment-
and
we
didn't
appreciate
that.
So
we
got
a
fox
guiding
the
hen
house
and
we've
got
somebody
that
took
our
council
out.
Who
is
part
of
this
this
issue
right
now
and
I
think
it
just
needs
to
maybe
start
all
over
again,
because
I
don't
think
it's
the
right
thing
to
do
with
the
fox.
C
P
P
Doing
the
work
of
a
volunteer
member
to
help,
engage
the
building
community
and
help
bring
forward
some
things
that
would
streamline
the
process.
This
is
something
that's
been
discussed
with
the
staff.
For
many
years
every
single
month
tbba
meets
with
the
city
staff
to
discuss
policy
and
process
issues
related
to
the
building
code.
This
is
all
open
to
the
public.
So,
while
I
understand-
and
frankly
I
respect
the
concerns
of
the
community,
it's
real
simple
guys,
there's
only
four
components
to
building
a
house,
materials,
labor,
land
and
local
regulations.
P
You
don't
have
the
authority
to
control
any
of
those
except
local
regulations.
I've
got
trust
packages
that
have
increased
thirty
thousand
dollars
a
week.
Every
single
week
for
the
last
two
years,
you're
not
going
to
address
that
you're
not
going
to
address
land
costs
and
everybody
wants
to
move
to
tampa
bay,
build
a
house
have
a
pool
put
in
that's
that's!
That's!
P
What's
going
on,
so
all
we're
trying
to
do
is
come
forward
in
good
faith
and
present
things
that
the
staff
agrees
with
and
that
most
reasonable
people
can
agree
with,
so
that
we
can
get
through
this
process
as
quickly
and
as
painlessly
as
possible.
But
I'll
never
have
these
guys
come
before
us
again.
If
this
is
how
we're
gonna
do
business,
because
this
has
been
being
worked
on
for
four
years,
these
people
have
been
off
my
board
for
four
years.
Let's
do
the
right
thing,
I
beg
of
you.
P
H
H
Probably
like
I
said
four
years
ago,
we
were
sitting
with
gloria
moretta
and
you
know,
probably
ten
years
ago,
sitting
on
the
ecc
committee,
which
was
the
economic
competitiveness
committee
that
the
previous
mayor
had
put
on,
and
I
was
on
that
board
with
jennifer
and
the
idea
was
to
come
up
with
ideas
that
would
make
this
city
a
little
more
competitive
than
when
there's
other
people
think
about
other
cities
to
go
to.
Let's,
let's
streamline
some
of
our
stuff.
H
I've
seen
like
pictures
of
you
know
all
the
rules
and
regulations
in
the
city
of
tampa
that,
if
it's,
if
the
stack
of
papers
is
thick,
that
much
is
chapter
27
in
the
code
city
camp
I
mean
the
the
zoning
codes
are
very,
very
complex
and
very
open
in
a
lot
of
ways,
a
lot
of
old
stuff
and
that
isn't
perfect
and
doesn't
work
all
the
time.
H
So
the
idea
is,
how
do
we
tweak
some
things
to
make
staff
more
efficient,
make
make
get
permits
done
more
efficiently
without
affecting
the
neighborhoods,
and
that
was
our
idea
glad
you
said
the
word
naive,
because
I
guess
I
was
naive
thinking.
This
would
be
a
simple
thing
and
we
put
some
time
in
like
we
did
with
the
tree
fund
with
it.
H
You
know
the
the
tcc
folks
would
say
your
tss
trade
see
something
three
something
say
something
folks,
you
know:
we've
met
dozens
and
dozens
of
times
with
them
to
try
and
get
the
tree
code
redone
which
we
did,
but
that
was
all
volunteer
work
on
our
behalf
also-
and
I
think
we
all
love
the
city
of
tampa-
we
want
to
make
it
better,
and
these
were
not.
You
know
done
these
four
or
four
amendments
to
slip,
something
in
or
not.
H
You
know
some
job
specific
thing
that
would
you
know,
help
somebody.
This
is
just
a
global
thing
to
try
and
make
the
city
more
efficient
and
make
staff
more
efficient
and
respectfully,
you
know
hopefully
gets
approved
today.
So
thank
you
very
much.
B
C
L
I
previously
stated
my
reasons
for
voting,
no
one
to
be
consistent,
we'll
vote
no
again.
E
A
Good
afternoon,
council
annie
barnes
development
coronation
item
number
64
is
rec
21104
being
presented
for
second
breeding
and
adoption
for
6907
north
nebraska
avenue.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
seminole
heights,
residential
and
seminal
heights
commercial
intensive
to
seminole
heights.
Planned
development.
A
H
Good
afternoon
council,
for
the
record,
my
name
is
yoni
wasser.
My
address
is
400
north
ashley
drive
and
I
represent
the
applicant
on
this
item
out
of
respect
for
council's
busy
day
I'll.
Keep
this
very
brief.
This
rezoning
received
unanimous
approval
back
on
february
24th.
Since
that
time
we
have
implemented
all
requested
modifications.
B
H
Excuse
me,
as
I
was
saying,
received
unanimous
approval
on
february
24th.
Since
then
we
have
implemented
all
requested
modifications,
including
cleaning
up
our
site
plan,
as
well
as
adding
a
variety
of
transportation
notes.
We
hope
to
receive
council's
approval
again
today
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
Any.
S
Yes,
sir,
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading,
an
adoption
ordinance
rezoning,
proper
general
vicinity
of
6907
north
nebraska
avenue
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
shrs
seminole
heights,
residential
single
family
to
shci,
seminole
heights,
commercial,
intensive
to
shpd,
seminole
heights,
plant
development,
residential
multifamily,
providing
an
effective
date.
H
C
C
A
Thank
you,
council,
annie,
barnes
development
coordination
item
number
65
is
82
2131
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
for
401
south
howard
avenue
for
special
use
to
allow
the
sale
of
alcoholic
beverages
for
a
small
venue,
beer,
wine,
beer
and
wine
consumption
on
premises.
Only
site
plans
were
dropped
off
at
city
hall.
Yesterday,
I'm
available
for
any
questions
if
needed,.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair
and
council,
jim
porter,
with
acreman
401,
east
jackson.
Street
I've
not
been
sworn.
N
H
I
do
chair
and
council
we're
here
for
a
second
reading.
We
amended
this
light
plan
to
prohibit
outdoor
amplified
music,
as
requested
at
the
first
reading,
and
we
respectfully
asked
for
your
approval
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Any
questions
for
the
joke.
B
Mr
shelby,
that's.
D
D
H
That
was
what
I
thought
council's
intent
was
I
mean
we
have
no
objection
to
the
word
sound.
Maybe
ms
barnes
can
speak
to
that,
but
we
were
directed.
We
requested
a
citizen
requested
that
at
the
first
reading
we
complied
with
that
I'm
not
wed
to
the
language,
but
that's
what
I
understood
council's
intent
to
be.
R
A
E
Since
we
are,
since
I
am
speaking
at
hypotheticals
today,
I
have
been
to
many
a
bingo
hall
where
it
gets
loud
because
of
amplified
calling
of
numbers.
I
have
been
to
auction
houses
where
it
gets
awful.
I'm
not
saying
that
this
is
going
to
happen
at
a
bar
restaurant,
but
is
there
a
difference
between
amplified
music
and
amplified
sound.
H
H
D
H
Just
wanted,
I
don't
have
a
position,
I
mean
I
I
think
I
understood
council's
intent
at
the
last
meeting.
We
chose
the
word
music
because
that's
what
we
thought
you
wanted,
I
don't
know
if
you
can
consider
that
a
scrivener
there,
we
could
change
the
site
plan
to
sound.
I
I
just
don't
want,
for
the
sake
of
the
client,
to
be
delayed
because
of
a
word
that
we
have
no
objection
to
and.
H
Right
and
keep
in
mind
council:
this
is
a
small
venue,
tennessee
restaurant.
So
I
understand
council,
member
cetro's
concern
the
space,
isn't
there
to
do
bingo
and
it's
not
that
type
of
event.
So
I.
H
The
risk
to
any
sort
of
violation
is
very
small,
but
whatever
council's
pleasure
is.
B
B
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
porter,
for
that
sure
any
other
question,
mr
porter.
Anybody
to
speak
on
this
item.
C
B
It's
nice
miranda,
all
the
favorite.
All
right
here
pose
motion
granted
miss
beard.
Did
you
read
the
last
one?
Yes,
sir,
mr
reddick,
you
take.
F
I'll
take
it
even
though
last
time
I
won't
change
my
vocals.
I
realized
that
this
is
item
number
65
found
over
ab2-21-31.
F
What
is
being
presented
for
second
reading
adoption
orders
approving
a
specialty
permit?
That's
you,
too,
for
a
crawl,
favorite,
sale,
small
venue,
consumption
on
premise
only
and
making
off
of
the
sale
of
beer
and
wine
at
or
from
a
certain
lot
plot
or
track
of
land
located
401
south
howard
avenue,
tampa
florida
or
particularly
scrappy
section
two,
providing
that
all
ordinance
of
parts
of
ordinance
and
conflict
are
repealed,
providing
an
effective
date.
F
A
Development
coordination
item
number
66,
says:
82
2201,
it's
been
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
for
2301
north
albany
avenue
for
special
use,
two
for
alcoholic
beverage,
sales,
large
venue,
beer
and
wine
consumption
on
premises
and
package
sales,
off-premises
consumption
site
plans
were
dropped
off
at
city
hall.
Yesterday,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
B
Any
question
ms
barnes
all
right,
no
question
for
her.
We
have
an
applicant
she
swore
in
please.
C
P
Yes,
thank
you
good
afternoon,
mr
chair
and
members
of
the
council.
My
name
is
tu
mai
of
htmi
inc.
I'm
here
representing
that
petitioner.
The
special
the
special
use
request
is
to
allow
for
a
sale
of
alcoholic
beverages
for
a
large
venue,
beer
and
wine
consumption
on
premises
in
package
sales,
off-premises
consumption.
P
It's
in
the
the
project
location
is
in
the
west
tampa
overlay
district
total
a
b
sales
is
5922
square
feet
indoors,
and
the
project
site
is
for
a
wine
tasting
bar
offices,
wine
production
and
packaging
wine,
aging
storage
with
wholesale
trade
and
it's
family
owned
and
operated
by
wine
stream
incorporated.
We
respectfully
request
your
approval
and
adoption
of
special
use.
Thank
you
and
question
for
the.
B
L
Yes,
sir,
like
to
move
file,
number
ab2-22.01.
L
Ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
adoption
ordinance,
approving
special
use,
permit
su-2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
large
venue,
consumption
on
premises
and
package
sales,
off-premises
consumption
and
making
lawful
to
sale,
beer
and
wine
at
or
from
that
certain
lot
plot
or
tract
of
land
located
at
2301,
north
albany
avenue
tampa
florida
is
more
particularly
described
in
section
2,
providing
that
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinances
and
conflict
are
appealed
providing
effective
date.
Second,.
E
C
A
Thank
you,
council,
annie,
barnes
development,
coronation
item
number
67
is
ab2
2202
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption
for
601,
south
harbor
island
boulevard
for
specialties,
2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
large
venue,
beer,
one
and
liquor
consumption
on
premises
solely
site
plans
for
drop
down
city
hall.
Yesterday,
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
B
C
G
Kevin
reality
for
the
record
for
the
applicant,
and
I'm
just
here
to
answer
any
questions.
All
the
requested
site
plan
changes
between
first.
I
G
I
B
I
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
second
reading
and
adoption,
an
ordinance
approving
a
special
use,
permit
s2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
large
venue,
consumption
on
premises
only
and
making
lawful
a
sale
of
beverages
regarding
of
alcoholic
content,
beer
wine
and
liquor
on
that
certain
lot
plot
or
tract
of
land
located
at
601,
south
harbor
island
boulevard
tampa
florida,
that's
more
particularly
described
in
section
two,
providing
that
all
ordinances
are
parts
of
ordinances
and
conflict
or
repealed,
providing
an
effective
date.
Okay,
say
one.
Mr
miranda,
roll
call
vote.
Please
see.
I
A
Due
to
a
three
to
three
thai
vote
on
february
24th
2022,
the
asking
is
proposing
a
special
use
too
for
a
for
I'll
call
beverage
sales
for
a
small
venue,
beer,
one
in
liquor,
consumption
on
premises
and
package
sales,
off-premises
for
property
located
at
703
north
willow
avenue,
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
B
D
Here
on
number
68
is
it?
Are
they
available.
D
The
thing
is:
if
the
applicant
were
here,
this
is
this
is
a
continued
public
hearing
and
it
would
need
to
be
continued
to
a
date
and
time
certain.
Certainly
if
there's
another
3-3
tie,
then
it
would
have
to
be
continued.
D
That
appears
that
that's
the
situation
without
the
applicant,
the
question
is:
how
would
they
be
able
to
be
aware
of
when
this
is
being
continued
to
susan
joshua?
D
O
O
Department,
when
this
was
continued
at
your
at
your
the
last,
the
first
reading
that
you
know
the
date
and
time
was
announced
for
today
today
correct,
so
I'm
not
sure
why
the
applicant
is
not
available
for
city
council.
Hearing,
however,
could
staff.
D
A
Andy
barnes
development
coordination,
so
the
african
and
I
believe,
agents
are
the
same.
It
was
announced
at
the
february
24
22
hearing
that
it
was
a
taivo
and
it
would
be
continued
to
this
date
at
the
hearing,
so
they
they
knew
that
this
meeting
was
gonna
happen.
D
D
Here's
the
question
council:
the
next
regular
meeting
is
april
7th,
but
that
would
be
the
literal
first
day
of
the
tentative
timeline
of
the
seventh
council
member,
the
next
date
after
that
is.
B
February
21st
21st,
the
clerk
was
the
21st
24.
I
B
B
G
B
C
C
G
Proposed
vacating
request
to
vacate
the
alley
line
south
of
john
f
kennedy,
boulevard,
north
of
cleveland
street,
east
of
disparities,
avenue
and
west
of
blogger
way.
This
alley
was
created
for
subdivision
of
platte
of
rosemont
subdivision.
The
alley
is
located
in
south
tampa
in
the
west
shore
overlay
district.
G
This
application
was
filed
in
9,
20
21,
the
african-owned
property
north
side
of
the
alley
that
is
requested
to
be
vacated.
The
applicant's
reason
for
application
is
as
follows:
the
alley
runs
behind
the
buildings,
the
alley
daddy
ends
at
the
east
end
and
is
unusable
as
an
alley
to
access
this
block.
G
The
total
square
feet
approximate
total
square
feet
of
the
alley
requested
to
be
vacated,
is
4050
square
feet.
Valley's
partially
improved
asphalt,
paving
at
the
east
end
and
appears
to
be
in
use
by
the
owner
of
4430
west
kennedy
boulevard
to
access
the
building
from
the
alley
a
door
opens
onto
the
alley.
G
The
alley
is
unapproved
at
the
west
end,
wastewater,
tico
and
frontier
facilities
are
located
within
the
alley.
Alley
continues
to
the
east
only
of
the
subject
alley
valley,
continuation
is
improved
again
in
yellow,
is
the
proposed
vacating
request
of
the
alloy
in
yellow
and
the
property
owner
in
red,
and
it
does
continue
here
to
the
east.
G
The
recommendation
is:
staff
objects
to
the
vacant
request
based
on
responses
received
from
transportation
planning
and
urban
design.
This
vacating
request
is
approved
by
council.
Easement
reservations
are
required
overall
for
wastewater
t-con
frontier,
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions
a
question
ross.
G
B
G
Oh,
you
have
it,
sir.
Yes,
sir
okay
vacation
21-18,
which
has
been
well
presented
by
the
staff
effectively
council
members.
This
is
an
alleyway
to
nowhere.
It's
unimproved
emotionally
unapproved,
there's
no
history
of
travel
by
anyone
in
the
public.
It's
in
pretty
bad
condition.
It's
unsafe.
G
G
What
you'll
see
is
that
the
alleyway
is
blocked
by
buildings.
At
this
point,
this
is
the
unimproved
alley
and
blocked
at
this
point.
So
again,
this
is
really
an
alleyway
to
nowhere.
We
talked
to
the
property
owners
over
here
about
potentially
moving
forward
with
with
a
vacating,
so
this
alleyway
is
unimproved
as
well,
so
again
we're
blocked
at
this
point
and
blocked
at
this
point,
it's
not
used
for
vehicle
passage,
as
you
can
see,
it's
only
partially
improved
and
by
the
test
of
time,
the
same
elements
in
2016
2009
2004.
G
The
alley
next
door
is
used
for
parking
and
for
purposes
of
the
business
as
it
is
here
for
partial
purposes.
You
can
see
the
condition
that
part
of
the
alley
next
door
is.
We
talked
to
the
property
owner
next
door
at
the
other
alleyway,
and
these
are
some
of
the
unimproved
areas
of
the
alleyway
that
you're
looking
at
now.
One
critical
factor
of
planning
is
crime
prevention
through
environmental
design,
which
is
september,
which
has
four
major
functions
to
keep
things
safe,
because
these
alleyways
are
dark.
G
G
Under
the
four
basis
of
crime
prevention
design,
it
doesn't
mean
any
of
them
in
the
sense
that
criminals
don't
want
to
be
observed.
They
can
hide
in
the
alleyway
as
dark
and
overgrown.
As
I
showed
you,
there's
no
access
control
in
terms
of
people
hanging
out
there,
there's
no
lighting,
there's
no
territory
enforcement
and
there's
really
no
maintenance,
terrible
maintenance
and
management.
G
There's
no
lights,
it's
overgrown,
it's
unimproved
and
those
conditions
are
very
bad
at
night,
so
really.
In
summary,
this
is
an
alley
to
nowhere,
mostly
unapproved
there's.
No
history
of
travel,
there's
no
in
terms
of
test
of
time,
there's
been
no
use
by
the
public.
It's
not
in
good
condition
it's
unsafe
and
creates
trash
and
safety
issues.
I
Jonathan
scott
transportation
planning
we
objected
to
the.
B
Any
questions
for
staff
before
I
go
back
to
mr
president,
rebuttal.
F
N
T
M
B
H
The
on.
H
D
H
And
we
didn't
feel
that
there
was
any
demonstrated.
L
L
C
H
H
H
So
this
alley
was
ideally
it
provides
it's
going
to
provide
vehicle
access
to
the
site
and
would
eliminate
the
need
for
multiple
curb
cuts
on
kennedy
boulevard,
which
ties
into
the
the
city's
visit
vision,
zero
policy,
so
it's
in
effect
the
alleyway
is
going
to
provide
kind
of
like
a
free
driveway
for
for
the
future
development
of
that
parcel.
B
G
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
I'm
not
sure,
with
all
due
respect
to
the
staff,
as
you
can
see
from
the
pictures,
this
alleyway
is
barely
wider
than
a
car.
So
if,
if
as
they
indicated,
it
would
provide
parking
for
this
parcel
but
to
clarify
it
does
not
require
for
access
to
the
parcel,
they
have
access
all
the
way
along
kennedy
and
on
the
side
streets.
G
So
when
staff
talks
about
vehicular
movements
through
this
alleyway
and
parking
for
this
property,
those
two
are
impossibilities,
as
they
address
each
other
and
again
to
clarify
the
property
owner
has
plenty
of
access.
This
is
not
the
access
to
the
property.
There
is
a
door
behind,
but
the
main
access
is
on
the
front
on
the
side,
streets.
G
Yeah,
I
would
like
to
touch
on
that
point
of
that
mr
pressman
made
about
currently
it's
as
wide
as
a
car.
Technically,
it's
platted.
It's
15
feet
wide
so
technically
in
the
future.
If
something
was
developed
there
to
mr
mikulski's
point,
the
developer
would
have
the
opportunity
to
maybe
pave
that
and
it
would
be
15
feet
in
the
future.
But
currently
yes,
mr
pressman's
right,
but
to
mr
mikulski's
point,
it
is
actually
15
feet
wide
by
flat.
G
H
So,
just
to
clarify
it's
not
not
that
you
would
we
would
if
someone
would
redevelop
this
parcel
that
they
would
park
in
the
alley,
but
their
parking
lot
would
be
accessed
off
the
alley
and
it's
something
that
we're
running
into,
and
especially
in
seminole
heights
along
the
you
know,
the
florida
and
tampa
corridor
is
we're
trying
to
make
it
more
walkable.
But
we
it's
really
impossible
because
there
are
no
alleys.
So
a
lot
of
that
we're
still.
G
B
B
I
E
Thank
you
file
number
vac,
21-18
orders
being
presented
for
first.
We
need
consideration.
E
North
city
tampa
florida,
vacating,
closing
discontinuing
and
abandoning
right
away:
alleyway
located
south
of
kennedy,
boulevard,
north
of
cleveland
street
east
of
hesperdys
street
and
west
of
lauber
way
within
the
platte
rosemont
subdivision,
a
subdivision
in
the
city
of
tampa
hillsborough
county
florida,
more
particularly
described
section
one
thereof,
subject
to
certain
governance
conditions
and
restrictions
is
more
particularly
set
forth
here
in
providing
for
enforcement
and
penalty
for
violation,
providing
for
definitions,
interpretations
and
repealing
conflicts,
providing
for
some
affordability
providing
for
an
effective
date.
Second,.
C
A
Good
afternoon
kamaria
pettis
mackel
from
the
city
attorney's
office
item
number
70
is
a
petition
for
review
that
was
filed
regarding
a
architectural
review
board
hearing
for
the
property
located
at
714
south
boulevard.
The
arc
case
number
is
arc
21-557.
A
The
architectural
review
commission
heard
the
request
on
december
9th
of
2021
and
denied
the
various
requests
by
the
property
owner
based
upon
the
property
owner,
not
meeting
the
hardship
criteria
as
set
forth
in
code
section
27-114,
specifically
subsections,
1
and
5.
Of
that
code.
Section
city
council
was
previously
provided
the
relevant
code
sections,
which
is
code,
section,
27-114
the
rules
of
procedure
and
sample
motions.
A
Regarding
this
particular
item,
the
standard
of
review,
as
according
to
code,
section
27-61,
subsection
j-2
is
a
de
novo
standard
of
review,
meaning
a
city
council
can
take
testimony,
receive
new
evidence
and
make
a
decision
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
petitioner
has
met
the
hardship
criteria.
That's
set
forth
in
code,
section
27-114.
A
Mr
vela,
with
staff,
will
give
an
overview
of
the
application
request
before
the
architectural
review
commission
and
explain
further
the
hardship
criteria
that
I
previously
provided
and
that's
again,
six
items
that
the
subsection
that
the
property
owner
must
meet
for
the
hardship
criteria
after
taking
the
public
testimony
and
receiving
any
evidence
regarding
this
item.
City
council
can
take.
Three
actions,
has
three
options
regarding
this
petition
for
review
city
council
can
affirm
the
architectural
review
decision
and
deny
the
variance
that
was
requested
by
the
property
owner
city
council.
A
Can
remand
the
item
back
to
the
architectural
review
commission
with
specific
direction
for
the
board
to
consider
or
lastly,
city
council
can
overturn
the
decision
from
the
architectural
review
commission
and
thereby
thereby
grant
the
variants
requested
by
the
property
owner
at
this
time.
I'll
turn.
D
So
sorry,
I
I
forgive
me
for
interrupting,
but
before
you
turn
it
over
to
mr
vela,
just
a
reminder,
council
that
if
you
have
any
ex
parte
communications
relative
to
this,
that
you
disclose
them
at
this
time
and
also
with
regard
to
any
written
documents
that
have
been
received.
If
we
could
have
a
motion
to
receive
and
file.
D
M
B
Yes,
you
blow
it
up
for
us.
There
bro.
M
Excuse
me,
we
got
it.
Thank
you,
sir.
So
to
provide
you
with
some
background
and
some
information
moving
forward,
I'm
going
to
go
through
a
brief
photo
presentation.
The
property
in
question
is
highlighted
in
the
screen
parcel.
The
address
is
714
south
boulevard,
but
your
fronts
to
the
to
the
north.
You
have
swan
as
a
cross
street.
You
have
bayshore
boulevard
to
the
east
and
to
the
south
and
then
inland
to
the
south.
There
is
a
16-foot
alley
that
runs
north
and
south
behind
the
subject
site.
M
M
The
next
is
an
ariel.
I
wanted
to
provide
you
with
a
point
of
reference.
Property
in
question
is
highlighted
in
the
green
box.
Once
again,
this
is
on
south
boulevard.
It's
just
to
the
south
of
swann.
As
you
come
down,
bayshore
boulevard,
you
head
into
hyde
park
into
hyde
park,
village
down
swann,
and
you
head
south
on
boulevard.
Edmond
is
the
cross
street
to
the
south
to
get
familiar
with
the
primary
structure.
This
is
the
front
elevation
of
the
subject
site.
M
Looking
at
the
front
elevation
and
the
north
elevation
and
then
looking
down
the
vehicular
corridor
that
that
ends
to
an
accessory
structure,
the
abundant
structure
to
the
north
is
this
contributing
structure
going
back
to
the
subject
site?
This
is
the
south
elevation
with
all
the
vegetation
that
is
there,
the
property
to
the
south.
M
This
is
the
property
directly
across
the
street,
focusing
on
the
the
structure
and
the
parcel
in
question.
This
is
the
rear
of
the
subject
site.
Currently
they
have
an
arbor
in
the
back,
that
is
about
16
foot
from
the
property
line,
the
vertical
aspect
of
it,
and
then
it
has
these
cascading
stairs
that
wrap
around
this
will
come
up
in
and
in
a
future
discussion.
M
M
M
The
application
came
into
the
office
for
an
addition
to
a
one-story
porch
and
enlarge
the
kitchen
on
the
rear
of
the
property,
with
a
variance
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
from
20
foot
to
16
foot
as
part
of
the
variance
hardship
criteria
moving
forward.
There
are
six
criteria
that
are
in
the
historic
districts
that
have
to
be
adhered
to.
M
When
I
read
the
motion
that
for
denial,
item
number
one
and
item
number
five
was
the
condition
that
they
that
the
board
felt
that
was
not
met
at
the
public
hearing.
M
This
is
the
existing
site
plan
and
this
is
the
proposed
site
plan
just
moving
through
the
existing
site
plan.
This
is
the
front
street,
which
is
boulevard.
Everything
that
is
that's
under
your
review
is
in
the
back.
So
this
is
the
existing
condition.
This
is
the
arbor
that
shows
the
hatch
line
in
here.
M
M
M
The
variance
request
is
in
this
section
here:
reduction
from
what
code
standards
are
for
this
zoning
classification,
which
is
20
foot,
rear
yard
setback
to
16
foot,
which
is
illustrated
by
this
dimension
line
with
an
encroachment
for
three
foot
for
eaves
and
gutters.
M
M
The
arc
voted
to
deny
the
variance
request
for
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
foot
to
16
foot,
with
an
encroachment
from
for
three
foot
for
eaves
and
gutters,
with
the
one
caveat
that
I
spoke
about,
the
condition
was
that
it
didn't
meet
the
hardship
criteria
for
items
number
one
and
item
number
five
on
the
hardship
criteria,
information
that
was
submitted.
N
C
R
R
The
the
board.
N
R
At
this-
and
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
regarding
this
particular
request
and
I'd
like
to
go
through
a
few
photographs
for
you
and
the
and
the
difficulties.
So
it's
it's
not
just
a
hardship,
but
it
also
says
practical
difficulties
and
the
property
in
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
existing
structure.
R
R
R
The
alley
and
the
rights
away
here
are
only
50
feet.
The
alleyway
I
mean
the
rights
away
here
is
60
feet,
so
this
property
has
lost
essentially
has
lost
the
ability
to
have
a
deeper
lot
and
also
to
have
the
the
setback.
That's
that's
being
proposed,
which
is
we've
lost
a
foot
off
of
the
overall
dimension
of
the
property
plus
the
dimensions
of
this
whole
block
are
smaller
than
the
other
ones.
R
So
when
you
start
going
through
the
hardship-
and
it
says
practical
difficulties
as
well,
they
didn't
establish
these
lots
or
these
dimensions
of
these
lots.
Their
house
is
an
existing
house
they're
not
going
to
pick
up
the
house
and
try
to
move
it
to
meet
another
criteria
for
a
setback
and
when
the
board
talked
about
not
meeting
the
practical
difficulties
or
the
hardship
criteria,
they
failed
to
recognize
the
fact
that
this
entire
block
was
some
not
even
substandard.
This
doesn't
even
meet
the
existing
code
regarding
the
zoning.
R
This
photograph,
which
is
the
existing
arbor
on
the
back,
which
sits
at
15
feet,
9
inches
from
the
property,
the
rear
property
line
and
granted.
I
you
know,
the
staff
can't
find
a
permit
for
this,
but,
however,
the
property
owners
didn't
build
this
they're
requesting
to
rebuild
this
and
make
it
compatible
with
the
existing
design
of
the
building.
R
R
There's
a
couple
more
photographs
showing
you
the
extent
to
which
this
is
an
extensive
development
here
in
terms
of
an
addition,
and
I'm
not
really
sure
how
it
would
adversely
affect
anyone
else.
That's
one
of
the
other
criteria
it
wasn't
created
by
this
applicant.
It
doesn't
interfere
or
adversely
affect
anyone
else.
The
condition
exists
already
at
fifteen
nine,
we're
asking
for
it
to
be
reduced
from
twenty
feet
to
sixteen
feet.
The
variance
is
in
harmony
with
the
designated
and
accommodating
the
unusual
conditions
of
the
property
we
essentially
are.
R
R
R
This
is
existing
property
here.
This
is
the
development
immediately
to
the
south,
which
is
718..
This
is
710,
showing
you
what
they
have
here:
the
713
zero
lot
line
on
the
alley:
zero
almost
zero.
This
is
probably
about
a
foot
off
the
alley
here
and
and
709
and
I'd
like
to
enter
into
the
record
the
three
property
owners
supporting
letters
from
7
18,
7,
10
and
711
711
fielding
710.
H
R
Boulevard
and
718
south
boulevard,
I'm
just
going
to
read
this
into
the
record
for
you,
we
own
and
reside
at
710
south
boulevard.
We
support
the
review
request
regarding
our
home
regarding
their
home
at
7
14.,
we've
reviewed
the
schematic
design
for
their
builder
and
aware
that
they
request
a
setback
relief
from
20
to
16
feet.
We
support
the
request
for
this
reasonable
and
limited
exception,
which
is
within
the
city
council's
purview,
to
grant,
in
light
of
the
size,
positioning
character
of
their
home.
We
believe
the
requested
variance
is
reasonable
and
appropriate.
R
D
Yes,
mr
mcelini,
are
you
going
to
be
putting
those
letters
into
the
record,
I'm
going
to
hand
them
to
you?
Let's.
R
Well,
at
property
owner
718
we're
writing
in
support.
Again
I
mean
I'm
just
paraphrasing
in
711
south
fielding,
and
one
of
the
things
that
is
noted
on
the
letter
from
7-eleven
fielding
is
that
this
individual
is
an
architect
and
member
of
the
historic
county,
hillsborough
county,
historic
preservation
grant
committee.
R
B
R
I
R
I
I
don't
know
that
that's
what
mr
villa
said:
okay,
that
they
looked
for
a
permit,
but
it
is
it's
old.
It's
not
a
new
construction,
so.
I
From
the
20s
on
so
what
you
plan
to
replace
it
with
is
an
enclosed
one-story
design,
basically
adding
an
additional
room
and
of
course
it
would
match
the
rest
of
the
house,
so
it
wouldn't
disturb
the
historic
integrity
and
you're
asking
for
20
feet
to
16
feet.
Yes,
sir,
and
looking
at
7
13,
7
11,
even
709
and
7
7
18.,
so
all
of
them
except
7
10.
G
I
I
mean
this,
I
mean,
I
think
it's
it's
a
lot
of
headache
for
something
really
so
minor,
that's
not
affecting
the
historic
integrity
and
and
character
of
the
surrounding
parcels.
So
I
I
mean
we'll
hear
from
the
public
on
this,
but
I
don't
see
an
issue
with
this.
L
Mr
michaelini
did
the
did
the
applicant
or
did
the
owner
I'm
sorry,
I'm
tired
did
the
owner
have
the
benefit
of
your
expertise
in
presenting
arc
and
if
so,
are
there
any
new
arguments
that
that
you
have
now
that
you
wish
you
had
made
at
that
meeting.
R
And
then
there
was
an
assertion
that
well,
these
weren't
really
occupied
spaces.
And
so
you
know
we
went
back
and
and
that's
when
you
have
those
letters
of
support
and
we
went
and
made
sure
that
they
knew
exactly
what
was
being
proposed
and
they
verified
that
their
properties
were
probably
more
out
of
not
out
of
character,
but
they
they
encroached
more
than
the
request
that
was
being
provided
to
the
arc.
I
Thank
you
very
much
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
overturned
the
arc's
decision
here
by
grant
the
variance
request
and
application
number
arc
21-557
for
the
property
located
at
714
south
boulevard,
because
the
petition
does
meet
the
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-114.
I
When
I
did
ask
questions
a
few
minutes
ago
to
the
applicant,
he
does
have
letter
of
support
from
the
surrounding
neighbors.
I
don't
think
it
would
affect
the
historic
character
of
the
the
neighborhood.
I
I
think
it
really
does
match
at
least
three
out
of
the
four
I'm
sorry
four
out
of
the
five
surrounding
properties
and
it's
a
minor
request.
They
are
taking
out
the
outdoor
patio
and
creating
an
enclosed
structure
that
would
match
the
architectural
style
of
the
house.
Therefore,
if
you
didn't
know,
you
would
think
it's
part
of
the
original
historic
structure.
That's
my
motion.
C
B
Are
we
you,
you
have
an
item
you
already
had
talked
about
it
this
morning.
I
didn't
know
that.
K
You
had
walking
at
nine
o'clock
in
the
morning,
but
what
am
I
concerned
so
I
have
to
come
back
another
day
to
talk
about
the
surgery
that
I
wanted
to
talk
about.
Okay,
because
you
already
had
to
open
the
door.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
My
my
resolution
is
one
that
the
resolution
for
the
tampa
city
council
of
the
city,
calling
upon
the
united
states
secretary
of
interior,
to
recognize
the
historical
significance
of
roberto
clemente's,
death
and
losia
puerto
rico
by
adding
it
to
the
natural
registry
of
historic
places,
providing
an
effective
basis.
B
Second
by
mr
maniscalco,
you
want
to
roll
call
that
mr
shelby
all
right,
all
in
favor
all
right.
Any
full
motion
granted
mr
committee,
all
right
we'll
go
to
the
second
walk
on
miss
adam
clerk
is
here
today.
Q
Good
afternoon,
council
shirley
fox
news
city
clerk
here
to
talk
about
the
city,
council,
appointment
policy
and
procedures,
guidelines
for
filling
the
vacancy
in
district
3
at
large
existing
on
march
14
2022.
Q
We
want
to
go
over
the
selection
process,
get
you
to
approve
the
process,
approve
the
timeline
and
the
application
that's
today,
and
I
will
just
briefly
go
over
the
timeline
and
on,
if
once
you
approve
that
today,
on
monday,
at
noon,
we
want
to
have
the
application
form
available
to
the
public.
Q
Q
April
5th,
I
stand
corrected
at
9
00
a.m
and
on
that's
on
march
21st
at
noon,
the
application
and
the
invitation
they
will
have
10
days
to
complete
the
application,
which
will
be
due
on
march
31st,
which
is
thursday
at
5
pm.
Q
Q
This
election
will
be
by
ballot
and
then
there's
a
resolution
that
will
be
passed.
That's
on
april
5th
and
on
april
7th,
which
is
d-day.
The
new
council
member
will
be
administered
their
oath
of
office
and
they
will
take
their
seat
his
or
her
seat.
D
Q
D
Q
L
D
For
the
two
minute
interviews-
and
so
I
can-
I
can
put
that
on
the
special
call
me
that
will
be
the
two
minute
interviews
and
there
wouldn't
be
no
general
public
comment
unless
that's,
as
I
recall,
miss
fox
knows
that
it's
never
has
not
been
done,
but.
L
We
can,
if
allowed
you,
could
you
could
put
a
second
sentence
that
says,
however,
feedback
can
be
made
a
public
comment,
all
the
meetings
prior
to
that
right.
All
the
thursday
meetings
people
can
make
in
the
regular
public
comment.
They
can
give
us
the
public
comment
there.
It's
not
that
we're
not
taking
public
comments,
we're
just
not
taking
it
on
that
day.
Well,.
D
B
B
Right
so
there's
really
there's
no
public
comment.
No
general
public
comment
on
this
day
of
our
of
our
reviewing
applications,
so
that
would
be
the
the
march
31st.
If
somebody
wanted
to
make
a
comment
about,
maybe
a
can
or
something
like
that.
But
there's
no
public
comment.
That's
right!
On
that
tuesday,
correct.
Q
That's
correct
just
for
the
applicants
just.
B
For
the
advocate,
because
I'm
like
looking
at
this
timeline
of
april
first
and
we're
getting
this
application
on
friday,
so
I'm
sure
y'all
are
going
to
get
that
tool
probably
to
about
noon
time.
I
would
imagine
if
that
and
it
could
be
a
multitude
of
applications
to
talk
about
review
over
a
weekend
to
be
ready
for
tuesday.
B
Q
By
the
you
would
need
at
least
four
votes
to
be
elected,
but
individuals
it
will
be
narrowed
down.
Based
on
how
many
votes
you
get.
B
D
And
that's
set
forth
by
the
way,
counsel
in
your
in
your
narrative,
description
of
the
selection
process.
Okay,
for
instance.
In
the
event
no
applicant
receives
a
requisite
four
votes.
Only
the
applicants
receiving
the
greatest
and
the
next
greatest
or
equal
number
of
votes
shall
be
eligible
for
another
ballot.
The
city
clerk
will
then
distribute
another
ballot
to
city
council,
with
only
the
names
legible
being
those
of
the
applicants
in
the
runoff
and
shall
tally
and
announce
the
results.
B
Yeah
once
it's
approved
the
application,
I
don't
need
to
face
you
just
the
application
all
right,
all
right.
Let's
go
off
something
else.
Man.
D
It's
a
ballot,
it's
a
ballot,
okay,
the
question:
the
question
will
be
how
the
clerk
does
announce
that
and
I'm
gonna
have
to
discuss
that
with
the
clerk
in
the
legal
department,
the
tallying
and
the
vote
in
light
of
recent
court
cases
just
to
make
sure
that
we
dot
all
our
eyes
and
cross
all
our
teams.
S
B
F
D
All
right,
so
please,
please
counsel,
even
though
this
has
been
approved,
did
you
want?
You
won't
be
distributing
it
until
noon.
On
mondays,.
C
Right
just
to
make
sure
we
don't
have
any
discrepancies
within
the
application,
it's
arrows,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that's
corrected,
but
it
will
be
released
on
noon
and
I
will
afford
a
copy
to
all
council
members.
In
addition
to
the
motion,
can
we
schedule
that
special
call
meeting
on
april
5th
just
for
the
record
schedule.
I
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
schedule
a
special
call
meeting
to
screen
the
applicants
and
hear
from
them
april
5th
at
9
00am.
B
Shelby
your
turn,
sir.
D
Mr
chairman,
thank
you.
First
of
all,
if
I
direct
your
attention
to
the
april
7th
meeting
on
your
calendar.
Your
last
item
is
that
the
chief
of
staff
and
the
chief
financial
officer
appear
and
discuss
the
collaborative
process
between
the
administration
and
the
council
for
creating
the
next
budget.
I'm
going
to
ask
council
to
amend
that
to
have
including
the
discussion
of
the
citizens,
budget
and
advisory
committee,
so
moved
moved.
E
D
Thank
you
one
last
thing,
council
and
it's
rather
significant-
and
it's
rather
unusual,
but
I'm
going
to
ask
for
a
council's
conspiracy
to
consider
postponing
next
week's
charter
workshop
in
light
of
the
events
of
this
week-
and
I
know
that
is
unusual.
But
in
talking
with
the
director
of
the
institute
of
government
at
usf
and
reviewing
what
has
happened
with
having
one
council
member
not
present
and
not
being
appointed
now
until
march
7th,
it
would
be
of
greater
value
to
council
to
have
a
full
council,
and
I
find
me
april
7th.
D
What
did
I
say
march?
Oh
I'm
living
in
the
past
april
7th
so
for
council's
consideration.
I
So
I'm
glad
you
brought
that
up,
because
I
was
thinking
about
that.
We
had
a
potential
thai
vote
here
that
we
had
to
continue
for
that
one
item
that
was
already
continued.
We
saw
what
happened
this
morning
with
the
chief
that
could
have
been
a
thai
vote.
There's
you
know.
Those
are
that's
a
that's
a
huge
issue
with
the
chief
and
being
that
we
have
an
even
number.
You
can't
have
a
4-3,
you
can't.
I
I
I
I'd
rather
be
a
full
council
and
we
get
what
we
want
done
on
that
said
workshop
day
and
continuing
this,
but
my
question
is:
will
we
lose
any
money
because
I
know
I
asked
that
the
the
last
time
was:
how
much
does
a
facility
tailor
facilitator
cost
and
is
it
a
contract
that
we
signed
or
didn't
sign?
Did
we
put
a
deposit?
Do
we
make
payment?
For
that
I
mean
do
we?
Are
we
affected
financially
by
that?
I
D
We
have
is
acceptance
of
the
proposal
by
council
and
I
have
had
it
approved
through
the
administration
through
the
process
of
purchasing
and
the
like.
There
is
no
signed
contract.
I
did
speak
with
angela
crist
in
the
discussion
of
the
week
and
she
assured
me
that
if
it
was
postponed
that
there
would
be
no
financial
impact-
and
it's
early
enough
now
for
it
to
be
for
next
week's
workshop
meeting
in
the
morning
to
be
cancelled
and
have
no
impact
on
the
facilitator.
D
I
Question
is
my
last
question:
if
we
make
any
changes
to
the
chart
or
anything
that
we
propose
and
it
has
to
go
to
a
ballot,
is
there
what
is
the
deadline
for
the
supervisor
elections
or
does
it
matter
if
we
postpone
it?
I'm
looking
here,
like
may
26th
looks
like
a
light
workshop
day.
The
april
workshop
is
very
busy,
but
what
are
the
deadlines
that
we
have,
so
we
don't
postpone
it
too
far
that
we
lose
getting
it
on
whatever
we
change.
If
we
change
anything
to
the
next.
B
Scalco
a
workshop
day
is
not
good,
sir.
We're
talking
about
charter
issues
you
saw
today
when
a
workshop
date
is
is
just
not
good.
That
has
to
be
a
special
call
meeting.
That's
why
previously
we
moved
everything
off
the
workshop
to
only
deal
with
the
charter
issue.
I
just
think
the
charter
is
just
too
important
to
try
to
have
other
things
and
try
to
rush.
We.
We
don't
need
to
rush
there,
because
you
know
people
the
public
spy
gonna
speak
on
that
as
well.
B
Other
councilmembers
have
ideas
and
so
forth,
and
I
wouldn't
want
to
put
that
on
a
workshop
day.
Unless
we're
scrapping
the
workshop
day,
then.
I
I
D
We
worry
about
having
speed,
but
you
do
answer
you
do
ask
a
very
good
question
about
the
deadlines.
If
you
wanted
it
for
the
november
8th
general
election,
it
has
to
be
the
supervisor
of
elections
august
the
deadline
for
final
approval
of
the
texas
august
23rd
of
this
year,
2022.
they.
L
Well,
two
things:
question
statement:
could
we
just
move
the
workshop
items
off
may
26th
and
move
them
to
the
future
and
then
clear
that
date,
because
again
the
public
expect
to
show
up
on
thursdays
and
and
maybe
they'll
find
out
the
show
up
on
tuesday.
But
if
we
can
move
that.
L
I
B
I
D
Before
I
have
a
question,
because
this
is
also
going
to
be
dependent
on
the
facilitators
availability,
so
if
council
would
give
me
their
druthers
and
remind
council
that
you
do
have,
you
do
have
a
special
call
meeting
set
for
the
appointment
and
you
will
you
also
have
a
the
commendations
are
already
set
on
a
tuesday
as
well.
So
it
would
be
an
additional
tuesday.
But
if
you
give
me
an
opportunity
to
come
back
next
week
with
available
dates,
that
or
non-available
dates,
then
you'll
be
able
to
fit
it
in.
D
So
if,
if
it's
council's
pleasure,
I
know
it's
rather
unusual,
and
but
if
council
wishes
to
cancel
next
week's
workshop,
then
you
would
have
the
morning
free
and
you'd
have
a
night
meeting,
and
I
know
it's
short
notice,
but
I
I
think
it
might
behoove
you
and
it
might
behoove
the
process.
At
least
that
was
the
understanding
and
discussion
that
I
had.
I
I
make
a
motion
that
we
direct
mr
shelby
to
communicate
with
the
facilitator,
see
what
dates
are
not
available,
and
then
we
can
ease
the
process
or
make
it
easier
for
us
to
select
a
date
which
we
could
do
by
next
thursday's
evening
session.
Correct,
that's
correct
and
that's
it
and
we'll
still
meet
the
deadlines
for
the
supervisor
and
we're
not
kicking
it
far
down
the
road
where
you
know
the
public
thinks
that
we're
avoiding
the
topic
or
anything
negative
and
we're
still
getting
down
to
business
with
the
full
council.
You
cancel.
D
And
decide
on
a
calendar
day
and
in
the
meantime,
council
individually,
just
give
it
some
thought,
check
your
calendars
and
see
what
works
for
you.
I
L
You
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
about
that.
You
all
may
have
seen
that
the
we
talked
about
it
briefly
this
morning,
but
the
comment
by
the
mayor's
spokesperson
yesterday
today.
In
the
times
I
think
it
was
40
or
so
years
that
there
was
no
major
amendments
to
the
charter
and
then
the
last
council,
which
we
have
three
members
here,
created
the
charter
review
commission,
in
which
two
of
us
won
and
and
each
of
the
members
who
were
here
nominated
people.
L
That
charter
review
commission
then
recommended
a
process
that
the
voters
voted
on
that
at
least
every
10
years.
There
would
be
a
charter
review
commission,
the
mayor's
spokesperson
said
in
the
media
that
that
goods
and
I
are
trying
to
circumvent
the
process
of
the
charter
review.
Commission.
L
If
no
city
council
have
done
that
before
that's
up
to
them,
but
it
doesn't
mean
that
just
because
we
on
the
chart,
review
commission,
the
city
council
at
the
time
put
the
charter
review
commission
every
10
years
doesn't
mean
it
can't
be
updated.
There's
no
process
to
circumvent
we're
following
the
process,
and
I
want
to
make
that
clear.
The
second
thing
is
a
is
like
a
conspiracy
theory
that's
going
around
and
I
think
it
was
started
by
the
last
mayor.
You
know
you're
trying
to
take
away
the
strong
mayor
or
former
government.
L
No,
some
one
of
you
may
propose
doing
that,
but
we
have
some
things
that
need
to
be
tweaked.
Just
like
the
last
time.
One
of
the
basic
things
was
instead
of
saying
he
or
him
we
changed
it
to.
I
think
he
she
etc,
but
but
there
are
some
things
that
are
confusing.
Like
the
last
time.
One
of
the
things
we
cleaned
up
because
of
a
problem
in
the
last
administration
was
how
long
can
a
nominee
be
interim
before
before
before
they
have
to
be
appointed
and
we
fixed
that
problem.
L
But
a
new
problem
that
arose
is
what's
the
title
of
somebody:
who's
been
nominated,
but
not
confirmed,
and
I
think
it's
worth
us
having
that
conversation,
that's
not
a
power
struggle
in
a
strong
way
or
form
of
government.
It's
just
clarifying.
So
there's
no
conflict
and
there's
some
other
minor
things
like
that
that
we
can.
I
don't
know
what
you
all
would
propose,
but
this
doesn't
have
to
be
a
fight
with
the
mayor's
office.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
a
fight
with
the
last
mayor.
L
It
is,
it
is
just
a
discussion
to
clear
up
some
language
so
that
we
can
avoid
problems
and
conflict
in
the
future.
Thank
you.
Well,.
B
Thank
you,
mr
carlson.
I
said
on
the
central
center
and
I
look
at
some
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
and
people
say,
went
back
and
reviewed
tapes
on
us,
but
I'm
just
in
my
mind
some
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about,
but
all
it
seemed
like
the
writing
was
kind
of
changed
them.
I
don't
know,
but
I
I
look
at
there
are
a
lot
of
things
in
the
chart
that
are
not
really
not
clear.
Now
sitting
here.
B
As
a
council,
I
see
why
probably
the
last
council
had
issues
or
cities
have
issues,
because
some
things
are
just
not
cut
and
dry
clear.
Mr
shelby
has
sometimes
we
make
an
interpretation
and
we
got
to
fight
with
the
eagle.
I
think
some
things
that
have
come
up
now
have
to
be
crystal
clear.
I
look
at
the
supreme
court
justice
nominee
right
now
that
person's
a
nominee
that
person
cannot
make
any
judicial
decisions
or
whatever
to
the
united
states
of
america.
B
Or
take
a
salary,
it
cannot
walk
around.
Who
knows
that
person
is
a
nominee
going
around
talking
to
the
senators
reference
to
a
confirmation,
and
I
think
it's
kind
of
out
of
balance
the
way
we're
doing
things,
and
that's
just
my
opinion,
I'll
just
talk
more
about
that
when
we
have
our
charter
view
discussion.
But
you
know
it's
just
a
matter
of
just
cleaning
a
few
things
up,
not
changing
the
form
of
government
but
just
cleaning
some
things
up.
So
we're
clear
and
the
public
wants
some
clear
explanation
as
well.
F
B
L
Two
things
real
fast:
if
I
could,
some
police
officers
have
told
me
that
there
are
a
couple
expenses
that
they
have
to
incur
that
they'd
rather
not
personally
incur
when
they
respond
to
a
a.
I
don't
know
what
what
do
you
call
a
response?
How
do
you
call
responding
to
it?
I'm.
B
L
L
Tenure-
and
the
second
thing
is
that,
if
they,
if
they,
there
are
certain
circumstances
by
which,
if
they're
responding
when
they
drive
through
a
a
red
light
camera
that
they
also
can
get
tickets
and
and
and
it
could
be
in
both
cases,
we
shouldn't
do
anything
or
maybe
we
should,
but
but
anyway,
I.
B
Even
even
if
you
go
through
the
tolls,
usually
you
have
a
toll
piece
or
you
have
most
police
cars.
Even
unmarked
cars
have
a
special
sticker.
So
even
if
it's
a
private
I
mean
I
don't
know
so.
L
In
both
cases
in
both
games-
and
I
confirmed
it
with
pba
this
morning-
okay,
in
both
cases,
the
police
officer
has
to
pay
those
themselves,
and
I
it
seems
to
me
that
unless
they're
obviously
breaking
the
law
that
we
should,
the
city
should
reimburse
them
so.
L
H
L
Turns
out
the
staff
finds
that
it's
that
it's
not
an
important
issue
and
or
that
it's
covered
in
some
way
and
some
police
officers
didn't
know
about
it.
Fine,
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
up.
Okay,
second
is
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
going
on
about
the
all
for
transportation
money
and
it
sounds
like
the
city
could
get
anywhere
back
from
80
to
120
million
after
the
refunds
we
don't
know
yet,
but
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
ask
staff
to
report
to
council
on
may
5th.
L
L
I
I
think
you
know
a
substantial
chunk
should
be
used
for
expanding
the
streetcar.
I
got
the
mayor's
support
on
that.
I'm
sure
and
the
rest
have
paved
the
streets
in
west
tampa,
councilman
miranda
and
I
have
suffered
so
have
the
people
listening
to
the
the
to
fix
these
streets.
But
I
don't.
T
I
I
L
E
L
Here
is,
is
that
is
that,
even
before
the
money
comes
in,
the
decision
may
not
have
been
made
by
mayfield,
but
let's
have
a
conversation
and
hear
from
the
public
and
let
staff
hear
from
city
council
as
to
what
our
suggestions
are.
Ultimately,
we
approve
the
budget,
so,
let's
give
them
our
input
before
they
decide
what
to
do.
Instead
of
us
responding
on
a
consent
agenda,
let's
give
feedback
on
it.
That's
the
idea.
There's
concern.
I
I
have
a
few
items
today,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
a
commendation
to
el
gallo
de
oro
on
april
12th.
Tomorrow,
el
gallo
de
oro
will
be
closing
its
doors
for
the
last
time.
This
iconic
restaurant,
located
in
fiesta,
plaza
in
west
tampa,
has
decided
to
make
a
new
start
in
the
northern
ocala
area.
F
I
Okay,
so,
oh,
I
look
forward
to
honoring
them
for
all
their
service
to
the
community
and
I've
already
reached
out
to
them
and
I
have
all
the
everything
written
down
for
the
clerk.
So
we
have
it.
H
I
And
that's
it
presented
accommodation.
I
All
right,
second,
I'd
like
to
extend
my
condolences
to
the
family
of
cookie,
garcia,
who
passed
away,
I'm
sure
everybody
everybody
knew
him
involved
in
the
community
forever.
I
knew
him
through
ebor
city
lions
club
these.
He
the
ex-husband
of
norma
bean
from
back
in
the
day
you
know
norma
bean
from
yeah.
My
mother
told
me,
and
then
I
got
confirmation
yesterday
or
the
day
before,
but
a
great
individual
involved
with
the
tambay
sports
club.
He
was
jesuit
high
school
alum
of
the
year.
I
Just
so
many
things
and
a
wonder,
wonderful,
wonderful
friend
to
me
and
a
lot
of
people
here,
so
my
condolences
to
the
family.
L
Dude,
can
I
just
say
you
know:
norma
was
divorced
from
him
for
a
long
time,
but
she
loved
him
and
and
and
you
know
he
was
in
and
out
of
hospice
and
other
things
and
and
they
had
a
great
relationship,
so
condolences
to
everybody.
Yeah.
I
And
and
that's
it
and
the
last
item
is
regarding
allied
security-
we
have
the
security
folks
here
especially
downstairs
and
those
that
have
helped
on
the
second
floor.
B
B
I
But
I
know
that
we
have
al
at
the
front
desk
and
al
has
been
there
for
years
and
he
knows
who
comes
in
and
out
on
a
regular
basis,
but
there's
also
the
young
lady,
with
the
dark
hair
who
you
see
that
has
been
working.
The
second
floor.
H
I
Donna
and
it
came
to
my
attention
that
she
was
being
reassigned
out
of
city
hall
and
somebody
else
was
taking
her
place
and
we
talked
about
it
and
her
concern.
She
loves
working
here.
I
think
today
may
be
her
last
day.
I
don't
know
what
we
can
do
if
we
can
reach
out
to
the
supervisor
or
somebody
in
charge
of
allied.
I
The
thing
is,
you
know
when
you
have
somebody
like
out
or
like
donna
who
is
familiar
with,
who
comes
in
and
out
of
city
council
city
hall.
You
know
they
build
a
rapport
with
the
community,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
regular
speakers
and
whatnot.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
have
people
that
you
know
know
the
community
know
the
faces
coming
in
and
that's
it.
So
it
would
be
my
recommendation,
maybe
to
jim,
who
I
know
has
been
coordinating
and
working.
I
I
All
right
can
we
send
a
letter
from
directed
by
the
chair's
office
that
we'd
like
to
keep.
I
My
motion
would
be
that
the
chair's
office
send
a
letter
of
support
that
we
keep
donna
here
with
us
at
city
hall.
E
Much,
mr
chair,
a
month
ago,
we
had
ab
miss
abby,
philly
and
miss
kate
wells,
discuss
some
items
about
chapter
27
at
a
workshop
that
was
presented
here
after
the
information
that
they
gave
us.
We
took
no
actions
on
the
information
that
was
presented
to
us,
but
I
have
made
a
motion
that
then
that
miss
feedly
come
back
and
briefly
rediscuss
the
items
presented
to
council.
Since
we
took
no
actions
right.
S
Got
a
couple:
nothing
big,
nothing
at
all.
Controversial
y'all
y'all
may
have
seen
the
memorial
outside
by
the
group,
remembering
our
fall,
and
I
wanted
to
give
them
a
city
council
commendation,
they're,
highlighting
local
soldiers
killed
in
action.
Thank.
B
You
bye,
mr
mascot,
all
in
favor,
aye,
aye
full
of
motion.
S
Thank
you,
sir.
Then
I
was
contacted
by
the
city
of
tampa
autism
friendly
committee
that
they
wanted
to
speak
before
tampa
city
council
for
autism
awareness
month,
and
I
think,
are
we
in
april
still
doing
the
commendation
weeks,
yeah.
Okay,
if
I
may
then
I'll
do
it
for
that
day,.
S
Once
you
grant
it
and
then
lastly,
you
know
I
it's
something
I
thought
of.
I
have
a
good
friend
of
mine.
Some
of
y'all
met
him
tim
reed,
who
has
a
a
veteran
canine
dog
who
was
in
afghanistan,
and
the
dog
had
a
lot
of
health
problems
and
and
and
whatnot
he
had
to
kind
of
pay
for
it
out
of
pocket.
S
Even
though
this
dog
saved
a
lot
of
lives,
and
it
kind
of
got
me
thinking
on
a
local
level,
which
is
what
does
the
city
of
tampa,
especially,
I
guess
tampa
police
department
do
with
its
canine
dogs
after
they're
finished
they're
adopted.
But
what
did
they
do
for
their
long-term
care
like
if
they
can't.
S
I'd
like
to
inquire
on,
and-
and
you
know
what
in
in
chairman
goods,
let
me
ask
you
what
we,
what
would
you
think
about
some
sort
of
a
city
program
to
help
with
the
maintenance
and
care
of
those
canine
dogs,
many
of
whom
have
health
conditions
that
are
related
to
the
work
that
they
do
with
the
tampa
police
department,
some
sort
of
a
fund
or
something.
S
S
To
administration
to
report
on
whether
or
not
there
is
any
fund
for
care
and
assistance
of
of
tpd
dogs,
once
they're
adopted.
H
S
S
S
B
F
S
F
B
Missy,
oh,
you
got
to
kill,
take
the
capital,
sir
matter
of
fact.
I
just
got
it
now.
As
you
know,
we
gave
miss
vivian
haywood
an
accommodation
this
month
and
I
went
to
the
hospital
to
give
it
to
us.
I
always
believe
giving
people
their
flowers
while
they're
here
she
did
pass
away.
B
Services
will
be
at
new
bethel
progress,
church,
2914,
east
north
bay
that'd
be
saturday
the
19th
at
10
a.m.
The
wake
will
be
friday
from
3
to
8
p.m.
At
wilson's,
funeral
home
and
they're
going
to
have
refreshments
at
11
30
a.m
at
al
barnes
park
at
32,
21st
avenue,
34th
street.
So
again
she
was
a
longtime
soldier
of
violence
in
our
communities
and
she
fought
the
good
fight
and
now
he's
taking
her
home
with
it.
I
B
I
B
Thing
I
I
looked
at
this
packet,
I
guess
is
something
that's
again
dealing
with
the
hannah
dpr
packet.
I
don't
know
if
this
was
received
by
the
clerk
or
received
and
followed
up,
but
I
think
everyone
seen
this
huge
packet
today,
but
we'll
just
put
it
as
a
receiving
file
when
we
get
a
chance
to
go
there,
but
mr
joe
robinson
distribute
it
distribute
it
to
everyone.
I
have
one
I'll
give
it
to
you,
but
huge
packet.
I
think
everyone
got
it
too.
I'm
not
mistaken.