►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 07142020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Brad
feldman,
dustin,
pasteur.
lynn,
hurtak.
lynn,
hurtak.,
sam
walker.,
sam
walker.,
also
in
attendance.
This
also
in
attendance
this
evening
are
from
legal,
evening
are
from
legal,,
ms.
susan
johnson-velez
from
ms.
susan
johnson-velez
from
development,
coordination,
development
coordination,,
ms.
roberta
meade-curry
and
mr.
A
A
A
A
Please
adhere
to
safe
social
distancing
as
set
in
the
room
distancing
as
set
in
the
room
and
please
maintain
wearing
and
please
maintain,
wearing
facial
masks
at
all
times.
facial
masks
at
all
times..
When
your
case
number,
and
when
your
case
number
and
petitioner
name
is
called,,
petitioner
name
is
called,.
Please
approach
the
podium..
A
A
and
if
you
have
been
sworn
in.,
the
petitioner
and/or
the
agent,
the
petitioner
and/or,
the
agent
will
have
ten
minutes
to
make
a
will
have
ten
minutes
to
make
a
presentation.
presentation..
All
participants
wishing
to
all
participants
wishing
to
speak
will
have
three
minutes.
speak
will
have
three
minutes..
Then
the
petitioner
an
then
the
petitioner
an
additional
three
minutes
for
additional
three
minutes
for
rebuttal.
If
needed.
rebuttal,
if
needed.
the
time
periods,
as
stated,
will
the
time
periods
as
stated
will
be
kept
by
the
board.
A
Be
kept
by
the
board.
any
information
such
as
pictures,
any
information
such
as
pictures
or
plans
that
have
not
been
or
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted
as
part
of
previously
submitted
as
part
of
your
petition
and
you
plan
to
your
petition
and
you
plan
to
present
at
this
hearing
for
present
at
this
hearing,
for
consideration
in
support
of
your
consideration
in
support
of
your
petition
must
be
individually.
Petition
must
be
individually
presented
and
accepted
by
the
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board.
board..
After
acceptance
by
the
board,.
A
A
Part
of
the
permanent
record.,
the
board
bases
decisions
on
the
board
bases,
decisions
on
competent,,
substantial
evidence,
competent,,
substantial
evidence
which
is
presented
and
meets
the
which
is
presented
and
meets
the
criteria
established
by
the
city
criteria
established
by
the
city
code
of
ordinances.
code
of
ordinances..
A
A
A
If
the
case
is
denied,,
you
may,
if
the
case
is
denied,,
you
may
wish
to
have
the
variance
review
wish
to
have
the
variance
review,
board's
decision,
reviewed
or
board's
decision
reviewed
or
appealed
by
the
city
council,
appealed
by
the
city
council,,
and
you
must
file
the
petition
and
you
must
file
the
petition
for
review
of
the
board's
for
review
of
the
board's
decision
within
ten
business
decision.
Within
ten
business
days
of
the
written
decision.
A
A
A
D
A
E
Aye.
dustin
pasteur:
eye.,
dustin,
pasteur:,
eye.
lynn,
hurtak:,
aye.
lynn,
hurtak:
aye.,
samantha,
walker:,
aye.,
samantha,
walker:
aye.
thank
you.
thank
you.
at
this
time,
board
members,
I
at
this
time,
board
members,.
I
would
like
to
ask
the
members
of
would
like
to
ask
the
members
of
the
board
if
they
have
had
any.
A
G
Roberta
meade-curry,
planning,
design
and
development
design
and
development
coordination.
coordination.
we
did
have
a
very
poor.
We
did
have
a
very
poor
recording
for
last
month's
recording
for
last
month's
hearing,,
so
I'm
going
to
make
hearing,,
so
I'm
going
to
make
some
housekeeping
suggestions.
G
some
housekeeping
suggestions.
everyone
pull
their
mike
closer
everyone
pull
their
mike
closer
towards
them
because
we
hardly
towards
them,
because
we
hardly
heard
some
of
the
comments.
You
heard
some
of
the
comments
you
were
making
when
you
were
making
were
making
when
you
were
making
your
motions..
So
we
need
to
your
motions..
So
we
need
to
make
sure
that
you're
speaking
make
sure
that
you're
speaking
right
into
the
mike,
please.
G
right
into
the
mike,
please.
also,
for
the
attendees
that
are
also,
for
the
attendees
that
are
here
this
evening.
You'll
see
here
this
evening,
you'll
see
that
there
is
a
mike
also
on
the
that
there
is
a
mike
also
on
the
podium
and
also,.
If
you
present
podium
and
also,.
If
you
present
near
the
overhead
projector,
near
the
overhead
projector,,
please
pull
that
mike
towards.
G
G
G
G
A
A
G
A
A
G
G
august,
the
11th.
also,
a
couple
of
other
also,,
a
couple
of
other
items,.
You
are
going
to
be
doing
items,.
You
are
going
to
be
doing
a
roll
call
each
time
you
vote.
a
roll
call.
Each
time
you
vote.
again,,
please
speak
very
clearly
again,,
please
speak
very
clearly
and
loudly,
state,
your
name
and
and
loudly,
state,
your
name
and
how
you
vote.
how
you
vote.
I
am
going
to
put
on
the
record.
G
A
H
H
A
A
G
First,
and
then
the
petitioner.
roberta
meade-curry:,
roberta
roberta
meade-curry:,
roberta
meade-curry,,
planning,
design
and
meade-curry,
planning,
design
and
development
coordination.
development
coordination..
I
have
been
sworn.,
I
have
been
sworn.,
please
let
me
know
if
you
cannot,
please
let
me
know
if
you
cannot
hear
me.
hear
me.
case
number
vrb
20-24.
G
The
applicant
is
seeking
relief
from
section
27209.
from
section
27209.
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
reduce
the
eave
to
eave
from
10,
reduce
the
eave
to
eave
from
10
feet
to
5
feet.
feet
to
5
feet.
applicant,
seeking
to
build
a
new
applicant
seeking
to
build
a
new
accessory
structure
and
cabana
accessory
structure
and
cabana
over
the
existing
pool
deck
over
the
existing
pool,
deck
area.
area.
property
is
zoned
rs-75.
G
G
Right-Of-Way
has
found
it
consistent
with
conditions
with
consistent
with
conditions
with
asking
to
relocate
any
asking
to
relocate
any
encroachments
out
of
the
encroachments
out
of
the
right-of-way,,
and
they
are
right-of-way,
and
they
are
referring
to
the
fence
that
they
referring
to
the
fence
that
they
are
showing
on
the
site.
Plan,
are
showing
on
the
site
plan,
that
that
be
removed
from
the
that
that
be
removed
from
the
right-of-way
and
relocated.
G
G
Side
yard
from
front
view
on
east
side.,
east
side.,
side
yard
from
west
view.
side
yard
from
west
view..
Again,
this
would
be
the
side
again.
This
would
be
the
side
that
would
be
where
the
cabana,
that
would
be
where
the
cabana
would
be.
If
you
look
further,
would
be
if
you
look
further
into
the
backyard.
G
G
G
A
I
I
I
I
Deck,
and
we
would
like
to
build
the
cabana
as
in
most
line
with
the
cabana,
as
in
most
line
with
the
current
pool
situation.,
the
current
pool
situation..
So
we
don't
have
to
extend
the
so.
We
don't
have
to
extend
the
deck
out
into
the
rear
yard,
much
deck
out
into
the
rear
yard,
much
further.
further..
We
did
look
at
the
attachment
of.
I
I
Didn't
have
to
--,
we
can
make
it
an
accessory
structure
and
keep
an
accessory
structure
and
keep
it
a
main
structure.
it
a
main
structure.,
but
in
building
that,
we
would,
but
in
building
that,.
We
would
then
be
offset
with
the
pool
and
then
be
offset
with
the
pool
and
then
encroaching
into
the
rear,
then
encroaching
into
the
rear
yard
setback
at
that
point.
I
I
ten
feet
to
five
feet.
currently,.
Anything
under
currently,,
anything
under
75-foot
yards
zoned
to
be
5-foot,
75-foot
yards
zoned
to
be
5-foot
in
the
city
of
tampa.
in
the
city
of
tampa..
In
this
particular
case,.
We're
in
this
particular
case,
we're
just
asking
to
abide
by
one
of
just
asking
to
abide
by
one
of
the
smaller
yard:
properties.,
the
smaller
yard,
properties.
eave
to
eave.
I
In
this
particular
case
here,
you
can
see,
we've
got
you
can
see.
We've
got
approximately
a
17-foot
by
approximately
a
17-foot
by
20-foot
cabana,
with
the
outdoor
20-foot
cabana
with
the
outdoor
kitchen,
underneath
there
with
a
kitchen
underneath
there
with
a
shower
room
off
of
here.,
shower
room
off
of
here.
alignment
with
the
pool
is
what
alignment
with
the
pool
is,
what
we're
trying
to
shoot
for
in
we're
trying
to
shoot
for
in
this
particular
case..
This
particular
case.,
the
reduction
of
the
overhang,
the
reduction
of
the
overhang
eave,
about
a
one-foot
overhang.
I
I
G
G
I
I
We
have
about
a
one-foot
overhang
on
the
house
and
six
overhang
on
the
house
and
six
inch
overhang
on
the
cabana.
inch
overhang
on
the
cabana.
at
that
point,.
That's
where,
at
that
point,.
That's
where
we're
looking
for
our
five
foot,
we're
looking
for
our
five
foot,
eave
to
eave
reduction
from
the
eave
to
eave
reduction
from
the
ten
foot
required
for
this
ten
foot
required
for
this
zoning.
zoning..
That
would
also
take
place
on
that
would
also
take
place
on
the
side
where
the
shower
room.
I
I
I
here
is
the
cabana.
our
roof
structure.
Turning
and
our
roof
structure?
Turning
and
then
you
can
see
our
separation,
then
you
can
see
our
separation
that
we
would
have
right
there
that
we
would
have
right
there
between
the
two
eaves
of
the
between
the
two
eaves
of
the
house.
house.,
at
that
point,
too,.
We
have
a
at
that
point,
too,.
We
have
a
second
story
back
further,
and
second
story
back
further,,
and
it
is
a
one-story
that
we
would.
I
I
C
C
F
F
Fire
retardant
material
to
try
and
give
them
--
they
often
--
and
give
them
--.
They
often
--.
They
often
bend
and
give
a
they
often
bend
and
give
a
little
break
in
hyde,
park,.
Some
little
break
in
hyde
park,,
some
of
the
historical
neighborhoods
of
the
historical
neighborhoods.
When
you
get
eave
to
eave,,
when
you
get
eave
to
eave,
shorter
than
seven
feet,
things.
G
I
G
I
I
I
spoke
with
zoning,
eric
and
roberta,,
and
they
said
that
as
roberta,
and
they
said
that
as
long
as
I
submitted
24
hours
long
as
I
submitted
24
hours
prior
to
the
meeting,,
which
it
prior
to
the
meeting,,
which
it
was,
that
--
was,
that
--
roberta
meade-curry:,
I'm
roberta
meade-curry:,
I'm
roberta.
roberta..
It
was
e-mailed
over.
I
F
F
I
E
I
I
I
I
E
A
C
C
E
A
C
A
A
C
C
And
that
said
variance
as
conditioned
be
variance
as
conditioned
be
granted
based
upon
the
applicant
granted
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
in
this
public
record
and
in
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty,
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five,
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
as
set
forth
hardship
criteria
as
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city.
C
Applicant
is
working
around
the
existing
layout
of
the
pool
and
existing
layout
of
the
pool
and
the
home
and
the
size
of
the
the
home
and
the
size
of
the
lot,
which
create
practical
lot,,
which
create
practical
difficulties;.
That
the
applicant
difficulties;.
That
the
applicant
is
attempting
to
maintain.
H
D
A
G
G
G
Feet
to
1.5
feet
to
vest
portion
of
existing
accessory
structure
of
existing
accessory
structure
and
existing
footprint
of
garage
and
existing
footprint
of
garage
built
in
1921.
built
in
1921..
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
build
new
accessory
structure,
build
new
accessory
structure,
and/or
garage
over
existing
and/or
garage
over
existing
footprint.
footprint..
The
property
is
owned,
rs-60
and.
G
G
Included
in
your
packet.
right-of-way
addressing
right-of-way
addressing
transportation
has
found
it.
Transportation
has
found
it
consistent.
consistent.
natural
resources
has
found
that
natural
resources
has
found
that
the
application
does
not
trigger
the
application,
does
not
trigger
tree
and
landscape
code.
G
G
G
G
A
J
A
J
J
J
J
J
J
It
would
not
affect
any
water,
electrical,
or
fios
services
in
electrical,
or
fios
services
in
this
area..
This
area.,
the
variance,
would
protect
a
the
variance,
would
protect
a
40-inch
grand
oak
that
sits
out
40-inch
grand
oak
that
sits
out
in
front
of
it
and
will
not
in
front
of
it
and
will
not
impede
into
the
root
zone.
J
J
J
Time.
anyway,
my
point,
and
we
have
anyway,
my
point,
and
we
have
lots
of
neighbors
that
come
by
lots
of
neighbors
that
come
by
and
just
to,
let
you
know
a
lot
and
just
to
let
you
know
a
lot
of
them
--
most
of
them,
of
them
--
most
of
them,,
everybody
that
comes
by
wonders,
everybody
that
comes
by
wonders,
why
we
have
to
do
this.
J
J
A
G
A
C
C
F
F
F
J
F
A
A
existing
garage??
The
reason
I
ask
is
we're.
The
reason
I
ask
is
we're
talking
about
18
inches
here
so
talking
about
18
inches
here,
so
the
question,,
the
natural,
the
question,.
The
natural
question
would
be.
Why
not
move
question
would
be.
Why
not
move
the
garage
18
inches
forward.,
the
garage
18
inches
forward.?
Are
you
keeping
any
of
the
old.
J
J
A
J
J
F
C
J
J
into
the
new
garage.
no,
sir.
no,
sir..
We
want
to
keep
everything
just
we
want
to
keep
everything
just
like
it
is
when
we
bought
the
like
it
is
when
we
bought
the
house
in
'81,.
It
was
a
dirt
house
in
'81,
it
was
a
dirt
driveway
from
the
front
on
driveway
from
the
front
on
harbor
view
to
the
porte-cochere
harbor
view
to
the
porte-cochere
all
the
way
to
the
back,
and
I'm.
J
J
Garage
has
stayed
the
same.,
it
hasn't
changed
and
there
is
a
it
hasn't
changed
and
there
is
a
smaller
structure
to
the
west,
smaller
structure
to
the
west,,
which
is
a
smaller
house.,
which
is
a
smaller
house..
We
call
it
our
little
house.,
we
call
it
our
little
house.
and
it's
just
the
house
that
the
and
it's
just
the
house
that
the
people
lived
in
while
they
were
people
lived
in
while
they
were
building
the
big
one.
J
building
the
big
one.
and
they
are
all
in
line.
and
they
are
all
in
line.
everything
--
and
that's
what
everything
--
and
that's.
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
keep
we're.
Trying
to
do
is
keep
everything
like
it
is,,
but
everything
like
it
is,,
but
again,,
the
garage,
yes,.
It
will
again,
the
garage,
yes,.
It
will
be
a
little
bit
bigger
than
what
be
a
little
bit
bigger
than
what
it
was.
A
J
A
B
B
Plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
of
the
hearing
for
a
reduction
of
the
rear
yard
setback
from
three
rear
yard
setback
from
three
feet
to
one
and
a
half
feet
to
feet
to
one
and
a
half
feet
to
vest
a
portion
of
the
existing
vest,
a
portion
of
the
existing
accessory
structure
and
existing
accessory
structure
and
existing
footprint
of
a
garage
built
in
footprint
of
a
garage
built
in
1921,.
In
addition
to
allowing
1921,.
B
and
gutters.,
based
on
the
applicant
based
on
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty,
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
hardship
criteria
set
forth.
In
section
27-80
of
the
city,
code,,
section
27-80
of
the
city.
B
Code,
specifically
that
the
applicant,
specifically
that
the
applicant
has
demonstrated
that
he
has
has
demonstrated
that
he
has
attempted
to
locate
the
garage
attempted
to
locate
the
garage
--,
that
it
is
impossible
to
--
that
it
is
impossible
to
locate
the
garage
to
a
different
locate,
the
garage
to
a
different
area
of
the
property
without
area
of
the
property
without
harming
a
grand
oak.
That's
harming
a
grand
oak,
that's
located
in
the
yard,
and
that
located
in
the
yard,
and
that
the
applicant
is
not
reducing.
B
A
E
E
E
The
request
says
that
they
are
vesting
a
portion
of
the
vesting
a
portion
of
the
existing
accessory
structure.
existing
accessory
structure..
So
there
was
a
structure
to
the
so
there
was
a
structure
to
the
left
of
the
garage.
left
of
the
garage.
I
just
wanted
to
get.
I
just
wanted
to
get
clarification
for
the
record.
A
A
Of
that
house,
as
well.,
when
you
say
vested
--,
when
you
say
vested
--,
dustin
pasteur:,
it
appears
to
dustin
pasteur:.
It
appears
to
be
the
same
distance
from
the
be
the
same
distance
from
the
property
line,
roughly
as
the
property
line,
roughly
as
the
garage
you're
trying
to
vest.
garage
you're
trying
to
vest.
and
the
notice
does
say
existing.
A
A
J
A
A
A
G
Ms.
curry?
roberta
meade-curry:,
roberta
roberta
meade-curry:,
roberta
curry,,
planning,
design
and
curry,
planning,
design
and
development,
coordination.
development
coordination.
the
only
portion
of
the
project,
the
only
portion
of
the
project
that
we
were
understanding
of
that
we
were
understanding
of
the
variance
was
to
relate
to
is
the
variance
was
to
relate
to
is
this
area
here.
A
A
A
A
To
do
work
in
that
structure.,
roberta
meade-curry:
they
roberta
meade-curry:
they
would
have
to
renotice.,
would
have
to
renotice.
dustin
pasteur:.
If
it
doesn't
dustin
pasteur:.
If
it
doesn't
occur,
tonight,
it
doesn't
affect
occur
tonight,.
It
doesn't
affect
that
structure
until
the
time
that
structure
until
the
time
that
they
want
to
modify
it,.
G
That
they
want
to
modify
it,
correct?
correct?,
because
it's
an
existing
because
it's
an
existing
condition.,
condition.,
roberta
meade-curry:
legal-
can
roberta
meade-curry:
legal
can
respond
to
me,,
but
this
respond
to
me,,
but
this
structure
here
is
not
part
of
structure.
Here
is
not
part
of
the
application.
This
evening.
A
A
A
E
A
Already
been
approved.,
somebody
mentioned
vesting
a
somebody
mentioned
vesting:
a
portion
of
the
accessory
portion
of
the
accessory
structure.
structure.
dustin
pasteur:.
They
read
dustin
pasteur:.
They
read
right
off
of
the
sheet
here,
right
off
of
the
sheet
here,,
which
is
still
valid,
right?,
which
is
still
valid,
right?.
What
ms.
curry
is
saying
is
the.
A
E
A
Dustin
pasteur:
correct.
susan
johnson-velez:,
I
want
to
susan
johnson-velez:.
I
want
to
make
sure.
make
sure.
when
the
letter
goes
out,
for
when
the
letter
goes
out
for
your
signature,
everybody
is
your
signature,.
Everybody
is
clear.,
clear.
dustin
pasteur:.
Do
we
need
to
dustin
pasteur:?
Do
we
need
to
amend
the
way
the
motion
was.
E
A
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
K
H
K
K
138
feet:
deep.
.2-acre.
.2-acre.,
it's
part
of
what
we
propose
to
it's
part
of
what
we
propose
to
build.
A
1900-square-foot
house,
build
a
1900-square-foot
house,,
which
is
also
in
keeping
with,
which
is
also
in
keeping
with
the
homes
in
the
neighborhood.
the
homes
in
the
neighborhood..
It's
not
--.
It's
not
oversized.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
A
A
K
A
Right
here.,
dustin
pasteur:
does
that
dustin
pasteur:?
Does
that
conclude
your
presentation?
conclude
your
presentation?
pardon
me?,
pardon
me?,
dustin
pasteur:.
Does
that
dustin
pasteur:?
Does
that
conclude
your
presentation?
conclude
your
presentation?
yes.
yes.
dustin
pasteur:?
Is
there
dustin
pasteur:?
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
who
anybody
in
the
audience
who
wishes
to
speak
on
this
case?.
A
F
I
think
it's
actually
the
approval
of
a
tree
removal.
approval
of
a
tree,
removal.
dustin
pasteur:,
you
have
to
dustin
pasteur:.
You
have
to
use
the
tree.
Language.
use
the
tree
language.
it's
down
at
number,
5.,
it's
down
at
number,
5.
david
ferrill:
number
5.
david
ferrill:
number
5.
thank
you.
thank
you.,
sorry.
sorry.,
another
rookie
mistake.,
another
rookie
mistake.
excuse
me.,
excuse,
me.
approval
of
the
tree
removal.
F
Of
proof
that
the
tree
would
be
rendered
hazardous
by
a
proposed
rendered
hazardous
by
a
proposed
construction
that
cannot
construction.
That
cannot
reasonably
be
reconfigured
when
reasonably
be
reconfigured.
When
considering
the
factors
set,
considering
the
factors
set
forth
in
section
27-284.25
of.
F
A
K
A
E
Mr.
peterika,
at
my
place
of
business.
business.,
they
have
nothing
to
do
with.
They
have
nothing
to
do
with
this
case..
This
case.
susan
johnson-velez:.
Do
you,
susan
johnson-velez:,
do
you
have
any
financial
or
pecuniary
have
any
financial
or
pecuniary
interest
in
the
outcome
of
this
interest?
In
the
outcome
of
this
matter?
matter?
dustin
pasteur:
no.
dustin
pasteur:
no.
susan
johnson-velez:?
Do
you,
susan
johnson-velez:,
do
you
believe
you
can
remain
impartial,
believe
you
can
remain
impartial
to
this
matter,
regardless
of.
A
J
L
L
We
thought
that
we
had
submitted
the
form
authorizing
me
as
the
form
authorizing
me
as
agent,,
but
I
don't
think
agent,,
but
I
don't
think
ms.
meade
is
aware
of
that..
Ms.
meade
is
aware
of
that.
I'll
go
first,,
but
just
kind
of
I'll
go
first,,
but
just
kind
of
in
the
role
of
general
public
in
the
role
of
general
public
comment,.
Although
I'll
be.
L
E
L
Start
with
the
staff
report.
susan
johnson-velez:
is
there
susan
johnson-velez:?
Is
there
an
affidavit
for
authorized
an
affidavit
for
authorized
agent
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
agent
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner?
property
owner??
I
thought
we
sent
one
the
I
thought
we
sent
one
the
following
day.
following
day.,
ms.
meade
is
saying
she
doesn't
ms.
meade
is
saying
she
doesn't
have
it.
have
it..
The
client
is
here
and
can.
A
A
D
A
A
A
H
A
G
G
G
Applicant
is
seeking
relief
from
section
27-284
to
remove
two
section
27-284
to
remove
two
grand
trees.
grand
trees..
I
think
their
application
is,
I
think
their
application
is
also
going
to
be
modified.
This
also
going
to
be
modified.
This
evening,
and
they'll
present
evening,
and
they'll
present
that
information
to
you,
this
that
information
to
you,
this
evening.
G
included
in
your
packet.
right-of-way
has
found.
This
right-of-way
has
found
this
consistent
with
conditions.
consistent
with
conditions..
What
they
are
asking
for
is
the
what
they
are
asking
for
is
the
developer
to
label
all
easements
developer,
to
label
all
easements
as
private
and
include
the
as
private
and
include
the
recorded
information
at
time
of.
G
G
G
G
And
this
was
the
plan
presented
for
the
natural
resources
for
the
natural
resources
report.
report.
I'm
sorry.,
I'm
sorry..
This
is
not
working
very
well..
This
is
not
working
very
well..
You
can't
see
it.,
you
can't
see
it.
and
again
there
has
been
some
and
again
there
has
been
some
modifications
to
their
request,
modifications
to
their
request,
and
that
will
be
presented
this
and
that
will
be
presented
this
evening.
So
that's
a
revised
site
evening.
G
G
G
G
G
G
Can
see
the
trees.
various
site
plans
presented
by
various
site
plans
presented
by
the
applicant.,
the
applicant.
they're
very
hard
to
read,
so
I'm
they're
very
hard
to
read
so
I'm
going
to
let
the
applicant
and
going
to
let
the
applicant
and
natural
resources
make
their
natural
resources
make
their
presentations
as
the
plans
are
presentations,
as
the
plans
are
hard
to
read.
G
G
G
A
A
L
I
have
been
sworn.
truett,
gardner.
gardner.,
dustin
pasteur:.
You
have
10
dustin
pasteur:.
You
have
10
minutes
to
present
your
case.
minutes
to
present
your
case.
sure.
sure..
I
had
the
pleasure
of
I
had
the
pleasure
of
representing
mr.
charles
lykes,
representing
mr.
charles
lykes,
at
5421
lykes
lane.,
at
5421,
lykes
lane.,
and
at
the
onset,
roberta,
and
at
the
onset,
roberta
mentioned
a
couple.
Things.
L
L
I
don't
want
to
speak
to
all
the
letters
of
opposition,,
but
I
did
letters
of
opposition,,
but
I
did
want
to
clarify
at
the
onset
want
to
clarify
at
the
onset
that
I
believe
most,
if
not
all
that
I
believe
most,
if
not
all
were
written
under
the
original
were
written
under
the
original
plan,
which
was
the
removal
of
plan
which
was
the
removal
of
two
grand
oak
trees.,
two
grand
oak
trees..
This
is
a
compromised
plan.
L
This
is
a
compromised
plan,
worked
out
with
mr.
peterika
and
worked
out
with
mr.
peterika
and
natural
resources
on
just
one.
natural
resources
on
just
one..
It's
a
little
confusing
and
I
it's
a
little
confusing,
and
I
wanted
to
clarify
that
for
the
wanted
to
clarify
that
for
the
record,
one,,
and
also
to
clarify
record,
one,,
and
also
to
clarify
to
you
that
our
plan
is
to
to
you
that
our
plan
is
to
proceed
with
the
compromised
proceed
with
the
compromised
plan
and
compromise
only.
L
L
The
lot
itself
is
1.24
aches,,
a
sizable
sizet
lot.,
sizable,
sizet
lot..
The
property
is
unique
in
that
the
property
is
unique
in
that
it's
heavily
wooded.,
it's
heavily
wooded..
The
property
is
also
unique
in
the
property,
is
also
unique
in
that
its
subject
to
the
that
its
subject
to
the
declarations
of
the
lykes
lane,
declarations
of
the
lykes
lane,
subdivision,
and
in
those
among
subdivision,
and
in
those
among
other
things,
are
enhanced.
L
Other
things
are
enhanced
setbacks,
--,
front
yard,
setbacks,
setbacks,
--,
front
yard.
Setbacks
are
required
to
be
50
feet
and
are
required
to
be
50
feet
and
sideback
setbacks
30
feet
as
sideback
setbacks,
30
feet
as
opposed
to
the
traditional
7
opposed
to
the
traditional
7
feet
in
a
lot
of
single
family
feet
in
a
lot
of
single
family,
residential
neighborhoods.,
residential
neighborhoods.
and
in
the
rear
yard,
similar
to
and
in
the
rear
yard.
Similar
to
most
of
the
ones
in
the
city
are.
L
L
Respect
to
these
trees,
they're,
an
absolutely
int
grayingal
part,
an
absolutely
int
grayingal
part
of
the
design
and
a
large
part
of
the
design
and
a
large
part
of
what
makes
the
neighborhood
of
what
makes
the
neighborhood
and
this
lot
so
special.,
and
this
lot
so
special.
I'll.
Let
the
project
arborist
I'll.
Let
the
project
arborist
speak
to
most
of
this,
since
this
speak
to
most
of
this.
L
There
are
a
total
of
eight
non-hazardous
grand
oaks
on
the
non-hazardous
grand
oaks
on
the
property.
property.,
seven
are
slated
to
retained
and
seven
are
slated
to
retained
and
six
other
large
oaks
ranging
six
other
large
oaks,
ranging
from
11
inches
to
30
inches
and
from
11
inches
to
30
inches
and
all
of
those
are
slated
to
be.
L
L
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
Goes
over
the
house.
after
verifying
the
extent
and
after
verifying
the
extent
and
height
of
that
limb,
we
height
of
that
limb,,
we
determined
we
could
clear
the
determined
we
could
clear.
The
building
and
we'd
leave
that
building
and
we'd
leave
that
preserve,
and
this
lower
limb
preserve,,
and
this
lower
limb
here
is.
The
other
limb
in
here
is
the
other
limb
in
conflict.
conflict..
There
will
need
to
be
a
pruning.
M
M
M
To
point
out
is
the
ficus
within
the
center
of
the
tree.,
the
center
of
the
tree.,
actually,
both
trees
have
this
actually
both
trees
have
this
condition,
which
is
negatively
condition
which
is
negatively
affecting
the
tree
to
some
affecting
the
tree
to
some
degree.
degree.,
not
at
a
point
where
it's
not
at
a
point
where
it's
considered
hazardous
but
the
considered
hazardous.
But
the
clock
has
been
started.
M
M
M
Before
I
was
brought
on,
board,
eric
hoyer,
registered
eric
hoyer,
registered
consulting
arborist
reviewed,
the
consulting
arborist
reviewed
the
trees
and
prepared
an
inventory
trees
and
prepared
an
inventory
which
mr.
gardner
spoke
to,,
but
which
mr.
gardner
spoke
to,.
But
I
want
to
just
highlight
that
he.
M
M
Site
plan
adjustments
to
see
if
we
could
preserve
both,
what
we
could
preserve
both,.
What
would
happen
to
the
proezposed
would
happen
to
the
proezposed
plan
if
--
proposed
plan,
if
plan,
if
--
proposed
plan,
if
preserved,
would
be
a
loss
of
preserved,
would
be
a
loss
of
formal,
dining
room,,
a
kitchen,,
a.
M
M
M
M
A
A
N
A
Not
here
in
opposition.
dustin
pasteur:
have
you
been
dustin
pasteur:.
Have
you
been
sworn
in?
sworn
in?
no.
no.?
Because
I
wasn't
planning
on
because
I
wasn't
planning
on
speaking.
speaking.
dustin
pasteur:,
okay.,
dustin,
pasteur:
okay..
Is
there
anybody
else
that
is
there
anybody
else
that
doesn't
plan
on
speaking
that
doesn't
plan
on
speaking?
That
has
not
been
sworn
in?.
H
Please
stand
and
let's
do
it
just
in
case.,
just
in
case..
Please
raise
your
right
hand,
please
raise
your
right
hand
and
stand.
and
stand..
Do
you
swear
to
and
affirm
that
do
you
swear
to
and
affirm
that
you'll
tell
the
truth,
the
whole
you'll
tell
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth?.
H
H
N
Please
stand
close
enough
to
the
mic.,
the
mic.,
in
reviewing
the
letters
of
in
reviewing
the
letters
of
opposition
since
I'm
familiar
opposition.
Since
I'm
familiar
with
the
neighbors
and
with
the
neighbors
and
neighborhood,,
there
are
three
neighborhood,.
There
are
three
additional
letters
that
were
additional
letters
that
were
written
that
were
not
included
written
that
were
not
included
in
the
list
of
letters
of
in
the
list
of
letters
of
opposition,.
So
just
would
like.
G
Not
included
in
that.,
that's
all
I
have.,
that's
all
I
have.
dustin
pasteur:,
ms.
curry,
did
dustin
pasteur:.
Ms.
curry,
did
you
receive
any?,
you
receive
any?,
roberta
meade-curry:,
the
roberta
meade-curry:,
the
letters
we
have
were
presented,
letters
we
have
were
presented
to
us
and
uploaded
to
the.
G
N
N
A
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
K
J
A
A
C
C
One
question
for
natural
resources.
resources.
I
just
seeking
some
clarity,-
I
I
just
seeking
some
clarity,.
I
thought
I
understood
this
at
the
thought.
I
understood
this
at
the
start
and
maybe
I
do,,
but
I
want
start-
and
maybe
I
do,,
but
I
want
to
make
sure.
to
make
sure.
with
the
compromise
of
the
one.
A
A
L
Have
three
minutes
for
rebuttal.
truett
gardner.,
truett
gardner.?
I
want
to
thanks
you
for
your.
I
want
to
thanks
you
for
your
time.
time.
again,,
wanted
to
clarify
that
again,
wanted
to
clarify
that.
It's
our
intention
to
provide
it's
our
intention
to
provide
with
the
modified
alternate
site
with
the
modified
alternate
site
plan,
with
the
removal
of
one
oak
plan
with
the
removal
of
one
oak
tree
and
not
the
one
with
the
tree
and
not
the
one
with
the
two.
two..
So
just
wanted
to
set
that
clear.
L
So
just
wanted
to
set
that
clear
for
the
record.
for
the
record.
and
we
think
it's
a
good
and
we
think
it's
a
good
compromise
and
well-reasoned,
compromise
and
well-reasoned,
well
thought
out
and
in
well
thought
out
and
in
particular
that
it
does
retain
particular
that
it
does
retain
almost
85%
of
the
trees
on
the.
L
L
L
A
A
C
Open
it
up
for
a
motion.
mr.
feldman?
mr.
feldman?
bret
feldman:,
I
will
make
a
bret
feldman:.
I
will
make
a
motion
presuming
that
I
have
the
motion,
presuming
that
I
have
the
right
language,,
so
somebody
right
language,,
so
somebody
shout
it
out.
If
I
get
this
shout
it
out.
If
I
get
this
wrong.
wrong.,
I
move
that
the
variance
request.
C
C
The
factors
set
forth
in
section
27-284.2.5f
---
am
I
doing
the
27-284.2.5f
--.
Am
I
doing
the
right
one?
right,
one?,
yeah?,
yeah?,
okay.,
okay.,
great.
great.,
the
city
code
for
grand
tree,
the
city
code
for
grand
tree
removal,
specifically
that
the
removal
specifically
that
the
evidence
presented
in
the
regard
evidence
presented
in
the
regard
and
this
public
hearing
showed.
C
C
That
the
applicant
has
sought
to
utilize
alternative
building
utilize
alternative
building
plans
and
has
reached
a
plans
and
has
reached
a
compromise
with
natural
compromise
with
natural
resources
and
the
city's
natural
resources
and
the
city's
natural
resources
department
finds.
The
resources
department
finds
the
compromise.
Consistent
that
the
compromise
consistent
that
the
applicant
can
preserving
applicant
can
preserving
numerous
other
grand
trees
on.
A
A
O
A
G
G
A
G
If
you
can
just
turn
that
into
ms.
curry-
and
she
can
give
us
ms.
curry-
and
she
can
give
us
the
staff
report-
please
a.
the
staff
report-
please
a.
roberta
meade-curry:
yes.,
roberta
meade-curry:,
yes.,
vrb,
--,
again,,
roberta
vrb,
--,
again,,
roberta
meade-curry,,
planning
and
design
meade-curry,
planning
and
design
and
development,
coordination.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
A
O
A
O
O
O
O
O
A
C
C
O
O
residence
will
remain
the
same.
because
it's
one
of
the
older,
because
it's
one
of
the
older
shotgun
lots
that
exist
all
over
shotgun
lots
that
exist
all
over
the
city,.
There
is
definitely
the
city,.
There
is
definitely
some
building
constraints,
so
I
some
building
constraints.
So
I
think
it's
--.
I
didn't
look
at
think.
It's
--!
I
didn't
look
at
it
here,
but
I'll
guess:
--
oh,
it
here,
but
I'll
guess:
--,
oh,,
yeah.,
yeah.,
25
feet,
wide.
25
feet,
wide.,
bret,
feldman:!
It's
a
tight,
bret
feldman:!
It's
a
tight,
one.
one.!
O
O
The
residence
was
going
to
exist
because
of
the
drainage
issues
because
of
the
drainage
issues
that
exist
on
north
a,,
a
little
that
exist
on
north
a,,
a
little
bit
north
of
kennedy,,
the
house
bit
north
of
kennedy,.
The
house
had
to
be
elevated,
so
that
kind
had
to
be
elevated,
so
that
kind
of
affected
how
the
house
was
of
affected,
how
the
house
was
going
to
be
constructed.
But
it's.
C
Going
to
be
constructed,
but
it's
till
going
to
remain
the
same
till
going
to
remain
the
same
exact
footprint.,
exact,
footprint.,
bret,
feldman:,
okay.
bret
feldman:
okay.,
so
the
footprint
is
unchanged.,
so
the
footprint
is
unchanged..
The
only
thing
you're
really
the
only
thing
you're
really
changing
is
there
is
another
changing.
Is
there
is
another
floor
being
added.
floor
being
added.
still
going
to
be
below
the
still
going
to
be
below
the
35-foot
max.
A
A
D
D
Eaves
and
gutters.
dustin
pasteur:,
second
story,
dustin,
pasteur:,
second
story
or
third
story?
or
third
story?
to
add
a
third
story
with
an
to
add
a
third
story,
with
an
encroachment
for
the
eaves
and
encroachment
for
the
eaves
and
gutters
based
upon
the
applicant
gutters,
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty,
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
A
A
H
H
H
Bret
feldman
is,
as
depicted
on
site
plan
to
be
granted
with
the
site
plan
to
be
granted
with
the
condition
that
it
never
be
condition
that
it
never
be
enclosed,
but
I
believe
that
was
enclosed,
but
I
believe
that
was
it.
it.,
a
portion
of
the
site
plan,
a
portion
of
the
site
plan
submitted
was
enclosed.
C
C
C
C
H
E
A
C
Public
hearing
and
allow
mr.
feldman
to
make
a
mr.
feldman
to
make
a
modification
to
his
motion
on
modification
to
his
motion
on
vrb
20-24.,
vrb,
20-24.,
bret,
feldman:,
all
right.,
bret,
feldman:,
all
right.,
so
for
clarification,.
My
motion
so
for
clarification,.
My
motion
is
that
the
cabana
is
to
remain
is
that
the
cabana
is
to
remain
enclosed.
enclosed..
It
was
not
intended
that
the
it
was
not
intended
that
the
shower
room,
which
is
enclosed,
be.