►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 07092019 part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
Property
address
is
for
144
North
Armenia
Avenue
applicant
name
is
mid-atlantic
investments
incorporated
agents,
name
is
Todd
Pressman.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
increase
the
sign
square
footage
area
from
50
to
240
square
feet,
increase
in
height
from
20
feet
to
29
feet
and
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
15
feet
to
one
foot
to
allow
40
additional
square
feet
to
an
existing
freestanding
sign
the
lava
zone,
CG
commercial
general-
it
was
purchased
in
1986.
The
commercial
complex
was
constructed
in
1988.
This
is
currently
going
through
a
change
of
use
under
a
building
permit.
C
C
C
This
is
the
proposal.
Step
leaves
this
the
existing
sign
there's
a
picture
of
it.
This
is
the
proposed.
Currently
it's
a
non.
You
know
it's
a
non-conforming
sign
based
on
the
new
sign
code.
It
was
probably
okay
back
in
the
80s,
but
now
they're
wanting
to
add
more
to
it,
so
they
have
to
increase
the
sign
square
footage
from
fifty
square
feet.
What
they're
asking
240.
D
Evening,
miss
chairman
board
members,
Todd
postman
200.
Second
Avenue
South
in
the
st.
Petersburg
Florida
number
451
hollow
point
for
you.
If
we
can
pull
that
up,
please
there
we
go
so
orient
you.
The
site
is
to
the
east
of
the
airport
very
much
mid,
tampa,
what's
very
important
here.
Mr.
chair
and
board
members
is
that
this
lot
size
is
drastically
different
than
all
the
surrounding
and
even
the
nearby
properties.
D
So,
as
you
can
see
from
the
property
appraiser,
this
site
is
composed
of
three
very
large
buildings,
very
deep
into
the
property
or
very
deep
from
North
Armenia,
where
every
other
property
along
North
Armenia
is
very
small,
serves
as
an
office
which
this
does.
It
is
dramatically
larger
in
scope
and
density
and
in
size
than
anything
else
along
the
entire
area
of
North
Armenia.
So
by
the
property
appraiser,
you
can
see
it's
actually
a
complex
of
buildings
which
are
under
change,
they're,
changing
to
medical
and
business
offices,
Zone,
C
G.
D
This
is
another
view
of
it.
I
know
the
different
three
buildings
for
you
and
again,
even
on
this
closer
you
can
see
address.
It
is
dramatically
different
in
terms
of
size
and
scope
and
mass
and
density
than
anything
else
in
the
immediate
area,
except
for
the
hospital
which
is
a
little
bit
to
the
south.
So
this
is
a
one
building
from
the
roadway.
This
is
the
second
building.
D
You
can
see
its
scope
and
sighs
and
the
third
to
the
rear,
I've
told
a
59,000
leasable
square
feet,
so
those
are
elements
that
do
create
the
site
to
be
unique
and
singular
in
regard
to
what's
proposed
before
you.
So
let's
talk
about
signage.
So
again,
as
joel
has
indicated
to
you,
there
is
an
existing
sign
here
and
again
the
site
is
under
change
of
use,
and
this
is
the
picture
of
the
existing
sign.
So
it's
that
240
square
feet
29
feet
high
one
foot
front
setback
it's
permissible
as
non-conforming.
D
So
what
we're
proposing
today
is
really
just
a
small
change
to
add
that
small
area
40
square
feet
to
the
sign.
Why
is
that
being
requested?
Well,
this
site
has
tremendous
challenges.
It
has
numerous
dozens
and
dozens
of
tenants
who
are
located
very
deep
into
the
lot
which
are
invisible
to
the
roadway,
unlike
every
other
lot,
unlike
every
other
business
and
office
along
North
Armenia
buried
by
Google
as
I.
Have
it
about
six
hundred
forty-five
feet
deep,
more
or
less
into
the
residential.
D
Many
freestanding
signs
would
normally
be
permitted,
and
that's
where
some
of
the
difficulty
is
that
sign
code
has
difficulty.
It
actually
is
impossible
to
place
the
site
like
this
into
any
kind
of
scope
of
square
footage
that
works.
Obviously,
the
building
signers
is
not
going
to
work
because
it's
located
further
from
the
roadway
behind
other
buildings,
so
this
site
has
a
tremendous
hardship
for
signage
and
visibility
minimal
for
the
many
patients
who
are
trying
to
visit
the
site
office,
tenants
or
customers
of
office
tenants
who
are
trying
to
visit
the
site
as
well.
D
They
have
any
minimal
visibility,
so
in
summary,
again
its
unique
and
singular
property
much
different
than
anything
else
in
the
media
area.
Even
in
the
immediate
vicinity,
it's
very
large,
very
deep
as
high-density.
It
does
create
a
hardship
particularly
into
how
signage
works
on
the
site.
The
wall
signs
are
ineffective.
What's
proposed
today
is
a
small
increase,
but
it
is
desperately
need
considering
the
use
of
the
site.
So
with
that,
we
appreciate
your
consideration
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
E
B
E
F
C
You
and
if
you
took
the
at
29
feet,
he's
looking
at
probably
30
feet
back
almost
to
be
29
feet
because
he's
got
Jed
general.
You
have
to
be
to
be
20
feet.
You
got
to
be
15
feet
at
the
setback,
got
a
15
foot
setback
and
you
can
go
up
one
foot
for
every
foot
after
that,
so
he
would
be
in
the
middle
of
a
parking
lot.
The
parking
lot
and
drive
aisles
if
he
was
going
to
be
compliant
with
that
respect.
But.
F
C
C
A
B
B
B
D
There
certainly
is
hope
that
there
would
be
enough
room
for
tenants
that
want
it.
There
will
be.
There
is
not
nearly
enough
room
for
other
tenants,
I
mean
we're.
Just
I
mean
weren't
going
to
come
forward
and
ask
for
another
hundred
square
feet.
We
looked
at
the
situation.
We
looked
at
the
existing
sign,
the
hardships
and
balanced
that
sure.
We'd
love
them
another
150
square
feet,
but
that's
not
reasonable
and
that's
not
capable
on
the
existing
sign.
So
we're
trying
to
find
a
solution
for
as
many
of
the
tenants
as
reasonably
possible.
H
H
D
F
C
A
B
D
B
D
H
B
H
B
B
H
H
C
H
D
C
You
could
you
you
could
allow
them
to
compete
at
ten
feet
if
he's
Ruiz
notice
for
one
you
can
get
in
10
say
that
again,
if
he's
read
he's
requested
for
one,
if
you
requested
for
one
foot
setback,
he
can
he
can
take
us
a
10-foot
setback.
You
can't
give
him
closer
than
the
one
plate.
You
can
give
him
further
back.
I
noticed.
Do
you
notice
for
one
foot?
The
board
can
agree
to
go
push
it
further
back
right,
based
on
the
request.
I
D
D
A
I
will
make
a
correction
I'm
gonna
make
a
correction.
The
bottom
line
is
we're
asking
for
the
variance
unset'
back
to
be
where
the
sign
is.
Existing.
I
did
notice
that
a
1
foot
setback
so
I
think
on
the
safe
side
with
all
Liberty.
If
you
are
gonna
move
forward,
let's
do
the
1
foot
setback
because
the
sign
staying
where
it
is
I
mean
that's.
D
It's
not
going
to
move
so
I
would
ask
for
the
1
foot
setback
to
make
sure
you
don't
have
any
other
now
will
not
have
any
effect
on
the
variance,
because
it's
going
to
be
where
the
sign
is
existing.
If
I
may
ask
for
that
deference
and
for
your
consideration.
Thank
you.
We'll
just
eliminate
any
errors.
J
D
B
J
J
J
B
B
B
We're
all
in
agreement
on
that
any
other
comments,
I
mean
I-
would
concur
with
what
we
heard
tonight
with
the
applicant
that
this
property
is
uniquely
different
than
most
properties
on
its
size
and
the
orientation
of
multiple
buildings,
with
only
one
being
actually
on
the
main
main
access
road.
So
it
does
create
a
unique
in
different
situation
that
our
sign
code
doesn't
seem
to
want
to
speak
to.
B
H
J
I
B
B
I
Increase
existing
236
square
feet
by
40
feet
to
allow
existing
twenty
nine
foot
height
and
to
allow
existing
front
setback
with
the
condition
that
the
location
size
of
this
location
and
height
of
the
sign
remain,
as
is
in
the
set
variance.
I'd
conditioned
be
granted
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
that
was
public
hearing
or
a
necessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
and
section
27a
t2
city
code.
Specifically,
that
is
a
unique
and
similar
singular
lot.
I
B
B
E
J
B
J
I,
don't
see
a
problem
with
that.
Okay,
if
you
do
want
to
ask
the
applicant,
we
can
clarify
that,
under
the
rules
of
procedure
to
approve
an
application,
the
board
is
required
to
have
four
votes,
and
so
since
there
are
only
four
members,
you
would
need
unanimous
approval
tonight
in
order
to
successfully
get
approval
of
your
application.
K
B
J
B
A
A
B
C
C
Be
1971
property
address
the
615
channel
side
Drive
applicant
name
is
CBP.
Development
agent
is
Sam
Stein.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
increase
the
sign
area
from
2086
square
feet
to
3340
square
feet.
Allow
the
placement
of
signage
on
any
portion
of
the
building,
regardless
of
frontage.
Allow
tenants
to
install
multiple,
slides
and
types
reduce
the
minimum
elevation
of
a
projecting
sign
from
10
feet
to
9
feet
for
clearance
above
the
pedestrian
way.
C
B
K
K
So
here
today
to
ask
the
board's
approval
for
a
signage
variance
for
Sparkman
Wharf,
formally
Channelside,
Bay,
Plaza
and
just
briefly
sparklin
wharf
is
the
anchor
to
the
water
street.
Tampa
development,
which
you
may
be
aware,
is
in
downtown
about
fifty
three
mixed-use
development
that
is
moving
forward
right
now
and
sparkman
wharf,
as
staff
had
shown,
is
located
here
on
the
map
in
the
southeast
corner
of
our
property
site.
It
is
currently
a
container
park,
as
well
as
a
large
makes
use
building.
K
So
there
are
additional
regulations
that
are
imposed
on
this
property
that
won't
be
imposed
on
the
rest
of
our
development,
and
we
believe
this
will
inhibit
the
connectivity
and
the
coherency
of
our
overall
project,
because
we
do
believe
this
is
an
anchor
of
our
development.
Additionally,
it
is
one
of
the
largest
commercial
excus
properties
within
the
channel
district,
whereas
most
buildings
are
residential
and
have
some
small
mix
of
uses
on
the
ground
floor.
K
K
A
lot
of
the
signage
code
that
was
developed
in
this
area
was
developed
at
a
time
when
the
channel
district
was
really
more
of
an
industrial
area
focused
on
vehicular
traffic
and
that's
kind
of
a
holdover
right
now
of
how
the
signage
code
plays
out
really
allowing
only
retailers
to
use
one
large
sign
on
their
site.
And,
additionally,
as
we
know
that
this,
the
subject
site
has
had
a
long
history
of
hardship,
economically
speaking,
with
a
lot
of
failure
from
a
retail
standpoint
of
keeping
a
viable
site.
K
And
that's
one
thing
that
we're
hoping
to
change
by
focusing
again
on
the
ground
floor
presence
in
the
pedestrian
experience.
And
we
believe
that
our
asks
are
consistent
with
the
Tampa
Comprehensive
Plan
and
that
it
does
give
special
priority
to
the
pedestrian
environment.
It
improves
the
downtown
streetscape
and
it
concurs
with
the
develop
of
redevelopment
of
existing
commercial
structures,
enhancing
building
facades,
signage
landscaping
and
the
economic
viability
of
the
retail
spaces.
K
So
we'll
go
into
the
ass
real,
quick,
we're
really
asking
just
for
for
variances
within
the
signage
code.
Don't
quickly
walk
through
those,
the
first
of
which
is.
We
are
asking
for
a
change
in
the
calculation
of
square
footage
per
linear
foot,
so
in
the
CBD
district
and
the
rest
of
the
Water
Street
Tampa
development,
it
is
two
square
feet
per
linear
foot
of
frontage
within
the
channel
district
and
that's
parkland
Wharf.
It's
one
two-five,
so
we're
just
asking
to
increase
that
to
what's
already
allowed
in
the
CBD
district
to
be
consistent.
K
Second,
we're
asking
for
frontage
signage
to
be
reallocated
to
any
frontage
right
now
we
have
a
lot
of
frontage
that
faces
the
water.
The
intent
is
not
to
put
a
lot
of
signage
facing
the
water
we'd
like
to
use
that
a
lot
of
square
footage
in
other
key
areas
like
the
entrance
to
the
to
the
container
park.
The
entrance
to
the
office
lobby
and
kind
of
redistribute
that
as
needed
on
the
site
third,
is
to
allow
the
combination
of
building
or
wall
signs
with
projecting
signs
which
is
consistent
with
downtown
as
well.
K
So
this
would
allow
a
retail
retailer
to
have
a
main
building
sign,
as
well
as
a
projecting
sign
like
a
blaze
sign.
Currently,
it's
restricted
to
one
sign,
and
that
would
just
be
either
a
building
sign
or
a
projecting
sign,
and
then
the
last
is
really
just
asking
to
lower
the
clearance
of
a
10-foot
minimum
of
blade
signs
down
to
nine
feet,
which
we
think
is
a
little
bit
more
pedestrian
scale.
K
Additionally,
asking
for
the
current
container
signs,
which
have
blade
signs
to
be
put
into
code
that
they
are
allowed
to
be
lower
than
that
at
their
current
height,
which
is
existing.
So
in
terms
of
the
signage
amount
and
allocation
up
here,
you
can
see
kind
of
see
a
site
plan
with
our
main
frontages
again.
K
Next,
just
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
this.
The
combination
of
signage
so
having
one
signage,
one
sign
only
really
forces
a
retailer
to
put
in
all
of
the
square
footage
allocation
into
the
largest
sign
they
can,
which
is
what
you
may
have
seen
at
previous
retailers,
like
the
former
Hooters
space,
that
was
there
we'd
like
to
break
down
those
signage
components
into
or
pedestrian
scale
signage,
so
adding
blade
sides,
canopy
signs,
awning
signs
to
really
focus
more
on
a
streetscape
and
a
an
opportunity
for
retailers
to
express
their
brand.
K
We
think
that
this
helps
the
economic
viability
of
retailers
and
creates
a
better
pedestrian,
focused
experience.
So,
if
you
have
a
retailer,
you
can
put
a
blade
sign
which
caters
to
the
person
walking
down,
channel
site
drive
but
also
have
a
reasonably
sized
wall
sign
that
drivers
and
people
on
the
trolley
can
see
as
well.
K
Here's
just
a
couple
precedents,
so
you
can
see
on
the
left
a
lot
of
examples
within
the
channel
district
and
other
areas
of
downtown,
where
you
really
have
one
main
sign.
It
prevents
the
retailer
from
a
lot
of
times
expressing
their
brand
and
really
just
limits
them
to
one
large
vehicular
focus
sign.
We
believe
by
breaking
it
down.
K
You
get
something
more
along
the
lines
of
what
you
see
to
the
right,
where
retailers
can
express
their
brand
through
blade
signs,
canopies
awnings
in
building
signs,
and
it
creates
a
richer
public
realm
here
are
a
few
renderings
of
Sparkman
Wharf,
which
are
public,
hopefully,
you've.
Seen
these
we're
really
excited
about
the
renovation.
K
We
have
a
large
address
sign
what
we're
proposing
above
the
lobby
and
potentially
some
office
signage,
and
this
goes
to
show
that
we
have
a
need
to
reallocate
signage
to
this.
This
frontage,
which
is
extremely
long
and
for
a
very
long
time,
has
been
mundane.
It's
hard
to
break
it
up,
so
one
of
our
goals
is
to
break
up
this
really
long
frontage
and
keep
it
interesting
to
keep
people
walking
down
the
street
and
then
I
just
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
role
as
the
landlord
in
this
property.
K
So,
although
we
are
asking
for
an
increase
of
signage,
that
doesn't
mean
that
we
intend
to
give
all
that
signage
to
the
retailer's.
We
impose
further
restrictions
and
all
of
our
retailers
through
something
called
a
tenant
design
criteria
manual.
This
is
something
that
we'll
do
for
all
of
our
properties
in
Water,
Street
and
basically,
what
it
is.
It
focuses
on
the
public
realm
experience
and
the
storefronts
and
the
signage
of
all
of
our
retailers.
K
It's
a
pretty
in-depth
guide
guideline
that
limits
the
amount
of
signage
that
they
can
have
that
ensures
high
quality
materials
and
standards
so
that,
despite
them
being
having
to
apply
comply
with
city
code,
they
also
have
to
comply
with
a
design
criteria
manual.
So
we
ensure
that
we
have
the
best
quality
experience
for
our
retailers
in
our
pedestrians.
So
just
a
few
snapshots
to
show
you
through
you
know,
parts
of
the
manual.
K
So,
for
example,
this
tenant
is
only
allowed
to
put
its
building
sign
on
a
canopy
that
is
a
base
building
canopy,
so
it
will
have
a
canopy
sign
and
it
can
only
be
a
certain
height
and
it's
letters
can
only
be
made
of
certain
materials
to
ensure
high
quality
standards.
So
we
do
this
for
the
entire
retail
experience.
K
Again,
we
go
through
things
like
shading
elements.
What
awnings
and
canopies
can
look
like
what
signage
can
be
like
what
materials
they
can
use?
What
materials
that
can't.
For
example,
we
restrict
things
like
just
box
lit
signs
that
are,
you
know
very
cheaply
made
and
don't
have
a
great
aesthetic.
Those
are
something
that
we
restrict
on
our
tenants
as
well.
K
So
this
is
really
just
a
show,
our
intention
of
really
building
a
vibrant
retail
corridor
and
that
we
believe
this
sinus
variance
will
help
us
do
that
again,
you
can
see
you
like
located
at
the
top
right
at
no
time
shall
a
letter
height
exceed
18
inches
for
leading
capitals
and
12
inches
for
lowercase
and
that
the
overall
signage
can't
be
a
certain
school
over
a
certain
square
footage.
So
again,
despite
us
asking
for
more
overall
signage
to
redistribute
that
doesn't
mean
the
retailer's
just
get
more
signage
per
their
space.
K
And
then
last
I
just
like
to
say
you
know
we
have
hopefully
you've
all
been
able
to
visit
the
site,
but
we
have
received
three
awards
on
our
signage,
that
is
in
the
container
park,
bringing
just
good
recognition
to
the
Tampa
Bay
area
and
our
building
retail
in
the
downtown
area.
So
I
just
wanted
to
show
that
you
know
this
is
something
we
hope
to
continue
to
provide
and
bring
great
recognition
to
the
area.
Again
here
is
our
general
statement
of
hardship,
which
you
have
it
detailed
in
front
of
you.
Thank
you.
C
A
B
K
Would
say
we
did
reach
out,
you
know
we
did
get
some
calls
from
neighboring
properties,
specifically
the
Channelside
towers,
and
they
they
offered
their
support.
They
wanted
to
see
kind
of
a
vibrant
retail
experience
and
have
been
happy
with
what
they've
seen
so
far.
So
we
did
get
several
calls
to
support
for
that
question.
I
J
A
J
A
Well,
we
actually
did
what
there
was
no
metric
for
us
to
approve
this.
Okay,
it's
the
1.25,
but
we
worked
long
and
hard
with
these
guys
over.
You
know
and
analyzed
what
they
were
proposing
and
felt
confident
that
you
know
it
was.
It
was
a
good
proposal.
Enes
mr.
Stein
had
indicated
it
does
meet
what
the
CBD,
if
it
was
only
200
yards
over
or
how
many
is
so
many
feet
it
would,
it
would
comply
with
the
CBD
code,
so
there
wasn't
anything
that
we
could
really
say.
J
J
And
as
the
attorney
I'm
concerned
about
the
delegation
of
authority
and
there
being
some
criteria
for
that
and
I'm,
just
asking
what
and
and
so
you're
saying
that
you
could
that
the
CBD
criteria
that
applies
there,
that
the
board
that
the
board
could
delegate
the
authority
to
you
and
that
you
would
apply
CBD
criteria.
Is
that
well.
A
A
It
was
never
intended
to
have
this
kind
of
entertainment
district.
That
was
never
the
original
intent
so
that
that
1.25
has
been
in
the
code
for
many
many
years,
and
so
they've
asked
for
a
relaxation
of
that
for
this
particular
type
of
development,
so
I
certainly
felt
comfortable.
It's
it's
very
professionally
done
it's.
It's
I
mean
it
meets
all
aesthetic
criteria,
I
think,
and
it
certainly
would
would
fit
very
nicely
in
the
CBD.
Unfortunately,
it's
not.
F
Councilor
to
find
me
know
just
ask
a
clarification
question
that
might
help
this
the
the
language
about
the
urban
development
approvals,
not
in
the
application,
it's
just
in
the
agenda
itself,
and
then
it
strikes
me
that
this
is.
It
seems
similar
to
situations
where
we
may
approve
a
variance
that
would
still
be
subject
to
Building,
Code
approval
or
permitting,
or
things
like
that,
and
so
it
would
strike
me
that
that
we
approve
the
variance
urban
design
would
still
need
to
make
its
approval
subsequent
to
our
approval
or
disapproval
of
appearance.
Yeah.
J
K
B
That's
a
60%
increase,
you're
you're
asking
to
be
allowed
to
put
the
sign
each
basically
anywhere.
You
want
on
all
sides
of
the
property.
Subject
is
still
the
Tampa
city
codes.
Well,
yeah,
I
understand,
but
the
variance
you
know
and
as
opposed
to
just
right
at
the
frontage.
So,
basically
anywhere
you
want
that
the
tenants
can
have
more
than
one
sign.
They
can
have
multiple
signs
and
end
up
different
types
of
signage
and
then
the
minimum
elevation
to
the
bottom
of
the
projecting
signs
coming
down
with
one
foot
intend
denied.
B
H
B
H
F
F
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27,
80
and
27
289
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
is
a
unique
property.
In
the
context
of
a
channel
district,
that
this
property
suffers.
Additional
regulations
not
applicable
to
the
rest
of
the
Water
Street
project
that
the
current
regulations
impact
retailers
differently
from
the
application.
F
The
current
site
code
in
this
area,
which
was
previously
focused
more
on
industrial
use
and
that
the
applicant
is
asking
to
increase
the
signage
to
what
is
already
permitted
in
other
portions
of
the
central
business
district,
which
covers
other
portions
of
this
project.
And,
finally,
that
this
is
an
extremely
long
frontage.
That
is
tough
to
break
up,
and
the
variance
will
allow
the
reline
reallocation
of
signs
which
would
create
a
more
pedestrian
friendly
experience
with
the
signage.
B
C
Okay,
property
address
34,
West,
Sevilla
Street
applicant
name
is
Elizabeth
in
Corbett
Ben
/,
section
27
156.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
9
feet.
We
construct
a
two-car
garage,
the
property
is
zoned,
rs.60
residential
single-family
was
purchased
by
the
applicant
in
1999.
The
existing
house
was
constructed
in
1956.
C
There
was
a
tree
consultation
conducted
in
February
to
2019
natural
resources,
found
it
consistent
if
they
also
stated
if
the
variance
report
approves
the
variance
effortless
route
prune
the
Cypress
at
the
rear
of
the
lot,
where
the
corner
of
the
proposed
addition
is
requested,
and
the
east
side
of
the
property,
where
a
38
inch
oak
and
the
proposed
development
meet.
Additional
information
is
available.
The
site
plan
markups
on
the
tree
consultation
transportation,
wants
to
be
sure
that
the
applicant
provides
driveway
access
to
the
proposed
garage.
C
C
C
E
B
G
G
G
The
hardship
that
we're
asking
is
to
make
sure
that
it's
attached,
if
it's
detached
that
would
force
us
to
put
it.
You
know
and
coach
into
the
backyard
that
you
don't
want,
and
it's
really
the
only
logical
spot
being
that
the
existing
single
car
will
turn
into
interior
space.
So
we
wouldn't
want
to
be
able
to
access.
G
G
And
then
the
dark
lines
are
just
the
proposals
of
what
we
would
like
to
do
will
continue
on
with
the
more
detailed
plans
with
OBO
when
I'm
so
excited
I
mean
a
bit
may
or
may
not
go
all
the
way
to
20
feet,
but
it'll
be
in
this
and
the
tree
that
used
the
Cypress
that
he
mentioned.
The
sits
right
here
and
we
have
a
picture.
G
And
then
I,
just
this
is
this
preliminary.
It
just
give
my
knee
of
the
expansion.
This
is
the
existing
garage
I'll
just
turn
into
all
this
interior
space,
and
then
this
is
Lucy.
Car
garage
that'll
be
attached
that
we
can
get
into
the
house
and
then
there's
an
extra
door
to
get
out
to
take
out
the
garbage.
G
G
A
I
G
G
I
The
reason
I
asked
is
because
there's
hardship
criteria
that
apply
and
they're
in
your
application,
there's
five
of
them
and
so
the
the
question
is
you
know
what
about
the
property
is
unique
or
singular.
That
would
dictate
the
need
for
the
setback
and
right.
The
current
property
has
a
one
car
garage
and
the
problem
you're
trying
to
solve
is
more
interior
space.
So
you
know
you
build
a
new
garage,
so
you
can
fill
in
the
old
one.
I
G
B
B
B
A
B
G
B
G
G
B
B
Okay,
so
that
these
are
the
kinds
of
things
the
board
has
to
look
at.
You
know
you,
your
homesites,
a
certain
size,
you
know.
Is
it
different
than
other
home
sites
in
the
area
what's
causing
the
hardship?
And
if
the
need
is
for
two
cars
to
be
in
a
garage,
there
might
be
another
way
to
do
it
that
the
board
would
say
okay.
Why
not
consider
that
instead
of
this
so
I
mean
I,
don't.
G
G
G
G
B
So
you're
gaining
living
area
plus
gaining
more
garage,
so
the
board
has
to
ask
itself.
You
know:
is
that
too
much
and
I'm
over
simplifying
this,
but
that's
kind
of
the
thought
process
is
they're,
just
so
much
being
asked
for
here
when
there's
might
be
adequate
space
to
still
get
most
of
what
you
want
and
again
we're
not
here
to
tell
you
how
to
design
your
home.
That's
not
our
job.
We
just
have
to
look
at
the
setback.
Ask
you
know
the
request
right.
G
B
Setbacks
were
to
go
away.
You
have
a
much
bigger
pallet
to
use.
Logically,
you
can
say
well,
I
could
even
have
a
different
configuration,
but
that's
unfortunately,
we
have
unfortunately
from
a
design
standpoint.
We
have
setbacks
that
we
want
everybody
to
try
to
stay
in
and
maintain
for
life
safety,
fire
egress.
You
know
blah
blah
blah,
so
this
home
site
other
than
the
tree
I
have
heard.
You
know
the
issue
of
the
tree,
but
even
that
I
think
you've
overcome
you.
G
H
L
I've
been
34
at
sea,
west
Sevilla
straight
I'm,
my
wife
and
I
are
the
property
owners.
When
it
one
of
the
things
we
really
took.
A
lot
of
consideration
into
was
the
the
building,
the
all
the
building
that
has
happened
around
us.
We've
been
in
this
home
for
20
years.
The
reason
we
stayed
there
it's
because
we
love
the
neighborhood.
We
love
the
schools.
L
A
L
L
They
said
that
a
we
could
keep
a
lot
of
backyard,
make
you
guys
aesthetically
appealing
to
the
neighborhood
and
not
say
not
to
really
jump
up
the
neighborhood
anymore,
so
I
I
do
think
it
is
a
reasonable
request,
because
we
keep
we
look
around
all
the
time
and
it's
you
can
deficit
the
neighborhood
its
tear
down
and
stare
down
it
stared
out
its
bigger
house.
All
we're
really
trying
to
do
is
add
this
two
car
garage
maximize
our
interior
space
as
a
family.
The
deep
garage
would
be
the
ugliest
thing
possible
for
that
house.
L
I
understand
exactly
I've
seen
the
deep
garages
in
our
neighborhood.
They
I've
never
seen
them.
Look
nice
at
all,
but
I
do
understand
exactly
what
you're
saying,
but
our
goal
here
is
really
to
keep
the
character
of
this
neighborhood.
You
know
we're
we're
three
blocks
away
from
Roosevelt
Elementary,
where
kids
went
to
school
and
we
like
to
see
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
stayed
that
way
and
that's
why
we
haven't
left,
you
haven't
moved.
L
We
took
a
long
time
and
plan
so
that
this
would
look
nice
for
us
for
our
neighbors
for
the
neighborhood
for
all
of
those
things,
and
if
we
wanted
to
just
put
a
car
two-car
garage
within
the
limitations,
we
would
have
just
dropped
it
in
the
backyard.
We
would
have
lost
the
backyard
our
next-door
neighbors
on
both
sides
of
hill.
Well,
we're
looking
at
the
corner
of
a
building.
You
know!
So
if
we
expanded
it
that
way,
because
we
knew
with
within
our
limitations
to
do
something
like
that,
but
we
did
so.
B
I
G
I
I
A
A
B
A
L
F
B
I
B
I
The
name
these
applicants
are
requesting
in
regards
to
the
apparent
rear
yard.
That's
just
for
color
and,
as
far
as
you
know,
consistency
of
the
neighborhood
and
immediate
neighbor
who
didn't
protest,
but
I
thought
it
was
something
that
we'd
want
to
point
out.
So
Joel
you're
saying
that
it
would
be
a
10-foot
setback.
If
you
had
a
detached
garage,
correct.
I
A
B
D
A
B
B
C
B
B
G
C
I
Joel,
let's
go
back
to
the
proposed
plan,
which
has
nine
feet
four
inches
to
the
property
line.
If
it
was
detached,
it
would
be
three
feet
from
the
property
line.
It
would
have
potentially
a
five-foot
breezeway
or
five
foot
building
separation
minimum
and
it
would
be
eight
feet
total,
which
is
a
foot
and
four
inches
shorter
than
what
they've
got
point
being
they
could.
They
could,
within
the
code,
have
a
detached
garage
in
this
exact
same
spot
with
a
breezeway
pure
Falls.
B
C
C
I
F
B
L
I
think
the
main
thing,
and
after
the
conversation
about
the
property
lines
and
setback,
the
most
important
aspect
of
this
design
was
to
give
the
most
to
give
that
from
the
edge
of
the
building
to
the
property
of
that
nine
feet.
If
we
were
to
detach
a
garage
in
whichever
way
that's
within
the
limitations
of
it,
there
would
be
no
siding.
You
can
still
see
it
on
there
is
that
my
neighbor
has
an
attached
garage.
If
I
I
look
at
my
fence,
it's
right.
L
There
decided
his
hat
his
garage
and
the
only
reason
it's
there
is
because
there's
a
breezeway
that
pushed
the
garage
over
so
be
closer
to
the
neighbor's
property.
When
I
thought
about
this,
when
we
went
through
that,
that
was
the
reason
for
it.
We
attached
it
to
the
home,
there's
nine
full
feet
on
that
side
of
the
house.
That
way
we
can.
You
can
get.
A
L
Out
I
could
still
even
have
my
yard
man,
there's
still
gonna
be
yard
back
there,
your
man
can
get
in
and
out
I
can
access
garbage
can
to
everything
else,
even
if
they're,
if
they're
for
emergency
services
to
come
in,
they
would
have
a
way
to
get
around
there
with
a
breezeway
like
this
most
of
the
breezeways
that
I've
ever
seen,
they've
got
doors
on
them
and
there's
something
limiting
access
into
the
home
itself.
So
with
this,
that
was
really.
L
L
B
A
I
Move
that
variance
request
for
case
vrb
1972,
the
property
located
at
34
to
west
Sevilla
Street,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site,
clamp
presented.
The
public
hearing
for
reduction
in
the
rear
yard
setback,
the
20
feet
to
9
feet,
width,
encroachment
fees
and
gutters
based
on
the
applicant
presenting
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record.
I
Now
this
public
hearing
of
Ana
necessary
hardship
of
practical
difficulty
and
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27
18
city
code,
specifically
that
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
has
two
car
garages
in
this
fashion,
including
the
immediate
neighbor
that
they
could
in
a
conforming
manner,
separate
this
garage
and
not
need
a
variance.
However,
that
would
move
their
garage
closer
to
their
neighbor
and
that
they
have
the
oddity
of
an
abandoned
alley
or
whatever.
B
A
B
Have
a
motion
for
approval
by
mr.
pastor:
we
have
a
second
by
miss
long.
I.
Do
have
some
discussion
just
briefly
I'm
not
going
to
support
this.
There
is
adequate
room
to
do
what
the
code
requires.
The
lot
is
not
uniquely
different
that
if
we,
if
I,
if
I,
had
heard
testimony
tonight
about
maybe
the
a
conflict
of
a
of
an
easement
that
will
require
them
to
be
more
than
three
feet
that
could
have
weighed
in
on
my
decision
but
based
on
the
testimony
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
support
this
I'm.
I
Just
add
to
your
comment
that
Joel
did
testify
that
it
would
be
a
five
foot
with
that.
If,
if
there
is,
there
is
no
regardless,
we
don't
know
that's
the
best
information
we
have
and
I
would
say
that
preserving
a
50s
house
rather
than
forcing
somebody
to
move
out
of
it
to
be
knocked
down.
It's
also
something
to
consider
well.
B
A
B
Breezeway
gives
them
adequate
protection
from
the
rain
and
access
and
whatnot,
and
that
that's
what
the
codes
is
written
to
clause
in
in
this
corner
life
situation,
which
the
neighbor
found
no
did,
shall
we
build
yep.
We
can
call
call
for
a
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye
any
opposed,
nay,
they
were
approved
four
to
one.
B
C
Property
address
2701,
north
essex
court,
applicant
name
is
jerome
and
bonny.
Perino
Burano
write
something
like
sorry
for
section
27,
156
and
290.
The
applica
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
5
feet,
reduced
the
south
side,
yard
setback
from
7
feet
to
4
feet,
2
inches
and
to
reduce
the
north
side
yard
from
7
feet
to
3
feet
to
construct
a
two-car
garage.
The
property
is
zoned
r,
is
50
residential
single-family
and
purchased
by
the
applicant
in
2019.
C
C
C
M
M
Okay,
got
it
okay,
so
the
property
currently
has
a
two
car
detached
garage
right
here.
It's
in
disrepair
we
recently
just
purchased
this
home
and
two-car
garage
is
not
structurally
sound,
so
it
has
to
come
down
and
what
we
want
to
do
is
rebuild
the
two-car
garage
and
create
a
little
bit
larger
space.
So
I'm
gonna,
read
you.
This
is
more
I
just
gave
a
commencement
speech
to
2,500
people,
and
this
is
more
nerve-racking
than
that.
M
M
So
I
wasn't
even
nervous
at
that
at
the
Performing
Arts
Center,
but
this
is
making
me
nervous
so,
okay,
so
we
have
my
husband
and
I
have
lived
in
in
Tampa
since
1990
we've
lived
in
all
different
areas
of
Tampa,
South,
Tampa,
Temple,
Terrace,
Carrollwood,
West,
chase
Odessa
and
downtown
Tampa,
including
Tampa
Heights,
Riverside,
Heights
and
Seminole.
Heights
is
a
highly
desirable
area.
We're
super
excited
about
what's
happening
in
that
area.
M
We're
invested
in
the
renovation
and
the
rejuvenation
that's
happening
at
the
heart
of
the
city,
and
we
want
to
make
our
home
in
Riverside
Heights
for
many
years
to
come.
We
fell
in
love
with
this
home
and
we're
determined
to
restore
it.
It
was
built
in
1925
and
we
want
to
restore
it
and
still
make
it
feasible
for
our
large
blended
family.
So
we
have
five
children.
We
have
one
who
lives
at
home
full-time
and
we
have
four
in
college.
M
Yes,
we
have
four
income
who
come
home
from
time
to
time,
so
the
home
has
an
existing
two-car
garage
in
serious
disrepair.
The
current
portico,
which
runs
along
the
side
of
the
house
to
the
two-car
garage,
is
extremely
narrow,
but
our
vehicles
won't
even
go
through
the
portico.
The
way
that
it
is
built,
so
garage
parking
is
going
to
be
essential
when
we
park
in
the
driveway.
We
cover
the
sidewalk
because
we
can't
get
through
the
portico.
M
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
garage
parking
so
we're
not
parking
on
the
sidewalk
or
off
constantly
on
the
city
street
in
front
of
the
home.
So,
as
I
said,
it's
currently
unusable
and
it
needs
to
come
down
and
the
rebuild
provides
us
an
ideal
opportunity
to
provide
additional
living
space
for
our
large
family.
And
so
the
plan
is
to
include
an
additional
bedroom
and
bathroom
when
we
build
the
two-car
garage
and
that's
where
the
change
in
the
setbacks
comes
in,
because
we
want
to
add
that
additional
living
space.
M
So
the
gentlemen
okay,
so
the
property
is
unique
because
it
is
bordered
on
two
sides
by
alleys.
So
there
is
really
only
one
neighbor
and
the
request
for
variance
would
not
negatively
affect
traffic
flow
parking
or
access
to
either
alley.
The
house
to
the
north
of
our
property
is
new
construction
and
the
garage
half
currently
has
a
three
foot.
M
It's
you
know:
failure
to
grant
the
variance
results
in
some
practical
difficulties
for
our
family
to
live
in
this
area.
Again
parking
would
be
difficult
for
us
because
we
would
be
parking
across
the
city
sidewalk
and
in
front
of
the
home.
So
let
me
show
you
a
couple
of
pictures
that
help
explain.
So
this
this
picture
shows
the
the
top
picture
shows
the
facing
front
view
here.
This
is
our
existing
garage
and
then
this
is
the
neighbor's
new
garage.
The
green
building
is
the
neighbors
new
garage
with
the
fence
running
in
between.
M
So
let
me
show
them.
This
is
a
real
quick.
So
this
is,
you
know
from
the
back
corner
of
our
property.
These
are
the
two
alleys.
So
basically,
this
is
on
home
here
and
there's
an
alley
running
this
way
along
this
side
of
our
property.
And
then
this
alley
runs
to
the
back
along
our
property,
and
the
entrance
to
the
garage
would
be
from
the
back.
M
So
we
would
not
have
to
go
through
that
portico,
which
we
can't
get
through
anyway,
and
then
just
to
show
you
a
couple
of
homes
around
the
area
that
have
very
similar
garages
coming
off
of
the
alleys.
This
is
the
new
neighbor
at
2703.
This
home
is
off
the
back
alley
at
27:10,
North
poplar.
This
is
a
brand
new
garage
that
they
just
still
facing
the
same
alley
with
basically
the
same
setbacks,
and
then
this
neighbor
is
across
the
opposite
alley,
with
the
with
the
garage
facing
as
well.
M
So
as
I
said,
we
love
this
area,
it's
a
1,300
square
at
home,
so
we
want
to
add
that
additional
bedroom
and
bathroom
so
that
when
our
kids
come
home
in
the
summer,
they
can
live
there
with
us
work
down
at
that
brand-new
Channelside
district.
That's
just
that's
coming
up,
you
know
be
a
part
of
the
community
and
we
want
to
preserve
the
home.
We
don't
want
to
tear
anything
down.
M
We
had
an
opportunity
to
build
a
brand
new
home
and
we
really
really
want
to
preserve
this
one
because
1925,
it's
got
the
original
floors,
the
original
roof,
and
we
just
want
to
make
the
most
of
it
and
be
able
to
live
there
and
have
it
make
sense
for
our
family
and
so
we've
taken
time.
We
have
our
architect
here
who
drew
the
plans
for
the
home
for
the
garage
and
we
want
the
garages
and
keeping
the
style
is
in
keeping
with.
M
Ok,
so
there
we
go
so
we
can
see
the
existing
wood
frame
res
residents
and
then
the
new
proposed
one-story
two-car
garage
and
then
the
proposed
little
studio
unit
we're
not
going
to
put
a
kitchen
in
it.
It's
not
going
to
be
an
apartment,
it's
just
going
to
be
a
place
where
our
kids
can
come
home
and
be
part
of
our
living
space
and
you
know
be
and
that
make
the
home
work
for
us
in
this
area.
F
M
M
I
M
Did-
and
we
talked
about
that
and
that
was
kind
of
where
our
architect
came
in,
and
we
drew
many
different
variations
of
the
plan
to
try
to
figure
out
what
made
the
most
sense
and
again
to
have
the
ability
to
pull
in
off
of
the
alley.
We
need
enough
space
in
the
garage
to
pull
the
vehicles
in
and
when
we
had
the
750
square
foot,
it
made
the
apartment
like
this
wide.
I
A
A
A
M
M
B
M
B
Just
trying
to
understand
the
ask
you
know
what
you're
asking
for
and
the
the
five
yard
setback
rear
setback
reduction
is
because
you're
over
the
allowable
750
square
feet,
just
as
mr.
Foster
asked
the
question,
did
you
consider
making
this
a
little
bit
smaller
and
not
have
to
come
here
tonight
and
be
nervous
other
than
you
would
have
to
vest
the
other
side
yard
setback?
M
B
M
I'm
not
sure
our
neighbors
are
gonna
support
it
at
that
point,
because
now
it's
gonna
be
sitting
way
in
front
of
their
current
garage.
Where
we
have
it
now,
the
two
garages
will
align
perfectly.
They
have
the
exact
same
setback
on
their
garage
that
they
just
built
so
well.
It
will
with
theirs,
and
the
two
structures
will
be
at
that
point.
We're
gonna
be
sitting
forward,
so
they're
gonna
be
sitting
in
their
brand-new
backyard.
Looking
at
our
garage,
they
exist.
A
B
C
M
Know,
like
I
said
we
talked
to
the
neighbors.
We've
had
a
chance
to
get
to
know
our
new
neighbors
we've
only
owned
the
house
for
a
couple
of
months,
but
the
new
neighbors
that
are
moving.
In
just
said.
We
wanted
to
write
a
quick
note
to
let
you
know
we
received
your
variance
request.
Please
know
that
as
your
new
next-door
neighbors,
we
support
this
request
and
then
I
had
another
letter
from
the.
M
Next
door
right,
new,
next-door
neighbors
and
then
from
down
the
street
good
morning,
Bonnie
and
J.
We
received
your
variance
request
and
wanted
to
let
you
both
know
that
we
support
this
request.
Anything
to
enhance
your
home
and
the
street
is
only
a
positive
for
the
neighborhood
best
of
luck,
so
I
think
we
put
a
lot
of
thought
and
time
into
you
know.
Looking
at
different
scenarios,
we
considered
everything
that
you
discussed
and
based
on
you
know
are
using
our
expert
architect.
You
know
this.
M
B
M
I,
just
I
so
I
think
it
would
you
know
for
them
and
for
you
know
to
not,
like
I,
said,
to
sit
in
their
brain
backyard
and
look
at
the
side
of
our
garage
it
just
it
aligns
it
would
align
well
and
it
doesn't
affect
anybody
on
the
other
side,
there's
no
neighbor.
On
the
other
side,
the
person
across
the
alley.
You
know
we've
talked
to
all
of
three
of
those
neighbors
across
the
alley,
and
you
know
they
all
work
we're
in
support
of
it.
So.
B
M
B
B
E
H
A
B
My
only
my
only
comment
is
that
I
can't
support
it
because
of
the
two
alleyways,
but
at
what
point
you
know
and
I'm
just
speculating
a
little
bit
here.
Obviously,
but
if
the
footprint
came
in
even
even
larger
and
took
up
more
of
the
backyard,
but
the
same
reasons,
the
same
hardships
were
given
at
some
point.
You
say
no,
that's
too
much.
B
So
that's
the
problem
I'm
having
right
now
is
you
know
what
is
too
much
when
you
know
if
they
reduced
it
to
750,
they
wouldn't
even
be
other
than
maybe
the
five
foot
ask
and
investing.
Obviously
they
have
the
best.
But
and
yes,
the
five
foot
ask
on
the
driveway
garage
primary
garage
door.
Access
is
not
egregious
in
this
situation
and
certainly
the
the
fact
that
it's
a
little
bit
larger
than
750
is
primarily
we.
Nobody
asks
the
question:
how
much
square
footage
is
in
the
covered?
Porch,
that's
probably
most
of
it.
F
B
It
covered
and
out
an
open-air
porch
does
not
count
well.
Okay,
then
I'll
retract.
That
statement
so
anyway,
that's
my
only
difficulty
here
is
in
this
size,
home
site.
That's
not
uniquely
different
in
terms
of
size,
especially
with
the
existing
home
cited.
The
way
it
is,
there's
plenty
of
room
back
there
to
make
things
fit.
So
that's
mr.
J
B
H
I
Just
answer
Gary's
comment
from
my
perspective:
when
you
know,
when
you
ask:
when
does
things
get
too
big,
sometimes
the
marker
I
uses?
Are
we
fringing
upon
the
50%
green
space,
which
we
didn't
really
talk
about
here,
and
you
know
we
might
be,
but
that's
what
I
was
sometimes
wonder
if
something,
if
something
starts
to
cut
into
that
50
percent,
then
maybe
you
do
ask
that
question
like.
Are
we
getting
too
big.
H
You
know
the
last
night
place
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practically
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27a
t
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
current
two-car
garage
is
no
longer
functional,
it
is
in
disrepair,
so
it
has
to
be
replaced.
The
property
is
on
a
corner
lot
and
two
of
the
four
sides
on
alleys,
so
the
encroachment
into
or
nearness
to
neighbors
becomes
almost
moot
for
this
issue.
B
B
G
C
C
Feet
was
approved
by
a
design
exception
so
that
that
particular
side
row
setbacks
already
been
addressed:
the
property
zoned
rs.50
residential
single-family
and
was
purchased
in
2018.
There
was
a
demo
permit
issued
in
November
of
18
and
there's
an
active
building
permit
for
a
new
construction
right
now,
natural
resources
weighed
in
and
that's
what
sources.
Inspection
also
mentions
that
the
moving
the
driveway
to
the
other
side
and
away
from
the
existing
property
line
trees.
They
recommended
doing
that
and
they
must
have
a
lot
of
identify
the
trees
on
site
in
correct
sizes.
Other
than
that.
C
B
N
N
Alley
back
here,
it's
not
really
a
active
alley.
It's
not
paved
once
while
I
do
see
people
driving
down
there
at
this
stage,
especially
after
the
rain,
it's
kind
of
overgrown
what
I'm
proposing
this
is
one
of
our
standard
plans.
We
build
a
lot
of
in
Riverside,
Heights
and
typically
the
covered.
Lanai
extends
the
entire
length
of
the
width
of
the
home
and
we
reduced
it
down
just
to
12.
N
Joel
had
mentioned
that
Natural
Resources
had
went
out,
Dave
Riley.
Actually
this
is
one
of
his
last
ones
before
it
retirement
and
went
out
and
requested
that
perhaps
we
move
the
drive
to
the
other
side.
However,
he
didn't
realize,
there's
a
Tico
power
pole
here
and
when
I
went
to
the
to
speak
to
Tico,
they
would
not
move
the
pole.
So
I
went
back
to
Dave
I
believe
three
weeks
ago
was
last
Friday
before
he
retired
and
he
accepted
the
way.
This.
N
N
One
I'd
like
to
just
read,
I
support
the
variance
to
reduce
the
reread
setback
at
9:18
Alfred
every
sighted
across
the
street,
from
this
property
for
the
past
41
years,
and
support
what
the
Builder
is
doing
in
our
neighborhood.
Sincerely
Joanne,
England
and
I
do
have
seven
others
I'd
like
to
submit
for
the
record.
A
N
H
N
I,
just
am
hoping
for
a
little
shade
in
the
backyard.
For
me,
my
family
and
my
pet.
It's
a
southern
exposure.
There's
no
tree
cover
there.
The
house
is
up
reconstructed,
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a!
What
do
you
call
it
a
plan?
It's
not
as
though
I
could
have
easily
chosen
to
have
a
slightly
shorter
house
so
that,
though,
and
I
could
be,
you
know
within
the
required,
the
ordinarily
required
setback.
N
F
B
F
N
B
F
B
C
C
A
D
B
B
B
I
B
B
A
J
B
B
D
N
D
B
N
N
B
J
Mr.
chairman,
there
is
not
a
definition
for
the
term
porch
in
27
43,
which
is
the
definition
section
of
zoning
code.
I
did
find
a
front
building
facade
term
when
I
looked
for
front
porch,
but
as
to
whether
or
not
that
term
would
be
the
term
applicable
here
is
the
question
I
would
have
to
defer
to
the
Zoning
Department
as
the
interpreters
of
the
code.
F
B
N
N
You
could
put
two
Cooper's
in
it:
I
thought
I
didn't
want
to
toot
our
scooters.
Yes,
but
I
didn't
I
I
sacrificed
the
two-car
garage
for
a
little
more
interior
space.
That
said,
if
I
have
guests,
they're
gonna
need
to
park
in
the
driveway
and
if
the
car,
if
the
but
the
house
has
moved
forward
their
cars
will
leave
that
much
closer
to
the
street.
That
much.
N
F
E
I
I
F
B
E
Right
I'll
make
a
motion
for
approval,
with
conditions
sort
of
like
to
move
the
variance
request
for
case
VRB
1974
property
located
in
918
West
Alfred
Street,
Tampa
Florida,
presented
at
the
or
as
depicting
who
sees
me
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
relief
from
section
27
156,
in
order
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
9
feet
to
construct
single-family
residence
with
covered
Oakland
when
I
under
the
following
conditions
that
the
covered
lanai
remain
open
and
not
being
closed.
At
any
time.
E
That's
said:
variances
condition
be
granted
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27
80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
there
are
some
unique
and
singular
features
here,
one
the
property
has
alley
to
the
rear,
which
kind
of
gives
them
more
buffer
to
discussion
of
moving.
The
house.
Perhaps
forward
could
be
impeded
by
the
fact
that
there's
an
electric
utility
pole
right
at
the
property
line
in
the
front
and.