
►
Description
City of Waterloo Planning, Programming & Zoning Commission Meeting - August 18, 2022
A
Originally
scheduled
for
August
9th
we'll
go
ahead
and
first
item
on
the
agenda.
Is
approval
of
this
afternoon's
agenda
any
revisions
or
updates.
B
A
D
Financial
report
puts
us
through
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year
and
on
the
revenue
side,
as
you
go
through
the
different
categories.
Some
of
them
are
above
100,
some
of
them
are
below
100
and
the
grand
total
was
at
98
so
really
close
and
on
the
expense
side.
Looking
down
through
the
subtotals
in
the
categories
like
91
81,
91,
91,
83,
one
area
at
113
and
106.,
they
didn't
have
an
overall
average
in
there,
but
it's
about
90
percent,
so
we
were
really
close,
hitting
revenue
and
under
on
expense,
so
looks
good.
E
A
Any
opposed
okay
financial
report
has
been
accepted.
Next
item
on
the
agenda
is
time
for
oral
presentations.
This
is
for
anyone
who's
in
attendance
who's
here
to
speak
on
an
item
that
is
not
already
on
the
agenda.
A
Okay,
and
do
we
have
anybody
else
on
phone
or
Zoom?
Okay,
all
right!
So
then,
we'll
move
on
to
new
business
time
is
for
403,
and
this
is
the
time
set
for
request
by
the
city
of
Waterloo
to
rezone
five
acres
from
A1
agricultural
District
to
M1
light
industrial
district
to
M1
light
industrial
district
located
east
of
2135
Commercial
Street.
A
Sorry,
at
this
time,
we
should
receive
and
place
and
file
a
statement.
Verification
signed
by
Pana
McGee
stating
I
Patty
McGee
do
hereby
certify
that
a
copy
of
the
attached
letter
overview
map,
aerial
map
and
notice
map
were
mailed
to
the
individuals
on
the
attached
list
on
July
25th
2022.
Could
we
have
a
motion
received
and
place
this
notice
on
file
so.
C
A
G
A
G
This
is
store
Alpha
staff,
the
applicants
requesting
to
rezone
property
in
question
for
future
development.
The
request
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
neighborhood,
as
is
surrounded
by
industrial
uses,
to
the
South
and
West,
and
the
Cedar
River
to
East
and
North,
which
Quest
would
not
appear
to
have
a.
H
G
Impact
on
vicular
pedestrian
traffic
movements
in
the
area,
the
area
the
area
served
by
Commercial
Street,
which
is
classified
as
local
Street
and
there's
no
sidewalks
in
the
area.
The
majority
of
the
property
is
on
the
A1
agricultural
District,
having
been
Zone
to
substance
being
rezoned
from
U1
and
classified
on
June
15
1998.
G
The
remaining
portion
is
zones,
M1,
light
Industrial
District
zone
of
such
since
the
adoption
zoning
ordinance
in
1969
surrounding
land
uses
and
their
zoning
to
the
north
to
see
the
river
zoned
A1
agricultural
District
to
the
South
Industrial
and
commercials
Zone
M1,
light
industrial
district
city,
east
of
the
Cedar
River
zone,
A1
agricultural
district,
and
to
the
West's
industrial
commercials
on
M1
light.
Industrial
District.
G
The
future
land
use
map
designates
this
area
is
industrial,
and
the
proposed
rezoning
would
be
in
performance
with
the
comprehensive
line
of
future
land
use
map
for
the
area.
The
application
is
requesting
to
rezone
approximately
five
acres
from
A1
agricultural
district
and
M1
light
industrial
district
to
allow
for
future
development.
The
prompting
question
is
surrounded
by
other
commercial
industrial
type
development
and
the
property
is
located
west
of
the
Cedar
River
Levy.
Therefore,
there
will
not
affect
the
Cedar
River
or
the
flood
plain.
G
A
portion
of
exists
in
one
area
is
being
included
for
the
rezone
to
create
for
easier
legal
description.
G
Therefore,
staff
recommends
that's
a
request
by
the
city
Waterloo
to
rezone,
approximately
five
acres
from
A1
agricultural
district
and
M1
light
Industrial
District
two
M1
light
industrial
district
located
east
of
2135
Commercial
Street
be
approved
for
final
reasons.
The
request
will
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
surround
the
area.
Direct
Quest
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area
and
the
request
of
the
conference
with
the
future
land
use
map
for
the
area.
A
A
A
C
I'll
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
the
recommendation
by
the
city
of
Waterloo
to
rezone
approximately
five
acres
from
A1
agriculture,
district
and
M1
light
industrial
district
to
M1,
light
industrial
district
located
east
of
2135
Commercial
Street,
and
that
this
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
The
request
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area,
nor
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area.
The
request
is,
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
future
land
use
map
for
the
area.
A
Next
item
on
the
agenda:
oh
the
hearing,
the
time
is
409
pm
and
a
hearing
is
scheduled
at
this
time
for
a
request
by
Mike,
Kim
and
Zaid
doing
business
as
cam
inside
masonry
for
a
site
plan
Amendment
to
the
m2p
planned
industrial
district
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
10,
800
square
foot
office,
slash
Warehouse
facility
located
north
and
east
of
2510
Liberty
Road.
At
this
time,
we
should
receive
in
place
file
a
statement
of
verification
signed
by
Patty
McGee
stating
I
Patty
McGee.
A
Do
hereby
certify
that
a
copy
of
the
attached
letter
overview
map,
aerial
map,
notice,
map
and
drawings
were
mailed
to
the
individuals
on
the
attached
list
on
August,
8th
2022,
we
have
a
motion
to
receive
in
place.
This
notice
on
file
so
moved
I'll.
Second,
it.
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
stayed
eye
all.
J
Is
blank
stuff
the
applicants
requesting
con
to
construct
a
new
10
800
square
foot
office,
warehouse
for
a
masonry
contractor
business
east
of
2210
Liberty
Road
in
the
Waterloo
air
in
real
Park?
The
request
to
construct
the
office
warehouse
facility
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
upon
the
surrounding
area,
as
it
would
appear
to
be
compatible
with
other
proposed
Industrial
Development
in
the
area.
J
The
area
is
the
Aryan
question
has
been
zoned
m2p
plan
industrial
district
since
June
10th,
June,
7
2010,
when
the
land
was
rezoned
from
A1
agricultural
District
surrounding
land
uses
and
their
zoning
designations
are
as
follows.
To
the
north
as
vacant
land,
zoned,
m2p,
plant
industrial
district
to
the
South
and
to
the
east
is
vacant.
Land
and
Airport
zoned
m2p,
plant
industrial
district
and
to
the
West
is
residential
and
vacant
land.
J
In
the
city
of
Cedar
Falls,
it
will
be
necessary
that
stormwater
detention
plan
is
submitted,
as
well
as
a
swipe
to
the
engineering
department
for
review
and
approval.
The
proposed
request
would
not
appear
to
have
negative
impact
upon
drainage
in
the
area
if,
if
proper,
stormwater
detention
techniques
are
put
in
place
for
the
two
proposed
drainage
ponds,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
construct
a
10
800
square
foot
office
warehouse
with
four
Bays
four
masonry
contractor
business.
A
gravel
Contractor
Yard
will
be
located
to
the
north
of
the
building.
J
The
area
in
question
is
on
m2p
plant
industrial
district
and
the
zoning
is
designed
to
permit
the
establishment
of
industrial
parks
and
to
provide
for
the
orderly,
planned
growth
of
Industries
on
large
tracts
of
land
and
allow
in
Greater
flexibility
and
diversification
of
land
uses
and
building
locations.
It
is
also
intended
that
such
industrial
parks
be
developed
to
maximize
the
potentials
of
industrial
areas
and,
at
the
same
time,
minimize
any
adverse
effect
upon
adjacent
properties
in
other
zoning
districts.
The
zoning
ordinance
requires
one
space
for
every
two
people
employed
at
the
facility.
J
J
At
tech
review,
the
fire
department
noted
if
Vehicles
were
stored
inside
the
building
and
larger
than
GVW
of
10
000
pounds
or
the
building
is
over
five
thousand
square
square
feet.
A
sprinkler
system
and
alarm
will
need
to
be
installed.
The
fire
department
also
mentioned
aerial.
Access
will
be
needed
depending
on
the
height
of
the
building,
and
a
turnaround
will
also
be
required
for
the
fire
department.
J
Access
engineering
department
will
need
a
site
plan
that
includes
stormwater
information.
Therefore,
staff
recommends
that
the
request
by
Cayman
Zion
masonry
for
a
site
plan
Amendment
to
the
m2p
heavy
industrial,
planned
industrial
district
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
10
800
square
foot
where
office
warehouse
facility
located
east
of
2210
Liberty
Road
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
The
request
is,
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
future
land
use
map
for
this
area.
J
The
request
would
appear
to
have
a
positive
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area,
as
this
will
be
another
addition
to
the
industrial
park.
The
request
will
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area
and
with
the
following
conditions:
at
the
final
site:
claimants
all
applicable
city
codes,
regulations
Etc,
including,
but
unlimited
to
parking,
Landscaping
screening,
drainage,
setbacks,
Etc.
A
C
B
Commissioner,
trost
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
request
by
Commons
and
masonry
for
a
site
plan
Amendment
to
the
m2p
heavy
Industrial
District,
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
10
800
square
foot
office.
Warehouse
facility
located
east
of
2210
leversey
Road,
be
approved
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
final
site
plan
meets
all
applicable
city
codes,
regulations
Etc,
including
the
not
limited
to
parking
Landscaping
screening,
drainage
setbacks,
Etc.
C
A
G
The
participation
program
would
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area
and
there
is
no
other
Billboards
in
the
vicinity.
The
special
permit
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
Empire
figure,
pedestrian
conditions
in
the
area.
The
area
in
questions
on
them
too
heavy
industrial
district
is
only
such
since
the
adoption
and
zoning
ordinance
number
2479
in
1969
to
the
Northeast
and
South
Industrial
zones,
M2
having
industrial
district
to
the
West
is
industrial
and
George
West
State
Park
is
on
the
m2p
plant
industrial
district
and
M1
light
Industrial
District
foreign.
G
Special
permit
for
a
300
square
foot
billboard
would
be,
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
future
land
use
map
for
the
area.
The
applicant's
requesting
a
special
permit
to
construct
a
30-foot,
32
foot
tall,
300
square
foot,
off-premise
billboard
at
3050,
Wagner
Road.
Their
proposed
billboard
would
have
signs
on
both
sides
and
the
signs
would
be
static
and
not
digital.
Zoning
requirement
requirements
requires
that
the
billboard
structures
shall
be
not
be
within
a
thousand
feet
of
each
other
and.
G
There
are
no
no
other
Billboards
within
the
immediate
vicinity.
The
zoning
ordinance
requires
that
all
districts
were
permitted,
C2,
C3,
M1
and
M2,
excluding
coronary
overlay
districts.
Billboard
Chow
have
a
prime
message
area:
nastics
seek
300
square
feet,
Billboard's
main
seeks
300
square
feet
for
unique
and
site
characteristics,
including,
but
not
limited.
Setbacks
surrounding
land
use
to
the
structures,
spaciousness
and
visibility.
G
The
17
by
20
sign
will
be
32
feet
high
and
there
will
be
15
feet
between
the
bottom
of
the
sign,
and
the
surrounding
grade
should
also
be
noted.
They
did
have
to.
They
did
change
the
location
of
the
sign
because
the
original
location
of
the
sign
was
over
a
seriesment,
and
so
the
sign
was
moved
to
to
alleviate
that
issue.
G
Therefore,
staff
recommends
that
the
request
for
a
special
permit
to
allow
for
300
Square
340
square
foot
Billboards
in
the
M2
having
industrial
district
at
30,
50
regular
rugby
approved.
For
final
reasons.
The
request
is
in
performance
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
future
Landing
information
for
the
area,
so,
as
could
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
there
in
the
area,
the
request
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area.
J
G
J
B
I
had
a
quick
question,
commissioner:
trost
under
the
staff
analysis
is
owning
ordinance.
It
talks
discusses,
you
know,
300
square
foot
maximum.
They
have
to
play
for
the
special
permit
when
it's
over
that
amount
and
they're
applying
for
a
340
square
foot
sign
it
talks
about.
B
They
can
remake
this
request
for
unique
site
characteristics,
including
the
not
limited
to
setbacks
surrounding
land
uses
and
structures.
Spaciousness
and
visibility.
Did
they
provide?
Was
there
any
specific
recommendations
based
on
any
of
those
qualifications
that
would
make
it
qualify
for
a
for
a
special
equipment
for
a
larger
size?
This.
D
Is
Schrader
with
staff,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
there's
an
applicant
on
that
can
address
some
of
that,
but
I
would
say
From
staff's
perspective.
We
would
look
at
the
location
surrounding
uses
and
then
also
because
of
the
sewer
line
that
was
in
there
and
the
need
for
them
to
push
this
thing.
54
feet
back
off
of
the
right-of-way
line
and
that's
the
right-of-way
line.
There's
you
know
I.
H
D
Know
how
much
this
is
a
pretty
wide
right-of-way,
probably
another
40
50
feet
from
the
right-of-way
line
to
the
edge
of
the
road.
So
this
thing
is
back
there
quite
a
ways
making
visibility
more
challenging
if
they
would
stick
with
a
300
square
foot
sign.
Okay,.
L
Oh
yes,
my
name's
Wesley
Rutledge,
with
Summit
locations,
I'm
calling
in
from
Ohio,
so
I
spoke
to
Seth
heiberger
and
we
didn't
really
talk
much
about
you
know,
visibility
or
you
know
those
things
you
just
mentioned
setbacks
I
do
see,
I
have
the
location
pulled
up
on
Google
Earth
and
around
the
proposed
sign.
There
is
a
there's
one
business,
there's
a
auction,
a
big
auction
business
and
then
there's
just
some
trees
on
the
other
parcel.
L
So
it's
mainly
just
I
think
it's
just
a
big
M2,
Industrial
District
and
we
did
talk
about
like
you
guys
mentioned,
moving
the
sign
back
because
of
that
sewage
line.
He
said
that
we
would
have
to
be
54
feet
from
the
property
line
and
we're.
I
L
A
G
D
C
I'll
make
a
motion
that
we
accept
the
request
for
a
special
permit
to
allow
for
a
340
square
foot,
billboard
in
the
M2
heavy
industrial
district
of
3050
Wagner
Road,
and
we
prove
it
for
the
following
reasons.
The
quest
is
in
conformance
of
the
comprehensive,
planned
and
future
land
use
math
for
this
area
and
does
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area.
The
request
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
any
of
the
surrounding
area.
B
So
if
this
gets
approved
is
above
the
minimum,
the
the
maximum
without
coming
to
this
commission
for
special
permit,
but
then
at
this
point,
does
it
go
on
the
board
of
adjustment?
Is
that
correct?
After
this.
D
This
is
Trader
with
staff,
yes,
they're
requesting
the
340
square
foot
billboard.
So
if
in
the
recommendation
were
to
be
approved
by
the
commission,
it
is
just
a
recommendation,
it
would
then
go
on
to
the
board
of
adjustment.
It
would
have
the
final
say
on
approving
the
340
square
foot
billboard.
Thank
you.
B
A
G
The
future
land
use
map
does
the
SS
areas.
Commercial
or
special
apartment
would
be,
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
future
land
use
map
for
the
area
commercial
uses
can
include
retail
uses,
neighborhood
commercial
uses
or
professional
offices.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
special
permit
to
construct
a
45th
five
foot
tall,
378
square
foot,
off-premise,
billboard
west
of
one
125
East
Tower
Park
Drive.
G
The
applicant
noted
that
the
West
face
of
the
billboard
would
be
digital
display.
The
East
face
would
be
a
norm,
a
static
display
the
applicant
previously
applied
for
a
special
permit
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
672
square
foot
billboard
and
while
the
planning
programming
is
only
commission
had
recommended
approval
or
the
request
at
their
May
10
2022
meet
regular
meeting
the
board
of
adjustment.
G
Tonight,
the
request
three
to
one
withhold
them
in
voting
against
the
denial
at
at
their
May
24th
2022
regular
meeting
the
owner
of
the
current
site
of
converting
Credit
Union
Bob
Crowe
was
president
of
voice.
G
Opposition
to
the
Seraph
and
staff
received
an
email
from
the
owner
of
125
East
Tower
Park
Drive
in
opposition
prior
to
the
May
24th
meeting,
and
you
that
the
Commissioners
were
also
given
the
Mr
Crow
and
the
owner
of
the
medical
center
also
sent
in
new
letters
for
this
request
and
you,
where
forward
those
along
with
a
letter
from
Mr
Webber
from
Lamar.
G
G
The
ordinance
requires
the
billboard
structure
shall
not
be
permitted
within
a
thousand
feet
of
another
billboard
structure
and
off-premise
sign,
measured
in
any
direction
along
both
sides
of
the
street,
which
joins
the
billboard
structure,
measured
from
the
base
of
the
structure
to
the
base
of
the
structure
regardless
of
grade.
There
are
no
other
off-premise
signs
within
the
media
vicinity.
G
The
maximum
allowable
height,
as
measured
from
the
natural
grades
at
a
base
of
the
sign
and
the
top
of
the
structure,
is
48
feet
with
there
being
a
minimum
of
10
foot
clearance
from
the
natural
grade
of
the
base
of
the
sign
to
the
bottom
of
the
structure.
There
is
a
20
foot
28
feet
between
the
bottom
of
the
sign
that
promotes
sign
in
the
surrounding
grade.
G
The
lighting
question
is
used
for
drainage
in
the
proposed
side
would
not
have
be
allowed
to
interfere
with
the
existing
drainage.
Detention
Facility
the
site,
submit
site
plan
submitted
by
the
applicant
shows.
The
sign
would
not
be
in
the
area
of
Detention
Facility
when
we
located
near
the
top
of
the
bank.
G
Their
proposed
billboard
would
not
appear
to
be
blocking
any
existing
signage
on
the
medical
office
to
the
east.
Has
their
signage
to
the
east
side
of
their
building
over
195
feet
from
the
proposed
site.
The
car
wash
to
the
West
has
a
sign
approximately
11
feet
tall
at
the
bottom
and
16
feet
at
the
top.
This
sign
would
not
appear
to
block
viewing,
as
the
bottom
of
the
sign
is
20
feet.
I'm
28
feet
at
the
bottom.
G
Therefore,
staff
recommends
that
the
request
by
Lamar
Advertising
for
a
special
permit
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
378
square
foot
billboard
and
the
C2
commercial
District
located
west
of
125
East
Tower
Park
Drive
be
approved.
For
the
final
reasons,
the
request
would
be
in
performance
with
the
comprehensive
future
land
use
map
for
the
area.
So,
of
course,
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area.
The
request
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area.
A
B
B
M
My
name
is
Tom.
Weber
I
represent
Lamar
Advertising.
He
said
that
I
had
sent
a
letter
out.
Did
you
all
get
a
chance
to
read
that?
Okay,
then
I
won't
go
through
the
whole
thing?
It's
it's
is
rather
long.
I
did
want
to
touch
on
a
couple
of
things.
Mr
Crow
said
that
he's
confident
that
no
other
business
owners
or
tenants
in
the
Sandman
Corridor
would
want
a
billboard.
M
I
looked
from
Ansborough
Avenue
to
Hammond
Avenue.
The
business
is
in
there
and
these
are
the
ones
that
currently
advertise
on
our
Billboards
Quickstar
Green
State
Credit,
Union,
Heartland,
Bank,
Lincoln,
Savings,
Bank,
Farmers,
State,
Bank,
Casey's,
Culver's,
Community,
Motors,
Perkins,
Menards,
Cedar,
Valley,
Primary,
Care,
Cedar,
Valley,
ENT,
Cedar,
Valley,
Eye,
Care,
Cedar,
Valley,
Orthopedic,
Cedar,
Valley,
pelvic
clinic
and
one
of
the
letters
of
opposition
is
from
Cedar
Valley
Medical
Specialists,
those
last
five
that
I
mentioned
in
the
last
eight
years,
they've
advertised
with
us
to
the
tune
of
120
000.
M
As
soon
as
the
letter
from
the
city
of
Waterloo
went
out
to
neighboring
property
owners,
the
Furniture
Row
called
us
and
wanted
to
reserve
a
spot
as
soon
as
that
sign
is
built.
People
need
the
advertising
there
and
you
just
approved
one
for
the
summit.
Advertising
I,
don't
know
exactly
where
theirs
is
from
the
road,
but
I
looked
at
it
and
it
was
about
a
hundred
feet
from
eastbound
traffic
and
115
feet
from
westbound
traffic.
M
Ours
is
130
feet
from
eastbound
traffic
and
190
feet
from
westbound
traffic,
so
the
conditions
that
need
to
be
there
for
a
special
permit
I
think
are
obviously
there
we're
quite
a
ways
and
this
oh
it's
up
there.
Now
this
photo,
the
Cedar
Valley
Medical,
Specialist
sign
is
down
here.
I,
don't
see
how
in
the
world
our
sign
could
possibly
block
dares
and
by
the
way
this
mock-up
was
made.
M
A
H
John
Pollock
come
co-owner
at
the
car,
wash
that
this
line
is
going
next
to
I.
Have
basically
one
question
when
they're
constructing
this
sign.
How
do
they
plan
on
getting
there.
M
Yeah
there
you
go
before
it
starts
sloping,
there's
plenty
of
room
for
a
pickup
truck
to
get
in
there.
We
planned
on
using
a
large
crane
from
the
back
of
the
property
to
lift
everything
over
and
all
we
would
need
to
do
is
get
a
pickup
truck
in
there.
If
we
have
to
get
a
bigger
truck,
we
should
still
have
room
to
get
the
bigger
truck
in
there
before
it
slopes
down
into
the
into
the
water
retention
area.
M
M
M
And
if
I
mean,
if
you
would
have
a
problem
with
with
some
of
that,
we
would
be
happy
to
pay
you
to
use
your
property
to
make
it
easier
for
us
that
we'd
be
happy
to
do
that.
If
we
could
work
something
out
with
you,
we
realize
it
is
kind
of
a
stretch
and
it
is
a
huge
inconvenience
for
us,
but
we'll
do
it
that
way
if
we
have
to.
But
you
know
if
we
could
work
something
out
with
you,
that'd
be
great.
A
H
You
sorry
they're
reasonably
isn't
room
for
the
pickup
truck
to
go
through
there.
Mowers
have
a
hard
time
going
because
of
the
slant
on
that
grade,
so
it's
almost
tips
over
the
mower.
J
I
The
property
owner
of
the
whole
thing
out
there
used
to
be
a
farm
been
in
the
family
for
about
90
years,
used
to
own
part
of
all
stop
by
the
way
that
turned
out
to
be
a
bad
deal.
They
are
the
car
wash
and
Viridian
and
the
whole
thing
out
there
turned
out
to
be
kind
of
a
mess.
I,
don't
know
what
Kroger's
is
doing.
I
It
seems
like
there's
some
underground
things
going
on
there.
I
wish
I
had
known
about
this.
I
was
asleep
at
the
the
pump
here
when
they
had
the
first
one.
You
guys
are
the
good
guys.
It's
the
Border
review
I
made
an
agreement
with
the
Lamar
people,
who
are
very
nice
people
a
year
ago,
and
we
kind
of
procrastinated
and
didn't
get
it
done,
and
if
it
had
been
done,
none
of
this
would
have
been
going
on.
That
electronic
sign
is
a
a
beautiful
thing.
There's
three.
J
I
Them
in
town
I
think
they
were
going
to
give
free
advertising
to
the
city
of
Waterloo
Irish
Fest,
my
Waterloo
days,
all
that
they
could
put
up
it's
your
birthday
whatever
and
they're
a
good,
a
good
business
partner
in
Waterloo
they
pay
taxes,
I,
don't
know!
If
you
read
all
that
letter,
everything
they
did
is
a
positive
I,
don't
know
exactly
what's
going
on,
I'm
sorry
about
missing
the
first
deal.
I
don't
know
if
they
could
resubmit
if
there
would
be
a
waiver
for
six
months,
but
that
the
big
sign
was
great
and
he's
right.
I
Furniture
row
and
I've
talked
about
three
people:
Community
Motors
our
deal
frame
shop,
all
kinds
of
people
we're
going
to
advertise
on
it
with
an
electronic
sign.
You
can
do
it
for
a
day
or
a
week.
You
can
have
six
things
on
in
one
day
with
the
other.
It's
there
for
30
days,
and
that's
it
I'm,
I'm,
sorry
that
this
slid
through
unbeknowns
to
me,
because
I
feel
guilty.
I
It
would
have
been
done
a
year
ago
and
they're
they're,
good
people,
and
we
had
an
agreement,
and
it's
all
this
stuff
about
blocking
and
this
and
that
I
could
complain
about
the
car
wash
and
dripping
over
on
our
land,
but
I
think
there's
three
or
four
people
that
are
trying
to
undermine
this
for
not
a
good
reason.
So
I
don't
know
if
there'd
be
any
way
to
do
a
waiver
on
that
six-month
thing,
so
they
could
have
a
sign
they
could
they
could
put
anything
you
want.
I
I
had
even
thought
about
talking
to
Veridian
now
they're
moving
across
the
street
I,
don't
know
what
croak
thinks
he's
going
to
do
there,
but
the
sign
is
not
a
negative
thing
to
anybody.
I
think
it's
a
positive
thing.
It's
a
good
thing.
It's
revenue
for
the
city
and
you're
you're.
Only
approving
this
extension
now,
which
is
a
small
thing.
Maybe
they
can
resubmit,
but
just
the
78
extra
feet
to
me
is
a
small
item
and
I'm
sure
they'll
be
they're
not
going
to
track
up
and
have
dirt
and
everything
in
somebody's
backyard.
I
I
I
say
what
I
think:
okay,
there
you
go
been
around
for
three
generations
in
Waterloo,
it's
nice
to
see
good
things
happen.
We
have
a
thing
going
on
right
now
that
people
are
opposed
to
that.
Philip
might
be
aware
of
we're,
trying
to
get
good
things
done
and
for
Waterloo
and
that
that's
anything,
that's
that's.
A
positive
thing
should
be
considered
and
not
nitpick
on
the
negative
part.
D
Okay,
well,
I
was
just
going
to
ask
Tom
if
he
wants
to
address
the
thoughts
on
concern
for
vehicular
access
to
the
site.
I
brought
up
a
street
view
image
that
you
thought
you
should
address
that
I.
M
Don't
know
if
there's
any
way
that
we
can
make
this
contingent
on
us
cleaning
it
up.
You
know
if
we
make
a
mess,
because
it
would
be
after
the
fact,
but
I
can
say
to
you
that
we
will
clean
it
up
to
his
satisfaction
if
we
make
a
mess
and
if
we
can
come
to
an
agreement
with
this
gentleman
to
use
his
property,
if
we
can,
if
we
can't,
we
will
do
it
from
the
street
if
we
have
to
wheelbarrow
Concrete
in
there
we'll
do
it.
M
D
A
B
B
I
know
it
came
through
the
commission
before
a
much
larger
size,
600
and
something
square
feet.
It's
nearly
you
know
40
less
than
that,
keeping
in
mind
the
thought
you
know
it
did
cross
my
mind.
It's
still
above
that,
but
they
wouldn't
have
to
be
here
if
it
was
300
square
feet.
B
So
if
it
was
slightly
less
than
what
they're
asking
for
right
now,
they
could
just
go
ahead
and
do
it
and
I
have
to
weigh
sort
of
the
percentage
difference
between
what
they're
requesting
and
what
the
maximum
would
be
allowed
without
coming
here
and
it's
it's
pretty
close
in
my
opinion,
I
know
it's
a
subjective
call,
but
that's
why
I
made
the
motion.
E
With
the
thousand
feet,
where
would
be
the
next
closest
where,
where
could
another
billboard
be
placed?
Do
you
have
a
sense
around
that.
D
Was
Mr
Schrader
with
staff,
so
a
thousand
feet
east
of
the
proposed
billboard
would
put
it
somewhere,
at
least
to
the
car
dealership,
that
the
community
community
right
and
the
thousand
foot
is
measured
along
the
frontage
of
both
sides
of
the
road
so
like
even
a
billboard
on
the
south
side
of
a
road
you'd
go
to
the
north
right-of-way
line
and
measure
a
thousand
feet
that
way
too,
but
so
on
or
east
of
the
community
or
on
or
west
of
the
far
west
side
of
where
Viridian
is
now
building
at
the
former
Burger
King
site.
A
Okay,
all
those
in
favor,
State,
aye.
F
A
Cody,
you
were,
you
were
voting
for
the
motion,
correct.
A
A
A
Okay
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
request
by
the
city
of
Waterloo
for
the
preliminary
and
final
plot
of
the
Waterloo
air
and
rail
Park
Third
Edition,
a
replay
of
track
B
of
Waterloo
air
and
rail
Park
first
edition
in
the
m2p
planned
industrial
district
located
north
and
east
of
2510
leversey
road.
We
have
the
staff
report
please
this.
J
Is
Blanco
staff
the
applicant's
requesting
to
subdivide
for
the
development
of
eight
industrial
lots
east
of
leversy
Road?
The
request
for
the
preliminary
and
final
plot
will
not
appear
to
have
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area.
It
would
appear
that
the
proposed
industrial
uses
would
blend
well
with
the
surrounding
area.
J
The
Aryan
question
has
been
zoned
m2p
plain
industrial
district
since
June
7
2010,
when
the
land
was
rezoned
from
A1
agricultural
districts
found
in
land
uses
in
their
zoning
designates.
Designations
are
as
follows:
to
the
north
as
big
land,
Zone
m2p,
plant
industrial
district
to
the
South
and
to
the
east
is
vacant.
Land
and
airports
on
m2p,
planet,
industrial
district
and
to
the
West
is
residential
and
vacant.
J
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
develop
a
large
for
industrial
uses
at
the
corner
of
leversy
Road
and
warp
drive
the
size
of
the
loss
range
in
size
from
1.24
acres
to
5
Acres,
with
an
average
lot
size
of
2.58
Acres.
Each
property
shows
at
least
one
30
foot
drainage,
easement.
The
preliminary
plaque
contains
illegal
description,
property
lines
with
Dimensions
date,
North
Arrow
scale
and
owner
sanitary
sewer,
location,
size
of
individual
lots
and
street
names.
The
final
plaque
contains
legal
description,
property
line
dimensions
date,
entering
subdivisions
he's
been
throwed
away,
widths
and
proper
land
sequence.
J
Air
Force
Africans
that
they
request
by
the
city
of
Waterloo
for
the
preliminary
and
final
plot
of
rail,
Park
Third
Edition,
a
replay
of
track
to
be
of
Waterloo
air
and
rail
Park.
First
edition
in
the
m2p
plant
industrial
district
located
north
and
east
of
2510
Liberty
Road
be
approved
for
the
following
reasons.
The
plot
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
this
area.
E
The
plot
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area.
Platt
would
not
appear
to
have
a
negative
impact
on
traffic
conditions
in
the
area
and
the
plant
will
create
additional
development
Lots
with
the
following
conditions
that
a
deta
dedication
is
submitted
prior
to
the
final
plot
being
sent
to
the
city
council.
D
This
is
Schrader
with
staff,
so
originally
back
in
2011,
this
city
of
Waterloo
adopted
the
city
limits
urban
revitalization
area,
an
incentive
program
that
provides
a
three-year
tax
abatement
on
the
increased
taxable
value
for
the
cons,
new
construction
of
either
a
single
family
home
or
a
two-family
Home
Building.
D
The
original
approval
was
for
five
years,
the
or
actually
the
original
approval
was
for
three
years,
and
then
it
was
extended
for
five
years,
and
now
that
is
up.
We
are
looking
to
extend
the
approval
again,
four
or
five
years,
and
there
is
a
proposal
to
change
the
wording
slightly
to
also
include
new
construction
editions
remodels
for
licensed
daycare
facilities
to
also
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
the
tax
abatement
program.
So
the
entire
proposed
plan
was
included
in
the
packet
I'll,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
C
D
So
the
provision
for
Planning,
Commission
roles
and
responsibilities
includes
General
plans
and
studies
of
the
city
of
Waterloo,
and
this
is
considered
a
plan.
The
city
limits,
Urban
relay
revitalization
area
plan,
and
so
you
are
making
a
recommendation
on
the
adoption
of
this
plan
and
this
this
program
to
the
city
council,
who
will
have
the
final
say
on
its
adoption.
D
Yes,
the
the
the
city
before
this
was
initially
enacted,
developed
a
it's
called
The
Grow
committee
to
kind
of
review
and
make
recommendations,
and
then
the
Planning
Commission
at
that
time
endorsed
the
plan,
as
is
currently
on
the
books,
and
the
committee
reviewed
didn't
suggest
any
additional
changes
other
than
what
is
proposed
right
here.
But
now
it's
before
the
commission
and
yes,
that
would
be
your
option
to
to
suggest
additional
changes.
E
E
So
what
about
the
opportunity
to
do
it
as
a
rebate
instead
of
an
abatement.
D
So
the
there
is
under
Iowa
law,
there
is
a
chapter
on
Urban,
revitalization
and
a
chapter
on
urban
renewal.
This
is
adopted
under
Urban
revitalization,
which
provides
for
tax
abatement
under
urban
renewal,
which
is
what
are
commonly
referred
to
as
Tiff
districts.
It
can
be
either
but
is
more
often
done
as
a
a
rebate,
but
an
urban
revitalization
per
state
code.
It
is
an
abatement,
so
we
would
not
have
that
option.
D
B
That
thing
has
that:
has
the
Cure
also
had
this
same
request
for
modification
in
the
past,
where
they
Incorporated
licensed
Child
Care
Centers.
D
The
reason
it
has
its
name
of
Consolidated
is:
there
were
little
neighborhood,
revitalization
areas
that
were
adopted
separately,
and
then
they
reorganized
those
under
one
Cura,
Consolidated
urban,
revitalization
area
under
that
section
of
code
and
then
years
later,
2011
when
we
looked
to
provide
an
incentive
for
the
rest
of
the
city,
but
they
wanted
to
make
that
at
additional
incentive
only
for
new
construction
of
single-family
homes
or
two
family,
but
inside
the
original
Cura
area.
D
It
is
any
improvements
that
commercial,
residential
new
construction
additions
remodel
as
long
as
it
increases
the
taxable
value
by
a
minimum
of
10
percent
for
residential
15
for
commercial
and
that's
per
state
code
as
as
well,
then
they
can
qualify
for
those
so
inside
the
cura,
any
sort
of
new
daycare
facility
or
an
addition
to
an
existing
building
or
an
existing
home
for
a
daycare
would
already
qualify.
Okay,
thank.
E
D
I
guess
I
have
not
seen
any
numbers
I've
not
heard
of
any
foreclosures
on
a
you
know,
essentially
a
what
it'd
be
about
a
four-year-old
home
at
that
point
in
time
by
the
time
the
taxes
come
on
and
you
get
through
the
three
years
of
abatement,
but.
I
D
So
yeah
it's
a
completely
separate
chapter
of
the
code
and
urban
renewal.
Essentially,
the
tips
is,
is
originally
more
geared
towards
industrial
if
it's
kind
of
morphed
a
little
bit
beyond
that,
but
it
is
for
residential
unless
it
is
what
is
considered
a
slum
and
blight
a
you
know:
a
heavily
depressed
area,
a
slum
and
blight
urban
renewal
can
use
in
incentives
for
residential
one
that
is
not
slum
and
blight
can.
D
But
then
there
has
to
be
a
set
aside
percentage
of
the
revenue
generated
by
that
urban
renewal
into
not
fair
market
incentivized.
How
or
low
income
housing
there
we
go,
couldn't
spit
it
out.
So.
E
D
Is
absolutely
not
impossible
and
we
do
have
areas
that
overlap
that
are
in
both
a
well
because
either
Cura
or
Clara
covers
the
entire
city
limits.
The
original
Cura
covers
kind
of
the
central
core
and
chlora
covers
everything
else
and
yeah.
The
Tiff
districts
are,
you
know
randomly
throughout
that,
so
there
are
definitely
overlaps.
So,
yes,
that
is
definitely
a
possibility.
E
D
We
do
in
the
areas
that
are
considered
slum
and
blight
tips,
the
downtown
Tiff
and
what
was
the
Logan
Tiff,
which
is
now
part
of
the
merged,
with
the
airport,
Tiff
called
the
East,
Waterloo,
unified
or
both
adopted
under
slum
and
blight,
and
there
have
been
incentives
provided
for
various
housing
projects,
particularly
in
the
downtown
area.
There
have
been
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
housing
projects
that
have
involved
a
tiff
development
agreement
and
incentives,
use
rebates,
not
always
just
rebates,
but
rebates
is
the
main
one.
B
D
Yeah
in
the
original
Cura
there
is
an
option.
You
can
either
pick
three
years
at
a
hundred
percent
or
the
10-year
prorated
I,
don't
have
it
all
memorized
with
like
80
the
first
year,
stepping
on
down
to
20
the
10th
year,
the
I.
It
goes
back
to
the
original
grow
committee
and
there
was
I
know
a
lot
of
discussion
on
that
and
what
incentive
to
offer
it.
The
Urban
revitalization
code
in
the
state
code
does
require
that
you
can't
provide
an
incentive.
D
That's
different
I
mean
when
I
say
different,
like
we
couldn't
do
one,
that's
not
in
the
cura.
Since
we're
doing.
The
Kura
has
two
options,
and
at
least
one
of
those
options
is
what
we
couldn't
pick
something
completely
different.
They
have
to
at
least
match
there,
but
it
yes,
we
could
do
both
like
we
do
in
the
cura,
but
that
was
the
grow
committee's
original
recommendation
and
then
how
it
was
originally
adopted
by
both.
D
I'm
not
aware
that
the
county
has
any
preference
one
way
or
the
other
I
think
the
the
city
has.
A
D
Councilman
bozen
I
know
you've
been
in
some
discussions
on
the
the
the
abatement
provided
too.
K
I
would
because
originally
and
Noel
sent
an
email
out
of
proving
The
Five-Year
clear-up,
but
he
had
also
included
multi-family
dwellings,
because
this
is
basically
a
one
and
two
family
I.
D
Yeah
this
Trader
with
staff.
So
yes,
there
was
also
discussion
about
also
amending
it
to
include
more
than
just
a
one
or
two
family
unit
to
also
then
include
multi-family.
It
is
my
understanding
that,
based
on
individual
discussions
with
council
members,
Noel
did
not
believe
there
was
support
for
adding
multi-family
at
this
time.
K
Up
in
the
past
was
because
it
does
two
things
number
one.
It
starts
bringing
taxable
Revenue
into
the
city
right
away,
as
opposed
to
the
third
or
fourth
year
and
and
number
two
homeowners
don't
receive
the
sticker
shock
at
the
end
of
three
years,
you'll
build
a
house
out
at
ottoman,
Park
and
and
neighborhood,
and
then
you've
got
your
three
years
at
100
tax
abatement
in
your
year
behind
and
all.
C
C
K
And
the
reason
I
suggested,
the
six
years
of
fifty
percent
is
at
the
end
of
that
six
years.
Your
your
tax
bill
is
only
going
to
go
up.
Half
of
that
and
then
it
I
thought
it'd
be
a
better
mix
for
the
for
the
buyer
of
the
home
that
they
wouldn't
be
subjected
to
a
huge
tax
increase
on
that
third
or
fourth
year
right
and
I.
D
As
I
understand
it,
if
the
Kira
Consolidated
urban
revitalization
area
stays,
as
is
with
offering
three
years
at
a
hundred
percent
or
ten
years
at
a
graduated
scale,
the
only
options
we
have
for
Cora
is
one
of
those
or
the
other
of
those
or
both
so
to
to
to
do
a
six
years
at
50
percent
on
clora.
The
only
way
to
do
that
would
be
to
also
do
an
amendment
to
the
cura
to
provide
that
as
a
third
option
or
as
a
replacement
option
to
one
of
the
existing
ones.
There.
K
Yeah
and
and
that
that
in
itself
could
be
done
no
different
than
how
we're
adding
day
carrots
to
this
so
I
mean
you,
you
could
go
six
six
years
at
fifty
percent
on
a
clear-up.
You
could
go
three
years
at
a
hundred
percent
at
a
sliding
scale
or
six
years
at
fifty
percent.
If
you
chose
to
do
that
under
Cura
right
and
amend
that
portion
of
it
correct,
but
I
I,
you
know
the
the
board
will
make
the
recommendation
and
send
it
out
to
council
and
we'll
we'll
see
where
it
goes.
K
L
K
K
That
that
it
would
help
the
the
owners
of
the
homes
as
far
as
the
sticker
shop
when
they
get
their
first
tax
bill
and
it's
a
win-win
for
the
city,
because
we
have
money
coming
in
right
away
or
at
least
a
year
behind
on
the
taxes,
but
it
it
it's
a
whole
lot
easier
for
for
us
budgeting
each
year,
knowing
that
these
homes
are
all
online
because
we
can't
even
get
from
the
county
what's
coming
on
next
year
right,
you
know
and
we're
averaging
somewhere
between
30
and
40
homes
a
year
coming
online,
you
know,
of
which
our
share
of
those
homes
on
an
average
is
somewhere
around
fifty
five
thousand
dollars
in
taxable
Revenue
to
the
city.
K
But
had
we
had
a
program
where
we
were
getting
money
up
front
for
the
first
six
years
and
even
at
50,
it
would
be
easier,
in
my
opinion,
as
a
council
person
that
has
to
work
this
budget,
it
would
be
easier
for
us
to
know
what's
coming
in
and
what
isn't
happening,
and
that's
why
I
proposed
it.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
councilman
I.
Wasn't
appreciate
that
commissioner
trustee
I
got
a
couple
couple
questions.
Do
we
have
any
data
that
tells
us?
Are
we
from
a
developmental
tax
revenue
standpoint?
Does
it
put
us
at
any
kind
of
more
of
a
disadvantage,
obviously
compared
to
our
neighbors
as
far
as
incentives
to
build
in
Waterloo
versus
other
communities?
If
we,
if
we
go
to
a
graduated
or
go
to
a
50
for
three
years
or
six
years,
whatever
it
might
be,
do
we
have
any
information
on
that
at
all.
D
Not
that
I'm,
aware
of
I
know
that
one
of
the
concerns
Noel
mentioned
on
eliminating
the
three
years
at
a
hundred
percent
option
is
whether
or
not
it
would
provide
less
of
an
incentive
for
building
here
in
Waterloo,
and
he
noted
that
apparently
Cedar
Rapids
has
a
similar
revitalization
plan
that
provides
10
years
at
100
percent.
D
K
B
A
E
A
H
B
They
can
choose
to
do
one
or
the
other,
so
it's
up
to
the
the
developer,
Builder,
whoever
it
might
be
to
owner
to
make
that
choice.
If
they
want
to
do
the
shock
in
so
many
years
and
do
the
100
or
take
the
the
50
and
graduate
it.
However,
they
want
to
do
it.
It's
the
10-year
graduated
or
it's
the.
What
was
the
other
one
for
Cura
three
years
at
a.
B
K
E
D
Certificate
of
occupancy,
completed
and
then
they'll
submit
the
form
requesting
the
abatement
and
in
the
cura
they've
got
to
pick
that
three
years
at
a
hundred
or
the
10-year
graduated
schedule,
and
then
that
is
reviewed
and
approved
by
the
council
and
then
forwarded
on
to
the
assessor's
office.
To
put
it
on
to
the
tax
rolls
so
that
they
get
the
abatement.
B
I
D
E
But
starting
with
the
cura,
because
right
now
you
offer
something
in
the
Cure
that
the
clera
doesn't
offer.
So
does
the
cura
start
it
like
it?
That's
the
you
know
what
I'm
saying,
because
right
now
the
cura
offers
three
and
ten,
but
the
Clara
doesn't
follow
that
you're
saying
they
have
to
be
the
same.
No,
they
don't
have
to
be
the
same.
D
E
I
mean
to
me
at
a
minimum:
they
should
be
the
same
in
the
graduated
option
should
be
available,
but
I
I
mean
I
agree
with
what
he
was
saying
too.
With
the
six
years.
50
sounds.
B
The
reason
is
not
a
quick
question
for
me,
commissioner
trost
here.
There's
a
Clara
and
there's
Akira
The
Cure
used
to
be
a
combination,
amalgamation
of
several
that
combined
into
one
and
now
we
also
have
now
a
clearer,
so
we're
sort
of
expanding.
B
Is
it
because
of
the
different
developmental
needs,
different
incentives
for
the
one
being
the
central
urban
area
and
one
being
more
city
limit
area?
Is
that
why
there's
a
difference?
So
if
you
theoretically
were
to
adopt
the
same
incentives
that
are
in
the
cura,
with
the
with
the
Clara
that
we're
talking
about
tonight
are.
D
To
build
in
the
career,
possibly
the
the
10-year
prorated
scheduled,
does
provide
more
incentive
if
you
I
mean
obviously
a
variable
on
that.
You
know
three
years
at
a
hundred
percent
versus
the
10-year
schedule.
The
variable
that
you
don't
know
until
it's
all
said
and
done
is
what
the
tax
levy
rates
are
going
to
do,
but
assuming
those
as
constant,
the
in
the
Kira,
the
10-year
prorated
provides
significantly
more
incentive
than
the
three
years
at
a
hundred
percent.
B
D
D
B
B
I
D
Been
working
towards
getting
it
in
front
of
you,
but
it
took
a
while
to
kind
of
get
details
worked
out
like
is
the
multi-family
going
to
be
included
or
not
the
child
care?
How
to
word
that
that
all
kind
of
took
a
little
while
to
get
worked
out.
D
The
process
of
getting
a
chlora
or
Cura
amendment
to
council
is
fairly
lengthy
because
it
involves
the
council
taking
action
to
set
a
data
hearing
and
then
mailing
notice
to
all
Property
Owners
within
the
affected
area
and
then
waiting
a
minimum
of
30
days
from
when
that
notice
is
sent
out
to
hold
a
hearing
and
there's
Provisions
that
a
potential
petition
could
get
filed
forcing
a
second
hearing
another
30
days
out
from
there.
So
there
are
some
time
constraints
issue.
D
B
It's
best
to
have
our
ducks
in
a
row,
though,
because
right
now
so
far,
it's
coming
from
the
Planning
and
Zoning
staff,
correct,
correct,
and
so
it's
probably
best
to
have
a
discussion.
I
would
think
and
then
to
have
an
honest
discussion
about
what
are
some
similar
changes.
Incentives
that
I
think
we're
discussing
here
and
then
having
those
Incorporated
come
forward
to
our
commission
so
that
we
can
vote
on
whatever's
an
agreement
on
that
we're
not
hurting
ourselves
in
the
long
run
from
an
urban
development
standpoint.
Also.
E
F
This
is
commissioner
life
Nicole,
as
liaison
from
the
Community
Development
board.
We
have
just
discussed
the
boundaries
of
the
era
district
and
obviously
was
it's
either
or
so.
What
we
were
kind
of
looking
at
was
with
the
cura
District,
not
really
encompassing
some
parts
where
some
homes
are
starting
to
get
older.
Maybe
we
expand
that
because
it
makes
people
that
live
in,
that
area
are
looking
to
move
into
that
area.
They
can
qualify
for
down
payment
assistance
and
I,
don't
want
to
bring
that
up.
D
This
is
Schrader
with
staff
yeah.
An
amendment
to
the
cura
boundary
would
effectively
cause
an
amendment
to
the
clera
boundary
as
well,
probably
best
if
they
were
done
at
the
same
time
like
an
actual
amendment
to
both,
but
the
actual
clora
defines
itself
as
all
areas
within
the
city
limits
of
the
city
of
Waterloo
except
and
then
it
uses
a
legal
description
that
accepts
out
what's
already
in
the
cura.
So
if
we
amended
the
Kira
yeah
we'd
have
to
amend
the
Clara,
but
we're
talking
about
amending
both
anyway.
D
D
B
B
B
B
So
do
we
need
a
table
motion
to
table
and
make
a
motion
to
table
the
approval
of
the
revised
Clara,
City
Limits
revitalization
area,
and
ask
staff
to
have
discussions
regarding
providing
additional
options,
as
as
reviewed
during
this
commission
meeting,
providing
a
a
six-year
fifty
percent
option
as
one
of
the
potential
options,
in
addition
to
potential
other
options
that
are
developed
or
thought
about.