►
From YouTube: VRB 2/8/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Aaron
murphy
also
in
attendance
this
evening
we
have,
let's
see
we
have
simone
savino
from
legal
from
development
coordination.
We
have
jane
madue
and
irene
rosario
from
natural
resources.
We
have
scott
eister
and
from
transportation
we
have
jonathan
scott.
There
are
some
procedural
rules
you
need
to
follow
due
to
the
covet
19
pandemic.
Please
adhere
to
safe
social
distancing,
as
set
within
the
room.
Please
maintain
wearing
a
face
mask
at
all
times
when
your
case
number
and
petitioner's
name
is
called.
A
Please
approach
the
podium
when
you
approach
the
podium,
please
state
your
name
address
and
if
you
have
been
sworn
in,
the
petitioner
and
or
their
agent
will
have
10
minutes
to
make
a
presentation.
All
the
persons
or
participants
wishing
to
speak
will
have
three
minutes,
and
then
the
petitioner
will
have
an
additional
three
minutes
for
a
bottle
if
needed.
A
The
time
periods,
as
stated,
will
be
kept
by
the
board.
Any
information
such
as
pictures
or
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted
as
part
of
your
petition
and
that
you
intend
to
present
at
this
hearing
for
consideration
in
support
of
your
petition
must
individually
be
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board.
A
After
acceptance
by
the
board,
you
must
submit
the
item
to
staff
for
it
to
be
entered
and
made
part
of
permanent
record
the
board
bases
its
decision
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
which
is
presented
and
which
meets
criteria
required
by
the
city's
code
of
ordinances.
Please
be
sure
to
to
clearly
state
your
hardship
criteria.
A
A
variance
granted
by
the
board
will
be
only
for
what
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
will
be
in
compliance
with
any
terms
and
conditions
stated
in
the
approval
by
the
board.
All
other
city
codes
will
need
to
be
met
if
the
case
is
approved,
your
variance
will
expire
two
years
from
the
date
of
the
decision.
If
case
continued,
it
will
be
continued
to
either
next
month's
vrba
board
agenda
or
to
the
next
available
position
on
an
upcoming
vrb
board
agenda.
A
If
the
case
is
denied,
you
may
wish
to
have
the
variance
review
board's
decision
appealed
by
the
city
council.
You
must
file
a
petition
for
review
of
the
board's
decision
within
14
days
of
the
written
decision.
You
will
not
be
able
to
pull
any
permits
until
after
the
14-day
review
period
has
passed.
A
Your
cooperation,
ensuring
that
this
meeting
is
run
smoothly,
is
greatly
appreciated.
Can
I
have
a
motion
from
one
of
the
board
members
to
approve
last
month's
meeting
minutes
so
moved?
Is
there
a
second?
Second
all
right,
all
in
favor
of
approving
the
meeting
minute
say
aye
any
opposed
all
right.
The
meeting
minutes
pass
at
this
time.
I
will
ask
legal
staff
to
please
confirm
whether
there
are
any
ex
parte
communications
or
conflicts
among
board
members.
E
A
All
right,
I
will
direct
staff.
Are
there
any
changes
to
the
agenda
this
evening.
F
A
Okay,
well,
then,
let's
go
ahead
and
do
the
swearing
in
at
this
time.
I
will
ask
a
staff
member
to
please
conduct
the
swearing
for
members
of
the
audience.
If
there's
a
chance
that
you
might
speak
this
evening,
if
there
is
the
possibility
that
you
might
be
speaking
this
evening,
I
would
ask
that
you
please
stand
and
be
sworn.
F
Good
evening,
once
again
to
the
board
jane
maddow,
with
development
coordination,
the
first
case
before
the
board
is
apologies
before
we
get
into
that.
The
way
that
we
have
structured
the
agenda
for
today
is
that
we
are
taking
the
spanish
cases
first,
then
we
take
the
tree
cases
and
then
proceed
with
other
cases.
F
So
the
first
two
cases
are
spanish
speakers
and
there's
a
translator,
that's
here,
to
interpret
on
their
behalf.
So
the
first
case
is
vrb2207.
The
property
owner
is
o'neil,
amaran,
I'm
not
about
to
butcher
the
name.
The
property
is
addressed
at
1207
west
hall
place,
it
is
zoned
as
rs
50,
residential
single
family
and
the
request.
The
variance
request
before
the
board
this
evening
is
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
17
feet,
and
this
is
for
an
existing
rear,
porch.
F
This
is
the
property
in
question
and
it's
showing
the
existing
home
and
the
addition
that
the
patio
that
was
added
onto.
F
The
residence
this
is
a
up
close
view
of
that
addition
showing
what
the
existing
setbacks
are
currently
at
17
feet
opposed
to
the
20
feet
and
the
on
the
other
side,
of
course,
is
33,
but
on
one
side
is
17.,
so
inconsistent.
F
Natural
resources
reviewed
it
and
found
it.
Inconsistent
transportation
review
was
not
required
and
right
away
found
it
consistent
with
conditions
that
there
is
an
existing
10-foot
public,
easement
utility
and
a
7.5
feet,
drainage
easement
on
the
south
side
of
the
parcel.
However,
the
work
that
the
applicant
is
doing
does
not
encroach
into
this
easements.
F
So
there
is
no
conflict
at
this
point
with
the
proposed
well
with
the
patio.
F
Natural
resources
had
comments
that
it
looks
like
they
have
been
about
seven
trees
removed
without
documentation,
and
they
have
requirements
for
what
the
applicant
would
need
to
do,
and
the
penalty
for
removing
trees.
G
F
A
Okay,
applicant.
H
A
We're
gonna
ask
that
you,
when
you
come
to
the
podium,
you
state
your
name,
your
address
and
confirm
for
us
that
you
have
been
sworn
in.
D
G
A
Please
proceed.
You
have
10
minutes
to
make
your
presentation.
I
I
A
Me:
okay,
if
you
have
anything
you
want
to
submit,
you
can
give
it
to
staffordshire.
E
G
A
Okay,
so-
and
I'm
going
to
say
this
to
you,
but
also
just
in
case
there's,
anyone
in.
G
A
H
H
H
I
H
I
H
H
H
A
H
A
So
we
understand
that
it's
a
pie
shaped
lot
irregular
shape.
A
A
Okay,
is
there
anything
else
that
you
wanted
to
explain
to
us
now
in
your
presentation,
or
perhaps
we
can.
A
Okay,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
open
it
up
for
questions.
If
there's
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
about
this
about
this
application,
not
a
chance.
D
H
K
K
G
I
A
Perhaps
staff
miss
madhu,
could
you
is
there
some
explanation
you
might
be
able
to
give
to
help
us
understand?
A
Was
this
applicant
before
us
once
before,
and
then
we
had
to
reschedule
it
because
the
timing
didn't
work
or
did.
Did
the
applicant
just
not
have
all
the
paperwork
in
the
first
time
through.
A
F
F
Be
his
first
appearance.
A
All
right,
sir,
you
have
three
minutes
for
rebuttal.
If
there's
anything
else,
you
want
to
share
with
us
any
responses
to
the
questions
we
asked
or
additional
information.
H
A
Yeah
so
I'll
give
it
a
shot.
Okay,
the
the
hardship
is
very
often
misunderstood
by
people
who
come
before
us.
It
doesn't
mean
that
it's
difficult
to
make
a
change
to
what
you've
done.
It
doesn't
mean
that
it's
going
to
cost
you
money
to
remove
or
replace
or
change
it.
H
A
H
H
H
E
E
Yeah
and
well,
if
you
don't
mind
I'd
rather
just
do
it
to
the
inter,
I
I
can
explain
to
the
interpreter
the
rule
that
we
go
by,
that
this
board
follows
for
every
case.
They
hear
it's
27-80.
E
F
E
And
simon
savino,
on
behalf
of
legal
staff,
has
just
explained
that
she
did
express
this
to
the
applicant
at
the
time.
H
H
A
H
A
H
H
I
H
A
Okay,
all
right
so
just
for
formality's
sake.
You
still
have
three
minutes
for
a
bottle.
H
A
All
right,
thank
you
with
that.
We
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
from
the
board
or
discussion
if.
A
Okay,
so
do
I
have
a
motion
or
is
discussion
needed.
C
Well,
although
not
enumerated
to
us
very
clearly,
I
think
the
comment
on
the
application
is
the
most
relevant,
which
is
the
irregular
shaped
lot
because
on
the
I'll
just
say
the
right
side
of
the
plane
that
we're
looking
at
the
porch
is
20
feet
from
the
property
line
and
on
the
left
side
it's
not
because
of
the
orientation
and
shape
of
life.
C
L
H
L
L
That
said,
variance
as
condition
be
granted
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship,
a
practical
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
alleged
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
is
unique
and
singular
with
respect
to
this
property.
As
it's
a
pie
shaped
lot,
it's
located
on
a
cul-de-sac
and
the
tilt
of
the
house.
E
L
Evidenced
by
the
survey
in
the
public
record
and
the
applicant's
statement,
it's
you
know,
kind
of
catty
corner.
H
H
F
F
This
is
zoned
rs,
60,
residential
single
family
60
and
for
the
code
section
in
reference
is
section
27-290
that
addresses
the
setbacks
for
accessory
structures,
60
feet
from
the
front
three
feet
from
the
side:
three
feet
from
the
rear
and
seven
feet
for
the
corner.
This
is
a
corner
lot,
so
the
setbacks
for
corners
does
apply.
F
F
This
is
what
the
floor
plan
of
that
accessory
structure
looks
like,
as
provided
by
the
applicant,
and
those
are
the
elevations
natural
resources,
transportation
and
right-of-way
reviewed
and
founded
consistent
trans
natural
resources
found
inconsistent
with
conditions
that
all
the
landscape
technical
codes
would
be
met
at
the
time
of
permitting.
F
She
has,
she
has
a
permitting
in
an
active
permit
for
this
accessory
structure.
However,
because
we
do
not
meet
the
setback
requirements,
she
has
to
apply
for
a
variant.
C
Oh
interesting
just
a
little
plan,
you
just
showed
they
look
very
small.
Isn't
there
a
minimum
size
required
to
need
a
permit?
I
assume
they
exceed
that.
F
C
F
L
A
Okay
applicant,
when
you
come
on
up
you'll
state,
your
name,
your
address
and
you'll
tell
us
that
you've
been
sworn
and
then
you'll
have
10
minutes
to
make
a
presentation.
H
M
H
H
Since
the
city
of
tampa,
the
department
of
the
city
of
tampa
mayor
asked
us
to
do
a
revision.
They
detected
that
the
area
on
the
corner,
the
limit
between
the
separation
of
the
of
what
we're
building
less
than
seven
feet
is
3.7
feet.
So
that's
what
we
are
asking
for:
the
reduction
of
the
setback
from
the
required
seven
feet
to
the
3.7.
H
This
is
the
reason
why,
with
the
city
of
tampa,
we
agreed
that
a
revision
had
to
be
done
and
they
advised
us
to
go
through
this
process
of
the
variance
petition.
And
this
is
what
I
submitted
the
petition
to
do,
because
we
want
to
do
what
is
correct
and
within
the
law.
H
A
H
A
A
All
right,
if
you
would
please
state
your
name,
your
address
and
confirm
that
you've
been
sworn
and
then
you'll
have
three
minutes.
G
Okay,
my
name
is
brad
mcintyre.
I
live
at
1706,
south
alexander
road,
and
this
structure
has
been
these.
Two
structures
have
been
there
for
several
years
now.
There
was
no
permits
that
I
saw.
There's
also
been
some
things
that
have
been
done
on
the
property
which
I
feel
needed
permits
that
were
not
done
of
those
was
big
limbs
on
oak
trees
being
cut
down.
G
G
A
M
C
Okay
next
question:
the
one
of
these
two
structures
is
crossing
the
seven
foot
line.
H
H
G
D
G
D
M
D
The
one,
so
if
yeah,
if
you're,
can
you
see
the
picture?
The
one
on
the
bottom.
M
H
E
H
M
H
F
So
it
is
one
it
is
one
building,
but
they
are
connected
by
this.
I
don't
want
to
call
it
a
breezeway,
but
there's
there
is
a
solid
concrete.
That
part.
That's
that's
kind
of
like
a
passageway
that
connects
this
too
sure.
D
And
I
have
a
second
question:
is
it
on
a
foundation?
It
is
on.
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
all
right,
then
you
have
three
minutes
for
additional
information.
You
want
to
share
with
us
rebuttal
anything
along
those
lines.
H
D
I
I
just
had
a
comment
about
this,
in
that
this
building
does
is
on
a
corner
a
lot
and
a
normal
side.
Setback
for
a
storage
unit
would
be
three
feet.
H
E
Simone
savino
assistant
city
attorney-
I
just
want
to
remind
the
board
it's
any
decisions
made,
should
be
based
on
substantial
competent
evidence
that
was
provided
to
you
or
already
enclosed
in
the
record
for
this
the
application,
so
just
as
you
know,
just
base
it
on
what
has
been
provided
to
you
or
has
been
provided
via
discussion.
Okay,.
A
H
G
H
H
H
C
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
opposed.
Okay,
your
petition
is
denied
you
have
14
days
if
you
would
like
to
appeal
it.
Otherwise
you
can
work
with
the
city.
F
So
do
you
have
your
documents?
Have
you
been
swimming?
Yes,
okay,
all
right.
So
the
next
case
before
the
war
this
evening
is
vrb
2205.
This
was
heard
at
the
january
vrb
and
they
were
requested
to
return
with
additional
evidence
which
they
confirmed
that
they
do
have.
At
this
point,
the
board
had
requested
that
they
come
back
with
the
survey
and
staff
steven
eister
had
requested
that
they
provide
a
tree
survey
as
well,
but
I
would
go
over
the
details
of
the
case.
F
F
F
This
is
an
arial
showing
on
the
subject
property.
It's
an
interior
lot
in
the
south
tamper
planning
district.
This
is
the
previous
site
plan
that
the
applicant
had
provided,
showing
the
variance
request
to
the
side
and
to
the
rear,
and
this
is
again
for
a
full
enclosure,
and
then
they
provided
plans
for
this
proposed
structure.
F
So
before
I
hand
it
over
to
the
applicant,
the
board
is
made
aware
that
section.
27-80
is
what
the
criteria
that
you
have
to
consider
in
the
approval
of
any
variance
request.
F
A
All
right
come
on
up
state
your
names,
your
address
and
confirm
that
you've
been
sworn
press.
Please,
okay,
my.
G
F
G
We
were
waiting
on
the
engineer
to
verify
the
redesign
of
the
pool
enclosure.
We
basically
brought
it
in
and
we
just
like
we
just
you
guys
all
found
out.
We
got
this
today
and
we
tried
to
get
the
pool
the
engineer
to
come
with
us
tonight.
In
case
you
had
any
questions
about
the
drawing
and
to
make
sure
that
it
met
the
guidelines
that
a
variant
was
not
required.
C
G
C
G
And
this
is
just
what
we're
showing
you
here.
Is
this
top
part
where
it
says
they're
not
available
to
come
tonight,
and
this
was
just
their.
A
E
Simone
savino
legal
department,
I'm
assuming
the
case,
is
being
withdrawn.
So
that's
that
does
need
to
be
noted
for
the
record.
A
E
A
Right,
well,
let's
do
it
this
way.
I
think
what
our
legal
staff
has
just
recommended
is
that
assuming
everything
is
accurate
on
your
survey
and
that
you
are
able
to
build
within
the
setbacks,
are
you,
okay,
with
withdrawing
that
case?
Consider
withdrawing
your
application,
considering
you
don't
need
a
variance
to
do
what
you're
asking
to
do
on
that
design.
A
Until
it's
real
terrific
all
right
well,
then,
if
anything
else
is
needed,
you
can
work
with
city
staff,
but
otherwise
have
a
great
night
all
right.
Thank
you.
A
Okay
is
the
african
here
for
2210.
A
A
A
What's
that
that
looks
yeah,
should
we
do
this
square
in
first
or
do
you
want
to
do
that
yeah
all
right?
Let's
do
the
square
root.
F
F
F
F
The
applicant
has
provided
what
would
be
their
proposed
site
plan
taking
out
this
tree
right
here
and
this
second
grand
tree
order
to
construct
a
new
single-family
residence
as
required
by
the
variance
application.
They
have
provided
alternative
site
plans
as
well.
F
A
A
And
then
the
criteria
for
the
variance
review
board
consideration
has
27-80
there
and
then
the
applicant
completed
the
application
with
22
27-80
of
the
city
code.
Did
the
applicant
have
the
20
the
correct
criteria
was
the
applicant
given
the
correct
criteria
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
application
process
gave
them.
F
They
did
provide
that
it
just
didn't
make
it
in
time
before
I
sent
it
to
five
cents
in
the
staff
report,
but
they
did
provide
that
alternative
a1
that
they
are
required
to
fill,
so
they
did
provide
that
to
staff.
Yes,
okay,.
J
Well,
basically,
the
the
tree
sits
almost
dead
center
of
the
property.
The
current
home
is
so
impacted
that
has
been
condemned.
It's
had
squatters
in
the
neighborhood
living
in
the
home
and
the
police
have
had
been
called
out,
so
there's
no
way
to
fix
the
current
house,
especially
since
it's
been
condemned.
J
So
if
you
take
the
house
down,
there's
no
other
place
to
put
a
home
except
right
on
top
of
the
root
structure
of
the
tree,
and
if
you
did
that
the
tree
then
becomes
hazardous,
trying
to
look
at
the
three
or
four
different
ways
to
put
the
tree
on
the
property.
It
always
impacts
the
tree
very
negatively.
J
So
when
you
look
at
there's
just
no
way
to
sell
salvage
the
quarkus
virginiano
the
live
oak,
the
laurel
look
on
the
right
hand.
Side
is
in
a
hazard,
shape
as
it
is
and
soon
as
somebody
move
into
the
home.
That
tree
would
then
be
hazardous
because
it's
going
to
aim
dangerous
because
it's
going
to
fall
on
the
home
that
you
just
built.
So
that's
the
request
to
remove
those
two
trees.
A
Does
that
complete
your
presentation
this
evening?
Yes,
sir,
it's
pretty
simple
terrific.
I
know
it
sounds
like
there's
some
folks,
or
at
least
one
person
here
to
speak
this
evening
on
this
petition.
A
O
Yes,
my
name
is
anna
cremie.
My
address
is
3310
west
van
buren
street
in
tampa
florida
33611.
O
I
live
two
doors
from
the
property
that
we're
discussing,
and
I
would
actually
first
like
to
start
by
thanking
you,
the
board.
You
do
important
work
for
the
city
of
tampa
and
as
a
resident,
I
appreciate
your
service.
O
I
also
would
like
to
thank
zorro
properties
and
thomas
hall,
because
their
inclusion
of
an
alternate
plan
that
saves
the
grand
trees
on
the
property
shows
that
they
have
respect
for
their
neighbors,
and
it
tells
me
that
they
care
about
our
beautiful
tree.
Canopy
tampa
has
a
time-honored
history
of
protecting
its
trees.
O
Our
urban
forest
is
world
renowned
and
estimated
to
provide
more
than
a
billion
dollars
in
compensatory
value
to
the
city
when
accounting
for
pollution,
removal,
carbon
storage
and
energy
conservation
trees
are
also
a
vital
part
of
our
ecosystem
as
a
key
as
a
keystone
species.
Oaks
host
more
than
400
varieties
of
pollinators
and
provide
food
and
shelter
for
countless
birds
and
animals,
but
it
isn't
just
wildlife
who
benefit
in
our
corner
of
interbay.
O
We
live
in
the
approach
zone
of
mcdill
air
force
base,
our
neighborhood
trees,
not
only
clean
the
air,
but
also
provide
crucial
noise
abatement
as
the
planes
fly
very
low
over
our
homes.
The
increased
noise
pollution
that
would
result
from
a
reduction
in
our
tree
canopy
would
decrease
our
quality
of
life
significantly
tree
removal
request.
Tre2255
was
submitted
in
october
2021
by
the
previous
property
owner.
The
request
claimed
that
the
grand
tree
on
the
north
side
of
the
property
was
quote
dead,
diseased
damaged.
O
It
is
worth
noting
that
the
city's
tree
evaluation
report
ranked
the
tree
as
b6
and
stated
that
quote.
If
the
tree
is
removed
due
to
damage
to
the
home,
the
home
cannot
be
demoed
for
two
years.
I
have
a
picture.
I
have
a
copy
of
that.
If
anyone
would
like
to
see
it,
the
permit
request
was
then
closed
and
the
application
for
variants
that
we
are
discussing
today
was
submitted
in
november
2021
on
behalf
of
the
previous
owner
of
the
property.
O
Those
statements
are
ludicrous
because
zoro
purchased
the
property
knowing
that
the
house
was
condemned
and
that
the
tree
was
protected
if
they
did
not
know
they
should
have
known.
This
is
not
a
case
of
an
existing
homeowner
wishing
to
expand
his
home
or
abate
a
problem.
It
is
a
case
in
which
the
trees
can
be
accommodated.
O
O
O
O
How
do
we
lose
our
canopy?
We
lose
our
canopy
one
tree
at
a
time.
One
request
for
variants
at
a
time,
and
if
we
lose
our
tree
canopy,
we
lose
it
for
the
rest
of
our
lives.
You
are
in
a
position
to
save
these
trees.
Please
approve
site
plan
alternate
one
and
disapprove
the
proposed
site
plan
and
site
plan
alternate
too.
Thank
you.
A
A
B
In
our
packet
we
have
a
letter
from
thomas
a
hall
and
it
looks
like
he
was
an
arborist
that
assessed
one
tree,
I'm
not
sure
what
tree
this
is.
It's
unclear,
based
on
the
plan
and
probably
dbh,
has
changed
a
lot
from
surveys
and
evaluation.
C
C
There
is
no
uncondemning
it.
I
guess
at
this
point,
so
I
took
that
out
of
the
equation,
as
I
think
he
factored
it
into
the
equation
and
I
think
that's
where
a
big,
a
big
part
of
the
discrepancy
lies
for
our
ratings,
but
I
don't
disbelieve
any
of
the
information
he
put
in
the
report
can.
C
Yeah,
so
in
the
front
of
the
house
it
looks
like
there
was
some
foundation
damage
there,
where
the
tree
did
adjust
things
and
shift
things
okay,
but
with
the
house
being
demoed,
I
think
it's
a
good
time
to
kind
of
redesign
and.
A
D
And
I
had
a
another
question
about
the
other
tree:
what
was
your
code
on
that?
What
was
your.
C
Yeah
so
the
other
tree,
I
think
we're
talking
about
it's
a
split
trunk
or
double
trunk.
I
think
it's
a
live
oak.
I
don't
think
it's
a
warlock,
it's
in
preservation,
quality,
which
is
why
it's.
If
you
look
at
the
chart
or
the
report,
I
guys
I
gave
you
guys.
I
don't
know
if
you
got
this
in
the
staff
report
I'll
pass
that
around
I
have
it
as
a
c7
which
is
preservation,
quality.
C
It
should
be
monitored.
The
original
site
plan
showed
the
house.
It
showed
the
tree
being
saved
on
the
proposed
plane,
but
it's
only
like
four
feet
away,
so
we
made
them.
Add
that
to
the
request,
because
there
was
no
way
it
would
be
able
to
handle
those
impacts,
and
then
I'll
give
this
to
you
guys.
So
you
can
read
through
it.
G
K
C
Think
it's
just
gonna,
basically
kind
of
stay,
how
it
is,
as
these
live
oaks
get
more
mature,
their
growth
rate
slows
down,
so
the
house
will
probably
kind
of
stay
in
its
condemned
state.
C
So
during
the
demo
phase
that
section
of
the
tree
that
20
foot,
whatever
falls
within
the
protective
radius,
will
have
to
be
demoed
by
hand,
so
they
can
rip
down
the
main
structure.
But
then
the
footers
and
the
stuff
below
ground
will
have
to
be
hand
demoed
and
that's
pretty
standard
for
anytime
there's
a
tree
near
an
old
foundation.
We
require
that
to
be
hand-demoed.
L
I'm
not
sure
steve
if
this
is
for
you
or
that's
for
jane,
but
let's
see
the
the
woman
who
came
up
and
spoke
in
opposition
to
this
variance
mentioned
that
there
was
a
two
year
like
no
build
period.
Can
you
speak
a
little
bit
about
that?
I.
C
Yeah,
so
for
any
grain
tree
removal
for
construction
damage,
like
say,
if
I
have
a
house,
I'm
living
in
it,
I
have
a
tree
causing
foundation
issues.
You
can
remove
it.
No
variance
is
required,
but
then
you
have
a
two
year
kind
of
hold
on
your
property,
where
you
can't
do
any
additions
or
do
anything
worth
say
that
tree
was
you're
like
oh,
I
have
a
tree
in
the
backyard
it's
causing
me
problems.
Let's
just
take
that
out
and
I'll
put
a
big
addition
on
the
back.
It
kind
of
prevents
that
from
happening.
L
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
from
the
board
for
well
you'll
get
rebuttal
time.
So,
if
there's
more,
you
want
to
say
that's
your
opportunity,
but
just
before
we
do
that
any
other
questions,
no
other
questions
all
right
applicant.
You
have
three
minutes
to
say
whatever
you
want
to
rebut
anything
that
was
said
to
just
tell
us
more
information
or
to
respond
to
any
of
the
questions
that
we're
asked.
J
Besides,
let
it
sit
there
the
way
the
tree
is
currently
situated
you
you
have
to
be
20
to
24
feet
off
the
foundation,
so
you
have
to
grant
a
variance
to
be
inside
of
the
root
zone
and
because,
in
our
area,
the
root
zone
for
a
tree
that
size
is
only
going
to
be
24
inches
deep,
but
it's
going
to
be
wide
once
you
start
cutting
those
roots
with
a
tree.
That's
only
24
inches
of
ground.
With
that
much
canopy,
it's
going
to
be
unstable.
J
That's
from
dr
edward
gilman
to
university
of
florida.
That's
not
me
speaking!
That's
somebody
with
way
more
experience
than
me
so
and
on
the
other
side,
the
other
tree
is
the
same
thing
once
you
start
cutting
into
the
root
zone
at
the
which
you
want
to
be
four
feet
off.
According
to
that
building
plan.
J
That
tree
is
not
going
to
be
stable
because
it's
going
to
lose
a
significant
portion
of
its
route.
Now,
in
both
things
there's
this,
the
city
is
already
compensated
by
replacing
it
with
type
1.
Florida
number
one
grade
shade
trees.
So,
even
though
this
tree
will
cease,
new
trees
will
be
added
and
the
property
can
have
the
proper
use,
which
is
not
sit
open
right
now,
which
has
had
squatters,
and
you
can
see
all
the
code
violations
and
the
police
have
been
called
out.
J
O
A
A
Hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
or
discussion
from
the
ward.
A
B
B
The
grand
tree
and
the
center
of
the
property
may
be
removed
with
the
one
on
the
west
side
remain
because
it
appears
in
sight
plan
alternate
one
and
two
that
you
can
build
a
structure
and
it
be
located
a
decent
distance
away
from
the
roots
on
not
impacting
the
house
new
housing
structure
that
will
be
built.
B
So
again,
one
tree
being
removed
the
other
one
remaining
with
that
said
variants
as
conditioned
to
be
granted
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
and
the
record
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth,
specifically
in
section
2780
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
tree
will
be
impacted
upon
new
construction
and
it
also
in
a
decline
state.
A
A
Would
be
two
motions,
so
is
that
what
legal
would
recommend
on
that
simone.
E
Savino
assistant
city
attorney,
yes,
I
would
because,
even
though
it's
requested
as
one
variance
you're
going
to
bifurcate
it
because
you're
turning
it
into
two
separate
motions,
essentially
and
based
on
what
it
sounds
like
you're
proposing,
so
I
would
recommend
that
that
way
each
is
specific
to
the
tree
and
be
as
clear
as
possible
when
just
when
labeling,
what
you're,
approving
or
motioning
to
approve
versus
motioning
to
deny
based
on
the
tree
in
the
site
plan.
If
that
makes
sense,.
B
A
That's
the
motion
you
would
like
to
make
what
you
want
to
do.
Is
you
want
to
move
to
approve
it
as
to
the
north,
the
removal
of
the
north?
I
guess
that
would
be
a
32-inch
oak
and
then
you
would
move
to
deny
it
as
to
the
west,
which
is
a
32-inch
oak.
G
B
A
A
G
D
You
could
also
use
well
yeah,
I
guess
that's
the
best
west
and
north.
You
would
just
clarify.
B
So
this
will
be
approval
of
tree
and
removal.
Move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
vrb
22-10
for
property,
located
at
3306
west
van
buren
drive
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
removal
of
a
grand
tree
based
upon
the
petitioner
meeting.
The
burden
of
proof
with
regard
to
the
six
factors
for
determining
tree
removal
is
set
forth
in
section
27-284,
0.2,
0.5
f-4
of
the
city
code
for
granting
tree
remover,
specifically
that
the
evidence
provided
in
the
record
showed.
B
E
L
A
A
So
that
that
motion
passes
five
to
one
all
right,
all
right
now,
you've
got
a
motion
to
deny
the
removal
of
the
second
tree
correct.
Give
that
one
a
shot.
B
So
I
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
vrv
2210
for
the
property
located
at
3306
west
van
buren
drive,
look
for
removal
of
a
grand
tree
be
denied
due
to
the
failure
of
the
petitioner
to
meet
the
burden
of
proof.
With
regard
to
the
six
factors
for
determining
reasonable
use
set
forth
in
section
27-284,
0.2.5
f-4
of
the
city
quote
for
granting
tree
removal,
specifically
that
with
alternate
plan,
one
and
two,
this
new
construction
of
a
house
can
be
set
back
for
far
enough
that
it
will
not
impact
the
tree.
B
I
said
specific
to
site
plan
alternate
one
and
two.
A
Okay,
so
is
there
a
second
to
that
motion.
L
A
All
right,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
on
the
denial
all
those
in
favor
of
the
denial
say.
I.
A
Four
to
three
46
count.
I
was
counting
correctly
first
okay,
if
there
is
any
portion
of
what
has
been
decided
tonight
that
you
would
like
to
appeal
or
that
anyone
would
like
to
appeal.
There
is
a
14-day
appeals
process
from
the
time
the
decision
is
issued
have
a
great
evening.
F
F
F
F
F
E
A
A
If,
if
there's
anyone
else
in
the
audience
who
hasn't
been
sworn
and
who
needs
to
be
sworn,
let's
go
ahead
and
stand
up
and
get
you
sworn
in
now,
please.
N
A
Okay,
applicants
state
your
name,
your
address
and
even
though
we
just
saw
you
get
sworn
in,
please
state
for
the
record
that
you've
been
formed.
N
N
N
Oh
okay,
sorry
I
didn't
know
that
so
before
we
even
built
the
structure,
we
were
looking
online
for
the
just
to
find
out.
If
I
needed
a
permit-
and
I
was
looking
at
the
code
of
ordinances.
N
Section
five
105.2
e:
it
said
if
it
was
less
than
500
square
feet
or
less
we
didn't
need
it
was
exempt
from
permit.
So
I
just
called
the
city
of
tampa's
permit
office
just
to
verify
all
that
was
true
and
they
said
as
long
as
it
was
less
than
500
square
feet.
We
were
okay,
so
I
didn't
know
that
I
needed
a
building
permit
before
we
built
it
and
the
builders
that
we
got
never
told
us.
N
We
needed
a
permit,
so
we
went
ahead
and
built
the
structure
and,
as
I
was
applying
for
the
building
permit
and
that's
when
they
told
me
that
I
needed
to
do
the
variance
and
that's
why
I'm
here
it
is
where
it
is
because
it's
furthest
away
from
the
main
streets.
It's
we
live
off
bay
shore.
So
it's
a
pretty
busy
road.
We
wanted
just
something
in
the
backyard
that
would
protect
my
daughter
from
the
sun
and
the
rain,
and
what
we
have
it's
the
only
place
in
the
property
that
it
would
fit.
N
We
didn't
want
it
too,
close
to
the
other
street,
so
it's
right
there
in
the
back
away
from
the
main
street.
It
doesn't
seem
to
be
an
eyesore,
it
doesn't
seem
to
bother
the
direct
neighbors
that
it
affects
in
their
yards.
I
also
thought
I
was
okay,
because
I
have
seen
neighbors
that
also
have
covered
structures
and
covered
pathways
in
our
neighborhood.
E
No,
I
was
just
here
for
support.
She,
you
know
knows
the
facts
better
than
me.
As
far
as
you
know
how
far
back
this
dates
and
this
the
issues
that
they've
had
along
the
way
to
finally
get
here
for
a
hearing,
so
you
know
I
made
sure
everything
was
done
properly,
so
they
could
be
heard
today
and
yeah.
I
mean
she
pretty
much
covered
it
as
far
as
the
hardship
goes.
This
is
the
only
place
on
the
property.
E
You
know
where
they
could
put
any
sort
of
covered
patio
if
they
were
adding
a
covered
patio,
it's
a
pretty
small
yard.
I
think
the
sides
are
even
smaller
than
the
the
back
area,
but
it
is
directly
behind
the
house,
so
you
can't
see
it
from
from
the
front
street.
It
is
a
very
busy
street
and
I
know
that
they
have
checked
with
all
of
their
neighbors
surrounding
the
property
and
nobody
seems
to
have
an
issue
with
it.
On
the
contrary,
they
they,
like
it
they've,
come
over
to
enjoy
it.
N
N
A
L
Yeah,
so
why
did
you
go
and
apply
for
a
permit?
You
know
after
it
was
constructed
like
because
you
showed
us
that
code
section.
N
Yes
and
then
afterwards,
one
of
my
neighbors
said
that
I
needed
a
permit
for
it
and
he
called
the
city
and
code
enforcement
came
out
and
said:
yes,
you
need
a
permit
for
that.
So
I
went
to
the
building
permit
hearing
and
then
they
told
me
I
needed
to
apply
for
the
variance
and
that
neighbor
has
since.
A
I
assume-
and
I
guess
I'll
ask
this
as
a
question:
are
you
aware
that
there
is
a
letter
in
opposition
in
in
our
packet
that
had
been
submitted
to
the
city?
You
said
that
you'd
spoken
to
all
the
neighbors.
I
assume
that's
the
neighbor
who's
who's
moved
that
you
were.
N
And
there
was
another
neighbor
that
also,
I
guess
had
more
of
an
issue
of
the
actual
process.
Not
he
didn't
have
anything
against
the
actual
structure
itself.
He
had
an
issue
with
how
I
notified
the
neighbors
about
the
hearing
about
the
hearing
back
in
october.
It
was
actually
halloween.
He
saw
my
sign.
I
guess,
like
the
the
wording,
had
melted
away
from
the
rain
and
he
came
by
and
knocked
on
the
door
and
brought
the
signs
over.
N
A
The
letters
from
george
gaskill.
N
A
Seeing
none,
you
have
three
minutes
for
a
bottle.
If
you
should
choose
to
use
it.
A
L
I
move
that
variant
request
for
case
vrb
21-121
for
property
located
at
5402
bayshore
boulevard
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
of
the
rear
yard,
setback
from
20
feet
to
5
feet,
with
an
encouragement
for
eaves
and
gutters
based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
the
hardships
did
not
result
from
the
actions
of
the
well,
that
the
hardships
are
unique
to
the
property
and
that
the
structure
that
you
know
is
currently
seated
on.
L
The
property
is
in
a
location
that
you
know
prohibits
construction
of
a
covered
patio
in
any
location
other
than
where
the
subject
patio
was
constructed
and
the
variants,
if
granted,
won't
substantially
interfere
with
the
health,
safety
or
welfare
of
others.
None
of
the
applicant
has
testified
that
she's
spoken
with
all
of
the
neighbors
and
the
neighbors,
with
objections
no
longer
live
there
and
other
neighbors
are.
You
know,
approve
of
this
construction.
K
A
F
January
development
coordination-
the
next
case
before
the
board
this
evening
is
vrb2221.
This
is
addressed
at
1907
burgundy
avenue.
The
property
owner
is
annette
eberhardt,
and
this
is
zoned
rs
50.,
residential
single
family.
The
variance
request
is
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
5
feet
in
order
to
accommodate
an
existing
attached
to
car
carport.
F
Comment
because
she
provided
a
full
site
plan.
That
was
one
of
their
comments
that
the
natural
resources
and
right
of
way
found
it
inconsistent
pending
a
full
site
plan
review.
She
provided
that,
as
of
today,
transportation
found
them
consistent
with
the
comments
that
they
need
to
show
the
paving
for
the
residents
for
the
two
parking
spaces
need
to
be
paved
and
the
apron
of
the
driveway
needs
to
be
updated
for
city
of
tampa
right-of-way
requirements.
A
Okay,
the
applicant
you've
been
sworn
yes,
okay,
come
on
up
state,
your
name,
your
address
and
then
just
confirm
that
for
the
record.
G
G
G
G
So
I
purchased
my
home
back
in
2001.
It
was
built
in
1961..
G
The
structure
didn't
have
the
carport,
I'm
currently
a
licensed
family
child
care
home
provider,
where
I
service
families
and
children
24
hours
seven
days
a
week,
so
the
structure
was
put
in
place
to
provide
shelter
when
the
parents
are
dropping
the
children
off
like
a
weather
like
today.
I
have
an
infant
that
just
started
this
week
and
a
one-year-old
as
well
two
siblings,
and
so
this
is
convenient
for
the
parents.
When
they're
dropping
the
children
off,
they
don't
have
to
worry
about
the
weather,
the
conditions,
whether
it's
hot,
whether
it's
raining
here
in
tampa
florida.
G
A
G
As
far
as
the
setbacks
and
things
like
that,
I'm
really
not
you
know
informed
on.
I
know
that
I
was
told
the
city
came
out.
One
of
my
neighbors
filed
a
complaint
that
the
carport
was
there.
It
has
been
there
since
2014
and,
like
I
said,
I
didn't
know
that
it
was
an
issue,
but
what
I
found
out
was
that
it's
something
going.
It
was
something
going
on
in
our
neighborhood
where
everybody
was
calling
on
everybody,
because
somebody
got
called
on.
A
Okay,
all
right
does
that
complete
your
presentation?
Yes,
okay!
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
wishes
to
speak
about
this
petition,
all
right
come
on.
F
A
G
My
name
is
joe
joel
alva
g
and
I
reside
at
1911,
east
londonville
avenue
and
I've
been
sworn
in.
G
I
reside
two
houses
over
from
mrs
l
from
the
red,
the
appliance
here
and
she
has
a
double
carport
on
our
property
and
she
is
a
has
a
nursery
on
our
on
our
home,
and
I
agree
that
that
she
should
have
that
cardboard
because
she
has
these
children
that
come
and
the
parents
pick
up
their
their
children.
And
it's
like
raining
today.
G
For
that
particular
reason
and
she's
been
there
and
she's
been
the
children
walk
by
my
property
every
morning,
and
and
it's
really
good
for
her
to
have
that
there,
because
that's
all,
I
have
to
say.
A
A
A
Seeing
none
are
there
any
questions
by
the
board
members
for
the
applicant
or
anyone
else?
Mr
pastor.
C
Miss
everhart:
did
you
say
that
you
had
this
built.
G
C
Okay,
I
haven't
heard
you
mention
what
the
character
of
the
immediate
neighborhood
is
in
regards
to
front
yard.
Carports.
Are
there
others
on
your
street
or
in
your
area,
or
are
you
the
only
one.
G
There
are
a
couple
of
others
on
my
street.
Yes,.
C
A
K
That
set
variants
as
conditioned
to
be
granted
based
upon
the
applicant,
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
When
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
27-80
of
the
city's
code,
specifically
that
it
was
an
older
home
built
in
1961
with
no
garage,
it
also
increases
the
safety
and
well-being
of
the
inhabitant
and
the
homeowner,
and
that
it
is
in
harmony
with
the
surrounding
neighborhoods.
F
No
sir,
our
last
applicant
is
a
no-show,
so
I
was
just
trying
to
con,
confer
with
the
legal
what
the
appropriate
action
would
be.
E
Simone
savino
assistant
city
attorney,
if
the
applicant
is
not
here,
they
are
required
to
produce
the
burden
that
you
would
weigh
the
application
on
so
either
this
I
mean
it
just
doesn't
go
forward
tonight.
A
Well,
we
understand
that
so
traditionally
we
have
two
options.
We
can
either
continue
it
or
we
have.
It's
been
recommended
against
simply
denying
them.
G
E
F
A
This
is
the
first
missed.
You
know
they
first
time
they
were
here
and
just
didn't,
show
yeah,
so
just
for
ease
of
moving
forward.
How
about
I
make
a
motion
to
continue
vrb
22-28
to
the
next
available
hearing
date.
Would.
D
Vrb
22-28
for
property
located
at
1611,
south
arowana
avenue
to
the
next
available
to.