►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 05142019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
A
In
attendance
this
evening
are
Kristin
Moore
assistant
city
attorney,
Wanda,
Anthony
and
Eileen
Rosario,
Ducksworth
of
land,
development
coordination,
Brian
Knox
of
natural
resources
and
no
one
from
transportation
right.
Okay,
I
would
take
just
a
few
minutes
to
review
tonight's
procedures.
Cases
will
be
called
in
the
order
that
they
appear
on
the
agenda
when
your
case
number
in
the
applicants
name
are
called.
Please
stand
an
either
aisle
to
the
side
of
the
room.
To
acknowledge
that
you
are
here,
staff
will
then
give
a
brief
introduction
to
the
board
of
each
application.
A
When
you
approach
the
podium,
please
speak
into
the
microphone
and
state
your
name
address,
and
if
you
have
been
sworn
in,
the
applicant
and/or,
their
agent
will
have
ten
minutes
to
give
testimony
present
witnesses
and
documentation
as
part
of
their
presentation.
This
is
your
time
to
present
all
of
your
evidence.
A
Anyone
in
the
audience
wishing
to
speak
in
support
of
or
in
opposition
to
the
application
will
then
have
three
minutes
each
after
that.
The
board
may
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
regarding
the
application.
Finally,
the
applicant
will
have
an
additional
five
minutes
for
rebuttal
if
needed.
The
time
periods,
as
stated,
will
be
kept
by
the
chair.
A
Any
information
such
as
pictures
or
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted
as
a
part
of
your
petition
and
you
to
present
at
the
hearing
for
consideration
in
support
of
your
petition,
must
be
individually
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board.
After
the
acceptance
by
the
board,
you
will
submit
the
item
to
staff
for
it
to
be
entered
and
made
a
part
of
the
permanent
record.
The
board
bases
its
decision
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
which
is
presented
this
evening
and
which
meets
the
criteria
required
by
the
city's
Code
of
Ordinances.
A
The
variance
granted
by
the
board
will
be
only
for
what
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
will
be
compliant
with
any
terms
and
conditions
stated
in
the
approval
by
the
board.
You
must
have
four
votes
for
the
variance
to
be
approved,
I'm,
going
to
repeat
that
you
must
have
four
votes
for
the
variance
to
be
approved
if
an.
A
A
All
other
city
codes
will
need
to
be
met
only
if
there
are
five
board
members
present
one
two
three
four
five,
then
only
three
votes
are
needed
to
deny
an
application,
so
you
need
four
votes
for
approval
tonight,
but
only
three
for
denial.
If
your
case
is
continued,
it
will
be
continued
to
either
July
9th
June
is
already
booked
public
hearing
and
the
next
one
after
that
is
August
13th.
A
If
you
wish
to
appeal
the
variance
review
boards,
the
decision
to
City
Council,
you
must
file
a
petition
for
a
review
of
a
board
decision
within
10
business
days
of
the
decision.
If
your
variance
is
granted,
you
will
not
be
able
to
pull
any
permits
until
after
the
10-day
appeal
period
has
passed.
Your
cooperation
will
ensure
that
this
meeting
runs
smoothly
and
will
be
greatly
appreciated
before
we
begin
the
first
case,
is
there
any
business
regarding
the
Genda
that
staff
would
like
to
address.
A
D
A
G
A
A
G
Time
ask
the
members
of
the
variance
review
board
if
you've
had
in
the
ex
parte
communications
regarding
any
of
the
matters
coming
before
you
this
evening
and
if
you've
had
any
verbal
communications.
Please
disclose
the
sum
and
substance
of
that
communication
when
and
where
it
occurred
and
with
whom
and
occurred,
and
if
you've
received
a
new
written
communications.
Please
disclose
the
nature
of
that
communication
and
file
it
in
the
record.
F
F
F
F
F
A
H
John
barber
represent
the
owners
at
303,
62nd,
Avenue,
North,
st.
Petersburg
and
I
was
warning.
I
didn't
really
don't
have
anything
else
to
add
other
than
it
was
an
existing
property.
A
tree
fell
on
it.
We
actually
reduced
a
setback
by
6
foot
because
it
was
a
porch
on
the
former
building.
We
eliminated
that
so
bring
that
back
to
the
17th
feet,
so
we're
just
requesting
at
the
the
basic
structure
we
can
just
renovate
the
structure
and
put
it
back
into
the
livable
condition.
A
H
They
do
it
a
little
different
safety,
but
anyway
it's
it's
like
I
said
it
was
an
existing
structure.
There
was
actually
three
structures
on
the
property
they're
run
with
properties
that
they're
gonna
turn
it
into
a
single-family.
So
they're
gonna
bring
that
much
into
the
compliance
they
think
there's
actually
bettering
a
property.
Overall,
the
setback
is
what
it
is.
They
gave
up
six
feet
off
the
porch
that
was
even
closer
to
the
street
to
lessen
they
did
the
setback,
but
I
physically
can't
move
that
structure,
and
you
know
God
dropped
the
tree
on
him.
H
H
H
H
Thank
you
because,
on
the
very
front
of
this
there
was
an
additional.
There
was
a
6-foot
screen
porch
on
the
front
of
this
building,
and
we
chose
not
to
even
ask
for
13c,
so
we
moved
it
back
as
far
as
they
possibly
can,
but
I
cuz.
If
we
can't
take
that
building
and
move
it
anyway,
it's
been
there
since
1948.
A
I
I
I
H
I
H
B
I
moved
that
case,
BRB
1934,
the
property
located
at
thirty
thirteen
East
Waters
Avenue,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
in
the
front
yard.
Setback
in
25
feet
to
15
feet
with
encroachment
of
eat.
Some
gutters
say
from
the
applicant
presenting
having
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
were
practical
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
March.
F
Towanda
Anthony
Linda
government,
the
RB
1947,
the
property
addresses
3106
West
Fair,
Oaks
Avenue.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
side
yard
setback
from
7
feet
to
3
feet
and
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
3.9
feet,
to
construct
a
one-story
addition
and
save
the
existing
grand
oak.
The
lot
is
owned
are
as
sixty
and
was
purchased.
In
1998
the
house
was
constructed
in
1946.
A
free
consultation
was
completed
in
2019
Natural
Resources
has
found
the
request
consistent
and
is
real
to
speak
more
in
depth
and
provide
more
details.
F
J
J
Now
here's
our
site
plan
this
is
there
are
serving
at
the
existing
property
as
it
sits.
Yeah
the
home
was
built
in
1946.
The
current
owners
bought
it
in
1998,
there's,
of
course,
from
the
picture.
You
can
see
there's
a
very
large
oak
tree
here,
it's
quite
nice.
The
existing
structure
is
the
3.9
feet
from
the
rear.
For
years,
where
yard
setback
says
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
the
addition,
the
one-story
addition
is
to
match
that
back
property
line,
align
the
other
building
and
then
push
towards
the
side
to
create
more
living
space.
J
This
has
a
ground
floor,
master
suite,
the
existing
master
suite
is
here
and
what
we're
trying
to
get
to,
because
they
don't
have
any
kind
of
garage,
storage,
etc.
On-Site
is
that
we're
creating
pushing
the
master
suite
back
and
over
and
creating
a
storage
facility
in
the
front,
as
well
as
a
screen
porch.
J
J
Natural
Resources
had
come
out
on-site
and
looked
at
this.
This
branch
that
you
can
see
is
quite
low
and
has
suggestions
that
we
pass
along
to
the
owner
and
how
to
treat
that
branch
so
that
later
on,
part
of
it
can
be
removed.
But
the
addition
as
design
is
below
this
branch,
and
it
will
not
cause
the
branch
to
be
removed
at
one
letter
of.
J
A
J
You
can
see
why
we're
doing
this
is
because
we
have
this
pretty
amazing
tree
front
guard
that
everyone's
concerned
about.
That's
why
the
neighbors
have
contacted
me
and
we're
curious
like
what
are
you
trying
to
do?
Basically,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
make
this
home
a
little
more
for
this,
the
car
Nona
into
the
future
and
not
to
not
mess
with
the
truth.
A
H
D
B
Move
that
variance
request
for
case
BRB
1947
for
the
property
located
at
31
is
six
West.
Bay
Oaks
Avenue,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan,
presented
a
public
hearing
for
reduction
the
side
yard
from
7
feet
to
three
feet:
a
reduction
in
the
rear
yard
from
20
feet
to
3.9
feet.
Investing
in
the
existing
structure,
with
encroachment
of
using
gutters
based
on
the
applicant
presenting
confident,
substantial
evidence
and
the
record
net
was
public
hearing
of
a
necessary
hardship
of
practical
difficulty.
B
A
F
1951
dancing
land
development.
This
is
k2
the
RB
1950.
The
property
is
located
at
1905
East,
Ellicott
Street.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
remove
a
grand
tree
to
construct
a
single-family
residence
per
Section
13
45.
A
grant
real
protected
tree
shall
be
permitted
to
be
removed
if
the
Grand
tree
or
protective
tree
denies
and
precludes
reasonable
use
of
a
parcel
of
property.
Reasonable
use
would
also
include
the
showing
of
alternative
designs
that
were
not
feasible
to
pursue
the
vacant
lauda
zone
RS
50
and
was
purchased
in
2017.
F
A
E
In
here
I'm
sorry,
so
this
this
site,
1905
East
Ellicott
there
was
a
grant
there's
a
grand
tree
in
the
northwest
corner.
We
went
out
to
the
site
and
evaluated
the
tree
and
we
rated
it
as
c8,
and
it
was
a
hundred
and
eighty
three
points.
There's
a
hundred
and
seventy-five
points,
minimum
requirement
for
a
oak
tree
to
be
a
grand
tree.
E
Other
than
that,
the
the
tree
has
some
canopy
on
the
south
side,
where
the
corner
of
the
property
would
be
located.
Natural
resources
would
support
pruning
of
that
canopy
to
build
a
single-family
residence.
It
already
has
a
pretty
high
clearance,
and
so
knowing
that
the
prune
would
not
be
excessive.
I
E
See
this
one
was
size,
two
had
about
36
inches,
so
it's
it's
well
over
25
years
old,
and
so
knowing
that
the
tree
is
at
a
point
where
it's
reached
its
mature
status,
and
so
the
tree
has
some
viability
to
the
overall
canopy
structure
for
the
city
of
Tampa
and
knowing
that
I
didn't
see
anything
that
would
warrant
the
tree
to
be
removed
by
code.
It's.
E
E
I
E
We
do
suspended
flooring,
we
work
with
the
applicant.
If
we
do
some,
we
do
some
excavating
and
see
the
visibility
of
the
roots,
and
it
is
determined
that
we
can
actually
do
the
suspended
flooring.
We
do
allow
that
we
also
try
to
work
with
the
applicant
to
maneuver
the
home,
so
they
could
save
a
tree
and
build
their
single-family
residence
as
intended.
If.
B
A
E
A
A
A
E
E
Believe
yeah
in
the
current
code,
there
is
nobody
we're
operating
under
the
current
code,
that's
correct!
So
if
it's
a
51-inch
camphor,
we
would,
if,
depending
on
its
condition,
we
it's
typically
an
inch
for
an
inch
if
it's
thirty
inches
or
greater.
If
we
find
that
the
tree
is
hazardous
to
the
point
where
we
would
definitely
recommend
removal,
we
sometimes
reduce
that
down
to
four
200
placements.
Okay,.
E
C
E
We
did
not
excavate,
we
simply
went
out
on
a
true
consultation,
and
we
stated
that
this
tree
is
considered
healthy
and
healthy
enough
per
for
preservation
by
code
and
a
alternative
structure.
Our
alternative
design
can
be
placed
on
this
property
and
both
of
those
things
can
exist
a
tree
and
okay.
There's.
A
A
E
A
A
K
Is
David
Osborne
address
is
212
south
Melville,
Avenue,
Tampa,
Florida
606
I
have
been
sworn
in.
Okay,
everything
you
heard
so
far
is
pretty
much
an
accurate
representation
of
what
we're
dealing
with
I
made
a
few
different
site
plans.
This
is
probably
the
most
simple
representation
of
the
issue
that
I'm
facing
this
is
a
20-foot
radius
around
Laurel
Oak
there's
another
protected
tree,
that's
mostly
in
my
neighbor's
yard.
That
kind
of
comes
into
play
when
you
start
moving
the
house
backwards
to
answer
your
question
before
mr.
Brown.
K
The
Kampfer
tree
here
is
is
on
the
property
line.
I
spoken
to
my
neighbor
somewhere
in
here.
He
signed
a
letter
saying
that
you'd
agreed
to
take
that
down.
I
could
give
you
a
copy
of
this
if
that's
of
any
use
or
interest
to
you,
but
basically
spelling
out
exactly
what
I'd
like
to
do.
I
propose
that
I
pay
for
whatever
contractor
or
whatever
the
costs
involved
in
taking
the
tree
down,
because
really
I
be
the
one
in
a
sense
benefiting
the
most.
K
So
he
agreed
to
that-
and
that's
just
all
kind
of
spelled
out
here,
but
as
far
as
the
right-of-way
is
here
that
this
is
Ellicott
Street.
So
this
this
is
our
property
line,
and
then
this
dotted
line
here
is
the
average
build
two
line
where
everyone's
house
is
along
the
street
and
then
this
dotted
line
just
represents
roughly
that
the
setback
minimum
so
Ike
I
believe
it's
I
can't
even
remember
now.
Five
feet
there
and
15
feet
from
the
rear.
K
I
was
just
following
the
East
Tampa
Development
District
guidelines
there,
so
I
just
kind
of
drew
that
for
myself
as
a
guide
as
I
was
playing
with
the
placement
to
make
sure
I
stay
within
that
box.
But
the
street
is
here,
and
so
this
is.
This
is
my
neighbor's
property.
Then
this
is
my
other
neighbor's
property,
I
guess
as
bait.
As
far
as
kind
of
what
my
issue
is
and
on
the
hardship
resulting
from
the
proposed
remedy
is.
K
But
the
cost
to
me
is
that
I
no
longer
have
a
functional
backyard,
so
I'd
kind
of
like
to
have
an
accessory
structure
where
I
could
store
a
lawn
mower
like
utility
items
and
things
that
I
really
wouldn't
want
to
have
in
my
house
and
as
far
as
the
other
part
shift,
really
the
probably
best
illustrated
by
a
picture
year.
The
my
neighbor
to
the
south
has
trees
here
and
then
there's
another
adolescent
oak
I'm,
not
really
an
arborist,
so
I,
don't
I.
K
Just
can
tell
it's
an
oak
tree,
I,
don't
know,
but
the
further
back
on
the
lot
you
get
the
closer
to
these
trees
you
get
and
depending
on
the
season,
the
declination
of
the
Sun
is
occluded
by
these
trees.
So
the
potential
for
me
to
install
solar
panels.
It's
really
impossible
to
see
on
this
rendering,
but
the
roof
is
hipped.
K
So
there's
a
slope
facing
upwards
into
the
south:
that's
really
kind
of
my
ideal
place
where
I
could
put
solar
panels
and
try
to
collect
some
solar
energy
and
the
closer
I
get
to
this
fence
and
those
trees
them
less
and
less
viable.
That
becomes.
The
other
problem.
Is
my
soils
engineer
and
I
really
want.
K
He
prescribes
a
five
foot
minimum
proximity
to
any
root
system,
so
he
wants
to
grub
everything
here
and
while
it
might
be
possible,
some
kind
of
engineering
marvel
to
have
like
a
cantilevered
floating
slab
that
can
support
the
weight
of
blocks
that
we
need
to
stack
on
top
of
it.
For
me,
the
expense
and
kind
of
experimental
unorthodox
nature
of
that
would
be
yet
another
hardship
for
me
that
I
really
wouldn't
want
to
expose
myself
to
the
other
thing.
K
As
far
as
the
camphor
tree,
being
a
hazard
I
can
attest
to
that
of
giant
were
relatively
giant
when
fell
when
I
went
to
try
to
post
my
sign
and
I
didn't
have
measuring
equipment,
but
I
can
maybe
deadlift
like
300
pounds
and
I
couldn't
even
lift
the
the
light
end
of
this
I
had
to
drag.
I
could
drag
it.
Maybe
a
foot
to
post
the
sign,
but
in
any
case
had
my
carbon
part
there
or
a
part
of
my
house,
then
nothing
but
got
nailed
by
this
thing.
K
That's
this
is,
of
course,
the
camphor
tree,
not
the
laurel
oak,
but
as
far
as
that
tree
is
concerned
like
this
is
kind
of
precisely
the
sort
of
hardship
I
don't
want
to
be
exposed
to
down.
The
line,
should
I
be
forced
to
build
close
to
on
top
of
around
root
systems,
or
limbs
like
this.
That
could
come
crashing
down.
K
Mean
there's
that
that's
really
that's
really
it
I
guess.
As
far
as
the
the
proposal
to
move
the
house
back
again,
that
would
just
be
assuming
a
best-case
scenario
where,
where
the
routes
end
where
the
20-foot
barrier
would
be,
then
of
course
there's
the
difficulty
of
trying
to
construct
a
home,
the
corner
of
which
is
almost
intersecting
with
some
kind
of
barrier
that
you
have
to
try
to
work
around.
B
G
B
Where
you
drew
it
that
would
take
the
projection
part
of
your
house
and
move
it
out
of
the
tree.
Radius.
You'd
still
have
a
small
corner
that
overlaps
and
probably
a
little
more
than
five
feet,
but
then
to
move
it
backwards,
yeah
exactly
except
then,
you've
got
in
your
situation.
You've
got
the
driveway
on
the
tree
roots,
which
is
probably
not
ideal.
B
Then
you
can
work
with
natural
resources
on
how
far
it
can
project
in
there,
and
maybe
the
house
would
only
have
to
move
back
two
or
three
feet
to
get
within
a
reasonable
zone,
or
maybe
you
could
peer
and
lentil
that
corner
and
not
have
to
move
it
back
at
all,
but
it
would
keep
your
backyard
preserved.
It
would
give
you
the
exact
same
house
design.
You
just
approach
the
house
from
the
other
side
and.
K
This
is
about
20
feet
here,
so
parking
a
car
unless
the
bumpers,
touching
the
siding,
would
project
onto
the
sidewalk.
In
that
case,
the
other
challenges,
as
this
tree
continues
to
grow
and
depending
if
we
did
have
to
move
it
at
all
this.
This
could
start
to
become
a
problem
in
the
root
system.
Here
in
the
corner
of
the
house,
yeah.
K
B
Leave
the
driveway
on
the
left
side
of
the
house,
where
you
really
yeah
and
just
flip
the
house
to
the
orientation
you're
showing
it
right
here.
It
would
be
further
to
the
right
than
this
plan,
but
it
would
be
much
more
of
the
house
out
of
the
tree
zone
and
you
might
be
able
to
keep
the
same
backyard
or
very
close
to
the
same
backyard.
Keep
the
house
design
mirrored
and
be
away
from
the
tree
in
the
back
and
solve
a
lot
of
these
problems.
B
I
K
I
believe
I've
submitted
this
at
least
to
Natural
Resources
before
you're
talking
about
maybe
doing
this
and,
of
course,
having
the
driveway
as
it
appears
here.
We
also
discussed.
Why
don't
you
use
the
alley
and
try
to
make
some
kind
of
driveway
here,
but
the
alley
is
closed
off.
There's
trees,
fences,
there's
anime
Centauri
wall
back
here
and
that's
just
in
my
yard,
so
you'd
have
to
kind
of
drive
through
people's
sheds
and
property.
There's
really
no
alley.
It's
basically
what
I'm
saying
so.
K
I
K
K
I
K
K
G
C
Question
for
you
real
quick,
have
you
considered
having
an
arborist
out
I
know.
You'd
have
mentioned
that
the
engineer
just
said
that
he
wants
to
do
excavation
in
the
front
and
shouldn't
have
the
tree
etc,
be
considered
having
an
arborist
out
to
do
some
exploratory
air
spading
just
to
see
what
kind
of
root
impacts
there
would
be
to
building
it
exactly
the
way
you
have
proposed.
Yeah.
K
Natural
resources
mentioned
that
and
I
I
had
never
heard
of
it
before
so.
I
had
to
do
some
research
and
try
to
figure
out
what
he
was
even
talking
about,
but
I
guess
in
that
sense,
I've
considered
it
looking
into
it
if
if
it
involves
having
piers
or
floating
pieces
of
reinforced,
concrete
and
stuff
I'm
averse
to
that
I've
considered
it,
but
it's
the
the
expense.
I
can
only
imagine
that
as
expensive
as
the
quotes
I've
been
getting
on
will
have
much
accustomed
to
build
a
regular
foundation.
K
C
C
C
E
There
could
be
it's
it's
really
hard
to
tell,
but
if
a
foundation
is
already
in
that
area,
it's
likely
that
the
roots
will
tend
to
divert
around
solid
structure,
trees
tree
roots.
Typically,
there
they
like
soil,
and
they
like
the
water.
If
it's
a
solid
structure,
they
typically
don't
impact
them.
Unless
there
was
something
that
was
there
already
like
a
crack.
Thank.
A
E
A
And
again
it
looks
like
it's
on
the
property
line
for
the
survey
it
does.
Okay
looks
like
it's
a
shared
tree,
so
I'm
gonna
have
a
follow-up
question
for
the
Apple
and
just
to
clarify
you
did
specify
you
did
excuse
me.
You
did
testify
that
if
air
spading
was
done
in
the
15
to
20
foot
area,
that
it's
very
possible
that
he
might
be
able
to
do
a
standard
foundation
but
not
like,
like
we
said
we
don't
know
because
nobody's
done
it,
that's
correct.
If
he
did
air
spading
say
between
ten
and
fifteen
feet.
A
E
K
No
just
from
when
we
both
did
surveys,
my
neighbor,
who
moved
in
not
long
after
I
purchased
this
lot,
so
we
both
saw
each
other's
respective
stakes
and
just
eyeballing,
and
it's
more
on
his
property
than
mine
and
I,
wouldn't
be
touching
it
I.
I
I
would
assume
just
leave
that
the
way
that
it
is
okay.
A
A
Would
get
too
close
to
that
tree
and
if
it's
mostly
your
neighbor's
tree,
they
may
not
like
that.
So
having
said
that,
the
idea
of
this
plan
that's
currently
up
and
and
having
the
drive
well
there's
two
thoughts
going
on
here,
but
this
plant
that
shows
the
drive
on
the
right-hand
side,
which
would
be
impacted
by
the
tree
in
question.
Mm-Hmm.
Can
you
tell
us
what
is
it
about
the
floor
plan
that
would
cause
you
to
have
to
put
the
driveway
on
that
side
of
the
house
versus
what
mr.
pastor
was
asking?
L
K
K
Little
bit
better,
there's
a
little
roof
here
and
whether
there's
a
walkway
here
through
what
I've
rendered
as
a
flower
bed
or
here
and
then
likewise
with
the
porch.
This
is
where
I'd
assumed
garbage
cans
or
cycle
bins.
Things
like
this
will
kind
of
happen
along
this
side
and
then
on.
The
longer
part
of
the
house
is
where
the
condenser
units
for
the
air
conditioner.
K
This
is
all
living
space
and
bathrooms,
basically,
and
so
that
I
kind
of
wanted
to
keep
on
the
narrower
side
that
you
don't
really
see
like
unsightly
things
like
potentially
a
water
here,
if
we
had
to
put
it
outside
and
air
conditioning
condenser
units,
the
electric
meter
stuff,
like
that
I
the
you
can
see
this
really
tiny,
but
there's
a
there's,
a
power
pole
here,
which
also
makes
the
driveway
in
this
drawing
a
little
difficult.
The
pole
is
a
little
bit
more
on
my
side
than
my
neighbor
to
this
side
side.
K
A
A
K
D
A
K
K
I
also
don't
want
a
tree
falling
on
my
house
or
any
other
sort
of
physical
or
expensive
structural
pain
and
hardship.
Five
years
from
now,
ten
years
from
now,
if
I
can
avoid
that,
that's
kind
of
why,
for
me,
it's
been
worth
it
to
spend
this
time.
The
money
to
try
to
it
would
certainly
be
cheaper
and
easier
if
I
could
just
leave
that
leave
the
tree
and
just
move
the
house.
But
for
me
it's
it's
really
just
not
worth
it
in
terms
of
considering
the
future.
A
I
C
Would
agree
with
all
that,
but
to
add
to
it
you
know,
I
think
that
there
we
don't
know,
there's
possibly
an
easy
solution
to
this
right.
I
mean
if
we're
fairly
inexpensive.
It
could
have
some
error
spading
time
and
may
be
able
to
build
it
exactly
as
proposed,
and
with
that
said,
it
was
something
something
like
that.
I
have
a
hard
time
proving.
C
B
Potentially
err
spading
can
alleviate
any
of
the
structural
issues.
I
know.
In
other
cases,
sometimes
natural
resources
will
approve
root
pruning
around
the
foundation
of
the
house
so
that
you
don't
have
roots
creeping
up
under
your
house.
You
can
do
a
substantial
portion
of
roots
in
some
cases
depending
on
the
tree,
and
then
it
only
takes
every
5
or
7
years.
You
come
back
and
make
sure
those
aren't
still
not
touching
your
house
I
think.
B
Even
if
a
minimal
amount
of
structural
work
had
to
be
done
on
that
corner,
the
cost
of
that
versus
taken
down
a
big
oak
tree
is
probably
very
cost
neutral.
In
my
experience
and
so
I
don't
think
it's
a
big
financial
burden
either
way.
I
know
taking
down
oak
trees
as
a
financial
burden,
so
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities
where
the
applicant
can
probably
get
exactly
what
they're
looking
for.
B
It's
relatively
easy
to
mitigate
risk
from
a
tree
overtime
with
limb,
pruning
or
root
pruning
as
needed,
and
that
can
be
done.
You
know
years
down
the
road
or
whatever.
So
it's
not
a
burden
now,
but
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
to
to
make
this
work
and
without
without
a
big
burden
on
the
applicant
yeah.
C
A
It
would
be
nice
if
an
applicant
really
fully
understood
what
that
meant
and
what
the
costs
were,
because
they're
very
minimal,
and
it
would
help
these
kinds
of
cases
tremendously.
For
for
everybody.
You
know
the
applicant
as
well
as
the
board,
if
you're
still
choosing
to
ask
for
the
tree
to
be
removed.
A
I'm
I'm
inclined
to
let
a
Laurel
Oh
Cassie
a
Laurel
oh,
come
out,
because
my
my
feeling
on
that
is
that
the
tree
has
to
be
mitigated.
There
is
a
significant
cost
and
a
number
of
trees
that
get
planted
when
this
happens,
to
the
extent
that
they
wouldn't
even
all
go
back
on
your
own
property
they'd
be
planted
elsewhere
in
the
same
neighborhood
most
likely
and
that
the
long-term
benefit
over
30
years
is
that
we'd
have
a
whole
bunch
of
big
trees.
A
If
it's
Live,
Oak
I,
think
it's
a
totally
different
scenario
now
we're
looking
at
a
house,
that's
gonna,
be
there
for
a
hundred
years
or
so,
but
the
tree
will
be
there
for
maybe
100
to
300
years,
but
that's
just
not
the
case
with
Lowell
Oaks.
The
house
will
be
there
for
a
lot
longer
so,
but
having
said
all
that
sure
would
have
loved
to
had
seen
you
know
the
possibilities
of
moving
this
house
in
with
that
20
foot
radius,
maybe
even
15
foot
radius
with
the
proper
air
speeding.
So
those
are
my
thoughts
just.
C
C
A
G
D
A
K
A
D
A
D
A
F
On
Danny
land
development,
this
is
application.
Brb
1953,
the
property
is
located
at
fifty
ten
was
the
ulna
Avenue.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
side
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
5
feet
for
one-story
residential
addition,
the
Lauda's
own
RS
75
that
was
purchased
in
1994.
The
house
was
constructed
in
2002.
F
A
A
M
This
house
was
built
in
2002
by
my
clients
fast
forward
to
2019,
as
they
are
starting
to
get
older
and
starting
to
plan
ahead.
They
would
like
to
provide,
on
their
first
floor,
a
house,
a
master,
bedroom
and
bathroom
that
will
allow
them
to
age
in
place.
The
area
that
we
are
requesting.
There
is
an
existing
bathroom
there
and
we
can
make
this
an
accessible
bathroom
I'd
like
to
show
you
some
photos.
A
M
M
M
M
M
This
is
from
the
back
of
the
property.
Looking
back
towards
Leona
Street,
you
see
that
same
bump
out,
and
here
is
a
little
bit
of
a
side
view
of
the
area
that
we're
talking
about
and
the
owners
have
spoken
to
their
next-door
neighbors,
who
are
really
the
only
people
that
would
be
directly
affected
by
this
addition
and
I
do
have
a
letter
and
support
that
they
have
no
objection
to
this.
Granting
this
request
can
I
submit
that
we.
M
M
B
G
The
code
has
ways
that
it
deals
with
existing
non-conformities,
which
is
that
they
are
not
required
to
be
removed
if
they
were
lawfully
permitted.
But
in
the
event
that
there's
a
disruption
and
or
a
significant
change
to
the
structure,
then
the
encouragement
would
have
to
be
removed.
So
there's
not
a
need
to
vest
it.
It's
would
just
follow
under
the
legal
non-conforming
evidence.
A
A
G
M
M
A
A
I
I
would
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
BRB,
19
53
for
property,
located
at
five
zero
one
zero
west
leona
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
the
reduction
of
the
side
yard
setback
from
seven
feet.
Five
feet
with
the
encroachment
of
using
gutters
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competently,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
that
this
public
hearing
and
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
for
practical
difficulty.
A
F
And
development
this
is
application.
Number
BRB,
1957
property
is
located
at
85,
45
and
Piper
Ridge
Avenue.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
side,
yard
setback
and
seven
feet
2.5
feet
to
construct
a
strength
screen
enclosure
over
an
existing
concrete
slab.
The
lot
is
own
PDA
and
was
purchased
in
2018.
The
townhouse
was
constructed
in
2006.
F
F
A
G
If
you
would,
please
raise
your
right
hand
and
anyone
else
that
may
give
testimony
this
evening,
that
has
not
been
sworn
in.
Please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand,
do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
the
testimony
you
give
this
evening
will
be
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth
I
do.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
G
Going
to
keep
this
very,
very
brief.
I've
lived
at
this
address
for
a
year
and
I'm,
essentially
asking
for
this
variance
so
that
I
can
have
a
screen
enclosure
placed
over
my
existing
concrete
slab
because
currently
I
have
no
outdoor
use
because
of
the
bugs
or
snakes
and
all
sorts
of
wildlife
that
come
on
to
that
slab
and
actually
in
through
the
sliding
glass
door.
That's
a
picture
which
they
already
showed.
But
let
me
show
you
a
picture
of
my
neighbor's
screen
enclosure
which
we're
trying
to
copy.
G
G
A
A
B
D
A
A
F
F
F
F
A
A
A
G
A
Sometimes
we'll
do
approvals
that
are
conditioned
on
things
like
screen
porches,
where
you
can
never
enclose
them
like
with
solid
walls
and
windows.
You
would
always
have
to
leave
it
as
a
screen
wall
on
three
sides
and
the
board
from
time
to
time
might
make
that
approval.
Knowing
that
the
applicant
was
okay
with
it.
Yes,.
A
B
Think
the
conservation
area
is
what
does
it
for
me
in
the
severe
lack
of
a
rear
yard,
and
you
know
the
fact
that
the
neighbor
has
it
doesn't
necessarily
make
it
okay,
but
it
does
speak
to
continuity
of
the
character
of
the
neighborhood,
which
is
part
of
our
criteria.
So,
like
I
often
say
the
rear.
Neighbor
is
the
one
most
affected
by
rear
decisions,
and
in
this
case
there
is
no
rear
neighbors,
so
I
don't
have
an
issue
with
it.
If
anybody
else
has
anything,
I
lived.
F
B
Rear
yard
setback
from
7
feet
to
0.5
feet
with
encroachment
of
ease
and
gutters,
based
on
the
applicant
presenting
confident,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
Section,
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
property
has
little
to
no
rear
yard,
has
no
rear,
neighbors
and
faces
the
conservation
area.
B
G
D
I
A
D
F
On
dancing
land
development,
this
is
application
number
of
vrb
1958.
The
property
is
located
at
39,
22,
West,
North,
B
Street.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
remove
a
grand
tree
to
construct
a
single-family
residence
for
section,
13
45,
a
grand
tree
or
protected
tree
shall
be
permitted
to
be
removed
if
the
grand
tree
of
protected
tree
denies
or
precludes
reasonable
use
of
a
parcel.
Reasonable
use.
Wooding
also
include
the
showing
of
alternative
designs
that
were
not
feasible
to
pursue.
The
property
is
zoned,
are
as
50
and
was
purchased
in
2019.
F
E
E
E
G
B
N
N
Let
me,
let
me
start
by
you
know:
you've
seen
this
you've
seen
this
already,
but
the
tree
the
tree
actually
spans
over
into
the
neighbor's
property
it
it's
a
little
over
70
foot
of
span
from
the
center
of
that
tree
on
either
side.
It
did
a
lot
of
60
feet
wide,
so
I
mean
that
gives
you
an
idea
of
exactly
what
we're
dealing
with
we're.
N
N
N
Is
not
very
tall,
it's
long
and
wide,
so
those
limbs
are
very
heavy
and
they're
subject
to
structural
failure.
Now
I'm
only
showing
those
to
you
it's
not
because
of
where
we
could
save
it,
because
it's
located
in
the
center
of
the
property,
it
is
not
salvageable
and
we're
arguing
denied
of
the
reasonable
use
of
the
property.
N
G
N
N
When
we
started
talking
about
the
value
I
know
that's
one
of
the
criteria
regarding
the
the
pre
and
post
conditions
regarding
the
the
assessed
value
or
what
what
the
potential
value
was,
and
that
ranges
approximately
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
a
lot
with
the
tree
up
to
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
without
the
tree,
and
we
have
a
an
appraisal
here
and
I'll
be
happy
to
read
to
you
that
the
we
have.
We
have
three
comparable
appraisals,
and
this
is
land
only
not
not
with
homes
at
one
hundred.
N
Ninety
thousand,
which
is
this
lot
with
without
the
tree
two
hundred
sixty
thousand
dollars
for
a
comfortable
one
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand,
and
one
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
they're
improved
value
for
each
of
those
is
seven
hundred
fifteen
thousand
five
hundred
and
sixty
eight
thousand
five
hundred.
Ninety
nine
tells
look.
That's
the
developed,
improved
portion
of
the
of
the
property.
N
I'm
gonna
read
you
from
the
arborist
report.
This
is
on
page
page
6
of
the
arborist
report.
The
bottom
was
citing
his
opinion.
It's
there
for
my
professional
opinion
as
an
is
a
certified
arborist
and
based
on
my
observations
from
the
ground
and
detailed
above
that
the
tree
does
appear
to
have
some
inherent
structural
and
health
issues
that
may
only
be
mitigated
with
some
difficult
difficulty
and
expense.
N
It's
therefore
my
opinion
that,
in
light
of
the
proposed
back
twenty
seven
development
on
the
property
that
the
owner
in
the
community
may
be
best
served
if
this
tree
will
removed
prior
to
construction
and
replace
and
didn't
the
tree
replacement,
be
on
the
lot
once
construction
is
completed
with
more
appropriate
trees,
the
arbiter
port
was
dated
in
the
March
25th
of
2019
and
there,
as
they
said,
their
significant
dead
wood.
There's
numerously
lesions
on
limbs.
N
The
tree
location
is
really
the
issue
it's
in
the
center
of
the
lot
and
extends
basically
from
property
line
of
property
line
from
side
to
side
and
located
in
the
center
of
a
lot.
The
land
is
owned,
residential
ten,
which
would
allow
ten
units
to
the
acre.
The
zoning
is
rs.50,
which
is
a
50
by
a
hundred
basic
minimum
lot
size.
The
lot
is
vacant
and
the
tree
is
located
in
a
critical
position
in
the
middle.
You.
N
The
land
values
within
the
trees,
I've
already
said,
indicated
the
land
values
or
are
within
reason
with
the
improved
versus
the
unimproved
section,
and
we
presented
you
with
the
alternative,
none
of
which
are
practical,
respectfully,
requests
your
approval
for
this.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
them.
Our
our
burst
is
here
as
well.
If
you
wish
to
answer
at
any
questions,
answer
to
asked
of
him:
okay,.
I
A
A
N
A
E
A
A
Than
10
for
sure,
okay,
yeah,
all
right,
okay,
I
was
just
trying
to
understand
the
radius
that
was
on
the
drawings
versus
the
practicality
of
saving
the
tree.
Obviously,
they
have
to
be
I,
would
think
more
than
10
feet
and
that's
which
agree
and
it
would
be
more
in
10,
but
they
were
without
investigation.
E
N
Is
a
personal
home
for
the
applicant?
This
is
not
a
spec
home
and
I
know.
We
asked
about
the
lot
split
and
the
lot
split
occurred
before
he
bought
it.
But
even
then
it's
not
germane
to
this
issue
is
it's
there
and
the
fact
that
that
tree
is
sitting
right
in
the
center
of
the
lot
this.
This
is
a
poster
child
for
the
new
code.
In
terms
of
you
can't
you
have
no
other
alternative,
and
is
it
a
reasonable
denying
use
absolutely
there's
no
way
around
it?
N
N
Understand,
but
with
with
the
existing
limb,
spread
from
from
property
line
to
property
line
and
being
in
the
centers
a
lot,
there
is
no
alternative,
I
mean
you,
you
could
perhaps
consider
a
doughnut-shaped
house,
but
that
wouldn't
be
considered
compatible
with
the
neighborhood.
I
mean
everybody
around
there.
Is
there
rebuilding
in
two
stories
and
in
filling
with
the
appropriate
development,
it
would
seem
to
me
that
the
most
appropriate
design
scheme
here
would
be
to
build
a
new
home
and
then
replace
it
with
appropriate
trees
along
the
property
line.
A
N
A
A
I
G
G
B
A
Well,
well,
no
I,
don't
agree
with
that
at
all,
so
well,
very
simple
that
the
previous
property
owner
and
I
don't
know
the
history,
because
we
didn't
hear
all
the
testimony,
but
assuming
there
were
only
two
buildable
Lots
that
could
have
been
three.
We
don't
know
there
may
have
been
no
issue
whatsoever
with
the
other
line
and
they
have
a
legal
right
to
because
it
was
a
platted
legal
line.
A
They
have
every
right
to
divide
the
property
up
just
because
someone
years
ago
decided
to
put
a
single
home
on
the
on
to
locks
at
the
time
that
tree
maybe
didn't
even
exist.
Maybe
they
planted
that
tree.
We
don't
know,
but
then
the
decision
by
a
subsequent
property
owner
to
sell
what
they
have
and
there's
nothing
wrong
with
the
other
lot.
Assuming
there
were
no
trees
removed
from
it.
They
have
a
legal
right
to
sell
off
that
buildable
legal,
why
that
leaves
it
leaves
whatever.
A
A
Well,
somebody
could
have
come
in
if,
if
the
board
thinks
somebody
could
have
come
in
and
designed
a
donut
home
I
mean
if
somebody
had
come
along
that
wanted
the
donut
home
work,
we'll
call
it
a
courtyard
home
with
a
huge
oak
tree
in
the
center
of
it
and
the
one-story
home
around
it.
They
had
a
right
to
do
that.
If
you
think
that's
reasonable,
then
you
can
vote
accordingly.
B
A
D
With
regard
to
the
ten
factors
for
determining
the
reasonable
use,
as
set
forth
in
Section,
thirteen
45
G
of
the
city
code
for
granting
tree
removal
is
stated
and
the
evidence
provided
in
this
public
hearing.
Specifically,
this
tree
has
a
70-foot
total
span.
That
goes
all
across
the
middle
of
the
lot.
A
F
Come
on
Danny
land
development,
application,
number
VRB,
1959,
the
property
address
is
43
15
and
43.
17
where's,
Andie
Bulevar,
the
applicant,
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
percentage
of
trees,
retain
from
50
percent
to
1
percent
for
property
over
an
acre
to
allow
for
the
redevelopment
of
the
site
for
a
public
supermarket
the
property
of
Zone
CI
a
was
purchased
in
2017.
The
existing
retail
building
was
constructed
in
1978
and
after
resources
has
reviewed
the
request
and
has
the
following
comments.
F
The
applicant
is
requesting
removal
of
all
the
trees
on
site,
with
the
exception
of
one
tree
due
to
redevelopment
requiring
an
additional
two
feet
of
field.
The
conditions
of
the
site
would
not
lend
to
survivability
of
the
trees
because
of
the
existing
conditions
of
the
trees
and
feel
added
to
the
site.
Natural
Resources
request
the
applicant
apply
for
variance
and
preserve
the
one
grand
treat
around
site.
A
G
E
Brian
Knox
natural
resources.
It
appears
that
these
trees
were
planted
during
the
development
of
the
parcel.
Most
of
them
are
planted
in
six
to
eight
foot
strips
and
their
condition
reflects
that.
The
one
tree
we
asked
the
applicant
to
preserve
is
a
grand
tree
located
right
here.
It's
on
the
existing
site,
it's
in
the
corner
of
a
lot,
it's
close
to
the
right
away,
but
it's
out
of
the
existing
footprint
of
Parker,
okay,.
H
A
B
E
J
Members
Jake
Famer,
with
Stearns
Reba,
Miller
401,
East,
Jackson
Street
number
2100
in
Tampa
I
have
been
sworn
so
we're
requesting
this
variance
so
that
we
can
modernize
the
site,
increase
its
flood
resiliency
and
improve
the
city's
overall
canopy.
So
this
is
sort
of
the
unusual
case
where
we
had
to
come
back.
Ask
for
a
variance
to
do
something.
That's
gonna
be
better
for
everyone.
J
It
the
site,
is,
as
you
can
see,
this
is
an
aerial
from
1980.
The
site
is
at
the
corner
of
near
the
corner
of
Gandy
and
Manhattan
unusually
shaped
the
current
aerial
one
already
or
already
showed
you,
but
it's
essentially
the
site
is
a
dead
big
box
now
and
so
Publix
is
coming
in
and
hoping
to
modernize
the
site.
So
you
can
see
the
canopy
in
the
aerial
here
and
to
give
you
an
idea
of
what
we
would
like
to
do
to
the
site,
and
this
is
the
site
plan.
J
So
a
couple
of
unique
things
about
this
site
that
this
is
an
it's
an
old
site
that
really
needs
to
be
redeveloped
most
of
the
trees
on
site
or
in
very
bad
condition.
As
you'll
hear
from
our
arborist
and
they're
there's
quite
a
few
that
are
actually
presenting
safety
issues,
the
other
unique
factor
and
I
think
is
a
board.
This
is
something
you're,
probably
going
to
start.
Hearing
more
about
is,
is
the
is
FEMA's
proposed
flood
map
updates.
So
this
is
the
current
flood
map
and
I'll.
Have
our
engineer
describe
this
a
little
bit
more?
J
This
is
the
current
flood
map
which,
if
we
were
gonna,
redevelop
the
site
under
the
current
FEMA
rules.
We
would
still
need
pretty
substantial
fill,
but
when
you
see
the
new
flood
map
that,
even
though
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
meet
the
standard,
yet
we
would
like
to
public.
So
the
core
person
would
like
to
do
that.
We're
gonna
need
two
or
three
feet
of
fill
around
the
entire
site
which,
when
you
are
dealing
with
trees
that
are
already
weakened
and
at
a
inferior,
State
I'm.
J
The
second
piece
of
this
is
we
did
work
extensively
with
staff
to
to
mitigate
as
much
as
we
could
on-site,
but
there
were
just
there's.
So
many
existing
trees,
even
though
they're
in
poor
health
that
we're
that
we
couldn't
mitigate
everything
on
site.
So
that's
the
second
part
of
our
request.
We
did
work
with
staff
and
increase
the
the
caliper
above
minimum
to
get
as
many
of
those
trees
mitigated
on-site
as
possible.
J
L
Name
is
Joe
Sam
make
14.99
19th
Street
in
beautiful
historic,
downtown,
Palm,
Harbor
and
I
have
been
sworn
in.
Thank
you
good
evening.
My
name
is
Joe
Sam
Nick
I'm,
a
consulting
arborist
entering
my
50
third
year
of
private
practice,
dedicated
to
the
study
and
research
of
trees.
So
this
assignment
I
was
asked
to
go
in
and
do
an
analysis
of
the
trees
subject
to
this
assignment.
This
is
a
quick.
L
L
We
have
trees
with
best
sitio,
carps
or
mushrooms
growing
from
the
base
of
the
tree
is
in
decay,
and
structural
integrity
in
this
tree
has
been
compromised.
Yet
another
tree
of
with
wounds
that
have
not
been
cared
for.
The
canopy
of
the
trees
include
poor
attachments.
Decayed
wood
this
tree
would
certainly
have
to
be
removed
if
it
weren't
going
to
be
removed
due
to
improvements
here,
we
have
another
large
tree,
that's
been
irreparably
damaged.
This
is
a
canopy
representation
of
one
of
the
trees
that
shows
over
all
died
back
in
the
crown
of
the
tree.
L
The
great
news
here
is
that,
in
addition
to
getting
these
particular
trees
out,
which
don't
belong
in
this
site,
is
that
they'll
be
replaced
with
Florida
grade
number
one
or
a
Florida
fancy
specimen
trees.
They
also
include
great
diversity
of
native
trees.
We
have
river
birch
flowing
in
the
sky.
Climber
live
oak
tree
is
going
in
bald
cypress
is
going
in
so
will
be
trees
here
with
a
great
proven
track
record.
We've
learned
a
lot
in
the
past
40
years
as
to
how
to
care
for
trees.
L
L
A
G
A
N
O
Good
evening
Jerry
Frank
how's
our
Bayside
West
Neighborhood
Association
I'm
here,
in
also
for
the
Fair
Oaks
Manhattan
manner
and
dandy,
Sun
Bay
South
associations.
We
never
received
any
notice.
So
that's
a
reason.
You
don't
have
any
comments
from
the
neighborhood
one
of
the
things.
There's
two
live
oak
trees
on
this
property
and
a
retention
pond
that
it
has
to
go
with
the
property
when
it
goes
again.
O
So
you've
got
those
two
things:
yes
and
we
have
flooding
in
one
section:
I,
don't
know
what
they're
going
to
do
with
that
one
section:
I'm
glad
that
the
they're
not
going
to
take
the
plans.
The
city
has
of
moving
the
properties,
a
la
la
Fitness
right
up
to
the
curb
I'm,
very
happy
that
they're
keeping
the
store,
I'm
sure
they're,
going
to
tear
it
down
and
build
a
new
one,
but
I'm
happy
that
they
are
putting
the
store
back
in
the
back
of
the
property.
O
So
the
parkings
in
the
front
I'd
hate
to
think
that
they
would
put
it
out
there
because
we're
gonna
have
a
tunnel
down
Gandy
before
it's
over.
Yes
and
I'm
sure
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about
the
overheads
going
to
hang
over
the
top
and
the
building's
will
be
out
at
the
curb
the
sidewalk
and
we'll
have
just
a
big
tunnel
going
down
through
there.
What
no
stuff
so
I
really
like
the
idea
of
all
the
trees
looks
like
there's
about
50
trees
on
the
property.
That's
where
a
three-inch
trees
will
really
take
place.
O
G
A
J
You
Jay
Kramer
again
for
the
record
I
did
want
to
mention
there.
There
is
a
a
second
grand
tree
that
is
a
hazardous
tree.
It's
we've
been
allowed
to
administrate
has
been
administrative
approved
to
remove
that
hazardous
tree.
So
it's
very
poor
health,
just
like
the
many
of
the
other
trees
we've
mentioned,
but
we
are
saving
the
one
grand
tree
that
we
discussed
in
the
southwest
corner
of
the
site.
So
with
that,
we
would
ask
for
your
approval
and
thank
you
for
your
time
tonight.
Thank.
A
A
A
D
It's
VRB
1959
for
property,
located
at
forty
three
one.
Five
and
forty
three,
seventeen
west
gandhi
boulevard
tampa
florida
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
of
trees.
A
lot
of
trees
based
upon
the
petitioner,
meaning
his
burden
of
proof
that
the
trees
deny
reasonable
use.
G
D
Preclude
the
improvement
of
parcel
property
with
regard
to
the
chin
factors
for
determining
reasonable
use,
as
set
forth
in
Section
13
45
G
of
the
city
code
for
granting
tree
removal.
As
stated,
and
the
evidence
provided
in
this
public
hearing,
specifically
that
the
new
FEMA
maps
show
that
that
area
will
be
flooded.
In
order
to
utilize
that
property
it
has
to
be
raised
to
Pete
by
raising
it
to
feet.