►
From YouTube: Planning, Programming & Zoning -March 9, 2021
Description
Planning, Programming & Zoning -March 9, 2021
A
B
C
A
D
D
Yeah,
because
there's
usually
only
a
hard
copy
of
that
that
one's
usually
not
included
in
what
we
email
out,
but
we
can
get
you
that,
but
the
report
that
would
basically
put
us
through
60
of
the
year
and
on
the
revenue
side
we're
doing
really
well.
The
totals
are
at
72,
so
we're
above
estimate
on
revenue
and
on
the
expense
side.
We're
also
looking
very
well.
The
total
comes
in
at
61,
so
just
barely
a
smidge
over
where
it
should
be
looking
good.
F
This
is
sue
flynn
and
just
wondering,
since
we
are
meeting
the
second
tuesday
of
the
month,
couldn't
these
reports
be
done
for
the
year-end
because
it
typically
for
the
month
end
because
it
typically
you
know
before
I
understood
it
would
be-
maybe
the
first
or
second
or
third,
but
this
is
ten
days
later
that
they
probably
run
these
reports.
I
know
with
our
school
stuff
we
can
get
the
reports
in
a
timely
fashion,
typically
five
days
after
month,
end.
That's.
D
D
G
B
C
A
All
right
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
time
for
oral
presentations.
This
is
if
anybody
is
on
the
call
who
is
present
to
speak
on
a
non-agenda
item.
So
if
an
item
is
already
on
the
agenda,
you
have
to
wait,
but
if
you,
if
you're
here,
to
speak
on
a
different
item,
please
come
forward
if
you're
on
the
call
and
you're
muted,
the
way
to
unmute
is
star
sticks
there.
Anyone
who's
here
on
a
non-agenda.
F
G
H
Yeah,
this
is
a
high
regard
with
the
staff
report,
the
the
applicant's
douglas
miller
at
six
four
one,
five
kimball
avenue
the
app
was
requested:
re-zoned
a
property
in
order
to
split
off
an
existing
home
that
was
built
in
1992
on
34.13
acres.
The
proposal
will
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area,
as
there
are
several
homes
in
the
minute
vicinity
that
are
zoned
a1
agricultural
district
and
our
one
one
and
two
family
residence
district.
H
H
The
nearest
recreational
trail
charlottesville
trail,
which
is
located
approximately
1.4
miles
to
the
north.
The
area
zone
a1
agricultural
district
and
has
been
since
the
adoption
of
the
zoning
ordinance
in
1969
surrounding
land
uses
are
as
follows:
to
the
north
is
residential
and
agricultural
zone.
A1
agricultural
district
and
r112
family
residence
district
to
the
south
is
agricultural
zone
a1.
H
H
Resilient
land
would
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
drainage
in
the
area
property's
not
located
in
a
special
flood
hazard
area,
the
there's
a
six-inch
water
main
that
runs
along
campbell
avenue,
intended
sewer
main
and
a
20
foot
sewer
easement
to
the
east
of
6415
kimball
avenue.
So
the
property
is
served
by
both
city,
water
and
sewer.
H
The
future
land
use
map
designates
this
area
as
low
density
residential.
Therefore,
this
reason
request
is
compliance
with
the
future
land
use
map
the
applicant's
requesting
to
rezone
approximately
2.71
acres
from
of
land
from
a1
agricultural
district
2r2,
one
and
two
family
residence
district.
In
order
to
splash
an
existing
1992
home
that
was
built
on
34.13
acres,
the
a1
air
cultural
district
provides
that
for
homes
built
prior
to
the
adoption
of
the
zoning
ones
in
1969,
they
could
be
split
off
onto
a
minimum
lot
size
of
1.5
acres.
H
However,
a
farm
house
built
after
1869
cannot
be
split
off
from
the
farm
unless
it
is
rezoned
as
something
other
than
a1
agricultural
district.
The
applicant
is
planning
to
divide
the
property
once
the
rezone
is
approved.
The
pro-split
would
be
the
first
on
the
property
since
the
adoption
of
the
subdivision
ordinance,
so
it
can
be
approved.
Administratively.
H
Therefore,
staff
recommends,
at
the
request,
by
douglas
c
miller,
at
six
four
one:
five
cable
avenue
to
rezone
approximately
two
point:
seven
one:
acres
from
mainland
agricultural
district
to
our
one
family,
residence
district
to
spluff,
an
existing
home
that
was
built
on
34.13
acres,
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
Requests
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
area
number
two.
The
request
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area.
C
E
H
G
D
D
C
E
C
C
B
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
request
by
douglas
c
miller
at
6415
kimball
avenue,
tourism,
approximately
2.71
acres
from
a1
agricultural
district
to
r1,
one
and
two
family
residence
district
to
split
an
existing
home
that
was
built
on
34.13
acres,
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons
that
are
listed
on
the
document.
The
request
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area.
Requests
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
upon
the
surrounding
area.
B
E
G
A
I
This
is
torn
off
of
staff.
The
request
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
neighborhood
or
land
use,
as
this
is
an
expansion
of
existing
medical
office
that
is
located
largely
in
a
commercial
neighborhood.
The
special
permit
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
vehicular
pedestrian
traffic
conditions
in
the
area.
The
site
is
served
by
franklin
street
which
classified
as
the
principal
arterial
at
walnut
street,
which
is
classified
as
a
collector.
I
I
surrounding
land
uses
in
their
zoning
designation
as
follows
to
the
north
is
residential
and
commercial
mixed
use,
a
duplex,
hardy's
restaurant
iowa,
northern
railroad
and
martin
luther
king
junior
drive
zone
seek
to
commercial
district
to
the
south,
is
vacant
land,
commercial,
residential
zone,
seat
to
commercial
district
and
r3.
Multiple
residence
district
to
the
east
is
residential
zone.
R3
multiple
residence
district
and
to
the
west
is
franklin
street
east
7th
street,
the
iowa,
northern
railroad,
commercial
and
civic
uses
zone
c2
commercial
district
and
c3
central
business.
I
The
is
in
coordinate
in
part
of
the
comprehensive
plan
future
language
metric
area,
which
includes
some
mixed
commercial,
medium
to
high
density,
residential
professional
office
and
neighborhood
commercial.
So
being
you
know
in
performance
with
that,
the
people's
community
health
clinic
was
originally
built
in
with
an
inspection
in
2004.
I
The
building
is
currently
forty,
two
thousand
one
hundred
thirty
nine
square
feet
and
will
be
expanded
to
sixty
three
thousand
five
hundred
seventy
five
square
feet
with
the
proposed
expansion.
The
exterior
treatment
of
the
expansion
will
match
the
current
exterior
there's
currently
225
parking
spaces
with
10
of
those
being
handicapped
spaces,
and
there
will
be
249
spaces
with
the
same
10
handicapped
spaces
when
the
expansion
is
done.
I
Parking
requirements
for
medical
office
is
one
stall
per
200
square
feet
of
floor
space
that
is
accessible
to
patients
with
the
56
451
square
feet
of
new
patient.
Using
your
floor
space.
Once
expansion
is
done,
the
number
of
parking
spaces
would
be
required.
Would
be
283
spaces,
therefore,
variance
to
the
parking
requirements
would
be
needed
when
the
special
permit
goes
before
the
board
of
adjustment.
I
I
The
side
elevation
shows.
The
interest
of
the
facility
continue
to
be
on
franklin's
side
of
the
property
with
their
existing
canopy.
There
also
be
a
secondary
entrance
emergency
actually
located
on
the
north
side
of
the
building.
Therefore,
staff
recommended
the
request
by
nicholas
then
on
behalf
of
people's
community
health
clinic
for
a
special
permit
for
expansion
of
the
people's
community
health
clinic
located
in
the
c2
commercial
district
and
cp
plan.
Commercial
district
located
905
franklin
street,
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
Special
permit
would
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
surrounding
area.
I
I
E
E
I
E
B
D
Actually,
it
is
almost
a
special
permit
right.
Yes,
no,
the
we
had
that
discussion
of
whether
it
would
need
this
special
permit
and
a
site
plan
amendment,
because
it's
partially
zoned
cp,
but
there's
not
very
much
of
the
site
that
zoned
cp
and
there's
not
much
change
occurring
in
the
cp
area.
The
building
or
excuse
me
not
the
building
the
parking
lot
expansion
gets
into
it
a
little
bit,
but
we
determined
that
to
be
a
minor
change
to
the
cp.
B
D
I
would
say
it
does
not
endorse
the
planning
commission
could
weigh
in
on
the
variance
needed
we
historically
haven't
in
most
instances
where
a
special
permit
also
needs
a
variance.
We
normally
just
inform
the
planning
commission
of
that,
and
then
the
variance
is
purview
of
the
board
of
adjustment,
but
it's
certainly
something
that
you
could
look
at.
You
know,
in
your
opinion,
does
the
need
for
the
variance
then
affect
your
thought
on
whether
they
should
be
approved
to
get
a
special
permit.
E
D
A
J
Yes,
so
we've
looked
at
this
parking
lot:
expansion
or
the
parking
lot
expansion
in
addition,
and
we've
gone
as
far
to
the
east
as
we
can
without
having
a
negative
impact
on
some
community
gardens
that
they
have
to
the
east
that
are
vital
to
the
to
the
community
as
well.
So
we
tried
to
keep
the
integrity
of
that
intact,
with
providing
as
many
parking
stalls
as
we
could
on
the
property
as
well.
E
E
K
K
K
E
E
G
This
is
leicester.
I
will
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
the
request
by
nick
liston,
on
behalf
of
people's
community
health
clinic
for
a
special
permit
for
the
expansion
of
the
people's
community
health
clinic
located
in
the
c2
commercial
district
and
cp
planned
commercial
district
located
at
905
franklin
street.
For
the
following
reasons.
The
special
permit
should
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area.
The
special
permit
should
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area.
G
D
Virginia
the
next
three
items
on
the
agenda
are
all
special
permits
that
are
similar
and
related.
They
are
separate
sites,
but
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
have
kind
of
a
combined
staff
report
for
all
three
and
then
after
the
staff
report,
they
can
be
discussed
collectively
and
then
they
could
either
be
acted
on
individually
or
acted
on
by
one
motion:
either
way
would
work.
A
All
right
so
next,
then
we'll
consider
the
request
by
is
it
so
so
tyria
and
soter
investments
llc
for
a
special
permit
to
turn
an
existing
single
to
turn
existing
single
family
group
homes
into
duplexes
for
continued
use
as
group
homes
in
our
three
multiple
residents
district
and
in
our
format,
multiple
residence
districts
and
the
properties
are
located
at
38,
45,
page
drive,
359
south
brook
drive
and
2009
coachman
drive
so
we'll
have
the
staff
report.
Please.
A
L
Western
with
staff,
the
first
one
is
at
38,
45
page
drive
the
minimum
lot
size,
width
and
parking
for
duplex
structure
within
the
r3.
Multiple
residence
district
is
70
feet
wide
a
minimum
lot
size
of
7200
square
feet,
a
minimum
of
four
all
street
parking
spaces.
Six.
If
there
are
two
resident
supervisors,
the
the
lot
width
for
38
45,
page
drive
is
100
feet
wide
along
the
front
property
line
and
235
feet
along
the
rear
property
line.
L
Therefore,
staff
recommends
that
the
request
by
soteria
and
soder
investments
llc
for
special
permit
to
turn
an
existing
single
family
group
home
into
a
duplex
for
use.
As
a
group
home
in
the
r3,
multiple
residence
district,
located
at
3845,
page
via
page
drive,
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
L
H
L
D
And
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
that
variance.
The
one
that's
short
on
south
brook
they
do
have
plenty
of
room.
There
is
on
street
parking
on
southbrook
and
the
one
side
of
west
9th
street,
and
they
would
have
sufficient
room
for
additional
parking
and
they
did
talk
about
potential
future
plans
of
parking
in
the
future,
but
we're
okay
with
the
variance
because,
generally
speaking,
the
employees
will
drive
to
the
site.
But
the
tenants
do
not.
B
Okay,
well,
thank
you.
I
don't
know
that
question
related
to
that's
what
I'm
sure.
Maybe
I
didn't
catch
it,
but
in
your
paragraph
on
page
46,
it
talks
about
that
a
minimum
of
four
off-street
parking
spaces.
Six.
If
there
are
two
resident
supervisors
and
the
lot
width
it
talks
about
that
and
essentially
says
there
appears
to
be
enough
room
for
two
off
street
parking,
but
it
would
need
four
if
the
site
has
two
resident
supervisors.
Is
that
correct,
correct?
Okay,
thank
you.
F
And
this
is
flynn
and
I'm
just
wondering
on
all
of
them,
especially
the
page
drive.
I
guess-
and
I
missed
my
point
there,
but
do
we
contact
the
neighbors
across
the
street
because
I
know
on
page
there
are
homeowners
right
in
that
same
area.
So
are
they
contacted
as
far
as
you
know,
the
changes
being
proposed.
D
L
No
there's
there's
nothing
on
file.
In
fact,
the
representative
explained
that
the
reason
for
the
converting
to
duplexes
as
a
state
law-
I
believe
they
they've-
changed
some
laws
where
their
their
ass.
The
house
has
to
be
split
and
into
a
duplex
and
they're,
actually
lowering
the
number
of
people
in
the
house.
Otherwise,
it's
going
to
be
exactly
the
same.
Just
with
least
people
less
people.
E
C
L
Yeah,
each
it's
not
a
typo.
The
one
on
south
brook
is
zone
r4,
that's
a
zoning
district
that
allows
multiple
residents
districts
and
it
is
kind
of
confusing
our
four
multiple
resident
district
includes
residential,
multiple
residential
and
low
traffic.
No
retail
commercials,
such
as
insurance
offices,
dentist
offices
and
things
of
that
nature
r3,
is
anything
from
one
or
single
family
residences,
duplexes
and
multiple
residences
like
such
as
apartment
complexes.