►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 03122019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Mean
nobody,
sorry
speaking
in
Spanish
thinking
in
Spanish
again
good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
name
is
Joseph
seatrout
and
welcome
to
this
variance
review
board
hearing
today,
March
12th
2019,
the
meeting,
a
City
attempt,
variance,
review
board
and
I
already
told
you
my
name
I,
am
the
chair.
During
these
proceedings,
the
members
of
the
board
that
are
present
starting
on
my
left
are
Michael
via
Dustin.
A
Susan
long
and
joining
us
tonight
is
Kristen
Morris
assistant
city
attorney,
along
with
Eileen
Rosario
and
Miss
Wanda
Anthony
and
mr.
Knox,
from
City's
land
development
and
from
city
services.
I
will
take
a
few
minutes
to
review
tonight's
procedures
in
the
case
being
called
an
order
that
they
appear
on
the
agenda
when
your
case
is
called
the
petitioner
and
or
the
or
the
what
am
I
trying
to
say.
Thank
you,
the
applicant
or
the
agent
for
the
applicant
will
approach
the
podium.
A
Miss
Anthony
will
then
review
the
board
review
the
variance
request
with
the
board
after
she
is
finished,
the
applicant
or
the
agent
will
have
ten
minutes
to
present
their
case.
When
that
is
finished.
Anyone
in
the
audience
that
wishes
to
speak
to
this
variance
request
will
have
three
minutes
each
to
do
so.
When
that
is
finished,
the
board
will
then
ask
the
applicant
and/or
the
agent
questions
after
that
is
finished,
the
Alpha
can
add,
or
the
agent
will
then
have
five
minutes
for
rebuttal
if
necessary.
A
Any
information
such
as
pictures
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted
as
part
of
your
petition,
and
you
intend
to
present
this
in
the
hearing.
You
can
present
them
for
consideration
and
support
your
petition.
They
must
be
individually
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board.
After
the
acceptance
by
the
board,
you
must
submit
them
to
staff
to
be
entered
and
made
part
of
the
permanent
record
as
evidence.
The
board
bases
its
decision
on
competent
in
substantial
evidence
which
is
presented
and
which
meets
the
criteria
for
City
Code
of
Ordinances.
A
The
variance
granted
by
the
board
will
only
be
for
what
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
will
be
in
compliance
with
any
terms
and
conditions
stated
in
the
approval
by
the
board.
You
must
have
four
affirmative
votes
for
your
variance
to
be
approved.
If
approved,
your
Vantage
will
expire
within
two
years
of
today's
date.
All
other
city
codes
will
need
to
be
met.
If
any
cases
are
continued
in
tonight's
hearing,
they
will
be
continued
to
May,
14th
or
June
11th.
A
If
you
wish
to
appeal
the
variance
reviews,
Board's
decision
to
City
Council,
you
must
file
a
petition
for
review
of
the
Board's
decision
within
10
business
days
of
the
decision.
If
your
variance
is
granted,
you
will
not
be
able
to
pull
any
permits
until
after
a
10-day
appeal
period
has
passed
before
we
begin.
Is
there
any
business
regarding
the
agenda
that
staff
would
like
to
address.
C
D
F
C
A
A
G
I
A
Was
a
question,
would
you
prefer
to
be
on
May,
14th
or
June
11,
May,
14th,
okay?
Okay,
since
you
are
here
and
which
case
is
yours,
I'm,
sorry,
22?
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
that
was
going
to
speak
or
would
like
to
speak
about
the
continuance
on
VRB
1922,
seeing
none?
If
someone
would
like
to
make
a
motion
for
this
case,
I'm.
J
F
A
A
H
A
A
H
There
were
five
members
seated.
The
vote
was
three
to
two:
the
those
voting.
Yes
to
deny
the
motion
where
Mr
past
or
mr.
de
Papa
and
mr.
via
those
who
voted
not
to
deny
were
mr.
Feldman
and
chairman
Brown
at
the
time.
The
minutes
recite
that
the
motions
failed
on
a
three-to-two
vote
with
Brett
Feldman
and
Gary
Brown
voting,
nay.
H
That
is
incorrect
because
under
chapter
27
and
the
procedural
rules
of
the
VRP
that
motion
passed
and
if
I
may
read
to
you
what
the
rule
says
and
I'll
put
it
in
front
of
you,
a
quorum
of
the
vrv
necessary
to
adopt
any
business
of
a
bore
shall
consist
of
four
members.
You
had
five
members
that
evening.
So
we
met
that
requirement.
A
concurring
vote
of
four
members
shall
be
necessary
to
approve
an
application
for
variance.
H
However,
a
simple
majority
of
those
present
three
out
of
five
and
empowered
to
vote
shall
be
necessary
to
conduct
a
routine
business
and
deny
an
application
for
variance
now.
Chapter
27
was
adopted
by
the
City
Council
to
govern
your
hearings
in
the
vrb
later,
the
VRP
adopted
its
own
rules
of
procedure
and
those
rules
of
procedure
are
as
follows:
both
required
as
to
certain
measures.
A
simple
majority
of
those
of
those
board
members
present
shall
be
sufficient
to
conduct
routine
business,
to
deny
any
application
and
to
decide
an
administrative
official
determination
on
appeal.
H
So
three
out
of
five
denied
the
application.
However,
the
vote
of
at
least
four
members
of
the
board
shall
be
required
to
approve
an
application.
Now
with
very
instructive,
is
the
code
that
your
rules
also
say
insufficient
or
tied
vote
when
it
matters
considered
by
the
board
and
an
insufficient
or
time
vote
is
obtained,
the
board's
action
becomes
a
nullity
and
the
matter
shall
be
automatically
carried
over
for
consideration
at
the
board's.
Next
meeting
has
unfinished
business.
You
did
not
meet
that
standard
at
5:42
because
you
did
not
have
an
insufficient
vote.
H
E
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
I
am
aware
of
this,
and
it
is
accurate
that
there
was
a
misunderstanding
at
our
previous
meeting.
It
had
been
a
long
night
with
a
very
short
number
of
members,
and
there
was
a
misunderstanding
on
the
part
of
the
barians
view.
Board
I
also
missed
it,
and
there
was
misunderstanding
on
the
part
of
the
applicant
as
well
as
everyone
else
that
was
in
the
audience.
E
E
H
Sukhram,
have
you
heard
this?
Isn't
what
the
rules
say
that
rules
do
not
say
that
after
you
vote,
you
can
say
you
misunderstood
something
and
we'll
do
it
next
month.
The
vote
is
cast.
You
don't
later
say.
I
was
misunderstanding.
I
would
like
the
opportunity
to
pull
those
of
you
who
were
present
and
if
you
wouldn't
answer
to
me
as
to
whether
you've
misunderstood
anything
about
that
hearing
and
that
vote
support.
A
H
K
Based
on
that,
we
stayed
with
it
and
we
had
in,
and
it
was
three
to
two
so
and
I
agree
with
witness
more
that
you
would
be
unduly
prejudiced
if
we
weren't
allowed
to
proceed
with
this
and
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
on
the
record,
because
that
was
our
understanding
going
into
the
last
review
board.
If
that
was
not
the
case
and
represented
differently
to
myself,
we
would
have
continued
it
and
been
here
tonight
in
front
of
the
six
of
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you
at
this
time.
I
would
ask
members
of
the
board
if
you've
had
any
ex
parte
communications
regarding
into
the
items
coming
before
you
this
evening,
you've
had
any
verbal
communications,
please
disclose
the
sum
and
substance
of
that
communication
with
whom
and
occurred
and
where
it
occurred,
and
as
well
as
when
it
occurred.
If
you've
received
any
written
communications,
please
disclose
the
nature
of
it
and
file
it.
In
the
record.
E
I
A
B
A
L
I
C
C
The
case
was
continued
at
the
February
12th
hearing,
due
to
a
3-2
vote
to
deny
at
the
meeting
the
applicant
did
agree
to
amend
the
request
for
the
rear
yard
from
from
5
feet
to
1
foot
to
5
feet,
3
point
4
feet
and
they
to
allow
the
rear
yard
for
the
maximum
high
to
remain
at
15
feet.
So
he
did
agree
to
that
condition.
The
property
is
owned.
Our
75
man
was
purchased
in
2017.
The
single
family
residents,
including
the
pool,
was
built
in
2018.
C
K
So
we
have
a
revised
site
plan,
it's
a
better
show
where
the
various
heights
are
and
the
half
gable
and
the
full
gable.
And
if
you
see
right
here,
there's
going
to
be
a
half
gable,
the
walls
of
the
entire
enclosure
are
twelve
feet.
The
half
gable
the
height
fifteen
feet.
It
will
go
directly
into
the
side
of
the
home
and
then,
as
we
move
to
this
side
here,
will
have
a
full
gable.
K
The
gable
hip
ends
where
again,
the
heights
15
feet
and
it'll
go
to
this
overhang,
which
is
at
thirteen
point
six
feet
and
then
down
here
at
the
bottom
is
actually
the
view
of
what
it
would
look
like
from
the
rear
of
the
property,
which
is
the
rear,
neighbor,
but
I
believe
is
here
tonight,
and
so
this
is.
This
is
exactly
what
it's
going
to
look
like
and
what
was
added
to
the
site
plan.
Were
these
dotted
lines
here?
K
K
This
is
just
an
example
are
in
the
current
case,
you
would
actually
go
into
the
side
of
the
house,
not
this
overhang
right
here,
but
this
is
essentially
what
it
look
like
on
this
end
right
here
and
then,
as
we
move
down
to
the
overhang
right
here
behind
the
lanai,
it
will
look
like
this.
That's
the
proposed
screen
enclosure
and
there
will
be
the
only
gutters
will
be
these
seven
inch
super
gutters,
which
are
right
here
over
the
overhang,
where
the
full
cable
is.
K
It
has
an
address
at
the
the
last
variance
review
board
here
and
the
intent
with
this
was
never
to
put
a
pool
cage
here.
It
was
intended
to
be
an
open-air
pool,
there's
other
neighbors
who
have
open-air
pools,
but
unfortunately,
as
time
went
on
the
trees
that
are
on
the
rear.
Neighbor's
property
began
to
really
basically
put
debris
daily
into
the
pool
in
question
here
as
well,
as
leaves
that
continually
Clause
up
the
filter
and
I
just
want
to
show.
K
You
here
was
the
site
map
that
Miss
Anthony
put
up
earlier
and
the
subject
property,
and
you
can
see
that
the
neighbor
directly
to
the
east.
It's
a
very
similar
sized
house,
similar
sized
pool,
no
screening,
that's
what
the
applicant
intended
to
do
here,
but,
as
you
can
tell,
they
didn't,
have
a
tree
problem.
Whereas
here
you
can
barely
see
the
rear
neighbor's
house
which
are
covered
by
these
Grand
Oaks
and
those
trees
are
not
on
the
applicants
property.
K
We
actually
had
a
separate
survey
done
to
show
where
those
trees
are
located
and
the
three
main
trees
in
question
are
here
here
and
here,
and
this
one
is
shared
between
the
applicant
and
the
rear,
neighbor
I
believe
they've
agreed
it's
approximately
75%
on
the
applicant
side
and
25%
on
the
rear
neighbor.
So
these
are
the
trees
in
question.
The
pool
screen
clearly
can't
go.
It
can't
go
anywhere
else.
The
request
is
a
foot
right
here.
K
As
I
mentioned,
the
reason
and
the
request
for
the
variance
all
relates
to
the
debris
and
leaves
that
are
accumulating
on
a
daily
basis
from
the
adjacent
trees
and
I
had
put
these
pictures
in
the
records
at
the
last
hearing,
I'd
like
to
just
put
them
back
in
again.
This
is
this
is
literally
overnight.
K
This
is
what
happens
overnight
again,
it's
a
daily
occurrence.
This
is
the
actual
filter
here,
and
so
after
the
last
hearing,
which
was
on
February
12,
the
applicant
took
pictures
almost
on
a
daily
basis
from
now
until
yesterday,
and
this
is
what
happens
and
the
applicant
has
a
pool
company
that
comes
once
a
week
on
Friday
the
applicant
skins,
the
pool
himself
pretty
much
daily,
and
this
is
still
the
result.
This
is
day
after
day
and
I'm
just
going
to
bust
through
these,
just
so
that
they're
in
the
record.
E
K
Now
understanding
the
standard
that
the
variance
Review
Board
has
to
abide
by
and
whether
or
not
to
grant
a
variance
I'd
like
to
run
through
those
factors,
real,
quick
and
I-
think
the
the
first
thing
I'd
like
to
address
is
this
a
non
use,
variance
we're
not
at
something
to
change
the
use
of
anything.
It's
simply
to
put
a
pool
screen
in
which
wasn't
contemplated
at
the
time
the
home
was
built
and
they
had
tried
to
enjoy
the
pool
for
a
period
of
time
without
the
pool
screen,
and
then
it
just
became
a
necessity.
K
There's
no
other
way
to
keep
these
leaves
out
in
this
debris
out,
they've
inquired
about
getting
a
creepy-crawler,
but
that
just
gets
clogged
up
it
burns
out.
The
motor
I
know
at
the
last
hearing
mr.
Crestor
suggested.
Maybe
there
are
other
ways
to
mitigate
this
I've
done.
My
own
independent
research,
I,
haven't
found
anything
I
found
articles,
in
fact
to
the
contrary
that
in
Florida
pool
screens
are
the
norm.
That's
the
way
to
keep
out
the
leaves
the
debris,
the
mosquitoes
sunlight
as
well.
K
There
are
covers
that
can
go
over
pools
where
those
are
mainly
used
up
north
to
winterize
the
pools,
so
the
applicant
is
kind
of
left
with
this
last
resort
to
keep
the
leaves
out
and
the
board
recognized
previously.
There
really
is
no
guidance
as
to
what
constitutes
a
practical
difficulty
or
an
unnecessary
hardship
in
these
cases,
and
I
would
suggest
here.
K
The
practical
difficulty
is
pretty
obvious
from
those
pictures
which
is
the
leaves
the
debris,
the
daily
cleaning
of
the
pool,
which
is
really
affecting
the
use
of
enjoyment
of
that
pool,
and
the
same
goes
for
the
unnecessary
hardship.
These
aren't
the
applicants
trees.
He
didn't
purchase
the
house
with
these
trees
on
the
property.
These
were
the
neighbors
trees,
which
he
has
no
control
over.
He
attempted
to
not
have
a
pool
screen.
It
didn't
work
that
now
he's
requesting
a
slight
variance
to
put
that
pool
screen
in
to
use
and
enjoy
the
pool
I'd
like
to.
K
Through
the
last
fourteen
years
of
the
VRBO
meeting
minutes
an
agenda
to
see
the
outcome
of
various
pool
screen,
applicants
similar
to
this
believe
I
found
39.
There
were
three
that
were
denied
and
I
can
address
those
later
on
rebuttal
if
necessary.
But
I
would
like
to
address
two
out
of
the
36
that
were
granted,
which
I
think
are
relevant
here.
The
first
one
was
BRB
11-0,
six
location,
one,
six,
zero,
zero,
five
Burnham
way.
K
The
request
was
to
reduce
the
rear
in
side
yard
setbacks
from
1/2
from
5
feet
to
one
foot
to
construct
the
pool
enclosure.
The
applicant
addressed
the
board
and
showed
four
trees
on
site.
Trees
were
small,
but,
as
time
went
by
the
leaves
became
a
problem
after
board.
Discussion
moved
to
approve
and
was
seconded
the
motion
passed
seven
to
seven
two
zero
unanimously.
K
Then
two
more
real,
quick.
The
next
one
is
VRB
11
23,
3,
909,
South,
Kona
wood
Avenue
reduce
the
side
and
rear
yard
setbacks
from
5
feet
to
2
feet
to
construct
a
screen
enclosure.
The
OPCON
addressed
the
board
went
over
the
particulars.
He
showed
pictures
of
oak
trees
that
are
on
adjacent
properties
which
drop
leaves
into
the
pool
he
showed
pictures
of
the
pool
in
the
rear
yard.
There
was
a
mr.
K
Barron
say,
there's
no
other
place
with
a
pool,
cage
and
made
a
motion
approved
and
motion
was
voted
unanimously
to
approve,
and,
lastly,
BRB
16
3273
Martinique
Avenue
on
Davis
Island,
where
this
property
is
requests
to
reduce
side
yard
from
5
to
3
feet
and
the
rear
yard,
from
5
to
4,
similar
to
this
case
for
a
pool
enclosure.
After
more
discussion
motion
to
approve
and
the
motion
unanimously,
a
very
similar
property
on
Davis
Island
and
real
quick
I
will.
A
K
A
H
Evening,
mr.
chairman
members
of
the
ferris
review
board,
my
name
is
John
grande
off
my
edges:
sweet
3,700,
Bank
of
America
Plaza
I,
have
the
pleasure
of
representing
mr.
Joe
Wright
and
then,
which
I
was
here
with
his
daughter,
Debbie
fee
and
they're
the
neighbors
to
the
rear.
First
of
all,
the
other
cases
have
absolutely
no
precedent,
avalue
its
established
law
that
what
you
do
on
a
variance
on
other
property
has
zero
import
this
evening.
So
please
disregard
those.
When
you
buy
home,
you
go
in
the
backyard
and
you
look
and
you
go.
H
I'm
gonna
build
a
pool
and
you
ask
your
architect:
what
are
the
rules
about
pools?
The
architect
says
five
feet
from
the
rear:
no
higher
than
15
feet.
If
you
go
over
one
foot,
you
have
to
start
stepping
back,
so
you
walk
back
and
you
look
and
you
see
that
you
have
a
large
oak
tree
in
the
corner
of
your
property.
H
The
petitioner
owns
this
oak
tree
because
here's
the
survey
stake
on
the
corner
and
you
notice
that
your
neighbor
mr.
weinerman
has
two
trees
in
his
rear
yard
and
you
immediately
go.
I'm
gonna
have
to
put
up
a
screen,
so
you
build
the
screen
five
feet
off
the
yard.
You
don't
need
a
variance.
You
build
your
pool.
These
folks
built
the
pool
and
then
said
we
need
a
screen
that
is
a
classic
self
created,
hardship
that
you're
not
here
to
remedy
for
them
on
the
rights
of
mr.
weinerman.
H
The
statement
of
hardship
written
by
mr.
Kaldur
le
says
the
practical
difficulties
from
the
neighbors
treated
impacts,
the
use,
enjoyment
and
operation
of
a
residential
pool
located
177
Cyprus,
there's
approximately
eight
feet
of
overhang
of
the
tree
canopy
to
the
rear
of
the
property.
This
hardship
does
not
result
from
the
actions
of
the
applicant.
Well,
I
took
these
photographs
yesterday
and
you'll
see
that
they've
done
an
admirable
job
of
trimming
those
trees.
So
you
have
to
trim
trees
from
time
to
time.
H
If
you
have
a
pool
now,
gentlemen,
representing
the
petitioner,
says,
there's
no
other
way
other
than
the
way
they
do
up
north
you
put
on
a
vinyl
vinyl
cover
and
you
roll
it
back,
and
then
you
roll
it
over
the
pool
you
vacuum
the
leaves
off.
That's
how
you
take
care
of
it
up
north
I
think
we
can't
do
that
down
down
down
south
and
Tampa.
You
have
the
technology
to
do
that.
That's
their
remedy,
without
impacting
the
rights
of
mr.
rineman.
H
H
Their
intent
was
not
to
put
a
pool
cage
only
afterwards
that
they
discovered
that
the
trees
were
a
problem
that
is
a
classic
self-will
created.
Hardship
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
shape
of
the
parcel,
the
layout
of
the
property.
You
can't
point
to
your
neighbor
and
say
you're,
creating
a
hardship
for
me,
so
I
need
to
put
up
a
full
screen.
That
is
not
what
the
law
says.
The
law
says
it
has
to
be
unique
and
singular.
It
cannot
be
a
practical
difficulty.
You
cannot
substantially
interfere
with
your
neighbor.
H
It
has
to
be
in
harmony
with
the
intent
and
purpose
of
the
chapter,
which
is
five
feet.
Setback
15
feet
of
height
and
the
substantial
justice
being
done
has
to
be
weighed
against
the
practical
difficulties.
He
has
no
practical
difficulty
in
simply
getting
a
bid
to
put
a
vinyl
liner
across
the
pool
with
a
machine
roller,
and
he
rolls
it
up
when
you
to
swim,
and
he
rolls
it
back
out
when
he
doesn't
want
to
swim.
It
catches
the
leaves
in
the
fall.
No
problem
at
all
doesn't
affect
mr.
H
Reiner,
leaving
her
on
an
extraordinary
hardship.
These
are
oak
trees
and,
as
I
said
at
the
beginning
of
my
discussion
with
you,
they
were
on
notice
at
the
time
they
bought
the
property
to
walk
back
there
and
see
what
the
situation
would
be
with
the
pool.
There
were
three
trees
that
were
an
issue.
They've
couldn't
accounted
for
that
and
built
the
screen
as
of
right
five
feet
away.
H
F
F
H
H
Are
created
for
aesthetic
purposes,
to
allow
light
and
air
to
pass
between
properties
and
also
for
emergently
personnel
to
get
between
properties,
so
the
fireman
can
run
between
the
property.
The
substantial
interferes
is
you're
affecting
his
property
right
to
have
adequate
space
between
the
property,
plus
the
aesthetic
interference
of
the
screen
vertical
being
that
much
closer
to
them.
Hooked
to
the
home,
the
rule
was
created
to
be
5
feet,
so
that
would
allow
for
air
and
space
and
to
not
create
a
visual
blight
upon
my
client.
H
A
I
Mr.
Severino
I
I
assume
you're
going
to
address
the
self-created
hardship
issue
because
I'd
like
to
hear
answer
that
I
really
have
two
questions.
That's
one
of
them.
The
other
is
to
ask
you
to
explain.
I
know
you
talked
about
it
a
little
bit
last
time
but
I'd
like
to
hear
it
again
explain
why
you
cannot
operate
within
the
5
foot
setback.
Why
you
need
this
additional.
K
We're
we're
requesting
basically
the
bare
minimum
that
we
can
to
put
the
pool
wall
where
it
is.
We
go
to
the
five
feet.
It's
going
to
be
right
at
the
edge
of
the
pool
and
there's
no
ability,
there's
no
space
to
maneuver
anywhere
in
there.
It
creates
a
safety
hazard.
They
have
children
being
able
to
get
out
of
the
pool
if
necessary,
that
additional
foot
that
is
put
here
allows
for
that
safety
and
also
again
we're
going
one
foot
and
I'll
dress
it
on
rebuttal.
K
But
you
know
this
isn't
a
huge
variance
that
I've
seen
granted
in
the
past.
It's
one
foot
we're
doing
all
that
is
necessary.
We're
not
asking
to
go
from
five
feet
to
one
foot
and
take
additional
space,
we're
putting
the
pool
screen
and
the
only
place
it
can
go
on
that
side
of
the
pool.
And
so
that's
that's.
Why
we're
we
need
the
one
foot
there
and
then
a
little
additional
more
space
down
here,
because
of
the
way
that
the
property
line
is
the
your
first
question
about
the
unique
hardship
here
is
and
I
know.
K
This
was
raised
last
time
by
some
of
the
board
members
that
there's
trees
everywhere
right,
so
you
build
a
house,
you
buy
a
house,
there's
gonna
be
trees.
These
trees
do
not
affect
everyone
the
same.
If
you
look
at
the
actual
aerial
photo,
you
could
see
that
different
neighbors
have
different
levels
of
tree
cover
and
this
unique
hardship
they're,
not
his
trees.
They're,
not
the
homeowners,
trees.
I
completely
understand
mr.
Cook
I'm.
I
K
And
I
think
they're
they're
kind
of
complimentary
in
the
sense
that
it
was
self
created.
He
argues
it's
self
created
because
we
built
a
house
there
and
there
were
trees
on
the
neighbor's
property
because
we
built
a
house,
we
self
created
it
well,
they're,
not
our
trees.
We
didn't
put
the
trees
there.
I
would
understand
his
argument
and
it
may
lend
some
credence
if
we
built
the
house
and
the
trees
were
on
our
property
and
we
said
okay,
we're
building
our
house.
K
This
is
where
we're
putting
our
pool
these
trees
are
here
and
then
I
came
to
you
and
asked
for
a
variance,
but
they've
done
what
they
could
to
not
need
a
pool
screen
which
is
trim
the
trees.
They
have
a
pool
company
come
once
a
week
and
it's
just
not
working,
and
so
it's
not
self
created
in
the
sense
that
the
trees
were
on
our
property.
We
knew
it
and
if
you
look
at
the
actual
survey
here,
there
were
no
other
variances
requested.
K
It's
not
as
if
these
go
to
property
line
the
property
line
you
know,
so
that
was
never
the
intent
to
build
this
huge,
huge
monstrosity
and
and
need
these
variances
and
the
pool
itself
is
actually
a
lap
pool.
It's
it's.
It's
not
your
normal
swimming
pool
because
of
the
size
of
the
law
and
the
shape.
So
they've
done
every
can't
everything
they
can
to
have
the
pool
and
to
enjoy
without
a
screen.
But
it's
simply
that
the
neighbors
trees,
which
are
causing
the
difficulty
with
keeping
it
clean
on
a
daily
basis.
B
K
K
F
My
question
is
along
the
same
line
as
mr.
pastor,
yet
lots
of
photographs
you
were
showing
us
of
the
leaves
problem,
I
think
there
was
one
I'd
like
to
see,
but
I
can't
without
looking
at
all
of
them
very
quickly.
Tell
you
which
one,
but
it
was
one
that
showed
this
decking
between
the
pool
and
the
yeah.
Okay,
that's
fine
that'll
work,
but
Chad
yeah
I
think
you
have
another
one
where
you
were
on
the
other
side,
Oh.
F
It's
18
inches,
I'm,
I'm
assuming
and
you
can
clarify
because
I
don't
want
to
assume
yeah
on
your
site
plan,
there's
an
edge
of
the
pool
deck
drawn,
correct,
okay,
so
you're
proposing
to
put
it
on
a
very
edge
of
that
deck
which
would
leave
you
the
three
point,
four
feet
and
the
four
feet:
correct.
Okay.
So
the
question
is:
if
you
had
to
meet
the
five
foot
criteria,
you'd
be
moving
in
a
foot
plus
a
little
bit
on
that
18
inches
yeah.
K
F
K
First
I'd
like
to
address
mr.
Randolph's
kind
of
opening
remarks
about
how
my
client
went
and
talked
to
the
architect
and
what
they
talked
about
and
what
the
architect
said
or
his
idea
of
how
this
would
have
gone
down.
My
client
did
not
intend
to
put
a
pool
screen
up
hide
I've
made
that
clear.
That
was
not
his
intent.
K
They
put
the
pool
in
and
said
he
wanted
a
pool,
they
put
it
within
the
variance,
and
then
it
became
a
problem,
the
trees
about
them
being
cut
mr.
Grint
upset.
You
know
what
trees
have
to
be
cut,
sometimes
he's
right,
but
mr.
Knox
has
advised
me
and
the
applicant
that
those
trees
cannot
be
trimmed
any
further.
So
there's
nothing
else.
We
can
do
with
those
trees.
Those
trees
are
gonna
stay
where
they
are
addressing
the
pool
cover
that
mr.
Randolph
said
we
could
get
a
bid
for
and
put
on.
K
The
woman
that
runs
the
pool
screen
company
told
me
that
she
had
never
heard
of
anyone
in
15
years
doing
that
or
requesting
a
quote
for
that
and
I
do
want
to
address
the
previous
VRBO
decisions
that
I
highlighted,
although
each
case
is
unique,
I
believe
those
do
provide
a
good
backdrop
of
the
hardship
criteria,
evidence
two
of
those
that
had
to
do
with
lead
specifically
another
one
on
Davis
Island.
That
was
almost
the
identical
setback
for
a
pool
screen.
K
The
overwhelming
majority
of
these
I
think
I
said
36
out
of
39
were
granted
goes
to
what
the
intent
of
the
variances
is
for,
which
is
I,
understand
the
rules
five
feet,
but
sometimes
things
come
up
and
you
need
a
variance
to
do
what
you
need
to
do.
In
this
case,
the
pool
screen
and
again
I
believe
the
applicant
is
being
extremely
reasonable.
With
the
one
foot
and
I
believe
one
point
six
feet,
we've
done.
K
We
believe
everything
we
can
to
minimize
the
impact
on
the
neighbor
and
the
moving
it
to
the
five
feet
to
the
edge
of
the
pool.
We
believe,
creates
a
safety
issue,
especially
for
the
they
have
two
young
children,
and
that
would
be
the
primary
reason
for
that
foot.
It
gives
them
a
little
bit
of
buffer
if
needed.
So
that's
all.
We
respectfully
request
that
you
grab
the
variance.
A
E
May
be
heard
briefly,
mr.
chair.
First
of
all,
thank
you
variance,
review
board
members
for
allowing
the
applicant
to
speak
in
hearing
this
case
in
order
to
guarantee
due
process.
I
appreciate
that,
procedurally,
where
we
are
at
is,
we
would
need
from
the
board
prior
to
any
motions,
a
motion
to
reconsider
the
motion
that
was
heard
or
the
the
motion
from
February
February
hearing.
So
procedurally
that
is
broke.
F
I
But
given
the
information
that
I
heard
tonight
and
given
the
the
discussion
which
was
party
as
of
last
time
about
the
self
created
hardship,
I'm
again
on
the
fence,
although
now
I
am
leaning
more
in
in
favor
of
denial,
so
I'm
interested
in
hearing
what
others
have
to
say,
opinion
is
obviously
fluid
and
I'm
interested.
In
hearing
my
colleagues.
B
My
opinion
remains
the
same.
The
issues
that
I
mentioned
last
time
we're
that,
of
course,
itself
created.
They
built
the
house
just
recently
in
the
people
that
built
the
house
live
in
the
house
and
the
trees
were
present
doesn't
matter
if
they
own
the
trees,
you
don't
own,
the
trees
are
there
on
another
or
your
property
or,
if
you're,
in
the
middle
of
the
fields
and
trees
right
next
to
your
house,
the
tree
is
there
and
it
was
there
when
it
was
built.
B
So,
yes,
it
would
have
been
nice
if
a
builder
or
architect
would
have
pointed
out.
The
fact
that
you
might
want
to
consider
screen
for
the
for
the
reason
of
the
trees-
and
maybe
that
did
or
didn't
happen
and
decisions
are
made
irrelevant
point-
is
that
the
trees
were
there,
I
think
the
biggest
issue
for
me.
Is
it
the
most
immediate
neighbor
that's
being
affected
by
this
is
opposing
it
and
it's
a
rear
yard
issue.
It
only
really
affects
the
one
neighbor
and
they
are
adamantly
opposed
to
it,
and
it's
for
the
reasons
that
mr.
B
grand
off
stated
that
it's
it's
the
space,
that's
guaranteed
them
by
the
code
or
not
guaranteed,
but
it's
a
right
afforded
them
by
the
code
unless
we
overrule
that
that
they
have
a
little
bit
of
distance
between
their
neighbors
and
I
know.
Last
time
we
talked
about
what
is
18
inches
and
18
inches
with
a
15-foot
wall
can
be
quite
substantial
in
the
backyard,
but
the
bigger
issue
and
I.
B
Don't
I,
don't
remember
if
we
clarified
this
or
lat
not
last
time,
but
we
clarified
it
tonight
is
that
it
can
be
built
at
5
feet
and
I'm,
not
sure
what
a
1
foot
perimeter
gets
you
as
far
as
safety,
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
safety
is.
Is
it
so
a
parent
can
run
around
and
grab
a
kid
because
a
parent,
a
full-grown
adult
on
one
foot
is
not
gonna,
do
very
well
running,
or
is
it
for
a
kid
to
sit
on
the
edge
I?
Don't
know,
but
it
doesn't
seem
like
that.
B
One
footage
is
getting
me
anything
in
regards
to
the
safety
and
so
I.
Don't
I
think
the
fact
that
you
can
build
this
within
code
and
then
they
can
have
the
leaf
issue
resolved.
Is
there
right,
but
to
encroach
upon
the
neighbor
just
doesn't
seem
reasonable
and
I've
seen
I
have
seen
the
automated
pool
covers
in
Florida
in
my
many
decades
of
living
here,
they're,
not
common,
they
do
exist,
and
so,
as
mr.
B
A
J
Keep
looking
at
this,
even
if
there
were
none
of
those
roll
out
in
Florida,
they're,
available
and
I,
don't
think
that's
a
valid
argument.
I've
never
seen
them
in
Florida.
To
me.
That
tells
me
nothing.
I
lived
up
north
for
30
years
and
most
pools
have
them
usually
it's
for
winter,
but
they
use
them
in
the
summer.
They
have
a
lot
of
trees,
so
they
do
serve
that
purpose
and
that
would
not
encroach
on
the
neighbors.
You
know,
yard
or
trees
or
anything
I'm,
I'm,
I,
understand
the
self-created,
hardship
or
difficulty
and
I'm
torn
I.
J
Don't
understand
why
any
I
had
pool
when
I
moved
to
Florida
and
I
built
it
and
you
know,
made
sure
there
weren't
any
trees
over
it,
because
I
know
that
trees
drop
leaves
all
the
time
and
I
can't
imagine,
throwing
a
pool
uncovered
under
a
bunch
of
big
old
oak
trees,
which
mine
are
still
dropping,
leaves
and
not
expecting
legs
to
be
in
your
pool.
It's
just
to
me
is
incomprehensible.
J
M
M
You
know
not
having
the
cage
is
a
denial
of
reasonable
use
of
the
pool
because
of
the
neighbors
trees,
but
on
the
other
hand,
if
you
look
at
putting
this
thing
to
the
edge
you
know
the
reasonable
use
of
the
pool
is
ensured.
Now
perhaps
the
the
applicant
may
have
an
issue
with
the
safety
with
that,
but
you
know
at
some
point:
the
applicant
has
to
bear
some
responsibility
on
absorbing
some
of
this
and
I
think
that
a
compromise
here
would
be
that
they
just
do
go.
F
Mr.
Randolph
has
changed
my
opinion
and,
although
I
still
believe
that,
even
though
you
know
you
have
to
draw
the
line
somewhere
and
five
feet,
is
the
line
that
people
waste
smarter
than
us
drew
a
long
time
ago,
but
I
mean
I
could
certainly
live
with
that
screen,
enclosure
being
at
four
feet.
I
really
am,
and
this
is
based
on
the
testimony
we
heard
in
the
last
time
with
which
wasn't
presented
tonight.
F
You
know
the
actual
photographs
and
views
from
the
backyards
neighbors
and
how
the
Afghan
has
planted
tall
vegetation
to
minimize
or
mitigate
the
appearance
of
the
screen
enclosure.
But
you
know
mr.
Brando
still
raises
valid
concerns
and
which
is
why
the
setbacks
are
there
yeah?
The
real
shame
in
all
of
this
is
that
we
well
I
shouldn't,
say:
shame
the
applicant
made
decisions,
design
decisions,
what
they
built
with
the
understanding
that
they
work
in
a
screen.
If
they
had
thought
differently
when
they
built
it
I'm
sure
the
design
would
have
been
shifted.
F
There
was
plenty
of
room
to
shift
it
to
allow
for
the
5-foot
screen
enclosure,
so
that
speaks
to
the
self-created
hardship,
but
I
can
certainly
understand
that
and
I
don't
know
that.
We
actually
heard
testimony
that
the
applicants
who
moved
here
from
out
of
state
I
don't
know
that
we
ever
heard
that
I
didn't
hear
that
there
were
longtime
Floridians
and
that
they
had
experiences
with
the
old
palm-leaf
season
that
we
experienced
it.
F
If,
if
they
truly
understood
how
bad
it
would
be,
regardless
of
where
the
trees
were
located
in
terms
of
proximity
to
their
rear
yard,
they
almost
would
have
a
problem.
In
my
opinion,
that
would
warrant
having
the
screen
anyway
and
in
the
design
consideration
of
doing
a
pool
without
a
screen.
There
are
other
options
not
covers.
You
could
have
multiple
skimmers
you
could
have.
You
could
have
had
four
skimmers
in
that
pool
as
small
as
it
is
and
it
would
have
trapped
the
leaves
without
a
whole
lot
of
maintenance.
F
B
I
moved
that
the
variance
requests
for
bait
case
vrb
1926,
with
a
property
located
at
177
Cypress
Avenue
for
reduction
the
rear
yard
from
five
feet
to
three.
In
whatever
change
we
discussed,
we
with
encroachment
of
eaves
and
gutters.
We
denied
due
the
failure
of
the
petitioner
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof
to
provide
common
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
a
necessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27
18
of
the
city
code.
B
A
C
Board
this
is
the
RV
1901.
The
property
address
is
10
406
North,
Montana
Avenue
for
section
27,
156
and
27
to
90.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
south
side
yard
setback
from
7
feet
to
2.9
feet
and
the
rear
yard
from
20
feet
to
3
feet,
as
well
as
the
building
separation
from
5
feet
to
two
feet,
to
construct
the
metal
accessory
structure
and
retain
existing
accessory
structures.
The
property
is
owned,
RS
50
and
the
applicant
purchased
the
property
in
1993.
C
C
C
A
N
A
N
I
had
a
makeshift
building
back
there
for
years,
and
I
drove
up
one
day
looked
like
an
eyesore
to
me,
so
I
decided
to
purchase
a
metal
carport,
so
I
toured
down
I
thought.
Getting
a
permit
was
just
walking
in
paying
some
money
getting
a
piece
of
paper
and
doing
what
you
had
to
do
and
then
I
found
out.
That's
not
how
it
works.
N
So
I've
been
dealing
with
us
for
probably
eight
months
and
all
I
want
to
do
is
put
up
a
carport.
It's
a
large
carport
to
put
my
toys
in
to
get
them
out
of
the
weather,
because
it's
beating
them
up
bad
I,
put
my
truck
up
for
sale
and
then
I'd
take
it
down
because
I
don't
want
to
get
rid
of
my
truck
I
like
my
truck.
A
N
It's
just
a
matter
of
putting
something
up.
That
looks
good.
You
know
it's
gonna
look
better
than
what
I
had
you
know.
Nobody
ever
said
anything
to
me
about
what
I
had
but
I
pulled
up
and
it
looked
bad
and
that's
when
you
got
to
do
something
about
it.
So
I
went
out
and
I
purchased
the
metal
carport
I
already
have
it
I
thought
I
was
gonna,
put
it
up,
but
I
was
wrong
and
when
I
went
in
there
and
I
asked
about
it,
they
told
when
I
bought
it
I
said.
A
I
I
I
N
Put
up
2025
years
ago,
okay
and
the
structure
that
I
tore
down
basically
had
been
there
about
the
same
amount
of
time,
but
it
was
really
makeshift
versus
the
other
things.
I
didn't
build
those
other
things,
okay,
so
they
were
actually
a
lot
nicer.
What
I
built
was
basically
a
pipe
frame
with
ten
on
it
that
had
two
sheds
put
together
at
the
back
and
that's
how
that
got
there,
and
it
really
was
an
eyesore
and
that.
N
J
N
E
F
C
F
C
F
F
D
A
F
A
N
E
Is
no
guarantee
that
that
easement
release
will
be
granted.
It
is
irrelevant
for
purposes
of
this,
whether
or
not
it
will
be
granted,
because
it
is
a
separate
issue
that
he
will
need
to
address.
Your
question
is
whether
or
not
the
variance
should
be
granted.
He
will
have
to
work
separately
with
city
staff
and
Tampa
Electric
Company
to
try
to
have
that
released
and
there's
no
guarantee,
even
if
the
variances
of
granted
today
that
that
will
be
granted
I
think.
F
E
B
C
A
B
N
The
smaller
building
about
a
hundred
square
foot-
that's
two
foot,
nine
inches
off
the
side.
I
have
a
letter
from
my
neighbor
that
approved
it,
and
this
set
this
between
the
two
foot
they're
talking
about.
Okay
is
the
two
points
of
the
roof:
it's
not
in
between
the
buildings,
I
Drive,
a
full
wheeler
through
there
and
never
had
a
problem
at
all
and
the
one
out
bat
I
have
river
tracks
behind
me.
It's
they're
never
going
to
build
anything
and
as
far
as
Tico
goes,
I
thought
I
had
the
OPA
the
approved
from
them.
A
B
B
F
Excuse
me,
the
side
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
2.9
feet,
reduced
the
rear
yard
from
20
feet
to
three
feet
and
building
separation
between
the
very
small
accessory
building
and
the
screen
porch
in
five
feet
to
two
feet
with
a
lot:
encroachments,
reeds
and
gutters
per
Section
27
156,
in
that
the
testimony
tonight
has
shown
that
there
really
is
no
hardship
being
created
to
immediate
neighbors
and
that
this
is
because
he
wants
to
build
a
really
big
carpet.
I
got
big
toys
and
that
it's
simply
just
investing
the
existing
structures.
F
A
B
N
N
C
Towanda
anthing
land
development,
this
application,
the
RFP
18
110,
the
property
is
located
at
44,
27,
West,
Fairview
Heights
for
section
27
156.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
from
20
feet
to
13
feet
to
enclose
an
existing
screening
room.
The
applicant
is
currently
in
permitting
for
the
construction
of
residential
additions,
including
the
aluminum
screen
room.
The
property
is
zoned
rs.60
and
was
purchased
in
2017.
The
house
was
built
in
1957.
C
O
Francisco
Diaz
Baba
90,
Stratford,
Avenue,
Tampa,
Florida,
3,
3,
603
I
am
the
contractor.
This
is
an
elderly
customer
of
mine
that
within
the
same
existing
footprint,
this
was
a
screen
enclosure
and
they
just
wanted
to
make
it
air-conditioned,
so
they
could
enjoy
that
back
room
there
and
when
we
went
to
submit
for
permanent
come
to
find
out,
it
was
built
not
within
the
setbacks,
so
we're
state
we're
staying
within
the
existing
footprint,
we're
just
replacing
the
wall
to
match
the
existing
finishes.
O
Yeah,
just
an
elderly
couple,
that's
looking
to
you
know,
use
this
outdoor
space.
It
gets
extremely
hot
back
there
and
that's
where
they
sit.
It's
a
you
know
to
do
their
therapy
and
work
out
and
stuff
like
that,
and
they
can't
take
the
condition
of
the
heat.
So
they
just
want
to
turn
it
from
a
you
know
from
an
outdoor
area,
so
heated
and
cooled
indoor
area.
I
O
O
O
Did
and
I
did
as
well
as
I
mailed
out.
You
know
hundreds
of
letters,
many's
called
they
said.
Yes,
yeah,
that's
what
we
had
to
do
it
three
different
times,
because
the
post
office
lost
documents
the
first
time
the
building
apart,
missed
a
document
the
second
time.
So
hundreds
of
letters
literally
on
this
case,
but
yeah
I,
spoke
to
several
neighbors.
So
did
the
homeowners
and
said
look
as
long
as
not
encroaching
on
my
property,
it's
been
there
since
we've
ever
lived
here.
You
know
it's,
it
was
there,
since
they
built
the
house
pretty
much.
O
B
O
D
A
I
I
A
A
C
Tawanda
anthing
land
development,
application
number
VRB
1924.
The
property
is
located
at
701,
Northwest,
Shore
Boulevard
per
Section
27.
To
eighty
three
point:
seven,
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
required
parking
spaces
from
55
to
48
spaces,
to
allow
the
existing
building
to
change
from
professional
office
to
medical
office
and
research.
F
F
F
A
F
F
P
A
B
P
I'll
just
start
the
the
history,
the
property
actually
dates
to
1999
for
the
current
structure.
It
was
built
it's,
it
was
16,000
square
feet
built
in
1999
and
2000
approved,
but
it
was
a
general
general
office
at
the
time
the
code
was
exactly.
The
parking
code
remains
the
same
from
20
years
ago.
When
it
was
built,
it
was
under
part.
It
received
an
administrative
variance
to
that
effect.
It
would
have
required
53
spaces.
There
were
only
48,
I'd
learned.
P
It
was
administrative
variance
granted
at
that
point
and
when
our
when,
when
the
current
owners
bought
this,
they
they
wanted
a
permanent
solution
and
their
main
goal
was
to
build
a
spinal
surgery
center
and
to
that
effect,
the
parking
increases
as
we've
seen
and
but
the
way
the
site
is
currently
constrained
and
makes
it
unique
is
if
you're
looking
immediately
to
the
left
of
the
photograph,
that's
I-275,
there's
nowhere
to
go.
They've
met
every
single
setback
requirement.
They
also
have
current
landscaping
and
and
some
massive
oak
trees
on
property.
P
They
maintain
the
ADA
accessibility
and
also
maintaining
the
safe
routes
for
bicycle
pedestrians
and
transit
riders.
There
is
a
bus
stop
directly
in
front
of
the
office
and
because
of
the
original
administrative
variance
and
an
extensive
research
we've
done,
we
want
to
find
a
permanent
solution
for
them.
They
did
receive
a
sure
they
did
receive
it
at
a
parking
lease
with
a
neighboring
property.
Unfortunately,
it's
non
recordable.
It's
been
in
place
for
two
years
since
I
believe
the
previous
meeting,
but
because
it
son
reportable
the
city's,
not
recognizing
it.
P
So
we
started
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
to
say
what
can
we
do
to
make
this
work?
We
were
able
to
get
the
down
to
55
spaces
with
roughly
the
entire
first
floor
would
be
medical
a
majority
to
set
at
the
third
would
be
medical,
but
we
would
replace
the
remaining
square
footage
with
research
with
a
research
office,
a
portion
of
the
third
floor,
B
research
and
the
entire
second
floor
would
be
dedicated
to
research.
P
Now
the
one
business
is
a
spinal
surgery
center
and
part
of
that
hardship
is
medical
office
is
very,
very
broad.
It's
a
wide.
It's
a
wide
net.
It's
this
isn't
a
high-impact
office.
They
see
at
maximum
12
patients
a
day,
because
this
is
very
you
know
strategic
and
inclusive
surgery.
It's
not
a
walk-in
clinic
and
to
be
able
to
meet
that
parking
requirement.
We
did
find
a
research.
Fellow
he's,
a
former
Navy
SEAL
who
is
in
the
processor,
has
just
acquired
his
geo
biomedical
dr.
P
ik,
and
he
works
closely
with
the
veterans
within
the
community
and
MacDill
Air
Force
Base.
He
does
hyperbaric
research.
So
as
a
Navy
SEAL,
he
was
a
diver.
He
learned
about
the
benefits
of
hyperbaric
chamber
is
how
they
work,
how
they
aid
the
body
and
that's
the
research
fellow
who's
coming
in
he's
the
only
person
right
now
he
anticipates
probably
hiring
two
to
three
more
employees.
That's
why
the
number
was
reached
to
55
and
with
all
that
being
said,
I
you
know
I
just
have
to
interject.
Here
too,
mobility
is
truly
changing
and
evolving.
P
Here
in
Tampa
Bay,
we
hear
it
all
day,
all
for
transportation.
You
have,
you
know
the
regional
transit
feasibility
study.
You
have
Tampa
Bay
next
and
at
other
often
other
office
that
they
operate
out
of
almost
25
percent
of
their
patient.
Their
daily
trips
of
patients
are
through
their
uber
corporate
account.
P
The
doctor
has
an
uber
corporate
account
where
he
actually
brings
patients
into
the
office,
but
that's
part
of
his
business,
so
they've
reduced
the
amount
of
parking
that
they
need
at
those
other
offices
and
and
truly
it
you
see
it
every
day
you
read
about
in
the
news
you
see
at
all
the
council
meetings
and
everything
Tampa
Bay
is
evolving
and
it's
the
way
it
moves
around,
and
this
doctor
is
at
the
forefront
of
that
as
well.
To
speak
about
the
specific
hardships
in
there
that
there's
the
unique
site
constraints.
P
There's
also,
you
could
say,
he's
changing
the
use
to
medical
office,
but
my
counter
would
be
he's.
Work
he's
tried
to
work
within
the
code
as
best
as
he
can
to
bring
in
a
research.
Fellow
and
the
property
has
already
had
an
administrative
variance
granted
it's
asking
for
two
additional
spaces.
To
my
knowledge,
has
this
been
20
years?
I
couldn't
find
any
complaints
about
parking
at
this
office,
but-
and
you
know
in
closing
with
that
I
you
know
I
just
want
to
drive
home.
P
That
fact
that
he
does
use
technology
to
his
advantage
to
get
patients
to
and
from
his
office
and
I
can
understand,
say:
hey
well,
actually
he's
a
guy
who
just
wants
to
get
it
zoned
and
sold.
That's
not
the
case.
It
would
be
an
extensive,
build
out
to
be
a
surgery
center
and
then,
who
knows,
he
gets
letters
constantly
from
FDOT
and
I
think
we
know
why
he's
right
he's
right
up
against
it
right
up
against
the
massive
interchange
of
State,
Road,
60
and
275.
So
you
know
it
could
it
could
be
five
years?
P
A
P
F
F
From
33
to
correct
you,
okay,
all
right
and
and
because
of
the
use
change
it's
53
is
now
55,
correct.
Okay,
that
part
I,
understand
question
for
Council,
whoever
staff
and
I
think
I
might
have
had
a
similar
question.
The
last
time
we
saw
this
property
medical
use,
as
was
testified
as
a
very
broad
thing,
and
so,
even
though
their
medical
use
may
in
fact
mitigate
the
need
for
53
or
55
spaces
and
everybody's
happy.
F
Ie
neighbors
are
happy
and
people
company
the
building
have
a
place
to
park
if
they
sell
the
building
to
another
medical.
That
could
be.
That
could
be
a
walk-in
clinic,
correct,
correct,
okay
and
then
just
for
my
own
understanding,
cuz
I
wasn't
quite
following
the
d-o-t
getting
letters
constantly
you're
implying
there's
interest
in
purchasing
the
property
to
do
what
interstate
widening.
Can
you
speak
to
this.
A
G
Born
in
Yahoo
anything
John
I
get
a
letter
at
least
once
a
week
from
an
attorney
firm
about
eminent
domain
protection.
During
one
point
to
the
research
fact
that
if
the
property
gets
sold,
it
would
be
sold
if
this
gets
granted
with
the
stipulation
that
almost
a
half
the
building
is
continued
to
be
used
as
research,
which
lowers
utilization
and
utilization
of
the
building.
G
F
I
I
have
a
question
again
for
either
legal
or
for
staff.
Let's
say
hypothetically,
this
is
approved
and
then
six
months
down
the
line,
there
are
complaints
from
neighbors
about
people
parking
and
there
are
lots
of
walking
over.
How
is
that
handled
from
an
administrative
standpoint?
Are
their
citations
then,
given
for
people
who
were
or
they
towed?
But
what's
the
list
plan
there
well.
E
E
P
So
we
there
was
an
agreement
with
a
neighboring
property
for
25
additional
spaces,
because
there
was
an
anticipation
to
have
this
as
a
more
intensive
use.
We
brought
it
to
the
city.
They
said
they
need
to
clarify
that
that
parking
was
going
to
be
specifically
for
medical
use
when
their
attorney
drafted
and
sent
it
back
with
saying
that's
strictly
for
medical
use
or
medical
use
parking
and
the
parking
spots
will
be
labeled.
He
also
put
a
provision
there
saying
this
is
non-reportable,
so
it
was
on
the
amendment
that
it
became
not
a
non-reportable.
P
P
P
D
G
D
P
F
E
E
M
P
M
This
goes
back
to
the
hypotheticals
in
both
or
either
can
can
respond,
but
I'm,
looking
at
the
site
plan
and
I'm
thinking
back
I
know
that
the
administrative
variance
to
this
point
in
time
over
the
last
20
years
now,
let's
just
say
that
somebody
just
said
you
absolutely
have
to
have
55
spots
here,
nobody's
changing
anything
and
I'm.
Looking
at
the
site
plan,
it
looks
like
kind
of
in
the
center
there
that
you
could
fit
two
and
it
looks
like
the
workers
are
described
on
the
site.
M
P
P
And
and
and
truly
it's
I
think
we
had
even
discussed
with
the
city
doing
what
you
know:
small
car
parking
spaces,
but
it
we
had
even
thought
to
speak
to
the
city
about
other
new
technologies
to
try
and
get
this
done.
But
as
it
is
now,
it's
truly
built
out
it.
Could
we
snake
one
in
there
somewhere?
Maybe
you
forget,
but
it's
not
we're
not
gonna
get
seven
and.
G
M
A
N
P
P
A
P
G
A
P
Think
I
just
would
also
like
to
add
them.
There
is
a
major
spinal
facility
very
close
to
this
property
that
recently
closed
within
the
past
week
and
I
truly
think
this
would
fill
the
void
of
patients
who
are
in
need
of
that
type
of
medical
treatment
and
further
incentive
to
never
want
to
sell
to
that
point.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
elaborate
on
that
a
little
bit,
but.
G
The
fact
that
we
have
a
corporate
uber
account
has
helped
us
help
us
to
make
sure
that
people
show
up
on
time
as
well.
I
would've
been
helpful
for
us
as
well,
but
not
everybody
wants
to
come
to
our
building
in
a
car
anymore.
There's
data
I
mean
we've
noticed
this
over
the
last
two
years.
That's
come
what's
the
difference,
so
the
uber
helps
us
and
the
fact
that
we
are
able
to
put
just
solid
research.
We
just
got
a
contract
with
the
VA
or
one
out
of
five
hyperbaric
chambers
in
the
state
of
Florida.
G
If
somebody
in
the
Tampa
Bay
gets
the
bends
disease
because
they
come
up
to
too
high
with
after
died
emergency,
they
come
to
our
building
for
for
emergency
treatment.
Just
treating
to
patients
requires
1,500
to
2,000
square
feet.
This
is
not
a
chiropractic
clinic.
This
is
another
clinic
where
we
run
through
80
90
patients
in
a
half-hour.
That's
not
the
intent.
That
will
never
be
the
intent.
In
fact,
if
I
sell
put
the
building
up
for
sale
tomorrow,
I'm
gonna
have
a
hard
time
selling
it
because
of
the
eminent
domain.
A
I
This
is,
this
is
really
almost
cutting
edge
of
parking
discussions.
Now
it's
it's
really
interesting,
because
I
I
actually
have
been
looking
at
future
transportation
technologies
and
it's
really
interesting
to
see
a
business.
That's
using
a
corporate
uber
account
and
thinking
about
where
things
are
going.
The
challenge
that
we
face
that
we
always
face
is
well.
At
least
these
issues
run
with
the
land,
and
so
we
have
to
be
considerate
to
the
neighbors,
the
future
neighbors
who
may
be
here,
but
it
sounds
like
we
have
a
business
owner
here.
That
is
cognizant
of
that.
I
J
A
To
make
a
comment
that
if
this
is
granted,
it's
going
to
stay
with
this
property-
and
this
is
just
my
personal
opinion-
that
in
the
future
city,
council
or
the
city
might
start
looking
at
parking
issues
where
this
is
granted
for
this
particular
building,
and
this
particular
owner
that
in
the
future
that
if
an
owner
sells
of
building
the
new
owner
would
have
to
come
back
in
and
repetition
for
the
type
of
amount
of
parking
spaces.
I
think
that
wouldn't
work
out
simply
because,
as
in
mr.
A
Feldman
said,
our
transportation
issues
are
going
to
be
forever
changing,
whether
it
be
10
or
20
years.
From
now,
if
I,
weren't,
chair
and
I
was
a
board
member
I
would
more
than
likely
grant
this
of
variance
for
this
petition.
Based
on
that,
however,
however,
the
way
our
codes
and
ordinance
are
today,
which
I
hope
to
see
change
in
the
future,
we
have
to
look
at
this
as
if
we're
doing
this
forever
and
if
this
building
does
get
sold.
A
F
I'm,
just
gonna,
throw
in
that
my
recollection
was.
There
was
significant
opposition
to
this.
This
proposed
project
in
the
past,
but
my
recollection
was
it
was
a
bigger
reduction
of
party
and
I.
Don't
recall
any
discussion
or
testimony
regarding
interest
from
d-o-t,
but
I.
Think
the
difference
for
me
and
tonight
is
that
there
is
a
definite
physical
limitation,
that's
being
forced
on
this
property
by
the
interstate
expansion
which
is
coming.
Nobody
knows
when
so
I
think
that
helps
me
to
consider
the
slight
reduction
of
parking
spaces.
F
F
F
I'm
saying
the
physical
aspects
of
this
property:
yes,
another
medical
concern
and
trying
to
do
business
there,
like
I'm,
just
I,
don't
mean
to
pick
on
walking
clearance
because
they
have
a
purpose.
But
you
know
they
do
generate
a
lot
of
traffic
at
one
time
and
and
I.
Just
don't
think
that
you
could
get
those
folks
to
park
across
the
street,
even
if
they
had
the
easement
agreement
more
than
once.
They
probably
wouldn't
go
to
that
walk-in
clinic
much
unless
I
had
to
so.
I
I
There
is
some
other
space,
but
that's
that's
for
a
different
discussion.
The
other
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out
just
to
touch
on
what
you
were
just
raising
is.
It
is
not
to
another
potential
owner
in
the
futures:
it's
not
to
their
benefit,
to
have
an
approval
for
less
spaces.
It
works
to
their
detriment
so
to
in
that
respect,
it
makes
it
harder
for
this
owner
to
sell
to
a
business
that
would
require
more
parking
for
their
for
their
people.
I
F
M
A
C
Swan
dancing,
land
development,
this
application,
BRB
1932,
the
property
address-
is
87
25,
33rd
Street.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
both
the
west
and
east
side
yard
setbacks
from
7
feet
to
2
feet
to
allow
construction
of
a
new
single-family
home.
The
lot
is
own
rs.15
and
was
purchased
in
1986.
The
vacant
lot
was
only
20
with
only
25
feet
of
frontage
is
a
legal
buildable
lot.
C
N
J
C
J
C
F
C
F
I
mean
I
can't
argue
that
with
you,
because
I've
never
heard
this
I
explanation
before
so,
if
legal
can
curse,
which
I'm
sure
they
do
100%,
okay,
because
I
always
thought
that
there
had
to
have
been
maybe
a
previous
structure
on
it
and
you
have
the
right
to
take
that
structure
down
and
replace
it.
But
this
is
a
vacant.
Lots
been
vacant
forever
right,
correct.
C
F
And
just
if
you
could
put
the
one
picture
back
up
that
showed
the
house
next
door
to
the
right,
it
was
more
kind
of
more
in
line
with
a
lot.
This
I
think
was
the
second
one
you
put
up
yeah,
okay
and
you
don't
need
to
put
it
back
up,
but
if
you
well,
maybe
you
do.
The
site
plans
showed
that
the
proposed
structure
two
feet
off
the
property
line,
the
existing
structured
next
to
it
is
two
point
something
feet.
F
D
Okay,
I
believe
mic
is
that
you
just
speak:
okay,
I'm,
Richard,
Valdez
and
owner
of
the
lot
I
bought
this
about
34
years
ago,
when
I
did
buy
it.
I
did
check
prior
to
from
the
city
that
it
was
a
bit
of
a
lot
time.
Is
time
is
now
to
do
something?
Finally,
my
son's
gonna
help
me
with
this
and
he'll.
Give
you
the
presentation.
His
name
is
David
he'll
introduce
some
stuff
David
Bell
Dez
I
have
been
sworn
in.
My
address
is
25
12
West,
Virginia,
Avenue,
Tampa,
Florida,
3,
3,
6
0
7.
D
The
current
lot
is
25
feet
wide
by
140
feet,
deep
in
order
to
build
a
single-family
residence
of
suitable
width.
On
this
parcel,
we
need
to
reduce
the
side,
yard
setbacks
again
down
from
7
feet
to
2
feet.
The
hardship
does
not
result
from
actions
of
the
applicant
or
owner
of
the
size
of
the
lot
is
today,
as
it
was
prior
to
1956.
D
A
F
L
F
D
You
can
take
it
down
for
and
leave
it
he's
got
some
issues
with
the
tree.
We
prefer
to
leave
it.
We're
even
put
our
driveway
on
the
north
side
of
that
tree,
which
is
on
the
left
and
still
access
the
house.
The
house
will
be
approximately
20
feet
across
the
front,
but
to
give
you
a
couple
feet
on
each
side
and
the
closest
neighbor
is
seven
and
a
half
feet
off
this
property
line,
so
give
it
a
9
and
a
half
feet
in
the
event
that
you
had
to
get
firefighters
in
there.
D
D
And
I
spoke
to
his
name
was
the
owner
of
the
I?
Guess
now
it's
in
the
state,
so
he
will
pass
away
and
left
it
to
his
sons
and
I.
Don't
think
it
illegally
allowed
to
sell
any
part
of
the
live
without
each
other's
consent.
For
the
two
brothers,
my
father
beautiful
times,
which
was
trying
to
purchase
machine.
C
C
D
F
F
F
F
F
D
F
I
mean
if,
if
that's
a
legal,
if
there
is
a
legal
25
foot
wide
planted
light
there,
that
that
owner
someday
in
the
future
decided
to
sell
to
something
whether
it
was
the
same
neighbor
or
a
different
neighbor
that
owner
future
owner
could
build
or
could
have
a
buildable
life
they'd
stopped
coming
and
ask
for
variances
if
they
needed.
Like
these
gentlemen,
are
Towanda.
C
F
D
A
This
this
is
a
curveball
but
I'm
just
going
to
ask
legal,
and
maybe
mr.
Brown
can
help
if
they
were
to
build
this
on
stilts
and
this
the
the
structure
for
the
stilts
were
within
the
seven
foot
setback.
Would
it
still
have
to
beat
the
head?
There
was
the
overhang
to
mr.
two
feet.
Would
it
still
have
to
come
for
us?
It's.
A
J
F
D
J
I
A
F
F
F
D
C
Towanda
anthing
land
development-
this
is
application.
Vrv
1933,
the
property
address
is
72
16,
South
Juanita,
the
first
section
27
156.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
14
feet,
6
inches
to
extend
the
existing
rear
balcony.
The
property
is
owned,
are
as
50
and
was
purchased
in
2003.
The
house
was
built
in
1989.
C
Here's
a
photo
facing
front,
and
here
is
the
survey
and
a
site
plan
just
showing
what
they're
proposing
and
you
can
see,
they're
reducing
the
setback.
This
is
the
area
here
to
fourteen
point
six
feet
to
allow
for
this
hatched
area.
This
is
the
addition.
This
is
the
existing
deck,
and
this
is
the
portion
that
they're
proposing
to
add
on.
C
D
The
sense
of
what
my
client
wants
to
do
is
extend
an
open
deck
right
now.
What
she
has
is
very
narrow
is
not
functionable.
She
wants
me
to
put
table
head
and
shares
and
maybe
entertain
a
couple
of
people.
It's
gonna
be
open
deck,
no
cover
over
no
size.
Only
the
full
post
will
be
on
the
ground
when
we
push
until
the
end
existing
set
bags.
D
I
L
L
That's
where
I'm
located
and
I'm
sure
you
all
know
what
that
is
right.
No
that's
Lennar
project.
This
is
where
is
it?
This
is
what
it
looked
like
before.
Then
our
started.
Well,
they
already
started,
but
others
that
yeah
I
mean
I.
Had
a
canal
running
there.
There's
no
neighbors
behind
me.
There's
two
vacant
lots:
I've
had
no
complaints,
I've
had
people
say,
yeah
go
for
it.
It
sounds
like
a
good
plan
and
it'll
enhance
the
neighborhood
with
all
these
new
construction
homes.
D
H
L
L
D
Yes,
I
have
been
small
sorry.
This
is
my
first
time
doing
this,
so
please
forgive
my
missteps.
Okay
I
originally
came
here
to
object
to
this,
because
I
have
been
living
with
the
lamar
construction
like
many
of
us
down
there,
and
can't
wait
for
600
extra
cars
down
my
street.
However,
after
seeing
what
she's
asking
for
I
sit
on
the
same
side
as
she
does
and
did.
D
Well,
no,
you
have
extra
five
feet.
Yes,
said:
100,
you
have
105
anyways
they're.
Building
a
deck
I
was
worried
about
a
house
being
built
behind
us
because
the
property
behind
her
it
was
hard
to
tell
whether
they
were
talking
about
the
property.
Pond
word
for
word,
so
I
have
no
objections
to
what
this
wonderful
young
lady
is
doing.
Sorry.
F
L
L
L
N
H
A
L
D
L
B
B
B
D
A
B
B
B
D
B
L
F
F
To
construct
the
extension
of
a
rear
balcony,
based
on
the
five
hardship
criteria
that
if
this
is
granted,
they
will
not
substantially
interfere.
We're
gonna
do
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
welfare
of
others,
and
it's
an
army
with
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan,
specifically
that
it
backs
up.
It
does
not
back
up
to
any
immediate
neighbors.
D
A
A
A
A
There
are
some
things
in
my
future
that
I
hope
we're
gonna
come
to
fruition,
and
in
that
case
well,
you
know
I'm,
just
I'm
just
stating,
and
in
that
case
I
would
prefer
not
to
run
for
a
chair
and
I
would
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
all
of
you
board
members
for
allowing
me
to
lead
this
board.
It
has
been
a
pleasure.
I
also
would
like
to
thank
mr.
Hickey
mr.
pett
arica,
mr.
dink
Feld
and
mr.
du
Papa,
for
allowing
me
to
be
chair
this
year.
A
I
had
an
immense
time
and
I've
learned
a
lot
so
much
from
all
of
you.
I
would
like
to
thank
city
staff
for
allowing
me
to
do
this,
and
especially
thank
you,
Miss
Moore,
for
your
guidance.
It
has
been
a
pleasure
working
with
that's
correct
now
using
my
last
privilege
as
chair.
I
would
like
to
nominate
mr.
Brown
for
chair
of
this
board.