►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council PM 12122019 part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
D
Good
evening
council
members,
David
Haye
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
I,
have
been
sworn.
We
remain
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
for
this
next
case.
The
subject
site
is
within
the
East
Tampa
urban
village.
They
urban
villages
have
specific
policy
direction.
In
the
comprehensive
plan
there
is
transit
located
along
North,
40th
Street
and
the
subject
site
is
not
within
an
evacuation
zone.
It
should
be
noted
on
the
map
at
40th.
Street
is
a
transit
emphasis
corridor
and
also
unidentified
that
mixed-use
cord
onto
the
aerial.
Here's
the
subject
site
you
could
see.
This
is
40th.
D
D
But
off
the
corridors,
it's
predominantly
single-family
detached
with
some
scattered
duplexes
onto
the
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
has
two
future
land
use
designations.
The
front
of
the
front
portion,
roughly
0.34
acres
is
designated
that
community
commercial
35,
that's
represented
by
the
red
in
the
back.
The
approximate
point
for
eight
acres
remaining
piece
in
the
back
and
all
this
tan
is
that
residential
ten
that's
predominately
single-family
detached,
and
then
there
is
some
higher
density
planned
along
East
Osborn
in
North
East
upon
Louisiana
and
Ellicott
on
the
east
side.
D
The
project
site
again
is
within
that
East,
Tampa
urban
village
within
urban
villages.
Developments
with
multiple
future
land
use
designations
may
proportionally
way.
The
Floria
ratio
over
the
entire
site
permitted
uses
within
each
land
use
category
may
be
considered
considered
anywhere
on
the
site
through
an
improved
planned
development.
Zoning.
The
Floria
ratio
of
the
pros
planned
development,
is
proportionately
distributed
over
the
entire
site
and
within
each
land
use
category,
and
that
is
consistent
with
the
policy
direction.
D
In
the
plan,
this
portion
of
north
40th
Street
corner
is
characterized
by
a
mix
of
light
industrial
light,
commercial,
single-family,
residential
and
public
semi
public
uses.
The
sited
joins
some
light
industrial
uses
to
the
south
and
residential
uses
to
the
north
Planning
Commission
staff
encourages
the
applicant
to
ensure
that
the
development
is
appropriately
buffered
from
the
adjoining
residence
to
the
north
of
and
to
the
west
of
the
site
along
East
Curtis
Street.
D
In
conclusion,
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
that
the
proposal
is
consistent
with
many
of
the
policies
and
the
comprehensive
plan
related
to
redevelopment
in
our
urban
villages
and
based
on
those
considerations.
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
a
proposed
rezoning
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
imagine
2040
comprehensive
plan.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
sir.
C
C
C
The
property
is
currently
zoned.
The
majority
of
the
site
is
furlings
own
commercial
incentive
in
the
back
part
is
own
RS,
50,
single-family
residential
the
site
is
currently
vacant.
It
is
surrounded
by
single-family
residential
uses
to
the
north,
south
and
west,
and
then
to
the
direct
northeast
east
across
40th
Street
into
the
South
or
other
manufacturing
retail
and
office
uses.
C
C
They
are
asking
for
a
waiver
to
allow
for
2
loading
spaces
at
12
by
30,
as
opposed
to
one
being
15
by
60
they're
asking
for
a
reduction,
and
they
used
to
use
buffer
to
the
south
on
the
property
to
the
south
is
owned
by
the
city
of
Tampa.
But
technically
it's
a
minute.
Ality
used,
so
instead
up
a
15
foot
buffer
they're
asking
to
reduce
that
down
to
a
10
foot
landscape
buffer
with
the
CMU
wall
and
then
the
other
to
the
other
waiver.
C
It's
a
correction
of
the
staff
report
is
227
to
84
to
the
remove
to
allow
the
removal
up
to
non-hazardous
grande
trees,
32
inch
pecan
and
a
54
inch
oak
tree
to
flat
the
chair
current
tree
code
with
noticing
requirements
for
removal
grin
trees.
If
this
is
approved,
there
are
some
changes
between
1st
and
2nd
reading,
with
the
planning,
design
and
development
coordination
department
found
on
page
2
of
your
staff
report.
The
urban
design
department
did
find
this
consistent
with
a
couple
changes
between
1st
and
2nd
reading
to
clarify
the
requirements
for
buffering
and
Natural.
C
Resources
also
did
by
this
consistent
that
there
are
a
number
of
changes
to
the
site
plan
between
1st
and
2nd
reading
to
make
it
compliant
with
the
land
development
code,
saying
that
also
for
the
trees
there
is
the
tree.
Evaluation
is
in
the
staff
report
so
saying
that
the
development
viewed
compliant
staff
has
BOM
is
consistent
with
the
city
temple
and
development
regulations.
C
F
Hi
there
for
the
record,
my
name
is
Patricia
Ortiz
and
my
address
is
28
10
North,
Central,
Avenue
I
have
been
sworn
in
and,
to
answer
your
question
exactly
where
I
was
going
to
start,
we
are
proposing
to
construct
a
light
manufacturing
use
on
this
vacant
lot
to
allow
for
the
production
and
transportation
of
Mediterranean
cuisine.
The
property
owner
works
for
global
food
or
is
associated
with
global
food,
which
is
a
food
manufacturer
of
Mediterranean
items
such
as
falafel
hummus
to
believe,
etc.
F
We
are
asking
for
the
waivers,
as
described
by
Mary
and
I'll,
put
a
little
graphic
down
for
you.
Take
a
look
at
this
area
in
red,
identifies
our
loading
dock
area
and,
as
Mary
mentioned
to
you,
we're
asking
for
two.
Smaller
loading
docks
rather
been
the
one
larger
at
fifteen
by
sixty
and
that's
because
our
product
is
small
food
items.
We're
gonna
be
using
box
trucks
rather
than
semi
truck
ders
and
trailers
to
transport
the
goods.
F
We're
also
asking
for
reduced
buffer,
just
485
feet
right
on
this
southern
property
boundary
and
that's
where
the
property
abuts
a
land,
zoned
rs.50
but
owned
by
the
city.
This
lot
is
also
vacant.
The
two
trees
that
were
spoken
of
we
have
a
32
inch
pecan
tree
and
a
54
inch
oak
tree.
These
trees
have
been
evaluated
by
Natural
Resources
staff,
and
we've
received
a
recommendation
of
consistent
from
natural
resources.
I
have
some
renderings
of
the
proposed
building.
Can.
B
G
It
says
32
inches
moral,
correct
instead
of
the
pecan
and
also
there
was
had
some
confusion
earlier.
It's
any
reading
staff
report
that
the
54
inch
oak
has
already
been
determined
to
be
hazardous
and
I
know.
If
that
doesn't
give
you
a
right
to
take
it
out
under
the
PD,
but
but
I
just
need
a
clarification
and
that.
F
Is
I'm
not
sure,
but
I
can
tell
you
what
I
do
know
about
this
tree.
We
have
worked
with
natural
resources.
The
property
owner
and
I
went
out
to
stake.
The
building
footprint
Natural
Resources
staff
went
out
to
look
at
this.
They
came
faith,
they
realized,
while
they
were
out
doing
their
assessment,
that
the
tree
was
unhealthy
and
that
it
would
be
better
to
remove
the
tree
at
prior
to
construction
than
after
construction,
because
the
configuration
of
the
lot
would
prevent
removal
of
that
tree
down
the
road.
G
F
B
E
Okay,
councilman
dude,
thank
you.
I
can
agree
with
a
few
things
you
said,
but
not
all,
because
I
live
in
East,
Tampa,
I
guess
what
I
want
to
know,
and
this
isn't
anything
based
on
my
decision.
That
way
tell
me
about
this
business
and
tell
me
you
know
we
we
hired
people
from
the
community
or
we
we
just
kept
bringing
the
business
in
East
Tampa.
Well,.
H
E
H
E
C
Marry
semi
ago,
any
other
type
of
light
manufacturing
use.
Typically,
my
light
manufacturing
use
is
any
use
where
you
assemble
different
parts
together
to
make
a
product,
so
it
could
be
any
number
of
different
types
of
uses,
so
you're
approving
any
type
of
light
manufacture.
You
use
that
falls
within
that
definition,
not
necessarily
her
clients,
business.
E
F
May
I
just
follow
up
with
this.
The
proposed
use
is
light
manufacturing
and
to
answer
your
previous
question.
I
have
researched
this
East
or
the
the
CRA
and
I
know
about
the
Enterprise
Zone
I've
spoken
to
the
property
owner
about
the
Enterprise
Zone,
but
we're
sort
of
putting
we're
getting
ahead
of
ourselves
here.
I
can't
commit
to
the
fact
that
mr.
L
car
C
will
work
with
the
Enterprise
Zone,
but
I
can't
see
why
he
wouldn't,
because
there
are
many
incentives
to
encourage
him
to
do
so
and
again
this
is
a
light
manufacturing
use.
F
We
would
be
you
know,
manufacturing
food
items
associated
with
the
Mediterranean
cuisine
and
I
have
some
renderings
of
the
building.
This
would
be
the
view
of
the
building.
It's
going
to
be
a
brand
new
building,
and
this
would
be
the
view
sort
of
if
you're
looking
from
the
Northeast
from
the
southeast
and
this
rendering
it
does
include
one
of
the
trees
which
is
proposed
to
be
removed,
so
I've
just
kind
of
put
a
big
X
over
that
tree.
That
tree
is
going
away,
but
the
rendering
still
included
it.
F
So,
if
we're
going
to
have
the
retention
area
and
the
wall
and
the
rear
part
of
the
property
and
along
this
northern
edge,
where
the
site
abuts
residential
development,
we're
going
to
have
that
buffer
at
15
feet,
as
required
by
code
on
the
south
side
for
a
distance
of
85
feet,
we're
asking
to
reduce
that
buffer
area
from
15
feet
to
10
feet
and
that
adjacent
neighbor,
the
property
is
zoned
residential
50.
But
the
lot
is
vacant
and
it's
owned
by
the
city.
Thank.
A
F
I
G
I
That's
not
a
good
tree
either
it's
got
50%
of
the
canopy,
it's
just
dead
and
and
the
reason
why
I
didn't
make
the
staff
report
is
a
grand
tree
was
because
when
this
project
started
it
was
not
a
grand
tree
back
in
June.
The
definition
of
grand
tree
changed
from
a
34
inch
tree
to
now
a
32
inch
tree
as
a
grand
jury
lowered
it
by
two
inches
in
that,
but
we
determined
that
because
it
started
out
as
a
9
grand
tree
under
the
O
code,
because
it
just
missed
it
by
a
couple
inches.
I
I
B
J
Mone
judge
47:13
I'm
directly
across
the
street
from
the
location,
so
we
couldn't
say
I
just
found
out
about
this
to
see
one
of
the
neighbors
directly
behind
the
lot
came
to
my
job,
to
see
to
tell
me
about
it
and
of
course
they
asked
me
to
come
down
and
I.
We
didn't
know
what
it
was
gonna
be,
but
I
do
know
in
June,
I
leave
on
the
weekends
and
I
come
back
Monday
and
there's
folks
on
the
lot.
We
call
downtown.
We
call
it
Orlando
mr.
goose
representative
goose,
and
they
stayed
there
for
about.
J
Maybe
three
four
weeks
before
the
ghost
Oh
God,
we
could
leave
again
and
I
come
back
to
work
on
Monday
and
it's
a
junkyard.
They
got
cars,
they
got
trucks
and
we
just
don't
believe
that
should
have
been
done
for
homes.
It's
always
been
on
that
side
of
the
40th
Street
even
threat
to
the
the
west
of
them
is
a
building
there
and
it's
a
small
manufacturer.
J
They
don't
keep
it
up.
It
is
not
what
East
Tampa
is
looking
for.
I
think
that
would
be
better.
Oh,
he
was
wrong.
That
is
where
most
of
that
kind
of
operation
is
going
and
for
jobs.
J
It's
not
that
much
I
mean
we're
looking
for
a
living
wage,
they're
not
gonna,
be
paying
that
kind
of
money,
we're
just
against
it,
and
we
don't
have
time
to
really
find
out
what
it
is
and
what
it's
going
to
be
so
I'm
hoping
for
the
second
read
we
could
get
the
neighbors
in,
and
you
know
it's
not
something
that
I
see
re
even
once
there
or
in
in
on
40th
Street.
It's
just
not
what
we
want
them
for
the
new
street.
Thank
you.
J
But
how
would
how
do
the
community
benefit
as
a
result
of
them
coming?
I
I
would
hope
she
would
take
that
in
consideration.
Give
our
community
an
opportunity
to
build
out
instead
of
the
availability
of
vacant
land
people,
seeing
it
as
a
prime
opportunity
for
them,
but
it's
not
matching
the
footprint
or
the
desire
to
community.
I
C
E
E
G
F
For
the
record,
I
complied
with
the
notice
requirements.
They
sent
a
letter
by
certificate
of
mailing
to
the
rainbow
Heights
neighborhood
association,
addressed
to
miss
Frankie
that
you
read
that
you're
referring
to
but
I,
don't
remember
the
the
last
name
of
this
person,
but
a
letter
was
specifically
mailed
to
this
person.
Consistent
with
the
notice
requirements
beside
the
site
was
posted
with
signs
indicating
public
notice
or
public
hearing
was
to
occur
on
this
date
and
I
haven't
received
any
calls
or
questions
from
anyone
in
the
community,
not
even
the
community
leader.
So
because.
E
I'm
just
surprised
because
those
folks
respond
there
they're
consistent,
miss
Frankie's,
consistent
gosh,
I,
can't
think
females,
Jackson
height
right
next
to
those
folks
they're
consistent
when
things
are
going,
especially
the
CRA
I'm,
really
stunned,
that
you
can
receive
anything
from
the
CRA
met
manager
or
either
anything
coming
from
the
CRA,
the
CAC
champers.
No.
E
E
E
K
G
B
If
I'm
a
councilman,
goons
and
dink
Felder,
you
know
one
friendly
direction:
there's
a
ten
commandments
and
then
there's
a
ten
suggestions.
We
can
make
a
suggestion
that
the
applicant
between
first
and
second
reading
avail
themselves
to
to
a
community
meeting
which,
of
course,
we
cannot
attend,
but
with
the
with
the
CRA,
the
local
neighborhoods,
etc,
to
address
this
very
legitimate
concerns
that
councilman
gutes
has
without
legally
weighing
on
or
burdening
the
process.
Just
ask.
F
E
F
Well,
and
perhaps
the
attorney
would
help
us
with
this
question,
but
I'm
required
to
notice
rainbow
heights.
I
have
I,
don't
mind
reaching
up
to
the
Community
Redevelopment
Association,
because
of
course,
I
would
like
to
have
support
for
this
project
and
I
believe
it
is
a
good
project
located
in
in
the
proper
location,
but
but
I'm
I'm
not
required
to
do
that.
F
E
F
These
neighborhoods
and
I'm
gonna
reach
out
to
the
Community
Redevelopment
Agency
I've
spoken
with
mr.
Johnson
in
the
past,
and
I
don't
mind
doing
that
again,
but
I'm
not
trying
to
be
subvert
of
here.
I've
done
everything
I'm
required
to
do
and
I
haven't
heard
a
peep
from
anyone
until
tonight.
So
I
thought
all
were
in
support
of
this
project.
F
A
F
Think
that's
the
right
thing
to
do
and
not
agreeing
to
do
that.
I
totally
I
would
like
to
address
a
couple
of
the
comments,
though
made
by
the
neighborhood
to
the
neighbors
who
just
spoken.
F
So
I
have
contacted
the
property
owner
in
regard
to
goats
being
on
site.
He
had
no
rep,
he
doesn't
know
anything
about
goats
being
located
on
site.
I,
however,
did
hear
a
rumor
about
goats
being
located
on
this
property,
and
that
was
when
I
was
posting.
The
signs
of
notice,
one
of
the
people
walking
down
the
sidewalk
said.
Oh,
are
you
bringing
the
goats
back
and
I
said
no,
but
I
really
didn't
know
what
they
were
referring
to,
but
I
have
heard
this
complaint
before
and
we
don't
intend
to
have
live
animals
on
the
property.
F
There
has
also
been
a
problem
with
some
illegal
dumping,
which
you
know
my
client
has
done,
has
taken
care
of
to
the
best
of
his
ability.
When
I
was
out
there
last
I
did
see
some
trash
on
the
site,
but
you
know
I
didn't
see
any
evidence
of
illegal
dumping.
We
do
have
a
lawn
care
service
that
was
going
out
and
trying
to
maintain
this
property,
but
they
sort
of
disappeared
on
us.
So
we've
gotten
a
new
crew
hired
to
you
know
make
sure
that
this
property
is
properly
mowed
and
maintained.
B
G
What
I
see
on
the
immediate
surrounding
property?
It
said
at
least
looking
at
the
suk-min.
It
said
vacant
lot,
bacon
law,
city
law
on
the
immediate
surrounding
property,
the
fact
that
it's
light
manufacturing
and
I'm
not
seeing
any
external
manufacturing
any
dust
dirt.
You
know
like
like
it's
not
like
the
cement
plant,
that's
over
there
on
50th
and
that
sort
of
thing
this
is
a
sounds
like
a
relatively
well
it's
food.
It's
gonna,
be
a
clean,
a
clean
process,
six
parking
spaces,
relatively
small
building
and
hopefully
a
handful.
G
You
know,
half
dozen
jobs
legal
staff
has
indicated
we
can't
get
into
who
gets
those
jobs
that's
beyond,
but
with
all
that
said
it
doesn't.
It
sounds
to
me
like
it
might
be
positive
for
the
neighborhood
I
will
agree
with
the
motion
to
approve
for
today,
but
hold
my
judgment
if
there's
something
that
comes
out
at
second
second
reading
and
all
of
a
sudden
there's
a
lot
of
neighborhood
concern.
That's
legitimate.
E
Goods
I'm,
like
one
being
favorite
emotion
today
and
we'll
see
how
second
reading
goes.
That
area
does
have
a
lot
of
businesses
on
there.
We
wanted.
You
know
some
good
because
is
praising
the
good
jobs,
but
look
at
the
design.
It
will
bring
something
to
the
tax
roll.
If
it's,
if
it's
something
is
put
there
and
hopefully
we
can
get
a
few
jobs
out
of
I,
don't
know,
but
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
do
it
today,
but
reserved
for
a
second
meeting
to
see
what
the
community
service.
M
I'm
in
a
in
the
same
position,
the
community
folks
who
spoke
said
that
they're
going
to
bring
more
folks
next
time
and
we'll
see
if
there's,
if
there's
competent,
substantial
evidence
may
change
my
mind
in
second
reading.
But
right
now
just
to
let
just
to
let
everybody
go
through
the
process
of
evaluating
getting
feedback.
I'm
gonna
vote
for
it.
B
Anyone
else
and
and
I
would
say,
I
adopt
what
my
three
colleagues
have
said
here,
which
is
that
this
appears
to
be
a
good
project.
It
appears
to
be
consistent,
etc.
It
appears
to
be
something
that
would
be
good
for
the
community,
but
there
is
some
matters
of
diplomacy
that
have
got
to
be
taken.
Care
of
that
may
not
be
legally
binding
on
us,
but
again
it's
good
citizen
stuff,
because
I
think
we
all
agree.
So
all
support.
B
G
H
B
H
H
B
H
D
H
H
Said
earlier
the
evening,
this
being
a
quasi-judicial
matter,
it's
treated
differently
and
there
are
certain
obligations
that
council
members
need
to
disclose
if
they've
had
ex
parte
communications
prior
to
the
start
of
the
hearing.
Otherwise,
the
courts
presume
that
this
prejudice
that
could
undermine
your
decision.
H
D
Good
evening,
council
members
David
hay
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff
I
have
been
sworn.
This
next
case
moves
us
up
to
the
University
planning
district.
More
specifically,
the
subject
site
is
located
within
the
designated
tamp
of
green
tech
quarter,
the
subject
site
based
on
the
heavy
industrial
future
land
use
designation,
can
seek
up
to
a
1
million
two
hundred
eighty
seven
thousand
square
feet
also,
even
though
this
is
a
heavy
industrial
category,
policy
direction
within
the
green
tech
corridor
allows
residential
units
to
also
be
considered
on
the
site.
D
If
meeting
those
policies,
there
is
transit
within
500
feet
of
the
subject
site
along
Malcolm
McKinley
Drive,
that's
Hartley's,
five
connecting
the
subject
site
to
downtown
Tampa
and
the
University
Area
Transit
Center.
Their
closest
recreational
facility
is
the
Greco
softball
complex,
located
1.25
miles
to
the
east.
The
subject
site
is
not
located
within
an
evacuation
zone.
D
D
Here
we
have
the
aerial.
This
is
the
subject
site.
This
is
McKinley.
Bugan
Villa
is
to
the
south.
The
area
has
actually
has
a
mixture
of
uses
to
the
south,
and
north
is
actually
the
pavilions
apartments,
the
oh
sorry,
the
Provo,
the
province
apartments,
then
to
the
southwest
is
the
lodge
at
lake
rest.
This
is
the
existing
campus
they're
looking
to
expand
the
hospital
across
McKinley
Drive
there's
some
light.
There's
some
manufacturing
uses
and
office
uses
scattered
throughout,
and
this
is
actually
F.
Dot.
D
Here
we
have
the
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
that
the
black
color,
that
is
the
heavy
industrial
future
land
use
category
the
Pink's
scattered
throughout,
have
been
plant
amendments
in
the
past
to
that
community
makes
use
35
to
allow
for
those
residential
developments
to
occur,
and
then
you,
the
single-family
detached,
is
located
east
of
46th
Street.
D
The
subject
site
again
is
located
within
a
green
tech
corridor.
The
main
objective
of
the
green
tech
court
is
to
create
economic
development
opportunities
that
attract,
retain
and
cultivate
high
quality
jobs
for
the
citizens
of
the
city
of
Tampa.
The
targeted
industries
are
outlined
in
the
report.
Those
are
directly
from
the
comp
plan.
Staff
has
reviewed
this
and
the
provided
site
plan
furthers
the
policy
direction
related
to
the
Tampa
green
tech
corridor.
Those
are
land
use
policies.
D
Eight
point,
twelve
point,
four
and
eight
point
nine
point:
three
overall,
the
submitted
site
plan
properly
addresses
the
Malcom
McKinley
corridor
by
placing
the
building
and
landscaping
toward
the
roadway
and
placing
the
majority
of
parking
areas
either
into
structures
or
toward
the
rear
of
the
site.
The
site
plan
provides
for
pedestrian
circulation
plan
connecting
all
major
structures
and
with
the
sidewalk
along
Malcolm
McKinley
Drive.
Finally,
the
site
plan
does
provide
for
a
mixture
of
uses,
there's
a
clinic
and
hotel
component
lodging,
which
is
encouraged
in
new
employment
centers.
D
So,
overall,
the
proposed
development
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
existing
uses
in
the
surrounding
area
and
is
also
consistent
with
that
development
pattern.
Envisioned
under
the
tampa
green
tech
quarter
so
based
on
that
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
the
rezoning
request
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
imagines
140
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
Thank
you.
C
Marry
Samaniego
planning,
design
and
development
coordination
again.
This
is
a
rezoning
request
from
heavy
industrial
to
planned
development
for
our
hospital
use.
In
this
case,
specifically,
it's
Moffitt
as
well
as
associated
clinic
use
and
hotel
motel.
The
hotel
military
uses
in
the
applicant
can
discuss
in
more
detail
a
concept
for
extended
stay
for
family
of
patients
and
residents
of
the
facility
they
are
proposing.
C
One
main
driveway
cut
on
to
Malcolm
McKinley
and
the
nature
driveway
cut
to
the
north
summer,
buildings
with
parking
garages
and
then
some
future
potential
surface
parking
lots
they're,
requesting
a
little
over
under
1.3
million
square
feet
of
entitlement,
which
is
right
at
their
allowable
f.
They
are
1.5
florida
area
ratio,
the
property
is
surrounded
to
the
north
and
south,
with
condominiums
or
apartment
buildings,
as
well
as
the
across
the
street
is
the
other
plan
development
firm
F.
The
existing
facility
for
map
Moffitt
Cancer
Center.
C
C
Sorry
parking
signage
waivers
to
increase
those
now
allowable
number
free-standing
signs
from
2
to
3
on
the
right-of-way
and
to
increase
the
surface
square
footage
area
at
the
sign
from
50
square
feet
per
side
to
100
square
feet
per
sign
face.
There
are
some
changes
between
1st
and
2nd
reading
from
planning
design
and
development
coordination
that
you
can
see
on
page
2
of
your
staff
report
again
clarification
that
transportation
does
not
have
any
changes
and
they
are
removing
their
inconsistency
and
then
Natural.
C
Resources
just
has
some
modifications
between
1st
and
2nd
reading
to
the
staff
report,
but
they
also
found
it
consistent.
So,
overall,
the
developer
view
compliance
staff
found
this
consistent
with
the
applicable
section
of
the
land
development
regulations.
Should
it
be
the
pleasure
of
council
to
approve
this?
Please
remember
that
there
is
a
modification
sheet
between
the
1st
and
2nd
reading.
Any.
L
G
N
I
have
not
heard
of
any
opposition,
my
name
is
John
Randolph.
My
address
is
suite
3700
Bank
of
America
Plaza
I'm
joined
this
evening
by
mr.
Everett
Simmons,
director
of
design
and
construction
for
Moffitt,
Cancer
Center,
mr.
Scott
Nolan
project
manager,
with
Hames,
Nicole,
Lynn
and
Ben,
Ryan
of
argue,
our
civil
engineers,
Steve
Henry,
our
transportation
engineer
and
last
but
not
least,
Neil
Corbett
of
HDR
our
project
architect,
and
we
are
most
honored
to
represent
Moffitt
Cancer
Center.
With
this
evening
we
had
no
question
with
this
San
Diego
summary
nor
mr.
N
excuse
me,
David
Hayes,
summary
conclusions
to
you
and
recommendations
as
to
the
Comprehensive
Plan
Moffett
owns
this
property.
This
is
an
administrative
building
right
now
it
will
be
demolished
and
eventually
will
be
back
to
you
to
approve
a
link
over
McKinley
Drive
to
tie
it
with
the
Western
campus
that
they
had.
This
will
be
a
state-of-the-art
medical
center.
We
were
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
We
respectfully
request
your
approval
this
evening.
Thank
you.
B
Sir,
any
questions
I
have
one
mr.
Gandalf
if
I
may-
and
this
has
no
bearing
whatsoever
on
my
decision
tonight-
do
we
have
here
the
the
terrorist
Park
Neighborhood
Association,
which
is
kind
of
gone
off
the
banner
they're
doing
great
they're,
usually
getting
40
50
people
at
their
meetings
a
month?
Have
you
because
I
can't
be
in
contact
with
them
on
this?
Have
you
been
in
contact
with
them
on
this
and
I
know?
Obviously
you
send
out
your
rub.
Your
notice
etc,
but
have
you
told
them
in
terms
of
what's
forthcoming
to
the
community.
N
B
N
B
B
H
H
B
N
C
K
C
Mary
Santiago
I,
don't
number
14
is
our
easy
19
1
0
1.
It's
the
property
load
located
at
4600
West
Cypress
Avenue
from
office
professional
1
to
plan
development
for
business,
professional
office,
banquet
drive-in,
restaurant
college
and
school
strip.
Commercial
center
with
all
CG
uses,
recreational
facility,
commercial
indoor,
hotel,
motel
in
principal
parking.
D
D
Gotta
say
it:
they
told
the
legal
department,
told
me
say
everything:
the
we're
in
the
West
Shore
planning
district
for
this
last
case.
More
specifically,
it's
also
in
the
business
center.
There
are
public
recreation
facilities
within
proximity,
that's
Charles,
B
Williams,
Park,
Lauretta,
Ingram,
Park
and
Cypress
Point
Park
there
is
transit,
Harvard's
30
serves
West
Shore
and
the
subject
site
is
in
evacuation
zone.
B,
here's
the
aerial,
the
subject
site.
This
is
Cypress,
West
Shore.
Of
course.
This
is
the
parcel
backs
up
to
the
I-275
corridor.
D
This
is
the
Double
Tree
Hotel
you've
got
the
Jefferson
High
School
and
we're
all
familiar
the
mariya.
It's
a
very
high,
intense
use.
You
don't
get
really
into
residential
unless
you're
south
of
the
interstate
east
of
Trask
or
east
of
Manhattan
on
to
the
future
land
use
map
the
subject
site
this
purple.
Color
is
all
that
regional
mixed
use.
100
the
blue
represents
the
public
quasi-public,
that's
jefferson
as
you
move
west
west
of
Occidental,
that's
the
ma,
P
you're
starting
to
get
in
the
flight
path
of
T
IA
and
then
again
the
residential.
D
D
D
D
D
So,
in
conclusion,
the
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
and
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
it
relates
to
the
city's
planning
strategy,
urban
design
and
development
and
mixed-use
quarters,
and
is
consistent
with
that
development
pattern
anticipated
under
that
regional
mixed-use
100.
So,
based
on
those
considerations,
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
the
rezoning
request
consistent
with
the
imagined
2040
Temper
conferences.
Fine,
thank
you.
C
Marry
Samaniego
planning,
design
and
development
coordination
again.
This
is
a
planned
development
for
a
mixed-use
project
located
on
Cypress
Street
and
a
small
part
of
it
is
across
the
street
Unruh
Nelly.
So
this
is
the
main
site
two
buildings
with
the
principal
use
in
this
building
with
the
parking
garage
and
then
there's
a
small
service
parking
lot
with
an
energy
plan
across
your
NLE
Drive
and
then
to
the
north
is
Cypress
Street.
C
This
property's,
currently
zoned
office
professional
one
they're
asking
for
again
entitlement
for
maximum
two
hundred.
Seventy
thousand
square
feet
on
the
property
is
a
little
over
two
point:
eight
acres
and
it's
currently
occupied
by
an
office
and
Bank
use
with
a
drive-in,
specifically
they're,
proposes
to
demolish
the
64,000
square
foot
buildings
and
associate
it
did
drive
in
facilities
and
develop
the
two
new
buildings
again
with
a
parking
garage.
C
The
overall
setbacks
for
the
north
and
southern
buildings
are
10
feet:
minimum
20
feet
maximum
south
and
west
five
feet
and
to
the
east
30
feet
and
then
separate
setback
spread
of
the
energy
plant.
This
10-foot
I'm,
sorry,
this
is
canta.
This
property
is
within
the
West
Shore
overlay
district
and
has
been
reviewed
for
compliance
with
those
provisions.
I
know
the
applicant
we're
going
detail
about
the
specifics
of
the
proposal.
A
total
of
1092
parking
spaces
are
required,
they're
proposing
926
for
a
10%
parking
reduction
because
of
that
10%
parking
reduction.
C
Remove
up
to
75%
of
the
trees
on
site
they're
asking
to
remove
eighty
nine
percent,
so
that
is
apartment
I'm.
Sorry,
that
is
a
waiver
that
is
being
requested.
However,
Natural
Resources
did
not
object
to
that
because
of
the
site
and
stormwater
and
flooding
regulations.
A
considerable
amount
of
fill
is
required
to
be
put
on
the
site
up
to
three
feet
because
of
all
that
fill
being
placed
on
the
site.
All
most
of
the
existing
trees
would,
if
that
they
were
effectively
removed.
C
They're
asking
for
maneuvering
in
the
right-of-way
for
Anneli
for
delivery
drivers
again,
because
part
of
the
site
is
across
a
right-of-way
there'll,
be
so
many
ring
between
the
two
portions
of
this
signal
are
used
across
this
right-of-way.
So
there's
a
maneuver
in
the
right-of-way
requests
for
deliveries,
as
well
as
solid
waste
provisions,
they're
asking
specifically
for
their
moogles
to
non
hazardous
grande
trees.
Again,
thirty-six
and
a
34-inch
again
there's
comments
from
Natural
Resources
regarding
this
in
the
staff
report
and
then
the
final
waiver
that
they're
asking
to
a
twenty
seventy
to.
C
Eighty
four
point,
four
is
to
pay
into
the
tree
trust
fund
for
any
mitigation
and
required
trees
that
could
not
be
planted
on
site,
saying
that
there
are
some
changes
between
first
and
second
reading,
but
overall
the
development
and
compliance
staff
did
find
this
inconsistent
with
the
land
of
almond
code,
basically
primarily
because
of
the
parking
waiver
through
the
transportation
of
vision.
As
a
reminder,
should
it
be
the
pleasure
of
council
to
approve
this
application,
please
remember
that
there
is
a
revision
shape
between
first
and
second
reading.
O
Of
evening
mr.
chairman,
council
members,
my
name
is
David
mechanic,
305,
South,
Boulevard,
Tampa,
Florida
I'm,
here
on
behalf
of
Highwoods
Properties
with
me.
This
evening
is
Dan
Woodward
vice
president
of
Highwoods
Tampa
and
chase
Collier
manager
of
acquisitions
and
dispositions
for
high
winds
and
Randy
:
of
coning
company.
We
are
very
late
in
the
evening.
I
will
try
and
make
this
brief
and,
of
course,
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
O
We
fully
agree
with
the
report.
The
report
was
very
thorough.
We
will
make
all
the
requested
vision
revisions,
as
indicated
in
the
revision
sheet.
I
would
just
remind
Council.
We
are
in
the
West
Shore
business
district,
which
is
the
largest
office
district
in
the
state
of
Florida.
The
regional
mixed-use
land-use
category
is
the
most
intense
anywhere
in
the
city
outside
of
the
downtown
area,
as
Mary
mentioned
the
necessity
for
the
waivers
concerning
the
trees.
O
It
has
to
do
with
the
physical
minimum
flood
elevation
requirements
that
we
have
to
meet
in
order
to
build
the
building,
and
this
is
truly
a
mixed-use
project.
The
10%
waiver
for
parking
is
rather
modest
and
is
justified,
based
upon
shared
use
with
the
mix
of
uses,
which
is
a
very
typical
reduction.
That
council
often
approves
in
these
situations,
and
with
that
I
will
stand
down
and
just
solicit
any
questions
you
might
have.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
You
mr.
mechanic
and
all
of
your
your
team
for
being
so
patient
waiting
this
later
in
the
evening.
The
only
question
is
this:
I
appear,
as
the
building
sort
of
being
ultimately
will
be
built
sort
of
on
spec,
and
that's
why
you
include
a
lot
of
potential
uses
because
you
don't
necessarily
know
what's
going
in
and
I
understand,
appreciate
that
and
the
problem
with
that,
but
might
I
guess
my
question
to
you.
Mr.
mechanic,
and/or
staff
is
this
notion
of
strips
strip
shopping
center
with
all
CG
uses
whatever
well.
O
O
It's
an
anomaly
because
it's
simply
a
defined
use
in
the
in
the
city
code
and
chip
strip
shopping
center
allows
you
to
do
a
variety
of
things
that
you
might
imagine
would
go
in
a
shopping
center,
although
this
obviously
is
not
going
to
be
a
shopping
center,
but
it
allows
a
mixture
of
personal
services.
You
know
like
a
dance
studio
or
physical
fitness
facility.
O
O
B
A
B
B
G
You
mister
mister,
mister,
hey
perk
up.
This
refers
to
you
guys
as
well
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
in
the
March
26th
council
workshop
at
9:30
a.m.
which
appears
to
be
open,
that
we
would
act
that
we
would
get
some
additional
information
about
urban
villages
from
the
Planning
Commission
staff
and
from
our
own
planning
staff.
G
A
M
O
G
G
M
H
A
M
B
And
I
and
I
wanted
to
salute
this.
I
think
this
is
great,
because
you
know
the
the
community's
coming
out
for
a
lot
of
these
developments,
sometimes
we'll
be
with
them.
Sometimes
we
won't,
but
the
larger
issue,
that's
an
acute
crisis
for
them.
Every
day
is
gonna,
be
addressed
here
in
so
counseling
calls,
and
thank
you
for
that.
Okay,
so
we
have
a
motion
by
Councilman
Carlson,
a
second
all
in
favor
any.
H
B
And
just
really
quick,
if
I
may
for
me,
I
just
quickly
motion
for
a
report
at
the
January
23rd
2020
meeting
no
in
person,
appearance
necessary
from
the
transportation
department
on
the
status
of
repaving,
north
Boulevard
and
Country
Club
Drive
in
Forest.
Hills
was
supposed
to
be
done
a
year
ago
and
it
still
hasn't
gotten
done
because
of
storm
water
problems.
Yes,.
B
E
B
E
B
It
finally
I
would
like
separate
sections
for
each
of
those
because
there's-
and
we
can
do
it
at
the
same
time-
have
no
problem
with
that,
but
just
separate
sections.
My
our
challenge
with
this
is
this
was
repaved
in
January
of
2019
and
due
to
storm
water
problems.
The
communities
had
a
way
to
the
Akashi
almost
a
year
in
counting,
which
is
something
else.
So
there
you
go
and
I
guess
that
second
by
yeah.
A
B
H
If
I
can,
before
you
do,
that,
I
just
have
a
couple
of
issues
that
I'd
like
to
bring
to
council's
attention
the
first
one
being
just
a
reminder:
counsel,
it's
a
special
discussion
meeting,
which
means
a
quorum
is
not
necessary.
Monday
morning
at
8:30,
from
8:30
to
12:30
is
the
for
our
ethics
training.
Here,
if
you're
here
great,
if
you
are
not
it's
going
to
be
recorded
by
CCTV,
it's
not
going
to
be
broadcast,
but
it
won't
be
available
to
you
on
streaming,
so
you
could
watch
it
at
your
convenience
same
thing.