►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 02282019 part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
A
D
D
This
plan
amendment
is
located
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district.
It
is
just
south
of
the
main
University
of
Tampa
campus.
They
have
acquired
property
along
Kennedy.
That
will
be
showing
you
shortly
here
is
that
aerial
again
here
is
the
main
campus.
This
is
Kennedy
coming
in
from
downtown
where
it
does
the
curb
at
Grand
Central
and
then
goes
down
further
west
heading
out
toward
West
Shore.
You've
got
these
are
the
railroad
tracks
that
are
the
at
the
back
of
the
university.
D
This
is
north
Boulevard
running
up
through
the
center
and
then
Casas
up
at
the
northern
part.
The
red
parcels
have
been
acquired
by
the
university
over
years
and
they're,
bringing
in
to
unify
it
under
a
public
quasi
public
land
use,
it
is
privately
initiated
by
the
University,
is
a
regular
amendment,
so
it
does
need
to
be
transmitted
up
to
the
state.
It
is
the
accumulated
parcels.
Equal
of
fifteen
point.
D
Seven:
seven
acres,
there's
three
lines
used
categories:
regional
mixed-use,
100,
the
urban
mixed-use
60
and
there's
some
recreation
open
space
on
there
again
they're,
looking
at
going
to
that
public
semi
public,
we'll
just
take
some
quick
photos
around
the
subject
site.
This
is
the
corner
of
North
Willow,
Avenue
and
West
Kennedy
Boulevard
Kennedy
Boulevard
is
here
on
the
right,
the
railroad
tracks
and
where
willow
minks
are
right
off
the
picture
to
the
left
here.
We're
on
Willow
Avenue
facing
toward
the
main
campus
toward
the
east
Kennedy
would
be
offering
to
the
right.
D
You
can
see
the
lights
of
the
lacrosse
field
and
the
railroad
tracks
are
right
behind
this
parcel
here
here
we're
moving
up
willow.
You
could
see
we're
looking
at
east
across
again
those
railroad
tracks
toward
the
lacrosse
field.
This
parcel
is
part
of
that
plan.
Amendment
then
we're
gonna
go
through
some
of
the
parcels
that
they've
acquired.
This
is
the
intersection
of
West
North,
8th,
Street
and
North
Edison
Avenue.
D
Here
we
have
the
parking
lot
at
North
Boulevard
in
West
Kennedy
that
they've
recently
completed
a
couple
of
years
ago.
Here's
the
Edison
building-
and
this
is
North
Boulevard
again
the
main
part
of
the
campuses
off
on
the
right
there.
Here
we
have
the
future
land
use
map
you
can
see.
The
subject
site
has
those
three
future
land-use
categories:
the
radishes
that
regional
mix
used
100,
that's
the
most
intensive
outside
of
downtown.
The
pink
is
that
urban
mixed-use
60
and
then
there's
that
Recreation
open
space
parcel
again.
D
This
is
Kennedy
willow,
North
Boulevard,
going
through
the
center
there.
Here's
the
future
land
use
map.
If
this
plan
amendment
is
finally
adopted
to
see
all
the
parcels
are
to
that
blue
color,
which
is
that
public
semi
public,
my
abuse
category
over
all
the
existing
maximum
density
that
could
be
considered
for
those
parcels
is
1073
units
or
two
million
one
hundred
fifty
four
thousand
square
feet
of
non-residential
under
the
public
quasi-public.
There
is
no
maximum
Floria
ratio.
It's
guided
by
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern,
so
I
didn't
rezoning
that
would
come
in.
D
We
would
be
looking
at
that
existing
pattern
and
and
that
the
new
pattern
would
need
to
mimic
the
existing
and
again.
This
does
represent
the
appropriate
category
for
churches
and
hospitals,
schools
and
the
university
would
fit
under
that
category.
Your
planners
Commission
found
it
consistent
with
policies
supporting
our
public
uses,
including
colleges
and
universities.
It
does
recognize
that
the
central
planning
district
that
the
university
is
is
in
is
our
main
growth
area
and
also
main
area
for
institutional
uses
and.
D
And
it's
there
are
policies
within
the
complement
talked
about
that
these
uses
need
to
be
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
which
the
Planning
Commission
did
deemed
it's
consistent.
So,
therefore,
our
recommendation
to
you
tonight
is
to
find
18
16
consistent
with
the
type
of
comprehensive
plan.
D
F
Good
evening
Morris
Massey
with
homer
Henderson,
101
East
Kennedy
Boulevard
suite
3700
here
in
camp
on
behalf
of
the
University
of
Tampa.
Mr.
hey
is
described.
The
purpose
of
the
number
three
plane
am
in
that
most
of
the
campus
is
already
public.
Semi
public
has
that
future
land
use
we're
trying
to
bring
the
remainder,
the
campus
parts
and
portions
of
which
have
been
owned
by
the
university
for
several
years
under
the
same
future
land-use
category,
to
help
with
the
redevelopment
of
areas
on
the
campus
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
F
One
last
thing:
one
of
the
parcels
involved
in
this
future
land
use
amendment
is
the
former
location
of
the
Barksdale.
Center
I
spoke
to
you
all
about
that
when
we
were
talking
about
the
dedicated
parks
ordinance
last
week,
I
believe
and
it
and
I
thought
that
there
was
a
motion
made
by
you
all
being
to
ask
legal
to
correct
the
address
because
of
our
CI
centers
down
been
moved
to
Lincoln
Avenue.
If
you
ought
that
when
the
the
action
agenda
came
out,
there
was
no
such
motion
shown
on
the
action
action
agenda.
D
F
E
And
further
clarify
mr.
chairman
members
of
council,
but
currently
because
that
address
has
not
been
changed.
The
marks
they'll
address
with
that
with
with
the
address
that
is
before
council
today
still
shows
in
your
ordinances
section:
16
91
your
list
of
dedicated
parts,
so
that
needs
to
be
corrected
and.
A
G
E
G
A
D
To
sorry
about
that
again
again:
David
Haye
Planning
Commission
staff.
The
next
item
for
your
review
is
1818
a
text
amendment.
So
this
is
another
transmittal
hearing
to
the
Phil
policies,
no
background.
This
was
publicly
initiated
by
you
all
at
Tampa,
City
Council.
Your
motion
directed
the
staff
to
provide
policy
language
on
future
land-use
categories
requested
on
water.
Your
Planning
Commission
staff
has
worked
closely
with
the
staffs
of
EPC
the
legal
department,
the
Port
Authority
and
land
development
to
work
on
this
language
that
we
bring
forward
this
evening.
D
There
are
a
few
areas
that
it
really
focuses
on
it
limits
the
future
land
use
designations
on
surface
waters
to
the
environmentally
sensitive
ESA
land
use
category.
Unless
meeting
certain
requirements,
things
such
as
public
uses
and
things
like
that.
It
prohibits
bill
on
surface
waters
unless
meeting
again
certain
requirements.
Those
are
similar
to
the
ones
listed
previously.
The
language
adds
definitions
for
incidental
fill,
man-made
water
bodies
and
surface
waters,
and
also
modifies
the
existing
definition
of
overriding
public
interest.
D
Planning
Commission
reviewed
the
comprehensive
plan
have
found
that
the
proposed
language
to
add
additional
policy
direction
regarding
the
appropriateness
of
fill
consistent
with
the
adopted
policy
guidance
within
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
Your
Planning
Commission
found
a
number
of
policies
dealing
with
the
protection
of
wetlands
marine
habitat,
natural
areas
on
Lake,
shorelines,
Beach
and
dune
systems,
protections
and
water
quality.
The
proposed
language
will
further
the
protection
of
these
areas.
D
It
will
also
provide
clearer
outcomes
and
expectations
during
any
proposed
future
land
use
and
a
map
amendment
so
based
on
that,
your
recommendation
from
the
Planning
Commission
is
to
find
TAC
PA
1818
consistent
with
the
imagine
2040
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation,
myself,
Shawn
College,
Kristin
Moore
with
city
legal
EPC
staff
is
also
here.
So,
if
you
have
any
questions,
feel
free
to
let
us
know.
Thank
you
very
much
question.
H
I
B
B
D
D
Here
we
have
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site.
Of
course
this
is
Kennedy
Boulevard.
You
have
West
Shore
course.
This
is
West
Shore
Plaza
here
this
is
the
Walgreens
right
at
the
corner
of
Kennedy
and
West
Shore.
This
parcel
is
behind
that,
while
brings
on
north
a
it's
roughly
0.2
acres
in
size,
you
can
see
all
the
commercial
and
then
that's
where
palms
area
has
been
transitioning
more
into
more
of
a
single-family
attached
and
multi-family
neighborhood
again.
This
is
a
privately
initiated,
fine
amendment.
It
is
small-scale
again
approximately
0.2
acres
in
size.
D
D
He
will
have
some
pictures
here,
we're
looking
on
north
from
North,
8th
Street.
The
subject
site
is
over
here
on
the
left.
This
is
the
building
immediately
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site.
It's
a
looks
like
a
house,
but
it's
actually
there's
a
sign
out
front.
It's
an
office
here
we're
on
North,
8th,
Street,
looking
north.
This
is
the
subject
site
here.
You
can
see
the
alley
and
the
townhomes
in
the
back
up
on
north
be
behind
these
trees,
but
you
can
see
the
site
is
currently
vacant
behind
this
fence.
D
D
D
Then
here
we're
looking
west
down
north
a
street.
The
subject
site
is
over
here
on
the
right.
You
can
see
we're
looking
toward
West
Shore
Plaza.
This
is
the
Walgreens
just
to
the
south
of
the
subject
site.
There's
the
Walgreens
again,
looking
more
Southwest
the
Intercontinental.
What's
behind
that
here
we
moved
up
on
the
north
side
of
the
subject
site
we're
looking
east
down
the
alley.
That's
in
the
back!
These
are
the
townhome
that
access
the
alley,
and
this
is
the
subject
site
this
wooded
area
right
on
the
right.
D
There
is
the
back
of
the
subject
site
here
we
have
the
existing
future
land
use
maps,
it's
kind
of
hard
to
see,
but
the
subject
site
and
all
this
brown
is
that
region.
Sorry,
the
residential
35,
the
reddish
color,
that's
to
the
south
and
directly
to
the
west,
is
that
regional,
mixed-use
100
and
then,
as
you
go
east
of
tracks,
it
goes
down
to
a
residential
20
and
it
stays
urban
mixed-use
60
along
portions
of
Kennedy
Boulevard.
D
The
maximum
intensity
and
density
the
density
would
remain
the
same
under
the
residential
35.
A
maximum
of
7
units
can
be
considered.
That
is
the
same
under
the
community
mixed-use
3/5,
the
differences
start
under
the
residential
35.
A
maximum
of
five
thousand
three
hundred
25
square
feet
can
be
considered
that
non-residential
square
footage
would
increase
to
a
maximum
seventeen
thousand
four
hundred
24
square
feet.
One
of
the
other
differences
is
residential
uses
would
be
allowed
in
that
mixed-use
category
under
the
maximum
square
footage
they're
allowed.
Whatever
is
more
beneficial
to
the
applicant.
D
D
We
always
send
these
out
for
agency
reviews.
None
had
any
concerns.
There
was
one
note
just
stating
that
both
Coleman
middle
and
plant
high
school
are
do
not
have
capacity.
At
this
moment,
it
should
be
noted
that
it
is
not
a
concurrency
determination.
A
concurrency
review
will
take
place
prior
to
the
preliminary
plat
or
site
plan
approval.
It's
just
an
informational,
only
comment.
D
Your
Planning
Commission
defined
this
request
consistent
with
a
number
of
comprehensive
plan
policies,
there's
a
policy
language
that
promotes
a
mixture
of
uses,
especially
within
the
city's
employment
centers.
This,
of
course,
has
been
identified
as
the
West
Shore
Business
Center
there's
also
policies
dealing
with
promoting
infill
development,
especially
within
proximity,
transit
and
employment
services.
This
is
right
next
to
West,
Shore
plasm,
so,
based
on
all
that,
your
Planning
Commission
recommends
the
proposed
map
amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
imagined
2040
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
H
The
evening
council
members
Jena
Grimes
with
a
law
firm,
the
hill,
Warren,
Henderson
and
I'm
here
tonight,
representing
zukovsky
USA.
They
are
the
owners
of
the
subject
property
right
now,
as
you
heard
from
David,
it's
currently
got
a
comp
plan,
category
of
are
35
and
it's
got
a
zoning
of
PD
and
the
existing
zoning
for
the
PD
was
approved
back
in
1981.
So
it's
it's
a
fairly
old
rezoning
and
it
allows
a
very
low
intensity
office
use
of
3,000
square
feet.
H
So
we
would
like
to
amend
the
comp
plan
from
the
are
35
to
the
CMU
35
to
allow
us
to
apply
for
a
rezoning
for
a
larger
office
development
there
on
that
site
and,
as
you
know,
if
the
comp
plan
amendment
has
approved,
the
rezoning
would
be
evaluated
for
all
the
specifics
dealing
with
the
access
and
the
buffering
and
and
so
forth.
We
think
the
comp
plan
amendment
is
appropriate
for
a
couple
different
reasons.
H
The
first
reason
is
that
know,
as
David's
noted
that
the
site
is
immediately
adjacent
to
the
rmu
100
comp
plan
category,
which
is
the
area
in
pink
purple.
The
rmu
100
is
the
most
intense
comp
plan
category
that
you
have
in
the
city
other
than
downtown,
and
then
this
subject
parcel
is
our
35.
Well,
the
this,
the
RM,
the
RM,
you
100,
allows
a
3.5,
f
AR,
but
the
current
comp
plan,
category
of
our
35
only
allows
a
point:
sip,
f,
AR,
so
there's
a
big
discrepancy
between
the
F.
H
We
also
think
that
it
is
appropriate
because
it's
consistent
with
the
existing
development
pattern
and
the
uses
and
I
I'm
going
to
use
some
of
David's
pictures
too,
to
show
you
what
I
mean
you
mentioned,
that
it's
some
immediately
adjacent
or
to
the
to
the
east
of
the
of
the
Florida
blue,
and
this
is
standing
right
on
North
a
street
looking
north.
This
is
Florida
blue.
So
you
can
see
it's
parking
right
in
here
and
then
this
is
the
subject
site
so
it'll,
be
this
art
proposed
office
development.
H
If
this
completa
members
approved
will
be
immediately
adjacent
to
a
parking
lot
to
the
south,
so
standing
on
the
site
and
look
himself
you're
looking
at
the
back
of
the
Walgreens
and
then,
as
you
can
see,
that
actually
I've
been
out
there
a
couple
times.
There's
usually,
service
vehicles
and
trucks,
delivery
vehicles
that
kind
of
use
Norv
a
to
service,
some
of
those
uses
and
then,
as
David
showed
you
the
third
side.
H
Also,
this
third
side
of
the
site
is
also
adjacent
to
an
existing
office
development
which
obviously
would
be
compatible
with
what
we're
proposing
and
then
I
just
want
to
point
out
to
the
north
where
they
have.
This
is
an
ally,
we're
looking
east
down
an
alley,
that's
on
the
north
boundary
of
our
site,
but
I
want
to
note
that,
even
though
it
is
residential,
these
are
the
group
backs
of
the
garages
to
the
to
the
residential
units
that
face
north
B
Street.
H
So
it's
gonna
have
very
little
impact,
especially
if
it's
an
office
development
to
those
residential
uses,
as
David
mentioned,
both
the
city
and
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
city
staff
have
recommended
approval
or
no
objection.
He
brought
up
the
comment
about
the
school
concurrency
will
given
that
we're
proposing
to
do
an
office
development,
it's
not
going
to
generate
any
residents
or
any
students
that
would
be
affected
by
the
limitation
or
the
capacity
of
Coleman
and
plants.
So
it's
even
more
appropriate
for
that
reason.
H
B
A
A
B
G
Germany
I
move
on
orders
represented
for
first
reading
consideration
in
order
to
amend
attempt
a
comprehensive
plan
plan.
Future
land
use
map
for
property
generally
located
in
4690
northeast
street
from
residential
are
35,
are
35
to
community
mixed-use
are
35
cm.
You
are
35,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinance
and
confident
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
date.
A
K
A
K
A
A
K
Counsel,
rhymin,
a
steel
and
development
coordination
item
before
use
number
item:
number
five
for
application:
a
b2
1905
the
properties
located
at
two
one:
seven
south
dale
mabry
highway.
The
current
zoning
on
the
property
is
PD
in
the
future
land
use
of
CMU
35.
The
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application,
finds
it
inconsistent
with
applicable
city
of
Tampa
to
land
development
regulations,
if
approved
on
first
reading,
minor
Corrections
to
the
site
plan
will
be
required
before
second
reading.
K
The
petition
before
use,
requesting
a
special
use
approval
to
allow
the
sale
of
alcohol
beverages
for
a
restaurant,
beer,
wine
and
liquor
consumption
on
premises.
There
is
an
act
of
Av
sales
ordinance
which
is
ordinance,
2000,
I'm,
sorry,
2007,
98,
on
the
property
for
a
for
copr
beer,
wine
and
liquor
in
connection
with
the
restaurant.
The
petition
before
you
is
increasing
the
approved
area
by
adding
an
outdoor
area
for
a
B
sales,
rezoning
1896
was
approved
for
all
CG
uses
and
the
restaurant
isn't.
A
previous
restaurant
space
was
before
a
pay
way.
K
The
total
AV
sales
area
is
3321
square
feet
which
contains
three
thousand
eighteen
square
feet.
Indoor
and
three
hundred
and
three
square
feet
outdoor
the
required
parking
for
the
restaurant
is
0.25
spaces
per
person
and
occupancy
per
the
floor
plan
is
132
people
which
requires
33
parking
spaces,
the
required
parking
for
the
entire
site,
276
spaces.
The
property
is
within
a
mixed-use
corridor
village,
and
the
distant
separation
requirement
is
250
feet
from
residential
uses
and
other
a
B
sales
establishments.
Hours
of
operation
are
listed
as
Sunday
through
Wednesday
7:00
a.m.
till
11:00
p.m.
K
and
Thursday
through
Saturday,
7:00
a.m.
to
2:00
a.m.
the
site
plan.
States
a
sales
arrow
sales
area
shall
not
be
located
within
a
parking
or
loading
area
or
space
and
no
outdoor
amplified
sound
after
11
p.m.
also
the
site
plan.
States
all
permits
issued
after
April
1st
2011
shall
be
kept
on
site
copy
of
the
dotted,
ordinance
and
associated
site
plan
for
alcohol
beverage
sales.
K
Land
development
did
find
it
inconsistent
due
to
section
27
132
and
that's
to
reduce
the
required
distance
separation
to
residential
uses
from
250
feet
to
80
feet
and
again,
section
27
132
to
reduce
the
required
distance
separation
to
other
AV
sales
establishments
from
250
feet
to
206
feet.
The
closest
residential
use
is
30,
809,
West,
Platte
Street
its
own
PD,
it's
for
condominiums
and
it's
80
feet
away
and
the
closest
ad
sales
establishment
is
2
to
2
south
Dale
Mabry
its
zone
CG.
It
holds
a
for
Co
PR
and
it's
206
feet
away.
K
K
Near
the
vicinity
map
showing
the
area
and
the
zonings
around
the
property,
this
particular
establishments
on
the
South
corner
of
the
property,
the
top
picture
showing
the
front
of
the
front
of
the
establishment.
This
better
shows
you
the
strip
center.
That's
located
in
top
picture
is
a
side
view
of
the
parking
area.
This
is
to
the
south
of
the
property
and
the
below
pictures.
K
Such
a
top
picture
is
the
rear
of
the
subject
site,
and
this
is
the
west
view
across
dale
mabry
the
site
planet
before
you
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
put
this
up
here.
These
are
the
corrections
that
are
listed
in
the
staff
report
that
would
be
required
between
first
and
second
reading
and
tpd
had
no
objection
to
the
special
use
request.
Staff
is
available
for
any
questions
you
may
have.
A
E
D
B
Good
evening
counsel,
Steve
Michael
any
I'm
representing
Chicho
cally,
was
the
petitioner
here
for
2017
south
dale
mabry.
If
you
recall
a
couple
of
months
ago,
the
the
rezoning
application
proceeded.
This
request
that
straightened
out
a
number
of
other
issues,
including
how
much
parking
was
there
and
what
how
it
was
allocated
to
the
various
establishments.
The
restaurant
is
an
existing
establishment.
It
has
an
alcoholic
beverage
license
and
an
alcoholic
beverage
zoning.
What
it
doesn't
have
is
a
303
square
feet,
patio
for
outside
dining
and
that's
what
we're
changing
to
add
that
on
to
our
application.
B
It
also
it
you
know
we
meet
the
code
regarding
parking,
so
there
are
no
waivers
is
being
requested.
The
establishment,
as
mr.
cohen
has
already
pointed
out,
the
waivers
that
were
being
requested
are
the
existing
waivers
that
were
previously
requested
and
approved
under
the
other
zoning
application
that
exist
now,
so
what
we
have
to
go
back
and
when
we're
changing
the
zoning
repeat
for
the
alcohol,
we
have
to
request
those
waivers
again.
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
It's
a
fairly
straightforward
proposal.
It's
an
existing
restaurant
and
we're
adding
outside
patio
dining.
C
K
C
B
K
Good
evening,
council
rhymin
st
city
tampa
land
development
coordination.
The
item
before
use
item
number
six
application:
a
B
to
1906
located
at
1001,
North
MacDill
avenue
suite
a
the
current
zoning
on
the
property
is
CG
in
the
future.
Land
use
a
CMU
35.
The
development
review
and
applying
staff
has
reviewed
the
application,
finds
it
inconsistent
with
applicable
city
of
Tampa
land
development
regulations.
K
Should
you
approve
for
first
reading,
there
are
minor
Corrections
that
would
be
required
between
before
second
reading,
the
petition
before
use
requesting
a
special
use
approval
to
allow
the
sale
of
alcohol
beverages
for
a
restaurant,
the
earn
wine
consumption
on
premises
only
with
the
proposed
use
of
restaurant,
with
a
retail
sales
convenience
good,
accessory
use.
The
current
act
of
a/b
ordinance
on
the
side
is
ordinance
75
to
9
a
and
it's
for
884
square
feet.
It's
a
to
aps,
which
is
beer
and
wine
package
sales.
K
Only
scientists,
historical
record
shows
the
current
use
on
the
property.
Has
retail
trade
in
the
total
ad
sales
area
is
1591
square
feet?
Indoor
only
required
parking
for
a
restaurant
is
0.25
spaces
for
a
person,
and
the
floor
plan
shows
the
total
occupancy
of
forty
eight
point.
Seven
occupants
requiring
twelve
spaces.
The
remaining
units
in
the
strip
center
require
34
parking
spaces
spaces
which
total
46
required
parking
spaces,
and
the
proposed
site
plan
is
showing
46
provided
parking
spaces.
The
property
is
in
the
West
Tampa
urban
village.
K
In
the
distance,
separate
separation
requirement
is
250
feet
from
a
be
I'm.
Sorry
from
other
AV
sales
establishments
and
the
proposed
hours
of
operation
are
consistent
with
chapter
14,
the
site
plan
states,
a
sales
area
shall
not
be
located
within
a
parking
or
loading
area
or
space
and
all
pair
all
permits
issued
after
April
1st
2011
shall
be
kept
on
site.
A
copy
of
the
adopted,
ordinance
and
associated
site
plan
for
alcohol
beverage
sales.
K
K
Subject:
property
is
outlined
in
red
and
the
specific
suite
days
to
the
north
of
the
property,
the
closest
alcohol
establishment
that
I
was
explaining.
The
staff
report
is
the
property
directly
to
the
north.
This
is
the
front
photo
of
picture
of
the
front
of
the
establishment,
as
well
as
a
backup
photo
showing
the
front
parking
area.
K
This
is
the
neighbor
to
the
north
below
picture
his
neighbor
to
the
that
would
be
the
East
neighbor
to
the
south
and
on
the
top
and
a
view
of
the
West,
there
are
some
minor
corrections
to
the
site
plan
needed
between
first.
The
second
reason
that
are
outlined
in
the
staff
report,
as
well
as
the
the
marked
up
site
plan
and
TPD,
found
this,
but
no
objection
to
the
special
use.
The
staff
is
available
for
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
B
M
Hi
good
evening,
my
name
is
Joyce
rush
on
behalf
of
myself
and
my
wife
Jan
rush,
we
own
the
property
directly
across
the
street,
1000
North
MacDill,
we've
owned
it
since
about
1995
about
eight
years
ago
we
converted
the
building
from
office
going
to
daycare
rezoning
and
it
has
been
operating
as
a
daycare
continuously
since
it
for
about
the
last
eight
years.
The
conversion
from
office
to
daycare
for
a
small
building
is
expensive.
The
rule
of
thumb
is
50%
of
the
value
of
the
building
because
of
the
security
issues
that
have
to
be
addressed.
M
M
We
as
landlords
rent
to
someone
who's
licensed
to
operate
the
daycare.
These
daycares,
this
particular
daycare
specializes
in
VPK
and
younger,
which
means
you
know
four
years
younger
and
we're
concerned
that
we
would
have
a
daycare
so
close
to
the
applicant
here
we're
the
least
we're
described
in
the
papers.
That's
within
a
thousand
feet
we're
actually
about
a
hundred
feet,
we're
looking
across
the
street
at
them,
and
we
see
this
could
be
detrimental
to
the
building
adds
a
daycare
entity.
M
If
you
get
a
reputation
as
being
too
close
to
a
the
wrong
kind
of
alcoholic
consumption
site,
you're
out
of
business
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
would
happen
here,
but
I,
don't
know
it
wouldn't
happen.
And
if
that
happens,
if
the
daycare
licensees
leave,
we've
got
to
pay,
which
would
again
be
more
than
$100,000
to
convert
it
back
to
an
office
I.
Don't
you.
M
A
M
M
M
J
J
O
M
J
Well,
you
know
it
is
kind
of
an
urban
setting
where
they're
at
there's
some
other
safety
issues
that
you
might
think
of
when
you
talk
about
a
daycare
because
they're
on
a
fairly
busy
street
so
and
I
understand
your
point
about
the
place
across
the
street,
but
there's
some
issues
you
know
in
terms
of
you
know,
there's
some
other
issues
that
are
there
too,
that
somebody
might
not
want
to
put
their
kids
there.
For
other
reasons,
too
well,.
J
E
K
A
A
M
Have
an
operation
for
you:
they
are
open,
I,
think
they
started,
but
they
start
very
early.
Six
or
seven.
They
run
I.
Think
two
four
or
five
but
I
know
they
also
to
have
the
night
time
service
because
I
happen
to
have
a
grandson
that
where
they
open
up
at
night,
for
parents
who
wanted
to
drop
their
kids
off
and
maybe
go
out
and
maybe
I
don't
know
what
their
closing
but
I
guess.
Nine
or
ten.
A
A
M
G
To
make
a
comment
that
corners
in
the
northwest
corner
and
back
and
sometime
back
that
I
was
owned
by
a
police
officer
named
Daniels
and
forget
his
first
name.
Now
he
retired
and
moved
it
was
a
residential
home.
It
was
3:103
and
I
didn't
have
none
of
that
brick
on
the
outside.
It
was
just
common
residents
and
then
somehow
was
resold
back
I
guess
in
the
eighties,
but
before
that
it
was
a
residential
I
think
as
Daniel's
he
was
a
police
officer
and
moved
to
somewhere
in
the
Tarpon
Springs
area.
A
B
I
understand
his
concern
and
I
want
addressing
his
concern.
The
daycare
I
believe
is
a
four
lane
vehicle
in
between
both
properties,
so
I
think
the
daycare
will
be,
you
know
for
them
to
be
able
to
get
to
the
to
the
restaurant
or
any
other
Charles
or
any
person
taking
care
in
the
childcare.
I,
don't
think
will
be
a
any.
You
know
to
cross
our
four
lanes
to
get
to
the
restaurant.
It
should
be
enough
space
and
I
sure
if
I'm
the
right,
flavor
man,
but
also
the
restaurant,
is
a
small
restaurant.
B
K
G
I'll
read
it:
she
where
it
goes,
was
a
German
file,
number
6a,
v,
19
o6
present
an
order
for
first
reconsideration
holding
approval
special
use,
permit
s
for
alcohol
beverage
sales,
Rus
ring
consumption
premise,
only
making
lawful
to
sell
beer
and
wine
at
or
from
a
certain
lot
plot
or
tract
of
land
located
100
one
norm
ideal.
Damn
you
sweet
a
Tampa
Florida,
more
particular
described
in
section
3,
providing
that
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinance
and
conflict
are
repealed.
Repeating
ordinance,
number
75,
29
a
providing
an
effective
date.
A
P
Council
item
number:
seven
is
a
special
use.
This
issue
to
1901
this
is
for
the
properties
located
at
1301
1305
and
1307
North
Jefferson
Street
in
Adel
to
East
Laurel
Street.
The
request
before
you
is
for
air-conditioned
storage.
The
applicant
is
braum
storage,
LLC
being
represented
by
John
Randolph.
We
have
David
Haye
here
with
the
Planning
Commission
I'll.
Let
him
come
up
and
give
his
report,
and
once
he
is
finished,
I'll
come
up
and
make
nothing.
Thank
you.
D
It's
within
proximity
to
transit
center
and
it's
in
the
central
central
business
district
employment
centers
outlined
on
them
on
the
map.
I
have
the
zoomed
out
version.
This
is
the
subject
site
right
in
the
center.
It's
at
the
off-ramp
of
I
275,
just
to
the
west
of
the
Burger
King.
It
is
the
subject
site
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
Site
is
the
designated
intermodal
transit
facility
owned
by
the
state.
Then
you
have
Oakland
Cemetery.
D
This
is
Orange
Avenue
and
that
comes
down
into
downtown.
You
have
perry,
harvey
senior
park
to
the
east,
and
then
you
have
the
greater
Bethel
Missionary
Baptist
Church
to
the
south,
we're
all
kind
of
familiar.
This
is
encore
over
here
and
the
CTV
building.
You
can
see.
That's
the
interstate
right
there.
There
we
have
the
future
land
use
map
the
subject
site
and
all
this
brownish
red
color,
that
is
the
central
business
district
land
use
category
you've
got
some
actual
a
small
pocket
of
this
dark
brown
is
Reza
3
that
continues
up
into
Tampa
Heights.
D
D
The
Planning
Commission
has
looked
at
this
and
under
existing
zoning
regulations,
an
air-conditioned
storage
use
that
is
to
be
located
within
the
central
business
district
has
to
be
located
north
of
Harrison
Street
and
also
be
located
within
a
mixed-use
structure
requiring
residential
uses
and
the
air-conditioned
storage
use
cannot
exceed
40%
of
the
total
building
square
footage.
These
regulations
were
developed
in
part
to
implement
comprehensive
plan
policies
regarding
development
in
the
central
business
district.
The
opposed
developments
overall
square
footage
consists
of
primarily
air-conditioned
storage.
D
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
waive
the
requirement
that
would
require
the
inclusion
of
residential
consisting
of
60
percent
or
greater
of
the
structure.
This
waiver
is
inconsistent
with
comprehensive
plan
policy.
The
area
north
of
Harrison
Street
in
the
central
business
district
is
home
to
the
Marion
Transit
Center
and
is
planned
as
the
location
of
the
future
downtown
intermodal
station.
D
The
central
business
district
is
also
identified
as
a
business
center
in
the
comprehensive
plan
with
specific
policy
language
regarding
the
promotion
of
transit
use
by
encouraging
new
economic
development
to
take
place
in
the
form
and
density
that
supports,
transit,
unquote
and
air-conditioned
storage.
Use
by
its
unique
operating
characteristics
would
typically
not
be
deemed
as
a
use
that
is
supportive
of
transit
usage.
The
comprehensive
plan
supports
a
mixed-use
development
pattern
around
major
transit
stations
that
provide
residential
opportunities
and
would
be
supportive
of
increasing
transit
ridership.
D
The
approval
of
the
proposed
special
use,
that
is
predominantly
storage,
would
be
moving
away
from
the
policy
direction
outlined
in
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
those
policies
are
provided
to
you
and
the
staff
report
based
on
those
considerations.
Planning
Commission
staff
find
Zero's
special
use.
Request
inconsistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
D
A
J
So
let
me
ask
you
a
question:
I
you
mentioned
about
that
being
reserved
for
F
dot,
multimodal
senator
that
one
parcel
that's
next
to
it
right
so,
based
on
everything
that
you're
saying.
Is
that
we're?
We
should
have
a
different
kind
of
development
pattern
there,
because
not
because
only
because
of
that,
but
because
of
other
issues
too,
is
that
it
or.
D
Well,
the
main
focus
out
of
the
policy
language
was
developing
that
uses
around
those
facilities
because
there's
not
only
the
designator
intermodal
but
there's
the
existing
Marion
transit
center.
That's
the
hub
for
heartline
right
so
I'm,
sorry,
I'm,
sorry,
where
the
policy
language
is
specific,
that
to
support
those
transit
and
that
investment
in
those
facilities,
the
city
should
be
providing
uses
that
are
supportive
of
creating
people
that
will
use
the
facilities
and
a
storage
use.
D
J
D
I
mean
there's
right
now.
There
is
an
official,
designation
and
sure
in
the
comp
plan.
I
know
everyone's
working
on
that,
but
this
would
be
probably
the
most
ideal
site
for
one
of
those
Tod
overlays,
due
to
the
investing
the
existing
investment
and
and
what's
anticipated,
with
bright
lines,
arrival
anticipated
arrival
into
Tampa
well.
J
D
It
may,
in
the
future,
be
incorporated
into
other
parcels.
I
know,
F
dot
is
looking
at
the
reconfiguration
of
the
intersection,
there's
different
ways
of
how
that's
gonna
play
out,
so
the
parcel
may
be
all
roadway
in
the
future.
It
may
be
a
part
of
a
much
larger
parcel
if
they're
able
to
reroute
the
roads
during
it.
Thank.
P
Shawn
dock
planning
and
urban
design
Council
there
are
a
few
items
I'd
like
to
review
with
you
regarding
process
with
this
application.
First,
the
requests
before
you
is
especially
used
to
for
the
use
of
an
air
conditioned
storage.
This
property
is
located
in
the
central
business
district
since
it
is
in
the
CBD
prior
to
permitting.
There
are
certain
Design
District
standards
that
must
be
met.
If
those
standards
cannot
be
met,
the
applicant
must
apply
for
design
exceptions
to
those
standards.
P
In
this
case,
through
a
separate
process,
the
applicant
has
a
property
has
applied
for
design
exceptions.
Those
exceptions
will
be
reviewed.
Administrative
ly
by
the
Zoning
Administrator,
those
exceptions
would
be
denied.
The
applicant
will
apply
for
an
appeal
hearing.
So
on
the
site
plan
that
you
have
before
you,
you
will
see
special
use,
waivers
and
design
exceptions.
We
can
only
discuss
the
special
uses
because
we
are
here
tonight
for
the
special
use
case.
The
design
exception
waive
result
on
the
design.
P
Exceptions
are
on
the
site
plan,
because
the
special
use
site
plan
and
the
design
the
design
exception
site
plan
must
be
consistent
for
permitting
purposes
at
the
appeal
hearing.
That
is
the
time
when
we
can
discuss
the
design
and
the
design
exception
elements,
and
that
is
scheduled
to
be
set
around
May
8th.
So
should
council
decide
to
approve
this
application
this
evening.
The
second
reading
should
be
scheduled
in
May
with
that
appeal
hearing.
E
I
I
This
is
an
unusual
process,
because
when
you
hear
a
special
use
process,
the
only
waivers
that
you
can
hear
are
to
the
specific
special
use
criteria.
You
can't
grant
waivers
to
setbacks
or
design
standards
or
write
there.
Anything
like
that.
Sometimes
you
can
through
the
a/b
process
for
parking
only,
but
that's
only
because
it's
actually
also
a
specific
criteria.
So
every
time
you
hear
a
special
use,
it's
only
the
specific
criteria
that
you
can
waive.
If
they
need
anything
else,
they
have
to
go
through
a
special,
a
different
process.
I
This
one
adds
another
layer
of
complications
because
the
because
they
need
some
design
exceptions
for
the
plan
that
they're
proposing.
That
ordinarily
is
not
a
problem,
except
we
don't
grant
design
exceptions
until
a
use
is
approved
and
they
don't
have
to
use
approved.
So
that's
why
we're
in
somewhat
of
a
unique
procedure
here.
This
is
much
like
a
case
you
heard
earlier
at
the
Burger
King
downtown,
so
this
is
a
process
that
you
have
done
before,
but
I
do
want
to
make
it
clear.
I
I
You
had
that
needed
a
design
exception,
I
think
it's
appropriate
to
go
forward
if
City
Council
is
comfortable
with
it,
but
it
does
not
remove
the
burden
from
the
applicant
to
prove
that
the
application
as
they're
presenting
to
you
meets
all
the
typical
general
requirements
for
the
special
uses
process
and
also
since
they're
asking
for
waivers.
The
applicant
also
has
the
burden
to
prove
and
by
waivers
I
mean
the
special
use,
specific
criteria
waivers.
G
G
I
City
Council
I
understand
what
you're
saying
I
might
not
make
the
same
choice
as
the
applicant
tonight,
so
perhaps
we
could
ask
the
applicant
before
we
spend
any
more
of
everyone's
time.
That's
here
tonight,
whether
or
not
they're
willing
to
waive
any
procedural
processes
that
may
come
from
having
any
different
counsel
here
this
case
they
may
not.
Maybe
they
prefer
a
continuance.
That's
certainly
appropriate
as
well.
C
I
City
Council
I
think
it's
leave
legally
appropriate
for
it
to
go
forward
on
first
reading
tonight
and
have
a
new
City
Council
play.
This
apply
the
same
rules
in
the
second
reading,
but
I
do
understand
what
everyone's
saying
and
I
think
it's
appropriate
that
the
applicant
you
know
gets
on
the
record
that
they
understand
that
and
they
want
to
proceed
and
they're
not
going
to
raise
anything
later
that
we
did
anything
inappropriate
by
having
two
different
councils
here
right.
Q
Good
evening
my
name's
of
council,
john
randolph,
sweet
3,700
bankamerica
flies
on
behalf
of
broom
capital.
I
totally
understand
what
miss
curd
has
been
explaining
and
also
a
miss
dog
has
been
explaining
also
under
the
truck
one
of
the
charters.
The
City
Council
is
the
body
that
passes
on
land-use
matters,
whether
it's
this
seven
members
or
it's
another,
seven
members
that
is
the
risk
of
democracy
and
operating
under
a
city
charter.
So
I
totally
understand
that
we're
prepared
to
go
forward
tonight.
E
And
mr.
chairman,
yes,
City
Council
with
regard
to
this,
the
practical
implications
of
going
forward
tonight
and
then
have
a
at
least
four
new
members
would
be
that
the
second
reading
would
be
and
more
involved
hearing
just
as
it
would
be
tonight.
It
would
be
actually
a
necessity
for
the
new
council
members
to
be
able
to
have
the
benefit
of
the
information,
as
normally
I
spent
a
good
deal
of
time
at
the
first
reading.
E
E
Actually,
you
you
have
actually
on
page
four
and
five:
are
the
27
129
be
on
direct
your
attention
also
to
27
132
and
the
staff
reports,
the
regulations
governing
individual
special
uses,
and
that
is
specific
to
this
case
with
air-conditioned
storage.
So
that
being
said,
I'm
also
going
to
distribute
to
council
the
general
standards
under
section
129
sub,
a
in
addition
to
what
you
already
have
and
also
miss
Kurt,
made
reference
to
the
waiver
criteria
for
a
special
use
on
a
site
plan
controlled
rezoning,
so
I'm
betting,
that
out
to
you.
C
E
C
P
Thank
You
councillor
Shaun,
doc,
planning
and
urban
design
Council.
This
application
has
been
reviewed
by
the
DRC
staff
and
finds
it
inconsistent
with
applicable
city
of
Tampa
land
development
regulations,
site
plan.
Modifications
are
required
to
be
made
between
first
and
second
reading.
I
have
provided
you
with
the
list
of
site
plan
modifications.
This
list
has
also
been
provided
to
the
applicant
and
they
do
agree
to
make
the
requested
changes
between
first
and
second
readings.
The
current
use
on
the
property
is
vacant.
The
proposed
special
use
is
for
air
conditioned
storage.
P
This
project
proposes
an
11
storage
structure
with
the
first
floor
containing
office
and
Lobby
uses
totaling
4410
square
feet.
The
second,
through
10th
floors,
would
contain
the
AC
storage
units
for
a
total
of
eight
hundred
and
eighty
units
containing
113
thousand
four
hundred
and
ninety
nine
square
feet.
The
eleventh
floor
would
contain
the
recreational
facility
use
private
recreational
facility
containing
seven
thousand
three
hundred
36
square
feet.
The
total
building
square
footage
is
125
thousand
two
hundred
and
forty-five
square
feet.
P
There
are
two
special
use
waivers
requested
with
this
project
and
they
are
under
Section
27
132.
The
first
waiver
is
to
allow
mixed-use
project
without
residential
use.
The
second
waiver
is
to
allow
the
AC
storage
used
to
exceed
the
project
square
footage
allowed
from
the
minimum
of
40%
to
91%
in
council
this
site,
as
you're
aware
of
it,
is
a
block
that
has
a
different
shape.
This
is
a
three-sided
block
and
it
is
located
on
the
northeastern
portion
of
the
district,
just
south
of
the
I-275
and
I-4
corridor.
P
The
site
has
Jefferson
Street
to
the
West
Orange
Street
is
south
to
the
end
to
the
east
and
lower
street
is
to
the
south.
The
plan
proposes
vehicular
access
with
ingress
and
egress
points
on
Orange
Street
and
on
Laurel
Street,
there's
ground
level
parking
proposed
with
that
parking
located
on
the
western
portion
of
the
site
and
the
site
is
surrounded
with
the
use
of
Burger
King
to
the
north.
The
drive-in
restaurant
the
park
is
to
the
east,
a
church
uses
to
the
south,
and
the
city's
parking
lot
is
to
the
west
and
council.
P
The
special
use
criteria
under
section
27
132,
the
first
criteria
for
air-conditioned
storage-
states
that
the
use
may
only
be
established
within
a
mixed-use
project
that
contains
at
least
two
uses,
one
of
which
must
be
residential,
and
this
project
does
not
propose
a
residential
component
and
staff
has
concerns
regarding
that,
given
that
the
site
is
a
vacant
site,
the
second
request
for
a
waiver
for
section
27
132,
is
the
cold
stays
for
air.
Conditioned
storage
that
you
shall
not
exceed.
P
This
is
the
property
outlined
in
red
soda
oriented.
This
is
Jefferson
Street.
This
is
foreign
Street,
and
this
is
Laurel,
and
this
isn't
within
CBD
one-
and
this
is
another
view
zoomed
out.
This
is
the
property
outlined
in
red
Jefferson
Street
to
the
West
Orange
Avenue
and
Laurel
Street
is
to
the
south
and
pictures
of
the
site.
Let's
start
at
Scott
and
Jefferson
and
didn't
work
our
way
south.
This
is
located
north
of
the
site.
This
is
the
Burger
King.
P
P
P
This
is
another
view
of
the
park
east
of
the
site
on
Scott.
This
is
looking
south
west
and
then
circling
back
around.
This
is
the
eastern
portion
of
the
site,
and
this
is
that
orange
and
Laurel.
This
is
looking
Northwest
and
you
can
see
the
interstate
in
the
background,
and
that
concludes
our
presentation.
Staff
is
available.
If
you
have
any
questions.
G
M
F
Frank
Smith
I'm,
with
American
Legion
Post,
five
on
the
post
and
district
15th
district,
which
is
Hillsborough
County
chairman
the
American
Legion
oratorical
contest
and
I'd
like
to
thank
the
council
for
this
site
that
believe
it's
about
the
10th
year.
Thanks
to
mr.
Miranda
that
they've
sponsored
honoring
our
contestants,
we
didn't
have
a
lot
of
contestants
this
year,
so
without
any
further
ado,
I'd
like
to
honor
the
ones
that
we
gathered
here,
there's
two
of
the
six
that
participated
in
the
post,
district
and
area
level,
so
the
first
one
we
have
is
Adriana
James
riddle.
F
H
B
F
Okay,
now
we
have,
the
contest
is
that
three
levels-
you're
watering
tonight
raah
during
the
post
level
and
unfortunate.
We
just
had
one
post
contest
this
year
in
our
district,
so
we
had
two
other
people
in
the
contest
and
the
second
level
was
the
district
contest.
We
had
two
people,
our
district
contest
this
year
and
then
the
area
contest
which
is
Hillsboro
Pinellas
and
Polk
County.
We
only
had
three
people
for
that
one.
F
So
the
the
next
one
I'd
like
to
honor
tonight
is
Lance
Lawson
Lance
Lawson
was
sponsored
by
post,
111
and
I
and
Al
Garcia.
Please
come
up
here
with
him.
They
present
this
to
you.
I
was
the
chairman
for
post,
111
and
Lance.
Here
is
a
student
at
Bayshore
Christian
and
he
came
in.
He
came
in
second
at
the
district
level
and
because
the
district
came,
he
could
not
make
the
area
contest.
He
he
came
in
got
the
bronze
medal
at
the
celery
contest.
Go
ahead.
All.
B
F
Okay
and
for
the
record
like
to
just
read
the
names
of
the
other
for
the
other
four
that
were
that
participated
this
year,
I,
don't
believe,
there's
any
parents
here,
no
okay,
the
other
four.
We
had
Sydney
Lomond
who's,
a
senior
at
the
Academy,
the
holy
names.
She
was
the
silver
medal
winner
at
the
post
five
contest.
F
He
comes
from
Winter
Haven,
Florida,
post
eight.
He
was
the
winner
of
the
seventh,
both
both
a
post,
eight
contest,
the
seventh
District
contest
and
the
central
area
contest,
and
he
attends
Auburndale,
high
school
and,
like
I,
say
he'll,
be
going
to
the
department
store
the
contest
next
month.
Thank
you
very
much
for
this
opportunity
for
I
to
say
this.
The
tenth
year
that
we've
been
doing
this
with
the
council
and
we
hope
to
do
it
for
many
more
years
to
come.
B
Q
Q
Come
after
Greg
and
he's
gonna
explain
to
you
some
market
research
that
he's
done
with
air
conditioned
storage
and
the
demand
downtown,
and
then
Jordan
will
also
show
you,
the
elevations
that
architect
have
prepared
of
the
air
conditioned
storage
and
the
private
recreational
facility
that
we
will
have
on
the
top
floor.
You
may
remember:
we
met
with
y'all
back
last
summer
explaining
this
project
and
the
two
waivers
the
two
waivers
were
requesting
this
evening.
Q
O
B
O
B
Q
O
Since
then,
we
met
with
the
United
residents
for
better
neighborhoods
of
Tampa
Bay,
as
well
as
the
jarana,
the
downtown
River
Arts
Neighborhood
Association.
We
met
with
Jason
ball
of
urban
Tampa
Bay
and
we
met
with
Mike
Pei
Anessa
of
drana,
and
we
sourced
feedback
from
them
on
our
current
design
of
the
building.
Neither
had
any
particular
issues
with
the
uses
that
we
were
proposing.
However,
we
did
source
various
feedback
from
them
on
the
aesthetics
of
the
building
and
the
revised
elevations
that
you
have
before
you
tonight
take
into
account
those
suggestions.
O
Q
A
O
O
Additionally,
for
the
for
the
triangular
point,
that's
on
Jefferson
and
orange,
we
have
an
all
glass,
basically
triangular
point
to
enhance
the
architectural
element
when
you're
driving
off
the
highway
into
downtown
Tampa
past
this
facility.
We
think
that
the
design
elements
are
sharp,
they're,
modern
they
fit
in
with
the
design
pattern
of
all
the
other
high-rise
developments
that
are
going
in
downtown.
O
Additionally,
we
hired
a
drone
photographer
to
go
up
to
the
height
of
the
11th
floor
and
take
360
degree
photos
from
that
elevation
and
we
superimpose
those
into
a
rendering
of
the
rooftop
event
space
from
the
top
floor.
So
this
is
what
you
see
here
is
the
outdoor
deck
on
that
rooftop
event,
space
with
the
cemetery
and
in
the
church
there's
great
views
into
the
skyline
of
downtown
Tampa.
O
Q
As
you
can
tell
by
the
last
rendering
we've
showed,
we
wanted
to
make
a
statement
about
downtown
to
the
point
that
it
would
be
similar
to
the
recreational
facility.
That's
on
top
of
the
Beck
building
near
our
mature
works.
Now
we
wanted
people
to
one
day
say:
have
you
been
to
the
new
building
downtown?
It's
the
one
with
the
private
recreational
facility.
On
top,
it's
got
the
beautiful
Western
view
and
we
think
that's
the
statement
that
will
be
made
with
this
project.
The
special
use
criteria
in
the
code
has
been
met
and
several.
Q
Several
standards
and
I'll
summarize
them
for
you
on
your
staff
report
on
page
four,
you
have
to
have
ingress
and
egress
off
street
parking
and
loading
refuse
and
service
areas.
Lighting
utilities,
drainage,
we've,
met
those
standards.
Then
the
standard
for
air
conditioned
storage
downtown
are
as
follows.
On
page
five,
the
first
standard
we're
asking
for
a
waiver
if
it
must
be
two
uses,
one
of
which
must
be
residential.
The
second
standard
is
that
shall
not
exceed
forty
percent
of
the
project
square
footage.
Q
In
other
words,
six
of
ten
floors
must
be
residential
and
we're
asking
for
a
waiver
of
that.
Continuing
the
code
says
the
use
must
be
integrated
with
structural
system
of
the
principal
building.
We've
met
that
standard,
no
customer,
related
business
or
retail
operations,
I'll
be
permitted.
We've
met
that
standard.
The
use
may
be
only
located
in
the
central
business
district
on
property
north
of
Harrison
Street.
We've
met
that
standard
and
that's
important,
because
the
drafters
of
the
code
decided
to
make
a
geographic
limitation
of
air-conditioned
storage
and
they
said
north
of
north
of
Harrison
Street.
Q
We
have
done
that.
We've
met
that
standard.
Second,
the
you
shall
not
be
located
at
ground
level,
except
the
entrance
and
the
loading
functions
and
occur
ground
level.
We've
met
that
standard
on
the
top
of
page
six,
the
storage
of
hazardous
materials,
etc,
etc
is
prohibited.
Obviously,
we've
met
that
standard.
Q
Q
The
code
requires
specially
you
permission.
Excuse
me
procedures
which
apply
in
relation
to
the
use,
occupancy
location,
construction,
design,
character,
scale,
manner
of
operation
for
the
necessity
of
making
complex
or
unusual
determinations,
and
to
ensure
consideration
of
particular
circumstances
in
each
case
and
the
establishment
of
such
conditions
and
safeguards
as
a
reasonably
necessary
for
the
protection
of
the
public
interest
generally
and
of
adjacent
properties,
the
neighborhood
and
the
city
as
a
whole.
That
is
the
intent
of
the
special
use
regulation.
Q
We've
had
no
opposition
from
any
neighbors
on
this
project
and
I'll
submit
to
you
that
in
the
downtown
CBD
district,
these
uses
are
permitted
and
they
are
frequently
found
to
be
special
uses
around
the
city,
congregate
living
facility,
hotels
and
motels
clubs,
place
of
religious
assembly,
alcoholic
beverage
sales.
It
is
your,
is
your
classic
special
use
because
of
all
the
other
exterior
effects
of
alcoholic
beverage
consumption
who
just
had
a
hearing
this
evening
just
before
us
about
alcohol
exposure.
Q
You
you
see,
air-conditioned
storage
is
a
special
use
and
then
Bank
Bank,
drive-in,
heliport,
kennel
medical
marijuana,
dispensary
radio,
TV
station
restaurants
all
are
permitted,
uses
downtown
medical
marijuana,
dispensary
permitted
use
downtown,
however,
there's
been
a
carve
out
downtown
and
the
carve-outs
are
as
follows:
alcoholic
beverage
sales
number
one
number,
two
air-conditioned
stores:
that's
us
and
number
three
restaurant
drive-in,
which
was
the
Burger
King
so
downtown.
There
are
only
three
special
use:
twos
that
come
before
you.
Every
other
special
use
in
the
city
is
a
permitted
use
downtown.
Q
So
you
have
to
ask
yourself
what
public
harm
or
public
safety
issue
where
we
tried
to
regulate
when
we
said
you
have
to
have
residential
and
has
to
be
at
least
40%
I
believe
that
is
an
illogical
control
of
the
use
and
it
makes
no
sense
given
the
map
that
has
been
shown
to
you
as
to
the
existing
development
in
the
neighborhood.
It
is
replete
with
residential
use.
Here's
the
property
right
here,
this
triangular
piece:
it's
only
13,000
square
feet.
The
residential
use
has
taken
care
of
itself
downtown.
Q
What
is
not
taking
care
of
itself
is
when
air
conditioned
storage
and
mr.
feralas
and
his
company
have
made
the
study.
They
have
determined
that
there
is
a
market
demand
for
air
conditioned
storage.
Above
and
beyond
this
artificial
restriction.
That's
in
the
code
and
we're
asking
you
to
approve
a
mixed
use,
which
will
include
this
as
a
adjunct
to
our
property,
to
make
it
a
mixed
use
and
make
it
a
compelling
site
that
people
will
be
proud
about
to
come
to
Tampa
and
we'll
tell
you
about
it.
Q
Q
Page
three
in
the
middle
policy.
Three
point:
one
point:
one:
six
CBD
redevelopment:
this
is
one
third
of
an
acre
should
be
a
mix
of
residential
employment
and
entertainment
uses
with
ground-floor
retail
and
service
uses
at
key
nodes
and
a
long
major
downtown
corridor.
So
I
ask
you
so
where
does
the
air-conditioned
storage
go?
It
goes
north
of
Harrison
Street.
That's
what
the
coach
said
we're
going
there.
We
simply
need
to
simple
waivers
from
you
this
evening
as
to
those
requirements.
Q
I'll
summarize
the
last
sentence
of
the
staff
report
of
the
Planning
Commission
on
page
four
says.
The
approval
of
the
proposed
special
use,
that
is
predominantly
storage,
will
be
moving
away
from
policy
direction
outlined
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
we're
simply
talking
about
14,000
square
feet.
This
will
use
mass
transit
people
come
downtown
to
see
this
facility,
especially
on
the
top
floor.
We
simply
ask
the
chief
for
five
residents
in
the
neighborhood
the
same
benefit
that
others
have.
We
have
a
letter
from
the
residents
of
Franklin
Street
in
which
they
state
dear
city
council.
Q
The
residence
is
a
Franklin
Street
is
a
condominium
association
of
forty
owner-occupied
units
at
the
northern
end
of
downtown.
This
is
immediately
south
of
where
fly'
used
to
be
a
few
blocks
away.
The
project
referenced
above
is
in
close
proximity
to
our
residences
and,
if
approved,
would
directly
impact
our
neighborhood.
Consequently,
the
residents
of
Franklin
Street
condominium
recently
reviewed
the
special
use
site
plan
for
this
facility.
Q
The
board's
opinion
is
that
such
a
facility
would
be
an
asset
to
our
neighborhood
and
residents
due
to
the
significant
need
for
quality
storage
space
in
the
north
end
of
downtown
tampa.
The
planned
meeting
space
on
the
top
floor
would
also
be
a
valued
addition
to
our
neighborhood,
the
residents
of
Franklin
Street
condominium
association,
favors.
The
project
has
put
forth
the
application
and
supports
its
approval,
signed
by
John
Christian
Board
President
as
respectively,
will
quest
to
waiver
of
these
two
items
this
evening
and
approval
of
the
special
site
plan.
J
Q
Believe
it's
narrow,
I
think
it
needs
a
broader
view
of
the
market.
Yes,
you
do
need
transit
and
you
need
transit
facilities,
but
these
talking
about
14,000
square
feet
of
triangular
property,
which
is
on
two
one-way
streets.
The
market
has
tested
this
property
now
and
it
has
not
come
to
the
market
for
any
other
use,
and
this
is
a
natural
use,
I
believe
the
Planning
Commission's.
Finding
of
inconsistency
is
very
narrow-minded.
Q
J
You
think
it's
narrow-minded,
because
the
plan
that
they
have
in
place
now
hasn't
been
changed
to
meet
some
of
the
needs
of
some
of
the
transit
that
might
be
coming
to
to
the
downtown
area.
By
virtue
of,
what's
you
know,
but
by
referendum
mode,
the
other
things
that
are
happening
is
it
possible
that
they
might
need
to
change
their
their
coal
I
mean
their
conference
plan.
I
agree.
Q
J
It
comes
to
Tod
and-
and
you
know,
other
transit
oriented
development
see
you
know
they
have
a
I
guess
they
have
a
a
range
of
different
changes
or
kind
of
a
I.
Don't
I'm
trying
to
think
of
the
word
that
they
use
for
it.
But
it's
like
a
surrounding
area
that
changes
the
entire
area
based
on
the
fact
that
it's
transferring
and
development
there,
meaning
that
a
space,
even
the
size
of
your
clients,
space
could
be
transformed
into
something
other
than
than
storage.
I
mean
that's.
The
idea
behind
Tod
is,
in
my
mind,
right.
Q
J
Q
But
that's
that's
a
market
issue
whether
the
market
will
come
to
the
property
and
want
to
put
it
to
a
Tod
use.
It
has
not
got.
In
fact
the
market
has
come
and
said.
This
is
where
you
put
air,
conditioned,
storage
and
I.
Believe
those
two
criteria
are
waving
or
arbitrary.
What's
the
rationale
Burton
behind
them?
Okay,.
J
Well,
we're
not
you're
looking
to
wave
those
those
those
aspects
so
call
it.
An
arbitrary
is
a
different
argument
for
a
different
time,
so
I
mean,
if
you're
saying
that
you
want
us
to
agree
to
the
waiver,
calling
it
arbitrary
is
not
a
really
good
argument
in
my
mind.
Okay,
so
you've
got
a
can't.
Have
it
both
ways?
Okay,
you
want
us
to
waive
it,
don't
call
it
arbitrary,
because
it's
not
arbitrary.
It's
based
on
our
comprehensive
plan
and
on
our
zoning.
You
know
ordinances.
So,
okay,.
C
C
N
C
And
they
were
not
getting
the
big
dollars
that
they
get
for
these
big
projects,
and
that
was
told
to
us
months
ago.
So
when
they
talk
about
the
residential
component,
I
found
that
interesting,
because
the
numbers
that
you
said
that
are
already
there-
and
you
know
we
had
that
same
now-
the
40
percent,
90
percent
storage-
that
one
that
part
you're
saying
the
market.
What
you're
indicating
is
that
the
market
is
really
requiring
it
or
or
needs
it
wants
it.
C
Same
thing
you
know
and
the
odd
shape
of
the
property
we
had
that
same
argument
with
Burger
King.
Nobody
that
property
was
for
sale
for
years
and
nobody
bought
it
until
Burger
King
came
and
then
we
had
the
Downtown
Partnership
come
in
here
and
say:
that's
not
the
kind
of
restaurant
we
want
downtown
I
said
I'm,
sorry,
but
people
have
to
be
buddy.
C
C
G
Just
an
observation
I'm
not
against
their
fort
I'm,
looking
at
it
as
not
meeting
the
requirement
of
the
residential
component,
I
think
that's
very
important.
Let
me
say
why
this
is
gonna
grow
by
40
percent.
There's
147
people
a
day
moving
into
the
Tampa
area,
I'm,
not
saying
totally
in
Tampa
in
the
ter.
What
that
means
is
that
if
you
go
back
just
15-20
years,
I
think
there
was
600
or
700
people
living
in
downtown
Tampa
I.
G
Think
now
I
forget
what
the
figure
is,
but
it's
about
10
or
12,000,
and
if
I
remember
the
figures
that
I
saw
there
real
quickly.
109
109
hundred
one
thousand
square
foot
of
dwellings
for
residential
use
and
I
believe
was
3500.
One
unit
is
thirty-four
that
would
not
equal
the
expectation
that's
coming
without.
G
Meet
the
needs
of
the
water
and
it's
expanding
water
plant.
The
to
share
a
treatment
plant
does
not
have
to
be
expanded
because
it
has
capacity,
but
it
has
to
be
brought
up
to
technology
standards
to
make
the
costs
of
joint.
We
have
to
do
without
water,
much
safer
and
more
economical
for
the
taxpayers
long-term.
G
N
G
City
and
then
I
come
here
because
we're
elected
at
seven
of
us
in
America.
They
come
here
for
only
two
reasons.
You
know
what
they
are,
there's
only
two
seasons
here,
Christmas
and
summer,
and
that's
how
it
is
so
we
have.
We
have
been
recognized
throughout
the
world
and
what's
coming
now
is
the
seeds
that
were
planted
by
individuals
that
are
no
longer
here
twenty
thirty
forty
years
ago,
and
that's
opened
the
door
to
the
Gateway
to
have
a
wonderful
life,
a
nice
little
look
right.
G
Affordability
not
fashionable
it's
not
what
it
used
to
be
when
you
compared
to
other
cities
in
the
state
of
Florida,
it's
more
acceptable
given
somewhere
else,
and
those
are
the
things
that
I
I'm
not
against
the
project,
but
I
certainly
would
like
to
see
more
residential
anywhere
in
the
city
Tampa,
because
without
this
heart
being
downtown,
the
city
is
not
going
to
well.
This
braids
out,
it's
already
been
sprinting
out,
if
and
I
believe,
all
the
figures
that
were
put
up
IRA.
G
When
you
look
at
the
residential
component,
even
around
bill,
maybe
even
around
the
airport.
There's
all
types
of
residential
units
have
been
built,
multifamily
apartments,
you
name
it.
They
got
it.
When
you
look
at
a
street
when
you
look
at
the
cypress
trees,
when
you
look
at
anything
meeting
in
the
downtown,
the
main
thing
is
residential
and
yes,
they
need.
They
need
areas
to
go
shopping
in,
but
without
mass
of
individuals
living
there.
Those
commercial
business
cannot
make
it.
So,
therefore,
you
have
to
have
the
residential
fertile.
B
C
C
However,
the
reason
that
there's
residential
long
boyscout
and
the
rest
of
it,
because
there
was
zero
residential
and
we
had
50
to
75
70,000
people
coming
into
West
Show
to
work
they
had
nowhere
to
live.
So
we
approved
many
many
many
units
there
in
the
past
since
I've
been
here,
which
is
almost
nine
years,
however
I
do
know,
we
are
looking
at
a
tower.
C
O
Those
7,000
units
are
gonna,
add
another
thirteen
thousand
three
hundred
people,
nearly
doubling
the
population
of
downtown
in
the
near
term,
and
there's
only
one
self
storage
facility
with
less
than
20,000
square
feet
and
Channelside
to
fit
the
need
of
those
people
that
are
going
to
be
moving
in
there
and
last
year
alone,
ages,
20
to
34.
There
was
17
point:
8
million
people
who
moved
across
the
country
and
one
in
three
of
those
people
used
self
storage
as
part
of
their
move.
B
G
O
O
I'm
not
sure
which
projects
are
and
which
aren't
I
just
know
that
as
residential
developer
ourselves,
we
build
townhomes
and
other
single-family.
We're
constantly
trying
to
increase
the
density
with
the
to
overcompensate,
for
the
increasing
cost
of
land
and
development
cost
with
tariffs
and
whatnot.
So
we're
shrinking.
You
know
the
unit's
increasing
the
living
area
and
shrinking
the
storage
space.
J
D
R
Self
storage
is
a
functional
need
of
the
community,
as
Jordan
just
spoke
up,
because
there
are
in
fact,
over
7,000
residential
units
that
are
planned
to
be
built
within
the
next
several
years
here,
of
which
I
have
some
documentation
to
allocate
that
that
is
actually
correct
numbers
and
when
these
are
built
all
within
approximately
one
mile
of
the
site,
those
units
are
going
to
need
self
storage.
Sir,
what
you
asked
the
question
about
whether
self
storage
is
integrated
into
some
of
these
residential
projects?
Yes,
it
is
a
very
minut
amount.
R
G
R
G
R
Sir,
thank
you
very
much.
The
recreation
facility
event
venue
designed
for
the
project
is
a
permitted
use
by
code
as
well
and
will
be
available
to
the
community
for
weddings,
corporate
events
and
more.
The
parking
for
these
events
is
immediately
available
at
the
adjacent
surface
lot
recently
constructed
by
the
city
of
Tampa.
The
property
is
located
within
development
district
north,
which
/
section
27
181
of
the
zoning
code,
provides
the
city
greater
flexibility
regarding
the
use
of
future
developments.
R
This
opens
the
door
for
the
city
and
council
to
allow
self
storage
to
be
combined
with
event
venue
instead
of
the
code
required
mark
multifamily,
which,
as
we
demonstrated
there,
is
a
high
volume
of
multifamily
already
coming
online
and
therefore
there
may
not
be
a
need
for
multifamily
at
this
particular
location
and
to
those
who
oppose
the
project
because
they
prefer
different
use
like
multifamily
or
office
or
hotel.
Please
know
that
I
marketed
this,
this
property
for
since
2014
to
those
groups
without
success.
R
They
simply
don't
want
it,
because
I
can't
get
the
parking
on
a
14,000
square
foot
site
and
those
other
uses
will
require
a
lot
more
parking
than
self
storage
does
to
those
who
oppose
this
project
because
they
prefer
the
city
or
Department
of
Transportation
to
purchase
for
a
future
roadway
expansion
or
in
connection
with
the
future
intermodal
station.
Please
know
that
I
attempted
to
sell
to
both
of
those
entities
as
well.
R
Neither
one
wanted
this
property
I'm,
bringing
it
to
your
attention,
so
City
Council
in
the
general
public
are
aware
that
the
appropriate,
market-driven
use
for
this
irregular-shaped
and
challenging
to
develop
site
is
a
mixed-use
self
storage
building,
and
please
know
that
I
brought
with
me
letters
of
endorsement
that
I
would
like
to
go
and
turn
in
to
City
Council
from
15
different,
individual
and
businesses
that
are
supportive
of
this
project.
Thank
you
very
much.
N
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Liam
Ella
thanks.
You
I
am
here
to
support
the
project,
because
I
sincerely
believe
both
proposed
users
are
in
fact
needs
of
the
community.
In
addition,
I've
been
as
being
a
real
estate
agent,
representing
that
the
the
seller
I
am
his
wife
and
I
can
tell
you
firsthand
that
my
husband
and
I
went
through
exhaustive
efforts
to
design
and
market
this
property
for
numerous
uses.
N
We
began
working
with
before
we
became
broke
working
with
from
capital
potential
buyers
from
multi-family
office
and
hotel
companies
expressed
some
concerns
about
the
size
and
geometry
of
the
site,
but
their
biggest
concern
was
always
parking.
Parking
requirements
for
these
kinds
of
projects
are
significant
and
will
be
need
to
be
address.
Address
off-site
in
hopes
of
resolving
that
parking
issue.
We
had
recommendations
with
multiple
members
of
the
city
and
the
Department
of
Transportation
in
hopes
of
securing
a
long-term
parking
lease.
N
The
city
inform
us
that
they
were
going
to
establish
a
lease
agreement
with
the
OTA
on
July
1st,
to
enable
the
construction
of
a
314
space
surface
lot.
We
attempt
to
get
long-term
lease
agreement
in
place
with
the
city
without
success
on
July
1st
2016
throughout
September's
through
September
September
6
2018.
We
first
spoke
with
the
parking
division
manager,
Charley's
dumb
it
and
then
the
interim
parking
division
manager,
Kelly
Stevens,
without
success
without
parking
uses
like
multifamily
projects
or
hotel
or
offices,
are
simply
not
viable.
N
However,
a
self-storage
project
requires
very
little
parking,
only
one
space,
400
storage
units
and
because
users
of
such
facilities
are
at
the
building
very
infrequently.
This
resulted
it's
self
storage
being
ideal
for
this
size
in
particular.
In
addition,
the
agenda
they
adjacent
lot,
which
the
city
will
not
least
long
term,
is
available
for
short
term
and
therefore
fulfills
the
needs
of
the
event
venue.
In
worst
case
scenario,
people
will
take
the
mass
transit
on
the
way
out
of
the
event
being
given
the
existent
parking
restrictions.
N
B
H
B
Floor,
an
850
square
feet
and
I
do
go
off
premises
and
I
do
have
a
storage
unit
where
I
put
some
of
my
office
signage
and
work
related
items,
boxes,
I
can't
fit
into
my
apartment
there.
We
do
have
storage
in
our
building
on
the
bottom
floor,
but
when
I
moved
in,
they
didn't
have
the
size
I
needed
and
they
wanted
to
charge
me
double
that
I'm
paying
currently
so
I
am
here
to
support
this
project.
M
R
M
Last
meeting
that
we
had
from
the
downtown
CAC
and
the
members,
including
drama
I,
voted
to
not
support
a
manure.
The
residential
and
I've
highlighted
in
there
that
motion
the
channel
district
folks
are
also
concerned
about
it
too,
but
since
they
don't
live
in
this
particular
area,
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
they
did
show
up
when
the
special
use
you
know
initiated
amendment
that
was
prior
to
this
was
you
know
exempt,
and
that
was
denied.
M
Their
concern
is
the
same.
Is
that
they're
concerned
about
we
set
up
these
standards
for
central
business
district
and
channel
district
codes
to
have
these
mixed
uses
in
order
to
achieve
the
community
that
they
envisioned
through
the
redevelopment
process
and
through
their
CRA
plans
and
their
strategic
action
plans.
So
these
being
a
non
contrary
and
I
agree
with
the
Planning
Association
or
the
Planning
Commission
about
it
being
inconsistent,
and
this
group
feels
the
same
way
and
they
have
realtors
on
that
as
well.
A
S
Mr.
chairman
board
members
taught
press
one
three,
three
four
he's
like
weird
animal
oil
to
Palm,
Harbor,
Florida
I'm
here
as
an
agent
for
South
foresight,
storage,
I'm,
handing
a
letter
out
to
you
from
the
Channelside
district
Community
Alliance,
who
is
a
designated
residential,
neighborhood
association
who
note
in
the
letter
they
stand
unanimously
in
opposition
to
this
project,
citing
specifically
the
residential
mixed
concerns
and
the
other
concerns
which
are
being
presented
to
the
city
in
great
respect.
Mr.
grant,
my
friend
mr.
Randolph,
on
the
developers
you
can
have
storage
here.
S
This
is
not
a
yes
or
no,
they
just
don't
want
to
comply
with
the
critical
aspect
of
providing
a
portion
of
residential
on
this
project.
In
fact,
in
our
opinion,
if
you
go
through
a
checklist
of
requirements
through
the
waivers
and
everything
else,
they're
asking
they
all
check,
no
that's
why
you
have
denials
from
the
Zoning
Department.
Then
I
was
from
the
Planning
Commission.
Then
I
was
from
the
transportation
department.
Opposition
from
the
Channelside
district,
which
looking
at
a
google
map,
is
about
the
same
distance
to
the
Franklin
that,
with
respect
mr.
S
Randolph
showed
and
also
from
this,
your
CRA
CRA
representatives.
But
the
all-encompassing
aspect
here
and
critical
factor
is
a
residential
component.
Again
they
can
have
a
residential
component
and
I,
don't
think.
Market
standards
or
market
demands
typically
our
supportive
element,
but
that
is
a
100%
waiver.
Mr.
chairman
board
members
they're
asking
for
virtually
no
residential
when
they
have
to
have
a
majority
of
the
project
as
residential.
S
If
you
look
quickly
on
a
google
map
and
just
google
for
public
storage
in
the
downtown
area,
you
can
quickly
see
that
there's
a
lot
of
storage
facilities
and
you
know
what
they
set
them
up
in
areas
where
you
can
do
complete
storage
and
no
residential
they're
located
in
the
correct
of
what
we
consider
to
be
the
correct
places.
So
I
don't
accept.
As
our
opinion,
we
don't
accept
the
issues
of
market
and
demand.
We
believe
there's
plenty
of
it.
It's
part
of
the
reason
why
I'm
here.
S
When
you
look
at
the
reasons
for
including
a
residential
element,
it's
critical,
because
these
use
has
become
a
dead
space,
no
activity,
so
particularly
in
this
area,
where
it's
planned
to
be
an
environment
or
an
economic
generator
as
a
transportation
center.
In
our
opinions,
the
last
thing
you
want
is
a
huge
dead
area
with
one
I
think
it's
one
percent
of
activity
outside
of
storage,
so
the
great
respect
again
to
the
applicants
and
not
referring
to
the
waivers
which
are
extreme
within
those
cells.
S
C
L
Morning,
Council,
my
name
is
Chris
fella
I
live
in
92
for
1/2
East
11th,
Avenue,
Tampa,
Florida,
3,
3,
6,
o
5
I'm,
a
resident
of
historic
Ybor,
City
I'm.
Also,
president
of
the
Neighborhood
Association.
This
is
really
a
disturbing
project.
I,
definitely
think
that
you
need
to
deny
any
special
use,
I
need,
and
especially
denying
type
of
waiver
attachments.
I.
Think
we're
here
today,
even
though
this
might
be
a
continued
business
to
the
new
council
is
to
make
basically
draw
a
line
in
the
sand
or
what
type
of
development
is
acceptable.
L
Clearly,
you're
heard
from
staff
here
that
this
type
of
development,
the
way
how
it's
being
presented
right
now,
is
not
going
to
meet
the
criteria
of
what
we
are
as
residents
want
as
moving
forward.
It's
not
meeting
the
future
use
of
this
property.
You
probably
could
look
in
the
envision
plan
that
mayor
Buckhorn
ruled
out
I,
don't
think
it's
littered
with
parking
garages.
It
was
just
disturbing
that
there
was
a
comparison
about
Burger
King
as
a
justification
and
that's
and
that's
what
the
heart
and
soul
of
this
issue
is.
L
If
you
guys
approved
something
that
doesn't
really
meet
our
future
use
and
also
there
needs
of
our
downtown
area,
it
just
sets
a
tone
for
other
people
to
follow
on
that
low-quality
type
of
development.
Look
at
what
happened
in
dr.
King
bullet
there.
What's
the
storage
unit
approve
over
there,
there
could
have
been
tremendous
amount
of
opportunities
that
could
have
occurred
in
East,
Tampa
in
terms
of
businesses
and
places
to
live.
We
can
say
the
same
thing
with
North
High
Park.
L
If
you
guys
recall,
there
was
an
approved
parking
storage
unit
over
there
in
the
heart
of
an
area
where
you
have
a
lot
of
families.
You
have
a
lot
of
students
over
there
that
are
seeking
housing.
We
have
thousands
of
people
that
are
lining
up
for
affordable
and
just
journal'
housing
opportunities
and
also
businesses.
We
are
in
a
downtown
area
there's.
This
should
be
no
discussion
at
all
approving,
like
a
storage
unit.
L
If
someone
decides
to
live
in
a
particular
neighborhood,
they
have
bare
faced
with
choices
and
they
have
to
make
certain
sacrifices
for
certain
games.
What
that
means
is
that,
if
you're
living
in
a
downtown
area
you're
going
to
have
a
compact
lifestyle,
the
dryer
is
just
no
other
way
around
that.
So,
while
I
sympathize
that
there
is
a
marketplace
to
have
like
that,
server
can
touch
with
urban
living
and
no
way
that
I
think
anybody
here
is
disputing
that.
L
You
can't
have
storage
units
anywhere,
but
what
we
don't
want
is
any
storage
units
and
prime
real
estate
area,
downtown
Tampa,
I'm
gonna
just
touch
base
in
a
couple
of
things
here.
This
area
is
very
sensitive.
My
father
actually
lives
in
encore.
He's
not
gonna,
find
any
use
for
this
development,
and
just
remember
that
this
area
was
completely
annihilated
disregarded
by
the
city
and
FDOT
I.
L
Think
there's
opportunity
now
that
we
are
moving
forward
to
have
transit
and
better
housing
that
we
can
turn
this
area
around
and
actually
create
a
lot
more
connections
not
only
to
you
Bohr,
but
just
to
everybody
in
their
quality
of
life.
So
just
consider
that
don't
move
forward
with
this
please
thank
you.
F
Somewhat
limited
by
the
oversaturation
of
the
medium
market
right
now,
so
the
more
event
spaces
that
we
have
the
more
jobs
and
creative
professionals
we
allowed
to
come
to
Tampa.
On
a
personal
note,
I'm
a
Tampa
native
I've
lived
here.
My
entire
life
I've
moved
several
times
in
the
last
years,
and
I
think
that
self
storage
is
a
necessary
component
of
apartment
and
moving
from
place
to
place
for
young
people
and
anything
that
can
support
and
encourage
the
residential
growth
of
the
downtown
area
would
be
beneficial
to
the
city
as
a
whole.
Thank
you.
B
And
the
last
item
I
would
address
is
that
we
have
a
a
real
major
concern
right
now
with
the
homeless
population
who
camp
who
camps
out
no
longer
at
the
bus
station.
But
they
camp
out
at
our
church,
which,
therefore,
we
think
that
it
will
also
draw
more
transients
to
the
area
as
well
to
camp
out.
So
we
stand
tonight
to
oppose
the
project
as
put
forth.
T
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Mark
Adams
I
serve
as
chairman
of
the
trustee
board.
Regret
about
the
Missionary
Baptist
Church
I,
just
want
to
you
know,
say
that
I
also
stand
in
opposition
of
this
project
for
just
common-sense
reasons.
We
all
know
how
difficult
it
is
to
move.
You
know,
I
mean
who
wants
to
move
11
floors
with
a
heavy
bed
upstairs
that
doesn't
make
any
sense.
When
the
elevator
goes
out.
T
You
know
it
can
be
a
pain
just
to
simply
move
boxes
and
whatnot,
so
that
alone
doesn't
quite
make
any
sense
to
me
in
my
mind,
also,
if
you
look
at
the
development
around
Tampa,
you
have
enough
rooftop
businesses
that
are
going
on.
You
see
them
all
over
the
skyline.
This
just
be
another
project.
If
you
will
where
you
would
have
another
rooftop
business,
which
in
my
mind,
doesn't
necessarily
add
anything
of
more
value
to
downtown
Tampa,
also
another
concern
that
I
have
too,
as
well
as
the
special
use
on
top
of
the
building
itself.
T
You
know
what's
to
say
that
you
know
these
parties
are
soirees
or
whatever
the
case
may
be.
You
know
they
don't
get
out
of
hand.
You
know
people
throwing
objects
from
the
rooftop
on
to
church
property.
We
already
have
a
problem
with
regards
to
transits.
Like
pastor
said,
you
know
they
trash
the
property
and
I,
don't
see
anyone
you
know
or
has
introduced
a
plan
about.
You
know
the
cleanup
aspect
of
this
operation
and
would
have
been
involved.
T
T
You
know
we've
been
126
years,
and
you
know
this
is
the
first
we've
heard
of
it
in
terms
of
what
this
is
gonna
be
a
proposed
project
for
so
that
alone
is
faced
me
things
just
don't
simply
add
up
and
over
time,
I
think
we
were
made
aware
of
that
too
tonight
you're
voting
for
a
an
air
conditioning
project
for
storage,
but
this
could
change.
You
know
use
over
time.
It
may
be
a
storage
unit.
You
know
one
moment
in
time.
It
may
be
something
else
completely
different
that
would
be
in
conflict
without
with
it.
T
B
M
B
M
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Karla
Saavedra
and
I
live
at
11:08
North
Franklin
Street
I
am
one
block
north
of
Harrison
between
Royal
and
Harrison
Franklin
in
Tampa
Street,
as
a
condo
owner
and
resident
in
downtown.
We
are
in
need
of
quality
air
conditioned
storage,
as
submitted
the
letter.
There
are
content
president.
We
do
endorse
this
project.
This
facility
is
a
half
a
mile
to
the
east
of
our
condo.
As
stated
earlier,
there
is
not
air
conditioned
storage
unit
north
of
Harrison.
M
Additionally,
the
planned
meeting
space
on
the
rooftop
floor
would
be
a
welcome
addition
to
the
area
I
want
to
also
let
you
know:
I
am
as
well
a
member
of
Drona,
which
is
the
downtown
resident.
Neighborhood,
Association
and
I
am
for
this
project.
So
not
everybody
who's,
a
member
of
Drona,
is
against
this.
I
am
for
it
I'm.
Also,
a
professional
organizer
and
I
have
clients
that
live
in
condos
that
are
downtown.
M
That
live
in
my
floor
that
live
in
South,
Tampa,
less
chase
an
air
conditioned
storage
is
always
something
that
we
consider
when
we're
organizing
downsizing
or
relocating
and
I.
Ask
that
you
please
support
this
project
to
move
it
forward
to
help
grow
the
downtown
area,
with
all
the
condo
projects
coming
online
in
those
that
are
online,
like
residents
of
Franklin
Street,
we've
been
there
twelve
and
a
half
years,
and
we
would
love
to
have
air-conditioned
storage
space
north
of
Franklin
Street.
Thank
you,
north
of
Harrison
speed.
I
I
just
wanted
to
set
the
stage
again
of
what
the
legal
parameters
are
for
what
City
Council's
considers,
whether
you
approve
this
application
or
deny
it
we
want
to
be
able
to
legally
defend
it.
The
air,
the
air
conditioned
storage,
I,
wanted
to
make
sure
I
got
the
term
of
art.
Right
is
an
allowable
use
in
this
area.
They
don't
have
to
the
applicant
does
not
have
the
burden
to
prove
a
need
for
it.
I
It
is
not
a
legal
basis
for
denial
or
approval
that
that
there
is
testimony
that
people
feel
there
is
a
need
for
it
or
don't
feel
that
there
is
a
need
for
it,
or
people
would
prefer
in
another
use
in
this
area.
That's
not
a
legal
base
for
approval
or
denial
with
a
the
applicant
does
have
the
burden
with
a
special
use
request.
They
don't
get
it
as
of
right.
They
have
the
burden
to
prove
that
it
meets
your
general
standards
which
have
been
provided
to
you.
I
They
also
have
to
meet
the
specific
standards
which
they
don't
so
they're
asking
for
waivers
the
waivers
they
also
have
the
burden.
Maybe
the
applicant
has
a
burden
to
prove
that
they
meet
the
waivers,
and
that
is
also
back
to
your
general
standard.
So
if
they
meet
the
general
standards
with
the
waivers,
they've
met
their
burden.
But
there
was
a
lot
of
testimony
tonight.
That
I
know
is
very
important
to
the
people
who
came
here
and
has
testified,
but
it's
not
a
legal
basis
for
your.
Q
Q
Q
Q
If
there
ever
was
one
it's
a
mixed
use
which
will
respond
to
market
demand,
we've
met
with
the
Downtown
Partnership.
They
see
a
significant
need
for
the
meeting
space.
This
would
be
a
landmark
site.
It
was.
The
project
is
consistent
with
the
tree
and
landscaping
code.
The
lot
the
lot
size,
the
location,
the
cost
factors
limit
the
uses.
There
are
no
dumpsters
they're
going
to
be
staged
in
the
right-of-way
that
you've
heard
on
other
projects
before
the
ingress
and
egress
is
very
functional.
We
have
no
conflicts
traffic,
it
is
safe.
Q
That
is
not
a
Canyon
effect
with
other
buildings
and
we're
north
of
Harrison.
The
surrounding
uses
are
not
significantly
impacted
by
this
use.
The
apartment
and
town
house
builders
are
building
smaller
units
because
of
development
budget
and
thereby
created
a
demand
for
air
conditioned
storage.
You've
had
repeated
testimony
to
that
effect,
I.
Q
J
And
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
get
this
right,
because
the
way
that
mr.
Burke
had
explained
the
standards
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
so
it
has
to
meet
the
general
standards
and
the
general
standards
that
I
see
here
are
under
27
129,
a
sub,
a
1
used
to
ensure
the
public
health
safety,
general
welfare
and
so
on.
You
left
somebody's.
J
Courses
because
I'm
figuring
it
up
as
we
go
along
here.
Okay,
that
to
the
use,
is
listed
as
a
special
use
and
then
we
get
into
especially
use
nature
of
it
after
it
meets
its
particular
criteria
and
the
general
standards
correct,
so
we're
starting
first
with
general
standard,
and
then
we
start
with
special
use.
Correct
correct
now
the
question
I
have
is
under
that
same
section,
sub
a
4.
J
It
says
that
the
use
is
in
conformity
with
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
and
we
have
a
report
from
from
the
Planning
Commission,
and
it
says
that,
based
on
the
above
considerations,
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
this
proposed
special
use
request
inconsistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
temporary
comprehensive
plan.
Does
that
mean
and
I
just
need
to
ask
this
question
that
it
doesn't
meet
the
general
standard
of
number
4.
J
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
got
that
right,
because
the
the
wording
is
a
little
bit
different.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
there
was
no
semantical
difference
in
terms
of
what
that
means.
So
mr.
Randolph
had
said
that
all
five
of
the
standards
were
met,
but
they're
not
being
based
on
the
report
that
we
got
from
the
Planning
Commission
I,
just
wanna
make
sure
I'm
correct
about
that.
All.
J
J
All
right,
I
just
want
to
make
sure,
because
it
gets
confusing.
When
you
have
a
lawyer,
no
offense
miss
Kirk,
explain
to
you.
What's
the
the
pink
the
general
standards
are
and
then
the
special
use
aspects
of
it
so
I
just
wanna,
make
sure
I
was
right
about
that
in
the
discussion.
Oh
yeah.
Thank
you
appreciate
it.
A
Q
Q
And
you'll
see
and
the
margin
says
section
27,
that's
129
general
standards,
right,
okay
and
then
the
second
line
says
of
the
case.
The
following
considerations
and
standards
shall
apply
generally,
in
addition
to
other
standards
and
requirements
set
forth
concerning
the
class
or
permit
being
considered
and
you'll
see
that
list
ingress
and
egress
off
park
off
street
parking
and
loading
refuse.
J
Q
M
J
J
E
J
D
E
G
J
J
The
recommendation
is
that
it
is
inconsistent
when
the
Planning
Commission
staff
I'm
excuse
me
finding
that
the
special
use
request
is
inconsistent
with
provisions
in
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan,
primarily
the
the
section
saying
that
the
central
Vista
just
excuse
me,
the
40%
of
total
bidding
building
square
footage
had
to
be
could
not
exceed
what
the
total
amount
of
storage
was
going
to
be.
At
this
point,
I
believe
this
project
is
over
ninety
percent
or
ninety
percent,
and
so
it
does
not
meet
the
criteria
under
our
general
comprehensive
plan.
J
In
addition,
under
the
under
subsection
excuse
me,
this
is
under
Section
27
132
sub
a
that
the
project
the
facility,
the
site,
is
hanging
to
say,
I'm,
trying
to
read
this
here
that
there
is
not
a
MIT.
It
does
not
have
at
least
two
uses,
one
of
which
must
be
residential.
That's
not
as
part
of
this
plan
under
sub
B
under
the
same
section
that
what
sub
B
is
where
we
get
the
90%
air
condition,
as
opposed
to
the
40%,
which
is
required
as
part
of
the
standard.
So
that
would
be
my
my
whole
life.