►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 02212019 part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
A
A
So
914
North
Franklin
is
the
patio,
and
that
is
the
owner
of
that
they
were
sent
a
copy
of
the
June
16
2017
letter
I
have
right
here
the
green
card
from
them
and
they
signed
it
and
received
it
on
June,
19,
2017
and
then
on
November
16
2017.
This
is
the
second
letter
that
Miss
Coyle
testified
to
the
follow-up
letter,
stating
they
are
still
in
violation
and
once
again
you
will
see.
C
I
will
try.
I
will
try
to
pick
back
up
where
we
left
off
I
had
to
make
a
clarification
that
someone
kind
of
elbowed
me
and
told
me
that
I
I
was
passed.
A
note
about
whether
there
were
citations
and
I
may
have
said
that
there
were
seven
calls
and
I
think
the
notes
of
seven
citation
so
I,
probably
misspoke,
but
on
the
topic
of
noise
violations.
I,
don't
believe,
that's
really
the
subject
of
what
we're
here
to
discuss.
C
It's
the
two
issues
on
the
site
plan
and
when
we
had
talked
with
the
city
about
this
hearing,
we
were
not
informed
that
we
were
going
to
sort
of
try
to
collect
the
history
of
every
phone
call
and
citation
that
may
have
occurred.
But
we
can.
We
have
our
litigation
counsel
here.
If
there
are
questions
on
that,
that's
probably
a
better
resource.
C
C
There
are
not
yet
individually
controlled
speakers
in
these
cabana
furniture.
Those
will
come
in
soon
and
our
plan
would
be
to
work
with
the
city
and
make
sure
that
the
city
staff
comes
out
and
takes
a
look
and
that
again
we're
all
on
the
same
page
as
we're
trying
to
move
forward.
I
think
this
was
another
item.
I
was
trying
to
get
up
for
you
to
take
a
look
at.
C
Maybe
some
clarification
needed
about
kind
of
how
we
got
here
and
maybe
just
a
little
bit
of
a
quick
background
in
summary,
about
what
maybe
transpired
between
the
issue
in
2017
and
that
we're
here
today
now
at
a
hearing
and
so
Eric
Koenig
is
litigation
counsel
in
the
pending
case
with
the
adjacent
property
owner
and
I
think
he
can
provide
a
real
succinct
summary
for
you
on
that
topic.
Miska.
E
E
C
You
know
and
I
know.
Typically
if
someone
was
coming
forward
with
a
special
use
permit
request
today,
I
think
the
type
of
language
we
would
see
would
be
real,
clear
and
I
know
you've
been
on
top
of
that
specifically
Councilwoman,
but
it
would
say
something
like
either
you
know
or
no
amplified
music
outside
after
10:00
p.m.
C
So
it's
kind
of
what
we're
working
with
is
something
that's
a
little
unusual
and
I
think
left
some
uncertainty
and
that's
why,
when
I
started
communicating
with
the
city
several
months
ago,
they
needed
to
come
back
to
me
and
tell
me
you
know.
Yes,
this
is
our
position.
We're
reading
this
very
strictly
or
not.
C
We
had
a
different
position
and,
as
I
was
explaining
earlier
franklin
manor
believed
that
they
were
operating
under
an
approval
that
the
city
had
come
out
and
seen
the
site
and
lost
it,
and
so
they
were
moving
forward
for
a
period
of
time.
But
you
know
nonetheless,
were
we're
really
here
to
to
move
things
forward
and
be
sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
and
that
there's
no
ambiguity.
But
that
is
the
text
of
the
note
that
were
working
with
thank.
E
F
You
mr.
Donnelly,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
I'm
clear
about
this,
because
when
we
left
at
the
end,
we
have
someone
who
owns
the
patio.
We
have
someone
who
owns
the
building.
We
have
a.
We
have
a
renter
that
rents
I,
assume
from
both
entities.
Is
that
correct
all
right
now?
This
is
a
site
plan
include
the
patio
property,
in
addition
to
it.
So
what
you
just
read
and
includes
the
entire
the
entire
footprint
both.
F
C
F
C
C
Nonetheless,
once
we've,
you
know,
we've
come
together
with
the
city
and
learned
that
this
issue
was
deemed
open,
learned
that
they,
though
there
was
some
uncertainty,
I
think
on
their
end
as
to
how
to
actually
address
this
and
that
maybe
I'm
speculating
but
I,
don't
know
why
there
wasn't
a
hearing
called
up
until
this
point.
Okay,.
F
F
D
C
C
F
F
E
G
F
We've
been
hearing
a
lot
of
stuff
first
of
all
about
you,
know,
barriers
and
this
and
that
and
then
you
know
less
at
that
and
now
somebody
else
is
an
owner
of
just
this
one
parcel.
That's
within
you
know
the
Accardi
adjacent,
a
cardis
property.
So
what
I
need
to
know
is
a
who's
being
cited
for
what
when
and
you
know,
because
we
heard
misquote
come
up
before,
but
we
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
the
owner
of
the
building.
A
F
A
A
C
F
F
I
A
F
And
the
reason
why
and
mr.
:
and
I
both
kind
of
looked
at
each
other
like
I,
don't
remember
zoning
this
it's
been
a
long
while
so
I
wasn't
sure.
So.
Thank
you
for
clarifying
that.
So
the
original
I
guess
it
would
be
the
special
use
that
was
done,
included
the
patio
and
the
building
does
it
did
it
have
a
designation
that
those
two
pieces
were
separate
entities
in
addition
to
separate
landlords,
in
addition
to
who
the
the
tenant
was
no.
F
So
hence
some
of
the
issues
that
we
keep
coming
back
to,
which
is
no
one,
knew
what
was
anyone
else
getting
and
somebody
else
didn't
get
it
so
work.
You
know.
Where
are
we
all
know
this?
You
know
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
did
not.
You
know,
send
something
out
and
they
received
it
and
then
just
ignored
it,
because
it
does
sound
like
there's
a
little
bit
of
confusion
there
now
I'm,
not
sure
if
it
is,
but
it
seems
like
it
might
be
so
the
second.
F
E
F
F
So,
in
this
case,
it
would
have
been
three
entities
should
have
been
getting
it
because
you
know,
and
it
does
not
sound
like
based
on
the
testimony,
was
provided
before
that
the
the
other
owner
of
the
patio
I
think
made
the
comment
that
he
had
not
received
any
notice
now.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
true
I
just
know
what
he
was
put
into
the
record.
That.
A
That
is,
that
is
what
he
stated.
However,
I
have
the
green
cards
that
I
will
enter
into
the
record:
okay,
the
owner
of
the
building,
the
owner
of
the
patio
and
the
operator,
the
nocturnal
group,
all
three
of
those
received,
the
June
17,
the
June
16th
2017
letter
telling
them
that
they
were
in
violation
all
three
of
those
received,
the
November
16th
2018
letter
telling
them
that
they
were
in
violation.
Okay,.
F
A
F
Good
I,
just
wanna,
make
sure
we're
clear
on
all
that.
Okay,
so
we
had
a
lot
of
testimony
come
beforehand
and
not
so
the
last
thing.
According
to
the
site
plan,
the
original
site
plan
and
the
approval
that
was
that
happened
in
2016
there
were
the
the
barriers
were
all
supposed
to
be
there
as
part
of
the
site
plan
correct
on
the
original
site
plan
or
not
the.
F
F
I
I
It
today
is
2019
and
I
know
about
the
other
council
members
I
never
heard
of
this
until
now,
however,
on
the
other
side
of
zonings
or
liquor
alcohol,
when
you
miss
a
yearly
statement
to
come
in
and
I'm,
not
against
the
city
or
anything
else,
I'm
just
trying
to
say
how
do
we
solve
this
problem?
So
it
doesn't
happen
again,
and
you
have
this
yearly
report
that
you
met
the
5149
and
those
that
don't
do
it
some
time
line
up
from
one
side
or
the
other
and
by
the
time
they
come
back.
I
A
I
Okay,
so
now
we
go
into
the
fencing
part
when
you
do
land
zonings,
and
you
hear
you
try
to
work
something
out,
you
say:
well,
we
won
bushes.
No,
we
don't
want
bush,
we
want
a
wooden
fence.
No,
we
want
a
chain-link
fence.
No,
we
want
a
vinyl
fence,
though
we
want
a
concrete
fence,
so
you
specifically
specify
what
you
want
on
the
fence
and
as
I'm
looking
at
this
year.
That's
why
I
asked
the
question
of
and
what
type
of
styrofoam
is
that.
Is
it
a
quarter
inch?
I
I
So
then,
I'm
telling
myself,
as
mr.
Schwarz
said,
councilman
Suarez,
says
one
owner
of
owner.
One
liquor
license:
is
it
cut
down?
The
middle
was
that
the
liquor
license
covered
both
it's
very
hard
to
understand
why
I
and
I'm
not
saying
you
didn't,
set
out
a
notice
and
I'm
not
saying
they
didn't
sign
it.
But
what
I'm
saying
is
three
years
later,
when
from
the
first
incident
to
now
that's
three
years
and
nobody's
heard
anything
about
it.
I
So
now
we
have
a
case
against
something
that
could
have
been
resolved
if
it
was
handled
just
like
the
handle
the
alcohol
zoning
on
the
5149,
which
is
part
of
that
process
that
we
go
through
in
a
yearly
basis.
If
those
things
are
in
place,
I
think
that
neither
one
of
the
two
owners
would
have
been
here.
I
I
Fine,
but
I
still
don't
know
how
come
we
weren't
advice,
oh,
that
this
hearing
today
would
have
been
never
heard.
We
would
have
solved
the
problem
somewhere
along
the
line
by
calling
me
and
says
you
either
pay
a
fine
or
suspend
it
or
we
pass
on,
but
something
had
to
be
done
as
the
process
goes
in
land,
zoning
and
I'm,
not
creating
land,
zoning
and
alcohol
zoning.
There's
a
process
in
place
where
those
individuals
that
are
giving
a
citation
have
a
right
to
make
amends
in
fiction.
I
In
this
case
three
years
we
don't
know
about
it,
I
didn't
say
we
could
fix
it.
I
said
at
least
we
don't
know
about
it.
Possibly
we
could
have
come
to
agreement
and
fix
it
three
years
ago,
but
here
we
are
today
and
I'm,
not
blaming
you.
Please
don't
take
that
that
way.
Oh
I,
don't
do
that,
but
I'm
saying
the
system,
including
us,
should
have
been
notified
of
what
was
going
on.
D
I
C
There
was
a
letter
that
came
from
the
city
was
June
of
2017
and
that
letter
looked
basically
the
same
as
the
November
2018
letter.
I
wasn't
representing
Franklin
Manor
at
that
time,
but
the
way
the
letter
reads
it
talks
about
the
exact
same
two
issues
that
were
here
saying
you
know
what
removed
let's
move
forward
together.
C
So
it
talks
about
the
same
issues
and
it
says
you
know,
remedy
them
or
we
will
bring
you
to
a
hearing.
Basically
the
same
thing:
that's
happened
in
November
and
that's
why
I
say
I
think
we
all
have
to
understand.
There
may
have
been
some
fusion
between
the
parties
that
were
involved
because
I
can't
explain
otherwise
why
there
was
no
hearing
Franklin
Manor,
they
were
kind
of
pushing
back
and
going
no.
This
is,
you
know
we're
operating
correctly.
C
You
approved
us
and
then
nothing
happened
now
upon
revisiting
whether
there
were
issues
and
learning
that
the
city
did
in
fact
do
this
as
an
open
issue
we
were
talking
together,
I
mean
even
before
that
November
letter
came
out.
We
were
sort
of
looking
to
city
legal
to
say.
Yes,
this
is
our
opinion
of
how
this
note
is
intended
to
be
interpreted
or
not.
So
we
were
working
together
on
that
and
knew
the
letter
was
coming
once
they
stated
their
position,
but
it
wasn't
unknown.
C
I
know
I
mentioned
that
Eric
Koenig
is
here
from
the
litigation
and
could
speak
to
this.
But
one
example
is
that
there
was
testimony
during
one
of
those
hearings
that
LaShawn
dot
gave
where
she
was
asked
in
November.
Are
they
in
violation?
Are
they
in
violation
or
not,
and
her
answer
was
I
don't
know,
and
so
there
was
I
I
believe
there
was
a
genuine
question
even
on
the
city
side,
as
to
what
needed
to
happen
here
and.
I
C
C
It
says
therefore,
pursuant
to
city
code,
so
it
lifts
the
to
the
same
two
issues
that
we're
here
telling
you
today
were
where
it
we're
close,
we're
close
to
working
through
those.
It
says
after
that
means
those
same
two
issues.
Therefore,
pursuant
to
city
code,
a
section
27
3,
1,
8,
The
Associated,
alcoholic
beverage,
Akoo
approval
may
be
subject
to
revocation
or
suspension.
C
Please
bring
this
operation
into
compliance
with
the
conditions
of
the
approval
or
contact
our
office
to
clarify
the
nature
of
the
operation
within
10
business
days
from
the
date
of
this
letter,
and
so
I
can't
say
that
I
wasn't
involved,
but
I
understand
that
their
belief
was
that
they
were
operating
in
the
same
way
they
always
had,
and
then
nothing
happened,
and
so,
from
our
perspective,
it's
kind
of
like
well.
If
there
was
a
fundamental
disagreement,
I,
don't
know
why
the
hearing
didn't
happen
then.
I
C
They
were
given
a
drop
daddy.
The
the
letter
read
that
they
were
to
contact
the
office
within
10
days
to
discuss
the
issue.
I
wasn't
there,
but
again
no
hearing
ever
happened
and
their
position
was
that
they
were
operating
appropriately.
So
I
can't
explain
why
nothing
occurred.
I,
don't
know
what
was
going
on
between
the
parties,
but
normally
I
think
you
would
have
the
letter
and
then,
if
there
was
a
fundamental
disagreement
you
would
be
here
at
the
hearing.
You
know
working
that
out,
but.
E
C
E
I
saw
the
photo
yeah
and
I
can
understand
when
they
didn't
when
it
was
not
specific
that
you
had
to
have
panels
this
size,
this
much
meeting
right
that
is
confusing
and
then,
when
they
point
out
that
there's
openings,
you
know,
like
you
said,
I
saw
that
and
they
were
like.
Maybe
two
inch
or
so
apart
I
understand
that,
because
we
were
not
specific
about
how
that
had
to
go
up
and.
E
C
So
it
says
the
fencing
surrounding
the
perimeter
area
must
be
lined
with
decorative
bone
panels
to
traffic
sensitive
reverberations.
The
required
foam
paneling
must
cover
the
entire
fencing
area
between
the
fence
post
and
then
the
other
item
says
self-contained.
Individual
controls
were
you
located
within
the
cabanas
so
that
music
levels
can
be
sustained
at
an
appropriate
level.
Outside
speakers
are
not
allowed.
Speakers
are
currently
located
on
the
stage
and
outside
of
the
building.
The
speakers
on
the
building
are
only
allowed
if
they're
in,
to
be
individually
controlled
by
the
tables
underneath
each
speaker.
Okay,.
E
So
the
paneling
when
it
said
what
I
want
to
know
is
it's
saying
you're
in
violation
of
the
paneling,
because
I
had
to
cover
it
entirely.
What
I
want
to
know
is:
is
that
how
it
was
directed
from
the
beginning?
Is
that
the
direction
that
was
there
when
they
got
the
permit?
How
was
it
described
that
they
were
supposed
to
put
up
the
paneling
so.
C
C
As
my
understanding
when
we
were
revisiting
this
issue
around
November,
the
city
pointed
out
that
there
were
some
sections
that
were
not
covered,
and
so
we
immediately
took
care
of
that
and
I
was
saying
today
that
Kathy
mentioned
the
small
gaps,
and
so
we
didn't
really
know
that
that
was
a
focus
of
what
we
were
talking
about.
We're
happy
to
work
with
the
city
and
make
sure
that
everything
is
we're
all
on
the
same
page
about
it.
C
E
A
Christel
more
illegal
Department,
we
have
the
noise
or
events,
and
the
noise
ordinance
would
apply
regardless
of
the
regulations
that
they
had
so
the
noise
ordinances,
the
noise
ordinance.
They
have
to
comply
with
that,
in
addition
to
that,
they
have
conditions
on
their
site
plan
permit
for
their
alcoholic
beverage.
They
have
must
comply
with
that
as
well.
What.
C
Would
describe
us
as
being
in
transition
but
very
close
to
complete
with
this
transition
over
to
what
the
city
is
told.
Us
they
believe,
is
necessary.
We
have
all
of
the
Cabana
furnitures
up
there
used
to
be
a
stage.
It's
been
taken
down
those
the
big
amplified.
Speakers
they're
all
gone,
we're
expecting.
C
The
next
step
will
be
to
install
the
speaker's
that
go
and
the
cabanas
that
we're
hoping
to
have
the
city
come,
and
you
know,
come
on-site
with
us
and
make
sure
that
we're
again
all
on
the
same
page
about
what
about
how
this
function-
and
it's
like
I,
said
it's
kind
of
a
strange
note
and
I.
Don't
think
that
we
would
see
that
yeah.
You.
E
Are
well
aware
that
how
I
feel
about
amplified
music
outside,
but
you
know,
I
will
tell
you
this.
We
have
people
complaining
about
our
Curtis
6and
Park
events
and
the
noise
that
back
and
we
haven't
cited
anybody
on
that.
But
that's
besides
the
point
I
just
want
to
bring
that
up
because
you
live
in
the
city
now
I,
don't
condone,
amplified
music,
it's
just
way
over
the
top,
but
I
will
point
that
out
because
that
that
has
you
know
occurred
to
me.
C
C
E
E
A
D
D
J
Been
sworn
Steve
Nicolini
to
4:07
Sunset
Drive
I
was
the
one
who
obtained
the
original
approvals
for
Franklin
Manor
and
he
immediately
following
the
notice
letter
that
went
out
in
June
I
was
engaged
by
Franklin
Manor
and
the
landlord
to
resolve
the
matter.
They
were
well
aware
of
what
had
to
be
done.
J
I
started
meeting
with
the
city
staff
within
a
day,
or
so
with
LaShawn
dock
and
with
Kathy
Coyle
and
with
Gloria
Marita,
to
try
to
resolve
the
matter
and
those
discussions
went
on
for
seven
months
and
the
whole
time
during
that
seven
months,
from
June
until
January
of
2018
I
I
was
engaged
to
try
to
resolve
that
and
I
went
back.
The
panels
that
you're
talking
about
were
to
be
engineered
by
a
sound
engineer.
J
They
allowed
Kathy
Coyle
came
out
to
the
site
and
she
allowed
panels
that
were
temporary
and
emplacements
to
be
put
on
the
fence,
and
then
she
came
back
out
and
said:
well,
it's
not
enough,
but
I'll.
Let
you
go
or
there's
a
temporary
measure
as
long
as
you
commit
to
resolving
that
problem,
Franklin
Manor
owners
were
there
at
those
meetings.
They
were
there
with
me
in
the
field,
along
with
the
architect,
so
to
say
that
they
didn't
know
simply
didn't
happen.
They
knew
from
June
all
the
way
through
January
of
2017
2018
I'm.
J
It
never
happened
and
in
January
of
2018
they
sent
me
a
letter
saying
we
don't
need
you
anymore
and
then
we're
gonna
hire
our
own
attorney
and
I
can
share
those
emails
with
you
if
you
wish,
but
as
late
as
March
of
2018,
I
implored
them
to
get
with
the
program
and
get
these
measures
corrected
and
to
address
them.
There
was
no
such
thing
as
we
didn't
know.
They
knew
they
knew
personally,
because
I
talked
to
him.
J
They
knew
personally
because
I
emailed
them
and
they
said,
and
then
they
even
emailed
the
landlord
and
told
him
Steve
McClean,
is
handling
this.
That
was
in
June
of
2017,
so
I
mean
I'm
also
been
subpoenaed
as
a
witness
in
the
and
the
court
case
involving
them.
Where
I
gave
exactly
that
same
testimony
and
I'll
be
happy
to
give
it
again
and
again
that
that
is
what
happened.
J
They
were
to
hire
a
sound
engineer
to
determine
what
the
size
of
those
panels
were
and
how
to
mitigate
the
sound
they
never
did
it.
The
architect
told
him
to
do
it.
They
didn't
do
that
either
so
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
I
mean,
as
I
said:
I
I
begged
them
month
after
month,
week
after
week
to
come
into
compliance.
Mr.
A
J
Summit,
some
of
them
some
of
the
responses
to
my
emails,
asking
them
to
comply.
We
are
filled
with
exponents
about
we're,
not
going
to
do
this.
We're
not
going
to
do
that
and
it
wasn't
for
lack
of
effort,
and
you
know
that
when
I
appear
in
front
of
City
Council,
you
take
me
at
my
word:
I
am
a
sworn
advocate
for
various
projects
and
I
don't
take
that
lightly,
and
so,
when
I
come
back
to
you
and
I
say
I
tried
that
means
I
did
try.
I
really
tried.
K
G
L
J
I
If
I
mean
I
asked
a
question
earlier
about
fencing
in
styrofoam
twenty
five
thirty
minutes
ago
and
your
counselor
agreed,
it
was
just
not
an
eighth
of
an
inch
or
sixteenth
of
an
inch
or
three
inches
or
4
inches
deep
depth
and
and
now
you've
come
mr.
McLean,
Ian,
possibly
correct,
say
they
were
told
to
hire
a
sound
engineer.
They
were
but
I've
never
seen
anything
like
that.
The.
I
Put
out
swear
for
the
city
tells
us
that
I
was
correct
and
saying
that
we
never
told
him
what
kind
of
panels
to
put
up.
You
can
rewind
the
tape
and
everything
I'm.
Not
blaming
you
mute
him.
You
didn't
know
the
other.
That
I
did
the
rest
of
us.
So
now
we
have
conflicting
interests
on
the
sound.
Well,
then,.
A
A
Wish
it
did,
but
they
they
have
sort
of
two
issues
going
on
that
I
think
mr.
McLean
II
was
involved
in
you
know
one
is
that
they
have
to
come
into
compliance
with
the
site
plan.
Number
two
is
that
they
have
to
be
precise,
the
noise
or
events
when
the
purpose
of
the
sound
engineer,
I,
think
that
was
to
address
their
noise
ordinance
violations
and.
J
E
J
J
M
Where
are
you
getting
to
public
honey,
Julia,
Mandel
I'm
here
representing
the
building
owner
mr.
Ricciardi,
and
tonight
nine
twelve
of
Franklin
LLC
I
think
it
would
be
appropriate
to
allow
us
to
have
some
rebuttal
on
the
testimony
that
doesn't
occurred,
but
III
and
keeping
in
mind
we're
the
landlord,
and
so
a
lot
of
these
have
to
do
with
the
tenant
rather
than
the
landlord.
That
being
said,
the
landlord,
what
becoming
aware
of
all
this
did
tell
the
Franklin
Manor
folks
they
need
to
come
into
compliance,
there's
obviously
confusion
there.
M
Almost
there
hopefully
they'll
get
there.
It
would
seem
to
me
that
it'll
be
appropriate
to
potentially
give
them
30
more
days
to
come
into
compliance
and
I'm
here
to
say
that
if
that
doesn't
occur,
the
landlord
may
also
have
some
remedies
under
their
lease.
So
there's
litigation
happening.
There's
a
lot
of
other
stuff
happening
and
I
have
a
sense.
The
two
are
getting
conflated
and
I.
Think
your
goal
is
to
get
this
business
in
compliance,
as
it
always
is
in
code
enforcement
and
other
matters.
M
D
N
B
Mr.
chairman
may
I
remind
all
people
who
are
speaking
pursuant
to
councils
rules
in
such
matters
all
persons
who
provide
testimony
information
or
opinion
regarding
a
petition
in
a
quasi-judicial
matter,
such
as
this,
pending
before
City
Council,
must
disclose
any
direct
or
indirect
business
or
personal
interest
between
themselves
and
the
petitioner
or
applicant,
which
is
requesting
action.
The
information
shall
not
be
used
to
deny
the
petition
or
matter
but
goes
to
the
weight
of
the
evidence,
information
or
opinion
provided.
B
N
At
each
and
every
one
of
you,
my
name
is
Joe
Parrish
I'm,
a
resident
of
915
Franklin,
which
is
apartments
directly
across
from
Franklin
Manor
I
will
say
that
the
special
use
permit
is
supposed
to
mitigate
the
reverberation
of
noise.
I
think
that's
actually
the
purpose
of
that
special
use
permit
and
it
is
failing
miserably
for
from
what
I
have
seen
the
paneling
I
think
is
a
quarter-inch
foam.
It
has
not
been
designed
to
stop
noise.
N
N
Had
a
police
officer
come
to
my
house.
He
actually
witnessed
and
put
in
his
report
that
there
were
reverberations
and
vibrations
of
my
windows
on
the
23rd
floor
above
Franklin
Manor,
because
it
was
so
loud
that
is
in
a
police
report.
So
it
shakes
my
windows.
It
keeps
my
kids
up
on
weeknights
before
they
have
to
go
to
school.
The
explicit
language,
by
the
way
that
you
can
hear
and
clearly
here
has
exploit
expletives,
which
I
had
the
lyrics
to
right
here.
N
N
As
that
is
being
passed
around,
I
want
to
say
that
there
are
more
complaints
than
just
myself,
but
there
are
people
that
are
afraid,
because
Franklin
Manor
has
has
created
a
situation
where
people
are
afraid
to
come
forward.
Why?
Because,
when
we
complain
to
the
police
and
became
public
record,
they
sent
myself
and
someone
else
a
glitter
bomb
in
the
mail,
and
they
also
sent
me
feces.
So
there
are
several
people
out
there
that
are
afraid
to
speak
up
against
Franklin
Manor
as
far
as
business
downtown.
N
First
of
all,
I
choose
to
live
downtown
because
I
like
to
be
in
the
middle
of
everything,
that's
true
occasional
train
going
by
and
a
crate
occasional
siren,
an
occasional,
loud
car,
but
not
consistent
pumping
of
explicit
lyrics
language
into
my
house,
in
which
I
have
to
listen
to
it.
Constantly
over
my
television
over
the
white
noise
machine
to
help
me
try
to
sleep.
That
is
not
something
that
I
considered
whenever
I
live,
downtown
and
I.
N
Don't
think
anybody
would
consider
that,
and
so,
whenever
you
start
to
limit
the
amount
of
people
that
live
downtown,
that's
what's
going
to
affect
the
business
downtown.
It's
not
going
to
be
shutting
down.
Franklin
Manor,
it's
going
to
be
keeping
people
from
moving
downtown.
So
that's
the
business
concern.
It's
not
what
these
landlords
want
their
their
tenant
to
keep
paying
their
rent.
It
is
for
residents
to
move
downtown
and
actually
support
the
businesses
that
are
downtown.
So
that's
why
we
choose
urban
living.
N
O
O
We
brought
a
significant
investment
to
this
part
of
the
city
well
over
in
excess
of
a
hundred
million
dollars.
We've
worked
with
the
city
on
several
matters.
We
followed
the
rules
and
that's
all
we're
asking
is
that
we
have
all
businesses
are
held
accountable
for
following
the
rules.
We've
mediated
with
the
group
across
the
street.
We've
met
with
them
and
promises
are
made
and
promises
are
broken
and
I
hate
to
steal
a
phrase
that
my
mother
used
to
always
used
with
me
when
I,
but
I
didn't
do
what
I
was
supposed
to
do.
O
Actions
speak
louder
than
words.
We
have
a
fiduciary
responsibility
to
people
that
live
at
9:15,
so
you
have
to
provide
them
a
quiet
and
peaceful
home,
and
we
cannot
do
that
with
the
rule.
Violations
that
have
been
broken
and
so
I'm
just
standing
here
and
asking
you
is
that
everybody
be
held
accountable.
I
mean
I.
There
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
confusion
here,
but
there's
really
no
confusion
from
our
side
in
terms
of
what's
supposed
to
be
done
and
what's
currently
happening.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
Good
afternoon,
members
of
the
council,
my
name
is
Malcolm
Isaac
and
the
mother
of
amytal
Isaac,
who
spoke
earlier
Michael
and
I
own
the
corporation
that
owns
the
patio
first
I
want
to
apologize
for
the
misstatement
that
we
didn't
receive
notice.
My
son
didn't
receive
notice
and
he
is
also
part
owner.
I'm.
B
The
one
who
received
notice
and
I
have
a
sick
husband
without
getting
into
details,
but
he
took
all
the
mail
and
destroyed
it
he's
demented
and
he
thought
that
it's
a
driver
license
or
so
forth,
so
I'm
apologizing
for
it
I
help
the
testimony
of
mr.
McKinney
and
I
can
stay
to
you
unequivocally
that
I
met
mr.
McElhaney
today
for
the
first
time
15
minutes
ago.
I
never
knew
of
everything
anything
I
heard
about
today.
B
I
never
knew
about
it
when
he
said
that
he
met
with
the
landlord
and
informed
the
landlord
I
assumed
that
he
met
with
mr.
Ricciardi
I
own.
The
patio
and
I
never
met
with
him.
He
never
told
me
I'm,
a
small
business
owner
and
I
have
lived
in
Tampa
or
close
to
Tampa,
but
I
own
property
in
Tampa
I've
been
a
good
citizen.
I'm,
the
owner
of
small
business
I've
been
paying
taxes
to
the
city
of
Tampa.
B
For
forty
five
years,
I
had
I
used
to
practice
law
I'm,
now
retired
and
I
have
employed
many
people
in
San
in
Tampa
and
gave
them
a
living,
and
my
favorite
lexie
that
sometimes
over
the
years,
many
millions
of
dollars
so
I
want
you
to
give
me
an
opportunity
not
to
lose
my
business.
It's
like
David
and
Goliath,
and
what
I'm
asking
you
today
is
to
give
the
tenants
an
opportunity
to
fix
the
problem,
not
to
put
us
out
of
business.
B
H
Thank
You
counsel
good
afternoon,
my
name
is
Carlos
Saavedra
and
I
live
at
11:08,
nor
Franklin
Street
unit
405
and
I'm,
a
resident
of
the
residents
of
Franklin
Street
we're
all.
We
are
two
blocks
north
of
Franklin
Manor
at
the
corner
of
Franklin
and
Royal
Street
and
I
am
an
urban
living.
I
chose
to
move
downtown
with
my
husband.
We
embrace
all
of
the
restaurants
and
the
businesses
that
are
here.
I
do
not
have
a
problem
with
what
they
are
trying
to
accomplish.
H
What
I'm
asking
you
today
is
to
hold
Franklin
Manor
to
the
law
regarding
the
noise
ordinance
they
have
repeatedly
violated
the
code.
Therefore
they're
privileged
to
serve
alcohol
is
in
jeopardy.
This
privilege
to
serve
alcohol,
the
privilege
to
serve.
Excuse
me.
It
is
a
privilege
to
serve
alcohol.
Not
a
right
with
the
privilege
goes
the
responsibility
to
follow
the
law,
and
that
is
all
that
I
am
asking.
I
am
happy
for
them
to
be
downtown
and
have
their
establishment
everybody
in
this
country
right
to
do
that,
I'm!
O
That's
the
apartment
community,
that's
located
directly
across
the
street
from
Franklin
Manor
I
would
just
like
to
state
that
the
loud
raucous
you
know
late
night,
music
emanating
from
Franklin
Manor,
has
not
only
hurt
our
business
operations.
It's
been
very
difficult
to
lease
apartments
and
retain
our
residents.
We've
had
to
make
a
lot
of
concessions,
monetarily
transfer
people,
let
them
out
of
their
leases
due
to
the
loud
late-night
noises,
and
it's
not
just
on
the
weekends
it's
Monday
through
Friday
as
well.
So,
additionally,
we
are
constantly
fielding
resident
complaints.
O
B
I
P
Thank
you
for
giving
me
the
opportunity.
I
represent
the
apartments
in
the
litigation.
That's
presently
pending
in
front
of
Judge
holder
right
now,
I've
had
the
opportunity
to
look
through
all
of
the
documents
that
we've
received,
that
it's
been
exchanged,
I'm
not
going
to
bring
all
of
those
to
you
today
because
it
fill
this
room.
What
I
am
gonna
do
is
share
with
you,
some
of
the
choice
documents
to
help
fill
in
the
gaps.
Some
of
the
questions
that
you've
been
asking.
P
We
know
that
Franklin
Manor
received
notice
from
the
city
in
June
of
2017
and,
as
mr.
mikulina
said,
he
promptly
told
him
you
need
to
into
compliance
the
response
that
was
received
and
that
the
ownership
group
told
to
the
ik
artis
I'm,
not
going
to
say
it
out
loud,
but
it's
highlighted
and
I'm
gonna
make
it
part
of
the
record.
That
was
the
first
response.
What
happens
next?
Mr.
Ricciardi,
recognizing
that
there's
a
significant
problem
with
the
city
of
Tampa
rights
to
the
ownership
group
and
tells
them
come
into
compliance
time
is
ticking.
P
There
was
a
question:
was
there
a
time
given?
Absolutely
it
was
ten
days
for
them
to
come
into
compliance
or
make
repairs
and
changes,
and
it
was
very
simple:
the
phone
paneling
but,
more
importantly,
take
down
the
outdoor
concert
venue
that
they
had
set
up.
They
had
an
outdoor
stage
with
nightclub
speakers
pointing
directly
at
the
apartment
buildings,
speakers
on
the
side
of
the
building,
blaring
and
speakers
everywhere
else,
no
cabanas,
no
sound
controls.
What
happens
next
mr.
michaleen
ii
continues
to
press
and
say
you
need
to
come
into
compliance.
P
Why
is
that
your
city
staff
wrote
to
mr.
McLean
II
in
October
and
told
them
the
speakers
have
to
come
down.
They
are
not
part
of
the
approval
that
you're
allows
your
client
to
operate.
That's
what
your
city
staff
told?
What
was
the
response
that
the
ownership
group
said
a
responsible
business
owner
in
this
city
and
I
live
here.
This
is
my
city.
I
would
expect
you
to
say
yes,
I
will
come
into
compliance.
You
know
what
he
said:
the
owner
who's,
not
here
by
the
way,
he's
absent
my
liquor
license,
sir.
P
My
business
was
on
the
line.
I'd
be
here,
guess
what
he
wrote.
He
wrote
that
it's
highlighted
and
you
know
who
he's
talking
about
y'all.
He
says:
let
y'all
take
him
to
court.
Don't
do
anything
just
keep
delaying
what
happens
next.
Miss
duck
again.
A
week
later,
rights
back
to
mr.
McLean
E
and
says:
has
Franklin
Manor
removed
the
outside
speakers.
P
What
does
he
say?
Steve
I'm,
not
removing
the
speakers
until
every
other
bar
in
Tampa
does
as
well
that's
a
great
position.
You
want
somebody
running
a
business
in
this
downtown
corridor
that
y'all
are
trying
to
make
good.
That's
the
response.
That's
given
mr.
McLean.
He
goes
on
and
tells
them
that
a
delay
is
a
bad
bet,
we're
in
December
of
2017.
P
Mr.
mikulina,
thankfully,
is
not
the
yes-man
to
these
people
and
instead
is
telling
them
you
need
to
come
into
compliance.
What
do
they
do
in
response
to
that?
Do
they
say?
Okay,
it's
been
six
months.
Time
is
up.
We
will
do
this.
No,
what
do
they
say?
Pardon
my
french,
but
they
say
it's
time
to
cut
the
from
them
and
he
says
that
y'all
should
give
them
a
plaque
and
not
bully
them.
P
Weekly
I,
don't
know
about
you,
but
asking
a
business
owner
to
do
what's
right
and
approved
responsible
people
respond
and
do
that
what
happens
next?
There's
a
change
of
the
noise
ordinance.
Mr.
Hagler,
who
appeared
before
you
wrote
to
the
people
across
the
street
at
the
Franklin
Manor
and
said
the
noise
ordinance
has
now
changed.
It's
a
plainly,
audible
standard
in
the
central
business
district.
What
happens
next?
The
ownership
group
responds
back
to
mr.
Hadley
and
says
in
light
of
your
recommit
recent
actions
or
lack
thereof.
P
I'm
gonna
extend
the
same
courtesy
sheet,
courtesy
to
you,
as
you
did
with
us
with
my
future
actions.
What
happens
next?
You
heard
folks
come
up
here
and
say
that
there
were
no
police
citations
or
they
didn't
know
about
him
wrong.
False,
absolutely
incorrect,
multiple
citations
sitting
here
in
my
hand,
from
the
city
of
Tampa
Police,
going
out
trying
to
address
the
residents
concerns
because
they
can't
sleep,
they
can't
enjoy
their
balcony.
They
can't
enjoy
their
kids,
they
can't
enjoy
their
family.
P
The
one
that
I
think
is
most
pertinent
for
you
to
know
is
the
one
that
happens
after
that
email
when
mr.
Hadley
is
told
that
Franklin
manors
gonna
treat
them
just
like
they
apparent
like
the
apartment
under
its
treated
Franklin
Manor
cops
are
called
early
in
the
morning,
not
at
10
or
11,
when
the
parks
going.
When
we
all
know
that's.
You
know
that
that's
like
this
here.
This
is
gosh.
It's
it's
like
1
o'clock
in
the
morning.
P
Police
are
out,
look
what
the
bar
owner
does
it's
disgusting,
the
bar
owner
comes
out
and
learns
of
the
violation
becomes
irate
states
he's
going
to
turn
his
music
all
the
way
up.
Now
that
his
business
is
getting
a
citation,
goes
back
in
the
bar
and
turns
it
up
extremely
loud
with
the
speakers
that
are
still
there.
So
what
happens?
We
go
to
court
because
the
police
can't
get
these
people
under
control.
They
won't
remove
the
speakers
that
they're
not
allowed
to
have
judge
holder
issues.
An
emergency
injunction
tells
him
to
stop.
P
P
There
are
multiple
residents
that
cannot
be
here.
I
have
their
affidavits
that
I'd
like
to
enter
into
the
record
they're
sworn
under
penalty
of
perjury,
all
of
them
singing
the
same
to
college
students
elementary
school
principals,
lawyers,
businesspeople,
saying
please,
you
have
got
to
get
this
under
control.
The
only
way
it
can
get
under
control
is
for
you,
fine
folks,
to
hold
these
people
accountable.
Judge
holder
has
tried.
The
City
of
Police
have
tried.
P
There
they
are
there's
multiple
speakers
or
six
of
them
still
sitting
there
all
operational
and
all
running,
and
so
does
just
otherwise
is
wrong.
I
have
petitions
here
from
the
neighbors
I'm
entering
into
the
record.
They
couldn't
be
here
all
saying
the
same
thing
close
this
place
down
it's
over
the
top
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
I
appreciate
your
attention.
Thank
you.
D
F
H
Hi
JC
Shamburger
any
three
and
a
half
year
resident
downtown
I
came
to
meet
the
owners
of
Franklin
Manor
by
being
resident
downtown
when
I
approached
them
for
a
charity
event
that
I
co-chair
and
asked
them
for
a
donation.
They
agreed
generously
and
helped
us
raise
money
for
a
very
worthy
charity.
Two
years
in
a
row,
I
thought
Frank
mannor
was
a
welcome
addition
to
downtown
that
northern
to
Franklin
Street
was
very
dangerous.
Nothing
was
down
there.
H
I
was
afraid
to
walk
that
way
when
they
opened
that
kind
of
made
it
a
little
more
safe
because
there
was
a
lot
more
foot.
Traffic
I
moved
closer
and
closer
proximity
of
Franklin
Manor
and
knew
what
I
was
getting
into
I've,
never
had
a
problem.
I
think
it
brings
livelihood
to
that
neighborhood,
there's
still
crime
in
that
area.
H
H
Just
think,
shutting
this
business
down
with
their
generosity
and
growth
of
the
community
is
just
it's
not
a
good
idea.
I
think
it's
a
bad
look
on
the
city
of
Tampa.
D
D
O
O
What
I
can
say
about
the
company
is
that
it's
one
of
the
best
businesses
I've
ever
worked
for
they're,
very
hospitable,
they're
very
generous.
They
do
toy
drives
food
drives
dog
adoptions,
on
Sundays,
for
dogs
that
were
rehomed
out
of
the
from
the
hurricane
in
Puerto
Rico.
They
really
put
the
community
first
and
they
put
us
first
as
friends
and
his
family
and
I'm
lucky
enough
to
call
them.
O
My
family,
Dave
and
Franco
they've
they've,
taken
me
under
their
wing
and
they've,
really
taught
me
the
hospitality
industry
in
the
hospitality
business
and
how
to
be
generous
and
how
to
be
hospitable
to
the
community
around
us.
We
love
our
neighbors
I.
Have
lots
of
friends?
I
live
in
I'm
15
that
aren't
bothered
by
the
sound
and
there's
people
that
are,
but
I
can't
call
to
how
that
building
was
built,
but
it
came
up
in
less
than
a
year
and
we
were
around
for
a
year
and
a
half
before
the
building
was
even
well.
O
The
ground
is
even
broken,
so
I
love
the
business
down
man,
I
love
working
for
these
guys
there
I
mean
things
can
be
taken
out
of
context.
The
way
people
say
you
can't
you
know,
base
somebody's
judge,
somebody's
character
based
on
that,
but
I
love,
nocturnal
hospitality
and
they've
done
nothing
but
be
right
by
me.
So
I
have
nothing
else
to
say
besides
that,
thank
you.
O
I
am
the
general
manager
of
Franklin
mater
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
me
and
the
50
employees
that
we
currently
employ
at
Franklin
matter.
You
know
it's
a
great
group
of
people
that
we
work
strongly
every
day
in
and
out
to
abide
by
the
law
that
you
guys
have
for
us
and
we're
not
trying
to
make
anyone
feel
uncomfortable
being
downtown.
O
We're
not
trying
to
you
know,
cause
all
these
issues
that
are
being
brought
against
us,
we're
literally
trying
to
build
downtown
into
something,
bigger
and
greater,
and
with
the
nocturnal
group
that
and
the
people
that
we've
brought
into
it,
we
feel
like.
We
are
accomplishing
that
and
little
by
little
we
are
going
to
actually
make
downtown
a
great
place
that
everybody
wants
to
be,
and
you
know
I
would
hate
to
see
establishment
like
Franklin
Manor.
O
O
O
I
just
started
about
four
months
ago,
as
the
general
manager
since
then
I
had
one
complaint
that
I
was
there
for
that
day.
So.
G
O
The
one
complaint
the
officer
came
and
me
and
head
of
security.
We
went
up
and
we
spoke
to
the
cop
and
he
actually
laughed
and
said
that
he
thought
it
was
a
vindictive
complaint
because
he
couldn't
even
hear
the
music
from
the
front
door
of
9:15.
O
O
R
My
name
is
Gregory
szalinski,
one
of
the
original
investors
for
Franklin
Manor
I
was
approached
in
2015
about
this
new
concept
and
I
happily
mortgaged
out
my
car,
my
house,
and
really
put
my
entire
savings,
my
mom
savings
and
my
wife's
savings
into
this
project
starting
off
a
long
time
ago.
I
was
criticized
without
the
part
of
town
that
had
abandoned
buildings
at
the
time.
R
A
lot
of
you
know:
people
walking
around
there
that
maybe
seemed
less
reputable
and
9:15
wasn't
around
them,
but
I
got
to
be
a
part
of
the
whole
build
out
and
I
worked
very
closely
with
the
sound
engineers
on
this
project
and
have
an
engineering
background.
Myself.
I've
made
it
very
clear
to
the
city
and
zoning
at
that
time
that
a
foam
panel
fence
would
it
do
anything
because
sound
travels
in
vector
so
how'd
the
bounces
off
the
ground
who
travels
up
the
building.
R
You
could
stand
outside
at
the
front
door
and
it
could
be
very
quiet,
but
when
you
go
up
50
stories
up,
it
could
be
very
loud.
So
a
wood
paneling
or
a
foam
panel
for
saying
it's
not
going
to
really
help
the
pictures
you've
seen
today.
One
of
the
gaps
was
behind
the
stage,
and
then
we
put
a
food
truck
to
try
to
put
up
the
try
to
block
as
much
sound
as
possible.
R
The
sound
engineers
are
working
with
right
now,
they're
doing
they're,
expensive,
but
they're
doing
amazing
work
I
mean
the
way
they
move.
Everything
around
the
cabanas
and
everything
would
do
moving
forward.
Really
has
an
impact
on
everybody
around
us
and
I.
Do
feel
like
we're
being
very
proactive
at
this
moment
on
how
we
got
around
that.
R
This
is
really
nothing
short
than
a
very
passionate
character
assassination
against
the
two
owners.
You
know
the
building
has
investors.
It's
got
an
answer
to
it's
a
business
plan.
That's
not
working
out
the
way
it
was
pitched
and
they're.
Looking
for
somebody
to
blame
so
we're
sitting
here,
trying
to
be
nice
and
we're
really
trying
to
make
ends
meet
I
mean
some
of
our
staff.
You
know
they're
expecting
two
of
them
are
newborns.
R
Things
like
this
does
scare
away
investors
potential
investors
moving
forward
to
other
concepts
and
I
have
people
from
out
of
town
that
want
to
invest
in
this
town.
They
love
the
concept
of
Tampa
Bay,
but
every
time
something
like
this
is
brought
to
the
table
with
that
a
business
is
to
be
shut
down.
It
really
dampers
our
efforts
of
bringing
money
in
from
outside
of
industries
or
outside
areas
into
into
the
Tampa
Bay
area.
O
A
E
Exactly
exactly,
and
you
know
why
we
didn't
exactly
what
they
just
said:
people
are
employed
wholesalers,
the
whole
nine
yards,
but
that
being
said
that
they
didn't
comply
is
very
important
to
me.
So
what
I
want
to
hear
from
them
is
what
they're
going
to
do
over
and
above
the
requirement,
I
want
to
know
what
time
they're
gonna
stop
the
music
I
want
to
know
and
if
they're
willing
to
put
it
on
the
site
plan.
That's
what
I
want
to
hear.
A
A
And
I
hope
that
they
will
the
the
only
the
only
vehicle
the
City
Council
has
for
compliance.
This
is
actually
gonna,
be
a
two-part.
It's
number
one,
fine,
if
there's
a
violation,
and
if
you
do
find
that
there's
a
violation,
you
have
the
ability
to
oppose
a
penalty
for
up
to
thirty
days,
suspension
of
the
sale
of
alcohol.
That
is
e.
That
is
the
only
enforcement
mechanism
that
you
have
at
this
future.
Okay,.
E
H
I've
been
asked
by
the
Catholic
oil
planning
of
Dillon
I've,
been
asked
by
legal
counsel
just
to
make
a
couple
clarifications
per
number.
Six
on
your
list
of
hearing
procedures
for
one
captain,
Neil
did
contact
us
back
and
there
have
been
seven
calls
to
TPD
four
complaints
since
November
1st
2018
I
just
wanted
to
get
that
on
the
record.
H
E
H
F
Yeah
yeah,
you
asked
a
couple
things
and
you're
right.
We
haven't
done
a
lot
of
these
I.
Do
remember
that
we
did
reduce
the
amount
of
time
for
Hollywood
nights
and
I.
Think
if
we're
not
mistaken,
I
think
Bar
Atlantic
was
another
one.
We
had.
That
was
a
long
Franklin,
which
is
one
of
the
older
buildings
over
there
that
we
shut
them
down
for
a
while,
but
here's
the
question
and
I'm
asking
staff.
So
you
missed
Oh
Donnelly,
you
can
just
move
away.
F
I
see
it
there,
okay,
so
you
know,
but
we're
still
in
a
situation
where
there's
a
lot
of
information
that
we
received
concerning
discussions
as
to
whether
or
not
they
were
ever
going
to
comply
back
in
2017,
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
jargon
and
stuff
like
that.
After
all
that
information,
you
know
we
don't
even
know
if
they
ever
tried
to
comply.
The
second
thing
is,
is
that
you
have
an
investor
of
the
company
who's
saying
none
of
this
matters,
and
yet
you
know
he
didn't
say
that
we
should
be
doing
this.
F
This
is
and
I
think
that
this
is
exactly
what
miss
Keene
was
saying,
which
is
we
had
the
ultimate
hammer
right
now
and
everybody's
saying
we're
bullying
them
or
that
we're
not
treating
them
right,
but
no
one's
coming
up
with
an
answer,
and
that's
part
of
the
problem
that
we
have
right
now
so
I'm
gonna
ask
mr.
Donnelly
to
come
up
and
you've
heard
some
of
some
of
this
mrs.
Donnelly.
If
you
can
come
on
up
you've
heard
what
Miss
Kapena
said,
you
know
what
are
chins
up.
F
Okay,
you
understand
that
we're
not
shutting
down
a
business,
we're
just
holding
them
income,
we're
holding
them
essentially
in
contempt
of
them,
not
following
what
is
already
on
the
site
plan.
So
if
you
don't
have
a
plan
forward
for
it,
it's
going
to
be
very,
it's
gonna
be
a
difficult
decision
for
you
all
not
for
us
right.
C
And
I
think
we're
coming
to
you
in
a
very
different
position
than
this
other
establishment
that
was
referenced
that
was
suspended
for
seven
days.
We've
come
and
shown
that
that,
since
the
city
told
us
in
November
we're
moving
forward,
we're
gonna
end
up
bringing
this.
You
know
we're
gonna.
Take
this
to
the
extent
of
having
a
hearing,
and
this
is
our
position,
we
didn't
know
their
position.
I
mean
we
had
someone
on
staff,
provide
testimony
in
November
saying
they
didn't
know.
C
If
we
were
out
of
compliance
as
soon
as
we
understood
their
position,
we
made
moves
we're
here,
showing
you
$60,000
worth
of
work.
That's
already
been
completed.
I
think
the
only
pieces
remaining
are
that
Cathy
Coyle
went
out
to
the
site
today
and
identified
some
gaps
that
she
felt
should
be
filled
in
and
we,
you
know
immediately
said
we
will
work
with
you.
We'll
figure
that
out
can.
F
I,
stop
you
there
for
a
second
I.
Just
wouldn't
stop
you
from
okay!
You
made
a
statement.
Here's
I
know
you
haven't
been
on
this
from
the
very
beginning,
so
we're
giving
you
I'm
giving
you
a
lot
of
leeway.
There's
there's
a
lot
of
emails
concerning
from
summer
of
2017,
okay,
I
believe
I
may
be
wrong
about
I
want
to
make
sure
I
get
this
right.
One
of
the
people
that
is
part
of
the
ownership
group
is
still
in
that
ownership
group
and
he
was
one
of
the
ones
that
was
communicating
with
mr.
F
C
F
I
understand,
but
there
were
other,
there
were
emails
from
miss
miss
doc
too,
concerning
the
situation
so
I
mean
that
and
she
does
represent
the
city.
So
my
point
is:
is
that
I
don't
want
to
have
a
situation
in
which,
whatever
the
time
frame
we
come
up
with
or
if
we
come
up
with
no
time
frame
that
we're
gonna
have
the
same
issue
and
that
there's
going
to
be
this
attitude
that
no
one's
going
to
comply?
Okay
now
I
know
not
selling
alcohol
is
a
big
loser
for
any
business
that
sells
a
lot
of
alcohol.
F
Okay,
but
I.
Don't
I,
don't
want
to
be
back
here
in
30
days
or
the
next
council,
and
you
know
three
months
having
to
deal
with
the
exact
same
situation
so
I.
We
need
some
clarification
from
your
side
and
I.
Think
it'll
give
some
comfort,
because
I
think
mr.
bean
put
it
pretty
succinctly
and
then-
and
you
know
yeah
so
I-
think
that
there's
some
there's
some
aspect
that
we're
gonna
have
to
know
something,
because.
C
It
is,
this
is
not
a
good
record
for
your
society
and
I
know
we've
times
throughout
this
very
long
discussion
that
we're
we're
happy
to
let
you
know
a
window
of
time
happen
where
we
can
get
with
Kathy
Coyle
on
the
site
and
let
her
see
the
speakers
that
will
go
in
I
think
that's
the
outstanding
issue.
Everything
in
these
photos
that
you've
seen
none
of
that
existed
a
couple
months
ago,
so
there
has
been
a
significant
effort.
F
C
F
A
little
bit
different
to
ask
for
permission
now
after
we've
got
a
record
like
this.
That's
the
problem
had
had
this
been
a
different
owner
and
it
had
not
been
a
person.
That's
already
part
of
your
ownership
group
that
was
sending
e-mails
back
and
forth
the
way
that
they
were
doing
I
think
you
might
have
had
clean
hands.
I,
don't
think
you
do
that's
part
of
the
problem
and
I
hope
you
follow
what
I'm
saying
to
you.
I.
C
C
Yeah,
let's
not
talk
about
the
litigation
sure-
and
my
only
point
is
this-
is
that
you
kind
of
got
a
snapshot
of
pulling
out
from
you
know,
piles
and
piles
of
documents
trying
to
find
the
absolute
you
know
worst
looking
email
that
could
be
pulled
out
of
all
of
that
there.
There
are
a
lot
of
other
things
that
we're
going
on.
Franklin
Manor
also
had
different
counsel
at
that
time,
in
contrast
to
emails
with
mr.
McLean
II,
we
don't
know
what
was
happening.
F
G
I
have
never
ever
been
handed
a
pile
of
documents
like
this
before
in
a
hearing
in
this
room.
I
am
flabbergasted,
but
the
first
thing
and
I
realize
you
were
not
the
attorney
on
the
case
when
a
lot
of
this
happened,
but
this
is
willful
non-compliance
documented
in
a
series
of
emails,
summing,
the
nose
of
the
city,
the
landlord
attempts
to
talk
sense
to
the
tenant
and
is
rebuffed
and
mr.
G
McLean
II,
clearly
over
and
over
again,
is
attempting
to
try
to
help
remedy
the
situation
and
is
rebuffed
and
over
a
year
and
a
half
went
by
I
mean
honestly
I
I.
Just
can't
believe
that
the
first
thing
that
was
that
didn't
come
out
of
someone's
mouth
was
an
apology,
because
that
is
what
is
owed
to
the
community
for
for
basically
saying
screw
them
worse
than
that.
Obviously
we're
not
going
to
do
it.
Let
them
take
us
to
court.
G
You
know
if
we
work
very,
very
hard
on
this
noise
ordinance
and
we
did
it
for
a
reason,
because
we
get
complaints
from
all
over
town
about
exactly
this
type
of
behavior
and-
and
you
know
the
Landlord
recognized
it.
The
owners
own
agent
recognized
it
and
Wow
I,
just
I
mean
it
may
be
selective,
but
it's
pretty
tough
stuff
I
know.
C
One
of
those
emails,
I
even
saw
that
was
flashed
up
on
the
screen
says
you
know:
do
we
need
to
talk
to
an
attorney,
and
so
that's
what
I'm
saying
there
there
there
was
more
going
on,
but
I
actually
to
your
comment.
We
we
were
going
to
bring
up
mr.
Lu
domer
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
ownership
and
just
talk
about.
You
know
where
they
are
right
now
and
how
they're
moving
forward,
and
we
would
really
appreciate
that
opportunity
because
I
don't
believe.
G
You're
moving
forward
in
good
faith,
I
really
don't
have
an
issue
with
that.
I
think
you
are
I,
think
you're
obviously
trying
to
remedy
it,
but
the
situation
has
gone
on
for
a
long
time
without
being
remedied
and
the
lack
of
the
lack
of
clarity,
I,
don't
I,
don't
really
see
it.
I
mean
what
Shawn
doc
is
asking.
What
have
the
speakers
been
taken
out
of
the
speaker's
been
taking
down,
as
the
speaker
has
been
taken
down,
I
mean
you
know
how
many
if
they
asked
me
that
question
I
would
take
the
speakers
down
and.
C
I
think
part
of
what
makes
us
again
really
confusing.
Is
that
what
theoretically
should
happen
if
there
was
an
impasse,
would
be
a
hearing
just
like
this
and
I
think
that's
part
of
the
history
here,
that's
just
it's
it's
murky
and,
and
it
is
what
it
is
we're
here
now.
This
is
the
first
time
we've
been
called
for
a
hearing
and
we've
we've
made
all
of
the
changes
with
very
minor,
except
but
I
really
would
like
the
opportunity.
Q
You
know
what
is
extremely
frustrating
is
you
know
a
Franklin
Manor
has
turned
around
that
area
because
before
that
it
was
dead
and
I
appreciate
it
and
I
see
it.
When
you
have
gentlemen,
like
mr.
mikulina,
who
has
decades
of
experience,
saying
if
you
don't
do
this,
this
is
gonna
happen.
He
knows
the
ins
and
outs
of
the
city
how
things
work
he's
been
here
firsthand
you
have
mr.
Ricciardi
as
the
property
owner
pleading
with
them.
Respectfully,
hey.
Q
Please
get
this
taken
care
of
and
I'm
looking
at
the
dates
2017
a
year
and
a
half
ago.
It's
not
a
matter
of
well.
They
can't
afford
to
make
the
improvements.
You
know
they
just
don't
have
the
money
it's
blatantly,
as
mr.
Cohen
has
already
mentioned,
you
know
thumbing
their
nose
at
the
city.
You
know
go
ahead.
You
know
sue
us
this,
that
whatever
the
language
was
in
these
emails,
when
you
have
residents
across
the
street
and
around
the
area
complaining
about
this,
this
could
have
been
avoided.
Q
This
should
have
been
avoided
responsibly
as
adults
and
taken
and
taken
care
of
in
a
different
matter,
but
I
mean
the
the
emails
speak
for
themselves
and
and
once
again
it's
frustrating
because
I
appreciate
everything.
They've
done
their
the
the
restaurants
up
the
street
and
whatnot
is
turning
around
Franklin
Street,
but
we
have
rule
rules
and
codes
and
regulations
that
are
not
just
for
these
business
owners,
but
for
everybody,
and
we
have
to
enforce
those
I
mean
it's.
It's
simple.
Q
If
I
were
in
their
position,
I'd
be
I'd,
be
losing
sleep
at
night
trying
to
come
into
compliance,
especially
when
mr.
Mick
aleni
once
again,
because
he
has
the
experience
with
these
cases.
As
saying,
if
you
don't
do
this,
there
will
be
consequences,
and
here
we
are
at
this
hearing
in
2019.
This
should
have
been
avoided.
We
shouldn't
be
wasting
our
time
on
this,
and
and
and
now
we
are
so
mister.
I
Narender
Thank
You
chairman
Helen
June
24th
of
the
year
2017
one
of
the
priors
of
the
building
total
specifically
to
this
and
asked
them
to
get
it
happy
before
the
city
shut
you
down
thanks
for
the
time
and
the
time
clicking,
they
did
this,
the
hell
with
you
to
the
owner.
They
said
that
or
your
clients,
yeah.
L
I
C
C
I
Had
three
years
of
this
and
I
blamed
the
city
and
partly
for
not
bringing
any
closer
and
sooner
that's?
Why
we're
getting
to
her
earlier
when
I
was
speaking
about
the
city,
we
have
to
change
our
rules.
When
we
talk
about
styrofoam
or
offensive,
we
have
to
say
what
it
is
specifically
within
a
law.
That's
what
we
do
for
everything
else,
but
this
council.
I
I
You
understand
me
guys,
but
this
here
is
not
gonna
be
what
the
city
of
Tampa
is
all
about.
All
this
year
we
spend
more
money
or
they
have
an
attorney
today
than
fixing
the
place.
I,
don't
understand
it.
I,
don't
understand
what
ship
in
the
shoulder
they're
carrying
I,
don't
understand
it.
I,
really
don't
I
mean
I
met
him
yesterday
for
the
first
time
I
said
these
are
two
a
real
nice
guys
and
I
still
think
they're
nice
guys
just
power
went
to
their
head
and
now
they're
paying
with
it
through
a
wallet.
I
O
You
mr.
chair
and
and
I
I
agree
with
the
comments
that
were
made
when
I
read
these
emails,
the
biggest
thing
I
see
is
pride,
pride
pride
fry
I
mean
in
and,
and
we
know
the
pride
cometh
before
the
fall,
and
the
sad
part
is
that
the
fall
is
not
just
going
to
be
sustained
potentially
by
the
owners
of
this
establishment,
but
by
the
the
workers
that
we
were
talking
about.
You
know
some
folks
we're
talking
about
the
I
think
it
was
the
40
50
employees
and
distributors
etc.
O
O
It's
going
to
be
the
workers
and
the
employees,
so
I
think
that
that's
you
know
whenever
I
hear,
to
the
extent
that
crocodile
tears
are
being
shed
regarding
the
workers,
the
the
protection
of
the
workers
began
right
here
and
when
we
see
this
kind
of
prideful
and
vulgar
defense
of
the
indefensible.
The
real
victims
going
to
be
the
the
working
families
represented
with
this
business.
C
C
D
E
You
know
everything
that
we
got
is.
Is
you
know,
I
learned
something
in
junior
high,
never
put
him
right
in
what
you're
thinking
at
that
moment
about
that
was
junior
high.
So
that
me,
that
being
said,
you
know
as
far
as
crocodile
tears
about
the
workers
and
it
it
really
is
true.
It
really
is
true.
You
don't
only
hurt
the
owners,
they
got
money,
you're
really
hurting.
It's
really
a
very
deep.
E
Schedule
of
people
along
the
line
they
get
so
as
I
said
before,
I
wanted
to
hear
from
you
and
your
people
what,
over
and
above
I,
don't
want
to
hear
we're
complying
I
want
to
hear
what
you're
willing
to
do
to
really
get
this
and
make
friends
and
be
really
good.
Stewards
of
this
city
and
I
understand.
This
was
the
first
place
that
went
down
in
North.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
I'm
gonna
tell
you
something.
You
know
that
patio
it's
right
on
the
corner.
There
was
a
building
there
and
they
got
torn
down.
E
E
It's
it's
really.
The
wood
has
come
up
here
and
you
know
that
I
said
too
bad.
We
didn't
have
a
hearing.
Will
you
have
any
one
now
right?
This
is
what's
happening
now,
so
we
have
zero
to
30
days
suspension.
One
of
the
things
I'd
like
to
maybe
see
is
continue
this
for
30
days
and
come
back
and
see
what
you
do
with
the
owners
of
the
buildings
and
the
ending
management.
A
If
I
can
make
a
suggestion,
City
Council
Krista
Mora
legal
department,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
there
are
two
parts
to
what
you
have
in
front
of
you
at
the
conclusion
of
this
hearing.
My
suggestion
would
be
that
you
might
want
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
finding
on
the
first
motion
and
then
you'd
like
to
wait
30
days
that
that
might
be
more
appropriate
for
the
second
part
of
that
motion.
Okay,.
B
30
days
is
sufficient
for
council,
if
you
wish
it
longer,
that's
fine
too,
but
my
point
is
that
it
should
not
be
or
taken
in
the
form
of
an
exaction
that,
in
order
for
them
to
get
the
mercy
of
this
council
that
they
have
to
mean
something
that
the
code
does
not
require
them
to
do.
I
am
just
that
they're
doing
it
out
of
duress.
Perhaps
so
I
know
what
you're
asking
for,
but
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
that
the
council
does
not
have
the
authority
to
go
in
that
direction
right.
E
B
C
B
Okay,
yes,
okay,
yeah
and
before
we
get
to
rebuttal,
there's
one
other
item
that
I
want
to
do
of
housekeeping,
and
that
involves
council,
Vieira
and
Councilman
Maniscalco,
because
you're
out
of
the
room
at
the
time
with
regard
to
ex
parte
communications
and
disclosures.
Is
it
my
understanding
that
neither
Jena
neither
of
you
have
met
with
anyone
involved
in
this
case
I
have
not
okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,.
B
A
B
S
J
C
O
I
am
not
part
of
the
ownership
of
Franklin
Manor,
but
I
do
consult
with
them
in
that
particular
portion.
I
am
part
of
the
investment
group
that
is
Osteria
male
Whaley
and
soon
to
be
one
other
venue
that
we
can't
talk
about.
Yet
what
I
can't
assure
you
now
and
since
I've
been
a
part
of
the
last
statement
that
was
given
by
the
city
or
the
last
notification
in
November
that
we
have
been
working
diligently
to
make
those
changes
that
are
required
to
actually
comply.
I,
like.
O
You
guys
can
expect
from
the
Franklin
manor.
I
will
do
everything
in
my
power
to
make
sure
that
happens
along
with
the
landlord's,
so
that
it
can
remain
a
viable
entity
and
a
good
part
of
the
city
of
Tampa,
because
I
believe
even
under
a
new
format,
which
is
already
changing
that
it
can
be
an
exemplary
part
of
what
we're
already
doing
for
down.
For
that
part
of
downtown
Tampa
and
making
a
destination
point.
D
L
O
Franklin
banner
was
put
together
on
two
years
of
begging
for
money
at
coffee
shops.
We
built
it
with
a
shoestring
budget.
I
am
NOT
from
a
family
with
money
and
that's
all
we
had
and
now.
Luckily,
the
little
bit
of
success
has
its
jot
on
the
celebrity
chef,
Fabio
Viviani
and
we're
opening
these
other
concepts.
A
lot
was
said
today
about
the
sound
of
shoe
and
boards
and
and
experts
and
etc,
etc.
If
we
had
another
five
hours,
you'd
hear
a
lot
more
of
how
we
have
hired
a
expert.
O
O
I'm
sorry
to
fix
the
outside
there
and
you
asked
what
we're
gonna
do
above
and
beyond.
Well
all
the
large
speakers
are
down
completely
there's
only
going
to
be
small
speakers
inside
those
cabanas
which
were
also
on
that
site
plan,
which
we've
also
had
built
in
about
two
weeks.
Somehow
and
like
Kathryn,
said
really,
it's
just
a
foam
board
issue
and
I
think
we'll
be
in
full
compliance,
so
I
urge.
Hopefully
we
can
work
for
the
city
and
they
could
do
a
site
visit
and
we
can
revenue
this
probably
within
fourteen
days.
C
We
realized
the
notes
on
that.
2011
site
plan
are
not
the
most
artfully
crafted
and
they
leave
a
lot
of
ambiguity.
Again.
We
had
foam
decorative
paneling
I
think
these
are
some
of
the
things
that
we
can
talk
about
with
city
staff.
If
we're
given
the
time
to
do
so,
make
sure
again
we're
on
the
same
page.
C
C
C
C
Committed
and
have
spent
a
lot
of
money
on
a
noise
expert
to
get
themselves
in
that
place,
and
you've
heard
that
there
were
calls
posed
to
November
when
a
lot
of
these
changes
took
place.
There
been
no
citations
since
that
point,
so
I
think
you're,
seeing
the
commitment,
but
we're
just
kind
of
I
think
we're
at
the
final
stages
of
getting
the
site
in
a
place
where
the
city
agrees
that
were
compliant
with
a
site
plan.
D
C
M
Julie
and
I
think
mr.
hardy
said
all
of
the
rebuttal
that
we
need
at
this
point
in
time
and
I
think
proceeding
forward
with
the
knowledge
that
both
owners
of
the
property
are
also
going
to
be
doing
the
best
they
can
to
assure
compliance
with
the
site
plan.
I
think
should
give
counsel
some
comfort
because
they
have
been
trying
to
do
that.
Thank
you.
D
E
B
E
E
E
B
Q
E
Watch
with
great,
but
here
here
and
some
actions
have
been
taken
to
correct
the
violation
since
then,
and
any
previous
felony
violations.
But
what
I
want
to
say
is
one
of
the
owners
came
up
and
said
in
fourteen
days.
They
can
correct
all
this
so
in
two
weeks.
I
would
propose
that
in
two
weeks
everything
is
corrected
and
I
want
to
know.
If
there's
any
noise
violation
in
the
in
between
now
and
or
I
suggest
that
we
find
out
about
that
in
between
now
and
those
two
weeks.
B
Here's
that
here's,
the
thing
counseling
there's
more
can
come
up
and
and
and
to
chime
counsel.
You
have
made
a
determination
that
they
are
in
violation
today
right
if
you
wish
to
have
a
period
of
time
for
them
to
do
whatever
they
wish
to
do,
whatever
insist
that
they
may
give
to
you
to
allow
them
to
come
back
at
a
continued
public
hearing
for
the
purposes
of
addressing
number
two,
the
second
part,
which
would
in
fact
be
the
penalty
phase.
B
I
E
E
That's
all
I
gotta
say
is
that
you
know
I,
don't
see
why
there
has
to
be
a
suspension
up
to
its
0
to
a
max
of
30
days,
I'm
saying
zero
suspension,
but
you
have
two
weeks
to
come
back
to
us,
which
is
what
one
of
the
owners
said
they
need
and
I
think
the
owners
of
the
property
are
gonna.
Hammer
on
this
I
feel
that
so
yes,
sir,
am
I,
saying
something.
No.
B
No,
no,
the
thought
the
thought
Council
is
with
this
continuance.
You
do
not
have
to
make
any
action
whatsoever.
You
cannot
decide
today
what
what
your,
what
your
penalty
will
be
at
the
time
you
come
back,
you
can
hear
additional
evidence
or
additional
facts.
The
staff
can
give
you
a
report.
What,
if
two
weeks
is
a
sufficient
time?
That
was
my,
in
other
words,
leave
that
whole
section
in
abeyance.
Okay,
until
you
have
the
facts
necessary
to
determine
number
two.
E
That's
what
I
was
getting
at,
because
somebody
said
suspension
and
I
said
yeah
well,
we'll
determine
that
in
two
weeks,
what
we're
going
to
do?
If,
if
anything
at
that
point,
if
we're
not
satisfied
with
our
staff
and
and
the
we
don't
have
any
more
noise
of
violations
or
whatever
it
is,
that
comes
to
us
in
two
weeks,
March.
Seventh,
to
return!
That's
my
motion
and.
E
F
O
F
You
know
I
think,
and
this
is
for
me
there
are
two
choices
once
the
choice
that
you've
chosen
to
come
back
in
two
weeks,
but
I
think
that
maybe
it's
part
of
the
motion-
and
this
is
just
a
suggestion
and
see
what
you
think-
that
they
cannot
have
any
kind
of
no
sound
at
all,
meaning
they
can't
have
any
kind
of
entertainment
for
the
next
two
weekends
and
come
back
with
the
fix
so
that
we
know
my
point
is:
is
that
I
know
what
he's
gonna
say?
Is
that
you
we're
asking
them
to
do
it?
E
E
F
Think
I
thinkwell
know
that
if
there's
something
but
I
will
say
this
I,
you
know
cuz
I'm,
I'm,
really
more
of
the
along
the
lines
of
that.
We
should
find
the
violation
and
give
them
the
two
weeks.
But
I
am
gonna,
go
with
what
the
council
wants
to
do
and
if
your
motion
passes
or
we
get
enough
votes
will
go
forward
with
that
and
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
your
suggestion
is
I.
Just
think
that
we
have
the
ultimate
hammer
now
and
I
think
the
only.
E
G
G
E
B
Mr.
chairman
may
I
I
think
it's
important
to
to
recognize
the
fact
that,
when
you're
presented
with
a
site
plan,
you
have
the
ability
to
place
conditions
on
the
site
plan
to
mitigate
adverse
impacts.
In
this
case,
when
you're
talking
about
the
speakers
and
you're
talking
about
the
phone,
the
purpose
was
not
to
determine
the
decor
of
this
venue.
It
was
to
address
at
the
time
what
the
council
thought
would
be
adverse
impacts.
B
So
there
is
a
nexus
between
the
noise
issues
that
the
community,
who
heard
testimony
about,
and
the
cures
that
are
being
proposed,
and
that
was
the
cures
that
were
placed
on
the
site
plan
at
the
time
in
order
to
mitigate
adverse
impact.
So
I
understand
what
mr.
Cohen
is
suggesting
that
with
that
nexus
30
days
allows
you
an
opportunity
whether
or
not
what
it's
gonna
end
in
two.
E
E
B
E
I
T
E
A
E
D
D
H
This
is
vacated
vacated
they
purchased,
burying
and
Eunice
is
vacated,
so
the
yellow
areas
are
what
they
want
to
vacate
in
addition
to
what
was
previously
vacated
two
years
ago.
So
we
have
a
picture
of
this
is
channel
side
driving
it.
Everything
is
under
construction
out
there,
so
the
pictures
are
sort
of
limited,
and
this
is
near
the
new
USF
Medical
Center,
your
cell
side
drive
on
the
north
side,
just
east
of
Nebraska
and
drinking
west
of
Nebraska
ambereen
street.
So
the
area
is
completely
under
construction.
At
this
time,
staff
has
no
objections.
H
There's
no
easements
required
Cottard.
We
do
have
one
provision
they're
supposed
to
be
bringing
their
plat
in
for
council
approval
on
three
seven,
and
so
the
second
reading
would
coincide
with
the
plat.
If
there's
any
delay
like
to
the
3:21
date
for
the
plat,
then
we
were
gonna
have
to
move
the
second
reading
of
the
vacation
to
that
date,
but
at
this
time
we're
anticipating
that
they
will
be
ready
to
go
on
three
seven.
O
D
H
D
G
You
very
much
mr.
chair
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance,
vacating
closing
just
continuing
abandoning
right-of-way
located
northwest
of
the
intersection
of
boring
Street
Jefferson
Street
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Hillsborough
County
Florida,
to
see
any
more
fully
describe
exception.
One
here
of
subject
certain
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions
more
particularly
set
forth
here
in
providing
an
effective.
D
H
H
D
D
H
N
H
You,
the
plat,
the
part
that
they're
asking
for
is
here
and
then
it
runs
it
bisected
by
the
North,
South
Valley
and
their
window
the
east-west
alley.
So
these
are
not
landlocked,
so
this
piece
could
be
vacated.
So
the
part
of
the
owners,
property
is
in
red
and
the
portion
of
the
alley
to
be
vacated
is
in
yellow
I
have
a
picture
of
the
property.
H
This
is
the
alley
looking
east
from
Ola.
This
is
the
petitioners
property,
and
then
this
is
this
alley
has
not
been
vacated.
This
is
North
South,
Valley,
looking
north
from
Warren
and
there's
you
see
the
structure
in
an
alley
that
stopped
us
from
including
this
and
the
remaining
forces
of
alley
are
all
blocked
and
I
talked
to
some
of
the
actual
owners
are
here
today
they
may
be
filing
an
application
for
the
rest
of
the
alley,
but
I
told
me
had
to
move
the
shed
out.
So
staff
has
no
objections
to
this
request.
O
L
L
So
we
purchased
a
property
and
trying
to
get
it
cleaned
up
and
get
the
alley
vacated.
So
we
cannot
move
forward.
I
do
I,
do
have.
L
O
O
Q
O
O
D
Q
You
very
much
mr.
chairman
I
have
an
ordinance
vacating,
closing
just
continuing
and
abandoning
a
right-of-way
alleyway
located
south
of
keys
avenues,
north
of
Warren
Avenue,
east
of
Olive,
Avenue
and
west
of
Highland
Avenue
in
Warren
and
key
subdivision,
a
subdivision
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Hillsborough,
County,
Florida,
the
same
being
more
fully
described
in
section
one:
hero
subject
to
certain
easement
reservation,
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions
more
particularly
set
forth
here
in
providing
effect.
A
After
noon
again,
counsel,
Kristen
Mora
legal
department,
as
an
initial
matter
I,
will
bring
up
that
there
was
a
continuance
request
by
a
third
party
on
this
application.
If
counsel
would
like
to
hear
the
continuance
request,
as
well
as
the
applicants
thought
before
we
proceed
with
the
hearing,
its.
L
D
L
L
Not
clear
to
me
that
actually,
the
by
the
way
at
the
same
time,
I
would
say
cuz
I'm
trying
to
be
cooperative,
but
at
the
same
time
we're
the
applicant
I,
don't
know
if
simply
a
person,
that's
of
notice
can
can
I
think
the
City
Council
can
entertain
a
request.
I,
don't
think
it's
necessarily
a
good
precedent.
I!
Don't
really
think
that
standing
by
the
way,
so
I
don't
want
to
I
want
to
give
two
shorter
shrift
to
this
I
mean
that's
we
would
like
to
perceive.
We
noticed
that
we're
ready
to
go.
F
M
Learned
a
lot
from
the
fray
Robinson
I
am
representing
a
third
party
who
lives
behind
the
property
who,
as
I
stated
in
the
letter,
could
not
be
here
today
and
I
do
agree
with
mr.
Sethi.
It's
not
as
a
matter
of
right.
I
did
want
to
make
it
part
of
the
record.
Just
in
case
I
was
something
that
council
wanted
to
consider,
or
the
applicant
wanted
to
consider.
M
A
A
I'll
proceed
again
for
the
record:
Kristin
Mora
legal
department:
this
is
for
property
at
twenty
six,
twenty
and
a
half
north
Dundee
Street.
This
was
a
variance
with
a
sweat
in
front
of
the
variance
review
board
and
it
was
to
increase
the
height
of
events
in
the
front
yard,
from
three
fifths:
six
feet:
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
eight
feet
and
with
the
allowed
encouragement
for
eaves
and
gutters,
the
variance
Review
Board
denied
this
request
unanimously
5-0,
seeing
that
the
hardship
criteria
had
not
been
met.
A
The
as
you
are
familiar
the
criteria
before
you
today
for
the
decision.
This
is
a
de
novo
hearing
and
you
have
the
ability
to
hear
this
under
and
the
criteria
that
you
will
apply
are
the
criteria
found
in
Section
27
80
of
our
code,
the
potential
motions
of
City
Council,
which
are
stated
on
the
handout
that
I
provided.
A
You
are
to
affirm
the
Board's
decision
which
be
to
uphold
the
denial
to
overturn
the
poor
decision
and
approve
the
variance,
and
you
may
also
add
conditions
at
that
time
or
you
could
remand
to
the
board
if
you
feel
that
there's
further
work
that
needs
to
be
done
by
the
Barons
review
board.
Mr.
Eric
cotton
will
provide
the
some
of
the
information.
In
fact,
I'm
on
this
and.
B
D
B
T
T
D
D
L
L
L
We
saw
a
previous
builder
back
in
2017,
sought
a
determination
by
the
Zoning
Administrator
to
be
able
to
let
these
lots,
TB
Holmes,
later
came
in
and
is
building
both
homes,
there's
a
home
existing
now
on
the
other
lot
and
there's
a
home
that
I'll
show,
you
is
almost
completed
a
lot
that
we're
talking
about
today,
but
in
determining
that
the
lot
split
and
by
the
way,
both
Lots
fully
comply
with
the
zoning
rs.75
and
as
far
as
square
footage.
As
far
as
setbacks
know
everything
they
comply.
L
So
that's
like
fully
complying
s
rs.75
sony
watts,
but
as
the
staff
mentioned,
the
Zoning
Administrator,
where
they
looked
at
this
said
historically
this
this
property
is
like
a
prow
of
a
ship
and
that
prow
they
determined,
was
all
going
to
have
a
front
yard,
which
means
a
25-foot
setback.
The
rear,
what
looks
to
be
the
rear
is
considered
a
side
yard.
L
So
that's
seven
feet
so
you
have
25
feet:
wrapping
the
property
in
a
77
foot,
setback
between
this
house
and
the
house
that
they
recently
built
I
submitted
into
the
record
when
we
filed
this
petition.
The
argument
of
a
hardship
which
is
the
hardship
is
this
complies
with
our
75.
It's
a
fully
compliant
lot,
but
at
the
same
time,
because
of
the
Zoning
Administrator
is
determination.
L
The
true
backyard
is
not
a
zoning
back
yard
and
one
more
point:
when
the
city
gave
a
dress
for
this
property,
they
gave
us
a
dress
on
Dundee
Street,
so
the
house
has
to
orient
towards
Dundee.
The
back
of
the
street
is
the
back
of
the
house.
The
natural
back
of
the
house
is
upon
client
circle,
so
the
house
is
oriented
towards
Dundee
and
the
back
of
the
house
is
oriented
toward
Brian
circle
and
I'll
see
you
look
in
some
of
the
pictures
and
I'll
show
them
to
you
now.
L
This
is
what
we're
proposing
and
we
are
proposing
and
we've
put
in
the
record
that
this
would
be.
This
would
have
a
six-foot
fence
would
look
with
we're,
proposing
12-foot
palm
trees
pursuant
to
a
site
plan.
We're
submitting
12
foot
along
the
back
here,
six
feet
just
over
the
fence
here,
the
rest
of
the
property
and
then.
L
L
K
B
O
L
L
There's
a
full
20
foot
setback
so
right
now,
what
we're
looking
for
is
a
variance
to
allow
instead
of
a
three
foot
fence
that
would
be
allowed
in
a
front
front
yard,
to
go
to
six
feet
to
provide
basically
a
buffer
for
the
abutting
property
owner
and
provide
the
family
that
will
live
here.
Some
some
ability
to
have
some
privacy
to
play
in
their
backyard
or
the
kids.
Obviously,
so
here's
the
pool
that's
being
proposed.
Here's
the
12-foot
palm
trees.
That
would
go
here,
there's
a
key
down
here
and
then
the
six
foot
palms.
L
Really
from
our
perspective,
this
is
a
pretty
straightforward
request.
There's
gonna
be
a
family
here,
located
pretty
pretty
soon
after
this
we
proceed
with
this.
Where
I
have
a
couple,
little
kids,
they're
gonna
out
then
play
this
is
gonna,
be
their
backyard.
We're
basically
asking
for,
like
everyone
in
wants
in
Florida,
have
a
small,
reasonable
pool
in
their
backyard.
We
did
just
as
a
couple
comments
the
house
that
was
here
before
there
was
one
house
that
had
a
very
large
pool
page.
There
was
some
discussion
of
the
variance
review
board
about
a
pool
cage.
L
There
will
be
no
pool
cage.
This
will
be
out
in
the
open.
We
did
there's
about
five
homes
by
the
way
in
Sunset.
Park
there's
also
are
orientated
houses.
There's
a
number
of
pools
on
the
side.
Yards
is
not
necessarily
unique
to
the
neighborhood
and
unless
there's
any
questions,
what
came
up
one
last
comment:
what
came
up
the
Rams
review
board
was
and
I
did
not.
I
did
not
conduct
that,
but
when
I
reviewed
the
record,
a
lot
of
it
was
discussion
about
split
of
this
lot.
L
M
Julie
Mandeville
welcome
McRae,
Robinson
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
mr.
and
mrs.
Jeffrey
passcard,
who
lived
directly
behind
the
property
and
our
have
been
involved
in
this
process
through
the
variance
with
the
board
and
did
submit
evidence
and
testimony
at
the
variance
review
board.
As
I
said,
they
could
not
be
here
that
pre-planned
trip.
So
all
the
evidence
that's
on
the
DVD
would
be
considered
evidence
for
you
to
consider
as
part
of
this
hearing.
M
M
However,
she
makes
two
notes
in
this
and
I
think
they're
both
important
the
the
second
one
is
number
nine
is
relating
to
the
idea
that
both
North,
Dundee
and
South
Pointe
circle
are
intended
to
be
treated
as
front
yards
for
the
purposes
of
orienting
the
house
and
is
for
the
purposes
of
constructing
the
house
and
any
parts
of
the
house,
such
as
a
pool
or
or
those
kinds
of
things.
So
that
was
inherent
in
the
approval.
The
second
and
I
think
this
is
just
as
important,
because
the.
M
Why
the
why
one
of
the
reasons
why
that
would
have
been
part
of
her
consideration
is
the
Oh
number
set
number
eight
Sunset
Park
subdivision
dedicated
a
30
foot
front,
building
setback
while
the
city
does
not
in
for
deep
restrictions.
You
need
to
be
aware
that
this
existed.
This
restriction
exists
and
there's
some
background
as
to
why
that
that
particular
provision
is
within
this
approval.
That
being
said
per
plaque,
not
just
per
city
of
Tampa
code,
the
proof
lack
this
was
always
intended
to
be
treated
as
front
yard.
M
It
was
not
intended
to
have
any
buildings
as
part
of
that
front
yard
area,
and
that
is
something
over
and
beyond
what
was
it
in
the
city
code
now
I
will
say
to
you.
This
is
not
something
the
city
has
the
right
to
enforce.
That
being
said,
the
property
owner
was
well
aware
of
these
conditions,
and
here
is
where
the
self-created
hardship
unfortunately
comes
into
place.
When
this
particular
developer
went
to
go
ahead
and
develop
this
property,
he
did
not.
They
do
not
ask
for
this
variance
prior
to
construction
of
their
house.
M
This
way,
certainly
they
had
the
right
to
do
it
this
way,
but
it
certainly
puts
my
clients
in
the
position
of
having
no
ability
to
have
any
say
as
to
what
may
or
may
not
happen,
because
they've
already
constructed
the
house,
not
to
mention
the
fact
that
there's
no
opportunities
to
move
the
house
to
move
this
around
to
maybe
create
more
of
a
buffer.
So,
unfortunately,
that
is,
in
my
opinion,
definition
of
a
self
created
hardship.
M
That
being
said,
they
built
the
house
and
then
came
and
asked
for
the
pool
and
I
think
that
in
and
of
itself
was
the
self
created,
hardship
that
forced
them
to
push
the
pool
and
their
fence
is
far
back
to
the
street
as
possible.
Not
only
that
it
interfere
intercedes
within
that
setback
of
the
the
city,
but
is
also
wholly
and
completely
within
the
building
setback.
M
F
I
F
F
M
F
L
L
And
I
full
disclosure
here
is
Julia's
clients
house
it's
right
across
there's,
no
we're
not
we're
not
debating
that
and
I'll
be
totally
understand
it.
So
just
a
couple
comments
first
points:
a
self-created
hardship,
I
mean
there
was
I,
will
point
out
that
the
Julia's
client
also
had
when
they
moved
in
1990.
There
was
one
house
on
the
Lots
early
2000.
They
built
their
house
sold
the
house
next
door.
They
had
every
right
to
do
that,
every
right
to
do
that,
but
they
increase
the
density
by
two
homes
in
the
neighborhood
we
hit
ever.
L
Actually,
the
previous
developer
builder
had
every
right
to
ask
for
this
lot
split.
It
complies
with
RS
60
75,
the
issue
and
I
don't
deny
it.
Is
this
front
yard
that
that
totally
envelops
the
property
we
didn't
create
a
self
hardship?
That
is
the
hardship
that
no
one
else
has
it's
a
complying
lot
that
you
don't
have
a
back
yard.
L
Basically,
so,
and
and
what's
what
will
happen
here
is
what's
the
reality,
there's
gonna
be
a
six-foot
fence
rather
than
a
three-foot
fence
in
a
pool,
so
there's
gonna
be
a
pool,
but
in
the
end
this
is
gonna
be
their
backyard.
This
is
where
they're
gonna
have
barbecues.
This
is
where
they
going
to
have
family
functions.
L
Yes,
there's
a
builder
here,
but
at
some
point
there's
going
to
be
a
family
there
and
I.
Think
it's
fair
to
look
at
that
family.
That
will
live
there
and
say
what
harm
is
it
to
have
a
six-foot
fence
rather
than
the
three-foot
fence,
a
reasonable
pool
in
what
is
basically
their
backyard?
So
you
know,
and
by
the
way
when
we
when
Julia
pointed
out
you're
right,
the
house
was
built
within
the
footprint
that
they
could
build
it
in.
L
They
had
to
build
it
in
there,
but
the
the
enforcement
of
that
30
foot
would
not
apply
to
the
pool
so
again
in
the.
If
you
approve
this
I
think
in
the
end,
is
it
really
gonna
affect
the
property
owner?
That's
across
the
street
looking
at
a
six-foot
fence
rather
than
three
foot
density,
and
we
would
commit-
and
if
you
approve
this,
which
we
appreciate
to
put
in
approval
of
the
site
plan,
we
submitted
committing
us
to
put
those
palm
trees
in.
We
certainly
want
to
follow
up
with
any
mobile.
We
appreciate
your
consideration.
E
Yes,
I
came
out
because
I
looked
at
the
lot
and
this
is
exactly
the
lot
that
I
have
in
Beach
Park.
That's
not
that
lot,
but
one
side
was
the
deal.
The
other
side
was
Royal
Palm
way
and
the
other
side
was
West.
Shore
and
I
was
told
by
the
city
that
I
had
no
backyard
and
I
couldn't
have
put
up
a
six
I
put
up
8-foot
hedges
around
the
entire
property
that
I
could
do
landscaping.
When
I
see
this
I
understand
the
dilemma:
I
understand
it
because
I
went
through
it.
L
J
L
L
E
L
E
E
F
E
I
K
I'm,
sorry
I
don't
realize
we
were
on
62
Rebecca
hurt
legal
apartment.
I'm
here
for
item
62.
The
property
owner
had
previously
requested
to
continue
and
on
this
item
it
is
not
a
de
novo
hearing,
and
yesterday
he
withdrew
his
request
to
continue
it's
based
upon
the
fact
that
the
other
party
did
not
file
any
exceptions
or
request
for
all
oral
argument.
I
do
have
some
sample
nation's
for
you
and
I'd
like
to
just
run
through
the
process
and
explain
to
you
where
we
are.
P
K
You
again
Rebecca
Kurt
legal
apartment.
The
underlying
decision
on
this
was
a
request
for
a
design
exception.
That
was
a
design
exception
to
so
it
was
noticed
to
the
neighbors
to
allow
stairs
to
encroach
into
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
20
point
four
feet
that
was
approved
by
the
Zoning
Administrator.
Since
it
was
noticed,
the
neighbor
had
the
opportunity
to
challenge
that.
As
you
know,
because
you
hear
these
all
the
time.
K
A
design
exception
typically
goes
to
you
for
de
novo
hearing
the
neighbor
chose
to
go
to
the
hearing
officer
and
have
the
de
novo
hearing
in
front
of
the
hearing
officer.
So
this
is
not
a
de
novo
hearing.
You
have
the
recommended
order
from
the
hearing
officer
to
base
your
final
decision
on
the
hearing
officer
in
this
case
recommended
that
City
Council
uphold
the
zoning
administrator's
approval
of
the
design
exception.
K
I
do
want
to
tell
you
that
the
neighbor
was
here
this
morning
and
I
spoke
with
her,
and
she
told
me
that
she
did
not
file
for
all
argument
or
exceptions,
because
she
did
not
feel
she
got
her
information
in
time.
What
I
told
her
is
what
I
was
going
to
tell
you,
because
I
don't
provide
people
legal
advice,
but
I
told
her.
K
My
advice
to
city
council
was
that
objection
needed
to
be
made
before
the
deadline
to
file
the
to
file
for
the
exception
in
the
oral
argument
it
couldn't
be
raised
at
this
late
date.
She
left
I
told
her.
She
does
not
have
to
leave.
She
told
me
she
understood
that
and
was
not
leaving
and
would
not
tell
anyone
that
I
told
her
to
leave,
but
she
is
not
here
and
I
think
she
would
agree
with
that.
We
had
a
I
think
a
clear
understanding
of
that.
K
That
being
said
again,
this
is
not
a
de
novo
hearing.
City
Council
has
the
ability
to
open
it
up
only
on
a
limited
basis
under
the
code.
If
you
find
an
ambiguity
in
the
record
there,
so
where
we
are,
is
we
had
an
approval
by
the
Zoning
Administrator?
You
have
a
recommended
order
that
you
uphold
that
approval
for
the
design
exception.
There
were
no
exceptions
and
no
requests
for
oral
argument
filed
and
at
this
point
it
is
City.
K
T
It
was
about
the
skateboard
structure
and
whether
or
not
what
kind
of
city
code
you
should
use
to
regulate
such
items.
The
city
Tampa.
We
consider
when
we're
reviewing
that's
correct,
right,
subject
to
existing
a
permitting
process
that,
right
now
the
city
of
Tampa,
has
reviewed
and
approved
a
couple
of
other
skateboard
type
ramps,
and
things
like
that
in
the
city
of
Tampa.
So
we
already
have
a
process
in
place
that
reviews
these
things
and
passes
judgment
on
them.
T
The
one
this
one
here
is
amphitheater
and
Coco
de
Mer,
ironically
in
south
or
in
Seminole
Heights,
and
what
I've
had
to
show
you
here
is
the
initial
thing
that
this
person
did.
He
they
went
through.
They
went
through
the
permitting
process.
They
had
to
go,
come
in
and
get
it
first.
They
had
a
design
exception.
I
put
this
up
here
simply
because
they
had
to
be
there
a
subject
in
the
greater
tat.
Seminole
Heights
areas
is
to
reduce
required.
Setback
from
an
accessory,
which
is
important
to
understand
is
that
we
consider
these
as
accessories.
T
T
One
heck
and
I
just
show
you
this:
all
the
shaded
areas
is
his
ramps.
He
kind
of
walked
round
him
all
over
the
place
and
always
coming
back
in
to
expand
on
that
again.
He
went
through
all
the
zoning
compliance
floodplain
requirements,
wind
load
factors,
everything
that
he
had
to
do
in
the
zoning
code.
He
did
that
now.
So
what
I'm
saying
is
that
this
person
that
has
this
skate
ramp?
T
What
I
also
have
to
show
you
this
one
here
which
you've
seen
this
you
know
they've
got
the
power
point
of
this
particular
one,
and
since
then,
code
enforcement
has
gone
out
cited
them
on
December
of
December
on
February
7th,
for
the
accessory
structure
does
not
meet
the
required
setbacks
from
the
side
yard
of
the
real
property
9.
Ok,
that
was
the
first
citation,
can.
F
T
Okay,
that's
it
I
just
want
to
know
okay
and
then
the
very
next
day
he
went
back
out
again.
Oh
sorry,
the
very
next
day
we
went
back
out
again-
and
he
was
cited
for
building
without
permits
in
essence,
does
that
the
setback
issues
might
be
taken
care
of
very
simply,
but
him
building
without
permits
triggers
a
whole
complete
code
review
and
the
types
of
things
that
they
will
have
to
do
to
turn
in
when
they
turned
in
their
site
plans.
You
know
they're
scheduled
to
go
in
front
of
the
hearing
magistrate.
T
The
magistrate
will
make
them
to
say,
and
these
are
fairly
clear,
but
the
zoning
questions
that
he
has
to
deal
with
in
terms
of
the
designs
for
the
permits
he
put
between
plates
in.
If
he
chooses
to
turn
in
the
permits,
he
gets
a
double
fee
for
the
purpose
for
not
turning
and
permits
in
the
first
place.
These
are
the
questions
you
know
the
property
line
of
the
height,
the
square
footage
e
impervious
area.
We
would
consider
this
and
I've
consulted.
T
This
design
creates
impervious
area
which
will
affect
the
drainage
patterns,
which
will
so
he
they
will
be
required
to
show
how
their
drainage
is
being
taken.
Care
of
over
that
cetera,
might
have
to
put
in
a
swale.
They
might
have
to
do
something
else.
The
other
thing
which
is
interesting,
especially
in
the
building
code.
It's
the
materials
and
fall
protection
which
he
does
not
have.
He
has
this
railing
here
in
here.
He
also
is
required
to
have
it
on
both
ends.
Anytime,
you
build
anything
above
30
inches.
You
have
to
put
fall
protection.
T
It
I
just
built
my
house.
It
was
at
35
inches,
they
maybe
put
in
a
rail
I,
my
porch,
the
other
thing
I
want
to
show
you,
then
the
flood
zone.
We
already
talked
about
that
he's
kind
of
turned
inside
and
sealed
drawings,
because
it
has
structural
engineering
kinds
of
questions.
Wind
load,
strength
load
is
it?
Is
it
hurricane
tied
down
in
this
sense,
I'm
gonna,
say
I'm
guessing,
maybe
not
because
these
here
those
are
bricks
and
it
just
kind
of
sits
on
there
by
its
own
weight.
T
There
are
code
requirements
that
you
require
you
to
tie
down
your
structures,
you're
supposed
to
tie
down
trailers
you're
supposed
to
tie
down
accessory
tool,
sheds
that
they're
over
150
square
feet.
You
have
to
make
them
secure
for
hurricanes.
So
there's
quite
there's
several
several
code
issues
they're
going
to
have
to
comply
with
and
go
through
that
review
after
he
goes
to
the
hearing
magistrate.
Then
he
comes
back
like
I
say
we
have
processes,
code,
review
zoning
review
in
place
to
it
to
address
these
kinds
of
things.
T
In
this
case,
this
person
just
chose
to
not
do
any
of
that.
What
a
surprise
to
you
that
somebody
did
something
without
getting
permits
being
in
Seminole
Heights.
One
of
the
questions
is,
is
that
an
accessory
structure
is
allowed
to
be
up
to
950
square
feet,
it's
impossible
for
us
to
take
any
kind
of
specific
legal
stance
on
how
big
that
thing
is
until
he
turns
in
his
plans.
T
If
he
turns
in
his
plans-
and
he
says
it's
960
square
feet-
it
has
to
meet
principal
structure-
setbacks,
which
is
a
big
push
away
from
the
3
foot,
3
foot.
If
he
says
it's,
it's
not
it's
900
square
feet,
and
then
we
do
it.
We
review
it.
They'll
approve
that.
But
then,
when
my
building
inspectors
go
out,
there
they'll
go
out
there
they'll
get
out
the
tape
measure,
they'll,
look
at
it
and
they'll
make
determination
exactly
how
big
it
is.
T
T
Unfortunately,
we've
never
had
a
chance
to
opine
on
whether
this
thing
could
be
built,
how
it
could
be
built
where
it
needed
to
be
located
and
on
and
on
and
on
because
he
did
not
come
in
as
a
result,
he
ended
up
going
getting
code
violation.
Now
he's
gonna
go
to
the
hearing.
Magistrate
that's
in
this
case
the
larger
picture
is,
and
it's
good
news
from
my
perspective
is
that
we
have
a
process
in
place.
T
Q
Q
F
T
In
the
meantime,
I
know
he
has
been
in
touch
with
TPD
about
the
noise
and
he
that's
my
talk
to
mr.
hatch
and
his
wife
and
he's
been
very
responsive
to
that
in
terms
of
the
noise
things
and
I
understand
about
the
height,
and
that
being
above
that,
if
see
this
looks
to
be
six
feet,
you
know,
if
that's
a
fence,
a
six-foot
fence,
maybe
it's
a
little
bit
bigger.
This
is
pretty
pretty
tall,
so
the
height
of
that
thing
is
gonna
dictate
where
it
has
to
be
located.
T
His
only
relief
will
be
as
if
it
is
so
big
and
I'm
gonna,
say:
I,
don't
know
how
big
it
actually
super.
But
if
it's
a
over
above
what
you're
allowed
there,
it
has
to
meet
the
principal
suction
principle,
structures
setbacks.
It
would
have
to
be
moved
the
other
option
you
could
tear
it
down
to
be
in
complete
compliance,
but,
frankly,
I,
don't
think
the
gentleman
who
owns
a
escape
ramp
is
going
to
do
that,
the
relief
that
he
has
councilman.
T
You
know
you
continue
to
call
TPD
and
TPD
comes
out,
and
you
know
after
they
build
up
a
certain
amount
of
times
with
citations
and
all
that
then
there
starts
to
get
additional
in
increasing
penalties,
I'm
not
completely
familiar
with
all
the
zoning.
For
the
excuse
me,
the
noise
ordinance
works
in
that
regard,
but
I
know
that
there
are
escalating
circumstances
and
that's
why
I
did
encourage
them
to
continue
the
call,
and
they
said
that
they
would.
The
police
said,
according
to
mr.
and
mrs.
T
T
What
they'll
do
is
they'll,
go
back
out
and
look
and
I'm
betting
dollars
to
donuts
that
they're
gonna
still
see
this
park
there
with
everything
there
and
they
may
see
people
sitting
on
the
fence
as
well,
but
didn't
they
say
he
failed.
Then
they'll
go
to
the
hearing
magistrate
one
of
my
staff
members
working
with
code
enforcement,
will
explain
exactly
what
they
saw,
that
they
were
still
in
violation.
The
magistrate
will
hear
that
case
and
then
he
will
issue
or
he
or
she
well.
Is
she
there
they're
ruling
on
what
he
needs
to
do.
T
He
could
start
to
find
them.
She
could
start
a
daily
fine
to
start
running.
You
know
so
many
you
know
hundreds
up
to
a
thousand
dollars.
I
think
you
can
actually
assess
running
on
the
lane
which
he
would
have
to
take
care
of,
or
that
would
continue
to
run
until
and
when
and
if
he
would
come
into
compliance,
but
once
he
has
that
lien
and
that
fine
on
there
the
magistrate
code
enforcement
could
require
them
to
pay
that
fine
all
right,
but
there
you
know
the
big
picture.
T
S
First,
like
to
say
thank
you
to
this
council
for
expediting
this
issue.
Everyone
in
the
city
of
Tampa
has
been
right.
They've
they've,
all
been
very
responsive,
so
I
really
offer
my
sincere
appreciation
for
that,
especially
the
police
department,
who
have
better
things
to
do
than
deal
with
noise
and
privacy
issues
generated
from
half
pipe
structures.
S
The
city
of
Tampa
has
a
minimum
of
three
skate
parks
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
proudly
spent
millions
and
making
that
happen
and
I'm
sure.
One
of
the
many
reasons
that
the
city
of
Tampa
built
these
skate
parks
is
to
avoid
any
residential
conflicts
that
these
structures
are
notorious
for.
I
forgot,
I
haven't
made,
yet
what
the
City
Tampa
failed
to
do
was
develop
specific
ordinances
to
define
residential
skating
and
halfpipe
structures
to
prevent
situations
like
this.
Of
course.
Today
these
structures
are
becoming
mainstream
and
more
will
be
built.
S
S
This
isn't
kids
on
this.
This
is
adults
on
this
structure.
I
have
measured
decibel
readings
as
100
as
115
decibels
on
my
property
line.
I
can
hear
it
inside
my
home
and
no
one
in
their
right
mind.
If
I
had
a
son,
my
house
would
want
to
buy
my
house,
my
neighbor
that
built
the
structure
has
been
cited.
D
S
S
Furthermore,
should
the
city
develop
ordinances,
these
ordinances,
to
address
these
structures,
I
know
that
they
cannot
make
them
retroactive
to
effect.
My
situation,
so
I
asked
today
from
the
city-
and
this
can
be
done
in
a
short
amount
of
time-
is
to
put
a
stay
on
the
issuance
of
any
permits
for
halfpipe
or
skating
structures
and
any
other
name
item
that
these
items
may
fall
under
until
they
can
develop
equitable
ordinances
for
all
the
citizens
of
Tampa.
D
F
F
T
F
Just
I'm
always
suspicious
when
somebody
puts
that
much
money
and
effort
into
putting
something
in
their
backyard,
and
you
know
that
is
not
a
cheap
thing
to
put
up.
You
know
the
kind
of
boards
you
have
to
put
up
there,
all
that
other
stuff.
It's
not
an
inexpensive
thing,
especially
people
using
it
quite
a
bit.
So
just
curiosity,
because
you
know
that
might
be
a
violation.
Also
I
don't
know:
okay,
okay,.
D
G
K
K
D
H
In
the
state
legislature
for
the
session
that
starts
March
5th,
it
would
incorporate
some
baby-changing
table
requirements
into
the
Florida
Building
Code.
It
has
a
companion
bill
which
is
identical,
which
is
why
I
only
gave
you
one
bill
that
was
filed
in
the
house.
That's
House
bill,
927
I
have
language
within
the
draft
ordinance
that
I
provided
to
you.
That
would
address
any
preemption
or
Building
Code
changes.
H
So,
as
you
know,
we
can't
know
what
that
bill
will
look
like
in
the
state
legislature.
It
may
not
go
very
far.
It
may
be
changed
radically
if
it
does
proceed,
so
it
would
be
appropriate
for
you,
if
you
decided
at
this
time,
to
wait
to
see
what
happens
to
that
legislation
as
it
moves
through
the
legislature,
but
it
would
also
be
appropriate
for
you
to
decide
to
take
action
here
in
the
city
for
buildings
that
we
own
mr.
chair.
O
Thank
you.
Mr.
chair,
yeah
I
think
it's
good
to
move
forward
on
this.
It's
I
think
it
makes
sense.
This
is
something
that
the
city
of
Tampa
can
take
a
stand
on
on
this
very,
very
important
moral
issue,
I'm
drawn
to
it
for
a
number
of
reasons.
First,
myself,
I'm,
a
father
and
I,
think
that
many
of
us
who
raise
children
who
are
men,
have
had
the
experience
of
going
to
a
restroom,
a
bathroom
and
trying
to
change
your
child.
When
they're,
you
know
an
infant
one
year-old
or
what
have
you
and
having
nothing
there.
O
I
remember
that
happening
to
me
and
that's
why
I
was
drawn
to
this.
This
is
a
very
good
statement
of
fatherhood
that
fathers
matter
and
fathers
have
to
be
a
part
of
their
sons
and
daughters,
lives.
I
think
that's
a
positive
statement
for
the
city
to
make,
and
secondly,
frankly,
it's
offensive
it's
very
very
offensive
to
have
changing
stations
just
in
women's
restrooms
and
not
in
men's
restrooms-
that
that's
a
sentiment
that
we
allegedly
left
behind.
O
This
is
society
4050
years
ago,
and
yet
it's
still
here
so
I
think
this
is
something
that
we
should
move
forward
with.
The
legislature
may
very
well
move
forward
with
their
own
version
of
it.
I
certainly
hope
they
do
I
think
the
the
more
the
better
but
I
think
that
this
is
a
good
ordinance
based
a
stance
of
moral
solidarity
that
city
city
of
Tampa
can
make,
and
it's
a
it's
a
good
statement,
so
I'm,
certainly
supportive
of
it
and
I.
Thank
you
for
your
work.
F
If
I
could
just
make
one
question
real,
quick
and
thank
you
mr.
veer
for
bringing
this
up
and
I
was
looking
at
senator
books
legislation.
It
looks
like,
as
you
mentioned
it,
jives
pretty.
Well
with
it.
It
doesn't
look
like
it's
Pasiphae
thing
about
public
buildings
per
se
and
ours,
and
it
just
deals
with
our
particular
facilities.
Is
that
correct
or
am
I
wrong?
The.
F
H
F
I
can
see
that
the
language
you
jibe
perfectly
with
the
languages,
which
is
good
and
I,
will
tell
you
having
three
sons
and
my
oldest
my
youngest
now
17
years
old.
There
were
times
that
there
were.
There
were
no
changing
tables
anywhere,
not
even
in
some
of
the
women's
bathrooms
and
public
facilities.
So
it's
a
good
idea
and
it's
definitely
something
that
will
be
helpful
for
people
that
are
bringing
children
into.
Thank
you
well,.
O
D
D
O
D
Q
One
item
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
on
April
4th
that
we
allow
10
minutes
at
the
beginning
during
a
ceremonial
activities.
There's
a
group
there's
no
official
name
of
students
from
Sicily,
that's
organized
by
Vince,
Pardo
and
other
people,
and
he
had
asked
that
they
be
given
an
opportunity
just
to
introduce
themselves
and
say
hello,
just
to
see
how
City
Council
is
on
that
morning.
F
D
G
Just
one
item
mr.
chair,
there
was
some
discussion
this
morning
related
to
the
planned
repaving
of
Beibei
and
I
happen
to
be
out
of
the
room
when
the
motion
was
made
related
to
sending
a
letter
to
the
mayor.
I
wanted
to
suggest
that
miss
Duncan
come
to
City
Council
for
a
staff
report
on
March
7th
and
give
us
an
update
on
actually
what
the
status
of
the
project
is.
What
the
proposed
scope
of
the
project
is
and
clear
up,
there's
an
awful
lot
of
confusion
in
the
community
about
what
actually
is
happening.
F
F
I
think
was
a
word
salad
that
we
couldn't
figure
out
so
well
anyway,
tomorrow
I'm,
sorry,
Saturday
I
think
that
most
of
my
colleagues
will
be
at
the
equality
Florida
gala
I
will
not
be
there
with
you.
I
am
going
to
see
Hamilton
and
hopefully
the
words
that
were
in
the
the
music
that
was
from
the
haunt
on
Franklin
is
not
included
in
the
hip-hop
version
of
Hamilton.
So.
F
D
B
B
The
way
it
would
read
would
be
that
City
Council
shall
elect
a
chair,
a
chair,
Pro
Tem,
but
the
first
regular
meeting
on
or
after
May
1st
of
each
year.
However,
in
an
election
year,
City
Council
shall
hold
an
organizational
meeting
for
this
purpose
on
May
1st,
at
a
special
call
meeting
immediately
following
certification
of
the
election
of
City
Council
members
and
taking
the
oath
of
office.
So
it's
the
same
rule
just
in
accordance
with
your
new.
It.