►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 09102019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
When
you
approach
the
podium,
please
speak
into
the
microphone
and
state
your
name
address,
and
if
you
have
been
sworn
in,
the
applicant
and/or,
their
agent
will
have
ten
minutes
to
give
testimony
present
witnesses
and
documentation
as
a
part
of
their
presentation.
This
is
your
time
to
present
all
of
your
evidence.
Anyone
any
audience
wishing
to
speak
in
support
of
or
in
opposition
to
the
application
will
will
then
have
three
minutes
each
after
that.
The
board
may
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
regarding
the
application.
A
Finally,
the
applicant
will
have
an
additional
five
minutes
for
a
rebuttal.
If
needed,
the
time
periods
as
stated
will
be
kept
by
me.
The
chair,
any
information
such
as
pictures
or
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted
as
a
part
of
your
petition,
and
you
intend
to
present
at
this
hearing
for
consideration
in
support
of
your
petition,
must
be
individually
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board.
After
acceptance
by
the
board,
you
must
submit
the
item
to
staff
for
it
to
be
entered
and
made
a
part
of
the
permanent
record.
A
The
board
bases
its
decision
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
which
is
presented
this
evening
and
which
meets
the
criteria
required
by
the
city's
code
of
ordinance.
The
variance
the
variance
granted
by
the
board
will
be
only
for
what
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
will
be
compliant
with
any
terms
and
conditions
stated
in
the
approval
by
the
board.
You
must
have
four
votes
for
the
variance
to
be
approved
if
an
insufficient
vote
is
obtained.
The
case
shall
be
automatically
carried
over
for
consideration
of
the
board's
next
meeting.
A
A
If
you
wish
to
appeal
the
variance
review
Board's
decision
to
City
Council,
you
must
file
a
petition
for
review
of
a
board
decision
within
10
business
days
of
the
decision.
If
your
variance
is
granted,
you
will
not
be
able
to
pull
any
permits
until
after
the
10-day
appeal
period
has
passed.
Your
cooperation
will
help
ensure
that
this
meeting
runs
smoothly
and
will
be
greatly
appreciated
before
we
begin
the
first
case.
A
D
D
F
Good
evening
board
Towanda
Anthony
land
development.
The
first
case
is
v
RB
1952.
The
property
address
is
three
thousand
one
north
olá
Avenue.
The
request
before
you
is
as
follows:
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
both
side
yard
setbacks
from
seven
feet
to
5
feet
the
front
yard,
setback
from
20
feet
to
10
feet
and
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
10
feet
for
the
construction
of
a
new
single-family
residence.
F
A
G
Miss
Anthony
mentioned
I
purchased
the
property
in
middle
of
2018
relatively
small
lot.
It
was
a
35
by
50
lot.
At
that
time,
there
was
an
alleyway
that
was
vacated
back
in
the
early
19th
century
was
never
recorded
at
the
city,
so
went
through
the
the
process
and
had
that
added
into
the
property
property
lines.
If
you
will
were
asking
to
build
a
single-family
home
on
the
property,
the
structure
on
the
property,
originally
we
weren't
going
to
salvage
it.
It
was
originally
built
in
1925.
G
However,
it's
completely
dilapidated
roof
has
fallen
apart,
structure
is
compromised,
the
old
owner
had
a
tenant
in
there.
That
was
unhappy
with
the
living
conditions
fairly,
so
we
allowed
them
to
to
stay
and
vacate
the
property
on
their
own
pace
without
charging
any
rent.
While
we
go
through
this
whole
process
of
requesting
the
variance
as
of
now,
it
is
a
40
by
50
foot
lot,
we'd
only
pretty
much
get
a
200
square
foot
house
on
there.
G
If
we
were
to
build
with
the
current
setbacks,
which
is
why
we're
requesting
the
side
setbacks
to
change
from
seven
to
five
feet
and
respectively
the
front
and
the
back
to
reduce
from
20
to
10
feet,
I
have
consulted
with
an
architect.
We
can
make
it
possible,
with
the
single-family
home
there,
by
going
up
one
floor
and
trying
to
maximize
living
space
as
well.
G
A
B
B
G
Particularly
as
it
relates
to
the
distance
between
the
exterior
walls
of
the
property
to
the
property
line,
I
/
I
do
not
have
a
diagram
of
that
or
something
that
would
show
that.
For
you,
however,
the
setbacks
that
were
that
I'm
requesting
would
be
the
exact
footprint
of
the
property
that
that
were
requesting
so
can
I.
Can
I
clarify
in
a
different
way.
I
G
This
is
the
architectural
rendering
for
the
property
once
it
will
be
constructed,
as
you
can
see,
towards
the
top
five
feet
from
the
top
or
excuse
me,
that's
the
north
side
at
the
at
the
very
top
five
feet
from
there
five
feet
from
the
South
again
ten
from
the
left
side,
which
is
the
west
side
and
then
the
right
side,
which
is
the
east
side
there.
The
property
as
it
currently
sits,
is
not
along
these
exact
lines.
It
is
a
little
bit
of
a
more
unique.
I
G
I
A
G
G
Now
it
is
I
was
able
to
have
the
vacated
alley
on
the
south
down
here.
Sorry,
okay,
it
was
originally
spent
five
feet
for
the
property
that
I
purchased
five
feet
for
the
neighbors
that
was
vacated
in
the
1930s
was
not
recorded,
so
I
had
to
go
down
and
record
that
with
the
county
as
well.
So
now
it
is
a
40
by
50
long.
A
G
A
G
A
A
You
know
you're
you're,
in
a
situation
today,
where
you're
explaining
to
us
that
you
don't
really
know
what
you're
gonna
build.
So
if
the
board
is
inclined
to
approve
this,
it
may
make
it
really
difficult
to
get
anything
added
to
it
later
on
understood,
okay,
but
that's
not
what
we're
here
to
consider
we're
just
trying
to
hear
the
evidence,
since
you
don't
have
a
plan
to
show
us
so
kind
of
this
is
the
footprint
yeah.
C
A
A
D
Chairman,
if
I
may
I
just
wanted
to
that,
you
said
that
you
had
visited
the
site
and
did
you
how
many
times
did
you
visit
the
site
just
once
I.
D
Just
drove
by
okay
I
just
went
there
Florida
Statute
to
86.0
one
one,
five,
subparagraph
C
three.
It
does
say
that
that
you
can
conduct
a
an
investigation
in
a
site
visit
and
but
that
does
need
to
be
made
part
of
the
record,
and
the
statute
seems
to
consider
a
site
visit
to
be
like
an
ex
parte
communication.
So
I'm
glad
that
you
did
put
it
into
the
record.
It's
the
statute
requires
it
to
be
part
of
the
record,
so
but
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
that
site
visits
are
considered
ex
parte
communications.
I
A
A
A
F
Tawanda
anthony
land
development-
this
is
application,
BRB
1989,
the
property
address
is
4318
west
and
for
Otto
Street.
The
request
is
as
follows:
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
corner
yard
setback
from
15
feet
to
10
feet,
to
remodel
and
best
existing
house.
The
property
is
owned,
are
as
100
and
was
purchased.
In
2018,
the
existing
single-family
residence
was
constructed
in
1949.
F
A
A
E
So
I
am
basically
requesting
to
reduce
the
setback.
I
guess
this
code
is
for
it
to
be
15
feet,
clearance
on
the
side,
we're
in
the
drop,
it
means
who's
new,
where
South
Manhattan
runs
we're
not
trying
to
change
the
basic
current
footprint
of
the
house,
but
where
it
is
constructed
right
now
as
it
stands,
is
at
10
feet,
and
so,
in
order
for
us
to
make
any
changes
in
the
home
which
we're
planning
on
doing,
we
have
to
get
the
variance
to
reduce
from
the
15
required
by
statute
to
the
10.
We're
currently
lies.
A
E
Can
you
see
that
there
that's
good
I
so
as
it
stands
right
now,
the
house
is
816
square
feet
and
that
just
covers
this
space.
This
is
our
plan.
What
we
plan
on
doing
with
the
house
right
now.
This
is
a
covered.
Porch
covered
carport,
it's
open
space,
and
we
would
like
to
build
into
this
space
to
put
our
kitchen
and
living
area
in
there.
So
we
may
make
an
additional
bedroom
here
where
the
house,
this
is
currently
poured
concrete
area
for
the
house
right
now.
E
This
is
just
unheated
space
and
so
we'd
like
to
enclose
it
here.
Our
driveway
right
now
is
not
very
usable
when
we
purchased
the
home
and
moved
in
and
saw
the
home.
South
Manhattan
was
closed
for
renovation.
They
were
working
on
the
water
and
the
drainage,
and
so
there
was
no
traffic
or
very
little
traffic
in
and
out
of
there.
E
However,
when
they
completed
it
and
opened
men
hat-
and
it
is
a
drag
way-
and
so
it's
very
difficult
to
get
in
and
out
of
there
and
we
have
two
young
children
and
additionally,
we
considered
building
out
in
front
of
the
house.
But
there
is
a
huge,
beautiful
Graham
tree
in
our
yard
right
here
and
also
my
neighbors
have
two
to
three
grand
trees:
three
grand
trees
in
their
yard,
I'm,
so
constructing
home
living
space.
E
I
A
A
A
A
G
It's
a
very
small
house,
so
I'm
going
to
move
at
the
various
requests
for
case
BRB
1989
for
property
located
at
43
18
West
Emperor
Otto
Street
in
Tampa,
presented
at
the
public
hearing
to
seek
relief
from
section
27
290
and
that's
in
order
to
reduce
the
corner
yard,
which
is
the
west
side,
setback
from
15
feet
to
10
feet
and
that's
to
remodel,
invest
the
existing
1949
home.
That
also
enabled
the
in
the
remodeling
process
to
relocate
the
driveway
from
South
Manhattan
Avenue,
which
was
high
traffic
and
probably
somewhat
dangerous.
I
I
F
Towanda
Anthony
land
development,
his
application,
VRB
1990,
the
property
addresses
3208,
West,
San,
Jose,
Street,
/,
section
27
156.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
13.8
feet
and
the
corner
yard
setback
from
7
feet
to
0
feet.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
construct
a
new
front,
porch,
invest
the
existing
house,
the
property
is
zoned
rs.60
and
was
purchased
in
2017.
The
existing
single-family
residence
was
constructed
in
1925.
A
tree
consultation
was
conducted
in
June
of
2017.
F
A
F
K
We
fully
understand
that
there's
probably
a
lot
of
questions
and
concerns
when
you
first
see
that
all
that
applies
to
is
the
existing
structure
of
the
home,
and
so
when
we
first
filled
out
our
application,
we
were
under
the
impression
that
the
existing
structure
needed
to
be
included
in
that
request
for
the
to
reduce
the
setback,
which
is
why
it
was
set
to
zero.
Obviously,
in
hindsight,
you
know
if
I
could
take
it
back,
we
would
revise
that
and
change
it
to
what
were
actually
trying.
K
Completion
do
and
all
that
applies
here
for
the
the
first
part
of
this
request.
Is
that
we're
looking
to
reduce
the
side
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
5
feet?
2
inches
it's
a
little
third
bedroom
in
our
backyard
and
then
I.
Here's
the
site
planet
is
highlighted.
The
5
foot
2
inch
request
for
the
setback
from
the
7
feet,
so
it's
a
1
in
tour.
K
Excuse
me:
1
foot,
10,
inch
difference
and
that's
for
a
third
bedroom,
and
the
second
part
of
this
is
to
reduce
that
front
hair
and
setback
from
25
feet
to
13.8
feet.
The
existing
setback
is
13.8
feet
for
the
front
porch.
It's
currently
a
uncovered
concrete
slab.
That
is
acts
as
our
porch
and
what
we're
simply
looking
to
do.
There
is
build
up
on
that
existing
structure
put
a
cover
on
it,
which
would
then
just
make
the
porch
covered,
and
we
have
no
intentions
of
enclosing.
K
K
We
did
outline
kind
of
the
reasons
for
it,
as
well
as
what
we're
actually
trying
to
accomplish,
which
is
once
again
that
7
feet
to
5
feet,
2
inches,
so
hopefully
that
helps
out
a
bit
abhi
sent
that
over
about
three
weeks
ago,
I
believe
so
just
thought
the
highlights
some
of
the
may
be
what
we
think
are
justifications
and
hardship
for
the
changes
to
the
backyard.
So,
as
you
saw
from
some
of
the
pages
really,
we
have
a
very,
very
large,
very
beautiful
oak
tree
in
our
front
yard.
K
It's
at
the
front
left
of
our
house.
It
pretty
much
takes
over
our
entire
house
at
the
top
end,
so
we
have
no
ability
to
build
up.
We
have
no
intention
of
affecting
that
tree
damaging
it
whatsoever
by
making
any
changes
to
our
home.
So
we
don't
want
to
touch
the
tree
it
most
likely
can't.
Our
house
is
also
built
in
1925
and
it
has
a
lot
of
character.
We
want
to
keep
the
original
structure
the
original
look
and
feel
and
integrity
at
home
as
much
as
possible.
K
So
really,
our
only
option
to
build
out
extra
room
in
our
home
is
to
build
out
on
the
back
and
add
on.
We
are
expecting
our
first
child,
this
February,
so
we're
trying
to
make
room
for
a
growing
family,
and
so
once
again
there
are
options
to
build
out
in
the
back,
which
is
why
we're
requesting
that
reduction
to
the
side
yard
setback
of
7
feet
to
5
feet,
2
inches.
K
These
are
the
plans
for
what
we're
looking
to
do
so
I'll.
Just
let
you
look
at
these
for
a
second
I'll
show
you
few
more
pictures,
but
this
will
be
the
cover
to
the
existing
uncovered
porch,
which
once
again,
is
already
at
the
existing
setback
of
13
feet.
8
inches
we're
just
looking
to
build
up
on
those
pylons
and
then
cover
it
and,
as
you
can
see
here,
we're
looking
to
keep
this
as
an
open-air
structure.
K
K
So,
as
you
can
imagine,
with
the
tree
this
size
with
an
uncovered
porch
between
rainy
season
and
all
the
debris
with
dirt
leaves
pollen.
It
becomes
a
kind
of
a
nightmare,
so
you
ooh
one,
keep
it
clean,
which
is
not
necessarily
the
hardship
that
we're
trying
to
justify
here.
But
that
is
an
issue
because
not
only
for
our
neighbors
on
the
outside,
also
us
looking
at
this.
K
It's
very
very
difficult
to
keep
clean,
but,
most
importantly,
as
you
can
see
here,
there
are
two
spots
that
accumulate
water
and
puddle
when
it
rains
and
then,
if
left
on
kept
for
maybe
a
day
or
two,
you
get
this
slippery
moss
and
this
becomes
a
safety
hazard
and
I've
just
left
on
it.
My
wife
slipped
on
it.
We've
had
delivery
people
almost
slip
on
it,
so
our
major
concern
is
obviously
that
that
would
continue
if
this
was
left
uncovered
any
visitors
to
the
home
delivery.
K
And
then
this
is
just
more
pictures
of
what
it
looks
like
when
it
rains.
This
is
also
that
huge
oak
tree
in
our
neighbor's
yard
on
the
right
side-
that's
not
allowing
us
to
build
any
closer
than
the
site
plan
notates.
What
we're
looking
to
build
out
on
the
backyard
for
once
again,
just
the
reduction
of
1
feet,
10
inches
from
7
to
5,
feet,
2
inches
and
that's
all
I.
All
the
prepared
comes
ahead.
A
J
J
Good
evening
my
name
is
Blodgett
Timoshenko
I
live
at
30,
206
West,
San,
Jose,
Street,
Tampa,
Florida,
3,
3,
69
and
I
have
been
sworn
in.
I
have
known
this
property
since
January
2009,
my
property
abuts,
the
applicant's
property
and
I'ma
directly
impacted
by
the
proposed
variance
request.
I
would
like
to
submit
into
the
record
the
letter
with
attachments
I
just
provided
detailing
my
concerns
regarding
this
request.
I'll
brief,
a
summary
of
those
concerns
regarding
the
front
yard
setback,
variance
request
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
to
13
feet
8
inches.
J
This
request
does
have
a
described
hardship
and
therefore
I
support
this
requested
reduction.
So
the
applicant
can
instruct
the
porch
cover
only
and
should
not
be
applied
to
the
entire
front
of
the
house
regarding
the
side,
setback,
variance
request
to
reduce
the
side
yard
setback
from
7
to
0
feet
and
5
feet,
2
inches
for
the
proposed
addition
to
the
house.
I
do
not
support
this
request:
a
reduction,
the
petitioners
variance
application
statement
of
hardship,
Exhibit
A
1
dated
July,
2nd
2019
and
the
Supplemental
supporting
hardship
statement
do
not
validate
or
support
the
request.
J
These
difficulties
are
not
unique
and
singular
with
respect
the
property,
as
they
are
very
common,
with
properties
built
during
the
same
time
period
and
similarly
located
a
further
approval
of
the
subject.
Variance
with
set
of
precedents
for
future
setback,
variance
requests.
There
is
no
hardship
that
supports
reducing
the
site
setback
for
a
new
addition
to
any
distance
less
than
7
feet.
Additionally,
the
grant
tree
does
not
influence
or
restrict
any
design
to
the
rear
of
the
house.
J
Applicant
obtained
a
tree
removal
imprinting
permit
in
June
2019
and
removed
the
tree
canopy
away
from
the
front
and
rear
of
the
house.
Please
see
attachments,
1,
&
2
of
my
letters.
There
is
an
existing
significant
water,
runoff
drainage
for
issue
occurring
during
rainfall
that
originates
from
the
petitioners
northeast
corner
of
the
half
home
during
any
rainfall,
storm
water,
pours
directly
on
the
ground
at
the
property
line
and
pools
accumulates
on
my
driveway.
This
water
runoff
causes
significant
water,
buildup
erosion
and
potential
water
damage
place.
J
The
attached
it's
three
or
four
of
my
letter,
A
proving
advanced
the
site
setback,
would
further
exacerbate
this
existing
condition,
potentially
reducing
than
curviest
area
by
reducing
the
volume
area
by
1.8
feet
by
20
feet
for
the
stormwater
retention
to
be
properly
conveyed
from
back
to
the
front
yard,
see
of
Tampa
technical
standard
manual,
private
development.
Additionally,
the
driveway
my
property
measures
at
12
feet
in
width
and
is
approximately
2p
for
that
applicants,
house
and
less
than
one
foot
from
their
chimney
the
place.
J
My
driver
in
symp,
in
summary,
I
respectfully
request
that
the
board's
consideration
to
grant
the
request
for
a
reduction
on
the
front
yard
yard
setback
from
25
to
30
feet
to
law,
construction
of
a
porch
cover
only
and
deny
the
request
for
a
reduction
of
the
side,
setback,
variance
from
7
to
0
feet
or
7
to
5
feet,
2
inches,
as
shown
on
the
site
plan
for
the
proposed
addition
submitted
in
the
variance
or
the
variance
application.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
A
L
K
Sure
yeah
absolutely
for
a
question,
and,
and
so
as
I
mentioned,
we
do
have
limited
room
to
build
in
the
back
and
when
you
combine
that
with
the
inability
to
build
up,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
maximize
space
as
much
as
possible
without
intruding
too
much
within
within
the
line,
and
so
when
we
met
with
contractors
to
design
this
site
plan.
With
with
those
plans
in
mind,
this
is
what
they
came
out
with
and
thought
it
was
reasonable.
Given
given
those
considerations,
what.
L
K
L
K
Oh,
no,
no
so
there-there
is
back
orchard
does
not
go
it's
well.
Oh
gosh,
I,
don't
even
know
it's
easily
20
feet
off
the
battery
or
something
well
in
my
life,
the
footprint
of
the
the
porch
is
going
to
be
quite
a
bit
smaller
than
the
footprint
of
the
proposal.
For
that
room.
The
porch
is
also
more
aligned
in
between
the
garage
and
in
the
room
that
bedroom
we're
proposing
to
build.
A
M
K
L
Again,
there's
nothing
wrong
with
creating
space
and
you
need
your
living
space
and
those
kinds
of
things.
The
question
is
like
I
said
for
argument's
sake.
What's
what's
with
the
additional,
you
know
one
point:
10
e
one
foot
10
inches
that
cuts
into
there
if
you're
gonna
be
building
it.
Why
not
go
to
the
17th.
N
G
F
Danny
land
development-
you
do
not
have
to
vest
the
existing
house,
it's
really
what's
before
you
tonight,
he's
asked
for
the
seven
to
zero,
but
if
he
wanted
to
change
the
request
to
just
this,
the
addition
in
the
rear
excuse
me
just
asked
for
the
addition
in
the
rear.
He
could
do
that
it
would
just
if
the
storm
came
along
or
something
happened,
the
house
would
not
be
able
to
be
constructed
in
the
current
footprint.
So
we
do
advise
the
applicants
of
that
and
that's
why
usually
they
do
request
the
best
in
the
existing
structure.
D
I
think
what
miss
Anthony
is
saying
is
that
the
board
could
grant
the
variance
for
what's
existing
and
then
that
would
it
would
no
longer
be
non-conforming
at
that
point.
It
would
there
would
be
a
new
setback
created
which
would
be
what
is
existing
there
today
and
at
that
point,
if
the
structure
did
become
destroyed
or
whatever
whatever
was
built
after
that
would
be,
it
would
be
allowed
to
be
built
to
the
newly
created
setback
by
the
board.
That.
D
A
D
Don't
see
an
issue
with
it
and
if
he
wants
to
reduce
that
for
in
third
from
zero
to
five
point
two,
eight,
our
five
foot
two
inches
I,
think
that
that
the
board
could
do
grant
the
fight
to
instead,
but
not
for
what's
existing,
because
it's
it's
already
sitting
at
zero,
so
that
part
portion
would
need
to
go
to
zero.
But
the
addition
would
need.
But.
C
A
Minor
standing
right
as
a
contractor,
pulling
permits
on
an
existing
structure
like
this
that
the
first
thing
they
do
is
look
at
the
existing
setbacks
and
if
they
don't
comply,
they
didn't
tell
you
to
go
to
the
VRB
and
read
it
vested
because
you're
adding
on
with
the
structure,
so
you
may
not
be
adding
on
to
that
side
in
this
case
he's
not
adding
on
to
the
side,
making
it
worse.
Okay
of
the
existing
the
existing
footprint.
A
But
the
neighbor
in
the
did
testify
is
objecting
to
a
zero
is,
is
objecting
to
an
existing
condition
that
he's
not
changing
he's
not
asking
to
change
it
he's
asking
to
build
further
away
than
zero
feet
with
the
5.2
or
whatever
it
is
and
yeah.
We
can
still
question
that
aspect.
I
I,
understand
that,
but
my
experiencing
on
this
board
has
always
been
that
there,
the
property
owners
are
required
to
ask
for
the
actual
condition
to
be
vested
when
they're.
A
D
M
D
C
It's
that
question.
Let's
say
that
that
we
discussed
and
decide
that
we
want
to
best
the
existing
structure
because
it's
there
and
he
intends
to
keep
it,
but
we're
not
okay,
with
a
encroachment
of
the
new
expansion
into
the
seven
feet.
If
we
only
vested
the
existing
structure,
he
could
still
go
back
and
permit
an
expansion
in
the
back
that
met
all
current
setbacks
without
us
right.
C
D
C
A
The
structure
if
the
vesting
was
approved
and
the
structure
got
wiped
out
tomorrow.
It's
our
understanding
in
the
past
that
he
couldn't
come
back.
He
could
come
back
and
build
in
the
exact
same
footprint
yeah,
but
he
couldn't
make
modifications
of
that
footprint
without
coming
back
in
front
of
the
board.
Again
right
right
simply
stated:
okay,.
A
I
K
The
neighbors,
the
good
good
neighbor
notice,
yeah,
it
was
not.
We
did
note
this
in
the
amended
hardship
criteria,
statement
that
we
sent
in
a
few
weeks
back
with
you
know
what
we're
talking
about
now
with
the
zero
five.
Two
is,
obviously
it's
a
pretty
convoluted
topic,
so
we
did
want
to
notate
that,
in
our
hardship
criteria,
statement
that
we
we
sent
in
probably
three
four
weeks
ago.
F
C
I
I
L
J
L
J
J
L
J
K
So
yes,
I
know:
Vijay
I
had
an
initial
meeting.
We
went
through
probably
about
an
hour
walks
through
the
property.
What
we're
trying
to
accomplish
this
is
why,
and
there
were
additional
questions
and
very
understand
was
so
given
some
of
concerns
and
questions
regarding
the
0,
vs
5
foot,
2
setback,
we've
just
emailed
over
the
information,
hopefully
clear
and
find
that
and
it
had
payback's
in
so
a
bit
of
a
surprise,
but
the
end
of
the
day.
K
You
know
fully
understand
the
concerns,
and-
and
you
know
it's
just
that-
he's
bringing
up
and
it
you
know
we're
here
to
work
at
the
City
Council
we're
gonna
work
at
the
neighborhood,
our
neighbors.
We
had
five
neighbors
right
support
letters.
We've
had
no
objections
whatsoever
to
the
front
porch
or
sees
me
the
front
gets
set
back
uh-huh,
even
in
the
the
two
that
wrote
objection,
letters
which
were
specifically
geared
towards
the
the
sad
setback.
They
had
no
issue
and
stated
they
had
no
issue
with
the
the
front
yard
setback.
K
So,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is,
with
the
limited
space
that
we
do
have
maximize
that
space
to
accommodate
for
our
growing
family,
while
also
keeping
the
integrity,
the
characteristics,
the
look
and
feel
of
the
exterior
of
our
home.
That,
hopefully,
then
compliments
our
neighborhood
as
well
to
try
to
keep
that
intact
and
also,
hopefully,
increase
in
the
value
of
our
property
and
therefore
increase
the
value
of
the
property
of
those
around
us.
By
building
this
addition,
so.
C
You
could
do
an
approval
with
the
condition
that
could
approve
the
front
setback,
invest
the
side,
yard
setback
for
the
existing
structure
and
the
condition
being
that
it
grants
no
variance
for
additions
and
then
not
there's.
No,
there
would
be
nothing
to
deny
and
that's
an
area
that
addresses
all
items.
Is
that
right?
If
that's
it,
that's
what
the
more,
but,
with
the
with.
C
A
I
A
F
Come
on
dancing,
land
development,
justice,
application,
number,
BRB,
1991,
the
property
address
is
13
18,
west,
south
Moody
Avenue.
The
request
is
as
follows:
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
18
feet
and
both
side
yard
setbacks
from
7
feet
to
two
feet:
to
construct
a
single-family
residence
and
fire
emergency
exit
stairs.
The
property
is
owned,
RM
16
and
was
purchased
in
2007.
The
existing
single-family
residence
was
constructed
in
1925.
F
F
So
this
is
moody
Avenue.
This
is
Alabama
Avenue.
It
is
a
through
lot,
so
they
have
two
fronts:
along
moody,
they're
meeting
the
25-foot
front,
setback
along
Alabama
they're,
asking
they're
at
18
feet
and
they're
asking
to
reduce
that
from
the
25
feet.
That's
required
because
it
is
a
front
yard
to
the
18th
tee,
even
though
it
looks
like
it
will
function
as
a
rear
yard.
A
I
I
A
M
Nicolini,
yes,
I've
been
sworn
I'm
representing
Jocelyn
Camp,
who
is
the
trustee
for
this
property?
As
Towanda's
pointed
out,
we
don't
have
a
double-whammy.
We
have
a
triple
whammy.
We
have
the
two
front
yards,
the
one
on
Moody,
the
one
on
Alabama
and
the
corner
yard
on
Mississippi,
so
we're
what
we're
asking
for
is
relief
from
the
Alabama
side
and
all
the
properties
that
front
on
Moody
access
the
rear
of
their
garages
on
Alabama.
There
are
no
front
yard
facing
homes
on
Alabama,
so
it's
consistent
all
along
that
side
of
the
street.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
So
that
brings
us
to
the
really
the
crux
of
the
matter,
which
is
this
isn't
about
occupancy
space,
except
for
the
area
in
the
rear,
we're
calling
the
rear
on
Alabama.
It
does
have
to
do
with
the
exit
stairs.
They
are
not
increasing
the
area
of
the
building
itself,
but
they
are
facilitating
the
exit
from
the
second
floor.
Let's
say
you
ask,
you
know
why
we
need
an
exit
stair
there,
because
that
bedroom
cannot
exit
through
the
adjacent
bedrooms
on
the
other
side.
So
you
have
to
have
your
own
means
of
egress.
M
To
my
knowledge,
you
mean,
if
you
look
at
the
site
plan,
you'll
see
on
the
Mississippi
side,
where
they,
where
the
stair
is
being
requested.
It
fronts
on
a
street,
so
there
are
no
adjacent
property
owners
that
would
be
affected
by
that
stair
and
from
mine.
I
understand
is
that
the
Builder
has
talked
to
the
other
property
owner
on
the
inside
at
1316
moody,
and
he
had
no
objection
to
the
stair
being.
M
If
that's
not
accurate,
then
up
I
didn't
have
that
conversation,
so
I'm,
that's
what
I'm
being
told
so
anyway,
the
front
of
the
property
will
be
developed
as
if
it
faces
on
moody
and
the
rear
will
be
functioning,
as
is
on
Alabama,
as
all
the
other
properties
do
function.
Currently
there
are,
as
I
said,
there
were
no
trees
that
are
affected
by
this
development
and
in
terms
of
the
of
the
criteria.
M
The
location
of
this
property
being
on
a
corner
with
two
fronts,
creates
the
difficulties
to
practical
difficulties
in
the
hardship.
The
comprehensive
plan
speaks
to
relief
generally
in
terms
of
what
can
and
can't
be
built,
and
it's
anticipated
with
these
kind
of
setbacks.
It
would
be
an
extraordinary
hardship
on
whoever
goes
into
this
property,
since
it
is
owned.
Rm
16,
it
does,
is
not
necessarily
going
to
be
redeveloped
as
a
single-family
residence,
but
it
will
be
developed
as
a
duplex
whether
this
particular
design
goes
through.
We
would
appreciate
your
your
support
for
that.
M
But
again
it's
not
a
matter
of
being
single-family.
It's
not
a
matter
of
aesthetics
of
what
it
looks
like,
but
if
you
don't
build
something
nice,
it's
not
going
to
sell.
We've
had
other
projects
in
the
area
that
are
very
similar
to
this
and
I
know
that
you've
heard
me
say
before
that,
but
for
the
fact
the
fire
marshal
wants
an
exit
from
a
bedroom
which
is
isolated,
that
we
wouldn't
be
here
before
you,
with
the
exception
of
the
access
relief
on
the
on
the
rear,
I'd,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
M
We
didn't
create
that
that
condition
the
zoning
code
is
really
what
we're
responding
to
in
terms
of
setbacks,
and
it
really
wasn't
until
we
got
into
the
project
that
we
realized
that
there
was
a
double
front
and
we
we
were
the
ones
who
brought
it
to
the
attention
of
the
staff
and
said
hey.
You
know
we
probably
didn't
notice
correctly,
because
there's
a
double
front
and
a
corner
that
we
have
to
deal
with.
So
those
are
extraordinary
conditions.
M
They
were
not
created
by
the
owner
of
that
property
and
they're
created
by
the
code
itself,
and
there
are
provisions
for
providing
relief
for
that
with
respect
to
the
code
and
injuring
any
other
parts
of
any
other
person.
You
have
a
street
on
one
side
and
an
internal
setback
on
on
the
other
side,
which
is,
as
I
said,
not
to
be
ever
enclosed.
It
is
for
relief
or
exiting
and
it
extends
21
feet
into
them
from
the
rear
of
the
building
is
healthy
and
in
terms
of
the
overall
dimensions
of
the
property
it's
relatively
minor.
M
M
A
O
O
Outlined
or
put
up
here
by
the
applicant
the
way
that
this
building
is
designed,
it
is
of
multifamily
residence.
It
should
have
two
units,
one
unit
here
and
one
unit
here,
and
but
the
way
it's
designed
is
that
there's
separate
bedrooms
in
the
back
that
are
not
connected
to
the
building
itself
and
as
a
result
of
the
design
that
they
want
to
put
there.
That's
what
requires
the
setbacks
for
the
stairs
that
go
up
into
these
two
back
bedrooms.
There
they're
characterizing
these
as
bedrooms,
but
that
property
that
the
fixture
that
they
just
showed.
O
You
is
another
multifamily
unit
that
they
placed
about
two
or
three
doors
down
to
the
north
of
this
property.
And
what
happens
is:
is
they
they
rent
out
these
rooms
as
Airbnb
s?
And
we
know
that
they
do
that,
because
and
we're
going
to
have
other
individuals
that
are
going
to
testify
to
you
that
we
know
that
happens,
because
they
can
see
people
coming
in
and
out
of
that
residence
with
those
two
bedrooms
in
the
back
rent
it
out
as
Airbnb
s
and
they
also
advertise
them
as
Airbnb
s,
creating
a
lot
more
traffic.
O
Creating
a
lot
more
parking
issues
and
creating
other
hardships,
but
what
I
wanted
to
address,
because
you're
gonna
hear
a
lot
of
other
things
from
the
other
neighbors,
but
I
wanted
to
address
as
the
criteria
I
hope,
I'm
reading
this
right.
But
one
of
the
criteria
is
that
the
hardship
or
practice
difficulty
does
not
result
from
the
actions
of
the
applicant
and
a
self-created
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
shall
not
justify
a
variance,
but
for
the
fact
that
they
designed
the
structure.
O
The
way
that
they've
designed
it
to
have
these
two
bedrooms
separated
from
the
main
structure
I
mean
common
sensical
II.
They
have
created
the
hardship
or
the
practical
difficulty
and
correct.
Is
it
practically
impossible
for
using
this
property
for
the
purpose
intended?
If
you
don't
create
the
hardship,
if
you
don't
approve
the
variance
I,
don't
think
so
so
you'll
hear
other
from
from
the
other
neighbors
you'll
hear
about
the
safety
concerns
that
we
have
you'll
hear
about
the
way
and
I'd
like
to
actually
how
many
minutes
do.
I
have.
O
It
does
not
comply
with
a
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
The
Tampa
Hut
comprehensive
plan
says
specifically,
you
want
to
sustain
and
enhance
an
attractive
and
safe
city,
and
you
want
to
strengthen
and
protect
the
residential
neighborhoods
from
development
pressure,
and
in
this
case,
that
property
is
going
to
be
used
for
development
pressure
and
for
Airbnb.
O
N
Name
is
Paul
D,
Dodson,
13
16,
south
moody,
Avenue
I've,
been
sworn
in.
I've
lived
at
this
address
for
the
past
25
years
used
to
mean
something
to
live
in
the
1925
bungalow
I
live
in,
but
now
it's
being
essentially
the
term
of
the
year,
it
seems
like
tear
down
so
I
guess:
I
live
in
a
teardown
13
16
13,
18,
13
14
I'm,
going
to
be
the
ham
in
the
sandwich
between
these
two
big
monstrosities
and
that's
what
I'm
going
to
call
it
a
two-story
20-foot
tall
monstrosity
is
what
this
is.
N
I
can
only
stay
emotionally
here,
because
I've
been
tending
to
that
property
at
13
18
for
the
past
22
years,
maintaining
the
lawn
for
the
three
sisters
that
lived
there.
So
what
he
was
talking
about
in
terms
of
the
unit
upstairs
on
this,
this
building
that
they're
proposing
from
the
applicant
he's
not
he's
being
disingenuous
with
you,
I,
don't
know
if
he
means
to
be,
but
it's
not
just
a
bedroom.
It's
it's
an
apartment.
N
You
got
Sally
O'neal's,
it's
Mississippi's
like
the
runway
to
get
to
policy
a
Country
Club
and
on
a
give
every
given
Thursday,
Friday
or
Saturday.
You
have
a
huge
overflow
of
parking,
as
it
is,
there's
no
calming
traffic
calming
devices
on
Mississippi,
so
it
becomes
very
dangerous
trying
to
pull
out
and
going
to
back
to
Howard
or
even
go
onto
MacDill.
You
can't
with
the
existing
structure.
There
that's
there
now
it's
hard
and
dangerous
to
look
out
and
see
when
you
pull
out
so
on.
In
addition
to
this,
this
13
18
address
I
mentioned
earlier.
N
A
P
Mac,
which
other
than
a
1312,
the
other
side
of
the
house
other
side
from
Paul
in
a
new
development.
Our
concerns
are
that
they
do
run
it.
Air
B&B,
the
out
of
the
back
I,
had
the
stairwell
right
next
to
my
house.
On
the
other
side,
people
come
up
down
the
stairwell
all
night
long
and
the
variance
seems
to
move
be
a
little
bit
closer
than
seven
feet
to
the
property
line,
because
I
can
reach
out
and
touch.
P
The
streets
are
very
crowded,
our
kids,
it's
a
very
single-family
home
street
and
port,
and
it's
already
taxed
as
far
as
traffic
on
all
the
neighbors
have
said.
It
were
just
concerned
about
you
know
putting
another
house
this
size
on
the
street.
The
house
they
built
already
is
2,800
square
feet
on
each
side
and
that's
all
I
need
the
variance
it
is
maxed
out
they
take
just
like
Paul
described
a
1925,
bungalow,
tear
it
down
and
build
that
Mississippi
is
considers
very
busy.
P
Every
morning
coming
out,
you
have
to
kind
of
ease
out
and
you're
arguing
to
go
closer,
which
means
it
can
be
impossible
to
see
around
the
Howard
traffic.
That's
may
have
two
kids
Azura
clicks
on
the
street.
How
do
you
in
school,
just
like
Paul,
talked
about
when
they
build
that
you
have
to
build,
see,
can
barely
see
now,
that's
dangerous.
You
know
another
person
dying
just
like
that.
The
lady
died
on
face
short
of
you
know.
Last
year,
someone
else
getting
hit
on
Howard.
You
know
we
live
in
a
great
neighborhood.
P
We
a
lot
a
lot
of
great
businesses
and
it's
part
of
living
down
there,
but
building
another
home
of
this
size.
In
this
variance.
It's
just
not
necessary,
build
a
single-family
home.
You
know
renovate
the
house,
it's
there.
We
all
love
that,
but
to
build
another
home
of
this
size,
which
is
a
minimum
of
two
people
I'm
your
talked
about
six
to
eight,
more
Lars
minimum
and
it's
ridiculous,
not
to
mention
the
fact.
P
I
You
know
when
actually
I
don't
have
any
pictures
of
the
street,
so
he
the
gentleman
that
was
up
here,
said
that
our
street
was
mostly
duplexes
and
that's
not
true.
Our
street
is
two
and
a
half
blocks
long.
That's
it
it's
two
and
a
half
blocks
long
on
one
end
right
by
the
the
hotel,
the
Epicurean
is,
that
so
hope,
apartment
condos
and
then
on
the
other
side.
Two
and
a
half
blocks
later
are
the
funky
funky
funky
villas
and
then
there's
a
condo
across
from
that.
That's
the
half
block
on
the
two
main
blocks.
I
There's
only
two
duplexes
there's
one
on
the
west
side
and
then
the
one
that
they
just
built.
Everybody
else
is
a
single-family
home.
So
it's
not
really
accurate
to
say
that
most
of
the
neighborhood
is
apartments.
Yes,
we
do
have
apartments.
I
will
grant
you
that,
but
this
two
main
streets
only
have
two.
Now
this
lot
is
not
a
big
lot.
They
choose
to
put
a
big
of
two
big
houses
there
that
have
detached
apartments.
They
have
detached
apartments.
I
I
We
have
a
sidewalk
on
our
side,
that
is
a
sidewalk
and
it's
a
wide
sidewalk,
but
it
doesn't
accommodate
all
the
people
that
walk
and
our
neighborhood,
because
we
do
have
a
walkable
neighborhood
and
we
do
have
the
businesses
of
Howard
on
Howard
that
are
Bella's
and
fresh
kitchen
and
people
do
Park
on
our
street
because
they
want
to
go
to
those
things
and
we're
fine
with
that
we're
fine
with
that.
That's
part
of
living
in
the
city.
I
The
problem
is
that
when
you
as
a
resident,
a
homeowner
cannot
find
parking
spaces
that
becomes
a
problem
now
on
the
backside
is
an
alley.
It's
their
Alabama
he's
calling
a
tattoo
for
two
front
yards:
that's
not
a
front
yard
as
an
alley.
It's
a
street
named
Alabama,
but
there
are
no
houses
facing
that
street.
It's
all
the
back
of
houses
and
the
back
of
businesses.
I
I
Q
Q
That
was
built
a
year
to
go
that
that
we've
been
experiencing
and
in
meaning
the
reason
that
the
gentleman
over
here
spoke
about
is
it's
not
just
a
single
family
home,
it's
gonna
be
two
townhouses,
plus
two
more
in
the
back,
so
I
just
don't
know
how
our
box
is.
Gonna
sustain
all
that,
especially
with
the
parking
we're
all
my
wife
and
I
have
to
share
a
single-file
lane
driveway,
so
we
shuffle
cars
in
and
out.
Q
We
try
not
to
park
on
the
street
to
accommodate
everyone,
but
we're
already
having
the
Soho
apartments
and
all
their
friends
and
everything
parking
in
front
which
a
lot
of
times
you
know,
there's
just
people
that
block
our
driveway,
and
so
we
have
to
somehow
figure
out
how
to
get
out
of
our
driveway
with
cars
halfway
park.
Then
I
also
have
two
kids
and
they're
young.
Q
So
that's
the
safety
concern
of
that
playing
out
on
the
street
or
on
the
plot,
and
then
the
other
thing
is
I
mean
I'm
all
for
beautifying,
our
neighborhood
and
I.
Think
the
point
is
a
single-family
home
would
be
great,
this
big
duplex
again,
whatever
it
is
townhouse
it
just
won't
work
for
a
block.
You
know
I
envision,
all
us
our
neighbors
having
a
nice
canopy
tree
block,
which
you
know.
Ten
years
ago
we
bought
the
house.
A
R
A
R
R
R
It's
very
emotional
for
me,
because
I
have
a
17
year
old,
daughter
and
every
day
that
she
gets
out
into
her
car
to
head
to
school.
I
watch
her
the
way
that
the
homes
are
currently
built.
It
makes
it
really
difficult
for
a
car
to
be
able
to
make
a
left
or
a
right
hand
turn
the
traffic
on
Mississippi
has
increased
tenfold
and
the
time
that
I
have
been
there.
R
The
parking
is
an
issue,
but
every
time
that
she
leaves
the
house,
you
have
to
actually
inch
up
and
I
encourage
you
before.
You
approve
this
variance
to
go,
drive
down
my
street
Moody
and
try
to
make
a
left
or
a
right,
and
you
will
find
that
the
front
end
of
your
car
is
almost
in
Mississippi,
because
you
cannot
see
beyond
the
current
fencing
and
beyond
the
current
foilage,
it's
out
there.
R
If
they
build
this
proposed
building,
we
will
not
be
able
to
see
it
all
I,
don't
know
how
we
would
make
left
and
right-hand
turns
there.
So
I
am
you
know.
My
issues
are
the
traffic,
the
parking
and
the
safety,
and
that
has
increased
already
in
our
current
environment
and
by
building
this
particular
structure,
you're,
adding
two
more
family
homes,
you're,
adding,
potentially
four
more
drivers
and
you're,
also
adding
in
the
back
those
spaces
that
they're
calling
bedrooms
which
are
really
concealed
apartments.
H
H
I
strongly
oppose
so
now,
I'm
gonna
be
like
the
lady
in
the
up
house
from
well
Disney
in
my
little
house
between
this
two-story
monstrosity
and
the
other
one.
That's
planning
on
being
built
right
next
to
me,
I've
been
at
my
house
for
25
years
in
a
personal
level.
I
know
all
my
neighbors
and
I
would
like
to
keep
that.
1924-25
bunk
I
was
there
if
we
can
like
I
said.
H
My
main
concern
is
already
the
parking
that
capability
of
emergency
vehicles
to
go
through
the
fact
that
they
raised
a
lot
and
I
already
have
erosion.
Coming
underneath
defense
to
my
one
side
where
that
building
was
built
because
they're
built
higher
than
level
my
houses
built
that
and
finally
I
mean,
if
I
can
put
in
perspective
the
level
of
frustration
when
you
comb
I'm,
a
probation
officer,
I
worked
late
into
an
IED
and
I
come
out
to
my
house
at
one
o'clock
in
the
morning.
H
I
know
that
a
play
ring
around
the
Rosie
trying
to
figure
out
what
I
come
park.
There's
no
parking
spot,
so
I
go
to
Alabama
behind
my
house.
Wake
up
my
family,
please
open
the
gates.
I
can
open
the
gates
to
park
because
there's
somebody
else
park
in
front
of
my
gate.
I
mean
I've
been
there
for
25
years,
and
this
is
a
war
that
have
ever
seen.
I
think
that
if
we
add
on
to
the
already
stress
that
we
have
it's
kind
of
unbearable
to
live
like
that,
under
those
conditions,
I
mean
I'm.
H
All
for
progress,
I
know:
South
Tower
is
hot
right
now
and
I
don't
mind
having
close
by
neighbors,
but
I
don't
want
them.
On
top
of
me,
not
to
mention
Mississippi
has
become
the
Grand
Prix
of
Montecarlo
people,
Ron
drive
through
there
at
unbelievable
speeds
and
when
they
turn
and
if
they
build
that
tall
two
stories,
they
won't
be
able
to
see
where
they're
turning
and
it's
just
a
recipe
for
disaster.
So
that's
a
lot
to
say.
S
My
name
is
Frank
Bob
asking
I
live
at
1418,
South,
Moody
and
I
have
been
sworn
in,
I
think
I'm,
probably
wrapping
this
up.
Then
you've
heard
concerns
of
self
created,
hardship,
you've
heard
of
the
concerns
for
the
safety
for
the
pedestrians
as
being
a
very
popular
cut
through
to
the
soho
district,
the
concerns
for
the
the
drivers
being
able
to
come
in
and
out
parking
issues,
traffic
issues,
the
congestion
on
the
neighbors,
a
use
that
is
contrary
to
what
you've
been
told.
S
This
would
be
4
and
the
domino
effect
of
a
building
like
this
in
a
very,
very
visible
location.
All
of
this
has
come
from
people
who
live
right
at
that
corner
and
I
have
been
asked
to
come
in
and
represent
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood.
Those
of
us
who
are
not
exactly
at
this
corner,
but
what
but
what
everyone
else
feels
I
am
exactly
one
block
south
from
them.
I
am
at
the
corner
of
Moody
and
Stroud.
S
We
understand
that
this
is
zoned.
You
know
that
allows
for
a
duplex.
What
we
don't
understand
is
why
this
cannot
be
designed
in
a
manner
that
is
consistent
to
this
neighborhood.
They
are
mostly
single-family
homes,
as
you
heard
earlier,
our
former
president
Vicki
Thalia,
who
very
diligent
woman
that
I
believe
you
probably
know
she
has
stayed
on
top
of
this.
S
She
said
that
every
effort
that
she
made
to
reach
there
there
are
representatives,
including
Steve,
were
not
returned
when
we
asked
to
for
a
postponement
so
that
we
could
work
with
him
and
talk
about
the
development.
He
cited
reasons
why
he
couldn't
do
that.
He
has
said
that
they've
reached
out
to
the
neighbor
next
door
13:16
and
that
the
neighbor
was
fine
with
it.
The
neighbors
actually
here
saying
that
that
is
not
true.
S
We've
tried
everything
that
we
can
do
to
work
with
him,
we're
not
getting
anywhere
with
that.
So
we
asked
that
the
board
help
us
protect
the
character
of
the
historic
1925
neighborhood.
We
want
to
believe
that
all
the
effort
that
we
have
made
to
keep
this
a
beautiful
walkable
name
hood
has
been
for
a
good
reason.
Thank
you.
L
L
That,
but,
like
a
little
bit
more
clarity
when
we're
trying
to
figure
out
is
whether
we
can
consider
the
use
of
how
that
property
is
being
used
when
you're
making
a
decision
as
to
whether
or
not
to
grant
a
variance,
whether
being
utilized
as
a
multifamily
or
single-family
home
committed
to
give
the
use
in
that
capacity.
Consider.
D
A
typically,
the
answer
is
no,
that
the
use
of
the
property
is
the
purview
of
the
Zoning
Administrator,
and
that,
if,
as
was
alleged
here,
that
the
property
is
going
to
be
used
as
an
Airbnb
or
some
type
of
illegal
transient
rental
unit,
that
would
be
a
code
enforcement
issue.
That
would
not
be
subject
to
not.
D
Of
that
said,
there
is
this
criteria
here
that
says
that
the
variance
cannot
substantially
interfere
with
the
health,
safety
or
welfare
of
others
and
I.
Think
if
there
was
a
connection
to
be
made
between
the
granting
of
the
variance,
because
what
what's
really
in
front
of
the
board
is
the
reduction
of
the
setback?
D
Not
whether
or
not
the
property
is
going
to
be
an
airbnb
that's
by
if
the
reduction
of
the
setback
enables
the
Airbnb
or
if
the
need
for
the
reduction
of
the
setback
is
because
they're
trying
to
use
it
as
an
air
B&B,
then
there
may
be
some
connection
there.
That
would
be
for
the
board
to
determine
okay.
L
M
M
L
M
N
M
I
F
I
L
M
L
M
L
M
M
I
M
You
have
to
have
a
means
of
egress
that
doesn't
go
through
another
bedroom,
the
other,
the
other
is
the
second-floor
bedrooms
you
can't
you
would
have
to
take.
These
are
only
18
feet
wide
units,
so
you
would
have
to
take
three
feet
and
create
an
interior
hallway
on
each
side.
So
you
you're,
taking
you're
down
to
you,
know
14
feet,
but.
I
M
No,
you
would
have
to
take
them
inside
the
garage
which
would
eliminate
one
of
the
parking
spaces
or,
as
mr.
Feldman
pointed
out,
if
you
could
do
it,
you
would
have
to
do
a
scissor
stair
in
the
in
the
atrium.
There
they
do.
The
deck
area
you'd
have
to
you'd
have
to
accommodate
in
some
other
way
to
have
it.
C
M
C
M
C
M
C
M
C
M
C
C
Got
that
so
you're
you're
saying
then
consistency
of
the
neighborhood
yeah
we're
okay.
So
then
my
question
is
you
want
to
reduce
it
down
to
18
right,
the
requirement
is
25
correct.
So
it's
not
12
or
13
is
25,
correct,
I'm
asking
why
you
need
18
and
you
say
because
12
or
13
is
not
enough,
so
I
need
to
make
it
18.
That's
not
really
the
question
you
want
to
make
it
less
than
25.
That's
the
issue
right
unless
I.
I
C
M
C
M
M
C
M
C
C
M
C
M
C
C
C
L
M
L
H
S
L
L
L
M
S
L
M
L
A
A
I
A
F
A
A
zoning
standpoint:
okay,
is
there
anything
in
the
zoning
regs
that
don't
allow
that,
assuming
that
it
doesn't
have
a
kitchen
I
guess
it's
allowed
to
have
a
bathroom,
but
it's
that's
a
question.
It
would
would
it
be
allowed
to
have
a
bathroom,
but
is
there
a
restriction
on
a
kitchen
or
a
version
of
a
kitchen
might
be
allowed?
Can
you
expand
on
that.
F
Tawanda
Anthony
land
development,
they
could
have
an
accessory
structure,
but
they
wouldn't
be
allowed
an
accessory
dwelling,
so
they
wouldn't
be
able
to
have
a
full
kitchen,
a
stove
cooking
appliances
on
that.
Would
that
would
consider
it
ate
a
set
of
fun
accessory
dwelling
once
they
add
the
cooking
appliances.
Okay,.
F
That's
more
of
a
permitting
question:
they
have
certain
guidelines
that
they
follow
in
terms
of
if
it's
an
accessory
structure,
what
they
are
allowed
in
terms
of
cooking
appliances
and
other
kitchen
appliances,
but
they
would
be
able
it's
just
like.
If
you
had
an
office,
you
could
have
a
market.
You
could
not
have
a
microwave,
because
it's
a
cooking
appliance,
but
you
could
have
a
refrigerator.
You
could
have
a
wet
bar.
So
you
do.
There
are
some
parameters
that
do
allow
for
some
amenities
that
they
could
have
been
you're.
F
A
F
A
F
A
I
Question
so
I'm
I'm
having
a
hard
time
envisioning
this,
the
brick
deck,
is
somehow
connects
the
unit
to
the
garage,
it's
all
under
one
roof.
Oh
so,
there's
a
debt
there's
a
roof
over
the
brick
okay.
That
is
where
I
was
missing.
So
if
these
stairs
went
away,
we
would
still
be
looking
at
a
garage
setback
issue,
because
the
the
garage
is
only
what
do
we
determine
five
feet
instead
of
seven
feet,
so
we
would
still
be
looking
at
that,
even
without
even
with
the
stairs
disappeared.
F
M
Okay,
let
me
show
you
that
the
pre
and
post
conditions-
this
is
the
this-
is
existing
condition
that
this
house
doesn't
meet
the
side
yard
setback
as
it
is
right
now
it
doesn't
meet
the
front
yard
setback
as
it's
currently
constructed.
This
accessory
structure
is
zero
lot
line,
that's
on
Alabama,
it
doesn't
meet
the
rear
yard
or
the
side
yard
setback.
M
So
your
your
post
conditions
will
be
much
better
than
your
existing
conditions,
so
you're
increasing
the
rear
yard
setback
and
then
take
you
back
to
this
this
site
plan,
where
you
currently
have
zero
and
zero
here,
you're,
increasing
it
to
the
five
and
the
eighteen
feet,
and
then
in
the
twenty
five
feet
and
the
seven
up
here
in
the
front
of
the
building.
So
when
they're
talking
about
safety
and
being
a
visual
triangle
around
the
corner
of
Moody
and
and
Mississippi,
those
those
conditions
will
be
better
in
the
post
condition
than
they
are
now.
M
So
you
won't
have
that
that
view
triangle
that
eliminates
the
safety
concern.
If
they're
talking
about
there
is
no
proposal
and
there's
no
intention
of
creating
an
airbnb.
These
units
do
not
have
kitchens
and,
as
Towanda's
pointed
out,
they
would
be
caught
at
at
the
permitting
if
there
was
ever
a
proposal
to
do
anything
like
that,
we
don't
only
meet
the
code
regarding
parking.
M
We
exceed
the
codes,
so
there's
no
reliance
upon
on
street
parking
most
of
the
homes
up
and
down
moody
have
driveways
and
most
of
them
don't
have
garages
so
that
they're,
relying
on
on
street
parking
for
their
residences.
This
will
not
increase
that
as
a
matter
of
fact,
it
will
decrease
the
reliance
upon
moody
for
on
street
parking.
The
two
units
are
allowed
by
code,
and
you
know
we
are
we're
building
that
to
the
specifications
of
what's
allowed
by
the
zoning
code.
M
The
units
are
eighteen
eighteen
feet
wide,
as
you've
asked
were
they're
all
there
alternative
designs
that
were
considered
no
there
weren't
none
that
I'm
aware
of
anyway,
and
we
as
I
said,
we
had
25
feet
of
setback
on
the
moody
side.
Sidewalks
are
condition
of
debris
development,
so
they
have
to
put
in
new
sidewalks
on
both
on
moody
and
Mississippi,
the
entire
length
of
both
of
those
property
lines
they
will
on
the
Mississippi
side.
They
will
connect
to
a
parking
lot,
that's
used
by
ballast
and
it's
it's
not
really
a
sidewalk,
that's
existing
there.
M
You
know
the
current
built
conditions
in
the
neighborhood,
whether
they're
single
family
or
not,
the
RM
to
16
is
allowed
by
right.
So
it's
not
a
matter
of.
We
would
love
to
have
a
single-family
house,
whoever
buys
the
property
or
whoever
finishes
with
this.
This
property
has
by
right
the
ability
to
build
a
duplex
and
they
have
the
right
to
build
to
35
feet
in
height
yeah.
M
You
know,
I
understand
that
there
are
other
single-family
houses
that
aren't
25
or
35
feet
in
height
I
understand
that
there
are
other
single-family
homes
and
not
duplexes,
but
this
is
I
showed
you
on
the
map
that
this
is
right
in
the
middle
of
what
is
our
m16?
It's
in
the
middle?
It's
not
on
the
fringe.
It's
not
near
anything
else.
There's
it's
surrounded
by
there's
apartments
over
here!
There's
commercial
and
apartments
down
here
here:
parking
lots
come
in.
M
In
terms
of
what
is
traditional
and
what
is
compatible
with
the
neighborhood,
I
would
say
that
this
is
an
area
that
is
in
a
strongly
under
pressure
to
redevelop
in
a
variety
of
different
capacities,
not
just
single-family
those
that
want
to
stay
and
remain
as
a
single-family
residence.
So
certainly
they
can,
but
there's
a
lot
of
pressure
on
these
properties
to
be
converted
to
duplexes
or
apartments
or
all
right.
Oh,
you
know
a
number
of
other
things.
M
People
talked
about
safety
and
you
know
that
they
would
rather
see
some
other
things.
This
does
not
create
the
safety
hazard
for
anyone.
It
takes
a
traffic
off
a
moody
where
they
have
currently,
as
I
said,
they
have
a
non-conforming
structure
with
setbacks.
They
have
a
single-car
canopy,
that's
non-conforming,
and
it
and
it
shifts
it
over
to
the
street,
which
is
Alabama
and
is
currently
being
used
for
access
to
all
the
properties
along
moody
that
are
on
this
side
of
the
street.
Didn't
you
wrap
up
mr.
McLean?
Yes,
sir,
it
is
a
permitted
use.
M
We
meet
the
parking
code,
we're
asking
for
relief
from
the
rear
yard
setback
off
of
Alabama,
because
it's
being
classified
as
a
front
normally
under
arm
16,
we
wouldn't
have
to
have
25
foot
setback.
The
other
property
is
all
along
Alabama
or
at
12
to
13
feet
they're,
not
at
25
feet,
and
some
of
those
are
new
construction.
I
think
that
we
have
demonstrated
clearly
that
we
have
met
the
hardship
criteria
we
with
respect
to
the
copper
inset
plan.
M
It
does
meet
that
code
and
with
respect
to
having
to
meet
extraordinary
setbacks
that
were
not
originally
planned.
We
cannot
be
injurious
to
other
people
if
we're
on
a
corner.
We're
on
three
streets
and
the
outside
stairwell
is
on
is
on
the
Mississippi
side
anyway.
I
think
I'm
certainly
be
happy
to
answer
any
more
questions
you
might
have,
but
I
think
that
we
have
met
the
criteria
and
we've
demonstrated
that
this
is
a
compatible
use
in
the
area.
We're
not
violating
any
zoning
codes
and
what
we
are
proposing
is
permitted.
L
L
I
want
to
make
it
clear
that
the
use,
while
it
might
be
opposed
by
the
neighborhood
I,
don't
see
it
as
something
that
is
really
and
I
do
see
that
there
is
a
hardship
as
to
the
two
footages
I
think
properties
are
entitled
to
have
a
rear
yard,
and
this
one
is
stuck
with
these
two
frontages
and
I
see
that
giving
them
a
setback
to
18
might
be.
Okay,
I
am
NOT.
G
L
With
the
side
yard,
setbacks,
I
don't
see
the
hardship
there.
I,
don't
see
the
reason
for
requiring
cutting
into
those
sacks.
So
I
am
inclined
at
this
stage
to
say:
I
would
grant
the
18,
but
I
can't
grant
it
I
mean
I,
guess
we
could
grant
it
to
this
set
back
to
this
site
plan,
but
I'm,
not
okay
with
that
beside
yours,.
C
Mr.
McLean
II
was
wrapping
up
with
that
multi-families
allowed
per
zoning
in
this
area,
which
means
that
these
lots
are
approved
for
multifamily,
and
so
that
means
that
when
they
were
approved
for
multifamily,
they
were
proved
as
the
size
Lots
that
they
are
with
the
setbacks
required
by
that
zoning.
So
my
point
is
if
this
was
approved
for
multifamily,
and
this
particular
lot
was
approved
as
part
of
that
multifamily
approval
and
it
was
approved,
assuming
that
it
could
be
used
with
the
restrictions
that
are
put
upon
it
to
create
multifamily.
C
So
I
asked
specifically
for
the
hardship
of
the
quote,
unquote
rear
yard
and
did
not
find
an
answer
that
answered
for
me
what
the
hardship
was.
It
was
actually
quite.
The
opposite
was
that
the
need
for
a
car
which
this
setback
gives
quite
a
bit
more
room
for
so
I,
know
that
you
can
see
why
there
could
be
a
need
for
it,
but
we
did
not
hear
testimony
of
the
need
for
it.
C
So,
given
that
the
entire
row
of
these
has
the
same
burden,
it's
not
unique
and
singular,
and
certainly
the
the
side,
yard
I
think
we've
all
discussed
at
length,
but
we
didn't
see
any
alternative
designs
that
show
why
about
this
property
makes
it
unique
or
how
could
we
try
to
address
the
stairs
or
any
of
that?
So
I
cannot
support
any
of
the
setback.
Requests.
A
G
Know
the
other
properties
you
know
would
be
subject
to
the
same
thing
on
the
Alabama
front
side,
and
none
of
those
are
conforming
to
that,
for
whatever
reason
one
reason
or
the
other
grandfathered
in
or
maybe
they
got
it
married,
so
I
would
certainly
and
I
think
I
would
agree
with
mr.
Feldman's
comments
that
you
know.
That
is
a
hardship,
because
that
is
an
odd
street.
G
A
I
Pastor
I
I
at
this
point,
don't
see
either
way
I'm
if
disowning
was
changed
like
he
said
and
I'm
looking
at
this
hardship
criteria
and
and
I'm
I'm
I
think
that
the
it
looks
like
because
this
was
designed
this
way
that
it
is
resulting
from
the
actions
that
applicant
there's,
you
could
design
a
different
building
to
fit
within
the
code.
Okay,
so
I'm
not
understanding
how
that's
a
hardship.
So
that's
my
loss,
I
have.
B
No
problem
with
the
Alabama
side,
setbacks
and
I
have
no
problem
and
I
understand
the
need
for
the
stairs,
and
you
have
to
have
and
I
also
understand,
I
believe
that
we
were
told
the
stairs
in
in
true
for
the
center
ball
sort
of
in
that
required
setbacks
that
you
would
lose.
Probably
two
parking
spaces
will
need
squash
and
if
you
have
a
house
that
size
after
two
parking
spaces,
so
that
doesn't
help
I
find
the
building
to
be
cute.
I
feel
sorry
for
mr.
Dawson.
B
I
can
understand
his
concern.
Unfortunately,
that
isn't
our
decision
to
make
you
want
to
build
a
two-story
house,
it's
allowed
by
code
builder,
neighborhood
of
one
story,
houses,
and
there
have
been
two
two-story
house
on
my
street
within
a
block.
My
house
and
the
people
in
between
them
are
not
happy,
but
there's
anything
so
I
get
the
dissatisfaction,
but
that's
not
our
and
I
could
agree
with
dr.
C
Long,
the
driveways
themselves
will
hold
two
cars
in
each,
so
you
could
fill
that
entire
garage
full
of
stare
and
still
meet
the
parking
requirement.
So
it's
not
really
a
reason
not
to
put
the
stare
internal
or
you
could
put
it
in
that
brick
courtyard.
That's
just
you
know,
that's
a
nice
thing
to
have,
but
is
it
required?
So
the
question
is:
why
would
you
put
a
stare
two
feet
from
somebody
else's
property
also
made
out
of
wood
by
the
way,
so
not
flame-retardant,
which
is
the
reason
for
the
setback
in
the
first
place.
C
Now
we
didn't
hear
any
good
reason.
Why
not?
We
didn't
see
any
alternative
design,
so
I
understand
what
you're
saying
but
I
think
when
you
really
look
at
it.
We
didn't
hear
a
good
reason
why
this
there
has
to
be
two
feet
from
the
property
line
and
we
didn't
see
any
alternative
where
it
didn't
work
somewhere
else.
They
could
still
meet
the
parking
requirement
with
just
the
driveway.
You
don't
need
the
garage.
A
All
right,
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
what
has
been
discussed
and
said
regarding
the
Alabama
side
setback
requests.
Mr.
pastor
I
think
that
the
applicant
did
did
demonstrate
a
a
unique
and
I'm,
not
gonna,
say
singular,
but
a
unique
condition
with
the
two
frontages
and
that,
because
it
is
a
street
and
not
an
alleyway,
you
know
they.
They
don't
have
the
use
of
benefit
like
similar
properties,
of
the
same
depth
that
you
know
and
again
we're
not
supposed
to
use
other
cases
as
precedent.
A
But
I
think
that
the
applicant
demonstrated
that
there
should
be
some
relief
on
the
Alabama
side.
I
didn't
hear
any
testimony
that
supported
the
decrease
of
the
side
yard.
In
fact,
I
heard
testimony
that
the
garages
were
made
wider
than
normal
for
some
other
use,
internal
use
and
so
I
think
that
there
could
be
a
design
where
the
stairs
could
be
located
in
a
different
way
and
the
zoning
use
doesn't
allow
or
mandate
the
right
to
have
separate
units
access
accessible.
A
Yes,
you
can
design
it
that
way.
As
long
as
you
meet
the
setbacks,
so
I,
don't
I
didn't
hear
any
hardship
regarding
that
aspect.
As
to
why
those
stairs
couldn't
have
been
repositioned,
only
testimony
that
it
wasn't
looked
at
so
I
could
not
support
the
side.
Yard
would
not
have
a
problem
supporting
the
double
front
or
Alabama
side.
I
wanted.
C
To
point
out,
we
heard
from
several
neighbors
that
they're
concerned
about
the
view
of
the
turn,
because
it's
on
the
side
to
Street
Mississippi,
so
to
turn
from
Mississippi's
to
Alabama.
You
are
allowing
them
to
build
a
35
foot,
building
7
feet
further
towards
Alabama,
which
is
reducing
the
view
angle.
C
So
there's
a
safety
concern
with
that
that
we
didn't
talk
about
and
if
you
have
cars
parked
on
that
drive,
while
you're
pushing
the
parked
car
7
feet
closer
to
that
Road,
which
also
reduces
the
viewing
angle,
which
I
think
we
heard
more
than
one
neighbor
mentioned.
The
fact
that
we're
approaching
upon
that
corner
I
doubt
that
they
were
talking
about
the
moody
side,
because
it's
a
25
feet.
So
we
didn't
talk
about
that
at
all.
But.
A
Difference
between
well,
actually,
there
they're
allowed
to
go
at
seven
okay.
So
if
we're
kind
of,
if
we're,
if
we're
all
agreeing
that
the
side
yard
is
still
the
biggest
issue,
they're
gonna
be
allowed
to
go
to
seven
with
a
park
column
I'm
talking
about
the
rear,
I'm
talk
about
Alabama,
which
in
my
mind,
is
yeah.
A
C
G
C
A
C
G
L
Moved
at
a
variance
request
for
case
vrb
1991
for
property
located
at
13,
18
South
Moody
Avenue
be
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
that.
We
look
hearing
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
18
feet
with
an
encroachment
free,
even
gutters,
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
L
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
the
multifamily
zone
property
has
to
frontages
and
is
entitled
to
a
rear
yard.
So
they
are
entitled
to
in
this
condition
a
reduction
from
25
feet
to
18
feet.
I
would
make
it
known
that
that
does
not
include
any
side
yard
setback.
C
L
A
F
A
A
L
A
B
M
F
M
D
Gonna
waste
our
cow.
Mr.
chairman,
if
I
made
the
rule
is
rule
5.2
and
it
states
that
when
a
matter
is
considered
by
the
board
and
an
insufficient
or
tie
vote
is
obtained,
the
board's
action
becomes
a
nullity
and
the
matter
shall
be
automatically
carried
over
for
consideration
at
the
board's
next
meeting
as
unfinished
business.
D
D
A
B
Be
granted
is
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
the
public
hearing
for
a
front
yard
setback
from
25
to
18,
in
both
side
yard
setbacks
from
7
to
2
feet
per
Section
27
156,
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
that
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship,
refractive
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
Section,
27
82,
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
property
has
two
front
yards
and
almost
all
other
questions
in
it.
The
vast
majority
of
properties.
B
A
B
L
I
move
that
the
variance
I'm
gonna
buy
back
a
chair.
I
knew
we're
gonna
start
with
the
with
the
side,
yard,
setback
and
I
move
that
variance
request
for
case
vrb,
13-18,
south
moody
for
the
property.
The
property
located
at
13,
18
South
moody,
VRB
1991,
be
denied
as
to
the
side
yard
setback
reduction
from
7
feet
to
2
feet
due
to
the
failure
of
the
petitioner
to
meet
its
burden,
approved
to
provide
confident
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
for
practical
difficulty.
A
I
A
L
P
L
Granted
as
to
the
reduction
of
the
front
yard,
setback
from
25
feet
to
18
feet
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
the
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
for
practical
difficulty,
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
property
has
to
frontages
and
that
it
is
trying
to
accommodate
the
the
two
frontages
and
the
corner
lot,
those
two
frontages
in
the
corner.
Lot
percent
of
our
check.
B
B
I
D
Just
verifying
in
the
in
the
again
rule
five
votes
required
as
to
certain
measures,
it
does
state
that
a
simple
majority
sobbing
she'll
be
sufficient
to
conduct
routine
bit
business
and
to
deny
an
application.
However,
the
vote
of
at
least
four
members
of
the
board
shall
be
required
to
approve
an
application.