►
From YouTube: VRB 12/13/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
Aaron
Murphy
also
in
attendance
this
evening
from
legal.
We
have
Susan
Johnson
Velez
from
development
coordination.
We
have
Jane
maddu
and
Mary
Tavares
from
natural
resources.
We
have
Steven
eister
from
Transportation.
No
Jonathan
Scott
tonight
is
Jonathan
here,
I,
don't
see
him
okay,
there
are
some
procedural
rules.
We
need
you
to
follow
when
your
case
in
number,
when
your
case
number
and
petitioner's
name
are
called.
Please
approach
the
podium
when
you
approach
the
podium.
Please
state
your
name,
your
address
and
if
you
have
been
sworn
I'll
say
this
again,
because
everybody
forgets.
B
Please
state
your
name,
your
address
and
confirm
that
you
have
been
sworn
in.
The
petitioner
and
or
your
agent
will
have
10
minutes
to
make
a
presentation,
all
other
persons
or
participants
wishing
to
speak.
We'll
have
three
minutes
and
then
the
petitioner
will
have
an
additional
five
minutes
for
rebuttal
if
needed.
The
time
periods,
as
stated,
will
be
kept
by
the
board.
B
Any
information
such
as
pictures
or
plans
that
have
not
been
previously
submitted
as
part
of
your
petition
and
that
you
intend
to
present
at
this
hearing
for
consideration
and
in
support
of
your
petition,
must
be
individually
presented
and
accepted
by
the
board.
After
acceptance
by
the
board,
you
must
submit
and
the
item
to
staff
for
it
to
be
entered
and
made
part
of
the
permanent
record.
The
board
base
is
its
decision
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
which
is
presented
in
which
meets
the
criteria
required
by
the
city's
code
of
ordinances.
B
Please
be
sure
to
clearly
State
your
hardship
criteria.
During
your
presentation,
a
majority
of
the
board
is
needed
to
approve
your
variance.
The
variance
request
granted
by
the
board
will
be
only
for
what
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
will
be
in
compliance
with
any
terms
and
conditions
stated
in
the
approval
by
the
board.
All
other
city
codes
will
need
to
be
met
if
the
case
is
approved,
your
variance
will
expire
two
years
from
the
date
of
the
decision.
B
If
the
case
is
continued,
it
will
be
continued
to
either
next
month's
vrb
board
agenda
or
the
next
available
position
on
an
upcoming
vrp
board
agenda.
The
case
is
denied.
You
may
wish
to
have
your
variance
review.
Have
the
variance
review
board's
decision
appealed
by
the
city
council?
You
must
file
a
petition
for
review
of
the
board's
decision
within
14
days
of
the
written
decision.
You
will
not
be
able
to
pull
any
permits
until
after
the
14-day
review
period
has
passed.
B
Your
cooperation
in
ensuring
that
this
meeting
is
run
smoothly
is
greatly
appreciated.
Can
I
have
immediate
a
motion
to
approve
the
meeting
minutes
from
the
November
BRB
board
meeting.
B
E
E
B
All
right,
thank
you.
We
will
I
guess
we'll
address
that
when
we
start
the
hearings
at
this
time,
I
would
like
a
staff
member
to
conduct
the
swearing-in
and
for
the
folks
in
our
audience.
If
you
plan
to
speak,
if
there's
a
chance,
you
might
speak
if
there
is
the
slightest
possibility
that
you
might
have
to
say
something
this
evening.
Please
stand
up
and
be
sworn
so
we
don't
have
to
do
it
again.
C
B
All
right,
Miss
madhu,
would
you
like
to
address
2292
now.
B
Okay,
sorry,
well,
do
we
need
a?
Would
you
like
a
motion
then
for
continuance
of
BRB
22-92
to
continue
to
the
January
10th?
Would
somebody
like
to
make
that
motion.
G
B
Right
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
wishes
to
speak
about
the
motion
to
continue
January
10
20,
the
BRB
22-92,
which
is
526
Luzon,
Avenue
hi
state
your
name,
your
address
and
confirm
that
you've
been
sworn.
This
is
only
as
to
the
continuance.
Yes,.
B
Of
course,
is
there
anyone
else
who
came
in
after
we
swore
in
who
needs
to
be
sworn?
If
you
have
now,
some.
I
F
H
Thank
you
hi.
My
name
is
Nicole
newgebauer.
My
address
is
401
East
Jackson
Street
I
represent
the
applicant
for
the
variants
I'm
here
in
support
of
the
variance
request.
We
are
working
on
some
site
plan,
changes
to
hopefully
save
a
tree
on
the
property,
and
so
that's
why
we're
asking
for
the
continuance.
B
H
B
F
The
next
the
first
case
before
the
board
is
vrb
2268
addressed
at
427,
Ari
Avenue,
the
property
owner
is
Charles
Cobb,
the
applicant
is
Eric
Hughes
and
the
variance
request
is
to
remove
a
grand
tree.
This
case
has
been
heard
since
September
2022
and
they
are
just
awaiting
the
decision
by
the
board,
but
I
doubt
that
the
applicant
is
here
today
so.
E
B
Is
is
anyone
here
for
22
68,
which
is
427
Erie
Avenue?
Is
anyone
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
or
seeking
to
oppose
it.
E
All
right
so
so
Mr
chair,
we,
we
did
notice
that
the
applicant
wasn't
here
so
pursue
it
to
your
rules.
The
applicant
or
authorized
agent
is
required
to
appear
in
support
of
the
application
of
the
public
hearing
and
if
the
applicant
or
authorized
agent
fails
to
appear,
the
board
may
allow
the
application
to
be
carried
over
to
the
next
available
agenda.
B
So
would
anyone
like
to
make
a
motion
to
move
2268
to
the
end
of
the
agenda?
You
can
then
talk
about
it
at
the
end
of
the
agenda
and,
if
necessary,
it'll
be
automatically
continued
or
do
we
need
a
motion
to
continue.
It
must.
E
Oh
I
think
the
board
can
can
pass
it
to
the
end
of
the
agenda.
B
A
F
Next
vrb
2215,
this
is
addressed
at
611,
North,
Bradford,
Avenue,
Zone,
RS,
50,
residential
single
family
property
owners
are
Eduardo,
Moret
and
Dory
mapita,
and
the
variance
request
is
to
reduce
the
side,
yard
setback
from
seven
feet
to
four
feet
and
two
inches,
and
this
is
for
an
existing
Porsche
Edition.
This
is
work
that
was
done
without
permits.
They
were
here
earlier
in
November
and
their
their
variance
request
was
continued
to
this
month.
B
E
A
F
This
is
the
subject
property.
It
is
in
the
USF
Planning
District.
F
G
G
G
B
You
have
10
minutes
to
explain
to
us
your
hardships,
the
reason
why
it
needs
to
be
built
as
it's
built
where
it's
built
and.
G
B
J
J
G
That
that
side,
where
we
put
the
porch,
is
where
the
kid
the
door
to
the
kitchen
faces.
So
we
decided
that
that
was
the
best
area
for
us
toward
the
port
to
have
the
family
gatherings,
because
before
that
it
was
an
empty
space.
J
B
Okay,
is
there
anything
else
that
you
would
like
to
share
with
the
board
that
would
support
the
hardship
for
the
reduction
of
the
side
yard.
A
B
K
G
B
Is
there
anything
that
you
would
like
to
address
as
to
the
the
neighbors
concerns
that
were
raised
here.
J
J
J
B
There's
nothing
else.
Is
there
anything
else
you'd
like
to
share
with
us
in
your
presentation.
B
Then,
let's
open
up,
if
there's
any,
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
wishing
to
speak
about
this
petition.
K
G
G
G
J
G
A
G
L
B
Over
all
right
so
I
guess
the
question
is:
is
it
possible
the
question
that.
K
Is
being
asked
of
you?
Is
it
possible
to.
G
M
N
G
A
L
G
B
I
think
I
think
the
the
question
that
Miss
Johnson
is
asking
is
intended
to
suggest
that
it,
the
approval,
is
not
needed,
I
mean.
C
That's
why
I
asked
for
most
feasible
and
doable
and
then,
if
it's
per
code,
then
they
can
think
about
how
their
improvements
as
well
as
well.
So.
B
I,
don't
know
that
I
mean
you
can
ask
staff
that
question
but
I
think
it's
I
think
the
problem
is
not
the
slab.
The
problem
is
the
the
overhang
and
the
the
supports
posts
and
staff
could
tell
you
that
answer
probably.
I
G
K
A
A
B
M
Is
okay,
so
the
slab
is
extends
to
about
okay.
L
B
Any
other
questions
seeing
none
all
right.
You
have
five
minutes
to
rebut
or
address
anything
that
was
asked
of
you
or
tell
us
anything
else.
B
For
emotion,.
I
C
C
A
B
N
B
The
petition
is
denied
you
have
14
days
from
the
written
decision
to.
J
F
The
next
case
before
the
board
is
vrb
2288.
This
is
addressed
at
1728
West
Powhatan,
Avenue,
property
owners
are
all
the
Lopez,
and
this
is
on
the
rs60
residential
single
family.
The
request
is
to
reduce
the
west
side
of
the
art
setback
from
seven
feet
to
zero
feet,
and
this
is
for
an
existing
carport.
O
F
G
G
F
A
Q
O
P
B
Okay
applicant,
if
you
would
please
state
your
name,
your
address
confirm
that
you've
been
sworn
then.
G
B
Okay,
if
go
ahead,
you
have
10
minutes
to
State
your
hardships
and
explain
to
us
why.
Q
Q
Q
G
Q
Q
Q
G
Q
G
Q
Q
G
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
A
Q
G
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
G
Q
B
Okay,
does
that
conclude
your
presentation.
G
Q
Q
G
L
G
G
G
Q
P
G
K
B
K
L
B
B
Be
met
but
I
guess.
B
B
G
B
Q
Q
Q
B
Q
L
Q
G
Q
Q
Q
G
B
Yeah
I
mean
let's
go
ahead
and
make
sure
that
your
questions
or
discussions
are
on
the
record
so
that
we
can.
G
G
M
Q
M
Q
Q
Q
Q
G
G
G
Q
Q
Q
Q
G
B
Right
You
have
five
minutes
for
rebuttal
to
share
with
us
anything
else.
You
want
to
share.
Q
B
G
R
A
C
G
B
All
right
is
there:
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
Is
there
a
need
for
discussion.
D
I
just
want
to
put
on
the
record
that
motion
and
I
just
want
to
kind
of
explain
my
reasoning.
Why,
which
is.
L
B
G
B
There's
posts:
okay,
the
motion
the
petition
is
denied.
If
you
would
like
to
appeal
to
city
council,
you
have
14
days.
Q
B
B
F
R
O
K
F
To
14.
the
side
set
back
from
7
to
0.9
feet
for
existing
additions
to
single
family
residence,
and
this
is
also
work
without
permits
code
section
in
reference
to
section
27-156c
that
has
the
schedule
of
area
bulk
height
and
placement
for
the
rs60
zoning
District
as
25
feet
for
the
front
20
feet
for
the
rear
and
seven
on
the
sides.
F
This
is
the
subject
property.
It
is
a
corner
lot
in
the
USF
institutional
Planning
District.
It
is
an
at
the
intersection
of
West
Comanche
and
North
Albany
Avenue.
F
This
application
did
receive
variance
with
two
variances
in
86
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
to
16.
and
for
addition
to
the
existing
home.
F
This
was
reviewed
by
natural
resources
and
found
consistent
with
the
following
comments.
Natural
resources
finds
the
submitted
requests
consistently
conditions
at
the
time
of
construction.
Additional
natural
resources,
changes
and
requests
can
be
made
to
ensure
all
other
applicable
sections
of
chapter
27
of
the
city
of
Tampa
code
and
city
of
Tampa
tree
and
Landscape
technical
manual
are
met.
F
If
you
have
any
questions
feel
free
to
email
me,
Transportation
found
them
consistent
with
no
comments.
Zoning
found
them
inconsistent
with
code
with
the
following
comments.
Zoning
finds
this
request
inconsistent
with
Section
27-156.
The
setback
reduction
has
implications
for
fire
safety,
privacy
and
access
for
maintenance.
B
All
right,
if
you
would
please
state
your
name,
your
address
confirm
that
you've
been
sworn
and
then
you'll
have
10
minutes
to
present
your
hardships.
Is
there
something.
C
C
This
is
a
corner
lot,
so
I
want
to
know
what
the
front
of
the
property
was,
so
that
off
of
Comanche
or
Albany,
it's
almost
Albany,
that's
the
front
Okay.
Thank
you
good.
A
B
B
I
B
G
My
name
is
Carmen
Roshan
I
live
at
5604,
North
Albany,
Avenue,
28
33603,
yes,
and
we
are
the
owners,
see
and
I
was
born
in
terrific.
O
R
R
G
Oh,
they
had
like
post
made
of.
R
Rio
Vista
so.
G
I,
the
house
is
located
on
a
corner
property
between
Comanche
and
Rio.
Vista
I
didn't
speak
to
the
neighbors,
and
nobody
opposed
to
the
very
answer
quiz
that
I
had
submitted.
R
G
R
G
R
G
B
G
R
R
B
Seeing
none
does,
does
anyone
on
the
board
have
any
questions
for
the
petitioner
staff.
L
The
house
itself
the
one
that
existed
prior
to
any
of
that,
the
the
13
6
13.6
the
front
setback
from
25
to
14.
Those
are
already
existing
at
some
point.
A
G
R
G
G
D
R
G
R
D
It
looks
like
it's:
it's
maybe
cinder
block
on
the
all
the
way.
On
the
left
hand,
side.
G
R
The
porch
porch
this
porch.
B
House,
okay,
so
Albany
is
that
they.
D
Okay
and
so
what
addition,
what
is
new
in
this
photo.
R
M
G
O
N
G
G
B
B
R
G
G
L
A
B
Other
questions
all
right,
then
you
have
five
minutes
to
share
with
us
anything
else.
You'd.
O
B
D
D
B
granted
because
that's
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
of
the
rear
yard,
set
back
from
20
feet
to
13.6
feet
and
a
reduction
of
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
14
feet
with
an
encroachment
for
Eaves
and
gutters.
Based
upon
the
applicant
presenting
confident
and.
D
The
property
was
the
building
located
on
the
property,
was
subject
to
these
to
setback
encroachments
when
the
applicant
purchased
the
property
and.
D
That
this.
G
B
G
R
G
K
D
A
lot
of
this
so
I
imagine
that
the
board
has
some
safety
concerns.
You
know
the
property
already
had
a
very
small
side,
yeah
side
yard
setback
based
on
the
additions
that
were
already
constructed.
F
D
Think
about
the
fact
that
the
property
had
a
1.6
foot
side
yard
set
back
when
they
purchased
it.
You
know
this
variance
is
only
asking
for
an
additional
half
a
foot.
That
said,
you
know
it's
just
it's
a
very
small
setback,
and
so
I
am
interested
in.
If
anyone
on
the
board
has
any
thoughts
about
approval
or
denial,
or
you
know
thoughts
about
the
hardship
criteria
here,.
G
P
G
C
R
J
C
G
A
G
G
L
B
M
M
B
He
was
you're
suggesting.
Is
that
your
question,
if
or
your
comment,
if
they
had
just
come
in,
to
confirm
the
variances
as
existed
when
they
purchased
it?
Yeah
I
mean
I
I,
look.
M
R
B
A
G
F
F
The
variance
request
is
to
reduce
the
radar
setback
from
20
feet
to
three
feet
and
the
side
yard
set
back
from
seven
feet
to
three
feet:
to
construct
an
accessory
structure
and
the
section
code
section
and
reference.
There
is
section
27-291z
accessory
structures
with
a
gross
floor
area
larger
than
15
of
the
minimum
required
lot
size.
Most
mid
principal
structure,
setbacks
as
reference
in
section
27-156.
F
This
is
the
site
plan
that
the
applicant
has
provided,
showing
us
the
existing
property.
It's
a
there
is
a
single
family
residence
on
the
property
and
then
towards
the
north
west
of
the
lot.
You
see
the
addition
to
this
accessory
structure
that
is
being
constructed.
F
They
do
have
a
building
permit
in
process
for
the
construction
of
this
awaiting
this
variance
determination.
F
This
was
reviewed
by
natural
resources
and
found
inconsistent
with
technical
standards
and
code
with
the
following
comments.
The
off-site
grantry
requires
a
20-foot
protective
ridges
from
the
face
of
the
tree.
The
cottage
currently
sits,
15
feet
from
the
tree
show
the
protective
20
feet:
protective
radius
of
the
Grand
Tree
and
the
three
foot
protective
ridges
for
the
Palms
ship.
The
building
outside
those
red
eye,
Transportation,
reviewed,
Transportation
review,
was
not
required.
Stormwater
reviewed
and
founded
approved,
approved
with
conditions
right
off.
We
also
found
it
consistent
with
conditions.
F
B
Okay,
any
questions
for
staff
before
we
get
started
in
none
all
right.
Applicants,
please
state
your
name.
Your
address
confirm,
you've
been
sworn
and
then
you'll
have
10
minutes.
S
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
I.
Think
I'd
like
to
just
start
by
saying
that
that
had
this
we've
got
an
older,
detached
wooden
garage
on
the
property
and,
if
it
hadn't
been
for
that,
then
the
three
foot
and
three
foot
setback
that
would
normally
be
accommodating
for
our
structure.
We
wouldn't
have
an
issue
we
wouldn't
probably
be
here.
S
We
have
a
very
old
house
that
was
built
prior
to
in
the
1940s
in
a
garage.
It
was
built
in
the
60s,
probably
prior
to
most
of
the
zoning
ordinances
that
we
have
on
the
books
today
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
and
it's
it's
the
combined
square
footage
of
the
two,
the
old
garage
and
the
new
structure,
we're
proposing
that
exceeds
the
15
percent
gross
square
footage
that
we
can
put
on
an
rs50
lot.
S
So
we
or
our
hardship
is
simply
that
that
you
know
my
clients
didn't
bring
this.
We
did.
We
didn't
create
the
hardship
with
this
older
structure.
It
was
existing
prior,
probably
three
previous
owners,
and
so
it's
a
nice
building.
You
know
it's,
it's
not
very
nice
looking,
but
if
you
go
inside
it's
an
older,
you
know
sort
of
a
Charming,
you
know
constructed
cedar,
siding
open
wall,
so
it's
it's
a
useful
building,
and
so
the
owners
really
don't
want
to
have
to
tear
it
down,
which
is
going
to
be
our
only
option.
S
The
the
second
thing
I
want
to
say
is
that
the
existing
house
is
not
suitable
for
remodel,
we're
actually
building
this
as
an
accessory
structure
for
an
elder
parent.
We
we
build
adus
for
parents
and
they
are
ADA
Compliant
and
it
we
we
always
designed
to
build
them
for
an
elder
parent.
It's
99
of
our
buildings,
we're
in
a
flood
zone
and
because
of
that
we
can't
remodel
the
existing
house.
There's
no
lateral
additions
that
can
be
put
on
this
building
and
the
existing
building
is.
Is
one
of
these.
S
It's
it's
1100
square
feet
and
it's
it's
the
original
floor
plan
in
the
house.
There's
just
no
place
in
the
hallways
in
the
bathrooms
to
expand
this
building,
to
make
it
compliant
for
we're
not
mean
compliant.
You
know
Ada
accessible,
so
we,
the
the
the
the
20-foot
setback,
pushes
the
r
structure
within
pushes
it
so
close
to
the
existing
building.
There's
there
is
a
seven
foot,
separation
or
five
foot,
Eve
separation.
We
can't
meet
even
if
we
try
to
push
it
off
the
rear
property
line.
S
Some
are
all
so
the
you
know.
Our
hardship
is
really
that
we
have
an
existing
building
that
my
owner
didn't
bring
to
the
property
of
the
gross
square.
Footage
is
pushing
us
into
trying
to
comply
with
with
a
primary
structure,
setback
and
there's
just
no
way
for
us
to
get
that
done
with
this
building,
and
so
we're
going
to
ask
that
you
consider
granting
a
variance
to
us.
S
It
sounds
like
a
big
setback
reduction,
but
in
fact,
if,
if
we
didn't
have
the
older
building
there,
the
three
foot
and
three
foot
setback
would
be
what
zoning
would
require
for
us
anyway.
So
so
the
you
know
again,
our
hardship
was
created
by
previous
owners.
You
know
this
building
the
garage
was
built
prior
to
the
60s.
S
We
have
actually
have
a
large
lot
more
something
more
consistent
with
an
rs75
zoning,
so
we're
in
an
RS,
50.
I
think
even
if
we
had
just
you
know,
speaking
truthfully,
even
if
we
had
an
rs75
zoning,
we
probably
still
couldn't
keep
under
this.
The
the
square
footage,
the
the
aggregate
between
the
two
buildings,
and
so
we
would
still
probably
be
here,
even
though
we
have
plenty
of
room
on
our
site.
S
We
believe
that
that
you
know
the
building
is
consistent
with
the
city's
priorities
of
of
creating
housing
and
keeping
Elder
parents
close.
You
know
we
we
want
to
keep
our
parents
close
to
us,
and
so
the
buildings
that
we
build
are
for
are
for
the
owner's
parent,
and
you
know,
Aging
in
place
is
an
important
thing.
S
S
Yeah
I
think
that
you
know
allowing
the
the
the
variance
is
going
to
create
a
situation
where
our
owner
is
going
to
be
able
to
take
care
of
her
mother
at
home,
with
close
proximity
to
to
the
primary
house
and
the
I
think
that,
as
she
gets
older,
she's
going
to
need
the
help
and
and
she's
going
to
be
able
to
stay
close
by
so
I.
Think
that
that
that's
basically
all
I'd
like
to
add
at
this
point
and
so
I
guess
I'm
open
for
questions.
B
All
right,
if
that
concludes
your
presentations,.
O
B
Technology
is
wonderful
until
it
starts
interrupting
you
is
there.
Are
there
any
questions
from
the
board
for
the
petitioner
or
for
staff.
C
A
question:
okay,
why
wasn't
or
maybe
it
was
considered
the
one-story
garage
like
a
conversion.
C
S
First,
first
of
all,
it's
it's
a
first
of
all.
We
have.
We
have
a
a
mobility
issue.
One
person
trying
to
get
in
and
out
of
here
the
City
Zoning
is
not
going
to.
Let
us
put
a
two-story
structure
there,
and
if
we,
if
we
tore
down
the
garage
and
tried
to
do
a
combination
of
the
two
I,
don't
think
we
could
still
meet
the
square
footage
that
that
the
zoning
would
require.
You
know
typical
garage
is
400
square
feet,
our
building's
486
square
feet.
S
S
Okay,
all
right,
I!
Think!
Let
me
just
start
with
the
this:
is
the
existing
house
and
I
think
it
flip
it
upside
down?
Okay,
there
we
go
I
want
to
show
you
how
narrow
the
building
is.
So
even
if
we
weren't
in
a
flood
zone-
and
we
wanted
to
remodel
this
building,
you
can
see
the
the
original
depth
of
the
building
from
here
to
here.
S
That's
if
we
weren't
in
the
flood
zone
I,
don't
think
that
we
could
actually
get
a
permit
to
do
much
of
anything
in
there.
That
would
be
suitable
for
for
the
mother.
S
S
You
know
it.
The
recourse
is
to
tear
the
building
down
and
the
owners
really
don't
want
to
do
that.
So
the
useful
life
of
this
building
has
got
its
limits
at
some
point
or
another.
It's
going
to
probably
fall
down
or
or
somebody
will
have
to
take
it
down.
Our
building
will
outlive
this.
This
building-
you
know
by
you,
know,
years
and
years
and
years,
so
we
don't
want
to
tear
it
down
if
we
don't
have
to
and
and
that's
basically
Where
We
Are.
S
S
S
Port
Tampa
is
an
older
neighborhood
and
the
lots
are
smaller
and
so
there's
just
not
anything
you
can
do
about
it
if,
if
because
again,
because
of
the
garage
there's
really
no
place,
we
probably
could
have
built
this
this
in
any
other
parcel
in
the
city
of
Tampa
again,
so
we're
asking
for
the
one
thing
we
can
do
is
is
a
variance
for
the
setback.
S
It
is
the
tree.
The
tree
is
not
a
grand
tree,
it's
actually
smaller
and
that's
been
clarified,
but
but
we
have
we're
taking
the
storm
water
drainage.
It
had
to
do
with
digging
around
that
end
of
the
building,
and
so
we're
take
we're
going
to
take
a
storm
water
pipe
down
through
the
middle
of
our
building
and
discharge
it
out
the
front,
so
it
will
be
under
our
foundation.
S
I,
don't
believe
so
I,
don't
think
it's
not
a
grand
tree.
There's
a
guy.
S
S
We,
we
have
taken
all
the
comments
that
the
city
has
provided
to
us
because
we
did
do
we
did
we
got
our
first
plan
review
on
this
building
when
we
got
the
comment
back
about
the
requiring
the
setbacks
and
we've
met
all
those
requirements
we
haven't
resubmitted
because
they
won't
take
the
plans
back,
but
we
don't
have
any
issues
any
pervious
issues
or
designed
issues
for
site,
Transportation
or
the
you
know,
Landscaping
we're
not
Landscaping.
S
There's
no,
that
would
remove
one
of
your
variants
requests.
It
would
be,
it
would
be.
Yeah
we'd
have
no
problem
doing
that.
Two
feet
is
not
a
is
not
an
issue
for
us
so,
but,
but
just
for
for
the
record,
it's
not
a
grand
tree,
it's
actually
a
much
smaller
Lower
Lake
and
it's
probably
seven
to
ten
feet
off
of
our
property.
In
under
normal
circumstances,
we
would
just
be
able
to
root
prune
and
move
on
matter
of
fact,
I
thought.
That's
what
what
we
had
here.
S
A
B
Any
structures
throughout
the
neighborhood
is
this
consistent.
S
Yeah,
it
is
consistent
with
a
neighborhood.
You
know
older
detachable
garages
and
you
know,
are
normal
in
older
neighborhoods
like
this,
you
know.
If
you
go
into
obviously
Hyde
Park
in
the
States,
you
know
Seminole
Heights,
Tampa
Heights.
These
buildings
are
all
over
the
place,
so
this
just
happens
to
be
an
old
40s,
build
house,
that's
not
quite
as
old
as
some
of
the
historical
structures
that
we're
talking
about,
but
it's
still
old
enough,
I
understand
talking
to
my
owner.
S
This
building
was
actually
moved
here
in
the
40s
from
another
site
and
that
that's
the
history
she's
got
on
it.
I
haven't
had
anybody
from
Tampa
preservation
or
you
know
the
historical
office.
You
know
validate
that,
but
it
is
just
an
old
building
and
it's
a
nice
building,
though
you
know
the
owner's
done,
a
nice
job,
restoring
it
keeping
it
up
again.
It's
just
you
know
an
old
garage
that
whose
useful
life
is
mostly
over,
but
it's
it's.
The
hardship
we've
got
is
the
garage.
B
Okay,
any
other
questions
all
right.
Seeing
none
you've
got
five
minutes
for
rebuttal.
If
you
choose
to
use
it
to
address
anything,
that's
been
asked
or
anything
else.
You
want
to
say.
S
Again,
I
think
that
I'd
just
like
to
reiterate
that
that,
under
normal
circumstances,
if
it
weren't
for
our
this
nice
old,
historical
garage,
the
three
foot
and
three
foot
setbacks
would
be
the
normal
setbacks
for
our
building
on
in
this
zoning
or
any
place
else
in
the
city
of
Tampa
that
we
have
met
all
the
city's
requirements.
S
You
know,
as
far
as
you
know,
plan
review
to
construct
a
building
and
we
don't
have
any
other
issues
other
than
the
the
setback
here
so
other
than
that
I
don't
have
anything
else
to
rebut
or
comment.
B
On
okay,
thank
you
very
much.
I
will
now
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
for
a
motion
from
the
board.
Anyone
like
to
make
a
motion
well
usually
a
little
bit
better
to
have
a
motion
first
and
then
we
can
have
discussion
afterwards.
B
M
I
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
vrb
22-104
for
property,
located
at
7209,
Southwest
Shore
Boulevard,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
in
the
rear
yard.
Setback
from
20
feet
to
three
feet
in
the
side:
yard
set
back
from
seven
feet
to
three
feet,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing.
M
It
is
a
much
older
home
within
a
flood
zone,
so
they
are
bound
by
what
they
can
do,
what
they
can
add
on
to
and
what
they
can
improve
upon
of
the
existing
structures
and
in
this
particular
neighborhood.
They
have
some
very
oddly
shaped
Lots.
These
are
not
quite
hundred
foot
deep
Lots.
So
a
lot
of
people
have
the
benefit
of
the
additional
five
feet
to
the
rear.
M
I
think
that
if
you
move
this
much
closer
to
that
one-story
garage,
it's
gonna
uncover
the
backyard
and
make
that
area
rendered
almost
useless.
So
this
probably
is,
in
my
opinion,
the
best
place
for
it
to
land.
Second,.
C
I'm
gonna
reject
this
motion,
but
I
just
want
to
explain
why
it's
new
construction,
so
all
new
construction
has
to
meet
the
code
anyway,
so
it
doesn't
matter
where
it
is.
Yes,
if
it's
attached
to
a
dis
existing
structure,
that
structure
also
has
to
be
met
with
the
same
code
standards.
C
What
worries
me
is
that
we
start
to
see
a
lot
of
impervious
roof
surfaces.
Yes,
having
a
one-story
detached
garage
next
to
an
older
home
is
common,
but
having
three
detached
structures
on
one
lot
is
not
common
I.
Don't
want
to
see
this
as
a
trend
for
a
variety
of
reasons.
I
think
you
know,
flooding
is
the
main
issue
in
this
area
and
we're
just
adding
to
it
by
creating
more
impervious
surfaces.
I
want
to
kind
of
Veer
away
from
that
Trend
I
know
the
city
of
Tampa
is
looking
at.
C
You
know
Adu
code
for
these
areas,
kind
of
like
to
wait
to
see
where
they
go
with
this
in
terms
of
how
this
works,
I
see
an
opportunity
here
to
place
a
new
construction
and
replacement
of
that
one-story
garage.
It's
the
perfect
place,
so
I
guess
I'd
like
to
see
a
little
bit
more
finesse
in
the
future
with
Adu
developments.
M
I
I
agree
with
you
on
a
lot
at
that
point.
You
know
the
impervical
surfaces
and
all
that
good
stuff
with
FEMA.
You
can't
improve
a
structure
by
more
than
50
of
its
value.
So
even
if
they
wanted
to
add
this
to
a
garage
or
completely
knock
down
the
garage
and
make
it
Ada
accessible,
it
would
most
likely
be
the
second
floor
that
the
person
would
be
living
in
so
you'd
have
to
put
either
a
very
large
ramp
or
an
elevator,
which
would
be
a
huge
cost
of
construction.
M
E
Could
I,
just
just
for
the
record
Susan
Johnsonville
has
legal
department,
so
I
hear
a
lot
of
talk
about
who's
going
to
occupy
this
structure,
so
please
keep
in
mind
that
variances
will
run
with
the
land
and
it's
not
personal
to
the
occupant
or
the
property
of
the
current
property
owner,
because
this
will
follow
the
land
from
now
until
the
end
of
time.
So
thank
you.
I.
L
B
M
There's
there's
Eve
to
Eve
separations.
You
have
to
keep
there,
so
you
can't
it
can't
go
that
direction.
I.
B
B
A
O
P
O
M
D
The
reason
that
I
seconded
Mr
Murphy's
approval
is
in
part
because
this
structure
is
meeting
the
setbacks
that
are
required
of
an
accessory
structure,
and
so
the
city
has
decided
that
three
feet
on
either.
You
know
in
the
in
the
rear
and
on
the
side
are
acceptable
for
accessory
structures
and
I
mean
I'm.
Looking
at
this
as
an
accessory
structure,
I
understand
that,
because
of
a
kind
of
a
Nuance
in
the
code,
this
this
building
has
to
meet
principal
setbacks.
C
I
mean
all
of
South
Tampa.
Has
this
problem
my
house,
everything
I
can't
do
it,
I,
don't
know
if
we
want
to
start
allowing
so
many
accessory
structures
on
one
lot.
That's
kind
of
my
thing.
I
mean
take
out
the
garage
retrofit
it
you
know
you
have
to
meet
FEMA,
sorry,
everybody
does
and
unfortunately
their
circumstance
they
need
and
Ada
accessible
unit.
No
one
can
do
this,
so
it's
a
really
big
problem.
P
B
But
the
point
that
was
made
by
the
applicant
is
even
if
they
were
to
sacrifice
the
garage
they
couldn't
do.
What
they're
trying
to
do.
They
could
knock
down
that
garage.
They
could
build
this
structure,
but
then
they'd
have
no
garage
they
if
they
wanted
to
choose
to
build
a
two-story
structure
in
which
you
know
again.
As
Mr
Murphy
pointed
out,
we
have
an
ADA
question,
separate
apart
from
it,
but
now
you're
going
to
trip
over
the
size
requirements
and
they're
right
back
here.
B
But
is
it
not
a
practical
difficulty
as
a
consequence
of
the
existing
structures
right
so
on
the
property,
the
existing.
B
L
B
Okay,
I
mean
it
is
what
it
is.
We
have
a
motion,
is
there
more
need
for
discussion,
or
do
you
want
to
just
have
a
vote
because
I
don't
want
to
cut
off
discussion
if
there's.
B
All
right,
I
see
seeing
none,
then
let's
go
ahead
and
call
the
vote
motion
to
approve,
as
as
requested
all
those
in
favor
say
aye.
All
this
opposed
all
right.
We
have
a
3-3
tie,
which
means
that
you
are
automatically
continued.
Do
we
have
space
in
the
January
hearing
this
video?
Yes,.
L
B
F
The
next
case
before
the
board
is
brb
22
105
addressed
at
7216
South,
Juanita
Street.
This
is
the
property
owners
of
Sandra
Kendall,
and
the
variance
request
is
to
release
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
14.5
and
side
yard
setback
from
7
feet
to
6.9
feet,
and
the
purpose
is
to
extend
an
existing
patio
and
construct
an
enclosed
screen
room.
F
F
This
property
went
through
a
variance
process
in
2019,
vrb
1933,
and
they
were
approved
for
the
reduction
of
the
rare
yard,
from
14
from
20
to
20
feet
to
14.6
inches
with
conditions
that
the
red
balcony
never
be
enclosed.
However,
the
applicant
never
got
to
construct
this
rare
addition
and
I
started
there
back
for
the
variance
with
the
addition
of
the
side
yard
setback
reduction
from
70
to
6.9
feet.
F
This
is
showing
the
existing
back
porch
and
the
upper
left
side
of
the
screen
and
the
proposed
back
porch
on
the
upper
right
side
in
the
Lower
Side.
You
have
the
elevations
of
what
that
portrait
looked
like
once
it's
completed.
This
was
reviewed
by
natural
resources
and
found
consistent
with
conditions
with
the
following
comments.
F
Natural
resources
finds
the
submitted
requests
consistently
conditions
at
the
time
of
construction,
additional
natural
resources,
changes
and
requests
can
be
made
to
ensure
all
other
applicable
sections
of
chapter
27
of
the
city
of
Tampa
code
and
city
of
Tampa
tree
and
Landscape
technical
manual
are
met
right
if
we
found
them
consistent
with
no
comments
and
transportation
was
not
required.
Stormwater
also
found
them
consistent
with
conditions.
F
F
B
F
Not
included,
but
the
survey
by
the
that
the
applicant
submitted,
surely
that
the
side
said
back.
F
B
N
Sandra
Campbell
7216,
South,
180,
Street,
Tampa,
33616
and
I
have
been
sworn
in
good
job.
All
right.
We
got
10.,
okay,
well,
I
just
want
to
make
one
one
point
clear:
the
when
they
said
it
could
never
be
enclosed,
I
came
back
and
did
an
appeal
and
that
was
overturned
so
I
just
wanted.
That
was
back
in
2019
we
had
a
company
that
we
were
working
with
to
do
an
enclosure
and
they
have
changed
their.
N
They
changed
their
whole
process,
so
we
went
with
somebody
else,
and
this
happened
in
towards
the
end
of
2019
and
then,
of
course,
we
had
2020
and
then
I
was
diagnosed
with
breast
cancer
and
had
chemo.
So
it's
been
put,
pushed
back
and
pushed
back,
so
we
just
want
to
get
it
done,
we're
in
the
position
to
do
it
now
and
thank
you.
B
Oh,
that
that
completes
your
presentation
all
right,
easy.
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
wishing
to
speak
about
this
petition,
seeing
them
questions
from
the
board.
N
B
B
N
Right
right
now,
yes,
I
mean
if
I
want
to
put
glass
up,
I'll
come
back
and
see
you.
Oh.
B
Indeed,
I
don't
know
what
the
if
this
is
a
drill
or
if
somebody
is
there's
a.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
B
Right
so
back
on
the
record
thumbs
up.
Thank
you,
sir
I
think,
just
before
we
were
sort
of
rudely
interrupted.
Yes,
sir,
we
were
talking
about
enclosure,
so
you
were
saying
yes
as
a
condition.
You
would
be
okay
with
that
correct.
Okay,
any
other
questions
for
for
our
applicant
tonight.
Anyone.
B
M
Before
we
go,
Motion
can
I
say
one
thing,
just
double
efforts
closed
sure,
the
letting
them
not
enclose
something
on
the
rear.
Just
point
of
work
so
I
always
say
that
with
someone
on
the
side
right
because
that
could
be
a
safety
thing,
won't
be
able
to
run
through
this
thing,
but
in
the
rear.
What's
the
what's
the
real
benefit,
I
think
we've
got
a.
M
Fact
of
if
we're
letting
this
thing
go
into
a
setback
and
it's
going
to
be
fully
built
out,
it's
just
not
some
screen,
Windows,
what's
the
harm
and
if
they
one
day
say
man,
it's
10
million
degrees.
In
the
summer,
I
would
like
to
throw
one
duct
in
here
or
a
mini
split
and
make
an
air
conditioned.
B
Well,
I
mean
it
it
just
it's
the
difference
between
what
is
a
what
is
a
porch
and
what
is
whatever
the
heck
else
they
want
to
make.
So
if
they
want
to
make
it
another
bedroom
and
that's
what
I
mean
it
to
some
degree,
I.
C
M
O
M
B
Obviously
not
going
to
make
the
motion
so
it
closed.
B
M
The
universal
size,
okay,
I,
move
that
the
variance
quest
for
vrb
22-105
for
property,
located
at
two
six
one.
Two,
seven
two
one,
six
South
Juanita
Street
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing,
4A
reduction
in
the
rear
yard,
setback
from
20
feet
to
14.5
feet
and
a
side
yard
set
back
from
seven
feet
to
6.9
feet
based
upon
the
applicant,
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
for
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
M
Considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
sent
forth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
it's
an
older
home
that
is
not
really
set
up
for
modern
day
and
outdoor
enjoyment
behind
the
home,
it's
a
little
too
small
of
an
area.
So
the
necessity
of
the
exterior
structure
for
outdoor
enjoyment.
B
And
just
for
discussion
purposes,
I
will
point
out
that
the
variance
was
previously
approved
for
almost
identical
foreign
all
right.
So
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
any
other
need
for
discussion.
A
A
F
F
F
F
This
was
reviewed
by
natural
service
that
found
consistent
with
conditions
with
the
following
comments:
condition
and
the
record
brick
pavers
construction
impacting
Grand
Prix
without
pyramid,
brick,
paver,
walk
throughout
the
sites
impacting
ground
trees,
I
witnessed
large
Woods
being
removed.
Average
report
is
required,
along
with
approved
building
permit
zoning.
F
Transportation
reviewed
and
found
them
inconsistent
with
code,
and
his
memo
was
uploaded
with
the
staff
report
receive
no
letters
of
objection
or
support
for
this
variance
request.
F
F
And
this
is
West
Neptune
showing
the
entrance
to
the
garage,
and
then
you
have
the
front
of
the
house.
F
B
B
T
Okay,
a
little
Grace
I've,
never
done
this
before
so,
but
the
we
so
I
hear
people
talking
about
an
old
house.
This
actually
is
an
old
house.
T
It
was
built
in
1925,
so
100
year,
old
house,
and
we
are,
we
moved
in
in
January
of
2020
we're
from
this
area,
but
we
bought
this
house
in
January
of
2020,
and
so
we
bought
it
sight
unseen
because
we
were
living
in
New
Jersey
for
my
work
and
it's
been
a
great
place,
but
it's
not
necessarily
suiting
what
we
need
now
and
so
what
we're
asking
for-
and
the
intention
is
the
one
car
or
excuse
me-
the
two-car,
one-story
garage
that
is
located
on
the
on
one
side
of
the
property.
T
We
can't
do
anything
with
that
because
of
this
Grand
Oak.
That
is,
that
is
next
to
it.
So
that,
basically,
is
you
know
we
want
to
protect
and
save
this
tree,
so
we
have
to
try
to
figure
out
something
else.
T
So
we
would
like
to
have
the
garage
two-car
garage
that
one
will
be
you
know
removed,
and
then
we
would
like
a
new
two-story
garage
on
the
other
side
of
the
property
and
really
just
with
the
same
setbacks
and
that
exists
today,
just
literally
moving
it
to
the
other
side
and
putting
a
second
story
on
for
my
company.
I'm
I
work
for
a
major
firm,
but
out
of
New
Jersey
and
I
work
from
home,
so
that'll
be
my
home
office.
T
Hopefully-
and
you
know,
there's
some
other
notations
here
that
we
will
install
you
know
we're
not
we're
we'll
always
park
in
the
garage
I
guess,
because,
since
the
setback
is
where
it
is,
we're
not
going
to,
you
know
Park
in
the
actual
drive
space
and
and
again
the
hardship
really
there's
a
number
of
hardships,
but
the
one
that
I
think
is
most
relevant
to
our
discussion
is
the
is
the
Grand
Oak
and
so
we've
been
informed.
That
can't
really
do
anything.
T
So
again,
all
we
would
ask
for
is
to
approve
the
variance
to
no
yeah
and-
and
so
our
my
wife
has
showed
me
this
now-
I'm
confusing
me,
but
our
so
there
are
I'm,
not
sure
how
many
houses,
but
you
know
the
front,
is
Neptune
and
then
it
goes
excuse
me,
the
front
of
the
house
is
Prospect
and
it
goes
back
to
to
Neptune
and
so
behind
us
are
two.
T
You
know
great
neighbors
there.
No
one
has
any
complaints
about
what
we're
trying
to
do
and
then
pretty
much
every
house
on
our
street.
They
all
have
the
same
two-car,
you
know
two-car
garage
and
the
Second
Story,
so
we
wouldn't
be
putting
anything
in
that
is
you
know
different
from
the
existing
and
across
the
street
on
Prospect,
you
know:
there's
there
has
been
a
one
new
construction
right
across
from
us.
T
They
toured
out
a
house,
unfortunately,
or
it
burnt
down,
and
then
they
bought
the
property
and
they
also
put
a
a
two-story
garage
they're
using
it
for
an
Airbnb,
which
is
very
maybe
that's,
maybe
that's
a
different
board.
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
know
if
I
need
it,
but
but
ours
is,
ours
is
just
to
be
used
for
you
know,
as
I
said
personal
use,
but
you
know
not
that
that
probably
matters
so
I
think
that's
it.
Unless
there's
anything,
you
wanted
to
add.
I
I
didn't
see
them
come
up,
but
I
just
wanted
to
show
that
that's
very
common
on
our
block
for
people
to
have
a
detached,
two-car,
two-story
dwelling.
I
So
this
is
two:
this
is
one
house
over,
that's
a
two-story
and
then
another
two-story
unit,
and
then
this
is
new.
These
are
all
this.
I
T
That
one
with
the
garbage
cans
in
front
is
old,
clearly
and
the
one
next
to
it,
they've
completely
remodeled.
They
probably
had
to
come
before
you
guys
I'm
guessing
that
and.
I
Then
this
is
directly
across
across
the
street
from
us.
This
is
a
new
construction
home
that
was
finished
after
we
moved
in
so
probably
in
2021,
and
that
is
a
detached,
two-car
two-story
and
that
is
directly
across
the
street
from
us,
and
so
it's
very
common
in
new
suburb
beautiful
to
have
these
types
of
additions
or
and
again
we're
just
moving
what
we
already
have
so
that
we
can
use
the
space
of
our
interior
home
better
for
our
family.
T
T
B
Right
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
is
just
to
speak
about
this
petition,
seeing
none
any
questions
from
the
board.
D
I
just
have
a
quick
question
for
staff:
does
this
property
have
two
front
yards?
Is
that
why
the
the
request
is
for
a
reduction
at
the
front
yard
setback?
Yes,.
T
M
B
Okay,
any
other
questions
seeing
none
you
have
five
minutes
for
rebuttal
should
choose
to
use
it.
T
B
B
D
I
move
that
the
variance
request
for
case
vrb
22-107
for
property
located
at
2626,
West
Prospect
Road,
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
of
the
public
hearing
for
a
reduction
of
the
front
yard,
setback
from
25
feet
to
1.5
feet
and
a
vehicular
entrance
setback
from
10
feet
to
1.5
feet.
The
encouragement
for
heaps
and
gutters
base
be
great,
has
picked
on
the
site
plan.
D
Sorry
said
that,
based
on
the
applicant
presenting
competent
and
substantial
evidence
in
the
record
and
at
this
public
hearing
of
an
unnecessary
hardship
or
practical
difficulty,
when
considering
the
five
hardship
criteria
set.
Fourth
in
section
27-80
of
the
city
code,
specifically
that
this
is
a
unique
property
in
that
it
has
two
front
yards
and
the
request
is
to
Simply
relocate
the
garage
from
the
west
side
of
the
property
to
the
east
side
of
the
property
and
is
in
harmony
with
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood.
L
B
All
right
so
motion
to
approve
with
second
all
those
any
for
discussion
other
than
that,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye,
any
post,
all
right
group,
six,
nothing
have
a
great
evening.
Thank.
B
A
B
Nobody
here
for
for
thank
you
for
reminding
I
told
you
I'd
forget,
BRB
2268
was
moved
to
the
end,
we're
going
to
continue
it's
January.
They
may
have
just
chose
that
they
got
continued
multiple
times.
We
still
have
an
even
board.
They
may
just
decide,
deny
us
and
we'll
go
to
the
city
council.
It
might
be
the
easier.