►
From YouTube: Variance Review Board 10132020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
At
this
time
I
would
like
ask
staff
to
ask
about
any
ex
parte
staff
to
ask
about
any
ex
parte
conflict.
conflict.,
camaria,
pettis-mackle:
city,
camaria,
pettis-mackle:
city,
attorney's,
office.,
attorney's
office..
Will
any
of
the
board
members
will
any
of
the
board
members.
Please
state
on
the
record.
A
A
Camaria
pettis-mackle:
okay.
dustin
pasteur:.
Do
I
need
to
dustin
pasteur:.
Do
I
need
to
run
down
the
list?
run
down
the
list?
camaria
pettis-mackle:
no.
camaria
pettis-mackle:
no.
always,?
Will
any
board
members
always,?
Will
any
board
members
please
state
whether
or
not
they
please
state
whether
or
not
they
have
had
any
conflicts
of
have
had
any
conflicts
of
interest
regarding
any
of
the
interest
regarding
any
of
the
items
that
are
on
the
agenda?.
E
E
Also,
on
the
agenda,
this
evening,
vrb
case
19-108
failed
evening,,
vrb
case
19-108
failed
to
notice,
so
it
has
been
moved
to
notice,
so
it
has
been
moved
to
november
10th.
to
november
10th..
So
anyone
in
the
audience
here
so
anyone
in
the
audience
here
for
case
number,
vrb
19-108,
that
for
case
number,
vrb
19-108
that
is
going
t
be
heard
in
is
going
t
be
heard
in
november.,
november.
also,.
If
you
are
here
for
case
also,,
if
you
are
here
for
case
number,
vrb
53,,
that
was
number
vrb
53,
that
was
officially
withdrawn.
E
B
B
F
E
E
So
we
will
have
a
mike
at
the
podium,.
There
are
two
podiums
podium,.
There
are
two
podiums
there,
and
if
the
podium
was
there,
and
if
the
podium
was
used
prior
to
you
walking
up
to
used
prior
to
you
walking
up
to
it
at
the
tampa
convention
it
at
the
tampa
convention
center
staff
here
will
wipe
down
center
staff
here
will
wipe
down
the
podium.
E
E
E
E
recording,
okay?
watch
this
queue,.
If
I
am
not
watch
this
queue,,
if
I
am
not
hearing
you,,
then
you
can't
hear
hearing
you,,
then
you
can't
hear
you.
you.
okay?
okay?
also,.
If
you
have
documentation
also,,
if
you
have
documentation
that
you
want
the
board
to
that,
you
want
the
board
to
present,
new
evidence,.
I
don't
present,
new
evidence,.
I
don't
have
in
my
staff
report.
That's
have
in
my
staff
report.
That's
already
been
to
the
board,
then
already
been
to
the
board,.
Then
please
bring
those
copies
over.
B
E
E
E
E
E
Is
included
in
your
packet.
land
development
right-of-way
land
development
right-of-way
found
it
consistent.
found
it
consistent.
natural
resources
did
not.
Natural
resources
did
not
trigger
the
tree
and
landscape
trigger
the
tree
and
landscape
code.
code.
transportation
found
it
transportation
found
it
consistent.
consistent.
zoning
found
it
inconsistent.
E
E
E
E
E
E
H
H
H
there's
a
switc
on
that..
Can
you
hear
me
now??
Can
you
hear
me
now?
yes.
yes.,
one
of
the
photos
that
you,
one
of
the
photos
that
you
will
be
seeing
will
be
very
will
be
seeing
will
be
very
similar
to
what
roberta
similar
to
what
roberta
presented.
presented.,
and
I
would
like
to
thank
the
and
I
would
like
to
thank
the
board
for
giving
us
the
board
for
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
you
opportunity
to
speak
to
you
tonight..
This
variance
is
being
tonight..
H
Faith,
not
knowing
that
it
had
several
violations
on
it.
several
violations
on
it.
and
the
best
way
to
describe,
and
the
best
way
to
describe
what
has
happened
is
going
to
what
has
happened
is
going
to
take
us
to
a
timeline
of
events,,
take
us
to
a
timeline
of
events,,
and
so
I
will
start
with
that,
and
so
I
will
start
with
that.
Now.
H
H
H
Property
appraiser's
office
identified
--
they
identified
identified
--.
They
identified
the
property
to
reassess
the
the
property
to
reassess
the
property
for
future
tax
rolls,
property
for
future
tax
rolls,,
which
would
have
occurred
in
which
would
have
occurred
in
october
of
that
same
year,,
2018,.
H
From
the
property
appraiser's
office,,
which,
as
you
can
see,
is
office,
which,
as
you
can
see,
is
very
difficult
to
tell
on
this
very
difficult
to
tell
on
this
map,.
But
if
you
enlarge
this,
you
map,.
But
if
you
enlarge
this,
you
would
see
the
staircase
that
had
would
see
the
staircase
that
had
been
added
by
the
previous
owner,
been
added
by
the
previous
owner
without
a
permit.
without
a
permit..
So
staircase
is
right
here
on
so
staircase
is
right
here
on
the
side,
and
the
subject:
the
side,
and
the
subject:
property
right,
here.
H
H
H
H
Which
contains
a
432-square
foot
mother-in-law,
suite.
mother-in-law,
suite.,
and
this
is
some
of
the-
and
this
is
some
of
the
brochures
from
the
realtor's
brochures
from
the
realtor's
office.
Indicating,
again,
office,
indicating,,
again,
two-car
garage
with
a
two-car
garage
with
a
mother-in-law
suite.
H
H
H
2.1-Foot
side
setback.
the
abstract,
didn't
return
any
the
abstract
didn't
return
any
violations
on
that
property
violations
on
that
property
because
the
inspection
was
done
because
the
inspection
was
done
after
the
abstract
was
done
so
after
the
abstract
was
done,
so
it
wasn't
being
recorded
yet,.
So
it
wasn't
being
recorded
yet,,
so
basically
just
a
project
under
basically
just
a
project
under
construction.
construction..
So
there
was
no
violation.
H
H
H
H
H
H
That
time.
so
farther
forwarding
to
june
so
farther
forwarding
to
june
24th,
in
2019,
the
new
24th,
in
2019,.
The
new
owners
had
applied
for
a
permit
owners
had
applied
for
a
permit
to
install
a
screen
enclosure
to
install
a
screen
enclosure
over
the
existing
pool
with
a
over
the
existing
pool.
With
a
covered
lanai
on
the
back.
H
H
H
City
ordinance,,
which
was
five
feet.
feet.
on
august
24th,
the
city
of
on
august
24th,
the
city
of
tampa
inspection
staff
had
tampa
inspection
staff
had
approved
the
final,
and
on
the
approved,
the
final,
and
on
the
25th.
The
new
owners
were
25th.
The
new
owners
were
issued,
the
certificate
of
issued
the
certificate
of
completion
for
the
improvements
completion
for
the
improvements
of
the
project.
H
of
the
project.,
and
that
was
formally
closed.,
and
that
was
formally
closed.
september.
7Th,,
the
city
september
7th,,
the
city
zoning
department,
requested
a
zoning
department,
requested
a
revision
to
the
variance,
which
revision
to
the
variance,,
which
is
why
we
are
here
today,
and
is
why
we
are
here
today,
and
the
request
was
to
include
the
request,
was
to
include
accessory
structure
within
the
accessory
structure
within
the
main
structure
setback,,
because.
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
B
B
I
H
H
H
H
H
H
Building,
used
it
for
living
space.
space.,
they
also
kept
the
building.
They
also
kept
the
building
closer
than
it
should
have
been
closer
than
it
should
have
been
to
the
east
property.
to
the
east
property.
and
the
staircase
in
the
back
and
the
staircase
in
the
back,
where
they
would
have
proper,
where
they
would
have
proper,
access.
access..
So
the
hardship
is
the
fact
that.
H
I
A
Difficulty
that
we
should
address?
address?,
camaria
pettis-mackle:
legal
camaria,
pettis-mackle:
legal
department.
department..
I
would
ask
ms.
roberta.
I
would
ask
ms.
roberta
immediate-
to
provide
additional
immediate
to
provide
additional
information
as
to
how
the
information
as
to
how
the
building,
that
additional
building,
that
additional
process
actually
occurred.
A
E
E
E
E
B
E
E
B
Setback,
and
the
upstairs
space
was
storage.
was
storage.
dustin,
pasteur:,
right.
dustin
pasteur:
right.,
but
what
I
am
asking
is,
that,
but
what
I
am
asking
is,,
that
original
permit
that
was
drawn
original
permit
that
was
drawn
correctly
and
built
incorrectly,
correctly
and
built
incorrectly,
was
approved
by
final
inspection.
I
I
A
That
we
can
rely
on
in
terms
of
variance?
variance?,
camaria
pettis-mackle:
legal
camaria,
pettis-mackle:
legal
department.
department.,
so
you
can
take
into
so.
You
can
take
into
consideration
the
permitting
consideration,
the
permitting
history
and
the
process,.
What
history
and
the
process,,
what
happened,
to
determine,
whether
happened,
to
determine
whether
or
not
that
is
in
fact
a
or
not
that
is
in
fact
a
hardship.
hardship..
You
can
take
into
consideration.
A
A
A
E
B
E
B
B
B
E
Building
separation
is
something
that
cannot
be
handled
through
that
cannot
be
handled
through
variance?
variance?,
roberta
meade-curry:.
They
roberta
meade-curry:.
They
initially,,
in
fact,
when
they
initially,,
in
fact,
when
they
first
noticed,,
and
that's
why
we
first
noticed,
and
that's
why
we
remanded
or
continued
the
case,
remanded
or
continued
the
case,
because
they
renoticed
the
because
they
renoticed
the
requirement.
requirement..
They
did
initially
ask
for.
E
E
Ongoing
in
the
middle
of
the
covid
case,,
we
had
to
stop
and
covid
case,.
We
had
to
stop
and
look
now.
The
structures
are
look
now.
The
structures
are
connected
by
the
pool
enclosure,
connected
by
the
pool
enclosure,
and
now
that
roof
to
the
pool
and
now
that
roof
to
the
pool
enclosure
has
affected.
The
enclosure
has
affected
the
accessory
structure,
separation,
accessory
structure
separation,,
so
it
was
best
for
us
to
ask
for.
B
B
H
B
J
J
On
the
site
plan
in
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
of
the
hearing
for
a
reduction
of
the
rear
yard,
setback
from
20
feet,
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
1
foot
9
inches
to
reduce
the
to
1
foot
9
inches
to
reduce
the
east
yard,
setback
from
7
feet
to
east
yard,
setback
from
7
feet
to
2
feet.
1
inches,,
both
with.
J
When
practical
difficulty,
when
considering
the
five
hardship,
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city,
code,
27-80
of
the
city,
code,,
specifically
that
the
alleged
specifically
that
the
alleged
hardship
or
practical
difficulty,
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
is
unique
to
this
property
in
is
unique
to
this
property.
In
light
of
the
fact
that
the
light
of
the
fact
that
the
permit
was
wrongly
closed
when
permit
was
wrongly
closed,
when
the
property
was
in
violation
of.
J
The
property
was
in
violation
of
the
city,
code.,
the
city,
code.,
there's
a
hardship
or
practical,
there's
a
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
that
did
not
result.
Difficulty
that
did
not
result
in
the
actions
of
the
applicant,
in
the
actions
of
the
applicant,
the
applicant
was
unaware
of
the
applicant
was
unaware
of
these
violations
when
they
these
violations,
when
they
purchased
the
property
and
did
purchased
the
property
and
did
so
in
reliance
on
inspection,,
so
in
reliance
on
inspection,
and
other
information
that
was
and
other
information
that
was
available
to
it
at
the
time.
J
available
to
it
at
the
time..
Accordingly,
this
is
not
a
accordingly.
This
is
not
a
self-created
hardship,
and
self-created
hardship,
and
finally,
allowing
the
variance
finally
allowing
the
variance
would
result
in
substantial
would
result
in
substantial
justice
being
done
by
allowing
justice
being
done
by
allowing
the
applicants
to
enjoy
the.
J
J
Object
approved
as
previously
stated,
with
--
stated,
with
--
roberta
meade-curry:.
It's
on
roberta
meade-curry:.
It's
on
page
one
of
the
staff
report.
page,
one
of
the
staff
report.
samantha
walker:
with
the
samantha
walker:,
with
the
condition
that
the
applicant
condition
that
the
applicant
revise
the
plan
and
resubmit
to.
B
D
C
B
E
E
E
E
E
included
in
your
packet.
land
development.
Right-Of-Way
land
development
right-of-way
has
found
it.
Consistent.
has
found
it
consistent..
Natural
resources
has
found
that
natural
resources
has
found
that
it
does
not
trigger
the
tree
and
it
does
not
trigger
the
tree
and
landscape
code.
landscape.
Code.
transportation
has
found
it.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Here
is
a
view
along
west
wyoming..
Wyoming.
in
this
corner
is
where
the
in
this
corner
is
where
the
planned
accessory
structure
will
planned.
Accessory
structure
will
sit..
This
is
the
rear
of
the
sit..
This
is
the
rear
of
the
primary
residence
that
faces
primary
residence
that
faces
interbay,
boulevard.
K
Hear
is
the
interior
shot
of
that
rear
corn,
where
there's
an
that
rear
corn,
where
there's
an
accessory
storage
shed
that
will
accessory
storage,
shed,
that
will
be
removed
and
the
accessory
be
removed
and
the
accessory
structure
will
sit
in
the
same
structure
will
sit
in
the
same
location..
Location.
here
is
the
proposed
site
plan.
K
Accessory
structure.
the
unique
hardship
for
this,
the
unique
hardship
for
this
property
was
not
created
by
the
property
was
not
created
by
the
home
opener..
This
was
home
opener..
This
was
employeesed
by
an
additional
employeesed
by
an
additional
front
yard
setback
where
this
front
yard
setback
where
this
property
is
imposed
with
front
property,
is
imposed
with
front
yard,
setback
off
of
interbay
and.
K
A
front
yard
setback
off
west
wyoming.
wyoming.,
preventing
any
such
accessory,
preventing
any
such
accessory
structure
to
be
allowed
to
be
structure
to
be
allowed
to
be
built
because
this
property
had
built
because
this
property
had
two
front
yards,
technically,,
two
front:
yards,
technically,
and
no
rear
yard.
Setback.
K
K
K
K
Residence
was
built
in
1921
and
then
there
is
two
properties.
Then
there
is
two
properties
that
face
west
wail
opening,,
one
that
face
west
wail
opening,
one
build
in
2004,
and
another
build
in
2004,
and
another
property
unknown.
That
was
built,
property
unknown.
That
was
built,
the
structure,
over
to
the
east,.
K
Was
built
in
1995.,
the
other
properties
had
the
other
properties
had
addresses
that
face
along
addresses
that
face
along
interbay.
interbay..
So
this
property
is
unique
where
so,
this
property
is
unique,
where
it's
uniquely
positioned,
where
it's
uniquely
positioned,
where
it
has
two
front
yard
setbacks.
K
K
The
north.
so
in
conclusion,,
allowing
this
so
in
conclusion,,
allowing
this
variance,
will
provide
the
variance
will
provide
the
homeowner
with
the
same
zoning
homeowner
with
the
same
zoning
restriction
as
their
adjacent
restriction
as
their
adjacent
neighbors
and
permit
them
to
neighbors
and
permit
them
to
have
one
front
yard.
Setback
have
one
front
yard
setback
already
determined
by
city
of
already
determined
by
city
of
tampa
in
the
property
tampa
in
the
property.
Appraiser's
records
of
58302
appraiser's
records
of
58302,
interbay
boulevard,
a.typical,
interbay,
boulevard,
a.typical,
rear
setback
would
would
be
rear.
B
K
K
B
J
K
E
K
B
Minutes
for
rebuttal,
if
you
need
it.
it.,
no
rebuttal
is
required..
No
rebuttal
is
required..
Thank
you.
thank
you.,
dustin
pasteur:
thank
you.
dustin
pasteur:
thank
you..
Without
objection,
I
will
close
without
objection,.
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it.
The
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
and
board.
D
D
60
feet
to
5
feet
with
an
encroachment
for
eaves
and
encroachment
for
eaves
and
gutters,,
based
upon
the
gutters,,
based
upon
the
applicant's
presenting
competent
applicant's,
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record,
and
at
this
public
record,
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty,
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five.
D
B
K
E
E
E
E
E
E
included
in
your
packet.
land
development.
Right-Of-Way
land
development
right-of-way
has
found
it.
Consistent.
has
found
it
consistent..
Natural
resources
has
found
that
natural
resources
has
found
that
it
did
not
trigger
the
tree
and
it
did
not
trigger
the
tree
and
landscape
code.
landscape.
Code.
zoning
has
found
it.
E
E
E
E
E
E
B
M
M
thank
you.,
the
information
as
she
was
the
information
as
she
was
showing
you
that
last
drawing,,
showing
you
that
last
drawing,
is
probably
the
most
critical,
is
probably
the
most
critical
one.
one..
We
have
the
structure
in
the
we
have
the
structure
in
the
back,,
which
was
built
18
years
back,,
which
was
built
18
years
ago
as
a
secondary
structure.
M
Structure
is
going
to
go,.
It
is
a
little
over
five
feet,,
five,
a
little
over
five
feet,
five
and
a
half
feet
wall
to
wall,
and
a
half
feet
wall
to
wall,,
but
where
the
eave
hangover
is
but
where
the
eave
hangover
is
going
to
be
reduced
to
two
feet
going
to
be
reduced
to
two
feet.
Nine
inches,
and
the
big.
M
Nine
inches,
and
the
big
critical
component
of
that,
critical
component
of
that,
there's
two
things.
We
want
to
there's
two
things
we
want
to
bring
to
your
attention,
the
bring
to
your
attention,.
The
height
differences
are
not
on
height.
Differences
are
not
on
the
horizontal
of
each
other.,
the
horizontal
of
each
other..
There
is
roughly
22
to
23
feet.
M
There
is
roughly
22
to
23
feet.
Difference
between
those
two
difference
between
those
two
eave
overhangs.
eave
overhangs..
The
other
component
is
that
the
other
component
is
that
these
two
eaves
are
internal
to
these
two
eaves
are
internal
to
the
property.,
the
property..
They
are
not
hanging
over
the.
M
M
And
this
is
hopefully
our
last
one,,
but
this
issue
is
causing
one,,
but
this
issue
is
causing
us
concern
because
in
order
to
us
concern,
because
in
order
to
build
the
property,
the
way
we
build
the
property,
the
way
we
would
like
to,
to
make
it
look
would
like
to,
to
make
it
look
like
it's
a
part
of
the
existing
like
it's
a
part
of
the
existing
home,,
and
it
wasn't
an
add-on,
home,
and
it
wasn't
an
add-on,.
You
can
clearly
see
you
have
a
you
can
clearly
see
you
have
a
separate,
structure.,
separate
structure..
M
M
And
in
doing
so,,
this
causes
a
problem
where
you
can't
have
an
problem
where
you
can't
have
an
easement
on
a
new
addition,
at
easement
on
a
new
addition,.
At
the
same
time,
it's
going
to
the
same
time
it's
going
to
cause
us
a
hardship
where
we
cause
us
a
hardship
where
we
have
to
remove
the
existing
--
have
to
remove
the
existing
--
on
the
secondary
structure
on
the
secondary
structure.
That's
22
feet.
Below.,
that's
22
feet!
Below.!
Now
we
worked
with
our
now.
M
Could
possibly
avoid
this,
and
the
long
and
short
of
it,
there,
the
long
and
short
of
it,
there
was
no
option
that
did
not
incur,
was
no
option
that
did
not
incur
significant
extra
costs.
significant
extra
costs..
One
of
those
costs
comes
down
to
one
of
those
costs
comes
down
to
having
to
top
off
half
of
the.
M
M
M
This
variance
problem,,
we
would
have
to
lop
off
the
first
20,
have
to
lop
off
the
first
20
feet
of
the
roof
of
the
overhang
feet,
of
the
roof
of
the
overhang
on
the
secondary
structure,
and
on
the
secondary
structure,.
And
then
you
have
aesthetics,
then
you
have
aesthetics
problem,
and
it
continues
down
problem,
and
it
continues
down
the
rest
of
it
to
the
secondary.
M
M
M
M
It
is
our
first
home
in
tampa..
Hopefully
it's
our
only
home..
Hopefully
it's
our
only
home..
We
are
building
this
addition.
So
we
are
building
this
addition,
so
we
can
have
family
move
in,
have
we
can
have
family
move,
in,
have
elderly
parents
to
take
care,
of,
elderly
parents
to
take
care
of,,
and
this
addition
is
critical
to
and
this
addition
is
critical
to
allow
them
to
be
able
to
do
that.
M
M
Property
in
the
area
that
we
can
afford.
afford..
So
that's
why
we
are
here
today.
So
that's
why
we
are
here
today
is
to
discuss
what
we
need,.
What
is
to
discuss
what
we
need,,
what
we
are
looking
for,,
what
the
we
are
looking
for,,
what
the
hardship,
is.
hardship,
is..
We
have
gone
through
significant.
M
M
M
Between
two
buildings,
joining
the
two
buildings,
and
this,
the
two
buildings,
and
this
created
new
problems
in
terms
of
created
new
problems
in
terms
of
various
setbacks
of
the
various
setbacks
of
the
structure.
Now.
structure,
now..
That
single
structure
cannot
be
that
single
structure
cannot
be
within
three
feet
of
the
within
three
feet
of
the
property:
line.
property
line..
It
also
added
enormous
costs.
M
We
would
have
to
--
the
wall
significantly
to
the
covered
significantly
to
the
covered
archway
8
feet
above
the
actual
archway
8
feet
above
the
actual
secondary
structure.
secondary
structure..
So
we
really
went
through
a
lot,
so
we
really
went
through
a
lot
of
hoops
trying
to
get
this,
and
of
hoops
trying
to
get
this,
and
the
drawing
is
the
one
that
the
drawing
is
the
one
that
makes
the
most
sense
and
makes
makes
the
most
sense
and
makes
it
the
least
invasive,
least.
M
It,
the
least
invasive,
least
costly,,
and
at
the
same
time
it
costly,
and
at
the
same
time
it
allows
us
to
keep
the
aesthetics
allows
us
to
keep
the
aesthetics
of
the
home.
Looking
like
the
way
of
the
home.
Looking
like
the
way
the
house
was
built.
Originally,
the
house
was
built
originally
versus
looking
like
it's
an
versus
looking
like
it's
an
add-on.
add-on..
So
if
you
all
have
--,
I
wish
I
so
if
you
all
have
--,
I
wish
I
had
been
a
little
better
had
been
a
little
better
prepared.
prepared..
M
B
B
B
B
M
M
Hardship
is
that
by
altering
our
design,,
we
are
creating
--,
we
design,,
we
are
creating
--.
We
are
revaluing
our
home
to
a
are
revaluing
our
home
to
a
certain
degree,
and
our
property,
certain
degree,
and
our
property,
and
our
real
estate
value
in
the
and
our
real
estate
value
in
the
area,
because
we
are
going
to
to
area
because
we
are
going
to
to
have
a
lopsided.
Looking
building
have
a
lopsided
looking
building
structures
connecting
into
one.
M
M
M
Does
not
look
like
a
jigsaw
puzzle,
together.,
puzzle
together.,
so
that
is
one
of
the
other,
so
that
is
one
of
the
other
components
of
it,,
just
the
components
of
it,,
just
the
aesthetics
of
the
home,,
the
aesthetics
of
the
home,,
the
property
to
make
it
look
like
a
property
to
make
it
look
like
a
home
and
that
it
belongs
in
the
home
and
that
it
belongs
in
the
neighborhood.
neighborhood..
In
terms
of
the
second,
in
terms
of
the
second
component,,
which
you
mentioned,.
M
B
M
B
Take
a
look
at
it:
real
quick.,
dustin,
pasteur:,
so
the
reason
dustin
pasteur:.
So
the
reason
I
mentioned
that,
the
five
I
mentioned
that,,
the
five
criteria
that
you're
looking
at
criteria
that
you're
looking
at
are
all
that
we
base
the
are
all
that
we
base
the
decision
on,
and
that's
what
decision
on,
and
that's
what
we're
bound
to.
we're
bound
to.,
even
the
question
of
property.
B
B
B
B
B
B
M
I
was
surprised
when
you
said%,
you
were
the
owner..
You
were
the
owner.,
I
thought
he
might
be
presenting.
I
thought
he
might
be
presenting
for
you.
for
you..
We've
been
in
constant.
We've
been
in
constant
conversation
with
the
architect
conversation
with
the
architect
about
this,,
and
I
wasn't
even.
M
B
If
he
was,,
I
would
gladly
have
him,
because
he
is
much
more
him,
because
he
is
much
more
experienced
and
knowledgeable
on
experienced
and
knowledgeable
on
the
subject.,
the
subject.
dustin
pasteur:,
the
other
dustin
pasteur:.
The
other
alternative
you
have
is
you
alternative
you
have
is
you
could
always
request
a
could
always
request
a
continuance.
If
you
wanted
more
continuance,
if
you
wanted
more
time
to
prepare
and
come
back.
B
M
M
M
Or
inability
to
present
this
properly
put
a
kibosh
on
this.,
properly
put
a
kibosh
on
this.
I'll,
take
an
extra
month
and
I'll
take
an
extra
month
and
talk
to
my
architect.
talk
to
my
architect..
Maybe
next
time
we'll
have
a
maybe
next
time
we'll
have
a
representation
here
for
us
who
representation
here
for
us
who
actually
knows
the
lingo
and
actually
knows
the
lingo
and
knows
how
to
properly
look
at
knows
how
to
properly
look
at
this
and
present
it
better
than.
A
E
A
I
B
B
B
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
minutes.
To
present
your
case.,
I
have
a
powerpoint.
I
have
a
powerpoint
presentation.
presentation..
First
of
all,
I
wanted
to
first
of
all,.
I
wanted
to
restate
my
hardship
for
you,,
restate
my
hardship
for
you,
that
this
is
a
safety
issue
to
that.
This
is
a
safety
issue
to
allow
better
egress
to
the
allow
better
egress
to
the
second
floor
of
my
home.
In
the
second
floor
of
my
home
in
the
event
of
an
emergency.
N
Originally
one
lot,
and
then
subdivided
years,
later.
subdivided
years,
later.
normally,.
I
would
have
enough
normally,.
I
would
have
enough
space
to
just
put
a
staircase
in
space
to
just
put
a
staircase
in
the
back
of
my
house,
and
I,
the
back
of
my
house
and
I
wouldn't
need
a
variance.,
wouldn't
need
a
variance.,
but
because
the
lot
was.
N
But
because
the
lot
was
subdivided,
both
of
our
homes,
subdivided,,
both
of
our
homes
are
nonconforming,
and
I
only
are
nonconforming,
and
I
only
have
13
feet
between
my
home
and
have
13
feet
between
my
home
and
the
fence,
and
my
neighbor.,
the
fence,
and
my
neighbor.
therefore,
I
needed
to
apply
for
therefore,
I
needed
to
apply
for
a
variance.
a
variance..
This
is
a
unique
position.
N
N
N
N
Are
present,
here,
have
sent
in
a
letter
saying
they
do
not
agree
letter
saying
they
do
not
agree
with
this.
with
this.,
so
I
wanted
to
address
that..
So
I
wanted
to
address
that.
this
is,
of
course,
the
front
of
this
is,
of
course,,
the
front
of
my
house
and
the
side
of
the
my
house
and
the
side
of
the
house,,
where
the
stairs
would
house,
where
the
stairs
would
go.
go..
This
is
what
the
stairs
this
is.
N
N
me
to
go
up
stairs.,
they
are
small.,
they
are
small.,
they
are
cramped..
They
are
cramped.
in
the
event
of
a
fire,
there
in
the
event
of
a
fire,,
there
would
be
only
way
to
get
out,
would
be
only
way
to
get
out,,
which
is
through
this
window,
which
is
through
this
window.
You're
looking
at,
and
I
would
you're
looking
at,
and
I
would
have
to
crawl
down
a
fire
escape,
have
to
crawl
down
a
fire
escape
ladder.
N
N
This
is
just
a
map
within
two
blocks
of
my
home,
because
my
blocks
of
my
home,
because
my
neighbors
have
stated
that
neighbors
have
stated
that
single-family
homes
don't
need
a
single-family
homes,
don't
need
a
second
staircase
and
second
staircase
and
single-family
homes
in
our
single-family
homes
in
our
neighborhood.
Do
not
do
that..
N
N
Single-Family
homes
that
have
a
second
additional
outside
second
additional,
outside
staircase.
staircase.
and
the
green
dots
are
other
and
the
green
dots
are
other
homes
that
have
auxiliary
homes,
that
have
auxiliary
structures
that
have
staircases
structures
that
have
staircases
or
possibly
staircases
in
their
or
possibly
staircases
in
their
own
home.
N
N
N
This
is
the
house
right
next
door,
509,
south
willow.,
door,
509,
south
willow..
As
you
can
see,,
there
is
a
as
you
can
see,.
There
is
a
staircase
to
their
auxiliary
staircase
to
their
auxiliary
structure,
but
it's
all
connected
structure,
but
it's
all
connected.
So
it's
one
single-family
home.,
so
it's
one
single-family
home.
that
staircase,
you
can
see
on
that
staircase,.
You
can
see
on
the
bottom
of
the
yellow
block
the
bottom
of
the
yellow
block
on
the
left-hand
side,.
There
is
on
the
left-hand
side,.
There
is
a
patio
umbrella,,
that's
my
a
patio
umbrella,!
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
The
right-hand
picture
is
the
supplementary,,
the
additional
supplementary,,
the
additional
garage
apartment,
type
of
thing,
garage
apartment,
type
of
thing,
with
an
outside
staircase.
with
an
outside
staircase..
That's
just
within
a
couple
of
that's
just
within
a
couple
of
houses
of
me.
houses
of
me.
on
south
willow,,
which
is
again,
on
south
willow,,
which
is
again,
historic
zone,
rs-50,
brand-new
historic
zone,
rs-50,
brand-new
house
on
the
left,
built
a
house
on
the
left,
built
a
brand-new
house,
outside
brand-new
house,
outside
structure.
structure..
N
Corner
of
willow
and
swann.
part
of
the
hyde
park,
part
of
the
hyde
park,
presbyterian
property.,
presbyterian
property.,
the
pastor
lives
there
as
a
the
pastor
lives
there
as
a
single-family,
home.,
single-family,
home.
you'll,
see
right
by
the
chimney,
you'll
see
right
by
the
chimney
outside
staircase.
outside
staircase..
This
is
also
on
609
south
willow.
N
This
is
also
on
609,
south
willow
and
so
forth.,
and
so
forth.
605,
south
willow.
605,
south
willow..
You
can
see
these
outside.
You
can
see
these
outside
staircases,
all
over.
staircases,
all
over..
This
is
across
the
street
from
this
is
across
the
street.
From
my
neighbor
on
de
leon,,
my
neighbor
on
de
leon,,
outside
staircase,
going
to
a
outside
staircase,
going
to
a
garage
apartment.
N
garage
apartment.
on
the
corner
of
horatio
and
on
the
corner
of
horatio
and
willow,,
one
block
away,
about
a
willow,
one
block,
away,
about
a
ten-year-old
structure,
outside
ten-year-old
structure,,
outside
staircases,
to
the
main
structure,
staircases
to
the
main
structure
and
the
auxiliary
structure.
N
N
N
N
Dustin
pasteur:,
thank
you
very
much.
much..
I
do
have
two
more
items
to.
I
do
have
two
more
items
to
add
to
the
record.
add
to
the
record.
dustin
pasteur:
okay.
dustin
pasteur:
okay.,
I'm
sorry.,
I'm
sorry..
I
forgot
something,
too..
I
forgot
something,
too..
I
don't
have
them
with
me,,
but
I
don't
have
them
with
me,,
but
there
are
three
other
letters.
N
N
E
E
E
B
N
Thank
you..
You
still
have
three
minutes.
If
you
still
have
three
minutes,
if
you
need
it.,
you
need
it.
well,.
I
did
also
want
to
add
well,.
I
did
also
want
to
add
something
in,
and
that
is
that
my
something
in,
and
that
is
that
my
neighbors
will
tell
you:
neighbors
will
tell
you,
single-family
homes
used
to
be
single-family,
homes
used
to
be
around
and
then
they
were
around
and
then
they
were
converted
and
whatever.
N
N
N
N
Keep
this
a
single-family.
Neighborhood
is
long.
Gone.
neighborhood
is
long
gone..
It
started
out
as
a
it
started
out
as
a
single-family
neighborhood.
single-family
neighborhood.
I've
lived
here,
43
years.,
I've
lived
here,
43
years.,
they
have
lived
there
less
than
they
have
lived
there
less
than
5.
5..
They
haven't
seen
the
changes
they
haven't
seen
the
changes
that
I
have
seen,
but
trust
me,
that
I
have
seen,
but
trust
me,.
N
It
started
out
as
a
it
started
out
as
a
single-family
and
through
no
single-family
and
through
no
fault
of
my
own,,
I've
had
to
fault
of
my
own,.
I've
had
to
adjust
over
and
over
and
over,
adjust
over
and
over
and
over
again.
again.,
the
condos
next
to
me,
the
the
condos
next
to
me,.
The
duplex
next
to
me
is
35
feet.
N
Duplex
next
to
me
is
35
feet.
High.
high.
I
used
to
be
able
to
look
across.
I
used
to
be
able
to
look
across
my
neighborhood.,
my
neighborhood..
Now
everything
is
blocked..
Now
everything
is
blocked..
This
is
what
happens..
This
is
what
happens.
progress
comes.
Along,
things
get
progress
comes
along,
things
get
built.
B
B
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Shown
you
this
evening
were
garage
apartments,
originally
garage
apartments,
originally
with
another
piece
of
property
with
another
piece
of
property
that
was
subsequently
separated.
That
was
subsequently
separated,
or
they
were
the
stairs
to
the
or
they
were
the
stairs
to
the
condominiums
that
are
adjacent
condominiums
that
are
adjacent
to
it..
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Improvements
that
she's
intending
to
put
in
over
the
intending
to
put
in
over
the
years.
years.,
dustin
pasteur:
30
seconds,
dustin
pasteur:
30
seconds,
please.
please..
It
would
be
our
hope
that
it
would
be
our
hope
that
this
would
be
denied
and
that
this
would
be
denied
and
that
you
would
not
allow
for
that.
B
F
F
F
F
F
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
N
They
are
currently
constructed,.
They
were
--.
I
was
trying
to
put,
they
were
--.
I
was
trying
to
put
them
towards
the
front
of
the
them
towards
the
front
of
the
property,
to
be
less
intrusive,
to
property,
to
be
less
intrusive
to
my
neighbors,,
so
I
had
them
my
neighbors,,
so
I
had
them
switch
back.
switch
back.!
That's
why
they
are
8
feet,
that's
why
they
are
8
feet
instead
of
4
feet.
N
B
B
N
Me
the
history
on.
If
this
house
was
two
story
when
you
bought,
it
was
two
story
when
you
bought
it
or
added
on
to?
or
added
on
to?
yes,.
It's
always
been
two
yes,.
It's
always
been
two
story.
story.
in
1979,,
the
city
of
tampa
along
in
1979,,
the
city
of
tampa,
along
with
hud
and
the
neighborhood
with
hud,
and
the
neighborhood
improvement
association,
came
to
improvement.
Association
came
to
my
house
and
helped
me
finance.
N
N
N
change
it
from
a
second
story.,
but
it's
very
common.,
but
it's
very
common.
kitty
corner
from
my
house
there,
kitty
corner
from
my
house.
There
is
a
home
also
listed
as
one
is
a
home
also
listed
as
one
story,
and
I've
been
to
their
story,
and
I've
been
to
their
upstairs
as
well.
upstairs
as
well..
It
was
very
common
to
call
it
a.
N
It
was
very
common
to
call
it
a
one-story
house
during
those
one-story
house
during
those
times
unless
it
was
a
square,
times
unless
it
was
a
square,,
completely
squared
off
house
completely
squared
off
house
because
of
the
pitch
of
the
because
of
the
pitch
of
the
roof,.
It's
what
we
would
call
a
roof,,
it's
what
we
would
call
a
loft
area
or
a
half
story.
B
B
B
B
E
Lot
split
or
something
that
didn't
get
updated
or
can
you
didn't
get
updated,
or
can
you
give
me
some
insight
into
what
give
me
some
insight
into
what
we're
looking
at?
we're
looking
at?,
roberta
meade-curry:,
yes.,
roberta
meade-curry:,
yes.,
roberta
meade-curry,
development,
roberta
meade-curry,
development
and
growth
management.
E
E
E
B
We
asked
for
the
reduction
from
that.
that.
dustin
pasteur:,
let's
say
in
a
dustin
pasteur:,
let's
say
in
a
scenario
where
the
stair
is
not
scenario
where
the
stair
is
not
approved,.
Are
we
not
in
a
approved,?
Are
we
not
in
a
position
where
we
have
to
vest
position
where
we
have
to
vest
the
structure,
because
it
was
the
structure
because
it
was
previously
approved
as
part
of.
A
B
B
B
If
this
variance
is
not
approved,,
we
still
won't
meet
20
approved,,
we
still
won't
meet
20
feet.,
feet.,
roberta
meade-curry:,
correct.,
roberta
meade-curry:,
correct.
dustin
pasteur:,
is
that
our
dustin
pasteur:
is
that
our
concern
at
all?
concern
at
all?,
roberta
meade-curry:
no.
roberta
meade-curry:
no.
dustin,
pasteur:
okay.
N
N
E
I
acquired
it
in
1977.,
dustin
pasteur:,
any
other
dustin
pasteur:,
any
other
questions?
questions?,
roberta
meade-curry:.
I
do
have
roberta
meade-curry:.
I
do
have
two
items
to
add
to
the
record.
two
items
to
add
to
the
record..
The
applicant
did
profess
that
the
applicant
did
profess
that
she
had
two
other
letters
of.
E
B
N
These
neighbors'
addresses
being
mentioned.
Your
immediate
mentioned
your
immediate
neighbors?
neighbors?
yes,
david
lauric,,
so
I'm
on
yes,,
david
lauric,,
so
I'm
on
the
corner
of
willow
and
de
the
corner
of
willow
and
de
leon.
leon.
so
directly
behind
me
is
the
so
directly
behind
me.
Is
the
morrison
plot.
morrison
plot.
to
the
right
of
me
still
on.
N
N
His
side
yard
faces
my
backyard..
He
would
still
be
affected.
He
would
still
be
affected
because
he
would
still
see
it.
because
he
would
still
see
it.
then
on
the
other
side,
509,
then
on
the
other
side,
509,
south
willow,,
which
is
the
south
willow,,
which
is
the
trinity
properties
and
trinity
properties
and
alessandro
--.
I
don't
know
how
alessandro
--
I
don't
know
how
to
pronounce
her
last
name
--
to
pronounce
her
last
name
--
that
is
509
next
to
me..
B
N
N
B
N
N
B
N
From
the
board?
seeing
none,
now
three
minutes
seeing
none,
now
three
minutes
for
rebuttal.
for
rebuttal.
okay.
okay.,
so
the
upstairs
room
was
always
so.
The
upstairs
room
was
always
used
as
a
play
room
for
my
used
as
a
play
room
for
my
children
or
a
craft
room
and
children
or
a
craft
room,
and
also
for
storage..
N
Also
for
storage..
It's
the
original
building..
It's
the
original
building.
there's
been
no
changes
to
it..
There's
been
no
changes
to
it..
There's
been
no
change
to
the
there's,
been
no
change
to
the
original
structure.
original
structure..
So,
whether
it's
one
or
two
so,
whether
it's
one
or
two
stories,,
I
don't
know.
stories,,
I
don't
know.
the
landscaping
that
they,
the
landscaping
that
they
mentioned
on
the
side
yard,
is.
N
N
A
path
on
the
side
of
my
yard.,
the
sprinklers,
were
repaired.,
the
sprinklers
were
repaired.
window
air
conditioning
unit
in
window
air
conditioning
unit
in
the
front
of
the
house
and
the
the
front
of
the
house
and
the
back
of
the
house.
back
of
the
house..
It's
always
been
air.
It's
always
been
air
conditioned.
conditioned..
It's
always
been
used
as
space.
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
I
I
B
B
B
B
B
E
E
E
E
Included
in
your
packet.
right-of-way
has
found
it.
Right-Of-Way
has
found
it
consistent.
consistent.
natural
resources
has
found
it.
Natural
resources
has
found,
it
did
not
trigger
the
tree
and
did
not
trigger
the
tree
and
landscape
code.
landscape,
code.
transportation
is
consistent,,
transportation
is
consistent,,
and
zoning
is
inconsistent.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
The
applicant
has
noticed
properly
and
I
have
nothing
else
properly
and
I
have
nothing
else
to
add
to
the
record.
to
add
to
the
record..
If
you
want
me
to
show
you
the,
if
you
want
me
to
show
you
the
letters
again,,
I
would
be
happy
letters
again,.
I
would
be
happy
to
do
that,,
but
they
were
to
do
that,,
but
they
were
included
in
the
packet
I
gave
included
in
the
packet.
I
gave
you
a
little
bit
ago.
O
Dustin
pasteur:
okay.
applicant,,
please
staple
your
applicant,,
please
staple
your
name,
address,,
whether
or
not
name,
address,,
whether
or
not
you've
been
sworn..
You've
been
sworn.,
steve,
michelini:,
steve,
steve
michelini:,
steve
michelini,,
2407
sunset
drive.,
michelini,,
2407,
sunset,
drive.,
yes,,
I've
been
sworn.
yes,.
I've
been
sworn.
before
I
begin
my
presentation,
before
I
begin
my
presentation,
I
would
like
for
the
staff
to.
B
B
F
O
O
O
O
and
then
the
motion
was
granted..
The
only
reason
I
bring
that
to
the
only
reason
I
bring
that
to
your
attention
is
because
we're
your
attention
is
because
we're
requesting
to
revest
what
was
requesting
to
revest
what
was
previously
approved.
previously
approved.
and
the
reason
that's
coming
and
the
reason
that's
coming
back
to
you
is
because
it
is
a
back
to
you
is
because
it
is
a
second-story
addition
and
the
second-story
addition
and
the
original
structure
was
removed.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
To
much
higher
flood
rate
insurance.
insurance.,
the
staff
has
a
copy
of
this,,
the
staff
has
a
copy
of
this,
and
it
was
also
sent
to
the
city,
and
it
was
also
sent
to
the
city
attorney
so
that
she
would
have
attorney
so
that
she
would
have
an
original
and
wouldn't
be
just
an
original
and
wouldn't
be
just
me
saying
this.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
B
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
granted
in
'93..
We
are
looking
at
those
we
are
looking
at
those
variances,
hopefully
that
you'll
variances,
hopefully
that
you'll
see
that
there
is
no
increase
in
see
that
there
is
no
increase
in
the
floor
area.
That
would
cause
the
floor
area
that
would
cause
the
difficulty.
the
difficulty..
We
have
the
same
site.
O
Constraints
that
we
had
in
1993.
the
rear
yard
setback
is
along
the
rear
yard.
Setback
is
along
the
hardened
seawall,,
which
the
hardened
seawall,,
which
we're
requesting
from
20
to
14.,
we're
requesting
from
20
to
14.
again,
the
height
that
we're
now
again,
the
height
that
we're
now
requesting
is
the
reduction
from
requesting
is
the
reduction
from
--
or
an
increase
from
35
feet.
O
O
O
O
january.
the
difficulty
that
actually
the
difficulty
that
actually
results
from
the
narrow
results
from
the
narrow,
frontage,,
the
irregular
shape,
frontage,
the
irregular
shape
and
the
location
and
proximity
and
the
location
and
proximity
to
the
flood.
Zone.
to
the
flood
zone.
again,
we
had
a
smaller
portion
again,,
we
had
a
smaller
portion
of
a
site
that
was
covered
by
of
a
site
that
was
covered
by
the
previous
fema
maps,
and
now
the
previous
fema
maps,,
and
now
approximately
75,
80
percent
of
approximately
75,
80
percent
of
the
site
is
now
covered
by
the.
O
O
The
change
in
the
fema
maps
wasn't
created
by
them.,
wasn't
created
by
them.
the
shape
of
the
lot.
Wasn't
the
shape
of
the
lot
wasn't
created
by
them
and
it
does
have
created
by
them,
and
it
does
have
some
practical
difficulties
in
some
practical
difficulties
in
development
in
order
to
meet
development
in
order
to
meet
those
various
requirements.,
those
various
requirements.,
it
is
not
substantially,
it
is
not
substantially
interfere
with
anyone.
Else.
O
O
In
terms
of
what
fema
is
requiring
us
to
do.
requiring
us
to
do.,
the
setbacks
are
the
same
as
the
setbacks
are
the
same
as
what
previously
existed
from
the
what
previously
existed
from
the
other
house.
That
was
there.
other
house
that
was
there..
The
variance
is
in
harmony
with
the
variance
is
in
harmony
with
the
comprehensive
plan.,
the
comprehensive
plan.
it
never
intended
to
compromise
it
never
intended
to
compromise
or
to
place
a
hardship
on
a.
O
O
O
O
O
O
So
I
think
that
we
have
met
the
criteria
as
established
by
the
criteria,
as
established
by
the
variance
review
board
and
the
variance
review
board
and
the
code,,
and
we
are
in
compliance
code,
and
we
are
in
compliance
with
all
of
those
provisions.
with
all
of
those
provisions..
These
are
not
self-created,
these
are
not
self-created
hardships,
and
they
will
not
hardships,
and
they
will
not
injure
the
rights
of
others.
B
B
B
Other
than
what
the
fema
regulation
would
require
us
to
regulation
would
require
us
to
do.
do.
dustin
pasteur:
thank
you.
dustin
pasteur:
thank
you..
Does
that
conclude
your?
Does
that
conclude
your
presentation?
presentation?
steve
michelini:,
it
does.
steve
michelini:,
it
does.
dustin,
pasteur:,
okay.,
dustin,
pasteur:
okay..
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience?
P
Side,
and
we'll
work
over.,
please
state
your
name
and
please
state
your
name
and
address,.
Whether
or
not
you
have
address,
whether
or
not
you
have
been
sworn.
been
sworn.
good,
evening.,
good
evening.,
marilyn,
healy.,
marilyn,
healy.,
4938,
west
melrose,
avenue,
south,,
4938,
west
melrose
avenue
south,,
also
representing
the
stoney.
B
P
Good
evening.
dustin
pasteur:,
have
you
been
dustin
pasteur:.
Have
you
been
sworn
in?
sworn
in?
yes,
sir.,
yes,,
sir.,
dustin,
pasteur:,
okay.,
dustin,
pasteur:,
okay.,
three
minutes.,
three
minutes.
in
essence,,
the
primary
just
in
essence,.
The
primary
just
indication
for
the
variance
indication
for
the
variance
requests
are
based
on
the
fema
requests
are
based
on
the
fema
regs
and
the
1993
variance.
P
P
A
new
comp
plan
since
then.
respectfully,
the
applicant
has
respectfully,
the
applicant
has
failed
to
provide
any
competent
failed
to
provide
any
competent,
substantial
evidence
that
the
substantial
evidence
that
the
project
meets
the
variance
project
meets
the
variance
criteria.
criteria.,
the
city's
own
zoning
official.
P
P
P
Not
something
that
an
applicant
just
goes
forward
and
does.
just
goes
forward
and
does.
in
this
case,
the
fema
map
in
this
case,,
the
fema
map
changes
in
the
elevations
apply
changes
in
the
elevations
apply
to
everybody,
that's
developing
to
everybody.
That's
developing
in
that
area,,
whether
you're
in
that
area,,
whether
you're
redeveloping
or
you
just
bought
redeveloping
or
you
just
bought
a
house
and
tore
it
down
like
a
house
and
tore
it
down
like
the
applicant
did
two
months.
P
The
applicant
did
two
months:
ago.
ago.
and
now
they
are
being
forced
to
and
now
they
are
being
forced
to
comply
with
the
fema
comply
with
the
fema
regulations,,
just
like
the
rest
regulations,.
Just
like
the
rest
of
us.
of
us.
conclusory
statements
that
the
conclusory
statements
that
the
lot
size
is
unique,
that
it's
a
lot
size
is
unique,
that
it's
a
platted
lot
and
it's
on
a
platted
lot
and
it's
on
a
cul-de-sac,.
We
all
face
that.
P
P
That's
our
zoning
conditions.
again,,
our
neighborhoods,,
the
again,,
our
neighborhoods,,
the
culbreath
isles
and
stoney
culbreath
isles
and
stoney
point,.
We
consist
of
older
point,.
We
consist
of
older
homes.
homes.
1950s
to
newly
constructed,
1950s,
to
newly
constructed,
one-story
houses
to
three.
P
P
neighborhood,
that
are
that
high..
They
certainly
realize
the
they
certainly
realize
the
application
of
this
ordinance
application
of
this
ordinance
and
the
fema
regulations
when
and
the
fema
regulations
when
they
bought
the
property
two.
They
bought
the
property
two
months
ago.
months
ago..
This
is
a
perfect
example
of
a.
P
This
is
a
perfect
example
of
a
self-created
hardship,
allowing
self-created
hardship,
allowing
variances
of
these
magnitudes
variances
of
these
magnitudes
creates
a
very
dangerous,
creates
a
very
dangerous
precedent
for
our
neighborhoods.
precedent
for
our
neighborhoods..
We
want
to
maintain
the
quality,.
P
P
And
the
other
thing
that
mr.
michelini
brought
up
--
michelini
brought
up
--
dustin
pasteur:
30
seconds
dustin
pasteur:
30
seconds
please.
please.
revesting
previously
approved
revesting
previously
approved
variance.
variance..
I
don't
believe
legally.
That's.
I
don't
believe
legally,
that's
correct.
correct.!
If
you're
granting
these
today,
if
you're
granting
these
today
or
denying
them,
you
base
them
or
denying
them,
you
base
them
on
the
facts
before
you
today.
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
one
next
door.
why?
why?.
There
is
a
notch
in
the
seawall..
There
is
a
notch
in
the
seawall.
they
wanted
to
get
closer
to.
They
wanted
to
get
closer
to
where
the
water
is.,
where
the
water
is.
perfectly
reasonable.
perfectly
reasonable..
I
supported
it.,
I
supported
it..
This
is
different..
This
is
different..
This
is
extreme.
B
G
B
F
G
G
Greg
young,
4917
west
melrose
avenue,
north.
avenue,
north.
dustin
pasteur:
you've
got
dustin
pasteur:
you've
got
three
minutes.
three
minutes.
thank
you.
thank
you.,
first
of
all,.
I
would
like
to
first
of
all,.
I
would
like
to
thank
the
panel
for
hearing
our
thank
the
panel
for
hearing
our
neighborhood's
concerns
and
neighborhood's
concerns
and
welcome
steve
to
the
welcome
steve
to
the
neighborhood.
neighborhood..
I
have
not
had
a
chance
to
meet.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
F
F
4940
west
melrose
avenue
north.
and
I
have
been
sworn.
and
I
have
been
sworn.
dustin
pasteur:,
all
right.,
dustin
pasteur:,
all
right..
You
have
three
minutes..
You
have
three
minutes.
similar
to
our
neighbors,,
I
similar
to
our
neighbors,.
I
just
want
to
echo
a
lot
of
what
just
want
to
echo
a
lot
of
what
they
have
said..
They
have
said.
I'll,
be
brief.
F
A
If
you
look
around
our
neighborhood,,
including
neighborhood,,
including
culbreath,
isles,
multimillion,
culbreath,
isles,,
multimillion
dollars,
homes.
dollars,
homes.
camaria
pettis-mackle:
excuse
camaria
pettis-mackle:
excuse
me,,
sir.
me,
sir..
If
you
could
scoot
closer
to
the,
if
you
could
scoot
closer
to
the
microphone
so
that
your
voice.
F
F
F
F
F
F
G
G
B
G
G
West
melrose
avenue
north
immediately
adjacent
to
the
immediately
adjacent
to
the
subject.
Property..
Subject:
property.
I'm
here
before
you
today
to
I'm
here
before
you
today
to
vehemently
object
to
the
vehemently
object
to
the
proposed
height
variance.
proposed
height
variance..
The
request
is
excessive
and
not.
G
The
request
is
excessive
and
not
based
on
hardship,
but
is
a
based
on
hardship,
but
is
a
lifestyle.
Choice.
lifestyle
choice.,
it
will
result
in
the
it
will
result
in
the
applicant's
house
looming
above
applicant's
house
looming
above
all,
others,
trumping,
every
other
all
others,
trumping,
every
other
house
in
the
neighborhood
and
house
in
the
neighborhood
and
towering
like
a
one-off
building
towering
like
a
one-off
building
in
our
midst.
G
in
our
midst.,
this
height
variance
application,
this
height
variance
application
will
create
an
unsightly
will
create
an
unsightly
situation
that
will
harm
our
situation.
That
will
harm
our
entire
neighborhood.
entire
neighborhood..
This
building
structure
will
this
building
structure
will
adversely
affect
the
uniformity,
adversely
affect
the
uniformity,,
harmony,
and
serenity
of
our
harmony,
and
serenity
of
our
neighborhood.
G
G
G
that
is
single-family
home.
finally,.
I
would
like
to
point
finally,.
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
this
application
is
out
that
this
application
is
defective
on
its
face
because
defective
on
its
face,
because
the
applicant
failed
to
address
the
applicant
failed
to
address
any
of
the
five
criteria.
G
G
G
G
four-plus
story.
House.
he's
simply
choosing
to
do.
So.
he's
simply
choosing
to
do
so..
He
failed
to
prove
that
the
he
failed
to
prove
that
the
variance
will
not
interfere
with
variance
will
not
interfere
with
or
harm
others.
or
harm
others..
He
failed
to
demonstrate
how
the
he
failed
to
demonstrate
how
the
variance
is
in
harmony
with
the
variance
is
in
harmony
with
the
city
code
and
comprehensive
plan,
city
code
and
comprehensive
plan,
and
he
failed
to
illustrate
how
and
he
failed
to
illustrate
how
substantial
justice
will
be
done.
G
B
B
F
F
F
O
B
Like
to
note
is
that
the
petition
you
received
--
petition,
you
received
--
dustin
pasteur:
well,,
we're
dustin
pasteur:
well,,
we're
not
in
rebuttal
yet.,
not
in
rebuttal,
yet.,
steve
michelini:,
I'm
sorry.,
steve
michelini:,
I'm
sorry..
I
thought
we
were
in
rebuttal..
I
thought
we
were
in
rebuttal.
dustin
pasteur:.
I
have
a
dustin
pasteur:.
I
have
a
question
for
ms.
curry.
B
B
C
O
C
A
A
O
O
O
O
I
The
nine,,
which
is
the
15
feet.
dustin
pasteur:
mr.
feldman,
dustin
pasteur:
mr.
feldman,,
do
you
have
questions??
Do
you
have
questions?
bret
feldman:?
I
do
have
a
bret
feldman:.
I
do
have
a
couple.
couple..
One
of
them
is
fairly
similar
to
one
of
them
is
fairly
similar
to
mr.
pasteur's
question..
Mr.
pasteur's
question..
I'm
just
going
to
ask
it
a
I'm
just
going
to
ask
it
a
little
differently.
I
Little
differently.,
how
--?
I
think
this
is
for
how
--
I
think
this
is
for
legal,
feel
free
to
kick
it
over
legal,
feel
free
to
kick
it
over
to
ms.
meade-curry,
if
you
think
to
ms.
meade-curry,
if
you
think
it's
more
her
issue.,
it's
more
her
issue..
But
how
does
the
city
address,
but
how
does
the
city
address
fema,
requirements?,
fema
requirements?
and
does
the
current
height.
E
I
E
And
does
the
current
height
limitation
consider
those
flood
limitation?
Consider
those
flood,
levels?,
levels?,
roberta
meade-curry:,
consider
roberta
meade-curry:
consider
a
flood
zone?,
a
flood
zone?
bret
feldman:
yeah.
bret,
feldman:
yeah.,
roberta
meade-curry:,
the
flood,
roberta
meade-curry:,
the
flood
zone
maps
again
are
determined
zone
maps
again
are
determined
by
fema.
E
I
E
The
current
flood
zone
is
ve-9,,
which
is
the
design
flood,
which
is
the
design
flood
elevation.
elevation..
That's
what
the
d
stands.
For,,
that's
what
the
d
stands.
For,
design
flood
elevation
is
design.
Flood
elevation
is
elevation,
10
feet,,
which
elevation
10
feet,,
which
includes
what
we
call
that
water
includes
what
we
call
that
water
board
and
I
think
dustin
and
board-
and
I
think
dustin
and
david.
You
would
understand
what
david
you
would
understand,
what
that
waterboarding
is
or
that
that
waterboarding
is
or
that
extra
foot
or
so.
I
B
B
E
I
regulations.
bret
feldman:.
I
think
this
bret
feldman:.
I
think
this
question,.
This
may
just
be
me
question,.
This
may
just
be
me
being
extra
cautious.
being
extra
cautious.,
it
may
have
been
addressed.
It
may
have
been
addressed.
Previously.
previously.
but
applicant
said
the
existing,
but
applicant
said
the
existing
grade
will
be.
Six
feet.
I
B
B
D
D
D
Really
little
one
on
my
screen.
kind
of
fuzzy.
kind
of
fuzzy.,
steve
michelini:,
looking
for
steve
michelini:,
looking
for
the
elevation?,
the
elevation?
lynn,
hurtak:
yes,,
it
was
up
lynn,
hurtak:
yes,.
It
was
up
earlier,
if
you
don't
mind.
earlier,,
if
you
don't
mind..
Thank
you
so
much..
Thank
you!
So
much.,
that's
so
much
clearer
than
the
that's
so
much
clearer
than
the
one
I
have.
D
One
I
have.,
so
maybe
you
or
the
architect,
so
maybe
you
or
the
architect
can
answer
this
question
for
me.
can
answer
this
question
for
me.
these
floor
trusses,?
Is
there
a
these
floor
trusses,?
Is
there
a
reason?
reason??
It
looks
to
me
like
if
I'm
it
looks
to
me
like
if
I'm
looking
at
this
bottom,
looking
at
this
bottom
structure,,
eight
foot,
ten
inches,
structure,,
eight
foot,
ten
inches
and
three
foot
one
inch
and
I
and
three
foot
one
inch
and
I
think
that
goes
with
the
floor.
F
F
F
F
F
D
F
F
D
To
--
cantilever,
this
kind
of
condition
versus
this.
condition
versus
this.
lynn
hurtak:.
So
I
see
this
lynn
hurtak:.
So
I
see
this
line
that
says
bottom
of
lowest
line
that
says
bottom
of
lowest:
structural
member.,
structural
member..
But
yet
I
don't
see
a
structural,
but
yet
I
don't
see
a
structural
member
there.
D
D
F
D
B
D
D
D
D
E
O
B
E
O
O
Right?
is
that
what
your
ask
is
this:
is
that
what
your
ask
is
this
evening?
evening?,
because
that's
what
we
don't,
because
that's
what
we
don't
know.
know.
steve
michelini:.
We
asked
for
steve
michelini:.
We
asked
for
the
44
feet.
the
44
feet.
you're,
only
looking
at
one
side,
you're
only
looking
at
one
side
of
the
building.
of
the
building.,
we
need
44
or
we
need
30
--.
B
B
E
Not
count
into
the
height?
roberta
meade-curry:
correct.,
roberta
meade-curry:,
correct.
dustin
pasteur:
as
long
as
it
dustin
pasteur:.
As
long
as
it
meets
the
five
foot
or
less.
meets
the
five
foot
or
less.
roberta
meade-curry:,
the
roberta
meade-curry:,
the
parapet
doesn't
constitute
parapet
doesn't
constitute
finished,
roof.
finished,
roof.
top
of
the
finished
roof.
E
O
O
D
D
D
O
D
I
B
B
A
E
B
I
I
I
I
O
I
just
want
to
understand
--.
You
said
the
unusual
shape
of
the
said,
the
unusual
shape
of
the
parcel-
and
I
understand
that.
parcel
and
I
understand
that.,
steve
michelini:,
yes,,
sir.,
steve
michelini:,
yes,
sir.,
the
previous
variance,,
to
my
the
previous
variance,
to
my
knowledge,,
would
carry
over
for
knowledge,
would
carry
over
for
a
one-story
home.
O
I
I
O
O
I
Still,
basically
meets
the
same
setbacks
that
were
previously
setbacks
that
were
previously
approved.
approved.
bret,
feldman:,
and,
again,.
I
bret
feldman:
and,
again,.
I
don't
want
to
--
because
the
don't
want
to
--,
because
the
home
has
been
demolished.
I
don't
home
has
been
demolished.
I
don't
want
to
rely
upon.
That.
I
O
I
O
O
cul-de-sac
have
done..
If
you
applied
the
25-foot,
if
you
applied
the
25-foot
setback,,
it
would
be
out
here
in
setback,.
It
would
be
out
here
in
the
middle
of
the
structure,,
the
middle
of
the
structure,,
which
would
significantly
reduce,
which
would
significantly
reduce
the
building
footprint,
that
the
building
footprint
that
would
be
allowable.
O
O
F
O
O
The
north
side.,
but
on
this
side,
so
we're,
but
on
this
side,,
so
we're
meeting
the
20
feet,
here,
and
meeting
the
20
feet
here,
and
then
on
this
side,.
We
were
also
then
on
this
side,.
We
were
also
meeting,
requesting
that
that
be
meeting,
requesting
that
that
be
reestablished
as
a
20-foot
reestablished
as
a
20-foot
setback
off
of
this
hardened
setback
off
of
this
hardened
seawall.
seawall.,
there's
no
other
neighbor
over
there's
no
other
neighbor
over
here.
That
would
be
adversely
here
that
would
be
adversely
affected,,
which
typically,
affected,,
which
typically,
that's.
O
O
Here,,
but
you
still
have
a
very
narrow
neck
here
when
you
follow
narrow
neck
here,
when
you
follow
that
arc
all
the
way
around.
that
arc
all
the
way
around.
and
we
only
have,.
I
think
this
and
we
only
have,.
I
think
this
is
only
even
at
14
feet,.
There's
is
only
even
at
14
feet,
there's
only
about
30
feet,
25
feet
for.
I
I
G
G
B
B
O
O
O
The
area
were
single
story
and
therefore,
multistory
structure,
therefore,
multistory
structure
was
not
compatible.
was
not
compatible.
well,,
the
homes
were
built,
well,,
the
homes
were
built
earlier,
and
they
were
built
earlier,
and
they
were
built
before
we
had
fema
codes
and
before
we
had
fema
codes
and
before
we
experienced
extreme.
O
O
O
Our
strategy
was
simply
to
look
at
what
was
going
to
be
needed
at
what
was
going
to
be
needed
and
to
elevate
the
garage,
use
and
to
elevate
the
garage,
use
the
six
feet
that
we
already
had
the
six
feet
that
we
already
had
and
request,.
Now
it's
less
than
and
request,.
Now
it's
less
than
nine
feet.
nine
feet.
it's
at
40.6
feet
to
the
top
of.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
I
do
think
that
the
applicant
has
shown,
as
far
as
the
side
has
shown,
as
far
as
the
side
yard,
setbacks
and
the
rear
yard
yard
setbacks
and
the
rear
yard
setbacks,,
I
think
they
have
setbacks,.
I
think
they
have
probably
shown
a
pretty
adequate,
probably
shown
a
pretty
adequate
case
that
it
is
a
difficult
site
case
that
it
is
a
difficult
site
to
do,
and
it's
a
large
to
do,
and
it's
a
large
expensive
site
and
warrants
a
expensive
site
and
warrants
a
large,
expensive,
home.,
large,
expensive
home..
C
B
B
B
buildable
area
of
house.
now,
when
the
federal
government
now,,
when
the
federal
government
takes
away
some
of
that
height,
takes
away
some
of
that
height,,
essentially
up
to
one
level
of
essentially
up
to
one
level
of
your
house,.
They
are
reducing
your
house,.
They
are
reducing
your
square
footage
and
either
your
square
footage
and
either
we
can
agree
with
that,
okay,.
B
B
That
right,
maybe
should
still
that
right,
maybe
should
still
exist,
and
you
should
still
have
exist,
and
you
should
still
have
the
right
to
build
35
feet
of
the
right
to
build
35
feet
of
house,
because
you
don't
create
house,
because
you
don't
create
the
flood
codes,
and
maybe
it
the
flood
codes,
and
maybe
it
was
applied
before
flood
codes
was
applied
before
flood
codes,
even
existed,.
But
we
don't
know
even
existed,.
But
we
don't
know
that
for
sure.,
that
for
sure.,
but
that's
my
practical,
but
that's
my
practical
standpoint.
standpoint.
B
B
B
Neighborhood
is
opposed
to
this,,
but
I
think
that
they
should,
but
I
think
that
they
should
also
consider
that,,
let's
say,
also
consider
that,.
Let's
say
that
they
pushed
this
even
that
they
pushed
this
even
further
and
made
it
the
city
further
and
made
it
the
city
code
that
the
floodplain
would
code
that
the
floodplain
would
not
be
taken
into
consideration,
not
be
taken
into
consideration,.
They
would
effectively
be.
B
They
would
effectively
be
reducing
the
buildable
area
of
reducing
the
buildable
area
of
all
of
their
lots
and
their
all
of
their
lots
and
their
resale
value,
because
now
anybody
resale
value,
because
now
anybody
that
buys
their
house
and
that
buys
their
house
and
redevelops
has
to
meet
that
35
redevelops
has
to
meet
that
35
feet.
feet.
and
when
the
flood
elevation
and
when
the
flood
elevation
goes
up
to
20
feet
in
five
years
goes
up
to
20
feet.
B
In
five
years,
from
now,
or
whatever
happens,
from
now
or
whatever
happens,
now
you're
down
to
15,
feet.,
now
you're
down
to
15
feet.,
so
things
to
consider
to
say
so
things
to
consider
to
say,
that,,
you
know,
to
take
five
that,,
you
know,
to
take
five
feet
out
of
it
right
now,
just
to
feet
out
of
it
right
now,
just
to
meet
this
old
code,.
That's
not.
B
Meet
this
old
code,,
that's
not
responsive
to
the
current
responsive
to
the
current
climate.
Just
means
that
in
five
climate
just
means
that
in
five
years
from
now,
somebody
else
is
years
from
now,.
Somebody
else
is
going
to
be
sitting
on
this
going
to
be
sitting
on
this
board
and
that
number
is
going
board
and
that
number
is
going
to
have
have
gone
up
and
they
to
have
have
gone
up
and
they
are
going
to
be
discussing.
This
are
going
to
be
discussing
this
yet
again.
B
J
Further?,
I
have
a
couple
of
things
to.
I
have
a
couple
of
things
to
say,,
but
I'm
also
happy
to
make
say,,
but
I'm
also
happy
to
make
a
motion.
a
motion..
Would
it
make
sense,,
I
think,
would
it
make
sense,?
I
think
we've
done
this
before
to
make
a
we've
done
this
before
to
make
a
motion
for
maybe
the
setbacks
motion,
for
maybe
the
setbacks
and
then
make
a
separate
motion
and
then
make
a
separate
motion
or
have
further
discussion
and.
I
Be
a
successful
measure.
before
you
bifurcate
and
go
before
you
bifurcate
and
go
through
the
trouble,
you
might
through
the
trouble,.
You
might
want
to
consider
whatever
want
to
consider
whatever
motion,.
I
don't
know
what
your
motion,.
I
don't
know
what
your
motion
is,,
but
you
might
want
to
motion
is,,
but
you
might
want
to
consider
whether
your
motion
consider
whether
your
motion
could
be
voted
upon
in
full.
J
J
J
J
Hardship.
samantha
walker:,
and
to
that
samantha
walker:,
and
to
that
end,.
I
don't
see
this
as
being
end,.
I
don't
see
this
as
being
unique
or
singular
to
the
unique
or
singular
to
the
property.
property.
in
fact,.
It
seems
like
it
in
fact,.
It
seems
like
it
applies
to
everyone
in
the
applies
to
everyone
in
the
neighborhood.
neighborhood..
I
think
one
of
the
neighbors,
I
think
one
of
the
neighbors
made
that
exact
point
is
that
made.
That
exact
point
is
that
moving
forward,,
all
of
the
moving
forward,,
all
of
the
neighbors
are
going
to
be.
J
J
J
J
J
I
lost
my
train
of
thought.,
even
taking
your
point
into
even
taking
your
point
into
consideration,.
They
purchased
consideration,.
They
purchased
this
property,
apparently
with
this
property,
apparently
with
the
intent
to
tear
it
down
and
the
intent
to
tear
it
down
and
rebuild
it.
rebuild
it..
So
I'm
having
a
hard
time.
J
So
I'm
having
a
hard
time
wrapping
my
mind
around
how
this
wrapping
my
mind
around
how
this
isn't
also
a
self-created
isn't
also
a
self-created
hardship.
hardship.,
but
on
the
other
end,
it
sounds,
but
on
the
other
end,,
it
sounds
like
based
on
what
I've
heard
like
based
on
what
I've
heard
the
applicant
could.
In
theory,
the
applicant
could
in
theory
build
a
bunch
of
land
and
build
build
a
bunch
of
land
and
build
35
feet.
On
top
of
that
which.
C
C
You
have
to
bury
it
to
create
the
height.,
the
height.,
so
you
created
a
lower
elevation,
so
you
created
a
lower
elevation
in
the
garage
so
that,
for
in
the
garage
so
that,
for
instance,
when
you
walk
in,
instance,
when
you
walk
in,,
because
it's
not
at
base
flood
because
it's
not
at
base
flood
elevation,
your
electrical
elevation,.
Your
electrical
outlet
is
way
up
on.
C
B
J
B
D
D
D
Us
a
little
more
guidance,
and
I
think,
that's
probably
what's
think
that's
probably
what's
coming,,
but
that's
not
what's
in
coming,,
but
that's
not
what's
in
front
of
us
right,
now.
front
of
us
right,
now.,
what's
in
front
of
us,
is
what
we
what's
in
front
of
us
is
what
we
see.
see.,
and
we
know
this
is
coming.
D
D
Regulations
are
changing.
and
that
e-mail,,
if
that
e-mail
and
that
e-mail,,
if
that
e-mail,
didn't
exist,,
I
think
this
didn't
exist,.
I
think
this
conversation
would
be
very
conversation
would
be
very
different.
different.,
but
knowing
that
it's
going
to,
but
knowing
that
it's
going
to
be
16
feet
in
three
and
a
half.
D
Months,
I
don't
know
how,,
even
if
this
wasn't
a
large
house
on
a
this,
wasn't
a
large
house
on
a
about
that
of
water,.
I
don't
about
that
of
water,.
I
don't
know
how
you
could
--
would
want
know
how
you
could
--
would
want
to
build
a
house
that
wouldn't
to
build
a
house
that
wouldn't
meet
the
current
code
in
terms.
D
D
B
B
16-foot
requirement.,
a
lot
of
them,
probably
don't
a
lot
of
them.
Probably
don't
have
a
requirement
at
all.
have
a
requirement
at
all.
and
if
they
were
to
rebuild
and
if
they
were
to
rebuild
right
now,,
a
lot
of
them
would
right.
Now,.
A
lot
of
them
would
probably
be
here
asking
for
a
probably
be
here
asking
for
a
similar
variance,
because
they
similar
variance
because
they
would
have
to
meet
it.
B
would
have
to
meet
it.
so
using
the
position
of
so
using
the
position
of
somebody
that
doesn't
have
to
somebody
that
doesn't
have
to
address
this
issue
because
they
address
this
issue
because
they
are
in
an
existing
home,
is
not
are
in.
An
existing
home
is
not
really
a
fair
argument
for
the
really
a
fair
argument
for
the
question
of
hardship.
B
B
To
me,
100%,
hardship
created
by
the
government
on
land,
that's
the
government
on
land-
that's
existed
for
a
hundred
years
is
existed
for
a
hundred
years
is
not
self-created.,
not
self-created.
now,
the
design,
certainly
is,
now,
the
design,
certainly
is,,
but
the
height
limit
exists
by,
but
the
height
limit
exists
by
the
city..
The
city..
The
flood
limit
exists
by
the
the
flood
limit
exists
by
the
federal,
government.
federal
government..
We're
asking
them
to
fit
the
we're
asking
them
to
fit
the
house
into
that
box.
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
I
J
J
J
Eaves
and
gutters,
based
on
the
applicant,
submitting
competent
applicant,
submitting
competent
and
presenting
competent
and
and
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty,
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five,
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city,
code,.
J
J
This
is
evidenced
by
the
fact
that
there
are
other
houses
in
that
there
are
other
houses
in
the
neighborhood
that
have
been
the
neighborhood
that
have
been
granted
similar
variances
and,,
granted
similar
variances
and,
in
fact,.
This
exact
property
has
in
fact,.
This
exact
property
has
been
granted
a
variance
for
the
been
granted
a
variance
for
the
exact
same
setbacks.
J
I
I
I
J
B
B
J
J
J
Code.
specifically,
that
this
hardship,
specifically
that
this
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
does
or
practical
difficulty
does
result
from
the
actions
of
the
result
from
the
actions
of
the
applicant.
applicant.
additionally,,
the
hardship,
additionally,,
the
hardship
criteria
is
not
unique
or
criteria
is
not
unique
or
singular
to
this
property.
J
Additionally,,
the
variance
if
granted,
will
actually
--
the
granted
will
actually
--.
The
variance
is
also
not
in
harmony
variance
is
also
not
in
harmony
with
the
general
neighborhood.
As
with
the
general
neighborhood,
as
none
of
the
other
houses
are,
none
of
the
other
houses
are
subject
to
--
all
of
the
other
subject
to
--.
All
of
the
other
houses
are
subject
to
a
35-foot.