►
From YouTube: TCC PM 8/17/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
E
E
East
4th
avenue.,
the
property
developer,
ks
ybor
master
developer
llc
is
requesting
designation
of
these
properties
as
brownfield
area
to
assist
in
the
assessment
and
remediation
of
environmental
impacts
that
may
exist
on
the
property..
Details
of
the
designation
have
been
outlined
in
a
document
entitled
staff
report
on
ybor
gateway
redevelopment
area
proposed
brownfield
area
designation,,
which
is
available
for
public
review
both
in
the
clerk's
office
and
on
sire,
associated
with
this
evening's
hearing..
E
E
A
A
A
G
Through
the
agenda
for
this
evening
and
then
swear
everybody,
in.
lachone,
dock:
yes,
good
evening,
chairman
and
council,
lachone
dock,
development
coordination..
If
I
may,,
I
just
have
a
couple
of
housekeeping
items
before
we
get
to
clear
the
agenda..
The
first
is.
I
would
like
to
mention
on
the
staff
reports
that
you
received,
you'll
notice,
that
some
of
the
staff
reports
have
a
new
format.
G
G
So
on
the
new
reports,,
what
will
happen
is
on
the
older
reports
that
were
issued
on
continued
cases,
you'll,
see
the
older
format
and
eventually
you'll
see
the
new
format
on
all
of
the
cases..
The
project
information
regarding
the
lot
size,,
your
square
footages,,
all
the
parking
information
will
be
found
in
that
table..
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
A
G
G
This
is
for
the
property
located
at
2406
west
north
b
street..
The
applicant
is
represented
by
steve
michelini..
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
rm
16
residential
multifamily
to
pd
planned
development
for
residential
single-family
attached
uses.
I'll
turn
it
over
to
emily.
To
give
her
report
and
I'll
come
back
and
give
my
report.
H
H
There
were
two
changes
that
needed
to
be
made
to
the
staff
report.
the
first
one
removes
the
reference
to
north
a
street
and
corrects
it
with
north
b
street
and
the
calculation
of
block
density
sentence
contained
in
the
staff
analysis.,
and
the
second
one
is
correcting
the
statement
that
the
site
is
one
block
from
kennedy..
H
H
H
H
H
The
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
an
adequate
housing
supply
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
present
and
future
populations..
The
request
is
also
consistent
with
the
compact
city
form
strategy,
which
encourages
infill
development
within
proximity
to
transit
and
employment.
Services..
H
A
G
G
G
G
and
the
site
is
located
in
the
west
tampa
overlay,,
so
it
must
comply
with
the
west
tampa
overlay
standards
at
the
time
of
permitting..
On
the
staff
report,
it
does
mention
within
on
page
2
of
the
staff
report,
that
there
is
one
waiver
that
the
overlay
requested,,
but
all
the
overlay
standards
were
met..
G
G
Designation
for
the
future
land
use
category,
as
emily
has
mentioned,,
so
it
does
allow
up
to
18
dwelling
units
by
right
and
you
can
have
20
dwelling
units
per
acre
with
bonus
provisions
met..
So
the
applicant
has
entered
into
a
bonus
agreement
to
allow
one
additional
unit.
with
the
square
footage
of
the
land
that
they
have
currently,.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
on
the
staff.
Report,
you'll
find
the
analysis,,
which
is
provided
on
pages
4
and
5
within
that
report..
It
does
speak
to
the
area
surrounding
the
site,,
although
it
has
residential
multifamily
zoning,,
the
predominant
use
is
residential
single-family..
There
are
some
two-family
uses
that
are
within
that
area,,
but
the
zoning
is
not
consistent
with
the
actual
uses
out
on-site..
So
the
pd
request
for
8
single-family
units
is
out
of
character
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
also,.
The
applicant,
I
just
want
to
note,
did
work
with
staff
to
redesign
the
site.
initially,.
G
G
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Regulate
the
level
of
building
intensity
and,
according
to
the
standards.,
the
standards
are
affected
by
the
land
use
designation,,
which
is
residential
20,,
and
we
are
below
that
requested
residential
20
density.
granted,.
We
have
to
have
a
density
bonus
of
one
unit
to
get
there.
however,,
it's
still
below
the
maximum
density.
That's
allowed.
I
I
I
Provide
for
additional
units
there
for
living.,
the
urban
village
is
contained
most
of
the
following
uses,
which
are
typically
made
up
and
considered
traditional
livable
community,,
single
and
multifamily
residential
neighborhoods
serving
commercial,
schools,
parks,
and
central
gathering
places,
mass
transit,
safe,
walkable
pathways
that
connect
people
to
areas
of
the
village..
This
site
does
all
of
those
things.
and,
again,.
These
are
the
findings
that
are
from
your
professional
planning.
Commission
staff.
I
ensure
that
the
development
projects
in
the
urban
villages
are
designed
for
pedestrian
traffic
and
connect
to
the
citywide
transit..
This
connects
to
the
existing
and
proposed
sidewalks
that
will
have
to
be
developed..
These
are
on-site,
sidewalks
and
the
connections
that
it
will
have
to
make
so
that
individuals.
I
I
I
I
compatible
development
and
redevelopment
to
sustain
stable
neighborhoods..
This
will
not
disrupt
that
neighborhood
in
any
respect..
It
is
the
intent
of
the
city
for
new
residential
development
projects
shall
be
minimally
disruptive..
It's
difficult
to
see
if
you
have
directly
across
the
street
town
houses
with
front
driveways
that
are
not
alley,
access,,
that
the
staff
showed
you
a
picture
of..
This
would
be
disruptive
when
you're,
showing
the
access
via
the
alley.,
accommodate
the
greatest
concentration
of
housing
and
desirable
pedestrian
oriented
urban
areas
having
convenient
access
to
local
and
regional
transit..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Let
me
just
run
through
the
things
that
we've
changed
since
the
first
site
plan
was
submitted..
We
moved
the
front
back
back
to
meet
the
front.
--
setback
back
to
meet
the
front
on
north
b,
street.
change,
the
side
yard
setback
from
7
to
5
feet
to
meet
the
overlay
district
requirements
and
standards.,
remove
the
rooftop
patios
and
lower
the
maximum
building
height
to
35
feet.
I
I
I
I
I
believe
that
we
have
gone
a
long
way
toward
trying
to
meet
all
of
the
provisions
in
the
code..
We
respectfully
request
your
approval..
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have..
We
have
endeavored
to
address
all
of
the
issues
that
were
raised
with
the
exception
of
the
density
issue
and
the
front
doors
that
anyone
has
discussed
with
us.
J
J
I
J
I
A
K
I
L
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Start
addressing
some
issues.
and
actually,
as
I
--,
and
I'm
going
to
leave
this
picture
up
here.
when
I'm
talking
and
when
you're
looking
at
this
picture,,
keep
in
mind
that
these
pedestrian
walkways
are
right
in
front
of
the
garages..
So
we
see
the
beautiful
children
in
the
back.
if
they
wanted
to
go
next
door
and
visit
their
friend,.
K
Something
as
simple
as
that
is
a
basic
finding
of
potential
safety
concerns
that
are,
as
a
grandmother
and
a
mother
of
three
children,,
five
grandchildren,
I
find
are
significant
because
a
child
could
get
hurt
because
you
won't
be
able
to
see
them
when
you're
backing
out
of
your
garage.,
but
back
to
the
bonus
provisions,.
What
I
have
here
--
is
that
the
right
--,
guido
maniscalco:
upside
down.
K
With
this
request,,
you
have
kind
of
a
chicken
and
an
egg..
The
pd
has
8
units..
If
you
don't
have
the
bonus
provision,,
the
pd
won't
be
able
to
be
built..
The
bonus
provision
has
issues
that
are
quite
significant,
and
if
you
don't
have
the
bonus
provisions,,
you
know,
both
of
them
have
to
come
in
tandem.
K
K
K
K
I
better
get
quick..
Please
look
at
the
code
--.
I
thought
I
had
more
time.
--
and
you
will
--
do
not
have
vested
rights
in
the
bonus.
Provision.,
that's
terrible.
and
the
code
does
not
--.
The
plan
does
not
meet
the
requirements
of
a
townhome
development.:
single-family
attached,:
you
can
have
two
categories,,
one
is
town
house
and
one
is
condominium..
K
K
N
N
Proposed
plan
inconsistent,
saying
it
is
incompatible
with
the
surrounding
community.
city
staff,
cited
the
fact
that
the
front
doors
do
not
meet
the
required
standard.
staff
finds.
This
pd
is
out
of
character
with
the
surrounding
community.
the
report
states.
These
three-story
structures
are
incompatible
with
the
built
environment
and
that
the
proposed
development
of
8
units
is
not
appropriate
in
a
location
with
surrounding
parcels
that
contain
one
or
two
units..
N
They
also
say
the
proposed
scale
of
three
stories
is
out
of
character
with
the
surrounding
area..
What
is
interesting
about
the
report
from
the
planning
commission,,
which
is
page
2,
and
as
you
can
see,,
they
corrected
the
problem
with
the
address,.
So
I
marked
out
what
I'm
no
longer
going
to
refer.
To,
is
that
it
is.
N
In
direct
conflict
with
the
city
staff
report
and
even
the
planning
commission's
own
--,
they
appear
to
ignore
the
comp
plan
which
states
the
guiding
principles
toward
shaping
the
city's
future
involves
steering
growth
and
change
to
specific
parts
of
the
city.
While
strengthening
and
protecting
our
residential
neighborhoods
from
development,
pressures.
N
N
N
N
A
O
O
When
you
get
to
the
end
here,,
there
is
a
dip
that
goes.
Down..
Remember
that
armenia
avenue
is
40
miles
an
hour,,
the
traffic
going
through
there.,
so
they
can
only
turn
to
the
right..
So
it
means
a
lot
of
the
people
that
go
--
going
towards
west
or
north
will
actually
go
out.
The
opposite
end
of
the
alley.-
and
this
is
a
little
bit
more
information
about
the
alleyway
here
going
down,,
and
this
is
on
the
opposite
side
of
armenia.
O
O
O
O
O
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
by
the
time
we
got
towing
people
out,
there,
they
snuck
in
and
moved
their
cars.
with
all
this
--
with
eight
units
there
and
all
these
cars
coming
through
there,.
It
is
just
--,
there's
not
going
to
be
the
--.
That
alley
is
not
going
to
support
this.
you
know,
and
another
thing,
too,
is
emergency
vehicles
trying
to
get
into
this
alleyway.
P
P
This
it's
all
going
to
end
up
in
our
parking
lot,,
because
this
happened
six,
seven
years
ago,
and
there
wasn't
half
the
development
in
that
area.
Today,
because
I
drove
through
there
again
just
to
refresh
my
memory.,
and
this
is
our
biggest
concern
there.
our
tenants
that
are
paying
money
for
this
thing
are
just
not
going
to
put
up
with
it.
P
P
P
Public.
using
their
vehicles,
their
cars.
from
what
I
understand,,
these
garages
are
parked
back
to
back..
They
are
not
side
to
side..
How
are
they
going
to
get
in
and
out
of
the
little
space??
She
brought
up
the
children
in
there.
and
there's
going
to
be
children
in
there.,
and
we
are
concerned
about
it.
P
A
Q
Q
Q
Because
developments
on
the
block
use
trash
cans
to
save
parking
spots.,
there
are
competing
challenges
with
finding
parking
on
that
street
alone,
which
will
probably
drive
into
other
areas.
similarly,
unfortunately,.
We
do
have
visibility,
risks
coming
out
of
our
neighborhood
onto
armenia..
I
think
this
will
contribute
to
that
with
many
blind
spots,
as
people
also
end
up
parking
in
designated
spots
on
the
armenia
corridor,
blocking
the
ability
to
look
out
at
the
oncoming
traffic
and
merge
into
it.
Q
Q
Q
Currently.,
so
likely
incompatible
and
inconsistent
with
the
residential
designs.
Currently
in
there.,
you
can
see
the
trash
cans,,
and
this
one,
I
think,
has
12
units,.
So
it's
a
little
bigger
than
what
this
one
would
be.
you
can
see.
People
will
put
the
trash
cans
out
and
block
the
ability
to
park.
There.
Q
Q
Q
R
R
R
R
R
Units
with
each
person
having
two
vehicles.
16
vehicles
that
will
be
utilizing
parking
in
this
area.,
so
take
half
of
those
vehicles
parking
in
their
garage,.
The
other
half
parking
on
the
street,
parallel
parking
spots
are
generally
about
24
feet
in
length..
So
if
you
have
8
cars
parking
along
the
street,,
they
are
going
to
exceed
the
property
boundary
line
of
110
feet..
R
R
R
R
S
S
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
A
L
V
V
V
V
V
V
In
the
mornings
before
trash
comes.,
the
trash
cans
are
there
and
look
at
the
parking
--
the
illegal
parking.
That's
on
the
streets..
If
you
also
notice
the
bottom
left-hand
picture
there,,
there
is
a
boarding
house
on
that
corner,,
which
is
another
8
or
10
cars.
basically,.
There
is
no
legal
parking
on
north
b
nor
tampania.
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
G
G
G
G
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
U
Very
much,
sir.
steve
michelini:
thank
you.,
guido
maniscalco:,
yes,,
ma'am.,
lynn,
hurtak:.
I
have
a
question.,
so
you
just
said
you
showed
that
there
are
developments
close
in
size
and
scale.,
but
at
the
very
beginning
of
your
presentation,
you
said
you
need
this
waiver
because
the
development
is
unique.
I
I
U
X
L
Without
our
approval.
guido
maniscalco:,
was
it
administratively
--
lynn
hurtak:
with
the
doors.
martin
shelby:,
sorry,,
folks.,
sorry
for
interrupting.,
martin
shelby,
city
council
attorney,.
If
you
have
questions,,
please
direct
them
on
the
record
and
if
it's
appropriate
for
staff,,
please
do
so
to
get
the.
A
G
U
G
I
J
J
J
J
G
U
D
I
I
Z
Z
J
G
G
I
J
Z
J
C
I
J
Alan
clendenin:,
I'm
struggling
with
this
as
well.,
I'm
actually,
okay,
with
the
increased
density.
in
fact,
you've
got
entitlement
there
for
density..
It's
how
it's
developed
out.,
I'm
actually
going
to
look
into
this
orlando
situation,
because
I'm
not
particularly
a
fan
of
this
type
of
development.
Either..
J
J
Some
of
the
neighbors
aren't
going
to
like
it.
honestly
in
the
city
of
tampa,,
we'll
continue
to
grow,.
If
you
live
adjacent
to
transportation,
corridors,
things
are
going
to
change..
Some
of
this,,
especially
the
next
properties
over,
should
be
step-down
density
areas,,
and
this
would
definitely
conform
with
the
step-down
density.
J
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
>steve
michelini:.
No,
I
understand.
alan
clendenin:
because
you
know
how
I
feel
about
pds.,
not
a
big
fan.,
steve
michelini:.
You
can
see
the
issues
that
we're
struggling,
with.
and
manatee
county
west
tampa
overlay
restrictions
in
the
code
--
and
some
of
the
west
tampa
overlay
restrictions
in
the
code
are
not
compatible
with
the
wishes
you
all
have
expressed.
I
U
U
AA
U
J
A
U
L
L
To
be.
lynn
hurtak:
and
I
will.
martin
shelby:,
I
appreciate
that.
I'm
going
to
caution
you
and
caution
the
rest
of
council
that,
in
order
for
you
to
make
this
decision
and
for
whatever
decision
you
make
to
withstand
legal
scrutiny,
that
you
do
it
based
on
evidence
in
the
record
and
not
on
a
blanket.
U
U
Rez-22-76
for
the
property
located
at
2406
west
north
b
street,
due
to
failure
of
the
applicant
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof
to
provide
competent
and
substantial
evidence
that
the
development
as
conditioned
and
shown
on
the
site
plan
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
code
and
the
applicant's
failure
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof.
With
respect
to
the
requested
waivers.
U
The
subject
site
is
surrounded
by
single-family
detached
uses
to
the
south,
east,
and
west,
and
single-family
semi
detached
to
the
north..
The
introduction
of
the
two
three-story
structures
for
total
dwelling
of
eight
units
does
not
promote
or
encourage
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location,,
character,
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood..
U
Specifically,
when
you
look
at
the
photos
that
were
given
to
us
and
put
into
the
record,
that
staff
showed,
that
photo,
that
was
actually
also
used
by
the
applicant
that
showed
all
of
the
street
frontage
and
the
houses
facing
the
streets,,
even
the
ones
with
driveways,
walkable,,
very
street-facing,.
And
then
you
look
at
the
property
and
the
pictures
that
were
provided.
That
show
two
frontages
and
then
a
big
piece
of
concrete.
That
is.
U
U
X
X
U
L
U
L
X
U
B
B
AB
H
H
H
A
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
Here
is
the
site
plan
again..
The
applicant
is
requesting
two
waivers.
one
to
reduce
the
required
use
to
use
buffer
from
a
15-foot
landscape
buffer
with
a
6-foot
masonry
wall
to
8,
feet;
landscape
buffer
with
6-foot
pvc
fence
on
the
north,
side,,
a
3-foot
landscape,
buffer
and
no
wall
on
the
east
side
and
to
reduce
the.
AB
Required
5-foot
landscape
buffer
to
3
feet
on
the
west
side..
The
second
waiver
is
to
request
to
allow
the
front
doors
to
face
the
side,
yard,
property,
lines.
development
coordination
and
compliance
staff,
reviewed
the
application
and
find
the
request
inconsistent
with
the
land
development
code..
This
is
due
to
findings
from
development
coordination
and
natural
resources..
AB
While
the
single-family
attached
is
compatible
with
the
area,,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
demo
all
existing
buildings
on
the
subject
side,
providing
them
with
a
blank
slate
to
design
buildings
with
a
more
appropriate
design
that
would
not
require
waivers
while
requesting
a
bonus
agreement..
You
can
review
the
findings
from
development
coordination
and
natural
resources
relating
to
the
waivers
requested
in
the
staff
report.
natural
resources.
Analysis
can
be
found
towards
the
top
of
page
3,
and
development
coordination.
AB
A
I
I
I
I
I
Code,,
it
says
to
promote
--,
and
this
is
the
staff
report
--
promote
the
sufficient
and
sustainable
use
of
land
and
infrastructure..
It
was
found
that
we
do
meet
that
requirement.
ic,
that
the
issue
--.
I
think
that
the
issue
regarding
the
buffers
and
the
landscaping,
when
you
look
at
the
surrounding
properties,,
what
are
we
buffering?
From?,
we're
buffering
from
the
back
of
an
apartment,
building,
a
parking
lot
on
the
north
side
or
an.
I
I
I
I
Allowed.
6,719
square
feet.,
the
subject
property
is
surrounded
by
multifamily,
like
commercial
and
residential
offices..
The
objective
that
we're
meeting
is
regulate
the
levels
of
building
intensity
according
to
the
standards
and
land
use
designations
in
order
to
meet
the
projected
population
of
150,000
people
and
157,000
employees
by
2040.
I
I
I
I
I
maintain
the
sustainability
of
existing
areas
while
expanding
opportunities
for
housing.
it
meets
that
criteria.
protect
the
low
density
and
single-family
areas
that
provide
opportunities
for
home
ownership
that
are
attracted
to
households..
There
aren't
any
single-family
houses
in
this
immediate
vicinity.
I
I
I
I
I
A
J
I
J
I
A
AD
first
of
all,.
I
would
like
to
apologize..
I
had
to
bring
them
due
to
some
technical
issues.,
but
my
name
is
dayton:
birchfield.,
I'm
speaking
against.,
specifically
due
to
the
presence
of
watermelon
swim
school
directly
adjacent
to
this
property.,
I
feel
like
not
enough.
Survey
has
been
done
with
regard
to
the
amount
of
traffic
that
occurs
in
this
neighborhood.,
specifically
directly
next
door
to
the
west..
A
A
T
T
T
a
three-foot
buffer..
Please
tell
me
how
you're
going
to
paint
that
building.
seriously,
three
feet.,
this
wide.,
those
guys
are
going
to
paint
that
building
in
a
three-foot
buffer
because
he's
going
to
put
a
fence
there,,
you
know.
What's
going
to
happen,,
they
are
going
to
take
the
fence
down
to
paint
the
building..
What
happens
if
there
is
a
stucco
problem??
You
got
to
take
the
fence
down
to
fix
the
stucco..
A
A
I
I
A
U
C
C
C
9.5.3,
regarding
the
code
section
27-136,
proposed
development,
showing
that
the
site
plan
promotes
and
encourages
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location,,
character,
compatibility
and
surrounding
neighbors.
waivers.
The
design
of
the
waivers
developed
is
unique
and
therefore
in
need
of
waivers..
J
G
G
H
A
L
A
G
L
Outside
that
250
feet.,
martin
shelby:,
in
other
words
--,
I
don't
want
to
put
words
in
your
mouth
--,
but
are
you
asking
whether
you
should
or
you
want
to
--?
Let
me
rephrase
it
--.
Do
you
want
to
abstain
to
avoid
the
appearance
of
a
potential
conflict
of
interest,
to
assure
a
fair
proceeding,
free.
A
L
H
H
H
H
15.2.4
encourage
a
range
of
uses
in
proximity
of
each
other
and
requires
commercial
development
to
be
buffered
from
residential
uses..
The
proposed
rezoning
will
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
neighborhood..
The
comprehensive
plan
promotes
pedestrian
safety
and
encourages
commercial
development
that
enhances
the
city
of
tampa's
character
and
ambience..
H
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
promotes
compatible
development
and
redevelopment
to
sustain
stable,
neighborhoods
and
ensure
the
social
economic
health
of
the
city.
with
those
in
mind,.
The
proposed
r.o.
rezoning
would
allow
for
development
that
is
compatible
and
comparable
to
the
surrounding
area.,
and
this
concludes
my.
G
G
G
Are
on
habana.
the
medical
office
uses.,
and
then
there
are
a
couple
of
ro-1
zonings
that
are
there.
and
then,
as
you
head
further
east
and
on
armenia,,
you
have
more
of
your
commercial
uses
that
are
there..
But
this
immediate
area
is
historically
for
medical
office
uses
that
exist.
the
site
has
a
frontage
of
125.
G
This
is
west
of
the
site,,
so
this
is
habana..
That's
the
view,
if
you're
looking
north
on
habana.
and
then
we're
swinging
back
around,,
this
is
west
of
the
site
at
the
corner
of
habana,
and
then
this
is
directly
west
of
the
site..
The
site
is
to
the
right
in
this
picture,
outside
the
picture.,
so
the
development
review
staff
has
reviewed
the
request
and
finds
the
request.
Consistent.
AF
AF
AF
We
have
no
need
for
any
waivers
at
all.,
normally
we're
here
in
front
of
you
with
complicated
pds,,
but
this
is
a
very
clean
one,
and
the
request
again
is
rs
50
to
ro.,
and
we've
got
a
slide
that
will
show
you
just
how
limited
that
zoning
category
is.
and
then
finally,
at
our
last
hearing,.
We
were
supposed
to
be
heard
in
july.,
we
requested
a
continuance..
AF
AF
AF
AF
AF
AF
AF
AF
AF
AF
Business
and
professional.
and
we
could
have,,
we
have
a
pd
immediately
adjacent
to
this,.
We
could
have
opened
this
up
and
put
this
property
within
the
pd,,
but
that
pd
actually
allows
for
medical
office,
going.
The
ro
route
was
even
more
limiting
because
all
we're
allowed
is
office,,
business,
and
professional,
as
you
can
see
directly
below
the
medical
office
is
not
a
permitted
use,
nor
will
it
be.
AF
AF
AG
AG
AG
I
can
attest
to
the
quality
and
attention
to
detail
to
every
project
she
undertakes,,
which
is
truly
a
reflection
of
her
character
and
the
care
for
her
patients.
I'd
like
to
show
you
evidence
and
enter
into
the
record
examples
of
before-and-after
pictures
of
the
immediate
and
adjacent
area
to
2529
west
curtis,,
which
attests
to
the
quality
and
attention
to
detail,,
specifically
as
it
pertains
to
this
application
and
the
beautification
of
curtis
street
and
the
surrounding
area..
AG
AG
AG
AG
Y
Y
C
AI
One
of
the
properties-
next
to
it,
the
beautiful
red
house
is
my
grandfather's..
He
owned
the
property
since
1968..
We
have
seen
what
this
area
and
this
community
has
become
and
what
we
have
slowly.
Unfortunately,
over
the
years
seen
businesses
and
medical
practices
eating
away
at
these
residential
areas..
As
you
can
see
in
that
picture,,
it's
already
small.
you're,
going
to
take
another
single-family
home
to
turn
it
into
an
office
space.
From
what
I'm
hearing
administrative.-ther.
AI
AI
AI
AI
and
the
other
issue
that
we
have
with
both
of
these,.
I
know
you
pointed
out
the
gate
on
osborne,
the
amount
of
speeding
that
we
have
on
curtis,.
I
cannot
have
my
children
in
the
front
of
my
house
for
fear
that
they
are
going
to
get
hit
by
a
car
and
the
number
of
times
that
we
ask
individuals,
though
please
slow
down
and
I
get
branded
a
weapon
when
I
am
trying
to
raise
my
family
in
an
area
that,
for
people
is
just
a
pass-through.,
doesn't
happen
in
your
neighborhood.
happened
in
your
neighborhood,.
AI
AI
AI
They
are
presenting
something
to
you
for
right
now
and
they'll
come
back
and
turn
it
into
something.
But
it's
not
what
is
intended..
They
said
they
passed
pamphlets
out..
The
only
reason
they
passed
pamphlets
out
is
they
found
out
at
the
last
meeting.
Last
month
there
were
some
of
us
who
objected
because,
as
the
district,
two
councilmen
who
abstained,
we
didn't
receive
anything
either.,
the
only
one
who
received
it
was.
AI
AI
J
AD
AD
Over
a
year
while
our
home
was
building
built
down
the
street.,
we
are
very
aware
of
the
issues
that
happen
with
regard
to
high-speed
transit
down
our
street..
There
have
been
a
number
of
issues
that
have
come
up
as
a
result
of
that..
It's
been
reported
to
the
police
department..
It's
been
reported
to
the
city.
AD
AD
AD
M
J
M
M
M
M
M
W
W
AJ
J
AF
AF
AF
AD
J
B
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
More
space,
to
add
on
to
the
ability
for
people
to
work
from
home
administratively,.
It
is
so
easy
to
work
from
home,,
even
with
hipaa.
people
do
medical
coding
and
billing
on
that.
it's
real
simple..
I
work
from
home
a
lot
of
times,,
which
brings
me
to
another
point..
When
they
came
around
to
people
around
the
neighborhood,,
they
did
it.
J
AF
Yes.
truett
gardner,
hundred
north
ashley
drive.
certainly
respect
the
comments
and
concerns
from
the
neighborhoods.
want
to
clarify
one
thing..
There
isn't
a
neighborhood
association..
All
we
had
to
go
by
at
first
was
the
250-feet
notice.
Area.
dr.
cancio
can
attest
to
this
again..
She
went
to
each
of
the
neighbors..
Only
when
we
heard
of
the
concerns
outside
of
the
250
feet
did
we
request
the
continuance
and
go
immediately
to
them
literally.
The
next
day.
AF
AF
AF
Utilize,
our
traffic
engineer
in-house,
to
reach
back
out
to
the
city
to
see
if
we
can
work
together
and
look
at
this
again
to
see
if
there
is
an
issue
and
if
there
is,
to
work
with
the
city
to
address
it..
I
think
that
is
their
biggest
concern..
Again,
competent
and
substantial
evidence
was
done
by
the
city
to
determine.
There
is
no
issue
by
our
traffic
engineer
to
confirm
that
and
then
also
transportation
and
the
staff
report.
Finding
consistency.
AF
AF
He
studied
it
and
determined
that
there
is
no
negative
effect
when
you
have
residential
locations,
--
located
next
to
office
or
commercial,,
even
including
medical
office,
in
this
neighborhood.
as
a
matter
of
fact,,
if
you're
adjacent
to
it,,
there
is
actually
an
enhancement
in
value,
perhaps
because
of
the
possibility
of
that
becoming
commercial,.
So
we
could
provide
that
for
the
record,
along
with
all
of
his
research.
AF
AF
again,
to
the
south
is
medical
office..
We
are
asking
for
ro,,
which
does
not
allow
for
medical
office,,
and
only
for
administrative
offices
which
will
serve
as
medical
office..
We
were
found
to
meet
locational
criteria.
again,
findings
of
consistency
on
this
very
topic
from
planning
commission,
as
well
as
land
development,
coordination.
lastly,.
I
just
wanted
to
state
for
the
record.
There
are
no.
AF
Baloney.,
dr.
cancio
cabrera
can
speak
to
her
intentions
and
needs..
The
property
immediately
to
the
west
is
zoned
pd.
the
reason
why,.
As
stated
before,,
we
did
not
open
the
pd
to
put
this
property
within.
It
is
to
provide
the
protections
for
the
neighborhood
and
solely
to
request
ro,,
which
specifically
does
not
allow
for
medical
office
and
only
allows
for
administrative
offices,,
which
is
what
we're
requesting
tonight.
Y
Y
Y
J
AK
I
find
that
the
applicant
met
burden
of
proof
to
provide
competent,
substantial
evidence
and
that
the
rezoning
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
city
code
also
adopt
the
findings
and
reasoning
of
the
planning
commission
and
the
staff
reports,,
including
the
compliance
with
applicable
goals,
objectives
and
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
As
noted
in
planning,
commission
staff
report
and
compliance
with.
J
G
At
6603,
south
trask
street.,
the
applicant
is
represented
by
kami
corbett..
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
pd
planned
development,,
which
currently
allows
for
residential
multifamily
to
pd
planned
development
for
residential
multifamily
use.
I'll
turn
it
over
to
emily.
To
give
her
report
and
I'll
come.
H
H
H
H
H
The
adopted
august
2016
greenways
and
trails
plan
updated
by
the
mpo,.
The
metropolitan
planning
organization,
identifies
the
existing
csx
right-of-way
adjacent
to
the
subject
site
as
a
conceptual
trail..
The
applicant
has
provided
a
note
on
the
site
plan
addressing
a
future
connection
at
the
time
of
construction
and
consistent
with
recreation
and
open
space
policies,
2.3.1
and
2.4.9..
H
G
G
Is
approved
for
residential
multifamily.,
the
request
which
is
before
you
is
for
the
same
use..
The
site
has
been
developed,,
but
this
pd
request
will
establish
newly
confirmed
property
lines
with
the
new
property
boundary
containing
a
reduction
of
a
15-foot
strip
of
land.,
and
that
is
on
the
northeast
side
of
the
site.,
and
what
I
can
do
is
show
you,
the
zoning
atlas
of
the
site
itself..
So
this
is
the
site
which
is
outlined
in
red..
This
is
mccoy
street..
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
U
G
AH
Lynn,
hurtak:
of
course.,
guido
maniscalco:,
applicant.,
jaime
maier.,
101,
east
kennedy,
boulevard.,
I'm
representing
the
applicant.,
have
been
sworn..
Thank
you
very
much,,
ms.
dock
for
the
presentation
and
staff
report.
I'll
add
a
little
bit
of
background..
So
this
was
an
approved
and
fully
constructed
pd..
AH
AH
AH
Encroachments.
some
neighbors
agreed
with
the
applicant's
interpretation
that
the
applicant
owned
the
land
and
others
maintained.
That
was
not
the
correct
interpretation
and
that
the
applicant
did
not
own
that
land..
So
the
applicant
directed
their
surveyor
to
review
it
and
the
surveyor
agreed
that
the
neighbor's
interpretation
was
a
reasonable
interpretation,
that
the
applicant
didn't
own.
That.
AH
AH
T
Stephanie
poynor.
I'm
here,
because
this
is
a
case
of
the
developer,
doing
the
right
thing.
that
15
feet
took
like
three-quarters
of
some
of
those
folks'
backyard..
I
manage
one
of
the
properties
and
I'm
friends
with
another
one
of
the
properties,
and
we
actually
had
quite
a
bit
of
interaction
with
the
neighbors
on
this.
T
T
T
A
AH
A
A
B
B
A
H
Is
residential
35.?
The
comprehensive
plan
encourages
infill
development
to
help
ensure
an
adequate
amount
of
land
as
preserved
is
planned
to
support
tampa's
growing
population.,
while
the
proposed
density
is
consistent
with
the
underlying
future
land
use
designation,.
The
request
is
inconsistent
with
several
comprehensive
plan.
H
East
columbus
drive
is
a
transit
emphasis
corridor
and
the
site
is
within
a
mixed
use.
Corridor.,
the
mixed
use,
corridor
policy,
support,
walking
and
transit
uses
and
the
site
plan
is
not
providing
safe
connections
to
transit.
overall,.
The
proposed
pd
is
inconsistent
with
policy
direction
of
the
comprehensive
plan..
The
pd
does
not
engage
the
public
realm
or
provide
safe
pedestrian
connections
from
the
three
single-family
attached
units
to
the
sidewalk
along
east.
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
So
we
have
a
pattern
of
development
that
is
encouraging
multifamily
in
the
area.,
and
I
said
we'll
make
the
corrections
in
the
event
that
council
approves
this,
we'll
make
the
corrections
regarding
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading.,
I
think,
again,.
This
is
an
ideal
area
for
redevelopment.
I
U
AC
U
U
Z
Z
Z
Z
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
J
J
J
D
D
Columbus
drive
due
to
the
failure
of
the
applicant
to
meet
the
burden
of
proof
to
provide
competent
and
substantial
evidence
that
the
development
as
conditioned
and
shown
on
the
site
plan
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
city
code
and
the
applicant's
failure
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof.
With
respect
to
the
requested.
D
L
U
U
U
A
AK
A
A
F
H
H
H
H
H
Designation.,
as
you
move
further
south
and
further
north
away
from
west
cypress
street,
it
transitions
to
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation.,
the
commercial
general
zoning
can
be
considered
in
the
community
mixed
use,
35
designation,
and
would
be
appropriate
for
this
site,
provided
that
any
potential
nonresidential
development
is
sensitive
to
the
existing
residential
uses.
Abutting
the
subject
site.
the
comprehensive
plan
promotes
pedestrian
safety
and
encourages
commercial
development
that
enhances
the
city
of
tampa's
character
and
ambience.
H
H
A
AC
AC
AC
AC
A
A
A
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
A
A
A
B
G
H
Emily
phelan:
emily
phelan,
planning,
commission
staff.
the
site,
is
located
within
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
and
the
ballast
point
neighborhood,
and
it's
located
within
the
coastal
planning,
area,
specifically
evacuation
zone
b.
this
is
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site,,
which
is
located
here,.
A
H
H
H
H
H
Also,
the
entrance
to
the
sidewalk
on
south
macdill.,
two
additional
entryways
with
a
sidewalk,
are
proposed
along
the
south-facing
wall
of
the
structure
providing
safe
pedestrian
access
from
the
parking
area.
finally,.
The
patio
is
proposed
adjacent
to
the
sidewalk
along
south
macdill
avenue,,
which
engages
and
improves
the
public
realm.
planning.
Commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
found
no
adverse
impacts
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood..
The
request
will
not
alter
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
this
portion
of
the
ballast
point
neighborhood..
H
A
G
G
Feet.,
the
setbacks
proposed
are
to
the
north
4
feet,,
to
the
south,
46
feet,,
to
the
west,
29
feet,
and
to
the
east
4
feet.,
so
the
existing
structure,,
which
is
on-site,,
which
I'll
show
you
pictures
of
shortly,
that
will
remain.
the
applicant,
is
proposing
to
add
an
additional
510
square
feet
of
outdoor
area
to
the
west.
G
and
then
I'll
show
you
the
zoning
atlas
in
the
immediate
area..
You
have
along
macdill
commercial
uses,,
but
there's
also
to
the
north,
an
approval,
that's
through
a
special
use
for
residential
use,
that's
just
to
the
north,
and
then
you've
got
residential
single-family,
that's
further
east,
and
then
commercial,
south
and
west.,
so
I'll
show
those
to
you
momentarily
on
the
zoning
map..
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
the
development
review
staff,
reviewed
the
request
and
finds
the
request.
Inconsistent.
it
is
due
to
the
waiver
and
inconsistent
is
from
transportation
and
that's
for
the
parking
waiver
requested.
also,
within
the
staff
report,.
I
did
not
include
the
revision
sheet,
so
I
have
the
revision
sheet
here
to
submit
into
the
record.,
and
that
concludes
my.
G
G
G
G
J
G
J
G
AO
AO
AO
AO
This
development
is
marketed
to
be
a
neighborhood
restaurant.,
it's
not
going
to
be,
obviously,!
You
don't
see
a
drive-through
or
a
lot
of
square
footage
for
the
restaurant
itself..
It's
generally
a
little
over
1900
square
feet
of
indoor
area
and
500
square
feet
of
outdoor
area..
This
room
probably
holds
70
some
people..
Looking
at
a
very
small.
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
Review
agency
departments
have
found
us
consistent
with
applicable
codes
from
the
land
developmen
regulations.,
most
notably,
the
waivers
from
natural
resources
are
still
found.
Consistent
and
lachone
pointed
that
out,
again,
existing
structure
and
we're
trying
to
accommodate
some
of
those
nonconformities
from
that
structure.
obviously,.
The
planning
commission
stated
that
they
were.
AO
AO
AO
AO
AI
AO
Bill
carlson::
do
you
know
something
--
we
do
intend
for
this
to
be
a
very
pedestrian
friendly
environment..
Obviously
I
showed
you
on
the
site.
Plan,.
I
think
staff
indicated
there's
pedestrian
connections.,
there's
sidewalks,.
There
are
bike,
racks.
again,
supposed
to
be
for
the
neighborhood..
I
think
ms.
poynor's,
e-mail
or.
AL
X
AL
X
X
AO
AO
X
AO
AO
A
U
J
alan
clendenin:
just
to
explain
my
vote
because
I
come
out
so
strongly
against
pds..
This
is
an
existing
structure..
They
are
modifying,.
It
has
had
the
same
use
as
restaurant
for
years..
This
is
one
of
those
things
kind
of
makes
sense
to
resolve
a
past
sin
and
do
what
needs
to
be
done
to
get
this
property
going
and.
D
C
H
H
Planning,
commission
staff
reviewed
the
application
and
found
minimal
impacts
on
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
subject.
Site
is
within
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation,
which
encourages
single-family
residential
development
up
to
10
dwelling
units
per
acre..
This
portion
of
north
church.
H
G
Consisting
of
a
property
that
contains
6,538
square
feet.,
the
applicant
proposes
to
construct
a
single-family
residential
detached
structure
on-site..
It
will
contain
two
stories
with
a
maximum
building
height
of
35
feet..
The
setbacks
proposed
are
to
the
north
7
feet,,
to
the
south,
6
feet,,
to
the
west
20
feet,,
and
to
the
east
25
feet.
G
G
G
G
G
You.
the
block
and
lot
number.,
so
what
I
did
is
just
run
the
numbers
on
the
lot
width
in
the
area..
It's
just
important
to
note
that,
one,.
This
is
a
different
area
just
because
of
what
I
mentioned,,
the
commercial,
that's
on
dale
mabry
to
the
east
and
to
the
south
on
hillsborough.,
but
also
this
is
the
county.
G
G
Smaller.
also,
as
you
approach
north
of
the
county
line.,
I
just
want
to
read
quickly
the
analysis,
the
results
of
the
analysis,,
but
I
think
you
can
see
the
majority
of
the
lots
are
larger
just
because
of
the
shape
of
these
lots
and
the
area
itself..
But
in
relation
to
reviewing
the
existing
development
pattern,,
the
subject
block,-
and
this
is.
G
G
G
G
J
J
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
G
I
A
X
G
G
I
steve
michelini:.
I
can't
find
any
evidence
that
it
was
split
off
from
either
the
adjacent
property..
I
know
from
previous
conversations
here
in
front
of
council.
You
all
have
been
concerned
that
perhaps
this
property
owner
split
it
off
and
decided
to
sell
it
or
this
property
decided
to
split
it
off
of
his
and
sell
it.
I
A
X
A
U
J
J
J
D
B
A
AC
H
H
H
H
The
comprehensive
plan
promotes
pedestrian
safety
and
commercial
development
that
enhances
the
city
of
tampa
character
and
ambience.
in
doing
so.
Land
use
policy
15.2.6
requires
new
commercial
development
to
connect
building
entrances
to
public
rights-of-way
and
to
provide
sidewalks
in
areas
where
it
is
practical
and
feasible
for
pedestrian
oriented
activities..
H
The
subject
site
is
also
within
a
mixed
use:
corridor
at
the
intersection
of
two
transit
emphasis
corridors
and
within
the
east
tampa
urban
village,
as
defined
by
the
comprehensive
plan..
Any
future
development
should
be
consistent
with
the
policy
direction
for
the
city
overall,
as
well
as
the
specific
areas.
H
H
AC
AC
AC
A
AC
A
AP
AP
AP
This
is
the
prior
site
plan
showing
the
walgreens
building..
While
our
client
intends
to
keep
this
as
commercial
development,,
we
want
the
flexibility
to
provide
a
different
range
of
uses
in
the
commercial
zoning
district
and
don't
necessarily
want
to
be
locked
in
to
a
specific
pharmacy
use
as
this
pd
prescribes..
AP
So
staff
fully
supports
the
application
as
zain
mentioned
previously,
and
I
wanted
to
note
that
our
client
did
meet
with
the
ybor
heights
neighborhood
association..
They
offered
to
help
in
any
way
they
can..
They
are
eager
to
see
this
being
redeveloped
and
they
are
planning
on
organizing
their
quarterly
neighborhood
residents,
meet
and
greet
in
our
parking
lot
to
get
some
more
eyes
on
the
property
to
help
come
up
with
a
future
vision
for
some
commercial
here.
with
that,,
I
will
close.
A
D
A
A
C
Henderson.,
all
in
favor?,
any
opposed?
councilman
miranda.,
charlie
miranda:
number
10,,
rez-23-77,
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration,
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
3917
north
nebraska
avenue,
in
the
city
of
tampa,
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
district
classification.
B
H
H
H
H
H
planning.
Commission
staff
reviewed
lot
widths
along
this
segment
of
west
san
pedro
avenue.
lot.
Widths
varied
from
approximately
35
to
90
feet..
The
lot
width
of
the
subject
site
is
150
feet
per
the
submitted
survey.,
taking
into
consideration
the
existing
block
density
and
range
of
lot
widths.
Among
this
segment
of
west
san
pedro
avenue,
planning,
commission
staff
finds
that
the
request
will
provide
for
residential
development
that
will
be
built
within
the
existing
street
block
and
lot
configuration
of
the
neighborhood..
H
The
proposed
rezoning
supports
many
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population..
The
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
present
and
future
populations..
The
proposed
rm
18
zoning
would
allow
for
development
that
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
uses
and
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
anticipated
under
the
residential
20
future.
AC
AC
I
A
B
I
A
A
We
have
a
city
council
workshop
sessin
and
we
also
have
a
city
council
evening
session,.
They
are
both
going
to
be
very
busy..
So
the
workshop
has
a
lot
of
items,
and
I'm
not
asking
you
to
do
anything.
This
evening,,
but
asking
council
members
to
look
at
what's
going
to
be
on
the
council
workshop
and
if
there's
anything
that
you
see,
that
could
be
continued.
That
is
not
absolutely
pressing,
just
for
the
sake
of
time,,
because
we
are
going
to
be
here
day
and
night..
A
U
U
A
X
AK
AK
A
AK
X
A
J
J
A
J
A
A
J
A
X
J
AK
AK
AK
Second
councilman
miranda.,
all
in
favor?,
luis
viera:
third,.
If
I
may,,
we
have
funded
a
job,
training
and
apprenticeship
program
for
returning
citizens,
which
I
believe
between
the
city
and
the
county.
I've
been
working
on
this
with
gwen,,
commissioner
gwen
myers
is
going
to
be
about
half
a
million
dollars
for
returning
citizens
training,
and
I
want
that
to
come
before
city
council
for
a
presentation.
So
we
can.