►
Description
City of Waterloo Planning, Programming & Zoning Commission Meeting - December 1, 2020
A
C
E
C
G
C
A
A
A
D
C
G
Gardner
edition
is
a
two
lot
subdivision,
with
one
lot
being:
1.35
acres
and
la
tube
being
1.71
acres
track
day
is
0.88
acres
and
designated
as
for
virgin
drive,
track
b
c
and
d
are
0.23
acres,
0.15
acres
and
0.30
acres
respectively,
and
a
reserve
for
storm
water
management.
There
are
no
changes
from
the
original
adopted
preliminary
plant.
The
plant
was
originally
referred
to
as
shirk
edition.
However,
a
conflict
with
the
existing
plot
was
discovered
and
does
the
name
change
the
gardner
edition,
because
there's
multiple
one
and
two
family
home?
G
Well,
all
two
family
homes
plan
to
be
built
on
a
single
lot
in
the
r2102
family
residence
district,
a
special
permit
will
be
required.
The
final
plan
includes
legal
description,
property
lines,
dimensions,
building,
lines,
dimensions,
they
joining
subdivisions,
engineer,
certificate,
survey,
easements
right
away
with
and
pro
proper
line
sequence
added
dedication
will
need
to
be
submitted.
G
Therefore,
staff
recommends
that
the
final
plat
for
gardner
edition
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
The
plot
would
have
no
negative
impact
on
surrounding
area.
The
plot
would
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area,
and
the
plot
will
create
additional
infill
development
in
the
site.
The
plant
will
need.
The
condition
is
the
plant
will
need
to
be
updated,
with
additional
documents
before
being
sub
submitted
to
the
city
council
and
on
the
special
permit.
G
The
applicants
are
looking
to
have
two
family
homes
on
a
common
lot,
with
the
property
being
maintained
under
a
condominium
association.
Therefore,
applic
ken
is
requesting
a
special
permit
to
allow
multiple,
two-family
resident
residential
structures
to
be
built
on
a
single
lot,
since
the
property
is
zoned,
r212,
family
residence
district
and
required
a
special
permit,
he's
muted.
G
G
C
C
G
Well,
apparently,
we're
also
having
tell
issue
with
televisions,
because
ed
came
in
here
and
had
an
issue
with
it.
So
I'll
do
this
real
quick.
So
basically
they
need
the
special
permit,
because
it's
zone
four
r2
one
and
two
family
residence
district.
If
it
was
zoned,
r3,
multiple
residence,
district
or
less
restrictive
zoning,
a
special
permit
would
not
be
required.
G
The
applicant
has
submitted
a
site
plan
showing
that
the
proposed
development
meets
all
the
requirements
of
an
r2102
family
residence
district.
Should
the
homes
eventually
be
split
into
individual
lots,
which
they
would
not
be
required
to
be
split,
but
are
required
to
show
the
ability
to
be
split
and
they
meet
all
those
requirements.
Therefore,
we
recommend
approval
the
special
permit
they
would.
It
would
not
have
a
negative
impact
around
the
area.
G
Negative
impact,
no
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions,
two
family
structures
would
be
split
into,
could
be
split
into
individual
lots.
Special
permit
will
create
a
additional
infield
development
site,
and
we've
received
only
one
phone
call
about
this,
and
once
I
explained
what
they
were
doing,
the
phone
caller
was
in
support
of
the.
H
Yeah,
I
don't
know
if
it's
for
the
developer
or
for
staff,
but
this
is
do
not
with
my
question.
My
question
is:
are
I
don't
know
how
to
work
my
question,
but
I
I
just
wanted
to
know
if
people
are
applying
to
be
in
the
condominium?
Is
there
any
restrictions
or
is
it
just?
Anybody
can
apply?
Who
is
able
to
pay
the
market,
the
market
cost
of
being
in
the
condo
minimum?
H
B
H
B
B
But
that's
what
I
was
asking:
okay,
yep
yep
it.
You
know,
I
I
guess:
if
someone
wanted
to
buy
two
lots
and
own,
you
know,
live
in
one
half
and
rent
the
other
half
like
sometimes
people
do.
I
don't
think
that
at
this
point,
there's
any
restriction
on
something
like
that,
but
the
idea
and
the
intent
is
to
sell
each
individual
unit
on
its
own.
J
This
is
flynn,
and
I
just
had
some
questions
on.
I
guess
it
looks
like
it's
on
page
31
of
42
in
our
packet,
and
I
guess
this
would
be
more
staff
oriented
it's
showing
city
council
as
six
twenty,
two,
twenty
wondering
what
that
means
question
one
question
two
is
on
number
three
e:
it's
saying
value
of
area
to
be
dedicated
conveyed
to
the
city.
Fifteen
thousand
just
wondered
the
explanation
of
that
and
then
in
that
same
section
on
three
a
name,
a
plaid.
J
E
E
The
preliminary
plat
did
have
a
different
name
on
it,
but
it
wasn't
identified
at
that
point
in
time
that
there
was
a
conflict
with
that
name,
so
they
then
did
change.
That
name
and
the
current
proposed
name
does
not
have
any
conflicts,
and
it
wouldn't
be
officially
the
name
of
this
subdivision
until
the
subdivision
is
both
approved
by
the
city
council
and
recorded
in
the
office
of
the
blackhawk
county
recorder.
Once
that's
done,
then
it
would
not
be
able
to
be
changed
without
going
through
an
amendment
process.
E
E
C
E
When
was
the
preliminary
plat
approved
that
way
the
pnz
approval
date
and
the
city
council
date?
Is
there
number
one
so
that
it's
clear
that
a
preliminary
plat
has
been
approved
but
number
two
just
kind
of
informational
purposes?
If
you're
trying
to
recall
like
hey,
did
we
look
at
the
preliminary
plot
on
this.
E
F
This
this
is
trost.
I
want
to
recognize
you
know
not
only
the
the
commission,
but
also
the
planning
and
zoning
department
staff
and
the
city
city
city
council,
efforts
that
this
is
a.
This
is
a
very
to
me.
In
my
opinion,
this
is
a
very
smart
development
project
taking
pieces
of
property.
I
know
we've
been
doing
it
across
the
community,
but
finding
those
areas
to
develop
housing
within
the
community.
F
This
can
be
attractive
to
older
people,
possibly
or
people
who
have
handicaps
accessibility,
issues
that
they're
within
the
community
in
the
heart
of
the
community,
and
have
easy
access
to
other
amenities
within
the
community.
So
you
know
this
one
this.
This
helps
in
these.
These
kind
of
focus
projects
obviously
help
save
tax
dollars
in
the
end,
expanding
infrastructure
projects
further
out
in
the
community
those
kinds
of
things.
So
I
do
appreciate
the
the
thinking
behind
these
kind
of
kind
of
developments.
H
B
C
H
F
C
B
E
I
like
to
co
here
I
will
motion
that
we
approve
the
request
by
steve
trotsky
for
the
final
plot
of
gardner
edition
a
two
lot
residential
subdivision
and
the
r2
one
and
two
family
residence
district
located
north
and
east
of
603,
south
hackett
avenue.
For
the
following
reasons.
The
plaque
should
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area.
The
plant
should
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area.
H
B
B
E
A
E
E
Some
minor
cleanup
like
in
the
s1
shopping
center
district.
The
current
title
of
the
district
was
in
there
wrong.
So
it's
cleaning
that
up
a
reference
to
clean
up
the
alcohol
sales
uses
in
s1
because
they
would
revert
back
to
the
c2
district,
but
that
was
not
clear
in
the
ordinance
tweaks
in
the
m1
district
for
manufacturing,
compounding
processing,
packaging
treatment
or
storage
of
various
products
and
then
a
corresponding
one
in
the
m2.
E
And
then,
the
last
time
we
did
an
expansion
of
an
existing
salvage
yard.
Question
was
raised
as
to
the
provision
requiring
a
new
salvage
yard
to
be
600
feet
from
any
protected
use.
The
question
as
to
whether
or
not
that
applied
to
the
expansion
of
an
existing
salvage
yard
that
might
already
be
less
than
600
feet.
That
was
never
the
intent
for
that
to
cover,
but
it
was
deemed
questionable
based
on
the
wording
of
the
ordinance.
So
this
amendment
would
clarify
that
the
amendment
adds
under
home
occupations.
E
E
It
was
changed
to
allow
home
occupations
out
of
accessory
structures,
and
we
don't
want
to
take
that
away,
but
we've
identified
some
potential
problems
that
can
cause
in
including
the
property,
then
not
having
the
required
parking
or
required
garage
space,
that's
otherwise
required
by
the
ordinance.
So
the
thought
process
would
be
to
add
they're
going
to
have
a
home
occupation
out
of
an
accessory
building
to
have
that
be
permitted
by
special
permit
approval.
Only.
E
There's
a
couple
other
cleanups
in
the
special
permit
section.
A
special
permit
is
also
known
as
a
conditional
use.
The
term
is
used
throughout
the
ordinance
in
either
as
a
special
permit
and
a
conditional
use,
so
that
just
makes
it
clear
that
whichever
term
you're
using
they
mean
the
same
thing
and
that
pretty
much
covers
the
main,
I
can
certainly
go
into
additional
detail
on
any
specific
one.
If
there's
questions.
H
D
E
Yeah
and
that
can
maybe
kind
of
depend
on
the
details
of
a
specific
like
if
it's
in,
if
it's
just
an
error
in,
say
the
printed
ordinance.
If
the
actual
ordinance
that
went
through
the
public
approval
process
and
was
passed
by
the
city
council
says
it
one
way.
But
then,
when
it
was
typed
into
the
print
version
of
the
ordinance
which
changed,
we
can
clarify
that
to
make
it
correct
with
what
the
actual
adopted
ordinance
was.
C
E
Yes,
otherwise,
if
it's
wording,
that's
actually,
you
know
part
of
the
ordinance
that
was
approved
by
council
and
we're
changing,
changing
it
from
what
was
previously
approved,
even
if
what
was
previously
approved
was
probably
a
a
small
error.
Generally
speaking,
those
have
to
go
back
through
in
a
process
and
oftentimes
handle.
Those
is
like
this
just
kind
of
a
catch-all
where
we've
got
an
amendment,
that's
needed
and
we
can
add
in
some
simple
little
clean
up
ones.
At
the
same
time,.
H
J
This
is
flynn.
I
was
just
wondering
on
like
the
chapter
5
general
regulations.
We
don't
see
what's
before
that
you
know.
I
don't
see
that
we
see
what's
before,
like
it
looks
like
it's
page
33
in
the
bolded,
and
so
what
I'm
just
wondering
it
looks
like
there's
a
one
or
what
we're
talking
about
here,
that
no
non-resident
employees
can
work
from
or
report
to
or
park
at
the
site
of
the
home
occupation.
E
Sure
the
straighter
was
staff
so
yeah,
and
that
definitely
was
not
in
any
sort
of
you
know
attempt
to
hide
anything.
It's
just
to
condense,
the
ordinance
amendment
I
was
just
showing
the
pages
actually
being
affected,
but
yeah.
So
you
would
all
have
a
copy
of
the
current
zoning
ordinance
and
if
you
know
for
the
general
public,
it's
also
online
so
yeah,
the
bolded
page
33
is
33
of
the
packet,
but
you
see
the
other
page
where
it
says:
31,
that's!
E
E
And
b
actually
are
different
sections
of
non-conforming
uses.
Subsection
c
is
fences
and
subsection
d
is
home
occupations.
So
within
subsection
d,
home
occupations
there
is
a
subsection
one
purpose,
so
it's
just
kind
of
covering
what
is
the
purpose
of
the
home
occupation
regulations
and
then
a
subsection
to
necessary
conditions.
So
we
weren't
proposing
any
changes
in
the
purpose
section,
and
I
just
didn't
include
it
in
there
to
try
and
save
pages
of
what
I
provided
in
there.
E
E
Correct
yep
yep
and
the
the
first,
the
the
page
ahead
there
in
the
packet
page
32
of
the
packet,
is
what
gives
the
overview
of
the
amendment
and
it
knows
notes.
The
first
changes
are
to
section
10
dash,
1
d,
the
home
occupation
section
and
then
changing
the
requirements
for
the
necessary
conditions
to
home
occupation.
So
yeah
ahead.
B
E
E
The
next
one
probably
does
that
too,
the
the
next
page
of
the
packet
is
page
34,
which
is
page
33
out
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
So
page
32
is
missing
because
we're
not
making
any
changes
on
page
32,
but
on
page
32,
is
where
subsection
e
accessory
structures
begins
and
then
within
subsection
e.
The
first
subsection
of
that
is
one
residential
accessory
structures,
and
it's
within
that
that
there's
a
change.
A
E
I
H
C
A
C
E
E
D
E
C
E
E
D
H
H
E
So
in
case
anyone
was
not
remembering
the
the
code
of
ordinances
that
provides
for
the
planning
commission
and
provides
for
the
appointment
of
a
chair
does
provide
for
the
chair
position
to
come
from
the
at
large.
So
it
excludes
the
positions
that
are
appointed
from
human
rights,
community
development
or
the
school
board.
F
A
All
right
motion
carried
thank
you.
I
enjoy
working
with
you
all,
and
the
staff
department
makes
it
easy
to
do
the
job.
I
think,
with
their
support.
Any
nominations
for
vice
chairperson,
so,
like
eric
said,
this
can
be
for
appointed
per
commissioner,
so
those
can
come
from
the
other
commissions
too.
I
think
eric
was
our
vice
chairperson
last
year,
or
this
year.
A
H
D
H
J
This
is
flynn,
and
the
only
thing
that
I
have
is
if
we
do
go
with,
you
know,
like
the
commission
members
that
are
a
point
appointed.
You
know
not
at
large
due
to
like,
for
instance,
my
role
in
the
school
board
and
eric's.
If,
if
he
would
not
be
appointed
back
to
his
commission
in
december,
then
would
that
be
a
conflict.
H
J
D
B
F
C
I
A
H
I
mean
last
time
or
last
term
I
got
appointed
or
reappointed
late,
just
because
the
human
rights
commission
sent
in
their
letter
sent
in
a
letter
late.
So
we
need.
We
need
that
to
be
on
time
for
my
appointment
letter
to
be
sent
over,
but
but
I
should
get
reappointed.
I
think
at
least
to
my
position
on
the
planning
and
zoning.
E
A
E
A
E
C
E
To
work
for
the
council
members,
though,
so
we're
not
asking
you
know
like
for
a
final
decision
now,
because
the
council
hasn't
made
a
final
decision
on
council
meetings
yet,
but
we're
just
trying
to
look
forward
because
they're
talking
about
if
they
do
act
on
it,
probably
would
be
already
for
you
know,
january
council
meetings.
I
don't.
F
C
E
Meets
first
tuesday,
board
of
adjustment
meets
fourth
tuesday.
So
that's
three
weeks
in
between
if
we
change
the
second
tuesday
that
lowers
that
down
to
two
weeks,
but
that
still
works
fine
for
getting
things
between
p
and
z
and
board
of
adjustment
and
may
actually
help
applicants
out,
because
it's
less
time
that
they
have
to
sit
and
wait.
J
J
A
C
E
E
H
I
E
E
That
was
the
indication
I
think
this
upcoming
monday
december
7th.
They
are
having
another
work
session
on
it.
They've
had
a
few
work
sessions
in
the
past,
so
I
don't
think
there
will
be
any
decision
on
december
7th,
but
I
think
they
are
looking
for
that
decision
to
be
shortly
there
after
that,
in
december.
E
E
E
E
I
E
Yeah,
so
I
guess
the
only
thing
there
is
we
might
have
to
communicate
with
community
development
because
on
the
instance
we're
there
on
the
third
tuesday
and
get
bumped
by
a
council
meeting
moving
from
monday
to
tuesday.
I
think
maybe
in
the
past
they've
then
moved
their
meeting
up
a
week
to
the
second
tuesday.
D
E
It
it
wouldn't
be
the
end
of
the
world
for
us
for
one
month.
I
don't
believe
I
I
don't
know,
would
that
be
kind
of
blindsided
with
time
to
get
work
prepared
for
our
meeting
john
in
our
office
has
noted
that,
because
of
the
coming
holidays
and
the
work
schedule
that
the
pnz
meeting
on
january
5th
is
going
to
potentially
be
a
scramble,
the
turn-in
deadline
will
be
december
15th,
but
yeah.
It's.