►
Description
City of Waterloo Planning, Programming & Zoning Commission Meeting - July 7, 2020
View the agenda packet here,
https://cms6.revize.com/revize/waterlooiowa/PlanningZoning/PZ_Packet_07-07-20.pdf
A
A
B
D
This
is
Anderson
with
staff,
so
this
puts
us
at
the
end
of
May,
which
would
put
us
that
91.6%
through
the
year
going
down
through
the
revenue
side,
first
we're
at
about
51%
total
of
all
the
revenues
in
there.
The
main
gap
that
we
had
was.
We
did
not
I
hate
to
jump
to
the
end.
It
were
already
past
our
fiscal
year,
so
moving
ahead
to
June.
D
So
we
won't
sell
that
it's
at
the
corner
of
Blackhawk
and
11th,
so
we
will
be
short
on
revenue
as
the
end
of
the
year
as
of
this
port
in
terms
of
expenses,
we're
at
82
83
%
for
salaries
and
benefits,
63
percent
for
contractual
services.
So
we
are
we're
we're
flying
about
probably
about
70,000
to
80,000
shorter
than
what
we
were
expected
to
be
for
expenses
for
the
year.
D
B
A
E
F
F
Highway
63,
which
was
classified
as
a
principal
arterial.
There
is
currently
no
sidewalks
or
trails
in
the
area.
There
is
long-term
plans
for
a
trail
along
u.s.,
63
Logan
Avenue,
but
is
nothing
currently
budgeted.
The
area
zoned
a1
agricultural
district
has
been
zoned
as
such,
since
the
adoption
is
over
the
ordinance
in
1969
surrounding
land
uses
and
their
zoning
as
follows:
to
the
north
residential
and
agricultural
zone
day,
one
agricultural
district
in
art,
one
and
two
family
residence
district
to
the
south,
residential
and
commercial
zone.
F
A
one
agricultural
district
and
c2
commercial
district
to
the
east
is
agricultural
zone.
A
one
agricultural
district
into
the
West
is
Logan
Avenue,
residential
and
agricultural
zone.
A
one
agricultural
district
homes
in
the
area
were
built
between
1879
and
1977,
and
the
commercial
properties
were
built
in
2006.
F
There
is
no
utility,
it's
in
the
area.
Nearest
utilities
are
located
in
Big,
Rock
Road.
A
new
house
would
have
to
utilize
a
well
and
septic
system,
but
they
would
be
required
to
hook
up
the
sewer
in
water
if
they
became
available
in
the
future.
The
future
land
use
map
designated
areas,
agricultural
residential
potential,
the
applicants
requesting
rezone
their
land
from
a
one
agricultural
district
are
two
one
and
two
family
residence
district
for
one
single
family
home.
F
The
applicant
is
looking
to
build
a
new
single-family
home
east
and
behind
the
existing
home
in
90
41
92
Logan
Avenue.
There
are
homes
located
to
the
north
that
are
zoned
r2
one
into
family,
residence
district
and
in
commercial
property
to
the
South
Zone
C
to
commercial
district.
The
new
home
is
being
applied
at
often
would
be
we're
required
an
easement
agreement
to
allow
access
to
the
lot
there's.
Currently,
there
is
not
currently
served
by
utilities.
Therefore,
a
septic
system
and
well
will
be
required.
Every
futilities
are
extended
anytime
to
the
area
in
the
future.
F
Therefore,
staff
recommends
that
the
request
by
gray
stuff
in
the
rezone
8.8
0
acres
from
a1
agricultural
district
to
r21
and
to
family
residence
district
or
a
single
one,
new
single-family
home,
located
at
41
92
Logan
Avenue,
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
The
request
will
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area.
The
request
would
not
appear
to
have
negative
impact
on
surround
the
area
with
the
conditions
being
met
below
and
homes
in
the
norfair.
F
Zoned
are
2,
1,
2,
family,
residence,
district
and
sowing
to
the
south
is
c2
commercial
district
and
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
homes
be
hooked
up
to
sewer
or
water,
if
they
ever
become
when,
if
and
when
they
ever
become
extended
to
the
area
and
just
to
know,
we
have
received
four
phone
calls
on
it
on
the
application.
One
of
them
was
not
opposed,
as
he
was
okay
with
just
this
one
single-family
home,
and
then
three
others
were
opposed
due
to
traffic
conditions
and
ones
worried
about
welcome
to
well
conditions
in
the
area.
A
A
Yeah
I
apologize
and
ask
questions
of
staff
first,
so
this
is
Commissioner.
Do
not
have
the
have
the
items
that
door
knock
was
just
talking
about
at
the
end
of
his
presentation.
Have
they
been
addressed
about
the
concerns
from
the
neighbors,
the
three
concerns
that
were
opposed
to
it
due
to
traffic
and
the
wells,
and
things
have
those
things
been
addressed
at
all.
F
A
A
A
A
F
C
A
A
E
A
A
G
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Greg
Stefan
I
own
the
property
and
resident
at
the
40
192
Logan
Avenue,
which
was
the
prior
ranchero
Saddle,
Club
or
sale
shop
before
I
purchased
the
property.
So
I'd
like
to
address
a
couple
of
concerns
in
is
the
staff
had
pointed
out
wanted
refers
to
the
traffic
involved
on
this
property.
G
I
am
asking
for
only
one
property
to
be
going
to
go
on
the
6.4
acres
behind
the
kind
of
a
t-shaped
property
behind
the
existing
buildings
house,
and
what
was
the
shop
that
I
just
have
is
a
storage
building
now
so
the
regarding
the
traffic.
It
used
to
be
a
retail
shop
for
45
years
and
had
traffic
in
and
out
of
there
12
hours
a
day
during
the
day,
so
being
a
private
residence
and
going
with
one
additional
property.
I,
don't
see
how
that
can
be
a
concern
on
a
major
arterial
such
as
highway
63.
G
A
G
Thank
you.
So
that's
addressing
the
the
traffic
question
I'm
asking
for
one
property,
which
is
probably
going
to
consist
of
about
2.2
acres
around
that
particular
property.
There's
a
total
of
8
point:
8
acres
there
in
the
back.
There
is
six
point,
four
acres,
so
as
far
as
one
additional
well
I
don't
foresee
that
that
is
a
problem
either
as
far
as
lowering
a
water
table
by
one
well,
so
I
respectfully
submit
that
that
is
what
I'm
trying
to
do.
G
I
am
thoroughly
aware
that
I'm
asking
for
one
property
in
one
property,
only
the
conditioned
to
hook
up
in
the
future
to
water
and
sewer,
if
extended,
first
I,
welcome
that
it
gets
extended.
I,
don't
foresee
that
happening,
because
it's
gonna
be
extremely
expensive
to
bring
that
out,
but
if
it
does
I'll
probably
be
the
first
one
in
line
to
hook
up.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
having
me.
H
A
F
G
Needs
to
be,
as
far
as
a
potential
having
an
abstract
that
let
2.2
acres,
that's
exactly
behind
the
existing
house
and
the
shop.
The
building
is
there
if
potentially
sold
to
someone
else
has
got
to
be
described
as
a
separate
piece
of
property.
It
has
already
been
surveyed.
The
stakes:
are
there,
I
purchased
the
survey
that
did
the
entire
boundary
as
well
as
finding
the
corners
of
that
particular
what
I'm
going
to
call
a
lot
of
2.2
acres,
so
it
just
it's
only
practical
that,
yes,
it
would
have
to
be
done.
G
A
I
F
E
A
D
G
A
I
apologize,
it's
taken
so
long
to
get
to
this
point,
but
now
we
come
to
the
time
when
anybody
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
make
a
crease
or
make
a
presentation
to
the
Commission
either
for
or
against
this
issue.
We'll
do
it
one
at
a
time,
and
please
give
us
your
name
and
address
and
state
your
comments.
Placement.
A
Will
start
off
I
think
there
was.
There
was
a
lady
that
wanted
to
talk
first
and
I
apologize
I,
don't
remember
your
name!
Oh
okay,
dear
Stevens,
that's
a
fully
245
one
Logan
Avenue
and
my
concerns
are
basically
that
number
one
in
regards
to
transit.
The
amount
of
traffic
did
the
bottle
shop
had
was
so
random,
I
mean
you're,
not
talking
about
javi
type
traffic
can
do
they
were
open
early
to
late,
but
a
car
here
and
there.
But
these
are.
A
These-
were
all
people
who
shopped
of
that
sort
for
ever
and
understood
the
traffic
patterns
and
how
just
before
you
get
there
in
the
traffic
starts
to
pick
it
up
in
feet.
Much
greater.
That
had
been
good
because
we've
had
multiple
accidents
over
years
out
there
because
of
people
that
didn't
know,
and
you
have
that
rise
coming
from
the
north-
that
people
come.
H
A
A
A
A
A
H
A
H
A
H
A
Well,
that's
true,
but
I
mean
you
go
in
any
directive.
I
do
have
the
other
concernment
is
that
uses
all
all
being
talked
about
now,
but
in
future,
when
there
are
different
folks
in
your
position,
what's
already
residential
acceptance
in
houses?
Thank
you.
This
is
this
is
first
maybe
staff
can
clarify
that
right
now.
A
My
understanding
is,
it
will
be
subdivided
that
have
to
come
back
in
front
of
zoning
or
City
Council
or
what
have
you
or
Erasmus
cladded,
eventually
to
be
two
separate
lives
in
if
they
were
to
go
and
try
to
make
that
back
area,
multiple
Lots
or
a
different
function,
other
than
doesn't
seem
a
residences.
What
has
to
happen?
I
mean
explain
that
for
the
caller
sure.
D
This
is
Anderson
with
staff,
so
this
would
be
the
first
split
of
the
property,
so
they
would
not
be
required
to
come
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
a
subdivision
on
they
could
do
apply
to
serve
a
split,
but
any
further
splits
of
the
land
would
require.
It.
Come
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
the
subdivision,
approval.
A
D
H
A
D
Again,
this
is
Anderson
with
staff
so
that
again
that
that
subdivision
would
have
to
come
back
through
the
Commission.
If
the
Commission
is
concerned
about
multiple
houses
going
up
there
up
out
there
too
fast,
you
could
add
the
condition
in
the
zoning
action
saying
that
this
is
for
one
house
and
that
any
further
houses
would
have
to
come
back
through
the
site
plan
amendment
process
or
the
rezoning
process
to
amend
that
condition.
C
This
is
Flynn
and
I
I
would
beg
to
differ,
because
we
go
by
guidelines
that
we
are
provided,
that
our
city
code
and
city
policies
making
our
decisions,
and
so
those
would
still
have
to
be
followed
in
the
future.
It's
not
just
if
it's
seven
different
people
and
they
have
in
a
different
opinion.
Those
codes
and
policies
and
regulations
are
followed
by
every
Commission.
That
you
know
is
appointed
to
this
Planning
and
Zoning
area,
so
it
would
not
be
just
because
they
thought
it
would
be
okay
to
do
that.
C
I
Is
straighter
with
staff
and
without
public
sewer
and
water?
It's
going
to
be
extremely
unlikely
that
additional
development
would
be
allowed.
But
if
public
sewer
and
water
were
to
be
extended
to
the
area,
then
it
makes
it
much
more
likely
that
additional
development
could
occur
and
it
wouldn't
make
sense
to
them.
D
B
D
Landowners,
we
would
generally
send
out
a
courtesy
letter
for
the
subdivision.
If
that
were
to
come
back.
If
we
do
not
put
any
condition
on
the
zoning,
there
would
be
no
requirement
to
notify
them
again.
If
let
let's
say
mr.
self
and
had
someone
else
come
out
and
say:
I
want
to
build
a
second
house
and
we
approve
it
as
it
is
today.
So
it.
E
B
D
Would
be
notified
as
a
courtesy
for
the
subdivision
for
sand,
but
not
for
the
rezoning,
because
it
wouldn't
be
a
rezoning
okay.
Now,
if
we
put
a
condition
on
there,
that
says
only
there's
one
house,
mr.
Stefan
would
have
to
agree
to
that.
Then.
If
a
second
one
came
in,
he
would
still
have
the
right
and
the
ability
to
come
in
and
say.
Okay
now,
I
want
to
amend
that
to
build
a
second
house
out
there,
and
that
would
come
back
to
this.
This
same
process
I
mean.
H
A
A
C
D
D
Mr.
Stefan
or
the
new
builder
could
definitely
contact
the
health
department.
You
know
at
any
time
during
this
process.
I
believe
that
the
Health
Department
will
want
to
see
some
specific
details
of
exactly
where
the
well
will
be,
and
all
that
so
that
maybe
further
down
the
line
after
the
rezoning,
because
then
they're
going
to
be
spending
money
on
contractors
and
things
like
that,
drawing
up
plans
for
the
exact
location,
it
would
still
have
to
be
done
before
construction.
A
A
A
You
know
we
get
constructed
and
figure
out
where
the
will
didn't
go
and
all
that
that
a
lot
of
things
into
it
by
the
time
they
decide
whether
he
has
well
or
not,
didn't
well
and
I.
Guess
that's
his
his
privilege
to
do
that
or
that's
why
he's
probably
always
going
to
have
to
do
anyway
in
order
to
get
the
permit
to
build
her
to
put
the
relevant
roses
his
risk
he
precedes
and
doesn't
have
his
his
water
source
lined
up
ahead
of
time.
C
Yeah
this
is
this
is
when
sorry
but
I.
If
you
have
concerns
I,
would
contact
black
economy
health
now
and
ask
you
know
what
the
usage
of
that
well
is
and
the
capacity
and,
if
you're
close
to
it,
and
maybe
they
can
check
into
that,
for
you
I,
don't
know
how
that
works,
but
that
is
out
of
our
realm.
As
far
as
the
the
well
capacity
in
that
area,
Thank
You
al.
A
A
C
A
My
first
concern
is
the
traffic
I
know.
This
has
already
been
beat
up
a
little
bit,
but
you
folks
need
to
understand
that
three
years,
four
years
ago,
water,
new
Postal
Service
decided
that
highway
is
too
dangerous
to
be
stopping
on.
So
they
pulled
all
the
mailboxes
could
squeeze
down
the
street
and
and.
A
Three
miles
of
no
Vale
service
because
of
that
traffic
people
aren't
paying
attention
they're
on
the
cell
phones,
the
speed
that
much
55
miles
an
hour
they're,
not
paying
attention
somebody
inside
roof,
I
need
to
turn
here.
I
have
helped
and
been
involved
with
many
accidents,
often
front
when
the
saddle
shop
was
there,
people
not
knowingly
addressed,
not
paying
attention
turned
late,
they're
lost,
they
turn
around
slam
on
the
brakes.
This
is
a
big
issue
and
there
has
been
fewer
accidents
since
the
saddle
shop
closed
and
Greg
blocked
that
place.
A
Now
we're
talking
about
what
the
multiple
do
possibly
to
family
resident
back
there.
That's
what
the
paperwork
says.
Well,
it
could
be
a
condo.
It
could
be
a
great
big
kind
of
who
knows.
My
concern
is
not
only
for
me,
but
my
family
and
people
that
come
to
visit
me.
I,
have
aborted,
absolutely
turds
trying
to
turn
in
my
driveway
I,
can't
because
something's
behind
me
not
paying
attention
so
I
have
bored
and
just
write
down
just
grilled
aways
turn
around
with
a
statement.
A
This
is
a
big
concern.
Also,
these
driveways
in
the
wintertime
everybody
pushes
the
driveway
snow
to
the
end
by
the
street,
and
then
it
piles
up
piles
up
a
pile,
but
pretty
soon
in
a
heavy
snow
winter.
You
can't
see,
what's
coming,
not
only
in
my
driveway,
the
one
north
of
me
and
the
one
tzompantli,
which
is
great
I
know
he
hasn't
been
there
for
a
heavy
snowfall.
Yes,
one
or
two
winners.
We
really
have
met
so
much
notion.
A
We
will-
and
this
is
also
a
very
big
concern
of
mine-
trying
to
get
out
of
the
driveway
I
can't
I'm
going
because
he's
got
snow
piled
up
there,
not
only
for
him.
If
I
understand
this
right,
the
driveway
the
heels
going
back
into
what
was
the
saddle
shop
property
also
feeds
this
new
building.
In
the
back
that
correct.
A
This
is
pro
asset.
A
quick
question
for
staff.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
when
we
talk
about
putting
the
caveat
in
here
that,
when
we're
proving
this
recommendation,
if
we
approve
it,
our
raise
a
promotion
is
for
the
purposes
of
a
single-family
residence
on
the
additional
piece
of
property.
Is
that
correct?
That
is.
D
C
A
Reading
here
is
one
in
two
family:
residence.
Okay,
so
that's
not
building
it's
one
which
in
my
language,
that's
a
condo,
hey
I've,
seen
condos
as
many
as
five
bedrooms,
each
with
basement
and
finished
basement.
You
could
put
how
many
people
in
that
thing
and
how
many
cars
again
I'm
concerned
about
a
house
back
there
or
multiple
houses
and
people
trying
to
find
that
place
and
can't
and
screw
themselves
up
on
that
highway
endangering
my
life,
my
pants,
my
kids,
everybody
that
comes
to
see
me
and
the
neighbors
across
the
street.
A
H
A
D
Correct,
that's
that's.
The
name
of
the
zoning
district
that's
being
proposed
is
the
one
and
two
family
residence
district
with
with
the
discussion
that's
gone
here.
The
the
potential
condition
to
add
on
to
this
would
be
that
the
rezoning
allows
only
one
additional
single-family
house
for
the
approval.
Any
additional
homes
would
come
back
for
an
amendment
to
this
condition,
so
we
would
be
limiting
it
to
one
single-family
home,
which
is
what
mr.
Stefan
is
indicating
is
the
proposed
project.
A
I
Is
straighter
was
stabbed?
That's
because
the
request
is
to
rezone
it
to
r21
into
family
residence
district.
That's
where
they're
getting
that,
because
that's
the
name
of
the
district,
it's
our
two
one
and
two
family
residence
district
which
can
allow
two
unit
buildings,
duplex
condo,
whatever
you
want
to
call
it.
The
city
of
Waterloo
does
not
have
a
residence
district
that
is
limited
to
only
single-family
homes.
We
have
an
r1
district,
but
the
r1
district
also
allows
one
and
two
family
homes.
I
We
debated
whether
to
rezone
this
to
r1
or
r2,
but
there's
no
r1
area
in
this
vicinity,
and
there
is
some
existing
r2.
So
that's
why
we
suggested
the
r2,
but
there's
really
effectively
minimal
difference.
They
both
allow
either
a
single
family,
home
or
two
unit
homes.
The
r2
has
a
slightly
smaller
lot
size
and
lot
with
requirement,
but
this
is
going
to
being
a
courage,
a
2.2
acre
proposed
lot
and
if
we
add
the
condition,
as
mr.
Anderson
suggested,
it
would
limit
it
to
a
single-family
home.
C
This
is
Flynn
and
I
just
had
a
question
for
the
gentleman
and
the
lady
I'm.
Sorry
can't
recall
either
name
and
I'm,
not
on
visual,
so
I
can't
see
them,
but
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
had
spoken
with
mr.
Stefan
at
all
about
what
the
proposed
building
would
look
like
or
where
were
you
hearing
that
it
was
a
condo
or
facility
or
home
for
six
to
twelve
people?
This.
A
Is
Mike
I'm
reading
the
letter
sent
to
me
by
the
city
and
it
says
agriculture,
a
one's
own.
Two
are
two
one
and
two
family
residents,
Wow
you're
going
to
build
a
house
back
there
and
that's
the
idea
here.
It
is
much
real
estate
for
as
much
money
as
you
can.
That's
that's.
The
bottom
line
so
and
I
have
talked
great,
but
I
didn't
realize
that
this
could
be
a
two
family
tree,
that's
what's
being
sown
for
so
he
certainly
could
do
that.
Or
is
that
not
correct?
So.
I
This
is
straighter
as
I
know
that
the
city
does
not
have
a
zoning
district,
that's
just
a
single-family
home,
it's
r1
or
r2,
both
of
which
are
a
one
in
two
family
residence
district.
So
yes,
that
is
the
title
and
yes,
that
district
would
allow
a
two
unit
home.
But
that's
why
you're
reading
that,
because
that
is
the
name
of
the
district,
but
he's
proposing
a
single
family,
home
and
staff
is
suggesting
a
condition
to
address
that
concern
of
the
neighbors
that
it
be
limited
to
a
single-family
home.
A
A
One
thing
I
don't
want
to
share
is
my
water,
with
this
proposed
new
house,
another
issue:
what
I've
got
here?
They're
gonna
have
to
put
a
second
thing
on
there,
even
one
or
two
family,
whatever
it
is
the
reaching
system
I,
don't
you
guys
realize
what
there's
a
creek
it
runs
down
in
it
eventually
dumps
into
Burton
Creek,
which
grows
in
Cedar
River
right
behind
the
house
around
this
property.
A
I
Is
trainer
with
staff?
Yes,
the
Health
Department
would
have
to
approve
a
permit
for
the
septic
system
as
part
of
getting
that
they
would
require
a
perc
test
be
done
and
they
would
require
that
the
septic
system
itself
be
properly
sized,
both
the
holding
tank
component
of
it
and
the
leach
field
component
of
it,
based
on
the
size
of
the
house
and
the
number
of
faucet
like
bathroom
fixtures
in
the
house.
A
A
A
All
these
things,
these
questions
we
actually
addressed
before
there's
permits
to
allow
this
house
we
built
back
there
well.
I
would
think
that
that
would
this
is
just
Haldeman,
and
this
is
my
opinion,
but
if
it
were
me
building
the
house
to
make
sure
I
could
put
in
a
well
in
a
septic
system
before
I
even
started
digging.
A
Just
row
so
I
believe
that
between
Lamar
County,
Health
Department
with
the
water
and
with
the
septic
field
they're
going
to
be
reviewing
both
of
those.
In
addition,
the
building
department's
going
to
require
a
permit
and
I
want
to
know
what
their
source
of
water
and
how
they're
going
to
treat
free
septic
and
probably
require
that
same
approval
review
process
in
the
black
on
County
Health
Department
am
I
correct
that
this.
I
D
A
H
A
A
A
G
Stefan
again,
41
92
Logan
Avenue
I
have
agreed
to
a
condition
that
this
be
a
single-family
homes.
It
is
gonna,
be
an
acreage.
There
is
a
process.
Okay,
it
makes
no
sense
to
go
out
to
health
department
and
ask
for
a
study
to
be
done
on
well
and
spent
that
money,
as
well
as
a
study
to
be
done
on
a
septic
without
first
getting
permission
from
this
organization.
This
Council
to
rezone
to
even
have
the
opportunity
to
do
that.
G
G
D
G
C
A
B
Commissioners,
surfing
I'll
make
the
motion
that
the
request
by
Greg
Stephan
to
rezone
8.8
acres
from
a1
agriculture
district
to
tar21
and
to
family
residents
Street
for
a
new
single-family
home
located
at
41
92
Logan
Avenue,
be
approved
with
the
understanding
that
this
request
does
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area
and
also
does
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
upon
the
surrounding
area.
With
the
conditions
being
met,
though,.
B
E
A
I
D
A
F
Yep,
this
start
off
of
staff.
The
request
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
neighborhood,
as
the
area
spent
as
neighbor
owns
back
when
it
was
first
developed
in
1960s,
surrounded
by
single-family,
home
single-family
and
multi-family
home.
The
requests
were
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
of
a
killer,
pedestrian
traffic
in
the
area,
air
served
by
Lincolnshire
Road
months,
eleven
uml
lanes,
which
are
local
streets
and
Eanes
Borough
Avenue,
which
is
a
minor
arterial.
F
F
F
The
applicant
is
proposing
24
Lots
lot
ones
lot.
One
would
have
sixty
five
hundred
and
nine
square
feet.
Lots
three,
five,
seven
and
nine
will
have
sixty
five
hundred
square
feet
of
lot
area
lots.
Two
four,
six,
eight
and
ten
will
have
60
250
square
feet
of
lot
area.
Lots
11
through
14,
19
and
20
will
have
5500
square
feed.
Lots
15
through
18,
21
and
22
will
have
4,500
square
feet
and
last
23
and
24
will
have
5,000
square
feet.
Lots
11
through
24
were
designated.
F
They
have
one
unit
of
a
two
unit
duplex
with
a
zero
lot
line.
Setback
between
units,
which
is
permitted
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
The
r1
RP
allows
flexible
density
to
allow
for
new
homes
to
meet
marking
conditions
in
the
area
track
day
is
designated
as
Lincolnshire
Road,
which
is
3595
square
feet,
track
be
as
designated
for.
Stormwater
management
is
sixteen
thousand
two
hundred
fifteen
square
feet
and
track.
C
is
designated
for
storm
drainage,
which
is
three
thousand
ninety
two
square
feet.
F
Midwest
of
home
is
proposing
a
mixture
single-family
to
family
units
for
development.
The
area
is
being
proposed
for
the
final
plat
was
first
shown
in
the
preliminary
plat
of
West
Ridge.
Addition
in
July
in
nineteen
sixty
one
has
a
future
edition,
but
was
then
sold
to
the
neighboring
church
and
never
developed
at
that
time.
The
areas
on
our
1rp
plain
one
and
two
family
residence
history,
the
RP
district,
mister.
E
A
F
Thank
you.
Okay.
The
plat
will
create
an
infill
project
within
the
developed
area
of
the
city,
which
has
been
underutilized
for
many
years
on
by
a
church
to
allow
for
future
expansion
that
the
church
is
no
longer
considering
the
project
create
24
new
homes,
which
will
provide
increased
taxpayer
revenue
for
the
city.
The
final
plan
includes
final
description,
property
lines,
dimensions
date,
joining
subdivisions,
deeded,
dedications
engineers,
certificates
survey,
right
away
with
proper
lot
sequence
and
contracting
waiver.
F
Originally
easements
were
shown
on
the
plat.
However,
one
of
only
one
of
the
easements
was
marked
indicating
use
some
dimensions.
They
will
need
to
remove
the
setback
lines
on
the
plat.
However,
they
could
choose
that
a
building
line
along
street
frontage
zoning
notes
information
would
need
to
be
removed.
However,
the
above-mentioned
items
have
been
addressed
and
the
engineer
has
sign-off
the
plat,
so
it
can
be
forward
to
City
Council.
Therefore,
staff
recommends
the
request
for
define,
apply
to
Lincolnshire
addition
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
F
The
request
will
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impacts
around
the
area.
The
request
will
not
appear
to
have
and
they
backed
on
pedestrian
traffic
conditions
in
the
surrounding
area.
The
request
will
create
new
infill
lots
and
develop
part
of
the
city.
The
request
will
put
three
acres
land
and
subsequent
homes
on
the
tax
rolls.
A
A
D
No,
the
the
land,
this
Anderson
with
staff,
the
land
was
actually
purchased
from
the
church.
So
previously
it
was
part
of
the
churches.
I
believe
there
is
some
playground
equipment
that
will
be
relocated
or
discontinued
as
part
of
the
development,
which
is
an
agreement
with
the
church
sale
to
them.
Okay,.
A
E
A
A
Okay,
Singh
done
we'll
entertain
a
motion.
This
is
voice
to
call
motion.
Second,
it's
been
moved
and
seconded
all
in
favor.
Please
say:
aye
hi
boys
opposed
same
sign.
That's
carried!
Thank
you
very
much
move
on
to
the
next
item
on
the
agenda.
Vacates
request
by
personified,
incorporated
to
vacate
approximately
1,000.
H
F
F
The
vacate
area
was
cut
off
from
us
is
cut
off
from
us
highway
218
by
a
trail
and
the
Iowa
northern
railroad
tracks
and
chain-link
flans
blocks
access
to
the
highway.
The
u.s.
218
trail
is
located
across
the
Northern
Iowa
northern
railroad
tracks
from
the
vacate
areas,
but
but
is
divided
by
a
chain-link
fence.
F
Commercial
business
center
in
the
air
were
develop
between
1948
and
1996,
with
the
church
being
built
in
1995.
There
are
no
known
utilities
located
in
blustery,
Water
Works,
says
of
water
and
17th
Street,
but
not
in
bluff.
The
request
to
vacate
Bluff
Street
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
area.
Traffic
congestions.
The
roll
bluff
Street
was
greatly
diminished
with
the
construction
of
ESI
o
18
to
18
as
an
expressway
in
the
1990s.
All
buildings
on
the
west
side
lust
for
demolish
and
a
few
buildings
remaining
on.
F
The
east
side
of
the
street.
Journal'
section
streets
have
already
been
vacated.
The
northern
part
of
bluff
street
to
16th
was
vacated
in
two
sections
by
ordinance:
39
77
on
October
11th,
1993
and
41:51
On
February
5th
1996,
a
portion
of
blustery
south
of
17th
to
18th
Street
was
making
it
by
ordinance
40
to
98
on
May
26
1998.
F
Therefore,
because
it's
been
over
one
year,
it
does
need
a
return
to
Planning
and
Zoning
for
recommendation
of
a
recommendation
again
during
tech
review
of
Water
Works
just
wanted
to
ensure
that
17th
Street
would
not
be
affected
by
their
vacate
area.
Since
there
is
a
hydrant
at
the
end
of
17th
Street
to
which
staff
responded,
there
is
no
portion
a
17th
being
vacated.
Therefore,
staff
recommends
a
request
to
vacate
12800
80
square
feet
of
blustery
being
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
F
The
request
to
vacate
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
surround
the
area.
The
request
to
vacate
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
a
fuel
or
pedestrian
traffic
in
the
area.
The
street
has
been
rendered
surplus
due
to
us
to
18
project
and
subsequent
vacations,
and
the
condition
can
be
removed
because
that
the
lego
description
has
been
corrected.