►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council PM 09262019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
D
E
B
Yes,
sir,
thank
you
before
we
prospectively
pass
this
resolution
or
or
vote
it
down.
Does
anybody
here
to
speak
publicly
on
item
number
one?
If
so,
please
come
forward?
B
B
Okay,
we
we're
going
to
have
a
a
walk-on
commendation
for
a
long
long
time,
city
of
tampa
staffer,
who
has
just
done
a
wonderful
job,
yeah.
C
B
Exactly
that's
long
long,
long
long
time
you
know
yeah,
you
know
what
let's
go
ahead
and
do
it.
Do
you
want
to
make
the
the
the
emotion.
B
We
have
a
motion
by
councilman
scott,
who
is
second
by
councilman
good,
all
in
favor
and
the
opposed
is
she
coming.
We
just
wrote
it
on
their
motions,
yeah.
F
B
F
B
H
Good
afternoon
council
members,
david
haye,
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
the
housekeeping
for
tonight
item
number
three
has
been
withdrawn
by
city
legal.
So
that
will
not
be
heard
this
evening
and
item
number
10,
which
is
1907
e,
has
been
continued
to
the
next
plant
amendment
cycle.
So
you
will
see
that
at
a
future
anything
else
that's
it.
B
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
to
remove
item
three.
E
H
B
H
Cycle,
the
planning
commission
has
continued
to
the
next
plan
amendment
cycle,
so
we
don't.
E
B
Have
a
motion
by
council
member
in
the
second
by
councilman
citra,
all
in
favor
aye
any
opposed?
Okay!
Thank
you!
So
much,
sir
okay.
Now
we
move
to
our
ceremonial
sir.
If
you
wish
to
go
forward,
this
is
for
mrs
lorena
hardwick,
who
is
a
hard-working,
dedicated
city
of
tampa
employee
and
a
really
wonderful
asset
to
our
city,
and
she
has
served
councilman
citro
and
before
that,
our
dear
friend
of
the
hard-working
councilman
mike
suarez
go
ahead.
Sir.
F
With
your
permission,
mr
chair
and
council
members,
this
woman
has
known
most
of
you
for
quite
a
long
time.
I
was
lucky
enough
to
gain
her
advice,
her
her
her
expertise
and
just
her
wonderful
friendship
for
these
short
four
months,
and
it
brings
me
ms
hardwick
great.
F
Well,
well,
you
know
miss
hardwick,
with
with
all
the
years
of
dedication
that
you've
given
to
this
city
to
councilman
suarez
to
myself.
We
would
have
to
probably
have
20
of
these
accommodations
to
justify
the
great
work
that
you've
done
for
us,
but
if
I
may,
the
city
of
tampa
council
and
their
staff
are
honored
to
recognize
the
talented,
miss
lorena
hardwick
for
her
many
years
of
dedication
to
the
services
city
of
tampa.
F
F
Thank
you.
Dog
determination
and
attention
to
detail,
have
earned
her
the
respect
of
colleagues
constituents
alike.
During
her
time
at
city
hall,
arena
took
the
reins
of
city
council
budget
advisory
committee,
initiated
painted
payne
street
program.
Excuse
me,
hosted
usf
legislation,
internship
program
and
worked
to
promote,
appreciate,
apprenticeships
city.
Excuse
me
tampa
city
council
and
the
staff
have
been
honored
to
serve
alongside
lorena
for
over
the
last
eight
years.
We
wish
her
well
look
forward
to
seeing
her
extraordinary
future
accomplishments
with
admiration
and
respect.
F
F
A
Hey
susan
hi
good
evening,
honorable
chair
and
members
of
tampa
city
council,
thank
you,
councilman
sitro.
I
really
appreciate
the
honor
and
it
has
been
a
pleasure
to
serve
with
all
of
you
and
with
these
amazing
legislative
aides
and
soon
to
be
legislative
aid.
A
It
really
has
been
an
adventure
since
2004
when
I
started
with
the
city,
it's
started
with
neighborhoods
with
carla
lewis,
national
rest
in
peace,
and
you
know
with
all
the
team
that
we
had
there.
It's
been
such
an
honor
working
with
our
community
working
with
our
neighborhoods.
Many
of
them
are
family.
To
me.
A
A
F
Nothing
but
her
sister's
here,
if
you
look
call
your
sister,
the
only
look
at
how
their
hair
is
and
the
resemblance
so
lorena's
leaving
and
they
have
lorena
for
the
nail
and
liz
now.
L
A
F
You
charlie
well,
thank
you
again
for
everything
you've
done
for
the
city
and
it's
a
pleasure
that
you
gonna
stay
working
in
the
vicinity
with
heart
line.
I
believe.
M
M
Yeah,
thank
you
for
all
your
work
and
thank
you
for
guiding
me
and
all
of
us
newbies
through
the
process
here
and
congratulations,
a
big
next
step
and
I'm
excited
for
you
and
can't
wait
to
see
what
you're
going
to
accomplish.
So.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
sir.
G
And
councilman
well,
it
was.
It
was
a
pleasure
working
with
you
these
last
four
plus
years.
I
think
I
met
you.
Maybe
2011
at
the
beginning,
with
with
councilmember
suarez
and
you've
always
been
very.
You
know
very
polite,
very
easy
to
work
with
very
helpful,
always
answering
any
questions
anytime.
I
needed
anything
so
I
appreciate
it
and
I
wish
you
the
best
of
luck.
Moving
forward
thanks.
Thank.
B
And-
and
I
also
have
here
lorena
a
salute
from
our
mayor-
jane,
castor
and
I'll-
give
it
to
you,
but
essentially
what
this
talks
about
is
your
work
and
your
professionalism,
your
work
in
hispanic
outreach
and-
and
I
think
that
you
know
all
of
this-
is
110.
True.
I've
obviously
gotten
to
know
you
not
just
as
a
city,
council
member,
but
also
through
my
friendship
with
your
former
boss,
mike
suarez.
B
You
know
you
you've
always
been
a
leader
in
this
office
and
I
mean
that
you've
always
been
a
person
that
can
always
be
counted
on
to
do
the
right
thing.
You've
got
people's
backs
and
you
have
good
morals
and
good
character,
you're
a
good
person,
and
I
mean
that
110
and
you
know
I'm
not
just
saying
that,
because
you
know
I
mean
that
you're,
a
very,
very
good
person.
B
Your
professionalism
is
second
to
none
and
to
me
if
this
was
a
baseball
team
in
terms
of
the
the
office
you'd
be
first
base,
you'd
be
the
don
mattingly
of
this
team,
and
I
mean
that
so
that's
that's
important
or
I'm
from
the
80s
man
don
maddenly,
but
but
really
thank
you
very
much
and
god
bless
you
for
all
that
you
do.
Thank
you.
B
A
A
B
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Oh
no
thank
you
and,
and
we
will
miss
lorraine,
110.
Okay.
Next,
we
move
onward
to
our
first
public
hearing.
Non-Quasi
judicial
item
number
two
open
items:
two
through
eleven,
we
have
a
motion
by
councilman
miranda
seconded
by
councilman
scott
call
in
favor.
F
H
Good
afternoon,
council
members,
david
haye,
with
your
planning
commission's
staff.
The
first
item
this
evening
is
the
adoption
public
hearing
for
plant
amendment
1906.
It
did
was
sent
up
to
the
state.
It
did
come
back.
There
were
no
concerns
from
the
state,
so
we'll
just
do
a
quick
little
reminder
of
what
this
is.
It's
a
little
background,
the
city
of
tampa
in
cooperation
with
planning.
Commission
staff
has
submitted
this
text
amendment
after
discussions
with
stakeholders,
property
owners
and
planning
commission
staff.
H
Currently
under
the
community
commercial
35
and
the
community
mixed
use.
35
future
land
use
categories
vertical
mixed
use,
development
located
on
arterial
roadways,
meeting
acreage
requirements
can
get
their
buy
right.
Floria
ratio
up
to
a
1.5
if
they're
meeting
certain
criterias.
This
amendment
would
extend
that
criteria
to
collector
roadways
within
the
city
of
tampa's
designated
urban.
H
Villages
currently
all
development
on
the
city's
collector
roadways
located
within
that
community,
mixed
use,
35
and
the
community
commercial
35
future
land
use
categories
is
capped
at
a
1.0
far
by
right,
with
the
option
to
enter
into
a
development
agreement
to
help
fund
identified
improvements
to
get
to
a
maximum
of
two
far.
H
The
development
community
in
in
discussions
with
staff,
have
stated
that
this
requirement
reduces
the
financial
viability
of
constructing
some
mixed
use.
Development,
which
is
the
identified,
preferred
development
pattern
within
the
comp
plan
on
our
city's
mixed-use
quarters.
This
amendment
would
reduce
the
potential
for
the
need
to
enter
into
an
additional
bonus
agreement
with
the
city,
thus
further
incentivizing
the
preferred
identified
development
pattern
of
vertical
mixed-use
development
on
the
city's
main
quarters.
Your
planning
commission
did
look
at
this
and
found
that
it
is
consistent
with
policy
direction.
H
They
also
found
that
it
was
consistent
that,
with
the
promotion
of
a
sustainable
form
of
development,
specifically
within
the
city's
urban
villages,
I
did
want
to
also
just
show
you
all.
I
know
at
the
last
hearing
we
had
on
this.
There
was
interest
on
what
properties
this
actually
would
affect,
or
or
the
properties
these
properties
would
be.
The
ones
eligible
you
can
see
on
this
map.
The
urban
villages
are
the
purple
areas
on
the
map
and
the
red
parcels
are
the
ones
that
currently
have
that
community
mixed
use
for
that
community
commercial
35.
E
That
does
the
clerk
have
a
copy.
No,
okay,
we'll
have
to
make
sure
the
clerk
gets
a
cut.
There's
three
copies.
H
And
based
on
that,
the
planning
commission
recommends
to
you
this
evening
that
the
proposed
testimony
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
imagine,
20
40
10
comprehensive
plan.
P
A
H
P
Heading
up
there,
yes,
and
we
had
this
discussion
about
what
sort
of
impacts
this
might.
This
might
be
so,
let's
say
for
dave
on
davis,
island,
for
example,
what
you
all
are
calling
an
urban
village.
P
So
I
see
a
little
cluster
of
red
there.
I
guess
that's
the
the
location
of
the
shops,
that's.
H
Correct
those
are
the
only
properties
on
davis
island
that
would
fall
under
this
plant
amendment.
That's
a
commercial
corridor.
Those
two
blocks
of
the
existing
commercial
on.
P
H
Remember
all
all
development
it
could
it
get
to
the
two:
that's
the
maximum
under
the
bonus
right
right.
If
you
do
standard
development,
you're
capped
at
a
one
by
right,
with
the
option
to
go
into
a
development
agreement
with
the
city
to
get
up
to
the
two
right.
This
would
remove
that
requirement.
If
you
know,
if
a
developer
wanted
to
go
from
one
to
one
point
two,
and
they
were
meeting
all
the
criteria
about
the
vertical
mixed
use,
the
acreage
size
that
you're
located
on
a
collector.
P
Who,
where
I
know
this,
has
probably
been
banging
around
for
a
while
a
while
prior
to
four
of
us
getting
here?
What
was
the
origin
of
this
plan?
Amendment
who
well.
H
Remember
you
asked
for
it,
it
is
already
allowed.
It
was
part
of
the
update
about
four
or
five
years
ago.
In
so
it's
allowed
on
the
city's
arterials.
There
was
discussions
with
staff
with
the
development
community.
There
was
a
meeting
held
over
at
north
boulevard,
probably
almost
a
year
ago
that
there
was
discussions
that
they
were
looking
at.
You
know
extending
this
to
the
city's
collectors
and
through
those
discussions,
city
staff
initiated
it
and
with
discussions
with
staff
at
the
planning
commission,
I.
P
I
don't
necessarily
feel
that
way
about
those
necessarily
those
davis
island
blocks,
just
as
an
example
off
a
base
off
of
bayshore.
What
do
you
got
going
in
there?
It's
looks
like
hyde
park,
high
park
village.
H
Hyde
park,
village
and
then
there's
some
properties
on
howard.
I
I
would
note
that
any
thing,
if
someone
was
seeking
to
utilize
this,
they
would
have
to
go
through
a
rezoning
process.
It
doesn't
give
them
any
rights
to
just
immediately
construct
if
they're
developing
a
vertical
mixed
use.
P
Yeah,
but
it
creates
a
presumption
we
get.
We
get
told
by
our
lawyers
about
the
presumption
you
know.
If
you,
if
you
bump
it
up
and
they've,
got
to
present
they've
got
a
higher
far
then
it
you
know
it
does
that
so
I
don't.
I
don't
think
we
should
take
it
lightly.
Also,
in
east
tampa,
it
looks
like
a
solid,
a
solid
mass
of
cmu
35
up
up
34th
street,
again
as
I
as
I
recollect
34th
street,
butts
up
to
a
lot
of
single-family
residential
adjacent
to
those
parcels.
P
Yeah,
I
I
don't
know
if
I
can
support
it
at
this
time.
I
it
concerns
me
greatly.
You
know
to
have
that
sort
of,
and-
and
you
know
another
thing
is
when
somebody
comes
in
and
requests
a
plan
amendment
to
go
to
a
cmu,
35,
okay
on
a
collector,
then
all
of
a
sudden
guess
what
that's
another
red
potential
red
dot.
So
just
because
you
have
the
existing
cmu
35s
right
now.
P
H
H
H
Yeah
there's
you've
got
like
willow
and
cass.
There
are
some
howard
there's
some
at
swan.
There's
a
lot
just
to
the
west
of
ebore.
P
Is
there
any
urgency
to
doing
this,
and
if
we
could
we
defer
it,
I
mean
it's
totally,
it's
totally
up
to
council.
Well,
I
mean
I
mean
in
terms
of
any
sort
of
timetable.
You
know
when
we
do
chapter
27
amendments,
we're
always
on
some
sort
of
timetable.
H
P
P
So
I
just
want.
I
think,
that's
why
council
should
be
very
cautious
on
this
and,
like
I
say
it's
not
just
the
red
dots,
it's
everything
in
between.
If
it's
on
a
collector
and
they
come
in
and
get
a
plan
amendment
then
all
of
a
sudden
they
become
a
red
dot
too,
and
I'm
I'm
concerned
about
neighborhood
impacts.
J
Were
there
any
and.
H
References
well,
we've
had
our
public
meetings
at
you
know
the
planning
commission.
There
was
no
opposition
at
the
planning
commission
from
any
neighborhoods.
It
was
advertised.
You
know
like
the
legal
requirement,
so.
J
We
have
maybe
one
or
two
so
so
we
we
have
one
or
two
people,
maybe
at
a
planning
commission
meeting,
because
I've
been
to
those.
So
I
can
tell
nobody
really
knows
really
about
this,
I'm
just
being
upfront
with
you
on
that,
and
I
know
nobody
really
knows
what
we're
doing
right
now.
What
potentially
vote
on
right
now
it
might
have
been
so-called
advertised,
but
I
don't
think
the
community
really
knows
when
we
look
at
34th
street
in
east
tampa,
that's
all
residential!
You
talk
about
34th
street
puddington,
15th
street.
You.
A
H
B
H
The
maximum
on
any
of
these
parts,
any
of
the
community
mixed
use
or
community
commercial
35,
is
a
two.
All
that
it
is
doing
is
removing
the
requirement
to
enter
into
the
separate
agreement
with
the
legal
department.
That's
all
this
does
it
does
not
grant
extra
floria
ratio
over
the
maximum
of
the
two.
P
H
H
H
H
All
right,
so
I'm
going
to
have
me
you're
testing
my
math
skills,
okay,
for
one
acre,
43
560
roughly
square
feet
under
under
the
proposal.
The
maximum
would
be
the
double
so.
H
Matter
of
right,
it
would,
from
this
someone
who
had
an
acre
would
go
from
the
43
560
to
probably
math
60
000
square
feet,
62
of
development.
P
It
was
a
little
vague
in
terms
of
the
development
community.
You
know
was
pursuing
this
well
sure.
I
couldn't
understand
why
I'm
very
concerned
80
of
this
is
in
east
tampa
in
the
purple
areas.
I'm
looking
at
very
residential,
very
single
family
butted
up
against
these
collective
roads.
East
camp
is
now
part
of
my
district.
With
all
due
respect,
I'm
citywide.
P
Hyde
park,
parts
of
what
is
that
west
tampa
going
up,
howard
avenue,
main
street
and
davis
island,
it
concerns
me,
you
know,
concerns
me
and
I
and
like
I
say,
I'm
not
100
against
it.
I
just
think
we
should
take
it
out
to
the
community
and
see
what
the
community
thinks
about
it
before
we
adopt
it
and
if
there's
no
urgency
to
it,
you
know,
then,
then,
why
not
put
it
off
for
a
few
months.
B
Anyone
else
with
any
questions.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Anyone
else
here
for
this
item
from
the
sitting,
yeah.
Okay.
Anybody
here
to
publicly
comment
on
item
number
two.
If
so,
please
come
forward,
we
have
a
motion
to
close
by
councilman.
Escalco,
wait!
Yes,
sir!
No!
I
was
gonna
make
a
mission.
Okay,
wait
a
second!
We
have
a
motion
to
close.
Do
you
wish
to
do
it
before
the
motion
to
closer
or.
P
No,
I
think
you
can
close
it
and
my
emotions
are
continuing.
Okay,.
B
E
If
you
wish
it
to
be
merely
continued
without
an
additional
notice
and
re-notice
to
the
public,
because
it
is
a
public
hearing,
my
suggestion
would
be
to
do
it
when
the
hearing
is
open
and
then
that
way,
if
you
wish
to
have
the
community
notified
in
some
form
or
fashion
staff,
would
perhaps
at
your
direction
be
able
to
do
that.
But
you
wouldn't
have
to
re-notice
this
as
a
public
hearing
and
re-advertise.
N
I
N
Will
fall
in
with
all
of
the
other
amendments
that
will
be
processed
at
that
time,
rather
than
just
continuing
it
to
to
an
another
date.
The
statutes
don't
really
address
what
happens
to
an
amendment
in
a
situation
like
this,
just
when
it's
transmitted
to
the
state
and
it's
returned
you're
required
to
have
a
public
hearing
within
180
days,
otherwise
it's
deemed
withdrawn,
but
it
doesn't
address
what
happens
if
you're
not
ready
to
act
on
it.
So
that's
my
recommendation.
B
Yeah,
let's
go
ahead
and
reopen
it.
We
have
a
motion
reopened
by
councilman
scott,
who
was
second
by
councilman
good's
all
in
favor.
Any
opposed
councilman
calls.
I.
H
Well,
we
there
were
numerous
meetings
with
some
stakeholders.
They
had
contacted
north
boulevard.
We
all
sat
in
the
meeting
kathy
coyle
was
present.
I
think
gloria
was
present.
There
was
stakeholders,
especially
in
west
tampa.
They
had
talked
about
the
potential
of
this
them
moving
a
private
amendment
forward.
H
Instead,
it
was
decided
to
work
with
city
staff,
so
city
staff
could
have
their
concerns
addressed
and
that's
why.
H
Was
remember
in
the
comp
plan,
the
urban
villages
have
specific
policy
direction.
They
talk
about
a
more
urban
character,
more
mixture
of
uses
in
those
urban
villages,
and
that's
why
staff
felt
that
it
was
appropriate
that
all,
instead
of
doing
it,
city-wide
of
just
targeting
where
the
identified
urban
villages
are
because
there
is
already
specific
policy
language
about
the
mixed-use
nature
of
these
villages.
M
Because
if
you
don't,
then
then
we're
going
to
delay
it
and
we'll
be
right
back
at
the
same
place.
I
think
it
sounds
like
maybe
putting
words
in
my
colleagues
mouths,
but
it
sounds
like
the
concern
is
that
the
maybe
the
neighborhood
associations
that
are
directly
affected
may
not
know,
may
not
participate
in
the
process,
and
so,
if
we
don't,
if
we
don't
have
a
new
process,
then
we
haven't
changed
anything
sorry
glenn.
L
If
I
could
randy
goers
the
city's
planning
development
department,
let
me
share
with
you
what
I
know
I
don't
have
all
the
specifics
of
the
planet.
The
was
conceptualized
and
formalized
before
I
started
following
and
reviewing
the
plan
amendments
for
the
city,
but
what
I
do
know
from
doing
the
staff
report
and
being
brief
of
the
city
staff
is.
My
understanding
is,
is
that
there
was.
The
staff
was
approached
by
some
private
interest
about
looking
at
development
along
other
areas
where
they
could
get
the
same
type
of
incentives
for
redevelopment.
L
The
initial
proposals
from
the
private
community
was
to
look
at
it.
Citywide
try
to
come
up
with
something
just
like
the
arterials
are
done.
Citywide
city
staff
considered
what
was
being
proposed
by
the
by
the
various
interests
and
came
back
with
a
proposal
that
the
staff
thought
was
workable
and
that's
the
urban
villages
and
the
reason
the
urban
villages
was
a
likely
place
is
because
the
comp
plan
is
is
trying
to
encourage
redevelopment
in
the
urban
villages
and
the
urban
villages.
What
you
see
on
the
map?
L
They
either
those
areas
either
are
covered
by
an
existing
development
agreement
or
by
overlay
districts.
So
much
of
what
would
be
required
in
a
development
agreement
to
to
to
the
city
would
already
be
required
within
an
overlay
district
which
governs
the
redevelopment,
so
the
staff
thought
that
there
was
a
sufficient
amount
of
protections
to
guide
the
redevelopment
for
those
areas
where
redevelopment
would
occur.
L
It
does
do
what
you've
what
we've
heard.
It
does
bring
a
an
opportunity
for
a
a
private
interest
to
get
to
1.5
f.a.r
easier
because
they
don't
have
to
go
through
a
development
agreement.
But
if
they,
if,
under
the
current
scenario,
they
would
be
able
to
get
to
1.5
or
2
by
going
through
the
development
agreement.
So
it
was
a
way
to
respond
to
the
the
intent
of
the
development
community
and
try
to
create
a
way
of
streamlining
the
process
to
reach
the
overall
urban
form.
M
That's
the
wrong
term,
but
a
a
plan
that
will
help
make
the
neighborhoods
more
pedestrian
friendly,
walkable
friendly
in
lots
of
different
ways,
and
that's
why
I've
been
proposing
these
neighborhood
commercial
district
plans
and
hyde
park
on
their
own
presented
one
the
other
day
and
through
the
planning
commission
we're
trying
to
partner
to
get
four
in
different
parts
of
the
city.
But
it
this
planning
seems
to
be
a
very
blunt
instrument
to
me.
M
I'm
still
learning
all
about
it,
but
it
seems
to
be
very
very
blunt
where
a
a
neighborhood
commercial
district
plan
would
be
more
precise
and
it
would
be
more.
It
would
involve
more
specific
engagement
with
the
public
on
exactly
what
they
want,
that
the
look
and
feel
and
texture
to
be.
So.
If,
if
my
colleagues
fears
are
true,
then
I'm
okay
delaying
it.
P
P
Right
now,
if
you
can
get
to,
if
you
can
get
to
a
right
now,
you're
automatically
at
a
1.0
f-er,
if
you
want
to
get
to
two,
you
have
an
incentive
to
enter
a
new
development
agreement
like
the
one
I'm
going
to
remind
council
when
we
first
came
on
on
board.
This
group,
mr
cohen,
came
in
in
that
north
hyde
park
development
and
he
had
a
big
development
agreement
with
a
lot
of
extra
stuff
for
that
immediate
community
to
mitigate
some
of
the
impacts
of
that
very
intense
development.
P
P
Okay,
it
was
a
package
deal
if
you
offer
the
1.5
as
a
matter
of
right
as
compared
to
the
2.0
with
the
development
agreement,
then
there's
not
as
much
incentive
for
them
to
enter
into
developing.
So
I'm
not
trying
to
necessarily
kill
this.
I
think
it's
something
we
should
defer
for
another
cycle.
Think
about
have
more
time
to
talk
about
take
to
the
community,
in
whatever
fashion
we
can.
Mr
carlson,
and
and
and
mull
it
over
a
little
bit
more,
maybe
it
doesn't
need
to
be
as
scatter
shot
as
this.
P
This
is
a
big
scatter
shot.
That's
that
you
know,
that's
a
that's
a
big
chunk
of
the
city
that
that
has
that
this
potentially
impacts.
J
J
We
didn't
have
a
say,
no
one
came
to
us
and
we
could
say
we
had
a
meeting
at
the
playing
commission,
but
I've
been
to
some
of
those
meetings
and
no
one
really
goes
to
this
meeting,
because
it's
not
really
really
advertised
per
se.
It's
not
nothing
in
a
community.
You
need
to
be
here.
This
is
what
we're
planning
to
do.
This
is
what
we're
trying
to
do
so.
B
B
E
Mr
chairman,
if
we
can
just
as
a
matter
of
housekeeping
with
regard
to
this,
if
you
could
include
accepting
the
substitute
so
that
will
appear
as
the
ordinance
that's
going
to
be
presented
when
it
comes
back
at
the
next
cycle,
would
that
be
appropriate?
May.
E
I
think
would
it
be
appropriate
after
a
motion
to
continue
or
do
you
want
to
to
rescind
that
and
you
want
to
just
leave
it
the
way
it
is
for
now.
E
H
Four
1905
is
the
next
amendment.
H
This
subject
site:
this
is
a
publicly
initiated
amendment.
This
was
transmitted
to
the
state.
It
came
back.
There
were
no
comments,
it
is
located
in
the
south
tampa
planning
district,
more
specifically
the
gandhi
sunday,
south
neighborhood.
This
is
the
subject
site
you
could.
This
is
inner
bay
and
the
base
is
for
the
south.
These
are
the
railroad
tracks
that
go
up
to
downtown.
You
can
see
the
development
pattern,
there's
some
light
industrial
down
on
inner
bay
and
then
apartments,
and
then
you've
got
robertson,
high
school
to
the
north.
H
Again,
it's
publicly
initiated
it's
a
small
scale.
It's
approximately
acres.
Currently
it's
designated
that
transitional
use
24..
The
amendment
seeks
to
change
their
future
land
use
category
to
residential
35
in
recognition
of
the
existing
apartments.
This
is
a
view
of
the
existing
apartments
on
site.
It's
the
gardens
at
sunday,
south
bay,
here's
lois
avenue
looking
north.
H
H
We
sent
certified
mail
to
the
property
owner.
We
also
went
out
on
site
talked
to
the
management
of
the
facility.
There
were
no
concerns
expressed
by
them
or
the
property
owners
throughout
this
process.
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
that.
Since
it's
a
publicly
initiated
amendment
here
we
have
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
If
you
remember,
the
transitional
use
24
is
that
category
that
allows
industrial
residential
commercial.
It
basically
allows
everything.
H
It's
not
probably
the
preferred
category
if
you
are
trying
to
guide
development
and
give
direction
of
where
or
protections
to
neighborhoods.
So
through
this
process,
the
planning
commission
is
continuously
evaluating
where
the
tu-24
is
located
and
looking
at,
where
it's
appropriate
to
bring
it
into
a
more
appropriate
category
based
on
the
existing
development
pattern.
So,
based
on
that
planning,
commission
staff
is
recommending
that
the
site
go
to
residential
35
to
recognize
the
existing
apartments.
That's
the
brown
color!
H
You
can
see
that
the
apartments
directly
to
the
east
are
also
the
residential
35.,
the
impacts
again,
the
maximum
potential
the
existing
under
that
224
is
344
units
or
a
maximum
of
938
282
square
feet.
If
it
does
go
to
the
residential
35,
the
unit
count
the
maximum
would
increase,
but
that
potential
for
non-residential
would
decrease
and
would
also
remove
any
potential
for
industrial
uses
on
the
side
of
the
apartments
ever
went
away.
H
H
They
also
found
it
consistent
with
promoting
and
sustaining
multi-family
residential
and
also
promoting
residential
at
densities
that
promote
walking
and
trains
of
youth.
So,
based
on
that,
your
planning
commission
recommends
to
you
this
evening
that
this
amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
imagine
2040
to
have
a
comprehensive
plan.
B
B
P
All
right
in
regard
to
file
number
pa
1905
I'll
move
the
substitute
ordinance
for
first
reading,
an
ordinance
of
many
in
the
camp,
a
comprehensive
plan,
future
land
use
element,
future
land
news
map
for
the
property
located
at
67,
27,
south
lois
avenue
from
transitional
use,
24
tu,
24
to
residential
35
r35,
providing
for
repealable
ordinances
and
conflict,
providing
for
severability
providing
for
an
effective
date.
And
I
I
make
the
motion
in
light
of
the
fact
that
it's
a
lower
intensity.
B
Thank
you,
mr
crew.
Now
item
number
five,
mr
hayden.
H
Good
afternoon
again,
david
haye
planning
commission
staff,
the
next
item
for
you,
it's
another
adoption
hearing.
This
is
in
regards
to
the
private
amendment
1909..
H
This
subject,
site
is
located
within
the
south,
tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically
the
port
tampa
city
area.
It
is
located
within
the
coastal
high
hazard
area.
Here
we
have
an
aerial
you
can
see.
This
is
a
subject
site.
This
is
mascot
street.
This,
of
course,
is
the
northern
boundary
of
the
base.
The
base
is
directly
to
the
south.
H
I
should
note
that
this
area
here,
even
though
it
showed
all
trees
here-
that's
no
longer
tree.
It's
under
development
for
single
family
detached
the
aerial's
a
little
updated.
This
again
is
a
privately
initiated
request.
It's
small
scale,
it's
approximately
0.81
acres
in
size.
The
current
designation
is
future
language
designations,
heavy
industrial
and
the
applicant
is
looking
to
go
to
a
residential,
10
future
land
use
category.
H
H
H
This
is
looking
up
mascot
street
we're
looking
north.
You
could
see.
This
is
the
end
of
the
road.
The
subject
site
is
off
to
the
right
out
of
frame,
but
you
can
see
the
street
is
all
single
family
detached,
and
then
this
is
another
picture
looking
west
toward
all
that
area.
That's
under
development.
H
H
H
under
the
existing
heavy
industrial.
Of
course,
residential
is
not
permitted.
The
maximum
development
under
that
would
be
52
924
square
feet
of
heavy
industrial
uses
with
the
planar
member
2
residential
10,
a
maximum
of
eight
units
could
be
considered
or
if
it
met
locational
criteria,
which
it
doesn't
a
maximum
12
349
square
feet
of
non-residential.
H
It
did
go
to
our
eighth
agency
review.
The
school
board
did
note
that
there
were
currently
there
is
not
capacity
at
west
shore
elementary
in
robertson.
I
should
note
that
this
is
just
for
information
only
and
during
any
zoning
is
when
there's
the
review
for
consistency
with
the
school
board's
plan
and
impact.
H
Your
planning
commission
did
find
this
application
consistent.
They
did.
There
were
numerous
policy
direction
regarding
housing
choices
and
infill
development.
Supporting
the
overall
neighborhood
context.
There
was
a
discussion
about
industrial.
We
typically
like
to
preserve
our
industrial
areas.
This
was
unique
due
to
the
fact
that
the
only
way
to
get
to
the
site
is
down
that
local
residential
road.
So
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
why
it
staff
found
that
it
would
be
appropriate
to
remove
it
and
there
were
policy
policy
direction
regarding
coastal
management.
H
M
You
said
you
reached
out
to
the
community:
did
the
port
tampa
neighborhood
association
make
a
judgment
on
this?
Did
they
approve.
H
Remember
this
is
a
privately
initiated.
The
applicant
has
to
abide
by
all
the
noticing
requirements:
the
signage,
the
mailings
to
the
neighborhood
association
and
the
surrounding
properties
within
250
feet.
There
was
no,
we
didn't
get
any
feedback
of
that.
This
was
a
concern
for
anyone.
P
Thank
you
david.
I
realize
this
is
the
last
little
vestige
you
know
and
that
whole
area
has
been
filled
in
but
I'll
tell
you
what
what
scares
the
heck
out
of
me
about
those
areas
is
evacuation
and
and
being
in
a
relatively
low
and
vulnerable
area.
Is
that
something
that's
looked
at
at
the
comp
plan
level.
H
It's
more
looked
at
at
the
rezoning
stage.
I
believe
they
they
have
a
rezoning
for
this
site
and
the
city
would
look
at.
You
know
any
mitigation
that
would
be
required
fees
or
anything
like
that
would
be
required
at
the
zoning.
B
B
J
Mr
chairman,
again
file
number
pa
19-09
substitute
orders
being
presented
first
consideration.
H
H
Again,
these
a
little
background,
the
previous
council.
There
was
a
discussion
about
staff,
reviewing
our
park
land
and
making
sure
that
it
was
appropriately
reflected
in
the
dedicated
park
list
and
on
our
future
land
use
maps.
We've
started
the
process
of
reviewing
we're
coordinating
with
our
partners
at
the
city
and
the
parks
department.
H
H
The
four
that
we'll
be
seeing
tonight
are
site
a
corona
park
which
is
down
in
south
tampa
highland
pines
park,
which
is
b
over
over
in
east,
tampa,
there's
sea
lincoln
gardens
park
and
then
oak
park
again
over
in
east.
Hampton.
H
A
little
background
again,
this
process
was
initiated
by
you
all
it
these
each
of
the
five
parks
that
are
your
well
four.
Now
that
you're
being
con
consider
our
listed
in
this
city's
dedicated
park
list,
which
is
that
chapter
16,
section
91
in
the
city's
code
of
ordinances
and
tonight,
all
these
are
going
to
the
recreation
open
space
we
sent
as
we
normally
do.
We
sent
these
to
our
partner
agencies.
H
H
So
the
first
one.
This
is
site
a
corona
park,
south
tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically
the
palmacio
neighborhood,
you
can
see
here's
dale
mayberry
highway.
This
is
corona
street
south
sterling
you,
you
have
commercial
development
along
dale,
mabry
and
immediately
behind
the
commercial
turns
into
single
family,
detached
here's.
A
few
pictures
of
the
park
we're
looking
south
east
toward
corona
park
from
corona
street.
H
This
is
looking
south
down
south
sterling
avenue
from
the
intersection
of
west
corona,
and
this
is
the
park
over
here
on
the
right
and
then
this
is
looking
west
down
west
corona
street
the
park
is
on
the
left
side.
Out
of
frame.
You
can
see
the
single
family
detached
here.
We
have
the
currently
adopted
future
land
use
map,
there's
two
categories:
residential
10
and
a
small
section
of
that
community.
Mixed
use
35.
H
If
this
amendment
is
approved,
it
would
go
to
the
recreation
open
space
reflected
by
the
green
again.
This
removes
the
potential
for
10
dwelling
units
or
10
nine
square
feet,
and
all
development
would
now
have
to
be
rec,
oriented
or
open
space,
either
public
or
private,
but
all
these
are
owned
by
the
city,
so
they'd
all
be
public.
So,
based
on
that,
your
planning
commission
recommends
that
the
proposed
map
amendment
1907
a
be
found
consistent
with
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
P
The
last
couple
of
days,
these
all
like
pretty
straightforward-
I
don't
see
any
differences
between
abc
or
d.
So,
if
they're
probably
not
a
whole
lot
else
to
add
right.
H
We
planning
commission
found
all
consistent
it's.
I
can
continue.
B
E
B
Before
each
before,
each
ordinance
is
read,
we'll
do
that
and
I
wanted
to
say
if
I
may,
that
is
something
we
began
in
the
last
council.
If
memory
serves
me
right,
councilman
suarez,
spearheaded
this
to
take
a
look
at
all
of
our
green
spaces
and
make
sure
that
they
were
preserved
to
the
highest
extent
that
our
at
our
local
laws
and
regulations
could
go
forward
with.
B
So
I'm
I'm
glad
to
see
this
go
forward,
and
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
shout
out
to
our
former
colleague
mr
suarez,
so
called
as
far
as
amendments
there
you
go.
There
will
be
many
of
these.
There
will
be
many
of
these
okay,
so
we're
on
to
number
six
councilman
or
strike
that
before
we
go
on
to
number
six.
Is
anybody
here
in
the
public
here
to
speak
on
number?
Six?
If
please
come
so,
please
come
forward
close
number
six.
F
B
Have
motion
to
close
by
councilman
dingfelder
second,
by
councilman
miranda,
all
in
favor
any
opposed
councilman
scout,
though,
if
you
don't
mind.
B
B
B
Speak
on
item
to
break
number-
eight,
oh
I'm
sorry
go
come
forward.
We'd
love
to
hear
from
you
ma'am!
Please
state
your
name.
K
K
But
since
I've
been
here,
I'm
getting
a
better
understanding,
but
with
you
rezoning
it
in
that
manner
is
that
it's
going
to
be
protected,
but
is
there
a
possibility
in
the
future
taking
that
from
being
residential
property
that
a
developer
couldn't
come
through
and
take
away
the
land
and
put
something
else
there.
K
G
C
E
Shelby
and
if
I
could
just
follow
up
on
that,
what
this
does
is
if
the
city
would
dispose
of
the
property
before
this
change,
because
it
has
the
underlying
land
use
it
would,
it
could
be
developable.
What
this
does
is
this
adds
an
added
protection
that,
if
it
were
to
change
it,
would
be
a
public
policy
decision
of
this
city
council
that
would
have
to
come
before
them
and
you'd
have
the
opportunities
the
public
to
know
about
that.
K
Okay
and
it
could
possibly
be
rezoned
because,
right
now
we
have
single
family
homes
in
some
apartments
which
butt
up
against
our
neighborhood
and
now
with
them,
building
grady
square
over
there.
They
only
have
one
way
and
one
way
out,
and
my
biggest
fear
is
that
you
guys
may
close
that
off
and
put
a
roadway
through
there.
You
know
anything
could
happen.
Councilman.
G
P
And
a
valid
concern
in
this
particular
case,
we're
on
your
side
we're
we're,
making
sure
that
this
park,
land
stays
parkland
and
that's
what
this
plan
amendment
does
it
takes
the
opportunity
a
way
to
develop
it
as
residential
anything,
it's
city,
it's
park,
boom,
great.
K
C
B
Two
years
ago,
over
the
babe
zaharias
golf
course,
and
folks
talking
about
prospectively,
you
know
building
something
other
than
a
golf
course
on
that
huge
piece
of
green
space
for
our
friends
in
forest
hills.
So
this
is
something
that
takes
all
of
these
green
spaces,
all
these
parks
and
provides
an
extra
layer
of
protection.
So
this
is
a
really
good
thing.
We.
K
B
K
B
B
Motion
by
councilman
miranda,
second
by
councilman,
maniscalco,
all
in
favor,
all
right
any
opposed.
Excuse
me,
mr
crude.
B
Yep
and
we'll
we'll
begin
that
first
thing
after
the
when
the
six
o'clock
ones
come.
Thank
you
ma'am.
We
have
a
motion
to
close
by
whom
was
it
councilman
miranda
and
whose
second
is
that
councilman
escalco
all
in
favor
any
opposed
councilman
carlson.
Do
you
mind,
sir?
Taking
item
number
nine
sure
if
I.
M
Could
just
for
a
second
to
say
one
thing
you
you
thanked
councilman,
suarez
and,
and
besides
this
he's
done
a
lot
of
other
great
things,
another
person
who
was
involved.
This
apparently
was
miriam
mohern.
Apparently
this
has
been
in
the
works
for
a
very
long
time.
So,
thanks
to
all
of
our
predecessors
who
work
to
try
to
get
this
done,
and
maybe
others
here
too,
we.
M
M
Yeah,
okay,
so
move
to
transmit
file,
number
pa1907d.
B
We
have
a
motion
by
councilman
carlson,
the
second
by
councilman
escaco,
all
in
favor
any
opposed.
Okay.
We
move
next
to
item
11.
and
thank
you
councilman
carlson,
for
mentioning
our
former
colleague
councilman
mahlhern.
We
move
onward
to
item.
Q
Good
evening
I'm
danny
collins,
the
planning
commission's
staff-
and
this
is
tampa
plan-
amendment
1908,
subject
site
is
located
in
the
university
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
usf
research
park
area.
Q
Q
Q
This
is
the
existing
adopted
future
land
use
map
you'll,
see
this
area
to
the
north
and
the
east
is
the
public
senate
public
use
this
area
in
light
pink
to
the
south
is
like
industrial.
This
area
further
to
the
south
is
heavy
industrial.
This
area
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site
is
under
the
jurisdiction
of
unincorporated
hillsborough
county.
This
this
area
has
light
commercial
office,
commercial
and
a
range
of
mixed
uses.
Q
Q
Q
The
planning
commission
reviewed
the
request
and
found
the
amendment
consistent
with
several
of
the
neighborhood
mixed
centers
and
corridors
policies.
The
request
is
consistent
with
land
use,
piles
objective
6.1
to
transform
major
corridors
to
include
a
broad
range
of
uses,
specifically
along
east
baller
avenue.
The
planning
commission
also
found
the
request
consistent
with
policy
direction
under
economic
development,
overlay,
green
tech
corridor
and
employment
centers.
The
request
would
preserve
the
supply
of
land
for
industrial
research
and
office
development
within
the
tampa.
Q
B
You
very
much
for
any
questions
from
okay.
Is
anyone
here
to
publicly
comment
on
item
number
11?
If
so
come
forward?
Yes,
man.
O
Good
evening,
julie,
mandel
with
the
law
firm
of
gray,
robinson,
401,
east
jackson,
street,
I'm
here
representing
the
usf
research
foundation,
which
is
a
direct
support
organization
for
the
university
of
south
florida.
I
think
staff
did
a
good
job
explaining
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
up
here.
This
is
really
just
intended
to
open
up
the
opportunities
for
this
area
to
be
developed
in
line
with
the
green
corridor
and
with
technology
centers
open
up
opportunities
for
jobs
and
to
help
to
promote
the
the
uses
that
are
in
support
of
the
university
of
south
florida.
O
I'm
available
for
any
questions,
oh
and
I
should
add,
allison
madden
from
the
usf
research
foundation
and
hillary
black
senior
associate
general
counsel
with
usf
are
also
here
as
well.
Thank
you.
B
B
P
We're
off
record
all
right:
what
are
we
on
number
11.?
Yes,
sir?
Okay
I'll
move
regard
to
file
pa
19-08
move
to
transmit
the
transmit.
The
plan,
amendment.
B
B
E
Yes,
sir,
before
we
begin
items
12
and
thereafter,
our
six
o'clock,
so
that's
not
impossible.
B
B
But
item
18
is
a
quasi-judicial,
so,
let's
and
now
oh
I
see
so-
let's
see,
let's
do
item
18..
So
let's
go
ahead
and
open.
We
have
a
motion
open
the
quasi-judicial
public
hearing
motion
by
councilman
citrus
second
by
councilman
good's,
all
in
favor
any
opposed
and
may
I
also
have
a
motion
to
go
ahead
and
move
item
18
before
12.,
so
moved
motion
by
councilman
sitro
seconded
by
councilman
goode
is
all
in
favor
aye.
Any
opposed.
A
H
B
Anyone
here-
oh
I'm,
sorry,
yes,
sir.
Yes,
sir,
if
you
are
going
to
be
here
and
you're
going
to
speak
or
testify
on
any
item
here,
that
is
quasi-judicial,
which
is
pretty
much
everything
going
forward.
Please
stand
up
if
you're
able
to
do
so,
raise
your
right
hand
and
prepare
to
be
sworn.
I
O
Good
evening,
jennifer
malone
with
your
planning
commission
staff.
This
is
located
in
the
university
planning
district
within
the
lowry
park.
Neighborhood
there
is
transit
located
approximately
600
feet
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site
and
it's
within
a
level
e
evacuation
zone.
The
closest
public
recreational
facility
is
changi
park,
which
is
located
approximately
four
thousand
feet
to
the
east.
The
surrounding
area
is
single-family,
detached
residential
in
character.
O
O
It
is
all
residential
10.
That's
that
orange
color.
The
r10
allows
us
to
attend
dwelling
units
to
the
acre
it's
predominantly
single-family
detached.
We
did
find
this
request
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
policies.
This
will
allow
for
development
on
the
subject
site
and
we
found
that
it
would
be
consistent
compatible
with
infill
development
and
consistent
with
the
form
of
the
surrounding
area
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
Any.
I
Mary
san,
diego
from
planning,
design
and
development
coordination.
Again
this
is
a
euclidean
rezoning
request
from
rs60
to
rs50
for
the
singular
property
at
8704
north
otis
avenue.
There
is
no
site
plan
to
review.
There's
no
waivers
requested.
Here's
the
zoning
map,
the
subject
property
is
in
red.
As
you
can
see,
a
majority
of
the
surrounding
area
is
in
the
rs-60
zoning
district
and
there
have
been
some
rezonings
in
the
immediate
area
to
go
to
the
rs50
or
plan
development
to
create
50
foot
wide
lots.
I
I
The
subject
property
meets
the
development
criteria
for
the
rs-50
zoning
district,
which
is
a
50-foot
wide
lot
and
5
000
square
feet
in
area.
This
lot
is
50
feet
wide
and
115
feet
deep.
So
the
total
lot
area
is
5
750
square
feet
in
total.
A
P
H
G
Much
do
we
have
the
opposite,
there's
an
interpreter.
L
E
C
N
N
N
A
N
A
I
G
L
G
Have
a
motion
to
close
from
councilman
miranda
with
the
secretary
councilman
goods,
all
in
favor,
all
right,
all
right
who?
Who
has
the
last
one
councilman.
F
I'll
read
it
councilman
miranda.
Thank
you.
Item
number
18
problem
number
rev,
19-81,
move
in
ordinance
for
first
reading,
consideration,
anonymous,
rezoning
property,
general
vicinity
of
8704,
north
otis
avenue
and
the
city
of
tampa
florida
are
particularly
described
in
section
one
concerning
district
classification,
rs-60
residential
single-family
to
rs,
50
residential
single
family,
providing
effectively.
G
C
G
M
G
M
M
I
need
to
abstain
from
this
marty.
M
Recently
learned
that,
just
before
the
meeting,
I
learned
that
one
of
one
of
the
clients
of
my
firm
owned
some
property
in
the
vicinity
of
this,
and
so
we're
trying
to
get
a
an
opinion
on
on
whether
it's
a
conflict
or
not,
but
in
abundance
of
caution.
I
think
we're
well.
E
Based
on
what
you've
shared
with
me
council,
it's
excuse
me
councilman.
It's
my
professional
opinion
that
it
appears
that
this
is
remote
and
speculative.
However,
section
286
of
florida
statutes,
if
I
can
pull
it
up
right
here,
286.012
states
that
if
the
official
decision
ruling
or
act
occurs
in
the
context
of
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding,
these
two
are
linked,
and
one
of
them
is
the
rezoning.
E
G
All
right
I'll
see
you
later
so
we'll
go
to
number
12
which
goes
with
item
13,
but
we'll
start
with
number.
O
12.
jennifer
malone
with
your
planning
commission
staff.
I
will
present
on
item
12
first
and
then
yeah.
I
will
start
with
item
12.,
so
this
has
a
history.
This
is
heard
previous
under
the
previous
council
as
the
entire
site.
The
subject
site
before
you
today,
though,
is
a
portion
of
that
subject:
site
we're
along
rollat
park,
drive
east
fly
avenue
is
to
the
south
that
gray
color
is
the
light
industrial
that
the
subject
site
is
currently
adopted
as
and
that
surrounds
the
site.
O
My
request
before
you
tonight
is
to
take
these
approximately
3.7
acres
from
light
industrial
to
residential
10,
which
would
allow
residential
consideration
on
that
portion
of
the
subject
site
and,
as
I
said,
it's
just
a
portion
of
the
subject
sites
the
commissioners
at
the
petitioner
they're
asking
for
the
this
was
heard
by
the
previous.
O
As
you
can
see,
the
entire
subject
site
is
about
16.85
acres,
but
the
request
before
you
is
to
only
change
what
is
outlined
in
the
black
dashes,
which
is
about
3.7
acres,
yes,
more
or
less
approximately,
and
so
this
is
the
request
before
you
today.
I
do
not
have
an
official
planning
commission
recommendation
on
this
specific
request,
because
this
was
heard
by
city
council
back
at
the
end
of
january,
under
a
different
request.
That
city
council
voted
to
continue
this
amendment,
and
here
we
are
today
and
through
that
process
it
has
been
amended.
B
B
Okay
and
this
in
no
way
disturbs
that
consistent,
finding
or
or
it
hasn't
had
the
chance
to,
because
it
hasn't
come
back
before
you,
the.
B
B
Okay,
applicant.
C
Mr
chairman,
council
members,
todd
pressman
200
second
half
of
the
south
and
saint
petersburg
florida.
I
have
a
powerpoint
for
you
if
you
could
pull
that
up,
please,
mr
chairman
and
council
members,
I
am
happy
thrilled
and
I
am
honored
to
be
representing
the
best
group
of
people
I've
ever
represented
in
my
25
years.
C
I'm
here
today
with
one
one
more
child
hope
street
campus
in
association
with
ottawa
baptist
church,
for
this
request
before
you
and
I'm
gonna
skip
through
for
the
land
use
part
landing
cement
parts
on
the
powerpoint.
For
you
I
want
to
let
you
know
we
have
great
community
support
everybody
who's
here.
If
I
may
who's
in
support,
would
you
please
stand
up.
C
Thank
you,
powerpoint.
Thank
you.
We
do
have
the
planning
commission's
board
support.
They
voted
to
find
consistent
of
the
entire
site
of
the
land,
use
that
we're
asking
for
we've
reduced
it
to
a
very
small
amount
after
talking
with
neighbors,
so
we
have
the
support
of
the
planning
commission.
We
have
the
support
of
the
planning
commission
staff.
C
C
We
have
spent
tremendous
cost
engineering,
this
entire
site,
environmental
trees,
everything
required
for
pd
plan.
We
have
met
every
request
and
recommendation
and
desire
of
the
folks
that
concerns,
except
one
and
I'll
talk
about
that
in
a
minute.
So
they
wanted
a
pd
plan.
We
did
it.
They
wanted
to
restrict
uses
specifically
to
what
these
guys
do.
We
did
it.
C
C
C
This
is
idaho
baptist
church,
one
more
child
and
one
more
child
and
hope
street.
They
provide
outstanding
services
to
the
community,
they're,
primarily
providing
food
service,
not
as
a
meal
or
soup
kitchen,
but
as
a
warehouse
which
I'll
show
you
how
they
work.
Some
of
the
folks
will
make
a
little
bit
more
what
their
operations
are.
They
provide
hundreds
of
thousands
of
diapers
household
items,
they're
involved
with
all
the
schools.
They
provide
a
million
meals
in
that
respect
and
many
volunteer
hours.
C
There's
a
history
to
the
site
in
2016
atlantis
amendment
came
through
that
was
approved
by
this
body,
allowing
an
increase
or
substantial
increase
in
residential
density
that
was
approved
by
dca,
the
owner
pulled
it
that
deal
fell
across
fell
apart.
I
told
you
in
january
2019
we
came
through
with
a
standard
application.
We
made
tremendous
time
tremendous
costs,
change
everything
retooled
it
and
we're
here
today
with
support
and
the
department
of
economic
opportunity
in
tallahassee
approved
it.
As
I
said
so.
C
C
What's
the
use
proposed?
Yes,
oh
I'm
sorry
excuse
me
that
was
knows
my
area,
so
this
uses
85
percent
warehousing
and
trucking
of
non-perishable
foods
and
a
single
mother's
home
program.
Housing
program
for
16
units
so
primarily
hope
street
has
trucks
that
go
to
the
supermarkets
and
other
volunteers
who
provide
foods.
They
bring
it
to
their
warehouse,
which
would
be
the
site,
and
then
they
distribute
those
non-perishable
items
throughout
the
community.
E
I've
been
advised
by
the
planning
commission
that
what
you're
talking
about
now
is
more
in
the
line
of
the
rezoning,
as
opposed
to
the
residential
section,
which
is
limited
to
three
point.
Approximately
3.7
acres.
C
Well,
I
I
certainly
agree
with
that,
but
at
the
same
time
the
console
has
to
have
a
minimal
basic
knowledge
of
what's
proposed
on
the
site,
which
is
two
primarily
uses.
One
use
is
not
in
the
land
use,
but
I
would
just
suggest
I'll
be
happy
to
do
whatever
direction
you
want.
But
these
gentlemen
cannot
vote
unless
these
at
least
have
just
a
minimal
understanding
of.
B
B
C
C
It
will
not
be
a
homeless
shelter,
it
will
not
be
a
soup
kitchen,
they
don't
cook,
serve
or
prepare
meals.
It
is
strictly
on
the
south
side
a
program
for
single
single
mothers
to
house
them.
They
run
them
through
a
program
over
many
months
to
make
themselves
sufficient.
So
to
give
an
example,
this
is
the
lakeland
campus
again
minimal.
Just
give
an
idea
what
goes
on
this
is
their
lakeland
campus
of
the
uses
that
we
talked
about,
and
this
is
the
single
mother
homes
that
are
at
that
site.
We
have
a
pd
plan
again.
C
The
residential
homes
you
see
are
at
the
south
end
and
laid
out
very
nicely
16
multi
units,
we
revised
again
a
tremendous
amount
of
items,
and
this
is
the
future
land
use
note
at
the
bottom
points
and
support.
C
Prior
city
council
voted
already
to
allow
a
great
a
huge
amount
of
residential
on
the
whole
site
in
2016
that
was
approved,
the
industrial
uses
will
still
be
there.
Economic
support
will
still
remain
there.
Planning
commission
comments.
The
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
the
long-range
development
pattern
and
vision
of
the
light
industrial
and
res
10
along
roller
park
drive
the
pd
is
a
multi-use
project
which
I'll
refer
to
later
there
are.
I
do
want
to
make
aware,
as
the
planning
commission
has
said,
there
is
mixed
use
in
the
area.
C
You
can
see
the
site
here
and
there's
plenty
of
residential
that
is
a
budding
to
the
east
and
to
the
south.
Already
there
are
industrial
uses,
there's
also
a
public
golf
course,
a
budding
to
the
north
and,
as
I
said,
all
the
departments
have
signed
off
on
this.
Excuse
me:
that's
that's
zooming,
so
the
state
department
of
juvenile
justice
support
judy
reiston,
the
chief
officer
notes,
one
more
child
hope
street
are
vital
to
the
well-being
of
this
community.
We
hope
you
strongly
consider
the
land
use
change.
C
C
It's
a
strong
belief
that
community
partners,
like
one
more
child,
hope
street,
are
vital
to
this
community
and
a
couple
of
the
policies
that
you
should
be
aware
of
is
that
cities
should
work
with
existing
community-based
nonprofit
organizations
to
provide
affordable
housing
opportunities,
which
is
echoed
in
the
staff
report
and
continue
collaboration
among
housing
agencies,
including
private
agencies
like
these
folks.
So
in
summary,
we've
revised
the
entire
plan
as
requested
and
desired,
except
for
one
item.
City
council
states
approve
this.
There
are
many
many
many
many
camp
comp
plan
categories
in
your
staff
report.
C
C
Mr
chairman,
I
would
note
to
you
that
we
have
today,
mr
stephen
robert
executive,
vice
president,
mr
keith
bab,
director
of
one
more
child's
hope
street
stuart
connor,
chairman
of
hope,
street
board
and
I'll,
be
speaking
with
you
as
well.
If
I
can
turn
this
over
to
them,
thank
you.
L
L
While
our
impact
is
vast,
it
often
begins
with
preventative
care
and
also
a
single
home,
a
single
home
where
a
child
will
know,
love
safety
and
hope
in
tampa.
48
of
the
families
do
not
bring
in
enough
income
to
meet
their
basic
needs
for
housing,
child
care
and
food.
58
of
hillsborough
county
middle
schoolers
are
eligible
for
free
or
reduced
lunch.
L
K
I'm
keith
bob
director
of
programs
for
one
more
childhood
stream.
I
just
want
to
give
some
qualitative
backdrop
to
what
we
currently
do
in
tampa
florida.
This
is
a
quote
from
a
mother
of
one
of
our
programs
that
we
serve.
She
said
whatever
you
guys
are
doing
with
these
kids.
Keep
it
up.
I
see
major
changes
in
my
son
and
I'm
sad.
It's
over.
Please
keep
in
touch
and
let
me
know
of
any
other
programs.
You
guys
may
offer
one
of
the
things
that
happened
about
back
in
2016.
K
The
previous
city
council
gave
us
approval
to
provide
programs
and
services
at
the
george
bartholomew
community
center.
That's
where
initially
we
started
over
some
just
quick
backdrop.
In
2017
we
served
50
young
men
with
the
department
of
juvenile
justice
in
2018.
We
served
36
boys
and
28
girls
with
the
department
and
then
year
to
date
we
serve
34
boys
and
17
girls.
We
serve
countless
youth
globally
across
the
state
and
locally,
and
one
of
the
recurrent
themes
that
we
hear
specifically
from
parents
is:
can
my
child
continue
in
your
program?
K
Unfortunately,
program
constraints
and
facility
capacity
limits.
Our
response
is,
unfortunately,
not
the
hope
that
these
families
need
and
services
that
will
ensure
their
success,
require
not
only
a
comprehensive
approach,
but
also
a
continuum
of
care.
This
project
that
we're
proposing
is
going
to
allow
a
comprehensive
approach
and
also
a
continuum
of
care.
We
don't
want
to
drop
off
these
young
people,
but
we
want
to
continue
to
ensure
their
success
throughout
their
lives.
K
As
many
of
you
are
aware,
this
project
is
centrally
located
in
an
area
that
is
resource,
deficient
and
historically
deprived
of
services
that
these
families
need
to
survive.
I'm
asking
that
you
don't
simply
approve
this
project
for
our
organization,
but
I
ask
that
you
approve
this
project
for
the
moms,
specifically
like
the
one
that
I
shared
this
quote
about,
so
that
we
could
expand
and
reach
one
more
child
and
family
that
so
desperately
needs
our
help.
Thank
you.
D
I
am
reading
a
letter
on
the
behalf
of
pastor
ken
whitton
to
the
honorable
city
council
members,
because
of
a
previous
speaking
engagement
that
could
not
be
broken.
I'm
sorry,
I
cannot
be
here
in
person
to
thank
each
of
you
for
what
you
do
with
the
city
every
day
and
to
witness
what
I
believe
will
be
a
historical
vote
to
care
for
children
and
families
in
sulfur
springs
area
and
beyond.
If
I
may,
let
me
give
a
little
context
to
this
vision.
D
In
2012
I
had
a
personal
meeting
with
mayor
bob
bockhorn
and
asked
him
this
question.
If
you
could
release
an
army
of
volunteers
to
go
anywhere
in
this
city
to
help
reduce
crime,
stop
human
trafficking,
assist
public
schools
with
mentors
model
families
and
be
a
catalyst
for
change
economically,
educationally
medically
and
spiritually.
D
Where
would
you
send
that
army
without
stammer
stutter
of
equivocation?
He
responded
with
two
words:
sulfur
springs.
Then
we
brought
this
site
to
your
staff.
The
zoning
staff
planning
commission
staff
and
planning
commission
board
all
agreed
that
we
met
and
reviewed
the
criteria
and
regulations
approved
by
you
in
2013.
I
created
a
non-profit
organization
called
hope
street
for
the
six
years.
We've
done
exactly
what
we
promised
mayor
to
do:
we've
seen
crime
reduced
by
46
percent
and
assisted
hundreds
of
families
in
the
inner
city.
D
I
know
you
have
a
record
of
all
the
testimonies
and
life
change
stories
we've
accomplished
in
the
past
six
years.
In
the
past
eight
months,
we've
done
everything
that
you've
asked
us
to
do
from
redesigning
the
campus
to
environmental
studies
to
studying
traffic
flow,
as
well
as
working
closely
with
city
officials
and
neighbors.
It
has
always
been
our
heart
to
be
the
best
partner
to
work
together
to
penetrate
darkness
of
hunger,
literacy,
violence
and
to
have
yielded
broken
homes
and
broken
hearts
in
the
mini
community.
D
My
ass
tonight
is
your
support
for
this
referendum,
with
a
vote
to
say,
let's
partner
with
the
city
with
one
more
child,
hope
street
and
send
a
message
to
our
children
and
families.
That
hope
is
on
the
way
because
help
has
come
our
way.
City.
Council
members,
our
children
are
not
our
future,
but
are
today
we
may
not
have
been
there
for
them
yesterday,
but
we
can
be
for
them
today
and
their
tomorrow.
D
Your
affirmative
vote
tonight
tells
them
we
are
aware,
and
we
care
thank
you
for
your
consideration:
pastor,
ken
whitton,
idlewild,
church
and
hope
street
founder.
C
J
I
don't
know
if
council
is
familiar
with
that
area,
but
I
know
it
like
the
back
of
my
hand
and
a
portion
of
that
community
to
the
north
does
have
some
challenges,
but
the
portion
to
the
east,
which
I
know
it
as
woodland
terrace
river
grove.
They
don't
have
as
many
challenges
as
maybe
the
northern
portion
itself
springs
and
I
look
at
the
artists.
I
don't
see
too
many
people
from
that
particular
community
here
tonight.
I
see
people
in
the
audience
and
support,
but
I
don't
see
anybody
from
that
particular
community.
J
That's
here
when
I
look
into
the
audience,
because
I
knew
a
lot
of
people
in
that
area
and
most
of
them
know
me,
but
I
know
that
area.
I
guess
my
concerns.
That's
always
been
an
industrial
area
down.
Raleigh
park
drive
strongly
industrial
area
from
chemco
from
the
car
wash
from
the
the
the
brick
the
bricks,
the
welders.
J
There
are
a
lot
of
com,
heavy
commercial
things,
but
I've
just
got
some
concerns
about
the
chemical
plants
and
stuff
forward,
and
I
I
don't
know
if
we've
had
if
the
studies
have
been
done.
I
haven't
been
on
that
last
council,
so
I
don't
know,
but
I've
got
some
concerns
in
reference
to
that
area,
which
is
to
me
heavy
industrial
to
change
that
to
residential.
J
J
J
F
P
And
and
details
not
usually
associated
with
just
a
plan,
I'm
wondering
I
recall
in
the
past.
Sometimes
we
would
have
the
presentation
for
the
plan,
amendment
and
the
rezoning
and
then
and
then
at
least
it'd
be
sort
of
comprehensive
and
then
we'd
vote.
I
can't
remember
exactly
how
we
used
to
do
it,
but
I'm
a
little
bit
clumped
as
they
say.
N
Kate
wells
with
the
office
of
the
city
attorney,
I
know
council
has
handled
these
types
of
hearings
differently,
depending
on
on
council's
desire.
I
think
the
concern
initially
with
opening
both
items,
12
and
13
at
the
same
time
and
having
a
comprehensive
presentation,
is
the
comprehensive
plan.
Amendment
portion
of
the
hearing
is
a
legislative
decision
and
the
standard
of
review
is
different.
The
discussion
is
different
and
the
basis
for
your
decision
is
different
than
when
you're
looking
at
a
pd
site
plan,
which
is
a
quasi-judicial
decision
and
oftentimes.
N
When
I've
been
in
hearings
where
both
items
were
open
together,
it
seemed,
and
I'm
not
saying
it's-
this
jurisdiction,
I'm
new
to
the
city.
Again,
I've
been
working
in
other
jurisdictions,
but
I
found
at
times
that
commissioners
were
making
a
decision
on
a
comp
plan
amendment,
but
taking
into
consideration
the
very
site-specific
issues
and
the
pd
site
plan.
That
decision
really
is
council's
pleasure
if
you'd
like
to
have
both
discussed.
N
At
the
same
time,
I
would
ask
that
when
you
make
a
decision
that
you
very
clearly
separate
out
the
motions
and
recognize
that
one
is
a
legislative
decision
and
what
the
standard
of
review
is
for
that
and
then
the
other
being
a
quasi-judicial
decision
and
the
standard
of
review
for
a
pd
site
plan.
Well,.
P
And
I
think
we're
on
the
same
plane,
because
I'm
hearing
the
kind
of
detail
associated
with
the
rezoning.
And
so,
if
we're
going
to
be
hearing
it,
we
might
as
well
recognize
that
and
and
and
and
just
deal
with
it
and.
P
E
When
you
have
these
two
hurt
together
and
if
council
is
not
exceptionally
cautious,
then
it
could
create
issues
in
the
record.
If
it's
council's
pleasure
to
do
that,
it's
certainly
it's
prerogative.
Best
practices
would
be
in
an
ideal
situation
and
I
understand
they
do
overlap,
and
sometimes
it
does
make
a
difference.
But
when
it
comes
to
rendering
your
decision
it
has
to
be
predicated
on
the
exact
criteria
under
which
you
determine
each
separate
matter,
so
it
counts
as
pleasure
as
to
how
you
wish
to
proceed.
You
may
wish
to.
E
It
may
be
more
expeditious
to
for
the
purposes
of
public
comment
and
that's
another
issue.
When
public
comment
is
taken
to
which
criteria
are
they
making
reference
to
which
criteria
would
then
apply?
So
it's
council's
choice
in
this
case
how
it
wishes
to
proceed.
B
And
if
I'm
in
mr
shelby,
you
know
we
had
this
discussion
before
and
there
was
the
concern
on
the
non-quasi,
judicial
and
and
the
quasi-judicial
issue
number
one.
If
we
proceed
with
merging
the
two,
what
is
the
cure
for
mr
pressman
in
terms
of
additional
time
number
two:
may
we
simply
have
a
public
comment
for
for
separate
items
with
with
hoping
that
the
public
will
comply
with
being
efficient
and
not
repetitive?.
E
Your
first
ques
well
with
the
answer
to
your
second
question,
is
certainly
tan.
You
can
limit
that
to
the
specific
item
and
ask.
E
Be
repetitive,
and
you
can
ask
then,
as
a
matter
of
the
record,
to
incorporate
the
public
comment
from
the
first
hearing
into
a
part
of
the
second
and
then
take
that
into
consideration.
B
Yes,
sir,
if
we
decide
to
merge,
if
you
will
at
this
time,
because
we
kind
of
you
know
councilman
felder's
point
is
well
taken,
which
is
it's
kind
of
the
obvious,
the
word
that
we're
ignoring
now
we're
kind
of
flirting
with
the
merger.
If,
if
we
go
full
speed,
what
is
the
cure
for
mr
pressman?
Does
he
get
additional
time
to
you
know
presently.
N
Given
that
mr
pressman's
presentation
was
cut
off
at
a
point
when
he
started
talking
about
the
rezoning
specific
issues
that
additional
time
would
be
appropriate,
if
council
wishes
to
merge
the
two
hearings,
I
think
that
would
be
an
equitable
solution.
I
would
defer
to
him
and
to
counsel
as
to
how
much
time
that
should
be.
B
Okay,
I
pleasure
of
counsel
with
regards.
I
am
perfectly
fine
and
do
we
need
to
take
public
comment
on
the
merger
issue.
I
would
think
not.
P
And
perhaps
just
out
of
abundance
of
caution,
maybe
we
should
make
sure
mr
pressman
has
no
problem
with
the
merger
notion.
Just
from
a
procedural
perspective,
mr
shelby.
F
H
P
F
L
F
B
I'll
tell
you
my
view,
I
mean
I'm
personally
fine
with
a
merger.
I
think
it's
gonna.
It's
gonna,
give
us
the
same
amount
of
time
that
we
would
have
and
it
would
just
make
things
more
merged.
I
guess,
with
regard
to
the.
F
Second
bite
at
the
airport:
that's
finished
no
you're
fine
and
in
your
case
we've
done
both
of
them.
At
the
same
time,
and
we
said
in
the
offset
of
the
meeting,
you
have
two
that
are
being
combined,
but
you
only
speak
once
and
you've
got
15
minutes
in
the
rebuttal.
That's
how
it
was
in
the
past.
Now
you
all
want
to
change
that
and
have
12.
F
B
E
Excuse
me,
mr
chairman,
I'm
sorry
not
that
I
want
to
complicate
matters,
but
mr
mclean
has
approached
me
with
an
objection
as
a
part,
as
somebody
who
represents,
I
believe,
without
knowing
fully
represents
a
party
or
a
potential.
R
Yes,
yes,
sir,
here's
michael,
you
can
state
your
name,
steve
michellini
I
represent
theo
kim,
which
is
an
adjacent
property
owner.
My
concern
is
that
if
you
mix
the
residential
component,
which
is
the
land
use
question
with
a
larger
question,
which
is
the
the
additional
portion
of
the
site
you,
you
have
now
complicated
the
residential
issue,
which
should
be
standing
alone,
that
that
should
never
be
co-mingled
with
with
the
industrial
park
property
that
they
plan
the
warehouse
in
and
those
other
components.
R
We
should
be
talking
about
the
residential
component,
standing
on
its
own
as
a
land
use
amendment
and
whether
or
not
it's
warranted,
and
not
whether
or
not
the
warehouse
and
and
the
other
outside
services
seem
to
be
benefiting
from
that.
This
is
strictly
a
land
use
question
that
involves.
Should
you
or
should
you
not
convert
light
industrial
to
a
residential
allowable
land
use
component?
So
I
would
argue
with
you:
please
do
not
co-mingle
these,
because
then
you're
going
to
have
trouble
saying.
Well.
I
like
this.
B
N
S
E
It
was
my
recommendation-
and
I
discussed
this
with
ms
wells-
that
in
an
abundance
of
caution
for
an
avoidance
of
putting
the
city
in
legal
jeopardy,
when
it
could
be
easily
voided
with
an
ounce
of
procedure
that
we
take
the
the
more
prudent
approach,
a
cautious
approach.
Given
the
parameters
of
what
we're
facing.
T
P
And
mr
mr
pressman,
with
all
due
respect,
we
need
you
know
we
just
need
to
keep
the
record
clean
if
we're
talking
about
the
land
use
amendment.
Let's
talk
about
that
and
not
get
into
the
whole
warehouse
and
other
issues.
B
And
I'll
say:
whenever
it
comes
to
public
comment,
I
mean
we
always
give
the
public
great
liberality
to
say
what
they
will,
but
we
will
direct
prior
to
public
comment
and
if
you
could,
mr
shelby,
before
we
proceed
with
that,
the
issues
that
we
are
considering
and
the
issues
that
will
be
relevant.
So
the
public
knows
when
they
do.
E
N
Kate
wells
office
of
the
city
attorney
since
we're
going
to
be
proceeding
on
the
land
use
amendment
only
and
I
think,
for
clarity
for
those
in
the
audience
that
may
wish
to
address
this
as
part
of
public
comment.
The
standard
of
review
on
an
amendment
to
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
is
whether
the
requested
land
use
category
in
this
ten.
In
this
case,
the
residential
ten
meets
the
intent
of
the
general
character
description
of
the
city
form
component
in
which
it
is
being
requested
and
is
otherwise
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
N
B
Thank
you,
sir
okay,
any
further,
so
that
being
that
we
will
go
forward
with
public
comments
unless
the
council
has
any
further
questions.
Councilman
citro
you've
been
waiting
so
patiently.
Yes,
go
ahead,
interest.
S
F
E
Zip
code
will
zip
code
suffice?
Well,
you
could
ask
them
if,
where
they,
where
they
live
in
relation
to
the
city,
if
they
don't
want
to,
if
they
don't
want
to
necessarily
give
their
specific
address,
you
can
inquire.
You
could
ask
them
to
do
so.
If
they
choose
not
to
they
can
at
least
tell
you
where,
within
the
relationship
to
the
property.
N
F
C
F
F
F
O
Jennifer
with
the
planning
commission,
I
did
calculate
this
before
the
hearing.
I,
if
my
memory
serves
me
correctly,
it
was
approximately
165
acres
of
light
industrial
land
within
this
general
vicinity
that
you
could
see
on
the
future
land
use
map
and
then
3.7
of
that
would
be
removed
as
light
industrial.
O
C
If
I
may,
with
with
liberty,
if
I
may,
both
the
planning
commission
well,
the
planning
commission
indicates
to
you
that
this
is
a
mixed
area
of
residential
and
industrial.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
sir
anything
further
from
council
before
we
hear
from
the
public.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Oh
yes,
sir,
and
one
thing
on
on
councilman
citroe's
request
on
residency.
Does
that
implicate
any
sort
of
legal
issues
for
appeals?
Anything
of
that
nature
just
to
make
sure
out
of
an
abundance?
I'm
not
aware
of.
E
Do
not
believe
there
are
that
there
would
be
the
case,
but
again,
if
there's
somebody
for
whatever
reason,
maybe
there's
a
legal
reason
that
they
would
not
want
to
disclose
their
exact
address,
to
be
able
to
give
it
in
the
general
vicinity.
Okay,
if
that's
the
case,
and
that's
that
that's
their
prerogative,
unless
counsel
insists.
B
Okay,
it
would
be
a
correct
statement
to
tell
the
public
that
if
12
does
not
pass,
then
13
is
not
going
to
happen.
Is
that
the
correct
statement.
E
I
is
that
legally,
that's
the
legally,
that's
the
that
would
be
actually
the
case.
What
the
options
are
the
petitioner
as
to
number,
depending
on
what
happens
to
number
12.
I
don't
know
what
what
all
the
options
are.
I.
N
B
T
Cornelius
pate
just
a
resident,
born
and
raised
native
of
tampa
me
and
my
wife,
I
that
property.
That's
that
we're
looking
to
I
got
married.
I
would
live
down
the
street
30
years
ago.
When
I
got
married,
we're
going
on
our
31st
anniversary
me
and
my
wife.
Then
there
was
junk
tires
bush
trees.
It
was,
I
mean
it
was
a
dumping
area
30
years
later.
Guess
what
it
is
dump
tires
everything
there
was
no
concern
for
this
property
until
hope
street
came
in
and
purchased
it
and
cleaned
it
up.
T
I
wish
it
was
here
in
the
last
meeting.
75
percent
of
the
audience
was
african-american
during
the
first
meeting.
I
know
you
wasn't
here.
Mr
reddick
was
here,
but
there
was
african-american
and
they
was
here
in
support
of
hope
street
during
the
first
meeting.
Most
of
us
was
told
not
we
didn't
have
to
come
to
this
meeting.
So
that's
a
reason
why
you
don't
see
representatives
of
this,
this
audience
representing
the
neighborhood,
because
we
was
told
not
to
come.
T
This
property
is
on
the
east
side
of
the
rural
tracks.
So,
even
though
you
mentioned
sulphur
springs,
sulphur
spring
students
go
to
sly,
sly,
middle
school,
they
go
to
foster
they
so
they're
part.
This
is
all
within
the
same
area.
Sly
is
a
d
school.
I
believe
foster
is
an
f
school,
so
this.
So
this
is
still
in
the
same
area,
which
is
really
you
know
on
the
east
side,
it's
90
95
99
african
american,
and
what
I'm
amazed
about
is
that
you
look
at
this
audience
now.
T
You
see
how
many
caucasian
is
willing
to
come
in
and
help
this
community.
In
this
way,
don't
deprive
us
of
this
opportunity.
Do
not
deprive
I'm
speaking
as
a
black
african-american.
Do
not
deprive
the
black
family
black
kids
of
this
tremendous
free.
I
mean,
there's
no
charge
free
opportunity
to
help
our
community
don't
deprive-
and
this
is-
and
this
is
not-
I
don't.
This
is
not
really
a
part
of
seminole
heights.
This
is
on
the
east
side
on
the
east
side
of
the
tracks.
T
Some
of
the
heights
is
really
on
the
on
the
west
side
side.
So
when
I
lived
on
the
east
side
right
down
the
street
30
years
ago,
I
wasn't
solicited
to
be
even
a
part
of
some
of
the
heights,
so
I
don't
know
what
that's
all
about,
but
anyway,
I
hope
to
approve
this
amendment.
Thank
you.
S
Good
evening,
commissioners,
excuse
me
councilman.
I
make
that
mistake
honestly
in
my
I'm
approaching
now
near
20
years
in
public
service,
and
this
is
the
first
opportunity
I've
ever
had
to
appear
in
front
of
you.
I
say
that
to
help
put
emphasis
on
the
importance.
I
believe
that
this
subject
matter
is:
I've
had
the
pleasure
of
serving
in
an
advisory
and
a
board
board
capacity
on
this
organization
since
its
inception
right.
S
It's
an
interesting
discussion
that
just
occurred
here
a
little
while
ago
and
to
speak
specifically
about
the
residential
component
of
it.
That
is
fundamental
to
the
philosophy
of
this
organization.
S
It's
trying
to
like
finding
where's
the
starting
point
on
a
circle
when
you
deal
with
some
of
these
things,
it's
almost
impossible
to
find,
but
this
group
has
identified
the
family
as
the
cornerstone
of
everything
else
that
they
build
on
whether
we're
talking
about
general
of
generational
poverty,
hunger,
illiteracy,
any
of
these
things
it
starts
with
the
strengthening
of
the
family
and
that's
what
this
is.
S
This
is
about
relatively
temporary
housing,
while
families
are
go
through
a
training
program
under
which
they
become
more
self-sufficient
and
able
to
deal
with
the
situations,
thereby
fortifying
the
underpinning
of
the
community
itself
right.
I
would
point
out
to
you
that
what's
also
interesting
is
the
proximity
of
these
three
acres
relative
to
the
existing
housing.
That's
right
there.
It
is
in
the
southernmost,
I
believe
so
westernmost
position
of
the
property,
and
please
keep
that
in
mind,
and
what
is
also
somewhat
ironic
is
that,
as
I
said,
this
is
the
cornerstone
of
this
organization's
program.
S
It
was
pointed
out
by
this
council
that,
should
this
one
element
not
go
forward,
then
the
entire
issue
is
moot,
so,
in
fact,
this
issue
is
in
fact
the
cornerstone
of
whether
or
not
this
organization
continues
in
this
community
or
not.
I
ask
you
to
to
give
a
favorable
vote
in
this
one
at
a
courage
of
leadership
and
two
out
of
your
humility
of
a
representative.
A
Leon
battle,
1015,
sykes,
boulevard,
lakeland
florida
prior
to
lakeland
florida
I
lived
in
tampa,
I
was
off
nebraska
avenue.
I
knew
what
it
was
like
to
live
in
toxic
environments,
toxic
environments,
meaning
drugs
and
alcohol
and
violence.
I
grew
up
with
a
father
who
was
a
crack
addict
me
and
my
mom
moved
around
quite
a
bit.
It
wasn't
until
we
were
able
to
get
moved
out
of
the
situation
that
we
were
in
into
a
new
situation
that
we
were
able
to
find
peace
and
wholeness.
A
That's
what
one
more
child
does
is
they
take
families
they
bring
them
to
a
secure
location,
put
them
through
a
year
program,
so
they
can
get
self-suffici
to
self-sufficiency.
One
more
child
moves
families
from
where
they're
at
to
many
of
them.
Having
their
first
home,
we
had
a
mother
recently
who
saved
fourteen
thousand
dollars
through
her
one
year
with
us.
She
was
able
to
buy
her
first
home.
She
went
from
living
in
her
car
to
having
her
first
home.
I
seriously
believe
in
this
program.
A
I
believe
that
every
child
is
one
caring,
adult
away
from
being
a
success
story.
I
believe
tampa
bay
is
a
place
where
we
have
a
lot
of
caring
adults.
We're
gonna,
there's
gonna,
be
volunteers
that
are
gonna
pour
into
these
children.
For
me,
it
was
when
brave
men
came
into
my
life
and
encouraged
me
today.
I
am
vice
president
of
strategic
partnerships
at
one
more
child,
I'm
working
on
my
doctorate.
A
It
wasn't,
but
by
the
grace
of
god
and
by
organizations
like
one
more
child
and
and
caring
people
and
individuals
coming
into
my
life
that
I
could
accomplish
what
I
am
today.
So
I
strongly
strongly
urge
you
to
approve
this
rezoning,
so
we
can
see
the
best
for
our
families
here
in
tampa
bay.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
very
much
aaron.
Thank
you
for
telling
your
story
next,
please,
mr
chairman,.
P
B
J
J
My
concern
is,
although
they
have
set
up
a
50-foot
buffer
from
their
residential
to
the
industrial,
there's
nothing
to
stop
the
kids
from
playing
in
that
area
running
around.
If
I
moved
into
one
of
those
residential
places
and
my
kid
got
sick
now
bear
in
mind,
I've
been
a
single
mother
for
years.
My
kids
are
now
grown,
so
I
don't
know
if
I
qualify
under
that
statement
anymore,
but
I
raise
them
pretty
much
by
myself.
J
If
I
moved
in
there
with
my
children
and
one
of
my
kids
came
home
and
I
couldn't
figure
out
what
was
wrong
with
them,
and
I
took
them
to
my
pediatrician
and
the
pediatrician
said:
what
have
you
been
doing
with
this
child?
His
lungs
are
full
of
crud
from
blah
blah
blah
listing
these
industrial
businesses
that
surround
this
place
practically.
J
J
Now,
in
my
opinion,
if
the
organization
gave
a
hold
harmless
to
the
residents,
excuse
me
to
the
industries,
or
I
don't
know
whatever
what
you
guys
are
legal
people
I'm
not,
but
if
they
gave
something
so
that
the
industries
that
were
there
before
could
not
be
sued
for
what
came
after
then,
I
would
be
happy
with
this.
Thank
you.
T
Hello,
daryl
starlin.
J
T
You
thank,
thank
you,
so
I'll,
be
quick
I'll,
be
quick.
It's
nice
to
see
you
coach,
so
I
I'll
be
quick.
Like
I
said
I'm
from
tampa,
I
grew
up
in
west
tampa.
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
in
sulphur
springs.
T
For
those
who
don't
know,
sulphur
springs,
we
call
it
the
springs.
You
know
it's
known
as
the
springs
and-
and
you
guys
can
see
through
the
statistics
that
you
know
the
area
needs
help.
I
understand
the
argument
behind.
You
know
rezoning
and
things
of
that
nature,
but
you
know
for
someone
who
spent
a
lot
of
time
in
sulphur
springs,
and
I
know
that
community
I
still
have
family
members
in
that
community.
I
have
friends
who
died
in
that
community
through
some
of
the
statistics
that
you
guys
would
look
at.
T
So
I
was
unfortunately
through
some
bad
decisions
that
I
made
I
was.
I
had
to
be
in
djj
a
djj
program
similar
to
the
one
that
keith
babb
oversees.
Okay,
my
mom.
She
took
advantage
of
our
families,
one
of
the
family
support
programs
similar
to
the
family,
support
programs
that
I
oversee
in
lakeland.
She
needed
clothes
for
us.
She
needed
food
for
us.
She
needed
help
with
her
education,
which
you
know
through
the
grace
of
god.
T
She
was
able
to
get
her
aaa,
but
it
was
through
an
organization,
a
church
organization
that
helped
her
and
another
or
another
program
that
I
oversee
in
lakeland
is
a
youth
after
school
program
called
kern.
I
took
advantage
of
a
program
like
that
in
tampa,
so
you
know
I
understand
you
know
the
rezoning
and
all
that
stuff.
You
know
it
can
pose
an
issue.
Just
like
the
last
speaker
said.
You
know,
and
I
respect
her
concerns
about.
T
You-
know
youth
playing
out
in
the
community
and
things
that
nature
ain't
getting
you
know
poisoned
or
what
have
you?
But
that's
not
what
you
know
we're
striving
to
to
do.
That
area
has
been
vetted.
I
believe
in
this
company
I
love
this
company
because
it
it's
a
180
degree,
360
degree
circle
for
me
to
come
back
into
the
community
and
pour
services
for
resources
in
the
community
and
if
you're,
not
from
the
community,
you
haven't
spent
time
in
the
community.
T
E
T
E
R
R
You
as
a
council
would
never
dream
of
putting
an
industrial
park
in
a
residential
area,
and
these
folks
have
been
there.
They
need
to
be
protected.
Theocam
alone
has
over
3.5
million
dollar
investment
in
their
building
and
in
their
equipment
and
in
their
operations
you're
putting
that
in
jeopardy.
They
they
have
approximately
six
acres
of
land
immediately
to
the
north
side,
and
this
property
doesn't
abut
the
golf
course.
R
R
Solar
solar
panel
manufacturers,
heavy
automobile
manufacturing
and
and
automobile
motor
repairs
and
and
machinery.
The
real
issue
is:
does
a
residential
component
belong
in
industrial
park?
The
answer
is
no,
it
doesn't.
They
had
no
previous
approvals.
I
know
that
mr
pressman
said
they
had
a
previous
approval.
They
did
not.
It
never
went
through
the
process
it
was
withdrawn.
R
They
have
never
had
a
completed
process
where
they
were
approved
for
anything
it
remained
light.
Industrial
there's
been
no
evidence,
no
discussion
whatsoever
about
why
a
residential
component
would
be
appropriate
in
this
location.
You
heard
about
the
programs
and
that's
why
I
was
insisting
that
they'd
be
separated.
They
talked
about
what
a
great
job
they
do.
I
agree
is
that
a
great
job,
but
the
great
job
doesn't
have
to
include
a
residential
component.
The
warehouse
can
be
there,
just
as
it
is
without
changing
any
land
use.
They've
recognized
that.
R
So,
if
that's
what
they're
really
talking
about
the
programs
and
what
a
great
job
they
do
go
for
it
there's
other
land
available.
That's
residential!
In
the
immediate
area
there
are
vacant
homes
immediately
to
the
east,
buy
them
put
the
people
that
they
want
there.
They
can
be
in
close
proximity,
but
don't
put
them
in
an
industrial
park.
Don't
jeopardize
the
other
businesses
that
are
there?
R
R
Now,
what's
going
to
happen,
you
know
you
heard
somebody
say
a
minute
ago:
why
put
them
in
jeopardy?
Why?
Why
jeopardize
the
children?
We
tried
to
reach
an
agreement
with
it
with
the
petitioner
regarding
reasonable
restrictions
that
would
protect
the
industrial
users
that
they
wouldn't
be
complaining
about
vapors
and
chemical
plants,
and
you
know
vibrations
and
everything
else
we
couldn't
get
to
that.
They
just
simply
said:
no
we're
not
going
to
do
that.
It's
overreaching.
R
B
Very
much
sir
appreciate
it
councilman
dingfield.
We
got
a
question.
P
And
I
apologize
when
you
put
when
you
put
the
map
up,
I
needed
you
to
point
out
specifically:
okay,
pull
it
back
a
little
bit,
so
I
can
just
see
the
total
okay
very
slowly
point
out
where
theo
kim
is.
He
goes.
A
P
P
B
R
R
You
know,
there's
flashing,
welders,
there's
doing
all
kinds
of
stuff
that,
but
we
didn't
want
it
you're
you're,
introducing
where
no
one
wins.
It
you're
putting
people
in
harm's
way
unnecessarily,
and
we
wanted
some
some
relief.
You
know
and
it's
not
a
guarantee
that
they
wouldn't
be
sued
in
some
future
time.
But
you
know
kids
wander
off,
they
don't
stay
in
one
area,
they
play
they
go
off
in
areas
and
so.
R
Stephanie
theophilus
is
is
an
attorney.
She
drafted
an
agreement
okay,
so
it
was
which
they
categorically.
B
B
And
mr
pressman,
I
I
would
ask
I
mean,
and
obviously
you
are
but
just
to
you
know,
steer
close
to
the
central
idea
of
why
this
change
should
be
done.
I
mean
we.
We
all
stipulate
that
the
your
clients
are
are
wonderful
people,
and
I
wholeheartedly
mean
that
I
know
a
lot
of
good
folks
over
at
idlewild
and
pastor.
Whitten
is
a
good
man
etc,
but
just
to
specify
that
mr.
P
Chairman,
yes,
sir,
just
as
a
procedurally
before
he
goes
to
rebuttal,
can
I
ask
my
question
to
staff
and
then
that
way
he
can
reply
afterwards.
I'm
sorry
todd.
P
Can
you
put
up
the
this
aerial
that
shows
existing
land
use.
P
P
O
Like
I
mean.
O
This
is
rowlet
park,
drive.
P
O
And
then
we
have,
I
believe
this
is
the
camera.
This
is
via
hem
I
do
have.
Maybe
this
will
help.
This
is
what
the
street
looks
like.
P
O
An
industrial
user-
I
I
don't
know,
do
we.
P
O
P
Right
and
then
we
get
to
those
those
two
big
parcels.
O
O
P
Just
wanted
to
put
it
in
context.
Thank
you.
K
C
There's
been
plenty
of
evidence
presented
to
you
from
the
experts
at
the
city
and
the
planning
commission
who
have
listed
many
many
compound
policies
and
support,
and
they
tell
you
that
it
does
meet
the
intent.
That's
required
for
you
to
find
today,
but
to
get
to
the
heart
of
the
matter
of
your
questions.
C
C
What
hope
street
is
proposing
is
area
right
here
for
the
land
use
amendment
existing
residential
is
1100
feet
as
I
had
it
by
google,
more
or
less.
What
hope
should
be
proposing
is
1300
feet,
so
that's
further
away,
but
even
more
so,
mr
chairman
of
council
members,
if
you
look
a
little
bit
further
out
to
the
for
north,
is
a
public
golf
course.
Public
is
moving
across
that
all
day.
Long,
that's
a
budding
I
had.
The
name
is
lead.
C
If
I
that's
the
same
person
same
entity
over
here
400
feet,
you
have
another
residential
over
here,
it's
sort
of
like
kids
playing
baseball
in
a
neighborhood
and
they
hit
a
ball
hard.
It
goes
through
a
window,
but
when
the
next
child
comes
up
and
hits
a
ball
in
the
same
window,
you
can't
break
it
again,
so
they
have
the
test
of
time.
You
have
the
test
of
time.
The
residential
is
existing.
There
has
been
no
problem,
there's
been
no
lawsuits.
There's
been
no
impacts
in
that
respect.
C
C
C
So
this
is
mr
mickelini's
client
here
we're
land
we're
doing
a
future
land
use
moment.
Here.
You
have
this
entire
distance,
that's
under
our
control
for
industrial.
This
is
not
going
to
change.
We
don't
abut
mr
michelini's
client.
You
have
a
vast
area
of
land
and
trees
between
the
two
plus
all
the
existing
residential.
In
just
an
immediate
area.
We
did
receive
a
whole
homeless
agreement
from
mr
michelini
and
his
client,
and
we
did
have
our
attorney
to
look
it
over,
and
his
answer
was
that
it
was
in,
in
my
words,
overreaching
and
excessive.
C
It
created
huge
liabilities
for
one
street
that
they're
placing
liabilities,
hazardous
waste
liabilities,
everything
they're,
placing
on
future
potential
liabilities
on
my
client
further
that
it
creates
liabilities
that
have
nothing
to
do
with
the
rezoning.
As
I've
been
told,
and
I've
been
consulting
that
respect.
C
So
I
would
ask
you
to
look
at
how
we
came
here
last
time
and
how
we
are
here
today.
You
have
support
from
the
community,
except
for
mr
michellini.
We
have
revised,
we've
renovated
we've
motivated
we've
done
everything.
You've
asked
to
do
for
this
particular
land
use
category.
You
have
tremendous
support
from
leadership
in
this
community.
That's
been
presented
to
you
and
you
have
tremendous
support
from
this
neighborhood
so
again.
In
summary,
we
appreciate
your
time
and
consideration.
C
G
How
I
look
at
it
is:
there's
plenty
of
residential
there,
some
closer
than
this
proposed
project
and
then
to
the
right
in
that
blue
section
of
the
map.
That's
the
city's
water
facility,
and
that's
even
I
mean
that
literally
abuts,
right
up
to
the
residential
section.
So
I
mean
had
this
been
something
completely
new
and
there
was
no
residential
to
begin
with.
That's
one
thing,
but
I
mean
it's
a
heavily
populated
area
or
a
well-populated
area
already.
B
Thank
you,
sir.
Anyone
else,
no
one
else:
okay
and
and
mr
pressman,
if
I
may,
how
many
kids
are
going
to
be
living
there.
B
Strike
that
question
strike
the
answer
struck.
Mr
chairman,
yes,
sir,
thank
you
thank
you
for
correcting
me.
Okay,
no
further
quest,
no
further
questions.
May
I
have
a
motion
to
close.
We
have
a
motion
enclosed
by
councilman
escalco,
a
second
by
councilman
citro,
all
in
favor
any
opposed.
What
is
the
pleasure
of
counsel,
councilman
I'll?
Take.
G
E
It's
already
been
filed.
Is
the
title
the
same,
do
you
know,
or
should
I
just
ask
the
council
to
accept
the
substitute
and
have
it
read
directly
from
this?
So
there's
no
error
what
the
memo
is
on
the
bottom.
E
G
You
very
much
I
apologize,
no
worries
all
right
so
reading
from.
G
Substitute
here,
an
ordinance
amending
the
tampa
comprehensive,
planned
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
generally
located
at
7,
000
1
roulette
park
drive
from
light
industrial
li
to
residential
10
r10,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
and
conflict
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
date.
Do
we
have
a
second
and
the.
G
Well,
I
I
see
competent,
substantial
evidence
from
the
petitioner
as
to
why
this
should
be
approved.
As
I
mentioned
in
comments
just
a
few
minutes
ago.
Residential
is
already
there
some
even
closer
than
the
proposed
change,
as
well
as
the
city
of
tampa's
water
facility
right
there.
G
P
Mr
man,
scott
go
make
an
excellent
motion,
I'll
just
add
to
it.
The
fact
that
I
think
it's
extremely
important,
as
I
think
mr
haye
mentioned
earlier
in
the
evening,
that
we
protect
our
industrial
areas,
because
they're
they're
becoming
fewer
and
far
farther
between.
P
B
Okay,
councilman
good
sir.
J
B
B
And
I'll
just
say,
I
agree
with
councilman
scalco's
motion.
I
think
that
including
his
rationale,
I
think
this
is
a
very
narrowly
tailored
a
section
there
with
sufficient
buffering
and
what
given
the
precedent
that
we
already
have
for
some
residential
involvement
there.
I
I
don't
see
this
as
an
issue
and
that's,
irrespective
of
anything
I
may
think
substantively
of
the
development
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
B
I
O
Residential
malone
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
I
won't
be
labor
my
intro,
since
you
will
all
be
familiar
with
the
site.
However,
this
plan
development
is
the
entire
site,
so
it's
approximately
16.75
acres.
O
O
So
after
that
is
adopted,
this
would
have
two
future
land
uses
the
light,
industrial
and
the
residential
tent,
and
on
that
site
plan
the
applicant
has
delineated
the
portions
residential
and
then,
where
those
residential
units
will
go
since
residential
is
not
an
allowable
use
in
the
light
industrial
future
land
use
at
all.
The
planning
commission
did
have
an
opportunity
to
review
this.
As
part
of
our
rezoning
consistency
review,
we
did
find
that
it
was
consistent
with
that
underlying
future
land
use
that
the
use
that
the
applicant
is
requesting
is
consistent.
O
I
Just
for
the
record,
originally,
this
was
a
euclidean
rezoning
request.
They
were
going
to
attempt
to
rezone
the
entire
property
to
commercial
intensive,
but
out
of
the
city
council
hearings
on
the
31st
and
of
january
and
march
14th,
they
reconsidered
amended
this
application
to
a
planned
development.
The
overall
property
is
16.84
acres.
They
are
proposing
a
25
hundred
and
thirty
five
square
foot,
warehouse
and
distribution,
building,
a
twelve
thousand
square
foot,
a
business
professional
office
and
then
sixteen
total
dwelling
units
in
eight
semi-detached
single-family
structures.
I
The
proposed
overall
setbacks
for
the
perimeter
of
the
property
is
70
foot
step
back
to
the
north
20
foot
to
the
south
60
feet
to
the
east
and
30
feet
to
the
west.
There
are
wetlands
to
the
north
of
the
property
that
have
been
delineated
through
the
historic
county.
Environmental
protection,
commission
and
the
site
plan
indicates
compliance
with
all
applicable
buffering.
I
For
that
wetland
feature
the-
and
I
know
the
applicant
will
go
into
more
detail
presentation,
but
they
are
proposing
two
vehicular
entrances.
One
will
be
mostly
for
the
warehousing
and
truck
traffic.
Then
a
separate
entrance
for
the
business
professional
office
use
of
the
multi-purpose
use
that
will
go
into
the
residential
area.
The
entire
residential
area
will
be
fenced
off
from
the
industrial
area,
so
there
will
be
a
fence
in
this
area
with
a
pedestrian
connection
and
a
gate
to
access
it.
I
The
development
coordination
has
some
minor
site
plan
modifications
between
first
and
second
reading.
If
you
do
adopt
this
pd
as
well
as
transportation,
they
have
some
modifications
to
some
of
the
waiver,
language
and
natural
resources.
Finally,
all
had
some
minor
changes
to
the
tree
data
given
the
site
is
currently
heavily
wooded.
I
I
know
we've
been
looking
at
a
lot
of
aerials,
but
here's
another
ariel
of
the
subject
property.
You
can
see
as
a
significant
number
of
trees
on
the
property.
The
applicant
has
worked
with
staff
to
try
to
preserve
as
many
trees
as
possible.
I
However,
17
non-hazardous
grand
trees
are
required
to
be
removed,
saying
that
there
is
language,
informational
comments
and
analysis
from
our
natural
resources
department.
They
do
still
find
this
petition
consistent
as
far
as
waivers
the
only
there
are
three
waivers
being
requested.
I
One
is
to
reduce
44-foot
drive,
aisle
backup
distance
to
20
foot,
that
is,
for
some
of
these
individual
driveways
for
the
semi
attached
units
to
reduce
the
required
number
of
loading
bursts
from
three
births.
72
and
finally,
again,
the
removal
of
nine
17
non-hazardous
grand
trees,
saying
that
the
overall
development
review
compliance
after
the
city
of
tampa
did
find
this
consistent
with
applicable
city
of
tampa
land
development
regulations.
C
C
This
is
rec
18-113
you're,
aware
of
the
support
for
the
project,
its
location,
the
user.
C
I
will
clarify
the
record
if
I
may,
in
2016,
a
vote
did
come
through
city
council
for
higher
density
residential
that
was
approved
by
city
council.
It
then
went
up
the
dca
or
department
of
economic
development.
It
was
approved
by
them,
but
did
not
come
back
to
council.
So
the
vote
was
made
and
approved.
It
did
not
come
back
to
council
because
the
deal
was
pulled.
So
I
did
want
to
clarify
that,
for
you.
C
So
we're
going
to
a
pd
which
quite
frankly,
has
been
designed
and
modified
to
meet
the
many
neighbors
of
concerns.
That's
really
why
we
went
to
the
pd
and
all
those
elements
I
will
say
regard
to
the
tree
issue.
We
worked
extremely
long
and
hard
with
natural
resources,
department,
the
zoning
staff
and
the
planning
commission
staff.
They
were
great
to
work
with
on
this
and
we
went
through
a
lot
of
renditions.
C
So
16
semi
detached
dwellings,
warehouse
distribution,
business,
professional
office,
which
is
laid
out
in
the
plan.
I
do
want
to
mention
that
the
residential
area
is
defined
by
a
security
fence
all
the
way
across
the
property.
That
was
one
critical
aspect
for
my
clients
that
is
separate
and
distinct
from
the
rest
of
the.
C
C
I'll
just
note
again,
your
staff
and
policies
are
completely
in
support.
Your
zoning
staff
knows
the
post
project
is
a
mix
of
warehouse
office
residential.
It
does
meet
the
intensity
as
consistent
with
intensity
and
development
pattern
of
the
industrial
office
and
residential
uses
in
the
area.
You've
heard
the
comments
from
the
planning
commission.
C
C
So
with
that
I
won't
go
any
more
details.
I
don't
think
that
we
need
it,
but
if
there's
any
questions
or
if
I
may
reserve
time
I'd
be
happy
to
thank
you.
J
C
C
The
hours
are
8
30
to
4
30,
but
that
can
pass
in
the
center.
That
area
is
not
a
budding
to
the
residential,
so
the
resident,
the
other
residential
neighbor,
I'm
sorry
other
residential
neighborhood
is
located
over
here
at
the
bottom.
Competition
is
up
over
there.
Thank.
B
You
thank
you,
sir
anyone
else.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay.
If
anyone
is
here
to
public
to
comment
on
item
number
13,
please
come
forward
state
your
name
and
before
mr
mikuri
starts.
Is
anybody
else
here
to
comment
on
item
13?
If
so,
please
raise
your
hand.
Okay,
mister,
okay,
go
ahead,
sir.
R
Overhead
steve
michelini,
representing
theo
kim
what
we
would
like
to
have
request
here
is
that
the
retention
areas
and
this
green
space
up
here
be
fenced
off
and
it
not
be
designated
for
open
space
or
recreational
use
as
an
appropriate
buffer
between
the
industrial
users
here
and
and
along
this
side,
and
I
know
that
kids
wander
off
and
they
get
into
other
areas,
I'm
glad
that
they
are
fencing
off
the
residential
component,
kids
get
out
of
there.
R
So
I
think
it's
a
reasonable
request
to
have
a
six
foot
fence
to
delineate
that
and
to
keep
that
safe,
so
the
kids
aren't
wandering
around
up
in
here
and
getting
close
to
the
other
industrial
users.
You
also
you
know
in
east
tampa
they've
had
drownings
where
kids
got
into
those
retention
ponds
because
those
fences
and
those
ponds
weren't
maintained.
I
think
it's
a
reasonable
health
safety
and
welfare
issue,
and
I
respectfully
request
the
council
direct
the
applicant
to
make
those
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
if
this
goes
forward.
Thank
you.
S
Rich
reedy
from
northdale
just
relative
to
the
the
overall
plan
now
here
this
is
going
to
be
the
base
of
operation
for
a
lot
of
the
key
services
that
this
organization
provides.
S
They
haven't
mentioned
it
before,
but
right
now
in
sulfur
springs
elementary.
They
serve
100
percent
of
the
children
in
that
school
every
weekend.
Every
weekend
those
children
go
home
with
a
backpack
full
of
food.
All
right.
This
facility
here
is
going
to
be
sort
of
the
core
of
which
the
intake
of
food
occurs.
S
It
is
approach
apportioned
accordingly
and
then
sent
out
to
distribution
points.
So
it's
essential
to
that.
That
happens.
You
know
walking
over
here
this
morning.
This
afternoon
I
noticed
a
couple
things.
You
can't
look
around
downtown
without
seeing
a
sky
crane,
a
sky
crane
and
everything
that
that
represents
about
the
future
and
prosperity
of
this
community.
S
S
S
A
Philip
whitten
and
I
live
in
the
land
of
lakes
area.
I
currently
oversee
the
backpack
program
that
mr
reedy
was
speaking
about
to
date
in
the
tampa
bay
area
at
sulphur
springs
and
one
other
school,
we
have
delivered
about
290,
000
meals
to
local
schools,
currently
in
conversation
with
five
other
schools
to
currently
deliver
about
that
exact
same
amount
over
the
next
12
months,
and
have
significant
potential
for
increase
for
hungry
children
and
also
other
areas
to
to
be
increased.
A
The
opportunity
that
lies
before
you
and
us
as
well
is
something
that
could
potentially
impact
the
community
for
generations
to
come.
The
generational
poverty,
that's
in
the
area
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
people
are
not
able
to
attend
is
they
have
no
transportation.
They
have
no
way
to
get
around.
Our
goal
for
this
particular
area
is
to
increase
financial
literacy
and
to
completely
transform
the
community
for
years
to
come,
and
that
is
our
our
goal
and
intention.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
C
I
would
just
comment
to
mr
michelini
that
if
we
can
get
the
fence
permitted,
if
it's
permissible
to
permit
it,
then
we'd
be
happy
to
meet
that
condition.
There's
a
lot
of
environmental
in
there.
We
just
want
to
be
sure,
that's
not
a
fixed
condition,
but
again,
if
we
will
attempt
to
permanently
talk
to
our
engineer,
if
we
can
then
we'll
supply
it.
R
B
And
and
yes,
ma'am
go
ahead.
I
Mary,
san,
diego,
I'm
sorry
to
interject,
I
will
just
bring
this
information
to
your
attention.
This
is
a
large
wetland
area.
There
are
three
retention
ponds
and
then
this
is
also
a
wetland
area
that
kind
of
goes
off
site
a
little
bit.
So
any
type
of
structure,
including
a
fencing,
would
have
to
go
through
epc
approval.
C
I
R
C
P
Sir,
yes,
sir,
go
ahead,
sir
last
question
on
this
one:
do
we
have
anybody
from
our
tree
our
tree
folks,
here.
P
So
I'm
seeing
some
exhaustive
work
on
the
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
trees
that
are
out
there,
but
I
didn't
see
the
the
ultimate
tree
table
that
it
speaks
to.
I
mean
I
heard
about
how
many
grand
trees
we're
gonna
lose,
but
I
didn't
hear
about
how
many
grand
trees
we're
gonna
save.
C
Report
does
have
a
comment
on
that,
which
is
that
there
are
904
trees
in
the
property
which
287
protected
trees
are
proposed
for
removal,
but
preservation
is
67
of
the
trees
in
the
site.
The
minimum
required
for
what
is
site
is
50,
so
they're
above
the
standard
the
city
calls
for,
and
let
me
also
say
that
none
of
this
will
be
done
through
the
state
exclusion.
It's
all
done
through
the
city
rules
and
requirements.
Natural
resources
is
accepting
the
report
and
again
we're
exhausted
with
them.
I
Yes,
it's
in
the
it's
in
the
staff
report.
As
he
indicated
there
are
over
900
trees.
Eight
287
are
proposed
for
removal,
and
36
of
the
53
will
remain
on
site.
P
B
By
councilman,
scott,
second,
by
councilman,
good,
all
in
favor
any
opposed,
mr
chairman,
if
I
can.
E
B
I
I
don't
recall
who
it's
next,
we'll
take
councilman,
we'll
just
put
you
in
there.
F
E
So
the
title
on
the
agenda
is,
is
the
old
ordinance?
I
ask,
as
you
read
the
title
from
the
the
substitute.
F
Right:
okay,
thank
you
very
much
file,
number
rev
18-113,
an
ordinance
reasoning.
Property
excuse
me
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
and
ordinance
resulting
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
7001
rollout
park,
drive
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
district
classification,
ig
industrial
general
to
pd
plan,
develop
business,
professional
office,
warehouse
and
wholesale
trade,
residential
single-family
semi-detached,
providing
an
effective
date,
because
this
is
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
use.
Excuse
me:
land
development
code
is
also
consistent
with
all
departments.
F
E
It's
been
brought
to
my
attention:
councilman
sitro,
that
there
is
a
revision
sheet
associated
with
this.
Could
that
be
incorporated
in
the
emotion.
B
I
I
you
know
it
would
be
inappropriate
to
talk
about
the
the
work
that's
been
done,
substantively
that's
being
sought
to
be
done
in
this
institution,
but
just
just
I
know
I
speak
for
everybody
here
when
I
say
that
we
are
are
not
only
admirers
of
this
work,
that's
gonna
be
done,
but
thankful
for
it,
and
I
just
I'll
speak
on
behalf
of
myself
that
I
always
see
ottawa
church
as
a
community
partner
in
in
helping
folks
out
and
in
not
just
feeding
the
stomach
but
also
feeding
the
the
heart
and
helping
the
heart,
and
I
think
that's
real
important.
B
I
know
ottawa
from
many
things,
including
is
the
church
where
judge
jared
smith
teaches
sunday
school,
so
there
you
go.
So.
Thank
you
guys
very
much.
Thank
you.
C
B
B
And
do
we
need
a
break
yet,
let's
take
if
I
may
counsel
a
like
a
seven
minute.