►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 05092019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Row
here,
Miranda
yeah,
Carlson
hubiera
here
and
councilman
Dean
feller,
called
to
say
he
would
be
a
little
bit
late.
He
specifically
requested
that
we
begin
without
him,
so
we
will
proceed
beforehand.
Some
people
were
here
tonight
for
a
motion
that
I
was
going
to
be
making
at
the
end
of
Tampa
City
Council
I
wanted
to
have
consent
of
this
board
to
make
a
motion
before.
If
I
may
any
objections
to
that
no
problem,
I
appreciate
everybody.
Everyone
is
I'm,
sure
aware
of
the
legislation.
A
It's
House
bill,
1
159,
which
is
kind
of
come
to
Governor
DeSantis,
which
deals
with
local
governments
abilities
to
govern
themselves.
Yet
again,
whatever
it
comes
to
trees.
This
proposed
legislation
around
allows
the
removal
of
of
trees
for
cause
simply
by
hiring
a
professional
arborist
to
determine
if
the
tree
stays
or
goes,
which
means
the
decision
is
solely
in
the
hands
of
a
contractor
and
essentially
takes
away
the
rights
of
cities
to
do
just
what
we
did
and
spent
about
two
years
on
of
a
lot
of
the
time
and
a
lot
of
hard
work.
A
This
is
something
that
we
continue
to
see
from
Tallahassee,
where
we
are
taking
away
powers
from
municipalities
and
local
governments
to
govern
ourselves.
We've
seen
on
a
lot
of
issues,
and
it
actually
goes
further
than
that
we're
actually
taking
away
power
from
the
people
we
see
recently
what
the
legislature
has
done
to
amendment
for
in
order
to
draw
that
back
the
clear
intent
of
almost
2
out
of
3
Floridians,
who
came
together
to
wipe
out
a
hundred
and
fifty
year
old
voting
restriction.
A
What
did
the
legislature
do
when
they
saw
that
they
scaled
it
back,
and
now
we
see
the
legislature
talking
even
about
scaling
back
the
inability
of
the
people
to
speak
out
on
initiatives.
So
for
me
this
goes
beyond
trees,
and
this
goes
to
the
idea
of
not
allowing
the
people
through
their
local
elected
officials
or
through
democratic
voices,
to
speak
out
on
their
behalf.
So,
therefore,
and
any
by
the
way
comments
from
yes.
B
A
Go
ahead.
Thank
you,
sir
anyone
else.
Okay,
great
so
therefore,
I,
motion
and
I'm
hitting
the
gavel.
The
vice
chairman,
it's
calcio
emotional,
for
all
council
attorney
to
write
a
letter
to
Governor
DeSantis,
asking
him
to
please
refrain
from
signing
House
bill.
Oh
thank
you!
We
have
a
second.
We.
B
A
A
D
You,
sir
Mary
Samaniego
from
development
coordination
item
number
one
which
is
vacation.
1910
item
number
three,
which
is
re
through
1931
item
number;
five,
which
is
1922
and
item
number
six,
which
is
1927.
None
of
those
four
applications
completed
notice,
and
so
they
are
going
to
be
moved
to
another
agenda.
German.
A
D
E
E
The
subject
site
is
located
within
proximity
to
transit,
the
closest
transit
stop
is
at
South
MacDill
Avenue
and
West
Cleveland
Street
the
site
is
located
within
a
level
D
evacuation
zone
and
the
closest
public
recreational
facility
is
a
quarter
mile
northeast
of
the
site
and
it's
West
Pines
Park
on
to
the
aerial.
This
is
the
zoomed
out
one
more
to
show
the
rooftop
here's
the
subject
site.
This
is
quad.
This
is
New
Jersey.
You
see
a
deal
Henderson
and
Kennedy.
This
is
Mitchell
Elementary,
one
block
choosing.
E
Onto
the
future
land-use
category,
the
subject
site,
which
is
in
the
center
and
all
this
brown
color,
is
the
residential
20.
The
blue
is
the
public
semi
public
that
represents
initial
elementary
you've
got
some
pink
along
MacDill
Avenue.
That's
the
community
mixed-use
35.
There's
some
light
commercial
office
uses
it
becomes
dense
as
you
go
further
south.
The
darker
brown
is
the
residential
35.
The
blue
here
is
Memorial
Hospital
and
then
this
kind
of
tan
color
of
orange
is
residential
and
intense
Planning.
E
Commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
petitioners
request
and
found
no
adverse
impacts
from
the
proposed
project
to
the
neighborhood.
The
request
is
consistent
with
several
policies
of
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
as
it
relates
to
housing.
The
city's
population,
general
Tampa's
comprehensive
plan
encourages
the
development
and
retention
of
a
diversity
of
housing
types
to
meet
the
needs
of
its
present
and
future
population
based
on
those
policies.
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
the
rezoning
request
consistent
with
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan.
Thank
you.
D
As
you
can
see,
it's
at
the
northeast
corner
of
Platt
and
New
Jersey
Avenue,
it
is
currently
occupied
by
a
single-family
detached
dwelling
in
this
is
the
zoning
map
Pacific
properties
in
green,
the
subject
property
and
the
surrounding
areas
currently
in
the
RM
16
length,
zoning
district,
that's
a
zoning
district
that
allows
for
single-family
houses,
semi
detached
dwelling
units
or
duplexes
multi-family
dwelling
townhomes,
primarily
over
on
MacDill
you've
got
some
commercial
zoning
and
some
planned
development
for
commercial
learning,
some
residential
office
and
then
again
residential
development.
Further
to
the
east.
D
Here's
the
subject:
property
I'll,
show
you
some
photographs
of
the
surrounding
area,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
the
development
pattern.
Here's
the
septic
property,
it's
on
a
corner
from
one
side.
That's
the
side
of
that
house.
Here's
the
front
of
the
house
as
I
go
through
these
pictures
here
is
two
dwelling
units,
another
structure
with
two
dwelling
units.
This
is
a
single-family
house,
so
maybe
that's
willing
utility
pipes.
D
With
the
subject
property,
it's
approximately
seven
thousand
two
hundred
and
ninety
square
feet,
they're
asking
the
big
rezone
from
honest
16,
which
typically
allows
sixteen
dwelling
units
per
acre
to
are
an
18
which
would
allow
18
swelling
the
units
for
that
acre.
Given
the
size
of
this
property.
If
the
rezoning
were
to
be
approved,
they
could
theoretically
develop
three
dwelling
units
on
the
site.
There
is
no
site
plan
to
review
with
this
rezoning
application.
They
just
asked
me
to
go
early
from
one
standard
zoning
district
to
together,
RM
16
to
RN
18.
D
As
you
can
see
from
the
photographs
I've
represented
this
area
is
in
transition.
It
was
historically
a
single-family
neighborhood,
but
with
the
art,
20
land-use
category,
that
David
indicated
this
is
an
area
that
we're
wanting
to
see
increased
intensity.
So
it
has
the
multi-family
zoning
district
on
it
already
and
we're
starting
to
see
some
of
the
single-family
residential
Lots
being
redeveloped
for
townhomes
and
duplexes
and
very
small
apartment
buildings.
So
this
rezoning
would
allow
for
rezoning
I'm
sorry.
D
F
Good
evening,
Council
Steve
McClean
iam,
representing
the
petitioner,
requesting
that
this
property
be
rezone
from
RM
16
to
RM
18.
As
a
staff
has
pointed
out,
the
land
use
classification
is
residential
20,
which
would
in
a
planned
category,
would
allow
20
units
of
the
acre
we're
requesting
18
units
to
the
acre,
which
would
allow
us,
in
this
specific
location,
to
develop
three
townhouse
units
at
approximately
2,400
square
feet.
Each.
The
staff
is
also
indicated
to
you
that
they
have
no
objections
either
from
the
city
side
or
from
the
Planning
Commission
side.
F
It
is
consistent
with
all
of
the
goals
and
objectives
of
the
city
and
it's
providing
much-needed
housing
in
an
area.
That's
anticipated
for
increased
growth
and
development.
It
is
in
between
a
number
of
commercial
districts
as
close
to
a
hospital
and
schools,
and
it's
providing
a
providing
a
residential
component
where
there
already
is
multifamily
components
immediately
adjacent
to
it
and
throughout
the
area
also
as
close
to
the
transit
corridors,
long
azile
and
MacDill
and
just
south
of
candidate.
So
we're
respectfully
requesting
your
approval,
we'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
it's.
F
This
is
a
Euclidian
zoning,
so
there
are
any
waivers
being
requested
through
this
rezoning
request.
If
there
are
any
subsequent
waivers,
they'll
have
to
go
through
a
different
process.
That
also
will
be
noticed
in
a
public
hearing.
Typically,
if
you
have
issues
regarding
the
site,
we'd
be
bringing
this
to
you
as
a
PD,
and
in
this
case
we
don't
need
that
those
kind
of
waivers
so
we're
respectfully
requesting
your
approval
to
go
from
our
m16
or
m18.
F
A
You,
sir,
any
questions
for
the
petitioner
from
the
council.
Okay
being
then,
we
move
forward
to
public
comment.
Anyone
here
in
the
public
would
like
to
comment
on
item.
If
please
stand
up
at
this
time
and
come
forward,
we
have
a
motion
to
close
by
by
Kellerman
Miranda,
a
second
by
Councilman
citral,
all
in
favor
any
opposed,
okay,
councilman
good.
Would
you
please,
sir,
take
item
number
two.
B
B
Members
in
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
214,
South,
New,
Jersey,
Avenue
and
CEO
Tampa
Florida,
and
one
particularly
described
in
section.
One
from
zoning
district
classifications
are
in
16
residential
multifamily
to
REM
18
residential,
most
your
family
providing
an
effective
date.
We.
A
G
B
A
E
Good
evening,
council
members,
David
Haye
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
I,
have
been
sworn.
We
moved
down
to
the
South
Tampa
planning
district.
For
this
next
case.
The
subject
site
is
located.
Transit
is
available
approximately
0.4
miles
to
the
east
along
South
MacDill
Avenue,
the
subject
site
is
located
within
a
level
C
evacuation
zone
and
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
burns
Park,
which
is
a
quarter
half
a
mile
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site
on
to
the
aerial,
the
subject
site,
of
course,
right
in
the
center.
E
This
is
Prospect
Street
Neptune
and
turns
down
Havana
to
the
south.
You
could
see
the
area
is
predominantly
single-family
detached.
There
is
some
multi-family,
the
Palma
Ceia
apartments
over
on
West
Mississippi
Avenue,
see
in
the
bottom
right
of
the
aerial
onto
the
future.
Land
use
map
the
subject
site
and
all
the
properties
on
Prospect,
Street,
Prospect
Road
in
the
general
neighborhood,
are
all
that
residential
ten
immediately
to
the
south
around
the
curve
of
Neptune
and
Havana.
If
there's
some
residential
twenty,
that's
that
brown
color
density
increases
as
you
move
east
down
Mississippi.
E
This
darker
brown
is
the
res
35
and
then
on
Howard
there's
some
community
mixed-use
thirty-five
represented
by
the
pink
there's
commercial
uses
over
some
commercial
uses
located
over
there.
The
subject
site
currently
has
a
single-family
home
on
site.
The
proposed
zoning
district
of
rs.75
will
allow
different
setbacks
and
requirements
that
allowed
under
the
then
are
allowed
under
the
rs.60
zoning
district.
The
request
will
not
alter
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
development
under
the
rs.75.
E
Zoning
district
will
be
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
dealth
development
pattern
and
overall
is
consistent
with
the
policies
of
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
and
based
on
that,
the
recommendation
from
the
Planning
Commission
staff
is
to
find
this
rezoning
consistent
that
the
imagine
2042
enterprise
the
plan.
Thank.
A
D
Marry
San
Diego
and
here's
an
aerial
of
the
subject:
property.
It's
on
Prospect
Road,
it's
in
the
chrony
of
detached
single-family
house.
The
circuit
property
on
the
zoning
map
is
in
green.
It
is
north
of
Neptune
is
rs.60.
Zoning
district
south
of
Neptune
is
primarily
the
RS
50
with
some
multi-family
residential
zoning
districts
in
certain
spots
here
is
a
photograph
of
the
selected
property,
and
then
these
are
photographs
of
houses
up
and
down
this
block
the
2500
block
of
Prospect
Road.
These
are
all
taken
from
perspective
from
the
public
right-of-way.
D
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
rezone
from
RS
6
feet:
Rs
75,
typically,
the
Rs
60
zoning
district
is
a
6,000
square
foot
minimum
lot
size
with
at
least
60
feet
of
road
frontage.
The
RS
75,
which
is
the
requested
zoning
district,
is
7,500
square
feet
in
an
area
as
well
as
75
foot
minimum
law
with
the
subject
properties,
live
width
is
81
feet
and
the
overall
score
footage
is
over
11,000
square
feet,
so
it
meets
the
criteria
for
the
artist
75
zoning
district.
D
H
You
are
subject
to
different
luck
with
requirements,
greater
a
lot
with
requirements
and
greater
area
requirements,
and
you
so
you're,
probably
wondering
why
are
we
doing
this
and
I'm
going
to
explain
that
to
you
in
just
a
minute
but
I'd
like
to
first
give
you
some
background
on
the
subject:
property
the
Redmon's
purchased
this
home
in
1988.
They
lived
there
for
the
for
31
years,
and
this
is
a
this
is
a
picture
of
the
property.
H
Recently
there
was
a
piece
of
property
in
between
this
home
and
the
Redmon's
home
that
went
up
for
sale.
There
was
a
home
on
that
property,
both
the
redness
and
there
are
neighbors
to
the
east
that
big
Eagle
hearts
purchased
that
property
they
each
purchased
a
portion
of
it.
The
Eagle
heart
purchase
40
feet,
the
Redmon's,
purchased,
20
feet
of
that
properties
and
the
Redmon's
purchased
the
property.
On
the
east
side,
they
had
a
quartic
to
shave,
their.
H
Portion
of
it
in
its
next
photograph,
so
we
supported
the
shade
on
this
part
of
their
property,
and
this
is
the
20
feet
that
they
added
to
their
property.
This
area
right
in
here
the
reason
that
they
purchased
it
is
they
wanted
to
add
a
driveway
in
a
garage
at
the
end
of
that
20
feet,
the
Porticus
shade
that
they
had
had
a
garage
at
the
end,
but
the
pork
of
shame
was
so
narrow.
They
were
never
really
able
to
maneuver
in
and
out
of
that
port
of
cachet
to
get
back
to
that
garage.
H
H
The
reason
for
the
rezoning
request
from
our
sixty
to
seventy-five
is
because,
under
the
RS
75
standards,
they
would
be
able
to
construct
a
slightly
larger
garage
and
I've
included
in
your
packaging
materials
up
and
actually-
and
let
me
go
back-
this
is
this-
is
the
area.
This
is
the
existing
garage
right
here.
That's
has
been
converted
to
a
pool
house
on
the
street
and
there
is
a
lot
of
on-street
parking.
In
fact,
sometimes,
as
you
can
see
here,
you
only
have
a
single
lane
of
travel.
H
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
this
rezoning
to
RS
75
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
in
the
area.
I
have
identified
on
this
on
this
map,
the
sizes
of
several
of
the
adjacent
Lots,
and
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
why
we
think
the
75
our
75
is
appropriate.
Here
you
have
lots
that
are
120
feet,
wide
120
feet
wide
90
feet
wide
88
feet
wide.
The
red
Smith
Redmon's
is
81
through
the
house.
Next
door
is
100,
9
d,
115,
105,
80,
150
150.
H
So,
as
you
can
see,
it's
an
area
with
very
large
lots,
so
the
RS
75
would
be
appropriate
in
this
location.
Also,
on
this
map,
every
every
name
marked
in
green,
has
submitted
a
letter
of
support.
So
we
have
widespread
support
from
the
neighborhood.
You
also,
as
you
heard,
have
support
from
both
the
city
staff
and
the
Planning
Commission
staff.
It's
consistent
with
the
comp
plan,
category
of
our
10
and
based
on
all
these
documents,
based
on
the
testimony
and
based
on
the
staff
reports.
H
A
B
A
G
Legal
legal
gives
us
magic
magic
words
at
the
VRB,
but
I'll
just
move
this
I'm
moving
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
and
ordinance
resigning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
2514
West
Prospect
Road
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
more
particularly
proud.
In
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs.60
residential
single-family
to
rs.75
residential
single-family,
about
an
effective
day
and
I
believe
they've
met
all
the
standards
and
there's
no
objection
from
the
community
and
it's
consistent
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
A
I
The
others
want
to
make
sure
well
at
this
time
there
is
no
obligation
to
have
to
state
the
reasons
why
you
support
it.
It
would
just
be
simply
to
be
able
to
do
it.
There
may
come
a
time
that
we
may
have
to
do
that
down
in
the
future,
based
on
what's
happening
up
in
Tallahassee,
but
at
this
point
in
time
it's
been
just
a
reading
at
first
reading,
great.
E
Good
evening
that
council
members
again
with
your
planning
staff
I,
have
been
sworn
we're
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district.
For
this
next
case.
The
subject
site
is
also
located
in
the
West
Tampa
urban
village.
It
is
located
in
the
North
Hyde
Park
neighborhood.
The
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
the
new
Julian
B
Lane
Riverfront
Park,
which
is
located
approximately
2100
feet
to
the
north
east
of
the
subject
site.
E
The
closest
transit
stop
is
located
approximately
1500
feet
to
the
east
and
the
intersection
of
North,
Boulevard
and
west
cast
that
is
served
by
Hart's
route
7,
which
connects
this
that
site
to
downtown
Tampa
a
Hillsborough
Community
College,
the
Dale
Maybury
campus.
The
subject
site
is
also
located
within
the
level
C
evacuation
zone.
E
E
You
can
see
that
there's
to
the
south,
predominantly
there's
a
mixture
of
light
industrial
uses,
commercial,
there's,
some
single-family
detached
and
we're
all
familiar
with,
what's
been
happening
on
Rome,
a
lot
of
these
industrial
sites
have
been
transitioning
into
multifamily
development.
Further
south
you
could
see
Kennedy
Boulevard
the
commercial
located.
This
is
the
Walmart
about
four
blocks
to
the
south
of
the
subject
site,
and
then
you
can
see
the
beginning
portion
of
the
University
of
Tampa's
campus
and
then
to
the
southeast.
E
E
The
surrounding
parcels,
in
that
light,
blue,
are
all
that
general
mixed-use
24,
that's
one
of
the
categories
in
the
city
that
allows
not
only
residential
and
commercial
but
also
of
light
industrial
uses
surrounding
the
site.
You
could
see
as
we
move
north
of
Cass
Street,
you
get
some
of
the
darker
brown,
that's
the
residential
35
and
then
it
transitions
and
the
density
starts
decreasing
as
you
go
north
into
the
residential
22.
E
About
two
blocks
to
the
north
over
to
the
west
of
Rome
is
where
you
get
some
residential
ten,
which
is
predominantly
single-family
detached
south
of
the
site.
There's
a
mixture
of
residential
20,
which
again
is
the
brand,
the
general
mixed-use
again.
The
light
blue,
which
allows
that
light,
industrial
consideration
and
then
down
on
Kennedy
is
that
urban
mixed-use
60
hard
to
tell
with
all
these
different
colors,
but
that
allows
up
to
succeed
well
in
units
per
acre.
E
E
The
subject
site
is
located
within
an
area
of
the
central
Tampa
planning
district,
which
has
been
transitioning
from
a
predominantly
light
industrial
development
pattern
to
a
more
mixed
use.
Urban
neighborhood,
the
subject
site,
is
also
located
within
the
West,
an
for
urban
village,
which
encourages
a
mixed-use
development
pattern
where
appropriate.
A
number
of
similar
type
developments
have
been
approved
and
developed
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site
mostly
centered,
along
North
Roma
Vinay.
E
The
comprehensive
plan
supports
infill
development,
such
as
this
proposal
that
brings
additional
density
and
intensity
into
areas
currently
served
with
transit
and
there
are
located
within
proximity
to
employment
centers.
The
proposed
development
provides
for
a
well
designed
structure
with
entryways
and
a
pedestrian
lobby
oriented
to
adjacent
public
rights-of-way.
E
Overall,
the
proposed
development
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern,
while
also
promoting
the
redevelopment
of
the
city's
mixed-use
corridors
in
a
way
that
promotes
pedestrian
and
transit
use
usage
excusing
the
repose
development
is
also
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
envisioned
under
that
community
makes
you
35
future
land-use
category.
Based
on
those
considerations,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
the
rezoning
request
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
imagine
2040
Tampa
Conference.
Thank
you,
sir.
D
Married
feminism
for
the
record:
here's
an
aerial
photograph
of
the
surrounding
areas.
They've
indicated
this
area
has
been
transitioning
for
the
last
several
decades
away
from
the
historic
single-family,
residential
and
light
industrial
uses
over
to
a
mix
of
townhomes
and
multi-family
residential
structures
with
some
small
retail
development.
So
the
subject
property
is
currently
the
showman's,
the
greater
Tampa
showman's
Association
facility
and
all
that
would
be
demolished
with
your
system
with
the
proposed
development.
Here's.
G
D
G
G
G
And
I
asked
my
client
showman's
rest
Inc.
If
they
were
corporately
related
to
the
other
showman's,
and
they
said
they
were,
they
were
not.
They
said
they
had
some
overlap
in
regard
to
membership,
but
I
don't
know
any
of
the
folks
who
owned
this
particular
property.
So
I
just
wanted
to
disclose
that,
for
the
record,
show
me
if
you
have
any
questions
for
me
in
that
regard.
Go
ahead.
I
I
G
I
I
D
D
D
They
are
requesting
on
this
property,
which
is
a
total
of
1.9,
3
acres,
193,
12
minutes
in
a
multi-family
context,
with
approximately
3,200
square
feet
of
retail
and
a
restaurant.
On
the
first
floor
along
Willow
north
willow,
this
is
Cass.
This
is
willow.
This
is
Cartman
and
the
entire
building
will
be
5
storeys,
with
the
maximum
square
footage
of
just
under
165
thousand
square
feet,
and
the
proposed
setbacks
as
part
of
a
planned
development
is
north
5
feet,
south
5
feet.
D
East
is
going
to
be
0
feet,
which
is
in
conjunction
with
the
West
Tampa
overlay
standards
and
to
the
west
is
8
feet.
The
maximum
building
height
will
be
65
feet
total.
As
far
as
the
waivers
outlined
in
your
step
report
on
pages
1,
&
2,
the
first
waiver
that
they're
requesting
is
to
contribute
to
the
tree
trust
fund
for
plants
that
cannot
be
planted
on
site.
D
The
second
waiver
that
they
are
requesting
is
to
allow
non
residential
parking
lots
to
access
arterial
or
collector
streets
for
Carmen
Street
Carmen's,
Cass
Street
is
considered
a
collector,
so
they're
allowed
to
have
a
driveway
here
which
they
have
one
way
in.
However,
they
have
a
double
one,
one
way:
I'm
sorry,
a
double
one
way
out
on
Carmen
streets.
The
Carmen
street
is
considered
a
local
street.
The
code
says
that
you
cannot
have
a
commercial
development
accessing
a
local
residential
street
because
they
have
a
commercial
element
to
this
project.
D
That
code
requirement
kicks
in
or
I'm
sorry
applies,
and
so
they
need
a
waiver
for
this
driveway
access
onto
carbon.
The
third
way,
where
they're
requesting
is
to
reduce
the
total
number
of
parking
spaces
for
the
three
hundred
and
sixty
seven
to
two
ninety
seven,
which
is
a
19%
parking
space
reduction.
We
staff
achieve
the
requirement
for
its
three
sixty
seven
based
on
the
number
of
dwelling
units,
as
well
as
the
combination
of
retail
uses
in
a
possible
restaurant
on
the
site.
Whenever
we
do
require
parking
for
a
plan
development,
we
make.
D
We
calculate
the
requirement
to
the
worst
case
scenario.
If
the
entire
3,200
square
feet
of
development
or
the
portion
that
they've
allotted
for
residential
I'm
sorry
restaurant
uses
were
to
be
developed
for
that
use
and
then
the
remaining
would
be
retail
and
all
the
units
were
occupied
for
the
maximum
amount
of
proposed
bedrooms.
That
would
be
where
we
get
the
three
sixty
seven,
but
they
are
asking
for
a
19%
parking
reduction.
D
Waiver
number
for
the
code
requires
two
loading
spaces
based
on
the
use
and
the
square
footage
of
the
building.
Typically,
your
first
loading
space
is
12
by
60
instead
of
having
112
by
60
loading
space
and
then
the
second
one
may
be
12
by
30
they're,
asking
for
both
of
those
party
loading
spaces
to
be
taught
by
30.
D
The
vertical
clearance
for
a
loading
area,
typically
16
feet
from
finish
grade
they're
asking
to
reduce
that
down
to
ten
and
a
half.
So
that's
the
fifth
waiver,
the
sixth
waiver
that
they
are
requesting
is
reduced.
The
required
green
space
for
multi-family
green
space
per
unit
from
a
total
of
sixty
seven
thousand
two
hundred
square
feet
of
green
space,
required
to
nine
thousand
three
hundred
and
sixty-seven
square
feet
of
green
space.
With
that
deficiency
paid
into
the
green
space
pay
and
we
fund
the
green
space
requirement
for
this
type
of
development.
D
Given
that
it's
five
storeys
requires
three
hundred
fifty
square
feet
of
green
space
on
site
for
dwelling
unit,
they
have
192
dwelling
units.
So
that's
how
staff
arrived
to
the
calculation
of
over
a
little
over
67,000
square
feet
of
green
space
they're
asking
for
a
way
to
reduce
that
amount
and
then
the
final
way
where
they're
requesting
is
to
some
of
the
signage.
It's
part
of
the
site
plan.
D
Basically,
for
the
allowable
of
sign
area
and
the
maximum
height
of
the
signage
along
the
main
corridor
and
willow
for
the
allowable
sign
areas
to
be
from
25
square
feet,
it's
37
square
feet
and
to
increase
the
maximum
allowed
texting
height
from
12
inches
to
24
inches
and
then
also
first
sign
number.
Five
to
increase
the
maximum
allowable
square
footage
of
sign
area
for
25
feet
to
41
feet
and
the
applicant
will
show
you
in
detail
kind
of
the
location
and
context
of
those
songs.
D
D
Transportation
did
find
this
inconsistent
based
on
the
access
to
a
local
street
again
for
Carmen,
as
well
as
the
19%
parking
reduce
natural
resources
found
this
plan
development
inconsistent
with
the
amount
of
green
space
waved
from
excuse
me.
Six,
a
little
over
67,000
square
feet
required
waiting
down
to
a
little
over
9,000
square
feet
and
there
are
several
other
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
that
Natural
Resources,
but
required.
D
As
well
as
the
natural
resources
has
also
formerly
objected
to
the
contribution
into
the
tree
trust
fund
for
the
mitigation
trees,
urban
design
did
review
this.
They
found
it
consistent
with
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
outlined
in
your
staff
report.
I'm
saying
that
the
overall
the
development
review
compliance
staff
did
find
this
inconsistent
with
the
land
development
code
again
referencing.
Any
report
to
transportations
concerns
with
parking
reduction
and
the
local
Street
access
and
Natural
Resources
referencing
the
green
space
provision,
as
well
as
the
mitigation
fund.
D
D
F
Yeah
Carmen
streets,
a
local
street,
so
the
code
prohibits
any
kind
of
non-residential
access
to
it,
so
that,
in
this
case,
most
of
the
use
is
residential,
but
they
do
have
a
commercial
component,
a
small
one.
So
therefore
they
would
be
inconsistent
with
that
code.
That's
the
only
reason
we're
objecting
to
that
since
there's
local
Street
there
and
it
has
residentially
zoned
property.
G
D
F
G
H
I
may
mr.
chairman,
Kristen
Maura
legal
department
I
just
want
to
address
you
briefly
regarding
the
bonus
provision
agreement,
the
development
agreement
that
the
San
Diego
reference
for
our
reading
councilmember
and
for
our
new
council
members.
The
city
does
have
a
new
bonus
provision
agreement,
section
of
our
code,
the
previous
version
of
27
140,
were
required.
A
consideration
by
council
of
whether
the
amenities
that
were
being
provided
were
sufficient
to
offset
the
bonus
that
was
being
sought.
The
new
bonus
provision
agreement
are
the
new
bonus
provisions
under
27.
H
140
does
not
require
that
consideration
by
City
Council.
It
is
a
straight
calculation
based
on
the
increase
and
then
that
is
directly
related
to
the
exact
monetary
value
of
the
amenities
that
have
to
be
provided
so
City
Council
does
not
need
to
make
an
inquiry
of
whether
or
not
there's
sufficient
amenities-
that's
already
set
out
in
our
code
of
exactly
how
much
they
have
to
provide
in
exchange
for
the
bonus
that
they
would
receive.
H
In
addition,
all
of
our
bonus
provision
agreements
and
the
code
contemplates
a
true
up
at
the
time
that
they
actually
build
this
project.
So
they
will
have
to
do
a
new
calculation
that
will
be
reviewed
by
the
Zoning
Administrator
at
the
time
of
development,
to
make
sure
that
the
amenities
they're
providing
will
offset
the
bonus
that
they
are
receiving.
So
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
that
that
little
explanation
briefly
councilman.
G
H
G
So
what
you're
saying
or
perhaps
what
I'm
interpreting
in
this
document?
Is
it
it's
not
a
payment
per
se
that
it's
a
that
that
these
amenities
of
new
sidewalks
public
parking,
I,
assume
off-site
sidewalks
public
parking
and
some
utilities
on
adjacent
properties
would
add
up
to
that
eight
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
is
that
how
this
is
working,
correct.
H
They
they
can
provide
certain
amenities
that
are
spelled
out
in
that
section
of
code
and
then
the
amount
of
amenities
they
have
they
provide
has
to
add
up
that
850
thousand.
If
they
have
a
shortfall,
we
do
have
a
provision
about
contribution
to
transportation
projects.
So
if
there
is
a
capital
improvements
project
in
the
area,
they'll
have
the
ability
to
contribute
to
that.
If,
for
some
reason,
there
are
other
amenities,
okay
and.
G
H
They
actually
do
whenever
our
building
department
is
issuing
a
new
building
permit.
They
actually
can
do
a
cost
analysis
to
try
to
look
at
the
current
cost
of
construction
of
that
particular
type
of
structure,
and
then
the
calculation
is
based
off
of
that.
So
exactly
how
much
of
the
structure
that
additional
density
that
they're
going
to
to
yield,
based
on
property
value
and
in
structure
costs
and
all
those
things
that
will
directly
relate
to
the
amenities
that
they
provide.
G
H
J
Good
evening,
mr.
chairman,
council
members,
my
name
is
David
mechanic
and
my
office
is
a
305
South
Boulevard
Tampa
Florida
with
me,
and
mr.
ding
Felder
I
am
going
to
answer
your
questions,
probably
about
midway
through
your.
My
presentation
here
with
me
this
evening
is
mr.
Andrew
Cohen
and,
as
you
know,
he
and
his
brother
Gary
have
done
numerous
projects
in
the
city
of
Tampa.
J
I
have
referred
to
those
in
Tab
A
and
the
notebooks
that
I
distributed
before
this
hearing
and
I
would
like
to
say,
I'd
like
to
enter
those
notebooks
or
a
copy
of
the
notebook
into
the
record.
It's
entitled
ABC
Capital
Corp
and
it's
referencing
petition,
19
34,
so
in
Tab
A,
as
I
mentioned,
our
several
projects
that
Andrew
and
Gary
have
worked
on
in
I
believe
their
reputation
is
well
known
with
this
council.
One
project
on
that
list.
J
The
grand
Sheridan
was
the
recipient
of
Award
for
Excellence
from
the
urban
forestry
council
for
preservation
of
green
trees.
The
nomination
for
that
project
was
I
made
by
Kathy
Veck.
The
city's
chief
Forester
I
believe,
is
her
title.
Also
with
me.
This
evening
is
Randy
Cohen
of
Cohen
&
Company
and
mr.
matt
cornea
of
scott
and
cornea
architects,
and
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
ask
mr.
Corby
hermia
to
present
give
you
a
little
walkthrough
of
the
project
visually
with
the
cyclin
and.
C
Hello,
you
hear
me
all
right
good
evening.
My
name
is
matt
cornea.
My
office
is
in
429
south
keller,
road
in
orlando
florida
and
when
the
principal's
at
Scott
and
Courtney
architects,
thank
you
for
having
us
appreciate
it.
Just
so,
you
know
we're
coming
from
some
other
experiences
in
the
city.
We're
in
one
week
we're
and
I
enjoy
grand
opening
at
channel
Club
down
in
the
Channelside
district
with
the
Publix.
It's
go
opening
up
and
we're
very
excited
about
that,
and
we
we
understand
some
of
the
Tampa
communities.
C
That's
kind
of
why
we're
here
we're
trying
to
have
this
project
be
kind
of
a
game
changer
for
the
the
area.
We
hope
it
spawns
a
lot
of
potential
for
new
development
of
existing
warehouses
into
offices,
restaurants
and
other
mixed-use
developments
for
the
future.
What
are
the
needs?
C
We
kind
of
discovered
that
most
of
the
those
needs
are
something
that's
in
line
with
the
city,
a
welcoming
place
for
home
and
patronage,
pedestrian,
friendly
and
bike
friendly
environment
and
appropriate
scale,
and
a
place
that
is
attractive
to
the
demographics
in
both
size
and
scale
of
the
actual
neighborhood
that
it's
it's
being
put
in.
So
what
we
did
is
we
kind
of
looked
at
four
main
features
and
how
we
implemented
this
and
how
those
needs
are
met.
C
C
C
One
of
the
other
features
that
creates
a
good
sense
of
scale
for
this
is
the
large
canopy
out
in
front
it's
going
to
have
a
lot
of
outdoor
seating
and
it's
very
pedestrian,
friendly
and
also
right
along
the
new
bike
path,
that's
being
built
on
Cass,
so
you
can
basically
park
your
bike
and
grab
a
coffee
and
then
get
on
or
back
to
work.
So
one
of
the
other
things
that's
a
very
key
part
of
this
is
because
of
the
parking
requirement.
C
This
had
to
have
a
structured
parking
in
all
of
these
views
and
actually
any
of
you
from
you
seen
and
the
site
plan.
The
parking
is
completely
out
of
you.
It's
basically
in
the
middle
of
the
site
and
we're
out
the
entire
building
around
it.
You
don't
see
ramps,
you
don't
see
vents,
you
don't
see
anything
that
has
anything
to
do
with
a
parking
garage,
and
that
was
intentional.
C
One
of
the
other
things
is-
and
this
is
something
we've
learned
in
other
properties-
is
that
the
city
of
Tampa
has
a
very
active
artistic
role
in
this
community
and
we're
hiring
a
local
artist.
I
think
who
is
going
to
present
and
in
this
elevation
is
best
seen,
there's
a
large
pallet.
If
you
will
on
the
corner.
That
shows
what
we're
we're
going
to
basically
decorated
with
so
right
now
call
it
a
call
of
the
canvas
and
we're
gonna
have
an
artist.
You
know
put
something
there.
That
is
either
two-dimensional
three-dimensional.
C
E
C
On
cast,
we
raised
the
finished
floor
up
above
the
street,
and
that's
shown
right
here
and
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
create
a
porch
where
people
can
come
out.
They
can
be
neighborly
they're,
not
right
on
the
roadway
and
also
it
gives
on
the
Walker
rise,
a
little
less
intimidating,
building
facade
to
be
walking
up
to
there's
a
little
bit
more
of
an
approach.
The
other
thing
is,
we
use
a
lot
more
different,
a
lot
different
materials.
We
have
right
here.
We
have
like
a
metal
panel
material.
We
have
brick.
C
We
have
this
really,
in
my
opinion,
a
very
cool
steel
structure
over
the
over
the
retail
area,
with
a
wood
ceiling,
a
nice
lady,
we'll
call
it
wood
siding,
but
it's
siting
nonetheless,
and
then,
and
then
there's
some
stucco
in
the
high
areas
that
would
finish
off
the
building
and
we're
trying
to
create
a
an
area
that
appeals
to
the
the
demographic
of
this
area,
that's
a
little
hip
and
and
fun,
and
also
the
right
scale.
One
of
the
things
that
we
mentioned
was
the
clearances.
C
J
Thank
you,
David
mechanic
again
for
the
record.
I
would
just
like
to
call
your
attention
to
tab
C
in
the
notebooks
to
show
you
the
extraordinary
level
of
community
outreach
which
was
conducted
by
my
client
you'll,
see,
I,
think
three
pages
of
individual
communications
with
residents
and
with
organizations
in
the
neighborhood.
J
It
was
in
my
experiences
the
most
thorough
and
complete
community
outreach
I've
ever
seen
on
a
project
and
to
that
end
and
the
answer
to
one
of
mr.
Bing
Felder's
questions
is
found
in
tab.
B
are
the
exhibits
to
the
bonus
agreement,
which
shows
about
12,000
linear
feet
of
sidewalk
and
10
parking
spaces
on
Street
that
we
intend
to
construct
as
part
of
the
bonus
agreement,
and
the
answer
to
the
question
is:
is
that
at
the
not
just
at
the
building
permit
stage,
but
at
the
CEO
stage?
J
If
the
actual
expenses
do
not
add
up
to
the
eight
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollar
figure,
then
the
property
owner
has
to
write
a
check
to
the
city
for
the
difference,
but
we
did
our
best
to
try
and
match
those
improvements
to
the
dollar
amount.
So
we
could
keep
that
investment
in
that
neighborhood
and
the
locations
of
all
those
sidewalks
were
really
a
consensus
of
the
neighborhood.
My
client
did
not
really
influence
that
decision.
He
relied
on
the
on
the
consensus
of
the
neighborhood
for
establishing
where
those
sidewalks
would
be.
It
would
be
installed.
J
I'd
like
to
talk
about
the
staff
report
a
little
bit.
First
of
all,
we
agree.
We
will
make
all
the
changes
that
Mary
listed
earlier.
We
have
no
problem
making
any
of
those
changes.
I
would
like
to
discuss
and
Mary
mentioned
it
several
times
on
page
one.
She
said
the
project
is
inconsistent
with
the
land
development
code.
J
Well,
the
only
reason
that
it's
inconsistent
is
because
we're
asking
for
waivers-
and
it's
part
of
the
process
through
the
rezoning
process
that
the
City
Council
considers
waivers
and
and
determines
whether
or
not
they
should
be
granted
these
the
waivers
we
are
seeking
are
very
commonly
granted
by
City
Council
and
I'd
like
to
just
go
through
oh
and
I,
whoa
I
didn't
want
to
mention
on
page
10
of
the
report
of
the
staff
report.
You
will
see
a
table
and
it
lists
ten
departments
or
agencies
of
the
city
and
only
two
of
them
had
inconsistencies.
J
The
other
aide
found
the
project
to
be
consistent
with
the
land
development
code.
Let
me
talk
about
the
three
that
are
listed
as
a
basis
for
inconsistency.
The
commercial
access
to
a
local
street
first
of
all,
I,
don't
believe
there
are
any
residences
on
Carmen.
But,
aside
from
that,
this
is
a
provision
of
the
code.
I,
don't
think
you
heard
mr.
Scott
tell
you
that
there
was
some
huge
problem
with
it.
He
just
told
you.
J
This
is
a
code
section
and,
frankly,
I
think
this
code,
section
is
a
little
out
of
date,
because
what
it
does
is
that
pen
Eliza's
mixed-use
projects.
If
we
had
no
retail
of
this
project,
we
wouldn't
need
this
particular
waiver,
and
it
is
that
particular
waiver
is
one
that's
very
commonly
granted
by
City
Council.
The
green
space
waiver
is
really
caused
by
a
similar
problem.
As
Mary
said,
the
city
code
requires
350
square
feet
for
every
unit
in
your
apartment.
J
In
your
apartment,
complex,
I'm,
sorry,
350,
feet
per
unit
is
like
something
you
would
see
at
a
palms.
It's
not
what
you
would
see
in
an
urbanizing
area
which
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
mr.
Hayes
just
said,
is
encouraging
dead
city
and
urban
mixed-use
development.
So
again,
the
green
space
requirement
is
not
really
suited
for
an
urban
development
area
such
as
this
particular
neighborhood.
J
Finally,
the
the
parking
requirements
of
the
city
are
also
excessive
in
an
urban
environment,
as
you
know,
the
downtown
regulations
are
more
lenient
than
the
rest
of
the
city.
Likewise,
in
an
urban
area,
perhaps
the
city
should
have
more
lenient
parking
regulations.
However,
we've
compensated
for
that
and
I
want
to
ask
mr.
Randy
Cohen
to
come
out
and
discuss
the
parking
waiver
in
particular.
Thank
you.
K
Good
evening,
Randy
Cohen
41:21
to
a
Cypress,
Street,
Tampa,
Florida
and
I
have
been
sworn
I
want
to
talk
about
parking.
This
is
the
21st
century,
we're
doing
things
a
lot
different
parking
wise
than
we
did
in
the
past,
we're
finding
that
there
are
decreases
in
auto
ownership,
especially
per
person.
When
we're
dealing
with
the
younger
folks
in
the
community.
We
have
the
effects
of
uber
and
lyft.
K
We
have
numerous
publications
of
which
just
a
few
on
reductions
in
parking
throughout
the
country
as
it
relates
to
multifamily
because
of
increasing
ownership,
uber
lyft,
the
various
things
that
are
going
on
in
the
area
in
this
particular
neighborhood.
We
have
a
number
of
parking
waivers
that
have
been
granted
in
the
past,
which
range
from
15
to
30
percent.
Our
waiver
is
19
percent.
We
also
have
a
number
of
things
going
on
in
the
neighborhood,
because
not
only
is
parking
changing,
but
in
fact
roadways
are
changing.
K
K
Green
Street
Green
spine,
major
pedestrian
and
bicycle
environment,
we're
located
right
there.
If
we
were
in
the
city
code,
we
get
credit
for
the
70
bicycle
spaces
were
providing
on
the
site,
35
spaces.
Our
12
motorcycle
spaces
would
also
be
creditable
against
parking.
Our
waiver
would
magically
go
from
19%
to
6%.
We
also
have
in
fact
a
lease
across
the
street
of
a
parking
lot
directly
across
the
street,
with
45
spaces
available
to
the
project
and.
K
G
Mr.
Koh,
yes,
could
you
put
that
aerial
shot
back
up
sure
not
related
to
the
parking
waivers
but
related
to
something
that
mr.
mechanic
said
a
minute
ago?
It
was
related
to
the
the
local
axis.
Yes,
Street
on
Carmen
I.
Think
mr.
mechanics
said
it,
but
we
don't
like
attorneys
to
testify,
but
you
can
testify
yes
on
you're
under
oath
correct.
Yes,
so
looking
at
this
map
and
your
experience
with
the
area
it
it,
it
doesn't
appear
to
me
that
you
have
any
single-family
use
or,
frankly,
any
use
across
this
small
little
local
street.
G
K
K
G
K
It's
vacant
and
it's
a
hodgepodge
of
things,
I've
driven
down
it,
but
it's
been
a
while
I
do
not
believe
there
are
any
residents
is
there,
but
it
is
in
fact
a
local
street,
so
under
code
it
requires
a
waiver
and
I
would
like
to
add,
because
you
had
that
question
before:
what's
commercial
traffic
that
would
be
on
the
street
in
the
morning,
it
would
be
six
vehicles
in
the
afternoon
it
would
be
twelve
vehicles.
The
predominance
is
project
is
residential.
K
B
A
J
You
very
much
I'm
David
mechanic
again
for
the
record
I'd
like
to
just
show
you
aerial
map
of
the
neighborhood
and
what
you
can
see
here
and
if
you
read
the
fine
print.
These
are
four
projects.
The
subject
property
is
in
the
upper
right
hand,
corner
the
other
projects
in
in
purple.
Green,
dark
purple
and
blue
are
all
projects
with
the
same
waivers
that
we
are
asking
for
council
to
grant
this
evening.
J
These
are
for
projects
that
were
approved
within
the
last
three
years,
one
of
which
NoHo
square
was
approved
this
past
January
by
City
Council.
So
we
are
not
asking
for
anything
extraordinary
or
untoward
or
unusual.
These
are
variances
or
waivers
that
are
grant
typically
granted
by
council
and
with
that,
I
would
just
urge
council
to
consider
the
recommendations
of
the
Planning
Commission.
This
is
of
the
West
Tampa
urban
village,
and
it
is
slated
and
proposed
for
additional,
dense,
mixed-use
development,
and
that
is
exactly
what
we're
proposing
you
can
see.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Thank
you,
sir.
Okay.
Now
we
move
forward
to
public
comment.
Is
anyone
here
to
speak
on
item
number
seven?
If
so,
please
stand
up
and
come
forward
and
I
would
ask
that
if
you
were
able
to
stand
that
everyone
who's
going
to
be
planning
on
speaking
on
item
number,
seven,
please
line
up
against
the
wall
to
your
right,
so
that
we
can
have
good
idea.
Mr.
L
M
Good
evening,
council
members
and
congratulations
on
your
receipt,
I
am
whit.
Raymer
president
of
walk-by
Tampa,
a
local
nonprofit
organization
focused
on
pedestrian
and
bike
safety,
promoting
active
transportation
options
and
quite
simply,
building
a
better
street-level
experience
for
all
users
to
enjoy
walk
like
Tampa
has
been
supportive
of
the
city
of
Tampa
has
green
spine
plan
for
several
years.
The
green
spine
plan,
as
the
applicant
partially
explained,
is
an
east-west
three-phase
semi-pro,
tected
bike
lane
stretching
from
Howard
and
the
West
to
15th
Street
in
the
East
and
Ybor
City
phase.
M
Three
of
the
green
spine
plan
runs
through
North
Hyde
Park
area
of
town
experiencing
a
lot
of
growth
and
where
the
applicants
property
is
located,
I
recognize
that
the
neighbors
in
this
area
objected
to
the
applicants
first
proposal
and
that
the
council
denied
that
original
application.
But,
as
we
understand
it
over
the
last
year,
the
applicant
has
spent
considerable
time
working
with
community
building
census
on
the
project.
Perhaps
they
need
to
spend
a
little
more,
but
the
project
provides
amenities
to
this
neighborhood
that
that
I
think
grows
in
a
manner
consistent
with
the
community's
values.
M
I'd
like
to
make
several
observations,
thanks
to
the
neighbors
and
the
council
for
nudging
the
applicant
to
take
a
hard
look
at
the
design
features
in
the
original
application.
That's
important
that
you
guys
push
back
sometimes
to
the
applicant
working
in
the
community
can
provide
valuable
insight
and
help
find
common
ground
early
on
in
the
process.
Another
note
to
applicants
before
council,
as
walked
by
Tampa,
continues
to
promote
and
advocate
for
streets
and
developments
that
provide
sidewalks
bike,
infrastructure
density
and
mixed
uses.
We
think
this
process
worked
as
we
understand
it.
M
We've
requested
and
received
confirmation
from
the
development
team
that
these
sidewalks
will
be
built
built
using
best
use
practices
such
as
proper
tree
shading,
a
protection
of
root
systems,
and
we
hope
the
developer
will
maintain
a
close
supervision
on
the
subcontractors
tasked
with
those
efforts
to
your
point:
councilman
Dean
Carter.
Finally,
we
suggested
that
the
developer,
install
electric
vehicle
charging
stations
specialized
bike,
racks
and
other
best
use
practices
for
growing
denser
areas,
and
those
recommendations
were
well
received.
M
I
don't
intend
on
coming
to
comment
before
every
development
or
council,
but
I
think
this
case
provides
a
good
lesson
to
all
those
applicants
that
are
creating
very
real
changes
to
the
building
stock
of
our
community.
We
need
to
recognize
how
these
changes
impact
neighborhood,
enjoys
coffee
on
the
ports
in
the
morning
or
walks.
Their
dog
tamp
is
a
wonderful
place
to
work,
live
and
play
each
of
these
individual
development
decisions
collectively
make
a
big
difference
in
the
fabric
of
our
neighborhoods.
We
appreciate
the
attention
and
direction
this
applicant
has
given
since
the
original
application.
M
F
Good
evening,
Council
welcome
to
the
new
councilman
good
to
see
some
new
faces.
My
name
is
Brandt
Peterson
I
own,
a
business
in
the
area
at
1727,
West,
Cypress,
Street
I'm,
also
on
the
board
of
the
North
High
Park
Alliance
I'm
speaking
this
evening
in
favor
of
this
project,
I
think
the
developer
has
done
an
excellent
job
of
reaching
out
to
the
community
and
hearing
their
needs.
They
have
performed
a
few
noteworthy
improvements
to
the
project
as
a
direct
result
of
comments
from
the
neighborhood
one
being
the
walk-up
units
on
Cass,
Street
I.
F
Think
it's
a
good
addition,
especially
given
the
green
spine
plan
along
that
area
of
Cass
significant
increase
to
the
retail,
which
is
very
important.
Something
we've
been
asking
for
for
quite
a
long
time,
the
neighborhood
here
and
then
a
third
and
I
think
it's
not
be
overstated.
Really
I'm,
not
this
pictures
been
shown.
Yet
if
I
can
use
the
projector
is
the
amount
of
sidewalks
in
the
area
is
significant.
We've
been
asking
for
four
or
five
longer
than
I've
been
involved
in
this
neighborhood
for
sidewalk
improvements
in
the
area,
so
to
get
12,000
feet.
F
What
I
understand
is
the
blue
lines
here
represented
the
map
is
extremely
significant.
That's
a
game-changer
for
the
area,
so
the
project's
done,
I
think
a
phenomenal
job
of
improving,
as
was
so
eloquently
stated
before.
Some
of
the
waivers
are
just
surprising
to
me.
The
requirements
for
the
waivers
excuse
me,
I,
think
I
heard
67,000
square
feet
of
green
space.
That's
over
an
acre
and
a
half
of
green
space.
I
love
green
spaces
as
much
as
the
next
guy,
but
that
seems
a
bit
extreme
for
a
project
of
this
nature.
F
L
Structure
is
not
for
our
community
at
this
time
it's
been
the
last
seven.
Eight
years
we've
been
dealing
with
condos
townhouses
in
our
area
on
State
Street
I
live
at
1315
West,
8th,
Street
I
was
blocked
in
when
they
built
the
first
development
about
70
years
ago,
and
we
was
using
Oregon
to
go
across
cast
to
get
to
Walmart,
but
since
they
put
all
the
condos
from
Cypress
almost
down
across
the
lemon,
our
community
was
just
using
Willow
and
Cass,
where
this
new
facilities
are
supposed
to
be
coming.
L
So
we
are
using
that
light
to
get
across
to
South
Tampa
going
up
to
Kennedy.
We
could
hardly
get
across
in
our
in
our
community.
I
know
everybody's
saying
it's
nice,
the
green
space
in
this,
and
that,
but
do
they
live
two
blocks
in
one
block
from
this
construction
that's
being
built,
and
also
we
have
to
consider
UT
I
passed
through
that
today.
That
was
blocked
all
the
way
down
from
Kennedy
across
from
North
Boulevard.
L
They
was
running
the
light
coming
through
there
and
where
they
heard
it
to
Cass
and
Willow,
which
is
going
to
being
more
traffic
to
our
community
and
also
bleep.
If
you
all
don't
know
that
a
lot
of
cars
are
also
headed
to
the
across
town
and
to
Kennedy,
and
also
at
405
North
Oregon,
which
is
only
about
a
block
from
this
new
structure
that
was
my
former
church,
that
burnt
down
they're,
building
a
new
whole
townhouse
community.
So
have
they
considered
that
particular
parking?
L
How
many
units
and
people
that's
going
to
bring
to
our
little
area?
Yes,
it's
all
good
to
come
and
bicycling
whatever,
but
do
you
have
to
live
there?
Do
you
have
to
try
to
get
across
to
shop
this?
This
is
just
to
us
is
just
not
the
time
and
it's
just
not
the
place
we
have
to
in
you
date
it
with
this
for
the
last
seven
eight
years
and
we
are
against
it
not
against
anyone,
but
it's
just
it's
just
no
other
place.
L
Harley
in
our
community
for
us
to
drive
the
herd,
demand
say
something
about
uber
and
lyft.
Yes,
uber
and
lyft,
because
people
don't
want
to
drive
anymore,
I
have
senior
citizens
neighborhood,
that's
taking
the
cab
and
uber
and
lyft
because
they
are
afraid
to
drive
across
Kennedy
on
Cypress,
so
I'm
just
here
to
say,
I'm
just
totally
against
this
right.
Now,
it's
a
beautiful
facility,
the
way
they
present
it
but
I,
don't
think
it's
for
our
neighborhood
at
this
time.
Thank
you
for
your
considerate.
G
G
L
We're
basically
saying
Casman
deduce
is
too
much:
we've
been
to
some
of
the
developers
meeting
and
right
there
on
that
corner.
It
floods
down
willow,
I'm
telling
you.
If
you
don't
live
there,
you
don't
know
the
ramification
of
having
to
go
through
that.
So
it
really
is
the
parking,
the
traffic.
You
know,
that's
gonna
be
coming
with
other
condos.
These
are
$400,000
units.
That's
going
to
be
built
right
there
in
our
community.
We
got
some
all
the
way
down
on
Rome
all
around
the
Walmart.
You
know.
L
G
Room
an
option
is
Rome
Avenue
an
option
for
the
neighborhood
because
sometimes
I
go
cutting
through
your
neighbor.
Do
I
apologize,
but
it
is
you
know,
but
but
israa
you
know
sometimes
I'll
go
down
to
Rome,
because
I
don't
want
to
mess
with
North,
Boulevard
or
even
Willow,
but
I
go
down
to
Rome
and
then
cut
across
the
Kennedys.
L
O
Raphael
Hernandez,
a
1917
West,
big
Street
I'm
excited
for
this
birthday,
I'll
be
waiting,
seven
years
for
mixed
use
in
North,
High
Park.
The
last
of
the
developer,
which
I
think
is
from
a
cannon
represented,
told
us
how
people
won
and
retail
we
can
take
an
uber
or
if
we
could
order
overeats
everyone
in
food,
basically
tows.
No,
we
wouldn't
put
that
much
retail.
This
project
is
actually
different.
It's
truly
mixed-use.
We
should
be
the
standard
for
projects
in
West
Tampa
moving
forward.
We
want
to
be
serious
about
walkability
and
transit.
O
This
project
brings
density
of
residential
and
retail,
which
we
know
makes
for
a
thriving
urban
neighborhood.
We
had
more
projects
like
this
senior
citizens,
wouldn't
need
to
get
in
a
car
or
get
a
new
where
they
could
just
walk
to
the
doctor's
office.
I
could
walk
to
the
coffee
shop
that
could
walk
to
a
restaurant
instead
of
forcing
them
to
get
into
vehicles.
As
far
as
parking
we
have
projects
like
this
I
have
empty
parking,
decks,
I've
seen
them.
There's
like
two
parking
decks
in
NoHo
flats.
There
are
empty,
no
cars
are
parked
there.
O
The
most
important
takeaway
from
this
project
is
that
this
project
was
rejected
by
City
Council.
Originally,
what
happened
did
the
developers
say?
I
gave
up.
No,
they
came
back
with
a
stronger
proposal,
a
proposal
that
benefits
most
of
the
neighborhood,
so
don't
hesitate
to
turn
down
projects
because
otherwise,
when
you
hesitate
non-users
rubber-stamp
projects,
we
get
a
project
like
the
one
behind.
Here
we
have
a
building
on
a
whole
city.
Block
I
think
has
a
coffee
shop
in
the
middle
of
downtown,
which
is
insane.
P
Good
evening
and
welcome
to
all
the
new
council
members,
my
name
is
Brenda
Lindsay
and
I
live
1916,
West
lemon
Street
I'm,
a
member
of
the
North
High
Park
Civic
Association
I'm,
here
to
speak
on
my
behalf
as
a
community
member.
When
this
project
was
first
proposed
to
us,
it
was
proposed
to
us
as
a
UT
project,
I
appreciate
the
developers
coming
back
and
changing
their
whole
concept.
P
So
I
approve
of
that
I.
Don't
like
the
project,
because
it's
gonna
bring
a
lot
of
traffic
to
the
area
they're
talking
about
putting
up
a
development
on
Oregon,
and
then
these
guys
are
talking
about
adding
35
street
parking
where,
where
they're
gonna
put
the
street
parking
on
what
street
all
on
Carmen,
it
won't
hold.
35,
so
they're
gonna
have
to
go
down
or
again
somewhere
to
put
the
street
parking
they're
talking
about
putting
35
by
a
motorcycles
parking
where
we're
gonna
put
that
around
that
build.
P
The
green
spine
is
coming,
I,
see
a
lot
of
congestion,
and
so
for
me,
it's
a
good
project,
but
it's
not
gonna
work
for
our
neighborhood.
The
traffic
will
be
too
horrendous.
I
commend
them
for
working
with
us.
They
did
change
a
lot
of
things
to
what
we
would
like
to
see
in
the
project
and
so
I
thank
them
for
that,
but
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
work.
Thank
you.
P
B
Think
this
is
a
fine
example
of
both
great
urban
design
and
also
a
developer
that
cared
about
the
neighborhood
enough
to
take
the
rejection
and
come
back
and
do
it
over
again
and
listen
to
the
to
the
folks
in
the
neighborhood,
the
stakeholders.
This
is
an
improving
neighborhood
that
wants
to
be
live.
Work
wants
to
be
truly
mixed-use,
it'll
feed,
Julian
billion
Park
and
all
the
amenities
of
the
city
has
done
I.
Think
mr.
cornea
and
ABC
Capital
are
both
very
experienced
and
fine
examples
of
people
in
their
professions.
B
J
Good
evening
everyone
I'm
Sam,
Ellison
I,
live
it,
but
a1
South,
12th
Street
in
the
channel
side.
If
you
know
changes
is
inevitable
and
I
think
this
project
will
bring
a
very
positive
change
to
this
neighborhood.
It
will
be
really
a
you
know.
Just
a
big
improvement
to
the
neighborhood
I
think
it'll
bring
more
life
to
the
neighborhood
and
I
think
that
the
residents
that
live
there
now
once
they
see
the
finished
product
will
be
proud
that
it's
in
their
neighborhood,
so
I
strongly
encourage
you
to
support
this.
K
N
N
Q
Good
evening,
counselor,
congratulations
excuse
my
voice
and
woke
up
with
a
bit
of
a
frog
in
my
mouth
better
throat.
Sorry,
my
name
is
Carla
Ramirez
2103,
West,
Carmen,
Street
I
am
on
the
board
for
the
Norfolk
Park
Civic
Association
and
neighborhood
watch
I'm,
also
on
the
board
for
the
Alliance,
which
allows
me
a
seat
on
the
West
stamp
RCRA
CA,
see
where
I'm
currently
heading
the
infrastructure
subcommittee.
Q
The
reason
I
say
all
this
is
because
I
want
you
all
to
know
how
involved
I
am
with
West
Tampa
in
my
community,
and
everyone
is
correct.
The
first
time
the
developer
came
and
presented
this
to
us.
We
were
all
here,
t-shirts
and
all
saying:
no,
we
don't
like
this
and
the
reason
is
we
don't
want
more
apartments
in
North
High
Park.
However,
the
developer
came
and
he
said,
a
lot
of
changes.
Q
He
has
listened
to
the
community
and
in
the
issues
that
we
had
with
the
other
development
and
he's
made
the
changes
to
improve
them.
He's
met
with
us
several
times.
The
infrastructure
subcommittee
for
the
West
Embassy
or
a
CAC
facilitated
a
meeting
with
three
other
communities:
West
River
North
Hyde,
Park
Alliance.
It
was
Burke,
Hyde,
Park
Civic,
to
discuss
the
sidewalks.
We
had
a
meeting,
we
had
follow-up
communication,
we
all
got
together,
North
High,
Park
Alliance,
the
Civic
Association.
We
got
together
as
to
where
we
think
the
sidewalk
should
be.
Q
We
reached
out
to
West
River,
and
we
heard
back
on
a
couple
of
streets
that
they
wanted
to
add.
Sidewalks
big
concern
for
us
was
walkability.
We
have,
we
can
live
in
our
community,
we
can
work
in
our
community,
we
can't
play
in
her
community
and
for
the
longest
time
we've
been
asking
for
mixed
use
to
come
in
and
help
us
and
grow,
and
nobody
has
listened
to.
Nobody
believed
in
the
vision
and
then
now
we
have.
You
know
this.
Q
Q
So
that
was
our
main
point
is
to
provide
sidewalks
continuous
sidewalks
on
both
sides
of
Rome
from
the
interstate
all
the
way
to
Kennedy
or
again
same
thing,
all
the
way
up
and
down
on
one
side,
so
it
so
it
could
be
continuous
and
the
rest
of
the
sidewalks
were
thought
or
were
presented,
so
we
can
connect
to
cast
Roman
willow,
and
so
you,
speaking
in
favor
of
the
development
I,
hope
you
look
at
these
type
of
projects.
I
mean
the
community
is
against
it.
Q
Q
Q
Trying
to
the
West
Tampa
CAC
cats
go
for
or
against
this
development
we
could
only
facilitate
certain
meetings,
but
as
far
as
the
neighborhood
is
concerned,
we
did
come
up
and
we
did
asked
for
the
study
to
see
if
it
had
correct
data.
We
had
another
previous
developer,
who
came
in
who
had
old
data,
just
the
vehicles
that
were
collected
worth
and
non-peak
times
that
were
done
when
UT
was
out
of
session.
So
we
asked
this
developer
if
they
had
gotten
current
data
and
they
said
they
did
well.
B
Q
Voice
of
the
community
there
was
a
there
were
concerns
of
transportation
of
cars,
and
but
there
were
also
a
lot
of
positives
of
people.
Happy
that
there's
going
to
be
some
kind
of
retail
some
kind
of
restaurant,
some
kind
of
place
for
people
to
gather
and
come,
and
also
the
sidewalks
are
a
plus
as
well.
B
R
Hi
good
evening,
my
name
is
sherry:
Denham
1,
7,
1,
3,
West,
Cass,
Street
I'm,
here
representing
myself
as
a
North
Hyde
Park
native
at
the
North
Hyde
Park
resident.
Rather
it's
hard
to
go
anywhere
in
Florida,
Drive,
50
miles
and
you're
gonna
see,
dump
trucks,
bulldozers
and
cranes.
We
are
growing.
We
are
developing
it's
just
who
we
are
as
a
state.
It's
up
to
the
communities
to
engage
or
complain
about
it
for
the
next
20
years,
North
Hyde
Park
has
continued,
has
chosen
to
engage.
Do
we
want
more
apartments?
R
Maybe
not
necessarily
so
if
we
turn
down
this,
we
turn
down
the
sidewalks
that
we
wanted.
We
turn
down
the
retail
that
we
wanted.
Then,
six
months
later,
another
developer
can
come
in
and
maybe
he's
not
so
willing
to
work
with
us.
Maybe
he
won't
give
us
public
art,
and
maybe
he
won't.
You
know,
give
us
the
retail
that
were
actually
requesting.
We've
requested
specific
retail
establishments
and
he's
actually
working
with
us
trying
to
bring
that
into
our
neighborhood.
R
So
that's
a
very
positive
thing
very
concerned
about
traffic
concerned
about
more
roads,
more
cars
on
Cass,
Street
Cass
is
a
main
vein
in
and
out
of
downtown
I
hear
the
traffic
every
morning
every
evening
right
outside
my
house.
So
that
is
a
concern.
However,
this
developer
has
been
very
willing
to
work
with
us.
He
has
been
very
attentive
to
the
needs
and
the
concerns
of
the
of
the
neighborhood,
so
I've
been
very
impressed
with
that.
We
feel,
like
we've,
definitely
reached
our
saturation
point,
please
no
more
new
apartment
complexes
after
this
one.
A
A
A
L
Welcome
to
New
City
Council,
my
name
is
Harriet
McCrory
I'm
working
with
the
West
riverfront
Neighborhood
Association,
one
of
the
things
I
want
to
emphasize
about
the
development
of
the
West
Tampa
area,
particularly
the
West
riverfront,
and
the
Old
West
temple
communities
is
that
the
communities
associations
that
are
present
now
are
the
ones
who
were
in
the
past
helped
to
get
the
area
as
it
is
now.
They're.
L
The
ones
who
went
out
and
did
the
overlay
I
was
one
of
the
members
of
the
overlay
who
helped
write
it
as
well
as
some
MS
McNair
and
other
the
North
High
Park.
Association
also
was
part
of
that.
So
the
segue
into
one
of
the
things
that
was
brought
by
the
city
departments
was
about
the
waivers
in
particular
for
chapter
27
zoning,
which
is
where
the
overlay
is
also
part
of.
L
I
wanted
to
know
whether
or
not
the
waivers
ever
asked
conflict
with
overlay
itself,
because
one
of
the
things
we
don't
want
to
do
when
we
were
developed
over
labels
to
set
to
standards.
But
we
also
did
not
want
to
set
a
precedence
where,
if
we
say
the
overlay
to
science
35
feet
long,
it's
supposed
to
be
35
feet.
We
didn't
want
to
have
something
with
petition
where
next
thing
is
40
feet,
50
feet
and
all
so
that's
one
of
the
questions
that
I
do
have
in
in
that
we
are
concerned
about.
L
One
of
the
things
also
I
know
that
there
was
some
sort
of
traffic
study
that
was
done,
I
believe
if
I'm
correct.
If
anyone
could
tell
me
I,
don't
know
how
long
ago
that
traffic
study
was
done,
but
one
of
the
things
that
has
to
be
consideration.
If
that
traffic
study
was
not
done
when
North
Boulevard
homes
was
unoccupied,
it
needs
to
be
redone
because
that
will
come
online
next,
that's
the
best
big
big
biggest
project.
That's
coming
on.
Next,
we
have
to
include
that
traffic
in
that
area.
L
That's
the
area,
that's
off
of
Willow
and
North
Boulevard.
That
has
to
be
considered
also
the
neighborhood.
If
it's
a
bell,
but
goes
through
or
doesn't,
the
neighborhood
has
to
be
very
considered
because,
as
they
say,
they
do
have
to
live
with
it,
and
if
you
have
to
live
with
something,
you
want
to
make
sure
that
you'll
be
able
to
have
a
sustainable
life
in
your
neighborhood
and
that
that
you'll
be
able
to
have
something
that
you're
that's
liveable,
for
not
only
yourself
but
also
for
the
generations
that
live.
That
will
come
afterwards.
A
L
L
What
the
neighborhood
watch
was
never
best
for
the
community,
so
I'm
not
I,
can't
really,
because
right
now,
I've
worked
with
a
lot
of
projects
that
have
come
in
and
we
try
to
do
what's
best
for
the
community.
If
the
community
doesn't
want
it
and
they
feel
that
still
has
gots,
what's
the
best
thing
for
it
and
it
should
be
shouldn't
be,
it
is
something
that's
going
to
be
negotiable.
There
should
be
something
that
both
besides
be
able
to
negotiate
so
both.
So
it
would
be
fair
to
all.
G
G
A
G
D
L
S
Taylor
aisle
three
seven
zero,
three
West,
a
and
Wan
Street-
did
not
come
here
to
talk
about
this
project,
but
I'm
going
to
I'm
aware
of
it.
It's
apparent
that
the
developer
reached
out
to
the
community
and
got
input
and
feedback
from
them
and
is
trying
to
do
the
right
thing
by
investing
in
infrastructure
and
that's
something
that
the
city
did
not
do
in
this
part
of
the
city.
North
Hyde
Park
from
2009
to
2010
shal
e.
S
S
Look
at
zoning,
look
at
infrastructure
and
figure
out
how
the
city
can
plan
in
advance
of
these
things,
so
that
the
neighbors
understand
and
are
a
part
of
the
planning
and
the
right
projects
come
forward
in
the
right
places,
as
opposed
to
requiring
a
developer
to
do
a
PD
and
ask
for
all
of
these
waivers
and
do
all
these
customizations.
Let's
get
the
zoning
right
and
allow
them
to
use
the
zoning
to
their
advantage
and
develop
great
projects.
Luckily,
this
project
is
a
great
project.
It
has
retail,
that's
actually
authentic.
S
It
is
a
creates,
an
outdoor
environment
for
the
residents
and
for
the
retail
and
commercial
areas,
and
it
is
including
art
and
hiding
parking
garages.
There's
been
a
lot
of
terrible
projects
approved
in
North,
Hyde,
Park,
surface
parking,
lots
and
others.
This
is
not
one
of
them
and
I
think
you
all
should
support
this
project.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
J
K
Good
evening,
Randy
Cohen
again
traffic
study.
Yes,
a
new
traffic
study
was
prepared
January
of
this
year.
It
included
all
development
to
date
and
proposed
development
that
had
not
been
built
for
a
city
at
amp
of
requirements.
We
actually
did
a
fairly
large
study
for
this
sort
of
a
project
we
looked
at.
A
number
of
intersections
casts
at
Rome
castle,
willow
Cass
at
North,
Boulevard,
Rome
and
Cypress
Kennedy
and
Willow.
We
found
that
all
the
intersections,
with
the
exception
of
willow
and
Kennedy,
worked
at
acceptable
levels
of
service
without
the
project
and
with
the
project.
K
Now
they
are
going
to
see
from
a
and
B
so
they're,
getting
a
little
worse,
but
they're
still
within
the
acceptable
margin
and
operate
well
at
Kennedy
and
Willow.
Those
particular
application
has
to
provide
a
transportation
mitigation
fee
to
pay
for
its
share
of
an
impact
to
that
intersection.
The
city
has
improvements
going
on
at
the
Kennedy
in
willow
right
now
and
their
CIP,
so
this
project
would
be
providing
mitigation
dollars
towards
that
improvement,
and
with
that
improvement
it
returns
that
intersection
back
to
a
level
of
service
C
operations.
K
C
G
K
I
believe
they
were
included
in
the
traffic
study.
We
have
an
Madrid
of
projects
that
were
included
in
the
traffic
study
with
our
traffic
counts,
we're
talking
about
only
projects
that
are
fairly
new
that
aren't
have
completed
at
this
point
in
time.
Remember.
Our
study
was
just
done.
Five
months
ago,
right
I
mean
I.
G
K
J
We
just
wrap
up
with
a
couple
almonds
david
mechanic
for
the
record
again,
first
and
foremost,
I
need
to
say
that
what
mr.
cohen
did
the
study
they
have
a
meeting
at
the
city
and
they
are
the
city
staff
directs
us
to
do
a
study
in
a
certain
way.
That
study
was
accepted
by
the
staff
and
we
did
it
in
accordance
with
their
instructions.
J
We
are
proposing
exactly
the
type
of
development
that
the
comprehensive
plan
contemplates
for
this
area
and
my
client
I
believe
has
gone
to
extraordinary
lengths
to
meet
all
the
city
requirements,
except
for
the
waivers
which
I
think
we've
indicated
are
really
a
product
of
antiquated
codes
that
don't
match
up
with
the
comprehensive
plan
in
terms
of
dense
urban
development
and
with
that
we
respectfully
request
the
City
Council's
approval
this
evening.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
A
L
B
I
H
I
I
Does
that
give
you
any
cause
to
be
anything
but
fair
and
impartial?
Can
you
be
fair
and
impartial
and
decide
this
solely
on
the
evidence
and
testimony
contained
within
the
record?
Yes,
sir,
okay,
thank
you,
and
can
you
be
free
from
bias?
Yes,
okay,
thank
you.
That
being
the
case,
unless
the
attorneys
have
any
other
opinion,
it
would
be
my
position
that
there
is
no
basis
for
you
to
abstain
from
this.
We
have
no
financial
stake
in
the
outcome
of
the
subject
of
this
matter.
Is
that
correct,
correct?
Okay?
I
F
A
Thank
you,
sir.
Okay.
We
have
a
motion
by
counsel
and
menÃs
calcio
to
close
a
second
by
councilman
Miranda,
all
in
favor
aye,
any
opposed.
Okay,
let's
go
to
discussion
any
thoughts
from
before
we
entertain
any
motions
from
Council
members
on
this
item,
just
for
whatever
it
counts.
For
me,
I
think
that
this
is
a
interesting
project.
One
of
the
things
that
always
look
at
in
projects
as
a
side
note
is
outreach
by
developers
when
you're
dealing
with
a
large
step
forward
for
for
developing
communities
and
for
any
community,
all
and
I.
A
Think,
and
with
this
we
see
some
really
good
thoughtful
outreach
and
I
and
I
for
I
appreciate
that
I
think
it's
an
outreach
that
takes
into
consideration
that
this
is
a
community
that
continues
to
change
and
move
forward
in
this
developer
wants
to
be
part
of
that.
Change
wants
to
be
part
of
that
moving
forward,
and
so
that's
certainly
something
that
I
appreciate
councilman
menÃs
calculated.
You
wish
to
take
item
number
seven,
sir.
Yes,
I
have.
B
Q
A
I
I
A
A
B
G
I'm
gonna
support
the
motion.
I
don't
want
the
folks
who
have
come
down
here
to
think
that
that
it
was
wasted
time.
I
think
that
the
last
time
you
came
down
here,
I
was
not
a
member,
but
obviously
you
had
a
major
impact
on
the
project.
In
regard
to
the
fact
that
council
turned
it
down.
Obviously,
they've
made
improvements
working
with
you
they're,
going
to
improve
the
sidewalks
and
add
some
additional
parking
etc
in
the
in
the
community,
which
is
over
and
above
what
a
typical
developer
has
to
do
so.
G
I
think
those
are
positive
things.
These
things
are
always
sort
of
a
balancing
and
a
weighing
of
of
the
pros
and
cons.
It
was
kind
of
inevitable
that
Sherman's
facility
was
obviously
underutilized
for
many
many
years.
It
was
sort
of
inevitable
as
you
drive
by
it
and
drive
by
and
drive
by
it
that
eventually
something's
going
to
go
there,
but
I
think
this.
G
Something
is
a
great
improvement,
obviously
over
what
was
proposed
before
I'm
a
little
disappointed
in
regard
to
the
bonus
provisions,
which
I
think
staff
has
done
a
good
job
in
revise
in
Council
in
revising
the
bonus
provisions.
Some
of
the
options
also
include
affordable
housing
as
an
option.
In
paragraph
F,
one
speaks
to
10%.
G
As
an
you
know,
10
percent
of
the
project
being
proposed
as
affordable
housing
I
think
that's
a
missed
opportunity
there
and
also
years
ago,
we
included
some
lead
standards
as
additional
option
for
a
project
and
I
didn't
hear
anything
about
green
or
LEED
standards.
Perhaps
the
developers
doing
it,
but
just
not
not
touting
them,
but
with
all
that
said
again
looks
like
an
improved
greatly
improved
project
than
I
can
support
it.
Thank.
A
A
G
A
T
T
A
B
D
E
Good
evening,
Council
members
David,
hey
again
with
your
Planning
Commission
stack
I've
been
warned.
We
move
up
to
the
University
planning
district
for
this
next
case.
The
subject
site
there
is
transit
provided
at
the
northeast
corner
of
West
Bush
Boulevard
in
North
46
Street.
That's
the
closest
transit,
stop
hearts
route,
39
and
5
connect
the
subject
site
to
the
northwest
transfer
center
downtown
Tampa
and
the
University
Area
Transit
Center.
The
subject
site
is
not
within
an
evacuation
zone.
E
Here
we
have
the
aerial.
You
can
see
the
subject
site
here
that
the
northwest
corner
of
46th
Street
butch
Boulevard.
This
large
area
is
the
parking
lot
for
a
post
Gardens.
Now
hot
dogs
is
right
here.
You've
got
also
the
Econolodge
kind
of
to
the
south
west
of
the
subject
site.
What
boulevard
is
predominantly
a
commercial,
a
single-family,
some
single-family
detached
and
multi-family
to
the
south,
and
then
there's
st.
mostly
single-family,
detached
to
the
north
of
the
subject.
G
G
E
On
to
the
future,
land
use
map
the
subject
site
and
all
these
properties
in
this
pink
on
Bush
Boulevard
are
all
that
community
mixed-use
35
directly
to
the
north
there's
some
residential
20
and
then
the
western
edge
of
East
Eva
Street.
It
goes
down
to
residential
10,
even
though
it
is
a
parking
lot.
The
parking
lot
is
planned
as
a
future.
Land
use
designation
of
urban
mixed-use
60
further
to
the
west
to
the
south
is
brown.
E
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
rezone
the
1.64
acre
site
from
the
commercial
general
zoning
district
to
the
PD
to
allow
the
construction
of
a
new
4,500
square
foot
gas
station
convenience
store
within
restaurant
with
drive-through.
The
subject
site
is
already
operated
as
a
gas
station.
The
proposed
PD
will
allow
construction
of
a
new
convenience
store
and
restaurant
with
the
drive-through
this
portion
of
the
East
that
did
the
yes
excuse
me.
This
portion
of
the
East
Bush
Boulevard
corridor
is
planned
and
developed
for
medium
intensity
uses.
E
While
the
comprehensive
plan
along
these
mixed
use,
quarters
promotes
orienting
buildings
to
the
street
along
its
these
mixed-use
quarters
do
the
unique
characteristics
of
the
gas
station
and
the
existing
gas
pumps,
which
will
remain
as
part
of
the
PV.
It
would
be
difficult
to
orient
the
building
to
Busch
Boulevard
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
that
the
introduction
of
the
new
convenience
store
with
drive-through
restaurant
would
be
comparable
incompatible
with
that
surrounding
development
pattern.
Along
this
portion
of
Busch
Boulevard,
the
comprehensive
plan
promotes
safe
pedestrian
connections.
E
The
proposed
PD
does
include
several
crosswalks
facilitating
safe
pedestrian
connections
to
those
building
entrances.
However,
a
Planning
Commission
staff
would
encourage
the
applicant
to
provide
a
sidewalk
along
the
northern
portion
of
the
site,
which
is
East
Eva
Street,
to
promote
a
safe
pedestrian
connection
and
further
the
policies
that
are
contained
within
the
comp
plan
dealing
with
pedestrian
sidewalks.
Based
on
those
considerations,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
does
find
the
proposed
plan
development
consistent
with
the
imagined
2040
temper
comprehensive
plan.
Thank
you.
D
Nereus,
a
me--have
of
the
record
here
is
an
areola
of
the
subject
properties
in
yellow.
It
is
on
the
corner
of
46
and
Bush
Boulevard,
as
well
as
Ava's
in
the
back
there's
single-family
and
multi-family
houses.
Here
with
the
bet
it's
currently
a
gas
station,
the
proposed
new
uses
the
gas
station
with
the
drive-in
restaurant
window.
Here's
a
zoning
map
of
the
subject
property.
It
is
currently
zoned
CG
to
the
north
is
our
16
Dunning
district,
which
is
a
multi-family
residential
zoning
district
to
the
northwest
is
a
single-family
or
a
60
zoning
district.
D
D
D
The
only
waivers
that
are
necessary
for
this
project
is
number
one.
There's
a
wetland
on
the
western
portion
of
this
site.
It
has
been
designated
by
this
those
working
on
a
EPC
and
per
the
code.
There's
a
25
foot
setback
for
buffer
from
the
edge
of
the
wetland
the
FDA
is
requesting
and
it
has
been
reviewed
through
Natural
Resources
and
they
found
it
consistent
for
this
portion
of
the
wetland
buffer
to
transfer
this
area
because
they
need
it
for
the
dry
bottle
to
relocate
it
additional
buffer.
D
The
same
square
footage
to
the
north
when
the
applicant
originally
came
through
with
this
with
a
site
plan
proposal,
this
driveway
entrance
was
further
to
the
west
and
staff
had
concerns,
because
this
area
was
really
tight
for
a
maneuvering
in
and
out
of
the
site.
So
staff
actually
requested
them
to
lose
one
of
the
row
of
gas
pumps
and
to
widen
out
this
area.
D
So
there's
clear,
ingress,
egress
from
Busch
Boulevard,
as
well
as
more
direct
route
into
the
dumpsters,
because
of
that
deftly
encroach
slightly
into
the
wetland
buffer,
but
again
through
coordination
and
work
with
our
Natural
Resources
staff.
They
provided
additional
buffer
again
for
the
same
square
footage
to
the
north.
The
only
other
waiver
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
is
to
the
vehicle
use
area
buffer
requirements.
D
Perdy
Florida
DoD
requirements.
There
is
going
to
be
a
deceleration
lane
and
turn
lane
into
the
site,
as
well
as
a
deceleration
laying
here
which
will
encroach
further
into
the
private
property.
Because
of
that,
and
then
you
have
the
sidewalk
improvements.
This
only
allows
for
six-foot
landscape
strength
because
there's
a
diesel
a
being
obstructed
and
the
sidewalk
and
the
VOA
buffer
and
then
the
parking
lots.
So
simply
they
kind
of
ran
out
of
space
to
provide
the
full
8
foot
width
again
because
of
those
trend.
D
Lane
improvements
so
they're
requesting
a
waiver
to
go
down
from
8
feet
to
6
feet,
subject
to
new
payments
that
those
no
concerns
about
that
way.
Other
than
that
I
know
the
applicant
is
here
to
present
her
proposal.
There
are
some
changes
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading,
mostly
just
notes
and
and
numbers
neat
certified
transportation.
D
Just
has
one
modification
about
the
mitigation
payments
and
that
for
resources
just
had
some
Corrections
to
the
tree
table,
but
other
than
that
the
development
review
compliance
stuff
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
city
tampa
van
development
code.
Do
you
have
any
specific
questions
about
this
application?
Any.
A
N
Baby
council
name
is
DV
SOT
Nathan
1055,
Kathleen,
Road
MDM
engineering.
As
the
staff.
We
worked
extremely
hard
with
the
staff
and
VOT
to
come
out
with
the
site
plan.
We
acquired
the
three
lofts
to
the
west.
As
you
could
see,
we
also
acquired
a
lot
of
wetlands
and
a
lot
of
Grand
Oaks
that
we
are
preserving
every
one
of
them.
N
We
worked
hard
vot
as
well
as
some
of
the
residences
that
neighbor
us
and
there
exists
a
wall
six-foot
wall
on
the
on
the
north
property
boundary,
which
is
its
dilapidated,
is
so
we
proposed
to
rebuild
that
this
facility
is
about
30
years
old,
it's
very
old
tired,
and
so
it's
a
fresh
new
look
and
it
is
commonly
see
G
zone
yourself.
Yes,.
N
A
A
Donuts
sold
there,
you
go
Thanks,
okay,
great!
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you.
Anybody
here
for
public
comment
and
item
number,
eight.
O
B
A
B
M
A
I
A
G
On
the
Barents
review
board,
mr.
Souter
and
I
experienced
y'all
gave
us
some
nice
guidance
and
in
regard
to
making
motions
and
that
sort
of
thing
here,
I'm.
Looking
on
page
7
of
this
report,
it
speaks
to
waivers
in
the
criteria
we're
supposed
to
use,
to
look
at
them
and
to
consider
the
waivers
is
that
just
for
future
reference
not
necessarily
specifically
related
to
this
but
generically?
P
Current
legal
department,
when
making
a
motion
to
approve
the
minimal
thing
that's
required
under
the
law,
is
to
read
the
title
on
force
rating
and
move
on
as
your
legal
counsel
who
is
charged
with
defending
these,
sometimes
with
approvals,
and
sometimes
with
denial
explaining
the
basis
for
it.
It's
always
something
that
I
appreciate
and
I
think
you
know
increases
the
viability
of
whatever
decision
it
is
it.
P
You
have
when
you
have
a
PD
there's
several
things
you're
supposed
to
require
with
all
rezoning.
Is
you
have
to
consider
your
entire
comprehensive
plan?
All
of
those
are
applicable
as
when
you
have
a
PD,
you
evaluate,
in
addition
to
that,
the
purpose
of
the
PD
and
the
waivers
and
the
waiver
criteria
that
you're
identifying
I,
certainly
as
I
said
appreciate
when
you
pass
the
motion
to
state
the
facts
that
you
heard
and
wait
them
to
the
things
the
minimum
that's
required
is
to
read
it.
G
E
I
This
is
this
is
extremely
relevant.
With
regard
to
denials,
specifically,
as
Miss
Kurt
said,
there
are
requirements
under
Florida
law
that
when
you
would
deny
a
development
order,
you
have
to
state
the
section,
the
code
or
the
the
comprehensive
plan
that
relates
to
that
the
law
is
evolving
in
this
area,
but
I
should
point
out,
as
a
general
rule
that
miss
Kurt
has
begun
the
process
of
perhaps
creating
a
an
opportunity
for
the
food
council
to
have
this
discussion,
because
I
think
as
time
goes
on,
it
will
be
very
useful.
I
But
that
being
said,
when
these
issues
are
challenged,
regardless
of
what
council
decision
is
whether
it
approved
or
whether
it
denied-
and
these
go
to
a
circuit
court
judge
for
review
a
circuit
court
judge
can't
second-guess
your
findings
of
the
fact.
So
you
are
the
finders
of
that.
This
port
are
the
finders
of
fact.
You
apply
it
to
the
code
and
just
as
a
jury.
Would
you
render
your
verdict?
I
Excuse
me
the
city's
position
to
support
your
decision
whatever
it
is,
so
I
think,
council
member
to
be
able
to
ask
you
a
question
and
a
question:
that's
well
taken
and
deserves
to
be
looked
at
in
a
way
we
can
support
you,
but
specifically,
it
would
be
inappropriate
for
staff
to
be
able
to
predict
and
prejudge
what
kind
of
criteria
or
matters
that
may
come
up
to
be
able
to
put
words
in
your
mouth.
It's
a
matter
of
well.
G
It
just
says
you
know
the
basis
for
my
motion
and
is
and
then
you
got
blank
and
then
we
would
fill
in
the
blank
depending
on
what
that
particular
case
is
and
what
the
facts
have
been
at
that
particular
case.
I
beat
this
horse
enough
for
this
particular
case.
I
think
we
should
just
vote
on
that,
but
it's
something
we
need
to
keep
talking
about.
Thank.
I
A
Yes,
sure
and
I
would
just
urge-
and
this
has
nothing
to
do
with
this
poor-
gentleman's
hearing
here-
that
if
anybody
has
any
questions
with
regards
of
these
issues,
cuz,
these
are
legal
issues
with
great
weight
upon
the
city.
If
we
are
sued
for
attorneys
fees
and
damages
etc,
to
set
up
a
meeting
with
one
of
our
very
skilled
city,
attorneys
I've
done
that
before,
because
anything
you
can
say
can
and
will
be
held
against
you
if
case
is
appealed,
that's
not
good.
So,
okay.
B
D
E
Good
evening,
council
members
david
way
again
for
our
live
paste,
we're
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district,
more
specifically
the
East
Tampa
urban
village,
the
subject
site
it's
an
existing
building
on
site.
The
site
is
not
within
an
evacuation
zone.
There's
convenient
transportation,
access,
public
transportation
access,
the
closest
bus
stop
is
approximately
550
yards
from
the
site
of
North's,
40th
Street
and
East
Osborn
Avenue
onto
the
aerial
subject
site.
This
is
Emma
Street
to
get
ends
into
the
railroad
tracks
that
are
here.
This
is
North
42nd
Street
again
mrs.
40th
Street.
E
You
can
see
there's
some
heavy
commercial
and
light
industrial
type
uses
ears,
but
predominantly
the
surrounding
area
is
mostly
a
single-family
detached
with
maybe
a
scattered
duplex
onto
the
future.
Land
use
map
that
see
the
subject
site
and
all
the
properties
directly
surrounding
it
are
in
that
residential
10.
There
is
some
residential
20
to
the
east
on
cayuga,
but
you
can
see
in
the
referring
back
to
the
arrow.
You
can
see
where
that
heavy
commercial
uses
are
on
40th
Street.
E
The
red
is
the
community
commercial
35
and
again
here's
public
semi
public
use
represented
by
the
blue
and
then
light
industrial
overall,
the
applicant
is
seeking
approval
to
redevelop
an
existing
building
into
a
place
of
religious
assembly.
Planning
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
applicants
request
and
found
the
proposed
project
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses
in
the
neighborhood
and
staff
also
found
that
approving
the
petitioners
request
will
create
an
educational
asset
in
the
neighborhood
and
provide
further
opportunities,
enhance
an
existing
structure
based
on
those
considerations.
E
D
D
D
However,
legally
one
can
only
ask
for
waivers
to
the
special
use
criteria
and
especially
used
to
process
because
of
the
nature
of
the
proposed
applicant
site
plan,
which
I'll
show
you
in
a
minute.
They
needed
waitress
from
other
Code
sections,
not
just
the
special
use
criteria.
Therefore,
this
application
mid
process
has
been
converted
to
a
plan
development
in
order
to
facilitate
the
legal
approval
of
those
waivers.
D
A
D
D
Thank
you
no
worries.
This
is
here's
the
site
plan
again.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
place
of
religious
assembly
for
a
total
of
20
seats
again
they're
using
an
existing
building
here
is
some
photographs
of
the
existing
building
on
the
corner.
Again
afore
you
sucking
at
Emma
there's
currently
a
grass
parking
lot.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
leave
it
as
a
grass
parking
lot
for
the
required
church
parking
and
they
would
be
required
to
pave
the
ad
a
space
and
then
install
wheel
stops
to
designate
each
individual
parking
space
the
surrounding
areas.
D
There
are
many
surrounding
areas
for
me
over
the
single-family
residential
homes.
So,
as
far
as
the
merits
of
the
site
plan,
so
the
applicant
is
requesting
seven
waivers.
The
first
waiver
is
to,
although
allow
access
to
a
week,
sir
till
that
access
to
a
local
street
and
the
street
in
lieu
of
an
arterial
or
collector
42nd
Street
meets
that
criteria.
However,
image
Street
is
a
local
street
and
again
the
criteria
for
the
special
use
is
that
places
of
religious
assembly
you're
only
supposed
to
access
arterioles
are
collectors,
so
that
is,
waiver
requests.
D
Never
one
for
access
drive,
aisle
connection
to
Emma,
Street
or
local
Street.
The
second
way
to
request
to
the
special
use
criteria
is
the
minimum
lot
size
per
place
of
religious
assembly
is
supposed
to
be
or
is
required
to
be
20,000
square
feet.
The
existing
site
is
just
a
little
over
10,000
square
feet,
so
that's
waiver
request,
number
cubes,
the
third
waiver
to
the
special
use
criteria.
27
132.
D
The
front
yard
is
required
to
be
20
feet
for
the
west
and
the
south,
because
we're
dealing
with
an
existing
building,
it's
at
zero
lot
lines
to
those
out
the
meet
on
West.
So
that's
the
third
way
for
us
to
reduce
the
front
yard
to
20
feet
to
zero
because
of
the
as
dull
condition.
The
fourth
waiver
is
I
just
indicated
is
to
allow
grass
13
spaces
as
well
as
grass
drive
aisles.
D
D
Again,
the
west
hip
overlay
they're
supposed
to
be
a
certain
amount
of
transparency
and
embellishment
on
the
facades.
The
current
conditions
don't
meet
those
standards,
so
they're
asking
for
a
waiver
from
that
standard
and
then
the
last
waiver
criteria
which
I
need
to
amend
is
from
the
north
and
east
prosody
line.
D
Land
development
has
some
just
minor
changes
to
the
staff
site
plan.
That
said,
Natural
Resources
also
has
a
couple
minor
changes.
Transportation
found
this
plan
development
inconsistent
because
of
the
reduction
in
the
drive
aisle
width
from
24
feet
down,
20
feet.
Transportation
is
here
tonight.
If
you
have
any
specific
questions,
urban
design
found
this
inconsistent
again
for
the
waivers
requested
for
the
yeah
vehicle
use
area.
Sorry
that
buffering
standards,
as
well
as
the
facade
embellishment
standards.
A
representative
from
urban
design
is
here
tonight.
A
D
This
okay,
one
moment
I
gather
my
thoughts
here.
Okay,
so
this
property,
as
David
indicated,
is
in
a
residential
ten
language
category.
So
residential
a
ten
land
use
category
is
primarily
for
single-family
neighborhoods,
saying
that,
always
in
a
zoning
and
planning
context,
there
are
certain
uses
which
are
compatible
with
single-family
neighborhoods,
primarily
schools,
playgrounds
or
parks,
places,
a
religious
assembly
and
sometimes
daycares.
Those
types
of
uses
historically
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
as
well
as
throughout
the
country,
are
either
conditional
uses
or
special
exceptions
or
special
uses
in
the
city
of
Tampa.
D
So
they
are
kind
of
conditionally
permitted,
so
they
have
to
meet
certain
criteria
to
ensure
that
they
are
compatible
with
the
single-family
neighborhood.
So
that's
why
this
started
out
as
especially
used
criteria
in
there
specific
criteria
that
should
be
on
our
arterial
er
collector.
It
should
be
at
least
twenty
thousand
square
feet
as
well
as
there
are
additional
setback
criterias.
Those
criterias
really
ensure
that
it's
compatible
with
the
single-family
neighborhood.
So.
G
A
O
E
O
A
G
O
G
O
O
J
O
G
Okay
and
in
regard
to
the
parking
the
parking
area
staff
indicated,
you
want
to
leave
it
grass,
yes,
okay,
so
would
we
change
the
the
site
plan
to
reflect
that?
Because,
right
now
the
site
plan
says
paved
I
wouldn't
want
him
to
get
to.
You
know,
get
over
to
building
construction
and
say
he
has
to
pave
it
now.
G
And
that's
one
of
them:
okay
and
the
last
thing
Mary
in
regard
to
the
overlay
district,
the
overlay
district
speaks
to
some
type
of
exterior
improvements.
I
think
you
alluded
to.
Yes,.
D
G
D
There's
a
minimum
30
percent.
If
I
may
can
I
call
Roberta
meet
up
she's
our
urban
design
staff
chickens
explain
the
specific
criteria.
Bird.
B
Video
named
Roberta,
curry,
planning
and
development
I
have
been
sworn
and
congratulations
to
each
and
every
one
of
you.
This
is
my
first
time
in
front
of
you,
so
thank
you
for
your
service.
Basically,
the
West
Tampa
overlay
does
have
certain
criteria
when
the
facades
of
this
building
face
the
street.
So
what
we're
looking
at
is.
Does
it
have
50%
transparency,
windows,
architectural
administration
and
detail,
70
percent
architectural
embellishment.
D
B
G
B
G
B
G
A
B
A
B
1990
61
are
presented
for
first
reconsideration
on
this
rezoning
property
general
synod
date,
4501
north
40
seconds
three
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
more
particulars
grabbing
section,
one
concerning
district
specification
or
eyes,
50
residential
single-family,
repeating
plan
development,
place
of
religious
eccentric.
Writing.
In
effect
the
date
would
change
it
between
first
and
second.
G
But
in
this
case
the
gentleman
has
really
looking
at
the
before
and
after
pictures
has
really
done
a
great
job,
improving
that
property,
and
you
know
putting
putting
some
hard-earned
money
into
that
property
and
making
those
improvements.
Oh
I
think
in
this
case
that
waiver,
as
well
as
the
the
concrete
wall
and
some
of
the
other
waiver
cities
that
he's
seeking,
are
appropriate
and.
E
A
D
A
B
B
B
B
B
The
next
one
is
for
departing
member
of
the
city
has
been
working
for
37
years.
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
president
accommodation
through
Kathleen,
Walker,
Hubert,
Parks
and
Recreation
team
leader,
who
is
retired
from
the
Park
and
Recreation
Department
after
37
years
of
dedicated
service
to
the
city
and
and
I
would
like
to
make
that
presentation
to
a
council
make
meditation
from
age
16
by
2019.
We.
A
B
The
third
one
think
mr.
Murch
calcio
made
this
from
last
year
and
when
I,
when
I
heard
it
I,
couldn't
believe
it,
but
it
I
got
it.
That's
behind
it.
So
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion,
presentation
combination
to
the
city
of
Tampa,
solid
department
of
solid
waste,
environmental
program
management,
recognizing
the
2019
garbage
man
of
the
year
and
woman
day
of
the
year
of
garbage
woman
of
the
year
combination
would
be
presented
on
June,
20th
2019.
We.
A
B
B
A
B
B
A
G
A
Thank
you,
sir
I'm
gonna
pass
the
gavel:
the
Oh.
If
I
may,
okay
I
move
that
counsel
be
requested
to
prepare
a
commendation
for
Michael
ere
Aryan
er
y
en
who
has
attained
the
rank
of
Eagle
Scout,
and
this
be
done
on
June
20
1019
under
ceremonial
activities.
C
A
All
know
that's
the
Navy
SEALs
of
scouting.
Second,
the
organization
carry
the
load
requested
that
a
commendation
be
prepared
for
their
nonprofit
walk.
Carry
the
load
is
a
organization
that
provides
an
active
way
to
honor
and
celebrate
our
nation's
heroes,
including
our
first
responders
with
regards
to
issues
revolving
PTSD,
and
this
be
done
on
May,
18
2019,.
B
A
Then
lastly,
pursuant
to
a
request
from
the
City
Attorney's,
Office
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
schedule
an
item
on
the
June
27
2009
teen
agenda
to
consider
a
proposed
settlement
in
the
matter
of
our
easy
1
8
8
3,
a
rezoning
for
property
located
at
one
zero,
one,
one:
zero
five,
one:
zero
nine
one,
one
one
North
Meridian
Avenue
and
one
zero
two
and
1:06
North
11th
Street
camp
of
Florida.
Please
give
this
motion
attachment
to
the
clerk
just
kidding.